This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Twisted Roe algebras and their KK-theory

Jintao Deng Department of Mathematics, SUNY at Buffalo, NY 14260, USA. [email protected]  and  Liang Guo Shanghai Institute for Mathematics and Interdisciplinary Sciences, Shanghai, 200433, P. R. China [email protected]
Abstract.

In this paper, we introduce a notion of twisted Roe algebras and a twisted coarse Baum-Connes conjecture. We study the basic properties of twisted Roe algebras, including a coarse analogue of the imprimitivity theorem for metric spaces with a structure of coarse fibrations. We show that the coarse Baum-Connes conjecture holds for a metric space with a coarse fibration structure when the base space and the fiber satisfy the twisted coarse Baum-Connes conjecture with coefficients. As an application, the coarse Baum-Connes conjecture holds for a finitely generated group which is an extension of coarsely embeddable groups.

1. Introduction

Let XX be a metric space with bounded geometry. The coarse Baum-Connes conjecture claims that a certain coarse assembly map

μ:KX(X)K(C(X))\mu:KX_{*}(X)\to K_{*}(C*(X))

is an isomorphism, where KX(X)KX_{*}(X) is the coarse KK-homology of the space XX and C(X)C^{*}(X) is the associated Roe algebras. This conjecture provides algorithm to compute the higher indices for elliptic operators on non-compact Riemannian manifolds. It has many applications in topology and geometry. In particular, it implies the Novikov conjecture on homotopy invariance of higher signatures, and the Gromov-Lawson-Rosenberg conjecture regarding nonexistence of positive scalar curvature metrics on closed aspherical manifolds.

The coarse Baum-Connes conjecture has been verified for a large class of metric spaces with bounded geometry, including all coarsely embeddable spaces [16], and certain relative expanders [5]. The purpose of the paper is to enlarge the class of metric spaces satisfying the coarse Baum-Connes conjecture.

In order to study the KK-theory of Roe algebras, we introduce a twisted version of Roe algebras for a metric space with bounded geometry using a coarse algebra. Let ZZ be a metric space with bounded geometry and 𝒜\mathcal{A} a stable CC^{*}-algebra. The coarse ZZ-algebra Γ(Z,𝒜)\Gamma(Z,\mathcal{A}) to be some certain CC^{*}-subalgebra of (Z,𝒜)\ell^{\infty}(Z,\mathcal{A}). Typical examples of a coarse ZZ-algebra include (Z,𝒦)\ell^{\infty}(Z,\mathcal{K}) and C0(Z,𝒦)C_{0}(Z,\mathcal{K}), where 𝒦\mathcal{K} is the algebra of compact operators on an infinite-dimensional separable Hilbert space, and C0(Z,𝒦)C_{0}(Z,\mathcal{K}) is the algebra of all functions from ZZ to 𝒦\mathcal{K} vanishing at infinity. Using coarse algebras, we define the twisted Roe algebra CΓ(Z,𝒜)(M,𝒜)C^{*}_{\Gamma(Z,\mathcal{A})}(M,\mathcal{A}) for a metric space MM with a coarse equivalence f:MZf:M\to Z. The twisted Roe algebras can be viewed as a coarse analogue of crossed product of a group GG and a GG-CC^{*}-algebra. Furthermore, we have the coarse imprimitivity theorem.

Theorem 1.1 (Coarse imprimitivity theorem).

Let ZXYZ\to X\to Y be a coarse ZZ-fibration metric space such that XX and YY have bounded geometry. For any coarse ZZ-algebra Θ(F,𝒜)\Theta(F,\mathcal{A}), we have the following Morita equivalence of two CC^{*}-algebras:

C(X,ΓindZ(X,𝒜))MoritaC(Z,Γ(Z,𝒜)),C^{*}(X,\Gamma_{ind}^{Z}(X,\mathcal{A}))\sim_{\text{Morita}}C^{*}(Z,\Gamma(Z,\mathcal{A})),

where ΓindZ(X,𝒜)\Gamma_{ind}^{Z}(X,\mathcal{A}) is the induced coarse XX-algebra associated with the coarse fibration ZXYZ\to X\to Y and the ZZ-algebra Γ(Z,𝒜)\Gamma(Z,\mathcal{A}).

As an application, we have CC0(X,𝒦)(X,𝒦)Morita𝒦.C^{*}_{C_{0}(X,\mathcal{K})}(X,\mathcal{K})\sim_{\text{Morita}}\mathcal{K}. This can be seen as a coarse analogue of C0(G,𝒦)rGMorita𝒦C_{0}(G,\mathcal{K})\rtimes_{r}G\sim_{\text{Morita}}\mathcal{K}. We also have C(X,𝒦)(X,𝒦)C(X)C^{*}_{\ell^{\infty}(X,\mathcal{K})}(X,\mathcal{K})\cong C^{*}(X), where C(X)C^{*}(X) is the Roe algebra of XX.

For metric space XX with bounded geometry and coarse XX-algebra Γ(X,𝒜)\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A}), we introduce a coarse assembly map

μΓ(X,𝒜):limdCL,Γ(X,𝒜)(Pd(X),𝒜)CΓ(X,𝒜)(X,𝒜).\mu_{\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A})}:\lim\limits_{d\to\infty}C^{*}_{L,\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A})}(P_{d}(X),\mathcal{A})\to C^{*}_{\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A})}(X,\mathcal{A}).

The twisted coarse Baum-Connes conjecture claims that the coarse assembly map is an isomorphism. In the case when Γ(X,𝒜)=(X,𝒦)\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A})=\ell^{\infty}(X,\mathcal{K}), the twisted coarse Baum-Connes conjecture is the usual coarse Baum-Connes conjecture, while it is the coarse Baum-Connes conjecture with coefficients in 𝒜\mathcal{A} when Γ(X,𝒜)=(X,𝒜)\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A})=\ell^{\infty}(X,\mathcal{A}).

In [16], Yu showed that the coarse Baum-Connes conjecture holds for a metric space which admits a coarse embedding into Hilbert space. We strengthen the result to the twisted Baum-Connes conjecture with coefficients in any coarse algebra.

Theorem 1.2.

Let XX be a metric space with bounded geometry which admits a coarse embedding into Hilbert space. If Γ(X,𝒜)\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A}) is any coarse XX-algebra with a stable fiber 𝒜\mathcal{A} over XX, then the twisted coarse Baum-Connes conjecture with coefficients in Γ(X,𝒜)\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A}) holds for XX, i.e., the twisted assembly map

μΓ(X,𝒜):limdK(CL,Γ(X,𝒜)(Pd(X),𝒜))K(CΓ(X,𝒜)(X,𝒜))\mu_{\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A})}:\lim\limits_{d\to\infty}K_{*}(C^{*}_{L,\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A})}(P_{d}(X),\mathcal{A}))\to K_{*}(C^{*}_{\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A})}(X,\mathcal{A}))

is an isomorphism.

Let ZXYZ\to X\to Y be a coarse fibration. It is possible that XX does not admit a coarse embedding into Hilbert space, even though ZZ and YY are coarsely embeddable into Hilbert space. The following is the main result of this paper.

Theorem 1.3.

Let ZX𝑝YZ\to X\xrightarrow{p}Y be a coarse fibration with bounded geometry. If both ZZ and YY satisfy the twisted coarse Baum-Connes conjecture with any coefficients, then the coarse Baum-Connes conjecture with coefficient holds XX.

We take a different approach to prove the twisted coarse Baum-Connes conjecture for the coarse fibration, other than the Dirac-dual-Dirac method.

Group extensions provide examples of coarse fibrations. In [2], Arzhantseva and Tessera showed that admitting a coarse embedding into Hilbert space is not preserved by group extensions. They constructed in [2] an extension of groups 1NGG/N11\to N\to G\to G/N\to 1 such that NN and G/NG/N are coarsely embeddable into Hilbert space, but GG is not coarsely embeddable. It is natural to ask if the coarse Baum-Connes conjecture holds for such a group GG. In [4], the first author showed that the Novikov conjecture with coefficients holds for GG, and it follows that the coarse assembly map is injective. In this paper, we strengthen this result to the following.

Theorem 1.4.

Let 1NGQ11\to N\to G\to Q\to 1 be an extension of finitely generated groups. If NN and QQ are coarsely embeddable into Hilbert spaces, then the coarse Baum-Connes conjecture holds for GG.

The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we introduce the concept of twisted Roe algebras and study their properties, especially the coarse imprimitivity theorem. In Section 3, we introduce the twisted coarse Baum-Connes conjecture and show how our framework of twisted coarse Baum-Connes can be used to prove the usual coarse Baum-Connes conjecture. In particular, we formulate a coarse algebra for a metric space admitting a coarse embedding into Hilbert space. In Section 4, we show the coarse Baum-Connes conjecture for a metric space XX with a coarse fibration structure ZXYZ\to X\to Y when the fiber ZZ and the baser space YY are coarse embeddable into Hilbert space.

Acknowledgement

The second author wishes to thank Texas A&M University and SUNY at Buffalo for hospitality and support during a visit in the spring of 2024.

2. Roe algebra with twisted coefficients

In this section, we will first introduce a coarse algebra for a metric space and use it to define twisted Roe algebra. We will then consider the properties of the twisted Roe algebras.

Let ZZ be a metric space with bounded geometry in the sense that for any R>0R>0, there exists NRN_{R}\in\mathbb{N} such that

supxX#B(Z,R)NR.\sup_{x\in X}\#B(Z,R)\leq N_{R}.

A partial translation on XX is a bijection v:DRv:D\to R from a subset DZD\subseteq Z onto another subset RZR\subseteq Z such that supxDd(x,v(x))R\sup_{x\in D}d(x,v(x))\leq R for some constant R>0R>0. Recall that a CC^{*}-algebra 𝒜\mathcal{A} is stable if 𝒜𝒦𝒜\mathcal{A}\otimes\mathcal{K}\cong\mathcal{A}, where 𝒦\mathcal{K} is the algebra of compact operators on an infinite-dimensional Hilbert space.

Let (Z,𝒜)\ell^{\infty}(Z,\mathcal{A}) be the CC^{*}-algebra of all bounded map from ZZ to 𝒜\mathcal{A}. For any map ξ(X,𝒜)\xi\in\ell^{\infty}(X,\mathcal{A}) and any partial translation v:DRv:D\to R on ZZ, we define a map from ZZ 𝒜\mathcal{A} by

vξ(x)={ξ(v(x)) if xD0 if xD.v^{*}\xi(x)=\begin{cases}\xi(v(x))&\text{~{}if~{}}x\in D\\ 0&\text{~{}if~{}}x\notin D.\end{cases}

In the case when RSupp(f)=R\cap{\rm Supp}(f)=\emptyset, we set vf0v^{*}f\equiv 0 on ZZ.

Definition 2.1.

Let ZZ be a metric space with bounded geometry, and 𝒜\mathcal{A} a stable CC^{*}-algebra. An algebraic coarse ZZ-algebra is *-subalgebra Θ(Z,𝒜)\Theta(Z,\mathcal{A}) of (Z,𝒜)\ell^{\infty}(Z,\mathcal{A}) satisfying that that

  • (1)

    for any xZx\in Z, the set {ξ(x)ξΘ(Z,𝒜)}\{\xi(x)\mid\xi\in\Theta(Z,\mathcal{A})\} is dense in 𝒜\mathcal{A};

  • (2)

    for any partial translation v:DRv:D\to R, and ξΘ(Z,𝒜)(Z,𝒜)\xi\in\Theta(Z,\mathcal{A})\subseteq\ell^{\infty}(Z,\mathcal{A}), vξv^{*}\xi is still an element in Θ(Z,𝒜)\Theta(Z,\mathcal{A}).

The completion, denoted by Γ(Z,𝒜)\Gamma(Z,\mathcal{A}), of Θ(Z,𝒜)\Theta(Z,\mathcal{A}) in (Z,𝒜)\ell^{\infty}(Z,\mathcal{A}) is called a coarse ZZ-algebra.

Let C0(Z,𝒜)C_{0}(Z,\mathcal{A}) be the CC^{*}-algebra of all maps from ZZ to 𝒜\mathcal{A} vanishing at infinity. It is obvious that (Z,𝒜)\ell^{\infty}(Z,\mathcal{A}) is also a coarse ZZ-algebra for any stable algebra 𝒜\mathcal{A}. Moreover, every coarse ZZ-algebra with fiber 𝒜\mathcal{A} contains C0(Z,𝒜)C_{0}(Z,\mathcal{A}) as an ideal.

Let MM and ZZ be metric spaces. We say that MM and ZZ are coarsely equivalent if there exists a proper map f:MZf:M\to Z and non-decreasing functions ρ+,ρ:++\rho_{+},\rho_{-}:\mathbb{R}_{+}\to\mathbb{R}_{+} with ρ±(t)\rho_{\pm}(t)\to\infty as tt tends to \infty, such that

  • (1)

    ρ(dM(x,x))dX(f(x),f(x))ρ+(dM(x,x))\rho_{-}(d_{M}(x,x^{\prime}))\leq d_{X}(f(x),f(x^{\prime}))\leq\rho_{+}(d_{M}(x,x^{\prime})) for all x,xMx,x^{\prime}\in M;

  • (2)

    there exists r>0r>0 such that Z=Nr(f(M))Z=N_{r}(f(M)), where Nr(f(M))={xZ:mM,such thatd(x,f(m))r}N_{r}(f(M))=\{x\in Z:\exists~{}m\in M,~{}\text{such~{}that}~{}d(x,f(m))\leq r\}.

The map ff is called a coarse equivalence and ρ±\rho_{\pm} is called the controlling functions associated with ff. We say that a family of metric spaces (Mn)(M_{n}) is uniformly coarsely equivalent to ZZ if there exists a coarse equivalence fn:MnZf_{n}:M_{n}\to Z for each nn such that the family of coarse equivalences (fn)n(f_{n})_{n\in\mathbb{N}} shares the same controlling functions ρ±\rho_{\pm} and the constant rr such that Nr(fn(Mn))=ZN_{r}(f_{n}(M_{n}))=Z for all nn\in\mathbb{N}.

Let MM be a proper metric space in the sense that the closure of a bounded subset of MM is compact. In order to define the twisted Roe algebra for the space MM, we fix a countable, dense subset M^M\widehat{M}\subseteq M.

Definition 2.2.

Let T:M^×M^𝒜T:\widehat{M}\times\widehat{M}\to\mathcal{A} be a uniformly bounded map.

  1. (1)

    The map TT is said to have finite propagation if there exists r>0r>0 such that T(x,y)=0T(x,y)=0 whenever d(x,y)>rd(x,y)>r for all x,yM^x,y\in\widehat{M}.

  2. (2)

    The map T:M^×M^𝒜T:\widehat{M}\times\widehat{M}\to\mathcal{A} is said to be locally compact if the set

    {(x,y)(B×B)M^×M^:Tx,y0}\left\{(x,y)\in(B\times B)\cap\widehat{M}\times\widehat{M}:T_{x,y}\neq 0\right\}

    is finite for any compact subset BMB\subseteq M.

Consider

M^,𝒜=2(M^,𝒜)={ξ:M^𝒜|az𝒜,zM^ξzξz converges in norm}.\mathcal{H}_{\widehat{M},\mathcal{A}}=\ell^{2}(\widehat{M},\mathcal{A})=\left\{\xi:\widehat{M}\to\mathcal{A}\ \Big{|}\ a_{z}\in\mathcal{A},\ \sum_{z\in\widehat{M}}\xi^{*}_{z}\xi_{z}\text{ converges in norm}\right\}.

The space X,𝒜\mathcal{H}_{X,\mathcal{A}} is a right Hilbert 𝒜\mathcal{A}-module as follows. For any ξ,η2(M^,𝒜)\xi,\eta\in\ell^{2}(\widehat{M},\mathcal{A}) and a𝒜a\in\mathcal{A}, we define

ξ,η=xξxηx,and(ξa)x=ξxa.\langle\xi,\eta\rangle=\sum_{x}\xi^{*}_{x}\cdot\eta_{x},~{}~{}~{}~{}\text{and}~{}~{}~{}~{}\left(\xi\cdot a\right)_{x}=\xi_{x}\cdot a.

It is called a geometric MM-𝒜\mathcal{A}-module. We say the map T:M^×M^𝒜T:\widehat{M}\times\widehat{M}\to\mathcal{A} is norm-bounded if it is bounded when it is viewed as 𝒜\mathcal{A}-linear map on 2(M^,𝒜)\ell^{2}(\widehat{M},\mathcal{A}) by

(Tξ)(x)=zM^T(x,z)ξz(T\xi)(x)=\sum_{z\in\widehat{M}}T(x,z)\xi_{z}

for all ξ2(M^,𝒜)\xi\in\ell^{2}(\widehat{M},\mathcal{A}).

Let ZZ be a metric space with bounded geometry, and f:MZf:M\to Z a coarse equivalence. Without loss of generality, we assume that the map ff is a Borel map (cf. [14, Lemma A.3.12]). Then, we obtain a uniformly bounded Borel cover {Bx=f1(x)}xZ\left\{B_{x}=f^{-1}(x)\right\}_{x\in Z}. By the stability of the algebra 𝒜\mathcal{A}, we consider a *-isomorphism

ψ:𝒜𝒦(2(M^))𝒜.\psi:\mathcal{A}\otimes\mathcal{K}(\ell^{2}(\widehat{M}))\to\mathcal{A}.

If T:M^×M^𝒜T:\widehat{M}\times\widehat{M}\to\mathcal{A} is norm-bounded, locally compact operator with finite propagation, then for any x,yM^x,y\in\widehat{M}, the operator χBxTχBy\chi_{B_{x}}T\chi_{B_{y}} lies in the algebra 𝒜𝒦(2(M^))\mathcal{A}\otimes\mathcal{K}(\ell^{2}(\widehat{M})). We obtain a map T~:X×X𝒜\widetilde{T}:X\times X\to\mathcal{A} by

T~(x,y)=ψ(χBxT~χBy)\widetilde{T}(x,y)=\psi\left(\chi_{B_{x}}\cdot\widetilde{T}\cdot\chi_{B_{y}}\right)

for all x,yXx,y\in X. Since each BxB_{x} is bounded and TT is locally compact, the map T~\widetilde{T} is well-defined.

Let v:DRv:D\to R be a partial translation on XX and let T:M^×M^𝒜T:\widehat{M}\times\widehat{M}\to\mathcal{A} be a norm-bounded, locally compact map with finite propagation. Then, we can consider a map Tv:Z𝒜T^{v}:Z\to\mathcal{A} by

Tv(x)={T~(x,v(x)) if xD0 if xDT^{v}(x)=\begin{cases}\widetilde{T}(x,v(x))&\text{~{}if~{}}x\in D\\ 0&\text{~{}if~{}}x\notin D\end{cases}

Now, we are ready to define the twisted Roe algebra for a proper metric space MM with a coarse equivalence f:MZf:M\to Z using a coarse XX-algebra.

Definition 2.3 (Algebraic twisted Roe algebra).

With notations as above, let Γ(Z,𝒜)\Gamma(Z,\mathcal{A}) be a coarse ZZ-algebra with a stable fiber 𝒜\mathcal{A}. The algebraic twisted Roe algebra of MM with twisted coefficients in Θ(Z,𝒜)\Theta(Z,\mathcal{A}), denoted by Θ(Z,𝒜)[M,𝒜]\mathbb{C}_{\Theta(Z,\mathcal{A})}[M,\mathcal{A}], is defined to be the *-subalgebra of B(2(M^,𝒜))B(\ell^{2}(\widehat{M},\mathcal{A})) all norm-bounded map T:M^×M^𝒜T:\widehat{M}\times\widehat{M}\to\mathcal{A} satisfying

  • (1)

    TT is locally compact with finite propagation;

  • (2)

    for any partial translation v:DRv:D\to R, TvΓ(Z,𝒜)T^{v}\in\Gamma(Z,\mathcal{A}).

The twisted Roe algebra CΓ(Z,𝒜)(M,𝒜)C_{\Gamma(Z,\mathcal{A})}^{*}(M,\mathcal{A}) is defined to be the completion of Γ(Z,𝒜)[M,𝒜]\mathbb{C}_{\Gamma(Z,\mathcal{A})}[M,\mathcal{A}] under the norm given by the representation on M^,𝒜\mathcal{H}_{\widehat{M},\mathcal{A}}.

Example 2.4.

Let ZZ be a metric space with bounded geometry, 𝒜\mathcal{A} a stable CC^{*}-algebra. Consider Γ(Z,𝒜)=(Z,𝒜)\Gamma(Z,\mathcal{A})=\ell^{\infty}(Z,\mathcal{A}). Then from Definition 2.3, it gives rise to the Roe algebra with coefficients in 𝒜\mathcal{A} without twist. In particular, when 𝒜=𝒦\mathcal{A}=\mathcal{K}, the twisted Roe algebra is the Roe algebra C(Z)C^{*}(Z).

Example 2.5.

Let ZZ be a metric space with bounded geometry, and 𝒦\mathcal{K} the algebra of all compact operators. Consider the coarse ZZ-algebra Γ(Z,𝒦)=C0(Z,𝒦)(Z,𝒦)\Gamma(Z,\mathcal{K})=C_{0}(Z,\mathcal{K})\subseteq\ell^{\infty}(Z,\mathcal{K}) over ZZ with fiber 𝒦\mathcal{K}. In fact, for any partial translation v:DRv:D\to R, v(f)v_{*}(f) is still a C0C_{0}-function. We take Z^=Z\widehat{Z}=Z since ZZ itself is countable. We have that Z,𝒜=2(Z,𝒦)\mathcal{H}_{Z,\mathcal{A}}=\ell^{2}(Z,\mathcal{K}).

For any fixed R>0R>0, let ER={(x,y):d(x,y)R}E_{R}=\left\{(x,y):d(x,y)\leq R\right\}. Since ZZ has bounded geometry, for any RR, we have a decomposition of ER=iNEiE_{R}=\bigsqcup_{i}^{N}E^{i} for some NN\in\mathbb{N}, such that

  1. (1)

    for each 1iN1\leq i\leq N, xZx\in Z, there exists at most one yZy\in Z such that (x,y)Ei(x,y)\in E^{i};

  2. (2)

    for each 1iN1\leq i\leq N, yZy\in Z, there exists at most one xZx\in Z such that (x,y)Ei(x,y)\in E^{i}.

For each EiE^{i}, we define

Di={x:there existsyZ such that (x,y)Ei}D^{i}=\{x:~{}\mbox{there~{}exists}~{}y\in Z\mbox{~{}such~{}that~{}}(x,y)\in E^{i}\}

and

Ri={y:there existsxZ such that (x,y)Ei}.R^{i}=\{y:~{}\mbox{there~{}exists}~{}x\in Z\mbox{~{}such~{}that~{}}(x,y)\in E^{i}\}.

A partial isometry vi:DiRiv^{i}:D^{i}\to R^{i} can be defined by vi(x)=yv^{i}(x)=y if (x,y)Ei(x,y)\in E^{i}, for all xDix\in D^{i}.

For any operator TCC0(Z,𝒦)(Z,𝒦)T\in C^{*}_{C_{0}(Z,\mathcal{K})}(Z,\mathcal{K}) with propagation less than RR, we obtain a decomposition T=iTiT=\sum_{i}T^{i}, where

Ti(x,y)={T(x,y)if (x,y)Ei0 otherwise.T^{i}(x,y)=\begin{cases}T(x,y)&\text{if }(x,y)\in E^{i}\\ 0&\text{~{}otherwise}.\end{cases}

Moreover, we can define ξi(x)=Ti(x,y)\xi^{i}(x)=T^{i}(x,y) for all xDix\in D^{i} and zero otherwise. Then, we have that Ti=ξiviT^{i}=\xi^{i}v^{i}. By definition, each element ξiC0(Z,𝒦)\xi^{i}\in C_{0}(Z,\mathcal{K}), and we can view it as a compact operator over the 𝒦\mathcal{K}-module 2(Z,𝒦)\ell^{2}(Z,\mathcal{K}). As a result, we have that

CC0(Z,𝒦)(Z,𝒦)𝒦(2(Z))×𝒦.C^{*}_{C_{0}(Z,\mathcal{K})}(Z,\mathcal{K})\cong\mathcal{K}(\ell^{2}(Z))\times\mathcal{K}.

Example 2.5 can be viewed as a coarse analogue of the identity C0(Γ,𝒦)Γ𝒦(2(Γ))𝒦𝒦C_{0}(\Gamma,\mathcal{K})\rtimes\Gamma\cong\mathcal{K}(\ell^{2}(\Gamma))\otimes\mathcal{K}\cong\mathcal{K} for a countable discrete group Γ\Gamma.

Example 2.6.

Let ZZ be a metric space with bounded geometry. Take 𝒜=𝒦\mathcal{A}=\mathcal{K} and ur(Z,𝒦)\ell^{\infty}_{\rm ur}(Z,\mathcal{K}) be the CC^{*}-subalgebra of (Z,𝒦)\ell^{\infty}(Z,\mathcal{K}) generated by all functions ξ:Z𝒦\xi:Z\to\mathcal{K} such that each ξ(x)\xi(x) is of finite rank and

supxXrank(ξ(x))<.\sup_{x\in X}\text{rank}(\xi(x))<\infty.

One can check that ur(Z,𝒦)\ell^{\infty}_{\rm ur}(Z,\mathcal{K}) is indeed a coarse ZZ-algebra. In this case, ur(Z,𝒦)[Z,𝒦]\mathbb{C}_{\ell^{\infty}_{\rm ur}(Z,\mathcal{K})}[Z,\mathcal{K}] is a subalgebra of [Z]\mathbb{C}[Z] consists of all T[Z]T\in\mathbb{C}[Z] such that TT can be approximated by a uniformly finite rank operator SS in norm, i.e.,

supx,yXrank(S(x,y))<.\sup_{x,y\in X}{\rm rank}(S(x,y))<\infty.

Then Cur(Z,𝒦)(Z,𝒦)C^{*}_{\ell^{\infty}_{\rm ur}(Z,\mathcal{K})}(Z,\mathcal{K}) is isomorphic to the uniform algebra UC(Z)UC^{*}(Z) (cf. [13, Definition 4.1]).

The twisted Roe algebras are invariant under coarse equivalence in the following sense:

Theorem 2.7.

Let MM and NN be proper metric spaces, and ZZ a metric spaces with bounded geometry. Let Γ(Z,𝒜)\Gamma(Z,\mathcal{A}) be a coarse ZZ-algebra. If there is a diagram

M{M}N{N}Z{Z}h\scriptstyle{h}f\scriptstyle{f}g\scriptstyle{g}

such that f,g,hf,g,h are coarse equivalences and the diagram commutes up to closeness, then hh induces a canonical CC^{*}-isomorphism

h:CΓ(Z,𝒜)(M,𝒜)CΓ(Z,𝒜)(N,𝒜).h_{*}:C_{\Gamma(Z,\mathcal{A})}^{*}(M,\mathcal{A})\xrightarrow{\cong}C_{\Gamma(Z,\mathcal{A})}^{*}(N,\mathcal{A}).

The proof is similar to the classic case (cf. [14, Lemma 5.1.12, Remark 5.1.13]). The key point is that the coefficient algebra 𝒜\mathcal{A} is assumed to be stable.

The following definition is introduced in [9].

Definition 2.8 (Coarse fibration structure).

Fix a metric space ZZ. A metric space XX is said to have a coarse ZZ-fibration structure if there exists a metric space YY (called the base space) and a surjective map p:XYp:X\to Y satisfying the following conditions:

  • (1)

    the map pp is bornologous (or uniformly expansive), i.e., for any R>0R>0, there exists S>0S>0 such that dY(p(x),p(x))Sd_{Y}(p(x),p(x^{\prime}))\leq S whenever dX(x,x)Rd_{X}(x,x^{\prime})\leq R;

  • (2)

    the family of fiber spaces {Zy}\{Z_{y}\} is uniformly coarse equivalent to ZZ, where Zy=p1(y)XZ_{y}=p^{-1}(y)\subseteq X is the fiber and {ϕy:ZyZ}yY\{\phi_{y}:Z_{y}\to Z\}_{y\in Y} is the family of coarse equivalences;

  • (3)

    for any R>0R>0, the family of maps {ϕy,R:p1(BY(y,R))Z}yY\{\phi_{y,R}:p^{-1}(B_{Y}(y,R))\to Z\}_{y\in Y} defined by for each yYy\in Y, xZyx\in Z_{y^{\prime}} and yB(y,R)y^{\prime}\in B(y,R),

    ϕy,R(x)=ϕy(x),\phi_{y,R}(x)=\phi_{y^{\prime}}(x),

    still forms a family of uniform coarse equivalence.

Such a space is also denoted by ZX𝑝YZ\to X\xrightarrow{p}Y.

Example 2.9.

If XX and YY are metric spaces, then the product space X×YX\times Y has both coarse XX-fibration structure and coarse YY-fibration structure. One can denote these two structures respectively by

XX×YpYYandYX×YpXX.X\to X\times Y\xrightarrow{p_{Y}}Y\quad\text{and}\quad Y\to X\times Y\xrightarrow{p_{X}}X.
Example 2.10.

Let 1NGQ11\to N\to G\to Q\to 1 be an extension of finitely generated groups. The group GG is equipped with a left-invariant word length metric. Then NN is equipped with the induced metric of GG and QQ is equipped with the quotient metric. One can check that GG has a coarse NN-fibration structure with base space QQ.

Let XX, YY and ZZ be metric spaces with bounded geometry, and let ZXYZ\to X\to Y be a coarse ZZ-fibration. By Definition 2.8, there exists ϕy:ZyZ\phi_{y}:Z_{y}\to Z a coarse equivalence for each yYy\in Y. Let Γ(Z,𝒜)\Gamma(Z,\mathcal{A}) be a coarse ZZ-algebra. This twisted coefficient algebra induces a twisted coefficient algebra on XX, which can be seen as a coarse analogue of the induction representation for groups, see [10]. For each yYy\in Y, we define

Γ(Zy,𝒜)={ξ(Zy,𝒜)|(ϕy)(ξ)Θ(Z,𝒜)},\Gamma(Z_{y},\mathcal{A})=\left\{\xi\in\ell^{\infty}(Z_{y},\mathcal{A})\ \Big{|}\ (\phi_{y})_{*}(\xi)\in\Theta(Z,\mathcal{A})\right\}, (1)

where for any ξ(Zy,𝒜)\xi\in\ell^{\infty}(Z_{y},\mathcal{A}), the function (ϕy)(ξ)(Z,𝒜)(\phi_{y})_{*}(\xi)\in\ell^{\infty}(Z,\mathcal{A}) is defined by

((ϕy)(ξ))(z)=ψ(xϕy1(z)ξ(x))𝒜,((\phi_{y})_{*}(\xi))(z)=\psi\left(\bigoplus_{x\in\phi^{-1}_{y}(z)}\xi(x)\right)\in\mathcal{A},

where ψ:𝒦(2(Zy))𝒜𝒜\psi:\mathcal{K}(\ell^{2}(Z_{y}))\otimes\mathcal{A}\to\mathcal{A} is an isomorphism. Since XX has bounded geometry and ϕy\phi_{y} is a coarse equivalence, this direct sum xϕy1(z)ξ(x)\bigoplus_{x\in\phi^{-1}_{y}(z)}\xi(x) is finite which defines an element in 𝒦(2(Zy))𝒜\mathcal{K}(\ell^{2}(Z_{y}))\otimes\mathcal{A}, thus (ϕy)(ξ)(\phi_{y})_{*}(\xi) is well-defined. Define the induced coarse XX-algebra associated with Θ(Z,𝒜)\Theta(Z,\mathcal{A}) to be

ΘindZ(X,𝒜)=yYΘ(Zy,𝒜).\Theta_{ind}^{Z}(X,\mathcal{A})=\bigoplus_{y\in Y}\Theta(Z_{y},\mathcal{A}).

Since X=yYZyX=\bigsqcup_{y\in Y}Z_{y} as a set, we can view an element in ΘindZ(X,𝒜)\Theta_{ind}^{Z}(X,\mathcal{A}) as an \ell^{\infty}-function from XX to 𝒜\mathcal{A}.

We now prove that ΘindZ(X,𝒜)\Theta_{ind}^{Z}(X,\mathcal{A}) is a coarse XX-algebra. For any partial translation v:DRv:D\to R on XX and any element ξΘindZ(X,𝒜)\xi\in\Theta_{ind}^{Z}(X,\mathcal{A}) with supp(ξ)D\textup{supp}(\xi)\subseteq D, by definition, one has that

(v(ξ))(x)=ξ(v(x)).(v_{*}(\xi))(x)=\xi(v(x)).

Since vv is a partial translation, there exists R>0R>0 such that d(x,v(x))Rd(x,v(x))\leq R for any xDx\in D. As p:XYp:X\to Y is bornologous, there exists SS such that dY(p(x),p(v(x)))Sd_{Y}(p(x),p(v(x)))\leq S. Thus if we view ξ\xi as a C0C_{0}-function from YY to yYΘ(Zy,𝒜)\bigsqcup_{y\in Y}\Theta(Z_{y},\mathcal{A}), we define the ε\varepsilon-support of ξ\xi to be

suppε(ξ)={yYξZyε}.\textup{supp}_{\varepsilon}(\xi)=\{y\in Y\mid\|\xi_{Z_{y}}\|_{\infty}\geq\varepsilon\}.

Then the ε\varepsilon-support of v(ξ)v_{*}(\xi) is totally contained in BY(suppε(ξ),S)B_{Y}(\textup{supp}_{\varepsilon}(\xi),S), as a result, v(ξ)|Zy0\|v_{*}(\xi)|_{Z_{y}}\|_{\infty}\to 0 as yy\to\infty.

On the other hand, for such a partial translation v:DRv:D\to R, we denoted by Ry=ZyRR_{y}=Z_{y}\cap R for each yYy\in Y. We denote

Dyy={v1(x)xRy}ZyD_{y^{\prime}y}=\{v^{-1}(x)\mid x\in R_{y}\}\cap Z_{y^{\prime}}

Define vyyv_{y^{\prime}y} to be the restriction of vv on DyyD_{y^{\prime}y}. For each vyyv_{y^{\prime}y} and ξΘindZ(X,𝒜)\xi\in\Theta_{ind}^{Z}(X,\mathcal{A}), one can check that (vyy)(ξ|Dyy)(v_{y^{\prime}y})^{*}(\xi|_{D_{y^{\prime}y}}) indeed defines an element in Θ(Zy,𝒜)\Theta(Z_{y},\mathcal{A}) using condition (3) in Definition 2.8. Since vv is a partial translation, there are only finitely many yy^{\prime} such that DyyD_{y^{\prime}y} is nonempty. This proves that ΘindZ(X,𝒜)\Theta_{ind}^{Z}(X,\mathcal{A}) is a coarse XX-algebra, and its completion is denoted by ΓindZ(X,𝒜)\Gamma_{ind}^{Z}(X,\mathcal{A}). We can then define the twisted Roe algebra of XX.

Theorem 2.11 (Coarse imprimitivity theorem).

Let ZXYZ\to X\to Y be a coarse ZZ-fibration metric space such that XX and YY have bounded geometry. For any coarse ZZ-algebra Γ(Z,𝒜)\Gamma(Z,\mathcal{A}), the following two CC^{*}-algebras are Morita equivalent:

CΓindZ(X,𝒜)(X,𝒜)MoritaCΓ(X,𝒜)(Z,𝒜).C_{\Gamma_{ind}^{Z}(X,\mathcal{A})}^{*}(X,\mathcal{A})\sim_{\text{Morita}}C_{\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A})}^{*}(Z,\mathcal{A}).
Proof.

Let X,𝒜=2(X,𝒜)=yY2(Zy,𝒜)\mathcal{H}_{X,\mathcal{A}}=\ell^{2}(X,\mathcal{A})=\bigoplus_{y\in Y}\ell^{2}(Z_{y},\mathcal{A}) be the geometric XX-module. The geometric module of ZyZ_{y} is given by y,𝒜=2(Zy,𝒜)\mathcal{H}_{y,\mathcal{A}}=\ell^{2}(Z_{y},\mathcal{A}), therefore we can write X,𝒜=yYy,𝒜\mathcal{H}_{X,\mathcal{A}}=\bigoplus_{y\in Y}\mathcal{H}_{y,\mathcal{A}}. Since ϕy:ZyZ\phi_{y}:Z_{y}\to Z is a coarse equivalence, by Theorem 2.7, one can find a covering unitary

Uy:y,𝒜Z,𝒜=2(Z,𝒜),U_{y}:\mathcal{H}_{y,\mathcal{A}}\to\mathcal{H}_{Z,\mathcal{A}}=\ell^{2}(Z,\mathcal{A}), (2)

and (ϕy)=Ad(Uy)(\phi_{y})_{*}=Ad(U_{y}) induces a CC^{*}-isomorphism between Θ(Z,𝒜)[Z,𝒜]\mathbb{C}_{\Theta(Z,\mathcal{A})}[Z,\mathcal{A}] and Θ(Zy,𝒜)[Zy,𝒜]\mathbb{C}_{\Theta(Z_{y},\mathcal{A})}[Z_{y},\mathcal{A}]. Define the inclusion

Wy:Hy,𝒜X,𝒜,W_{y}:H_{y,\mathcal{A}}\to\mathcal{H}_{X,\mathcal{A}}, (3)

Then for each yYy\in Y, the algebra Θ(Z,𝒜)[Z,𝒜]\mathbb{C}_{\Theta(Z,\mathcal{A})}[Z,\mathcal{A}] can be seen as a subalgebra of ΘindZ(X,𝒜)[X,𝒜]\mathbb{C}_{\Theta_{ind}^{Z}(X,\mathcal{A})}[X,\mathcal{A}] under the conjugation of the isometry

Vy=WyUy:Z,𝒜X,𝒜.V_{y}=W_{y}\circ U_{y}^{*}:\mathcal{H}_{Z,\mathcal{A}}\to\mathcal{H}_{X,\mathcal{A}}. (4)

Fix yYy\in Y. Take

Py:X,𝒜y,𝒜P_{y}:\mathcal{H}_{X,\mathcal{A}}\to\mathcal{H}_{y,\mathcal{A}}

be the canonical projection onto y,𝒜\mathcal{H}_{y,\mathcal{A}}. By definition, the propagation of PyP_{y} is exactly 0. Thus PyP_{y} is a multiplier of CΓindZ(X,𝒜)(X,𝒜)C^{*}_{\Gamma^{Z}_{ind}(X,\mathcal{A})}(X,\mathcal{A}). Moreover, one also has that

PyΘindZ(X,𝒜)[X,𝒜]Py=Θ(Zy,𝒜)[Zy,𝒜]Θ(Z,𝒜)[Z,𝒜].P_{y}\cdot\mathbb{C}_{\Theta_{ind}^{Z}(X,\mathcal{A})}[X,\mathcal{A}]\cdot P_{y}=\mathbb{C}_{\Theta(Z_{y},\mathcal{A})}[Z_{y},\mathcal{A}]\cong\mathbb{C}_{\Theta(Z,\mathcal{A})}[Z,\mathcal{A}].

Thus Θ(Z,𝒜)[Z,𝒜]\mathbb{C}_{\Theta(Z,\mathcal{A})}[Z,\mathcal{A}] can be seen as a corner of ΘindZ(X,𝒜)[X,𝒜]\mathbb{C}_{\Theta_{ind}^{Z}(X,\mathcal{A})}[X,\mathcal{A}]. Then it suffices to show for fixed yYy\in Y this corner is full, see [3] or [14, Defintion 1.7.9].

For any fixed R>0R>0 and a finite subset KYK\subseteq Y, we shall denote ΘindZ(p1(K),𝒜)[X,𝒜]R\mathbb{C}_{\Theta_{ind}^{Z}(p^{-1}(K),\mathcal{A})}[X,\mathcal{A}]_{R} the subalgebra of ΘindZ(X,𝒜)[X,𝒜]\mathbb{C}_{\Theta_{ind}^{Z}(X,\mathcal{A})}[X,\mathcal{A}] consisting of all functions T:X×X𝒜T:X\times X\to\mathcal{A} satisfying that

  • Prop(T)R\textup{Prop}(T)\leq R;

  • for any partial translation v:DRv:D\to R, TvyKΘ(Zy,𝒜)T^{v}\in\bigoplus_{y\in K}\Theta(Z_{y},\mathcal{A}).

It suffices to show

ΘindZ(p1(K),𝒜)[X,𝒜]RΘindZ(X,𝒜)[X,𝒜]PyΘindZ(X,𝒜)[X,𝒜],\mathbb{C}_{\Theta_{ind}^{Z}(p^{-1}(K),\mathcal{A})}[X,\mathcal{A}]_{R}\subseteq\mathbb{C}_{\Theta_{ind}^{Z}(X,\mathcal{A})}[X,\mathcal{A}]\cdot P_{y}\cdot\mathbb{C}_{\Theta_{ind}^{Z}(X,\mathcal{A})}[X,\mathcal{A}], (5)

where for any R0R\geq 0 and KYK\subseteq Y a compact subset. Since p:XYp:X\to Y is bornologous, there exists S>0S>0 such that dY(p(x),p(x))Sd_{Y}(p(x),p(x^{\prime}))\leq S for any (x,x)ΔR(x,x^{\prime})\in\Delta_{R}. Denoted by K=B(K,S)YK^{\prime}=B(K,S)\subseteq Y the SS-neighbourhood of KK in YY. Then by definition, for any TΘindZ(p1(K),𝒜)[X,𝒜]RT\in\mathbb{C}_{\Theta_{ind}^{Z}(p^{-1}(K),\mathcal{A})}[X,\mathcal{A}]_{R}, one has that T(x,y)=0T(x,y)=0 whenever p(x)Kp(x)\notin K. Since the propagation of TT is less than RR, the support of TT stands in p1(K)×p1(K)p^{-1}(K)\times p^{-1}(K^{\prime}). Since YY has bounded geometry, there are only finitely many fibers we need to consider. For any y1,y2Ky_{1},y_{2}\in K^{\prime}, we define

Ty1,y2=Wy1TWy2,T_{y_{1},y_{2}}=W^{*}_{y_{1}}TW_{y_{2}},

where WyW_{y} is defined as in (3). One can see that Ty1,y2T_{y_{1},y_{2}} is equal to Py1TPy2P_{y_{1}}TP_{y_{2}} as an operator form y2,𝒜\mathcal{H}_{y_{2},\mathcal{A}} to y1,𝒜\mathcal{H}_{y_{1},\mathcal{A}}. Thus TT can be written as a finite sum of {Ty1,y2}y1,y2K\{T_{y_{1},y_{2}}\}_{y_{1},y_{2}\in K^{\prime}}. Then it suffices to show such an element Ty1,y2T_{y_{1},y_{2}} belongs to the right side in (5). Let Uy1U_{y_{1}} be the unitary defined as in (2), then by the condition (3) in Definition 2.3, one can see that

Sy1,y2=Uy1Ty1,y2Uy2Θ(Z,𝒜)[Z,𝒜].S_{y_{1},y_{2}}=U_{y_{1}}\cdot T_{y_{1},y_{2}}\cdot U^{*}_{y_{2}}\in\mathbb{C}_{\Theta(Z,\mathcal{A})}[Z,\mathcal{A}].

Without loss of generality, we may assume that Sy1,y2S_{y_{1},y_{2}} is positive. Take Sy1,y21/2S^{1/2}_{y_{1},y_{2}} to be its square root. Then

Vy1Sy1,y21/2VyandVySy1,y21/2Vy2V_{y_{1}}\cdot S^{1/2}_{y_{1},y_{2}}\cdot V^{*}_{y}\quad\text{and}\quad V_{y}\cdot S^{1/2}_{y_{1},y_{2}}\cdot V^{*}_{y_{2}}

defines two elements in ΘindZ(X,𝒜)[X,𝒜]\mathbb{C}_{\Theta_{ind}^{Z}(X,\mathcal{A})}[X,\mathcal{A}] (by the condition (3) in Definition 2.3), where VyV_{y} is defined as in (4). Notice that PyVy=VyP_{y}V_{y}=V_{y} and WyWy=PyW_{y}W^{*}_{y}=P_{y}, one can then compute that

Vy1Sy1,y21/2VyPyVySy1,y21/2Vy2=Vy1Sy1,y2Vy2=Wy1Uy1Uy1Ty1,y2Uy2Uy2Wy2=Wy1Wy1TWy2Wy2=Py1TPy2=Ty1,y2.\begin{split}V_{y_{1}}\cdot S^{1/2}_{y_{1},y_{2}}\cdot V^{*}_{y}\cdot P_{y}\cdot V_{y}\cdot S^{1/2}_{y_{1},y_{2}}\cdot V^{*}_{y_{2}}&=V_{y_{1}}\cdot S_{y_{1},y_{2}}\cdot V^{*}_{y_{2}}\\ &=W_{y_{1}}U_{y_{1}}^{*}\cdot U_{y_{1}}\cdot T_{y_{1},y_{2}}\cdot U^{*}_{y_{2}}\cdot U_{y_{2}}W^{*}_{y_{2}}\\ &=W_{y_{1}}W^{*}_{y_{1}}TW_{y_{2}}W^{*}_{y_{2}}=P_{y_{1}}TP_{y_{2}}=T_{y_{1},y_{2}}.\end{split}

This finishes the proof. ∎

Remark 2.12.

Example 2.5 can be viewed as a special case of Theorem 2.11. In fact, we consider the coarse fibration given by {pt}XX\{pt\}\to X\to X. The coapct operators 𝒦\mathcal{K} forms a coefficient algebra of a single point {pt}\{pt\}, in this case, the twisted Roe algebra for {pt}\{pt\} is 𝒦\mathcal{K}. The induced coarse XX-algebra is given by C0(X,𝒦)C_{0}(X,\mathcal{K}) by definition. Since the twisted Roe algebra admits a countable approximate unit, then CC0(X,𝒦)(X,𝒦)C_{C_{0}(X,\mathcal{K})}^{*}(X,\mathcal{K}) is stable isomorphic to 𝒦\mathcal{K} by [3].

3. The coarse Baum-Connes conjecture and coarsely proper algebras

In this section, we shall introduce the twisted version of the coarse Baum-Connes conjecture. In [8], a notion of coarsely proper algebra was introduced to give a conceptual framework for the geometric Dirac-dual-Dirac method. In this section, we will understand the coarsely proper algebra from the perspective of coarse XX-algebras.

Let XX be a metric space with bounded geometry, 𝒜\mathcal{A} a stable CC^{*}-algebra, and Γ(X,𝒜)\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A}) be a coarse XX-algebra. Let MM be a metric space with coarse equivalence f:MXf:M\to X.

Definition 3.1 (Twisted localization algebra).

The algebraic localization algebra of MM with twisted coefficient in Θ(X,𝒜)\Theta(X,\mathcal{A}), denoted by L,Θ(X,𝒜)[M,𝒜]\mathbb{C}_{L,\Theta(X,\mathcal{A})}[M,\mathcal{A}], is defined to be the *-algebra of all uniformly bounded and uniformly continuous functions g:+Θ(X,𝒜)[M,𝒜]g:\mathbb{R}_{+}\to\mathbb{C}_{\Theta(X,\mathcal{A})}[M,\mathcal{A}] such that

Prop(g(t))0ast.\textup{Prop}(g(t))\to 0\quad\text{as}\quad t\to\infty.

The twisted localization algebra CL,Γ(X,𝒜)(M,𝒜)C^{*}_{L,\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A})}(M,\mathcal{A}) is defined to be the completion of L,Θ(X,𝒜)[M,𝒜]\mathbb{C}_{L,\Theta(X,\mathcal{A})}[M,\mathcal{A}] under the norm

g=supt[0,)g(t),\|g\|=\sup_{t\in[0,\infty)}\|g(t)\|,

for all gL,Θ(X,𝒜)[M,𝒜]g\in\mathbb{C}_{L,\Theta(X,\mathcal{A})}[M,\mathcal{A}].

There exists a canonical evaluation map

ev:CL,Γ(X,𝒜)(M,𝒜)CΓ(X,𝒜)(M,𝒜),gg(0).ev:C^{*}_{L,\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A})}(M,\mathcal{A})\to C^{*}_{\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A})}(M,\mathcal{A}),~{}~{}g\mapsto g(0).

The ecaluation-at-zero map induces a *-homomorphism

ev:K(CL,Γ(X,𝒜)(M,𝒜))K(CΓ(X,𝒜)(M,𝒜)).ev_{*}:K_{*}(C^{*}_{L,\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A})}(M,\mathcal{A}))\to K_{*}(C^{*}_{\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A})}(M,\mathcal{A})).
Definition 3.2 (Rips complex).

Let XX be a discrete metric space with bounded geometry. For each d0d\geq 0, the Rips complex Pd(X)P_{d}(X) at scale dd is defined to be the simplicial polyhedron in which the set of vertices is XX, and a finite subset {x0,x1,,xn}X\{x_{0},x_{1},\cdots,x_{n}\}\subseteq X spans a simplex if and only if d(xi,xj)dd(x_{i},x_{j})\leq d for all 0i,jn0\leq i,j\leq n.

There exists a canonical semi-spherical metric on the Rips complex defined as in [14, Definition 7.2.8]. Under this metric, one can check that (P0(X),dP0)(P_{0}(X),d_{P_{0}}) identifies isometrically with (X,d)(X,d) and the canonical inclusion id:XPd(X)i_{d}:X\to P_{d}(X) is a coarse equivalence for each d0d\geq 0, see [14, Proposition 7.2.11] for details. Choose a coarse inverse map fd:Pd(X)Xf_{d}:P_{d}(X)\to X of idi_{d}. We can then define the twisted localization (Roe) algebra of the Rips complex associated with Θ(X,𝒜)\Theta(X,\mathcal{A}).

If d<dd<d^{\prime}, then Pd(X)P_{d}(X) is included in Pd(X)P_{d^{\prime}}(X) as a subcomplex via a simplicial map. Passing to the inductive limit, we obtain the twisted assembly map

μΓ(X,𝒜):limdK(CL,Γ(X,𝒜)(Pd(X),𝒜))K(CΓ(X,𝒜)(X,𝒜)).\mu_{\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A})}:\lim_{d\to\infty}K_{*}(C^{*}_{L,\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A})}(P_{d}(X),\mathcal{A}))\to K_{*}(C_{\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A})}^{*}(X,\mathcal{A})). (6)
Conjecture 1 (Twisted coarse Baum-Connes conjecture with coefficients/𝐂𝐁𝐂𝐜𝐨𝐞𝐟{\bf CBCcoef\ }).

Let XX be a metric space with bounded geometry. Then for any coarse XX-algebra Γ(X,𝒜)\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A}), the twisted assembly map μΓ(X,𝒜)\mu_{\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A})} is an isomorphism.

For brevity, we shall write Conjecture 1 by 𝐂𝐁𝐂𝐜𝐨𝐞𝐟{\bf CBCcoef\ } in this this paper. If we take Γ(X,𝒜)=(X,𝒜)\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A})=\ell^{\infty}(X,\mathcal{A}), then the twisted assembly map is exactly the classic Baum-Connes assembly map with coefficients in any CC^{*}-algerbas. Thus, the Conjecture 1 is stronger than the classic coarse Baum-Connes conjecture.

In the rest of this section, we will introduce a coarse analogue of the generalized Green-Julg’s theorem.

Definition 3.3.

A coarse XX-algebra Γ(X,𝒜)\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A}) is called coarsely proper if there exist a locally compact, Hausdorff space ZZ such that 𝒜\mathcal{A} is a ZZ-algebra, and a map f:XZf:X\to Z such that

  • (1)

    for each R>0R>0 and xXx\in X, there exists a neighborhood Ox,RZO_{x,R}\subseteq Z of f(x)f(x) such that

    • (i)

      Ox,ROx,RO_{x,R}\subseteq O_{x,R^{\prime}} for all R<RR<R^{\prime} and R>0Ox,R\bigcup_{R>0}O_{x,R} is dense in ZZ for each xXx\in X;

    • (ii)

      ρ:++\exists\rho:\mathbb{R}_{+}\to\mathbb{R}_{+} such that Ox,ROx,ρ(d(x,x))+RO_{x,R}\subseteq O_{x^{\prime},\rho(d(x,x^{\prime}))+R} for any x,xXx,x^{\prime}\in X;

    • (iii)

      Ox,ROx,R=O_{x,R}\cap O_{x^{\prime},R}=\emptyset whenever d(x,x)2Rd(x,x^{\prime})\geq 2R;

  • (2)

    Θ(X,𝒜)=R0Θ(X,𝒜)R\Theta(X,\mathcal{A})=\bigcup_{R\geq 0}\Theta(X,\mathcal{A})_{R} is dense in Γ(X,𝒜)\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A}), where

    Θ(X,𝒜)R={ξΘ(X,𝒜)supp(ξ(x))Ox,RZ}\Theta(X,\mathcal{A})_{R}=\{\xi\in\Theta(X,\mathcal{A})\mid\textup{supp}(\xi(x))\subseteq O_{x,R}\subseteq Z\}

    is an ideal of Θ(X,𝒜)\Theta(X,\mathcal{A}).

Example 3.4.

Let XX be a metric space with bounded geometry that admits a coarse embedding into a Hilbert space. Say f:Xf:X\to\mathcal{H} is a coarse embedding. Let 𝒜()\mathcal{A}(\mathcal{H}) be the algebra introduced in [16, Section 5], which is a ×+\mathcal{H}\times\mathbb{R}_{+}-algebra. We shall use the notation in [16, Section 5]. Define

Ox,R={(η,t)×+ηf(x)2+t2ρ(R)2},O_{x,R}=\{(\eta,t)\in\mathcal{H}\times\mathbb{R}_{+}\mid\|\eta-f(x)\|^{2}+t^{2}\leq\rho_{-}(R)^{2}\},

where ρ\rho_{-} is the lower controlling function associated with the coarse embedding ff and Γ(X,𝒜()𝒦)R\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A}(\mathcal{H})\otimes\mathcal{K})_{R} to be the CC^{*}-algebra consisting of all functions ξ:X𝒜()𝒦\xi:X\to\mathcal{A}(\mathcal{H})\otimes\mathcal{K} such that

  • (1)

    supp(ξ(x))Ox,R\textup{supp}(\xi(x))\subseteq O_{x,R} for all xXx\in X;

  • (2)

    N\exists N\in\mathbb{N} such that ξ(x)β(𝒜(WN(x)))\xi(x)\in\beta(\mathcal{A}(W_{N}(x))), where β\beta is the Bott map as in [11];

  • (3)

    K0\exists K\geq 0 such that ηaxK\|\nabla_{\eta}a_{x}\|\leq K for any xXx\in X, ηWN(x)\eta\in W_{N}(x) with norm 11 and ax𝒜(WN(x))a_{x}\in\mathcal{A}(W_{N}(x)) such that β(ax)=ξ(x)\beta(a_{x})=\xi(x).

Define

Θ(X,𝒜()𝒦)=R0Θ(X,𝒜()𝒦)R.\Theta(X,\mathcal{A}(\mathcal{H})\otimes\mathcal{K})=\bigcup_{R\geq 0}\Theta(X,\mathcal{A}(\mathcal{H})\otimes\mathcal{K})_{R}.

It is obvious that Θ(X,𝒜()𝒦)\Theta(X,\mathcal{A}(\mathcal{H})\otimes\mathcal{K}) is indeed an algebraic coarse XX-algebra. Indeed, for any partial translation vv with Prop(v)R\textup{Prop}(v)\leq R^{\prime} and ξΘ(X,𝒜()𝒦)R\xi\in\Theta(X,\mathcal{A}(\mathcal{H})\otimes\mathcal{K})_{R}, since ff is a coarse embedding, there exists some S>0S>0 associated with ff such that v(ξ)Θ(X,𝒜()𝒦)R+Sv^{*}(\xi)\in\Theta(X,\mathcal{A}(\mathcal{H})\otimes\mathcal{K})_{R+S}. Therefore, the completion Γ(X,𝒜()𝒦)\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A}(\mathcal{H})\otimes\mathcal{K}) of Θ(X,𝒜()𝒦)\Theta(X,\mathcal{A}(\mathcal{H})\otimes\mathcal{K}) is a coarse XX-algebra.

It seems that the coarsely proper algebra defined in Definition 3.3 is different from the one in [8, Definition 3.1], however, we will point out that they are actually the same.

Remark 3.5.

Recall that in [8], a CC^{*}-algebra 𝒜\mathcal{A} is a coarsely proper algebra associated with the coarse embedding f:XYf:X\to Y, if there is a locally compact, second countable, Hausdorff space ZZ such that 𝒜\mathcal{A} is a ZZ-CC^{*}-algebra and a map φ:YZ\varphi:Y\to Z such that for each xXx\in X and R>0R>0, there exists an open set Ox,RZO_{x,R}\subseteq Z such that

  • (1)

    Ox,Rφ(Y)=φ(BY(f(x),R))O_{x,R}\cap\varphi(Y)=\varphi(B_{Y}(f(x),R)), Ox,ROx,RO_{x,R}\subseteq O_{x,R^{\prime}} for all R<RR<R^{\prime} and R>0Ox,R\bigcup_{R>0}O_{x,R} is dense in ZZ for each xXx\in X;

  • (2)

    for a sequence {BY(f(xi),R)}iI\{B_{Y}(f(x_{i}),R)\}_{i\in I} with BY(f(xi),R)BY(f(xj),R)=B_{Y}(f(x_{i}),R)\cap B_{Y}(f(x_{j}),R)=\emptyset for any iji\neq j, the corresponding sequence of open set {Oxi,R}\{O_{x_{i},R}\} also satisfies that Oxi,ROxj,R=O_{x_{i},R}\cap O_{x_{j},R}=\emptyset for any iji\neq j.

If a CC^{*}-algebra 𝒜\mathcal{A} is coarsely proper in the sense of [8], for each R>0R>0, we can define Θ(X,𝒜𝒦)R(X,𝒜𝒦)\Theta(X,\mathcal{A}\otimes\mathcal{K})_{R}\subseteq\ell^{\infty}(X,\mathcal{A}\otimes\mathcal{K}) to be the set consisting of all functions ξ:X𝒜𝒦\xi:X\to\mathcal{A}\otimes\mathcal{K} such that ξ(x)𝒜Ox,R𝒦\xi(x)\subseteq\mathcal{A}_{O_{x,R}}\otimes\mathcal{K}, where 𝒜Ox,R\mathcal{A}_{O_{x,R}} is the ideal of 𝒜\mathcal{A} consisting of all elements aa with supp(a)Ox,R\textup{supp}(a)\subseteq O_{x,R}. Then

Θ(X,𝒜𝒦)=R0Θ(X,𝒜𝒦)R\Theta(X,\mathcal{A}\otimes\mathcal{K})=\bigcup_{R\geq 0}\Theta(X,\mathcal{A}\otimes\mathcal{K})_{R}

is a coarsely proper algebra in the sense of Definition 3.3. One can check that the completion Γ(X,𝒜𝒦)\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A}\otimes\mathcal{K}) of Θ(X,𝒜𝒦)\Theta(X,\mathcal{A}\otimes\mathcal{K}) is a coarse XX-algebra, since ff is a coarse embedding. The second condition in [8, Definition 3.1] guarantees that Θ(X,𝒜𝒦)\Theta(X,\mathcal{A}\otimes\mathcal{K}) satisfies the condition (2) in Definition 3.3.

The following result is a coarse analogue of Green Julg’s theorem that for any countable discrete group GG and any proper GG-CC^{*}-algebra AA, the Baum-Connes with coefficients in AA holds for GG.

Theorem 3.6.

Let Γ(X,𝒜)\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A}) be a coarsely proper XX-algebra. Then twisted assembly map

μΓ(X,𝒜):limdK(CL,Γ(X,𝒜)(Pd(X),𝒜))K(CΓ(X,𝒜)(X,𝒜))\mu_{\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A})}:\lim_{d\to\infty}K_{*}(C^{*}_{L,\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A})}(P_{d}(X),\mathcal{A}))\to K_{*}(C_{\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A})}^{*}(X,\mathcal{A}))

is an isomorphism.

Proof.

By Remark 3.5, if Γ(X,𝒜)\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A}) is a coarsely proper algebra, then Γ(X,𝒜)[X,𝒜]\mathbb{C}_{\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A})}[X,\mathcal{A}] is exactly the twisted Roe algebra introduced in [8]. Then it suffices to show that the twisted localization algebra CL,Γ(X,𝒜)(Pd(X),𝒜)C^{*}_{L,\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A})}(P_{d}(X),\mathcal{A}) has the same KK-theory with the twisted localization algebra defined as in [8]. Notice that in [8], a function gg in the twisted localization algebra should satisfy that supp(g(t)(x,y))Ox,R\textup{supp}(g(t)(x,y))\subseteq O_{x,R} for all t+t\in\mathbb{R}_{+} which makes it smaller than CL,Γ(X,𝒜)(X,𝒜)C^{*}_{L,\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A})}(X,\mathcal{A}) defined in Definition 3.1.

By the same arguments in [15, Proposition 3.7 and 3.11], one can show that the KK-theory of twisted localization algebras is invariant under strongly Lipschitz homotopy equivalence, and it also has Mayer-Vietoris sequence. Moreover, following the arguments in [15, Theorem 3.2] of induction on dimensions, we obtain that the K-theory of the two versions of twisted localization coincide.

For the induction on dimensions of simplicial complexes, we first need to show the two versions of twisted localization algebras have the same KK-theory for a 0-dimensional simplicial complex XX with bounded geometry. In this case, XX is a discrete space. It suffices to prove the canonical inclusion

limRCub(+,Γ(X,𝒜)R)Cub(+,Γ(X,𝒜))\lim_{R\to\infty}C_{ub}(\mathbb{R}_{+},\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A})_{R})\to C_{ub}(\mathbb{R}_{+},\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A}))

induces an isomorphism on KK-theory, where Cub(+,Γ(X,𝒜)R)C_{ub}(\mathbb{R}_{+},\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A})_{R}) and Cub(+,Γ(X,𝒜))C_{ub}(\mathbb{R}_{+},\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A})) are the CC^{*}-algebras of all uniformly continuous and bounded maps from the non-negative half real lines +\Re_{+} to Γ(X,𝒜)R\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A})_{R} and Cub(+,Γ(X,𝒜))C_{ub}(\mathbb{R}_{+},\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A})), respectively. Since 𝒜\mathcal{A} is assumed to be stable, then Γ(X,𝒜)R\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A})_{R} and Γ(X,𝒜)\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A}) are quasi-stable for each R0R\geq 0. By [14, Lemma 12.4.3], the evaluation map from Cub(+,Γ(X,𝒜))C_{ub}(\mathbb{R}_{+},\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A})) to Γ(X,𝒜)\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A}) is an isomorphism (similar for Γ(X,𝒜)R\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A})_{R}). Thus it suffices to show

limRΓ(X,𝒜)RΓ(X,𝒜)\lim_{R\to\infty}\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A})_{R}\to\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A})

induces an isomorphism on KK-theory. This holds directly from the fact that R0Θ(X,𝒜)R=Θ(X,𝒜)\bigcup_{R\geq 0}\Theta(X,\mathcal{A})_{R}=\Theta(X,\mathcal{A}).

For the inductive step, we can the decompose an (n+1)(n+1)-dimensional simplicial complex into two parts, following the decomposition in [15, Theorem 3.2]. Then, the result follows from the Mayer-Vietoris arguement. ∎

For uniform algebra in Example 2.6, the KK-theory of the associated localization algebra is some uniform version of the KK-homology group. The reader is referred to [12] for the uniform KK-homology and [6] for the homotopy invariance of the uniform KK-homology.

In [16], Yu showed that the coarse Baum-Connes conjecture with coefficients in any CC^{*}-algebra holds for a metric space which admits a coarse embedding into Hilbert space. More precisely, let XX be the coarsely embeddable space with bounded geometry, and AA any CC^{*}-algebra. The coarse assembly map

μ:limdK(CL(Pd(X),A))limdK(C(Pd(X),A))K(C(X,A))\mu:\lim\limits_{d\to\infty}K_{*}(C_{L}^{*}(P_{d}(X),A))\to\lim\limits_{d\to\infty}K_{*}(C^{*}(P_{d}(X),A))\cong K_{*}(C^{*}(X,A))

induced by the evaluation-at-zero map on KK-theory is an isomorphism.

Now, we strengthen Yu’s result [16] to the twisted coarse Baum-Connes conjecture with coefficients in any coarse algebra.

If XX coarsely embeds into Hilbert space, we denote Γ(X,𝒜()𝒦)\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A}(\mathcal{H})\otimes\mathcal{K}) the coarsely proper algebra defined as in Example 3.4. For any coarse XX-algebra Γ(X,)\Gamma(X,\mathcal{B}), we define the algebraic coarse XX-algebra Θ(X,𝒜())\Theta(X,\mathcal{A}(\mathcal{H})\otimes\mathcal{B}) to be a *-subalgebra of (X,𝒜())\ell^{\infty}(X,\mathcal{A}(\mathcal{H})\otimes\mathcal{B}) generated by the set

{ξ(X,𝒜())ηΓ(X,𝒜),ζΓ(X,) such that ξ(x)=η(x)ζ(x)}.\left\{\xi\in\ell^{\infty}(X,\mathcal{A}(\mathcal{H})\otimes\mathcal{B})\mid\exists\eta\in\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A}),\zeta\in\Gamma(X,\mathcal{B})\text{ such that }\xi(x)=\eta(x)\otimes\zeta(x)\right\}.

Let Γ(X,𝒜())\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A}(\mathcal{H})\otimes\mathcal{B}) be the completion of Θ(X,𝒜())\Theta(X,\mathcal{A}(\mathcal{H})\otimes\mathcal{B}). It is obvious that Γ(X,𝒜())\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A}(\mathcal{H})\otimes\mathcal{B}) is a coarsely proper algebra.

Theorem 3.7.

Let XX be a metric space with bounded geometry that admits a coarse embedding into Hilbert space. Then the twisted coarse Baum-Connes conjecture with coefficients holds for XX.

Proof.

For any coefficient algebra Γ(X,)\Gamma(X,\mathcal{B}), we define Γ(X,𝒜(H)𝒦)\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A}(H)\otimes\mathcal{K}) to be the proper algebra as in Example 3.4 and Γ(X,𝒜(H))\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A}(H)\otimes\mathcal{B}) as above. Then, we have the following commuting diagram

K+1(CL,Γ(X,)(X,)){K_{*+1}\left(C^{*}_{L,\Gamma(X,\mathcal{B})}(X,\mathcal{B})\right)}K+1(CΓ(X,)(X,)){K_{*+1}\left(C^{*}_{\Gamma(X,\mathcal{B})}(X,\mathcal{B})\right)}K(CL,Γ(X,𝒜())(X,𝒜())){K_{*}\left(C^{*}_{L,\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A}(\mathcal{H})\otimes\mathcal{B})}(X,\mathcal{A}(\mathcal{H})\otimes\mathcal{B})\right)}K(CΓ(X,𝒜())(X,𝒜())){K_{*}\left(C^{*}_{\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A}(\mathcal{H})\otimes\mathcal{B})}(X,\mathcal{A}(\mathcal{H})\otimes\mathcal{B})\right)}K+1(CL,Γ(X,)(X,)){K_{*+1}\left(C^{*}_{L,\Gamma(X,\mathcal{B})}(X,\mathcal{B})\right)}K+1(CΓ(X,)(X,)){K_{*+1}\left(C^{*}_{\Gamma(X,\mathcal{B})}(X,\mathcal{B})\right)}ev\scriptstyle{ev_{*}}β\scriptstyle{\beta}β\scriptstyle{\beta}ev\scriptstyle{ev_{*}}\scriptstyle{\cong}α\scriptstyle{\alpha}α\scriptstyle{\alpha}ev\scriptstyle{ev_{*}}

where β\beta is induced by the Bott map

xXβx:(X,𝒮𝒦)Γ(X,𝒜()𝒦)\prod_{x\in X}\beta_{x}:\ell^{\infty}(X,\mathcal{S}\otimes\mathcal{K})\to\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A}(\mathcal{H})\otimes\mathcal{K})

and α\alpha is induced by the Dirac map

xXαx:Γ(X,𝒜()𝒦)(X,𝒮𝒦),\prod_{x\in X}\alpha_{x}:\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A}(\mathcal{H})\otimes\mathcal{K})\to\ell^{\infty}(X,\mathcal{S}\otimes\mathcal{K}),

following [16, Section 7]. By Theorem 3.6, the middle horizon map is an isomorphism and the compositions of the vertical maps on both sides are isomorphisms by using the same argument with [16]. This finishes the proof. ∎

4. Proof of the main theorem

In this section, we will prove the following theorem.

Theorem 4.1.

Let ZX𝑝YZ\to X\xrightarrow{p}Y be a coarse fibration with bounded geometry. If both ZZ and YY satisfy the twisted coarse Baum-Connes conjecture with any coefficient, then the twisted coarse Buam-Connes conjecture with coefficient holds XX.

We will prove this theorem by the following four steps.

Step 1. Reduction the question to CBCcoef for X×YX\times Y with certain coefficient.

Equip X×YX\times Y with the 1\ell^{1}-product metric, i.e., d((x,y),(x,y))=dX(x,x)+dY(y,y)d((x,y),(x^{\prime},y^{\prime}))=d_{X}(x,x^{\prime})+d_{Y}(y,y^{\prime}). Consider the map

p×id:X×YY×Y,(x,y)(p(x),y).p\times id:X\times Y\to Y\times Y,\quad(x,y)\mapsto(p(x),y).

There is a diagonal inclusion YY×YY\to Y\times Y, then preimage of the diagonal in Y×YY\times Y is given by

p×id:yYZy×{y}Y.p\times id:\bigsqcup_{y\in Y}Z_{y}\times\{y\}\to Y.

Equip yYZy×{y}\bigsqcup_{y\in Y}Z_{y}\times\{y\} with the subspace metric of X×YX\times Y. We define g:XyYZy×{y}g:X\to\bigsqcup_{y\in Y}Z_{y}\times\{y\} by x(x,p(x))Zp(x)×{p(x)}x\mapsto(x,p(x))\in Z_{p(x)}\times\{p(x)\}. For any x,xXx,x^{\prime}\in X, one has that

dX(x,x)d((x,p(x)),(x,p(x)))dX(x,x)+dY(p(x),p(x)).d_{X}(x,x^{\prime})\leq d((x,p(x)),(x^{\prime},p(x^{\prime})))\leq d_{X}(x,x^{\prime})+d_{Y}(p(x),p(x^{\prime})).

Since pp is a bornologous map, there exists an upper control function ρ+:++\rho_{+}:\mathbb{R}_{+}\to\mathbb{R}_{+} such that dY(p(x),p(x))ρ+(dX(x,x))d_{Y}(p(x),p(x^{\prime}))\leq\rho_{+}(d_{X}(x,x^{\prime})). This shows that XX is coarsely equivalent to yYZy×{y}\bigsqcup_{y\in Y}Z_{y}\times\{y\}. We then have the following pull-back diagram

X×Y{X\times Y}Y×Y{Y\times Y}X{X}Y.{Y.}p×id\scriptstyle{p\times id}p×id\scriptstyle{p\times id}g\scriptstyle{g}

Let Γ(X,𝒜)\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A}) be a coarse XX-algebra. For each yYy\in Y, the canonical inclusion iy:ZyXi_{y}:Z_{y}\to X induces a coarse ZyZ_{y}-algebra by pull-back construction

Θ(Zy,𝒜)=iy(Θ(X,𝒜))\Theta(Z_{y},\mathcal{A})=i_{y}^{*}\left(\Theta(X,\mathcal{A})\right)

Then Θ(X,𝒜)\Theta(X,\mathcal{A}) is actually a subalgebra of yYΘ(Z,𝒜)\prod_{y\in Y}\Theta(Z,\mathcal{A}). Denoted by ΔY,RY×Y\Delta_{Y,R}\subseteq Y\times Y the RR-diagonal and denoted by XRX×YX_{R}\subseteq X\times Y the preimage of ΔY,R\Delta_{Y,R} in Y×YY\times Y under p×idp\times id.. For each R0R\geq 0, we define R(Y×Y,yYΘ(Zy,𝒜))\mathcal{B}_{R}\subseteq\ell^{\infty}(Y\times Y,\prod_{y\in Y}\Theta(Z_{y},\mathcal{A})) consisting of all functions ff such that

  • (1)

    for each yy and yYy^{\prime}\in Y, the function f(y,y)f(y,y^{\prime}) is in Θ(Zy,𝒜)\Theta(Z_{y},\mathcal{A});

  • (2)

    f(x,y)=0f(x,y)=0 whenever (p(x),y)XR(p(x),y)\notin X_{R}.

We define =R0R\mathcal{B}=\bigcup_{R\geq 0}\mathcal{B}_{R}. The product of this algebra is given by multiplication pointwisely. For an element in ff\in\mathcal{B} and (y,y)ΔY,R(y,y^{\prime})\in\Delta_{Y,R}, one can see that f(y,y)Θ(Zy,𝒜)f(y,y^{\prime})\in\Theta(Z_{y},\mathcal{A}). Thus, for any xZyx\in Z_{y}, f(y,y)(x)𝒜f(y,y^{\prime})(x)\in\mathcal{A}. Therefore, ff can be seen as a bounded function

f:X×Y=(yYZy)×Y𝒜.f:X\times Y=\left(\bigsqcup_{y\in Y}Z_{y}\right)\times Y\to\mathcal{A}.

It is direct to check that \mathcal{B} forms a coarse X×YX\times Y-algebra since XX is a coarse ZZ-fibration.

Lemma 4.2.

CBCcoef for XX with coefficients in Θ(X,𝒜)\Theta(X,\mathcal{A}) is equivalent to CBCcoef for X×YX\times Y with coefficients in \mathcal{B}.

Proof.

Denoted by XRX_{R} the preimage of ΔR\Delta_{R} in Y×YY\times Y under p×idp\times id as above. We have proved that X0X_{0} is coarsely equivalent to XX. Similarly, we can also prove XRX_{R} is coarsely equivalent XX for any R>0R>0. Indeed, one can check that

XR=yYp1(BY(y,R))×{y}.X_{R}=\bigsqcup_{y\in Y}p^{-1}(B_{Y}(y,R))\times\{y\}.

By the Condition (3) in Definition 2.8, there exists a family uniform coarse equivalence

{ϕy,R:p1(BY(y,R))Z}yY.\{\phi_{y,R}:p^{-1}(B_{Y}(y,R))\to Z\}_{y\in Y}.

Choose a family of uniform coarse inverse map {ψy:ZZy}yY\{\psi_{y}:Z\to Z_{y}\}_{y\in Y} to {ϕy}\{\phi_{y}\}, where ϕy\phi_{y} is given as in Definition 2.8. Then we conclude that the map φR:XRX0\varphi_{R}:X_{R}\to X_{0} which restricts on p1(BY(y,R))×{y}p^{-1}(B_{Y}(y,R))\times\{y\} is equal to ψyϕy,R\psi_{y}\circ\phi_{y,R} is a coarse equivalent and the canonical inclusion from iR:X0XRi_{R}:X_{0}\to X_{R} is the coarse inverse of this map. Then by Theorem 2.7,

(iR):CΓ(X,𝒜)(X,𝒜)CΓ(X,𝒜)(XR,𝒜)(i_{R})_{*}:C^{*}_{\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A})}(X,\mathcal{A})\to C^{*}_{\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A})}(X_{R},\mathcal{A})

is a CC^{*}-isomorphism.

Consider the algebraic twisted Roe algebra [X×Y,𝒜]\mathbb{C}_{\mathcal{B}}[X\times Y,\mathcal{A}], where the twisted information is recorded in \mathcal{B}. For any R,R0R,R^{\prime}\geq 0, we shall denote R[X×Y,𝒜]R\mathbb{C}_{\mathcal{B}_{R}}[X\times Y,\mathcal{A}]_{R^{\prime}} the subspace of [X×Y,𝒜]\mathbb{C}_{\mathcal{B}}[X\times Y,\mathcal{A}] consisting of all operators TT such that

  • (1)

    for any partial translation, the function TvT^{v} is in R\mathcal{B}_{R};

  • (2)

    Prop(T)R\textup{Prop}(T)\leq R^{\prime}.

By definition,

[X×Y,𝒜]R=R0R[X×Y,𝒜]R.\mathbb{C}_{\mathcal{B}}[X\times Y,\mathcal{A}]_{R^{\prime}}=\bigcup_{R\geq 0}\mathbb{C}_{\mathcal{B}_{R}}[X\times Y,\mathcal{A}]_{R^{\prime}}.

For any TR[X×Y,𝒜]RT\in\mathbb{C}_{\mathcal{B}_{R}}[X\times Y,\mathcal{A}]_{R^{\prime}}, the support of TT must be in XR×XRX_{R}\times X_{R} with propagation no more than RR^{\prime}. Thus we conclude that

TΘ(X,𝒜)[XR,𝒜]R.T\in\mathbb{C}_{\Theta(X,\mathcal{A})}[X_{R},\mathcal{A}]_{R^{\prime}}.

To sum up, we have that

C(X×Y,𝒜)=limRCΓ(X,𝒜)(XR,𝒜).C^{*}_{\mathcal{B}}(X\times Y,\mathcal{A})=\lim_{R\to\infty}C^{*}_{\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A})}(X_{R},\mathcal{A}).

By the continuity of the KK-theory, we conclude that K(C(X×Y,𝒜))limRK(CΓ(X,𝒜)(XR,𝒜))K_{*}(C^{*}_{\mathcal{B}}(X\times Y,\mathcal{A}))\cong\lim_{R\to\infty}K_{*}(C^{*}_{\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A})}(X_{R},\mathcal{A})), which is also isomorphic to K(CΓ(X,𝒜)(X,𝒜))K_{*}(C^{*}_{\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A})}(X,\mathcal{A})).

For the part of localization algebra, it remains to show the canonical inclusion

I:limRCL,Γ(X,𝒜)(Pd(XR),𝒜)CL,(Pd(X×Y),𝒜).I:\lim_{R\to\infty}C_{L,\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A})}^{*}(P_{d}(X_{R}),\mathcal{A})\to C^{*}_{L,\mathcal{B}}(P_{d}(X\times Y),\mathcal{A}).

induces an isomorphism on KK-theory. The proof is similar to Theorem 3.6. Since both sides admit homotopy invariance and the Mayer-Vietoris sequence. It suffices to prove it for the inclusion of the 11-dimensional skeleton on both sides. For the 11-dimensional case, the inclusion map between the localization algebras on both sides is equivalent to the map

I:limRCub(+,R)Cub(+,),I:\lim_{R\to\infty}C_{ub}(\mathbb{R}_{+},\mathcal{B}_{R})\to C_{ub}(\mathbb{R}_{+},\mathcal{B}),

on the level of KK-theory. Since R\mathcal{B}_{R} and \mathcal{B} are both quasi-stable, by [14, Lemma 12.4.3], the evaluation map induces an isomorphism on KK-theorey. Thus it suffices to show

I:limRK(R)K().I_{*}:\lim_{R\to\infty}K_{*}(\mathcal{B}_{R})\to K_{*}(\mathcal{B}).

which follows directly from the continuity of the KK-theory. ∎

Step 2. Partial localization algebra and the main commuting diagram.

By Lemma 4.2, it suffices to prove the coarse Baum-Connes conjecture with coefficient \mathcal{B} holds for X×YX\times Y. We shall begin with the definition of a partial version of the localization algebra.

Let M×NM\times N be the 1\ell^{1}-product of MM and NN, 𝒟\mathcal{D} a coarse M×NM\times N-algebra with stable fiber 𝒜\mathcal{A}. Denoted by M×N,𝒜=2(M^×N^,𝒜)\mathcal{H}_{M\times N,\mathcal{A}}=\ell^{2}(\widehat{M}\times\widehat{N},\mathcal{A}) the geometric M×NM\times N-𝒜\mathcal{A}-module. There are two canonical representations of C0(M)C_{0}(M) and C0(N)C_{0}(N) on this module M×N,𝒜\mathcal{H}_{M\times N,\mathcal{A}} since

2(M^×N^,𝒜)2(M^)2(N^,𝒜)2(M^,𝒜)2(N^).\ell^{2}(\widehat{M}\times\widehat{N},\mathcal{A})\cong\ell^{2}(\widehat{M})\otimes\ell^{2}(\widehat{N},\mathcal{A})\cong\ell^{2}(\widehat{M},\mathcal{A})\otimes\ell^{2}(\widehat{N}).

Thus, for an operator T(M×N,𝒜)T\in\mathcal{L}(\mathcal{H}_{M\times N,\mathcal{A}}), we can define PropM(T)\textup{Prop}_{M}(T) and PropN(T)\textup{Prop}_{N}(T) the propagation of TT associated with the C0(M)C_{0}(M)-representation and C0(N)C_{0}(N)-representation, respectively.

Definition 4.3 (partial localization algebra).

Let M×NM\times N be the 1\ell^{1}-product of MM and NN, 𝒟\mathcal{D} a coarse M×NM\times N-algebra. The algebraic partial localization algebra of M×NM\times N associated with NN, denoted by pN-L,𝒟[M×N,𝒜]p_{N}\text{-}\mathbb{C}_{L,\mathcal{D}}[M\times N,\mathcal{A}], is the algebra of all bounded uniform continuous function

g:+𝒟[M×N,𝒜]g:\mathbb{R}_{+}\to\mathbb{C}_{\mathcal{D}}[M\times N,\mathcal{A}]

such that PropN(g(t))\textup{Prop}_{N}(g(t)) tends to 0 as tt tends to infinity.

Since this algebra is local only on the NN-direction, the homotopy invariance and Mayer-Vietoris sequence only hold for the NN-direction. We should mention this partial version of the localization algebra is inspired by the π\pi-localization algebra introduced in [7].

For any d0d\geq 0, there is a canonical continuous inclusion

Pd(X×Y)Pd(X)×Pd(Y)P_{d}(X\times Y)\to P_{d}(X)\times P_{d}(Y)

defined by

(x,y)X×Ya(x,y)[(x,y)](xX(yYa(x,y))[x],yY(xXa(x,y))[y]).\sum_{(x,y)\in X\times Y}a_{(x,y)}[(x,y)]\mapsto\left(\sum_{x\in X}\left(\sum_{y\in Y}a_{(x,y)}\right)[x],\sum_{y\in Y}\left(\sum_{x\in X}a_{(x,y)}\right)[y]\right).

On the other hand, Pd(X)P_{d}(X) and Pd(Y)P_{d^{\prime}}(Y) are respectively coarsely equivalent to XX and YY. By [14, Lemma 7.2.14], there must exist a continuous coarse equivalent

Pd(X)×Pd(Y)Pn(X×Y)P_{d}(X)\times P_{d^{\prime}}(Y)\to P_{n}(X\times Y) (7)

for sufficiently large n>0n>0 which restricts to an identity maps from X×YPd(X)×Pd(Y)X\times Y\subseteq P_{d}(X)\times P_{d^{\prime}}(Y) to X×YPn(X×Y)X\times Y\subseteq P_{n}(X\times Y). Moreover, by using [14, Lemma 7.2.13], the composition

Pd(X×Y)Pd(X)×Pd(Y)Pn(X×Y)P_{d}(X\times Y)\to P_{d}(X)\times P_{d}(Y)\to P_{n}(X\times Y)

is homotopy equivalent to the canonical inclusion map

Pd(X×Y)Pn(X×Y).P_{d}(X\times Y)\to P_{n}(X\times Y).

Moreover, the construction of the map (7) is based on a partition of unity of Pd(X)×Pd(Y)P_{d}(X)\times P_{d^{\prime}}(Y). Repeat the argument as in [14, Lemma 7.2.13], one can also prove that the composition

Pd(X)×Pd(Y)Pn(X×Y)Pn(X)×Pn(Y)P_{d}(X)\times P_{d^{\prime}}(Y)\to P_{n}(X\times Y)\to P_{n}(X)\times P_{n}(Y)

is also homotopy equivalent to the canonical inclusion

Pd(X)×Pd(Y)Pn(X)×Pn(Y).P_{d}(X)\times P_{d^{\prime}}(Y)\to P_{n}(X)\times P_{n}(Y).

By passing the parameters to infinity, we conclude the following result.

Lemma 4.4.

The map (7) induces an isomorphism on the inductive limit:

limd,dK(CL,(Pd(X)×Pd(Y),𝒜))limnK(CL,(Pn(X×Y),𝒜)).\lim_{d,d^{\prime}\to\infty}K_{*}(C^{*}_{L,\mathcal{B}}(P_{d}(X)\times P_{d^{\prime}}(Y),\mathcal{A}))\to\lim_{n\to\infty}K_{*}(C^{*}_{L,\mathcal{B}}(P_{n}(X\times Y),\mathcal{A})).\hfill\qed

We then have the following commuting diagram:

limd,dK(CL,(Pd(X)×Pd(Y),𝒜)){\lim\limits_{d,d^{\prime}\to\infty}K_{*}(C^{*}_{L,\mathcal{B}}(P_{d}(X)\times P_{d^{\prime}}(Y),\mathcal{A}))}K(C(X×Y,𝒜)){K_{*}(C^{*}_{\mathcal{B}}(X\times Y,\mathcal{A}))}limdK(pY-CL,(X×Pd(Y),𝒜)){\lim\limits_{d^{\prime}\to\infty}K_{*}(p_{Y}\text{-}C^{*}_{L,\mathcal{B}}(X\times P_{d^{\prime}}(Y),\mathcal{A}))}K(C(X×Y,𝒜)){K_{*}(C^{*}_{\mathcal{B}}(X\times Y,\mathcal{A}))}ev\scriptstyle{ev_{*}}iY\scriptstyle{i_{Y}}=\scriptstyle{=}ev\scriptstyle{ev_{*}} (8)

where the horizontal maps are given by the twisted assembly map induced by the evaluation map, and the left vertical map is induced by the canonical inclusion. Here is a short explanation for the map iYi_{Y}. Notice that Pd(X)×Pd(Y)P_{d}(X)\times P_{d^{\prime}}(Y) is coarsely equivalent to X×Pd(Y)X\times P_{d^{\prime}(Y)}. By Theorem 2.7, the twisted algebra C(Pd(X)×Pd(Y),𝒜)C^{*}_{\mathcal{B}}(P_{d}(X)\times P_{d^{\prime}}(Y),\mathcal{A}) is isomorphic to C(X×Pd(Y),𝒜)C^{*}_{\mathcal{B}}(X\times P_{d^{\prime}}(Y),\mathcal{A}) by AdUAd_{U} for each d,d0d,d^{\prime}\geq 0, where UU is a unitary between the geometric module. Since partial localization algebra only shrunk the propagation in the direction of Pd(Y)P_{d^{\prime}}(Y), we can use C(X×Pd(Y),𝒜)C^{*}_{\mathcal{B}}(X\times P_{d^{\prime}}(Y),\mathcal{A}) to define the partial localization algebra. Thus iYi_{Y} is actually induced by the composition

CL,(Pd(X)×Pd(Y),𝒜){C^{*}_{L,\mathcal{B}}(P_{d}(X)\times P_{d^{\prime}}(Y),\mathcal{A})}pY-CL,(Pd(X)×Pd(Y),𝒜){p_{Y}\text{-}C^{*}_{L,\mathcal{B}}(P_{d}(X)\times P_{d^{\prime}}(Y),\mathcal{A})}pY-CL,(X×Pd(Y),𝒜).{p_{Y}\text{-}C^{*}_{L,\mathcal{B}}(X\times P_{d^{\prime}}(Y),\mathcal{A}).}inclusionAdU\scriptstyle{Ad_{U}} (9)
Lemma 4.5.

The bottom horizontal map evev_{*} in (8) is an isomorphism.

Proof.

We shall prove that the map evev_{*} is essentially a twisted coarse assembly map of YY and this lemma holds as the coarse Baum-Connes conjecture with coefficient holds for YY.

For each yYy\in Y, define ρy:YY×Y\rho_{y}:Y\to Y\times Y by ρy(y)(y,y)\rho_{y}(y^{\prime})\mapsto(y^{\prime},y). Since \mathcal{B} is a set of functions from Y×YY\times Y to yYΘ(Zy,𝒜)\prod_{y\in Y}\Theta(Z_{y},\mathcal{A}). Thus we can define

y=ρy()\mathcal{B}_{y}=\rho_{y}^{*}(\mathcal{B})

to be the pull-back to \mathcal{B} under the map ρy\rho_{y}, which is an algebra of functions from YY to yYΘ(Zy,𝒜)\prod_{y\in Y}\Theta(Z_{y},\mathcal{A}). Recall the definition of \mathcal{B}, one can see that the value of a function in y\mathcal{B}_{y} at yy^{\prime} is taken in Θ(Zy,𝒜)\Theta(Z_{y^{\prime}},\mathcal{A}) and the function will vanish as yy^{\prime} tends to infinity. Thus

ylimSyB(y,S)Θ(Zy,𝒜)yYΘ(Zy,𝒜).\mathcal{B}_{y}\cong\lim_{S\to\infty}\bigoplus_{y^{\prime}\in B(y,S)}\Theta(Z_{y^{\prime}},\mathcal{A})\cong\bigoplus_{y^{\prime}\in Y}\Theta(Z_{y^{\prime}},\mathcal{A}). (10)

Thus the family {y}\{\mathcal{B}_{y}\} is actually isomorphic to each other and an element in y\mathcal{B}_{y} can be seen as a function from yYZy𝒜\bigsqcup_{y\in Y}Z_{y}\to\mathcal{A}, which naturally gives a coarse XX-algebra structure. For simplicity, we shall denoted

0=yYΘ(Zy,𝒜) and y,S=yB(y,S)Θ(Zy,𝒜).\mathcal{B}_{0}=\bigoplus_{y^{\prime}\in Y}\Theta(Z_{y^{\prime}},\mathcal{A})\quad\text{ and }\quad\mathcal{B}_{y,S}=\bigoplus_{y^{\prime}\in B(y,S)}\Theta(Z_{y^{\prime}},\mathcal{A}). (11)

Define Cy(X,𝒜)C^{*}_{\mathcal{B}_{y}}(X,\mathcal{A}) to be the twisted Roe algebra associated with the coefficient algebra y\mathcal{B}_{y}. Define

Θ(Y,C0(X,𝒜)𝒦)yYCy(X,𝒜)𝒦\Theta(Y,C^{*}_{\mathcal{B}_{0}}(X,\mathcal{A})\otimes\mathcal{K})\subseteq\prod_{y\in Y}C^{*}_{\mathcal{B}_{y}}(X,\mathcal{A})\otimes\mathcal{K}

consists of all functions ξ:YCy(X,𝒜)𝒦\xi:Y\to\prod C^{*}_{\mathcal{B}_{y}}(X,\mathcal{A})\otimes\mathcal{K} such that

  • (1)

    there exists N>0N>0 such that ξ(y)=i=1NSy,iKy,i\xi(y)=\sum_{i=1}^{N}S_{y,i}\otimes K_{y,i} where Sy,iy[X,𝒜]S_{y,i}\in\mathbb{C}_{\mathcal{B}_{y}}[X,\mathcal{A}] and Ky,i𝒦K_{y,i}\in\mathcal{K};

  • (2)

    there exists R>0R>0 and S>0S>0 such that Sy,iy,S[X]RS_{y,i}\in\mathbb{C}_{\mathcal{B}_{y,S}}[X]_{R} for any yYy\in Y and ii which means that Prop(Sy,i)R\textup{Prop}(S_{y,i})\leq R and for any partial translation vv,

    Sy,ivy,s;S_{y,i}^{v}\in\mathcal{B}_{y,s};
  • (3)

    there exists M>0M>0 such that rank(Ky,i)Mrank(K_{y,i})\leq M for any yYy\in Y and ii.

It is direct to check that Θ(Y,C(X,0)𝒦)\Theta(Y,C^{*}(X,\mathcal{B}_{0})\otimes\mathcal{K}) is an algebraic coarse YY-algebra.

For any T[X×Y,]T\in\mathbb{C}[X\times Y,\mathcal{B}] and fixed y1,y2Yy_{1},y_{2}\in Y, there is a function from Ty1,y2:X×X𝒜T_{y_{1},y_{2}}:X\times X\to\mathcal{A} defined by

(x1,x2)T(x1,y1),(x2,y2)𝒜.(x_{1},x_{2})\mapsto T_{(x_{1},y_{1}),(x_{2},y_{2})}\in\mathcal{A}.

By definition, T(x1,y1),(x2,y2)T_{(x_{1},y_{1}),(x_{2},y_{2})} is the ((x1,y1),(x2,y2))((x_{1},y_{1}),(x_{2},y_{2}))-entry of TT viewed as a compact adjointable operator from 𝒜\mathcal{A} to 𝒜\mathcal{A}. Since 𝒜\mathcal{A} is assumed to be stable, T(x1,y1),(x2,y2)T_{(x_{1},y_{1}),(x_{2},y_{2})} determines an element in 𝒜\mathcal{A}. We shall view this function Ty1,y2T_{y_{1},y_{2}} as an operator on X,𝒜=2(X,𝒜)\mathcal{H}_{X,\mathcal{A}}=\ell^{2}(X,\mathcal{A}) and the action is given by convolution. In this case, we obtain a family of operators (Ty1,y2)y1,y2Y(T_{y_{1},y_{2}})_{y_{1},y_{2}\in Y}. One should notice that there are two important facts associated with this family:

  • (1)

    the propagation Prop(Ty1,y2)\textup{Prop}(T_{y_{1},y_{2}}) as an operator of X,𝒜\mathcal{H}_{X,\mathcal{A}} is uniformly bounded, i.e., there exists R>0R>0 such that Prop(Ty1,y2)R\textup{Prop}(T_{y_{1},y_{2}})\leq R for any y1,y2Yy_{1},y_{2}\in Y.

  • (2)

    there exists S>0S>0 such that

    Ty1,y2y1,S[X]RT_{y_{1},y_{2}}\in\mathbb{C}_{\mathcal{B}_{y_{1},S}}[X]_{R}

    for any y1,y2Yy_{1},y_{2}\in Y.

The first one is because the propagation of TT as an operator on X×Y,𝒜\mathcal{H}_{X\times Y,\mathcal{A}} is bounded and the second one is given by the twisted condition. Since 𝒜\mathcal{A} is stable, we conclude that the Roe algebra Cy(X,𝒜)C^{*}_{\mathcal{B}_{y}}(X,\mathcal{A}) is quasi-stable. Thus, we can identify Cy(X,𝒜)C^{*}_{\mathcal{B}_{y}}(X,\mathcal{A}) with Cy(X,𝒜)p0C^{*}_{\mathcal{B}_{y}}(X,\mathcal{A})\otimes p_{0} as a subalgebra of Cy(X,𝒜)𝒦C^{*}_{\mathcal{B}_{y}}(X,\mathcal{A})\otimes\mathcal{K}, where p0p_{0} is a fixed rank 11 projection. In this case, the map

(y1,y2)Ty1,y2(y_{1},y_{2})\mapsto T_{y_{1},y_{2}}

defines an operator in Θ(Y,C(X,0)𝒦)[Y,C0(X,𝒜)𝒦)]\mathbb{C}_{\Theta(Y,C^{*}(X,\mathcal{B}_{0})\otimes\mathcal{K})}[Y,C^{*}_{\mathcal{B}_{0}}(X,\mathcal{A})\otimes\mathcal{K})]. This correspondence gives a map

[X×Y,]Θ(Y,C0(X,𝒜)𝒦)[Y,C0(X,𝒜)𝒦)].\mathbb{C}[X\times Y,\mathcal{B}]\to\mathbb{C}_{\Theta(Y,C^{*}_{\mathcal{B}_{0}}(X,\mathcal{A})\otimes\mathcal{K})}[Y,C^{*}_{\mathcal{B}_{0}}(X,\mathcal{A})\otimes\mathcal{K})].

This map is not an isomorphism in general, however, by a similar argument as in [13, Proposition 4.7], one can show that these two algebras are Morita equivalent to each other by using the uniform rank condition of Θ(Y,C0(X,𝒜)𝒦)\Theta(Y,C^{*}_{\mathcal{B}_{0}}(X,\mathcal{A})\otimes\mathcal{K}). Thus they have the same KK-theory. For the localization algebra, one can also check in a similar way that there is a corresponding map

pY-CL(X×Pd(Y),)CL,Γ(Y,C0(X,𝒜)𝒦)(Pd(Y),C0(X,𝒜)𝒦).p_{Y}\text{-}C_{L}^{*}(X\times P_{d}(Y),\mathcal{B})\to C^{*}_{L,\Gamma(Y,C^{*}_{\mathcal{B}_{0}}(X,\mathcal{A})\otimes\mathcal{K})}(P_{d}(Y),C^{*}_{\mathcal{B}_{0}}(X,\mathcal{A})\otimes\mathcal{K}).

We shall now show that this map induces an isomorphism on the level of KK-theory. Since the KK-theory of localization algebras have homotopy invariance and Mayer-Vietoris sequence (for partial localization algebra, it has these two properties in the direction of the localized part), it suffices to prove it for the 11-skeleton of Pd(Y)P_{d}(Y). Thus we have the following diagram

pY-CL,(X×Y,𝒜){p_{Y}\text{-}C_{L,\mathcal{B}}^{*}(X\times Y,\mathcal{A})}CL,Γ(Y,C0(X,𝒜)𝒦)(Pd(Y),C0(X,𝒜)𝒦){C^{*}_{L,\Gamma(Y,C^{*}_{\mathcal{B}_{0}}(X,\mathcal{A})\otimes\mathcal{K})}(P_{d}(Y),C^{*}_{\mathcal{B}_{0}}(X,\mathcal{A})\otimes\mathcal{K})}Cub(+,yYuCy(X,𝒜)){C_{ub}(\mathbb{R}_{+},\prod^{u}_{y\in Y}C^{*}_{\mathcal{B}_{y}}(X,\mathcal{A}))}Cub(+,Γ(Y,C0(X,𝒜)𝒦)){C_{ub}(\mathbb{R}_{+},\Gamma(Y,C^{*}_{\mathcal{B}_{0}}(X,\mathcal{A})\otimes\mathcal{K}))}\scriptstyle{\cong}\scriptstyle{\cong} (12)

where the symbol uu in yYu\prod^{u}_{y\in Y} means it is a subalgebra of the direct product algebra consists all sequences that can be approximated by sequence with uniformly finite propagation. On the other hand, the right-bottom corner of (12) is isomorphic to

Cub(+,Γ(Y,C0(X,𝒜)𝒦))=limNCub(+,yYuCy(X,𝒜))MN().C_{ub}(\mathbb{R}_{+},\Gamma(Y,C^{*}_{\mathcal{B}_{0}}(X,\mathcal{A})\otimes\mathcal{K}))=\lim_{N\to\infty}C_{ub}\left(\mathbb{R}_{+},\prod^{u}_{y\in Y}C^{*}_{\mathcal{B}_{y}}(X,\mathcal{A})\right)\otimes M_{N}(\mathbb{C}).

By the stability and continuity of KK-theory, we conclude that the bottom map in (12) induces an isomorphism on KK-theory.

From the above argument, we have shown that the bottom map in (8) is equivalent to a twisted assembly map for YY, by assumption, it is an isomorphism. ∎

Step 3. Cutting and pasting technique on localization algebra.

By Lemma 4.2 and Lemma 4.5, to show Theorem 4.1, it suffices to show iYi_{Y} in (8) is an isomorphism. In this section, we shall further reduce it to the coarse Baum-Connes conjecture for XX with a special coefficient.

Definition 4.6.

For each d0d\geq 0, define A(Pd(X))A^{*}(P_{d}(X)) be the subalgebra of

yYCy(Pd(X),𝒜)\prod_{y\in Y}C^{*}_{\mathcal{B}_{y}}(P_{d}(X),\mathcal{A})

consists of all elements (Ty)yY(T_{y})_{y\in Y} such that there exists R>0R>0 and S>0S>0 such that

Tyy,S[Pd(X)]RT_{y}\in\mathbb{C}_{\mathcal{B}_{y,S}}[P_{d}(X)]_{R}

for any yYy\in Y, where y,S\mathcal{B}_{y,S} is defined in the previous step, we shall define the propagation of (Ty)yY(T_{y})_{y\in Y} to be

Prop((Ty)yY)=supyYProp(Ty).\textup{Prop}((T_{y})_{y\in Y})=\sup_{y\in Y}\textup{Prop}(T_{y}).

Moreover, we define AL(Pd(X))A^{*}_{L}(P_{d}(X)) to be the algebra of all bounded uniformly continuous functions gg from +\mathbb{R}_{+} to A(Pd(X))A^{*}(P_{d}(X)) such that

Prop(g(t))0ast.\textup{Prop}(g(t))\to 0\quad\text{as}\quad t\to\infty.

Notice that A(Pd(X))A^{*}(P_{d}(X)) are isomorphic to each other for different dd since the family (Pd(X))d0(P_{d}(X))_{d\geq 0} is coarse equivalent to each other. When d=0d=0, A(P0(X))=A(X)A^{*}(P_{0}(X))=A^{*}(X). There is a canonical assembly map induced by the evaluation map as follows

ev:limdAL(Pd(X))A(X).ev_{*}:\lim_{d\to\infty}A^{*}_{L}(P_{d}(X))\to A^{*}(X). (13)
Lemma 4.7.

To show iYi_{Y} in (8) is an isomorphism, it suffices to show evev_{*} as in (13) is an isomorphism.

Proof.

As we discussed before, we have the homotopy invariance and Mayer-Vietoris sequence in the direction of Pd(Y)P_{d}(Y) for K(pY-CL,(X×Pd(Y),𝒜))K_{*}(p_{Y}\text{-}C^{*}_{L,\mathcal{B}}(X\times P_{d}(Y),\mathcal{A})), by a reduction argument as in [15, Theorem 3.2], it suffices to proof iYi_{Y} is an isomorphism for the 11-skeleton of YY. Thus it suffices to prove

iY:limdK(CL,(Pd(X)×Y,𝒜))K(pY-CL,(X×Y,𝒜))i_{Y}:\lim_{d\to\infty}K_{*}(C^{*}_{L,\mathcal{B}}(P_{d}(X)\times Y,\mathcal{A}))\to K_{*}(p_{Y}\text{-}C^{*}_{L,\mathcal{B}}(X\times Y,\mathcal{A}))

is an isomorphism. As YY is discrete, the problem can be further reduced. For the left side, it is direct to see that

CL,(Pd(X)×Y,𝒜)AL(Pd(X)).C^{*}_{L,\mathcal{B}}(P_{d}(X)\times Y,\mathcal{A})\cong A^{*}_{L}(P_{d}(X)).

On the right side, one has that

pY-CL,(X×Y,𝒜)Cub(+,A(X)).p_{Y}\text{-}C^{*}_{L,\mathcal{B}}(X\times Y,\mathcal{A})\cong C_{ub}(\mathbb{R}_{+},A^{*}(X)).

Thus it suffices to prove the composition

AL(Pd(X)){A^{*}_{L}(P_{d}(X))}Cub(+,A(Pd(X))){C_{ub}(\mathbb{R}_{+},A^{*}(P_{d}(X)))}Cub(+,A(X)){C_{ub}(\mathbb{R}_{+},A^{*}(X))}inclusion\scriptstyle{\cong}

induces an isomorphism on KK-theory after passing dd to infinity, where the second isomorphism is given by the isomorphic between A(Pd(X))A^{*}(P_{d}(X)) and A(X)A^{*}(X). Since 𝒜\mathcal{A} is stable, Cy(X,𝒜)C^{*}_{\mathcal{B}_{y}}(X,\mathcal{A}) is quasi-stable, so is A(X)A^{*}(X). Thus the evaluation map

ev:K(Cub(+,A(X)))K(A(X))ev_{*}:K_{*}(C_{ub}(\mathbb{R}_{+},A^{*}(X)))\to K_{*}(A^{*}(X))

is an isomorphism by [14, Lemma 12.4.3]. Thus it suffices to prove the composition

AL(Pd(X)){A^{*}_{L}(P_{d}(X))}Cub(+,A(Pd(X))){C_{ub}(\mathbb{R}_{+},A^{*}(P_{d}(X)))}Cub(+,A(X)){C_{ub}(\mathbb{R}_{+},A^{*}(X))}A(X).{A^{*}(X).}inclusion\scriptstyle{\cong}ev\scriptstyle{ev_{*}}

induces an isomorphism on KK-theory after passing dd to infinity, which is exactly the map evev_{*} as in (13). ∎

Step 4. Reduction to CBCcoef for ZZ.

After such a long preparation, for the last step, we shall further reduce the question to CBCcoef for ZZ and finish the proof of Theorem 4.1.

Proof of Theorem 4.1.

By Lemma 4.7, it suffices to prove evev_{*} in (13) is an isomorphism.

For an element (Ty)yYA(X)(T_{y})_{y\in Y}\in A^{*}(X), there exist R>0R>0 and S>0S>0 such that

Tyy,S[X]RT_{y}\in\mathbb{C}_{\mathcal{B}_{y,S}}[X]_{R}

for any yYy\in Y. Write Zy,S=yB(y,S)ZyZ_{y,S}=\bigsqcup_{y^{\prime}\in B(y,S)}Z_{y^{\prime}} equipped with the subspace metric endowed from XX. Then, by the definition of y,S\mathcal{B}_{y,S}, we conclude that

supp(Ty)Zy,S×Zy,S.\textup{supp}(T_{y})\subseteq Z_{y,S}\times Z_{y,S}.

Moreover, y,S\mathcal{B}_{y,S} forms a coarse Zy,SZ_{y,S}-algebra, therefore we can define the twisted Roe algebra associated with this coefficient algebra. Then TyT_{y} defines an element in Cy,S(Zy,S,𝒜)C^{*}_{\mathcal{B}_{y,S}}(Z_{y,S},\mathcal{A}). Thus, (Ty)yY(T_{y})_{y\in Y} determines an element in yYuCy,S(Zy,S,𝒜)\prod^{u}_{y\in Y}C^{*}_{\mathcal{B}_{y,S}}(Z_{y,S},\mathcal{A}), where the symbol ``u′′``u^{\prime\prime} means it is the subalgebra of the direct product algebra generated by all elements (Ty)(T_{y}) such that they can be approximated by sequence of operators with uniformly finite propagations. By definition, we have that

limSyYuCy,S(Zy,S,𝒜)=A(X).\lim_{S\to\infty}\prod^{u}_{y\in Y}C^{*}_{\mathcal{B}_{y,S}}(Z_{y,S},\mathcal{A})=A^{*}(X).

Notice that Zy,SZ_{y,S} is coarsely equivalent to ZZ by Definition 2.8 and y,S=yB(y,S)Θ(Zy,𝒜)\mathcal{B}_{y,S}=\bigoplus_{y^{\prime}\in B(y,S)}\Theta(Z_{y^{\prime}},\mathcal{A}), by Theorem 2.7, we conclude that

Cy,S(Zy,S,𝒜)CΓ(Zy,𝒜)(Zy,𝒜).C^{*}_{\mathcal{B}_{y,S}}(Z_{y,S},\mathcal{A})\cong C^{*}_{\Gamma(Z_{y},\mathcal{A})}(Z_{y},\mathcal{A}).

As the sequence (Zy,S)(Z_{y,S}) is uniformly coarsely equivalent to (Zy)yY(Z_{y})_{y\in Y} by definition, the canonical inclusion map from (Zy)yY(Z_{y})_{y\in Y} to (Zy,S)(Z_{y,S}) induces an isomorphism

yYuCΓ(Zy,𝒜)(Zy,𝒜)yYuCy,S(Zy,S,𝒜)\prod^{u}_{y\in Y}C^{*}_{\Gamma(Z_{y},\mathcal{A})}(Z_{y},\mathcal{A})\xrightarrow{\cong}\prod^{u}_{y\in Y}C^{*}_{\mathcal{B}_{y,S}}(Z_{y,S},\mathcal{A})

for each S0S\geq 0. As SS tends to infinity, we conclude that

K(yYuCΓ(Zy,𝒜)(Zy,𝒜))K(A(X)).K_{*}\left(\prod^{u}_{y\in Y}C^{*}_{\Gamma(Z_{y},\mathcal{A})}(Z_{y},\mathcal{A})\right)\cong K_{*}(A^{*}(X)).

Define

Z~=yYZy\widetilde{Z}=\bigsqcup_{y\in Y}Z_{y}

to be the separated disjoint union of (Zy)yY(Z_{y})_{y\in Y}, which means the metric dd on Z~\widetilde{Z} satisfies that dd restricts to the original metric on each ZyZ_{y} and the distance between ZyZ_{y} and ZyZ_{y^{\prime}} is infinity whenever yyy\neq y^{\prime}, see [14, Definition 12.5.1]. Notice that 𝒟=yYΓ(Zy,𝒜)\mathcal{D}=\prod_{y\in Y}\Gamma(Z_{y},\mathcal{A}) is a coarse Z~\widetilde{Z}-algebra and

C𝒟(Z~,𝒜)yYuCΓ(Zy,𝒜)(Zy,𝒜).C^{*}_{\mathcal{D}}(\widetilde{Z},\mathcal{A})\cong\prod^{u}_{y\in Y}C^{*}_{\Gamma(Z_{y},\mathcal{A})}(Z_{y},\mathcal{A}).

In this case, we can also define the localization algebra CL,𝒟(Pd(Z~),𝒜)C^{*}_{L,\mathcal{D}}(P_{d}(\widetilde{Z}),\mathcal{A}) for each d0d\geq 0. By a similar argument as in the last paragraph of the proof of Lemma 4.2, we can also prove that

K(CL,𝒟(Pd(Z~),𝒜))K(AL(Pd(X))).K_{*}(C^{*}_{L,\mathcal{D}}(P_{d}(\widetilde{Z}),\mathcal{A}))\cong K_{*}(A_{L}(P_{d}(X))).

Thus it suffices to prove the assembly map induced by the evaluation map

ev:limdK(CL,𝒟(Pd(Z~),𝒜))K(CL,𝒟(Z~,𝒜))ev_{*}:\lim_{d\to\infty}K_{*}(C^{*}_{L,\mathcal{D}}(P_{d}(\widetilde{Z}),\mathcal{A}))\to K_{*}(C^{*}_{L,\mathcal{D}}(\widetilde{Z},\mathcal{A})) (14)

is an isomorphism. This can be seen as an infinite uniform version of CBCcoef of ZZ. Actually, it can be viewed as the CBCcoef of ZZ with a specific coefficient. Fix (ψy:ZZy)yY(\psi_{y}:Z\to Z_{y})_{y\in Y} to be a family of the coarse inverse maps to the coarse equivalences (ϕy:ZyZ)yY(\phi_{y}:Z_{y}\to Z)_{y\in Y}. We define ψ(Θ(Zy,𝒜))\psi^{*}(\Theta(Z_{y},\mathcal{A})) to be a coarse ZZ-algebra as following: the function ξψy(Θ(Zy,𝒜))\xi\in\psi_{y}^{*}(\Theta(Z_{y},\mathcal{A})) if and only if for any xZyx\in Z_{y},

((ψy)(ξ))(x)=zψy1(x)ξ(z)𝒦(2(Z)𝒜)𝒜((\psi_{y})_{*}(\xi))(x)=\bigoplus_{z\in\psi_{y}^{-1}(x)}\xi(z)\in\mathcal{K}(\ell^{2}(Z)\otimes\mathcal{A})\cong\mathcal{A}

gives an element in Θ(Zy,𝒜)\Theta(Z_{y},\mathcal{A}) (as we did in (1)). Define

(Z,(Y,𝒜)𝒦)\mathcal{E}\subseteq\ell^{\infty}(Z,\ell^{\infty}(Y,\mathcal{A})\otimes\mathcal{K})

to be the set of all functions ξ\xi such that

  • (1)

    there exists NN\in\mathbb{N} such that ξ(z)=i=1Nηz,iKz,i\xi(z)=\sum_{i=1}^{N}\eta_{z,i}\otimes K_{z,i}, where ηz,i(Y,𝒜)\eta_{z,i}\in\ell^{\infty}(Y,\mathcal{A}) and Kz,i𝒦K_{z,i}\in\mathcal{K};

  • (2)

    for any fixed yy, the map zηz,i(y)z\mapsto\eta_{z,i}(y) determines an element in ψy(Θ(Zy,𝒜))\psi_{y}^{*}(\Theta(Z_{y},\mathcal{A}));

  • (3)

    there exists M>0M>0 such that rank(Kz,i)Mrank(K_{z,i})\leq M for any ii and zZz\in Z.

One can check that \mathcal{E} is a coarse ZZ-algebra. For any yYy\in Y, we may write y=ϕy(Θ(Zy,𝒜))\mathcal{E}_{y}=\phi_{y}^{*}(\Theta(Z_{y},\mathcal{A})) to be the restriction of \mathcal{E} at yy. Then it is direct to check that

C(Z,(Y,𝒜)𝒦)MoritalimnyYuMn(Cy(Z,𝒜))yYuCΓ(Zy,𝒜)(Zy,𝒜)C(Z~,𝒟),C^{*}_{\mathcal{E}}(Z,\ell^{\infty}(Y,\mathcal{A})\otimes\mathcal{K})\sim_{\text{Morita}}\lim_{n\to\infty}\prod^{u}_{y\in Y}M_{n}(C^{*}_{\mathcal{E}_{y}}(Z,\mathcal{A}))\cong\prod^{u}_{y\in Y}C^{*}_{\Gamma(Z_{y},\mathcal{A})}(Z_{y},\mathcal{A})\cong C^{*}(\widetilde{Z},\mathcal{D}),

where the first Morita equivalence is given by the uniform rank condition and the second isomorphism is because 𝒜\mathcal{A} is stable and Cy(Z,𝒜)C^{*}_{\mathcal{E}_{y}}(Z,\mathcal{A}) is quasi-stable. With a similar argument as in the last paragraph in the proof of Lemma 4.5, we can show that the map (14) is equivalent to the assembly map of ZZ with coefficient in \mathcal{E}. By assumption, CBCcoef holds for ZZ, thus the map (14) is an isomorphism. This finishes the proof. ∎

Remark 4.8.

Here is a short remark on the infinite uniform version of the coarse Baum-Connes conjecture (without coefficient). For a metric space XX, if K(C(X))K_{*}(C^{*}(X)) is finitely generated, then the coarse Baum-Connes conjecture for XX is equivalent to the coarse Baum-Connes conjecture for X~=nX\widetilde{X}=\bigsqcup_{n\in\mathbb{N}}X. Indeed, one should notice that there exists a canonical inclusion

C(X~)nC(X).C^{*}(\widetilde{X})\to\prod_{n\in\mathbb{N}}C^{*}(X). (15)

For the KK-homology side, by [14, Theorem 6.4.20], we have that

K(CL(Pd(X~)))nK(C(Pd(X)))K_{*}(C^{*}_{L}(P_{d}(\widetilde{X})))\cong\prod_{n\in\mathbb{N}}K_{*}(C^{*}(P_{d}(X)))

for each d0d\geq 0. Hence, it suffices to show (15) induces an isomorphism on KK-theory. More precisely, it suffices to show for every presentation element of KK-theory class on the right side, it is homotopy equivalent to an element that has uniform finite propagation.

We shall only show it for K0K_{0}, it is similar for K1K_{1}. Say {a(0),,a(n)}K0(C(X))\{a^{(0)},\cdots,a^{(n)}\}\subseteq K_{0}(C^{*}(X)) is a finite generating set. Thus it suffices to show for an element in the form [ay(ny)]yYK0(C(X))[a^{(n_{y})}_{y}]\in\prod_{y\in Y}K_{0}(C^{*}(X)). Since the Baum-Connes conjecture holds for XX, there exists d0d\geq 0 such that one can find elements {b0,,bn}K0(CL(Pd(X)))\{b_{0},\cdots,b_{n}\}\subseteq K_{0}(C^{*}_{L}(P_{d}(X))) such that ev(bk)=akev_{*}(b_{k})=a_{k} for each k{0,,n}k\in\{0,\cdots,n\}. One can always find such a dd since there are only finitely many elements in our consideration. The presentation element ([pk][qk])([p_{k}]-[q_{k}]) for (bk)(b_{k}) can be chosen to be equi-continuous by [14, Theorem 6.4.20]. For sufficiently large tt, one can assume that (pk(t)qk(t))kMn(C(Pd(X)))(p_{k}(t)-q_{k}(t))_{k}\in M_{n}(C^{*}(P_{d}(X))) has uniformly finite propagation. Since Pd(X)P_{d}(X) is coarse equivalent to XX, thus [AdU(pk(t)qk(t))][Ad_{U}(p_{k}(t)-q_{k}(t))] is equal to aka_{k}, where AdUAd_{U} induces an isomorphism between Roe algebras. This finishes the proof.

5. Applications and corollaries

As a direct corollary of Theorem 4.1 and Theorem 3.7, we have the following result.

Corollary 5.1.

Let ZXYZ\to X\to Y be a coarse ZZ-fibration with bounded geometry. If ZZ and YY admit a coarse embedding into Hilbert space, then the coarse Baum-Connes conjecture (with coefficient) holds for XX.∎

A metric space XX in Corollary 5.1 is said to admit a CE-by-CE coarse fibration structure. It is proved in [1] that such a space may not coarsely embed into Hilbert space. Let (1NnGnQn1)n(1\to N_{n}\to G_{n}\to Q_{n}\to 1)_{n\in\mathbb{N}} be a sequence of group extensions. In [5], Q. Wang, G. Yu, and the first author show that if the coarse disjoint unions of (Nn)n(N_{n})_{n\in\mathbb{N}} and (Qn)n(Q_{n})_{n\in\mathbb{N}} coarsely embeds into Hilbert space, then the coarse Baum-Connes conjecture holds for the coarse disjoint union of (Gn)n(G_{n})_{n\in\mathbb{N}}. But their method can not be used for a single extension 1NGQ11\to N\to G\to Q\to 1 with N,QN,Q are infinite and coarsely embeddable into Hilbert space. But here the quotient map p:GQp:G\to Q gives a coarse NN-fibration to GG, which gives a CE-by-CE coarse fibration structure to GG. By Corollary 5.1, we show that the coarse Baum-Connes conjecture and the Novikov conjecture hold for the groups constructed by G. Arzhantseva and R. Tessera in [2].

More generally, we have the following result.

Corollary 5.2.

Let GG be a countable discrete group which is a finite extension of groups that coarsely embeds into Hilbert space. Then the coarse Baum-Connes conjecture (with coefficient) holds for GG.∎

We also conclude the CBCcoef for product space.

Corollary 5.3.

CBCcoef holds for XX and YY if and only if CBCcoef holds for X×YX\times Y.

Proof.

For ()(\Rightarrow), it is a direct conclusion of Corollary 5.1 and Example 2.10. By Theorem 2.11, together with a similar argument as in Lemma 4.2, the coarse Baum-Connes conjecture with a coefficient for XX is equivalent to a coarse Baum-Connes conjecture for X×YX\times Y with an induced coefficient. This proves ()(\Leftarrow). ∎

This method can also be used to study coarse Novikov conjecture, which claims that the coarse assembly map is injective.

Conjecture 2 (Coarse Novikov conjecture with coefficient).

Let XX be a metric space with bounded geometry. Then for any coarse XX-algebra Γ(X,𝒜)\Gamma(X,\mathcal{A}), the twisted assembly map μX,𝒜\mu_{X,\mathcal{A}} is injective.

Recall the proof of our main theorem, CBCcoef for the base space is used in Step 2, and CBCcoef for fiber space is used in Step 3 and Step 4. Notice that in Step 3, we shall need an isomorphism to do the cutting and pasting argument, which can not be replaced by injective. But if we only assume the coarse Novikov conjecture with coefficient for the base space, we can still conclude the coarse Novikov conjecture for the whole space XX, which leads to the following theorem.

Theorem 5.4.

Let ZXYZ\to X\to Y be a coarse ZZ-fibration with bounded geometry. If the coarse Novikov conjecture with coefficient holds YY and CBCcoef holds for ZZ, then the coarse Novikov conjecture with coefficient holds XX.

In [8], Z. Luo, Q. Wang, Y. Zhang, and the second author have introduced many examples of coarsely proper algebras with a Bott generator. By using a similar argument with Theorem 3.7, one can actually show that the coarse Novikov conjecture with coefficient holds for a bounded geometry space XX that coarsely embeds into a Hadamard manifold (or a Banach space with Property (H), or an admissible Hilbert-Hadamard space). Therefore, Theorem 5.4 provides a new approach to the main theorem of [8, Theorem 1.2].

References

  • AT [15] G. Arzhantseva and R. Tessera. Relative expanders. Geom. Funct. Anal., 25(2):317–341, 2015.
  • AT [19] G. Arzhantseva and R. Tessera. Admitting a coarse embedding is not preserved under group extensions. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN, 2019(20):6480–6498, 2019.
  • BGR [77] L. G. Brown, P. Green, and M. A. Rieffel. Stable isomorphism and strong Morita equivalence of CC^{*}-algebras. Pacific J. Math., 71(2):349–363, 1977.
  • Den [22] J. Deng. The Novikov conjecture and extensions of coarsely embeddable groups. J. Noncommut. Geom., 16(1):265–310, 2022.
  • DWY [23] J. Deng, Q. Wang, and G. Yu. The coarse Baum-Connes conjecture for certain relative expanders. Adv. Math., 424:Paper No. 109047, 52, 2023.
  • Eng [19] A. Engel. Uniform KK-theory, and Poincaré duality for uniform KK-homology. J. Funct. Anal., 276(7):2103–2155, 2019.
  • FWY [20] B. Fu, X. Wang, and G. Yu. The equivariant coarse Novikov conjecture and coarse embedding. Comm. Math. Phys., 380(1):245–272, 2020.
  • GLWZ [23] L. Guo, Z. Luo, Q. Wang, and Y. Zhang. The twisted coarse Baum-Connes conjecture with coefficients in coarsely proper algebras. J. Funct. Anal., 285(8):Paper No. 110067, 2023.
  • GLWZ [24] L. Guo, Z. Luo, Q. Wang, and Y. Zhang. KK-Theory of the maximal and reduced Roe algebras of metric spaces with A-by-CE coarse fibrations. J. Topol. Anal., 16(6):989–1016, 2024.
  • Gre [78] P. Green. The local structure of twisted covariance algebras. Acta Math., 140(3-4):191–250, 1978.
  • HKT [98] N. Higson, G. Kasparov, and J. Trout. A Bott periodicity theorem for infinite-dimensional Euclidean space. Adv. Math., 135(1):1–40, 1998.
  • Špa [09] J. Špakula. Uniform KK-homology theory. J. Funct. Anal., 257(1):88–121, 2009.
  • ŠW [13] J. Špakula and R. Willett. Maximal and reduced Roe algebras of coarsely embeddable spaces. J. Reine Angew. Math., 678:35–68, 2013.
  • WY [20] R. Willett and G. Yu. Higher index theory, volume 189 of Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2020.
  • Yu [97] G. Yu. Localization algebras and the coarse Baum-Connes conjecture. KK-Theory, 11(4):307–318, 1997.
  • Yu [00] G. Yu. The coarse Baum-Connes conjecture for spaces which admit a uniform embedding into Hilbert space. Invent. Math., 139(1):201–240, 2000.