This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Thermal transport properties of IrSbSe

Yu Liu,1,∗ Milinda Abeykoon,2 Niraj Aryal,1 David Graf,3 Zhixiang Hu,1,4 Weiguo Yin,1 and C. Petrovic1,4 1Condensed Matter Physics and Materials Science Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA.
2National Synchrotron Light Source II, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA.
3National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306-4005, USA.
4Materials Science and Chemical Engineering Department, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York 11790, USA.
Abstract

We report a thermal transport study of IrSbSe, which crystallizes in a noncentrosymmetric cubic structure with the P213P2_{1}3 space group and shows a narrow-gap semiconducting behavior. The large discrepancy between the activation energy for conductivity [EρE_{\rho} = 128(2) meV] and for thermopower [ESE_{S} = 17.7(9) meV] from 200 to 300 K indicates the polaronic transport mechanism. Electrical resistivity varies as exp(T0/T)1/4exp(T_{0}/T)^{1/4} and thermopower varies as T1/2T^{1/2} at low temperatures, indicating that it evolves into the Mott’s variable-range hopping dominant conduction with decreasing temperature. IrSbSe shows relatively low value of thermal conductivity (\sim 1.65 W/K\cdotm) and thermopower of about 0.24 mV/K around 100 K, yet poor electrical conductivity. On the other hand, high vacancy defect concentration on both Ir and Sb atomic sites of up to 15%, suggests high defect tolerance and points to possibility of future improvement of carrier density by chemical substitution or defect optimization.

I INTRODUCTION

New transition metal chalcogenides may enable transformative changes in thermoelectric energy creation and conversion RoychowdhuryS ; OuyangY ; BanikA . Ternary CoSbS with Kondo-insulator-like intrinsic magnetic susceptibility features high value of thermopower up to 2.5 mV/K at 40 K but also relatively large value of thermal conductivity \sim 100 W/K\cdotm near the thermopower peak temperature DuQ . This inhibits the thermoelectric figure of merit ZT=(S2ZT=(S^{2}/ρ\rhoκ\kappa)TT, where SS is thermopower, ρ\rho is electrical resistivity, κ\kappa is thermal conductivity, and TT is temperature.

Electronic correlations are important in many transition metal and rare earth-based materials PallsonG ; KoshibaeW . Theoretical study confirms that the colossal thermopower in CoSbS is due to carrier correlation and large increase of effective mass GuptaR . In addition, it was suggested that thermoelectric power factor in CoSbS may show 107 times increase in magnetic field due to high spin-orbit coupling (SOC) effect on thermopower GuptaR . The SOC causes considerable enhancement of electrical conductivity, which is rather sensitive to Co atomic moment and yet leaves the phonon dispersion and thermal conductivity unaffected.

Iridium-based materials with strong SOC host a variety of exotic quantum phases but also properties of interest for applications RauJ ; TakagiH ; WanX ; YL . In IrBiSe, for example bulk electronic bands are split by giant spin orbit splitting about 0.3 eV and are fully spin polarized LiuZ . Electronic states in IrBiSe with three-dimensional (3D) chiral spin texture with negative and positive chiralities along crystallographic [111] direction are of interest for spin sensor applications and could exhibit spin-triplet superconductivity upon doping LiuZ .

In this work we report the thermal transport properties of noncentrosymmetric and cubic IrSbSe, isostructural to IrBiSe. We observed vacancy defects on both Ir and Sb atomic sites, i.e. Ir0.90Sb0.85Se stoichiometry, leading to low values of thermal conductivity. The large discrepancy between the activation energy for electrical conductivity and for thermopower from 200 to 300 K suggests the polaronic transport mechanism. With decreasing temperature, it evolves into the Mott’s variable-range hopping dominant mechanism at low temperatures. Whereas high values of electrical resistivity inhibit ZTZT, relatively high tolerance of the crystal structure to defect formation may allow for further carrier tuning and optimization of thermoelectric performance, similar to IrBiSe LiuZ .

II EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS

IrSbSe polycrystal was synthesized via solid state reaction starting from an intimate mixture of high purity elements Ir powder (4N, Alfa Aesar), Sb and Se pieces (5N, Alfa Aesar) with a stoichiometric ratio. The starting materials were mixed and ground in an agate mortar, pressed into a pellet and sealed in an evacuated quartz tube backfilled with pure argon gas. The tube was heated to 500 C and dwelled for 12 h, and then slowly heated to 800 C and reacted for 5 days followed by furnace cooling. The chemical composition was determined by multiple points energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS) in a JEOL LSM-6500 scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Synchrotron powder x-ray diffraction (XRD) measurement was carried out in capillary transmission geometry using a Perkin Elmer amorphous silicon area detector at 28-ID-1 (PDF) beamline of the National Synchrotron Light Source II (NSLS II) at Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL). The setup utilized a \sim74 keV (λ\lambda = 0.16635 Å{\AA}) x-ray beam. Two dimensional diffraction data were integrated using Fit2D software package Hammersley . The Rietveld and PDF analysis were carried out using GSAS-II and PDFgui software packages, respectively Toby ; Farrow . Electrical resistivity, thermopower and thermal conductivity were measured in a quantum design PPMS-9 with standard four-probe technique. Sample dimensions were measured by an optical microscope Nikon SMZ-800 with resolution of 10 μ\mum.

III RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

Table 1: Atomic coordinates and displacements parameters for Ir0.90(1)Sb0.84(1)Se obtained from Rietveld refinement at 300 K in synchrotron powder XRD experiment.
Atom occupancy xx yy zz UisoU_{\textrm{iso}}2)
Ir 0.904(4) 0.0040(2) 0.0040 0.0040 0.0034
Sb 0.844(6) 0.3790(3) 0.3790 0.3790 0.0052(5)
Se 1.000 0.6235(4) 0.6235 0.6235 0.0010

Refer to caption

Figure 1: (Color online). (a) The Rietveld refinement of the background subtracted IrSbSe synchrotron powder x-ray diffraction. Plots show the observed (dots) and calculated (red solid line) powder patterns with a difference curve (blue). The black vertical tick marks represent Bragg reflections in the P213P2_{1}3 space group. (b) Crystal structure and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image along with (c) the energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) mapping on the IrSbSe sample.

Figure 1(a) shows the Rietveld refinement of synchrotron powder XRD for IrSbSe, indicating that all reflections can be well indexed in the P213P2_{1}3 space group Hulliger , and there are no extra impurity peaks. The determined lattice parameter aa = 6.20484(4) Å. The crystal structure is a derivative of the structure of iron pyrite (FeS2) Hulliger , which can also be viewed as a network of distorted IrSb3Se3 octahedra with each Sb or Se belonging to three such octahedra [Fig. 1(b)]. The EDS mapping presented in Fig. 1(c) shows that the ratio of Ir : Sb : Se \thickapprox 33(3) : 35(3) : 31(3), however, the Rietveld refinement indicates vacancy defects on both Ir and Sb atomic sites (Table I). The vacancy defect concentration is considerable, about 10% on Ir and 15% on Sb atomic sites, respectively.

Figure 2 shows the magnetic susceptibility of IrSbSe measured from 2 to 300 K in a magnetic field of HH = 10 kOe, which shows no evidence for long-range magnetic ordering below 300 K, and follows the Curie-Weiss behavior. The inverse susceptibility was modeled by the Curie-Weiss law, χ(T)=χ0+C/(TθW)\chi(T)=\chi_{0}+C/(T-\theta_{\textrm{W}}), where CC is the Curie constant, θW\theta_{\textrm{W}} is the Weiss temperature, and χ0\chi_{0} = -8×105\times 10^{-5} emu mol-1 Oe-1 is the temperature-independent diamagnetic term. The linear fit in the inset of Fig. 2 gives θW\theta_{\textrm{W}} = -3 K and CC = 1.67×103\times 10^{-3} emu K mol-1 Oe-1. The derived effective moment of μeff\mu_{\textrm{eff}} = 8C\sqrt{8C} \approx 0.12 μB\mu_{\textrm{B}}/Ir is considerably smaller than the value of 2.83 μB\mu_{\textrm{B}}/Ir expected for spin-only SS = 1 with Ir5+ (5d4d^{4}) ions. A similar magnetic behavior was also reported in Ir5+ compounds NaIrO3 and KIrO3 NaIrO3 ; KIrO3 .

Refer to caption

Figure 2: (Color online). Temperature dependence of magnetic susceptibility χ(T)\chi(T) for IrSbSe. The inset shows a Curie-Weiss plot with a fit to the Curie-Weiss law as explained in the main text.

Refer to caption

Figure 3: (Color online). (a) Temperature dependence of electrical resistivity ρ(T)\rho(T) for IrSbSe. (b) ln(ρ/T\rho/T) vs T1T^{-1} fitted by the adiabatic small polaron hopping model from 200 to 300 K. (c) lnρ\rho vs T1/4T^{-1/4} fitted by the Mott’s variable-range hopping model from 100 to 200 K.

Temperature dependence of electrical resistivity ρ(T)\rho(T) for IrSbSe is depicted in Fig. 3(a), showing an obvious semiconducting behavior. The value of ρ300K\rho_{\textrm{300K}} at room temperature is \sim 1.2 Ω\Omega m. It is plausible to consider three typical models to describe the semiconducting behavior: (i) thermally activated model ρ(T)=ρ0exp(Eρ/kBT)\rho(T)=\rho_{0}exp(E_{\rho}/k_{\textrm{B}}T), where EρE_{\rho} is an activation energy; (ii) adiabatic small polaron hopping model ρ(T)=ATexp(Eρ/kBT)\rho(T)=ATexp(E_{\rho}/k_{\textrm{B}}T) Austin ; YL1 ; YL2 ; (iii) Mott’s variable-range hopping (VRH) model ρ(T)=ρ0exp(T0/T)1/4\rho(T)=\rho_{0}exp(T_{0}/T)^{1/4}, where T0T_{0} is a characteristic temperature and is related to density of states available at the Fermi level N(EF)N(E_{\textrm{F}}) and carrier localization length. To understand the transport mechanism in IrSbSe, it is necessary to fit the ρ(T)\rho(T) data based on these three formulas. Figure 3(b) shows the fit result of the adiabatic small polaron hopping model. The extracted activation energy EρE_{\rho} is \sim 128(2) meV from 200 to 300 K, thus the band gap is estimated \sim 256(4) meV. However, the ρ(T)\rho(T) curve can also be well fitted using the thermally activated model (not shown here). With decreasing temperature, the ρ(T)\rho(T) data from 100 to 200 K obeys the Mott’s VRH model [Fig. 3(c)]. The derived characteristic temperature T0T_{0} \sim 2.1(1) ×\times 108 K for the Mott’s VRH conduction, and the corresponding localization length ξ\xi \sim 1.1 Å given by ξ3\xi^{3} = 18/[kBT0N(EF)]18/[k_{\textrm{B}}T_{0}N(E_{\textrm{F}})] Rong ; Fried , where N(EF)N(E_{\textrm{F}}) is the density of states at the Fermi level.

Refer to caption

Figure 4: (Color online). (a) Temperature dependence of thermopower S(T)S(T) for IrSbSe. (b) S(T)S(T) vs T1T^{-1} fitted by using S(T)=(kB/e)(α+ES/kBT)S(T)=(k_{\textrm{B}}/e)(\alpha+E_{S}/k_{B}T) from 200 to 300 K. (c) S(T)S(T) vs T1/2T^{1/2} with a linear fit from 100 to 121 K.

To distinguish the thermally activated model and polaron hopping model, we further measured temperature-dependent thermopower SS [Fig. 4(a)]. The S(T)S(T) shows negative values in high temperature regime with a relative large value of \sim -101 μ\muV K-1 at 300 K, indicating dominant electron-like carriers. With decreasing temperature, S(T)S(T) changes its slope and the sign from negative to positive below 130 K, suggesting the hole-like carriers dominate at low temperatures. As shown in Fig. 4(b), the S(T)S(T) vs T1T^{-1} curve can be well fitted with the equation S(T)=(kB/e)(α+ES/kBT)S(T)=(k_{\textrm{B}}/e)(\alpha+E_{S}/k_{\textrm{B}}T) Austin , where ESE_{S} is an activation energy and α\alpha is a constant. The obtained activation energy for thermopower ESE_{S} = 17.7(9) meV from 200 to 300 K [Fig. 3(b)], which is much smaller than that for conductivity EρE_{\rho} = 128(2) meV [Fig. 3(b)]. This large discrepancy between ESE_{S} and EρE_{\rho} typically reflects the polaron transport mechanism of carriers. Within the polaron hopping model, ESE_{S} is the energy required to activate hopping of carriers, while EρE_{\rho} is the sum of energy needed for the creation of carriers and activating the hopping of carriers Austin ; therefore, ESE_{S} is smaller than EρE_{\rho}. The weak temperature-dependent S(T)S(T) at high temperatures also supports the small polaron conduction. With decreasing temperature, the resistivity evolves into the Mott’s VRH dominant mechanism [Fig. 3(c)]. Within the Mott’s VRH model the S(T)S(T) can be described by S(T)=S0+AT1/2S(T)=S_{0}+AT^{1/2} Zvyagin ; it can be seen from the rapid slope change of SS(T), and SS varies as T1/2T^{1/2} from 100 to 121 K [Fig. 4(c)].

Refer to caption

Figure 5: (Color online). Temperature dependence of (a) thermal conductivity κ(T)\kappa(T) and (b) heat capacity Cp(T)C_{p}(T) for IrSbSe.

Figure 5(a) presents the temperature dependence of thermal conductivity κ(T)\kappa(T) for IrSbSe. Generally, κtotal=κe+κL\kappa_{\textrm{total}}=\kappa_{\textrm{e}}+\kappa_{\textrm{L}}, consists of the electronic charge carrier part κe\kappa_{\textrm{e}} and the phonon term κL\kappa_{\textrm{L}}. The κe\kappa_{\textrm{e}} estimated from the Wiedemann-Franz law is negligibly small due to large electrical resistivity of IrSbSe, indicating a predominantly phonon contribution. The κ(T)\kappa(T) shows a relatively low value of \sim 1.85 W/K\cdotm at 200 K due to its structural complexity such as high nonstoichiometry. With decreasing temperature, κ(T)\kappa(T) follows a T3/2T^{3/2}-dependence below 30 K [inset in Fig. 5(a)]. This deviates from the common κ\kappa \sim T3T^{3} usually observed in bulk crystals or thin films Toulokian ; McConnell , and it is close to power-law observed in thermal conductivity of nanostructures due to grain size variation WangZ ; ZhaoH . This might imply nanostructural differences that are induced by different vacancy defects in particular grains and associated phonon frequency changes. It should be noted that IrSbSe shows relatively low value of thermal conductivity \sim 1.65 W/K\cdotm and thermopower of \sim 0.24 mV/K around 100 K, yet poor electrical conductivity, leading to rather small values of power factor (<< 10-2 μ\muW/m\cdotK2) and zTzT (<< 10-6). The specific heat Cp(T)C_{\textrm{p}}(T) of IrSbSe at low temperatures is depicted in Fig. 5(b). By fitting the Cp/TC_{\textrm{p}}/T vs T2T^{2} data below 30 K by using Cp(T)/T=γ+βT2C_{\textrm{p}}(T)/T=\gamma+\beta T^{2}, we obtain the Sommerfeld electronic specific-heat coefficient γ\gamma \sim 0.4(2) mJ mol-1 K-2, as expected for an insulating ground state. The derived Debye temperature ΘD\Theta_{\textrm{D}} = 288(1) K from β\beta = 0.244(1) mJ/mol\cdotK by using the equation ΘD=[12π4NR/(5β)]13\Theta_{\textrm{D}}=[12\pi^{4}NR/(5\beta)]^{\frac{1}{3}}, which implies an average sound velocity of νs2600\nu_{\textrm{s}}\approx 2600 m/s SV . The phonon mean free path lκl_{\kappa}\sim 0.5 μ\mum at 2 K estimated from the heat capacity and thermal conductivity via κL=Cpνslκ/3\kappa_{\textrm{L}}=C_{\textrm{p}}\nu_{\textrm{s}}l_{\kappa}/3 QH .

Refer to caption

Figure 6: (Color online). (a) Band structure and (b) the atom-resolved density of states (DOS) calculated without spin-orbit coupling (SOC) on stoichiometric IrSbSe. (c) Band structure and (d) the DOS calculated with SOC.

We note that the polaronic transport is favored in materials with strong SOC that lack inversion symmetry GrimaldiC . To get insight into the relevance of SOC, we further performed first-principles calculations using density function theory. We applied the WIEN2K 43 implementation of the full potential linearized augmented plane wave method in the generalized gradient approximation using the PBEsol functional 44 on stoichiometric IrSbSe Hulliger . The SOC is treated in the second variation method. The basis size was determined by RmtKmaxR_{\mathrm{mt}}K_{\mathrm{max}} = 7 and the Brillouin zone was sampled with a regular 15×15×1515\times 15\times 15 mesh containing 176 irreducible kk points to achieve energy convergence of 1 meV. As shown in Fig. 6(a-d), the calculated band structure and atom-resolved density of states (DOS) indicates that the system is a nonmagnetic semiconductor. There is a band gap of about 1 eV for the calculations without SOC [Fig. 6(a,b)] and about 0.9 eV for the case with SOC [Fig. 6(c,d)]. The total DOS (black line) rises rapidly from the band edges with the band character being mainly of Ir 5d5d orbitals. However, the contributions from Sb and Se pp orbitals are significant in reducing the Ir 5d5d orbital weight, compared with the dominant character of the transition metal in CoSbS and FeSbS 46 . This weakens magnetic instability, if any, upon charge doping. The effects of SOC is more clearly seen in the band structures [Fig. 6(a,b)], where the SOC induces the band splitting is about 0.2 eV for the valence bands around the Fermi level. The band-structure plots also suggest that the valence and conduction bands are substantially massive. These are similar to the results for IrBiSe LiuZ , where the SOC splitting of about 0.3 eV was reported. Thus, the split band in stoichiometric IrSbSe is also expected to be fully spin-polarized with 3D chiral spin texture LiuZ . The present off-stoichiometric polycrystalline sample with a much smaller band gap suggests the occurrence of in-gap states.

Refer to caption

Figure 7: (Color online). Variation of calculated thermopower SS for electron doped case (a) as a function of carrier concentration nn for different temperatures and (b) as a function of temperature for different values of nn. Inset in (a) shows the experimental SS and nn at the indicated temperatures.

In order to compare with the experimental thermopower (SS), we calculate SS in the presence of SOC within the rigid band constant relaxation time approximation as implemented in the Boltztrap2 software package BT . As shown in Fig. 7(a), the variation of SS with electron carrier concentration (nn) for different temperatures shows Pisarenko behavior, i.e. logarithmic in carrier concentration, for a wide range of temperature and nn. Such behavior has also been observed in many other semiconductors including CoSbS which lies in the same family 46 . To make a more direct comparison with the experimental data, we also studied the temperature dependence of SS for different values of nn [Fig. 7(b)]. For this plot, we fix the value of nn at TT = 300 K and take into account the temperature dependence of n(T)=Ec𝑑Egc(E)/[e(Eμ)/kBT+1]n(T)=\int_{E_{c}}^{\infty}dEg_{c}(E)/[e^{(E-\mu)/k_{\textrm{B}}T}+1] AshcroftMermin , where gcg_{c} is the density of states of conduction bands, EcE_{c} is the conduction band edge, and μ\mu is the chemical potential at that temperature. Temperature dependence of μ\mu is obtained from the Sommerfeld relationship μ(T)=EFπ2kB2T2g(EF)/6g(EF)\mu(T)=E_{\textrm{F}}-\pi^{2}k_{\textrm{B}}^{2}T^{2}g^{\prime}(E_{\textrm{F}})/6g(E_{\textrm{F}}). The calculated magnitude of SS decreases as temperature decreases, in agreement with the experiment.

The Hall coefficient measured in the present polycrystalline sample is negative at the room temperature, in agreement with the negative value of SS(300 K) [Fig. 4(a)]. The derived carrier concentration nn(300 K) 1.9(1)×1017\sim 1.9(1)\times 10^{17} cm-3; it increases to nn(350 K) 1.25(2)×1018\sim 1.25(2)\times 10^{18} cm-3 [inset in Fig. 7(a)]. For the values of nn calculated larger than the experimental ones, we find the magnitude as well as the temperature dependence of SS are similar to the experimental results. As shown in Fig. 8, our calculation can reproduce the linear dependence of SS with T1/2T^{1/2} at low temperatures for the Mott’s VRH dominant conduction, and T1T^{-1} at high temperatures, respectively. The derived activation energy EScalE_{S}^{cal} = 65(5) meV, which is larger than the experimental value of EsE_{s} = 17.7(9) meV but still much smaller than EρE_{\rho} = 128(2) meV, confirming the polaronic nature at high temperatures. However, we should note that the experimentally observed pnp-n transition at TT\sim 130 K has not been reproduced by the simulation, calling for further investigation of thermoelectric properties in this system beyond the constant relaxation time approximation by including temperature as well as energy and momentum dependent electron-phonon scattering rate. It is also plausible that such pnp-n transition is the consequence of impurities in this system due to a large off-stoichiometry since it is not reported in a similar system CoSbS single crystal DuQ . Further efforts on single crystal growth will be helpful to clarify this, and carrier optimization is needed to obtain better thermoelectricity performance.

Refer to caption

Figure 8: (Color online). Fitting of the calculated thermopower SS with nn(300 K) = 5×10195\times 10^{19} cm-3 in linear dependence of (a) T1/2T^{1/2} and (b) T1T^{-1} at low and high temperatures, respectively, similar to the experimental observation.

IV CONCLUSIONS

In summary, we observed poor electrical and thermal conductivity in IrSbSe polycrystal. Electronic transport mechanism indicates the polaronic nature at high temperatures and the Mott’s VRH conduction at low temperatures. The thermopower is also simulated by using abinitioab-initio calculation. Structurally, IrSbSe crystallizes in the P213P2_{1}3 space group even with high vacancy defect concentration, i.e. with Ir0.90Sb0.85Se stoichiometry. Such high defect tolerance implies possibilities for future carrier optimization by vacancy defects and chemical doping.

Acknowledgements

Work at BNL is supported by the Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Materials Sciences and Engineering Division, U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under Contract No. DE-SC0012704. This research used the 28-ID-1 beamline of the NSLS II, a U.S. DOE Office of Science User Facility operated for the DOE Office of Science by BNL under Contract No. DE-SC0012704. A portion of this work was performed at the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, which was supported by the National Science Foundation Cooperative Agreement No. DMR-1644779 and the State of Florida.

Present address: Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA.

References

  • (1) S. Roychowdhury, M. Samanta, A. Banik, and K. Biswas, Thermoelectric energy conversion and topological materials based on heavy metal chalcogenides, J. Solid State Chem. 275, 103 (2019).
  • (2) Y. Ouyang, Z. Zhang, D. Li, J. Chen, and G. Zhang, Emerging theory, materials, and screening methods: new opportunities for promoting thermoelectric performance, Ann. Phys. 531, 1800437 (2019).
  • (3) A. Banik, S. Roychowdhury, and K. Biswas, The journey of tin chalcogenides towards high-performance thermoelectrics and topological materials, Chem. Comm. 54, 6573 (2018).
  • (4) Q. Du, M. Abeykoon, Y. Liu, G. Kotliar, and C. Petrovic, Low-temperature thermopower in CoSbS, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 076602 (2019).
  • (5) G. Palsson and G. Kotliar, Thermoelectric response near the density driven Mott transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4775 (1998).
  • (6) W. Koshibae and S. Maekawa, Effects of spin and orbital degeneracy on the thermopower of strongly correlated systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 236603 (2001).
  • (7) R. Gupta and C. Bera, Spin-orbit coupling effect on the thermopower and power factor of CoSbS, Phys. Rev. B 101, 155206 (2020).
  • (8) J. G. Rau, E. K.-H. Lee, and H.-Y. Kee, Spin-orbit physics giving rise to novel phases in correlated systems: iridates related materials, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 7, 195 (2016).
  • (9) H. Takagi, T. Takayama, G. Jackeli, G. Khaliullin, and S. E. Nagler, Concept and realization of Kitaev quantum spin liquids, Nat. Rev. Phys. 1, 264 (2019).
  • (10) X. Wan, A. M. Turner, A. Vishwanath, and S. Savrasov, Topological semimetal and Fermi-arc surface states in the electronic structure and pyrochlore iridates, Phys. Rev. B 83, 205101 (2011).
  • (11) Y. Liu, H. Lei, K. Wang, M. Abeykoon, J. B. Warren, E. Bozin, and C. Petrovic, Thermoelectric studies of Ir1-xRhxTe2 (0x0.30\leqslant x\leqslant 0.3), Phys. Rev. B 98, 094519 (2018).
  • (12) Z. Liu, S. Thirupathaiah, A. N. Yaresko, S. Kushwaha, Q. Gibson, W. Xia, Y. Guo, D. Shen, R. J. Cava, and S. V. Borisenko, A giant bulk-type dresselhaus splitting with 3D chiral spin texture in IrBiSe, Phys. Status Solidi RRL 14, 1900684 (2020).
  • (13) A. P. Hammersley, S. O. Svenson, M. Hanfland, and D. Hauserman, Two-dimensional detector software: from real detector to idealised image or two-theta scan, High Pressure Res. 14, 235 (1996).
  • (14) B. H. Toby, EXPGUI, a graphical user interface for GSAS, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 34, 210 (2001).
  • (15) C. L. Farrow, P. Juhas, J. W. Liu, D. Bryndin, E. S. Bozin, J. Bloch, T. Proffen, and S. J. L. Billinge, PDFfit2 to PDFgui: computer programs for studying nanostructure in crystals, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 19, 335219 (2007).
  • (16) F. Hulliger, New compounds with cobaltite structure, Nature 198, 382 (1963).
  • (17) D. C. Wallace and T. M. McQueen, New honeycomb Iridium(V) oxides: NaIrO3 and Sr3CaIr2O9, Dalton Trans. 44, 20344 (2015).
  • (18) S. Guo, K. M. Powderly, Synthesis, structure, and magnetism of BCC KIrO3, Dalton Trans. 49, 12018 (2020).
  • (19) R. Hu, V. F. Mitrovic, and C. Petrovic, Anisotropy in the magnetic and electrical transport properties of Fe1-xCrxSb2, Phys. Rev. B 76, 115105 (2007).
  • (20) J. R. Friedman, Y. Zhang, P. Dai, and M. P. Sarachik, Magnetic-field-induced crossover from Mott variable-range hopping to weakly insulating behavior, Phys. Rev. B 53, 9528 (1996).
  • (21) I. G. Austin and N. F. Mott, Polarons in crystalline and non-crystalline materials, Adv. Phys. 50, 757 (2001).
  • (22) Y. Liu, C.-J. Kang, E. Stavitski, Q. Du, K. Attenkofer, G. Kotliar, and C. Petrovic, Phys. Rev. B 97, 155202 (2018).
  • (23) Y. Liu, Z. Hu, M. Abeykoon, E. Stavitski, K. Attenkofer, E. D. Bauer, and C. Petrovic, Polaronic transport and thermoelectricity in Mn3Si2Te6 single crystals, Phys. Rev. B 103, 245122 (2021).
  • (24) I. P. Zvyagin, On the theory of hopping transport in disordered semiconductors, Phys. Status Solidi B 58, 443 (1973).
  • (25) Thermophysical Properties of Matter; Touloukian, Y. S., Ed.; IFI/Plenum: New York, 1970-1979.
  • (26) A. D. McConnell, K. E. Goodson, Thermal conduction in silicon micro- and nanostructures, Annu. Rev. Heat Transfer 14, 129 (2005).
  • (27) Z. Wang, J. E. Alaniz, W. Jang, J. E. Garay, and C. Dames, Thermal conductivity of nanocrystalline silicon: importance of grain size and frequency-dependent mean free paths, Nano Lett. 11, 2206 (2011).
  • (28) H. Zhao, M. Pokharel, G. Zhu, S. Chen, K. Lukas, Q. Jie, C. Opeil, G. Chen, and Z. Ren, Dramatic thermal conductivity reduction by nanostructures for large increase in thermoelectric figure-of-merit of FeSb2, Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 163101 (2011).
  • (29) Orson L. Anderson, A simplified method for calculating the Debye temperature from elastic constants, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 24, 909 (1963).
  • (30) Q. Du, X. Tong, Y. Liu, and C. Petrovic, Suppression of thermal conductivity and electronic correlations in Fe1-xRuxSb2 (0x0.60\leq x\leq 0.6), Appl. Phys. Lett. 118, 171904 (2021).
  • (31) C. Grimaldi, Large polaron formation induced by Rashba spin-orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. B 81, 075306 (2010).
  • (32) K. Schwarz, P. Blaha, and G. K. H. Madsen, Electronic structure calculations of solids using the WIEN2k package for material sciences, Comput. Phys. Commun. 147, 71 (2002).
  • (33) J. P. Perdew, A. Ruzsinszky, G. I. Csonka, O. A. Vydrov, G. E. Scuseria, L. A. Constantin, X. Zhou, and K. Burke, Restoring the density-gradient expansion for exchange in solids and surfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 136406 (2008).
  • (34) D. Parker, A. F. May, H. Wang, M. A. McGuire, B. C. Sales, and D. J. Singh, Electronic and thermoelectric properties of CoSbS and FeSbS, Phys. Rev. B 87, 045205 (2013).
  • (35) G. K. H. Madsen, J. Carrete, and M. J. Verstraete, BoltzTraP2, a program for interpolating band structures and calculating semi-classical transport coefficients, Comp. Phys. Commun. 231, 140 (2018).
  • (36) N. W. Ashcroft and N. D. Mermin, Solid State Physics (Cengage Learning, 2011).