Underlying mechanism of charge transfer in Li-doped MgH16 at high pressure
Abstract
A lithium-doped magnesium hydride Li2MgH16 was recently reported [Y. Sun ., Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 097001 (2019)] to exhibit the highest ever predicted superconducting transition temperature under high pressure. Based on first-principles density-functional theory calculations, we reveal that the Li dopants locating in the pyroclore lattice sites give rise to the excess electrons distributed in interstitial regions. Such loosely bound anionic electrons are easily captured to stabilize a clathrate structure consisting of H cages. This addition of anionic electrons to H cages enhances the H-derived electronic density of states at the Fermi level, thereby leading to a high- superconductivity. We thus propose that the electride nature of Li dopants is an essential ingredient in the charge transfer between Li dopants and H atoms. Our findings offer a deeper understanding of the underlying mechanism of charge transfer in Li2MgH16 at high pressure.
I I. INTRODUCTION
The realization of room-temperature superconductivity (SC) is one of the most challenging and very long standing issues in condensed matter physics Hydride-Rev2020-Eremets . For this issue, metallic hydrogen has been proposed Ashcroft as an ideal system exhibiting the conventional Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) type SC BCS . The lightest atomic mass in metallic hydrogen gives rise to high vibrational frequencies, which lead to achieving high with strong electron-phonon coupling. However, it is very challenging to synthesize metallic hydrogen under extremely high pressures over 400 GPa MetalicH-Rev.Mod.Phys2012 ; MetalicH-PRL2015 ; MetalicH-Science2017 ; hydrogen2020 using diamondanvil cells diamondanvil-Rev2009-Bassett ; diamondanvil-Rev2018-K.K.Mao . In order to accomplish the metallization of hydrogen at relatively lower pressures, metal hydrides have been employed to utilize the so-called chemical precompression of hydrogen through metal elements Ashcroft-MetalHydride . Motivated by the theoretical predictions of high- SC in a number of hydrides LiHx-PANS2009 ; LiHx-acta cryst.2014 ; KHx-JPCC2012 ; CaH6-PANS2012 ; H3S-Sci.Rep2014 ; MgH6-RSC-Adv.2015 ; rare-earth-hydride-PRL2017 ; rare-earth-hydride-PANS2017 , experiments have been conducted to confirm that sulfur hydride H3S exhibits a of 203 K at pressures around 150 GPa ExpH3S-Nature2015 and more recently, lanthanum hydride LaH10 exhibits higher around 250260 K at 170 GPa ExpLaH10-PRL2019 ; ExpLaH10-Nature2019 . Therefore, the combined theoretical and experimental breakthroughs in high-pressure compressed hydrides have triggered a new era of high- superconductors Hydride-Rev2020-Eremets ; FeH5-Science2017 ; CeH9-Nat.Commun2019-T. Cui ; CeH-Nat.Commun2019-J.F. Lin ; Hydride-Rev2019-JCP .
To search for metal hydrides with higher , there have been many theoretical studies of binary compounds including alkali metals LiHx-PANS2009 ; LiHx-acta cryst.2014 ; KHx-JPCC2012 , alkaline earth metals CaH6-PANS2012 ; MgH6-RSC-Adv.2015 , and rare earth metals rare-earth-hydride-PRL2017 ; rare-earth-hydride-PANS2017 ; CeH9-Nat.Commun2019-T. Cui ; CeH-Nat.Commun2019-J.F. Lin . Recently, the realm of research has been extended to ternary compounds which may be more effective for achieving high- SC because of an increase in the number of combinations of metal elements Li2MgH16-PRL2019 ; CaYH12-PRL2019 ; LiPH6-Npj2019 . Based on first-principles density-functional theory (DFT) calculations and the Migdal-Eliashberg formalism, Yanming Ma and his colleagues predicted that a ternary hydride Li2MgH16 exhibits a of 473 K at 250 GPa Li2MgH16-PRL2019 . Such highest ever predicted was enabled by Li doping in a binary hydride MgH16 containing a large amount of H2 molecules. Here, the supply of extra electrons via Li doping breaks the strong covalent bond of H2 molecules to stabilize the clathrate H cages with weakly covalent HH bonds. The resulting H network enhances the H-derived electronic density of states (DOS) at the Fermi level , giving rise to a high- SC. It is natural that the charge transfer from Li dopants to H atoms in Li2MgH16 would be induced by a much lower electronegativity of Li atom compared to H atom Li2MgH16-PRL2019 .
The concept of electronegativity describes the tendency of an atom to attract electron density towards itself. The electronegativity is usually assumed to be similar values in a variety of chemical environments. It is, however, noted that a recent quantum-mechanical model study electronegativity-under-pressure reported a significant variation of under pressure. Meanwhile, at high pressure, some materials behave as electrides, where some excess electrons are transferred from positively charged ions to interstitial regions hoffman ; hosono ; Li6P . Such loosely bound anionic electrons are here demonstrated to play an important role in the charge transfer process between Li dopants and H atoms in Li2MgH16.

In the present study, we propose the underlying mechanism behind the charge transfer from Li dopants to H atoms in Li2MgH16. Using first-principles DFT calculations, we reveal that the Li dopants locating in the pyroclore lattice sites exhibit an electride feature with the anionic electrons residing in interstitial regions. Such loosely bound anionic electrons are easily captured to stabilize the clathrate H cages composed of two H species, H1 and H2 [see Fig. 1(a)]. It is thus likely that anionic electrons play an essential role in the charge transfer from Li dopants to H atoms. Our findings demonstrate that the anionic electrons created by the pyroclore-structured Li dopants are of vital importance not only for stabilizing the clathrate H cages, but also for enhancing the H-derived DOS at . The presently proposed charge transfer mechanism via anionic electrons can be also applied for compressed LaH10 ExpLaH10-PRL2019 ; ExpLaH10-Nature2019 , and hence, it is anticipated to be more generic to other compressed high- superconducting hydrides with clathrate structures.
II II. COMPUTATIONAL METHODS
Our DFT calculations were performed using the Vienna ab initio simulation package with the projector-augmented wave method vasp1 ; vasp2 ; paw . Here, we included Li-12, Mg-223, and H-1 electrons in the electronic-structure calculations. For the exchange-correlation energy, we employed the generalized-gradient approximation functional of Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE) pbe . A plane-wave basis was taken with a kinetic energy cutoff of 850 eV. The -space integration was done with 161616 points (in the Brillouin zone) for the structure optimization and 323232 points for the DOS calculation. All atoms were allowed to relax along the calculated forces until all the residual force components were less than 0.001 eV/Å. Using the QUANTUM ESPRESSO package QE ; oncv , we calculated phonon frequencies with 444 points.

III III. RESULTS
We first optimize the geometry of Li2MgH16 at a pressure of 300 GPa Li2MgH16-PRL2019 , which has a clathrate structure with the high crystalline symmetry of space group [see Fig. 1(a)]. The optimized lattice parameters of the primitive unit cell are = = = 6.572 Å. It is noted that Mg atoms form a diamond lattice [see Fig. 1(b)], while Li dopants form a pyroclore or three-dimensional (3D) kagome lattice [see Fig. 1(c)]. As shown in Fig. 1(a), there are two kinds of H cages: i.e., one is the H18 cage surrounding a Li atom and the other is the H28 cage surrounding a Mg atom. The H18 cage consisting of six pentagon rings is opened to connect to neighboring H18 cages, but the H28 cage consisting of twelve pentagon and four hexagon rings has a closed shape [see Fig. 1(a) and Fig. S1 in the Supplemental Information supple ]. The two cages are formed by two species of H atoms, H1 (equivalent to H96g in Ref. Li2MgH16-PRL2019 ) and H2 (equivalent to H32e). We find that the HH1 bond length () is 1.195 (1.023) Å, while the HH2 bond length is 1.084 Å. Note that the longer HH1 bond arises from the pentagon ring, while the shorter one is shared by the pentagon and hexagon rings (see Fig. S1 in the Supplemental Information supple ). These values of , , and are in good agreement with those ( = 1.20, = 1.02 Å, and = 1.08 Å) of a previous DFT calculation Li2MgH16-PRL2019 .
Figure 2(a) shows the valence charge-density isosurface of the isolated Li dopants [see Fig. 1(c)] whose structure is taken from the optimized structure of Li2MgH16. Since the Li-1 core state is located at around 46.6 eV below [see Fig. S2(a) in the Supplemental Information supple ], we exclude the 1 core electrons to plot the valence charge density. It is noted that each Li atom in Fig. 2(b) has 0.08 electrons within the muffin-tin (MT) sphere having a radius of 0.713 Å [close to the size of the corresponding Bader basin in Li2MgH16: see Fig. 3(d)], indicating that Li loses about 0.92 electrons. Interestingly, we find that some electrons detached from Li atoms are well distributed in the interstitial regions surrounded by four adjacent Li atoms [see Fig. 2(a)]. The confinement of such anionic electrons around the A1 and A2 sites is confirmed by the electron localization function ELF (see Fig. S3 in the Supplemental Material supple ), which is effective for the characterization of interstitial electrons in electride materials ELF-elect1 ; ELF-elect2 ; ELF-elect3 . It is, however, noticeable that anionic electrons arising from Li dopants are extensively distributed over the regions within and outside the MT spheres around the A1 and A2 sites [see Fig. 2(b)]. Figure 2(c) shows the histogram of volume distribution for every charge density range of 0.01/Å3. This histogram reveals that, although anionic electrons have the highest densities at the A1 and A2 sites, they occupy more volume outside the MT spheres around the A1 and A2 sites compared to within the MT spheres. In order to examine how anionic electrons arising from Li dopants change as a function of pressure, we compare the valence charge densities of the isolated Li dopants at 250, 300, and 350 GPa, respectively (see Fig. S4 in the Supplemental Information supple ). We find that the charge density at the A1 or A2 site increases as 0.158, 0.164, and 0.170 /Å3 at 250, 300, and 350 GPa, respectively, reflecting that anionic electrons around the A1 and A2 sites increase more dominantly with increasing pressure. It is thus likely that more anionic electrons can be captured to H cages with increasing pressure. Consequently, the HH1 and HH2 bond lengths are calculated to be shortened as (, , ) = (1.229, 1.043, 1.106), (1.195, 1.023, 1.084), and (1.168, 1.006, 1.065) Å at 250, 300, and 350 GPa, respectively. Based on these results, we can say that the Li dopants locating in the pyroclore lattice sites possess the electride characteristics with the A1 and A2 anions.

In Fig. 2(d), we present the band structure of the pyroclore-structured Li dopants. It is seen that one band is fully filled but three bands are partially filled, with four valence electrons coming from four Li atoms in the primitive unit cell. Specifically, one band exhibits a partially flat dispersion at 0.1 eV above . The charge character of this flat band at the point represents strongly localized electrons at the interstitial regions surrounded by adjacent four Li atoms [see Fig. 2(e)], much larger than the total valence charge density shown in Fig. 2(b). Such a flatband nature of localized electrons is likely attributed to the geometric character of 3D kagome lattice, which hosts the destructive interferences of Bloch wave functions Fe3Sn2-PRL . The destructive interfered electrons producing dispersionless flatbands have been theoretically proposed in 2D kagome lattices Kagome-JPA1992 , and their existence has been experimentally observed in real materials Fe3Sn2-PRL . We note that, despite the localized character of such interstitial electrons, the pyroclore-structured Li dopants show metallic behavior with multiple dispersive bands crossing [see Fig. 2(c)].

Next, we explore the charge density of the parent MgH16 system whose structure is taken from the optimized structure of Li2MgH16. Since the Mg-2(2) semicore states located at 77.8(44.6) eV below are well separated from the valence states [see Fig. S2(b) in the Supplemental Information supple ], we exclude such semicore electrons to plot the valence charge density of MgH16 in Fig. 3(a). It is seen that H atoms in the H18 and H28 cages are bonded to each other with covalent bonds. We note that each HH bond has a saddle point of charge density at its midpoint, similar to the CC covalent bond in diamond diamond . The charge densities at the midpoints of the HH1 and HH2 bonds are 0.60 and 0.80 /Å3, respectively [see the arrows in Fig. 3(a)]. It is, however, noticeable that the calculated phonon spectrum of MgH16 exhibits imaginary frequencies in the whole Brillouin zone [see Fig. S5(a) in the Supplemental Material supple ], indicating that the MgH16 structure without Li atoms is dynamically unstable. We further relax the structure of MgH16 to find a saddle point. The calculated phonon spectrum of such a saddle point structre also shows imaginary-frequency phonon modes [see Fig. S5(b)], indicating that it is still dynamically unstable. Meanwhile, the Li2MgH16 structure is dynamically stable without any imaginary-frequency mode [see Fig. S5(c) in the Supplemental Information supple ]. It is thus likely that the stability of H cages in Li2MgH16 is enabled by capturing the anionic electrons in the pyroclore-structured Li dopants, as discussed below.
Figure 3(b) shows the calculated valence charge density of Li2MgH16, where the charge densities at the midpoints of the HH1 and HH2 bonds are 0.69 and 0.90 /Å3, respectively [see the arrows in Fig. 3(b)]. These values are larger than the corresponding ones (0.60 and 0.80 /Å3) in MgH16, because the anionic electrons of the pyroclore-structured Li dopants are captured to the H18 and H28 cages. It is interestingly noticeable that the charge transfer from Li dopants to H atoms was interpreted in terms of a lower electronegativity of Li atom compared to H atom Li2MgH16-PRL2019 . By contrast, we here propose that the electride nature of Li dopants is an essential ingredient in the charge transfer between Li dopants and H atoms, thereby providing new insight into understanding the charge transfer mechanism in Li2MgH16. In order to examine the charge transfer from the Li dopants to H cages, we calculate the charge density difference, defined as = , where and represent the separated charge densities of Li dopants [see Fig. 2(b)] and parent MgH16 [see Fig. 3(a)], respectively. As shown in Fig. 3(c), illustrates that electronic charge is transferred from Li [including the anion sites A1 and A2 in Fig. 2(b)] and Mg to H atoms. We further estimate the number of transferred electrons between the Li/Mg and H atoms by calculating the Bader charges Bader of Li2MgH16. Figure 3(d) shows the Bader basins of the constituent atoms, obtained from the gradient of the total charge density of Li2MgH16 Bader . We find that the Bader charges inside Li, Mg, H1, and H2 basins are 2.22, 8.34, 1.18, and 1.28, respectively. Since this Bader charge of Li (Mg) includes 1 (22) core electrons, Li (Mg) atoms lose electrons of 0.78(1.66) per atom, while H1 (H2) atoms gain electrons of 0.18(0.28) per atom.
The charge transfer from Li dopants to H cages is expected to shift the Fermi level upward into the conduction band of the parent MgH16 system. To explore the rigid band shift due to such an electron doping, we compare the band structures of MgH16 and Li2MgH16, which are displayed in Figs. 4(a) and 4(b), respectively. The band dispersions of the two systems are generally similar to each other. As expected, we find that the empty conduction-band states of the MgH16 system are occupied by Li doping, thereby leading to a shift of by 2.49 eV [see the arrow in Fig. 4(b)]. It is noteworthy that the Li-derived states show their highest local DOS (LDOS) peak at around 3.9 eV above [see Fig. 4(b)], indicating that Li2MgH16 is an electron-doped magnesium hydride via Li doping. Especially, the LDOS values of Li, Mg, H1, and H2 atoms at are 0.810-3, 1.210-3, 2.510-3, and 6.610-3 states/eV/Å3, respectively [see Fig. 4(b)], indicating that the H-derived states are about 38 (25) times larger than Li (Mg)-derived states. Such large ratios of H-derived states in Li2MgH16 are different from the cases of other high- hydrides such as H3S H3S-Sci.Rep2014 and LaH10 LaH10-liangliang where the LDOS of H-derived states at is nearly the same as those of S- and La-derived states, respectively. Such large H-derived electronic states near should increase electron-phonon coupling Li2MgH16-PRL2019 , which leads to the highest ever reported.
IV IV. CONCLUSION
Our first-principles DFT calculations have shown that the pyroclore-structured Li dopants exhibit an electride nature with anionic electrons ditributed in interstitial regions. Such loosely bound anionic electrons are easily captured to the H18 and H28 cages. We thus proposed that the electride nature of Li dopants importantly determines the charge transfer between Li dopants and H atoms. The present findings demonstrated that the anionic electrons created by Li dopants play important roles not only in stabilizing the clathrate H cages, but also in enhancing the H-derived DOS at . It is noted that the presently proposed charge transfer mechanism can be applicable to compressed LaH10 LaH10-Seho which was recently synthesized ExpLaH10-PRL2019 ; ExpLaH10-Nature2019 to exhibit the highest so far among experimentally available superconducting materials. Here, the charge transfer from La to H atoms is driven by the electride property of the La framework at high pressure (see Fig. S6 in the Supplemental Material supple ). Therefore, the underlying mechanism of charge transfer in Li2MgH16 would be more generic, and it will be useful for the discovery and design of new high- hydrides in the future.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean Government (Grants No. 2019R1A2C1002975, No. 2016K1A4A3914691, and No. 2015M3D1A1070609). The calculations were performed by the KISTI Supercomputing Center through the Strategic Support Program (Program No. KSC-2019-CRE-0183) for the supercomputing application research.
∗ Corresponding author: [email protected]
References
- (1) J. A. Flores-Livas, L. Boeri, A. Sanna, G. Profeta, R. Arita, and M. Eremets, Phys. Rep. 856, 1 (2020), and references therein.
- (2) N. W. Ashcroft, Phys. Rev. Lett. 21, 1748 (1968).
- (3) J. Bardeen, L. N. Cooper, and J. R. Schrieffer, Phys. Rev. 106, 162 (1957).
- (4) J. M. McMahon, M. A. Morales, C. Pierleoni, and D. M. Ceperley, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 1607 (2012).
- (5) J. McMinis, R. C. Clay, D. Lee, and M. A. Morales, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 105305 (2015).
- (6) R. P. Dias and I. F. Silvera, Science 355, 715 (2017).
- (7) P. Loubeyre1, F. Occelli1, and P.l Dumas, Nature 577, 631 (2020).
- (8) W. A. Bassett, High Press. Res. 29, 163 (2009).
- (9) H. K. Mao, X. J. Chen, Y. Ding, B. Li, and L. Wang, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015007 (2018).
- (10) N. W. Ashcroft, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 187002 (2004).
- (11) D. Duan, Y. Liu, F. Tian, D. Li, X. Huang, Z. Zhao, H. Yu, B. Liu, W. Tian, and T. Cui, Sci. Rep. 4, 6968 (2014).
- (12) E. Zurek, R. Hoffmann, N. W. Ashcroft, A. R. Oganov, and A. O. Lyakhov, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 42 (2009).
- (13) Y. Xie, Q. Li, A. R. Oganov, and H. Wang, Acta Cryst. C70 104 (2014).
- (14) J. Hooper and E. Zurek, J. Phys. Chem. C 116 13322 (2012).
- (15) H. Wang, J. S. Tse, K. Tanaka, T. Litaka, and Y. Ma, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 6463 (2012).
- (16) X. Feng, J. Zhang, G. Gao, H. Liu, and H. Wang, RSC Adv. 5, 59292 (2015).
- (17) F. Peng, Y. Sun, C. J. Pickard, R. J. Needs, Q. Wu, and Y. Ma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 107001 (2017).
- (18) H. Liu, I. I. Naumov, R. Hoffmann, N. W. Ashcroft, and R. J. Hemley, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114, 6990 (2017).
- (19) A. P. Drozdov, M. I. Eremets, I. A. Troyan, V. Ksenofontov, and S. I. Shylin, Nature (London) 525, 73 (2015).
- (20) M. Somayazulu, M. Ahart, A. K. Mishra, Z. M. Geballe, M. Baldini, Y. Meng, V. V. Struzhkin, and R. J. Hemley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 027001 (2019).
- (21) A. P. Drozdov, P. P. Kong, V. S. Minkov, S. P. Besedin, M. A. Kuzovnikov, S. Mozaffari, L. Balicas, F. F. Balakirev, D. E. Graf, V. B. Prakapenka, E. Greenberg, D. A. Knyazev, M. Tkacz, and M. I. Eremets, Nature (London) 569, 528 (2019).
- (22) C. M. Pépin, G. Geneste, A. Dewaele, M. Mezouar, and P. Loubeyre, Science 357, 382 (2017).
- (23) X. Li, X. Huang, D. Duan, C. J. Pickard, D. Zhou, H. Xie, Q. Zhuang, Y. Huang, Q. Zhou, B. Liu, and T. Cui, Nat. Commun. 10, 3461 (2019).
- (24) N. P. Salke, M. M. Davari Esfahani, Y. Zhang, I. A. Kruglov, J. Zhou, Y. Wang, E. Greenberg, V. B. Prakapenka, J. Liu, A. R. Oganov, and J.-F. Lin, Nat. Commun. 10, 4453 (2019).
- (25) E. Zurek and T. Bi, J. Chem. Phys. 150, 050901 (2019).
- (26) Y. Sun, J. Lv, Y. Xie, H. Liu, and Y. Ma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 097001 (2019).
- (27) X. Liang, A. Bergara, L. Wang, B. Wen, Z. Zhao, X. F. Zhou, J. He, G. Gao, and Y. Tian, Phys. Rev. B 99, 100505(R) (2019).
- (28) Z. Shao, D. Duan, Y. Ma, H. Yu, H. Song, H. Xie, D. Li, F. Tian, B. Liu, and Tian Cui, Npj Comput. Mater. 5, 104 (2019).
- (29) M. Rahm, R. Cammi, N. W. Ashcroft, and R. Hoffmann, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 10253 (2019).
- (30) M. Miao and R. Hoffman, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 3631 (2014).
- (31) J. Wang, Q. Zhu, Z. Wang, and H. Hosono, Phys. Rev. B 99, 064104 (2019) and referenes therein.
- (32) Z. Zhao, S. Zhang, T. Yu, H. Xu, A. Bergara, and G. Yang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 097002 (2019).
- (33) G. Kresse and J. Hafner, Phys. Rev. B 48, 13115 (1993).
- (34) G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15 (1996).
- (35) P. E. Blöchl, Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953 (1994).
- (36) J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996); 78, 1396 (1997).
- (37) P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, G. L. Chiarotti, M. Cococcioni, I. Dabo et al., J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21, 395502 (2009).
- (38) M. Schlipf and F. Gygi, Comput. Phys. Commun. 196, 36 (2015).
- (39) See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/xxxxx for the HH bond lengths of the H18 and H28 cages, the band structures of the parent MgH16 system and Li2MgH16, the electron localization function of the pyroclore-structured Li dopants, the valence charge densities of the isolated Li dopants with respect to pressure, the phonon spectra of MgH16 and Li2MgH16, and the anionic electrons in LaH10.
- (40) B. Silvi and A. Savin, Nature (London) 371, 683 (1994).
- (41) T. Tada, S. Takemoto, S. Matsuishi, and H. Hosono, Inorg. Chem. 53, 10347 (2014).
- (42) Y. Ysuji, P. L. V. K. Dasari, S. F. Elatresh, R. Hoffmann, and N. W. Ashcroft, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 14108 (2016).
- (43) Y. Zhang, H. Wang, Y. Wang, L. Zhang, and Y. Ma, Phys. Rev. X 7, 011017 (2017).
- (44) Z. Lin, J. H. Choi, Q. Zhang, W. Qin, S. Yi, P. Wang, L. Li, Y. Wang, H. Zhang, Z. Sun, L. Wei, S. Zhang, T. Guo, Q. Lu, J.-H. Cho, C. Zeng, and Z. Zhang Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 096401 (2018).
- (45) A. Mielke, J. Phys. A 24, L73 (1991); . 24, 3311 (1991); . 25, 4335 (1992).
- (46) E. Kaxiras, Atomic and Electronic Structure of Solids. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 152 (2003).
- (47) R. F. W. Bader, Acc. Chem. Res. 18, 9 (1985).
- (48) L. Liu, C. Wang, S. Yi, K. W. Kim, J. Kim, and J.-H. Cho, Phys. Rev. B 99, 140501(R) (2019).
- (49) S. Yi, C. Wang, H. Jeon, and J.-H. Cho, arXiv: 2007.01531.
Supplemental Material for “Underlying mechanism of charge transfer in Li-doped MgH16 at high pressure”
1. H-H bond lengths of the H18 and H28 cages

2. Band structures of the pyroclore-structured Li dopants, MgH16, and Li2MgH16

3. Electron localization function of the pyroclore-structured Li dopants

4. Valence charge densities of the isolated Li dopants at 250, 300, and 350 GPa, respectively

5. Phonon spectra of MgH16 and Li2MgH16

6. Structure of LaH10 and anionic electrons in the La lattice
