This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Topological Mott transition in a two band model of spinless fermions with on-site Coulomb repulsion

Igor N.Karnaukhov G.V. Kurdyumov Institute for Metal Physics, 36 Vernadsky Boulevard, 03142 Kiev, Ukraine
Abstract

In the framework of mean field approach, we study topological Mott transition in a two band model of spinless fermions on a square lattice at half filling. We consider the combined effect of the on-site Coulomb repulsion and the spin-orbit Rashba coupling. The ground state phase diagram is calculated as a function of the strength of the spin-orbit Rashba coupling and the Coulomb repulsion. The spin-orbit Rashba coupling leads to a distinct phase of matter, the topological semimetal. We study a new type of phase transition between the non-topological insulator and topological semimetal states. Topological phase state is characterized by the zero energy Majorana states, which there are in defined region of the wave vectors and are localized at the boundaries of the sample. The region of existence of the zero energy Majorana states tends to zero at the point of the Mott phase transition. The zero energy Majorana states are dispersionless (they can be considered as flat bands), the Chern number and Hall conductance are equal to zero (note in two dimensional model)

keywords:
Hubbard model , zero energy Majorana states , Mott transition
journal: Journal of  Templatesmytitlenotemytitlenotefootnotetext: Topological Mott transition in a two band model of spinless fermions with on-site Coulomb repulsionmyfootnotemyfootnotefootnotetext: [email protected]

1 Introduction

The experimental discovery of the first Weyl semimetal in TaAs [1] gave impetus to the study of topological gapless states in real compounds. The chiral surface states determine the topological features of the phase state: in one-dimensional systems, these are the zero energy Majorana states [2, 3, 4] (the Majorana fermions), in two-dimensional systems, we are talking about chiral edge modes localized at the boundaries [5, 6] (the Dirac fermions), in three-dimensional systems there are the Weyl nodes and topological surface states [1, 7, 8] (the Weyl fermions). As a rule, topological surface states of fermions exist for a certain dimension of the system.

Nevertheless, such behavior of topological state may not be fulfilled, such in a transverse magnetic field, graphene exists in the topological insulator state with the Chern number and Hall conductance equal to zero [3, 4]. The topology of this state is determined by the zero energy Majorana states localized at the boundaries [3, 4]. We show that this behavior of the system is not unique; the gapless state of the two-dimensional fermion liquid with the spin-orbit coupling and on-site Coulomb repulsion can be topological with the zero energy Majorana states.

In topological insulator state the interaction between fermions kills the chiral edge modes [4, 9] and a fermion liquid transforms to non-topological insulator state. At the Mott phase transition the repulsion between fermions leads to a gapped spectrum of quasi-particle excitations, the gap opens and insulator state is realized. At the same time the spin-orbit coupling opens a window for topological state formation. The Mott phase transition occurs as a result of the competition of these processes. We shall show, that in two dimension structures the spin-orbit coupling leads to the Mott transition between topological gapless state and non-topological gapped state. The zero energy Majorana states determine the gapless state with the Chern number and Hall conductance equal to zero. Thus we study a new type of metal-insulator phase transition.

2 Model and method

Consider the Hubbard model on a square lattice, the Hamiltonian of which includes the Rashba spin-orbit coupling =Hub+SO{\cal H}={\cal H}_{Hub}+{\cal H}_{SO}. The first term in Hub{\cal H}_{Hub} is a nearest neighbor hopping term, the second takes into account the on-site repulsion of spinless fermions

Hub=j=1N1α=1,2tα(cj,αcj+1,α+cj+1,αcj,α)+Uj=1Nnj,1nj,2.\displaystyle{\cal H}_{Hub}=-\sum_{j=1}^{N-1}\sum_{\alpha=1,2}t_{\alpha}(c^{\dagger}_{j,\alpha}c_{j+1,\alpha}+c^{\dagger}_{j+1,\alpha}c_{j,\alpha})+U\sum_{j=1}^{N}n_{j,1}n_{j,2}. (1)

The term SO{\cal H}_{SO} is defined for the two-orbital square lattice model [10]

SO=vm,n[cn+1,m;1cn,m;2cn+1,m;2cn,m;1+\displaystyle{\cal H}_{SO}=v\sum_{m,n}[c^{\dagger}_{n+1,m;1}c_{n,m;2}-c^{\dagger}_{n+1,m;2}c_{n,m;1}+
i(cn,m+1;1cn,m;2+cn,m+1;2cn,m;1)+H.c.],\displaystyle i(c^{\dagger}_{n,m+1;1}c_{n,m;2}+c^{\dagger}_{n,m+1;2}c_{n,m;1})+H.c.], (2)

where cj,α,cj,αc^{\dagger}_{j,\alpha},c_{j,\alpha} are the fermion operators determined on a lattice site j={n,m}j=\{n,m\} with orbital index α=1,2\alpha=1,2, UU is the value of the on-site Hubbard interaction determined by the density operator nj,α=cj,αcj,αn_{j,\alpha}=c^{\dagger}_{j,\alpha}c_{j,\alpha}, the band widths of fermions is determined by the hopping integrals tαt_{\alpha}, where t1=1t_{1}=1 and t2=tt_{2}=t (tt is changed in the interval 0<t10<t\leq 1), vv defines the strength of the Rashba spin-orbit coupling, N is the total number of atoms. As a rule the Rashba spin-orbit coupling is determined by the orbital indices ss and pp, we used the two-digit index α\alpha.

In the Hubbard model at half filling, a gap opens at the Mott-Hubbard phase transition point. It was shown in [11], that this phase transition is similar to the Peierls transition. The effective λ\lambda-field is determined by an unknown phase, its value corresponds to the minimum of the action.

Define the operators χj=cj,2cj,1\chi_{\textbf{j}}^{\dagger}=c^{\dagger}_{\textbf{j},2}c_{\textbf{j},1} and χj\chi_{\textbf{j}}, using the Hubbard-Stratonovich transformation for the on-site Coulomb repulsion, we obtain the λ\lambda-field, conjugate with these operators, λjχj+λjχj\lambda_{\textbf{j}}\chi^{\dagger}_{\textbf{j}}+\lambda^{*}_{\textbf{j}}\chi_{\textbf{j}} [11]. The solution for λj=exp(iqj)λ\lambda_{\textbf{j}}=\exp(i\textbf{q}\textbf{j})\lambda is determined by an unknown vector q and an amplitude λ\lambda, on which the energies of the quasiparticle excitations depend. The effective Hamiltonian that determines low energy excitations is defined as follows

eff(k,q)=(ε1(k)λw(k)0λε2(k+q)0w(k+q)w(k)0ε2(k)λ0w(k+q)λε1(k+q)),{\cal H}_{eff}(\textbf{k,q})=\left(\begin{array}[]{cccc}-\varepsilon_{1}(\textbf{k})&\lambda&w(\textbf{k})&0\\ \lambda^{*}&-\varepsilon_{2}(\textbf{k+q})&0&w^{*}(\textbf{k+q})\\ w^{*}(\textbf{k})&0&-\varepsilon_{2}(\textbf{k})&\lambda^{*}\\ 0&w(\textbf{k+q})&\lambda&-\varepsilon_{1}(\textbf{k+q})\end{array}\right), (3)

where ε1(k)=2i=x,ycoski\varepsilon_{1}({\textbf{k}})=-2\sum_{i=x,y}\cos{k}_{i}, ε2(k)=2ti=x,ycoski\varepsilon_{2}({\textbf{k}})=-2t\sum_{i=x,y}\cos{k}_{i}, k=(kx,ky)\textbf{k}=(k_{x},k_{y}), w(k)=2v(sinkx+isinky)w(\textbf{k})=2v(-\sin k_{x}+i\sin k_{y}), k and q are the momenta of fermions.

The λ\lambda-field connects the states of fermions with different orbital indexes and the wave vectors k and k+q, the effective Hamiltonian (3) takes into account this connection. The effective action SS has the following form

Sβ=12NkΨ(k,q)[τ+eff(k,q)]Ψ(k,q)+|λ|2U,\displaystyle\frac{S}{\beta}=\frac{{1}}{{2N}}\sum_{\textbf{k}}\Psi^{\dagger}(\textbf{k,q})[\partial_{\tau}+{\cal H}_{eff}(\textbf{k,q})]\Psi(\textbf{k,q})+\frac{|\lambda|^{2}}{{U}}, (4)

where Ψ(k,q)\Psi(\textbf{k,q}) is the four-component fermion field, two allows for a doubled cell.

Due to symmetry of the spectrum, at half filling the chemical potential is equal to zero for arbitrary λ\lambda, vv and q. According to numerical calculations [11, 12] vector q=(π,π)\textbf{q}=(\pi,\pi) corresponds to the minimum energy of system or action SS, its doubles the cell of the lattice, here

Sβ=T2Nknγ=14ln[iωn+Eγ(k,q)]+|λ|2U,\displaystyle\frac{S}{\beta}=-\frac{{T}}{{2N}}\sum_{\textbf{k}}\sum_{n}\sum_{\gamma=1}^{4}\ln[-i\omega_{n}+E_{\gamma}(\textbf{k},\textbf{q})]+\frac{|\lambda|^{2}}{{U}}, (5)

where ωn=T(2n+1)π\omega_{n}=T(2n+1)\pi are the Matsubara frequencies, four quasiparticle excitations Eγ(k,q)E_{\gamma}(\textbf{k},\textbf{q}) (γ=1,,4\gamma=1,...,4) determine the fermion states in the λ\lambda-field. In the saddle point approximation λ\lambda is the solution of the following equation S/λ=0\partial S/\partial\lambda=0.

At q=π\textbf{q}=\overrightarrow{\pi} the spectrum of quasi particle excitations is symmetric with respect to zero energy, it has the Majorana type. Four branches of the spectrum ±Eγ(k)\pm E_{\gamma}(\textbf{k)} (γ=1,2\gamma=1,2) are determined by the following expression

Eγ(k)=α(k)+(1)γβ(k),E_{\gamma}(\textbf{k})=\sqrt{\alpha(\textbf{k})+(-1)^{\gamma}\beta(\textbf{k})}, (6)

where α(k)=12(ε12(k)+ε22(k))+|λ|2+|w(k)|2\alpha(\textbf{k})=\frac{1}{2}(\varepsilon_{1}^{2}(\textbf{k})+\varepsilon_{2}^{2}(\textbf{k}))+|\lambda|^{2}+|w(\textbf{k})|^{2}, β2(k)=14[ε12(k)ε22(k)]2+[ε12(k)+ε22(k)][|λ|2+|w(k)|2]2ε1(k)ε2(k)[|λ|2|w(k)|2]+|λ|2[w(k)+w(k)]2\beta^{2}(\textbf{k})=\frac{1}{4}[\varepsilon_{1}^{2}(\textbf{k})-\varepsilon_{2}^{2}(\textbf{k})]^{2}+[\varepsilon_{1}^{2}(\textbf{k})+\varepsilon_{2}^{2}(\textbf{k})][|\lambda|^{2}+|w(\textbf{k})|^{2}]-2\varepsilon_{1}(\textbf{k})\varepsilon_{2}(\textbf{k})[|\lambda|^{2}-|w(\textbf{k})|^{2}]+|\lambda|^{2}[w(\textbf{k})+w^{*}(\textbf{k})]^{2}.

In the ground state the equation for λ\lambda follows from action (5) and spectrum (6)

2|λ|U=12γ=1,2𝑑kEγ(k)|λ|.\frac{2|\lambda|}{U}=\frac{1}{2}\sum_{\gamma=1,2}\int d\textbf{k}\frac{\partial E_{\gamma}(\textbf{k})}{\partial|\lambda|}. (7)

Below we consider separately the cases of the Hubbard model and the model with bands arbitrary along the band width.

3 The Hubbard model with the Rashba spin-orbit coupling

The λ\lambda-field breaks spontaneous symmetry of the Hamiltonian (1), the number of fermions in each band is not conserved. This allows one to take into account the scattering between fermions of different bands and the Hubbard interaction in the Hamiltonian (3). The λ\lambda-field (or UU) opens a gap in the insulator state. The Rashba spin-orbit coupling (2) breaks the time reversal symmetry of the Hamiltonian (1), forming the topological state in a gapless phase. The Rashba spin-orbit coupling removes spectrum degeneracy, the fermion spectrum splits into four branches of quasi particle excitations. The gap between high energy branches is equal to 2λ2\lambda, as it takes place in the Hubbard model in insulator state [11]. The gap Δ\Delta between the low energy branches depends on the values of λ\lambda and vv, it is equal to zero at |v|vc|v|\geq v_{c}, here vc=λ2+λλ2+1622v_{c}=\frac{\sqrt{\lambda^{2}+\lambda\sqrt{\lambda^{2}+16}}}{2\sqrt{2}}. Using the connection between λ\lambda and UU (7), we calculate the ground state phase diagram in the coordinates (U,vU,v), see in Fig 1a). The value of low energy gap tends to 2λ2\lambda at λv\lambda\gg v. At |v|<vc|v|<v_{c} an insulator state is realized, at |v|>vc|v|>v_{c} exists a gapless state (see the behavior of Δ\Delta and λ\lambda as function of UU and vv in Fig 1b) and Fig 1c)). We will consider gapless state in detail, because it is special, as shown below. For illustration let us consider the phase transition at v=0.2v=0.2 and 0<λλc=0.07840<\lambda\leq\lambda_{c}=0.0784, for λc\lambda_{c} the gap in the spectrum collapses and fermion liquid transforms into gapless state. At λ>λc\lambda>\lambda_{c} the gap opens and the Mott-Hubbard phase transition in an insulator state is realized. At λ<λc\lambda<\lambda_{c} a particle-hole symmetry protects the gapless phase. A similar behavior of an electron liquid takes place on a hexagonal lattice in a transverse magnetic field at half filling, when the Hamiltonian is a particle-hole symmetric. With another filling, the states of the topological insulator are realized [3, 4].

Nontrivial peculiarities in the behavior of the fermion liquid is determined by the low energy branches of the spectrum in a gapless state, therefore we consider the transformation only low energy spectrum at the Mott-Hubbard transition. For doubled cell the interval for wave vectors is limited by π\pi (0kx,kyπ0\leq k_{x},k_{y}\leq\pi). At the phase transition point λc\lambda_{c}, the low-energy branch touches zero energy in two points in the k-planes kx=0k_{x}=0, ky=0.4554k_{y}=0.4554 and kx=πk_{x}=\pi , ky=120.4554k_{y}=\frac{1}{2}-0.4554 forming a gapless state (see in Figs 2). Due to the Rashba spin-orbit coupling, in the gapless state a low-energy spectrum is split twice near zero energy (see in Figs 3 at λ=0.05<λc\lambda=0.05<\lambda_{c}, for illustration). There are two points, that touch zero energy in each (0,π)(0,\pi) k-plane: kx=0k_{x}=0 ky=0.4418k_{y}=0.4418, ky=0.4788k_{y}=0.4788 and kx=πk_{x}=\pi ky=0.0212k_{y}=0.0212, ky=0.0582k_{y}=0.0582 (see in Fig 3c)). As a rule, the point of the phase transition, in which a gap collapses, separates two different phase. In our case the points in k-planes, in which the gaps are equal to zero, separate topological (between these points) and non topological states in the kyk_{y}-space regions. Numerical calculations show, that topological state is characterized by the zero energy Majorana states, localized at the boundaries (see in Fig 3d)) [3, 4]. We consider the 2D fermion system in the stripe geometry with open boundary conditions for the boundaries along the y-direction. The real part of the wave function of the zero energy Majorana states as function of lattice site along the x-axis is shown in Fig 3d), the wave function is calculated for ky2π=0.46\frac{k_{y}}{2\pi}=0.46 (for all other wave vectors from these kyk_{y}-space regions, the behavior of the wave function is the same). Numerical calculations show, that topological semimetal state exists for an arbitrary v>vcv>v_{c}, the k-space regions, in which the zero energy Majorana states are realized, increase with increasing vv. Thus, the 2D topological state with the zero energy Majorana states is realized for given regions of wave vectors. Note that, the Chern number and the Hall conductance are zero, this is the state of the 2D topological semimetal (the gap equal to zero) with zero Chern number. For the first time such topological state was obtained in the framework of the Hofstadter model on a honeycomb lattice [3, 4].

Refer to caption

a)

Refer to caption

b)

Refer to caption

c)

Figure 1: (Color online) The ground state phase diagram of the Hubbard model (t=1t=1) in the coordinates (U,v)(U,v) a). The gap of low energy quasiparticle excitations b) and λ\lambda c) as a function of UU and vv.
Refer to caption

a)

Refer to caption

b)

Refer to caption

c)

Figure 2: (Color online) A low energy branch of the spectrum at the point of the Mott-Hubbard transition calculated at λc=0.0784\lambda_{c}=0.0784, v=0.2v=0.2; a low energy part of the spectrum a), near the zero energy b), c) cutting at kx=0k_{x}=0 and kx=πk_{x}=\pi.
Refer to caption

a)

Refer to caption

b)

Refer to caption

c)

Refer to caption

d)

Figure 3: (Color online) A low energy branch of the spectrum in gapless phase calculated at λ=0.05\lambda=0.05, v=0.2v=0.2; a low energy part of the spectrum a), near zero energy b), cutting at kx=0k_{x}=0 and kx=πk_{x}=\pi c) (the regions of existence of band states and zero energy Majorana states are highlighted in blue and red, respectively), the wave function of the zero energy Majorana states as a function of coordinate 1x1041\leq x\leq 10^{4} (x=1 and x=104x=10^{4} are the boundaries), calculated at ky2π=0.46\frac{k_{y}}{2\pi}=0.46 d).

4 The two band model with the Rashba spin-orbit coupling

According to the ground state phase diagram, presented in Fig 1a), the region of existence of the insulator state increasing with UU and decreasing with vv. As we shown in previous section, at t=1t=1 the gapless state is topological. At 0<t10<t\leq 1 the fermion liquid is realized in the same phase state for arbitrary tt at given UU and vv. A critical value of vv, at which the gap opens, is equal to vc=λ2+λλ2+16t22v_{c}=\frac{\sqrt{\lambda^{2}+\lambda\sqrt{\lambda^{2}+16t}}}{2\sqrt{2}}. We do not discuss the point t=0t=0, when the Hamiltonian (1) describes the Falicov-Kimball model. These are two points of view about the behavior of fermion liquid in the Falicov-Kimball model at half-filling: popular, that this is an exciton insulator state [13] and unpopular, that this is a point of the phase transition exhibiting in the model (1) at t=0t=0 [11]. At t=0t=0, the phase of the λ\lambda -field is not defined; it changes jumpwise from π\pi to 0. Within the framework of the considered approach, we do not know the behavior of the fermion liquid (1) at t=0t=0. In this context, it makes no sense to consider the Mott phase transition in (1),(2) at t=0t=0, when taking into account the Rashba spin-orbit coupling.

Refer to caption

a)

Refer to caption

b)

Figure 4: (Color online) The ground state phase diagram of the model with different band widths (0<t<10<t<1) in the coordinates (U,t,v)(U,t,v) a), the insulator phase is limited by plates. The gap of low energy quasiparticle excitations as a function of UU and vv, calculated at t=12t=\frac{1}{2} b).
Refer to caption

a)

Refer to caption

b)

Refer to caption

c)

Figure 5: (Color online) A low energy branch of the spectrum in gapless phase calculated at λ=0.05\lambda=0.05, v=0.2v=0.2, t=12t=\frac{1}{2}; a low energy part of the spectrum a), near zero energy b), cutting at kx=0k_{x}=0 and kx=πk_{x}=\pi c) (the regions of existence of band states and zero energy Majorana states are highlighted in blue and red respectively).

The value of vcv_{c} increases with increasing tt, the region of existence of gapless states decreases (see in Fig 4a)). At critical value of vcv_{c} the gap opens (see in Fig 4b)), kk-space regions in which, the Majorana zero energy states are realized, increases with decreasing tt. We consider an intermadiate value of t=12t=\frac{1}{2} at the same λ=0.05\lambda=0.05 and v=0.2v=0.2. The details of numerical calculations of a low energy spectrum are shown in Figs 5. The value of the splitting of the spectrum near zero energy increases with decreasing tt. In Fig 5c) the k-space regions of existence of zero energy Majorana state are shown, where at kx=0k_{x}=0 ky=0.4149k_{y}=0.4149, ky=0.4795k_{y}=0.4795 and at kx=πk_{x}=\pi ky=0.0205k_{y}=0.0205, ky=0.08519k_{y}=0.08519. These state are localized at the boundaries, the wave function has the form as in Fig 3d).

5 Conclusions

The two-dimensional model of spinless fermions with different band widths is considered at half filling within the mean-field approach. The Mott-Hubbard phase transition in the Hubbard model was also studied as a special case. The ground state phase diagram of the model is calculated. It is characterized by two phase states: an insulator and a topological semimetal. Note, that the point of the Mott phase transition is realized at not strong spin-orbit coupling, such in the Hubbard model when 0.05<v<0.20.05<v<0.2, vU<0.28\frac{v}{U}<0.28. It is shown that the nontrivial topology of the gapless phase is due to the zero energy Majorana states, localized at the boundaries of the sample. These states are dispersionless chiral modes in certain ranges of the one-dimensional wave vector. It was shown in Refs [3, 4] that such topological state is realized in graphene in an external magnetic field applied perpendicularly. Despite the fact that we are talking about the two-dimensional model, the Chern number and the Hall conductance are equal to zero. When taking into account the Rashba spin-orbit coupling in two dimensional systems, the Mott phase transition must be considered as a phase transition between the topological semi-metal and non-topological insulator states.

References

  • [1] S.-Y.Xu, Ch. Liu, S.K Kushwah et al, Science 347 (2015) 294.
  • [2] A.Yu. Kitaev, Phys.—Usp. 44 (2001) 131.
  • [3] K.Esaki, M.Sato, M.Kohmoto, B.I.Halperin, Phys.Rev.B 80 (2009) 125405.
  • [4] I.N.Karnaukhov, Phys.Lett.A 383 (2019) 2114.
  • [5] A.Yu. Kitaev, Annals of Physics 321 (2006) 2.
  • [6] Y. Ando, L.Fu, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 6 (2015) 361.
  • [7] Y.Binghai, C.Felser, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 8 (2017) 337.
  • [8] A.A.Burkov, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 9 (2018) 359.
  • [9] I.N. Karnaukhov, Europhysics Letters 124 (2018) 37002.
  • [10] X.-L. Qi, T.L. Hughes, S.-C. Zhang, Phys.Rev.B 78 (2008) 195424.
  • [11] I.N. Karnaukhov, Annals of Physics 433 (2020) 168308.
  • [12] I.N. Karnaukhov, IOP SciNotes 2 (2021) 015204.
  • [13] D.I.Golosov, Phys.Rev.B 101 (2020) 165130.