This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Theorem of resonance of Small Volume High Contrast multilayered materials

Taoufik Meklachi School of Science, Engineering, and Technology, Penn State Harrisburg [email protected] School of Science, Engineering, and Technology, Penn State Harrisburg
Abstract

The need of mathematically formulate relations between composite materials’ properties and its resonance response is growing. This is due the fast technological advancement in micro-material manufacturing, present in chips for instance. In this paper two theorems are presented, providing formulas of scattering resonance of double-layered and multilayered small volumes in terms of the coefficient of sussceptibility, being high, and the geometric characteristics. Spectroscopy measurements of the composite medium can exploit the formula to detect its dimension and susceptibility index.

Keywords— Spectroscopy, multilayered materials, nonlinear eigenvalue problems, resonance formula, high contrast material, compact operators, novel materials.

1 Introduction

Non-linear spectral analysis of scattering resonances has been a growing field attracting more interest due to the vital applications in imaging, spectroscopy for instance, and material science. In particular, the material’s design efficiency at the microscopic level and the refined choice of the material’s components, unarguably, enhance quality and function of the composite material. In this paper, I will present a first order approximation of scattering resonance of small multilayered volume with high contrast. the layers are concentric and of arbitrary number. Furthermore, the shape of the small volume is also arbitrary, which gives this formula a wide scope of usefulness. The results in this work is a smooth transition from the asymptotic formula for a single small volume with high contrast, elaborated in ref. [15], to a high contrast small volume composed of multiple concentric media. The scaling technique used in this paper is the same employed in ref. [14]. Data mining and artificial intelligence, from other hand, were introduced to advance materials manufacturing via an extensive library of materials’ properties data. Approach that is especially used when the mathematical physics model is complex to solve or the resulting novel material manifest anomalous phenomena violating physics laws, as in the unnatural bending of incident electromagnetic waves in metamaterials which violates Snell’s law  [14][16][2][3][4][6][17][7][8][9][10][12]. For instance, in ref.[11] machine learning is adopted to study the elastic localization linkages in high-contrast composite materials. A decent number of literature is referenced therein. Most recent contributions to the study of high contrast media can be found in[13][1][5]. In section 2 the scattering resonance for two concentric layers is derived, which serves as a basis to generalize the formula to any number of concentric layers in section 3.

2 The double layered case

Consider a small 3D volume BhB_{h} in vacuum and contains the origin, with arbitrary shape and a dielectric susceptibility η(x)\eta(x) such that

η(x)=χhB(x)η0(x)h2\eta(x)=\chi_{hB}(x)\frac{\eta_{0}(x)}{h^{2}}

Suppose BhB_{h} is optically inhomogeneous with two concentric high contrast media B1B_{1}, the inner medium, and B2B_{2}, the outer one, such that

hB=hB1hB2,hB=hB_{1}\cup hB_{2},
η(x)=χhB1(x)η1+χhB2(x)η2=χhB1(x)η01h2+χhB2(x)η02h2,\eta(x)=\chi_{hB_{1}}(x)\eta^{1}+\chi_{hB_{2}}(x){\eta^{2}}=\chi_{hB_{1}}(x)\frac{\eta_{0}^{1}}{h^{2}}+\chi_{hB_{2}}(x)\frac{\eta_{0}^{2}}{h^{2}},

and

η0(x)=χB1(x)η01+χB2(x)η02\eta_{0}(x)=\chi_{B_{1}}(x)\eta_{0}^{1}+\chi_{B_{2}}(x){\eta_{0}^{2}}

for constants η1\eta^{1}, η2\eta^{2}, η01\eta_{0}^{1} and η02\eta_{0}^{2}. First, I will derive an asymptotic formula for scattering resonances λh\lambda_{h} on the scaled down volume hBhB with two concentric media. Formula that will be later generalized to multiple layers of arbitrary number of concentric media. The field uu satisfies Helmholtz equation:

Δu+k2(1+η)u=0\Delta u+k^{2}(1+\eta)u=0 (1)

where kk is the wave number and λ=k2\lambda=k^{2} is the spectral parameter. Scaling technique, as performed in [15], on the integral form of the solution of (1) given by Lippmann-Schwinger results in the non-linear eigenvalue problem

λhTh(λh)uh=uh\lambda_{h}T_{h}(\lambda_{h})u_{h}=u_{h} (2)

where

Th(λ)(u)(x)\displaystyle T_{h}(\lambda)(u)({x}) =η014πB1exp(iλh|xy|)|xy|u(y)𝑑y\displaystyle=\frac{\eta_{0}^{1}}{4\pi}\int_{B_{1}}\frac{\exp({i\sqrt{\lambda}h|x-y|)}}{|x-y|}u(y)dy (3)
+η024πB2exp(iλh|xy|)|xy|u(y)𝑑y\displaystyle+\frac{\eta_{0}^{2}}{4\pi}\int_{B_{2}}\frac{\exp({i\sqrt{\lambda}h|x-y|)}}{|x-y|}u(y)dy (4)

The limiting form of equation (2)

λ0T0(u0)=u0\lambda_{0}T_{0}(u_{0})=u_{0} (5)

as h0h\rightarrow 0 is a linear eigenvalue problem where

T0(u)(x)=η014πB11|xy|u(y)𝑑y+η024πB21|xy|u(y)𝑑yT_{0}(u)({x})=\frac{\eta_{0}^{1}}{4\pi}\int_{B_{1}}\frac{1}{|x-y|}u(y)dy+\frac{\eta_{0}^{2}}{4\pi}\int_{B_{2}}\frac{1}{|x-y|}u(y)dy (6)

Let

U1=B1u0(x)𝑑xand U2=B2u0(x)𝑑xU_{1}=\int_{B_{1}}u_{0}(x)dx\quad\text{and }\quad U_{2}=\int_{B_{2}}u_{0}(x)dx

The following Theorem provides a first order approximation to λh\lambda_{h} for small volume high contrast two concentric media.

Theorem 2.1.

Let UU be a domain bounded away from the negative real axis in \mathbb{C}. Let T0T_{0} and Th(λ)T_{h}(\lambda) be two linear compact operators from L2(B)L^{2}(B) to L2(B)L^{2}(B) defined by (6) and (3), respectively. Let λ00\lambda_{0}\neq 0 in UU be a simple eigenvalue of T0T_{0}, and let u0u_{0} be the normalized eigenfunction. Then for hh small enough, there exists a nonlinear eigenvalue λh\lambda_{h} of ThT_{h} satisfying the formula:

λh=λ0iλ0524π[η01U12+η02U22+(η01+η02)U1U2]h+𝒪(h2).\lambda_{h}=\lambda_{0}-i\frac{{\lambda_{0}}^{\frac{5}{2}}}{4\pi}\left[{\eta_{0}^{1}U_{1}^{2}+\eta_{0}^{2}U_{2}^{2}+(\eta_{0}^{1}+\eta_{0}^{2})U_{1}U_{2}}\right]h+\mathcal{O}(h^{2}). (7)
Proof.

This proof uses Lemma 2.1 and Theorem 2.1 in ref. [15]. First, Th(λ)T_{h}(\lambda) converges uniformly in the L2(B)L^{2}(B) norm to T0T_{0} as h0h\rightarrow 0. This can be shown by using Lemma 2.1 to first establish uniform converge on L2(B1)L^{2}(B_{1}) and L2(B2)L^{2}(B_{2}), then the triangular inequality property of the L2L^{2}-norm establishes the uniform convergence on L2(B)L^{2}(B). In fact, there exist positive C1C_{1} and C2C_{2} such that

Th(λ)T0\displaystyle||T_{h}(\lambda)-T_{0}|| ||(Th(λ)T0)|B1+(Th(λ)T0)|B2||\displaystyle\leq||(T_{h}(\lambda)-T_{0})|_{B_{1}}+(T_{h}(\lambda)-T_{0})|_{B_{2}}||
Th(λ)T0L2(B1)+Th(λ)T0L2(B2)\displaystyle\leq||T_{h}(\lambda)-T_{0}||_{L^{2}(B_{1})}+||T_{h}(\lambda)-T_{0}||_{L^{2}(B_{2})}
C1h+C2hby Lemma 2.1\displaystyle\leq C_{1}h+C_{2}h\quad\text{by Lemma 2.1}
=(C1+C2)h\displaystyle=(C_{1}+C_{2})h

Theorem 2.1 in [15] provides a first order approximation of λh\lambda_{h} given by

λh=λ0+λ02(T0Th(λ0))u0,u0+𝒪(h2)\lambda_{h}=\lambda_{0}+{\lambda_{0}}^{2}\large\left\langle(T_{0}-T_{h}(\lambda_{0}))u_{0},u_{0}\large\right\rangle+\mathcal{O}(h^{2}) (8)

In particular we have

(T0Th(λ))(u0)(x)\displaystyle(T_{0}-T_{h}(\lambda))(u_{0})(x) =η014πB1(1exp(iλh|xy|))u0(y)|xy|𝑑y\displaystyle=\frac{\eta_{0}^{1}}{4\pi}\int_{B_{1}}\big{(}1-\exp({i\sqrt{\lambda}h|x-y|)}\big{)}\frac{u_{0}(y)}{|x-y|}dy (9)
+η024πB2(1exp(iλh|xy|))u0(y)|xy|𝑑y\displaystyle+\frac{\eta_{0}^{2}}{4\pi}\int_{B_{2}}\big{(}1-\exp({i\sqrt{\lambda}h|x-y|)}\big{)}\frac{u_{0}(y)}{|x-y|}dy (10)

Taylor expansion on the function hexp(iλh|xy|)h\rightarrow\exp({i\sqrt{\lambda}h|x-y|)} to the first order gives

(1exp(iλh|xy|))1|xy|=iλh+𝒪(h2)\big{(}1-\exp({i\sqrt{\lambda}h|x-y|)}\big{)}\frac{1}{|x-y|}=-i\sqrt{\lambda}h+\mathcal{O}(h^{2})

Substituting in (9) and (10) we obtain

(T0Th(λ))(u0)(x)=iλ0124π(η01U1+η02U2)h+𝒪(h2)(T_{0}-T_{h}(\lambda))(u_{0})(x)=-i\frac{{\lambda_{0}}^{\frac{1}{2}}}{4\pi}(\eta_{0}^{1}U_{1}+\eta_{0}^{2}U_{2})h+\mathcal{O}(h^{2})

Finally plugging the last expression in (8) concludes formula (7) ∎

A useful formulation in spectroscopy applications when computing the volume of BhB_{h} could be

λh=λ0iλ0524π[(η01U1+η02U2)U0]h+𝒪(h2).\lambda_{h}=\lambda_{0}-i\frac{{\lambda_{0}}^{\frac{5}{2}}}{4\pi}\left[{(\eta_{0}^{1}U_{1}+\eta_{0}^{2}U_{2})U_{0}}\right]h+\mathcal{O}(h^{2}). (11)

where

U0=Bu0(x)𝑑x.U_{0}=\int_{B}u_{0}(x)dx.

The special case when η01=η12\eta_{0}^{1}=\eta_{1}^{2}, hence η1=η2\eta^{1}=\eta^{2}, provides exactly the asymptotic formula for the resonance derived for a single small volume and high contrast scatterer, ref. [15], which writes

λh=λ0iη04πλ052U02h+𝒪(h2).\lambda_{h}=\lambda_{0}-i\frac{\eta_{0}}{4\pi}{\lambda_{0}}^{\frac{5}{2}}{U_{0}}^{2}h+\mathcal{O}(h^{2}). (12)

3 The multilayered resonance Theorem

Let BhB_{h} be a small 3D volume that contains the origin with arbitrary shape and dielectric susceptibility η(x)\eta(x) such that

η(x)=χhB(x)η0(x)h2\eta(x)=\chi_{hB}(x)\frac{\eta_{0}(x)}{h^{2}}

Suppose BhB_{h} is composite and optically inhomogenous with nn layers of concentric high contrast media {Bi}1in{\{B_{i}}\}_{1\leq i\leq n}, such that

hB=i=1i=nhBi,hB=\cup_{i=1}^{i=n}hB_{i},
η(x)=i=1i=nχhBi(x)ηi=i=1i=nχhBi(x)η0ih2,\eta(x)=\sum_{i=1}^{i=n}\chi_{hB_{i}}(x)\eta^{i}=\sum_{i=1}^{i=n}\chi_{hB_{i}}(x)\frac{\eta_{0}^{i}}{h^{2}},

and

η0(x)=i=1i=nχBi(x)η0i\eta_{0}(x)=\sum_{i=1}^{i=n}\chi_{B_{i}}(x)\eta_{0}^{i}

for constants ηi\eta^{i}, η0i\eta_{0}^{i}. The field uu satisfies Helmholtz equation (1), and similarly to the double layer case, can be formulated as an integral non-linear eigenvalue problem (2) where

Th(λ)(u)(x)=k=1k=nη0k4πBkexp(iλh|xy|)|xy|u(y)𝑑yT_{h}(\lambda)(u)({x})=\sum_{k=1}^{k=n}\frac{\eta_{0}^{k}}{4\pi}\int_{B_{k}}\frac{\exp({i\sqrt{\lambda}h|x-y|)}}{|x-y|}u(y)dy (13)

having the limiting linear eigenvalue problem (5) of the operator

T0(u)(x)=k=1k=nη0k4πBk1|xy|u(y)𝑑yT_{0}(u)({x})=\sum_{k=1}^{k=n}\frac{\eta_{0}^{k}}{4\pi}\int_{B_{k}}\frac{1}{|x-y|}u(y)dy (14)

as h0h\rightarrow 0.

Theorem 3.1.

Assume that the hypotheses in Theorem (2.1) hold. The scattering resonance satisfying (2) is given by

λh=λ0iλ0524π[U0k=1k=nη0kUk]h+𝒪(h2)\lambda_{h}=\lambda_{0}-i\frac{{\lambda_{0}}^{\frac{5}{2}}}{4\pi}\left[{U_{0}\sum_{k=1}^{k=n}\eta_{0}^{k}U_{k}}\right]h+\mathcal{O}(h^{2}) (15)

where

U0=Bu0(x)𝑑x,U_{0}=\int_{B}u_{0}(x)dx,

and

Uk=Bku0(x)𝑑x,1kn.U_{k}=\int_{B_{k}}u_{0}(x)dx,\quad 1\leq k\leq n.
Proof.

Uniform converge of Th(λ)T_{h}(\lambda) to T0T_{0} as h0h\rightarrow 0 can be shown the same way as in the proof of Theorem (2.1). Furthermore, and similarly to the two layer case, we have

(T0Th(λ))(u0)(x)\displaystyle(T_{0}-T_{h}(\lambda))(u_{0})(x) =k=1k=nη0k4πBk(1exp(iλh|xy|))u0(y)|xy|𝑑y\displaystyle=\sum_{k=1}^{k=n}\frac{\eta_{0}^{k}}{4\pi}\int_{B_{k}}\big{(}1-\exp({i\sqrt{\lambda}h|x-y|)}\big{)}\frac{u_{0}(y)}{|x-y|}dy
=iλ0124π(k=1k=nη0kUk)h+𝒪(h2)\displaystyle=-i\frac{{\lambda_{0}}^{\frac{1}{2}}}{4\pi}(\sum_{k=1}^{k=n}\eta_{0}^{k}U_{k})h+\mathcal{O}(h^{2})

which, substituted in formula (8), gives the asymptotic expression (15) ∎

References

  • [1] H. M. Ammari, B. Davies, and E. O. Hiltunen, Functional analytic methods for discrete approximations of subwavelength resonator systems, 2021.
  • [2] G. Bouchitté and B. Schweizer, Cloaking of small objects by anomalous localized resonance, Quarterly Journal of Mechanics and Applied Mathematics, 63 (2010), pp. 437–463.
  • [3] O. P. Bruno and S. K. Lintner, Superlens-cloaking of small dielectric bodies in the quasistatic regime, Journal of Applied Physics, 102 (2007), p. 124502.
  • [4] W. Cai, U. K. Chettiar, A. V. Kildishev, V. M. Shalaev, and G. W. Milton.
  • [5] D. P. Challa, F. Mouffouk, and M. Sini, Estimation of a class of quasi‐resonances generated by multiple small particles with high surface impedances, Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences, 42 (2019), pp. 3568 – 3578.
  • [6] A. Greenleaf, Y. Kurylev, M. Lassas, and G. Uhlmann, Cloaking devices, electromagnetic wormholes, and transformation optics, SIAM Rev., 51 (2009), pp. 3–33.
  • [7] R. V. Kohn, D. Onofrei, M. Vogelius, and M. I. Weinstein, Cloaking via change of variables for the helmholtz equation, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 63 (2010).
  • [8] R. V. Kohn, H. Shen, M. Vogelius, and M. I. Weinstein, Cloaking via change of variables in electric impedance tomography, Inverse Problems, 24 (2008), p. 015016.
  • [9] Y. Lai, H. Chen, Z. qing Zhang, and C. T. Chan, Complementary media invisibility cloak that cloaks objects at a distance outside the cloaking shell., Physical review letters, 102 9 (2009), p. 093901.
  • [10] H. Liu, Virtual reshaping and invisibility in obstacle scattering, Inverse Problems, 25 (2009), p. 045006.
  • [11] R. Liu, Y. C. Yabansu, A. Agrawal, S. R. Kalidindi, and A. N. Choudhary, Mathematical study of scattering resonances, Integrating Materials and Manufacturing Innovation, 7 (2016), pp. 192–208.
  • [12] R. C. McPhedran, N. A. Nicorovici, L. C. Botten, and G. W. Milton, Cloaking by plasmonic resonance among systems of particles: cooperation or combat?, Comptes Rendus Physique, 10 (2009), pp. 391–399.
  • [13] T. Meklachi, K. Li, and B. Adams, Spectral analysis of scattering resonances with application on high contrast nanospheres, arXiv, (2022).
  • [14] T. Meklachi, G. Milton, D. Onofrei, A. Thaler, and G. Funchess, Sensitivity of anomalous localized resonance phenomena with respect to dissipation, Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, 74 (2016), pp. 201–234.
  • [15] T. Meklachi, J. C. Schotland, and S. Moskow, Asymptotic analysis of resonances of small volume high contrast linear and nonlinear scatterers, Journal of Mathematical Physics, 59 (2018), p. 20.
  • [16] G. W. Milton and N. A. Nicorovici, On the cloaking effects associated with anomalous localized resonance, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 462 (2006), pp. 3027 – 3059.
  • [17] F. G. Vasquez, G. W. Milton, and D. Onofrei, Broadband exterior cloaking., Optics express, 17 17 (2009), pp. 14800–5.