This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

The ϕp\phi p bound state in the unitary coupled-channel approximation

Bao-Xi Sun [email protected] Faculty of Science, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China    Ying-Ying Fan Faculty of Science, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China    Qin-Qin Cao Faculty of Science, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
Abstract

The strong attractive interaction of the ϕ\phi meson and the proton is reported by ALICE collaboration recently. The corresponding scattering length f0f_{0} is given as Re(f0)=0.85±0.34(stat)±0.14(syst)Re(f_{0})=0.85\pm 0.34(stat)\pm 0.14(syst)fm and Im(f0)=0.16±0.10(stat)±0.09(syst)Im(f_{0})=0.16\pm 0.10(stat)\pm 0.09(syst)fm. The fact that the real part is significant in contrast to the imaginary part indicates a dominate role of the elastic scattering, whereas the inelastic process is less important. In this work, such scattering processes are inspected based on a unitary coupled-channel approach inspired by Bethe-Salpeter equation. The ϕp\phi p scattering length is calculated based on this approach, and it is found that the experimental value of the ϕp\phi p scattering length can be obtained only if the attractive interaction of the ϕ\phi meson and the proton is taken into account. A significant outcome of such attractive interaction is a two-pole structure in the ϕp\phi p scattering amplitude. One of the pole, locating at (1969i283)(1969-i283) MeV might correspond to N(1895)1/2N(1895)1/2^{-} or N(1875)3/2N(1875)3/2^{-} listed in the review of the Particle Data Group(PDG). The other one, locating at 1949i3{1949-i3} MeV should be a ϕN\phi N bound state, which has no counterpart in the PDG data.

pacs:
12.40.Vv, 13.75.Gx, 14.20.Gk

I Introduction

The strong interaction at low energies, due to its non-perturbative attribute, has led to rich structures of matter as reflected by an abundance of hadronic states. How to understand the nature of those hadrons poses a long-lasting challenge to physicists. Among the attempts tackling this challenge, chiral perturbation theory provides a systematic approach that effectively accounts for the interaction among hadrons. By asserting the unitarity condition, the chiral interaction between hadrons results in scattering amplitudes possessing poles in un-physical Riemann sheets in the complex energy plane. Such poles can be connected with heavier hadronic states as listed in the review of the Particle Data GroupPDG . This strategy have made great triumph in interpreting a host of resonances as dynamically generated from the chiral interaction between the baryon and meson ground states, i.e. the spin 1/21/2 baryon octet and the pseudoscalar Goldstone-boson octet under the SU(3) flavor symmetryKaiser1995 ; angels ; Krippa ; Oller:1997ng ; ollerulf ; carmina ; hyodo ; Lutz . Noticeably, the chiral interaction between the spin 3/23/2 decuplet and the Goldstone bosons are also found to be important to understanding some higher resonances Sarkar:2004jh .

Besides the above hadronic degrees of freedom, previous works have shown that vector-meson degrees of freedom may be of crucial significance in understanding the hadron spectraMolina ; Geng ; Gonzalez ; souravbao ; ramos2010 ; Hosaka2011 ; Danilkin:2012ua ; Guo:2018zvl . Remarkably, a recent result of the heavy-ion collision experiment at ALICE indicates an attractive strong interaction potential between the ϕ\phi meson and the protonALICE . But on the other hand, it is troublesome to accommodate those vector-meson degrees of freedom in an effective Lagrangian due to their intermediate masses and their unique decay patterns. Different models have been proposed for this enterprise Meissner:1987ge . Among them, the hidden-gauge symmetry model provides plausible accounts of several important phenomenological laws involving the vector mesons Meissner:1987ge ; hidden1 ; hidden2 ; hidden3 ; Nagahiro . Based on this approach, the interaction of vector mesons with baryon octet was studied in detail in Ref. ramos2010 . This work suggested a vanishing elastic potential of the ϕ\phi meson with the proton. This conclusion is, however, in contradiction with the recent ALICE result. From the experiment, the strong interaction between the ϕ\phi meson and the proton is shown to be attractive as indicated by the corresponding scattering length as given by the Lednicky-Lyuboshits fit. The real and imaginary parts of the scattering length read respectively,

Re(f0)\displaystyle{\rm Re}(f_{0}) =\displaystyle= 0.85±0.34(stat)±0.14(syst)fm,\displaystyle 0.85\pm 0.34\rm(stat)\pm 0.14(syst)\,fm,
Im(f0)\displaystyle{\rm Im}(f_{0}) =\displaystyle= 0.16±0.10(stat)±0.09(syst)fm.\displaystyle 0.16\pm 0.10\rm(stat)\pm 0.09(syst)\,fm. (1)

Apparently, the imaginary part of the scattering length is negligible given the error budget. This fact indicates that the elastic scattering is playing a dominant role in the interaction between ϕ\phi and the proton, whereas the inelastic scattering turns to be unimportant. Interestingly, such an attractive potential may be attributed to the K+KpK^{+}K^{-}p three-body correlation as suggested by Ref. DelGrande:2021mju . But for the time being, the dynamical aspects of such a vector-meson-proton system still far away from being comprehended and urgently requires more studies.

The present work is dedicated to a further study on the dynamics of the ϕ\phi-proton interacting system using an effective Lagrangian approach. Both the vetor-meson nonet and bayon ground-state octet under flavor SU(3) are incorporated in the effective Lagrangian. Based on the Lagrangian, we will scrutinise the coupled-channel effects of such a system in more depths. Especially, we will explore the impacts of an attractive ϕ\phi-proton potential to the couple-channel dynamics.

In the following section, we will firstly discuss the construction of the effective Lagrangian. The vector-meson degrees of freedom will be introduced in accordance with the hidden gauge formalism. Next, we will discuss the coupled-channel approach with a restoration of the two-body unitarity. The latter is implemented by a bubble-loop resummation inspired by the Bethe-Salpeter equation. Such a resummation involves a potential which can be obtained directly from the effective Lagrangian. However, given our current leading-order approach, the effective Lagrangian will not lead to a direct ϕ\phi-proton potential which should be significant and attractive as suggested by ALICE. We will incorporate such effect by proposing a Yukawa-type potential in addition to the one directly obtained from the Lagrangian. The corresponding discussion is referred to in Section IV. This work will then end up with an application of our approach to various two-body coupled-channel systems involving the vector-meson nonet and the baryon octet. Special attentions will be paid to a possible resonance dynamically generated in the ϕN\phi N scattering channel.

II The hidden gauge formalism

The interaction of the vector meson with the octet of baryons can be involved according to the hidden gauge formalism. The Lagrangian of vector mesons can be written as

L=14VμνVμν,L=-\frac{1}{4}\langle V_{\mu\nu}V^{\mu\nu}\rangle, (2)

where the symbol \langle\rangle represents the trace in the SU(3)SU(3) space and VμνV_{\mu\nu} is the tensor of vector mesons,

Vμν=μVννVμig[Vμ,Vν],V_{\mu\nu}=\partial_{\mu}V_{\nu}-\partial_{\nu}V_{\mu}-ig\left[V_{\mu},V_{\nu}\right], (3)

with g=MV2fg=\frac{M_{V}}{2f} and the pion decay constant f=93f=93MeVsouravbao ; ramos2010 .

The Lagrangian of vector mesons in Eq. (2) supplies an interacting vertex of three vector mesons in the interaction of the vector meson with the octet of baryons, which comes from

LIII3V=ig(VμνVμνVμVμ)Vν,L^{3V}_{III}=ig\langle\left(V^{\mu}\partial_{\nu}V_{\mu}-\partial_{\nu}V_{\mu}V^{\mu}\right)V^{\nu}\rangle, (4)

with the SU(3)SU(3) matrix of vector mesons VμV_{\mu} defined by the matrix

Vμ=12(ρ0+ω2ρ+2K+2ρρ0+ω2K02K2K¯02ϕ)μ.\displaystyle V_{\mu}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left(\begin{array}[]{ccc}\rho^{0}+\omega&\sqrt{2}\rho^{+}&\sqrt{2}K^{*^{+}}\\ &&\\ \sqrt{2}\rho^{-}&-\rho^{0}+\omega&\sqrt{2}K^{*^{0}}\\ &&\\ \sqrt{2}K^{*^{-}}&\sqrt{2}\bar{K}^{*^{0}}&\sqrt{2}\phi\end{array}\right)_{\mu}. (10)

Similarly, the Lagrangian for the coupling of vector mesons to the octet of baryons is constructed as

LBBV=g(B¯γμ[Vμ,B]+B¯γμBVμ),L_{BBV}=g\left(\langle\bar{B}\gamma_{\mu}\left[V^{\mu},B\right]\rangle+\langle\bar{B}\gamma_{\mu}B\rangle\langle V^{\mu}\rangle\right), (11)

with the SU(3)SU(3) matrix of the octet of baryons

B=(16Λ+12Σ0Σ+pΣ16Λ12Σ0nΞΞ023Λ).\displaystyle B=\left(\begin{array}[]{ccc}\frac{1}{\sqrt{6}}\Lambda+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\Sigma^{0}&\Sigma^{+}&p\\ &&\\ \Sigma^{-}&\frac{1}{\sqrt{6}}\Lambda-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\Sigma^{0}&n\\ &&\\ \Xi^{-}&\Xi^{0}&-\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}\Lambda\end{array}\right). (17)

With the interactions in Eqs. (4) and (11), the tt- channel interaction of the vector meson and the baryon can be constructed, where a vector meson is exchanged between them. Since the scattering process is studied on the energy region near the ϕ\phi-proton threshold, the momentum of the exchanged vector meson can be neglected, and thus only the mass term is left in the propagator. Therefore, the potential of the vector meson with the octet of baryons takes the form of

Vij=Cij14f2(k0+k)0ϵϵ,V_{ij}=-C_{ij}\frac{1}{4f^{2}}\left(k^{0}+k^{\prime}{}^{0}\right)\vec{\epsilon}\vec{\epsilon}^{\prime}, (18)

where k0(ϵ)k^{0}(\vec{\epsilon}) and k(ϵ)0k^{\prime}{}^{0}(\vec{\epsilon}^{\prime}) are energies(polarization vectors) of the incoming and outgoing vector mesons, respectively, and the CijC_{ij} coefficient values can be obtained according to the Lagrangian in Eqs. (4) and (11). Furthermore, due to the mixing of the octet and the singlet of vector mesons in the SU(3)SU(3) space, the physical states of the ω\omega and ϕ\phi mesons can be written as

ω\displaystyle\omega =\displaystyle= 23ω1+13ω8,\displaystyle\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}\omega_{1}+\sqrt{\frac{1}{3}}\omega_{8},
ϕ\displaystyle\phi =\displaystyle= 13ω123ω8.\displaystyle\sqrt{\frac{1}{3}}\omega_{1}-\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}\omega_{8}. (19)

Since the singlet state ω1\omega_{1} does not couple to other vector mesons, and only the octet state ω8\omega_{8} gives a contribution to the amplitude, the CijC_{ij} coefficients of the ω\omega and ϕ\phi mesons must be multiplied by factors 13\sqrt{\frac{1}{3}} and 23-\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}, respectively.

In the channel of Isospin I=1/2I=1/2, the isospin states for ρN\rho N, ωN\omega N, ϕN\phi N, KΛK^{*}\Lambda, KΣK^{*}\Sigma can be written as

|ρN;12,12=13|ρ0p23|ρ+n,|\rho N;\frac{1}{2},\frac{1}{2}\rangle~{}=~{}-\sqrt{\frac{1}{3}}|\rho_{0}p\rangle~{}-~{}\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}|\rho_{+}n\rangle, (20)
|ωN;12,12=|ωp,|\omega N;\frac{1}{2},\frac{1}{2}\rangle~{}=~{}|\omega p\rangle, (21)
|ϕN;12,12=|ϕp,|\phi N;\frac{1}{2},\frac{1}{2}\rangle~{}=~{}|\phi p\rangle, (22)
|KΛ;12,12=|K+Λ,|K^{*}\Lambda;\frac{1}{2},\frac{1}{2}\rangle~{}=~{}|{K^{*}}^{+}\Lambda\rangle, (23)

and

|KΣ;12,12=13|K+Σ0+23|K0Σ+,|K^{*}\Sigma;\frac{1}{2},\frac{1}{2}\rangle~{}=~{}\sqrt{\frac{1}{3}}|{K^{*}}^{+}\Sigma^{0}\rangle~{}+~{}\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}|{K^{*}}^{0}\Sigma^{+}\rangle, (24)

respectively. We have used the phase convention ρ+=|1,1>\rho^{+}=-|1,1> and Σ+=|1,1>\Sigma^{+}=-|1,1> for the isospin states in Eqs. (20) and (24), which is consistent with the structure of the VμV^{\mu} and BB matrices. It is apparent that the interaction between isospin states with isospin orientation Iz=1/2I_{z}=-1/2 would generate the same resonances, so only the isospin states with Iz=1/2I_{z}=1/2 are discussed in this section.

The coefficients CijC_{ij} for the fixed strangeness S=0S=0 and isospin I=1/2I=1/2 are listed in Table 1.

ρN\rho N ωN\omega N ϕN\phi N KΛK^{*}\Lambda KΣK^{*}\Sigma
ρN\rho N 2 0 0 32\frac{3}{2} 12-\frac{1}{2}
ωN\omega N 0 0 3213-\frac{3}{2}\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}} 3213-\frac{3}{2}\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}
ϕN\phi N 0 32(23)-\frac{3}{2}\left(-\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}\right) 32(23)-\frac{3}{2}\left(-\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}\right)
KΛK^{*}\Lambda 0 0
KΣK^{*}\Sigma 2
Table 1: Coefficients CijISC_{ij}^{IS} for the sector I=1/2I=1/2, S=0S=0.

III The unitary coupled-channel approach

A full scattering amplitude can be expressed in an integral representation according to Bethe-Salpeter equation. By applying the on-shell condition to the potential VV involved, the equation can be reduced to a resummation of bubble-loop series and we end up with the scattering amplitude of ϕpϕp\phi p\rightarrow\phi p, reading as

T=[1VG]1V,T=\left[1-VG\right]^{-1}V, (25)

with GG being the bubble-loop function of the intermediate stable vector meson and baryon. According to this approach, coupled-channel effects are well incorporated. In the dimensional regularization scheme, the loop function GG takes the form of

Gi(s)\displaystyle G_{i}(\sqrt{s}) =\displaystyle= 2Mi(4π)2{ai(μ)+logmi2μ2+Mi2mi2+s2slogMi2mi2\displaystyle\frac{2M_{i}}{(4\pi)^{2}}\left\{a_{i}(\mu)+\log\frac{m_{i}^{2}}{\mu^{2}}+\frac{M_{i}^{2}-m_{i}^{2}+s}{2s}\log\frac{M_{i}^{2}}{m_{i}^{2}}\right.
+\displaystyle+ Qi(s)s[log(s(Mi2mi2)+2sQi(s))+log(s+(Mi2mi2)+2sQi(s))\displaystyle\frac{Q_{i}(\sqrt{s})}{\sqrt{s}}\left[\log\left(s-(M_{i}^{2}-m_{i}^{2})+2\sqrt{s}Q_{i}(\sqrt{s})\right)+\log\left(s+(M_{i}^{2}-m_{i}^{2})+2\sqrt{s}Q_{i}(\sqrt{s})\right)\right.
.log(s+(Mi2mi2)+2sQi(s))log(s(Mi2mi2)+2sQi(s))]},\displaystyle\Biggl{.}\left.-\log\left(-s+(M_{i}^{2}-m_{i}^{2})+2\sqrt{s}Q_{i}(\sqrt{s})\right)-\log\left(-s-(M_{i}^{2}-m_{i}^{2})+2\sqrt{s}Q_{i}(\sqrt{s})\right)\right]\Biggr{\}},

where the loop function follows the form in Ref. ollerulf , and μ=630\mu=630MeV and ai(μ)=2.0a_{i}(\mu)=-2.0 in the calculation, and the two-body unitarity is therefore preserved in (25).

Since the vector mesons, particularly the ρ\rho and the KK^{*}, are rather broad, a proper account for their widths is required when performing the loop integral. We follow Ref. ramos2010 and convolute the vector meson-baryon loop function with the mass distribution of such a meson, i.e., by replacing the GG function appearing in Eq. (III) by G~\tilde{G}

G~(s)\displaystyle\tilde{G}(s) =\displaystyle= 1N(m12Γ1)2(m1+2Γ1)2𝑑m~12(1π)Im1m~12m12+im1Γ~1(m1~)\displaystyle\frac{1}{N}\int\limits^{(m_{1}+2\Gamma_{1})^{2}}\limits_{(m_{1}-2\Gamma_{1})^{2}}d\tilde{m}^{2}_{1}\left(-\frac{1}{\pi}\right)\mathrm{Im}\frac{1}{\tilde{m}^{2}_{1}-m_{1}^{2}+im_{1}\tilde{\Gamma}_{1}(\tilde{m_{1}})} (27)
×G(s,m~12,M2)\displaystyle\times G(s,\tilde{m}_{1}^{2},M^{2})

with

N\displaystyle N =\displaystyle= (m12Γ1)2(m1+2Γ1)2𝑑m~12(1π)Im1m~12m12+im1Γ~1(m1~)\displaystyle\int\limits^{(m_{1}+2\Gamma_{1})^{2}}\limits_{(m_{1}-2\Gamma_{1})^{2}}d\tilde{m}^{2}_{1}\left(-\frac{1}{\pi}\right)\mathrm{Im}\frac{1}{\tilde{m}^{2}_{1}-m_{1}^{2}+im_{1}\tilde{\Gamma}_{1}(\tilde{m_{1}})}

where m1m_{1} and Γ1\Gamma_{1} are the mass and width of the vector meson in the loop. We only take into account the widths of the ρ\rho and the KK^{*}. In the case of the ω\omega or ϕ\phi, one or both of the kernels of these integrals will reduce to a delta function δ(m~2M2)\delta(\tilde{m}^{2}-M^{2}). The Γ~i\tilde{\Gamma}_{i} function is energy dependent and has the form of

Γ~(m~)=Γ0m2m~2qoff3qon3Θ(m~m1m2)\tilde{\Gamma}(\tilde{m})=\Gamma_{0}\frac{m^{2}}{\tilde{m}^{2}}\frac{q^{3}_{\mathrm{off}}}{q^{3}_{\mathrm{on}}}\Theta(\tilde{m}-m_{1}-m_{2}) (29)

with

qoff=λ1/2(m~2,mπ2,mπ2)2m~,qon=λ1/2(Mρ2,mπ2,mπ2)2Mρ,q_{\mathrm{off}}=\frac{\lambda^{1/2}(\tilde{m}^{2},m_{\pi}^{2},m_{\pi}^{2})}{2\tilde{m}},\quad q_{\mathrm{on}}=\frac{\lambda^{1/2}(M_{\rho}^{2},m_{\pi}^{2},m_{\pi}^{2})}{2M_{\rho}}, (30)

m1=m2=mπm_{1}=m_{2}=m_{\pi}, and m=mρm=m_{\rho} for the ρ\rho or

qoff=λ1/2(m~2,mK2,mπ2)2m~,qon=λ1/2(MK2,mK2,mπ2)2MK,q_{\mathrm{off}}=\frac{\lambda^{1/2}(\tilde{m}^{2},m_{K}^{2},m_{\pi}^{2})}{2\tilde{m}},\quad q_{\mathrm{on}}=\frac{\lambda^{1/2}(M_{K^{*}}^{2},m_{K}^{2},m_{\pi}^{2})}{2M_{K^{*}}}, (31)

m1=mπm_{1}=m_{\pi}, m2=mKm_{2}=m_{K} and m=mKm=m_{K^{*}} for the KK^{*}, where λ\lambda is the Källen function, λ(x,y,z)=(xyz)24yz\lambda(x,y,z)=(x-y-z)^{2}-4yz, and Γ0\Gamma_{0} is the nominal width of the ρ\rho or the KK^{*}.

The scattering amplitude TijT_{ij} takes a form of

Tij=gigjss0T_{ij}=\frac{g_{i}g_{j}}{\sqrt{s}-\sqrt{s_{0}}} (32)

at the pole position s0\sqrt{s_{0}} in the complex energy plane approximately. Therefore the coupling to the iith channel gig_{i} can be calculated with the residue of the scattering amplitude TiiT_{ii} at the pole position. After gig_{i} is obtained, the couplings to the other channels gjg_{j} are easy to be evaluated with the residues of inelastic scattering amplitudes TijT_{ij}.

When the Bethe-Salpeter equation is solved in the unitary coupled-channel approximation, the vertices of the baryon octet and vector mesons are used, and the outlines in Feynman diagrams are cut off, which implies the polarization vector of mesons is eliminated in the calculation. More detailed discussions on this question can be found in Ref Sun2017 . In the present work, we adopt the original formula in Refs. Gonzalez ; souravbao ; ramos2010 , where ϵϵ=1\vec{\epsilon}\vec{\epsilon}^{\prime}=-1 in Eq. (18) is assumed. Actually, this scheme is consistent with the formula discussed in in Ref Sun2017 . As for the spin of the nucleon, the interaction would vanish if the spin orientations of the initial and final nucleons are different from each other. Therefore, the vertices used in the Bethe-Salpeter equation are independent on the spin of the system. At this point, it is different from the case in the chiral SU(3) quark modelHuang:phiN .

IV The Yukawa-type potential of the ϕ\phi meson with the proton

The Yukawa-type potential of the ϕ\phi meson with the proton takes the form of

V(r)=Aexp(αr)r,V(r)=-A\frac{\exp(-\alpha r)}{r}, (33)

with A=0.021±0.009±0.006(syst)A=0.021\pm 0.009\pm 0.006(syst) and α=65.9±38.0(stat)±17.5(syst)\alpha=65.9\pm 38.0(stat)\pm 17.5(syst)MeVALICE . Therefore, the ϕ\phi- proton potential in the momentum space can be obtained with a Fourier transformation of Eq. (33), which is written as

V(q)=gϕN2q2+α2,V(\vec{q})=\frac{-g^{2}_{\phi N}}{\vec{q}^{2}+\alpha^{2}}, (34)

with gϕN24π=A\frac{g^{2}_{\phi N}}{4\pi}=A. Apparently, the potential in Eq. (34) is a non-relativistic form supposing that the three-momentum of the proton(phi-meson) is far lower than the proton(phi-meson) mass. In this case, the zero component of the momentum transfer in the phi-proton tt-channel interaction tends to zero in the non-relativistic approximation. More detailed iterations can be found in the appendix part of Ref. sun:Fermi . It should be noticed that the phi-proton coupling in this work gϕN2/4π=Ag_{\phi N}^{2}/4\pi=A is different from that in Ref. ALICE , where gϕN2=Ag_{\phi N}^{2}=A.

When the Bethe-Salpeter equation is solved, the Yukawa type potential in Eq. (34) is multiplied by a mass of ϕ\phi meson. and the three-momentum transfer q\vec{q} vanishes at the ϕ\phi- proton threshold. Therefore,

V(0)=gϕN2mϕα2,V(\vec{0})=\frac{-g^{2}_{\phi N}m_{\phi}}{\alpha^{2}}, (35)

which can be used as the potential involved in the Bethe-Salpeter resummation.

In the calculation of the present work, we set A=0.021A=0.021 and α=65.9\alpha=65.9MeV, and the corresponding potentials of the vector meson and baryon octet are depicted in Fig. 1. There are not direct interactions of ωN\omega N, ϕN\phi N and KΛK^{*}\Lambda when the hidden gauge symmetry is taken into account. However, the attractive ϕN\phi N potential in Eq. (35) is a constant and about half of the ρN\rho N potential, and it is no doubt that it would play a critical role in the sector of strangeness S=0S=0 and isospin I=1/2I=1/2.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: The potential of the vector meson and baryon octet as a function of the total energy of the system ECME_{CM} for elastic processes with strangeness S=0S=0 and isospin I=1/2I=1/2. The ϕN\phi N, ρN\rho N and KΣK^{*}\Sigma cases are represented by solid, dash and dot lines, respectively, while the ωN\omega N and KΛK^{*}\Lambda potentials are zero.

In Ref. ALICE , it is assumed that the elastic process of the ϕ\phi meson and the proton plays a dominant rule, while the inelastic process is not important.

V The ϕN\phi N bound state

With the coefficients listed in Table 1, the scattering amplitude TT of the ϕNϕN\phi N\rightarrow\phi N reaction is evaluated by solving the Bethe-Salpeter equation in the unitary coupled-channel approximation, and then the ϕN\phi N scattering length can be obtained according to the ϕN\phi N elastic scattering amplitude at the thresold, i.e.,

aϕN=MN8πsTϕNϕN(s=mϕ+MN).a_{\phi N}=\frac{M_{N}}{8\pi\sqrt{s}}T_{\phi N\rightarrow\phi N}(\sqrt{s}=m_{\phi}+M_{N}). (36)

With μ=630\mu=630MeV and al(μ)=2.0a_{l}(\mu)=-2.0, the real part of the ϕN\phi N scattering length is about 0.15-0.15fm, and the imaginary part is 0.110.11fm approximately. Apparently, the ϕN\phi N scattering length takes a small value and can not be consistent with the value announced by ALICE collaboration recently, as given in Eq. (I). Even if the subtraction constants are adjusted, it is still far away from the experimental value.

In order to obtain the ϕN\phi N scattering length consistent with the experimental value supplied by the ALICE collaboration, we include the attractive ϕN\phi N potential as given by Eq. (35) when performing the Bethe-Salpeter resummation. By adjusting the subtraction constant values, the ϕN\phi N scattering length is obtained, and it is consistent with the experimental value in the range of uncertainty. The subtraction constant values and the corresponding ϕN\phi N scattering length are listed in Table 2.

aρNa_{\rho N} aωNa_{\omega N} aϕNa_{\phi N} aKΛa_{K^{*}\Lambda} aKΛa_{K^{*}\Lambda} f0f_{0}
-2.0 -2.0 -2.4 -1.9 -1.8 0.86+i0.19
Table 2: The subtraction constants and the real and imaginary parts of the corresponding ϕN\phi N scattering length obtained in unitary coupled-channel approximation when the ϕN\phi N attractive interaction is taken into account, where the scattering length f0f_{0} is in units of MeV, and the regularization scale μ=630\mu=630MeV.

With the subtraction constants listed in Table 2, the scattering amplitudes |Tii|2|T_{ii}|^{2} of the vector meson and the baryon octet are calculated in the unitary coupled-channel approximation. In Fig. 2, the scattering amplitude with strangeness S=0S=0 and isospin I=1/2I=1/2 is displayed. In this case a peak around 1950MeV is visible in the ϕN\phi N, KΛK^{*}\Lambda and KΣK^{*}\Sigma channels. Since it is below the ϕN\phi N threshold, which could be associated with a ϕN\phi N bound state. Actually, there is another pole of |Tii|2|T_{ii}|^{2} being detected around 1970MeV in the KΛK^{*}\Lambda and KΞK^{*}\Xi channel. However it is far from the real axis, and therefore leads to no visible effects in Fig. 2. Since it is higher than the ϕN\phi N threshold, it can be regarded as a ϕN\phi N resonance.

Refer to caption
Figure 2: The amplitude squared |T|2|T|^{2} as a function of the total energy of the system ECME_{CM} for elastic processes with strangeness S=0S=0 and isospin I=1/2I=1/2. The ϕN\phi N, KΛK^{*}\Lambda and KΣK^{*}\Sigma cases are represented by solid, dash and dot lines, respectively, while the amplitudes squared of ρN\rho N and ωN\omega N are small and the corresponding curves are invisible in this figure.

The pole positions and corresponding couplings of these two states to the different channels, obtained from the residues at the poles are shown in Table 3. Since the inelastic scattering amplitudes are far lower than the elastic ones, all couplings are calculated according to elastic processes. It can be seen that the state at 1949i31949-i3MeV couples strongly to the ϕN\phi N channel, and the state at 1969i2831969-i283MeV mainly couples to the KΛK^{*}\Lambda and KΣK^{*}\Sigma channels.

Pole positions ρN\rho N ωN\omega N ϕN\phi N KΛK^{*}\Lambda KΣK^{*}\Sigma
1949i31949-i3 0.0+i0.00.0+i0.0 0.1+i0.00.1+i0.0 2.1+i0.12.1+i0.1 1.6+i0.31.6+i0.3 1.8+i0.01.8+i0.0
1969i2831969-i283 0.1+i0.10.1+i0.1 0.0+i0.20.0+i0.2 0.1i0.10.1-i0.1 0.3i0.40.3-i0.4 0.2i0.00.2-i0.0
Table 3: Pole positions in units of MeV and coupling constants to various channels of resonances with strangeness S=0S=0 and isospin I=1/2I=1/2.

The Yukawa type potential of the phi-proton system is only valid when the total energy of the system is close to the phi-proton threshold. At this point, the three-momentum transfer in the phi-proton potential is not large and can be neglected in the calculation, and a phi-nucleon bound state is found when the scattering amplitude is analyzed. Since the bound state is about 10MeV lower than the phi-nucleon threshold, it is reasonable to neglect the three-momentum transfer in the phi-proton potential in Eq. (34) when the Bethe-Salpeter equation is solved.

Actually, we also studied the case that the three-momentum transfer q\vec{q} is not zero. By solving the Bethe-Salpeter equation, it is found that two poles appear at 1949i31949-i3 MeV and 1970i2831970-i283 MeV on the complex energy plane, respectively. It is apparent that these results are almost the same as those with q=0\vec{q}=0, where the three-momentum transfer is neglected. Moreover, the same value of the phi-nucleon scattering length is obtained with the subtraction constants listed in Table 2. The coupling constants to different channels are calculated again, and it shows that the values of them change slightly. However, these two states still couple strongly to the ϕN\phi N, KΛK^{*}\Lambda, KΣK^{*}\Sigma channels.

In the S-wave approximation, two poles of the scattering amplitude with strangeness S=0S=0 and isospin I=1/2I=1/2 are found in the unitary coupled-channel approximation, and they are degenerate in JP=1/2,3/2J^{P}=1/2^{-},3/2^{-}. The resonance state at 1969i2831969-i283MeV might correspond to either the baryon N(1895)1/2N(1895)1/2^{-} or N(1875)3/2N(1875)3/2^{-} particles, while the pole at 1949i31949-i3MeV has no counterpart in the PDG data since its decay width is too small. It might be a ϕN\phi N bound state caused by the strong attractive interaction between the ϕ\phi meson and the proton. The pole position and corresponding PDG data are listed in Table 4.

Pole position name JPJ^{P} status mass width
1949i31949-i3 - - - - -
1969i2831969-i283 N(1895)N(1895) 1/21/2^{-} **** 1870-1920 80-200
N(1875)N(1875) 3/23/2^{-} *** 1850-1920 120-250
Table 4: The pole position and corresponding PDG data with strangeness S=0S=0 and isospin I=1/2I=1/2, all in units of MeV .

The pole position in the complex energy plane is closely related to subtraction constants when the Bethe-Salpeter equation is solved. With the subtraction constant a=2a=-2 for variant channels, a pole at 1979i561979-i56MeV is generated in the sector of strangeness S=0S=0 and isospin I=1/2I=1/2, which is similar to the result in Ref. ramos2010 . However, in this work, the subtraction constants are determined in order to obtain the experimental phi-nucleon scattering length, as listed in Table 2. Therefore, a pole at 1969i2831969-i283MeV is generated, which is higher than the threshold of the phi-meson and the nucleon, and can be regarded as a phi-N resonance state. While the particles N(1895)1/2N(1895)1/2^{-} and N(1875)3/2N(1875)3/2^{-} is under the phi-N threshold, might be bound states of the phi-meson and the nucleon.

The discrepancy of the calculation results from the experimental data might come from the SU(3) hidden gauge symmetry, by which the vector mesons are included in the interaction Lagrangian. Anyway, the masses of vector mesons are different from each other, so the SU(3) hidden gauge symmetry are only reliable approximately. Moreover, perhaps some high-order corrections on the kernel should be taken into account when the Bethe-Salpeter is solved in the unitary coupled-channel approximation. These topics would be investigated continuously in the future work of ours.

The ϕ\phi-nucleon bound state is also studied in the chiral SU(3) quark modelHuang:phiN , where the exchange of scalar meson σ\sigma is dominant in the attractive potential of the phi-meson and the nucleon. In the phi-nucleon potential in Eq. (34), the three-momentum transfer is negligible in the calculation, and thus only the ratio gϕN2/α2g^{2}_{\phi N}/\alpha^{2} is critical in the calculation, which equals to 6.0×1056.0\times 10^{-5}MeV-2 approximately. In the chiral SU(3) quark model, the attractive potential via a scalar meson can be obtained when gϕNg_{\phi N} and α\alpha in Eq. (34) are replaced with the coupling constant gchg_{ch} and the mass of the scalar meson σ\sigma in Ref. Huang:phiN , respectively. In the region of the phi-nucleon threshold, the three-momentum transfer can be neglected and the value of gch2/mσ22.4×105g^{2}_{ch}/m_{\sigma}^{2}\approx 2.4\times 10^{-5}MeV-2 is obtained in the extended chiral SU(3) quark model of type II, which has the same order of magnitude as that of gϕN2/α2g^{2}_{\phi N}/\alpha^{2} in this work. Moreover, the bound state is about 10MeV lower than the phi-nucleon threshold, and it is consistent with the binding energy of the phi-nucleon bound state obtained in the chiral SU(3) quark modelHuang:phiN .

VI Summary

In the present work, we investigate the implications of a strong attractive potential of the ϕ\phi meson and proton as recently reported by the ALICE collaboration. An effective description of such a potential is obtained by introducing a Yukawa-type formalism on top of the vector-meson-nonet and baryon-octet interaction given by the effective Lagrangian. We deliberate on the impacts of such a potential to the coupled-channel effects of vector-meson and baryon scattering systems. A unitary approach has been employed to implement the coupled-channel effects. This approach involves a series resummation reduced from Bethe-Salpeter equation, and we arrive at a ϕN\phi N scattering length consistent with the experiment. Based on such potential, we investigate the coupled-channel effect, and special attentions have been paid to the coupled-channel effects of the vector-meson and baryon scattering system with strangeness S=0S=0 and isospin I=1/2I=1/2. Two poles have been found in the complex energy plane of the corresponding scattering amplitude. One pole locates at s=(1969i283)\sqrt{s}=(1969-i283)MeV, and might correspond to either the baryon N(1895)1/2N(1895)1/2^{-} or N(1875)3/2N(1875)3/2^{-}. In addition, we predict a possible ϕN\phi N bound state, which has not been found in the PDG. This state leads to another pole structure at s=(1949i3)\sqrt{s}=(1949-i3)MeV in the scattering amplitude.

Acknowledgements.
Bao-Xi Sun would like to thank Xiao-Yu Guo for reading and revising the whole manuscript. Moreover, we appreciate the constructive and helpful advice from referees of Communications in Theoretical Physics.

References

  • (1) R.L. Workman et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of Particle Physics, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022, 083C01 (2022)
  • (2) N. Kaiser, P. B. Siegel and W. Weise, Chiral dynamics and the S11 (1535) nucleon resonance, Phys. Lett.  B 362, 23 (1995)
  • (3) E. Oset and A. Ramos, Nonperturbative chiral approach to s wave anti-K N interactions, Nucl. Phys.  A 635, 99 (1998)
  • (4) B. Krippa, Chiral dynamics of the low-energy kaon - baryon interactions, Phys. Rev. C 58, 1333 (1998)
  • (5) J. A. Oller, E. Oset and J. R. Pelaez, Nonperturbative approach to effective chiral Lagrangians and meson interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3452 (1998)
  • (6) J. A. Oller and U. G. Meissner, Chiral dynamics in the presence of bound states: Kaon nucleon interactions revisited, Phys. Lett.  B 500, 263 (2001).
  • (7) C. Garcia-Recio, M. F. M. Lutz and J. Nieves, Quark mass dependence of s wave baryon resonances, Phys. Lett.  B 582 49 (2004).
  • (8) T. Hyodo, S. I. Nam, D. Jido and A. Hosaka, Flavor SU(3) breaking effects in the chiral unitary model for meson baryon scatterings, Phys. Rev.  C 68, 018201 (2003).
  • (9) E. E. Kolomeitsev, M. F. M. Lutz, On baryon resonances and chiral symmetry, Phys. Lett. B 585, 243 (2004).
  • (10) S. Sarkar, E. Oset and M. J. Vicente Vacas, Baryonic resonances from baryon decuplet-meson octet interaction, Nucl. Phys. A 750, 294 (2005) [erratum: Nucl. Phys. A 780, 90 (2006)]
  • (11) R. Molina, D. Nicmorus and E. Oset, The rho rho interaction in the hidden gauge formalism and the f(0)(1370) and f(2)(1270) resonances, Phys. Rev. D 78, 114018 (2008).
  • (12) L. Geng and E. Oset, Vector meson-vector meson interaction in a hidden gauge unitary approach, Phys. Rev. D 79, 074009 (2009).
  • (13) P. Gonzalez, E. Oset and J. Vijande, An Explanation of the Delta(5/2-)(1930) as a rho Delta bound state, Phys. Rev.  C 79, 025209 (2009).
  • (14) S. Sarkar, B. -X. Sun, E. Oset, M. J. Vicente Vacas, Dynamically generated resonances from the vector octet-baryon decuplet interaction, Eur. Phys. J.  A 44, 431 (2010).
  • (15) E. Oset and A. Ramos, Dynamically generated resonances from the vector octet-baryon octet interaction, Eur. Phys. J.  A 44, 445 (2010).
  • (16) K. P. Khemchandani, H. Kaneko, H. Nagahiro and A. Hosaka, Vector meson-Baryon dynamics and generation of resonances, Phys. Rev. D 83, 114041 (2011).
  • (17) I. V. Danilkin, M. F. M. Lutz, S. Leupold and C. Terschlusen, Photon-fusion reactions from the chiral Lagrangian with dynamical light vector mesons, Eur. Phys. J. C 73, 2358 (2013).
  • (18) X. Y. Guo and M. F. M. Lutz, On light vector mesons and chiral SU(3) extrapolations, Nucl. Phys. A 988, 48 (2019).
  • (19) S. Acharya et al. [ALICE Collaboration], Experimental Evidence for an Attractive p-ϕ\phi Interaction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 172301 (2021).
  • (20) U. G. Meissner, Low-Energy Hadron Physics from Effective Chiral Lagrangians with Vector Mesons, Phys. Rept. 161, 213 (1988).
  • (21) M. Bando, T. Kugo, S. Uehara, K. Yamawaki and T. Yanagida, Is rho Meson a Dynamical Gauge Boson of Hidden Local Symmetry?, Phys. Rev. Lett.  54, 1215 (1985).
  • (22) M. Bando, T. Kugo and K. Yamawaki, Nonlinear Realization and Hidden Local Symmetries, Phys. Rep.  164, 217 (1988).
  • (23) M. Harada and K. Yamawaki, Hidden local symmetry at loop: A New perspective of composite gauge boson and chiral phase transition, Phys. Rep.  381, 1 (2003).
  • (24) H. Nagahiro, L. Roca, A. Hosaka and E. Oset, Hidden gauge formalism for the radiative decays of axial-vector mesons, Phys. Rev. D 79, 014015 (2009).
  • (25) R. Del Grande, L. Šerkšnytė, L. Fabbietti, V. M. Sarti and D. Mihaylov, A method to remove lower order contributions in multi-particle femtoscopic correlation functions, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 244 (2022).
  • (26) B. X. Sun, G. Y. Tang, D. M. Wan and F. Y. Dong, DD¯D\bar{D}^{*} and πψ\pi\psi interactions in a unitary coupled-channel approximation, [arXiv:1704.02076 [nucl-th]].
  • (27) F. Huang, Z. Y. Zhang and Y. W. Yu, NϕN\phi state in chiral quark model, Phys. Rev. C 73, 025207 (2006).
  • (28) B. X. Sun, The collective excitation of nuclear matter in a bosonized Landau Fermi liquid model, Nucl. Phys. A 1004, 122030 (2020).