Topological Floquet engineering of a three-band optical lattice with dual-mode resonant driving
Abstract
We present a Floquet framework for controlling topological features of a one-dimensional optical lattice system with dual-mode resonant driving, in which both the amplitude and phase of the lattice potential are modulated simultaneously. We investigate a three-band model consisting of the three lowest orbitals and elucidate the formation of a cross-linked two-leg ladder through an indirect interband coupling via an off-resonant band. We numerically demonstrate the emergence of topologically nontrivial bands within the driven system, and a topological charge pumping phenomenon with cyclic parameter changes in the dual-mode resonant driving. Finally, we show that the band topology in the driven three-band system is protected by parity-time reversal symmetry.
I Introduction
Ultracold atoms in optical lattices provide a flexible platform to explore topological insulators and associated phenomena, facilitated by the ability to adjust the lattice configuration experimentally [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. Periodic time-dependent modulation techniques, also known as Floquet engineering, have been established as an effective method to examine topological bands within these systems. Tailored modulations of the lattice have successfully produced nontrivial bands with novel topological characteristics [6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12], which have led to the observation of many interesting phenomena, including topological charge pumping [13, 14, 15, 16]. Floquet band engineering has thus become a prominent path in the field of optical lattice research.
Researchers have extensively studied topological bands in one-dimensional (1D) optical lattices to gain essential insight into topological matter. As a minimal representation for 1D topological insulators, in particular, a cross-linked two-leg ladder system or similar models have been investigated [17, 18, 19, 12, 20]. As illustrated in Fig. 1(a), the ladder system is composed of two lines of lattice sites called legs, and the legs are interconnected both vertically and diagonally, representing the hopping between sites. The diagonal cross-links give rise to topological features in the system. In experimental setups, the legs can be assigned to different spin states of atoms or different orbitals in the lattice, with the cross-linking provided by spin-orbit coupling or band-mixing processes, respectively. In recent experiments, a cross-linked two-leg ladder system employing and orbitals was implemented successfully using a two-tone driving scheme [12, 20], where the optical lattices were shaken resonantly with two frequencies, and the cross links were produced by two-photon resonant interband coupling [21]. Furthermore, the ability to dynamically adjust the linking properties enabled the demonstration of topological charge pumping [22, 13].
In this work, we propose an alternative Floquet approach to construct a tunable cross-linked two-leg ladder system. Our approach features creating the ladder with and orbitals, which share the same parity, and using both the amplitude and phase modulations of the lattice potential simultaneously at an identical frequency. When the modulation frequency is set close to the energy gap between the and bands, the amplitude modulation (AM) generates the on-site resonant coupling between the and orbitals, thus forming the ladder rungs [Fig. 1(b)] [10, 21, 23, 24]. Meanwhile, the phase modulation (PM), which triggers lattice shaking, does not generate a direct - interorbital coupling owing to parity conservation; however, it establishes diagonal connections through three-photon resonant transitions via orbital [Fig. 1(c)]. This three-photon process represents an indirect resonant interband coupling that employs an off-resonant third band as an intermediate state. To the best of our knowledge, such indirect resonant coupling has not been discussed as an effective interband coupling mechanism in the literature on Floquet band engineering. Owing to the dual-mode driving employing both AM and PM simultaneously, a cross-linked ladder is formed, comprising two orbitals with identical parity, which leads to the formation of topological bands that exhibit minimal or absent bulk gaps. Consequently, this method enables the investigation of the physics of topological semimetals [25, 26, 27], which was not possible in previous studies using lattice shaking.
Using a three-band model, we numerically demonstrate the topological properties of the 1D optical lattice system subjected to dual-mode resonant driving. We comprehensively analyzed the resultant Floquet bands under a range of driving parameter conditions, including the relative intensity and phase of AM and PM. Our analysis shows the emergence of a topologically nontrivial phase under certain driving conditions, as evidenced by the entanglement entropy and spectrum [28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33], along with the observation of a topological phase transition. Through numerical simulations, we illustrate a topological charge pumping effect expected during slow cyclic changes in driving parameters [34, 35, 36, 37, 38]. Lastly, we elucidate that the topological phases of the Floquet bands in the three-band model are protected by parity-time reversal symmetry.
The remainder of the paper is organized as follows. Sec. II introduces a three-band model of the 1D optical lattice system under dual-mode resonant driving. We further derive an effective two-band description of the system by adiabatic elimination of the off-resonant band [39], which provides insight into the indirect resonant interband coupling and the topological structure of the driven system. Sec. III presents our numerical results of the quasi-energy and entanglement spectrum of the driven lattice system, and also illustrates the topological charge pumping effect with cyclic parameter changes in the dual-mode resonant driving. Sec. IV demonstrates the role of symmetry in protecting the topology of the Floquet bands. Finally, Section V provides a summary and some concluding remarks.

II Dual-mode resonant driving of optical lattice
II.1 Three-band model
Let us consider a spinless fermionic atom in the driven 1D optical lattice potential , which is given by
(1) |
where and are the amplitude and phase of the lattice potential, respectively, and is the lattice constant. and are determined by the parameters of the laser beams involved, such as intensity, polarization, and phase, and can be dynamically controlled for Floquet engineering. The two fundamental modulation approaches are periodically modulating and in time, which we refer to as AM and PM, respectively [Figs. 1(b) and 1(c)]. As the position of the lattice site is determined by the phase , PM induces lattice shaking. When viewed from the reference frame comoving with the driven optical lattice, the system’s Hamiltonian is described as follows [5, 9]:
(2) | |||||
where is the kinetic momentum of the atom, denotes its mass, is the stationary lattice potential, denotes the relative variation of lattice amplitude such that , and represents the inertial force resulting from PM.
In the tight-binding approximation, the Hamiltonian can be expressed in terms of Wannier states localized on lattice site in the band, given by [9]
(3) |
where is the creation (annihilation) operator for the atom in the Wannier state , represents the on-site energy, and denotes the hopping amplitude between the Wannier states in the band separated by lattice sites. In addition, and correspond to the lattice potential and lattice displacement matrix elements for interorbital transitions separated by lattice sites, respectively. Lastly, represents the time-dependent Peierls phase [40]. See Appendix A for detailed definitions of the tight-binding parameters. By Fourier transforming this tight-binding model Hamiltonian, we obtain the Bloch Hamiltonian for quasimomentum in the presence of AM and PM as follows:
(4) |
Here, is expressed in units of .
In this work, we consider a model system that includes only the three lowest bands, indexed by . Considering the lowest-order effects of lattice modulation, the Bloch Hamiltonian of the three-band system is given by
(5) |
with . See Appendix A for details on the derivation.
We focus on a case where the system is subjected to dual-mode resonant driving with
(6) |
and the driving frequency . Here, and are dimensionless parameters that represent the strengths of AM and PM, respectively, and is the relative phase of the two modulation modes.
II.2 Effective two-band model

When the three-band lattice system is driven with a frequency , the couplings between the orbital and the others become off-resonant, resulting in the band being energetically isolated. We can project the three-band system into an effective two-band system using an adiabatic elimination technique [39] owing to the minimal involvement of the band in band mixing.
Tight-binding parameters | Effective two-band parameters | ||||||
0.388 | |||||||
2.885 | 7.933 | 12.059 | 0.173 | ||||
0.019 | 0.244 | 0.794 | 0.663 | ||||
1.602 | 4.832 | 6.315 | 0.236 | ||||
0.317 | |||||||
0 | 0 | 1.725 | 4.220 | ||||
0.440 | 0.698 | 0 | -1.443 |
First, let us take a proper rotating frame by applying a unitary transformation of to the Bloch Hamiltonian in Eq. (5), where
(7) |
with representing the zero energy point. In the rotating frame, the modified Hamiltonian is given by
with , , and . Note that when the driving frequency is set to , providing a suitable condition for adiabatic elimination of the band. The energy level structure is depicted in Fig. 2(a). It can be viewed as a characteristic V-type system in which the two adjacent upper states are coupled to each other by and also to a lower level simultaneously by . For comparison, the Floquet energy diagram of the driven three-band system is illustrated in Fig. 2(b).
Simplifying the notation of as
(9) |
the equation of motion for the system state is written by
(10) |
Claiming owing to the band being negligibly populated, we obtain . Injecting this relation back into Eq. (II.2) yields the effective Hamiltonian as
(11) |
The additional terms in the diagonal and the off-diagonal element are proportional to , which represent additive band energy shifts and interband couplings, respectively, arising from the off-resonant couplings to the band.
In terms of the Pauli matrices , we obtain the modified effective Hamiltonian as
(12) |
with . The definitions of , , , and are listed in Table 1. In the derivation of , we ignored the trace part of the Hamiltonian, i.e., , which does not affect the topological properties of the system.
Next, we derive the approximated time-independent Hamiltonian for using the high-frequency expansion method [41, 42]. When the Fourier series expansion of is given by , the second-order approximation of is given by
(13) |
Neglecting the higher order terms [43], we obtain
(14) | |||||
where , , , and . The details of the derivation are provided in Appendix B.
The final expression of in Eq. (II.2) reveals the band topology of the driven lattice system. The terms with and correspond to the vertical and diagonal interleg links in the two-leg-ladder description [Fig. 1(a)]. Notably,
(15) |
indicating that the vertical links are generated by the on-site one-photon interorbital transition , induced by AM, while the diagonal links originate from the three-photon transitions involving site hopping, e.g., , induced by PM.
The effective Hamiltonian exhibits chiral symmetry at , as ; this means that the spin states of the bands are restricted to the plane of a three-dimensional space with axes represented by Pauli matrices, ensuring that the spin winding number across the Brillouin zone is well-defined and topologically protected by symmetry. At , a topologically critical point emerges when , rendering for and for . Given the parameters of the optical lattice system at ( is the lattice recoil energy), as detailed in Table 1, the ratio is achieved when . This modulation condition is experimentally feasible, for example, with and , which corresponds to the lattice-shaking amplitude of .
Thus far, we have demonstrated that a cross-linked ladder structure can be established in a three-band optical lattice by utilizing dual-mode resonant driving. Developing an effective two-band description, we have clarified the critical role of the off-resonant band in Floquet engineering, which is essential for determining the topological characteristics of the driven lattice system. In the following section, we will confirm our theoretical findings through a direct numerical simulation of the three-band Hamiltonian in Eq. (5).
III Floquet state analysis
III.1 Quasienergy spectrum
We investigate the quasienergy spectrum of the driven three-band optical lattice system in accordance with Floquet theory [44]. We numerically calculate the time-evolution operator over one driving period , defined as
(16) |
with being the time-ordering operator, and obtain the quasienergy spectrum by directly diagonalizing . Here, is the Floquet band index and is independent of the choice of time . In the calculation, we use the parameter values listed in Table 1 and set the modulation frequency to .

In Fig. 3(a), the quasienergy spectrum is presented for , , and . The two upper () Floquet bands demonstrate the avoided crossing of the bare and bands of the stationary lattice system under the resonant driving, while the lower () Floquet band is located apart from the upper bands, aligned with the off-resonant band. In Figs. 3(b)–3(d), we plot the fractional weights of the orbitals in the Floquet Bloch states . The Floquet Bloch states are eigenstates of such that
(17) |
It is observed that the orbital contribution is minimal in the upper Floquet bands, as expected from the off-resonance nature of the band. This observation supports the validity of our use of adiabatic elimination in the previous section.
III.2 Topological characteristics

To examine the topological characteristics of the driven lattice system, we calculate the Zak phases of the Floquet bands [45, 46], which are defined over the Brillouin zone (BZ) as
(18) |
The numerical results of for are illustrated in Fig. 4, as a function of the driving parameters and . It is noted that critical points are found at and , accompanied by discontinuous changes in and nearby. The effective two-band model in the previous section predicts the critical points at for and , which is in a good agreement with our numerical observations [47]. We note that when , the Zak phase takes only the values of zero or , while the Zak phase continuously varies in the parameter space; this is consistent with the symmetry protection condition discussed in the previous section. Furthermore, we observe that only for , i.e., the Zak phase of the lowest Floquet band is for [Fig. 4(c)]; this is a characteristic of a three-band system.
In Fig. 4(d), we show the time evolution of the Zak phases for , revealing that they show quantized values only at and . For the effective two-band Floquet system, the chiral symmetry is expressed as with a proper choice of time frame [6], and we find that the symmetry condition is satisfied only with (mod ) at and (mod ), which is consistent with the times when the Zak phases are well quantized.
As another topological characteristic of the system, we examine the entanglement entropy and spectrum [28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33]. For a 1D non-interacting fermionic system, the entanglement entropy of the many-body ground state is defined as
(19) |
where is the reduced density matrix of on subsystem A. Here, A and B denote the two subsystems that are formed by splitting the system into two equal parts. The entanglement spectrum comprises the eigenvalues of the single-particle correlation matrix, , limited to subsystem A, where denotes the creation (annihilation) operator for an atom in the Floquet Wannier state , localized on lattice site within subsystem A in the Floquet band. The details on the calculation of and are provided in Appendix D. When the system undergoes a quantum phase transition, the entanglement entropy exhibits a sharp peak [33] and furthermore, the entanglement spectrum unveils the system’s mid-gap states. The presence of mid-gap states serves as an indication of the non-trivial topological phase of the system, which is analogous to the bulk-edge correspondence observed in edge states [29, 30], and it holds even in the case of Floquet systems [31, 32].

Figure 5 presents our calculation results of the entanglement entropy and spectrum of non-interacting spinless fermions for our three-band system. The many-body ground state is a uniformly filled topological Floquet band, and we choose the band in Fig. 3(a) as our reference state. When , the entanglement entropy exhibits a sharp peak at the critical point as varies [Fig. 5(a)], indicating a topological phase transition [29, 32]. In the entanglement spectrum, we also observe the presence of mid-gap states and their splitting into upper and lower states at the same critical point of [Fig. 5(b)]. These results are consistent with the Zak phase in the parameter space [Fig. 4(b)].
Finally, we remark on the edge states in our system, which are another characteristic of the topological phase [48, 49]. In our three-band system, the global bulk gap may not exist because both the and bands exhibit a similar curvature tendency, although varying in degree. The absence of the global bulk gap implies that symmetry-protected edge states may not manifest explicitly, which was the case in our numerical investigation.
III.3 Topological charge pumping
When the driving parameters {} vary slowly enough compared to the timescale of the driving period , the system can adiabatically follow the change in driving conditions. In other words, the long-term dynamics of the system is governed by the time-varying effective Hamiltonian, [50, 51]. Using this adiabatic following, topological charge pumping can be achieved in a driven lattice system by slowly varying the driving parameters around a topological singular point, as demonstrated in recent experiments [13, 16].
Given its experimental relevance, we numerically investigate the topological charge pumping effect in the driven three-band system. A pumping protocol is considered, where the driving parameters slowly revolve around a singular point in the parameter space with the pumping cycle time , i.e.,
(20) |
with . The system undergoes a change in the Zak phase for each cycle, leading to a charge transport in which all atoms are shifted by one lattice site. Note that this phenomenon only occurs when the trajectory of the driving parameters encircles the singular point in the parameter space, regardless of the specific details of the pumping protocol used to modulate the driving parameters [34, 35, 36, 37, 38]; this is why this charge pumping phenomenon is a topological one.
In the numerical simulation, the system is initially prepared in an insulating state of the Flquet band and the amount of pumped charge is calculated as , where is the charge current given by with velocity operator [52, 53]. The time evolution of the system state is calculated directly from its time-dependent Shrödinger equation , including the cyclic modulations of the driving parameters.

In Fig. 6(a), the pumped charge is displayed as a function of time for various pumping parameter conditions. We observe that when the change of driving parameters is slow enough, increases (decreases) by unity in every pumping cycle for the () Floquet band. The observed timescale for the adiabaticity of the charge pumping process is , attributed to the local gap between the and Floquet bands, estimated as [Fig. 3(a)]. Furthermore, we confirm that if the trajectory of the driving parameters, such as the case of in Eq. (III.3), does not encircle any topological singular point in the parameter space, then the charge transport does not occur [Fig. 6(b)]. The middle inset of Fig. 6(a) shows the evolution of the entanglement spectrum of the driven lattice system during one pumping cycle, . As expected, the mid-gap states propagate like edge modes in the bulk gap [54, 53].
IV Symmetry in three-band model
As predicted in the effective two-band model discussed in Sec. II.2 and verified numerically in the preceding section, topological phases arise in the driven three-band system at . Given that establishes the relationship in Eq. (2), we propose that symmetry is the symmetry that protects the topological phases in this driven system. The topological phases protected by symmetry were recently discussed in [55, 57, 56, 58, 59, 60]. In this section, we discuss the symmetry protection of the three-band system.
If the Floquet Hamiltonian, which is defined as , exhibits symmetry, it should satisfy the relation of
(21) |
where is a unitary matrix defined as
(22) |
for a non-interacting spinless fermionic system [61, 62]. Here, is the preferred time frame for the Floquet Hamiltonian to exhibit symmetry and in our system, and (mod ) for . We consider the situation at and , omitting the time notation in the following. On the orbital basis , the Floquet state is expressed as
(23) |
where is a complex function defined on , and is the argument of . Then, the symmetry condition of in Eq. (21) requires , i.e.,
(24) |
with being a real function of . This requirement can be encapsulated in two relations:
(25) |
Here, we choose a gauge of for to be and then, under this gauge fixing, is imaginary and and are real-valued.
The constraints on due to symmetry significantly affect the Zak phase of the Floquet band. Using Eq. (23), the Zak phase is expressed as
(26) |
This expression shows that can be interpreted as twice the sum of the areas of the closed loops traced by on the complex plane. When symmetry is present, the enclosed area traced by becomes zero in general because is confined to the imaginary axis and to the real axis. Thus, the topological phase of the Floquet band is trivial with . However, in a special situation where becomes zero at , the second relation in Eq. (25) is not necessarily required so that and can have complex values even with the fixed gauge of ; this means that as passes through , and can trace paths on the complex plane and return to the real axis. In the trace, the angle between and must be maintained because of the first relation in Eq. (25). Then, in the vicinity of , and have identical variations of or (mod ), and it results in or (mod ), where we use the normalization condition of . Consequently, the symmetry requires the quantization of the Zak phase, thus protecting the topological phases of the three-band system.
V Summary
We introduced a Floquet framework for controlling the topological features of a 1D optical lattice system with dual-mode resonant driving. We investigated a three-band model for the three lowest orbitals, clarifying how a cross-linked ladder forms via indirect interband coupling mediated by an off-resonant band. We provided numerical evidence for the appearance of topologically nontrivial bands in the driven system in conjunction with a phenomenon of topological charge pumping due to cyclic changes in parameters within the dual-mode resonant driving. Furthermore, we examined the role of symmetry in protecting the band topology. The dual-mode resonant driving approach facilitates the hybridization of and orbitals with the same parity, which leads to the formation of topological bands that exhibit minimal or absent bulk gaps; this method might be used to explore the physics of topological semimetals [25, 26, 27]. Moreover, given the unique driving mechanism relative to previous studies on shaken lattices, our dual-mode approach may provide valuable insights into the reduction of heating effects in the Floquet engineering of optical lattices [9, 63, 64].
Acknowledgements.
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (Grants No. NRF-2023M3K5A1094811 and No. NRF-2023R1A2C3006565).Appendix A Bloch Hamiltonian of the three-band system
The Hamiltonian of a spinless single particle in a driven optical lattice takes the form of
where is the kinetic momentum of the atom, denotes its mass, is the lattice constant, and is the stationary lattice amplitude. In addition, denotes the relative variation of the lattice amplitude, and is the phase of the lattice potential.
The modulated lattice is generally studied in a moving frame, in which case the driving acts through an inertial force [5, 9]. When viewed from the reference frame comoving with the driven optical lattice, the Hamiltonian of the system becomes
(28) | |||||
by a unitary transformation with the spatial displacement operator
(29) |
Here, denotes the oscillating lattice position, which is defined as . To convert the time-dependent vector potential into a potential gradient, we perform an additional gauge transformation, using the time-dependent momentum displacement operator
(30) |
Then the transformed Hamiltonian becomes
(31) | |||||
where the last term is a global time-dependent energy shift that does not impact the system’s dynamics. Hence, by applying an appropriate unitary transformation, we can cancel it out, and the resulting Hamiltonian is
(32) | |||||
where we define
(33) | |||||
(34) | |||||
(35) |
Here, represents the inertial force resulting from the phase modulation, and is the stationary lattice potential.
In the tight-binding approximation, the Hamiltonian can be expressed in terms of Wannier states localized on lattice site in the band [9]:
(36) | |||||
where is the creation (annihilation) operator for the atom in the Wannier state . To restore translational symmetry, we perform a gauge transformation using the unitary operator . Then, the Hamiltonian takes the form of
where we introduce the following parameters:
(38) | |||||
(39) | |||||
(40) | |||||
(41) | |||||
(42) |
Here, represents the on-site energy, and denotes the hopping amplitude between the Wannier states in the band separated by lattice sites. In addition, and correspond to the lattice potential and lattice displacement matrix elements for interorbital transitions separated by lattice sites, respectively. Lastly, represents the time-dependent Peierls phase [40].
By Fourier transforming this tight-binding model Hamiltonian, we obtain the Bloch Hamiltonian for quasimomentum in the presence of amplitude and phase modulations as follows:
Here, is expressed in units of . In this work, we consider a model system that includes only the three lowest bands, indexed by . Considering the lowest-order effects of lattice modulation, the Bloch Hamiltonian of the three-band system is given by
(44) |
where .
Appendix B High-frequency expansion method
In Floquet theory, the high-frequency expansion method is one of the useful techniques for analyzing periodically driven quantum systems. The main idea of the high-frequency expansion method is to separate the effects of periodic driving on the system into fast and slow parts. By using perturbation theory (in powers of ), it converts the motion for the slow part of the system into a time-independent effective Hamiltonian, making it easier to analyze the system’s dynamics. This approach is valid when the driving frequency is sufficiently larger than any other relevant energy scale of the system.
From Eq. II.2, one can obtain the coefficients of the Fourier series expansion of , which are given by
(45) |
with and being the th order Bessel function of the first kind. Here, denotes the even (odd) integers greater than 3.
Using the high-frequency expansion method [41, 42], the time-independent effective Hamiltonian can be perturbatively obtained as . The coefficients for the leading terms are provided by
(46) | |||||
Then the effective Hamiltonian truncated to the first-order term is given as
(47) | |||||
where , , , and . Here, we ignored the terms involving the second-order Bessel function and the higher-order terms of and , as they are negligible compared to the other terms, given our parameter values in Table 1.

Appendix C Quasienergy spectrum for
In Fig. 3, we present the quasienergy spectrum and the fractional weights of the original orbitals in the Floquet Bloch states for , , and . In this section, we also examine the cases for other values of , specifically [Fig. 7].
From Eq. 5 and II.1, one can observe that when the relative phase changes from to , the Bloch Hamiltonian of our three-band system also changes from to . Since the quasienergy does not depend on time [Eq. 17], should exhibit an inverted quasienergy spectrum with respect to compared to [Fig. 7(a) and (e)].
Appendix D Entanglement spectrum and entropy
As mentioned in Sec. III.2, the single-particle entanglement spectrum is defined as the set of eigenvalues of the correlation matrix [30], which is given by
(48) |
Here, denotes the creation (annihilation) operator for an atom in the Floquet Wannier state , localized at lattice site within subsystem A (one of the two halves of the original system) in the Floquet band. After applying a Fourier transform, the correlation matrix can be expressed in terms of Floquet Bloch states as follows:
(49) | |||||
In this expression, represents the coefficient of the Floquet state in the original Wannier basis, where . By calculating the Floquet Bloch states, which are the eigenstates of the one-cycle time-evolution operator [Eq. (17)], we can obtain all the coefficients . These coefficients are then used to construct the correlation matrix. Diagonalizing this matrix yields the entanglement spectrum.
Meanwhile, due to the Wick’s theorem, there is a special relation between the correlation matrix and the reduced density matrix, given by [32]
(50) |
Here, are the eigenvalues of the correlation matrix (i.e., the entanglement spectrum) and are the eigenvalues of the entanglement Hamiltonian , defined as
(51) |
where is the reduced density matrix, and . Using Eq. (50), the entanglement entropy can be expressed in terms of the entanglement spectrum as follows [32]:
(52) | |||||
In this study, we obtained the entanglement spectrum from the correlation matrix, and then calculated the entanglement entropy from the entanglement spectrum.
References
- [1] M. Aidelsburger, M. Atala, M. Lohse, J. T. Barreiro, B. Paredes, and I. Bloch, Realization of the Hofstadter Hamiltonian with Ultracold Atoms in Optical Lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 185301 (2013).
- [2] G. Jotzu, M. Messer, R. Desbuquois, M. Lebrat, T. Uehlinger, D. Greif, and T. Esslinger, Experimental realization of the topological haldane model with ultracold fermions, Nature 515, 237 (2014).
- [3] N. Goldman, J. C. Budich, and P. Zoller, Topological quantum matter with ultracold gases in optical lattices, Nat. Phys. 12, 639 (2016).
- [4] A. Eckardt, Colloquium: Atomic quantum gases in periodically driven optical lattices, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 011004 (2017).
- [5] N. R. Cooper, J. Dalibard, and I. B. Spielman, Topological bands for ultracold atoms, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 015005 (2019).
- [6] T. Kitagawa, E. Berg, M. Rudner, and E. Demler, Topological characterization of periodically driven quantum systems, Phys. Rev. B 82, 235114 (2010).
- [7] P. Hauke, O. Tieleman, A. Celi, C. Ölschläger, J. Simonet, J. Struck, M. Weinberg, P. Windpassinger, K. Sengstock, M. Lewenstein, and A. Eckardt, Non-Abelian Gauge Fields and Topological Insulators in Shaken Optical Lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 145301 (2012).
- [8] J. Cayssol, B. Dóra, F. Simon, and R. Moessner, Floquet topological insulators, Phys. Status Solidi 7, 101 (2013).
- [9] N. Goldman and J. Dalibard, Periodically driven quantum systems: Effective hamiltonians and engineered gauge fields, Phys. Rev. X 4, 031027 (2014).
- [10] W. Zheng and H. Zhai, Floquet topological states in shaking optical lattices, Phys. Rev. A 89, 061603(R) (2014).
- [11] L. D. Marin Bukov and A. Polkovnikov, Universal high-frequency behavior of periodically driven systems: from dynamical stabilization to floquet engineering, Adv. Phys. 64, 139 (2015).
- [12] J. H. Kang, J. H. Han, and Y. Shin, Creutz ladder in a resonantly shaken 1D optical lattice, New J. Phys. 22, 013023 (2020).
- [13] J. Minguzzi, Z. Zhu, K. Sandholzer, A.-S. Walter, K. Viebahn, and T. Esslinger, Topological Pumping in a Floquet-Bloch Band, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 053201 (2022).
- [14] Y.-P. Wu, L.-Z. Tang, G.-Q. Zhang, and D.-W. Zhang, Quantized topological anderson-thouless pump, Phys. Rev. A 106, L051301 (2022).
- [15] R. Citro and M. Aidelsburger, Thouless pumping and topology, Nat. Rev. Phys. 5, 87 (2023).
- [16] A.-S. Walter, Z. Zhu, M. Gächter, J. Minguzzi, S. Roschinski, K. Sandholzer, K. Viebahn, and T. Esslinger, Quantization and its breakdown in a hubbard–thouless pump, Nat. Phys. 19, 1471 (2023).
- [17] M. Creutz, End States, Ladder Compounds, and Domain-Wall Fermions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 2636 (1999).
- [18] D. Hügel and B. Paredes, Chiral ladders and the edges of quantum hall insulators, Phys. Rev. A 89, 023619 (2014).
- [19] J. Jünemann, A. Piga, S.-J. Ran, M. Lewenstein, M. Rizzi, and A. Bermudez, Exploring interacting topological insulators with ultracold atoms: The synthetic creutz-hubbard model, Phys. Rev. X 7, 031057 (2017).
- [20] K. Sandholzer, A.-S. Walter, J. Minguzzi, Z. Zhu, K. Viebahn, and T. Esslinger, Floquet engineering of individual band gaps in an optical lattice using a two-tone drive, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 013056 (2022).
- [21] S.-L. Zhang and Q. Zhou, Shaping topological properties of the band structures in a shaken optical lattice, Phys. Rev. A 90, 051601(R) (2014).
- [22] J. H. Kang and Y. Shin, Topological floquet engineering of a one-dimensional optical lattice via resonant shaking with two harmonic frequencies, Phys. Rev. A 102, 063315 (2020).
- [23] C. Sträter and A. Eckardt, Interband heating processes in a periodically driven optical lattice, Z. Naturforsch. A 71, 909 (2016).
- [24] C. Cabrera-Gutiérrez, E. Michon, M. Arnal, G. Chatelain, V. Brunaud, T. Kawalec, J. Billy, and D. Guéry-Odelin, Resonant excitations of a bose einstein condensate in an optical lattice, Eur. Phys. J. D 73, 170 (2019).
- [25] A. A. Burkov, Topological semimetals, Nat. Mater. 15, 1145 (2016).
- [26] K. Sun, W. V. Liu, A. Hemmerich, and S. Das Sarma, Topological semimetal in a fermionic optical lattice, Nat. Phys. 8, 67 (2012).
- [27] M. Jangjan and M. V. Hosseini, Topological phase transition between a normal insulator and a topological metal state in a quasi-one-dimensional system, Sci. Rep. 11, 12966 (2021).
- [28] H. Li and F. D. M. Haldane, Entanglement Spectrum as a Generalization of Entanglement Entropy: Identification of Topological Order in Non-Abelian Fractional Quantum Hall Effect States, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 010504 (2008).
- [29] A. M. Turner, Y. Zhang, and A. Vishwanath, Entanglement and inversion symmetry in topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B 82, 241102(R) (2010).
- [30] T. L. Hughes, E. Prodan, and B. A. Bernevig, Inversion-symmetric topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B 83, 245132 (2011).
- [31] D. J. Yates, Y. Lemonik, and A. Mitra, Entanglement properties of floquet-chern insulators, Phys. Rev. B 94, 205422 (2016).
- [32] L. Zhou, Entanglement spectrum and entropy in floquet topological matter, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 043164 (2022).
- [33] S. Ryu and Y. Hatsugai, Entanglement entropy and the berry phase in the solid state, Phys. Rev. B 73, 245115 (2006).
- [34] D. J. Thouless, Quantization of particle transport, Phys. Rev. B 27, 6083 (1983).
- [35] L. Wang, M. Troyer, and X. Dai, Topological Charge Pumping in a One-Dimensional Optical Lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 026802 (2013).
- [36] F. Mei, J.-B. You, D.-W. Zhang, X. C. Yang, R. Fazio, S.-L. Zhu, and L. C. Kwek, Topological insulator and particle pumping in a one-dimensional shaken optical lattice, Phys. Rev. A 90, 063638 (2014).
- [37] S. Nakajima, T. Tomita, S. Taie, T. Ichinose, H. Ozawa, L. Wang, M. Troyer, and Y. Takahashi, Topological thouless pumping of ultracold fermions, Nat. Phys. 12, 296 (2016).
- [38] M. Lohse, C. Schweizer, O. Zilberberg, M. Aidelsburger, and I. Bloch, A thouless quantum pump with ultracold bosonic atoms in an optical superlattice, Nat. Phys. 12, 350 (2016).
- [39] E. Brion, L. H. Pedersen, and K. Mølmer, Adiabatic elimination in a lambda system, J. Phys. A 40, 1033 (2007).
- [40] M. Weinberg, C. Ölschläger, C. Sträter, S. Prelle, A. Eckardt, K. Sengstock, and J. Simonet, Multiphoton interband excitations of quantum gases in driven optical lattices, Phys. Rev. A 92, 043621 (2015).
- [41] S. Rahav, I. Gilary, and S. Fishman, Effective hamiltonians for periodically driven systems, Phys. Rev. A 68, 013820 (2003).
- [42] A. Eckardt and E. Anisimovas, High-frequency approximation for periodically driven quantum systems from a floquet-space perspective, New J. Phys. 17, 093039 (2015).
- [43] We ignore the terms with the second order Bessel function and the higher order terms of and .
- [44] M. Holthaus, Floquet engineering with quasienergy bands of periodically driven optical lattices, J. Phys. B 49, 013001 (2015).
- [45] J. Zak, Berry’s phase for energy bands in solids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2747 (1989).
- [46] M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Colloquium: Topological insulators, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045 (2010).
- [47] Different from the case when , where the gap closes at , in this instance, the gap closing occurs at due to the presence of the energy shift which results in .
- [48] M. Mancini, G. Pagano, G. Cappellini, L. Livi, M. Rider, J. Catani, C. Sias, P. Zoller, M. Inguscio, M. Dalmonte, and L. Fallani, Observation of chiral edge states with neutral fermions in synthetic hall ribbons, Science 349, 1510 (2015).
- [49] B. K. Stuhl, H.-I. Lu, L. M. Aycock, D. Genkina, and I. B. Spielman, Visualizing edge states with an atomic bose gas in the quantum hall regime, Science 349, 1514 (2015).
- [50] V. Novičenko, E. Anisimovas, and G. Juzeliūnas, Floquet analysis of a quantum system with modulated periodic driving, Phys. Rev. A 95, 023615 (2017).
- [51] P. Weinberg, M. Bukov, L. D’Alessio, A. Polkovnikov, S. Vajna, and M. Kolodrubetz, Adiabatic perturbation theory and geometry of periodically-driven systems, Phys. Rep. 688, 1 (2017).
- [52] N. Sun and L.-K. Lim, Quantum charge pumps with topological phases in a creutz ladder, Phys. Rev. B 96, 035139 (2017).
- [53] D. Xiao, M.-C. Chang, and Q. Niu, Berry phase effects on electronic properties, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1959 (2010).
- [54] R. Resta, Manifestations of berry’s phase in molecules and condensed matter, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 12, R107 (2000).
- [55] J. Ahn and B.-J. Yang, Unconventional Topological Phase Transition in Two-Dimensional Systems with Space-Time Inversion Symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 156401 (2017).
- [56] J. Ahn, D. Kim, Y. Kim, and B.-J. Yang, Band Topology and Linking Structure of Nodal Line Semimetals with Monopole Charges, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 106403 (2018).
- [57] Q. Wu, A. A. Soluyanov, and T. Bzdušek, Non-Abelian band topology in noninteracting metals, Science 365 1273 (2019).
- [58] J. Ahn, S. Park, D. Kim, Y. Kim, and B.-J. Yang, Stiefel–whitney classes and topological phases in band theory, Chin. Phys. B 28, 117101 (2019).
- [59] A. Bouhon, A. M. Black-Schaffer, and R.-J. Slager, Wilson loop approach to fragile topology of split elementary band representations and topological crystalline insulators with time-reversal symmetry, Phys. Rev. B 100 195135 (2019).
- [60] In [55, 58], symmetry is called space-time inversion symmetry.
- [61] C.-K. Chiu, J. C. Y. Teo, A. P. Schnyder, and S. Ryu, Classification of topological quantum matter with symmetries, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 035005 (2016).
- [62] R. Roy and F. Harper, Periodic table for floquet topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B 96, 155118 (2017).
- [63] S. A. Weidinger and M. Knap, Floquet prethermalization and regimes of heating in a periodically driven, interacting quantum system, Sci. Rep. 7, 45382 (2017).
- [64] M. S. Rudner and N. H. Lindner, Band structure engineering and non-equilibrium dynamics in Floquet topological insulators, Nat. Rev. Phys. 2, 229 (2020).