This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

The numerical value for a universal quantity of a two-dimensional dimerized quantum antiferromagnet

Fu-Jiun Jiang [email protected] Department of Physics, National Taiwan Normal University, 88, Sec.4, Ting-Chou Rd., Taipei 116, Taiwan
Abstract

The numerical value of a universal quantity associated with the quantum critical regime, namely χuc2/T\chi_{u}c^{2}/T, for a two-dimensional (2D) dimerized spin-1/2 antiferromagnet is calculated using the quantum Monte Carlo simulations (QMC). Here χu\chi_{u}, cc, and TT are the uniform susceptibility, the spin-wave velocity, and the temperature, respectively. By simulating large lattices at moderately low temperatures, we find χuc2/T0.32\chi_{u}c^{2}/T\sim 0.32. Our estimation of χuc2/T\chi_{u}c^{2}/T deviates from the related analytic prediction but agrees with recent numerical calculations of other 2D dimerized spin-1/2 antiferromagnets.

I Introduction

Spatial dimension two is special because of the famous Mermin–Wagner theorem Mer66 . Specifically, continuous symmetry cannot be broken spontaneously (at finite temperature TT) in spatial dimension two. As a result, for two-dimensional (2D) quantum antiferromagnets, as TT rises from zero temperature, one encounters a crossover instead of a phase transition to a unique phase called the quantum critical regime (QCR).

Using the relevant field theory, properties of QCR are investigated Chu94 . In particular, several universal quantities are proposed. Among these quantities, we are especially interested in χuc2/T\chi_{u}c^{2}/T due to the recently found discrepancy between the analytic prediction and the numerical calculations. Here χu\chi_{u} and cc are the uniform susceptibility and the spin-wave velocity, respectively.

Analytically, it is predicted that the numerical value of χuc2/T\chi_{u}c^{2}/T is given by (around) 0.27185. Although this prediction was confirmed by earlier Monte Carlo studies Chu94 ; Tro98 , recent investigations of 2D dimerized bilayer and plaquette spin-1/2 Heisenberg models conclude that χuc2/T0.32(0.33)\chi_{u}c^{2}/T\sim 0.32(0.33) Sen15 ; Tan181 . Because of this discrepancy, it will be interesting to conduct a further examination on the numerical value of χuc2/T\chi_{u}c^{2}/T.

In this study, we perform large-scale Monte Carlo simulations to determine the χuc2/T\chi_{u}c^{2}/T of a 2D dimerized quantum antiferromagnetic Heisenberg model. By simulating lattices as large as L=512L=512 (LL is the linear system size), we obtain χuc2/T0.32\chi_{u}c^{2}/T\sim 0.32 which matches quantitatively with recent outcomes claimed in Refs. Sen15 ; Tan181 . Our result suggests that a refinement of analytic calculation is needed.

The rest of the paper is organized as follows. After the introduction, the model and the measured observables are described in Sec. II. We then present the obtained results in Sec. III. In particular, the numerical evidence to support χuc2/T0.32\chi_{u}c^{2}/T\sim 0.32 is demonstrated. We conclude our investigation in Sec. VI.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: The herringbone model considered in this study. The thick and thin bonds represent the coulplings of strength JJ^{\prime} and JJ, respectively

II The considered model and observable

The Hamiltonian of the considered 2D spin-12\frac{1}{2} dimerized herringbone Heisenberg model takes the following expression

H\displaystyle H =\displaystyle= ijJSiSj+ijJSiSj,\displaystyle\sum_{\langle ij\rangle}J\,\vec{S}_{i}\cdot\vec{S}_{j}+\sum_{\langle i^{\prime}j^{\prime}\rangle}J^{\prime}\,\vec{S}_{i^{\prime}}\cdot\vec{S}_{j^{\prime}}, (1)

where JJ and JJ^{\prime} are the antiferromagnetic couplings connecting nearest neighbor spins ij\langle ij\rangle and ij\langle i^{\prime}j^{\prime}\rangle, respectively, and Si\vec{S}_{i} is the spin-12\frac{1}{2} operator at site ii. A cartoon representation of the studied model is depicted in fig. 1. JJ is set to 1 in our investigation. As the magnitude of JJ^{\prime} increases, a phase transition will occur for a particular value of J>JJ^{\prime}>J. This special point J/JJ^{\prime}/J in the parameter space is denoted by (J/J)c(J^{\prime}/J)_{c} and is found to be (J/J)c=2.4981(2)(J^{\prime}/J)_{c}=2.4981(2) in the literature Pen20 . The investigation presented in this study is conducted at the critical point (J/J)c(J^{\prime}/J)_{c}.

To examine the universal quantity χuc2/T\chi_{u}c^{2}/T of QCR, the uniform susceptibility χu\chi_{u} and the spin-wave velocity cc are measured. On a finite lattice of linear size LL, the uniform susceptibility χu\chi_{u} is defined by

χu=βL2(iSiz)2.\chi_{u}=\frac{\beta}{L^{2}}\left\langle\left(\sum_{i}S_{i}^{z}\right)^{2}\right\rangle. (2)

The quantity β\beta appearing above is the inverse temperature. The spin-wave velocity cc for the investigated model is calculated through the temporal and spatial winding numbers squared (Wt2\langle W_{t}^{2}\rangle and Wi2\langle W_{i}^{2}\rangle with i{1,2}i\in\{1,2\}).

Refer to caption
Figure 2: The spin-wave velocity cc as a function of the linear system size LL.
Refer to caption
Figure 3: χuc2/T\chi_{u}c^{2}/T as functions of β\beta for various values of linear system sizes LL and (J/J)c\left(J^{\prime}/J\right)_{c}. The horizontal dashed and solid lines are 0.27185 and 0.32, respectively.

III Numerical Results

To conduct the proposed investigation, we have carried out large-scale quantum Monte Carlo calculations (QMC) using the stochastic series expansion algorithm (SSE) with efficent operate-loop update San99 . The obtained outcomes are described in the following subsections.

III.1 The determination of spin-wave velocity cc

The observable spin-wave velocity cc is required to compute the numerical value of χuc2/T\chi_{u}c^{2}/T. Therefore we have calculated this quantity first.

We compute the spin-wave velocity cc by the method of winding numbers squared Sen15 ; Jia11 . The procedure is as follows. For a given box size LL and a J/JJ^{\prime}/J, the value of β\beta is tuned so that Wt2\langle W_{t}^{2}\rangle and W2=12i=1,2Wi2\langle W^{2}\rangle=\frac{1}{2}\sum_{i=1,2}\langle W_{i}^{2}\rangle match each other quantitatively. When this condition is fulfilled, the spin-wave velocity c(L,J/J)c(L,J^{\prime}/J) associated with this set of LL and J/JJ^{\prime}/J is given by c(L,J/J)=L/βc(L,J^{\prime}/J)=L/\beta.

It should be pointed out that the existence of long-range antiferromagnetic order is essential to employ this method to calculate cc. As a result, we conduct the related simulations at J/J=2.4975J^{\prime}/J=2.4975 which is close to the critical point (J/J)c=2.4981(2)(J^{\prime}/J)_{c}=2.4981(2) and is in the antiferromagnetic phase.

The spin-wave velocity cc as a function of the linear system size LL is shown in fig. 2. The data in fig. 2 is fitted to the equation of a0+a1/L+a2/L2a_{0}+a_{1}/L+a_{2}/L^{2}. The determined a0a_{0} is the bulk cc and is given by 1.952(5)1.952(5). The obtained cc will be used in estimating the numerical value of χuc2/T\chi_{u}c^{2}/T.

III.2 χuc2/T\chi_{u}c^{2}/T as functions β\beta

The simulations of calculating χu\chi_{u} are done with L=128,256L=128,256, and 512. In addition, the uncertainty of (J/J)c(J^{\prime}/J)_{c} is taken into account in these simulations. Using c=1.952(5)c=1.952(5), the χuc2/T\chi_{u}c^{2}/T of various LL and (J/J)c(J^{\prime}/J)_{c} as functions of β\beta are shown in fig. 3. The outcomes shown in the figure indicate that as LL and β\beta increase, the value of χcc2/T\chi_{c}c^{2}/T deviates from its analytic prediction of 0.27185 ( the horizontal dashed line in the figure) and approaches 0.32 (the horizontal solid line in the figure). This result agrees with that of Sen15 and Tan181 .

IV Discussions and Conclusions

In this study, we calculate the numerical value of χuc2/T\chi_{u}c^{2}/T corresponding to the 2D dimerized quantum herringbone Heisenberg model using QMC. By simulating lattice as large as L=512L=512 at moderate low temperatures, we obtain χuc2/T0.32\chi_{u}c^{2}/T\sim 0.32. Our result deviates from the associated analytic prediction χuc2/T=0.27185\chi_{u}c^{2}/T=0.27185 but agrees quantitatively with recent numerical calculations of 2D spin-1/2 bilayer and plaquette Heisenberg models. Based on the obtained outcomes in this study, it will be interesting to refine the relevant theoretical calculations.

Acknowledgement

Partial support from National Science and Technology Council (NSTC) of Taiwan is acknowledged (MOST 110-2112-M-003-015 and MOST 111-2112-M-003-011).

Author Contributions

F.J.J proposed the project, conducted the calculations, analyzed the data, and wrote up the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  • (1) N. D. Mermin and H. Wagner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 17, (1966) 1133.
  • (2) A. V. Chubukov, S. Sachdev, and J. Ye, Phys. Rev. B 49, (1994) 11919.
  • (3) Jae-Kwon Kim and Matthias Troyer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, (1998) 2705.
  • (4) A. Sen, H. Suwa, and A. W. Sandvik, Phys. Rev. B 92, (2015) 195145.
  • (5) D.-R. Tan and F.-J. Jiang, Phys. Rev. B 98, (2018) 245111.
  • (6) J.-H. Peng, D.-R. Tan, and F.-J. Jiang, Phys. Rev. B 102, 214206 (2020).
  • (7) A. W. Sandvik, Phys. Rev. B 55, (1999) R14157.
  • (8) F.-J. Jiang, Phys. Rev. B 83, (2011) 024419.