Two iterative formulas of largest and smallest singular value of nonsingular matrices
Abstract
We obtain an iterative formula that converges incrementally to the smallest singular value. Similarly, we obtain an iterative formula that converges decreasingly to the largest singular value.
Keywords: Singular values, Frobenius norm, Determinant.
1 Lower bound for the smallest singular value
Let be the space of complex matrices. Let be the singular values of which is nonsingular and suppose that . For , the Frobenius norm of is defined by
where is the conjugate transpose of . The relationship between the Frobenius norm and singular values is
It is well known that lower bounds for the smallest singular value of a nonsingular matrix have many potential theoretical and practical applications [1, 2]. Yu and Gu [5] obtained a lower bound for as follows:
The above inequality is also shown in [4]. In [6], Zou improved the above inequality by showing that
In [3], Lin and Xie improve a lower bound for smallest singular value of matrices by showing that is the smallest positive solution to the equation
and . Under certain conditions, will hold. However, in many cases, is not true. We give necessary and sufficient conditions such that in Proposition 1 .
2 Main results
Let
And is the smallest positive solution to the equation
From [3], we have . Next, we give necessary and sufficient conditions such that .
Proposition 1.
Let a be the smallest positive solution to the equation
then if and only if
Proof.
If , then
Since and , we have
By the arithmetic-geometric mean inequality, the above equation holds if and only if
if and only if
Let
Then is the smallest positive solution to the equation
if and only if is the smallest positive zero point of
Next, we proof . Obviously, we can see that and . Next, we prove that is an strictly increasing function on . Taking the derivative of , we can get
, we have
We have . Therefore is an strictly increasing function on and is the smallest positive zero point of
Therefore, is the smallest positive solution to the equation
We get ∎
In the above special condition, can be equal to , which is not general. Next, we give our main theorem. We give an iterative formula for the smallest singular value, which converges incrementally to the smallest singular value.
Theorem 1.
Let be nonsingular and and
Then and .
Proof.
Let , by the arithmetic-geometric mean inequality, we have
Since
we have
Let tends to from the left). We get that the above inequality is also true for . Therefore, for , we have
(1) |
We show by induction on that
We have . In equation 1, let , we have
Assume that our claim is true for , that is . Now we consider the case when . In equation 1, let , we have
Hence . This proves . By the well known monotone convergence theorem, exists. Let , then
We have
Since
we have
We get that is the eigenvalue of . Since is the smallest eigenvalue of , we have . According to the definition of , we have . Therefore, and we get . Hence . ∎
From Theorem 1, we can see that as long as there is a lower bound of (we set it to ) and let in Theorem 1 , we can get a better lower bound than . For example, we bring the lower bound of Lin and Xie [3] into our Theorem 1 to obtain the following results.
Corollary 1.
Let a be the smallest positive solution to the equation
Let and
Then and .
We give the iterative formula for the smallest singular value:
where , which converges incrementally to the smallest singular value. Similarly, we can give an iterative formula that converges decreasingly to the largest singular value.
Theorem 2.
Let be nonsingular, . Assume
Then and .
Proof.
Set , according to the arithmetic geometric mean inequality, we can get
Since
we can get
Let ( tend to from the right). We get that the above equation is also true for . So, for , we have
(2) |
We use induction on to prove that:
For , can be obtained from the condition. In the equation (2), taking , we can get
Suppose our conclusion holds for , that is, . Now let’s consider the case of . In equation (2), let , we can get
So . This proves that . From the monotone convergence theorem, exists. Let , then
We have
because
we can get
So is the eigenvalue of . Because is the largest eigenvalue of , there is . According to the definition of , we have , so . We get , so . ∎
The largest singular value has an obvious upper bound. Because , so . We give an iterative formula for the largest singular value:
where , which converges decreasingly to .
References
- [1] R. A. Horn and C. R. Johnson. Matrix Analysis. Cambridge University Press, 1985.
- [2] R. A. Horn and C. R. Johnson. Topics in matrix analysis. Cambridge University Press, 1994.
- [3] Minghua Lin and Mengyan Xie. On some lower bounds for smallest singular value of matrices. Applied Mathematics Letters, 121:107411, 2021.
- [4] G Piazza and T Politi. An upper bound for the condition number of a matrix in spectral norm. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 143(1):141–144, 2002.
- [5] Yu Yisheng and Gu Dunhe. A note on a lower bound for the smallest singular value. Linear algebra and its Applications, 253(1-3):25–38, 1997.
- [6] Limin Zou. A lower bound for the smallest singular value. Journal of Mathematical Inequalities, 6(4):625–629, 2012.