Unraveling the role of V-V dimer on the vibrational properties of VO2 by first-principles simulations and Raman spectroscopic analysis
Abstract
We investigate the vibrational properties of VO2, particularly the low temperature M1 phase by first-principles calculations using the density functional theory as well as Raman spectroscopy. We perform the structural optimization using SCAN meta-GGA functional and obtain the optimized crystal structures for metallic rutile and insulating M1 phases satisfying all expected features of the experimentally derived structures. Based on the harmonic approximation around the optimized structures at zero temperature, we calculate the phonon properties and compare our results with experiments. We show that our calculated phonon density of states is in excellent agreement with the previous neutron scattering experiment. Moreover, we reproduce the phonon softening in the rutile phase as well as the phonon stiffening in the M1 phase. By comparing with the Raman experiments, we find that the Raman-active vibration modes of the M1 phase is strongly correlated with the V-V dimer distance of the crystal structure. Our combined theoretical and experimental framework demonstrates that Raman spectroscopy could serve as a reliable way to detect the subtle change of V-V dimer in the strained VO2.
I Introduction
Vanadium oxide (VO2) has been a focus of intense research since its discovery in 1959Morin (1959). Besides academic interest, it underpins a plethora of applications including gas sensorsStrelcov et al. (2009), window coatingsManning et al. (2004), resistive random access memory (RRAM) devices Kim et al. (2013a), electronic switchesShin et al. (1977); Lim et al. (2012); Yang et al. (2011), and so on. The versatile phase diagram of VO2 showcase well known first order metal-insulator transition (MIT) at almost room temperature (340 K) and ambient pressure accompanied by a structural transition from a high-temperature rutile (R phase) to a low-temperature monoclinic (M1 phase). The intricate concomitant nature of these two transitions has fueled a long-standing debate on the plausible mechanism for the MIT in VO2. Several scenarios have been adopted including Peierls typeCavalleri et al. (2004); Wentzcovitch et al. (1994); Goodenough (1971), Mott-Hubbard-type and even combination of these twoBiermann et al. (2005); Haverkort et al. (2005); Weber et al. (2012)utilizing the role of lattice instabilities, electron-electron interactions, electron-phonon interactions, and so on. Though extensively studied, a consensus for a exact mechanism of MIT in VO2 is still elusive.
The role of lattice vibrations in this MIT is still not completely understood. Studying lattice vibrational properties of the VO2 turns out to be a non-trivial task from both the experimental and theoretical point of view. For example, the bottleneck of single-crystal inelastic neutron scattering (INS) is the incoherent vanadium neutron scattering cross-section. Even, some of the existing Raman spectroscopic studies of the structural phase transition (SPT) in epitaxial VO2 films have been found to be inconsistent due to the large thicknesses of studied films (80- 100 nm) or even misinterpreted due to the strong signals from the substratePetrov et al. (2002); Shibuya and Sawa (2014); Okimura et al. (2014); Yang et al. (2016).
Besides these experimental challenges, achieving an exact theoretical description of the lattice dynamics of VO2 has been a tougher nut to crack. Since lattice vibrational properties are strongly related with the structure of the material, first-principle based methods that take into account the much needed material specific information can be an ideal tool for this task. However, a reliable exchange functional which can correctly describe the vibrational properties of all the phases of VO2 is not readily available and still an going topic of research. It has been found that the standard functional such as local density approximation (LDA) and generalized gradient approximations (GGA) can not describe the structural, electronic and magnetic features of the R and M1 phases simultaneously Wentzcovitch et al. (1994); Zhu and Schwingenschlögl (2012). To ameliorate the inaccuracy of the band structure calculations based on the standard functional, several attempts have been already made to go beyond the LDA or GGA functional. For example, the modified Becke-Johnson (mBJ) exchange potential has been demonstrated to be very efficient for describing the MIT in VO2Zhu and Schwingenschlögl (2012). Unfortunately, the Hellmann–Feynman force calculations are not possible using the mBJ ruling out the possibility of phonon calculations within this exchange approximation. The GW method and its variants successfully predict the electronic feature of the MITContinenza et al. (1999); Gatti et al. (2007); Sakuma et al. (2008). However, equivalent GW calculations for phonons are still not clear. The dynamical mean-field theory and its cluster extensions correctly describe the electronic properties of both the R and M1 phases of VO2Laad et al. (2006); Biermann et al. (2005). Cluster extension of DMFT such as dynamical cluster approximations (DCA) and its typical medium extension named as typical medium DCA (TMDCA) for disordered phononic systems has been recently developedMondal et al. (2017, 2019). Unfortunately, such DCA and TMDCA method for phononic systems are currently available for parameter-based model calculations. Moreover, hybrid functionals efficiently describe the electronic properties of VO2Eyert (2011) and is found to be also successful in describing the structural properties of all the phases of VO2Xu et al. (2017). However, phonon calculations using hybrid functionals turn out to be a very expensive computational task. First-principle based Quantum Monte Carlo based calculations have been also performed for VO2Zheng and Wagner (2015). Again, computational expenses discard such possibility for applying the method in the lattice dynamics calculations.
Considering all these limitations, the GGA+U method Korotin et al. (2002); Kim et al. (2013b); Mellan et al. (2019); Budai et al. (2014) has been extensively used for phonon calculations of VO2. However, the GGA+U method remains controversial in producing an accurate description of VO2. Anisimov and co-authorsKorotin et al. (2002) find insulating nature of the R phase which strongly disagree with experimental findings. Mellan et al.Mellan et al. (2019) predict electronic structure of VO2 that is consistent with experiment using non-spin polarised GGA+U calculations. But, U value within the LDA+U method has been treated so far as a free parameter and the results are also very sensitive with the choice of U value. For example, Budai et al.Budai et al. (2014) point out that the U value less than 3.4 eV is more appropriate in determining energy difference between the R and M1 phase that could be more consistent with experiment, but such lower U value can produce more smaller bandgap. Hence, an accurate prediction of the U value rather using it as a free parameter or bare atomic value, may have a paramount importance for reliable estimation of the vibrational properties of VO2. To best of our knowledge, calculations for determining U value of VO2 via the constrained random phase approximation (cRPA) or linear response method are still missing. Another important thing is to include temperature effect and anharmonicity. Such calculationsBudai et al. (2014) have been already performed and can help to validate further theoretical development.
In this paper, we present a comprehensive study of the lattice dynamics and electronic structures using various DFT functionals and benchmark our calculations with experiments. By comparing with Raman spectroscopy, we investigate the interplay between strain effect and local environment (e.g. spectral shifts of the V-V and V-O phonon modes) in epitaxial VO2 thin films deposited on MgF2 (001) and (110) substrates. We show that our calculations are in a good agreement with the observed Raman shifts of the characteristic phonon modes induced by the epitaxial strains imposed on VO2 thin films. Our work demonstrates that Raman spectroscopy could serve as a reliable way to detect the subtle change of V-V dimer in the strained VO2.
We have organized this paper as follows: we give details of our first-principles simulations in section II. We provide information of our experimental set up in section III. We present and discuss our results in section IV. Finally , we conclude our discussions in section V.
II Computational details
We consider a plane-wave basis and the projector-augmented- wave (PAW) method as implemented in the Vienna Ab initio Simulation Package (VASP)Kresse and Furthmüller (1996, 1996). We have used several different exchange correlation functional including the LDA, the PBE GGAPerdew et al. (1996), and the SCANSun et al. (2015). We note that the SCAN has been implemented for self-consistent calculations in the VASP and such self-consistent implementation is still not available in other first-principles packages like WIEN2K. We choose PBE GGA pseudopotential in our calculations using SCAN. For electronic structure calculations, we use the plane-wave cutoff energy as 500 eV. We also verify that there is no appreciable changes in the results using a cutoff energy of 600 eV. For all Brillouin-zone sampling, -centered k-point grids is considered as . The self-consistent calculations are considered to be converged by considering eV between successive iterations, and the convergence of structural relaxation is decided by the total energy difference between two successive ionic steps as eV. We have also cross-checked our electronic structure calculations by using mBJ calculations as available in WIEN2K. The results obtained from the WIEN2K are not shown here. For the phonon calculations, we have employed the pseudopotential band method and the supercell approach that are implemented in VASPKresse and Furthmüller (1996, 1996) and PHONOPYTogo and Tanaka (2015). As a standard supercell based phonon calculations, force-constants are computed by means of the Hellmann-Feynman theoremParlinski et al. (1997).
III Experimental details
High quality 10-nm-thick VO2 films were grown on rutile MgF2 (001) and (110) single crystal substrates by reactive molecular-beam epitaxy (MBE) via codeposition method under a distilled ozone background pressure at the PARADIM Thin Film Growth Facility at Cornell university.Paik et al. (2015) Raman microscopy analysis was conducted at the Center for Nanoscale Materials at the Argonne National Laboratory. The spectra were recorded using a Raman microscope (inVia Reflex, Renishaw, Inc.) with spectral resolution of 0.5 cm-1 using 532 nm excitation from a diode pumped solid state laser (RL532C50, Renishaw, Inc.). Samples were held in a nitrogen-purged temperature-controlled stage (THMS600/TMS94/LNP94, Linkam Scientific Instruments Ltd). Excitation and collection of scattered light occurred through a 50x objective (Leica, NA=0.50). The laser power was set to 0.64 mW to exclude local heating effect. Collected spectra are typically consisted of the average of 20 integrations, where each integration was collected for 1 min.
IV Results and discussions
We begin our discussions by understanding the well-known experimental crystal structure of VO2Eyert (2002) as described in Fig. 1. The unit cell contains 6 atoms for the R phase and 12 atoms for the M1 phase in our considered experimental structure. As shown in Fig. 1(a), the V-V atoms form a periodic V chain with fixed V-V bond distance as 2.86 in the rutile structure, whereas there are significance differences in the arrangement of the V atoms along the rutile axis in the M1 phase, as demonstrated in Fig. 1(b). In this M1 phase, the V atoms are arranged such a way that they form dimmer alternatively and tilt along the axis, which leads to doubling of the unit cell volume of that for the R phase with V-V distance as 2.62 (bonding) and 3.16 (anti-bonding). With this understanding of available experimental crystal structure, we perform structure optimization of both the R and M1 phases of VO2.
Functional | V-V distance |
---|---|
Exp.Eyert (2002) | 2.86 |
GGA | 2.76 |
RefXu et al. (2017). | 2.80 |
SCAN | 2.77 |
Functional | V-V dimer (long) | V-V dimer (short) |
---|---|---|
Exp.Eyert (2002) | 3.16 | 2.62 |
LDA | 2.72 | 2.72 |
GGA | 3.0 | 2.59 |
RefXu et al. (2017). | 3.14 | 2.44 |
SCAN | 3.16 | 2.47 |
For structure optimization, we consider the ionic optimization process, in which the lattice parameters are fixed and atoms are allowed to move to search for minimum energy configurations. First, we optimize the crystal structure of the R phase using different functional and compare with experimentEyert (2002) as well as previously reported valuesXu et al. (2017) as given in Table 1. For SCAN meta-GGA functional, the V-V pair distance changes from the experimental value 2.86 to 2.76 , whereas it is 2.77 for the GGA functional. We note that there is no significant changes in the results obtained from the SCAN meta-GGA and GGA functional. However, this is certainly not true for the case of M1 phase. Our calculations suggest that the optimization process is extremely sensitive to the functional used in the calculations as summarized in Table 2. We find that the LDA functional completely fails to optimize the M1 structure. We observe that the long V-V dimer and short V-V dimer distance becomes almost equal as 2.72 which imply that the M1 structure reduces to the rutile like structure through the LDA optimization process. Hence, like electronic properties, our calculations reveal that the LDA is not applicable to determine the structural properties of the M1 phase. The situation becomes better when the GGA is applied in our calculations. In the optimized M1 structure based on the GGA functional, the long V-V dimer distance decreases to 3.0 from the experimental value and short V-V dimer separation decreases to from the experimental value . Such drastic change in the dimmer distance clearly indicates that the M1 structure again tends to go to the rutile phase through the optimization process. As has been already foundXu et al. (2017), this failure of the LDA and GGA can be cured by the Hybrid functional. To overcome this barrier, we have utilized SCAN meta-GGA functional for optimizing the M1 structure. As summarized in Table 2, in the SCAN optimized M1 structure, the long V-V dimer nature survive as which is very close to the value as found in hybrid calculationsXu et al. (2017) and exact as as found in experimentEyert (2002). The short V-V dimer using SCAN functional is found to be which is also to as found from the hybrid functional calculations. Thus, like hybrid functional, the optimized crystal structure using SCAN has all the expected features of the experimentally derived structure: All V-V chains of M1 are found to be dimerized and canted along the rutile axis, whereas all V-V chains form straight undimerized one in the rutile phase.
Here we want to investigate the effect of the structural optimization on the electronic structure, in order to draw an accurate band theory picture of the M1 phase. Fig. 2 presents the electronic density of states (DOS) based on our optimized structures. To treat the comparison on equal footing, we use SCAN functional in the calculation of electronic DOS from the structures that are obtained from different functional. As shown in the top panel of Fig. 2, there is no gap in the DOS corresponding to the LDA optimized structure. However, a pseudogap feature tends to emerge in the DOS of the GGA optimized structure as shown in the middle panel of the Fig. 2. Such small gap in the DOS with the GGA optimized structure was also previously reported and our calculations are consistent with these previous calculationsKim et al. (2013b); Budai et al. (2014). Interestingly, we find a fully gapped spectrum with the SCAN optimized structure as displayed in the bottom panel of Fig. 2.
Next, we study the effect of V-V dimerization on the electronic properties of M1 phase. Fig. 3 displays the variation of the density of states as a function of various values of short V-V dimer separation. As it is clearly seen from the top to bottom of this figure, there is no gap in the density of states for the V-V dimer distance as . Interestingly, a finite gap emerges as the V-V dimer separation is varied from to . Thus, our calculations suggest that a gap can be opened up for the M1 phase depending only on the structure property without considering any Hubbard on-site coulomb interactions. From our calculations, it is certainly clear that the role of Peierl’s distortion cannot be neglected in determining the insulating nature of the M1 phase. Such observations strongly suggest that the M1 is not pure a conventional Mott insulator.
Besides successfully describing phase, determining the correct electronic structure of VO2 including both rutile and M1 phases using a single-functional is a considerable difficult task from band-theory point of view. To test the performance of SCAN against other functional in describing both the rutile and M1 phases of VO2, we calculate the density of states as presented in Fig. 4. From the optimized structure, SCAN based calculations predict the high temperature rutile phase as a metal and the low temperature M1 phase as an insulator. These findings are consistent with experiments. We note that previous calculations based different functional fail to correctly describe both the phases of VO2 simultaneously. For example, the LDA+U method find insulating nature of the rutile phase of VO2Korotin et al. (2002); Liu et al. (2010). However, mBJ and hybrid functional as we discussed before can successfully describe both VO2 phases. As we have already mentioned, mBJ cannot be utilized for calculating the forces and hybrid functional is computationally very expensive. Hence, they are not highly suitable particularly for phonon calculations of VO2.
After establishing the correctness of our optimized structure and producing consistent electronic properties with the SCAN optimized structure, now we are ready to discuss our phonon results. Fig. 5 shows the phonon dispersion curves of R-VO2 using SCAN meta-GGA functional. We have also performed same calculations using GGA functional. We find that the phonon dispersion for the rutile phase using the SCAN does not deviate significantly from the results using the GGA functional and observe the phonon softening instabilities in both the SCAN and GGA calculations. Such phonon softening of the rutile phase has already been reported before Kim et al. (2013b). We note that zero temperature DFT calculations within harmonic approximations fail to predict stable rutile phase which is also expected since the rutile phase is stable only at high temperature. We obtain phonon softening at and which are excellent agreement with previous GGA based calculationsKim et al. (2013b). Existing studies Brews (1970); Hearn (1972); McWhan et al. (1974); Terauchi and Cohen (1978); Gervais and Kress (1985); Woodley (2008) suggest that the phonon softening at leads structural transition from the high temperature R structure to low temperature structure. However, we have not observed any phonon softening at and . The phonon softening at is observed in the previous LDA+U calculationsKim et al. (2013b). It has been argued electron correlation is the driving force for such instability. However, recent experimental studyBudai et al. (2014) shows that experimental dispersion curve with no negative frequencies of the rutile phase can be reproduced by including temperature and anharmonicity in the theoretical calculations. However, the role of structural instability in driving the MIT is still not well understood.
To test the limitations of harmonic approximations and zero temperature calculations, we calculate phonon density of states of rutile phase as shown in Fig. 7. Followed by the dispersion, there are negative frequencies in the low energy region of the spectrum which is not shown here. Interestingly, we obtain a good agreement with the experimental phonon density of states. We note that the experimental phonon spectrum has been collected at temperature T = 381 K, whereas our calculations are limited to T = 0 K within harmonic approximations. Despite these limitations, we are able to capture qualitatively peak features of the experimental spectrum around 18 meV, 33 meV, 45 meV, and 72 meV. We also observe that the height of the peak around 18 meV and 33 meV is more compared to the experimental one. This could be consequence of temperature effect. In addition, we also compare our results against previous calculationsBudai et al. (2014). As we expected, we notice that the height of the peak decreases significantly particularly around 18 meV and 33 meV as temperature increases from 0 to 425 K. We also observe that our calculations are able to capture some features of the spectra that agree better with the experimental spectrum compared to previous theoretical calculationsBudai et al. (2014). For example, the peak around 55 meV corresponding to the experimental DOS is shifted to around 65 meV in the DOS obtained from the previous calculationsBudai et al. (2014). Also, previous calculations find DOS at the high energy region remain around 83 meV, whereas the bandwidth of the experimental spectrum is larger. We note that the bandwidth of our calculated spectrum is much closer to the band width of the experimental DOS compared to previous finite temperature calculations. Although the high temperature rutile phase is believed to be anharmonic, the low temperature M1 phase is found to be highly harmonic. So, we expect our theoretical framework is more suitable for the M1 phase, which is our next topic of discussion.
We have computed phonon dispersion of the M1 phase as displayed in Fig. 6. Our calculated dispersion curve for the M1 phase is in good agreement with previous calculationsLee et al. (2017). As shown in Fig. 6, unlike rutile phase, there is no phonon softening which is in agreement with experimental observationsBudai et al. (2014). It confirms that this M1 phase is the stable structure of VO2 at low temperature. Such structural information can be directly probed in Raman spectra. To understand that, a careful analysis of the phonon density of states can be good a starting point.
The phonon density of states of M1 phase is presented in Fig. 8. Followed by dispersion, there is no negative frequency in the low frequency region of our calculated phonon density of states. We compare our calculated phonon density of states at T =0 K with the phonon density states corresponding to T=298 K obtained from experiment using neutron spectrometer as reported in RefBudai et al. (2014). We find our zero temperature calculations using SCAN functional successfully capture the experimentally observed phonon density of states at room temperature. To check the performance of SCAN against other functional, we also compare our results with previous LDA+U calculationsBudai et al. (2014) as shown in the lower panel of Fig. 8. Comparison between the results obtained from SCAN and LDA+U clearly shows that the results obtained from SCAN serves better than the LDA+U. In particular, the peak features in the low frequency region around 20 meV is more intense compared to the LDA+U results as observed in experiments.
We take a more closer look on the phonon density of states and study the effect of the V-V dimer on it. The role of V-V dimerization on the insulating behavior of the M1 phase is well understood now, whereas its effect on the lattice vibrations is still not extensively studied. Here, we aim to explore such physics. As we have already discussed that the V-V dimer distance deviates significantly from the experimental one, we compare phonon density of states of M1 phase using both optimized and experimental structure as shown in Fig. 9. We observe that there are large number of negative frequencies in the low frequency region of the phonon density of states derived from experimental structure as displayed in upper panel of Fig. 9, whereas there are no such negative frequencies in the low frequency region of the phonon density of states considering optimized structure as shown in the lower panel of Fig. 9. The absence of such negative frequencies in the low frequency region of the phonon density of states corresponding to optimized structure is well expected. Moreover, there are also other noticeable differences. There is a peak in the low frequency region around 190 cm-1 and a peak in the high frequency region around 609 cm -1 in the phonon density of states obtained from with out optimizing the structure. The low frequency peak is mainly contributed from V-V pair and high frequency peak is originated from V-O pair which can be understood from Fig. 10. The positions of the peak and nature of the vibrations are in excellent agreement with the observed Raman spectra. However, the position of the peaks are shifted in the phonon density of states corresponding to optimized structure compared to without optimization one. We attribute this to the drastic change in the short V-V dimer distance that occurred in the optimization process Table 2.
Modulation of the V-V dimer length can be accomplished with strain engineering. It has previously been shown in VO2/TiO2 epitaxial thin films that tensile strain on the cR-axis shifts the MIT mechanism towards bulk-like characteristics largely driven by the Peierls physics while elongation of the cR-axis induces a larger influence from electron correlation or Mott physics.Quackenbush et al. (2016); Paez et al. (2020); Lee et al. (2019). However, due to the strong signal from the TiO2 in Raman spectroscopy, the strain effect on the phonon modes has been misinterpreted.Yang et al. (2016) Moreover, although strain has been accomplished on numerous substrates such as ZnOWong et al. (2013), Al2O3Fan et al. (2013), LSATLiu et al. (2018), and RuO2Fischer et al. (2020), the formation of rotational domains may complicate fundamental structural analysis in the investigation of the MIT. Like TiO2, MgF2 is isostrucutral to VO2 in its high temperature phase, and exhibits weaker Raman response than TiO2 substrateShibuya et al. (2013) and thus we selected it as the substrate for the epitaxial growth of VO2 thin films. Fabrication of VO2 on MgF2 (001) induces the tensile strain of the cR-axis while MgF2 (110) films elongate the cR-axis. Indeed, using Raman spectroscopy we observed spectral shift of the characteristic Raman peaks which represent V-V and V-O phonon modes. As shown in the right panel of Fig. 11 and Fig. 12, low frequency peak is shifted from 196 cm -1 to 197 cm -1, whereas high frequency peak is shifted from 609 cm to 618 cm -1 with the application of strain. Such spectral displacement is shown in our calculated phonon density of states by manipulating V-V dimmer. As presented in the left panel of Fig. 11 and Fig. 12, the low frequency peak has been shifted from 190 to 230 cm-1 as short dimer V-V distance is varied from 2.62 to 2.47 . Similarly, the high frequency peak is deviated from 609 cm -1 to 628 cm -1. Thus, our calculations qualitatively explain the effect of strain on the lattice vibrations as observed in our Raman experiments.
V Conclusions
In this paper, we have computed vibrational properties of the R and M1 phases of VO2 using first-principles calculations. A crucial step for calculating such vibrational properties is the structure optimization which is found to be non trivial for the M1-VO2. We have employed SCAN meta-GGA functional and successfully optimized the M1 structure. The performance of the SCAN has been compared with various other functional in optimizing the M1 structure. Particularly, the SCAN has been found to be as accurate as the Hybrid functional. The SCAN optimized structure has been shown to produce consistent electronic properties including both the R and M1 phases of VO2. We have shown that the R phase is a metal, whereas the M1 phase is found to be an insulator with finite band gap value. Moreover, we numerically demonstrate that a gap can be opened up as the V-V dimer length is varied without incorporating electronic correlations. Hence, our results strongly suggest that the M1 phase is not a conventional Mott insulator given the sensitivity to the dimer distance to its electronic phase. Thus, we have validated the SCAN for phonon calculations of VO2. The phonon softening related with the R phase and the phonon stiffening of the M1 phase explain the structural phase transition from the R to M1 as temperature is lowered. We argue that such structural phase transition can play a vital role in the MIT of VO2 as found in recent experiment. The V-V dimer has significant impact on both the electronic and vibrational properties of the M1 phase. We show that the vibrational density of states significantly changes with the variation of the V-V dimer distance. Our calculated vibrational spectra are corroborated by previous neutron scattering experiment as well as our Raman experiment. Moreover, our first principles based calculations of bulk VO2 enable us to gain insight into the structural properties of strained VO2 as found in our Raman experiment. Our work also suggests that the SCAN can be utilized for investigating phonon properties of related materials and such work is in progress.
Acknowledgements.
We thank Dr. Christopher N Singh for helpful discussions in our theoretical calculations, Dr. David J. Gosztola and Dr. Benjamin T. Diroll for assistance with Raman microscopy measurements. This paper is based on the work supported by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research under Award No. FA9550-18-1-0024 administered by Dr. Ali Sayir. For the film synthesis we acknowledge the National Science Foundation (Platform for the Accelerated Realization, Analysis, and Discovery of Interface Materials (PARADIM)) under Cooperative Agreement No. DMR-1539918. This research used resources of the Center for Nanoscale Materials, an Office of Science user facility, was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357. Moreover, this work made use of the Cornell Center for Materials Research Shared Facilities which are supported through the NSF MRSEC program (DMR-1719875). Galo J. Paez acknowledges doctoral degree grant support (Grant No. E0565514) from the Comisión Fulbright Ecuador in conjunction with the Ecuadorian national science department Secretaría de Educación Superior, Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (Senescyt).References
- Morin (1959) F. J. Morin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 3, 34 (1959).
- Strelcov et al. (2009) E. Strelcov, Y. Lilach, and A. Kolmakov, Nano Letters 9, 2322 (2009), pMID: 19507888, https://doi.org/10.1021/nl900676n .
- Manning et al. (2004) T. D. Manning, I. P. Parkin, M. E. Pemble, D. Sheel, and D. Vernardou, Chemistry of Materials 16, 744 (2004), https://doi.org/10.1021/cm034905y .
- Kim et al. (2013a) S. Kim, J. Park, J. Woo, C. Cho, W. Lee, J. Shin, G. Choi, S. Park, D. Lee, B. H. Lee, and H. Hwang, Microelectronic Engineering 107, 33 (2013a).
- Shin et al. (1977) S. H. Shin, T. Halpern, and P. M. Raccah, Journal of Applied Physics 48, 3150 (1977), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.324047 .
- Lim et al. (2012) W. L. Lim, E. J. Moon, J. W. Freeland, D. J. Meyers, M. Kareev, J. Chakhalian, and S. Urazhdin, Applied Physics Letters 101, 143111 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4757865 .
- Yang et al. (2011) Z. Yang, C. Ko, and S. Ramanathan, Annual Review of Materials Research 41, 337 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-matsci-062910-100347 .
- Cavalleri et al. (2004) A. Cavalleri, T. Dekorsy, H. H. W. Chong, J. C. Kieffer, and R. W. Schoenlein, Phys. Rev. B 70, 161102 (2004).
- Wentzcovitch et al. (1994) R. M. Wentzcovitch, W. W. Schulz, and P. B. Allen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 3389 (1994).
- Goodenough (1971) J. B. Goodenough, Journal of Solid State Chemistry 3, 490 (1971).
- Biermann et al. (2005) S. Biermann, A. Poteryaev, A. I. Lichtenstein, and A. Georges, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 026404 (2005).
- Haverkort et al. (2005) M. W. Haverkort, Z. Hu, A. Tanaka, W. Reichelt, S. V. Streltsov, M. A. Korotin, V. I. Anisimov, H. H. Hsieh, H.-J. Lin, C. T. Chen, D. I. Khomskii, and L. H. Tjeng, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 196404 (2005).
- Weber et al. (2012) C. Weber, D. D. O’Regan, N. D. M. Hine, M. C. Payne, G. Kotliar, and P. B. Littlewood, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 256402 (2012).
- Petrov et al. (2002) G. I. Petrov, V. V. Yakovlev, and J. Squier, Applied Physics Letters 81, 1023 (2002).
- Shibuya and Sawa (2014) K. Shibuya and A. Sawa, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics 53, 3 (2014).
- Okimura et al. (2014) K. Okimura, N. Hanis Azhan, T. Hajiri, S. I. Kimura, M. Zaghrioui, and J. Sakai, Journal of Applied Physics 115 (2014), 10.1063/1.4870868.
- Yang et al. (2016) M. Yang, Y. Yang, Bin Hong, L. Wang, K. Hu, Y. Dong, H. Xu, H. Huang, J. Zhao, H. Chen, L. Song, H. Ju, J. Zhu, J. Bao, X. Li, Y. Gu, T. Yang, X. Gao, Z. Luo, and C. Gao, Scientific Reports 6, 23119 (2016).
- Zhu and Schwingenschlögl (2012) Z. Zhu and U. Schwingenschlögl, Phys. Rev. B 86, 075149 (2012).
- Continenza et al. (1999) A. Continenza, S. Massidda, and M. Posternak, Phys. Rev. B 60, 15699 (1999).
- Gatti et al. (2007) M. Gatti, F. Bruneval, V. Olevano, and L. Reining, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 266402 (2007).
- Sakuma et al. (2008) R. Sakuma, T. Miyake, and F. Aryasetiawan, Phys. Rev. B 78, 075106 (2008).
- Laad et al. (2006) M. S. Laad, L. Craco, and E. Müller-Hartmann, Phys. Rev. B 73, 195120 (2006).
- Mondal et al. (2017) W. R. Mondal, N. S. Vidhyadhiraja, T. Berlijn, J. Moreno, and M. Jarrell, Phys. Rev. B 96, 014203 (2017).
- Mondal et al. (2019) W. R. Mondal, T. Berlijn, M. Jarrell, and N. S. Vidhyadhiraja, Phys. Rev. B 99, 134203 (2019).
- Eyert (2011) V. Eyert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 016401 (2011).
- Xu et al. (2017) S. Xu, X. Shen, K. A. Hallman, R. F. Haglund, and S. T. Pantelides, Phys. Rev. B 95, 125105 (2017).
- Zheng and Wagner (2015) H. Zheng and L. K. Wagner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 176401 (2015).
- Korotin et al. (2002) M. Korotin, N. Shorikov, and V. Anisimov, Phys. of Metals and Metallograph (USSR) 94, 17 (2002).
- Kim et al. (2013b) S. Kim, K. Kim, C.-J. Kang, and B. I. Min, Phys. Rev. B 87, 195106 (2013b).
- Mellan et al. (2019) T. A. Mellan, H. Wang, U. Schwingenschlögl, and R. Grau-Crespo, Phys. Rev. B 99, 064113 (2019).
- Budai et al. (2014) J. D. Budai, J. Hong, M. E. Manley, E. D. Specht, C. W. Li, J. Z. Tischler, D. L. Abernathy, A. H. Said, B. M. Leu, L. A. Boatner, R. J. McQueeney, and O. Delaire, Nature 515, 535 (2014).
- Eyert (2002) V. Eyert, Annalen der Physik 11, 650 (2002).
- Kresse and Furthmüller (1996) G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996).
- Kresse and Furthmüller (1996) G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Computational Materials Science 6, 15 (1996).
- Perdew et al. (1996) J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996).
- Sun et al. (2015) J. Sun, A. Ruzsinszky, and J. P. Perdew, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 036402 (2015).
- Togo and Tanaka (2015) A. Togo and I. Tanaka, Scr. Mater. 108, 1 (2015).
- Parlinski et al. (1997) K. Parlinski, Z. Q. Li, and Y. Kawazoe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 4063 (1997).
- Paik et al. (2015) H. Paik, J. A. Moyer, T. Spila, J. W. Tashman, J. A. Mundy, E. Freeman, N. Shukla, J. M. Lapano, R. Engel-Herbert, W. Zander, J. Schubert, D. A. Muller, S. Datta, P. Schiffer, and D. G. Schlom, Applied Physics Letters 107, 1 (2015).
- Liu et al. (2010) G.-H. Liu, X.-Y. Deng, and R. Wen, Journal of Materials Science 45, 3270 (2010).
- Brews (1970) J. R. Brews, Phys. Rev. B 1, 2557 (1970).
- Hearn (1972) C. J. Hearn, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics 5, 1317 (1972).
- McWhan et al. (1974) D. B. McWhan, M. Marezio, J. P. Remeika, and P. D. Dernier, Phys. Rev. B 10, 490 (1974).
- Terauchi and Cohen (1978) H. Terauchi and J. B. Cohen, Phys. Rev. B 17, 2494 (1978).
- Gervais and Kress (1985) F. m. c. Gervais and W. Kress, Phys. Rev. B 31, 4809 (1985).
- Woodley (2008) S. M. Woodley, Chemical Physics Letters 453, 167 (2008).
- Lee et al. (2017) S. Lee, K. Hippalgaonkar, F. Yang, J. Hong, C. Ko, J. Suh, K. Liu, K. Wang, J. J. Urban, X. Zhang, C. Dames, S. A. Hartnoll, O. Delaire, and J. Wu, Science 355, 371 (2017), https://science.sciencemag.org/content/355/6323/371.full.pdf .
- Quackenbush et al. (2016) N. F. Quackenbush, H. Paik, M. J. Wahila, S. Sallis, M. E. Holtz, X. Huang, A. Ganose, B. J. Morgan, D. O. Scanlon, Y. Gu, F. Xue, L.-Q. Chen, G. E. Sterbinsky, C. Schlueter, T.-L. Lee, J. C. Woicik, J.-H. Guo, J. D. Brock, D. A. Muller, D. A. Arena, D. G. Schlom, and L. F. J. Piper, Physical Review B 94, 085105 (2016).
- Paez et al. (2020) G. J. Paez, C. N. Singh, M. J. Wahila, K. E. Tirpak, N. F. Quackenbush, S. Sallis, H. Paik, Y. Liang, D. G. Schlom, T.-L. Lee, C. Schlueter, W.-C. Lee, and L. F. J. Piper, Physical Review Letters (2020), 10.1103/physrevlett.124.196402.
- Lee et al. (2019) W. C. Lee, M. J. Wahila, S. Mukherjee, C. N. Singh, T. Eustance, A. Regoutz, H. Paik, J. E. Boschker, F. Rodolakis, T. L. Lee, D. G. Schlom, and L. F. Piper, Journal of Applied Physics 125 (2019), 10.1063/1.5052636, arXiv:1808.07063 .
- Wong et al. (2013) F. J. Wong, Y. Zhou, and S. Ramanathan, Journal of Crystal Growth 364, 74 (2013).
- Fan et al. (2013) L. L. Fan, S. Chen, Y. F. Wu, F. H. Chen, W. S. Chu, X. Chen, C. W. Zou, and Z. Y. Wu, Applied Physics Letters 103 (2013), 10.1063/1.4823511.
- Liu et al. (2018) Y. Liu, S. Niu, T. Orvis, H. Zhang, H. Zhao, H. Wang, and J. Ravichandran, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A 36, 061506 (2018).
- Fischer et al. (2020) S. Fischer, J.-O. Krisponeit, M. Foerster, L. Aballe, J. Falta, and J. I. Flege, Crystal Growth & Design (2020), 10.1021/acs.cgd.0c00120.
- Shibuya et al. (2013) K. Shibuya, J. Tsutsumi, T. Hasegawa, and A. Sawa, Applied Physics Letters 103, 021604 (2013).