Tuning the superconducting dome in granular aluminum thin films
Abstract
Granular aluminum, which consists of nanometer-sized aluminum grains separated by aluminum oxide, is a peculiar superconductor. Its phase diagram as function of normal-state resistivity features a superconducting dome with a maximum critical temperature well above the of pure aluminum. Here we show how the maximum of this superconducting dome grows if the substrate temperature during deposition is lowered from 300 K to cooling with liquid nitrogen (150 K and 100 K) and liquid helium (25 K). The highest we observe is 3.27 K. These results highlight that granular aluminum is a model system for complex phase diagrams of superconductors and demonstrate its potential in the context of high kinetic inductance applications. This is augmented by our observation of comparably sharp superconducting transitions of high-resistivity samples grown at cryogenic temperatures and by a thickness dependence even for films substantially thicker than the grain size.
- Keywords
-
Superconductivity, granular aluminum, grain size, superconducting dome
I Introduction
Strongly disordered as well as granular superconductors can have very low superfluid density , i.e. the density of Cooper pairs in the superconducting condensate can be much smaller than in crystalline superconductors [1]. Such superconductors with low can host various unconventional electronic states including Cooper pair insulators or pseudogap states [2]. These states often depend on the level of disorder in the material, which thus acts as a convenient tuning parameter during material growth. The corresponding phase diagrams, where the critical temperature of superconductivity typically is suppressed with increasing disorder, have been studied in great detail in the context of the superconductor-insulator transition [3]. Manifestations of low are long London penetration depth (from a magnetic-field point of view) and high kinetic inductance (from an electrodynamic point of view) [4]. Superconductors with high play an important role as microwave circuit elements [5], or for parametric amplifiers [6, 7, 8] within the context of superconducting quantum computing [9]. Furthermore, strongly disordered superconductors are the core material for superconducting nanowire single photon detectors (SNSPDs) [10].

Granular aluminum plays a prominent role among the wider class of disordered superconductors due to several characteristics [11, 12]: (1) preparation of granular aluminum films is straightforward by deposition of aluminum vapor in an oxygen atmosphere (e.g. using thermal or electron-beam evaporation or sputtering) [13, 14, 15, 16]. (2) The normal-state resistivity and the superfluid density can be tuned over several orders of magnitude [13, 17]. (3) With increasing normal-state resistivity, first increases substantially before then decreasing, leading to a phase diagram with a so-called superconducting dome [13]. (4) These properties are advantageous in the field of quantum circuits and superconducting quantum computation, and therefore granular aluminum has been employed in numerous studies of concrete applications [18, 19, 20, 16].
Thus it might come as a surprise that the underlying mechanisms that control superconductivity in granular aluminum, including the shape of the superconducting dome, have been at the center of long-standing discussions. General considerations about material characteristics of granular aluminum are sketched in Fig. 1(a), and the previously established resulting phase diagram with superconducting dome [21, 13, 17, 22, 23] is shown schematically in Fig. 1(b).
Granular aluminum consists of nanometer-sized grains of pure aluminum within an aluminum oxide matrix. With overall properties being metallic, this means that neighbouring aluminum grains are strongly coupled via thin oxide barriers [24]. Microscopically, the superconducting state of granular aluminum thus can be considered a random three-dimensional array of superconducting islands coupled via Josephson junctions, while the macroscopic electronic properties of granular aluminum are similar to those of homogeneously disordered superconductors [25, 17, 26, 23]. The normal-state dc resistivity is a commonly used material property to quantify grain decoupling in granular aluminum, which in the phase diagram (see Fig. 1(b)) is a parameter that can be tuned during growth. Previous studies have demonstrated that the initial increase of for increasing is due to an increase of the superconducting energy gap while the subsequent decrease of is caused by suppressed superfluid density [17, 27]. The size of the aluminum grains is another crucial parameter. Most experiments with superconducting granular aluminum employ thin films that were deposited on room-temperature substrates, where the diameter of the aluminum grains is around 3 nm, with maximum of the superconducting dome around 2.2 K [21]. If instead the films are deposited onto substrates cooled with liquid nitrogen, then the grain size is around 2 nm, and maximum is around 3.2 K [13, 28]. Superconductivity in such films grown at nitrogen temperatures was researched intensely by the Tel Aviv group [29, 23, 28, 11]. Earlier related investigations into superconducting aluminum films utilized even colder substrates [30, 31, 32], though with different scientific aims, with different fabrication, and with challenges concerning sample stability. Therefore, the goal of the present study is investigating the evolution of the superconducting dome of granular aluminum as a function of substrate temperature, from room temperature down to cooling with liquid helium.
II Sample preparation and measurement
The granular aluminum films presented in this work were prepared by thermal evaporation of high-purity aluminum from a tungsten boat onto sapphire (Al2O3) substrates mounted on a copper substrate holder held at a distance of 28 cm from the boat. The substrate holder plate is directly coupled to the cryogenic tank and has built-in heater and sensor for temperature control. The films were grown in presence of a constant oxygen flow in the chamber to achieve the granular structure. An adjustable and gradually increasing current was passed through the tungsten boat to control the rate of evaporation of the aluminum. The substrate was kept at a constant temperature with the help of the heater. The thickness of the film was calculated using a quartz crystal installed inside the evaporation chamber that acts as rate meter.
The pressure in the deposition chamber before evaporation, in absence of oxygen, ranged between (for substrates at 300 K) and (for substrates at 25 K). To reach cold substrate temperatures, liquid nitrogen (N2; boiling temperature of 77 K) or liquid helium (He; boiling temperature of 4 K) was introduced in the cryostat above the sample holder.
Two main process variables that affect the resistivity of the films are oxygen flow in the chamber and rate of evaporation of aluminum. The lower the oxygen flow, the lower is the resistivity due to reduced aluminum oxide barriers between the aluminum grains. Similarly, the higher the evaporation rate, the more aluminum is deposited on the substrate with respect to the incorporated oxygen, hence decreasing the resistivity. The films were prepared with resistivities ranging from 4 to 7000 cm. To cover this range, the oxygen flow in the chamber was varied between 0.1 and 1.0 SCCM (standard cubic centimeters per minute). Similarly, the rate of evaporation of aluminum was varied between 0.8 and 3.5 Å/s. The growth rate is set to a nearly constant level before the shutter in front of the substrate is opened.
For substrates cooled with liquid nitrogen, we investigated samples grown either at 150 K or 100 K substrate temperature. For helium-cooled substrates, the temperature was 25 K, which was the lowest temperature that we could routinely stabilize during the growth process of the films.
After film growth, the samples were taken out of the evaporator to ambient, and then contacted for temperature-dependent dc resistance measurements, which were performed in separate 4He-cooled bath cryostats. Most of the samples were grown on mm2 substrates (suitable for THz measurements [33, 17, 23]) and studied using 4-point dc measurements in van der Pauw geometry (with contacts at the corners of the sample). A few samples were grown on mm2 substrates and then contacted using gold Corbino contacts (suitable for GHz measurements [34]) deposited through a shadow mask in a separate thermal evaporator. Here dc resistance was measured in 2-point configuration, and the offset due to wiring was determined from a reference measurement. For all samples, the dc resistivity was obtained from the dc resistance, the known lateral geometry, and the thickness as determined during growth with the quartz rate meter. The normal-state resistivity at 5 K is used to relate the samples within the phase diagram below, and was defined as the temperature where the measured resistivity amounts to half of this normal-state value.
III Results and discussion

III.1 Thickness dependence
For superconducting films prepared from pure aluminum, previous studies have demonstrated a clear increase of above the bulk value 1.2 K if the thickness is reduced, in particular below 20 nm (with 1.4 K) and even more pronounced below 10 nm, while the actual numbers depend a lot on details of the sample fabrication [35, 36, 37, 38].
For granular aluminum films the grain size is a key length scale governing [39], whereas the thickness is considered to be less important. Therefore, discussion of the superconducting dome as presented in Fig. 1 usually does not consider the sample thickness, which for many studies in this context is several tens of nanometers up to 100 nm.
In line with the current interest in superconducting films with preferably high kinetic inductance, we focus on granular aluminum films of thickness between 10 nm and 20 nm, several times the expected grain size of 3 nm or smaller. But during the course of this work, we realized an influence of the film thickness also for granular aluminum. Therefore, we grew several films at the same substrate temperature of 100 K, with film thickness ranging from 10 nm to 70 nm. The desired value was chosen on the top of the superconducting dome, where small variations of have little impact on . The superconducting transitions of these samples are shown as resistivity data in Fig. 2(b) and the resulting values for in Fig. 2(a).
For these films, clearly depends on film thickness, in a way that qualitatively resembles the behavior of pure aluminum films. But while for the latter a simple behavior was found [36], here we observe that the decrease of with increasing is weaker. This indicates that the thickness is less important here, which is consistent with the granular structure setting an intrinsic relevant length scale, namely the grain size of approximately 2 nm, which is still smaller but not much smaller than the investigated film thicknesses.

III.2 Superconducting domes
The resistive transitions for exemplary samples grown at three different substrate temperatures are shown in the three panels of Fig. 3. In total, these samples span more than three orders of magnitude in normal-state resistivity, and the corresponding varies substantially. These plots also indicate that the superconducting transitions in general become broader for the higher-resistivity samples, although one should not be misled due to the different vertical scale regions.

The resulting phase diagrams, i.e. superconducting domes for different substrate temperatures, are shown in Fig. 4. The main result is that the highest , i.e. the top of the superconducting dome, increases for reduced substrate temperature, and thus our highest is obtained for our lowest substrate temperature of 25 K. This confirms the trend previously observed when comparing samples grown at room temperature and with nitrogen cooling [13]. (Additional data concerning substrate temperatures between 150 K and 290 K are presented in the Appendix.)
Here it might seem surprising that the superconducting domes that we find for substrate temperatures 150 K and 100 K basically lie on top of each other. But this can be explained by the different film thickness, with the 100 K-grown films of 20 nm being thicker than the 150 K-grown films of 15 nm. Thus, for these two data sets the enhancements due to lower substrate temperature (smaller grains) and lower film thickness compensate to coincidental overlap.
Furthermore, the maximum of the superconducting domes seem to be located in the same normal-state resistivity range, 300 cm to 800 cm, for all investigated substrate temperatures. This is consistent with previous studies of the superconducting dome of granular aluminum [13, 40, 41, 23, 27, 22].
The fundamental mechanism causing the strong enhancement of superconducting energy gap and has been debated since its first observation [11]. For the left side of the dome, the shell effect can explain the enhancement and highlights the role of the grain size [42, 43, 17], which can be tuned by substrate cooling. For the right side of the dome it has been demonstrated experimentally that the superfluid density strongly decreases with increasing , and thus it is assumed that here is governed by the superfluid stiffness , i.e. the energy scale that characterizes the resilience of the superfluid condensate to fluctuations of the phase of the condensate [44]. For such superconductors in the dirty limit, one often estimates via . Assuming that is basically constant on the right side of the dome [17], then should be proportional to and thus inversely proportional to . Comparing the behavior of as suggested by Pracht et al. [17] with our observed , we find the previously reported convergence of and for samples grown under nitrogen cooling. For samples grown at 25 K, the higher maximum suggests a larger energy gap due to smaller grain size and thus, following , larger is expected for a given (assuming that is governed by the oxide between the grains and not by the pure aluminum grains). Thus the right flank of the ‘25 K dome’ could be shifted slightly upwards/to the right when compared to the ‘100 K dome’. Unfortunately, the highest that we have obtained for samples grown under helium cooling is only 1630 cm, and thus too low for definite statements concerning the slope on the right side of the dome. Here, further studies towards even higher resistivity are desired.
On the left side of the phase diagram, our data would be consistent with all these investigated superconducting domes fanning out around . Also here more detailed studies would be of interest to confirm whether there indeed is such a unique value of that separates overlapping from differing behavior or whether the curves separate more gradually.
III.3 Width of superconducting transitions

For certain applications as well as for fundamental material characterization, the width of a superconducting transition is important. For granular aluminum, it has been observed that the superconducting transition becomes broader with higher of the sample [13]. In Fig. 5 we show the transition width, defined as the temperature difference between the two temperatures where the sample resistivity equals 90% and 10%, respectively, of the normal-state resistivity at 5 K, for samples grown at substrate temperatures 300 K, 100 K, and 25 K. Here we see the expected trend with low transition width for low and a clear increase with increasing . Interestingly, for the samples grown at 100 K and 25 K, the transition width seems to not increase further for beyond 1000 cm. As seen in the inset of Fig. 5 and in Fig. 3(a) for the high- samples grown at 300 K there is prominent rounding of the curve at the higher-temperature edge of the superconducting transition, as is commonly discussed as Aslamazov-Larkin paraconductivity for homogeneously disordered superconductors and for granular aluminum [45, 46]. This effect is less pronounced for samples grown at lower temperatures. This might possibly be explained with previous observations [47, 48, 11] that the grain-size distribution for films grown at cryogenic temperatures is more homogeneous and thus that disorder effects are less relevant.
IV Conclusions
We have grown granular aluminum films at substrate temperatures ranging from room temperature down to 25 K. We find that the superconducting dome of becomes higher for decreasing substrate temperature, thus extending to the helium temperature range the trend previously observed down to nitrogen temperatures. This suggests that the reduction of grain size, which was previously characterized for room temperature and nitrogen temperature, continues into the helium temperature range. Clearly, structural characterization of films grown at helium temperatures is highly desired to confirm this evolution of grain size.
Often granular aluminum is considered to be a material system that is rather unsusceptible to the exact details of sample preparation, i.e. the type of disorder in the system generated by growth of aluminum grains with oxide barriers in between generally seems to be rather robust. Our study indicates that the story of superconductivity in granular aluminum might be even more intricate than already established. One aspect is the substantial thickness dependence. Another is the fact that the maximum of the superconducting domes that we observe for substrate temperatures of 300 K and 100 K is somewhat lower than previously reported in literature [21, 13, 17, 22, 23]. This might be important for quantitative optimization of devices that utilize the kinetic inductance of superconducting granular aluminum, since is not ‘universal’ even for room-temperature growth.
This makes the picture of superconductivity in granular aluminum more complex, and it asks for more theoretical investigations of this fascinating model system for superconductivity with mesoscopic disorder. It also means that additional tuning parameters during growth might be possible, which could be helpful during material optimization for specific applications. In this context, our observation that the transition width of granular aluminum grown on cryogenically cooled substrates, for the region of high resistivity and thus high kinetic inductance, is narrower than for room-temperature growth, might be particularly attractive. It also reinforces the general interest in unconventional behavior of superconductors with low superfluid density, e.g. including collective excitations [49, 50, 51, 52, 27], which now might become accessible with an even wider choice of tuning options.
Acknowledgments
We thank Gabriele Untereiner for support with sample preparation, Alessandro D’Arnese for initial work on the evaporator, and Nimrod Bachar, Ameya Nambisan, and Ioan Pop for helpful discussions. We acknowledge financial support by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG (project SCHE 1580/6-1 / DR 228/57-1) and by the Baden-Württemberg Stiftung within project QT-10 (QEDHiNet).

Appendix: continuous evolution of dome height
We have prepared a set of films matching closely the top of the ‘150 K’-dome, with thickness 10 nm and , while changing the substrate temperature between 150 K and 290 K. The resulting values for are shown in Fig. 6. We find a continuous reduction of with increasing substrate temperature. This confirms the general conception that grain size decreases continuously for cooler substrates and that this induces higher . Thus any cooling of the substrate, even if it does not reach the ‘nitrogen range’ around 77 K to 100 K, can significantly enhance .
References
- Dutta et al. [2022] S. Dutta, P. Raychaudhuri, S. S. Mandal, and T. Ramakrishnan, V, Superfluid density in conventional superconductors: from clean to strongly disordered, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 34, 335601 (2022).
- Sacépé et al. [2011] B. Sacépé, T. Dubouchet, C. Chapelier, M. Sanquer, M. Ovadia, D. Shahar, M. Feigel’man, and L. Ioffe, Localization of preformed Cooper pairs in disordered superconductors, Nat. Phys. 7, 239 (2011).
- Sacépé et al. [2020] B. Sacépé, M. Feigel’man, and T. M. Klapwijk, Quantum breakdown of superconductivity in low-dimensional materials, Nat. Phys. 16, 734 (2020).
- Meservey and Tedrow [1969] R. Meservey and P. M. Tedrow, Measurements of the kinetic inductance of superconducting linear structures, J. Appl. Phys. 40, 2028 (1969).
- Niepce et al. [2019] D. Niepce, J. Burnett, and J. Bylander, High kinetic inductance nanowire superinductors, Phys. Rev. Applied 11, 044014 (2019).
- Eom et al. [2012] B. H. Eom, P. K. Day, H. G. LeDuc, and J. Zmuidzinas, A wideband, low-noise superconducting amplifier with high dynamic range, Nat. Phys. 8, 623 (2012).
- Malnou et al. [2021] M. Malnou, M. Vissers, J. Wheeler, J. Aumentado, J. Hubmayr, J. Ullom, and J. Gao, Three-wave mixing kinetic inductance traveling-wave amplifier with near-quantum-limited noise performance, PRX Quantum 2, 010302 (2021).
- Zapata et al. [2024] N. Zapata, I. Takmakov, S. Günzler, A. Nambisan, D. Rieger, T. Reisinger, W. Wernsdorfer, and I. M. Pop, Granular Aluminum Parametric Amplifier for Low-Noise Measurements in Tesla Fields (2024), arXiv:2403.10669 [quant-ph] .
- Winkel et al. [2020] P. Winkel, K. Borisov, L. Grünhaupt, D. Rieger, M. Spiecker, F. Valenti, A. V. Ustinov, W. Wernsdorfer, and I. M. Pop, Implementation of a transmon qubit using superconducting granular aluminum, Phys. Rev. X 10, 031032 (2020).
- Esmaeil Zadeh et al. [2021] I. Esmaeil Zadeh, J. Chang, J. W. N. Los, S. Gyger, A. W. Elshaari, S. Steinhauer, S. N. Dorenbos, and V. Zwiller, Superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors: A perspective on evolution, state-of-the-art, future developments, and applications, Appl. Phys. Lett. 118, 190502 (2021).
- Deutscher [2021] G. Deutscher, Granular Superconductivity: a Playground for Josephson, Anderson, Kondo, and Mott, J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. 34, 1699 (2021).
- Bachar and Moshe [2023] N. Bachar and A. G. Moshe, From a superconductor to a Mott insulator: The case of granular aluminum, Physica C 614, 1354359 (2023).
- Deutscher et al. [1973a] G. Deutscher, M. Gershenson, E. Grünbaum, and Y. Imry, Granular Superconducting Films, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 10, 697 (1973a).
- Rotzinger et al. [2016] H. Rotzinger, S. T. Skacel, M. Pfirrmann, J. N. Voss, J. Münzberg, S. Probst, P. Bushev, M. P. Weides, A. V. Ustinov, and J. E. Mooij, Aluminium-oxide wires for superconducting high kinetic inductance circuits, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 30, 025002 (2016).
- Grünhaupt et al. [2019] L. Grünhaupt, M. Spiecker, D. Gusenkova, N. Maleeva, S. T. Skacel, I. Takmakov, F. Valenti, P. Winkel, H. Rotzinger, W. Wernsdorfer, A. V. Ustinov, and I. M. Pop, Granular aluminium as a superconducting material for high-impedance quantum circuits, Nat. Mater. 18, 816 (2019).
- Kamenov et al. [2020] P. Kamenov, W.-S. Lu, K. Kalashnikov, T. DiNapoli, M. T. Bell, and M. E. Gershenson, Granular aluminum meandered superinductors for quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. Appl. 13, 054051 (2020).
- Pracht et al. [2016] U. S. Pracht, N. Bachar, L. Benfatto, G. Deutscher, E. Farber, M. Dressel, and M. Scheffler, Enhanced Cooper pairing versus suppressed phase coherence shaping the superconducting dome in coupled aluminum nanograins, Phys. Rev. B 93, 100503 (2016).
- Grünhaupt et al. [2018] L. Grünhaupt, N. Maleeva, S. T. Skacel, M. Calvo, F. Levy-Bertrand, A. V. Ustinov, H. Rotzinger, A. Monfardini, G. Catelani, and I. M. Pop, Loss mechanisms and quasiparticle dynamics in superconducting microwave resonators made of thin-film granular aluminum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 117001 (2018).
- Zhang et al. [2019] W. Zhang, K. Kalashnikov, W.-S. Lu, P. Kamenov, T. DiNapoli, and M. E. Gershenson, Microresonators Fabricated from High-Kinetic-Inductance Aluminum Films, Phys. Rev. Appl. 11, 011003 (2019).
- Moshe et al. [2020] A. G. Moshe, E. Farber, and G. Deutscher, Granular superconductors for high kinetic inductance and low loss quantum devices, Applied Physics Letters 117, 062601 (2020).
- Deutscher et al. [1973b] G. Deutscher, H. Fenichel, M. Gershenson, E. Grünbaum, and Z. Ovadyahu, Transition to zero dimensionality in granular aluminum superconducting films, J. Low Temp. Phys. 10, 231 (1973b).
- Valenti et al. [2019] F. Valenti, F. Henriques, G. Catelani, N. Maleeva, L. Grünhaupt, U. von Lüpke, S. T. Skacel, P. Winkel, A. Bilmes, A. V. Ustinov, J. Goupy, M. Calvo, A. Benoît, F. Levy-Bertrand, A. Monfardini, and I. M. Pop, Interplay Between Kinetic Inductance, Nonlinearity, and Quasiparticle Dynamics in Granular Aluminum Microwave Kinetic Inductance Detectors, Phys. Rev. Appl. 11, 054087 (2019).
- Moshe et al. [2019] A. G. Moshe, E. Farber, and G. Deutscher, Optical conductivity of granular aluminum films near the Mott metal-to-insulator transition, Phys. Rev. B 99, 224503 (2019).
- Cohen and Abeles [1968] R. W. Cohen and B. Abeles, Superconductivity in Granular Aluminum Films, Phys. Rev. 168, 444 (1968).
- Steinberg et al. [2008] K. Steinberg, M. Scheffler, and M. Dressel, Quasiparticle response of superconducting aluminum to electromagnetic radiation, Phys. Rev. B 77, 214517 (2008).
- Pracht et al. [2013] U. S. Pracht, E. Heintze, C. Clauss, D. Hafner, R. Bek, D. Werner, S. Gelhorn, M. Scheffler, M. Dressel, D. Sherman, B. Gorshunov, K. S. Il’in, D. Henrich, and M. Siegel, Electrodynamics of the superconducting state in ultra-thin films at THz frequencies, IEEE Trans. THz Sci. Technol. 3, 269 (2013).
- Levy-Bertrand et al. [2019] F. Levy-Bertrand, T. Klein, T. Grenet, O. Dupré, A. Benoît, A. Bideaud, O. Bourrion, M. Calvo, A. Catalano, A. Gomez, J. Goupy, L. Grünhaupt, U. v. Luepke, N. Maleeva, F. Valenti, I. M. Pop, and A. Monfardini, Electrodynamics of granular aluminum from superconductor to insulator: Observation of collective superconducting modes, Phys. Rev. B 99, 094506 (2019).
- Moshe et al. [2021] A. G. Moshe, G. Tuvia, S. Avraham, E. Farber, and G. Deutscher, Tunneling study in granular aluminum near the mott metal-to-insulator transition, Phys. Rev. B 104, 054508 (2021).
- Bachar et al. [2015a] N. Bachar, S. Lerer, A. Levy, S. Hacohen-Gourgy, B. Almog, H. Saadaoui, Z. Salman, E. Morenzoni, and G. Deutscher, Mott transition in granular aluminum, Phys. Rev. B 91, 041123 (2015a).
- Buckel and Hilsch [1954] W. Buckel and R. Hilsch, Einfluß der Kondensation bei tiefen Temperaturen auf den elektrischen Widerstand und die Supraleitung für verschiedene Metalle, Z. Physik 138, 109 (1954).
- Strongin and Kammerer [1968] M. Strongin and O. F. Kammerer, Superconductive phenomena in ultrathin films, J. Appl. Phys. 39, 2509 (1968).
- Sixl et al. [1974] H. Sixl, J. Gromer, and H. C. Wolf, Tunnelspektroskopie an dünnsten supraleitenden aluminium-, indium- und bleischichten / superconducting tunneling into ultrathin aluminum, indium and lead films, Z. Naturforsch. A 29, 319 (1974).
- Bachar et al. [2015b] N. Bachar, U. S. Pracht, E. Farber, M. Dressel, G. Deutscher, and M. Scheffler, Signatures of Unconventional Superconductivity in Granular Aluminum, J. Low Temp. Phys. 179, 83 (2015b).
- Scheffler and Dressel [2005] M. Scheffler and M. Dressel, Broadband microwave spectroscopy in Corbino geometry for temperatures down to 1.7 K, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 76, 074702 (2005).
- Chubov et al. [1969] P. N. Chubov, V. V. Eremenko, and Y. A. Pilipenko, Dependence of critical temperature and energy gap on thickness of superconducting aluminum films, Sov. Phys. JETP 28, 389 (1969).
- Meservey and Tedrow [1971] R. Meservey and P. M. Tedrow, Properties of Very Thin Aluminum Films, J. Appl. Phys. 42, 51 (1971).
- Arutyunov et al. [2019] K. Arutyunov, E. Sedov, I. A. Golokolenov, V. V. Zav’yalov, G. Konstantinidis, A. Stavrinidis, G. Stavrinidis, I. Vasiliadis, T. Kekhagias, G. P. Dimitrakopulos, F. Komninu, M. D. Kroitoru, and A. A. Shanenko, Quantum Size Effect in Superconducting Aluminum Films, Phys. Solid State 61, 1559–1562 (2019).
- Yeh et al. [2023] C.-C. Yeh, T.-H. Do, P.-C. Liao, C.-H. Hsu, Y.-H. Tu, H. Lin, T.-R. Chang, S.-C. Wang, Y.-Y. Gao, Y.-H. Wu, C.-C. Wu, Y. A. Lai, I. Martin, S.-D. Lin, C. Panagopoulos, and C.-T. Liang, Doubling the superconducting transition temperature of ultraclean wafer-scale aluminum nanofilms, Phys. Rev. Mater. 7, 114801 (2023).
- Abeles et al. [1966] B. Abeles, R. W. Cohen, and G. W. Cullen, Enhancement of Superconductivity in Metal Films, Phys. Rev. Lett. 17, 632 (1966).
- Dynes et al. [1984] R. C. Dynes, J. P. Garno, G. B. Hertel, and T. P. Orlando, Tunneling Study of Superconductivity near the Metal-Insulator Transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 2437 (1984).
- Bachar et al. [2013] N. Bachar, S. Lerer, S. Hacohen-Gourgy, B. Almog, and G. Deutscher, Kondo-like behavior near the metal-to-insulator transition of nanoscale granular aluminum, Phys. Rev. B 87, 214512 (2013).
- García-García et al. [2008] A. M. García-García, J. D. Urbina, E. A. Yuzbashyan, K. Richter, and B. L. Altshuler, Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer theory of finite-size superconducting metallic grains, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 187001 (2008).
- Bose and Ayyub [2014] S. Bose and P. Ayyub, A review of finite size effects in quasi-zero dimensional superconductors, Rep. Prog. Phys. 77, 116503 (2014).
- Emery and Kivelson [1995] V. Emery and S. Kivelson, Importance of phase fluctuations in superconductors with small superfluid density, Nature 374, 434 (1995).
- Aslamazov and Larkin [1968] L. Aslamazov and A. Larkin, Effect of fluctuations on properties of a superconductor above critical temperature, Sov. Phys. Solid State 10, 875 (1968).
- Pracht [2017] U. S. Pracht, Electrodynamics of Quantum-Critical Conductors and Superconductors, Phd thesis, University of Stuttgart (2017).
- Bachar [2014] N. Bachar, Spin-flip Scattering in Superconducting Granular Aluminum Films, Phd thesis, Tel Aviv University (2014).
- Moshe et al. [2018] A. G. Moshe, N. Bachar, S. Lerer, Y. Lereah, and G. Deutscher, Multi-Level Kondo Effect and Enhanced Critical Temperature in Nanoscale Granular Al, J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. 31, 733–736 (2018).
- Buisson et al. [1994] O. Buisson, P. Xavier, and J. Richard, Observation of Propagating Plasma Modes in a Thin Superconducting Film, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 3153 (1994).
- Sherman et al. [2015] D. Sherman, U. S. Pracht, B. Gorshunov, S. Poran, J. Jesudasan, M. Chand, P. Raychaudhuri, M. Swanson, N. Trivedi, A. Auerbach, M. Scheffler, A. Frydman, and M. Dressel, The Higgs mode in disordered superconductors close to a quantum phase transition, Nat. Phys. 11, 188 (2015).
- Pracht et al. [2017] U. S. Pracht, T. Cea, N. Bachar, G. Deutscher, E. Farber, M. Dressel, M. Scheffler, C. Castellani, A. M. García-García, and L. Benfatto, Optical signatures of the superconducting Goldstone mode in granular aluminum: Experiments and theory, Phys. Rev. B 96, 094514 (2017).
- Maleeva et al. [2018] N. Maleeva, L. Grünhaupt, T. Klein, F. Levy-Bertrand, O. Dupre, M. Calvo, F. Valenti, P. Winkel, F. Friedrich, W. Wernsdorfer, A. V. Ustinov, H. Rotzinger, A. Monfardini, M. V. Fistul, and I. M. Pop, Circuit quantum electrodynamics of granular aluminum resonators, Nat. Commun. 9, 3889 (2018).