This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

The physical origin of positive metallicity radial gradients in high-redshift galaxies: insights from the FIRE-2 cosmological hydrodynamic simulations

Xunda Sun School of Astronomy and Space Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (UCAS), Beijing 100049, China Xin Wang School of Astronomy and Space Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (UCAS), Beijing 100049, China Institute for Frontiers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 102206, China National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China Xiangcheng Ma Department of Astronomy and Theoretical Astrophysics Center, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA Kai Wang Kavli Institute for Astronomy and Astrophysics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, People’s Republic of China Andrew Wetzel Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Davis, CA, USA 95616 Claude-André Faucher-Giguère CIERA and Department of Physics and Astronomy, Northwestern University, 1800 Sherman Ave, Evanston, IL 60201, USA Philip F. Hopkins TAPIR, Mailcode 350-17, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA Dušan Kereš Department of Physics, Center for Astrophysics and Space Sciences, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA Russell L. Graf Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Davis, CA, USA 95616 Andrew Marszewski CIERA and Department of Physics and Astronomy, Northwestern University, 1800 Sherman Ave, Evanston, IL 60201, USA Jonathan Stern School of Physics & Astronomy, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel Guochao Sun CIERA and Department of Physics and Astronomy, Northwestern University, 1800 Sherman Ave, Evanston, IL 60201, USA Lei Sun School of Astronomy and Space Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (UCAS), Beijing 100049, China Keyer Thyme Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
Abstract

Using the FIRE-2 cosmological zoom-in simulations, we investigate the temporal evolution of gas-phase metallicity radial gradients of Milky Way-mass progenitors in the redshift range of 0.4<z<30.4<z<3. We pay special attention to the occurrence of positive (i.e. inverted) metallicity gradients — where metallicity increases with galactocentric radius. This trend, contrary to the more commonly observed negative radial gradients, has been frequently seen in recent spatially resolved grism observations. The occurrence rate of positive gradients in FIRE-2 is about 10%\sim 10\% for 0.4<z<30.4<z<3, and 16%\sim 16\% at higher redshifts (1.5<z<31.5<z<3), broadly consistent with observations. Moreover, we investigate the correlations among galaxy metallicity gradient, stellar mass, star formation rate (SFR), and degree of rotational support. Our results show that galaxies with lower mass, higher specific SFR (sSFR), and more turbulent disks are more likely to exhibit positive metallicity gradients. The FIRE-2 simulations show evidence for positive gradients that occur both before and/or after major episodes of star formation, manifesting as sharp rises in a galaxy’s star-formation history. Positive gradients occurring before major star-formation episodes are likely caused by metal-poor gas inflows, whereas those appearing afterwards often result from metal-enriched gas outflows, driven by strong stellar feedback. Our results support the important role of stellar feedback in governing the chemo-structural evolution and disk formation of Milky Way-mass galaxies at the cosmic noon epoch.

Hydrodynamical simulations — Galaxy evolution — Galaxy formation — Interstellar medium — Metallicity — High-redshift galaxies

1 Introduction

Metallicity is one of the most fundamental properties of galaxies. It can be quantified in two elemental phases: stellar metallicity, reflecting the time-averaged abundance across the entire galactic star formation history, and gas-phase metallicity, which indicates the present state of metal enrichment in the interstellar medium (ISM). These metrics are essential for understanding the evolution of galaxies. In particular, the galaxy mass-metallicity relation (MZR) presents a critical observed trend of tight correlation of galaxy stellar mass with both gas-phase metallicity and stellar metallicity. Metallicity may be influenced by various feedback mechanisms, including gas accretion, supernova explosions, and stellar winds (Wang et al., 2023). The MZR indicates that more massive galaxies generally possess higher metallicity, a trend attributed to their enhanced ability to retain metal-enriched gas and convert gas into stars (Wang et al., 2017, 2020, 2022; He et al., 2024). These findings suggest that the interplay between galaxy mass and metal content is important for understanding galaxy formation and evolution, offering insights into the processes that govern the chemical enrichment of galaxies across the universe (Vickers et al., 2021; Lian et al., 2023).

The metallicity radial gradient is widely used to study the spatial distribution of metals in galaxies. Analyzing its response to feedback mechanisms helps us reveal the role these processes play in regulating galactic evolution. Since Searle (1971), it has been known that galaxies in the present-day universe are more inclined to show negative gas-phase metallicity gradients, implying that gas is more metal-enriched in the inner galaxy (e.g. Zaritsky et al., 1994; van Zee et al., 1998). Typically, galaxies exhibit negative metallicity gradients, characterized by a decrease in metallicity with increasing radial distance from the galactic center. Since the density of stars declines more steeply than that of gas, there is a gradual decrease of metallicity in the stellar regions as the radius increases (Ho et al., 2015; Ma et al., 2017). While Wang & Lilly (2022) established a metal enrichment model which simplified the accretion mechanisms of galactic disks. This model demonstrates that the negative metallicity gradient is actually facilitated by the inflow of cold gas, providing a different perspective. Boardman et al. (2022) found that galaxies with larger physical extents at a given stellar mass (>10M>10\rm M_{\odot}) tend to have steeper metallicity gradients, which suggests that galactic feedback significantly shapes these gradients over extended timescales, reflecting the prolonged evolutionary history of these galaxies (Gibson et al., 2013; Hemler et al., 2021; Acharyya et al., 2024). According to Bellardini et al. (2021, 2022), as galaxies evolve, their disks gradually become rotationally supported, which restricts the radial mixing of metals in gas, leading to a gradual steepening of the radial metallicity gradients over time (also see Ju et al., 2024, for the very recent observational evidence from the MSA-3D survey).

Although the majority of galaxies possess negative metallicity gradients, a number of them show positive gradients, as first identified by Cresci et al. (2010) at z3.0z\sim 3.0. This anomalous pattern, contrary to the usual tendency, indicates higher metal concentrations in the outskirts than in the central regions of these galaxies. Such distributions are consistent with observations of star-forming galaxies at high redshifts, which generally exhibit metal-enriched gas outflows, expected to result in spatial variations of metal distribution across galaxies. Subsequent studies have quantified the occurrence of positive metallicity gradients. Pérez-Montero et al. (2016) reported that approximately 10%10\% of galaxies in the CALIFA nearby galaxy sample show positive gradients. Carton et al. (2018) found this percentage to be around 8±3%8\pm 3\% at 0.1<z<0.80.1<z<0.8 from MUSE. In addition, (Tissera et al., 2022) reported that 2025%20-25\% of galaxies at z2z\leq 2 from the EAGLE simulations show positive metallicity gradients. Schönrich & McMillan (2017) suggests that these positive metallicity gradients are likely caused by high rates of central gas loss and re-distribution processes, such as the re-accretion of metal-enriched material combined with inside-out galaxy formation and near-disk galactic fountaining. Wang et al. (2019) reports the first sub-kpc resolution measurements of extremely positive metallicity gradients in two dwarf galaxies at redshift z2z\sim 2, demonstrating rapid mass assembly and significant impact of stellar nucleosynthesis and gas outflows on chemical distributions. Venturi et al. (2024) shows that the redistribution of metals in galaxies may be dominated by mergers. These phenomena suggest that galactic evolution processes may include a variety of complex feedback mechanisms, resulting in these observed positive gradients that differ from more common scenarios. Understanding these unique phenomena could provide valuable insights into the diversity of galactic structures and the mechanisms driving their formation and growth.

The Feedback In Realistic Environments (FIRE) project111See also: https://fire.northwestern.edu/ (Hopkins et al., 2014, 2018, 2023) comprises a set of cosmological zoom-in simulations that explore how feedback mechanisms influence galaxy formation, gas distribution, chemical evolution, and morphological development. In this work, we use eight cosmological zoom-in simulations from the Latte suite of Milky Way-mass galaxies (introduced in Wetzel et al., 2016), part of the FIRE-2 project, to study the relations between gas-phase metallicity radial gradients and other galactic properties, and to examine the proportion of inverse metallicity gradients under various conditions to understand their causes. The simulated galaxies from the FIRE-1 and FIRE-2 samples have been used to explore the properties of the MZR (see e.g., Ma et al., 2016; Porter et al., 2022; Marszewski et al., 2024; Bassini et al., 2024) and the radial gradients of elemental abundances (see e.g., Mercado et al., 2021; Porter et al., 2022; Orr et al., 2023). In particular, Ma et al. (2017) studied the diversity of the spatially resolved gas-phase metallicities in galaxies at 0.6<z<30.6<z<3 using the FIRE-1 simulations. Bellardini et al. (2021, 2022) investigated the three-dimensional (3D) elemental abundances pattern in both gas and in stars at birth in FIRE-2 simulations, tracing their formation histories at z<1.5z<1.5. They demonstrated that metallicity radial gradients at early times typically appear flat and can scatter to positive values; additionally, they showed the consistency of the ISM gradients with observational data at z=0z=0. Graf et al. (2024) showed that the trends of stellar gradients with age in these FIRE-2 galaxies today parallel those measured in the Milky Way. In this work, aiming at a comprehensive exploration of the physical causes of positive metallicity gradients, we analyze the spatially resolved properties of the FIRE-2 Milky Way-mass galaxies in a wide redshift range of 0.4<z<30.4<z<3, going further back to the cosmic noon epoch.

The organization of this paper is as follows. In Section 2, we introduce the simulation details of FIRE-2 and describe the methods used to measure the gas-phase metallicity gradients of these simulated galaxies. Our main results are presented in Section 3, and our conclusions are provided in Section 4.

2 Methodology

2.1 Simulations

Table 1: Simulation details.
Name MhaloM_{\rm halo} mbaryonm_{\rm baryon} mdmm_{\rm dm} ϵstar\epsilon_{\rm star} ϵdm\epsilon_{\rm dm} ϵgas,min\epsilon_{\rm gas,min} Cosmology Reference
(M) (M) (M) (pc) (pc) (pc)
m12z 9.25×10119.25\times 10^{11} 4200 21,000 3.2 33 0.4 Z Garrison-Kimmel et al. (2019)
m12w 1.08×10121.08\times 10^{12} 7100 39,000 4.0 40 1.0 P Samuel et al. (2020)
m12r 1.10×10121.10\times 10^{12} 7100 39,000 4.0 40 1.0 P Samuel et al. (2020)
m12i 1.18×10121.18\times 10^{12} 7100 35,000 4.0 40 1.0 A Wetzel et al. (2016)
m12c 1.35×10121.35\times 10^{12} 7100 35,000 4.0 40 1.0 A Garrison-Kimmel et al. (2019)
m12b 1.43×10121.43\times 10^{12} 7100 35,000 4.0 40 1.0 A Garrison-Kimmel et al. (2019)
m12m 1.58×10121.58\times 10^{12} 7100 35,000 4.0 40 1.0 A Hopkins et al. (2018)
m12f 1.71×10121.71\times 10^{12} 7100 35,000 4.0 40 1.0 A Garrison-Kimmel et al. (2017)
  • Parameters describing the initial conditions for our simulations (units are physical):

  • Name: simulation designation.

  • MhaloM_{\rm halo}: approximate mass of the main halo at z=0z=0.

  • mbaryonm_{\rm baryon}, mdmm_{\rm dm}: initial masses of baryonic (gas or star) and dark-matter particles.

  • ϵstar\epsilon_{\rm star}, ϵdm\epsilon_{\rm dm}: force softening (Plummer equivalent) for star and dark-matter particles.

  • ϵgas,min\epsilon_{\rm gas,min}: minimum adaptive force softening (Plummer equivalent) for gas cells.

  • Cosmology: cosmological parameters used in the simulation, as follows:

  • A (‘AGORA’: Ωm\Omega_{\rm m} = 0.272, ΩΛ\Omega_{\Lambda} = 0.728, Ωb\Omega_{\rm b} = 0.0455, hh = 0.702, σ8\sigma_{8} = 0.807, nsn_{\rm s} = 0.961);

  • P (‘Planck’: Ωm\Omega_{\rm m} = 0.31, ΩΛ\Omega_{\Lambda} = 0.69, Ωb\Omega_{\rm b} = 0.0458, hh = 0.68, σ8\sigma_{8} = 0.82, nsn_{\rm s} = 0.97);

  • Z (Ωm\Omega_{\rm m} = 0.2821, ΩΛ\Omega_{\Lambda} = 0.7179, Ωb\Omega_{\rm b} = 0.0461, hh = 0.697, σ8\sigma_{8} = 0.817, nsn_{\rm s} = 0.9646).

  • Reference: where the simulation is first presented.

Our analysis focuses on the Latte suite galaxies from the FIRE-2 cosmological zoom-in simulations, all modeled as Milky Way-mass isolated galaxy progenitors. The Latte suite comprises eight simulations as listed in Table 1 (see also Wetzel et al., 2023; Garrison-Kimmel et al., 2017, 2019; Samuel et al., 2020; Wetzel et al., 2016; Hopkins et al., 2018). The simulations were conducted using the gizmo code in mesh-less finite-mass (MFM) mode (Hopkins, 2015). These simulated galaxies were evolved down to redshift z=0z=0, yielding a main halo mass of Mhalo1012M_{\rm halo}\sim 10^{12} M at z=0z=0. We selected snapshots spanning redshifts z0.443z\sim 0.44-3, covering the stellar mass range of M108M_{\star}\sim 10^{8} to 1011M10^{11}{\rm M}_{\odot} for central galaxies only. Force softening (Plummer equivalent) values are ϵstar=3.24.0\epsilon_{\rm star}=3.2-4.0 pc for stellar and ϵdm=3240\epsilon_{\rm dm}=32-40 pc for dark-matter particles. The minimum adaptive force softening for gas cells is ϵgas,min=0.41.0\epsilon_{\rm gas,min}=0.4-1.0 pc. Initial masses of baryonic (gas or star) and dark-matter particles are Mbaryon=42007100MM_{\rm baryon}=4200-7100{\rm M}\odot and Mdm=2100039000MM_{\rm dm}=21000-39000{\rm M}_{\odot}, respectively.

FIRE-2 incorporates radiative cooling and heating across a temperature range from 10 to 101010^{10} K, tracking the abundances of 11 different elements (H, He, C, N, O, Ne, Mg, Si, S, Ca, Fe). The model includes detailed stellar feedback mechanisms, including supernovae (Type II and Ia), stellar winds (from OB and AGB stars), and radiative feedback, to accurately simulate the dynamics and chemical composition of the ISM. These processes, crucial for driving galactic winds and regulating star formation, are based on stellar evolution models with rates and energies derived from starburst99 (Leitherer et al., 1999) and assume a Kroupa (2001) initial mass function. Together, these mechanisms enrich ISM with metals and play a significant role in galaxy evolution through balancing gas heating and cooling.

FIRE-2 features an explicit model for the turbulent diffusion of gas-phase metals (Su et al., 2017; Escala et al., 2018; Hopkins et al., 2018), which addresses the sub-grid scale mixing processes critical for the chemical evolution of galaxies. This mechanism facilitates chemical exchange between particles, enabling a more realistic representation of metal mixing and distribution within the ISM. Bellardini et al. (2021) showed that varying the diffusion coefficient for metal mixing affects the azimuthal variations in gas metallicity in these galaxies, but it does not significantly affect the vertical or radial gradients.

2.2 Galaxy definitions

We focus solely on the most massive halo in each galaxy at redshifts z0.443z\sim 0.44-3. The detailed physical properties of these galaxies are presented in Appendix B.

We define the center of each galaxy as the point within a sphere of radius ranging from 20 down to 1 kpc that consistently exhibits the highest stellar mass density. The stellar mass, gas mass, and SFR, relevant to our calculations, are confined to within 5 kpc of this center. Following Ma et al. (2017), we define a characteristic radius R90R_{90} as the radius enclosing 90 percent of the total SFR within 5 kpc, with the SFR averaged over a period of 200 Myr.

In Fig. 1, we present three examples of our simulated galaxy sample: m12b at z0.44z\approx 0.44 (top), m12w at z1.42z\approx 1.42 (middle), and m12c at z2.28z\approx 2.28 (bottom). For each individual galaxy, the zz-axis is defined to be aligned with the total angular momentum of all gas particles within R90R_{90}. The ‘face-on’ view is thus along the zz-axis, and the ‘edge-on’ view is along a direction perpendicular to the zz-axis. For each example, the left two columns of Fig. 1 display the face-on gas density map (upper left), edge-on gas density map (upper right), face-on stellar density map (bottom left), and face-on SFR map (bottom right). The R90R_{90} range is indicated by a white dashed circle in each map. These images illustrate that m12b features a thin disk, m12w a thick disk, and m12c appears irregular.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 1: Left: Three example galaxies from our FIRE-2 simulations, displaying face-on gas density in the upper left panel, edge-on gas density in the upper right panel, stellar surface density in the lower left panel, and SFR surface density in the lower right panel. A white circle marks R90R_{90} defined in Section 2.2. Black lines on the edge-on gas images indicate the long slit from which we extract the gas velocity curves. Right: Velocity curves of all gas particles extracted from the slit. Symbols and error bars represent the velocity and velocity dispersion measurements, respectively, while red lines depict the best-fit results from the arctan function specified in Eq. 2. In the upper left, we also display the degree of rotational support (vc/σv_{\rm c}/\sigma), measured using the 1-σ\sigma velocity dispersion of the total velocity. Galaxy m12b exhibits a well-ordered thin disk, m12w has a thick disk, and m12c appears irregular.

2.3 Calculation of metallicity gradients

In the top panels of Fig. 2, we show the face-on metallicity distributions of the three galaxies in Fig. 1. Here the gas-phase metallicity is measured in each pixel (100 pc ×\times 100 pc), and only pixels with gas mass density Σg10Mpc2\Sigma_{\rm g}\geq 10{\rm M}_{\odot}\cdot{\rm pc}^{-2} are included in the metallicity gradient statistics. This threshold represents the surface density of pixels above which there will be observationally detectable nebular emission lines, indicative of star formation (Orr et al., 2018).

Our analysis focuses on all particle data within the radius interval of 0.25-1R90R_{90}, following Ma et al. (2017), which has shown that the metallicity gradients measured within a more inner range (0-2 kpc) yield qualitatively consistent results. As shown by the red lines in the bottom panels of Fig. 2, the radial metallicity profile can be fitted with a linear function

logZgZ=αR+β,\log\frac{Z_{\rm g}}{Z_{\odot}}=\alpha R+\beta, (1)

where α\alpha is the metallicity gradient in dexkpc1\mathrm{dex}\cdot\mathrm{kpc}^{-1}. Eq. 1 provides a measure of the gradients of total metal in dlogZg/dRd\log Z_{\rm g}/dR.

In this study, positive gradient denotes α>0\alpha>0, and we subdivide negative gradients (α<0\alpha<0) into “flat” and “strong negative”, where flat gradient denotes 0.03<α<0-0.03<\alpha<0, and strong negative gradient denotes α<0.03\alpha<-0.03.

We note that for galaxies with a well-ordered rotation curve whose metallicity is concentrated at the center (e.g. m12b in Figs. 1 and 2), the metallicity profile may be better modeled by a reciprocal (dlogZg/dR1/Rd\log Z_{\rm g}/dR\sim 1/R) rather than linear function, especially when considered over a larger radial distance (see Appendix A for more details). Nonetheless, Eq. 1 is still a good approximate for characterizing metallicity gradients.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 2: Top: Face-on gas-phase metallicity maps for the example galaxies shown in Fig. 1. Bottom: Radial gas metallicity profiles. The markers and error bars respectively represent the median and the 1-σ\sigma uncertainty measurements of metallicity in each radial bin. The red lines are the best linear fits according to Eq. 1, where α\alpha represents the slope of the metallicity gradient in dex\cdotkpc-1. Galaxy m12b at z=0.44z=0.44 exhibits a strong negative gradient; m12w at z=1.42z=1.42 shows a flat gradient; and m12c at z=2.28z=2.28 displays a positive gradient.

2.4 Kinematics

We measure the kinematic properties for gas of these galaxies by mimicking the widely used long-slit spectroscopy technique following Ma et al. (2017). To begin with, we put a long slit with a width of 1 kpc at the center along the y-axis (edge-on) direction, as shown in the edge-on gas density images in Fig. 1. A one-dimensional velocity curve is then extracted along the direction of this slit, covering the range R90<y<R90-R_{90}<y<R_{90} and -0.5 kpc <z<<z< 0.5 kpc, with all gas particles therein considered in the calculation. We measure the mass-weighted mean velocity of gas in each bin and the 1-σ\sigma velocity dispersion of total velocity. Three examples are shown in the right column of Fig. 1, m12b at z=0.44z=0.44, m12w at z=1.42z=1.42, and m12c at z=2.28z=2.28, where black points represent the line-of-sight velocity and error bars indicate the velocity dispersion along the slit.

We fit the one-dimensional velocity curve with the following function

v(R)v0=vc2πarctanRRt,v(R)-v_{0}=v_{\rm c}\frac{2}{\pi}\arctan\frac{R}{R_{\rm t}}, (2)

which originates from the simple disk model and similar to Eq.(1) in Ma et al. (2017) except that the peculiar velocity v0v_{0} in the simulation box is placed on the left side. Here vcv_{\rm c} represents the asymptotic rotation velocity of the gas at large radius. In the right panels of Fig. 1, the red lines are the best-fits for the three examples. On the top left corner of each panel, we provide vc/σv_{\rm c}/\sigma for all the gas particles to indicate the disk formation of these galaxies, with σ\sigma denoting the velocity dispersion of the line-of-sight velocity of all gas particles in the considered range.

We adopt vc/σ1v_{\rm c}/\sigma\geq 1 in identifying rotationally supported disk systems. Galaxies with vc/σ<1v_{\rm c}/\sigma<1 lack well-ordered rotation, and exhibit irregular morphology. And we define a threshold at vc/σ=3v_{\rm c}/\sigma=3, where galaxies with vc/σ3v_{\rm c}/\sigma\geq 3 are classified as thin disks, and galaxies with 1<vc/σ<31<v_{\rm c}/\sigma<3 are classified as thick disks.

The velocity curves of m12b at z=0.44z=0.44 can be well fitted by the arctan function, indicating that it possesses a well-ordered rotating thin disk, as evidenced by vc/σv_{\rm c}/\sigma reaching 4.72. Meanwhile, m12w at z=1.42z=1.42 can be roughly fitted, suggesting it possesses a thick disk with a vc/σv_{\rm c}/\sigma of 2.76. However, m12c at z=2.28z=2.28 returns a very poor fit, with a vc/σv_{\rm c}/\sigma value of 0.28, indicating that it is an irregular galaxy. These observations are consistent with the images in Fig. 1.

In this study, we focus on galaxies with a vc/σv_{\rm c}/\sigma value within the range of 0.3-8, as those with vc/σv_{\rm c}/\sigma values beyond this range typically exhibit characteristics of irregular galaxies, which often show very unstable rotational velocities.

3 Results

3.1 Metallicity gradients

Fig. 2 displays the gas-phase metallicity maps and the radial metallicity distributions with linear fits for each galaxy snapshot in Fig. 1. Galaxy m12b at z=0.44z=0.44 represents a galaxy in the later stages of evolution with a highly ordered rotational thin disk and a strong negative gradient with metals concentrated at the center. Galaxy m12w at z=1.42z=1.42 indicates a mid-stage evolutionary galaxy with a thick disk, characterized by a flat gradient. Galaxy m12c at z=2.28z=2.28 shows an irregular galaxy with a disordered velocity field, displaying a higher metal abundance in the outer regions, which is classified as a positive gradient. See Appendix B for the metallicity gradients of other galaxies in our study. Previously, we mentioned that the results are similar across different regions. In Fig.3, we show that metallicity gradient measurements from 0-1R90R_{90} and from 0.25-1R90R_{90} are in excellent agreement with one another, with a correlation coefficient of k=0.994k=0.994.

Refer to caption
Figure 3: Comparison of gradients from 0-1R90R_{90} and from 0.25-1R90R_{90}. The two measurements are in excellent agreement for galaxies in our sample with a correlation coefficient of k=0.994k=0.994 and no evidence for systematic differences.

Intense outflows, rapid gas infall, and mergers in galaxies stir the ISM and drive galaxy-scale gas flows that mix metal-enriched or metal-poor gas. These gas flows move at velocities of hundreds of km s-1, which can reshape the spatial distribution of gas and metals in a very short time or cause changes in the galaxy’s morphology (Ma et al., 2017; Pandya et al., 2021). Therefore, simulations with ”enhanced” feedback often exhibit flat metallicity gradients, while the absence of such feedback can lead to steeply negative gradients (Gibson et al., 2013). In the simulation m12c at z=2.28z=2.28, perturbations are predominantly caused by a series of minor mergers, as observable in the images. These merger events across the galaxy mix metals in the gas, effectively reversing the gradient. Meanwhile, for m12w at z=1.42z=1.42, the central starburst acts as the main source of feedback, driving metal-enriched gas radially outward and consequently fostering the formation of a flat gradient. On the other hand, in m12b at z=0.44z=0.44 (Fig. 1), the weak feedback (or lower SFR) produces less energy, which allows strong negative gradients to remain stable. In galaxy evolution, different types of dynamical processes (such as mergers, starbursts and associated feedback, accretion, etc.), their intensities, and the interactions among them can lead to changes in their impact on the entire galaxy (Mercado et al., 2021). This dynamic interaction not only influences galactic structure and star formation but also manifests in the observable variations in metallicity distribution across the galaxy. Thanks to the high resolution of FIRE-2, we are able to resolve the movements of galactic winds on very small scales, the turbulence within the ISM, and its effects on radial mixing.

Fig. 2 also illustrates how measurements of radial metallicity gradients in galaxies can be influenced by the choice of center. In fact, when we choose starbursts as the center, flat and positive gradients are more easily observed. It is easy to define the center for thin disk galaxies, while it is more challenging for thick disk or irregular galaxies. As mentioned in Bellardini et al. (2021, 2022), late-stage evolved thin disk galaxies exhibit minor variations in azimuthal angle; however, early-stage galaxies experience additional azimuthal scatter due to gas flows. Feedback mechanisms within the galaxy, such as localized star formation activities, influence azimuthal metal abundance variations and lead to a patchy distribution of metals (as shown in m12c at z=2.28z=2.28 in Fig.2), resulting in observable an larger azimuthal scatter. The impact of these dynamics is particularly significant in galaxies with active star formation or turbulent conditions, where localized events can rapidly alter the metal distribution. These analyses, distinct from radial distributions, provide more information related to local conditions. In this paper, we use the galaxy’s center of mass as the center for measuring metallicity gradients, and we do not discuss other potential centers for measurement extensively.

In the following parts of this section, we first present the Mass-Metallicity Relation (MZR) of our samples in Section 3.2. Next, we explore the relationships of metallicity gradient with stellar mass and sSFR in Section 3.3. In Section 3.4, we examine the correlation between metallicity gradient and the degree of rotational support. Following that, in Section 3.5, we discuss the dependence of metallicity gradient on redshift across all our samples, with a specific focus on m12b. Finally, using m12b as an example, we investigate the formation of positive gradients in Section 3.6.

3.2 The mass-metallicity relation

Refer to caption
Figure 4: Mass-metallicity relations from FIRE zoom-in simulations at z2z\sim 2. The red circles represent the 8 simulations at z=2z=2 from the FIRE-2 simulations. The blue dashed line shows the MZR fit using Eq. 3 from 22 FIRE-1 galaxies (Ma et al., 2016). Black circles are the simulations from Ma et al. (2017) of 2 FIRE-1 galaxies.

In Fig. 4, we present the mass-metallicity relation for our simulated galaxies at redshift z=2z=2. Following the definition in Ma et al. (2016), the gas-phase metallicity is identified as the mass-weighted mean metallicity of the ISM gas, i.e., all gas particles with temperature below 104 K and R<RvirR<R_{\rm vir}. Generally, this helps distinguish the star-forming regions clearly. Here ZZ is the total gas-phase metallicity and Z=0.02Z_{\odot}=0.02 is the solar metallicity. In Fig. 4, the blue dashed line shows the linear fit

logZZ=0.35[logMM10]+0.93e0.43z1.05\log\frac{Z}{Z_{\odot}}=0.35[\log\frac{M_{\star}}{{\rm M}_{\odot}}-10]+0.93e^{-0.43z}-1.05 (3)

from Ma et al. (2016) for gas-phase metallicity at z=2z=2 using FIRE-1 galaxies with a stellar mass range 1041010M10^{4}-10^{10}M_{\odot}. The black circles show the FIRE-1 simulated galaxies A2:0 and A8:0 at z=2z=2 in Ma et al. (2017), which expand the mass range to 1011M10^{11}M_{\odot}. The red circles represent all galaxies from FIRE-2 simulations at redshift z=2z=2 studied in this work. Our sample spans a stellar mass range of M108.51010M_{\star}\sim 10^{8.5}-10^{10}M, including only Milky Way-mass galaxies (at z=0z=0). Compared to FIRE-1, FIRE-2 incorporates improved numerical methods and algorithmic advancements, along with a larger set of available simulations. Although our study on the MZR does not cover a broader range of mass than previous published studies, the comparison plotted here is useful to relate our study to the previous analyses by Ma et al. (2016, 2017).

3.3 Metallicity gradient versus stellar mass and sSFR

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 5: Metallicity gradient versus stellar mass and sSFR. SFRs are measured as the average formation rate of young stars over the past 200 Myrs. The red lines show the linear fit at 0.44<z<30.44<z<3 from our FIRE-2 simulations. The blue dashed lines represent the linear fit to the observational data at z=02.5z=0-2.5 compiled by Stott et al. (2014). Note that there is a positive correlation between stellar mass and redshift. Metallicity gradients show a weak negative correlation with stellar mass and a strong positive correlation with sSFR. Galaxies with low mass and high sSFR are more likely to have positive radial gradients. The text at the top indicates the proportion of positive gradients in different segments.

We first examine the relationship between metallicity gradients, stellar mass, and sSFR. The SFR for a given epoch is measured as the average formation rate of young stars over the past 200 Myrs. We display this relationship in Fig. 5 for all the galaxies across the redshift range of z0.443z\sim 0.44-3. Ma et al. (2017) indicates that redshift changes do not significantly alter the underlying relationship between the metallicity gradient and these galaxy properties, so we do not distinguish between redshifts in this particular study. Although we only use the m12 series galaxies, where there is a direct correlation between the stellar mass and redshift, the relationship between gradient and stellar mass is not independent of redshift. Nevertheless, due to the diverse evolutionary paths of different galaxies, the result still provides valuable insights into the relationships among them. The red line represents the linear fits to the simulated data, while the blue dashed lines show the result from Stott et al. (2014) at redshifts z02.5z\sim 0-2.5.

From the left panel of Fig. 5, metallicity gradients exhibit a weak negative correlation with stellar mass, indicated by a Pearson correlation coefficient of r=0.16r=-0.16 and p=0.62p=0.62. The correlation between stellar mass and metallicity gradients in our Milky Way-mass galaxies is very weak. However, high mass galaxies still tend to exhibit strong negative gradients, while positive gradients occur more frequently in low mass galaxies. For instance, the occurrence of positive gradients is around 20%20\% for galaxies with masses less than 109M10^{9}M_{\odot}, and decreases to about 10%10\% for those in the 1091010M10^{9}-10^{10}M_{\odot} range. Lower mass galaxies have smaller scales and lower v/σv/\sigma, which indicates that (turbulent) mixing is more efficient in them. This leads to the redistribution of metals on a galactic scale (Muratov et al., 2015; Belfiore et al., 2017), thereby more easily resulting in extreme gradients, like positive ones. However, due to the instability of the internal dynamics of galaxies, the average metallicity gradients they exhibit are highly unstable, leading to variable trends at lower masses (even showing an increase). The relation between redshift and stellar mass suggests that as galaxies evolve towards larger mass, they rapidly develop thin, stable disk structures (see, e.g., Stern et al., 2021; Hafen et al., 2022; Gurvich et al., 2023; Hopkins et al., 2023; McCluskey et al., 2024, for more on the emergence of thin disks and its connection to the end of bursty star formation in FIRE), leading to the pronounced steepening of the gradient above M3×1010MM_{\star}\sim 3\times 10^{10}\rm{M}_{\odot}. Compared to Stott et al. (2014), our simulation provides a flatter fit, largely due to the correlation between stellar mass and redshift for our galaxies, so the discussion of redshift and metallicity gradients might also apply to stellar mass.

We also observe a strong positive correlation between gradients and sSFR, as reflected by a Pearson correlation coefficient of r=0.73r=0.73 and p=0.004p=0.004, showing an increased frequency of positive gradients at higher sSFR levels. Higher sSFR drives stronger feedback, leading to more vigorous gas flows, which can more effectively promote the redistribution of metals. Typically, strong star formation activity occurs in these galaxies that have more cold gas and are more unstable at high redshift, making them more susceptible to the resulting feedback. This suggests that galactic winds triggered by starbursts which could transport metal-enriched gas outward, or rapid accretion events which drive high sSFR, or just overall turbulence in the galaxy could result in strong mixing or create patchiness, leading to the formation of positive gradient.

From our analysis of the FIRE-2 galaxy sample, we only see subtle dependence of metallicity gradient on stellar mass. Although, we caution that this analysis is performed on the same simulation galaxies over a wide redshift range across their mass assembly history, so there is an inevitable degeneracy between the effects that stellar mass and redshift plays in the evolution of gradients presented here and in Sect. 3.5. In contrast, the correlation between metallicity gradient and sSFR is stronger. This indicates that in galaxies with lower mass (more susceptible to feedback) and active star formation activity (strong feedback), the gas in the ISM is more easily disturbed, leading to the redistribution of metals on a galactic scale, resulting in positive gradients.

3.4 Metallicity gradient versus kinematic properties

Refer to caption
Figure 6: Metallicity gradient versus degree of rotational support for the ISM gas. The red line represents the linear fit of our sample within the range of vc/σ0.38v_{\rm c}/\sigma\sim 0.3-8 at 0.44<z<30.44<z<3 from our FIRE-2 simulations. The metallicity gradient exhibits a negative correlation with the degree of rotational support. Galaxies without rotationally supported disks are more likely to have flat and positive radial gradient. The text at the top indicates the proportion of positive gradients in different segments.

In Fig. 6, we illustrate the relationship between the gas-phase metallicity gradient and the degree of rotational support for gas, denoted by vc/σv_{\rm c}/\sigma. Similar to the analysis for stellar mass and sSFR, the red line represents the linear fit to the simulated data. Additionally, although the redshift of the m12 series galaxies correlates with disk formation, the insights derived from the differences among various galaxies provide substantial reference value for the relationship.

Within the range of vc/σv_{\rm c}/\sigma\sim 0.3-8, the gradients exhibit a negative correlation with the degree of rotational support, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of r=0.86r=-0.86 and p=0.0003p=0.0003, suggesting that galaxies with thinner disks tend to have stronger negative metallicity gradients. For convenience, all galaxies are classified into three regions according to their gradient and vc/σv_{\rm c}/\sigma as shown by the grey dotted lines in Fig. 6.

For 0.3<vc/σ<10.3<v_{\rm c}/\sigma<1, the internal dynamics of galaxies are unstable, making them more susceptible to disturbances caused by strong feedback-driven gas flows, leading to a wide redistribution of metals. Typically, starbursts near the center result in flat or positive gradients, while those further from the center may cause strong negative gradients. In these irregular galaxies, the proportion of positive gradients is relatively high (20%\sim 20\%), while strong negative gradients are much less common. Galaxies with rotationally supported disks have a higher likelihood of exhibiting strong negative gradients, reaching nearly half in thin disk galaxies. Meanwhile, the proportion of positive gradients is decreasing as well, reducing to 6%\sim 6\% in thick disks, and falling to only 3%\sim 3\% in thin disks. As galaxies transition from disordered states to rotational disks, strong feedback progressively weakens, thus diminishing the gas mixing in the ISM dominated by strong feedback, such as gas inflows, outflows and turbulent mixing (Graf & Wetzel, in prep.). Similar to FIRE-1 galaxies in Ma et al. (2017), almost all galaxies with strong negative gradients are likely to be rotationally supported, but not vice versa. Stable disk galaxies inhibit these powerful gas flows across the entire galaxy, while localized, orderly gas exchanges gradually maintain stability and promote the formation of strong negative gradients.

3.5 Metallicity gradient versus redshift

Refer to caption
Figure 7: Metallicity gradient versus redshift. The grayscale colormap represent the metallicity gradients of our FIRE-2 simulated galaxies measured within 0.25-1R90R_{90}. The red line and shaded region indicate the median, 1-σ\sigma and 2-σ\sigma spread of our measurements. In comparison, we display the results from some recent high-zz spatially resolved spectroscopy from HST and JWST with the incidence rate of positive gradients (Simons et al., 2021, 70%70\%), (Wang et al., 2017, 2019, 2020, 2022, 1020%10-20\%), and data from simulations, i.e., MUGS and MaGICC (Gibson et al., 2013), FIRE-1 (Ma et al., 2017, 13%13\%), FIRE-2 (Bellardini et al., 2022), and FOGGIE (Acharyya et al., 2024). Our results show a flatter trend, with a slight increase at z>1.5z>1.5, following a sharp decline at z<1z<1. An analysis of the proportion of different gradient magnitudes shows that as redshift decreases, the proportion of positive and strong negative gradients decrease, while the proportion of flat gradients increases, reaching its highest at 1<z<1.51<z<1.5, where strong negative gradients are minimal. At z<1z<1, the occurrence of strong negative gradients dramatically increases. The panel at the top shows the proportions of positive gradients in different redshift ranges.

In Fig. 7, the metallicity gradients of our simulated galaxies at z0.443z\sim 0.44-3 are represented as gray points, while the red line indicates the average for each redshift bin. Our analysis suggests that the majority of the gradients fall within the range from -0.08 to 0.04. The consistent trend in galaxies reveals the diversity of metallicity gradients during evolution, from positive to flat to strong negative gradients, demonstrating the sensitivity of these metals to various feedback mechanisms within the galaxy.

Throughout the chemo-structural evolution of these galaxies, positive metallicity gradients account for a total of 10%10\%, a proportion similar to that reported in Pérez-Montero et al. (2016); Carton et al. (2018); Wang et al. (2020). In contrast, Simons et al. (2021) reported a significantly higher proportion of 29%29\% for their emission-line selected galaxy sample at 0.6<z<2.60.6<z<2.6. Yet we notice that only X-ray bright active galactic nuclei (AGNs) are removed from their galaxy sample, and AGN ionization can strongly increase the [O iii]λ\lambda5007/[O ii]λλ\lambda\lambda3727,3730 line flux ratio in galaxy centers, resulting in artificial positive metallicity gradients. From the numerical simulation side, Gibson et al. (2013) conducted two different sets of simulations; the conservative feedback model (MUGS) showed that galaxies establish very strong negative metallicity gradients at high redshifts, which gradually flatten as the galaxies grow. A similar phenomenon occurs in Acharyya et al. (2024), where they state that the feedback mechanisms employed in the current FOGGIE simulations are overall underpowered. While the ”enhanced” feedback models maintained flat metallicity gradients at high redshifts and evolved to become steeper over time. Based on the feedback model and the burstiness of star formation in the FIRE-2 simulations, our results show a wide scatter in metallicity gradients, indicating that these average metallicity gradients steepen with the evolution of redshift (See also: Ma et al., 2017; Bellardini et al., 2022). Although the trends toward steeper gradients at lower redshifts are similar, the average gradients we observe at higher redshifts not as flat as those reported by Bellardini et al. (2022). The gradient calculations for these high-redshift galaxies are influenced by various factors, including the computational ranges used in this paper (00.25R900-0.25R_{90}). Furthermore, the inclusion of ELVIS LG-like galaxies in their calculations may also contribute to the observed discrepancies.

Additionally, the proportion of inverted metallicity gradients decreases with lower redshifts, as shown in Fig. 7. As galaxies transition from irregular to ordered disks (at z1z\lesssim 1), the positive gradients tend to decrease. This occurs as strong feedback, which drives the redistribution of metals through powerful gas flows, is gradually suppressed, transforming some positive gradients into flat ones. The same transformation applies to strong negative gradients in irregular galaxies. In the mid-stages of galaxy evolution, more ordered rotating disks prevent strong feedback that spans the entire galactic scale, suppressing the emergence of positive gradients; while radial mixing (turbulence) within the ISM mixes metals, inhibiting the formation of strong negative gradients (Graf & Wetzel, in prep.). At z<1z<1, weaker feedback (lower SFR) dominates, and the presence of stronger ordered rotating thin disks inhibits radial mixing in the ISM, leading to a reduction in flat gradients and an increase in negative gradients. Therefore, as metals continue to enrich in thin disk galaxies, their metallicity gradients will further steepen.

Refer to caption
Figure 8: Evolution of metallicity gradient and sSFR in galaxy m12b. Here, the red line represents the metallicity gradient, and the blue line represents the sSFR across z0.443z\sim 0.44-3. Some sSFR peaks coincide with the occurrence of positive (or very flat) gradients, indicating that starbursts may trigger these gradients, potentially representing metal-enriched gas outflows. Meanwhile, some sSFR peaks follow the occurrence of positive gradients, suggesting that starbursts occur after the positive or flat gradients, which suggests metal-poor gas inflows inducing star formation.

In Fig. 8, we display all snapshots of galaxy m12b, including both gradients and sSFR over the last 10 Myrs, showing gradients in red and sSFR in blue. The proportion of positive metallicity gradients is about 10%\sim 10\%, which is roughly consistent with observed across all galaxies. This proportion aligns with previous findings, with the trend reflecting a transition from disorder to order (Zhuang et al., 2019).

We observe a clear evolution for these Milky Way-mass progenitors galaxies: at redshifts z>1.5z>1.5, galaxies typically exhibit bursty star formation activity, leading to extremely strong outflows (Muratov et al., 2015, 2017; Anglés-Alcázar et al., 2017; Pandya et al., 2021), which facilitates radial metal mixing in ISM, manifesting in flat and positive gradients. Around z1.5z\sim 1.5, the average gradient peaks as the internal dynamics and structure of galaxies stabilize. And the relative stability in the physical structure of galaxies supports the formation and maintenance of more stable gradients. From z1.5z\sim 1.5 to 11, as the intensity of stellar activities declines, the impact of feedback mechanisms weakens, leading to weaker radial metal mixing or turbulence in the ISM (Graf et al., 2024; Graf & Wetzel, in prep.). Consequently, there is a noticeable steepening in the average metallicity gradients across galaxies. Then z10.7z\sim 1-0.7, galaxies transition further from disordered states to rotational disks. The SFR decreases from bursty to time-steady (Gurvich et al., 2023), and galactic-scale gas outflows or turbulence are suppressed; the disordered accretion from CGM shifts to orderly form (namely, the virialization of the inner CGM) (Stern et al., 2021), leading to a further steepening in the average metallicity gradients. Below z<0.7z<0.7, dynamics are dominated by weak “fountain flows” (Anglés-Alcázar et al., 2017) and ordered accretion from the CGM. The effective radial redistribution of metals nearly are prevented, stabilizing metallicity at steep negative values around -0.08.

3.6 Positive metallicity gradients

After discussing the evolution of positive metallicity gradients into strong negative gradients, we now explore their formation mechanisms. Our simulations indicate that positive gradients are more likely to occur in smaller galaxies with higher activity and irregular shapes, where strong feedback is more active and more susceptible to complex gas flows.

We observed several samples in Fig. 8 where the peaks of sSFR coincide with the appearance of positive metallicity gradients, suggesting that intense starburst activity can reverse metallicity gradients. This observation supports the hypothesis that high intensity starbursts at the galaxy’s center can drive metal-enriched gas towards the outskirts, altering the overall metal distribution and leading to positive metallicity gradients. The sample shown in m12c of Fig. 1 is a typical example, with a notably active center causing higher metallicity in the outer regions than at the center. Additionally, some samples do not have sSFR peaks coinciding with positive gradients, indicating no strong outflows dominating metal redistribution in these instances, with peaks instead appearing after the positive gradients. In such cases, metal-poor gas accreted into the galaxy’s center dilutes the existing central gas, introducing cold, metal-poor gas that promotes star formation activity. The first phenomenon is commonly referred to as metal-enriched gas outflow, while the second is known as metal-poor gas inflow (Wang et al., 2022).

At cosmic noon, star-forming galaxies are often characterized by intense star bursts and vigorous gas accretion. These processes catalyze sustained and powerful feedback mechanisms within galaxies, including powerful, galaxy-scale outflows driven primarily by supernovae. These feedback effects are crucial for reshaping the ISM by dispersing and mixing metals throughout the galaxy, significantly influencing their structural and chemical properties. Consequently, this active redistribution leads to the formation and frequent occurrence of positive metallicity gradients.

In our study of positive gradients, we often found that many gradients are quite flat, and the extent of these gradients depends on the intensity of strong feedback. When strong feedback is insufficient to reverse the distribution of metal, it could result in flat gradients. The reasons of these flat gradients are similar to those for positive gradients, thus positive gradients may be observed in a smaller area. In Fig. 7, the proportion of flat gradients increases with redshift, suggesting that as galaxies evolve, the weakening of strong feedback and the suppression of galaxy-scale gas flows make many gas flows too weak for positive gradients, yet sufficient for flat gradients. We are not suggesting that all flat gradients originate in the same way as positive gradients. Some may arise from strong turbulence within the galaxy, which merely mixes metals (rather than altering the large-scale metal distribution), leading to the formation of flat gradients.

4 Conclusions

In this work, we utilize eight high-resolution cosmological zoom-in simulations from the FIRE-2 project to examine gas-phase metallicity gradients and their relationship with various galaxy properties. These samples span a range of redshift z0.443z\sim 0.44-3 and of stellar mass M1081011M_{\star}\sim 10^{8}-10^{11}M, with 281 snapshots for each galaxy. Across all galaxies, we find that positive gradients make up about 10%10\% of the total. Thanks to the high resolution and detailed physical processes modelled by FIRE-2, we can observe the evolution of galaxies and the effect of feedback mechanisms on the spatial distribution of gas-phase metallicity.

We investigated the relationships among galaxy metallicity gradient, stellar mass, sSFR, and the degree of rotational support across the entire redshift range of 0.4<z<30.4<z<3. Our results indicate that the relationship between mass and gradient is very weak, but low mass galaxies still tend to exhibit more positive gradients than higher ones; whereas, the gradient has a strong correlation with sSFR and vc/σv_{c}/\sigma. Galaxies that have high sSFR, or have limited rotational support tend to exhibit flat metallicity gradients and are more likely to develop positive gradients. Low mass galaxies are typically more affected by strong, bursty feedback, which means they are more susceptible to galactic-scale gas flows, leading to positive gradients. Consequently, the proportion of positive gradients in low mass galaxies can reach as high as 18%\sim 18\%. Gas flows driven by strong feedback from starbursts can rapidly reshape the spatial distribution of metallicity, altering the chemical landscape across different regions of galaxies. These outflows disrupt the gas disk by mixing metal-enriched and metal-poor gas, potentially leading to the formation of flat gradients or even positive gradients. Notably, in these active galaxies with high sSFR, up to 20%20\% exhibit positive gradients. Over long timescales, the metallicity gradients of our entire sample show a downward trend from cosmic noon to lower redshifts. With gas cycling in fountain-like flows, galaxies tend to re-establish negative gradients. During periods dominated by weak feedback, the formation of negative gradients is unimpeded, often resulting in strong negative gradients in disk galaxies.

From the gas density distribution maps and the velocity slit fitting images obtained, we can categorize all of our simulations into three groups: irregular galaxies, thick disk galaxies with preliminary rotational properties, and rotation-dominated thin disk galaxies. For well-ordered, rotation-dominated galaxies, where vc/σ>3v_{\rm c}/\sigma>3, strong negative gradients are most prevalent. The remaining galaxies mostly exhibit flat gradients, with only a minority showing positive gradients (2%\sim 2\%). In thick disk galaxies, identified by 1<vc/σ<31<v_{\rm c}/\sigma<3, flat gradients are more common, and only a few exhibit positive gradients (7%\sim 7\%). Meanwhile, irregular galaxies, with vc/σ<1v_{\rm c}/\sigma<1, display the highest proportion of positive gradients (16%\sim 16\%) and fewer strong negative gradients. While flat and positive gradients dominate in irregular galaxies, we do not find a consistent distribution of their gradients.

Since all our galaxies are selected to have a dark matter halo mass of 1012M\sim 10^{12}\rm M_{\odot} at z0z\approx 0, they exhibit similar characteristics for each redshift range. At high redshifts (z1.5z\gtrsim 1.5), galaxies exhibit intense star formation activities, with gas flows occurring on a galactic scale. This facilitates the distribution of metals to the outer regions, thereby increasing the likelihood of positive gradients, up to 16%\sim 16\%. At medium redshifts (z11.5z\sim 1-1.5), as galactic activities gradually decrease, galaxies transition from disordered states to stable rotating disks. Concurrently, the influence of gas flows diminishes to sub-galactic scales, and the virialization of the CGM occurs (Stern et al., 2021), leading to decreased metallicity gradients, with the proportion of positive gradients dropping to 7%\sim 7\%. At low redshift z<1z<1, galaxies are in a stable thin disk state, with reduced radial mixing in the ISM, which supports the maintenance of stable, strong negative gradients (Graf & Wetzel, in prep.). Meanwhile, the occurrence of positive gradients continues to decline to 6%\sim 6\%. This trend actually aligns with changes in feedback within the galaxy.

Currently, our focus is on the overall properties of the galaxies, without delving into the specific dynamics of gas flows and gas-phase metallicity. WHaving already demonstrated the relationships between gas-phase metallicity and various galactic properties, our next focus will be on the relationship between gas flow with distribution of metal.

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant 12373009), the CAS Project for Young Scientists in Basic Research Grant No. YSBR-062, the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, and the science research grant from the China Manned Space Project. XW acknowledges the support by the Xiaomi Young Talents Program, and the work carried out, in part, at the Swinburne University of Technology, sponsored by the ACAMAR visiting fellowship. AW received support from NSF, via CAREER award AST-2045928 and grant AST-2107772, and HST grant GO-16273 from STScI. CAFG was supported by NSF through grants AST-2108230 and AST-2307327; by NASA through grant 21-ATP21-0036; and by STScI through grant JWST-AR-03252.001-A.

Appendix A Gradient Radial Variations

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 9: Left: Galaxies m12b at redshift z=0.44z=0.44 and m12c at redshift z=1.69z=1.69, displaying their gas-phase metallicity gradients versus radius. Right: the metallicity of m12b fitted using a reciprocal (red) and a logarithmic (blue) function, and m12c using a linear (red) function. The metallicity gradient becomes steeper towards the inner part of the galaxy. We calculate the gradient over a range of ±\pm5 kpc, totaling a 10 kpc span, around 5 - 12 kpc from the center, observing a maximum difference of about 17-fold between the highest and lowest values. For m12c it’s a 5 kpc span (±\pm2.5 kpc), around 2.5 - 9 kpc from the center, with the maximum difference being only 1.5-fold.

On the upper left of Fig. 9, we illustrate the relationship between gas-phase metallicity gradient and radius of galaxy m12b at redshift z=0.44z=0.44. Here we consider a range from 5 to 12 kpc, and every region is composed of ±\pm5 kpc, totaling a 10 kpc span for the calculation of the gradient. The maximum difference of the gradient, defined as the absolute change from its highest to its lowest value, is about 17-fold. However, in m12c at z=1.69z=1.69, where each region spans ±\pm2.5 kpc from 2.5 to 6.5 kpc, different results are observed. Within whis range, the maximum difference found is only 1.5-fold.

In a disk galaxy, the observed gradient tends to become more steeper while closer to the interior, which is also mentioned in Bresolin et al. (2012); Bresolin (2017). For various metal elements, their gas-phase metallicity exhibit such a distribution pattern, and similarly, the stellar metallicity also display a comparable distribution (Bellardini et al., 2021, 2022). From this we could infer that in the disk galaxies, there is not only higher metallicity, but also the change of metallicity could not simply be described using a linear function as is shown on the right of Fig. 9. We used reciprocal and logarithmic function for the fitting, as shown by the red and blue line:

Red:logZgZ=0.14+1.201R(kpc),Red:\log\frac{Z_{g}}{Z_{\odot}}=-0.14+1.20\frac{1}{R\ (\rm{kpc})}, (A1)
Blue:logZgZ=0.460.20lnR(kpc).Blue:\log\frac{Z_{g}}{Z_{\odot}}=0.46-0.20\ln R\ (\rm{kpc}). (A2)

Here, the reciprocal (red) function provides a better fit than the logarithmic (blue) function. This phenomenon may be related to the dynamics, as in our sample, it is often found to occur in disk galaxies. Additionally, it may reflect the way in which the galaxy formed.

However, for high redshift galaxies or those that have not formed a thin disk, we could not observe phenomena like this. The change in the gradient of m12c is very small, as shown in Fig. 9. This means that for the high-redshift galaxies, especially for those with flat and positive gradients, a linear fitting usually meets our requirements.

Appendix B Galaxy Information

In this section, we present in Table 2 the properties of selected galaxy samples, including stellar mass, sSFR over 200 Myrs, R90R_{90}, gas-phase metallicity gradients measured from 0.251R900.25-1R_{90} (denoted as α\alpha), and kinematic properties (vc/σv_{\rm c}/\sigma).

Table 2: Galaxy properties, metallicity gradients and kinematics of the simulated sample.
       Name        zz        R90R_{90}        MM_{\star}        sSFR        α\alpha        vc/σv_{\rm c}/\sigma
       kpc        M        10-11yr-1        dex\cdotkpc-1
       m12w        0.5        4.14        1.42×10101.42\times 10^{10}        22.104        -0.0209        3.237
       m12w        1.0        4.14        6.56×10096.56\times 10^{09}        27.913        -0.0253        1.65
       m12w        2.0        4.98        1.31×10091.31\times 10^{09}        68.88        -0.04        2.177
       m12w        3.0        4.68        2.90×10082.90\times 10^{08}        124.291        -0.0078        0.215
       m12r        0.5        3.0        5.48×10095.48\times 10^{09}        8.386        -0.0543        3.813
       m12r        1.0        3.12        3.76×10093.76\times 10^{09}        19.06        -0.0058        -
       m12r        2.0        3.16        2.24×10092.24\times 10^{09}        29.272        -0.0546        5.442
       m12r        3.0        4.4        1.04×10091.04\times 10^{09}        15.988        -0.0147        1.156
       m12i        0.5        5.36        3.35×10103.35\times 10^{10}        24.503        -0.0358        4.359
       m12i        1.0        5.08        1.44×10101.44\times 10^{10}        52.759        -0.041        -
       m12i        2.0        3.22        1.90×10091.90\times 10^{09}        138.197        0.0012        0.411
       m12i        3.0        4.6        4.86×10084.86\times 10^{08}        300.955        -0.0894        -
       m12c        0.5        4.8        2.36×10102.36\times 10^{10}        17.697        -0.0189        2.399
       m12c        1.0        5.04        9.63×10099.63\times 10^{09}        51.737        0.0074        -
       m12c        2.0        4.28        1.37×10091.37\times 10^{09}        54.896        -0.0037        1.532
       m12c        3.0        4.78        3.35×10083.35\times 10^{08}        192.025        -0.0401        -
       m12b        0.5        3.14        4.90×10104.90\times 10^{10}        8.533        -0.0726        5.534
       m12b        1.0        3.0        2.89×10102.89\times 10^{10}        33.654        -0.0172        -
       m12b        2.0        4.48        4.73×10094.73\times 10^{09}        56.294        -0.0282        0.714
       m12b        3.0        4.62        8.19×10088.19\times 10^{08}        164.365        -0.0508        -
       m12m        0.5        5.28        3.52×10103.52\times 10^{10}        19.22        -0.0151        6.18
       m12m        1.0        4.84        1.10×10101.10\times 10^{10}        39.969        -0.0038        6.794
       m12m        2.0        4.76        1.21×10091.21\times 10^{09}        50.654        -0.0326        0.291
       m12m        3.0        5.2        2.61×10082.61\times 10^{08}        181.052        -0.0041        0.208
       m12f        0.5        4.78        3.83×10103.83\times 10^{10}        15.221        -0.0417        4.042
       m12f        1.0        4.2        2.24×10102.24\times 10^{10}        29.182        -0.0404        2.716
       m12f        2.0        3.68        6.90×10096.90\times 10^{09}        97.119        -0.0203        -
       m12f        3.0        4.4        8.15×10088.15\times 10^{08}        146.122        0.0066        -
  • Galaxy properties studied in this paper (units are physical):

  • Name: simulation designation.

  • zz: redshift where the properties here are measured.

  • R90R_{90}: the radius that contains 90 percent of the SFR (averaged over 200 Myr) density.

  • MM_{\star}: stellar mass within the central 5 kpc of the galaxy at the given redshift.

  • sSFR: specific star formation rate within the central 5 kpc of the galaxy (averaged over 200 Myr).

  • α\alpha: gas-phase metallicity gradient measured over 0.25-1R90R_{90}.

  • vc/σv_{\rm c}/\sigma: degree of rotational support for the ISM gas.

References

  • Acharyya et al. (2024) Acharyya, A., Peeples, M. S., Tumlinson, J., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.06613, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2404.06613
  • Anglés-Alcázar et al. (2017) Anglés-Alcázar, D., Faucher-Giguère, C.-A., Quataert, E., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 472, L109, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slx161
  • Bassini et al. (2024) Bassini, L., Feldmann, R., Gensior, J., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2401.13824, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2401.13824
  • Belfiore et al. (2017) Belfiore, F., Maiolino, R., Tremonti, C., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 469, 151, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx789
  • Bellardini et al. (2022) Bellardini, M. A., Wetzel, A., Loebman, S. R., & Bailin, J. 2022, MNRAS, 514, 4270, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1637
  • Bellardini et al. (2021) Bellardini, M. A., Wetzel, A., Loebman, S. R., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 505, 4586, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1606
  • Boardman et al. (2022) Boardman, N., Zasowski, G., Newman, J. A., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 514, 2298, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1475
  • Bresolin (2017) Bresolin, F. 2017, in Astrophysics and Space Science Library, Vol. 434, Outskirts of Galaxies, ed. J. H. Knapen, J. C. Lee, & A. Gil de Paz, 145, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-56570-5_5
  • Bresolin et al. (2012) Bresolin, F., Kennicutt, R. C., & Ryan-Weber, E. 2012, ApJ, 750, 122, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/750/2/122
  • Carton et al. (2018) Carton, D., Brinchmann, J., Contini, T., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 478, 4293, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1343
  • Cresci et al. (2010) Cresci, G., Mannucci, F., Maiolino, R., et al. 2010, Nature, 467, 811, doi: 10.1038/nature09451
  • Escala et al. (2018) Escala, I., Wetzel, A., Kirby, E. N., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 474, 2194, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2858
  • Garrison-Kimmel et al. (2017) Garrison-Kimmel, S., Wetzel, A., Bullock, J. S., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 471, 1709, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx1710
  • Garrison-Kimmel et al. (2019) Garrison-Kimmel, S., Hopkins, P. F., Wetzel, A., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 487, 1380, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1317
  • Gibson et al. (2013) Gibson, B. K., Pilkington, K., Brook, C. B., Stinson, G. S., & Bailin, J. 2013, A&A, 554, A47, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321239
  • Graf & Wetzel (in prep.) Graf, R. L., & Wetzel, A. in prep.
  • Graf et al. (2024) Graf, R. L., Wetzel, A., Bellardini, M. A., & Bailin, J. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2402.15614, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2402.15614
  • Gurvich et al. (2023) Gurvich, A. B., Stern, J., Faucher-Giguère, C.-A., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 519, 2598, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3712
  • Hafen et al. (2022) Hafen, Z., Stern, J., Bullock, J., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 514, 5056, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1603
  • He et al. (2024) He, X., Wang, X., Jones, T., et al. 2024, ApJ, 960, L13, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad12cd
  • Hemler et al. (2021) Hemler, Z. S., Torrey, P., Qi, J., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 506, 3024, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1803
  • Ho et al. (2015) Ho, I. T., Kudritzki, R.-P., Kewley, L. J., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 448, 2030, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv067
  • Hopkins (2015) Hopkins, P. F. 2015, MNRAS, 450, 53, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv195
  • Hopkins et al. (2014) Hopkins, P. F., Kereš, D., Oñorbe, J., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 445, 581, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1738
  • Hopkins et al. (2018) Hopkins, P. F., Wetzel, A., Kereš, D., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 480, 800, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1690
  • Hopkins et al. (2023) Hopkins, P. F., Wetzel, A., Wheeler, C., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 519, 3154, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3489
  • Ju et al. (2024) Ju, M., Wang, X., Jones, T., et al. 2024, MSA-3D: Metallicity Gradients in Galaxies at $z\sim1$ with JWST/NIRSpec Slit-stepping Spectroscopy, arXiv, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2409.01616
  • Kroupa (2001) Kroupa, P. 2001, MNRAS, 322, 231, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04022.x
  • Leitherer et al. (1999) Leitherer, C., Schaerer, D., Goldader, J. D., et al. 1999, ApJS, 123, 3, doi: 10.1086/313233
  • Lian et al. (2023) Lian, J., Bergemann, M., Pillepich, A., Zasowski, G., & Lane, R. R. 2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 951, doi: 10.1038/s41550-023-01977-z
  • Ma et al. (2016) Ma, X., Hopkins, P. F., Faucher-Giguère, C.-A., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 456, 2140, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2659
  • Ma et al. (2017) Ma, X., Hopkins, P. F., Feldmann, R., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 466, 4780, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx034
  • Marszewski et al. (2024) Marszewski, A., Sun, G., Faucher-Giguère, C.-A., Hayward, C. C., & Feldmann, R. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2403.08853, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2403.08853
  • McCluskey et al. (2024) McCluskey, F., Wetzel, A., Loebman, S. R., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 6926, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3547
  • Mercado et al. (2021) Mercado, F. J., Bullock, J. S., Boylan-Kolchin, M., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 501, 5121, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3958
  • Muratov et al. (2015) Muratov, A. L., Kereš, D., Faucher-Giguère, C.-A., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 454, 2691, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2126
  • Muratov et al. (2017) —. 2017, MNRAS, 468, 4170, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx667
  • Orr et al. (2018) Orr, M. E., Hayward, C. C., Hopkins, P. F., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 478, 3653, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1241
  • Orr et al. (2023) Orr, M. E., Burkhart, B., Wetzel, A., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 521, 3708, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad676
  • Pandya et al. (2021) Pandya, V., Fielding, D. B., Anglés-Alcázar, D., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 508, 2979, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2714
  • Pérez-Montero et al. (2016) Pérez-Montero, E., García-Benito, R., Vílchez, J. M., et al. 2016, A&A, 595, A62, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628601
  • Porter et al. (2022) Porter, L. E., Orr, M. E., Burkhart, B., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 515, 3555, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1958
  • Samuel et al. (2020) Samuel, J., Wetzel, A., Tollerud, E., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 491, 1471, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz3054
  • Schönrich & McMillan (2017) Schönrich, R., & McMillan, P. J. 2017, MNRAS, 467, 1154, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx093
  • Searle (1971) Searle, L. 1971, ApJ, 168, 327, doi: 10.1086/151090
  • Simons et al. (2021) Simons, R. C., Papovich, C., Momcheva, I., et al. 2021, ApJ, 923, 203, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac28f4
  • Stern et al. (2021) Stern, J., Faucher-Giguère, C.-A., Fielding, D., et al. 2021, ApJ, 911, 88, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abd776
  • Stott et al. (2014) Stott, J. P., Sobral, D., Swinbank, A. M., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 443, 2695, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1343
  • Su et al. (2017) Su, K.-Y., Hopkins, P. F., Hayward, C. C., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 471, 144, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx1463
  • Tissera et al. (2022) Tissera, P. B., Rosas-Guevara, Y., Sillero, E., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 511, 1667, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab3644
  • van Zee et al. (1998) van Zee, L., Salzer, J. J., Haynes, M. P., O’Donoghue, A. A., & Balonek, T. J. 1998, AJ, 116, 2805, doi: 10.1086/300647
  • Venturi et al. (2024) Venturi, G., Carniani, S., Parlanti, E., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2403.03977, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2403.03977
  • Vickers et al. (2021) Vickers, J. J., Shen, J., & Li, Z.-Y. 2021, ApJ, 922, 189, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac27a9
  • Wang & Lilly (2022) Wang, E., & Lilly, S. J. 2022, ApJ, 929, 95, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5e31
  • Wang et al. (2023) Wang, K., Wang, X., & Chen, Y. 2023, ApJ, 951, 66, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acd633
  • Wang et al. (2017) Wang, X., Jones, T. A., Treu, T., et al. 2017, ApJ, 837, 89, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa603c
  • Wang et al. (2019) —. 2019, ApJ, 882, 94, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab3861
  • Wang et al. (2020) —. 2020, ApJ, 900, 183, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abacce
  • Wang et al. (2022) Wang, X., Jones, T., Vulcani, B., et al. 2022, ApJ, 938, L16, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac959e
  • Wetzel et al. (2023) Wetzel, A., Hayward, C. C., Sanderson, R. E., et al. 2023, ApJS, 265, 44, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/acb99a
  • Wetzel et al. (2016) Wetzel, A. R., Hopkins, P. F., Kim, J.-h., et al. 2016, ApJ, 827, L23, doi: 10.3847/2041-8205/827/2/L23
  • Zaritsky et al. (1994) Zaritsky, D., Kennicutt, Robert C., J., & Huchra, J. P. 1994, ApJ, 420, 87, doi: 10.1086/173544
  • Zhuang et al. (2019) Zhuang, Y., Leaman, R., van de Ven, G., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 483, 1862, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2916