This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

\UseRawInputEncoding

The nuclear transient AT 2017gge: a tidal disruption event in a dusty and gas-rich environment and the awakening of a dormant SMBH

F. Onori1, G. Cannizzaro2,3, P.G. Jonker3,2, M. Kim4, M. Nicholl5,6, S. Mattila7, T. M. Reynolds8, M. Fraser9, T. Wevers10, E. Brocato1,11, J. P. Anderson10, R. Carini11, P. Charalampopoulos12, P. Clark13, M. Gromadzki14, C. P. Gutiérrez15,7 N. Ihanec14,10, C. Inserra16, A. Lawrence17, G. Leloudas12, P. Lundqvist18, T. E. Müller-Bravo19, S. Piranomonte11, M. Pursiainen12, K. A. Rybicki14,20, A. Somero7, D. R. Young21, K. C. Chambers22, H. Gao22, T. J.L. de Boer22, E. A. Magnier22
1INAF-Osservatorio Astronomico d’Abruzzo, via M. Maggini snc, I-64100 Teramo, Italy
2 SRON, Netherlands Institute for Space Research, Niels Bohrweg 4, 2333 CA Leiden, The Netherlands
3Department of Astrophysics/IMAPP, Radboud University, P.O. Box 9010, 6500 GL Nijmegen, the Netherlands
4Department of Astronomy and Atmospheric Sciences, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 702-701, Korea;
5 School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
6Institute for Gravitational Wave Astronomy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
7Tuorla Observatory, Department of Physics and Astronomy, FI-20014 University of Turku, Finland.
8Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Jagtvej 128, 2200 København N, Denmark
9School of Physics, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
10 European Southern Observatory, Alonso de Córdova 3107, Casilla 19, Santiago, Chile
11INAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma, Via Frascati, 33, 00078 Monte Porzio Catone RM
12DTU Space, National Space Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Elektrovej 327, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
13Institute of Cosmology and Gravitation, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, PO1 3FX, UK
14Astronomical Observatory, University of Warsaw, Al. Ujazdowskie 4, 00-478 Warszawa, Poland
15Finnish Centre for Astronomy with ESO (FINCA), FI-20014 University of Turku, Finland
16Cardiff Hub for Astrophysics Research and Technology, School of Physics & Astronomy, Cardiff University, Queens Buildings,
The Parade, Cardiff, CF24 3AA, UK
17Institute for Astronomy, SUPA, University of Edinburgh Royal Observatory Edinburgh, Blackford Hill, Edinburgh EH9 3HJ, UK
18Department of Astronomy, Stockholm University, The Oskar Klein Centre, AlbaNova, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden
19Institute of Space Sciences (ICE, CSIC), Campus UAB, Carrer de Can Magrans, s/n, E-08193 Barcelona, Spain.
20Department of Particle Physics and Astrophysics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel
21Astrophysics Research Centre, School of Mathematics and Physics, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN, UK
22Institute of Astronomy, University of Hawaii, 2680 Woodlawn Drive, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA
E-mail: francesca.onori@inaf.it
(Accepted 2022 September 8. Received 2022 August 1; in original form 2022 June 1)
Abstract

We present the results from a dense multi-wavelength (optical/UV, near-infrared (IR), and X-ray) follow-up campaign of the nuclear transient AT 2017gge, covering a total of 1698 days from the transient’s discovery. The bolometric light-curve, the black body temperature and radius, the broad H and He i λ\lambda5876 emission lines and their evolution with time, are all consistent with a tidal disruption event (TDE) nature. A soft X-ray flare is detected with a delay of \sim200 days with respect to the optical/UV peak and it is rapidly followed by the emergence of a broad He ii λ\lambda4686 and by a number of long-lasting high ionization coronal emission lines. This indicate a clear connection between a TDE flare and the appearance of extreme coronal line emission (ECLEs). An IR echo, resulting from dust re-radiation of the optical/UV TDE light is observed after the X-ray flare and the associated near-IR spectra show a transient broad feature in correspondence of the He i λ\lambda10830 and, for the first time in a TDE, a transient high-ionization coronal NIR line (the [Fe xiii] λ\lambda10798) is also detected. The data are well explained by a scenario in which a TDE occurs in a gas and dust rich environment and its optical/UV, soft X-ray, and IR emission have different origins and locations. The optical emission may be produced by stellar debris stream collisions prior to the accretion disk formation, which is instead responsible for the soft X-ray flare, emitted after the end of the circularization process.

keywords:
transients: tidal disruption events – galaxies: active nuclei – black hole physics – infrared: galaxies – X-rays: galaxies – galaxies: AT2017gge
pubyear: 2022pagerange: The nuclear transient AT 2017gge: a tidal disruption event in a dusty and gas-rich environment and the awakening of a dormant SMBHA

1 Introduction

When an unlucky star wanders too close to a supermassive black hole (SMBH) it is ripped apart by the strong tidal forces. In this process, approximately half of the stellar material is expelled in unbound orbits, while the rest streams back to the SMBH and circularize to form a new accretion disk Strubbe & Quataert (2009); Lodato & Rossi (2011). These tidal disruption events (TDEs) manifest themselves as a luminous, short-lived, flares coming from the nuclei of otherwise quiescent galaxies (Hills, 1975; Rees, 1988; Phinney, 1989; Evans & Kochanek, 1989) and represent an important tool to study the properties of dormant SMBHs. The emission usually peaks in the UV/optical or in soft X-rays and the bolometric luminosity is expected to follow the bound debris fallback rate, with a powerlaw decline t5/3\propto t^{-5/3} on the timescale of months to years (e.g., Evans & Kochanek 1989; Cannizzo et al. 1990; Rees 1990; Lodato et al. 2009).

The fist TDE candidates were discovered in the X-rays Komossa & Bade (1999), but thanks to the development of wide-field optical surveys dedicated to the search of transients, the population of observed TDEs has quickly grown and the optical band has become the main discovery channel. Multi-wavelength monitoring campaigns represents a crucial instrument to identify TDEs among nuclear flares and have revealed an intriguing and puzzling diversity in the observational properties (see the reviews from van Velzen et al., 2020; Saxton et al., 2020; Gezari, 2021). The optical spectra are characterized by a strong blue continuum at early times and are dominated by broad (\sim104 km s-1) H and/or He emission lines with different strengths and relative ratios Arcavi et al. (2014); Leloudas et al. (2019); Charalampopoulos et al. (2022). A fraction of TDEs have shown broad Bowen fluorescence emission lines Blagorodnova et al. (2019); Leloudas et al. (2019); Onori et al. (2019) and evidence for Fe ii emission lines have been found in a small subset of TDEs Wevers et al. (2019b); Cannizzaro et al. (2021). Following these discoveries, the TDE population has been divided into three main spectral classes, depending on the appearance or lack of the different broad spectral features Arcavi et al. (2014); Leloudas et al. (2019); van Velzen et al. (2020). In some TDE candidates, high ionization coronal emission lines have been identified Komossa et al. (2008, 2009); Wang et al. (2011); Yang et al. (2013); Palaversa et al. (2016), suggesting the presence of a gas-rich environment surrounding these sources. Furthermore, infrared (IR) echos, resulting from the reradiation of the TDE emission by dust, have been detected thanks to dedicated observations Mattila et al. (2018), follow-up campaigns or WISE archival searches (see Jiang et al., 2021; van Velzen et al., 2021a, for a recent review). Recent findings suggest that some TDEs are expected to be so highly dust enshrouded that they could have remained out of the reach of optical or X-ray surveys due to the large column densities of obscuring dust and gas Reynolds et al. (2022). From photometric analysis, surprisingly low and constant black body temperatures of \sim104 K, which cannot be explained through traditional accretion process, have been derived Hinkle et al. (2020); van Velzen et al. (2021b). Despite what is expected in the case of emission from a newly formed accretion disk, TDEs selected in the optical are typically not detected in the X-rays. Only few exceptions have been discovered, with some events showing also soft X-ray emission, sometimes delayed with respect to the optical peak emission (e.g ASASSN-14li, ASASSN-15oi, AT 2019dsg, AT 2018fyk, AT 2019qiz, AT 2019azh; Holoien et al., 2016; Gezari et al., 2017; Cannizzaro et al., 2021; Wevers et al., 2019b; Nicholl et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2022, respectively).

Despite the recent progress in this field, there are many aspects that remain unclear, such as the emission mechanism behind all the observed features, the geometry of the emitting region and the X-ray non-detection of the optically-selected TDEs. Different scenarios have been proposed, including the presence of an optically thick atmosphere which reprocess the high energy radiation emitted during the accretion process (Guillochon et al., 2014; Roth et al., 2016; Roth & Kasen, 2018), or emission by shocks from intersecting stellar debris streams during the disk-formation phase Piran et al. (2015); Shiokawa et al. (2015); Bonnerot et al. (2017). However, in these models, the X-rays are expected to show up eventually, once the wind calm down or the circularization process ends. Dai et al. (2018), instead, have explained the X-ray/optical dichotomy in the framework of a TDE unified model in which optically thick winds are produced following the formation of the accretion disk and are responsible for the X-ray obscuration. Inclination effect together with the physical properties of the mass outflow determine the detection of the X-ray emission.

AT 2017gge was first detected on 2017 August 03 (MJD 57 968.35) by the Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System survey (ATLAS, Tonry et al., 2018), which reported a discovery magnitude in the ATLAS orange filter of o=18.70±0.17o=18.70\pm 0.17 mag (in the AB system, Tonry et al., 2017). The transient is located within 0″.1 (0.1 kpc) from the center of the host galaxy, specifically at the coordinates RA(J2000) = 16:20:34.99 and DEC(J2000)= +24:07:26.5. The host galaxy has been identified to be SDSS J162034.99+240726.5, a spiral galaxy at redshift z=0.0665z=0.0665, classified as a star-forming galaxy from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) pre-transient optical spectrum. The field has been observed in the 0.1-2.4 keV energy band by the ROentgen SATellite (ROSAT) within the ROSAT all Sky Survey (RASS) on the 1990 July 30, and no signs of X-ray emission have been detected (only an upper limit of F0.3-10keV=1.0×\times10-12 erg cm-2 s-1 can be derived). A mid-infrared (MIR) flare in the WISE light curve of AT 2017gge has been recently reported by Jiang et al. (2021). Due to its proximity to the host galaxy core, AT 2017gge is classified as a nuclear transient. The spectroscopic classification reported an uncertain nature for AT 2017gge Fraser et al. (2017), with a spectrum taken three weeks after the transient’s discovery characterized by a blue continuum and by a broad component at the base of both the narrow Hα\upalpha and Hβ\upbeta emission lines, which are not consistent with a SN scenario. Fraser et al. (2017) suggest the possibility of a TDE nature for AT 2017gge, as the smooth evolution of the lightcurve is atypical for AGN variability. Recently, based on the X-ray and optical analysis, Wang et al. (2022) claimed a TDE nature for this transient.

In this paper we present the results of our dense multi-wavelength follow-up campaign of AT 2017gge, which covers a total of 1698 days from the transient’s discovery. The data-set includes optical photometric and spectroscopic data obtained with a number of ground based facilities, soft X-ray observations delivered by Swift and a series of near-infrared (NIR) spectra obtained after an enhanced MIR emission. Thanks to this dense, long-lasting and multi-band data-set we have been able to further investigate the nature of this transient, to accurately study the spectroscopic evolution of the broad emission lines and the connection between a delayed soft X-ray flare and the emergence of a broad He ii λ\lambda4686 emission line and of a number of high ionization coronal emission lines. Finally, thanks to late-time, high resolution spectroscopy, the activity status of the host galaxy, after the occurrence of the nuclear transient, has been inspected and the black hole (BH) mass has been derived, using two independent methods. In this manuscript, all the times are reported with respect to MJD 57 968.35, which corresponds to the discovery date of AT 2017gge as reported by the ATLAS survey. Throughout the paper we use a luminosity distance of dLd_{\rm L} = 297.6 Mpc, based on a WMAP9 cosmology with H0H_{\rm 0} = 69.32 km s-1 Mpc-1 , ΩM\Omega_{\rm M} = 0.29, ΩΛ\Omega_{\Lambda} = 0.71 Hinshaw et al. (2013).

2 Observations and Data reduction

Our monitoring campaign of the nuclear transient AT 2017gge started on 2017 September 14. In order to provide good coverage of the transient’s evolution, we have followed its emission by using different instruments with a multi-wavelength approach. In particular, while the X-ray data has been obtained through the XRT instrument on board the Neil Gehrels Swift observatory Gehrels et al. (2004), the optical/NIR photometric and spectroscopic follow-up has been carried out by using a variety of ground-based facilities together with the UV-optical photometric observations delivered by Swift/UVOT instrument. In the following section we describe the observational set-up and data reduction for all the instruments used.

2.1 Ground-based observations

A dense photometric coverage of the first \sim40 days of AT 2017gge have been performed in the oo and cc filters by the ATLAS survey Smith et al. (2020) and in the ii^{\prime} filter by the Panoramic Survey Telescope and Rapid Response System (Pan-STARRS, Huber et al., 2015; Chambers et al., 2016). Additional ww images have been obtained by Pan-STARRS between 600 and 700 days from the transient discovery. The spectroscopic monitoring was carried out mainly by using the ESO Faint Object Spectrograph and Camera (EFOSC2, Buzzoni et al., 1984), mounted on the 3.58 m New Technology Telescope (NTT) as part of the ePESSTO ESO public survey Smartt et al. (2015) and the Andalucia Faint Object Spectrograph and Camera (ALFOSC), mounted on the 2.56 m Nordic Optical Telescope (NOT), as part of the NOT Unbiased Transient Survey (NUTS111http://csp2.lco.cl/not/). Additional optical observations and late time images have been obtained with the Device Optimized for the LOw RESolution (DOLORES) installed at the 3.58 m Telescopio Nazionale Galileo (TNG), the Auxiliary-port CAMera (ACAM) mounted on the 4.2 m William Herschel Telescope (WHT) and the Optical Wide Field Camera (IO:O) at the Liverpool Telescope (LT, Steele et al., 2004), respectively. Higher resolution spectra were obtained with the Gemini North Multi-Object Spectrographs (GMOS-N), mounted on the 8.1 m Frederick C. Gillett Gemini North telescope, with the Optical System for Imaging, the low-Intermediate-Resolution Integrated Spectroscopy (OSIRIS), mounted at the 10.4 m Gran Telescopio CANARIAS (GTC) and the X-shooter spectrograph Vernet et al. (2011), mounted on the UT3 the Very Large Telescope (VLT), located at the ESO Paranal observatory. NIR spectra and images in the JJ, HH and KsKs bands have been obtained with the infrared spectrograph and imaging camera Son of ISAAC (SofI Moorwood et al., 1998), mounted on the NTT. After the transient light had faded below the detection levels, host galaxy spectra and images were taken for each ground-based facility and with the same observational set-up used during the follow-up.

All the spectroscopic observations have been carried out with the slit oriented at the parallactic angle. In Table 1 the main observing information, such as the observing date, the grism used, the exposure time, the slit width, the airmass and seeing condition, are reported for each instrument. The sequence of the optical spectra is shown in Figure 14, the SofI NIR spectra are shown in the lower panel of Figure 5, while we show the whole X-shooter spectrum (UVB, VIS and NIR arms) in Figure 16.

Table 1: Spectroscopic observations of AT 2017gge.
MJD Phase UT date Instrument Grism Exp. time Slit Airmass Seeing
[days] [s] [″] [″] [″]
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9)
58 010.01 141.7 2017 Sep 14 NTT/EFOSC2 Gr#13 1x9000 1.5 2.4 1.3
58 011.88 143.5 2017 Sep 15 WHT/ACAM V400 1x1800 1.0 1.5 1.0
58 012.88 144.5 2017 Sep 16 WHT/ACAM V400 2x1800 1.0 1.5 0.5
58 162.21 193.9 2018 Feb 13 NOT/ALFOSC Gr#4 1x2400 1.0 1.4 1.1
58 186.35 218.0 2018 Mar 09 NTT/EFOSC2 Gr#13 1x2700 1.0 1.9 0.9
58 187.36 219.0 2018 Mar 09 NTT/EFOSC2 Gr#18 1x3600 1.0 1.8 0.8
58 198.14 229.8 2018 Mar 21 TNG/DOLORES LR–B 1x2700 1.0 1.3 1.2
58 200.12 231.8 2018 Mar 23 NOT/ALFOSC Gr#19 1x3200 1.3 1.2 1.2
58 201.17 232.8 2018 Mar 24 NOT/ALFOSC Gr#4 1x3600 1.0 1.1 0.9
58 202.33 234.0 2018 Mar 25 NTT/EFOSC2 Gr#13 1x3600 1.0 1.8 1.0
58 203.36 235.0 2018 Mar 25 NTT/EFOSC2 Gr#18 1x3000 1.0 1.7 0.7
58 207.16 238.8 2018 Mar 30 TNG/DOLORES LR–B 1x3600 1.0 1.0 0.5
58 207.18 238.8 2018 Mar 30 WHT/ACAM V400 6x6000 1.0 1.0 0.8
58 216.35 248.0 2018 Apr 08 NTT/EFOSC2 Gr#18 1x3600 1.0 1.7 0.7
58 217.34 249.0 2018 Apr 09 NTT/EFOSC2 Gr#13 1x3000 1.0 1.7 1.0
58 229.28 260.9 2018 Apr 21 NTT/EFOSC2 Gr#13 1x3000 1.0 1.7 0.6
58 229.34 261.0 2018 Apr 21 NTT/EFOSC2 Gr#18 2x1500 1.0 1.7 0.7
58 243.26 274.9 2018 May 05 NTT/EFOSC2 Gr#18 1x3600 1.0 1.7 0.7
58 244.24 275.9 2018 May 06 NTT/EFOSC2 Gr#13 1x3600 1.0 1.7 1.1
58 260.15 291.8 2018 May 22 NTT/EFOSC2 Gr#13 2x3000 1.0 1.8 0.7
58 261.13 291.8 2018 May 23 NTT/EFOSC2 Gr#18 2x3000 1.0 2.0 0.7
58 279.02 310.7 2018 Jun 10 NOT/ALFOSC Gr#19 2x2800 1.0 1.0 1.1
58 299.06 320.7 2018 Jun 30 NTT/EFOSC2 Gr#13 2x3600 1.0 1.7 0.9
58 307.00 338.6 2018 Jul 07 GTC/OSIRIS R500B 2x1800 1.0 1.1 0.9
58 347.07 378.7 2018 Aug 17 NTT/SofI BG 1x2160 1.0 1.7 0.5
58 376.22 407.9 2018 Sep 15 Gemini/GMOS-N B600 4x9400 1.0 1.2 0.9
58 525.21 556.9 2019 Feb 11 NOT/ALFOSC Gr#4 1x2800 1.3 1.3 0.7
58 540.57 572.2 2019 Feb 26 Gemini/GMOS-N B600 4x9000 1.0 1.4 0.8
58 552.16 583.8 2019 Mar 10 TNG/DOLORES LR–B 2x2000 1.5 1.2 2.5
59 314.29 1346.0 2021 Apr 10 NTT/SofI BG 1x3240 1.0 1.7 1.0
59 316.29 1348.0 2021 Apr 12 NTT/EFOSC2 Gr#13 1x1800 1.0 1.7 0.9
59 316.31 1348.0 2021 Apr 12 NTT/EFOSC2 Gr#18 1x1800 1.0 1.7 0.8
59 666.29 1697.9 2022 Mar 28 VLT/Xshooter UVB/VIS/NIR 2x1360 1.0/0.9/0.9 1.7 0.6

Notes: (1) Modified Julian dates of observations; (2) Phase with respect to the discovery date MJD 57 968.35 (3) UT date, (4) Telescope and instrument; (5) Grism; (6) Exposure time; (7) Slit width; (8) Airmass; (9) Seeing.

2.1.1 NTT/EFOSC2+SofI

As shown in Table 1, a total of 16 spectra have been taken with EFOSC2 instrument by using the grism Gr #\#13, which covers a wide wavelength range (3685-9315 Å) with a resolution of R=λ/Δλ300R=\lambda/\Delta\lambda\sim 300, calculated for a 1″.0 slit (a slightly higher resolution is achieved in case of seeing better than 1.0″). In order to perform more detailed observations in the He ii λ\lambda4686 region, we also used the grism Gr#\#18, which provides a resolution of R=λ/Δλ750R=\lambda/\Delta\lambda\sim 750 (calculated for a 1.0″slit and for a 1.0″ seeing) in the wavelength range 4700-6770 Å. Two NIR spectra have been obtained with the SofI instrument in nodding mode with the BG grism, which covers the wavelength range 9500-16400 Å and provides a resolution R=λ/Δλ1000R=\lambda/\Delta\lambda\sim 1000, calculated for a 0.6″slit. We use the two instruments also in imaging mode in order to obtain images of the field in the gg^{\prime} and rr^{\prime} filters (with EFOSC2) and in the JJ, HH and KK filters (with SofI).

All these spectra and images have been reduced using the ePESSTO NTT Pipeline v.2.4.0222https://github.com/svalenti/pessto (in spectroscopic and imaging mode, respectively), which is based on standard IRAF tasks, such as bias, flat-field and cosmic rays correction. The spectroscopic wavelength and flux calibration are performed using arc lamps and standard stars, respectively. Multiple spectra taken on the same night are averaged in order to increase the SNR. The photometric zero points of the images are calculated using SDSS stars for the Sloan filters, while the stars in the 2MASS catalog are used for the SofI images.

2.1.2 NOT/ALFOSC

A total of 5 spectra of AT 2017gge were obtained with the ALFOSC instrument mounted on the NOT at days 193.9, 231.8, 232.8, 310.7 and 556.9. For these observations we first used the grism Gr#\#4, which covers the wavelength range 3200-9600 Å with a resolution R=λ/Δλ360R=\lambda/\Delta\lambda\sim 360, calculated for a 1.0″slit under seeing conditions of 1″ or larger. We performed more detailed observations in the He ii λ\lambda4686 region by using the grism Gr#\#19, which provides a resolution of R=λ/Δλ970R=\lambda/\Delta\lambda\sim 970 (for a 1.0″slit under seeing conditions of 1″ or larger) over the 4400-6950 Å wavelength range.

We reduced the spectra by using the foscgui 1.7 pipeline333foscgui is a graphical user interface aimed at extracting spectroscopy and photometry obtained with FOSC-like instruments. It was developed by E. Cappellaro. A package description can be found at http://sngroup.oapd.inaf.it/foscgui.html., which is based on standard IRAF reduction tasks (Tody, 1986), including bias and flat field correction, cosmic ray cleaning, wavelength calibration by using arc lamps and flux calibration with a standard star.

We used ALFOSC also to obtain images of the transient field in gg^{\prime} and rr^{\prime} filters. These images have been reduced with the foscgui 1.7 pipeline in imaging mode, which is based on standard IRAF reduction tasks and includes bias, flat fields and cosmic rays correction. It also provides the World Coordinate System calibration using SDSS stars. The photometric zero points are derived using SDSS stars in the field of view.

2.1.3 WHT/ACAM

We observed AT 2017gge with the low-resolution spectrograph of ACAM on three nights. In particular, we used the V400 grating which provides a nominal wavelength coverage of 3950-9400 Å and a resolution R=λ/Δλ430R=\lambda/\Delta\lambda\sim 430 for a 1.0″slit, under seeing conditions of 1″ or larger. We reduced the data by using a the standard IRAF tasks including bias, flat field and cosmic ray correction, wavelength and flux calibration with arc lamps and standard stars, respectively.

2.1.4 TNG/DOLORES

A total of three spectra of AT 2017gge were obtained with the low resolution spectrograph and camera DOLORES. In the spectroscopic mode we used the the LR-B grating which provides a wavelength coverage of 3000-8430 Å and a resolution R=λ/Δλ580R=\lambda/\Delta\lambda\sim 580 for a 1.0″slit and under seeing condition of 1.0″or larger. We used DOLORES also in imaging mode in order to obtain uu^{\prime}, gg^{\prime} and rr^{\prime} images of the field of the transient. The data have been reduced by using the standard IRAF tasks which includes bias, flat-field and cosmic rays correction. The spectroscopic wavelength and flux calibration are performed by using arc lamps and standard stars, respectively.

2.1.5 LT/IO:O

We observed AT 2017gge with the IO:O at the Liverpool Telescope in order to obtain images of the transient field in the uu^{\prime}, gg^{\prime} and rr^{\prime} filters. The images were reduced with the IO:O pipeline444https://telescope.livjm.ac.uk/TelInst/Pipelines/#ioo and the zeropoints calculated using stars in the the American Association of Variable Star Observers (AAVSO) Photometric All-Sky Survey (APASS) catalogue (Henden, 2019).

2.1.6 GTC/OSIRIS

Two spectra of AT 2017gge have been taken 338.6 days after the transient discovery with the OSIRIS instrument, located at the Nasmyth-B focus of GTC. We use the spectrograph in the long slit mode and with the R500B grism, which covers the 3600-7200 Å wavelength range with a resolution R=λ/Δλ540R=\lambda/\Delta\lambda\sim 540, calculated for a 0.6″ slit under seeing condition of 0.6″ or larger. The data has been reduced by using the dedicated GTCMOS pipeline Gómez-González et al. (2016), which is an IRAF-based script and performs bias, flat-field, cosmic rays correction. It also delivers wavelength calibrated 2D spectral images (calibrated by using arc lamps) and flux calibration is applied on the extracted spectra by using a standard star for reference. The spectra taken on the same night are then combined together, in order to increase the S/N.

2.1.7 Gemini/GMOS-N

Two additional late-time, higher resolution spectra of AT 2017gge have been obtained with the Gemini Multi-Object Spectrograph (GMOS) mounted at Gemini North telescope, in single long slit mode (1.0″ slit) and using the B600 grism. This configuration allows to approximately cover the 4400-7500 wavelength range with a resolution R=λ/Δλ=844R=\lambda/\Delta\lambda=844, achieved with a slit width of 1.0″ under seeing condition of 1.0″ or larger. The science data was obtained through dithering in the spatial and spectral direction to avoid contamination from bad pixels and columns. Data have been reduced with the Gemini iraf package, including bias subtraction, flat-field, wavelength calibration. The flux calibration was performed with the spectra of the standard stars EG 131 and Hilt 600. Four individual exposures were combined into each final spectrum.

2.1.8 VLT/X-shooter

One spectrum of the AT 2017gge host galaxy has been taken at day 1697.9 with the X-shooter instrument which is an intermediate resolution spectrograph covering a wide wavelength range. In particular, it spans the 3000-25000 Å range in a single observation, thanks to the presence of three arms (UVB, VIS and NIR) working simultaneously. Specifically, the UVB arm covers the 3000-5595 Å wavelength range, the VIS arm spans the 5595-10240 Å and the NIR arm ranges from 10240-24800 Å . We used the 1.0″, 0.9″ and 0.9″ slit widths configuration for the UVB, VIS and NIR respectively, which deliver the respective nominal resolutions of R=λ/ΔλR=\lambda/\Delta\lambda = 5400, 8900 and 5600. Data have been reduced by using the X-shooter pipeline in the EsoReflex environment Freudling et al. (2013) and telluric corrections were performed by using the molecfit V. 4.2 software Smette et al. (2015); Kausch et al. (2015).

2.2 Swift observations

AT 2017gge was monitored by the Neil Gehrels Swift observatory over a period spanning \sim200 days, starting from \sim60 days after the transient discovery. A total of 19 XRT and UVOT observations have been obtained. In particular, we were awarded six epochs of Swift ToO observations between 2018 March 09 and 2018 April 07 for late-time follow-up of the source. In Table 2 a list of the Swift observations for AT 2017gge are reported, together with the main properties (date of observation, time after the transient discovery and instruments exposure times). All the XRT observation have been executed in photon counting mode.

Table 2: List of the Swift observations executed for the monitoring of AT 2017gge. The XRT data have been obtained in photon counting mode. (1) Date of observation; (2) time after discovery; (3) XRT exposure time (4) UVOT exposure time.
MJD Time XRT exp. time UVOT exp. time
(days) (days) (s) (s)
(1) (2) (3) (4)
58 031.12   1062.8 1631 1555
58 041.75   1073.4 1604 1532
58 046.29   1077.9 1403 1338
58 051.78   1083.4 2084 2020
58 055.04   1086.7 2232 2180
58 143.57 175.2 1532 1480
58 156.93 188.6 2153 2104
58 162.98 194.6 1504 1480
58 168.35 200.0 2109 2058
58 174.28 205.9 1564 1536
58 177.72 209.4 1432 1387
58 186.15 217.8 1908 1906
58 193.72 225.4 1490 1489
58 200.76 232.4 1379 1378
58 211.60 243.3 1560 1559
58 213.85 245.5 1535 1534
58 215.98 247.6 1576 1578
59 651.84 1683.5 3574 3502
59 655.29 1686.9 2283 2210

2.2.1 Swift/UVOT data

The Swift/UVOT observations include images in the filters UVW2 (1928 Å), UVM2 (2244 Å), UVW1 (2600 Å), U (3465 Å), B (4392 Å) and V (5468 Å) which have been reduced using the standard pipeline with the updated calibrations from the HEAsoft-6.25 ftools package. In order to derive the apparent magnitudes of the transient we have used the HEAsoft routine uvotsource. For each filter we have measured the aperture photometry using a 5″ aperture centered on the position of the transient and a background region of 60″ radius placed in an area free of sources. We derive the Galactic extinction correction for the UVOT filters by assuming RVR_{V}=3.1 and AVA_{V}= 0.193 Schlafly & Finkbeiner (2011) and a Cardelli extinction law Cardelli et al. (1989).

In Table 4 we provide the Swift/UVOT UVW2, UVM2 and UVW1 apparent magnitudes (in the AB system) together with the Swift/UVOT U, B and V filters apparent magnitudes (in Vega system), not corrected for for foreground extinction.

2.2.2 Swift/XRT data

We processed the XRT observations by using the online analysis tools provided by the UK Swift Science Data Centre Evans et al. (2007, 2009). The data have been combined together in order to obtain a single deep stack of total exposure time \sim22 ks which has been analyzed locally. The stacked image is shown in Figure 1. An X-ray source at the position of AT 2017gge is clearly visible. By using a 25″ wide aperture placed at the transient coordinates we measured an excess of 78±\pm12 counts above the background (at 6.6σ\sigma). The X-ray emission was delayed with respect to the optical one (see below). When active AT2017gge showed a 0.3-10 keV count rate of 102\sim 10^{-2} ct s-1.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: Stacked Swift/XRT image in the 0.3-10 keV band of AT 2017gge. The position of the transient is marked with a cyan cross. An X-ray source is clearly visible at the transient position.

3 Photometric analysis

3.1 Differential photometry

In order to analyse the photometric properties of AT 2017gge, we first have carried out differential photometry procedures against the host galaxy for each images of our data-set. This has allowed us to subtract the host galaxy contribution and thus to obtain images where only the nuclear transient’s emission is present. To this purpose we used the pre-transient host galaxy images available in the Pan-STARRS1 data archive (DR2) in the gg^{\prime} and rr^{\prime} filters, and the host cataloged uu^{\prime} image available on the SDSS archive (DR16, Ahumada et al., 2020; Doi et al., 2010). For the data in the NIR taken with NTT/SofI, we have used the host galaxy images obtained with the same instrument at very late times, 1346 days from the AT 2017gge discovery.

For each images we subtracted the host galaxy contribution by using hotpants V5.1.11 software (Becker, 2015). We have then applied aperture photometry on the resulting images by using the sextractor software with apertures of variable size, depending on the seeing conditions. In Table 5 we report the measured host-subtracted optical and IR magnitudes of AT 2017gge, not corrected for foreground extinction and in their common systems (AB for Sloan filters and Vega for Johnson filters). In the case of the UVOT filters, we have used the host contribution as determined from the photometric analysis performed on the very late-time observation (taken at \sim1680 days from the transient discovery). The resulting light curves, including also the host-subtracted UVOT, ATLAS and PS1 data, are shown in Figure 2.

Refer to caption
Figure 2: Lightcurves for AT 2017gge. Open circles indicate the optical photometric data taken from the ATLAS and PS1 database, filled circles and filled stars indicate the NOT/ALFOSC, NTT/EFOSC2, TNG/DOLORES and LT/IO:O data from this work, while the Swift/UVOT data are shown as colored filled diamonds. The black filled points (square and triangles) indicate the NIR photometry from NTT/SofI photometry. All the magnitudes are in AB system and not corrected for foreground Galactic extinction. All magnitudes are host-subtracted. The day zero on the x-axis corresponds to the transient’s discovery date as reported by the ATLAS survey (Tonry et al., 2017).

3.2 Bolometric light curve

From the multi-color photometry derived from our analysis, together with the values from the ATLAS and PS1 surveys, we computed the bolometric luminosities for AT 2017gge. We used the python routine superbol Nicholl (2018), all the input magnitudes have been corrected for the Galactic extinction from Schlafly & Finkbeiner (2011), which assumes a reddening law with RV=3.1R_{V}=3.1, and K-correction Oke & Sandage (1968) has been applied. When needed, we extrapolated the photometry assuming a constant color evolution for the light curve. Subsequently, we have integrated over the spectral energy distribution (SED) inferred from the multi-band data (for each epoch) and, finally, we fitted the SED with a single black body function. The best-fit black body at each epoch was then used to compute the additional flux bluewards of the UVW2 band and redwards of KK band. In Figure 3 we show the results for the first \sim300 days from the transient’s discovery: the bolometric luminosity evolution (upper panel, black circles for the luminosity calculated by integrating over observed fluxes only, the red diamonds show the luminosity derived using a single black body model to fit the SED); the black body temperature and radius evolution are shown in the central and lower panel, respectively. While the black body temperature is characterized by no significant evolution over time, being consistent with a constant value of TBBT_{\rm BB}\sim1.8×\times104 K, the black body radius show a first phase of expansion from RBBR_{\rm BB}=(7.7±\pm0.8)×\times1014 cm to a maximum value of RBBR_{\rm BB}\sim(12.9±\pm2.8)×\times1014 cm, reached at \sim25 days from the transient’s discovery, followed by a phase of decline finally reaching a value of RBBR_{\rm BB}=(7.3±\pm2.7)×\times1014 after \sim300 days form the transient’s discovery.

In Figure 4 we show the bolometric luminosity of AT 2017gge (derived using the black body correction, filled black square) in comparison with the bolometric light curves derived for other TDEs555Photometric data retrieved from The Open TDE Catalog https://tde.space by applying the same method used for AT 2017gge data (colored dashed lines). After PS1-10jh Gezari et al. (2012), AT 2017gge is the second brightest object in the plot, with a luminosity and an evolution notably similar to what observed for AT 2018hyz. Moreover, for the first \sim100 days it shows a light curve behaviour comparable to the one observed for AT 2019qiz. From the bolometric luminosity evolution we estimate that the emission reached its peak value of LbolL_{\rm bol}=(1.4±\pm0.5)×\times1044 erg s-1 at MJD 57 989.26, which corresponds to \sim20 days from the transient’s discovery. The rise of the light curve is consistent with a t1/2t^{1/2} powerlaw, while in decline it is better represented by a t1.1t^{-1.1} powerlaw (red dot-dashed line) rather than the t5/3t^{-5/3} trend (light-blue dot-dashed line), when considering \sim600 days of emission. We note that during the first \sim200 days the light curve decline can be well represented also by the t5/3t^{-5/3} power-law. The total energy radiated (EradE_{\rm rad}) is derived by integrating the bolometric luminosity over time and it results EradE_{\rm rad}= (1.0±\pm0.1)×1051\times 10^{51} erg. In their recent letter on AT 2017gge, Wang et al. (2022) independently derived the bolometric lightcurve, together with the black body temperature and radius by using all the UVOT data but V filter and only the ATLAS oo band data. Although their values are consistent with our results, they found a declining trend for the bolometric lightcurve luminosity compatible with the t5/3t^{-5/3} powerlaw. This discrepancy can be explained with the use of a more complete and well sampled photometric dataset in our analysis.

The photometric properties, such as the steep rise to the peak luminosity, reached after \sim20 days from the transient’s discovery, the powerlaw decay of the bolometric luminosity the constant black body temperature at TBBT_{\rm BB}\sim1.8×\times104 K and the black body radius RBBR_{\rm BB} \sim1015 cm evolving with time, are all commonly observed in TDEs (Hinkle et al., 2020; van Velzen et al., 2020; van Velzen et al., 2021b; Zabludoff et al., 2021, and reference therein), and thus are indicative of the TDE nature of AT 2017gge.

3.3 IR emission

Interestingly, AT 2017gge is listed in the Mid-InfraRed Outburst in Nearby Galaxies (MIRONG) sample Jiang et al. (2021), which includes a total of 137 low-redshift SDSS galaxies that have experienced recent MIR flares of at least an amplitude of 0.5 mag in their WISE light curves. In Figure 5 we show the AT 2017gge WISE light curves for the W1W1 and W2W2 filters (with half a year sampling) and the epochs of the two SofI spectra. The MIR flare is detected at \sim197 days from the transient’s discovery in both filters and the first SofI spectrum has been obtained 178 days after the MIR flare, when the MIR emission is still \sim0.6 dex higher than during the quiescent phase.

Notably, in their work, Jiang et al. (2021) propose IR echoes (i.e. optical/UV light absorbed and reradiated by dust) of emission originating from transient accretion onto SMBHs as the main source of the detected MIR outbursts and they derive some physical properties of the dust responsible for the detected emission, such as the temperature, luminosity, mass and its distance from the central heating source. Specifically, for the case of AT 2017gge they infer a distance of the dust of logRdust\log R_{\rm dust}=-1.51±\pm0.12 pc or logRdust\log R_{dust}=-1.01±\pm0.16 pc, depending on the considered absorption coefficient, which correspond to RdustR_{\rm dust}\sim1017cm. We independently computed the time lags (τ\tau) between the optical and MIR data using two different methods, the interpolated cross correlation function (ICCF, White & Peterson, 1994) and the javelin tool Zu et al. (2013, 2016). From the ICCF method, the time lag τ\tau for W1W1 band is estimated to be τ=204.643.5+77.6\tau=204.6^{+77.6}_{-43.5} days, which is consistent with that computed applying the javelin method (τ207.624.7+24.7\tau\approx 207.6^{+24.7}_{-24.7} days). These methods are commonly used in active galactic nuclei (AGN) reverberation mapping studies and are based on the tight correlation between the IR luminosity and the dust radius of ordinary AGNs (size–luminosity relation). Thus, it is possible to infer the luminosity of a possible AGN from the estimated time lag. In particular, by using the size–luminosity relation from Lyu et al. (2019), we found LAGN1045L_{\rm AGN}\approx 10^{45} erg s-1.

Our estimated peak bolometric luminosity for AT 2017gge from the observed optical and UV fluxes was (1.4±\pm0.5)×\times1044 erg s-1, but we can infer that the true peak was larger than this due to the presence of the IR echo. Therefore it is not unreasonable to assume that the intrinsic TDE luminosity was large enough to be consistent with this estimate. The time lag measurements above also provide values for the distance to the dust producing the IR echo, which are 0.1610.034+0.0610.161^{+0.061}_{-0.034} pc for CCF, and 0.163±0.0190.163\pm 0.019 pc for javelin. These values are similar to the dust sublimation radius of 0.15 pc found for the TDE PTF-09ge by van Velzen et al. (2016), implying that is is reasonable for AT 2017gge to have also sublimated dust out to this radius. The estimates for the dust radius in Jiang et al. (2021) are somewhat smaller than this, and precise measurements require a more involved model. It is possible to use the infrared light echo to estimate the required luminosity of the flare needed to sublimate the dust to the sublimation radius. In particular, we have obtained a flare peak luminosity of LabsL_{\rm abs}=1.14×\times1045erg s-1by using the the Equation 1 reported in van Velzen et al. (2016), the (independently derived) sublimation radius of 0.16 pc and assuming a sublimation temperature of 1850 K for the dust. Notably, this value is consistent with the luminosity inferred by using the AGN size–luminosity relation of Lyu et al. (2019) (LAGN1045L_{\rm AGN}\approx 10^{45} erg s-1) and thus further support the hypothesis of an intrinsic TDE luminosity larger than what derived from the observed optical and UV fluxes. Interestingly, from the the MIR luminosity analysis, Wang et al. (2022) derived a covering factor of \sim0.2 for the dusty environment. As already discussed by the authors, such a high value is comparable with what is usually observed for the AGN torus. However, prior to the transient occurrence, an AGN classification has been excluded given: a) the X-ray non-detection in the RASS observations, b) the quiescent WISE color (W1-W2\sim0.6, Stern et al., 2012) and c) the the SDSS spectrum based location in the Baldwin, Phillips & Terlevich (BPT) diagrams. We however note that the pre-transient SDSS values placed the host galaxy on the (theoretical) extreme starburst line and this may indicate the presence of a weak AGN contribution, see Section 8.1 for a detailed discussion).

Wang et al. (2022) estimated the total radiated energy of AT 2017gge in the IR (until July 2021) of 1.3×\times1051 erg. Combined with our estimated radiated energy in the optical the total radiated energy detected is \sim2×\times1051 erg and this is a lower limit for the total radiated energy from the TDE. This is still significantly lower than the total energy of 1053 erg expected to be released by the accretion of a solar mass star (see e.g. Giannios & Metzger, 2011). However, the covering factor of \sim0.2 implies that a large proportion of radiation in the UV could still be unobserved in both the optical and IR bands and make up for this discrepancy.

Refer to caption
Figure 3: Top: Evolution of the bolometric luminosity during the first 300 days from the AT 2017gge discovery. The black filled circles show the pseudo-bolometric luminosity calculated by integrating over the observed fluxes, while with red filled diamonds we show the luminosity derived by fitting the SED with a single component black body model. Middle: Black body temperature evolution. Bottom: Black body radius evolution.
Refer to caption
Figure 4: AT 2017gge bolometric light curve (filled black squares), with a powerlaw decline of t5/3t^{-5/3} and t1.1t^{-1.1} indicated by a light blue dotted line and a red dot-dashed line, respectively. We show, for comparison, the bolometric light curves of some other TDEs with colored dashed lines: PS1-10jh (Gezari et al., 2012); ASASSN-14ae (Holoien et al., 2014); ASASSN-14li (Holoien et al., 2016); iPTF16fnl (Blagorodnova et al., 2017; Onori et al., 2019); AT 2018hyz (Short et al., 2020) and AT 2019qiz (Nicholl et al., 2020). In all cases the phase is reported with respect to the discovery date.
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 5: Upper left: IR light curves for AT 2017gge, covering a range of \sim 2400 days around the transient’s discovery. The luminosities were derived by using the WISE W1W1 (3.4 μ\upmum, orange squares) and W2 (4.6 μ\upmum, green triangles) magnitudes, corrected for foreground extinction. Grey dashed vertical lines indicate the phase at which IR SofI spectra have been taken. Upper right: Multi-component Gaussian fit of the He i λ\lambda10830 region of the SofI spectrum taken at 374 days. Dashed colored lines indicate each component, while the total model is shown with the magenta solid line. Residuals with respect to the fitting model are shown at the bottom. Lower: Rest-frame NIR spectra of AT 2017gge taken with SofI at two different epochs from the transient’s discovery (374.7 days and 1342 days, respectively) in comparison with the NIR X-shooter spectrum taken at 1698 days. The spectra have been corrected for the foreground reddening. The detected emission lines are indicated by vertical lines. The regions affected by telluric absorption lines is indicated by grey bands.

4 The delayed X-ray emission

In this section we describe the spectral analysis performed on the X-ray source detected at the location of AT 2017gge in the stacked Swift/XRT image, shown in Figure 1. We extracted the spectrum of the source by using a 40″ wide region centered on the position of the transient and a background region of 140″ radius placed in an area free of sources. The data fitting procedure has been performed by using the software XSPEC v12.11.1 Arnaud (1996) and the Cash statistics. The extracted spectrum has been grouped to at least four counts per bin. We used a fixed Galactic column density of NHN_{\rm H}=5.0×\times1020cm-2, as derived for the source position by using the Heasarch nH ftools and the HI4PI Collaboration map HI4PI Collaboration et al. (2016).

4.1 The X-ray light-curve

In Figure 6 the XRT light curve in the 0.3-10 keV band, produced by specifying a minimum of 3 counts per bin, is shown. In order to convert the count rates to unabsorbed fluxes, we used the results obtained from the spectral fitting with an absorbed powerlaw model (see subsection 4.2 for a detailed discussion on the spectral analysis), which gives a conversion factor of 0.07×\times10−9 erg cm-2 cts-1. The RASS pre-transient upper limit of F0.3-10keV=1.0×\times10-12 erg cm-2 s-1, corresponding to observation taken at MJD 48102, is also shown before the transient detection for comparison (red cross in Figure 6). The detected X-ray emission has a transient nature, with only upper limits (grey triangles in the Figure) for the first 170 days from the discovery of AT 2017gge and showing the peak around 200 days. Furthermore, no X-rays have been detected in the recent XRT observations taken at \sim1684 days (see Wang et al., 2022). Such a delayed X-ray brightening with respect to the optical/UV peak has already been observed in some TDEs, specifically, ASASSN-14li Pasham et al. (2017); Gezari et al. (2017), ASASSN-15oi Gezari et al. (2017); Holoien et al. (2018), AT 2019azh van Velzen et al. (2021b); Liu et al. (2022) and OGLE16aaa Kajava et al. (2020); Shu et al. (2020), which have shown \sim30 days, 1 year, 200 and 140 days of delay in the X-ray emission, respectively. In all these cases the authors investigate the different scenarios for the origin and location of the optical/UV emission and the delayed X-ray flare, including the stream-stream collision and reprocessing photosphere/winds hypothesis. Among these, a two-process scenario, where the UV/optical emission is produced by the stellar debris streams during the circularization phase, whereas a delayed formation of an accretion disk is responsible for the X-rays, has been suggested and, in some cases, has been even preferred (i.e. ASASSN-15oi, ASASSN-14li, OGLE16aaa, AT 2019azh Gezari et al., 2017; Pasham et al., 2017; Kajava et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2022).

Refer to caption
Figure 6: The X-ray light curve in the 0.3-10 keV band from the XRT observations. The grey triangles represent upper limits. The upper limit at \sim80 days from the transient discovery are derived by stacking 4 nearby observation (from MJD 58041.75 to MJD 58055.04). The orange vertical dashed line indicates the first detection of the broad He ii λ\lambda4686 emission lines in the optical spectra. The pre-transient upper limits from the RASS observation of the AT 2017gge field, taken at MJD=48182, are shown with a red cross.

4.2 The X-ray spectral analysis

The spectrum of the source is very soft, with the emission detected only between the 0.3-1 keV energy range. We modelled the data with an absorbed powerlaw by using the model TBABS*ZASHIFT*POWERLAW (solid blue line, left panel) and we obtain a photon index of Γ\Gamma=6.0±\pm0.8 and a c-stat/d.o.f.=11.74/12 The unabsorbed flux in the 0.3-10 keV band results to be F0.310F_{0.3-10}=(0.18±\pm0.05)×\times10-12 erg cm-2 s-1, which corresponds to an X-ray luminosity of LXL_{\rm X}=(2.4±\pm0.7)×\times1042 erg s-1, calculated for the distance of AT 2017gge. These spectral features are usually observed in the X-ray emission of non-jetted TDEs, which show very soft spectra well represented either by a single powerlaw with a photon index value Γ\Gamma>4 or by a black body model with temperatures between 10-100 eV Auchettl et al. (2017); Saxton et al. (2020). Therefore, we also modelled the X-ray spectrum using a black body model TBABS*ZASHIFT*BBODYRAD (middle panel of Figure 7, magenta solid line). In this case we obtain c-stat/d.o.f.=7.24/12. The inferred temperature and radius are kTT=70±\pm10 eV and RR=(1.40.4+0.7{}^{+0.7}_{-0.4})×\times1011 cm. These values are consistent with a TDE nature for this transient. The unabsorbed flux in the 0.3-10 keV band is F0.310F_{0.3-10}=(0.15±\pm0.04)×\times10-12 erg cm-2 s-1, which corresponds to a luminosity of LXL_{\rm X}=(1.8±\pm0.5)×)\times1042 erg s-1. The results of the spectral analysis are reported in Table 3 and are shown if Figure 7. These results are all consistent with the X-ray analysis already presented in the recent discovery paper of AT 2017gge Wang et al. (2022). Additionally, in order to investigate the origin of the delayed X-ray flare as produced by a newly formed accretion disk, we have modelled the data with the TBABS*ZASHIFT*DISKBB model (right panel of Figure 7, red solid line). In this case we obtain a c-stat/d.o.f.=7.76/12, a temperature at the inner disk radius of Tin=83±\pm10 eV, an unabsorbed flux of F0.310F_{0.3-10}=(0.15±\pm0.04)×\times10-12 erg cm-2 s-1, which corresponds to a luminosity of LXL_{\rm X}=(1.9±\pm0.5)×\times1042 erg s-1. We note that although it is difficult to discriminate between these two models given the very similar c-stats values, the accretion disk model is able to represent well the data. Thus, given the derived X-ray properties, we can conclude that the AT 2017gge X-ray emission resembles what is usually seen in non-jetted TDEs, as it is characterized by a very soft emission and a steep spectrum well modelled either by an absorbed powerlaw, by a black body or by an accretion disk model.

Table 3: Results from the spectral analysis on AT 2017gge XRT stacked data. The reported fluxes are unabsorbed and calculated in the 0.3-10 keV band.
Model Parameter Value
TBabs NHN_{\rm H}(×\times1022 cm-2) 0.05 (frozen)
zashift Redshift 0.0655113 (frozen)
POWERLAW Γ\Gamma 6.00±\pm0.80
norm (×\times10-6) 5.282.6+4.0{}^{+4.0}_{-2.6}
C-stat/d.o.f. 11.74/12
F0.310keVF_{0.3-10keV}=(0.18±\pm0.05)×\times10-12 erg cm-2 s-1
L0.310keVL_{0.3-10keV}=(2.4±\pm0.7)×\times1042 erg s-1
TBabs NHN_{\rm H}(×\times1022 cm-2) 0.05 (frozen)
zashift Redshift 0.0655113 (frozen)
BBODYRAD kTT (keV) 0.070±\pm0.01
norm 20721324+4416{}^{+4416}_{-1324}
C-stat/d.o.f. 7.24/12
F0.310F_{0.3-10}=(0.15±\pm0.04)×\times10-12 erg cm-2 s-1
L0.310keVL_{0.3-10keV}=(1.8±\pm0.5)×\times1042 erg s-1
TBabs NHN_{\rm H}(×\times1022 cm-2) 0.05 (frozen)
zashift Redshift 0.0655113 (frozen)
DISKBB TinT_{in} (keV) 0.083±\pm0.01
norm <<4187
C-stat/d.o.f. 7.76/12
F0.310F_{0.3-10}=(0.15±\pm0.04)×\times10-12 erg cm-2 s-1
L0.310keVL_{0.3-10keV}=(1.9±\pm0.5)×\times1042 erg s-1
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 7: Spectral analysis of the AT 2017gge Swift/XRT spectrum extracted from deep stacked data (total exposure time \sim22 ks) obtained by combining 17 observations taken between MJD 58 031.12 and MJD 58 215.98. The results obtained by using an absorbed powerlaw model (TBABS*ZASHIFT*POWERLAW, the TBABS*ZASHIFT*BBODYRAD model and the the TBABS*ZASHIFT*DISKBB model are shown in the upper left, upper right and lower panels, respectively. The residuals with respect to the fitting models are shown at the bottom of each figure. Colored solid lines refer to the total model.

5 Optical and NIR spectroscopic analysis

The rest-frame optical spectra of AT 2017gge taken with the different ground-based facilities described in section 2 are shown in Figure 14, while the rest-frame SofI NIR spectra and the UVB, VIS and NIR X-shooter spectra are shown in the lower panel of Figure 5 and in Figure 16, respectively. We corrected all the reduced spectra for the foreground extinction by using the Cardelli function Cardelli et al. (1989) with AV=0.193A_{V}=0.193 mag and RV=3.1R_{V}=3.1. In this section we discuss the spectroscopic features detected in the optical and NIR spectral sequence.

5.1 The optical spectra and the detection of high ionization coronal emission lines

The first spectra of our data-set (taken \sim42-45 days from the transient’s discovery) are characterized by broad Hβ\upbeta, He iλ\lambda5876 and Hα\upalpha emission lines superimposed on a blue continuum. However, from the spectral sequence shown in Figure 14, a clear evolution emerges with time of the broad emission line profiles and, more in general, of the spectral properties, with a number of features, consistent with high ionization coronal emission lines, appearing later in time, following the X-ray flare. In Figure 8, the evolution of the lines profile from a selection of normalised spectra is shown for the Hβ\upbeta and the Hα\upalpha regions (left and right panel, respectively). The transition of the Hα\upalpha from a broad-component-dominated profile toward a narrow-component-dominated profile (pink and violet spectra in Figure 8, respectively) is clearly visible, as well as the emergence of the narrow emission lines of [N ii] and [S ii]. A similar behaviour is observed for the emission lines in the Hβ\upbeta region.

Of particular interest is the emergence of the broad He ii λ\lambda4686, which is not present in the first spectrum of the sequence nor in the pre-transient SDSS spectrum Smee et al. (2013), as shown in Figure 8 (pink and black spectra, respectively). This feature is first detected in the spectrum taken after 193.9 days from the transient’s discovery and it is characterized by a line profile time evolution, with the gradual narrowing of the broad component until only a narrow core remains, which is well visible in the Gemini spectrum taken at day 407.9 (dark green in Figure 8). Notably, the phase in which the broad He ii λ\lambda4686 first appears corresponds to the detection epoch of the soft X-ray flare, as shown in the X-ray light-curve in Figure 6.

In Figure 9 we show a comparison between the late-time Gemini and X-shooter spectra (taken at days 408, 572 and 1698, respectively) and the pre-transient SDSS spectrum. A number of high ionization coronal narrow lines compatible with some iron transitions (i.e. ([Fe xiv] λ\lambda5303, [Fe vii] λλ\lambda\lambda5720,6087, [Fe x] λ\lambda6374) are well visible in the Gemini and X-shooter spectra, with the exception of the [Fe xiv] λ\lambda5303, which is not detected anymore in the X-shooter spectrum. We note that the derived X-ray temperature of \sim70 eV, imply that these lines arise from photoionization, rather than from collisional ionization equilibrium Lundqvist et al. (2022); Arnaud & Raymond (1992). As most of these coronal lines are first detected 218 days from the transient’s discovery and are not detected at the resolution of the pre-transient SDSS spectrum, we conclude that these features have a transient nature. These findings are remarkable as, together with the TDE AT 2019qiz Nicholl et al. (2020), they represent the first time in which high ionization coronal emission lines are detected in the optical spectra of a TDE soon after the occurrence of the X-ray flare (see Short et al., in prep., for an accurate study on the detection of the high ionization coronal emission lines in the optical spectra of AT 2019qiz). This strongly suggests a close connection between the TDE X-ray outburst and the presence of high ionization coronal emission lines in the TDE late-time spectra and host galaxy.

Refer to caption
Figure 8: Sequence of a selection of normalized spectra showing the lines profile evolution starting from 42 days from the transient’s discovery for the Hβ\upbeta and Hα\upalpha region (left and right panels, respectively). The SDSS pre-transient spectrum is shown for comparison (upper black spectrum in both panels). Vertical black dashed lines show the main emission lines (O, H, [N ii] and [S ii]). Red and green dashed lines indicate the position of the Bowen lines at 4640 Å and the He ii λ\lambda4686, respectively. Grey dashed line in the right panel shows the position of the high ionization coronal emission line [Fe x] λ\lambda6374.
Refer to caption
Figure 9: Comparison between the SDSS spectrum of AT 2017gge host galaxy taken before the transient first detection (in grey) and the late-times Gemini and X-shooter spectra taken at days 408, 572 and 1698 (black, cyano and purple, respectively). The positions of the main emission lines are indicated.

5.2 The NIR spectra

In the lower panel of Figure 5 we show the NIR spectra taken with SofI at two different epochs from the transient’s discovery, specifically at 374.7 days (in black) and 1342 days (in orange) in comparison with a part of the NIR X-shooter spectrum taken after 1698 days (in red). Although our NIR data-set is composed of only three spectra, a spectral time evolution is visible also in this wavelength range. Indeed, the first SofI spectrum shows a prominent and composite emission line in the He i λ\lambda10830 region, with a very broad component and a narrower one (FWHM=7660±\pm1500 km s-1 and FWHM=1639±\pm330 km s-1, respectively), blended with the Paγ\upgamma in which we also detect an intense narrow emission line consistent with the high ionization coronal line [Fe xiii] λ\lambda10798 (see the upper right panel of Figure 5). This finding is particularly notably as it represents the first detection of a transient high-ionization coronal NIR line in a TDE. Indeed, such a broad and complex feature becomes less prominent in the second SofI spectrum, where the broad component becomes fainter, the Paγ\upgamma starts to emerge and the narrow [Fe xiii] λ\lambda10798 is not detected anymore. Finally, this broad feature has completely disappeared in the X-shooter spectrum, the He i λ\lambda10830 and the Paγ\upgamma are well detected and show only narrow components. Also in this case, the narrow [Fe xiii] λ\lambda10798 is not detected.

6 The subtraction of the host galaxy contribution

In order to isolate the nuclear transient spectral features, we have first subtracted the host galaxy contribution from each spectrum of our data-set by using the penalized pixel fitting (ppxf) method Cappellari & Emsellem (2004); Cappellari (2017). In this way it has been possible to model the host galaxy spectral features present in the AT 2017gge spectra through convolution with a host-galaxy template spectrum. Subsequently, the best fit host-galaxy model is subtracted from the observed transient+host spectrum, resulting in the final transient-only spectrum. During the fitting procedure, we excluded all the spectral regions where intense emission lines were present (with particular care for the Hα\upalpha and Hβ\upbeta regions) and the areas affected by telluric absorption (see also Onori et al., 2019, for an application of this method).

Based on our photometric analysis, the transient’s emission can be considered exhausted (or at least faded beyond the detection in the optical bands) after \sim500 days from its discovery. Thus we used the spectra taken after this phase as the host galaxy templates in our host-subtraction procedure. In particular, in order to have a host galaxy spectrum with the same observational set-up as the one used for the transient+host spectra taken during our follow-up campaign, we have collected late–time spectra with different instruments: ALFOSC/NOT (Gr#\#4, at day 557), DOLORES/TNG (LR-B, at day 584) and EFOSC2/NTT (Gr#\#13 and #\#18 at day 1348). For each spectrum of our data-set, we then have applied the ppxf method by using as host-galaxy template the aforementioned late-time spectra. Due to the lack of late–time spectra obtained with ACAM/WHT, ALFOSC/NOT in the Gr#\#19 configuration and OSIRIS/GTC, we have used as host galaxy template the late–time spectra taken with DOLORES/TNG, EFOSC2/NTT in the Gr#\#18 and in the Gr#\#13 configuration, respectively. In Figure 10 we show the application of this host subtraction method in the case of the AT 2017gge spectrum taken with EFOSC2/NTT (Gr#\#13 grism) on 2018 March 25 (at 234 days from the transient’s discovery), where we used as host galaxy template the spectrum taken with the same observational set-up (EFOSC2/NTT, Gr#\#13 grism) on 2021 April 12 (1348 days). In Figure 15, the full sequence of the host-subtracted AT 2017gge spectra is shown.

Refer to caption
Figure 10: Subtraction of the host galaxy contribution from the AT 2017gge EFOSC2/NTT Gr#\#13 spectrum, taken on 2018 March 24. In the upper panel, the best-fit host galaxy (in red) is plotted over the transient+host spectrum (in black). Gray areas delimited by the dotted green vertical lines show the spectral regions excluded during the fitting procedure. The resulting host-subtracted spectrum is shown in the lower panel (in blue), together with the identification of the main emission lines.

7 The TDE broad emission lines

In this section we describe the method used for the emission line fitting and the results from the spectral analysis of the AT 2017gge host-subtracted spectra.

7.1 Fitting of the emission lines

In order to investigate the properties and evolution of the main spectral features observed in the host-subtracted spectra of AT 2017gge (see Figure 15 for the entire sequence), we modelled them with Gaussian functions by using the python packages curvefit and leastsq. In the case of simultaneous presence of broad and narrow components in the line profiles, a multi-component Gaussian fit has been applied. During the fitting procedure, a wavelength window of \sim1100 Å has been selected, in order to include both the spectral features of interest and the local continuum. A narrower fitting window has been selected in late time spectra, when the width of the broad emission lines became smaller. The same fitting procedure has been applied also in the case of not host-subtracted spectra, such as the SDSS, SofI, Gemini and X-shooter spectra. In Figure 11 the application of the multi-component Gaussian fit for the Hβ\upbeta and Hα\upalpha region in the Gemini and X-shooter spectra is shown, while in the upper right panel of Figure 5 it is shown for the He i λ\lambda10830 region of the SofI spectrum of day 374.

7.2 The time evolution of the optical broad emission lines

We analyzed the evolution of the emission line properties, such as the full width at half maximum (FWHM), the equivalent width (EW) and the EW ratio of the main broad emission lines detected in the host-subtracted spectra of AT 2017gge. Specifically, we focus on the properties of the He ii λ\lambda4686, Hβ\upbeta, He i λ\lambda5876 and Hα\upalpha emission lines, as derived from the fitting procedure described in section 7.1. In Figure 12 the results from this analysis are shown. Broad components in the Hβ\upbeta, He i λ\lambda5876 and Hα\upalpha are detected starting from the first spectra of our data-set, taken 41.7 and 44 days from the transient’s discovery, and they last until phase 291 (for He i), 408 (for Hβ\upbeta) and 572 (for Hα\upalpha). As shown in the upper panels of Figure 12, all these three features have high values of the FWHM in the initial phases of the transient emission with FWHM\sim(1.3-2.0)×\times104 km s-1, which are consistent with the broad emission lines widths typically observed in TDEs Arcavi et al. (2014); van Velzen et al. (2020); Charalampopoulos et al. (2022). In this picture, the He ii λ\lambda4686 broad emission line is an exception: it is characterized by a late-time development, a FWHM one order of magnitude smaller (FWHM\sim103 km s-1) than what measured for the H and He i λ\lambda5876 lines and it shows a completely different time evolution.

7.2.1 The FWHM time evolution

In the upper panels of Figure 12 we show the FWHM time evolution for the Hα\upalpha, Hβ\upbeta, He i λ\lambda5876 and He ii λ\lambda4686 broad emission lines. The evolution of Hα\upalpha and He i is quite similar, with high values measured over longer times compared to what is observed in Hβ\upbeta, which instead shows a more rapid decline. However, although the width of the He i is kept at an almost constant value of FWHM\sim1.3×\times104 km s-1 for 250 days, its decline became quite fast between 250 and 291.8 days, where this feature rapidly changes its width from FWHM=(1.0±\pm0.3)×\times104 km s-1 to FWHM=(0.20±\pm0.06)×\times104 km s-1 and completely disappears from the subsequent spectra. Instead, the Hα\upalpha shows a steady decline from the initial value of FWHM=(1.8±\pm0.1)×\times104 km s-1, as measured at phase 41.7 days, to a FWHM=(0.23±\pm0.01)×\times104 km s-1 as derived at 572.2 days. It is worth noting that a broad Hα\upalpha component of FWHM=(0.12±\pm0.01)×\times104 km s-1 is still detected in the X-shooter spectrum (at day 1698), while any other broad feature is not present anymore.

The Hβ\upbeta evolution is quite fast, with a rapid change of the line width in \sim150 days, from a value similar to what is observed in the Hα\upalpha, FWHM=(2.0±\pm0.2)×\times104 km s-1 at 41.7 days, to a narrower broad component of FWHM=(0.56±\pm0.06)×\times104 km s-1 at 193.9 days. Finally, a broad He ii λ\lambda4686 is first detected only after \sim193.9 days from the transient’s discovery, it is characterized by smaller value of FWHM with respect to Hβ\upbeta, He i and Hα\upalpha, with a nearly constant value at FWHM\sim0.6×\times104 km s-1 until its last detection at 338.6 days, in which a FWHM=(0.56±\pm0.05)×\times104 km s-1 is measured. Later time spectra show only a narrow He ii emission line.

7.2.2 The EW time evolution

The middle panels of Figure 12 show the EW time evolution of the He ii λ\lambda4686, Hβ\upbeta, He i λ\lambda5876 and Hα\upalpha broad components. As for the FWHM, the EW of these features follows a declining trend, with the Hα\upalpha characterized by the higher values (from an initial EW\sim120 Å to EW\sim30 Å as measured at 572 days) with respect to the other lines during the whole monitoring campaign. Indeed, the Hβ\upbeta shows a trend similar to what is observed in the Hα\upalpha, but at EW values one order of magnitude lower, while the He i is characterized by an initial growing phase until 193.9 days, followed by a very rapid declining trend which ends at 291.8 days. Also in this case the EW values are one order of magnitude lower than what measured for the Hα\upalpha. The behaviour of the He ii is instead completely different from the aforementioned lines. In fact, it is characterized by a late-time development and by a rapid variation of the EW, which oscillates between different values (from EW\sim8 Å to EW\sim30 Å) within a time interval of \sim20 days.

7.2.3 The broad line ratios

In the bottom left panel of Figure 12 we show the time evolution for the Hα\upalpha/Hβ\upbeta and of the He ii/He i line ratios. In particular, the Hα\upalpha/Hβ\upbeta line ratio is consistent with the value of 2.86, expected for the theoretical Case B recombination (black dashed line Osterbrock & Ferland, 2006) but with two remarkable exceptions. Indeed, the Hα\upalpha/Hβ\upbeta line ratio is greatly enhanced around day 200, when it changes from a value of 1.7±\pm0.2 at 41.7 days to the values of 4.9±\pm0.8 and 6.5±\pm1.4 at 193.8 and 218 days, respectively. After \sim10 days, it comes back to values in agreement with the Case B recombination. This consistency with the Case B recombination value lasts for \sim80 days, when the line ratio gradually increases again toward the value of 6.7±\pm1.1 at 407.9 days. It is interesting to note that the high Hα\upalpha/Hβ\upbeta line ratio values detected at days 193.8, 218 and 407.9 are all consistent with the line ratio value expected if the emission is dominated by an AGN broad line region (BLR, red dotted-dashed line, Osterbrock & Ferland, 2006). This variation in the Hα\upalpha/Hβ\upbeta is mainly due to the broad Hβ\upbeta declining more rapidly than the broad Hα\upalpha, which started around 194 days.

The He ii/He i line ratios, instead is characterized by a steep and rapid rising trend, from an initial values of 0.32±\pm0.15, as measured at 193.9 days, to a final value of 3.67±\pm1.52 as measured at 292.8 days. This behaviour has been already observed in the recent spectroscopic study on a sample of 16 TDEs performed by Charalampopoulos et al. (2022). In their paper, the authors ascribe the observed temporal rising of the He ii/He i line ratio with a photoionizazion increase in the Helium line emitting region. In AT 2017gge, the development of the He ii soon after the X-ray flare and the simultaneous disappearance of the He i suggests that they are emitted from the same region which is being further ionised probably as a result of the delayed X-rays. However, we stressed that although our results can be explain within this scenario, they are not strong enough to extend such a delayed X-ray photoionization of He II broad region model to the general TDE behaviour. Indeed, we outline that other events characterized by a multiwavelength behavior similar to that of AT 2017gge, have shown broad He ii emission line in the early-time spectra, well before the X-ray detection (i.e. ASASSN-15oi and AT2019azh Gezari et al., 2017; van Velzen et al., 2021b; Hinkle et al., 2021)

In the bottom right panel of Figure 12 the time evolution of the He ii/Hβ\upbeta and He ii/Hα\upalpha line ratios in comparison with the value expected in the case of a nebular environment for a solar helium abundance (black dotted line, Hung et al., 2017) are shown. The He ii-to-Hα\upalpha line ratio is in agreement with the nebular argument for all the duration of the monitoring campaign. This behaviour has been also shown to hold for many others TDEs (see Figure 9 of Charalampopoulos et al., 2022).

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 11: Multi-components Gaussian fit of the Hβ\upbeta(left panel) and Hα\upalpha (right panel) emission lines in the AT 2017gge Gemini spectra obtained 408 and 572 days from the transient’s discovery (upper and central panels, respectively) and in the X-Shooter spectra taken at 1698 days. Each single Gaussian component is shown with dashed colored lines, while the total model is shown with a solid magenta line. Residuals with respect to the fitting models are shown at the bottom of each panel. A broad component in the Hβ\upbeta is detected only in the Gemini spectrum of day 408, while a broad Hα\upalpha component is clearly visible in all the three spectra.
Refer to caption
Figure 12: Upper: Time evolution of the FWHM for the broad components in the Hα\upalpha, Hβ\upbeta(left panel, red squares and blue circles, respectively), He ii λ\lambda4686 and He i λ\lambda5876 (right panel, green triangles and purple diamonds, respectively). Middle: Time evolution of the the broad components EW for Hα\upalpha, Hβ\upbeta(left panel, red squares and blue circles, respectively), He ii λ\lambda4686 and He i λ\lambda5876 (right panel, green triangles and purple diamonds, respectively). Bottom: Time evolution of the Hα\upalpha/Hβ\upbeta and He ii/He i EW ratios (left panel, black filled circles and green filled triangles, respectively) and of the He ii/Hβ\upbeta and He ii/Hα\upalpha (right panel, yellow squares and cyan triangles, respectively). The location of the typical value for the Hα\upalpha/Hβ\upbeta ratio in the Case B recombination (T=104T=10^{4} K and nen_{e}=104 cm-3, Osterbrock & Ferland 2006) is shown by the black dashed line, while its value in homogeneous AGN BLR models (Osterbrock & Ferland 2006) is shown by the red dotted-dashed line. The black dotted line in the bottom right panel shows the expected He-to-H ratio in a nebular environment in the case of solar abundance Hung et al. 2017.

8 The host galaxy activity status and the black hole mass

In Figure 9, we show the late time high resolution spectra of AT 2017gge taken with Gemini (after 408 and 572 days from the transient’s discovery) and X-shooter (taken at 1698 days) in comparison with the pre-transient SDSS spectrum. It is clearly visible how the host galaxy spectrum has been modified after the nuclear transient took place. Indeed, in the SDSS spectrum only narrow Hα\upalpha and Hβ\upbeta emission lines are present, with no signs of broad components or outflows, and the [O iii] λ\lambda5007 is barely detected. In contrast, the Gemini spectra are characterized by Hβ\upbeta and Hα\upalpha line profiles similar to those usually observed in AGN Osterbrock & Ferland (2006), with broad components clearly visible in both lines in the spectrum taken at day 408, and only the broad component in the Hα\upalpha detected at 572 days. In the X-shooter spectrum, only a faint broad Hα\upalpha emission line is detected, together with a clear enhancement of the [O iii] λ\lambda5007 emission line. Furthermore, as already discussed in Section 5, a narrow He ii λ\lambda4686 and many high ionization emission lines compatible with iron transitions are present only in the Gemini and X-shooter spectra, but are not detected in the pre-transient SDSS spectrum.

8.1 The host galaxy activity status

We investigated on the activity status of the AT 2017gge host galaxy by using the BPT diagrams (Baldwin et al., 1981) and the EW of the narrow Hα\upalpha, Hβ\upbeta, [O iii] λ\lambda5007, [N ii] λ\lambda6583 and [S ii] λλ\lambda\lambda 6716,6731 lines detected in these spectra. The lines profiles have been modelled following the method described in Section 7.1.

The line ratios derived from the SDSS spectrum are log([N ii]/Hα\upalpha)=-0.27±\pm0.0), log([O iii]/Hβ\upbeta)=-0.40±\pm0.33 and log([S ii]/Hα\upalpha)=-0.45±\pm0.10. Despite the faint [O iii] λ\lambda5007 emission line, these values place the galaxy on the boundary between the HII and composite regions in the BPT diagram shown in the left panel of Figure 13 and well inside the star–forming region in the BPT diagram shown in the right panel of Figure 13. We note that the location on the extreme starburst line may indicate that an additional ionising component is required to explain the line ratios. The line ratios obtained from the Gemini spectrum of day 408 are log([N ii]/Hα\upalpha)=-0.04±\pm0.08, log([O iii]/Hβ\upbeta)=-0.08±\pm0.11 and log([S ii]/Hα\upalpha)=-0.09±\pm0.12. While the line ratios obtained from the Gemini spectrum of day 572 are log([N ii]/Hα\upalpha)=-0.03±\pm0.06, log([O iii]/Hβ\upbeta)=-0.2±\pm 0.10 and log([S ii]/Hα\upalpha)=0.01±\pm 0.07. In this case, the derived line ratios values are consistent between each other and place the galaxy well inside the LINER region and on the boundary between the composite and the AGN regions (cyan square and magenta triangle in Figure 13), indicating an increase in the activity of the galaxy nucleus after the nuclear transient took place. Finally, the line ratios obtained from the X-shooter spectrum (taken at 1698 days) are log([N ii]/Hα\upalpha)=-0.36±\pm0.03, log([O iii]/Hβ\upbeta)=-0.08±\pm0.03, and log([S ii]/Hα\upalpha)=-0.54±\pm0.04 and place the galaxy inside the composite and the starforming regions in the BPT diagrams of Figure 13 (green star in the left and right panels, respectively), indicating a further variation in the host galaxy activity, which come back to values in agreement with what derived from the pre-transient spectrum of SDSS. A similar variation in the activity status of a TDE host galaxy has been observed also in AT 2019qiz (Short et al, in prep.).

The discovery of AT 2017gge in a starforming galaxy make this TDE particularly interesting as it probes a host galaxy population (the blue galaxies) poorly represented in most optically and X-ray selected TDE host galaxies samples which result to be dominated by green valley galaxies Hammerstein et al. (2021); Sazonov et al. (2021).

8.2 The SMBH mass

The detection of AGN-like features in the Gemini optical spectra, their location in the BPT diagnostic diagrams (see Figure 13) and the evolution of the Hα\upalpha/Hβ\upbeta line ratio, suggest an AGN-like behaviour of the AT 2017gge host galaxy after the TDE occurrence. This led us to use these two spectra and a single epoch (SE) relation to test a different and independent method for the SMBH mass derivation, beside the commonly used MσM-\sigma_{\star} scaling relations. Recently, Ricci et al. (2017) derived a SE relation based on the AGN X-ray luminosity in the 2-10 keV band and on the width of Hβ\upbeta and/or Hα\upalpha broad components. If the broad H emission lines detected in the Gemini spectra are emitted in a virialized photosphere (similar to an AGN-like BLR), then we can use this SE relation to estimate the mass of the black hole.

To this scope we first have derived the unabsorbed X-ray luminosity in the 2-10 keV band from the Swift/XRT spectral analysis of LXL_{\rm X}=(6±\pm3)×\times1039 erg s-1. Then we have fitted the H broad emission lines detected in the Gemini spectra. In particular, the broad components detected in the Hβ\upbeta and Hα\upalpha emission lines of the Gemini spectrum taken at 408 days results to be centered at λc\lambda_{c} = 4857.30±\pm1.40 Å and λc\lambda_{c}= 6559.10±\pm0.62 Å and are characterized by a FWHM=2318±\pm268 km s-1 and FWHM=2760±\pm69 km s-1, for the Hβ\upbeta and the Hα\upalpha respectively. In the Gemini spectrum of 572 days only the Hα\upalpha broad component is detected, which results centered at λc\lambda_{c}=6556.08 ±\pm 0.49 Å and with a FWHM=2274±\pm38 km s-1.

By using the virial estimator presented in Table 4 of Ricci et al. (2017) with the zero points constants valid for all the classes of host galaxies we derived a black hole mass of logMBH\log M_{\rm BH}=5.5±\pm0.3 when using the width of the broad Hβ\upbeta, a logMBH\log M_{\rm BH}=5.8±\pm0.3 and logMBH\log M_{\rm BH}=5.4±\pm0.3 when using the width of the broad Hα\upalpha measured in the Gemini spectra of 408 days and 572 days, respectively. Finally, we derive the BH mass of the host galaxy by using the MBHσM_{\rm BH}-\sigma_{\star} scaling relation of McConnell & Ma (2013) and Gültekin et al. (2009), following the method illustrated in Wevers et al. (2017, 2019a) for a sample of TDEs. To this purpose, we measured the stellar velocity dispersion of the host galaxy of AT 2017gge by applying the ppxf fitting procedure to the X-shooter UVB and VIS spectra. We derive a stellar velocity dispersion of σ\sigma_{\star}=(97±\pm3) km s-1, which correspond to a logMBH\log M_{\rm BH}=6.55±\pm0.45 or to a logMBH\log M_{\rm BH}=6.80±\pm0.43, when using the MBHσM_{\rm BH}-\sigma_{\star} scaling relation of McConnell & Ma (2013) or the relation of Gültekin et al. (2009), respectively. We note that by using the SE relation of Ricci et al. (2017) we obtain values for the BH mass that are \sim one order of magnitudes lower than what is derived with the MBHσM_{\rm BH}-\sigma_{\star} relation. Moreover, given the bolometric luminosity of LbolL_{bol}=4.6×\times1044 at peak, the BH masses derived with the SE relation would imply a super Eddington accretion (with an Eddington ratio \sim10). Instead, a Eddington limited accretion would requires a BH mass of \sim4×\times106 M, which is consistent with the values obtained with the MBHσM_{\rm BH}-\sigma_{\star} relations. Thus we favour the BH mass as derived from the MBHσM_{\rm BH}-\sigma_{\star} scaling relation for AT 2017gge and we suggests that the region emitting the broad lines in this TDE is not virialized as in the case of the AGN BLR.

Refer to caption
Figure 13: BPT diagrams for the host galaxy of AT 2017gge derived from the equivalent widths of the narrow emission lines detected in the pre-transient SDSS spectrum (black filled point), in the Gemini spectra taken 408 and 572 days from the transient’s discovery (cyan filled square and magenta filled triangle, respectively) and in the X-shooter spectrum taken after 1698 days from the transient’s discovery. The different activity regions of the diagram are separated by the following lines: red dashed line from (Kewley et al., 2001), blue dotted line from (Kauffmann et al., 2003) in the left panel and blue dotted line from (Kewley et al., 2006) in the right panel.

9 Discussion

The nuclear transient AT 2017gge was first discovered by the ATLAS survey on MJD 57 968.35 and was alerted as a possible TDE by the ePESSTO spectroscopic classification Fraser et al. (2017). A first claim on the TDE nature for this transient was recently presented by Wang et al. (2022), who investigated on its properties following the detection of a MIR flare in the WISE lightcurve Jiang et al. (2021). The optical/UV photometric evolution, the properties of the X-ray emission and the dense spectroscopic sequence as presented in this work, not only confirm the TDE nature of AT 2017gge, but have also allowed us to accurately investigate on the observational properties and their evolution with time in a multiwavelength approach. This led us to the finding of a strong connection between the TDE flare and the appearance of extreme coronal line emission (ECLEs), to the the first detection of a transient high-ionization coronal NIR line in a TDE and to the suggestion a possible scenario for the emission mechanism and the geometry of the emitting region.

9.1 AT 2017gge as a gas-rich TDE surrounded by a dusty environment

The detection of very broad (FWHM \sim 104 km s-1) H emission lines in the optical spectra place AT 2017gge among the H-rich TDEs subclass Arcavi et al. (2014); van Velzen et al. (2020); Charalampopoulos et al. (2022). Notably, in correspondence of a delayed X-ray flare, a broad (FWHM \sim103 km s-1) He ii λ\lambda4686 emerges after 194 days from the transient discovery, indicating a transition toward a TDE H+He subclass. Together with the He ii λ\lambda4686, also a number of high ionization coronal emission lines appear. These spectral features and the IR echo, strongly indicate the presence of a gas-rich and dust-rich environment surrounding the source, consistent with the starforming nature of the host galaxy.

The MIR reverberation signal is detected with a delay of \sim200 days from the optical peak emission and corresponds to a distance for the dust producing the IR echo of \sim0.16 pc, as derived in this work by using two cross correlations methods. This value is similar to the sublimation radius obtained for the case of the TDE PTF-09ge van Velzen et al. (2016) and suggests that AT 2017gge may have sublimated the pre-existing in-situ dust out to this radius. Our estimation of the the total (optical/UV+IR) radiated energy of 2×\times1051 erg is significantly lower that the 1053 erg that has been theoretically predicted for the case of the disruption of a solar mass star, despite the large covering factor of \sim0.2 derived by Wang et al. (2022). This could be explained by a large proportion of far-UV emission remaining unobserved, as potentially indicated by the large intrinsic luminosity required to produce the delay time we observe in the IR. This can be compared with TDEs in galaxies with a very high covering factor for the SMBH such as the IR-luminous, highly obscured TDE Arp 299-B AT1, where a direct integration over time of the IR SED yielded a total radiated energy of >>2×\times1052 erg Mattila et al. (2018); Reynolds et al. (2022).

We have presented three NIR spectra taken after the IR echo and we report the detection of a broad feature in the He i λ\lambda10830 and a intense Fe xiii coronal emission line, both gradually disappearing in the subsequent spectra. This is the first time that a broad feature and a high-ionization coronal line are detected in the NIR spectra of a TDE taken following an IR echo from surrounding dust (but see the case of the candidate TDE AT 2017gbl in which NIR spectra have been presented, Kool et al., 2020).

The presence of the luminous and transient high ionization coronal emission lines in the spectra obtained soon after the detection of the soft X-ray emission implies a strong correlation with the soft X-ray emission and a gas-rich environment of the TDE, as expected from the starforming nature of the host galaxy. These high ionization coronal lines are long-lasting as, together with a narrow He ii λ\lambda4686, are still present in the X-shooter medium resolution spectrum taken after 1698 days from the transient discovery. Together with the TDE AT 2019qiz (Short et al., in prep.), this is the first time that high ionization coronal emission lines are detected in the optical spectra of TDEs following the X-ray outburst. This strongly indicates a close connection between the two phenomena and support the hypothesis that the extreme coronal emission lines detected in the spectra of a sample of non active galaxies could be a signature of the occurrence of a TDE in the past (as suggested by Wang et al., 2012).

9.2 The broad line emitting region

We study the evolution of the EW, the FWHM and the line ratios of the broad Hβ\upbeta, He ii λ\lambda4686, Hα\upalpha and He i λ\lambda5876 emission lines detected in the host-subtracted spectra of AT 2017gge. With the exception of the He ii emission line, all the other broad lines are detected starting from the very first spectra (at day \sim40) with FWHM\sim104 km s-1and show a declining trend with time. In particular, the Hβ\upbeta have a different behaviour with respect to the Hα\upalpha and He i λ\lambda5876, being characterized by a faster decline before becoming undetectable after \sim400 days from the transient discovery. Instead, the broad Hα\upalpha is characterized by a slow declining trend and it is long-lived as it is still detected in the X-shooter spectrum, after 1698 days from the transient discovery, when all the other broad lines are no longer detectable. Contrary to what observed in the Hα\upalpha, the broad He i λ\lambda5876 keeps constant high values of the FWHM for \sim250 days and soon after this phase it starts a very rapid decline, which last only \sim50 days. Notably, this almost coincides with the appearing of the broad He ii λ\lambda4686 emission line. This feature it is first detected at 194 days, soon after the delayed X-ray flare, and it does not show a particular declining trend. Instead it keeps an almost constant width of FWHM\sim6×\times103 km s-1 (one order of magnitude smaller than what measured for the broad H and He i) until its last detection at 338.6 days.

The observed different behaviour of the various broad emission lines is indicative of a stratified photosphere where different lines are produced at a different distance from the continuum source. Moreover, the time evolution of the various lines ratios can give us more insight in the properties of the region emitting the broad lines. In particular, the observed rising trend of the He ii/He i line ratio can be ascribe to an increase in the photoionization of the broad Helium emitting region. Given that the He ii line is known to be produced by photoionisation due to (soft) X-ray photons, we suggests that the observed delayed X-ray flare could be responsible for this phenomenon. Furthermore, the observed evolution of the Hα\upalpha/Hβ\upbeta line ratio, which experiences variation from a values consistent with the Case B recombination to values predicted for homogeneous AGN BLR models, is mainly due to the faster decay of the broad Hβ\upbeta with respect to the Hα\upalpha.

9.3 A two-process scenario for the AT 2017gge emission

The X-ray peak brightening detected with a delay of \sim200 days with respect to the UV/optical peak emission, followed by the development of a broad He ii λ\lambda4686, suggests a different origin for the two signals in AT 2017gge. A delayed X-ray emission is not new in the TDE field. It has been predicted to eventually occur in some models of TDE emission (i.e. reprocessing envelope model, the stream-stream collision scenario and the TDE unified model, Guillochon et al., 2014; Piran et al., 2015; Dai et al., 2018) and it has been already observed in some TDEs (i.e. ASASSN-14li, ASASSN-15oi, AT 2019azh and OGLE16aaa, Pasham et al., 2017; Gezari et al., 2017; Holoien et al., 2018; Liu et al., 2022; Kajava et al., 2020; Shu et al., 2020). Recently, Hayasaki & Jonker (2021) proposed an interesting two emission scenario in order to explain such a time delay between the two signals, observed in a sub-sample of optically selected TDEs. In particular, in this picture, the optical emission is produced by the collision of intercepting stellar debris streams during the initial phase of the stellar disruption, while the X-ray flare is emitted following the formation of an accretion disk, after the end of the circularization process.

As suggested also by Wang et al. (2022), the AT 2017gge observed emission can be well described by this scenario. Indeed, the results from the optical photometry, the X-ray spectral analysis and even from the optical spectroscopy, are in line with this picture. In fact, while the optical/UV black body radius results ranging between RBBR_{\rm BB}=7-13×\times1014 cm, from the X-ray spectral fitting we derive a much smaller value for the black body radius, RBBR_{\rm BB}\sim1.4×\times1011 cm, suggesting a different location for the source of the two signals. Moreover, an accretion disk model is able to represent well the X-ray spectrum.

The non-detection of the He ii in the optical spectra taken prior to the X-ray flare may indicate the absence of the X-ray emission at these epochs, as the He ii line is known to be correlated with the soft X-ray photons Pakull & Angebault (1986); Schaerer et al. (2019); Cannizzaro et al. (2021). However we note that in the case of the TDE ASASSN-15oi and AT 2019azh a broad He ii feature is detected well before the onset of a delayed soft X-ray flare Gezari et al. (2017); van Velzen et al. (2021b); Hinkle et al. (2021). Additionally, in the recent work of Nicholl et al. (2022), where the light-curves of 32 optically bright TDEs have been thoroughly analyzed, it has been found that the events without He ii were consistent with a stream-crossing origin for the luminosity, while those with He ii were more consistent with forming accretion disks. The late-time developing of the He ii observed in AT 2017gge could further support this scenario as this TDE seems to transition between these two regimes. However, we caution that there are also alternative explanations connecting both the optical/UV and X-ray emissions to the accretion phenomena, such as the lowering of the optical depth of an outflowing wind or of a reprocessing region, that cannot be excluded from our study. In particular, the delayed X-ray brightening observed in AT 2017gge could still be explained within a reprocessing scenario in which the decreasing of the optical depth of a reprocessing material at later times finally reveals the gas-rich circumnuclear environment from the flare and release the soft X-rays photons, allowing them to power the the narrow He II and iron coronal lines.

9.4 The awakening of the host galaxy activity

In order to understand the impact that a TDE can have on the host galaxy nucleus, we have used the pre-transient SDSS and the Gemini and X-shooter late-time optical spectra (taken after \sim408, 572 and 1698 days from the AT 2017gge discovery, respectively) to investigate on the activity status of host galaxy through the BPT diagrams. From this analysis a variation on the host galaxy activity clearly emerges. In particular, while the line ratio measured from the pre-transient SDSS spectrum are consistent with the starforming classification (although its location on the the extreme starburst line suggests the presence of an additional ionising component), the values derived from the Gemini spectra place the galaxy at the border between the composite and the AGN region and well inside the LINER region, suggesting an AGN-like activity between 400 and 600 days from the transient discovery. Finally, the galaxy activity status has come back to the initial values at 1698 days, as derived from the X-shooter spectrum. All this evidence suggests the possibility that the occurrence of the TDE resulted in the enhancement of the activity of the SMBH, which passes from quiescent to an AGN-like, with the formation of a transient stratified photosphere, similar to a BLR, surrounding the source.

In the hypothesis of the formation of a virialized BLR-like photosphere, we test an independent method to derive the SMBH mass by using the SE relation developed by Ricci et al. (2017) and the broad Hα\upalpha and Hβ\upbeta as measured in the Gemini spectra (which correspond to the phase of the increased activity of the host galaxy in the BPT diagrams). We derive a SMBH mass which is one order of magnitude smaller than what derived by using the canonical MBHσM_{\rm BH}-\sigma_{\star} scaling relations developed by McConnell & Ma (2013) and Gültekin et al. (2009) and the stellar velocity dispersion as measured from the X-shooter spectrum (logMBH\log M_{\rm BH}=5.4-5.7 and logMBH\log M_{\rm BH}=6.6-6.8, respectively). Given the peak bolometric luminosity of LbolL_{\rm bol}=1.4×\times1044 erg s-1, an Eddington limited accretion would requires a BH mass of \sim4×\times106 M, consistent with the values obtained from the MBHσM_{\rm BH}-\sigma_{\star} relation. Thus, we consider this method more trustworthy and we suggest that the broad lines emitting region is not virialized.

10 Conclusion

We have presented the results from our dense, long-lasting and multiwavelength follow-up of the nuclear transient AT 2017gge. Based on the on the detection of very broad Hβ\upbeta and Hα\upalpha emission lines in the optical spectra and on the results from the bolometric light-curve and the X-ray analysis, we confirm the TDE nature of this transient and we classify this object as a H-rich TDE (TDE H) in transition toward the H+He TDE (TDE H+He) subclass. The SMBH mass as derived from the MBHσM_{\rm BH}-\sigma_{\star} relation results to be logMBH\log M_{\rm BH}=(6.55±\pm0.45) or logMBH\log M_{\rm BH}=(6.80±\pm0.43) (depending on the scaling relation used) and is consistent with the typical values derived for the TDEs host galaxies.

The occurrence of the TDE have an impact on the activity of the host galaxy which passes from a quiescent starforming galaxy to a composite/AGN in the BPT diagram, to come back to quiescence after 1698 days. The photoionitazion induced by the delayed X-ray flare is responsible for the production of a number of high ionization coronal emission lines, which also indicate that the TDE occurred in a gas-rich environment.

The picture that we suggest from our analysis is that of a TDE occurred in a dusty and gas-rich environment, in which the UV/optical emission is produced at a distance of RR\sim1015 cm from the SMBH by the collision between intercepting streams of stellar debris during the initial phase of the stellar disruption. After \sim200 days from the transient discovery, the circularization process ends and a newly-formed accretion disk released a soft X-ray flare. However we caution that the reprocessing scenarios are still able to explain the delayed X-ray brightening observed in AT 2017gge. The emitting region of the observed broad lines is consistent with a symmetric and stratified photosphere. Finally, placed at at a distance RR\sim1017 cm, an absorbing dust surrounds the whole system. The covering factor of \sim0.2 suggests that a large proportion of UV radiation could still be unobserved in both the optical and IR bands and could be behind the observed total (optical/UV+IR) energy radiated being significantly lower than the energy expected to be released by the disruption of a solar mass star.

Our dense and long lasting monitoring campaign of AT 2017gge have revealed a remarkable TDE which have induced a variety phenomena in the host environment, allowing us to build a picture describing both the geometrical and the physical properties of the system. Moreover, its occurrence in a star-forming galaxy suggests a close connection between a gas-rich environment, the soft X-ray flare and the production of long-lasting high ionization coronal emission lines, strongly supporting the idea that extreme coronal line emitter galaxies may have indeed experienced a TDE in the past. This demonstrate the importance of such dense multiwavelength follow-up campaigns of TDEs in the study of accretion processes around quiescent SMBHs.

Acknowledgements

We thanks the anonymous referee for the useful comments that improved the manuscript. The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Program under the AHEAD project (grant agreement n. 654215). NUTS is supported in part by IDA (The Instrument Centre for Danish Astronomy). This work is based [in part] on observations made with the GTC operated by the Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias, the NOT, owned in collaboration by the University of Turku and Aarhus University, and operated jointly by Aarhus University, the University of Turku and the University of Oslo, representing Denmark, Finland and Norway, the University of Iceland and Stockholm University, the WHT operated by the Isaac Newton Group of Telescopes, the Liverpool Telescope operated by Liverpool John Moores University with financial support from the UK Science and Technology Facilities Council, the TNG (program A42DDT4) operated by the Fundacion Galileo Galilei of the INAF. All these facilities are located at the Spanish Roque de los Muchachos Observatory of the Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias on the island of La Palma. This work was supported by K-GMT Science Program (PID: GEMINI-KR-2018B-007 and GEMINI-KR-2019A-014) of Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute (KASI). ATLAS is primarily funded to search for near earth asteroids through NASA grants NN12AR55G, 80NSSC18K0284, and 80NSSC18K1575. Science products are made possible by grants Kepler/K2 J1944/80NSSC19K0112,HST GO-15889, and STFC grants ST/T000198/1 and ST/S006109/1 and contributions form University of Hawaii Institute for Astronomy, the Queen’s University Belfast, the Space Telescope Science Institute, the South African Astronomical Observatory, and The Millennium Institute of Astrophysics (MAS), Chile. Pan-STARRS telescopes are supported by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration under Grants NNX12AR65G NNX14AM74G, from the Near-Earth Object Observations Program. Data are processed at Queen’s University Belfast enabled through the STFC grants ST/P000312/1 and ST/T000198/1. This publication makes use of data products from the Near-Earth Object Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (NEOWISE), which is a joint project of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory/California Institute of Technology and the University of Arizona. NEOWISE is funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. SDSS-IV acknowledges support and resources from the Center for High Performance Computing at the University of Utah. The SDSS website is www.sdss.org. Based on observations collected at the European Organisation for Astronomical Research in the Southern Hemisphere, Chile, as part of ePESSTO (the advanced Public ESO Spectroscopic Survey for Transient Objects Survey) and ePESSTO+ (the advanced Public ESO Spectroscopic Survey for Transient Objects Survey). ePESSTO+ observations were obtained under ESO programs ID 1103.D-0328 and 106.216C (PI: Inserra), while ePESSTO under ESO ID 199.D-0143 (PI: Smartt). FO acknowledges support from MIUR, PRIN 2017 (grant 20179ZF5KS) “The new frontier of the Multi-Messenger Astrophysics: follow-up of electromagnetic transient counterparts of gravitational wave sources” and the support of AHEAD2020 grant agreement n.871158. MK was supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant (No. 2020R1A2C4001753 and 2022R1A4A3031306) funded by the Korean government (MSIT). MN is supported by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement No. 948381) and by a Fellowship from the Alan Turing Institute. MF is supported by a Royal Society - Science Foundation Ireland University Research Fellowship. MG is supported by the EU Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 101004719. NI is partially supported by Polish NCN DAINA grant No. 2017/27/L/ST9/03221. G.L. and M.P are supported by a research grant (19054) from VILLUM FONDEN. TEMB acknowledges financial support from the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (MCIN), the Agencia Estatal de Investigación (AEI) 10.13039/501100011033 under the PID2020-115253GA-I00 HOSTFLOWS project, and from Centro Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) under the PIE project 20215AT016 and the I-LINK 2021 LINKA20409. TEMB was also partially supported by the program Unidad de Excelencia María de Maeztu CEX2020-001058-M.

11 DATA AVAILABILITY

The data underlying this article are available in the article and in its online supplementary material. The NTT spectra and images are publicity available through the PESSTO SSDR4 ESO Phase 3 Data Release (see the ESO archive search and retrieve interface). The NOT, TNG, WHT, GTC data are public and available through the corresponding telescope archives. The processed data underlying this article will be shared on request to the corresponding author.

References

  • Ahumada et al. (2020) Ahumada R., et al., 2020, ApJS, 249, 3
  • Arcavi et al. (2014) Arcavi I., et al., 2014, ApJ, 793, 38
  • Arnaud (1996) Arnaud K. A., 1996, in Jacoby G. H., Barnes J., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 101, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V. p. 17
  • Arnaud & Raymond (1992) Arnaud M., Raymond J., 1992, ApJ, 398, 394
  • Auchettl et al. (2017) Auchettl K., Guillochon J., Ramirez-Ruiz E., 2017, ApJ, 838, 149
  • Baldwin et al. (1981) Baldwin J. A., Phillips M. M., Terlevich R., 1981, PASP, 93, 5
  • Becker (2015) Becker A., 2015, HOTPANTS: High Order Transform of PSF ANd Template Subtraction, Astrophysics Source Code Library (ascl:1504.004)
  • Blagorodnova et al. (2017) Blagorodnova N., et al., 2017, ApJ, 844, 46
  • Blagorodnova et al. (2019) Blagorodnova N., et al., 2019, ApJ, 873, 92
  • Bonnerot et al. (2017) Bonnerot C., Rossi E. M., Lodato G., 2017, MNRAS, 464, 2816
  • Buzzoni et al. (1984) Buzzoni B., et al., 1984, The Messenger, 38, 9
  • Cannizzaro et al. (2021) Cannizzaro G., et al., 2021, MNRAS, 504, 792
  • Cannizzo et al. (1990) Cannizzo J. K., Lee H. M., Goodman J., 1990, ApJ, 351, 38
  • Cappellari (2017) Cappellari M., 2017, MNRAS, 466, 798
  • Cappellari & Emsellem (2004) Cappellari M., Emsellem E., 2004, PASP, 116, 138
  • Cardelli et al. (1989) Cardelli J. A., Clayton G. C., Mathis J. S., 1989, ApJ, 345, 245
  • Chambers et al. (2016) Chambers K. C., et al., 2016, arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:1612.05560
  • Charalampopoulos et al. (2022) Charalampopoulos P., et al., 2022, A&A, 659, A34
  • Dai et al. (2018) Dai L., McKinney J. C., Roth N., Ramirez-Ruiz E., Miller M. C., 2018, ApJ, 859, L20
  • Doi et al. (2010) Doi M., et al., 2010, AJ, 139, 1628
  • Evans & Kochanek (1989) Evans C. R., Kochanek C. S., 1989, ApJ, 346, L13
  • Evans et al. (2007) Evans P. A., et al., 2007, A&A, 469, 379
  • Evans et al. (2009) Evans P. A., et al., 2009, MNRAS, 397, 1177
  • Fraser et al. (2017) Fraser M., et al., 2017, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 10747, 1
  • Freudling et al. (2013) Freudling W., Romaniello M., Bramich D. M., Ballester P., Forchi V., García-Dabló C. E., Moehler S., Neeser M. J., 2013, A&A, 559, A96
  • Gehrels et al. (2004) Gehrels N., et al., 2004, ApJ, 611, 1005
  • Gezari (2021) Gezari S., 2021, ARA&A, 59, 21
  • Gezari et al. (2012) Gezari S., et al., 2012, Nature, 485, 217
  • Gezari et al. (2017) Gezari S., Cenko S. B., Arcavi I., 2017, ApJ, 851, L47
  • Giannios & Metzger (2011) Giannios D., Metzger B. D., 2011, MNRAS, 416, 2102
  • Gómez-González et al. (2016) Gómez-González V. M. A., Mayya Y. D., Rosa-González D., 2016, MNRAS, 460, 1555
  • Guillochon et al. (2014) Guillochon J., Manukian H., Ramirez-Ruiz E., 2014, ApJ, 783, 23
  • Gültekin et al. (2009) Gültekin K., et al., 2009, ApJ, 698, 198
  • HI4PI Collaboration et al. (2016) HI4PI Collaboration et al., 2016, A&A, 594, A116
  • Hammerstein et al. (2021) Hammerstein E., et al., 2021, ApJ, 908, L20
  • Hayasaki & Jonker (2021) Hayasaki K., Jonker P. G., 2021, ApJ, 921, 20
  • Henden (2019) Henden A. A., 2019, Journal of the American Association of Variable Star Observers (JAAVSO), 47, 130
  • Hills (1975) Hills J. G., 1975, Nature, 254, 295
  • Hinkle et al. (2020) Hinkle J. T., Holoien T. W. S., Shappee B. J., Auchettl K., Kochanek C. S., Stanek K. Z., Payne A. V., Thompson T. A., 2020, ApJ, 894, L10
  • Hinkle et al. (2021) Hinkle J. T., et al., 2021, MNRAS, 500, 1673
  • Hinshaw et al. (2013) Hinshaw G., et al., 2013, ApJS, 208, 19
  • Holoien et al. (2014) Holoien T. W.-S., et al., 2014, MNRAS, 445, 3263
  • Holoien et al. (2016) Holoien T. W.-S., et al., 2016, MNRAS, 455, 2918
  • Holoien et al. (2018) Holoien T. W. S., Brown J. S., Auchettl K., Kochanek C. S., Prieto J. L., Shappee B. J., Van Saders J., 2018, MNRAS, 480, 5689
  • Huber et al. (2015) Huber M., et al., 2015, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 7153, 1
  • Hung et al. (2017) Hung T., et al., 2017, ApJ, 842, 29
  • Jiang et al. (2021) Jiang N., et al., 2021, ApJS, 252, 32
  • Kajava et al. (2020) Kajava J. J. E., Giustini M., Saxton R. D., Miniutti G., 2020, A&A, 639, A100
  • Kauffmann et al. (2003) Kauffmann G., et al., 2003, MNRAS, 346, 1055
  • Kausch et al. (2015) Kausch W., et al., 2015, A&A, 576, A78
  • Kewley et al. (2001) Kewley L. J., Heisler C. A., Dopita M. A., Lumsden S., 2001, ApJS, 132, 37
  • Kewley et al. (2006) Kewley L. J., Groves B., Kauffmann G., Heckman T., 2006, MNRAS, 372, 961
  • Komossa & Bade (1999) Komossa S., Bade N., 1999, A&A, 343, 775
  • Komossa et al. (2008) Komossa S., et al., 2008, ApJ, 678, L13
  • Komossa et al. (2009) Komossa S., et al., 2009, ApJ, 701, 105
  • Kool et al. (2020) Kool E. C., et al., 2020, MNRAS, 498, 2167
  • Leloudas et al. (2019) Leloudas G., et al., 2019, arXiv e-prints,
  • Liu et al. (2022) Liu X.-L., Dou L.-M., Chen J.-H., Shen R.-F., 2022, ApJ, 925, 67
  • Lodato & Rossi (2011) Lodato G., Rossi E. M., 2011, MNRAS, 410, 359
  • Lodato et al. (2009) Lodato G., King A. R., Pringle J. E., 2009, MNRAS, 392, 332
  • Lundqvist et al. (2022) Lundqvist P., Lundqvist N., Shibanov Y. A., 2022, A&A, 658, A30
  • Lyu et al. (2019) Lyu J., Rieke G. H., Smith P. S., 2019, ApJ, 886, 33
  • Mattila et al. (2018) Mattila S., et al., 2018, Science, 361, 482
  • McConnell & Ma (2013) McConnell N. J., Ma C.-P., 2013, ApJ, 764, 184
  • Moorwood et al. (1998) Moorwood A., Cuby J. G., Lidman C., 1998, The Messenger, 91, 9
  • Nicholl (2018) Nicholl M., 2018, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 2, 230
  • Nicholl et al. (2020) Nicholl M., et al., 2020, MNRAS, 499, 482
  • Nicholl et al. (2022) Nicholl M., Lanning D., Ramsden P., Mockler B., Lawrence A., Short P., Ridley E. J., 2022, arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:2201.02649
  • Oke & Sandage (1968) Oke J. B., Sandage A., 1968, ApJ, 154, 21
  • Onori et al. (2019) Onori F., et al., 2019, MNRAS, 489, 1463
  • Osterbrock & Ferland (2006) Osterbrock D. E., Ferland G. J., 2006, Astrophysics of gaseous nebulae and active galactic nuclei. CA: University Science Books
  • Pakull & Angebault (1986) Pakull M. W., Angebault L. P., 1986, Nature, 322, 511
  • Palaversa et al. (2016) Palaversa L., Gezari S., Sesar B., Stuart J. S., Wozniak P., Holl B., Ivezić Ž., 2016, ApJ, 819, 151
  • Pasham et al. (2017) Pasham D. R., Cenko S. B., Sadowski A., Guillochon J., Stone N. C., van Velzen S., Cannizzo J. K., 2017, ApJ, 837, L30
  • Phinney (1989) Phinney E. S., 1989, in Morris M., ed., IAU Symposium Vol. 136, The Center of the Galaxy. p. 543
  • Piran et al. (2015) Piran T., Svirski G., Krolik J., Cheng R. M., Shiokawa H., 2015, ApJ, 806, 164
  • Rees (1988) Rees M. J., 1988, Nature, 333, 523
  • Rees (1990) Rees M. J., 1990, Scientific American, 263, 56
  • Reynolds et al. (2022) Reynolds T. M., Mattila S., Kankare E., Efstathiou A., Kool E., Ryder S., Peña-Moñino L., Pérez-Torres M. A., 2022, arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:2202.04019
  • Ricci et al. (2017) Ricci F., La Franca F., Onori F., Bianchi S., 2017, A&A, 598, A51
  • Roth & Kasen (2018) Roth N., Kasen D., 2018, ApJ, 855, 54
  • Roth et al. (2016) Roth N., Kasen D., Guillochon J., Ramirez-Ruiz E., 2016, ApJ, 827, 3
  • Saxton et al. (2020) Saxton R., Komossa S., Auchettl K., Jonker P. G., 2020, Space Sci. Rev., 216, 85
  • Sazonov et al. (2021) Sazonov S., et al., 2021, MNRAS, 508, 3820
  • Schaerer et al. (2019) Schaerer D., Fragos T., Izotov Y. I., 2019, A&A, 622, L10
  • Schlafly & Finkbeiner (2011) Schlafly E. F., Finkbeiner D. P., 2011, ApJ, 737, 103
  • Shiokawa et al. (2015) Shiokawa H., Krolik J. H., Cheng R. M., Piran T., Noble S. C., 2015, ApJ, 804, 85
  • Short et al. (2020) Short P., et al., 2020, MNRAS, 498, 4119
  • Shu et al. (2020) Shu X., et al., 2020, Nature Communications, 11, 5876
  • Smartt et al. (2015) Smartt S. J., et al., 2015, A&A, 579, A40
  • Smee et al. (2013) Smee S. A., et al., 2013, AJ, 146, 32
  • Smette et al. (2015) Smette A., et al., 2015, A&A, 576, A77
  • Smith et al. (2020) Smith K. W., et al., 2020, PASP, 132, 085002
  • Steele et al. (2004) Steele I. A., et al., 2004, in Oschmann Jacobus M. J., ed., Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series Vol. 5489, Ground-based Telescopes. pp 679–692, doi:10.1117/12.551456
  • Stern et al. (2012) Stern D., et al., 2012, ApJ, 753, 30
  • Strubbe & Quataert (2009) Strubbe L. E., Quataert E., 2009, MNRAS, 400, 2070
  • Tody (1986) Tody D., 1986, in Proc. SPIE Instrumentation in Astronomy VI. ed. D.L. Crawford, 627, 733
  • Tonry et al. (2017) Tonry J., Stalder B., Denneau L., Heinze A., Weiland H., Rest A., Smith K. W., Smartt S. J., 2017, Transient Name Server Discovery Report, 2017-895, 1
  • Tonry et al. (2018) Tonry J. L., et al., 2018, PASP, 130, 064505
  • Vernet et al. (2011) Vernet J., et al., 2011, A&A, 536, A105
  • Wang et al. (2011) Wang T.-G., Zhou H.-Y., Wang L.-F., Lu H.-L., Xu D., 2011, ApJ, 740, 85
  • Wang et al. (2012) Wang T.-G., Zhou H.-Y., Komossa S., Wang H.-Y., Yuan W., Yang C., 2012, ApJ, 749, 115
  • Wang et al. (2022) Wang Y., et al., 2022, ApJ, 930, L4
  • Wevers et al. (2017) Wevers T., van Velzen S., Jonker P. G., Stone N. C., Hung T., Onori F., Gezari S., Blagorodnova N., 2017, MNRAS, 471, 1694
  • Wevers et al. (2019a) Wevers T., et al., 2019a, MNRAS, 487, 4136
  • Wevers et al. (2019b) Wevers T., et al., 2019b, MNRAS, 488, 4816
  • White & Peterson (1994) White R. J., Peterson B. M., 1994, PASP, 106, 879
  • Yang et al. (2013) Yang C.-W., Wang T.-G., Ferland G., Yuan W., Zhou H.-Y., Jiang P., 2013, ApJ, 774, 46
  • Zabludoff et al. (2021) Zabludoff A., et al., 2021, Space Sci. Rev., 217, 54
  • Zu et al. (2013) Zu Y., Kochanek C. S., Kozłowski S., Udalski A., 2013, ApJ, 765, 106
  • Zu et al. (2016) Zu Y., Kochanek C. S., Kozłowski S., Peterson B. M., 2016, ApJ, 819, 122
  • van Velzen et al. (2016) van Velzen S., Mendez A. J., Krolik J. H., Gorjian V., 2016, ApJ, 829, 19
  • van Velzen et al. (2020) van Velzen S., Holoien T. W. S., Onori F., Hung T., Arcavi I., 2020, Space Sci. Rev., 216, 124
  • van Velzen et al. (2021a) van Velzen S., Pasham D. R., Komossa S., Yan L., Kara E. A., 2021a, Space Sci. Rev., 217, 63
  • van Velzen et al. (2021b) van Velzen S., et al., 2021b, ApJ, 908, 4

Appendix A Some extra material

Table 4: Swift/UVOT photometric measurements
MJD Phase UVW2 UVM2 UVW1 U B V
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8)
58 031.12 62.8 18.03±\pm0.08 17.86±\pm0.08 17.66±\pm0.09 16.51±\pm0.12 17.26±\pm0.14 16.62±\pm0.17
58 041.75 73.4 18.23±\pm0.09 18.02±\pm0.08 18.00±\pm0.11 16.81±\pm0.15 17.77±\pm0.21 16.93
58 046.29 77.9 18.18±\pm0.08 18.14±\pm0.08 17.98±\pm0.10 16.97±\pm0.14 17.83±\pm0.17 17.20±\pm0.22
58 051.78 83.4 18.42±\pm0.09 18.11±\pm0.08 17.99±\pm0.11 16.84±\pm0.16 17.48±\pm0.17 16.84
58 055.04 86.7 18.34±\pm0.09 18.17±\pm0.09 18.18±\pm0.11 16.65±\pm0.14 17.84 16.85
58 143.57 175.2 19.09±\pm0.13 19.25±\pm0.14 19.48 17.35±\pm0.18 18.20 17.11
58 156.93 188.6 19.49±\pm0.10 19.57±\pm0.1 19.22±\pm0.11 17.87±\pm0.13 18.33±\pm0.13 17.23±\pm0.13
58 162.98 194.6 19.42±\pm0.09 19.55±\pm0.10 19.22±\pm0.12 17.91±\pm0.14 18.44±\pm0.14 17.53±\pm0.16
58 168.35 200.0 19.55±\pm0.11 19.93±\pm0.13 19.65±\pm0.16 18.07±\pm0.18 18.46±\pm0.17 17.50±\pm0.18
58 174.28 205.9 19.40 \cdots 19.50±\pm0.16 17.85±\pm0.21 18.07 \cdots
58 177.72 209.4 19.49±\pm0.12 19.76±\pm0.13 19.30±\pm0.15 18.07±\pm0.19 18.34±\pm0.17 17.46±\pm0.20
58 186.15 217.8 \cdots 19.71±\pm0.09 \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots
58 193.72 225.4 19.77±\pm0.12 \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots
58 200.76 232.4 \cdots \cdots \cdots 18.06±\pm0.09 \cdots \cdots
58 211.60 243.3 \cdots \cdots 19.64±\pm0.10 \cdots \cdots \cdots
58 213.85 245.5 19.51±\pm0.09 \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots
58 215.98 247.6 \cdots \cdots 19.57±\pm0.09 \cdots \cdots \cdots
59 651.84 1683.49 20.74±\pm0.12 20.82±\pm0.12 20.34±\pm0.14 18.43±\pm0.13 18.56±\pm0.11 17.56±\pm0.11
59 655.29 1686.94 20.86±\pm0.15 20.90±\pm0.16 20.44±\pm0.16 18.29±\pm0.14 18.30±\pm0.10 17.62±\pm0.13

Notes: (1) MJD date of observations; (2) Phase (days) with respect to the discovery date MJD 57 968.35 (3), (4) and (5), apparent magnitudes and uncertainties for the UVOT filters UVW2, UVM2, UVW1, in AB system; (6), (7) and (8), apparent magnitudes and uncertainties for the UVOT filters U, B and V, in the Vega system. The values indicated with \ddagger are upper limits. All the magnitudes reported are uncorrected for foreground extinction. With \cdots we indicate epochs with no data available (no observations). The full table including photometric measurement until MJD 59 655.29 is available online.

Table 5: Optical photometric measurements
MJD Phase cc oo uu^{\prime} gg^{\prime} rr^{\prime}/ww ii^{\prime} Telescope
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9)
57 968.35 0.00 \cdots 18.70±\pm0.17 \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots ATLAS
57 971.32 2.97 \cdots 18.48±\pm0.17 \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots ATLAS
57 972.30 3.95 \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots 18.57±\pm0.04 PS1
57 975.32 6.97 \cdots 18.38±\pm0.13 \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots ATLAS
57 977.30 8.95 \cdots 18.24±\pm0.07 \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots ATLAS
57 979.29 10.94 \cdots 18.13±\pm0.10 \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots ATLAS
57 981.27 12.92 \cdots 17.89±\pm0.06 \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots ATLAS
57 983.30 14.95 17.60±\pm0.04 \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots ATLAS
57 985.26 16.91 \cdots 17.76±\pm0.05 \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots ATLAS
57 987.30 18.95 17.43±\pm0.10 \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots ATLAS
57 989.26 20.91 \cdots 17.56±\pm0.05 \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots ATLAS
57 995.27 26.92 \cdots 18.03±\pm0.10 \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots ATLAS
57 996.27 27.92 \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots 17.42±\pm0.02 PS1
57 997.24 28.89 \cdots 18.28±\pm0.10 \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots ATLAS
57 999.27 30.92 \cdots 18.12±\pm0.12 \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots ATLAS
58 007.27 38.92 \cdots 18.08±\pm0.07 \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots ATLAS
58 009.28 40.93 \cdots 18.45±\pm0.10 \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots ATLAS
58 013.26 44.91 \cdots 18.29±\pm0.12 \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots ATLAS
58 162.22 193.87 \cdots \cdots \cdots 19.97±\pm0.10 19.87±\pm0.10 \cdots NOT
58 186.39 218.04 \cdots \cdots \cdots 19.95±\pm0.16 19.63±\pm0.21 \cdots NTT
58 194.25 225.90 \cdots \cdots 20.19±\pm0.14 20.13±\pm0.15 20.45±\pm0.22 \cdots TNG
58 198.10 229.75 \cdots \cdots 20.33±\pm0.24 20.32±\pm0.11 21.10±\pm0.26 \cdots TNG
58 201.19 232.84 \cdots \cdots \cdots 20.35±\pm0.09 20.44±\pm0.14 \cdots NOT
58 202.37 234.02 \cdots \cdots \cdots 20.27±\pm0.230 20.08±\pm0.16 \cdots NTT
58 207.15 238.80 \cdots \cdots 21.47±\pm0.25 19.97±\pm0.18 20.64±\pm0.18 \cdots TNG
58 216.40 248.05 \cdots \cdots \cdots 20.15±\pm0.20 19.42±\pm0.15 \cdots NTT
58 263.10 294.75 \cdots \cdots \cdots 19.70±\pm0.20 20.87±\pm0.25 \cdots NOT
58 263.17 294.82 \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots 20.06±\pm0.20 PS1
58 274.52 306.17 \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots 20.34±\pm0.25 PS1
58 538.89 570.54 \cdots \cdots 21.41±\pm0.19 20.80±\pm0.23 20.45±\pm0.19 \cdots LT
58 610.57 641.65 \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots 20.59±\pm0.08 \cdots PS1
58 611.58 643.23 \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots 20.32±\pm0.05 \cdots PS1
58 633.53 665.18 \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots 20.74±\pm0.11 \cdots PS1
58 693.35 725.00 \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots 20.73±\pm0.10 \cdots PS1
58 696.32 727.97 \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots 21.08±\pm0.23 \cdots PS1
JJ HH KsKs
58 347.043 374.75 19.96±\pm0.16 17.50±\pm0.09 16.12±\pm0.09 \cdots \cdots \cdots NTT

Notes: (1) MJD date of observations; (2) Phase (days) with respect to the discovery date MJD 57 968.35; (3) and (4) host-subtracted apparent magnitudes and uncertainties for the ATLAS filters cc and oo, respectively; (5) and (6) host-subtracted apparent magnitudes and uncertainties for the filters uu^{\prime} and gg^{\prime} obtained in the framework o our monitoring campaign; (7) host-subtracted apparent magnitudes and uncertainties for the filters rr^{\prime} obtained in the framework o our monitoring campaign and for the PS1 filter ww; (8) host-subtracted apparent magnitudes and uncertainties for the filter ii^{\prime}, obtained by PS1; (9) telescope used. NIR magnitude from SofI/NTT observations are reported in the last row of the table. All the optical magnitudes are uncorrected for foreground extinction and are in the AB system, while the NIR data are in the Vega system. With \cdots we indicate epochs with no data available (no observations). PS1 data in ww band central wavelength correspond to the rr^{\prime} one Smith et al. (2020). The full table including photometric measurement until MJD 58 696.32 is available online.

Refer to caption
Figure 14: Sequence of the rest-frame optical spectra of AT 2017gge taken with different facilities: EFOSC2/NTT (in blue), ALFOSC/NOT (in red), DOLORES/TNG (in orange), ACAM/WHT (in green), OSIRIS/GTC (in black) and GMOS/Gemini (in purple). All the spectra have been corrected for reddening. The time of the observation in days since the transient discovery and the main emission lines are indicated. The location of telluric absorption lines is indicated by gray bands.
Refer to caption
Figure 15: Sequence of the host-subtracted spectra of AT 2017gge. In the left panel the He ii+Hβ\upbetaregion is shown, while in the right panel the Hα\upalpha region. The host-subtracted spectra obtained for the EFOSC2 Gr#\#18 and the ALFOSC Gr#\#19 are shown in green in the left panel only (as they don’t cover the Hα\upalpha region). The position of the H lines and of the [O ii] λ\lambda3727 are shown with black vertical dashed lines, while the He ii and the position of the Bowen blend at λ\lambda4640 are indicated by green ad red dashed lines, respectively. The solid gray vertical lines indicates the position of the high ionization coronal lines [Fe x] λ\lambda6374. For each spectrum, the days from the transient discovery are also indicated.
Refer to caption
Figure 16: Rest-frame X-shooter spectrum (UVB, VIS and NIR) of the AT 2017gge host galaxy taken 1648 days after the transient discovery. The spectrum has been corrected for reddening. The main emission lines are indicated with dashed vertical lines, while red solid vertical lines indicate the position of the H lines. The region affected by telluric absorption lines is indicated by grey bands.