This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

\catchline

THE TRANSPORT OF SELF-PROPELLED ELLIPSOIDAL PARTICLES CONFINED IN 2D2D SMOOTH CORRUGATED CHANNEL

BING WANG School of Mechanics and Optoelectronic Physics, Anhui University of Science and Technology
Huainan, 232001, P.R.China
[email protected]
   WENFEI WU School of Mechanics and Optoelectronic Physics, Anhui University of Science and Technology
Huainan, 232001, P.R.China
(Day Month Year; Day Month Year)
Abstract

Directed transport of self-propelled ellipsoidal particles confined in a smooth corrugated channel with asymmetric potential and Gaussian colored noise is investigated. Effects of the channel, potential and colored noise on the system are discussed. Large xx axis noise intensity inhibits the transport in x-x and +x+x direction. The directed transport speed |V||\langle V\rangle| has a maximum with increasing yy axis noise intensity. Proper size of the bottleneck is good for the directed transport of the ellipsoidal particles, but large and small size of bottleneck inhibits this directed transport. The transport reverse phenomenon appears with increasing load and self-propelled speed. Perfect sphere particle is easier to directed transport than needlelike ellipsoid particle.

keywords:
Self-Propelled Ellipsoidal Particle; Confined Channel; Directed Transport.
{history}

1 Introduction

Recent years, we have seen enormous activities in the study of the properties of the confined Brownian particles. These studies, both theoretical and experimental, revealed that there are two ways of confinement fundamentally effect a system. One way is by regulating the transport space accessible to its diffusing components[1], and the other way is by increasing the hydrodynamic drag on the particles[2]. There exists a large number of natural and artificial confined geometries, e.g., biological cells[3, 4, 5, 6], zeolites[7], artificial nanopores[8, 9], ionpumps[10, 11, 12, 13] and micro fluidic devices[14, 15, 16, 17].

Confined particle shows a series of novel features, e.g. current reversal[18, 19, 20, 21, 22], self-organization[23, 24], geometry-induced stochastic resonance phenomenon[25, 26] and so on. Hänggi et al. proposed a model of asymmetry particles confined in a compartmentalized channel and found the absolute negative mobility[27]. Ghosh et al. investigated directed transport of suspended particles and found inertial corrections must be considered when the width of the bottlenecks is smaller than an appropriate particle diffusion length[28]. Using the hybrid molecular dynamics method, Chen et al. studied the properties of self-propelled synthetic motors[29]. Pu et al. investigated the reentrant phase separation behavior of active particles and found that phase separation shows a re-entrance behavior with variation of the interaction strength[30]. Li et al. found non-Gaussian normal diffusion phenomenon of Brownian particles floating in a narrow corrugated channel with fluctuating cross section[31]. Yang et al. experimentally investigated the diffusion of particles moving in a planar channel[32].

In many biological systems, transport particles are often nonspherical, such as proteins diffusing in membranes and fine grains migrating through the pores of micro media[34, 33]. Han et al. studied the transport of ellipsoid particles confined in a two dimensional channel and quantified the crossover from short-time anisotropic to long-time isotropic diffusion[35]. Ohta et al. found deformable particles exhibit bifurcation and circular motion phenomenon[36]. Ai et al. investigated the rectified transport of active ellipsoidal particles in a two-dimensional asymmetric potential[37]. Ghosh et al. numerically simulated the transport of elliptic particles confined in two-dimensional channels with reflecting walls and observed long diffusion transients[38]. Traditionally, stochastic differential equations used in physical and biological science have involved Gaussian white noise. Investigation of laser noise problems [39, 40], bistable systems[41] and self-propelled particle systems[42, 43] found that it is necessary to consider colored noise in those systems.

In this paper, we investigate the directed transport of self-propelled ellipsoidal Brownian particles confined in a two dimensional(2D2D) smooth channel. The paper is organized as follows: The basic model of the system is provided in Sect.2. In Sect.3, the effects of the channel, the potential and the colored noise on the ellipsoidal particles are investigated by means of simulations. In Sect. 4, we get the conclusions.

2 Basic model and methods

In this work, we consider self-propelled ellipsoidal particles confined in a 2D2D smooth corrugated channel with potential and Gaussian colored noise. In the lab frame, the displacement δR(t)\delta\vec{R}(t) of the particle can be described by the mass center(δx\delta{x}, δy\delta{y}). We use the following Langevin equations to describe the dynamics of the particle[35, 44]

xt=v0cosθ(t)+Fx[Γ¯+ΔΓcos2θ(t)]+ΔΓFysin2θ(t)+ξx(t),\frac{\partial{x}}{\partial t}=v_{0}\cos\theta(t)+F_{x}[\bar{\Gamma}+\Delta\Gamma\cos 2\theta(t)]+\Delta\Gamma F_{y}\sin 2\theta(t)+\xi_{x}(t), (1)
yt=v0sinθ(t)+Fy[Γ¯ΔΓcos2θ(t)]+ΔΓFxsin2θ(t)+ξy(t),\frac{\partial{y}}{\partial t}=v_{0}\sin\theta(t)+F_{y}[\bar{\Gamma}-\Delta\Gamma\cos 2\theta(t)]+\Delta\Gamma F_{x}\sin 2\theta(t)+\xi_{y}(t), (2)
θ(t)t=ξθ(t).\frac{\partial{\theta(t)}}{\partial t}={\xi}_{\theta}(t). (3)

The angle between the lab frame xx axis and the body frame x^\hat{x} axis is θ(t)\theta(t). The self-propelled velocity is v0v_{0}, and v0v_{0} is along the long axis of the particle. The quantities Γ¯=12(Γx+Γy)\bar{\Gamma}=\frac{1}{2}(\Gamma_{x}+\Gamma_{y}) and ΔΓ=12(ΓxΓy)\Delta{\Gamma}=\frac{1}{2}(\Gamma_{x}-\Gamma_{y}) are the average and difference mobilities of the body, respectively. The mobilities along its long axis and short axis are Γx\Gamma_{x} and Γy\Gamma_{y}, respectively. ΔΓ\Delta\Gamma determines the asymmetry of the body of the ellipsoidal particle. The particle is a perfect sphere when ΔΓ=0\Delta\Gamma=0 and a very needlelike ellipsoid when ΔΓΓ¯\Delta\Gamma\rightarrow\bar{\Gamma}. ξx\xi_{x}, ξy\xi_{y} and ξθ\xi_{\theta} are the noises. ξx\xi_{x} and ξy\xi_{y} parallel to xx axis and yy axis, respectively. ξθ\xi_{\theta} is the angle noise. ξx\xi_{x}, ξy\xi_{y} and ξθ\xi_{\theta} satisfy the following relations,

ξi(t)=0,(i=x,y,θ),\langle\xi_{i}(t)\rangle=0,(i=x,y,\theta), (4)
ξi(t)ξj(t)=δijQiτiexp[|tt|τi],(i=x,y,θ),\langle\xi_{i}(t)\xi_{j}(t^{\prime})\rangle=\delta_{ij}\frac{Q_{i}}{\tau_{i}}\exp[-\frac{|t-t^{\prime}|}{\tau_{i}}],(i=x,y,\theta), (5)

where QiQ_{i} and τi\tau_{i} are the noise intensity and the self-correlation time of the noises, respectively.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: Illustrations of the smooth corrugated channel with Δ=0.8\Delta=0.8, xL=yL=1.0x_{L}=y_{L}=1.0, η=2.0\eta=2.0.

The particles are confined in a two dimensional smooth corrugated channel. As shown in Fig.1, the channel is consisted of many cavities and is periodic in spatial along the xx-axis. The walls of the cavity are modeled by the following sinusoidal functions,[45]

W+(x)=12[Δ+(yLΔ)sinη(πxxL)],W_{+}(x)=\frac{1}{2}[\Delta+(y_{L}-\Delta)\sin^{\eta}(\frac{\pi x}{x_{L}})], (6)
W(x)=12[Δ+(yLΔ)sinη(πxxL)],W_{-}(x)=-\frac{1}{2}[\Delta+(y_{L}-\Delta)\sin^{\eta}(\frac{\pi x}{x_{L}})], (7)

where xL=1.0x_{L}=1.0 and yL=1.0y_{L}=1.0 are the length and width of the cavity, respectively. The additional tunable geometric parameter is η\eta. The cavity represents the compartment of sinusoidally corrugated channel when η=2\eta=2. When η0\eta\rightarrow 0, the cavity reproduces the compartment of sharply corrugated channels. The channel width is h(x)=W+Wh(x)=W_{+}-W_{-}. The minimal channel width(the bottleneck) is hmin=h(x)|x=±k,k=0,1,2,=Δh_{min}=h(x)|_{x=\pm k,k=0,1,2,\cdot\cdot\cdot}=\Delta, and through which the particles can exit the cavity. The maximal channel width is hmax=h(x)|x=±(2k+1)12,k=0,1,2,=yLh_{max}=h(x)|_{x=\pm(2k+1)\frac{1}{2},k=0,1,2,\cdot\cdot\cdot}=y_{L}.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 2: The asymmetric potential U(x,y)U(x,y) with U0=1.0U_{0}=1.0, ε=0.5\varepsilon=0.5:(a)3D view with f=0.3f=-0.3;(b)Front view with f=0.3f=-0.3; (c)3D view with f=0.3f=0.3; (d)Front view with f=0.3f=0.3.

The asymmetric potential is described by the following equation[37](shown in Fig.8),

U(x,y)=U02y2[cos(x+εlncoshy)+1.1]+fx,U(x,y)=\frac{U_{0}}{2}y^{2}[\cos(x+\varepsilon\ln{\cosh y})+1.1]+fx, (8)

where U0U_{0} is the height of the potential, and ff is the load. The asymmetric parameter of the potential is ε\varepsilon, and the potential is symmetric for ε=0.0\varepsilon=0.0. The equipotential is look like a herringbone pattern if ε0\varepsilon\neq 0. The forces Fx=UxF_{x}=-\frac{\partial U}{\partial x} and Fy=UyF_{y}=-\frac{\partial U}{\partial y} are along xx and yy directions of the lab frame, respectively.

In the theory of Brownian motion, the central question is the particle’s over all long time behavior. The velocity of the particle is one of the key quantities. We only calculate the average velocity in xx direction because the channel in yy direction is confined,

Vθ0=limtx(t)x(t0)tt0,\langle V_{\theta_{0}}\rangle=\lim_{t\to\infty}\frac{\langle{x(t)-x(t_{0})}\rangle}{t-t_{0}}, (9)

the position of particles at time t0t_{0} is x(t0)x(t_{0}). The initial angle of the trajectory is θ0\theta_{0}. The full average velocity after another average over all θ0\theta_{0} is

V=12π02πVθ0𝑑θ0.\langle V\rangle=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int^{2\pi}_{0}\langle V_{\theta_{0}}\rangle d\theta_{0}. (10)

3 Results and discussion

In order to give a simple and clear analysis of the system. We integrate Eqs.(1,2,3) with time step Δt=104\Delta t=10^{-4} using the Euler algorithm. The average velocity is obtained as ensemble averages over 10510^{5} trajectories with random initial conditions. In the simulation, we set xL=yL=1.0x_{L}=y_{L}=1.0, Γ¯=1.0\bar{\Gamma}=1.0 and U0=1.0U_{0}=1.0 throughout the paper.

Refer to caption
Figure 3: The average velocity V\langle V\rangle as a function of QxQ_{x} for different values of ff. The other parameters are Δ=0.8\Delta=0.8, ε=0.5\varepsilon=0.5, η=2.0\eta=2.0, v0=0.5v_{0}=0.5, Qx=Qy=Qθ=1.0Q_{x}=Q_{y}=Q_{\theta}=1.0, τx=τy=τθ=1.0\tau_{x}=\tau_{y}=\tau_{\theta}=1.0.

Fig.3 displays the average velocity V\langle V\rangle as a function of xx axis noise intensity QxQ_{x} with different load ff. In this paper, we find the average velocity V>0\langle V\rangle>0, and V\langle V\rangle decreases with increasing QxQ_{x} when the load f=0.1f=-0.1 and f=0.3f=-0.3. Which means that negative load ff induces directed transport in +x+x direction, and large xx axis noise intensity QxQ_{x} inhibits this transport. When the load f>0f>0(f=0.1f=0.1 and f=0.3f=0.3), the average velocity V<0\langle V\rangle<0, and V\langle V\rangle increases with increasing QxQ_{x}. So positive ff leads to directed transport in x-x direction, and large QxQ_{x} is bad for this directed transport. Of cause, we can also say that the directed transport speed |V||\langle V\rangle|(|V||\langle V\rangle| is the absolute value of V\langle V\rangle) decreases with increasing QxQ_{x}, so large xx axis noise intensity inhabits directed transport along xx axis.

Refer to caption
Figure 4: The average velocity V\langle V\rangle as a function of τx\tau_{x} for different values of ff. The other parameters are Δ=0.8\Delta=0.8, ε=0.5\varepsilon=0.5, η=2.0\eta=2.0, v0=0.5v_{0}=0.5, Qx=Qy=Qθ=1.0Q_{x}=Q_{y}=Q_{\theta}=1.0, τy=τθ=1.0\tau_{y}=\tau_{\theta}=1.0.

Fig.4 displays V\langle V\rangle as a function of self-correlation time τx\tau_{x} with different load ff. In this figure, comparing with the effect of QxQ_{x} in Fig.3, we find τx\tau_{x} has exactly reverse effect on the system. The directed transport speed |V||\langle V\rangle| increases with increasing τx\tau_{x}. Large self-correlation time τx\tau_{x} is good for the transport. In this figure, we can also find negative ff induces directed transport in +x+x direction, but positive ff induces directed transport in x-x direction. From Figs. 3 and 4, we find the slopes of VQx\langle V\rangle-Q_{x} and Vτx\langle V\rangle-\tau_{x} curves almost changes to zero when QxQ_{x} and τx\tau_{x} are large. So changes of QxQ_{x} and τx\tau_{x} have weak impact on the transport when their values are large.

Refer to caption
Figure 5: The average velocity V\langle V\rangle as a function of QyQ_{y} for different values of ff. The other parameters are Δ=0.8\Delta=0.8, ε=0.5\varepsilon=0.5, η=2.0\eta=2.0, v0=0.5v_{0}=0.5, Qx=Qθ=1.0Q_{x}=Q_{\theta}=1.0, τx=τy=τθ=1.0\tau_{x}=\tau_{y}=\tau_{\theta}=1.0.

Fig.5 displays V\langle V\rangle as a function of yy axis noise intensity QyQ_{y} with different ff. In this figure, we find the directed transport speed |V||\langle V\rangle| has a maximum with increasing QyQ_{y}. So proper yy axis noise intensity is good for the transport in xx and x-x direction, but too large or too small QyQ_{y} inhabits this phenomenon. From figures 3 and 5, we find an interesting phenomenon, large xx axis noise intensity inhabits the directed transport in +x+x and x-x direction, but proper yy axis noise intensity is good for this transport.

Refer to caption
Figure 6: The average velocity V\langle V\rangle as a function of τy\tau_{y} for different values of ff. The other parameters are Δ=0.8\Delta=0.8, ε=0.5\varepsilon=0.5, η=2.0\eta=2.0, v0=0.5v_{0}=0.5, Qx=Qy=Qθ=1.0Q_{x}=Q_{y}=Q_{\theta}=1.0, τx=τθ=1.0\tau_{x}=\tau_{\theta}=1.0.

Fig.6 displays V\langle V\rangle as a function of yy axis noise self-correlation time τy\tau_{y} for different ff. Comparing with the effect of τx\tau_{x} in Fig.4, we find the directed transport speed |V||\langle V\rangle| decreases with increasing τy\tau_{y}. This means that large τy\tau_{y} has negative effect on the transport along xx axis.

Refer to caption
Figure 7: The average velocity V\langle V\rangle as a function of QθQ_{\theta} for different values of ff. The other parameters are Δ=0.8\Delta=0.8, ε=0.5\varepsilon=0.5, η=2.0\eta=2.0, v0=0.5v_{0}=0.5, Qx=Qy=1.0Q_{x}=Q_{y}=1.0, τx=τy=τθ=1.0\tau_{x}=\tau_{y}=\tau_{\theta}=1.0.
Refer to caption
Figure 8: The average velocity V\langle V\rangle as a function of τθ\tau_{\theta} for different values of ff. The other parameters are Δ=0.8\Delta=0.8, ε=0.5\varepsilon=0.5, η=2.0\eta=2.0, v0=0.5v_{0}=0.5, Qx=Qy=Qθ=1.0Q_{x}=Q_{y}=Q_{\theta}=1.0, τx=τy=1.0\tau_{x}=\tau_{y}=1.0.

Figs.7 and 8 display V\langle V\rangle as functions of angle noise intensity QθQ_{\theta} and self-correlation time τθ\tau_{\theta} for different ff, respectively. In these two figures, we find there exits almost no change of V\langle V\rangle with increasing QθQ_{\theta} and τθ\tau_{\theta}. So the effect of the angle noise is very weak for the transport.

Refer to caption
Figure 9: The average velocity V\langle V\rangle as a function of the size of bottleneck Δ\Delta for different values of ff. The other parameters are ε=0.5\varepsilon=0.5, η=2.0\eta=2.0, v0=0.5v_{0}=0.5, Qx=Qy=Qθ=1.0Q_{x}=Q_{y}=Q_{\theta}=1.0, τx=τy=τθ=1.0\tau_{x}=\tau_{y}=\tau_{\theta}=1.0.

The average velocity V\langle V\rangle as a function of the bottleneck(the minimal channel width) Δ\Delta is reported in Fig.9. We find V0\langle V\rangle\rightarrow 0 when Δ0\Delta\rightarrow 0. This is because the channel becomes many closed cavities when Δ0\Delta\rightarrow 0, and the particle is confined in these cavities. The directed transport speed |V||\langle V\rangle| increases with increasing Δ\Delta, and reaches a maximum when Δ=1\Delta=1, and then decreases with increasing Δ\Delta. So an interesting phenomena appears, that is, large and small size of the bottleneck both restrains the directed transport.

Refer to caption
Figure 10: The average velocity V\langle V\rangle as a function of ΔΓ\Delta\Gamma for different values of ff. The other parameters are Δ=0.8\Delta=0.8, ε=0.5\varepsilon=0.5, η=2.0\eta=2.0, v0=0.5v_{0}=0.5, Qx=Qy=Qθ=1.0Q_{x}=Q_{y}=Q_{\theta}=1.0, τx=τy=τθ=1.0\tau_{x}=\tau_{y}=\tau_{\theta}=1.0.

The average velocity V\langle V\rangle as a function of the asymmetry of the body ΔΓ\Delta\Gamma for different ff is reported in Fig.10. We know ΔΓ\Delta\Gamma characterizes the asymmetry of the particle, and the particle is a perfect sphere when ΔΓ=0\Delta\Gamma=0, and the particle is a very needlelike ellipsoid when ΔΓΓ¯\Delta\Gamma\rightarrow\bar{\Gamma}. In this figure, we find the average directed transport speed |V||\langle V\rangle| decreases with increasing ΔΓ\Delta\Gamma. So perfect sphere particle is more easier for directed transport than needlelike ellipsoid particle. This result coincides with the common sense.

Refer to caption
Figure 11: The average velocity V\langle V\rangle as a function of ε\varepsilon for different values of ff. The other parameters are Δ=0.8\Delta=0.8, η=2.0\eta=2.0, v0=0.5v_{0}=0.5, Qx=Qy=Qθ=1.0Q_{x}=Q_{y}=Q_{\theta}=1.0, τx=τy=τθ=1.0\tau_{x}=\tau_{y}=\tau_{\theta}=1.0.

The average velocity V\langle V\rangle as a function of the asymmetric parameter ε\varepsilon for different ff is reported in Fig.11. We find the Vε\langle V\rangle-\varepsilon curve is almost horizontal, this means that the effect of ε\varepsilon is very weak on the directed transport phenomenon.

Refer to caption
Figure 12: The average velocity V\langle V\rangle as a function of self-propelled speed v0v_{0} for different values of ff. The other parameters are Δ=0.8\Delta=0.8, ε=0.5\varepsilon=0.5, η=2.0\eta=2.0, Qx=Qy=Qθ=1.0Q_{x}=Q_{y}=Q_{\theta}=1.0, τx=τy=τθ=1.0\tau_{x}=\tau_{y}=\tau_{\theta}=1.0.

The average velocity V\langle V\rangle as a function of self-propelled speed v0v_{0} with different ff is reported in Fig.12. When the load is negative(f=0.3f=-0.3 and f=0.1f=-0.1), inert particle(self-propelled speed v0=0v_{0}=0) moves in +x+x direction(V>0\langle V\rangle>0), and V\langle V\rangle decreases with increasing v0v_{0}, then the particles changes to moving in x-x direction when 2.8<v0<6.02.8<v_{0}<6.0, and V0\langle V\rangle\rightarrow 0 when v0=6.0v_{0}=6.0. So the transport reverse phenomenon appears with increasing v0v_{0}. When the load is positive(f=0.1f=0.1 and f=0.3f=0.3), inert particle(v0=0v_{0}=0) moves in x-x direction(V<0\langle V\rangle<0), and the transport reverse phenomenon appears too with increasing v0v_{0}, and V0\langle V\rangle\rightarrow 0 when v0=6.0v_{0}=6.0. In this figure, we can also find negative load leads to directed transport in +x+x direction when v0<3v_{0}<3, but positive load leads to directed transport in x-x direction when v0<3v_{0}<3. So self-propelled speed v0v_{0} can also influence the moving direction of the particles.

Refer to caption
Figure 13: The average velocity V\langle V\rangle as a function of load ff for different η\eta. The other parameters are Δ=0.8\Delta=0.8, ε=0.5\varepsilon=0.5, v0=0.5v_{0}=0.5, Qx=Qy=Qθ=1.0Q_{x}=Q_{y}=Q_{\theta}=1.0, τx=τy=τθ=1.0\tau_{x}=\tau_{y}=\tau_{\theta}=1.0.

The average velocity V\langle V\rangle as a function of the load ff for different η\eta is reported in Fig.13. We find V\langle V\rangle decreases monotonically with increasing load ff. V>0\langle V\rangle>0 when f<0f<0, but V<0\langle V\rangle<0 when f>0f>0. This means negative load leads to positive transport(directed transport in x-x direction), but positive load leads to negative transport. Directed transport speed |V||\langle V\rangle| increases with increasing |f||f|, so large load |f||f| is good for directed transport(in xx direction or in x-x direction). We know the potential UU is inversely proportional to the load ff(Fig.8), so the particles move to the place where potential is lower. In this figure, we can also find the smaller η\eta, the larger |V||\langle V\rangle| is.

4 Conclusions

In this paper, we numerically investigated the directed transport of self-propelled ellipsoidal particles confined in a smooth channel with potential and colored noise. We find the moving direction is closely linked to the direction of the load when the self-propelled speed is small(v0<3v_{0}<3). Negative load leads to directed transport in xx direction, but positive load leads to directed transport in x-x direction. Small and large size of bottleneck restrains the directed transport of the ellipsoidal particle. Large xx axis noise intensity inhibits the directed transport. But proper value of yy axis noise intensity is good for this phenomenon. The transport reverse phenomenon appears with increasing self-propelled speed v0v_{0}. The effects of angle noise on the system is negligible.

Acknowledgments

Project supported by Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province(Grant No:1408085QA11).

References

  • [1] P. Hänggi, F. Marchesoni, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 387 (2009).
  • [2] P. S. Burada , P. Hänggi, F. Marchesoni, G. Schmid, P. Talkner, Chem. Phys. Chem. 10 45 (2009).
  • [3] H. X. Zhou, G. N. Rivas, A. P. Minton, Annu. Rev. Biophys. 37 375 (2008).
  • [4] Y. Wu, Q. Ding, T. Li, D. Yu, Y. Jia, Nonlinear Dynamics 111 2693 (2023).
  • [5] J. Liu, J. D. Bao, X. Chen, Phys. Rev. E 102 062122 (2020).
  • [6] R. F. Cui, Q. H. Chen, J. X Chen, Nanoscale 12 12275 (2020).
  • [7] F. J. Keil, R. Krishna, M. O. Coppens, Rev. Chem. Eng. 16 71 (2000).
  • [8] M. Firnkes, D. Pedone, J. Knezevic, M. Döblinger, U. Rant, Nano. Lett. 10 2162 (2010).
  • [9] D. Pedone, M. Langecker, G. Abstreiter, U. Rant, Nano. Lett. 11 1561 (2011).
  • [10] Z. Siwy, A. Fulinski, Am. J.Phys. 72 567 (2004).
  • [11] Z. Siwy, I. D. Kosinska, A. Fulinski, C. R. Martin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 048102 (2005).
  • [12] L. Bosi, P. K. Ghosh, F. Marchesoni, J. Chem. Phys. 137 174110 (2012).
  • [13] P. K. Ghosh, V. R. Misko, F. Marchesoni, F. Nori, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 268301 (2013).
  • [14] S. Matthias, F. Müller, Nature 424 53 (2003).
  • [15] T. M. Squires, S. R. Quake, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77 977 (2005).
  • [16] R. M. Bradley, Phys. Rev. E 80 061142 (2009).
  • [17] L. Dagdug, I. Pineda, J. Chem. Phys. 137 024107 (2012).
  • [18] Y. Jia, S. N. Yu, J. R. Li, Phys. Rev. E 63 052101 (2001).
  • [19] C. Hu, Y. Ou, J. Wu, Q. Chen, B. Ai, J. Stat. Mech. 2015 05025 (2015).
  • [20] Z. Liu, L. Du, W. Guo, D. C. Mei, Eur. Phys. J. B 89 222 (2016).
  • [21] Y. Xu, Y. Jia, M. Ge, L. Lu, L. Yang, X Zhan, Neurocomputing 283 196 (2018).
  • [22] H. W. Hu, L. Du, L. H. Qu, Z. L. Cao, Z. C. Deng , Y. C. Lai, Phys. Rev. Research 3 033162 (2021).
  • [23] J. Richardi, M. P. Pileni, J. J. Weis, J. Chem. Phys. 130 124515 (2009).
  • [24] Z. Yoshida, H. Saitoh, J. Morikawa, Y. Yano, S. Watanabe, Y. Ogawa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 235004 (2010).
  • [25] P. K. Ghosh, F. Marchesoni, S. E. Savelev and F. Nori, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 020601 (2010).
  • [26] P. K. Ghosh, R. Glavey, F. Marchesoni, S. E. Savelev, F. Nori, Phys. Rev. E 84 011109 (2011).
  • [27] P. Hänggi, F. Marchesoni, S. Savelev, G. Schmid, Phys. Rev. E 82 041121 (2010).
  • [28] P. K. Ghosh, P. Hänggi, F. Marchesoni, F. Nori, G. Schmid, Phys. Rev. E 86 021112 (2012).
  • [29] J. X. Chen,Y. G. Chen, R. Kapral, Advanced Science 1800028 (2018).
  • [30] M. Pu, H. Jiang , Z. Hou, Soft Matter 13 4112 (2017).
  • [31] Y. Li, F. Marchesoni, D. Debnath, P. K. Ghosh, Phys. Rev. Res. 1 033003 (2019).
  • [32] X. Yang, Q. Zhu, C. Liu, W. Wang, Y. Li, F. Marchesoni, P. Hänggi, H. P. Zhang, Phys. Rev. E 99 020601(R) (2019).
  • [33] P. G. Saffman, M. Delbruck, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 72 3111 (1975).
  • [34] F. Lugli, E. Brini, F. Zerbetto, J. Chem. Phys. C 116 592 (2012).
  • [35] Y. Han, A. M. Alsayed, M. Nobili, J. Zhang, T. C. Lubensky, A. G. Yodh, Science 314 626 (2006).
  • [36] T. Ohta, T. Ohkuma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 154101 (2009).
  • [37] B. Ai, J. Wu, J. Chem. Phys. 140 094103 (2014).
  • [38] P. K. Ghosh, P. Hänggi, F. Marchesoni, F. Nori, Phys. Rev. E 89 062115 (2014).
  • [39] S. Zhu, A. W. Yu, R. Roy, Phys. Rev. A 34 4333 (1986).
  • [40] X. Zhou, Phys. Rev. A 80 023818 (2009).
  • [41] K. Y. R. Billah, M. Shinozuka, Phys. Rev. A 42 7492 (1990).
  • [42] R. Wittmann, J. M. Brader, A. Sharma, U. Marini Bettolo Marconi, Phys. Rev. E 97 012601 (2018).
  • [43] S. Mondal, B. C. Bag, Phys. Rev. E 91 042145 (2015).
  • [44] R. Grima, S. N. Yaliraki, and M. Barahona,J. Phys. Chem. B 114 5380 (2010).
  • [45] P. K. Ghosh, J. Chem. Phys. 141 061102 (2014).