This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

The non-explosive stellar merging origin of the ultra-massive carbon-rich white dwarfs

Adela Kawka1, Lilia Ferrario1,2 and Stéphane Vennes1,2
1 International Centre for Radio Astronomy Research - Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia
2 Mathematical Sciences Institute, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
Contact e-mail: [email protected]
(Accepted XXX. Received YYY; in original form ZZZ)
Abstract

We have investigated the origin of a sub-class of carbon-polluted white dwarfs (DQ) originally identified as the “hot DQ" white dwarfs. These objects are relatively hot (10 000Teff25 00010\,000\lesssim T_{\rm eff}\lesssim 25\,000 K), have markedly higher carbon abundance (C-enriched), are more massive (M0.8M\gtrsim 0.8 M) than ordinary DQs (M0.6M\sim 0.6 M), and display high space velocities. Hence, despite their young appearance their kinematic properties are those of an old white dwarf population. The way out of this dilemma is to assume that they formed via the merging of two white dwarfs. In this paper we examine the observed characteristics of this population of “C-enriched" DQ white dwarfs and confirm that nearly half of the 63 known objects have kinematic properties consistent with those of the Galactic thick disc or halo. We have also conducted population synthesis studies and found that the merging hypothesis is indeed compatible with observations. Studies of this sub-class of white dwarfs have important implications for our understanding of Type Ia Supernovae (SNeIa), commonly used to determine the expansion history of the universe, since the same formation channel applies to both kind of objects. Hence probing the properties of these white dwarfs that failed to explode may yield important constraints to the modelling of the mechanisms leading to a thermonuclear runaway.

keywords:
white dwarfs – stars: evolution – stars: kinematics and dynamics – stars: atmospheres – supernovae: general
pubyear: 2022pagerange: The non-explosive stellar merging origin of the ultra-massive carbon-rich white dwarfs4

1 Introduction

White dwarfs are the final stage of stellar evolution for the majority of stars and about a quarter of white dwarfs are found in binary systems (Hollands et al., 2018). However, about half of intermediate mass main-sequence stars (the progenitors of the white dwarfs) are in binaries (Ferrario, 2012; Duchêne & Kraus, 2013). This discrepancy provides evidence that some white dwarfs formed in stellar mergers (Briggs et al., 2015; Toonen et al., 2017).

The merger of double degenerates (DDs) provides one path toward Type Ia supernova explosions. The study of white dwarfs that lead to such events, but failed to explode, yield important constraints to the modelling of the mechanisms leading to a thermonuclear runaway (Ruiter, 2020). The expectation is that white dwarfs formed via DD mergers are more massive than white dwarfs descending from single stars and this was indeed shown to be the case by the population synthesis calculations of Briggs et al. (2015, 2018). Temmink et al. (2020) further investigated the impact of binary evolution on apparently single white dwarfs and found that about a quarter of them should have formed in a stellar merger, but that only about 3 per cent formed from a DD merger, which is consistent with the findings of Briggs et al. (2015). Schwab (2021) calculated evolutionary models for these white dwarf merger remnants and showed that they should be massive and fast rotating. Overall, the products of DD mergers should be rare.

The entire sub-class of hot, carbon-rich white dwarfs are candidate merger products (Dunlap & Clemens, 2015). White dwarfs with carbon lines or molecular carbon bands are generally classified as DQs (Dufour et al., 2005). The presence of carbon in most of these stars can be explained by the dredge-up of core carbon by a deep helium convection zone (Pelletier et al., 1986; Fontaine & Brassard, 2005). This model explains the observed increase in the carbon abundance with increasing temperatures up to Teff10 000T_{\rm eff}\lesssim 10\,000 K but fails to explain the surge in carbon observed in hotter DQ white dwarfs (Dufour et al., 2007, 2008b; Coutu et al., 2019). These hot DQ white dwarfs display neutral and ionized carbon line spectra in a carbon dominated atmosphere at effective temperatures ranging from 18 000\sim 18\,000 to 25 00025\,000 K (Dufour et al., 2008b). Cooler objects display a blend of neutral carbon lines and molecular carbon bands at temperature ranging from 10 000\sim 10\,000 to 16 00016\,000 K (Coutu et al., 2019) in a mixed carbon/helium atmosphere. Using Gaia parallaxes, Coutu et al. (2019) suggested that these hot DQs should also be very massive (0.8\gtrsim 0.8 M). Furthermore, Dunlap & Clemens (2015) showed that these hot DQs have high transverse velocities. This means that despite their high temperatures and high masses, characteristic of a young white dwarf population, they would in fact belong to an old one. These properties, along with the presence of a magnetic field and high rotation rate (Dunlap & Clemens, 2015), strongly suggest that these objects formed through the merger of two white dwarfs.

This population of massive carbon-polluted merger products should extend below 10 000\sim 10\,000 K and could be distinguished from canonical DQ white dwarfs by having a higher carbon abundance at a given temperature. Therefore, we are dealing with an unusual white dwarf population that has a different origin from the general white dwarf population. To avoid confusion, we shall refer to the combined population of hot DQ white dwarfs and their cooler counterparts as “C-enriched DQs”.

Strong independent evidence in support of the merger hypothesis for the origin of the C-enriched DQs is provided by a kinematical study of the DQ white dwarf LP 93-21. Kawka et al. (2020) showed that the total age of LP 93-21, assuming single star evolution, is too short and inconsistent with its Galactic kinematics which place LP 93-21 in the halo hence bolstering a merger origin for the star.

In this paper we extend the kinematical approach to the now much larger sample of massive DQ white dwarfs and we investigate, through a population synthesis study, whether the stellar merger hypothesis for the origin of the C-enriched DQs is consistent with observed population properties (age, mass).

2 Massive DQ white dwarfs

We have gathered all known DQ white dwarfs from several sources including those from the recent studies by Coutu et al. (2019), Blouin & Dufour (2019) and Koester & Kepler (2019) and we have adopted the properties (effective temperature, surface gravity, mass and carbon abundance) from these sources. For stars that have not been analysed using Gaia measurements, we used available spectroscopy, photometric measurements and Gaia distance measurements to determine their properties. If the effective temperature and carbon abundance are known, we combined this information with the Gaia parallax and photometry and our model photometry to estimate the surface gravity and mass. We used the evolutionary mass-radius relations for helium atmospheres of Benvenuto & Althaus (1999) combined with our model DQ spectra (Kawka et al., 2020) to calculate absolute magnitudes.

From this sample we extracted white dwarfs with masses greater than 0.8 M that we consider representative of potential merger products. We checked all massive candidates for their carbon abundance to ensure they lie in the enhanced carbon sequence and removed those that appear to lie in the lower carbon abundance sequence. To this sample we added two new massive DQs from the SkyMapper survey of high proper motion white dwarfs (Vennes et al., in preparation, see Appendix A). The spectra of these two stars were obtained with the Focal Reducer and low dispersion Spectrograph (FORS) at the European Southern Observatory and the Wide-Field Spectrograph (WiFeS) at Siding Spring Observatory (SSO). These massive and C-enriched DQs are listed in Table 2 with their atmospheric parameters and they are shown as the green circles in Fig. 1.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: Carbon abundance measurements as a function of the effective temperature of the known population of DQ white dwarfs. The massive C-enriched DQs are shown in green whilst the others are shown in blue. The size of the circles is proportional to the mass of the white dwarf.

2.1 Kinematics

We calculated the Galactic velocity components using the distance and proper motion from Gaia, and, wherever possible, a measurement of the radial velocity. For most stars we used spectra from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). In a few cases we extracted archival spectra from the European Southern Observatory (ESO) Archive and the Keck Observatory Archive: A UVES spectrum of J0045-2336 obtained on 2016 Sep 4 (Programme ID 097.D-0063), a series of PMOS (FORS2) spectra of J0106++1513, J0236-0734, and J0818++0102 obtained on 2012 Nov 17-18 (Programme 090.D-0536), and Low Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (LRIS) spectrum of J0205++2057 obtained on 1996 Dec 12. We also obtained a FORS2 spectrum of J2255-2826 on 2016 Jun as part of our ESO Programme 097.D-0694, and spectra of J1225++0959 and J2140-3637 obtained at Siding Spring Observatory (SSO) with the 2.3-m telescope and the Wide-Field Spectrograph (WiFeS) on 2020 Mar 19 and 2015 Sep 25, respectively.

Interestingly, the high resolution UVES spectra of J0045-2336 revealed that some lines show strong red asymmetry, similar to Si ii lines observed in the heavily polluted GALEX J193156.8+011745 (Vennes et al., 2011). At low resolution, these asymmetric profiles appear as redshifted profiles as noted in the analysis presented by Kawka et al. (2020). In the high electronic density of massive DQs, the carbon line positions are altered by the Stark effect which induces large radial velocity shifts (see a discussion in Kawka et al., 2020). In cooler objects dominated by neutral carbon, the extent of this shift (ded_{e}) depends on the electronic density in the atmosphere and, given the range of temperatures and masses among these objects, the Stark shift was estimated at de15d_{e}\approx-15 km s-1 for measurements based on the spectral line C iλ5181.83\,\lambda 5181.83Å which is only minimally Stark shifted. In hotter objects, dominated by singly ionized carbon, the total Stark shift is estimated at de+dii45d_{e}+d_{\text{C\,{ii}}}\approx 45 km s-1 for measurements based on C iiλ4270\,\lambda 4270Å (Larbi-Terzi et al., 2012). These velocity measurements were corrected for the Stark shift as well as for the gravitational redshift. All measurements are barycentric corrected. In the presence of a magnetic field, the central (π\pi) component was employed for the measurement. For seventeen stars it was not possible to measure a radial velocity because of a low signal-to-noise ratio or a lack of publicly available spectra. For these stars we assumed a radial velocity of zero.

The Galactic space velocity components were computed using Johnson & Soderblom (1987) and assuming that the Solar motion relative to the local standard of rest is (U,V,WU_{\odot},V_{\odot},W_{\odot}) = (11.1, 12.2, 7.3) km s-1 (Schönrich et al., 2010). The resulting velocity vectors for the C-enriched DQs are listed in Table 4. We have also derived the zz-component of their angular momenta, JzJ_{z}, and the eccentricity of their orbit, ee using galpy (Bovy, 2015). We assumed that the rotational speed of the Galactic disc is 220 km s-1 and the Sun’s distance from the Galactic centre is 8 kpc. These kinematical properties provide an additional constraint to help distinguish between thin disc, thick disc and halo stars (Pauli et al., 2003, 2006).

2.2 Space density of C-enriched DQ white dwarfs

Hollands et al. (2018) estimated a white dwarf space density of 4.49±0.38×1034.49\pm 0.38\times 10^{-3} pc-3 using the 20 pc sample. In this sample 75 per cent are isolated white dwarfs, that is 104 white dwarfs. Using population syntheses Temmink et al. (2020) showed that 10 to 30 per cent of observed single white dwarfs would have formed through binary mergers, and of these 15 per cent would have formed via DD mergers. Therefore within 20 pc, about 10 to 31 single white dwarfs would have formed in binary mergers and of these, 1 to 5 would have formed in DD mergers for a space density of 7-35×10535\times 10^{-5} pc-3 . The C-enriched white dwarfs would only be a subset of all merger products alongside other merger candidates such as ultra-massive magnetic white dwarfs (e.g., RE/EUVE J0317-855, Ferrario et al., 1997; Vennes et al., 2003). We can estimate the space density of C-enriched DQs by bracketing its value between a maximum value based on a complete, local sample, and a minimum value based on a list of all known objects. There are no C-enriched DQs within 20 pc allowing us to place an upper limit to their space density at 3×105\la 3\times 10^{-5} pc-3. Two C-enriched DQs (G47-18 and SMSSJ2140-3637) are found within 40 pc. In the same volume McCleery et al. (2020) reported 1233 white dwarf candidates from the Gaia DR2 (Gentile Fusillo et al., 2019), out of which a minimum of 521 (40\approx 40 percent) were spectroscopically confirmed white dwarfs, most of them in the Northern hemisphere. Allowing for a minimum of two current C-enriched DQ identifications to be part of that selection, for a possible total of 4 identifications within the complete 40 pc sample, we estimate a space density of C-enriched DQs of at least 0.751.5×1050.75-1.5\times 10^{-5} pc-3, hence bracketing the C-enriched DQ space density in the range ρ0.83.0×105\rho\approx 0.8-3.0\times 10^{-5} pc-3. At the upper range of space densities, C-enriched DQs could represent nearly half of all DD mergers, or at the lower range no more than a few percent.

Refer to caption
Figure 2: Left panel: Cumulative distance distribution function (histogram) of C-enriched DQs identified in the SDSS with a sky coverage of 9380 degree2. The long-dash, short-dash, and full line curves represent cumulative distributions assuming space density in the Galactic plane of 3×1053\times 10^{-5}, 1.5×1051.5\times 10^{-5}, and 7.5×1067.5\times 10^{-6} pc-3, respectively, assuming a Galactic scale-height of 250 pc and a fractional sky coverage of 0.227 (9380 degree2). The full red line curve represents a cumulative distribution at ρ0=7.5×106\rho_{0}=7.5\times 10^{-6} pc-3 and Z0=350Z_{0}=350 pc. Right panel: The height,|Z||Z|, above the plane of all known massive C-enriched DQs.

Fig. 2 shows the cumulative distance distribution of C-enriched DQs in the SDSS. Most of these objects were identified in the SDSS which has a current (DR17) sky coverage of 23 percent (9380 degree2), and only five objects out of 63 are not included in the SDSS. The observed SDSS cumulative distribution is compared to calculated distance distributions N<dN_{<d} assuming a space density in the Galactic plane of ρ0=3.0\rho_{0}=3.0, 1.51.5, and 0.75×1050.75\times 10^{-5} pc-3, a scale-height Z0=250Z_{0}=250 pc, and a fractional sky coverage Φ=0.227\Phi=0.227:

N<d=Φ 4πρ0Z03[12(dZ0)2+(dZ0+1)ed/Z01]N_{<d}=\Phi\,4\pi\rho_{0}Z_{0}^{3}\Big{[}\frac{1}{2}\Big{(}\frac{d}{Z_{0}}\Big{)}^{2}+\Big{(}\frac{d}{Z_{0}}+1\Big{)}e^{-d/Z_{0}}-1\Big{]} (1)

The SDSS distribution appears to follow the calculated distribution at ρ0=1.5×105\rho_{0}=1.5\times 10^{-5} pc-3 up to a distance of 80 pc. Assuming that all C-enriched DQs were correctly identified over the whole sky and within a distance of 40 pc, i.e., ρ0=1.5×105\rho_{0}=1.5\times 10^{-5} pc-3, we find that only one fifth of C-enriched DQs have been identified within a distance of 100 pc leaving 40\approx 40 bright objects to be discovered, mostly in the Southern hemisphere and outside the SDSS footprint. Gentile Fusillo et al. (2019) showed that the white dwarf space density decreases with distance using the 100 pc sample of white dwarfs that were selected from the Gaia 2nd Data Release and that this decrease can be modelled with a scale height of 230 pc. Based on the 2DF sample of distant blue white dwarfs Vennes et al. (2002) showed that the scale height can be as high as 350 pc thereby minimizing the effect of Galactic scale-height of the expected number count of C-enriched DQs. Application of Equation (1) at Z0=350Z_{0}=350 pc shows that Galactic scale-heights in the 230-350 pc range have a negligible effect on the number count in local surveys (d100d\la 100 pc). We calculated the height above the Galactic plane for all the massive C-enriched DQs and found that they drop off at higher scale heights most likely because of the SDSS survey limit. The majority (87 percent) of stars are found below Z=200 pc (Fig. 2).

3 Origin of C-enriched DQ white dwarfs

The characteristics of the C-enriched DQs are different from those of ordinary white dwarfs as summarised below.

  1. 1.

    Their optical spectra show notable absorption lines of C i at 4270.2, 4933.4, 5053.6, 5181.8, 5381.8Å and/or C ii at 4267, 4300, 4370, 4860, 6578, and 6583Å  and weak He i lines. Weak Swan bands are detected at the cooler end of the population (10 000\approx 10\,000K). The detection of hydrogen in C-enriched DQ white dwarfs is relatively rare, i.e., in less than 20\approx 20 percent of the population (Dufour et al., 2007, 2008a; Coutu et al., 2019), such as in the two massive DQ white dwarfs G35-26 (Thejll et al., 1990) and G227-5 (Wegner & Koester, 1985). An upper limit of log(H/C)2.7\log{\rm(H/C})\approx-2.7 is otherwise achieved among the hottest objects from the absence of hydrogen lines in the spectra (Dufour et al., 2008a). Upper limits to the hydrogen abundance in cooler objects have yet to be determined relative to the dominant species, helium or carbon (Coutu et al., 2019).

  2. 2.

    Their masses are substantially higher. The average mass of H-rich white dwarfs with effective temperatures below 60 000 K is 0.5400.540 M while that of He-rich white dwarfs below 50 000 K is 0.5750.575 M (Bédard et al., 2020). The average mass of the C-enriched DQs is M=1.027M,σM=0.116M\langle M\rangle=1.027\,M_{\odot},\sigma_{M}=0.116\,M_{\odot} (see section 6), thus substantially larger. In fact, their average mass surpasses even that of the magnetic white dwarfs (M=0.87M,σM=0.22M\langle M\rangle=0.87\,M_{\odot},\ \sigma_{M}=0.22\,M_{\odot}; Kawka, 2020).

    This suggests that either the main sequence progenitors of the C-enriched DQs were substantially more massive or that they are the result of mergers.

  3. 3.

    About 70 percent of hot DQs are magnetic (Dufour et al., 2013; Dunlap & Clemens, 2015) exhibiting field strengths from 0.3 MG up to 18 MG but with the majority of fields between 1 and 4 MG. This is a much higher percentage than among the general white dwarf population (14 - 20 percent in volume-limited samples, Kawka et al., 2007). This is again a strong indicator that stellar merger occurred and was responsible for the generation of their magnetic fields (Tout et al., 2008; García-Berro et al., 2012; Wickramasinghe et al., 2014; Briggs et al., 2015).

  4. 4.

    The kinematics characteristics of the C-enriched DQs indicate that they belong to an older population (see Section 5 and Dunlap & Clemens, 2015). Thus these C-enriched DQs are highly unlikely to be the progenies of single massive stars since white dwarfs with masses of 0.81.20.8-1.2 M are the descendants of main sequence stars of 3.583.5-8 M (e.g., Romero et al., 2015) whose evolution to the compact phase is very fast (0.5\leq 0.5 Gyrs). Such warm/hot white dwarfs would be confined to the thin Galactic disd. If, instead, they evolved from single stars and became white dwarfs billions of years ago, they would be very cool and dim, unlike the population of the currently observed C-enriched DQs. Therefore, it is much more likely that these DQs are the outcome of merging events many of which occurred with long delay times from the formation of the progenitor binary.

The points highlighted above strongly support a merger hypothesis for the C-enriched DQ white dwarfs (Dunlap & Clemens, 2015). However, not all mergers are expected to produce C-enriched DQ white dwarfs. The studies of Briggs et al. (2015) have shown that high field magnetic white dwarfs are the result of merger events during common envelope evolution with the major contributors coming from low-mass main-sequence stars merging with the degenerate cores of red giant branch (RGB) and asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars. The DD mergers only represented a very small fraction of the population of magnetic white dwarfs and populated the high-mass tail of the magnetic white dwarf mass distribution. The latter are the most likely progenitor’s candidates of the C-enriched DQs. A second possible channel may consist in the merger of a white dwarf with a naked helium star or in the merger of two naked helium stars. The common property that characterises these two channels is the absence of hydrogen in their envelopes.

4 Population synthesis calculations

Refer to caption
Figure 3: Star formation rate (SFR) of the Galactic disc (dashed line) and bulge (dotted line) with the total SFR shown as a solid curve. The disc’s SFR has been used in the present studies. These SFRs yield the observed stellar masses and age distributions of the given components. The SFR reached a maximum about 12.5 Gyr ago but it is only the Galactic disc that has continued to contribute to star formation up to the present day.

In order to test the stellar merger hypothesis as an explanation for the origin of the C-enriched DQs, we have used the rapid Binary Stellar Evolution (BSE) code of Hurley et al. (2002) which includes the updates of Kiel & Hurley (2006). Common envelope (CE) evolution, as first proposed by (Paczynski, 1976), is necessary to explain compact binaries whose size is smaller than the initial radius of the primary star. The outcome of CE evolution is either a merged object or a close binary. Since the processes that govern the CE phase are still not fully understood and the ejection of the envelope may or may not be complete, two parameters are usually introduced. The first is the CE efficiency parameter αCE\alpha_{\rm CE} which was introduced to parametrise the efficiency of the injection of orbital energy into the envelope (Livio & Soker, 1988) and the other is λb\lambda_{\rm b} which depends on the structure of the donor star and on how tightly bound to the core the envelope is. Here we use the BSE option whereby λb\lambda_{\rm b} is calculated from the detailed stellar evolution models of Pols et al. (1995) obtained with the Cambridge STARS code (Eggleton, 1971). An extensive explanation of the nature of this parameter and the range of values it can attain are in Loveridge et al. (2011).

Since the envelope clearance efficiency is low at small αCE\alpha_{\rm CE}’s, the envelope has a longer time to exert a drag on the orbit and consequently the number of stars that merge during CE increases as αCE\alpha_{\rm CE} decreases. Most of these merger events occur during the RGB or AGB phases of the primary star. Those systems that do not coalesce emerge from CE evolution at smaller orbital separations. Ivanova et al. (2013) have shown that the post-CE orbital separation is directly proportional to αCE\alpha_{\rm CE}. Ruiter et al. (2011) found that in order to obtain a number of events that is consistent with the predicted rate of SNe Ia from the DD merger channel one has to assume complete CE efficiency, that is, αCEλb=1\alpha_{\rm CE}\lambda_{\rm b}=1. Similarly, Ruiter et al. (2019) investigated the various pathways to neutron star formation via the accretion induced collapse (AIC) of oxygen-neon white dwarfs in interacting binaries or via merger induced collapse. They explored their results using two different approaches for CE evolution. In one they have αCEλb=1\alpha_{\rm CE}\lambda_{\rm b}=1. In the other they keep αCE=1\alpha_{\rm CE}=1 but with the donor binding energy parameter based on the stellar evolution calculations of Xu & Li (2010) and on the evolutionary state of the donor at the onset of CE evolution. They find that the AIC birthrates are similar in both cases. In the present work, we also require αCE=1\alpha_{\rm CE}=1, since low αCE\alpha_{\rm CE}’s yield too many merged objects with M0.95M\lesssim 0.95. Because of our choice of λb\lambda_{b}, our simulations are closer to those labelled Model 2 in Ruiter et al. (2019).

The masses of the stars, M1M_{1} for the primary and M2M_{2} for the secondary, are assigned values in the range 0.8100.8-10 M while the initial orbital period at the ZAMS, PiP_{\rm i}, varies in the range 1010 00010-10\,000 days. The masses of the primary are randomly chosen according to Kroupa (2001) mass function and those of the secondary stars according to a flat mass distribution with q=M2/M11q=M_{2}/M_{1}\leq 1 (e.g. Ferrario, 2012). The initial period distribution is assumed to be uniform in the logarithm (Kouwenhoven et al., 2007). The metallicity is near solar taking into consideration that we may slightly underestimate the number of merger events since their rates are higher at lower metallicity due to lower wind-mass-loss rates (Côté et al., 2018).

In our population synthesis calculations we have followed the evolution of 10710^{7} binaries up to an age tGal=13t_{Gal}=13 Gyrs. From this evolved population we then extracted all single white dwarfs that were the result of either the merger of two white dwarfs or of a white dwarf with a naked helium star or two naked helium stars. All such mergers yield white dwarfs with no hydrogen in their atmospheres. The evolutionary path that leads to these events requires one or two common envelope phases. If the two stars do not coalesce during common envelope evolution, they both evolve to the compact star stage and form a close binary system consisting of two white dwarfs. Because the merger of two white dwarfs is driven by gravitational wave radiation, their merging can be delayed substantially (see section 6). To gain more familiarity with these complex processes, we refer the reader to the thorough review of Ivanova et al. (2013) on binary evolution, on the role that common envelope evolution plays in bringing stars together, and on possible mergers or explosions.

Our population synthesis calculations correspond to a single starburst (one generation of stars). In order to model the currently observed C-enriched DQ population, which is the result of binaries that were born at different Galactic times, we have assigned various birth epochs to the starburst, in agreement with the Galactic disc star formation history (SFH) of Crocker et al. (2017) and shown in Fig 3. Briefly, this SFH is given by

log10[SFR+D]=max[Az2+Bz+C,0],\log_{10}[SFR+D]={\rm max}[Az^{2}+Bz+C,0], (2)

where zz is the cosmological redshift as first proposed by van Dokkum et al. (2013) and Snaith et al. (2014). This form was then renormalized by Crocker et al. (2017) so that the integrated stellar mass of the disc is (3.7±0.5)×1010(3.7\pm 0.5)\times 10^{10} M, in agreement with Bland-Hawthorn & Gerhard (2016). In this context we would like to remark that the star formation history that we have adopted does not take into account a possible inside-out assemblage history of our Galaxy (Xiang et al., 2018) and that the effect on the present day merger population remains to be investigated.

This SFH allowed us to scale up the progenitors of the DQs to a number (and thus mass) that makes this subgroup of binaries consistent with the total mass of the Galactic disc. The method consisted in producing many generations of DQs whose progenitor binaries were born at times that were randomly sampled from the SFH of equation (2) under the simplifying assumption that there is an equal number of single stars as number of binaries. Each of our merged white dwarf was then assigned a location in the Galaxy in the cylindrical coordinate system (RR, Φ\Phi, zz) with origin in the Galactic centre. The distribution of stars in the RR and zz directions were taken to follow exponential laws (e.g. van der Kruit & Searle, 1982, and references therein) with radial and vertical scale-lengths of r0=2.6±0.5r_{0}=2.6\pm 0.5 kpc and z0=800±180z_{0}=800\pm 180 pc respectively at R=8R=8 kpc (distance of the Sun from the Galactic centre Bland-Hawthorn & Gerhard, 2016). A multiplicative factor (t/tGal)1/2(t/t_{Gal})^{1/2}, where tt is the total age of the star (from the birth of the binary on the main sequence to the present time, Eggleton et al., 1989), has been applied to the distribution in the zz direction. This was done to take into consideration the vertical age gradient in the Milky Way disc. Effective temperature and magnitude were assigned to each synthetic object using the tables available at http://www.astro.umontreal.ca/~bergeron/CoolingModels (Bergeron et al., 2011; Bédard et al., 2020).

We have limited our population analysis to objects that have a Gaia G-magnitude, GG, less than 20. This choice was determined by the study of Boubert & Everall (2020) on the completeness of Gaia DR2. More specifically, these authors found that over 3<G<203<G<20, Gaia is essentially complete and falls from 100 to 0 per cent over 20.0<G<21.520.0<G<21.5. Thus, all our model data represent a magnitude-limited sample of mergers with G20G\leq 20.

The 2nd data release of Gaia revealed an enhancement of massive white dwarfs in a narrow temperature range (Q-branch; Gaia Collaboration et al., 2018) that cannot be explained with the current cooling models. Cheng et al. (2019) showed that this enhancement could be explained by a delay in the cooling of massive (>1.08>1.08 M) white dwarfs by 22Ne settling in C/O white dwarfs. This delay could potentially increase the cooling age of the cooler white dwarfs by 8 Gyr. Recently, it was shown that this cooling delay can only occur in white dwarfs with C/O cores and not in O/Ne core white dwarfs because crystallization occurs much earlier in the evolution of O/Ne white dwarfs as compared to C/O core white dwarfs (Camisassa et al., 2021; Blouin et al., 2021). Schwab (2021) showed the massive white dwarfs that form from the merger of two C/O white dwarfs end up being O/Ne white dwarfs, and therefore these would not experience this additional delay. The properties of the C-enriched DQs indicate that they may fall into this category.

Before examining the implications of the population syntheses, we first establish the kinematic properties of the population, and in particular its age distribution.

5 Galactic orbits and stellar populations

Refer to caption
Figure 4: Top panel: U2+W2\sqrt{U^{2}+W^{2}} versus VV diagram of the C-enriched DQs. The dotted and short-dashed curves correspond to vt=(U2+V2+W2)1/2v_{t}=(U^{2}+V^{2}+W^{2})^{1/2} km s-1 at 7070, and 180180 km s-1, respectively, and with respect to the local standard of rest. Bottom panel: Regions AA, BB and CC denote thin disc, thick disc, and halo C-enriched DQs.

We now examine the kinematical properties of the observed sample of C-enriched DQs to establish to which Galactic population they belong. We plot in the top panel of Fig. 4 the Galactic space velocity components as U2+W2\sqrt{U^{2}+W^{2}} versus VV, where UU is positive in the direction of the Galactic centre, VV is positive in the direction of the Galactic rotation and WW is positive toward the North Galactic pole. The velocities are relative to the local standard of rest.

To a first approximation, stars with a total velocity vt=(U2+V2+W2)1/270v_{t}=(U^{2}+V^{2}+W^{2})^{1/2}\lesssim 70 km s-1 belong to the thin disc, stars with 70vt18070\lesssim v_{t}\lesssim 180 km s-1 belong to the thick disc (Venn et al., 2004), while stars with vt180v_{t}\gtrsim 180 km s-1 are likely to be halo objects. There is a likely overlap of thin and thick disc white dwarfs between about 5050 and 7070 km s-1.

We present the plot of JzJ_{z} against ee in the bottom panel of Fig. 4. According to Pauli et al. (2006) thin disc stars occupy region AA which is characterised by low eccentricities and JzJ_{z} in the range 1 6002 0001\,600-2\,000 kpc km s-1. In region BB, stars have larger eccentricities and lower JzJ_{z} and are likely to belong to the thick disc population. Region CC is generally populated by halo stars. We can see that the location of the C-enriched DQs in the JzJ_{z} against eccentricity plot is consistent with that of the U2+W2\sqrt{U^{2}+W^{2}} versus VV diagram. In particular, we note that there are two DQs that belong to the Galactic halo, one of which is LP93-21 (Kawka et al., 2020) which is on a retro-grade orbit and the other, SDSS J0918+4843, appears to have a very eccentric orbit with near-zero JzJ_{z}. The two other halo candidates identified in the U2+W2\sqrt{U^{2}+W^{2}} versus VV diagram fall in the thick-disc region in the JzJ_{z} versus ee diagram, however they have a much higher JzJ_{z} than the other thick-disc candidates. These are likely halo stars since they also have a maximum vertical amplitude zmax>1.5z_{\rm max}>1.5 kpc (Martin et al., 2017).

Refer to caption
Figure 5: Same as Fig. 4, however here we compare the kinematics of white dwarfs for which we measured a radial velocity (red points) to the same white dwarfs assuming, instead, a zero radial velocity (blue points).

We have found that about half of the observed sample of DQs have kinematic properties that are consistent with those attributed to the Galactic thick disc or halo. However this a lower limit because for about one quarter of the sample we had to assume radial velocities of 0 km s-1 (see section 2.1). Pauli et al. (2003) suggest that as much as 23 per cent of thick disc white dwarfs can be misclassified as thin disc when assuming a radial velocity of 0 km s-1. We revisit this problem by recalculating the kinematics of the sample for which we have radial velocity measurements and assuming a zero velocity instead. Fig. 5 shows the shifts in the Galactic velocity components U2+W2\sqrt{U^{2}+W^{2}} versus VV and JzJ_{z} versus ee which confirms that the inclusion of the radial velocity measurements increases the kinematical age, i.e., it pushes some thin disc stars to the thick disc and thick disc stars to the halo.

We calculated kinematics for all known C-enriched DQs using Gaia parallaxes and proper motions, and radial velocities for about two thirds of the sample. Radial velocities for the remaining third should be acquired to confirm the population kinematics.

6 Discussion and conclusions

Refer to caption
Figure 6: The distribution of delay times of the simulated types of mergers within 1 kpc and for one starburst.

We extracted two samples from the population synthesis calculations. The first contains white dwarfs that formed via DD mergers. The second consists of He star mergers. We show in Fig. 6 the type of merger versus delay time, noting that these are simulated data that only pertain to a single starburst. It is obvious that white dwarf-white dwarf progenitors have the longest delay times ranging from a few hundred Myrs to a Hubble time. The delay times of the second sample, instead, are shorter and mostly confined to below a couple of Gyrs. After performing integration over time (see section 4), we applied the following selection criteria to compare theory to observations. We took all relevant merger products, the DD mergers and He star mergers, within a distance of 200 pc which is the distance encompassing the majority of known C-enriched DQs (see Fig. 2). We also assembled the mergers products brighter than (Gaia magnitude) G<20G<20 noting that neither observed sample following such criteria is complete since a number of very dim objects would escape detection even within a distance of 200 pc. From these selections we extracted the number of objects with a temperature in the range 8 000Teff25 0008\,000\leq T_{\rm eff}\leq 25\,000 K, and, separately, in the range Teff25 000T_{\rm eff}\geq 25\,000 K. Table 1 shows the average and dispersion of the age and mass distributions for the two different samples as well as the number of objects selected under these criteria. Although the simulated mass distributions appear similar both in their average and dispersion, the projected age distribution of DD mergers corresponds to a much older population than that of He star mergers. This is not surprising since it is entirely consistent with the simulated delay time data portrayed in Fig. 6.

Table 1: Statistics of synthetic and observed populations.
DD He-star
TeffT_{\rm eff} age/σa\sigma_{a} M/σMM/\sigma_{M} NN age/σa\sigma_{a} M/σMM/\sigma_{M} NN
(10310^{3} K) (Gyr) (MM_{\odot}) (Gyr) (MM_{\odot})
d<200d<200 pc 8258-25 6.45/3.43 1.131/0.108 150 2.36/1.20 1.108/0.100 291
d<200d<200 pc 2525-\ \ \ 4.55/3.99 1.217/0.109 10 0.70/0.44 1.205/0.132 26
G<20G<20 8258-25 5.80/3.38 1.098/0.098 277 1.84/0.99 1.088/0.097 512
G<20G<20 2525-\ \ \ 5.75/3.79 1.159/0.124 126 0.63/0.31 1.156/0.108 172
TeffT_{\rm eff} age/σa\sigma_{a} M/σMM/\sigma_{M} NN
(10310^{3} K) (Gyr) (MM_{\odot})
observed 8258-25 8.51/2.14 1.026/0.116 63

Fig. 7 (top panel) shows the observed mass distribution of the C-enriched DQs. The mean average of the sample is 1.0261.026 M with a dispersion of 0.1160.116 M. This sample is compared to the mass distribution from the DD merger and He star merger population syntheses. The DD mergers produce more massive white dwarfs, whereas He star mergers can produce a higher fraction of lower mass white dwarfs when compared to DD mergers. Both simulated mass distributions peak at slightly higher mass than the observed distribution with relatively fewer objects than observed at the low end (0.8M0.8\,M_{\odot}). The mass distribution of DD mergers simulation peaks at a slightly lower mass than that of He star mergers. The He star channel appears to form twice as many objects as the DD channel in the d<200d<200 pc sample.

Refer to caption
Figure 7: Observed mass distribution of massive and C-enriched DQs (top) compared to the mass distribution derived from the d<200d<200 pc population synthesis (bottom). The red and blue histograms in the bottom panel show the mass distributions from DD mergers and He star mergers, respectively.
Refer to caption
Figure 8: The top panel shows the measured cooling age (+200 Myr) distribution (blue) and eccentricity-determined age distribution (green) of C-enriched DQs. The latter has been smoothed with a 4 Gyr boxcar function to simulate the intrinsic dispersion in the Age-eccentricity relation. The middle panel shows the simulated age distributions for the DD mergers and the bottom panel shows the simulated age distributions for the He star mergers. The simulated data apply to the G<20G<20 synthetic sample.

Our population synthesis study does not provide information on space velocity, however we can use the observed kinematics, such as the eccentricity of the Galactic orbit, to estimate a total age for each white dwarf. Kordopatis et al. (2011) determined the average eccentricity for the thin disc, thick disc and halo, and showed that the eccentricity increases with age. We assigned an age of 8 Gyr for the thin disc, an age of 10 Gyr for the thick disc (Sharma et al., 2019) and an age of 11 Gyr for the halo (Kilic et al., 2019). We fitted a function (Age =13.52.05e0.5=13.5-2.05e^{-0.5}, where ee is the eccentricity of the Galactic orbit) to these three points that we can apply to the C-enriched DQ white dwarf sample. Fig. 8 (top panel) compares ages of the observed C-enriched DQs assuming single star evolution (blue histogram) to the age determined from the eccentricity (green histogram). The age assuming single star evolution includes the cooling age of the white dwarf that is based on its mass and temperature added to an average pre-white dwarf lifetime of 200 Myr. In the lower two panels we show the synthetic populations (G<20G<20) that emerged from DD mergers (middle panel) and He star mergers (bottom panel). The age distribution of objects emerging from the DD channel is in qualitative agreement with the kinematic age of the C-enriched DQs, although our simulations suggest that there should be a larger number of C-enriched DQs than currently observed. As mentioned earlier, the C-enriched white dwarfs would only be a subset of all merger products alongside other merger candidates such as ultra-massive magnetic white dwarfs. It demonstrates that the much longer lifespan of C-enriched DQs relative to their apparent (cooling) age is the result of binary evolution and interaction in the form of DD mergers. The age of the He star channel products is much lower and corresponds to a thin Galactic disc population rather than the observed thick disc or halo populations.

Results obtained from the G<20G<20 sample in the population synthesis show a large excess of He star merger products relative to the DD merger products. Again the age distribution of these objects does not match the observed distribution.

Neither observed samples, d<200d<200 pc and G<20G<20, are complete but the simulations show that many more objects should be identifiable at current and future survey limits and that He star mergers should dominate in the thin Galactic disc. However, only DD merger products take the appearance of the kinematically old population of C-enriched DQs.

Because our population synthesis study does not provide information on space velocity we have not addressed the excess of C-enriched DQs with a transverse velocity >70>70 km s-1 in the Q-branch region of the H-R diagram that was attributed by Cheng et al. (2019) to some additional cooling delay mechanisms. However, we have concluded that the products of mergers are likely to produce O/Ne core white dwarfs which do not experience additional cooling since crystallization occurs at higher temperatures than those of white dwarfs on the Q-branch. Therefore, if white dwarfs produced from mergers do experience additional cooling as they pass through the Q-branch, it cannot be through 22Ne settling and another mechanism is required.

We know that one of the evolutionary channels leading to Type Ia SNe, used as standard candles to measure cosmological distances, consists in the merger of two white dwarfs. We can therefore state that these massive C-enriched DQs are failed Type Ia SNe, as first noted by Dunlap & Clemens (2015). We have also shown that these mergers are rare events and that only a few C-enriched DQs are observed with an estimated space density that is between 0.2 to 0.7 percent of the local space density of white dwarfs. Nonetheless, they may constitute from a few to about 5050 percent of all DD merger products.

Our study shows that this population of white dwarfs is old, with nearly half of the observed objects having kinematic properties consistent with those of stars belonging to the Galactic thick disc and halo. Our population synthesis results largely support these findings and are compatible with a population of white dwarfs descending from the merger of two white dwarfs. We found that the merger of stars whose envelope was stripped of hydrogen during common envelope evolution (He star mergers) would leave remnants much younger than actually observed. Note that the simulated distributions were not actually fitted to observed distributions; the predicted and observed population numbers may differ by more than a factor of two but are generally of the same order of magnitude. The population synthesis predicts a large number of very hot white dwarfs (25 000<Teff110 00025\,000<T_{\rm eff}\lesssim 110\,000) that resulted from DD mergers. They would represent 15 percent of DD mergers in a volume-limited survey (d<200d<200 pc), and up to 75 percent in a magnitude-limited survey (G<20G<20). These white dwarfs will most likely have carbon rich atmospheres not unlike the hottest known objects in the C-enriched population. Few such objects are known, but the ultra-hot, massive DZQ H1504+65 and cooler siblings (Werner & Rauch, 2015) which show a mixed carbon-oxygen atmosphere are emerging as possible candidates. The observed trend in carbon abundance with temperature in these likely merger products remains to be explained.

To conclude, we note that binary white dwarfs are sources of low-frequency gravitational waves. Therefore, some of the progenitors of these merging binaries will be detectable with the space-based gravitational wave observatory LISA, which is an European Space Agency-led mission, scheduled to launch in the early 2030’s. Whilst most binary white dwarfs are invisible in the electromagnetic spectrum, LISA will be able to ‘hear’ thousands of them millions of years before they merge.

Acknowledgements

LF and SV would like to express their gratitude for the hospitality of the staff at the International Centre for Radio Astronomy Research. We thank D.T. Wickramasinghe for useful discussions. This study is partly based on observations made with ESO telescope at the La Silla Paranal Observatory under programmes 097.D-0694 and 097.D-0063 and 090.D-0536. We thank M.S. Bessell for sharing with us the spectrum of J2140-3637. Funding for the SDSS IV has been provided by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science, and the Participating Institutions. SDSS-IV acknowledges support and resources from the Center for High-Performance Computing at the University of Utah. The SDSS web site is www.sdss.org. This work presents results from the European Space Agency (ESA) space mission Gaia. Gaia data are being processed by the Gaia Data Processing and Analysis Consortium (DPAC). Funding for the DPAC is provided by national institutions, in particular the institutions participating in the Gaia Multi-Lateral Agreement (MLA). The Gaia mission website is https://www.cosmos.esa.int/gaia. The Gaia archive website is https://archives.esac.esa.int/gaia.

Data Availability

The SDSS spectra are available publicly from the SDSS Archive (https://www.sdss.org/). The FORS2 and UVES spectra are from the author (AK).

References

  • Bédard et al. (2020) Bédard A., Bergeron P., Brassard P., Fontaine G., 2020, ApJ, 901, 93
  • Benvenuto & Althaus (1999) Benvenuto O. G., Althaus L. G., 1999, MNRAS, 303, 30
  • Bergeron et al. (2011) Bergeron P., et al., 2011, ApJ, 737, 28
  • Bland-Hawthorn & Gerhard (2016) Bland-Hawthorn J., Gerhard O., 2016, ARA&A, 54, 529
  • Blouin & Dufour (2019) Blouin S., Dufour P., 2019, MNRAS, 490, 4166
  • Blouin et al. (2021) Blouin S., Daligault J., Saumon D., 2021, ApJ, 911, L5
  • Boubert & Everall (2020) Boubert D., Everall A., 2020, MNRAS, 497, 4246
  • Bovy (2015) Bovy J., 2015, ApJS, 216, 29
  • Briggs et al. (2015) Briggs G. P., Ferrario L., Tout C. A., Wickramasinghe D. T., Hurley J. R., 2015, MNRAS, 447, 1713
  • Briggs et al. (2018) Briggs G. P., Ferrario L., Tout C. A., Wickramasinghe D. T., 2018, MNRAS, 478, 899
  • Camisassa et al. (2021) Camisassa M. E., Althaus L. G., Torres S., Córsico A. H., Rebassa-Mansergas A., Tremblay P.-E., Cheng S., Raddi R., 2021, A&A, 649, L7
  • Cheng et al. (2019) Cheng S., Cummings J. D., Ménard B., 2019, ApJ, 886, 100
  • Côté et al. (2018) Côté B., Denissenkov P., Herwig F., Ruiter A. J., Ritter C., Pignatari M., Belczynski K., 2018, ApJ, 854, 105
  • Coutu et al. (2019) Coutu S., Dufour P., Bergeron P., Blouin S., Loranger E., Allard N. F., Dunlap B. H., 2019, ApJ, 885, 74
  • Crocker et al. (2017) Crocker R. M., et al., 2017, Nature Astronomy, 1, 0135
  • de Martino et al. (2007) de Martino D., Koester D., Treves A., Sbarufatti B., Falomo R., 2007, in Napiwotzki R., Burleigh M. R., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 372, 15th European Workshop on White Dwarfs. p. 273
  • Duchêne & Kraus (2013) Duchêne G., Kraus A., 2013, ARA&A, 51, 269
  • Dufour et al. (2005) Dufour P., Bergeron P., Fontaine G., 2005, ApJ, 627, 404
  • Dufour et al. (2007) Dufour P., Liebert J., Fontaine G., Behara N., 2007, Nature, 450, 522
  • Dufour et al. (2008a) Dufour P., Fontaine G., Liebert J., Schmidt G. D., Behara N., 2008a, ApJ, 683, 978
  • Dufour et al. (2008b) Dufour P., Fontaine G., Liebert J., Williams K., Lai D. K., 2008b, ApJ, 683, L167
  • Dufour et al. (2013) Dufour P., Vornanen T., Bergeron P., Fontaine G., Berdyugin A., 2013, in Krzesiń ski J., Stachowski G., Moskalik P., Bajan K., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 469, 18th European White Dwarf Workshop.. pp 167–172
  • Dunlap & Clemens (2015) Dunlap B. H., Clemens J. C., 2015, in Dufour P., Bergeron P., Fontaine G., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 493, 19th European Workshop on White Dwarfs. pp 573–577
  • Eggleton (1971) Eggleton P. P., 1971, MNRAS, 151, 351
  • Eggleton et al. (1989) Eggleton P. P., Fitchett M. J., Tout C. A., 1989, ApJ, 347, 998
  • Ferrario (2012) Ferrario L., 2012, MNRAS, 426, 2500
  • Ferrario et al. (1997) Ferrario L., Vennes S., Wickramasinghe D. T., Bailey J. A., Christian D. J., 1997, MNRAS, 292, 205
  • Fontaine & Brassard (2005) Fontaine G., Brassard P., 2005, in Koester D., Moehler S., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 334, 14th European Workshop on White Dwarfs. p. 49
  • Gaia Collaboration et al. (2018) Gaia Collaboration et al., 2018, A&A, 616, A10
  • García-Berro et al. (2012) García-Berro E., et al., 2012, ApJ, 749, 25
  • Gentile Fusillo et al. (2019) Gentile Fusillo N. P., et al., 2019, MNRAS, 482, 4570
  • Hardy et al. (2018) Hardy F., Dufour P., Jordan S., 2018, A New Look at Magnetic White Dwarfs, https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/handle/2152/71592
  • Hollands et al. (2018) Hollands M. A., Tremblay P. E., Gänsicke B. T., Gentile-Fusillo N. P., Toonen S., 2018, MNRAS, 480, 3942
  • Hurley et al. (2002) Hurley J. R., Tout C. A., Pols O. R., 2002, MNRAS, 329, 897
  • Ivanova et al. (2013) Ivanova N., et al., 2013, A&ARv, 21, 59
  • Johnson & Soderblom (1987) Johnson D. R. H., Soderblom D. R., 1987, AJ, 93, 864
  • Kawka (2020) Kawka A., 2020, IAU Symposium, 357, 60
  • Kawka et al. (2007) Kawka A., Vennes S., Schmidt G. D., Wickramasinghe D. T., Koch R., 2007, ApJ, 654, 499
  • Kawka et al. (2020) Kawka A., Vennes S., Ferrario L., 2020, MNRAS, 491, L40
  • Kiel & Hurley (2006) Kiel P. D., Hurley J. R., 2006, MNRAS, 369, 1152
  • Kilic et al. (2019) Kilic M., Bergeron P., Dame K., Hambly N. C., Rowell N., Crawford C. L., 2019, MNRAS, 482, 965
  • Koester & Kepler (2019) Koester D., Kepler S. O., 2019, A&A, 628, A102
  • Koester et al. (1982) Koester D., Weidemann V., Zeidler E.-M., 1982, A&A, 116, 147
  • Kordopatis et al. (2011) Kordopatis G., et al., 2011, A&A, 535, A107
  • Kouwenhoven et al. (2007) Kouwenhoven M. B. N., Brown A. G. A., Portegies Zwart S. F., Kaper L., 2007, A&A, 474, 77
  • Kroupa (2001) Kroupa P., 2001, MNRAS, 322, 231
  • Larbi-Terzi et al. (2012) Larbi-Terzi N., Sahal-Bréchot S., Ben Nessib N., Dimitrijević M. S., 2012, MNRAS, 423, 766
  • Leggett et al. (2018) Leggett S. K., et al., 2018, ApJS, 239, 26
  • Livio & Soker (1988) Livio M., Soker N., 1988, ApJ, 329, 764
  • Loveridge et al. (2011) Loveridge A. J., van der Sluys M. V., Kalogera V., 2011, ApJ, 743, 49
  • Martin et al. (2017) Martin P., Jeffery C. S., Naslim N., Woolf V. M., 2017, MNRAS, 467, 68
  • McCleery et al. (2020) McCleery J., et al., 2020, MNRAS, 499, 1890
  • Paczynski (1976) Paczynski B., 1976, in Eggleton P., Mitton S., Whelan J., eds,  IAUS Vol. 73, Structure and Evolution of Close Binary Systems. p. 75
  • Pauli et al. (2003) Pauli E. M., Napiwotzki R., Altmann M., Heber U., Odenkirchen M., Kerber F., 2003, A&A, 400, 877
  • Pauli et al. (2006) Pauli E. M., Napiwotzki R., Heber U., Altmann M., Odenkirchen M., 2006, A&A, 447, 173
  • Pelletier et al. (1986) Pelletier C., Fontaine G., Wesemael F., Michaud G., Wegner G., 1986, ApJ, 307, 242
  • Pols et al. (1995) Pols O. R., Tout C. A., Eggleton P. P., Han Z., 1995, MNRAS, 274, 964
  • Romero et al. (2015) Romero A. D., Campos F., Kepler S. O., 2015, MNRAS, 450, 3708
  • Ruiter (2020) Ruiter A. J., 2020, IAU Symposium, 357, 1
  • Ruiter et al. (2011) Ruiter A. J., Belczynski K., Sim S. A., Hillebrandt W., Fryer C. L., Fink M., Kromer M., 2011, MNRAS, 417, 408
  • Ruiter et al. (2019) Ruiter A. J., Ferrario L., Belczynski K., Seitenzahl I. R., Crocker R. M., Karakas A. I., 2019, MNRAS, 484, 698
  • Schönrich et al. (2010) Schönrich R., Binney J., Dehnen W., 2010, MNRAS, 403, 1829
  • Schwab (2021) Schwab J., 2021, ApJ, 906, 53
  • Sharma et al. (2019) Sharma S., et al., 2019, MNRAS, 490, 5335
  • Snaith et al. (2014) Snaith O. N., Haywood M., Di Matteo P., Lehnert M. D., Combes F., Katz D., Gómez A., 2014, ApJ, 781, L31
  • Temmink et al. (2020) Temmink K. D., Toonen S., Zapartas E., Justham S., Gänsicke B. T., 2020, A&A, 636, A31
  • Thejll et al. (1990) Thejll P., Shipman H. L., MacDonald J., Macfarland W. M., 1990, ApJ, 361, 197
  • Toonen et al. (2017) Toonen S., Hollands M., Gänsicke B. T., Boekholt T., 2017, A&A, 602, A16
  • Tout et al. (2008) Tout C. A., Wickramasinghe D. T., Liebert J., Ferrario L., Pringle J. E., 2008, MNRAS, 387, 897
  • van der Kruit & Searle (1982) van der Kruit P. C., Searle L., 1982, A&A, 110, 79
  • van Dokkum et al. (2013) van Dokkum P. G., et al., 2013, ApJ, 771, L35
  • Venn et al. (2004) Venn K. A., Irwin M., Shetrone M. D., Tout C. A., Hill V., Tolstoy E., 2004, AJ, 128, 1177
  • Vennes et al. (2002) Vennes S., Smith R. J., Boyle B. J., Croom S. M., Kawka A., Shanks T., Miller L., Loaring N., 2002, MNRAS, 335, 673
  • Vennes et al. (2003) Vennes S., Schmidt G. D., Ferrario L., Christian D. J., Wickramasinghe D. T., Kawka A., 2003, ApJ, 593, 1040
  • Vennes et al. (2011) Vennes S., Kawka A., Németh P., 2011, MNRAS, 413, 2545
  • Wegner & Koester (1985) Wegner G., Koester D., 1985, ApJ, 288, 746
  • Werner & Rauch (2015) Werner K., Rauch T., 2015, A&A, 584, A19
  • Wickramasinghe et al. (2014) Wickramasinghe D. T., Tout C. A., Ferrario L., 2014, MNRAS, 437, 675
  • Williams et al. (2013) Williams K. A., et al., 2013, ApJ, 769, 123
  • Xiang et al. (2018) Xiang M., et al., 2018, ApJS, 237, 33
  • Xu & Li (2010) Xu X.-J., Li X.-D., 2010, ApJ, 716, 114

Appendix A Two new carbon-enriched DQ white dwarfs

Refer to caption
Figure 9: Optical spectra (in grey) and best-fit spectral syntheses (in red) of the newly identified C-enriched DQs WD J2140-3637.
Refer to caption
Figure 10: Optical spectra (in grey) and best-fit spectral syntheses (in red) of the newly identified C-enriched DQs WD J2255-2836.

We included in this work two newly identified carbon-enriched white dwarfs. The objects were identified in the SkyMapper survey of white dwarfs (Vennes et al., in preparation). The two objects, WD J2140-3637 and WD J2255-2836, lie along the abundance versus temperature relation (Fig. 1) at Teff=11 800±1 000T_{\rm eff}=11\,800\pm 1\,000 K and logC/He2\log{\rm C/He}\approx-2, and Teff=16 800±1 800T_{\rm eff}=16\,800\pm 1\,800 K and logC/He0.6\log{\rm C/He}\approx-0.6, respectively. The cooler object, WD J2140-3637, shows C2 Swan bands and atomic carbon lines. Also, along with approximately one in five C-enriched DQs in the Coutu et al. (2019) sample, WD J2255-2836 shows contamination by hydrogen (logH/He2.3\log{\rm H/He}\approx-2.3). These objects are among new DQ identifications in the Southern hemisphere complementing the SDSS Northern hemisphere coverage. Fig. 9 shows the SSO2.3m/WiFeS optical spectrum of WD J2140-3637 and Fig. 10 shows the VLT/FORS spectrum of WD J2255-2836, along with their best-fit spectral syntheses. We employed mixed H/He/C convective model atmospheres. A complete description of these two objects and models will be presented elsewhere (Vennes et al., in preparation).

Appendix B Atmospheric and kinematic parameters

Table 2 lists all known DQ white dwarfs with a surface composition enriched in carbon relative to normal DQ white dwarfs; its members have higher than average mass and effective temperatures extending up to 25 000 K. We list the distance calculated from the Gaia parallax and the stellar parameters (effective temperature, surface gravity, mass, and carbon abundance) obtained from the literature or determined in this work (see Section 2).

Table 4 lists the radial velocities measured in this work along with the Galactic velocity components U,V,WU,V,W, the Galactic orbital eccentricity ee, and the angular momentum along the Z-axis JZJ_{Z} (see Sections 2.1 and 5).

Table 2: Atmospheric parameters of C-enriched DQ white dwarfs.
Name Distance TeffT_{\rm eff} logg\log{g} MM logC/He\log{{\rm C/He}} Reference
(pc) (K) (c.g.s.) (MM_{\odot})
J0005-1002a SDSSJ000555.90-100213.3, PHL 657 150.7 19018 8.80 1.10  2.00 1
J0019++1847 SDSSJ001908.63++184706.0 150.3 10280 8.55 0.93 -2.84 2
J0045-2336 G268-40 47.2 10500 8.65 1.00 -2.70 3,4
J0106++1513a SDSSJ010647.92++151327.8 372.0 23430 8.50 0.93  1.00 4,5
J0205++2057 G35-26 85.4 16150 9.04 1.20  3.00 6
J0236++2503 SDSSJ023633.74++250348.9 177.7 13376 8.70 1.03 -1.58 7
J0236-0734a SDSSJ023637.42-073429.5 663.0 24400 9.07 1.22  2.00 4
J0243++0101 SDSSJ024332.77++010111.1, WD0240++008 182.4 8225 8.63 0.99 -4.23 7
J0807++1949 SDSSJ080708.48++194950.7 171.3 13501 8.78 1.08 -1.24 7
J0818++0102 SDSSJ081839.23++010227.5 266.8 24483 8.33 0.81  2.00 2
J0852++2316 SDSSJ085235.43++231644.3 185.9 11099 8.61 0.97 -3.18 7
J0856++4513 SDSSJ085626.94++451336.9 205.9 9484 8.51 0.91 -3.27 7
J0859++3257 SDSSJ085914.63++325712.1, G47-18 23.1 9486 8.45 0.87 -3.52 7
J0901++5751 SDSSJ090157.93++575135.9, WD0858+580 153.8 13576 8.76 1.07 -1.99 7
J0918++4843 SDSSJ091830.27++484323.0 184.4 9203 8.80 1.09 -3.72 7
J0919++0236 SDSSJ091922.22++023604.5, WD0916++028 159.9 11319 8.61 0.98 -2.85 7
J0936++0607 SDSSJ093638.07++060710.0 161.7 11013 8.61 0.97 -3.07 7
J0958++5853 SDSSJ095837.00++585303.0 175.1 15444 8.95 1.16 -0.50 2
J1036++6522a SDSSJ103655.38++652252.0, WD1033+656 175.3 15500 8.83 1.12 -1.00 8,4
J1040++0635 SDSSJ104052.40++063519.7 283.7 13882 8.40 0.84 -2.08 7
J1045++5904 SDSSJ104559.14++590448.2, LP93-21 57.7 9730 8.90 1.14 -2.73 9
J1049++1659 SDSSJ104906.61++165923.6 194.1 12799 8.92 1.15 -1.64 7
J1058++2846 SDSSJ105817.66++284609.3 162.6 9422 8.49 0.89 -3.60 7
J1100++1758 SDSSJ110058.03++175806.9 150.9 12367 8.76 1.07 -1.28 7
J1104++2035a SDSSJ110406.68++203528.7 173.4 23476 8.60 0.99  2.00 1
J1113++0146 SDSSJ111341.33++014641.7 43.1 5961 8.71 1.03 -5.14 10
J1133++6331 SDSSJ113359.94++633113.3, WD1131++637 194.1 11517 8.57 0.95 -2.68 7
J1140++0735 SDSSJ114059.85++073530.1 160.8 10651 8.56 0.94 -3.36 7
J1140++1824 SDSSJ114006.35++182402.3 94.2 9656 8.35 0.81 -3.54 7
J1148-0126 SDSSJ114851.68-012612.7, WD1146-011 68.2 9680 8.46 0.88 -3.48 7
J1153++0056 SDSSJ115305.54++005646.2 165.3 21650 9.40 1.39  2.00 4,5
J1200++2252 SDSSJ120027.73++225212.9 378.6 21880 8.50 0.92  2.00 2
J1203++6451 SDSSJ120331.89++645101.4, WD1200++651 87.2 12359 8.77 1.07 -1.59 7
J1209++5355 SDSSJ120936.50++535525.7 236.0 11721 8.53 0.92 -2.71 7
J1215++4700 SDSSJ121510.64++470011.0 160.6 13230 8.87 1.13 -2.00 7
J1225++0959 LP495-79 84.4 11100 8.60 0.97 -2.60 11,4
J1328++5908a SDSSJ132858.19++590851.0, WD1327++594 147.7 18755 9.01 1.19  3.00 6
J1331++3727 SDSSJ133151.38++372754.8 134.9 16741 9.03 1.16  0.41 2
J1332++2355 SDSSJ133221.56++235502.1 210.6 14205 8.70 1.03 -1.76 7
J1337-0026a SDSSJ133710.19-002643.7 304.5 22711 8.66 1.02  1.50 1
J1339++5036 SDSSJ133940.53++503612.8 182.4 11680 8.62 0.98 -2.20 2
J1341++0346 SDSSJ134124.28++034628.7 196.1 13765 8.76 1.07 -2.18 7
J1400-0154 SDSSJ140051.57-015414.4, 2QZJ140051.6-015413 142.3 9394 8.69 1.02 -3.56 7
J1402++3818a SDSSJ140222.26++381848.9 320.5 17232 8.61 0.99 -0.50 1
J1426++5752a SDSSJ142625.70++575218.4 306.3 18809 8.72 1.04  2.00 2
J1428++3238 SDSSJ142812.54++323817.7 161.8 10718 8.56 0.94 -3.20 7
J1434++2258 SDSSJ143437.82++225859.5 191.9 14575 8.75 1.06 -1.14 7
J1435++5318 SDSSJ143534.01++531815.0 196.0 15167 8.85 1.12 -1.91 7
J1444++0434 SDSSJ144407.25++043446.7, WD1441++047 180.5 9813 8.44 0.87 -3.47 7
J1448++0519 SDSSJ144854.80++051903.5 120.3 15966 8.94 1.16  0.30 2
J1452++6020 SDSSJ145236.57++602036.3, WD1451++605 224.9 12572 8.65 1.00 -1.73 7
J1455++4209 SDSSJ145524.89++420910.8 266.4 14288 8.78 1.08 -1.48 7
J1542++4329 SDSSJ154248.67++432902.4 184.4 9799 8.49 0.89 -3.61 7
J1555++3219 SDSSJ155539.51++321914.1 189.1 9195 8.59 0.96 -3.74 7
J1615++4543 SDSSJ161531.71++454322.4 455.5 20940 8.62 1.00  1.74 10,4
J1622++1849 SDSSJ162205.12++184956.7 187.7 16693 9.13 1.16 -0.08 2
J1622++3004 SDSSJ162236.13++300454.5 74.7 16131 8.93 1.15 -0.10 2
J1728++5558 SDSSJ172856.19++555823.0, G227-5 47.1 14453 8.90 1.14 -1.37 7

Table 3: continued

Atmospheric parameters of massive DQ white dwarfs. Name Distance TeffT_{\rm eff} logg\log{g} MM logC/He\log{{\rm C/He}} Reference (pc) (K) (c.g.s.) (MM_{\odot}) J2140-3637 SMSSJ214023.58-363757.5 39.8 11800 8.70 1.02 -2.00 4 J2200-0741a SDSSJ220029.09-074121.5 207.2 21271 8.64 1.01  2.00 1 J2250++1240 SDSSJ225000.22++124019.8 182.5 9801 8.50 0.90 -3.66 7 J2255-2836 SMSSJ225523.30-283649.6 153.7 16800 9.07 1.22 -0.60 4 J2348-0942 SDSSJ234843.30-094245.2 375.6 21550 8.54 0.93  2.00 4,5
References: (1) Hardy et al. (2018) (2) Koester & Kepler (2019) (3) Koester et al. (1982) (4) This work (5) Dufour et al. (2008b) (6) Leggett et al. (2018) (7) Coutu et al. (2019) (8) Williams et al. (2013) (9) Kawka et al. (2020) (10) Blouin & Dufour (2019) (11) de Martino et al. (2007)
a Confirmed to be magnetic.

Table 4: Kinematics of C-enriched DQs.
vrv_{r} UU VV WW ee JzJ_{z}
(km s-1) (km s-1) (km s-1) (km s-1) (kpc km s-1)
J0005-1002 10-10 49-49 6-6 1111 0.1740.174 16481648
J0019++1847 38-38 109109 16-16 6-6 0.3460.346 15751575
J0045-2336 7676 25-25 45-45 72-72 0.1940.194 13411341
J0106++1513 228228 45-45 120120 193-193 0.6310.631 27032703
J0205++2057 195-195 227227 79-79 3131 0.7200.720 10441044
J0236++2503 1-1 1414 44 0 0.0380.038 17571757
J0236-0734 2828 2020 1313 31-31 0.0630.063 18761876
J0243++0101 (0) 2929 96-96 19-19 0.4960.496 938938
J0807++1949 9393 41-41 113-113 1919 0.5780.578 814814
J0818++0102 137137 109-109 61-61 2929 0.4400.440 12691269
J0852++2316 5353 9-9 22-22 5353 0.1090.109 15491549
J0856++4513 (0) 15-15 1515 23-23 0.0620.062 18521852
J0859++3257 66 17-17 1212 16-16 0.0600.060 17961796
J0901++5751 113-113 126126 12-12 30-30 0.3930.393 16061606
J0918++4843 (0) 29-29 208-208 11 0.9890.989 3333
J0919++0236 4747 6868 59-59 6565 0.3340.334 12211221
J0936++0607 7-7 55 17-17 36-36 0.1020.102 15761576
J0958++5853 24-24 49-49 16-16 66-66 0.1720.172 15901590
J1036++6522 103-103 8383 28-28 57-57 0.2870.287 14791479
J1040++0635 (0) 16-16 1-1 12-12 0.0570.057 17091709
J1045++5904 1515 203-203 423-423 5757 0.6140.614 1672-1672
J1049++1659 12-12 1414 2929 22 0.1050.105 19401940
J1058++2846 2626 8181 74-74 5050 0.4240.424 10971097
J1100++1758 18-18 2323 6-6 16-16 0.0980.098 16521652
J1104++2035 3636 16-16 19-19 2828 0.1250.125 15591559
J1113++0146 (0) 1616 57-57 39-39 0.2910.291 12351235
J1133++6331 (0) 11-11 137-137 7474 0.5530.553 606606
J1140++0735 3737 4444 17-17 3737 0.1730.173 15541554
J1140++1824 6767 43-43 45-45 5252 0.2510.251 13461346
J1148-0126 6969 1515 66-66 4040 0.3290.329 11671167
J1153++0056 90-90 70-70 19-19 111-111 0.2160.216 15591559
J1200++2252 (0) 38-38 10-10 3-3 0.1450.145 16301630
J1203++6451 58-58 2929 70-70 8-8 0.3800.380 11361136
J1209++5355 (0) 11-11 30-30 1414 0.1820.182 14681468
J1215++4700 79-79 5555 44-44 50-50 0.2710.271 13441344
J1225++0959 55 44-44 29-29 33 0.2220.222 14661466
J1328++5908 (0) 37-37 30-30 1919 0.2150.215 14641464
J1331++3727 6161 1919 5-5 7474 0.0500.050 16551655
J1332++2355 17-17 1717 0 10-10 0.0640.064 16851685
J1337-0026 5757 4040 88 5858 0.1290.129 17211721
J1339++5036 (0) 59-59 3535 12-12 0.2310.231 19811981
J1341++0346 4545 61-61 36-36 7878 0.2380.238 14021402
J1400-0154 (0) 8-8 83-83 6-6 0.4310.431 10261026
J1402++3818 (0) 12-12 1414 99 0.0570.057 17981798
J1426++5752 22 22 2424 11 0.0710.071 18931893
J1428++3238 70-70 5454 3-3 73-73 0.1680.168 16551655
J1434++2258 1313 1717 32-32 2929 0.1840.184 14231423
J1435++5318 7878 16-16 6060 6868 0.2660.266 21752175
J1444++0434 (0) 3838 88 11-11 0.1180.118 17341734
J1448++0519 57-57 63-63 46-46 9-9 0.3170.317 13281328
J1452++6020 3232 59-59 3-3 5050 0.2100.210 16731673
J1455++4209 (0) 2424 8-8 1616 0.0940.094 16201620
J1542++4329 (0) 5353 99 1-1 0.1560.156 17591759
J1555++3219 (0) 23-23 3-3 3535 0.0950.095 16581658
J1615++4543 27-27 37-37 0 6-6 0.1520.152 16721672
J1622++1849 23-23 5959 39-39 38-38 0.2660.266 13641364
J1622++3004 55-55 8-8 61-61 0 0.3290.329 12011201
J1728++5558 38-38 44-44 28-28 66 0.2190.219 14781478
J2140-3637 3-3 5151 1515 4646 0.1660.166 17991799
J2200-0741 8282 6262 6464 37-37 0.3070.307 21772177
J2250++1240 9999 68-68 4949 113-113 0.3580.358 20812081
J2255-2826 90-90 14-14 62-62 8282 0.2340.234 11931193
J2348-0942 1818 2929 44 14-14 0.0760.076 17251725