This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

The existence of homologically fibered links and solutions of some equations

Nozomu Sekino
Abstract

There is one generalization of fibered links in 3-manifolds, called homologically fibered links. It is known that the existence of a homologically fibered link whose fiber surface has a given homeomorphic type is determined by the first homology group and its torsion linking form of the ambient 3-manifold. In this paper, we interpret the existence of homologically fibered links with that of a solution of some equation, in terms of the first homology group and its torsion linking form or a surgery diagram of the ambient manifold. As an application, we compute the invariant hc(){\rm hc}(\cdot), defined through homologically fibered knots, for 3-manifolds whose torsion linkng forms represent a generator of linkings.

1 Introduction

It is known that every connected orientable closed 3-manifold MM has a fibered link [1], i.e., a link LL in MM such that the complement of a small open neighborhood of LL admits a structure of a connected orientable compact surface bundle over S1S^{1} and that each boundary component of a fiber surface is a longitude of a component of LL. Moreover, it is known that every connected orientable closed 3-manifold MM has a fibered knot [9]. However, finding fibered links in a given 3-manifold is difficult in general. For example op(M){\rm op}(M), defined as the minimal genus of fiber surfaces of fibered knots which MM has, is a topological invariant which is difficult to calculate. There is one generalization of fibered links, called homologically fibered links [4] (defined in Definition 2.2 below). A homologically fibered link requests some Seifert surface such that the result of cut a 3-manifold along the surface is a homological product of a surface and an interval, whereas a fibered link requests some Seifert surface such that the result of cutting a 3-manifold along the surface is the product of a surface and an interval. Clearly, a fibered link is also a homologically fibered link, and hc(M){\rm hc}(M) [4], defined as the minimal genus of homological fiber surfaces of homologically fibered knots which MM has gives a lower bound of op(M){\rm op}(M). Homological products of surfaces (of a fixed homeomorphic type) and intervals are not merely the homological constraint for fiber structures, but they form a monoid by stacking, which contains the mapping class group as a submonoid (see [4]). This attracts attention as a generalization of the mapping class groups. Homological products of surfaces and intervals are studied using “clasper theory”. As a consequence of clasper theory, it is known that the existence of a homologically fibered link whose fiber is a given homeomorphic type in MM depends on the first homology group of MM with its torsion linking form. In this paper, we interpret the existence of a homologically fibered link whose fiber is a given homeomorphic type with the existence of a solution for some equation as follows.

As a convention, for an m×mm\times m-matrix AA and an n×nn\times n-matrix BB, ABA\oplus B is an (m+n)×(m+n)(m+n)\times(m+n)-matrix whose (i,j)(i,j)-entry is the same as the (i,j)(i,j)-entry of AA for 1i,jm1\leq i,j\leq m, the (m+i,m+j)(m+i^{\prime},m+j^{\prime})-entry is the same as the (i,j)(i^{\prime},j^{\prime})-entry of BB for 1i,jn1\leq i^{\prime},j^{\prime}\leq n, and the other entries are 0.
Let OrO_{r} be an r×rr\times r-zero-matrix, IrI_{r} an r×rr\times r-identity matrix, and we regard 0×00\times 0-matrix (O0O_{0} and I0I_{0}) as the identity element for \oplus.
Let PP, QQ, F0kF^{k}_{0}, F1kF^{k}_{1} and G1kG^{k}_{1} be matrices as follows, where a0a\geq 0 and k0k\geq 0:

  • PP is a diagonal a×aa\times a-matrix whose (i,i)(i,i)-entry is pip_{i}\in\mathbb{Z} for a>0a>0 or I0I_{0} for a=0a=0.

  • QQ is a diagonal a×aa\times a-matrix whose (i,i)(i,i)-entry is qi-q_{i}\in\mathbb{Z} for a>0a>0 or I0I_{0} for a=0a=0.

  • F00F^{0}_{0}, F10F^{0}_{1} and G10G^{0}_{1} to be I0I_{0},
    and F0k=(02k2k0)F^{k}_{0}=\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}0&2^{k}\\ 2^{k}&0\\ \end{array}\right) ,           F1k=(2k+12k32k2k+1)F^{k}_{1}=\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}2^{k+1}&-2^{k}\\ -3\cdot 2^{k}&2^{k+1}\\ \end{array}\right) ,           G1k=(1003)G^{k}_{1}=\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}-1&0\\ 0&-3\\ \end{array}\right) for k>0k>0.

Also let SS and TT be matrices as follows, where r0r\geq 0, e00e_{0}\geq 0, e10e_{1}\geq 0, k0=k0=0k_{0}=k^{\prime}_{0}=0, ki1k_{i}\geq 1 for i0i\neq 0, and kj2k^{\prime}_{j}\geq 2 for j0j\neq 0:

  • S=OrP(0ie0F0ki)(0je1F1kj)S=O_{r}\oplus P\oplus(\bigoplus_{0\leq i\leq e_{0}}F^{k_{i}}_{0})\oplus(\bigoplus_{0\leq j\leq e_{1}}F^{k^{\prime}_{j}}_{1}).

  • T=IrQI2e0(0je1G1kj)T=I_{r}\oplus Q\oplus I_{2e_{0}}\oplus(\bigoplus_{0\leq j\leq e_{1}}G^{k^{\prime}_{j}}_{1}).

As usual notation, Σg,n+1\Sigma_{g,n+1} denotes a connected orientable compact surface of genus gg with n+1n+1 boundary components.

Theorem 1.1.

Let MM be a connected closed oriented 3-manifold whose free part of the first homology group with integer coefficient is isomorphic to r\mathbb{Z}^{r} and whose torsion linking form is equivalent to (0laApl(ql))(0ie0E0ki)(0je1E1kj)(\bigoplus_{0\leq l\leq a}A^{p_{l}}(q_{l}))\oplus(\bigoplus_{0\leq i\leq e_{0}}E^{k_{i}}_{0})\oplus(\bigoplus_{0\leq j\leq e_{1}}E^{k^{\prime}_{j}}_{1}), where a,e0,e1a,e_{0},e_{1} are non-negative integers and notations Apl(ql),E0ki,E1kjA^{p_{l}}(q_{l}),E^{k_{i}}_{0},E^{k^{\prime}_{j}}_{1} represent linkings, defined in Subsection 3.1.
Suppose (g,n)(0,0)(g,n)\neq(0,0). Then MM has a homologically fibered link whose homological fiber is homeomorphic to Σg,n+1\Sigma_{g,n+1} if and only if there exist (r+a+2e0+2e1)×(2g+n)(r+a+2e_{0}+2e_{1})\times(2g+n)-matrix of integer coefficients XX and (2g+n)×(2g+n)(2g+n)\times(2g+n)- symmetric matrix of integer coefficients YY satisfying the following equation:

|STXXtY+(On)|=±1,\displaystyle\left|\begin{array}[]{cc}S&TX\\ X^{t}&Y+(\mathcal{E}\oplus O_{n})\\ \end{array}\right|=\pm 1, (3)

where \mathcal{E} is a 2g×2g2g\times 2g-matrix whose (2i1,2i)(2i-1,2i)-entry is 11 for every 1ig1\leq i\leq g and the others are 0.

Remark 1.1.

For the case which is not covered by Theorem 1.1, it is known that a connected closed orientable 3-manifold MM has a homologically fibered link whose homological fiber is homeomorphic to Σ0,1\Sigma_{0,1} if and only if MM is an integral homology 33-sphere. See the definitions in the Subsection 2.1.

In general, it is not easy to compute the torsion linking form of a 3-manifold. Sometimes surgery diagrams of a 3-manifold may be easy to handle. A statement in terms of surgery diagrams is given in Proposition 5.1.

The rest of this paper is organized as follows: In Section 2, we recall the definition of homologically fibered links and the fact of their dependence on torsion linking forms. In Section 3, we recall three types of generators of linking forms and give rational homology 3-spheres whose torsion linking forms are the generators. In Section 4, we give a correspondence between surfaces in 3-manifolds and tuples of annuli and bands for Theorem 1.1. In Section 5, we give a proof of Theorem 1.1. In Section 6, we compute hc(){\rm hc}(\cdot) for 3-manifolds whose torsion linking forms are two of three types of generators in Section 3.

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Takuya Sakasai and Yuta Nozaki for introducing him this subject and giving him many ingredients about it. He also is grateful to referee for his or her kindness, patience and correcting many mistakes in the proofs and the arguments.

2 Homologically fibered links

In this section, we review the definition of homologically fibered links and the fact that the existence of homologically fibered links depends on the torsion linking forms. In this paper, the homology groups are with integer coefficients.

2.1 Definitions

Definition 2.1.

(homology cobordism, [3, Section 2.4])
A homology cobordism over Σg,n+1\Sigma_{g,n+1} is a triad (X,+X,XX,\partial_{+}X,\partial_{-}X), where XX is an oriented connected compact 3-manifold and +XX\partial_{+}X\cup\partial_{-}X is a partition of X\partial X, and ±X\partial_{\pm}X are homeomorphic to Σg,n+1\Sigma_{g,n+1} satisfying:

  • +XX=X\partial_{+}X\cup\partial_{-}X=\partial X.

  • +XX=(+X)\partial_{+}X\cap\partial_{-}X=\partial(\partial_{+}X).

  • The induced maps (i±):H(±X)H(X)(i_{\pm})_{*}:H_{*}(\partial_{\pm}X)\rightarrow H_{*}(X) are isomorphisms, where i±:±XXi_{\pm}:\partial_{\pm}X\rightarrow X are the inclusions.

Note that the third condition is equivalent to the condition that i±i_{\pm} induce isomorphisms on H1()H_{1}(\cdot). Moreover by using the Poincare´\rm{\acute{e}}-Lefschetz duality, we see that it is sufficient to require only one of i+i_{+} and ii_{-} to induce an isomorphism on H1()H_{1}(\cdot).

Definition 2.2.

[4] Let LL be a link in a closed orientable 3-manifold MM. LL is called homologically fibered link if there exists a Seifert surface FF of LL such that (MF,F+,F)(M\setminus F,F_{+},F_{-}) is a homology cobordism over a surface homeomorphic to FF, where F±F_{\pm} are the cut ends. In this situation, we call FF a homological fiber of LL.

Clearly every fibered link is a homologically fibered link since the former requests that the manifold cut opened by some Seifert surface to be the product of an interval and a surface and the latter requests it to be the homological product of an interval and a surface. By the observations above the Definition 2.2, for a Seifert surface FF in a closed 3-manifold MM to be a homological fiber, it is enough to check that push-ups (or push-downs) of oriented simple closed curves on FF which form a basis of H1(F)H_{1}(F) also form a free basis of H1(MInt(F×[0,1]))H_{1}(M\setminus Int(F\times[0,1])).

Remark 2.1.

By definition, when a connected closed orientable 3-manifold MM has a homologically fibered link with homological fiber FF, H1(M)H_{1}(M) can be generated by 1χ(F)1-\chi(F) elements, where χ(F)\chi(F) is the Euler number of FF. Therefore the minimal order of generating sets for H1(M)H_{1}(M) imposes some constraint on homeomorphic types of homological fibers in MM.

2.2 Dependence on the torsion linking forms

Definition 2.3.

(Torsion linking form)
Let MM be a connected closed oriented 3-manifold, TH1(M)TH_{1}(M) the torsion part of H1(M)H_{1}(M). For every aTH1(M)a\in TH_{1}(M), there is a non-zero integer nn such that nana vanishes in H1(M)H_{1}(M), and we fix such an integer nan_{a} of minimal absolute value. This aa has a representative as oriented curves LaL_{a} in MM such that the nan_{a}-parallel copy of LaL_{a} bounds a surface SaS_{a} in MM. The torsion linking form of MM, ψM:TH1(M)×TH1(M)/\psi_{M}:TH_{1}(M)\times TH_{1}(M)\longrightarrow\mathbb{Q}/\mathbb{Z} maps (a,b)(a,b) to <Sa,Lb>namod\frac{<S_{a},L_{b}>}{n_{a}}\ {\rm mod}\ \mathbb{Z}, where <Sa,Lb><S_{a},L_{b}> represents the algebraic intersection number of SaS_{a} and LbL_{b}. It is known that ψM\psi_{M} is well-defined and is non-singular, symmetric bilinear pairing, and that ψM=ψM\psi_{-M}=-\psi_{M}, where M-M denotes the manifold homeomorphic to MM with the opposite orientation.

There is the operation of 3-manifolds preserving the first homology groups and the torsion linking forms, called the “Borromean surgery” introduced in [8].

Definition 2.4.

Let VV be a standard handlebody of genus three in S3S^{3} which contains 0-framed link as in Figure 1. Consider a compact orientable 3-manifold MM and an embedding f:VMf:V\longrightarrow M. Let NN be a manifold obtained as a result of the Dehn surgery on MM along the framed link in f(V)f(V). This NN is called the manifold obtained from MM (and ff) by a Borromean surgery.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: A standard handlebody of genus three containing a 0-framed link

About Borromean surgeries, the following facts are known:

Fact 2.1.

[5], [7] Let XX be a homology cobordism over Σg,n+1\Sigma_{g,n+1} and YY a manifold obtained from XX by a Borromean surgery. Then YY is also a homology cobordism over Σg,n+1\Sigma_{g,n+1}.

Fact 2.2.

[8] Let MM and NN be closed oriented 3-manifolds. Then the following are equivalent:

  • There is an isomorphism between H1(M)H_{1}(M) and H1(N)H_{1}(N) such that ψM\psi_{M} and ψN\psi_{N} are equivalent under this isomorphism.

  • MM is obtained from NN by a finite sequence of Borromean surgeries.

By the facts above, we can see the dependence on the first homology groups and the torsion linking forms about the existence of homologically fibered links:

Proposition 2.1.

Suppose that for connected closed oriented 3-manifolds MM and NN, there exists an isomorphism between their first homology groups such that their torsion linking forms are equivalent under the isomorphism. Then NN has a homologically fibered link whose homological fiber is homeomorphic to Σg,n+1\Sigma_{g,n+1} if and only if MM has a homologically fibered link whose homological fiber is homeomorphic to Σg,n+1\Sigma_{g,n+1}.

Proof.

We prove the if part and note that it is enough. By Fact 2.2, there is a finite sequence of Borromean surgeries starting from MM and ending at NN. Since it is enough to prove when NN is obtained from MM by one Borromean surgery, we assume that. Suppose MM has a homological fibered link with homological fiber FF which is homeomorphic to Σg,n+1\Sigma_{g,n+1}. Take a spine TT of FF and assume that FF lies in a small neighborhood of TT. Isotope FF so that it is disjoint from the surgery link of the Borromean surgery. This can be done since TT and the surgery link are graphs in a 3-manifold. Let FF^{\prime} be a surface, which is the image of FF after the Borromean surgery. Since FF is disjoint from the surgery link, a triad (NF,F+,F)(N\setminus F^{\prime},F^{\prime+},F^{\prime-}) is obtained from (MF,F+,F)(M\setminus F,F^{+},F^{-}) by the Borromean surgery. Then by Fact 2.1, (NF,F+,F)(N\setminus F^{\prime},F^{\prime+},F^{\prime-}) is a homology cobordism over Σg,n+1\Sigma_{g,n+1}. This implies that NN has a homologically fibered link with homological fiber FF^{\prime} which is homeomorphic to Σg,n+1\Sigma_{g,n+1}. \Box

Note that if a connected closed oriented 3-manifold MM has a homologically fibered link whose homological fiber is homeomorphic to Σg,n+1\Sigma_{g,n+1}, then M-M also has such a homologically fibered link. By Proposition 2.1, for a connected closed oriented 3-manifold MM containing a homologically fibered link with homological fiber of a given homeomorphic type we can replace MM with another one whose first homology group with the torsion linking form is the same as arbitrary one of MM and M-M.

3 Representatives with respect to the first homology groups and their torsion linking forms

In this section, at first we recall a part of the result of [12], which gives a generator of the semigroup of the linkings on finite abelian groups, and next we fix representatives of 3-manifolds with respect to the first homology groups and their torsion linking forms. In fact, representatives are given in [6]. We give another representatives for our use. Note that they may coincide.

3.1 Linking pair

A linking is a pair (G,ψ)(G,\psi) such that GG is a finite abelian group and ψ\psi is a non-singular, symmetric bilinear pairing G×G/G\times G\longrightarrow\mathbb{Q}/\mathbb{Z}. Sometimes ψ\psi is called a linking on GG. We call two linkings (G,ψ)(G,\psi) and (G,ψ)(G^{\prime},\psi^{\prime}) equivalent if there exists a group isomorphism between GG and GG^{\prime} through which ψ\psi and ψ\psi^{\prime} are equivalent. By fixing a basis of GG, ψ\psi is represented as a non-singular, symmetric matrix with coefficients in /\mathbb{Q}/\mathbb{Z}, whose (i,j)(i,j)-entry is the image of the ii-th element and the jj-th element of the basis under ψ\psi. For two likings (G1,ψ1)(G_{1},\psi_{1}) and (G2,ψ2)(G_{2},\psi_{2}), define the product as (G1G2,ψ1ψ2)(G_{1}\oplus G_{2},\psi_{1}\oplus\psi_{2}), where ψ1ψ2\psi_{1}\oplus\psi_{2} maps ((g1,g2),(h1,h2))\left((g_{1},g_{2}),(h_{1},h_{2})\right) to ψ1(g1,h1)+ψ2(g2,h2)\psi_{1}(g_{1},h_{1})+\psi_{2}(g_{2},h_{2}) for every g1,h1G1g_{1},h_{1}\in G_{1} and g2,h2G2g_{2},h_{2}\in G_{2}. Under this product, linkings form an abelian semigroup \mathcal{R}. For a connected closed orientable 3-manifold MM, its torsion linking form, (TH1(M),ψM)(TH_{1}(M),\psi_{M}) is an example of linkings. Moreover, for two connected closed oriented 3-manifolds MM and NN, the torsion linking form of M#NM\#N is ψMψN\psi_{M}\oplus\psi_{N}. In [12], a generator of \mathcal{R} is given as following:

Fact 3.1.

[12]

  • Let Ap(q)A^{p}(q) be a linking on /p\mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z} (with a generator 1/p1\in\mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z}) which is represented by (qp)\left(\begin{array}[]{c}\frac{q}{p}\\ \end{array}\right) for coprime integers p>1p>1 and qq, and

  • let E0kE^{k}_{0} be a linking on /2k/2k\mathbb{Z}/2^{k}\mathbb{Z}\oplus\mathbb{Z}/2^{k}\mathbb{Z} (with a basis {(1,0),(0,1)}\{(1,0),(0,1)\}) which is represented by (02k2k0)\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}0&2^{-k}\\ 2^{-k}&0\\ \end{array}\right) for every integer k>0k>0, and

  • let E1kE^{k}_{1} be a linking on /2k/2k\mathbb{Z}/2^{k}\mathbb{Z}\oplus\mathbb{Z}/2^{k}\mathbb{Z} (with a basis {(1,0),(0,1)}\{(1,0),(0,1)\}) which is represented by (21k2k2k21k)\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}2^{1-k}&2^{-k}\\ 2^{-k}&2^{1-k}\\ \end{array}\right) for every integer k>1k>1.

Then \mathcal{R} is generated by Ap(q)A^{p}(q), E0kE^{k}_{0} and E1kE^{k}_{1}.

Moreover, the presentation of \mathcal{R} is revealed by combining the results in [12] and [6]. As a notation we regard A1(q)A^{1}(q), E00E^{0}_{0} and E10E^{0}_{1} as ϕ\phi, the identity element of \mathcal{R}.
Thus every linking is represented as (0laApl(ql))(0ie0E0ki)(0je1E1kj)(\oplus_{0\leq l\leq a}A^{p_{l}}(q_{l}))\oplus(\oplus_{0\leq i\leq e_{0}}E^{k_{i}}_{0})\oplus(\oplus_{0\leq j\leq e_{1}}E^{k^{\prime}_{j}}_{1}), where a0a\geq 0, p0=1p_{0}=1, plp_{l} is an integer greater than 11 for l0l\neq 0, qlq_{l} is an integer prime to plp_{l}, and e00e_{0}\geq 0, k0=0k_{0}=0, ki>0k_{i}>0 for i0i\neq 0, and e10e_{1}\geq 0, k0=0k^{\prime}_{0}=0, kj>1k^{\prime}_{j}>1 for j0j\neq 0. Note that this representation is not unique.

3.2 Representatives

We give 3-manifolds representing the generators in Fact 3.1. On showing that the torsion linking forms of these are the generators, we adopt a method of calculating torsion linking forms of rational homology 3-spheres by using their Heegaard splittings [2]. At first, we review the method.

3.2.1 Calculating torsion linking forms by using Heegaard splittings [2]

Let MM be a rational homology 3-sphere and M=VWM=V\cup W a Heegaard splitting i.e. MM is obtained from two handlebodies of same genus, say gg, VV and WW by pasting their boundaries by some orientation reversing homeomorphism, say f:VWf:\partial V\longrightarrow\partial W. We give VV and WW orientations as standard handlebodies in 3\mathbb{R}^{3}, and we give MM an orientation coming from VV. Take a symplectic basis {a1V,agV,b1V,,bgV}\{a^{V}_{1},\dots a^{V}_{g},b^{V}_{1},\dots,b^{V}_{g}\} of H1(V)H_{1}(\partial V) such that biVb^{V}_{i} is 0 in H1(V)H_{1}(V) for every ii, where symplectic basis means that the intersection form on V\partial V satisfies aiV,ajV=0\langle a^{V}_{i},a^{V}_{j}\rangle=0, biV,bjV=0\langle b^{V}_{i},b^{V}_{j}\rangle=0, and aiV,bjV=δi,j\langle a^{V}_{i},b^{V}_{j}\rangle=\delta_{i,j} for every 1i,jg1\leq i,j\leq g. Similarly, take a symplectic basis {a1W,agW,b1W,,bgW}\{a^{W}_{1},\dots a^{W}_{g},b^{W}_{1},\dots,b^{W}_{g}\} of H1(W)H_{1}(\partial W) such that biWb^{W}_{i} is 0 in H1(W)H_{1}(W) for every ii. Denote by (ABCD)\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}A&B\\ C&D\\ \end{array}\right) the matrix representing ff_{*}, the map between the first homology group induced by ff with respect to these bases, where AA, BB, CC and DD are (g×g)(g\times g)-matrices over \mathbb{Z}.

Fact 3.2.

[2] In the situation above, det(B)0det(B)\neq 0 and H1(M)H_{1}(M) is isomorphic to g/Btg\mathbb{Z}^{g}/B^{t}\mathbb{Z}^{g}. Moreover, the torsion linking form ψM\psi_{M} is equivalent to g/Btg×g/Btg/;(v,w)vt(B1A)w\mathbb{Z}^{g}/B^{t}\mathbb{Z}^{g}\times\mathbb{Z}^{g}/B^{t}\mathbb{Z}^{g}\longrightarrow\mathbb{Q}/\mathbb{Z}\ ;(v,w)\mapsto-v^{t}\left(B^{-1}A\right)w.

Remark 3.1.

We review the procedure for the calculation in terms of Heegaard diagrams rather than gluing maps used in the following. Let M=VWM=V\cup W be a genus gg Heegaard splitting of a closed oriented 3-manifold (not necessarily a rational homology three sphere), and SS the splitting surface. Give SS the orientation as V\partial V. Take a family of pairwise disjoint oriented simple closed curves {b1V,,bgV}\{b^{V}_{1},\dots,b^{V}_{g}\} on SS such that each biVb^{V}_{i} bounds pairwise disjoint disks in VV and that these disks cut VV into a ball. Similarly, take a family of pairwise disjoint oriented simple closed curves {b1W,,bgW}\{b^{W}_{1},\dots,b^{W}_{g}\} on SS such that each biWb^{W}_{i} bounds pairwise disjoint disks in WW and that these disks cut WW into a ball. Note that the triplet (S,{b1V,,bgV},{b1W,,bgW})(S,\{b^{V}_{1},\dots,b^{V}_{g}\},\{b^{W}_{1},\dots,b^{W}_{g}\}) determines the homeomorphic type of M=VWM=V\cup W. It is well-known that we can compute H1(M)H_{1}(M) using the curves: H1(M)=x1,,xg/(Σi=1gbiV,bjWSxifor 1jg)H_{1}(M)=\mathbb{Z}\langle x_{1},\dots,x_{g}\rangle/\left(\Sigma^{g}_{i=1}\langle b^{V}_{i},b^{W}_{j}\rangle_{S}\cdot x_{i}\ {\rm for}\ 1\leq j\leq g\right), where ,S\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle_{S} is the algebraic intersection form on SS. By this, we can see whether MM is a rational homology 33-sphere or not. Suppose that MM is a rational homology 33-sphere in the following. Choose a family of pairwise disjoint oriented simple closed curves {a1V,,agV}\{a^{V}_{1},\dots,a^{V}_{g}\} on SS such that aiV,bjVS=δi,j\langle a^{V}_{i},b^{V}_{j}\rangle_{S}=\delta_{i,j} for every 1i,jg1\leq i,j\leq g. Similarly, choose a family of pairwise disjoint oriented simple closed curves {a1W,,agW}\{a^{W}_{1},\dots,a^{W}_{g}\} on SS such that aiW,bjWS=δi,j\langle a^{W}_{i},b^{W}_{j}\rangle_{S}=-\delta_{i,j} for every 1i,jg1\leq i,j\leq g. Then the homology class of {a1V,,agV,b1V,,bgV}\{a^{V}_{1},\dots,a^{V}_{g},b^{V}_{1},\dots,b^{V}_{g}\} in SS forms a symplectic basis of H1(V)H_{1}(\partial V) such that each biVb^{V}_{i} vanishes in H1(V)H_{1}(V) , and the homology class of {a1W,,agW,b1W,,bgW}\{a^{W}_{1},\dots,a^{W}_{g},b^{W}_{1},\dots,b^{W}_{g}\} in SS forms a symplectic basis of H1(W)H_{1}(\partial W) such that each biWb^{W}_{i}vanishes in H1(W)H_{1}(W). In this situation, we can compute the matrices AA, BB using curves: The (i,j)(i,j)-entry of AA is biW,ajVS\langle b^{W}_{i},a^{V}_{j}\rangle_{S}, and the (i,j)(i,j)-entry of BB is biW,bjVS\langle b^{W}_{i},b^{V}_{j}\rangle_{S}.

3.2.2 Representatives for Ap(q)A^{p}(q)

Let MM be a lens space of type (p,q)(p,q) for p>1p>1. MM has a surgery presentation as in Figure 2 and a Heegaard splitting VWV\cup W as in Figure 3. In Figure 3, VV is the inner handlebody and WW is the outer handlebody, and a box containing qp\frac{-q}{p} represents curves in it, a result of resolving the intersection points of horizontal |q||q| lines and vertical |p||p| lines so that they twist in left-hand (or right-hand) side if qp>0\frac{-q}{p}>0 (or <0<0, respectively). We take the (p,q)(p,-q)-curve as b1Vb^{V}_{1} and the (0,1)(0,1)-curve as b1Wb^{W}_{1} on the splitting torus. Note that the orientation of L(p,q)L(p,q) coming from the standard one of S3S^{3} corresponds to that coming from VV. By computation, we see that MM is a rational homology 3-sphere. Let a1Va^{V}_{1} be the (r,s)(r,s)-curve for r,sr,s such that rqsp=1-rq-sp=1. Then the matrices in 3.2.1 are A=(r)A=\left(-r\right) and B=(p)B=\left(-p\right) by computing the algebraic intersections a1V,b1W\langle a^{V}_{1},b^{W}_{1}\rangle and b1V,b1W\langle b^{V}_{1},b^{W}_{1}\rangle on W\partial W. Note that V=W\partial V=-\partial W. Thus by Fact 3.2, H1(M)=/pH_{1}(M)=\mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z} and the torsion linking form is (rp)\left(\begin{array}[]{c}-\frac{r}{p}\\ \end{array}\right). Let xx be a generator of H1(M)=/pH_{1}(M)=\mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z} corresponding to the 1×11\times 1-matrix (rp)\left(\begin{array}[]{c}-\frac{r}{p}\\ \end{array}\right). Note that qxqx is also a generator of H1(M)=/pH_{1}(M)=\mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z} since pp and qq are coprime. Under this new generator, the matrix representation of the torsion linking form is (rq2p)=(qp)\left(\begin{array}[]{c}-\frac{rq^{2}}{p}\\ \end{array}\right)=\left(\begin{array}[]{c}\frac{q}{p}\\ \end{array}\right) since rq1rq\equiv-1 mod pp, the same as Ap(q)A^{p}(q). Henceforth, M(Ap(q))M(A^{p}(q)) denotes L(p,q)L(p,q).

Refer to caption
Figure 2: A surgery description of L(p,q)L(p,q)
Refer to caption
Figure 3: left: A Heegaard splitting of L(p,q)L(p,q)    right: Examples of boxes contain rational numbers

3.2.3 Representatives for E0kE^{k}_{0}

Let MM be a connected closed orientable 3-manifold having a surgery description as in Figure 4. It has a Heegaard splitting VWV\cup W as in Figure 5, so-called a vertical Heegaard splitting. The convention of boxes containing rational numbers is as in Figure 3. Note that this Heegaard diagram is not minimally intersecting. We regard VV as the inner handlebody and WW as the outer handlebody. Note that the orientation coming from the standard one of S3S^{3} corresponds to that coming from VV. By computation, we see that MM is a rational homology 3-sphere. Let a1V,a2Va^{V}_{1},a^{V}_{2} be curves as in Figure 6, where b1V,b2Vb^{V}_{1},b^{V}_{2} is the same as in Figure 5, which we abbreviate. Then the matrices in 3.2.1 are A=(0111)A=\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}0&1\\ 1&1\\ \end{array}\right) and B=(2k02k2k)B=\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}2^{k}&0\\ -2^{k}&2^{k}\\ \end{array}\right). Thus by Fact 3.2, H1(M)=x,y/(2kx2ky,2ky)H_{1}(M)=\mathbb{Z}\langle x,y\rangle/(2^{k}x-2^{k}y,2^{k}y) and ψM=B1A=(02k2k21k)\psi_{M}=-B^{-1}A=\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}0&-2^{-k}\\ -2^{-k}&2^{1-k}\\ \end{array}\right) under the basis {x,y}\{x,y\}. By changing a basis, H1(M)=(x+y/(2k(x+y)))(x/(2k(x))H_{1}(M)=\left(\mathbb{Z}\langle x+y\rangle/(2^{k}(x+y))\right)\oplus\left(\mathbb{Z}\langle-x\rangle/(2^{k}(-x)\right) and ψM=(02k2k0)\psi_{M}=\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}0&2^{-k}\\ 2^{-k}&0\\ \end{array}\right) under the basis {x+y,x}\{x+y,-x\}, the same as E0kE^{k}_{0}. Henceforth, M(E0k)M(E^{k}_{0}) denotes this MM.

Refer to caption
Figure 4: Surgery descriptions of MM
Refer to caption
Figure 5: A Heegaard splitting of MM
Refer to caption
Figure 6: Curves a1V,a2V,b1W,b2Wa^{V}_{1},a^{V}_{2},b^{W}_{1},b^{W}_{2}

3.2.4 Representatives for E1kE^{k}_{1}

Let MM be a connected closed orientable 3-manifold having a surgery description as in Figure 7. It has a Heegaard splitting VWV\cup W as in Figure 8, so-called a vertical Heegaard splitting. The convention of boxes containing rational numbers is as in Figure 3. We regard VV as the inner handlebody and WW as the outer handlebody. Note that the orientation coming from the standard one of S3S^{3} corresponds to that coming from VV. By computation, we see that MM is a rational homology 3-sphere. Let a1V,a2Va^{V}_{1},a^{V}_{2} be curves as in Figure 9, where b1V,b2Vb^{V}_{1},b^{V}_{2} are the same as in Figure 8, which we abbreviate. Then the matrices in 3.2.1 are A=(0133)A=\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}0&-1\\ -3&3\\ \end{array}\right) and B=(2k22k2k32k)B=\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}2^{k}&2\cdot 2^{k}\\ -2^{k}&-3\cdot 2^{k}\\ \end{array}\right). Thus by Fact 3.2, H1(M)=x,y/(2kx2ky,22kx32ky)H_{1}(M)=\mathbb{Z}\langle x,y\rangle/(2^{k}x-2^{k}y,2\cdot 2^{k}x-3\cdot 2^{k}y) and ψM=B1A=(321k32k32k21k)\psi_{M}=-B^{-1}A=\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}3\cdot 2^{1-k}&-3\cdot 2^{-k}\\ -3\cdot 2^{-k}&2^{1-k}\\ \end{array}\right) under the basis {x,y}\{x,y\}. By changing a basis, H1(M)=(x+y/(2k(x+y)))(y/(2k(y))H_{1}(M)=\left(\mathbb{Z}\langle x+y\rangle/(2^{k}(x+y))\right)\oplus\left(\mathbb{Z}\langle-y\rangle/(2^{k}(-y)\right) and ψM=(21k2k2k21k)\psi_{M}=\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}2^{1-k}&2^{-k}\\ 2^{-k}&2^{1-k}\\ \end{array}\right) under the basis {x+y,y}\{x+y,-y\}, the same as E1kE^{k}_{1}. Henceforth, M(E1k)M(E^{k}_{1}) denotes this MM.

Refer to caption
Figure 7: Surgery descriptions of MM
Refer to caption
Figure 8: A Heegaard splitting of MM
Refer to caption
Figure 9: Curves a1V,a2V,b1W,b2Wa^{V}_{1},a^{V}_{2},b^{W}_{1},b^{W}_{2}

From the above, we have representatives for connected closed oriented 3-manifolds with respect to the first homology groups and their torsion linking forms.

Proposition 3.1.

Suppose that a connected closed oriented 3-manifold MM whose free part of the first homology group is isomorphic to r\mathbb{Z}^{r} and whose torsion linking form is equivalent to (0laApl(ql))(0ie0E0ki)(0je1E1kj)(\bigoplus_{0\leq l\leq a}A^{p_{l}}(q_{l}))\oplus(\bigoplus_{0\leq i\leq e_{0}}E^{k_{i}}_{0})\oplus(\bigoplus_{0\leq j\leq e_{1}}E^{k^{\prime}_{j}}_{1}) for integers a,pl,ql,e0,ki,e1,kja,p_{l},q_{l},e_{0},k_{i},e_{1},k^{\prime}_{j} as in the end of Subsection 3.1.
Then a 3-manifold (#rS2×S1)#(#0laM(Apl(ql)))#(#0ie0M(E0ki))#(#0je1M(E1kj))\left(\#^{r}S^{2}\times S^{1}\right)\#\left(\#_{0\leq l\leq a}M\left(A^{p_{l}}(q_{l})\right)\right)\#(\#_{0\leq i\leq e_{0}}M(E^{k_{i}}_{0}))\#(\#_{0\leq j\leq e_{1}}M(E^{k^{\prime}_{j}}_{1})) has isomorphic first homology group to that of MM and has equivalent torsion linking forms to that of MM, where as a notation we regard #0S2×S1\#^{0}S^{2}\times S^{1}, M(A1(q0))M(A^{1}(q_{0})), M(E00)M(E^{0}_{0}) and M(E10)M(E^{0}_{1}) as S3S^{3}.

We use this in Section 5.

4 Thickened surface and its spine bands

In this section, we explain how surfaces (with their spines) in a given 3-manifold correspond to pairs of annuli and bands in the manifold. All surfaces and 3-manifolds in this section are oriented, and we can use the terminology “front” and “back” sides of surfaces.

We state the statement as a proposition:

Proposition 4.1.

Let MM be an oriented 3-manifold. Fix non-negative integers gg and nn.
There is a bijection between the set of isotopy classes of oriented surfaces in MM, each of which is homeomorphic to Σg,n+1\Sigma_{g,n+1} with the spine as in Figure 10 and the set of oriented annuli A1,,A2g+nA_{1},\dots,A_{2g+n} with oriented core curves and the oriented bands (regarded as small rectangles) B1,,Bg,C1,,Cg+n1B_{1},\dots,B_{g},C_{1},\dots,C_{g+n-1} satisfying the following condition (see Figure 11 for example):

  • One side of Bi\partial B_{i}, which consists of four sides, is on the back side of A2i1A_{2i-1} and is a properly embedded essential arc on A2i1A_{2i-1}, and the opposite side of Bi\partial B_{i} is on the front side of A2iA_{2i} and is a part of the core curve of A2iA_{2i} for 1ig1\leq i\leq g.

  • For 1ig1\leq i\leq g, near the intersection of BiB_{i} with A2i1A_{2i-1}, the front side of BiB_{i} is on the positive direction with respect to the orientation of the core curve of A2i1A_{2i-1}, and near that of with A2iA_{2i}, the front side of BiB_{i} is the “right” side of the core curve of A2iA_{2i}, where we look the intersection (this is on the front side of A2iA_{2i}) so that the core curve of A2iA_{2i} runs from the bottom to the top.

  • For 1ig11\leq i\leq g-1, CiC_{i} connects the “left” boundary of A2iA_{2i} and the “right” boundary of A2i+1A_{2i+1} so that the front sides are attached, and for gjg+n1g\leq j\leq g+n-1, CjC_{j} connects the “left” boundary of Aj+gA_{j+g} and the “left” boundary of Aj+g+1A_{j+g+1} so that the front sides are attached, where we look the front side of AkA_{k} so that the core curve runs from the bottom to the top.

We call the condition for annuli and bands in Proposition 4.1 the condition \spadesuit. We construct oriented annuli and bands from a surface with its spine in Subsection 4.1, and construct a surface with its spine from oriented annuli and bands in Subsection 4.2. We can see that these operations are the inverses of each other. Thus Proposition 4.1 holds.

Refer to caption
Figure 10: A spine of Σg,n+1\Sigma_{g,n+1}
Refer to caption
Figure 11: Annuli and bands

4.1 Annuli and bands obtained from surfaces

Let FF be a surface homeomrphic to Σg,n+1\Sigma_{g,n+1} in MM. Fix an embedding ι:Σg,n+1×[1,1]M\iota:\Sigma_{g,n+1}\times[-1,1]\longrightarrow M such that ι(Σg,n+1×{0})=F\iota(\Sigma_{g,n+1}\times\{0\})=F and identify Σg,n+1\Sigma_{g,n+1} with FF via ι\iota. Take a spine (K1K2)w1wg1(K2g1K2g)wgK2g+1wg+1wg+n1K2g+n(K_{1}\cup K_{2})\cup w_{1}\cup\cdots\cup w_{g-1}\cup(K_{2g-1}\cup K_{2g})\cup w_{g}\cup K_{2g+1}\cup w_{g+1}\cup\cdots\cup w_{g+n-1}\cup K_{2g+n} of FF as in Figure 10. We assign an orientation to KiK_{i} for each 1i2g+n1\leq i\leq 2g+n. Denote the point K2i1K2iK_{2i-1}\cap K_{2i} for 1ig1\leq i\leq g by pip_{i}. Let UiU_{i} be the square centered at pip_{i} and VjV_{j} the rectangle around wjw_{j} as in Figure 12. Take charts ϕi:[1,1]2Ui\phi_{i}:[-1,1]^{2}\longrightarrow U_{i} such that ϕ([1,1]×{0})\phi([-1,1]\times\{0\}) is a part of K2i1K_{2i-1}, ϕ({0}×[1,1])\phi(\{0\}\times[-1,1]) is a part of K2iK_{2i}, and ψj:[1,1]2Vj\psi_{j}:[-1,1]^{2}\longrightarrow V_{j} such that ψ([1,1]×{0})\psi([-1,1]\times\{0\}) is a part of wjw_{j} and {1}×[1,1]\{-1\}\times[-1,1] is near K2jK_{2j} for 1jg1\leq j\leq g, near Kj+gK_{j+g} for g+1jg+n1g+1\leq j\leq g+n-1.

Refer to caption
Figure 12: Charts

Denote the annulus whose core curve is KiK_{i} by AiA^{\prime}_{i} for 1i2g+n1\leq i\leq 2g+n as in Figure 13. Consider F×[1,1]F\times[-1,1], see Figure 14. We regard that it is in MM via ι\iota. Let A2i1A_{2i-1}, A2iA_{2i} and AjA_{j} be A2i1×{1}A^{\prime}_{2i-1}\times\{1\}, A2i×{1}A^{\prime}_{2i}\times\{-1\} and Aj×{1}A^{\prime}_{j}\times\{1\}, respectively for 1ig1\leq i\leq g and 2g+1j2g+n2g+1\leq j\leq 2g+n. These annuli can be regarded as framed knots in MM. Let BiB_{i}, CiC_{i} and CjC_{j} be ϕi({0}×[1,1])×[1,1]\phi_{i}\left(\{0\}\times[-1,1]\right)\times[-1,1], {ψi({t}×[1,1])×{t}|t[1,1]}\left\{\psi_{i}(\{t\}\times[-1,1])\times\{t\}|t\in[-1,1]\right\} and ψj([1,1]2)×{1}\psi_{j}([-1,1]^{2})\times\{1\}, respectively for 1ig1\leq i\leq g and g+1jg+n1g+1\leq j\leq g+n-1. These are bands in MM. We get an oriented annuli AkA_{k}’s and bands BiB_{i}’s and CjC_{j}’s (these are rectangles) in MM as in Figure 11. Observe that these satisfy the condition \spadesuit with appropriate orientations.

Refer to caption
Figure 13: Annuli
Refer to caption
Figure 14: Thickened FF

4.2 Surfaces from annuli and bands

Let A1,,A2g+nA_{1},\dots,A_{2g+n} be oriented annuli and B1,,Bg,C1,,Cg+n1B_{1},\dots,B_{g},C_{1},\dots,C_{g+n-1} be bands satisfying the condition \spadesuit in MM. These look like some embeddings of the union of annuli and bands as in Figure 11. Thicken these (denoted by NN) and consider curves with colors as in Figure 15. In this figure, a part of the core curve of A2iA_{2i}, which is also one edge of the band BiB_{i} is replaced with the other three edges of BiB_{i} for each 1ig1\leq i\leq g. A small neighborhood FF of these curves in N\partial N is homeomorphic to Σg,n+1\Sigma_{g,n+1} with a spine as in Figure 10. Let K2i1K_{2i-1} denote the red curve coming from A2i1A_{2i-1} and K2iK_{2i} the blue curve coming from A2iA_{2i} and BiB_{i} for 1ig1\leq i\leq g, and wjw_{j} the green curve coming from CjC_{j} for 1jg+n11\leq j\leq g+n-1. For each 1i2g+n1\leq i\leq 2g+n, fix an essential arc αi\alpha_{i} in AiA_{i} such that it is disjoint from wjw_{j} for 1jg+n11\leq j\leq g+n-1 and KlK_{l} for lil\neq i, and let DiD_{i} be an essential disk in NN obtained by thickening αi\alpha_{i}. Then each Di\partial D_{i} intersects F\partial F twice with the opposite orientations and DiD_{i}’s cut NN into a ball. Therefore, FF gives NN the structure of Σg,n+1×[1,1]\Sigma_{g,n+1}\times[-1,1] so that FF is Σg,n+1×{1}\Sigma_{g,n+1}\times\{1\}. The colored curves play a role of a spine of Σg,n+1\Sigma_{g,n+1}. We get a surface corresponding to Σg,n+1×{0}\Sigma_{g,n+1}\times\{0\} with a spine obtained by projecting the curves along the product structure. In other word, the surface Σg,n+1×{0}\Sigma_{g,n+1}\times\{0\} with its spine is isotopic to FF with its spine in MM. We can easily show that the operations in Subsections 4.1 and 4.2 are inverses of each other.

Remark 4.1.

Let mA2i1m_{A_{2i-1}} be a meridian curve of A2i1A_{2i-1} (i.e. an oriented circle on the boundary of a small neighborhood of A2i1A_{2i-1} which bounds a disk in the neighborhood intersecting the core of A2i1A_{2i-1} once positively) for 1ig1\leq i\leq g. We assume mA2i1m_{A_{2i-1}} is in a small neighborhood of A2i1A_{2i-1} and disjoint from A2i1A_{2i-1}. Note that the curve obtained from A2iA_{2i} by the above procedure represents [A2i][mA2i1][A_{2i}]-[m_{A_{2i-1}}] in H1(MN)H_{1}(M\setminus N), where [A2i][A_{2i}] and [A2i1][A_{2i-1}] denote the elements represented by push-ups of the core curves of A2iA_{2i} and A2i1A_{2i-1}, respectively.

Refer to caption
Figure 15: Thickened annuli and bands

5 A proof of Theorem 1.1

In this section, we give a proof of Theorem 1.1. At first, we consider the condition for a connected closed orientable 3-manifold having a homologically fibered link whose homological fiber is given homeomorphic type using a surgery diagram. In order to define the linking number lk(,)lk(\cdot,\cdot) among knots in the surgery link, we have to give the link an orientation. We fix any one. However, this choice does not matter for the existence of a homologically fibered link whose fiber is the given homeomorphism type, see Remark 5.1.

Proposition 5.1.

Let MM be a connected closed orientable 3-manifold. Suppose that MM is obtained from S3S^{3} by the surgery along a link L=L1LmL=L_{1}\sqcup\cdots\sqcup L_{m}, where each LiL_{i} is an oriented knot and its coefficient is piqi\frac{p_{i}}{q_{i}}.
Then MM has a homologically fibered link whose homological fiber is homeomorphic to Σg,n+1\Sigma_{g,n+1} if and only if there exist m×(2g+n)m\times(2g+n)-matrix of integer coefficients XX and (2g+n)×(2g+n)(2g+n)\times(2g+n)-symmetric matrix of integer coefficients YY satisfying the following equation:

|ΦΨXXtY+(On)|=±1,\displaystyle\left|\begin{array}[]{cc}\Phi&\Psi X\\ X^{t}&Y+(\mathcal{E}\oplus O_{n})\\ \end{array}\right|=\pm 1, (6)

where Φ\Phi is an m×mm\times m-matrix whose (i,i)(i,i)-entry is pip_{i} and (i,j)(i,j)-entry is qilk(Li,Lj)q_{i}lk(L_{i},L_{j}) for iji\neq j, Ψ\Psi is an m×mm\times m-diagonal matrix whose (i,i)(i,i)-entry is qiq_{i}, and \mathcal{E} is a 2g×2g2g\times 2g-matrix whose (2i1,2i)(2i-1,2i)-entry is 11 for every 1ig1\leq i\leq g and the others are 0.

Proof.

Suppose MM has a homologically fibered link whose homological fiber FF is homeomorphic to Σg,n+1\Sigma_{g,n+1}. We will construct a solution of (6). By choosing a spine of FF, and using the construction in Section 4, we get oriented annuli A1,,A2g+nA_{1},\dots,A_{2g+n} and oriented bands B1,,BgB_{1},\dots,B_{g}, C1,,CnC_{1},\dots,C_{n} satisfying the condition \spadesuit. We regard these annuli and bands are in the surgery diagram on S3S^{3} missing the surgery link. Let TiT_{i} be the canonical longitude (regarded in S3S^{3}) of the core curve of AiA_{i} and mAim_{A_{i}} the meridian of (the core curve of) AiA_{i} such that lk(Ti,mAi)=1lk(T_{i},m_{A_{i}})=1 and tit_{i} the framing number of AiA_{i} regarded as a framed knot. Note that H1(MF)H1(M((1i2g+nAi)(1jgBj))(1lnCl)))H1(M(1i2g+nAi))H_{1}(M\setminus F)\cong H_{1}\left(M\setminus\left((\bigcup_{1\leq i\leq 2g+n}A_{i})\cup(\bigcup_{1\leq j\leq g}B_{j}))\cup(\bigcup_{1\leq l\leq n}C_{l})\right)\right)\cong H_{1}\left(M\setminus(\bigcup_{1\leq i\leq 2g+n}A_{i})\right), and that the push-up of KiK_{i}, which is in spines of FF as in Figure 10 represents
{[T2i1]+t2i1[mA2i1]if 1i2gandi=2i1,[T2i]+t2i[mA2i][mA2i1]if 1i2gandi=2i,[Ti]+ti[mAi]if 2g+1i2g+n\begin{cases}[T_{2i^{\prime}-1}]+t_{2i^{\prime}-1}[m_{A_{2i^{\prime}-1}}]\ \ {\rm if}\ 1\leq i\leq 2g\ {\rm and}\ i=2i^{\prime}-1,\\ [T_{2i^{\prime}}]+t_{2i^{\prime}}[m_{A_{2i^{\prime}}}]-[m_{A_{2i^{\prime}-1}}]\ \ {\rm if}\ 1\leq i\leq 2g\ {\rm and}\ i=2i^{\prime},\\ [T_{i}]+t_{i}[m_{A_{i}}]\ \ {\rm if}\ 2g+1\leq i\leq 2g+n\\ \end{cases}
in H1(M(1i2g+nAi))H_{1}\left(M\setminus(\bigcup_{1\leq i\leq 2g+n}A_{i})\right).
Let mLim_{L_{i}} be the meridian of LiL_{i} and set li,jl_{i,j} to be lk(Li,Lj)lk(L_{i},L_{j}) and l~i,j\tilde{l}_{i,j} to be lk(Li,Tj)lk(L_{i},T_{j}) and l¯i,j\bar{l}_{i,j} to be lk(Ti,Tj)lk(T_{i},T_{j}). Note that H1(S3(L(1i2g+nAi)))m+2g+nH_{1}\left(S^{3}\setminus\left(L\cup(\bigcup_{1\leq i\leq 2g+n}A_{i})\right)\right)\cong\mathbb{Z}^{m+2g+n} is generated by {[mL1],,[mLm],[mA1],,[mA2g+n]}\{[m_{L_{1}}],\dots,[m_{L_{m}}],[m_{A_{1}}],\dots,[m_{A_{2g+n}}]\}, and that piqi\frac{p_{i}}{q_{i}}-slope of LiL_{i} represents an element pi[mLi]+qi{Σ1jmijli,j[mLj]+Σ1k2g+nl~i,k[mAk]}p_{i}[m_{L_{i}}]+q_{i}\{\Sigma_{\begin{subarray}{c}1\leq j\leq m\\ i\neq j\end{subarray}}l_{i,j}[m_{L_{j}}]+\Sigma_{1\leq k\leq 2g+n}\tilde{l}_{i,k}[m_{A_{k}}]\} in H1(S3(L(1i2g+nAi)))H_{1}\left(S^{3}\setminus\left(L\cup(\bigcup_{1\leq i\leq 2g+n}A_{i})\right)\right), denoted by 𝔸i\mathbb{A}_{i}. Note also that the push-up of KiK_{i}, which is in a spine of FF as in Figure 10 represents
{t2i1[mA2i1]+Σ1jml~j,i[mLj]+Σ1k2g+nkil¯i,k[mAk]if 1i2gandi=2i1,t2i[mA2i][mA2i1]+Σ1jml~j,i[mLj]+Σ1k2g+nkil¯i,k[mAk]if 1i2gandi=2i,ti[mAi]+Σ1jml~j,i[mLj]+Σ1k2g+nkil¯i,k[mAk]if 2g+1i2g+n\begin{cases}t_{2i^{\prime}-1}[m_{A_{2i^{\prime}-1}}]+\Sigma_{1\leq j\leq m}\tilde{l}_{j,i}[m_{L_{j}}]+\Sigma_{\begin{subarray}{c}1\leq k\leq 2g+n\\ k\neq i\end{subarray}}\bar{l}_{i,k}[m_{A_{k}}]\ \ {\rm if}\ 1\leq i\leq 2g\ {\rm and}\ i=2i^{\prime}-1,\\ t_{2i^{\prime}}[m_{A_{2i^{\prime}}}]-[m_{A_{2i^{\prime}-1}}]+\Sigma_{1\leq j\leq m}\tilde{l}_{j,i}[m_{L_{j}}]+\Sigma_{\begin{subarray}{c}1\leq k\leq 2g+n\\ k\neq i\end{subarray}}\bar{l}_{i,k}[m_{A_{k}}]\ \ {\rm if}\ 1\leq i\leq 2g\ {\rm and}\ i=2i^{\prime},\\ t_{i}[m_{A_{i}}]+\Sigma_{1\leq j\leq m}\tilde{l}_{j,i}[m_{L_{j}}]+\Sigma_{\begin{subarray}{c}1\leq k\leq 2g+n\\ k\neq i\end{subarray}}\bar{l}_{i,k}[m_{A_{k}}]\ \ {\rm if}\ 2g+1\leq i\leq 2g+n\\ \end{cases}
under the basis {[mL1],,[mLm],[mA1],,[mA2g+n]}\{[m_{L_{1}}],\dots,[m_{L_{m}}],[m_{A_{1}}],\dots,[m_{A_{2g+n}}]\} of H1(S3(L(1i2g+nAi)))H_{1}\left(S^{3}\setminus\left(L\cup(\bigcup_{1\leq i\leq 2g+n}A_{i})\right)\right), denoted by 𝔹i\mathbb{B}_{i}. Since FF is homological fiber, H1(MF)H_{1}(M\setminus F) must be 2g+n\mathbb{Z}^{2g+n} and the push-ups of KiK_{i}’s form a free basis of H1(MF)H_{1}(M\setminus F). This implies that {[mL1],,[mLm],[mA1],,[mA2g+n]}/𝔸1,,𝔸m\{[m_{L_{1}}],\dots,[m_{L_{m}}],[m_{A_{1}}],\dots,[m_{A_{2g+n}}]\}/\langle\mathbb{A}_{1},\dots,\mathbb{A}_{m}\rangle is isomorphic to 2g+n\mathbb{Z}^{2g+n}, which also implies that 𝔸1,,𝔸m\mathbb{A}_{1},\dots,\mathbb{A}_{m} are linearly independent in H1(S3(L(1i2g+nAi)))H_{1}\left(S^{3}\setminus\left(L\cup(\bigcup_{1\leq i\leq 2g+n}A_{i})\right)\right), and 𝔹j\mathbb{B}_{j}’s modulo 𝔸1,,𝔸m\langle\mathbb{A}_{1},\dots,\mathbb{A}_{m}\rangle form a basis of it. Thus {𝔸1,,𝔸m,𝔹1,,𝔹2g+n}\{\mathbb{A}_{1},\dots,\mathbb{A}_{m},\mathbb{B}_{1},\dots,\mathbb{B}_{2g+n}\} is a basis of m+2g+n\mathbb{Z}^{m+2g+n} freely generated by {[mL1],,[mLm],[mA1],,[mA2g+n]}\{[m_{L_{1}}],\dots,[m_{L_{m}}],[m_{A_{1}}],\dots,[m_{A_{2g+n}}]\}. Thus considering the change of basis matrix, we get a solution of (6) by setting XX equal to a matrix whose (i,j)(i,j)-entry is l~i,j\tilde{l}_{i,j}, YY equal to a symmetric matrix whose (k,k)(k,k)-entry is tkt_{k}, (2i1,2i)(2i-1,2i)-entry and (2i,2i1)(2i,2i-1)-entry for igi\leq g are l¯2i1,2i1\bar{l}_{2i-1,2i}-1 and other (i,j)(i,j)-entry is l¯i,j\bar{l}_{i,j}.

Conversely, suppose we have a solution XX, YY for (6). Then we can construct oriented framed knots K1,,K2g+nK_{1},\dots,K_{2g+n} in the surgery diagram on S3S^{3}, which will be the core curves of annuli A1,,A2g+nA_{1},\dots,A_{2g+n}, such that lk(Li,Kj)lk(L_{i},K_{j}) is the (i,j)(i,j)-entry of XX, the framing of KiK_{i} is the (i,i)(i,i)-entry of YY, lk(K2i1,K2i)lk(K_{2i-1},K_{2i}) for igi\leq g is equal to 11 plus the(2i1,2i){\rm the}\ (2i-1,2i)-entry of YY, and lk(Ki,Kj)lk(K_{i},K_{j}) for other pair (i,j)(i,j) is the (i,j)(i,j)-entry of YY. Take bands B1,,Bg,C1,,C2g+n1B_{1},\dots,B_{g},C_{1},\dots,C_{2g+n-1} satisfying the condition \spadesuit. Note that we can choose bands arbitrarily since these do not affect on the homology. We get a surface which is homeomorphic to Σg,n+1\Sigma_{g,n+1} by the construction in Section 4. By reversing the argument in the previous paragraph, we see that this surface is a homological fiber. \Box

Remark 5.1.

Suppose there is a solution XX, YY for the equation (6) in Proposition 5.1 for some orientation of the surgery link. If we reverse the orientation of the ii-th component of mm-component surgery link, then the signs of the ii-th row and ii-th column of Φ\Phi except for the (i,i)(i,i)-entry and the (i,i)(i,i)-th entry of Ψ\Psi in the left hand side of the equation (6) are switched. Then a pair of the matrix obtained from XX by switching the signs of the ii-th row and YY is a solution of the new equation. Therefore the existence of a solution of the equation (6) is preserved.

Remark 5.2.

For a given surgery diagram and a solution of (6), we can concretely construct a homologically fibered link as in the latter part of the proof of Proposition 5.1. However we have many choices in construction: There are many links with linking each others in the given number and linking the surgery link in the given number, and we can arbitrary take bands. These homologically fibered links corresponding to one solution are not always different, i.e. they may be isotopic. Moreover, two homological fibered links corresponding to two different solution may be isotopic.

Proof of Theorem 1.1.

Suppose that MM is a connected closed oriented 3-manifold whose free part of the first homology group is isomorphic to r\mathbb{Z}^{r} and whose torsion linking form is equivalent to (0laApl(ql))(0ie0E0ki)(0je1E1kj)(\bigoplus_{0\leq l\leq a}A^{p_{l}}(q_{l}))\oplus(\bigoplus_{0\leq i\leq e_{0}}E^{k_{i}}_{0})\oplus(\bigoplus_{0\leq j\leq e_{1}}E^{k^{\prime}_{j}}_{1}).
Then M~=(#rS2×S1)#(#0laM(Apl(ql)))#(#0ie0M(E0ki))#(#0je1M(E1kj))\tilde{M}=\left(\#^{r}S^{2}\times S^{1}\right)\#\left(\#_{0\leq l\leq a}M\left(A^{p_{l}}(q_{l})\right)\right)\#(\#_{0\leq i\leq e_{0}}M(E^{k_{i}}_{0}))\#(\#_{0\leq j\leq e_{1}}M(E^{k^{\prime}_{j}}_{1})) has the isomorphic first homology group to MM and has a torsion linking form equivalent to that of MM by Proposition 3.1. By Proposition 2.1, MM has a homologically fibered link whose homological fiber is homeomorphic to Σg,n+1\Sigma_{g,n+1} if and only if M~\tilde{M} has such homologically fibered link. We have a surgery diagram on S3S^{3} for M~\tilde{M} which consists of rr copies of an unknot with surgery slope 0 (for #rS2×S1\#^{r}S^{2}\times S^{1}), aa copies of an unknot with surgery slope plql\frac{p_{l}}{-q_{l}} for 0la0\leq l\leq a (for #0laM(Apl(ql))\#_{0\leq l\leq a}M\left(A^{p_{l}}(q_{l})\right)), e0e_{0} copies of 22-component link as in the right of Figure 4 for 0ie00\leq i\leq e_{0} (for #0ie0M(E0ki)\#_{0\leq i\leq e_{0}}M(E^{k_{i}}_{0})), and e1e_{1} copies of 22-component link as in the right of Figure 7 for 0je10\leq j\leq e_{1} (for #0je1M(E1kj)\#_{0\leq j\leq e_{1}}M(E^{k^{\prime}_{j}}_{1})). Applying Proposition 5.1 with this surgery diagram with appropriate order, we get the equality (3). \Box

Almost the same statement as the next corollary was given by Nozaki.

Corollary 5.1.

Let MM be a connected closed orientable 3-manifold. Suppose that M#(S2×S1)M\#(S^{2}\times S^{1}) has a homologically fibered link whose homological fiber is homeomorphic to Σ0,n+1\Sigma_{0,n+1} for n1n\geq 1 (resp. Σ1,1\Sigma_{1,1}). Then MM has a homologically fibered link whose homological fiber is homeomorphic to Σ0,n\Sigma_{0,n} (resp. Σ0,2\Sigma_{0,2}).

Proof.

At first, for the case where M#(S2×S1)M\#(S^{2}\times S^{1}) has a homologically fibered link whose homological fiber is homeomorphic to Σ0,2\Sigma_{0,2}, we can see that H1(M#(S2×S1))H1(M)H1(S2×S1)H_{1}(M\#(S^{2}\times S^{1}))\cong H_{1}(M)\oplus H_{1}(S^{2}\times S^{1}) is generated by one element by Remark 2.1. Thus MM is an integral homology 33-sphere and has a homologically fibered link whose homological fiber is homeomorphic to Σ0,1\Sigma_{0,1}. In the following, for the case where M#(S2×S1)M\#(S^{2}\times S^{1}) has a homologically fibered link whose homological fiber is homeomorphic to Σ0,n+1\Sigma_{0,n+1}, we assume that n2n\geq 2.
Fix a surgery diagram 𝒟\mathcal{D} of MM, and let m1m-1 be the number of knots in 𝒟\mathcal{D}. A surgery diagram 𝒟\mathcal{D}^{\prime} of M#(S2×S1)M\#(S^{2}\times S^{1}) is obtained by adding disjoint unknot UU with surgery slope 0(=01)0(=\frac{0}{1}) to 𝒟\mathcal{D}. We give an order among the link in 𝒟\mathcal{D}^{\prime} so that UU is the first component. Then by Proposition 5.1, we have a solution of (6) for Σ0,n+1\Sigma_{0,n+1} (resp. Σ1,1\Sigma_{1,1}) and fix it. Let 𝕏\mathbb{X} denote the matrix in the left hand side of (6) and let 𝕏i,j\mathbb{X}_{i,j} denote the (i,j)(i,j)-entry of 𝕏\mathbb{X}. Note that 𝕏1,i=𝕏i,1=0\mathbb{X}_{1,i}=\mathbb{X}_{i,1}=0 for 1im1\leq i\leq m, and that 𝕏1,i=𝕏i,1\mathbb{X}_{1,i}=\mathbb{X}_{i,1} for m+1im+nm+1\leq i\leq m+n (resp. m+1im+2m+1\leq i\leq m+2).
Since (6) holds, 𝕏1,m+1,𝕏1,m+2,,𝕏1,m+n\mathbb{X}_{1,m+1},\mathbb{X}_{1,m+2},\dots,\mathbb{X}_{1,m+n} (resp. 𝕏1,m+1,𝕏1,m+2\mathbb{X}_{1,m+1},\mathbb{X}_{1,m+2}) are coprime. This implies that the (ordered) set {𝕏1,m+1,𝕏1,m+2,,𝕏1,m+n}\{\mathbb{X}_{1,m+1},\mathbb{X}_{1,m+2},\dots,\mathbb{X}_{1,m+n}\} (resp. {𝕏1,m+1,𝕏1,m+2}\{\mathbb{X}_{1,m+1},\mathbb{X}_{1,m+2}\}) can be changed into nn-element set (resp. two-element set) such that the first element is 11 or 1-1 and the other elements are 0 in finitely many steps, at each of which the ll-times of the ii-th element is added to the jj-th element for some integer ll and 1ijn1\leq i\neq j\leq n (resp. 1ij21\leq i\neq j\leq 2). Fix one of such sequence of steps. Along this sequence, at each step, say the ll-times of the ii-th element is added to the jj-th element, we change 𝕏\mathbb{X} as follows: Add ll times the (m+i)(m+i)-th column to the (m+j)(m+j)-th column and then add ll times the (m+i)(m+i)-th row to the (m+j)(m+j)-th row. Note that at any time in the sequence, each matrix obtained from 𝕏\mathbb{X} is also a “solution” of (6). A solution for a homologically fibered link whose homological fiber is homeomorphic to neither Σ0,n+1\Sigma_{0,n+1} nor Σ1,1\Sigma_{1,1} is not necessarily preserved under this operation. At the end of the sequence we get a matrix 𝕏\mathbb{X}^{\prime} obtained from 𝕏\mathbb{X} whose (1,i)(1,i)-entry is 0 for im+1i\neq m+1 and ±1\pm 1 for i=m+1i=m+1. Note that the (i,1)(i,1)-entry of 𝕏\mathbb{X}^{\prime} is 0 for im+1i\neq m+1 and ±1\pm 1 for i=m+1i=m+1.
Expand the determinant of 𝕏\mathbb{X}^{\prime} along the first row (the only one cofacter survives) and expand the determinant of the cofacter along the first column (the only one cofacter survives). The cofacter finally obtained is a solution for Σ0,n\Sigma_{0,n} (resp. Σ0,2\Sigma_{0,2}) in a 3-manifold which has a surgery diagram 𝒟\mathcal{D}, representing MM.

\Box

6 Examples

Though we have Theorem 1.1, it is difficult in general to find a solution of (3) for a given manifold and homeomorphic type of a surface. Nozaki [10] proved that L(p,q)L(p,q) has a homologically fibered link whose homological fiber is homeomorphic to Σ1,1\Sigma_{1,1} for every pair (p,q)(p,q) by solving some equations, which is equivalent to (3), using the density theorem. The author [11] proved that L(p,q)L(p,q) has a homologically fibered link whose homological fiber is homeomorphic to Σ0,3\Sigma_{0,3} for every pair (p,q)(p,q) by solving (3) following the Nozaki’s argument. Thanks to Nozaki [10], we see that hc(M(Ap(q)))=1{\rm hc}(M(A^{p}(q)))=1 for every (p,q)(p,q). Moreover, he also proved in his thesis that hc((#2mS2×S1)#M(Ap(q)))=m+1{\rm hc}\left((\#^{2m}S^{2}\times S^{1})\#M(A^{p}(q))\right)=m+1, and hc((#2m+1S2×S1)#M(Ap(q)))=m+1{\rm hc}\left((\#^{2m+1}S^{2}\times S^{1})\#M(A^{p}(q))\right)=m+1 if qq or q-q is quadratic residue modulo pp and hc((#2m+1S2×S1)#M(Ap(q)))=m+2{\rm hc}\left((\#^{2m+1}S^{2}\times S^{1})\#M(A^{p}(q))\right)=m+2 otherwise for every non-negative integer mm. Thus we know hc(){\rm hc}(\cdot) for all 3-manifolds whose torsion linking form is Ap(q)A^{p}(q). In this section, we determine hc(){\rm hc}(\cdot) for 3-manifolds whose torsion linking forms are the other generators for linkings, (#rS2×S1)#M(E0k)(\#^{r}S^{2}\times S^{1})\#M(E^{k}_{0}) and (#rS2×S1)#M(E1k)(\#^{r}S^{2}\times S^{1})\#M(E^{k}_{1}) for a non-negative integer rr, we state as a proposition, proved at Subsections 6.1 and 6.2:

Proposition 6.1.

In the following, n\lceil n\rceil and n\lfloor n\rfloor for a real number nn represent the minimal integer greater than or equal to nn and the maximal integer less than or equal to nn, respectively.

  • For r0r\geq 0, hc((#rS2×S1)#M(E0k))=r2+1{\rm hc}\left((\#^{r}S^{2}\times S^{1})\#M(E^{k}_{0})\right)=\lceil\frac{r}{2}\rceil+1 if k=1k=1 or k3k\geq 3.

  • hc(M(E02))=2{\rm hc}(M(E^{2}_{0}))=2, and for r1r\geq 1 hc((#rS2×S1)#M(E02))=r2+1{\rm hc}\left((\#^{r}S^{2}\times S^{1})\#M(E^{2}_{0})\right)=\lceil\frac{r}{2}\rceil+1.

  • For r0r\geq 0, hc((#rS2×S1)#M(E12))=r2+1{\rm hc}\left((\#^{r}S^{2}\times S^{1})\#M(E^{2}_{1})\right)=\lceil\frac{r}{2}\rceil+1.

  • For r0r\geq 0, hc((#rS2×S1)#M(E1k))=r2+2{\rm hc}\left((\#^{r}S^{2}\times S^{1})\#M(E^{k}_{1})\right)=\lfloor\frac{r}{2}\rfloor+2 if k3k\geq 3.

As a preparation, we review two observations: Firstly, the invariant hc(){\rm hc}(\cdot) is subadditive under the connected sum i.e. hc(M1#M2)hc(M1)+hc(M2){\rm hc}(M_{1}\#M_{2})\leq{\rm hc}(M_{1})+{\rm hc}(M_{2}) since we get a homological fiber by the plumbing of two homological fibers, see [11] for example. Secondly, it is known that S2×S1S^{2}\times S^{1} has a fibered link whose fiber surface is an annulus. By the plumbing it and a Hopf annulus in S3S^{3}, and by the plumbing two fibered annuli of S2×S1S^{2}\times S^{1}, we get genus one fibered knots in S2×S1S^{2}\times S^{1} and #2S2×S1\#^{2}S^{2}\times S^{1}. Since they are not integral homology 33-spheres, we see that hc(S2×S1)=1{\rm hc}(S^{2}\times S^{1})=1 and hc(#2S2×S1)=1{\rm hc}\left(\#^{2}S^{2}\times S^{1}\right)=1.

6.1 hc((#rS2×S1)#M(E0k)){\rm hc}\left((\#^{r}S^{2}\times S^{1})\#M(E^{k}_{0})\right)

We divide the argument into three cases, where rr is zero, where rr is positive even, and where rr is odd.

6.1.1 hc(M(E0k)){\rm hc}\left(M(E^{k}_{0})\right)

We will compute hc(M(E0k)){\rm hc}\left(M(E^{k}_{0})\right). Since M(E0k)M(E^{k}_{0}) is not an integral homology 3-sphere, hc(M(E0k))1{\rm hc}\left(M(E^{k}_{0})\right)\geq 1. Moreover, it is known that M(E0k)M(E^{k}_{0}) has a fibered link whose fiber surface is homeomorphic to Σ0,3\Sigma_{0,3} as in Figure 16: If we ignore the green curve, the right of Figure 16 represents a fiber surface of a fibered link whose fiber surface is homeomorphic to Σ0,3\Sigma_{0,3} in L(2k,1)#L(2k,1)L(2^{k},1)\#L(2^{k},1), which is obtained by the plumbing of fibered annuli in each prime components in appropriate way. The green curve is on this fiber, and note that the canonical framing of this curve is identical with the surface framing. Then (12k)\left(-\frac{1}{2^{k}}\right)-surgery (with respect to the canonical framing) along the green curve preserves the fiber structure. By the plumbings of two Hopf annuli, we get a genus two fibered knot in M(E0k)M(E^{k}_{0}). This implies hc(M(E0k))2{\rm hc}\left(M(E^{k}_{0})\right)\leq 2. Thus it is enough to show whether M(E0k)M(E^{k}_{0}) has a genus one homologically fibered knot or not.

Refer to caption
Figure 16: Surgery link on a planar fiber surface

By Theorem 1.1, M(E0k)M(E^{k}_{0}) has a genus one homoloically fibered knot if and only if there exist integers x,y,z,w,α,βx,y,z,w,\alpha,\beta and γ\gamma satisfying

±1\displaystyle\pm 1 =\displaystyle= |02kxy2k0zwxzαβ+1ywβγ|\displaystyle\left|\begin{array}[]{cccc}0&2^{k}&x&y\\ 2^{k}&0&z&w\\ x&z&\alpha&\beta+1\\ y&w&\beta&\gamma\\ \end{array}\right| (11)
=\displaystyle= 22k{αγβ(β+1)}+2k+1{x(zγwβ)y(zβwα)}2k(xw+yz)+(xwyz)2\displaystyle-2^{2k}\{\alpha\gamma-\beta(\beta+1)\}+2^{k+1}\{x(z\gamma-w\beta)-y(z\beta-w\alpha)\}-2^{k}(xw+yz)+(xw-yz)^{2} (12)

(i) k=1k=1
In this case, it is known that M(E01)M(E^{1}_{0}) has a genus one fibered knot as in Figure 17: If we ignore the green curve, the right of Figure 17 represents a fiber surface of a genus one fibered knot in L(2,1)#L(2,1)L(2,1)\#L(2,1), which is obtained by the plumbing of fibered annuli in each prime components in appropriate way. The green curve is on this fiber, and note that the surface framing of this curve is the (1)(-1)-slope with the canonical framing. This implies that the (12)\left(-\frac{1}{2}\right)-slope of the green curve with respect to the canonical framing is the (12)\left(-\frac{1}{2}\right)-slope with respect to the surface framing. Then the surgery along the green curve preserves the fiber structure. Thus M(E01)M(E^{1}_{0}) has a genus one homologically fibered knot. In fact, x=3,y=1,z=0,w=1,α=1,β=0x=3,y=1,z=0,w=1,\alpha=-1,\beta=0 and γ=0\gamma=0 is one of the solutions. This solution may correspond to a non-fibered knot.

Refer to caption
Figure 17: Surgery link on a fiber surface of genus one

(ii) k=2k=2
In this case, there exist no solutions. If there was, (xwyz)(xw-yz) must be odd since the other terms in the right hand side of (6.2.4) are even. If (xwyz)(xw-yz) is odd, then the right hand side of (6.2.4) is congruent to 55 modulo 88 by noting that xw+yz=xwyz+2yzxw+yz=xw-yz+2yz and that the square of every odd integer is congruent to 11 modulo 88. This cannot be ±1\pm 1.

(iii) k3k\geq 3
In this case, x=2k1,y=1,z=1,w=1,α=2k3+1,β=0x=2^{k-1},y=1,z=1,w=1,\alpha=2^{k-3}+1,\beta=0 and γ=0\gamma=0 is one of the solutions of (6.2.4).

6.1.2 hc((#2mS2×S1)#M(E0k)){\rm hc}\left((\#^{2m}S^{2}\times S^{1})\#M(E^{k}_{0})\right) for m1m\geq 1

Since H1((#2mS2×S1)#M(E0k))2m/2k/2kH_{1}\left((\#^{2m}S^{2}\times S^{1})\#M(E^{k}_{0})\right)\cong\mathbb{Z}^{2m}\oplus\mathbb{Z}/2^{k}\mathbb{Z}\oplus\mathbb{Z}/2^{k}\mathbb{Z} requires at least 2m+22m+2 elements for generating, hc((#2mS2×S1)#M(E0k))m+1{\rm hc}\left((\#^{2m}S^{2}\times S^{1})\#M(E^{k}_{0})\right)\geq m+1 by Remark 2.1. By the plumbing of two fibered annuli of S2×S1S^{2}\times S^{1} to a fiber surface of M(E0k)M(E^{k}_{0}) in the right of Figure 16, we get a genus two fibered knot in (#2S2×S1)#M(E0k)(\#^{2}S^{2}\times S^{1})\#M(E^{k}_{0}). Thus

hc((#2mS2×S1)#M(E0k))\displaystyle{\rm hc}\left((\#^{2m}S^{2}\times S^{1})\#M(E^{k}_{0})\right) \displaystyle\leq (m1)hc(#2S2×S1)+hc((#2S2×S1)#M(E0k))\displaystyle(m-1){\rm hc}(\#^{2}S^{2}\times S^{1})+{\rm hc}\left((\#^{2}S^{2}\times S^{1})\#M(E^{k}_{0})\right)
\displaystyle\leq m+1.\displaystyle m+1.

Therefore, hc((#2mS2×S1)#M(E0k))=m+1{\rm hc}\left((\#^{2m}S^{2}\times S^{1})\#M(E^{k}_{0})\right)=m+1 for m1m\geq 1.

6.1.3 hc((#2m+1S2×S1)#M(E0k)){\rm hc}\left((\#^{2m+1}S^{2}\times S^{1})\#M(E^{k}_{0})\right) for m0m\geq 0

Since H1(((#2m+1S2×S1)#M(E0k)))2m+1/2k/2kH_{1}\left(\left((\#^{2m+1}S^{2}\times S^{1})\#M(E^{k}_{0})\right)\right)\cong\mathbb{Z}^{2m+1}\oplus\mathbb{Z}/2^{k}\mathbb{Z}\oplus\mathbb{Z}/2^{k}\mathbb{Z} requires at least 2m+32m+3 elements for generating, hc((#2m+1S2×S1)#M(E0k))m+2{\rm hc}\left((\#^{2m+1}S^{2}\times S^{1})\#M(E^{k}_{0})\right)\geq m+2 by Remark 2.1. By the plumbing of two fibered annuli, one is in S2×S1S^{2}\times S^{1} and the other is in S3S^{3}, to a fiber surface of M(E0k)M(E^{k}_{0}) in the right of Figure 16, we get a genus two fibered knot in (S2×S1)#M(E0k)(S^{2}\times S^{1})\#M(E^{k}_{0}). Thus

hc((#2m+1S2×S1)#M(E0k))\displaystyle{\rm hc}\left((\#^{2m+1}S^{2}\times S^{1})\#M(E^{k}_{0})\right) \displaystyle\leq mhc(#2S2×S1)+hc((S2×S1)#M(E0k))\displaystyle m\cdot{\rm hc}(\#^{2}S^{2}\times S^{1})+{\rm hc}\left((S^{2}\times S^{1})\#M(E^{k}_{0})\right)
\displaystyle\leq m+2.\displaystyle m+2.

Therefore, hc((#2m+1S2×S1)#M(E0k))=m+2{\rm hc}\left((\#^{2m+1}S^{2}\times S^{1})\#M(E^{k}_{0})\right)=m+2 for m0m\geq 0.

6.2 hc((#rS2×S1)#M(E1k)){\rm hc}\left((\#^{r}S^{2}\times S^{1})\#M(E^{k}_{1})\right)

We divide the argument into four cases, where rr is zero, where kk is two, where kk is not two and rr is even, and where kk is not two and rr is odd.

6.2.1 hc(M(E1k)){\rm hc}\left(M(E^{k}_{1})\right)

We will compute hc(M(E1k)){\rm hc}(M(E^{k}_{1})) for k2k\geq 2. Since M(E1k)M(E^{k}_{1}) is not an integral homology 3-sphere, hc(M(E1k))1{\rm hc}\left(M(E^{k}_{1})\right)\geq 1. Moreover, M(E1k)M(E^{k}_{1}) has a genus two fibered knot as in Figure 18: If we ignore the red curve and the blue curve, two of the bottom of Figure 18 represent fiber surfaces of genus two fibered knots in L(2k,1)#L(2k,1)#L(23{2k1(1)k1},1)#L(2,(1)k1)L(2^{k},1)\#L(2^{k},1)\#L\left(-\frac{2}{3}\{2^{k-1}-(-1)^{k-1}\},1\right)\#L\left(2,(-1)^{k-1}\right) for odd kk and even kk, which are obtained by the plumbings of fibered annuli in each prime components in appropriate way. The red curve and blue curve are on this fiber. Note that the 0-slope of the red curve with respect to the canonical framing is the (1)(-1)-slope with respect to the surface framing, and that the ((1)k2)\left((-1)^{k}\cdot 2\right)-slope of the blue curve with respect to the canonical framing is the 11-slope with respect to the surface framing. Then the surgery along the red curve and the blue curve preserves the fiber structure. Therefore we have hc(M(E1k))2{\rm hc}\left(M(E^{k}_{1})\right)\leq 2. Thus it is enough to show whether M(E1k)M(E^{k}_{1}) has a genus one homologically fibered knot or not.

Refer to caption
Figure 18: Surgery link on a fiber surface of genus two

By Theorem 1.1, M(E1k)M(E^{k}_{1}) has a genus one homologically fibered knot if and only if there exist integers x,y,z,w,α,βx,y,z,w,\alpha,\beta and γ\gamma satisfying

±1\displaystyle\pm 1 =\displaystyle= |2k+12kxy32k2k+13z3wxzαβ+1ywβγ|\displaystyle\left|\begin{array}[]{cccc}2^{k+1}&-2^{k}&-x&-y\\ -3\cdot 2^{k}&2^{k+1}&-3z&-3w\\ x&z&\alpha&\beta+1\\ y&w&\beta&\gamma\\ \end{array}\right|
=\displaystyle= 22k{αγβ(β+1)}+2k+1{γ(x2+3xz+3z2)+α(y2+3yw+3w2)(2β+1)(xy+3zw)}\displaystyle 2^{2k}\{\alpha\gamma-\beta(\beta+1)\}+2^{k+1}\{\gamma(x^{2}+3xz+3z^{2})+\alpha(y^{2}+3yw+3w^{2})-(2\beta+1)(xy+3zw)\}
32k(2β+1)(xw+yz)+3(xwyz)2\displaystyle\hskip 56.9055pt-3\cdot 2^{k}(2\beta+1)(xw+yz)+3(xw-yz)^{2} (18)

(i) k=2k=2
In this case, we get a genus one fibered knot as in Figure 19: If we ignore the green curve, the right of Figure 19 represents a fiber surface of a genus one fibered knot in L(4,1)#L(4,1)L(4,1)\#L(4,1), which is obtained by the plumbing of fibered annuli in each prime components in appropriate way. The green curve is on this fiber, and note that the surface framing of this curve is the (1)(-1)-slope with the canonical framing. This implies that the (34)\left(-\frac{3}{4}\right)-slope of the green curve with respect to the canonical framing is the (14)\left({1}{4}\right)-slope with respect to the surface framing. Then the surgery along the green curve preserves the fiber structure. Thus M(E12)M(E^{2}_{1}) has a genus one homologically fibered knot. In Fact, x=1,y=1,z=1,w=0,α=1,β=0x=-1,y=1,z=1,w=0,\alpha=1,\beta=0 and γ=0\gamma=0 is one of the solutions. This solution may correspond to a non-fibered knot. Thus we have hc(M(E12))=1{\rm hc}\left(M(E^{2}_{1})\right)=1.

Refer to caption
Figure 19: Surgery link on a fiber surface of genus one

(ii) k3k\geq 3
In this case, there exist no solutions of (6.2.1). In fact, all terms but the last in the right hand side of (6.2.1) are divisible by 88 and the last term is congruent to neither 11 nor 1-1 modulo 88. Thus we have hc(M(E1k))2{\rm hc}\left(M(E^{k}_{1})\right)\geq 2. We conclude hc(M(E1k))=2{\rm hc}\left(M(E^{k}_{1})\right)=2.

6.2.2 hc((#rS2×S1)#M(E12)){\rm hc}\left((\#^{r}S^{2}\times S^{1})\#M(E^{2}_{1})\right) for r0r\geq 0

Since H1(((#rS2×S1)#M(E12)))r/4/4H_{1}\left(\left((\#^{r}S^{2}\times S^{1})\#M(E^{2}_{1})\right)\right)\cong\mathbb{Z}^{r}\oplus\mathbb{Z}/4\mathbb{Z}\oplus\mathbb{Z}/4\mathbb{Z} requires at least r+2r+2 elements for generating, hc((#rS2×S1)#M(E12))r2+1{\rm hc}\left((\#^{r}S^{2}\times S^{1})\#M(E^{2}_{1})\right)\geq\lceil\frac{r}{2}\rceil+1 by Remark 2.1. On the other hand,

hc((#rS2×S1)#M(E12))\displaystyle{\rm hc}\left((\#^{r}S^{2}\times S^{1})\#M(E^{2}_{1})\right) \displaystyle\leq hc(#rS2×S1)+hc(M(E12))\displaystyle{\rm hc}(\#^{r}S^{2}\times S^{1})+{\rm hc}\left(M(E^{2}_{1})\right)
\displaystyle\leq r2+1.\displaystyle\lceil\frac{r}{2}\rceil+1.

Therefore, hc((#rS2×S1)#M(E12))=r2+1{\rm hc}\left((\#^{r}S^{2}\times S^{1})\#M(E^{2}_{1})\right)=\lceil\frac{r}{2}\rceil+1 for r0r\geq 0.

6.2.3 hc((#2mS2×S1)#M(E1k)){\rm hc}\left((\#^{2m}S^{2}\times S^{1})\#M(E^{k}_{1})\right) for m0m\geq 0 and k3k\geq 3

Note that

hc((#2mS2×S1)#M(E1k))\displaystyle{\rm hc}\left((\#^{2m}S^{2}\times S^{1})\#M(E^{k}_{1})\right) \displaystyle\leq mhc(#2S2×S1)+hc(M(E1k))\displaystyle m\cdot{\rm hc}(\#^{2}S^{2}\times S^{1})+{\rm hc}\left(M(E^{k}_{1})\right)
=\displaystyle= m+2.\displaystyle m+2.

We will show that (#2mS2×S1)#M(E1k)(\#^{2m}S^{2}\times S^{1})\#M(E^{k}_{1}) has no homologically fibered links whose homological fibers are homeomorphic to Σm+1,1\Sigma_{m+1,1}. This implies that hc((#2mS2×S1)#M(E1k))=m+2{\rm hc}\left((\#^{2m}S^{2}\times S^{1})\#M(E^{k}_{1})\right)=m+2.
Suppose that (#2mS2×S1)#M(E1k)(\#^{2m}S^{2}\times S^{1})\#M(E^{k}_{1}) had a homologically fibered links whose homological fibers are homeomorphic to Σm+1,1\Sigma_{m+1,1}. By applying Theorem 1.1, we have a solution XX, (2m+2)×(2m+2)(2m+2)\times(2m+2)-integer matrix, and YY, (2m+2)×(2m+2)(2m+2)\times(2m+2)-symmetric integer matrix, for an equation below.

|O2m(2k+12k32k2k+1)(I2m(1003))XXtY+|=±1\displaystyle\left|\begin{array}[]{cc}O_{2m}\oplus\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}2^{k+1}&-2^{k}\\ -3\cdot 2^{k}&2^{k+1}\\ \end{array}\right)\par\par\par&\left(I_{2m}\oplus\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}-1&0\\ 0&-3\\ \end{array}\right)\right)X\\ X^{t}&Y+\mathcal{E}\\ \end{array}\right|=\pm 1 (25)

Note that the left hand side is congruent to |Xt(I2m(1003))X|=3|X|2\left|X^{t}\left(I_{2m}\oplus\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}-1&0\\ 0&-3\\ \end{array}\right)\right)X\right|=3\left|X\right|^{2} modulo 88. This cannot be ±1\pm 1, and this leads a contradiction.

6.2.4 hc((#2m+1S2×S1)#M(E1k)){\rm hc}\left((\#^{2m+1}S^{2}\times S^{1})\#M(E^{k}_{1})\right) for m0m\geq 0 and k3k\geq 3

First, we show that M(E1k)M(E^{k}_{1}) has a homologically fibered link whose homological fiber is homeomorphic to Σ1,2\Sigma_{1,2}. By Theorem 1.1, the existence of such a link is equivalent to that of a solution a,b,c,d,e,f,v,w,x,y,za,b,c,d,e,f,v,w,x,y,z of the equation below.

|2k+12kxyu32k2k+13z3w3vxzab+1dywbceuvdef|=±1\displaystyle\left|\begin{array}[]{ccccc}2^{k+1}&-2^{k}&-x&-y&-u\\ -3\cdot 2^{k}&2^{k+1}&-3z&-3w&-3v\\ x&z&a&b+1&d\\ y&w&b&c&e\\ u&v&d&e&f\\ \end{array}\right|=\pm 1 (31)

By substituting u=1,v=d=e=f=0u=1,v=d=e=f=0, the left hand side of (31) becomes equal to |2k+13z3wzab+1wbc|\left|\begin{array}[]{ccc}2^{k+1}&-3z&-3w\\ z&a&b+1\\ w&b&c\\ \end{array}\right|. Note that the existence of a,b,c,z,wa,b,c,z,w such that the determinant becomes ±1\pm 1 is equivalent to that of a genus one homologically fibered knot in L(2k+1,3)L(2^{k+1},3) by Theorem 1.1, and the existence is guaranteed by Nozaki. Thus M(E1k)M(E^{k}_{1}) has a homologically fibered link whose homological fiber is homeomorphic to Σ1,2\Sigma_{1,2}. Moreover, we get a homologically fibered link whose homological fiber is homeomorphic to Σ2,1\Sigma_{2,1} in (S2×S1)#M(E1k)(S^{2}\times S^{1})\#M(E^{k}_{1}) by the plumbing with a fibered annulus in S2×S1S^{2}\times S^{1}.

Since H1(((#2m+1S2×S1)#M(E1k)))2m+1/2k/2kH_{1}\left(\left((\#^{2m+1}S^{2}\times S^{1})\#M(E^{k}_{1})\right)\right)\cong\mathbb{Z}^{2m+1}\oplus\mathbb{Z}/2^{k}\mathbb{Z}\oplus\mathbb{Z}/2^{k}\mathbb{Z} requires at least 2m+32m+3 elements for generating, hc((#2m+1S2×S1)#M(E1k))m+2{\rm hc}\left((\#^{2m+1}S^{2}\times S^{1})\#M(E^{k}_{1})\right)\geq m+2 by Remark 2.1. On the other hand,

hc((#2m+1S2×S1)#M(E1k))\displaystyle{\rm hc}\left((\#^{2m+1}S^{2}\times S^{1})\#M(E^{k}_{1})\right) \displaystyle\leq mhc(#2S2×S1)+hc((S2×S1)#M(E1k))\displaystyle m\cdot{\rm hc}(\#^{2}S^{2}\times S^{1})+{\rm hc}\left((S^{2}\times S^{1})\#M(E^{k}_{1})\right)
\displaystyle\leq m+2.\displaystyle m+2.

Therefore, hc((#2m+1S2×S1)#M(E1k))=m+2{\rm hc}\left((\#^{2m+1}S^{2}\times S^{1})\#M(E^{k}_{1})\right)=m+2 for m0m\geq 0.

References

  • [1] J. W. Alexander. A lemma on systems of knotted curves. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 9(3):93–95, 1923.
  • [2] A. Conway, S. Friedl and G. Herrmann. Linking forms revisited. Pure and Applied Mathematics Quarterly, volume 12, Number 4, 493–515, 2016.
  • [3] S. Garoufalidis and J. Levine. Tree-level invariants of three-manifolds, Massey products and the Johnson homomorphism. In Graphs and patterns in mathematics and theoretical physics, volume 73 of Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., pages 173–203. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2005.
  • [4] H. Goda and T. Sakasai. Homology cylinders and sutured manifolds for homologically fibered knots. Tokyo J. Math., 36(1):85–111, 2013.
  • [5] K. Habiro. Claspers and finite type invariants of links. Geom. Topol. 4 (2000), 1–83.
  • [6] A. Kawauchi and S. Kojima. Algebraic classification of linking pairings on 3-manifolds. Math. Ann. 253 (1980), 29–42.
  • [7] G. Massuyeau and J.-B. Meilhan. Equivalence relations for homology cylinders and the core of the Casson invariant. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 365 (2013), 5431–5502.
  • [8] S. Matveev. Generalized surgeries of three-dimensional manifolds and representations of homology spheres. Mat. Zametki 42 (1987) 268–278, 345 (Russian); English translation: Math. Notes 42 (1987), 651–656.
  • [9] R. Myers. Open book decompositions of 3manifolds. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 72(2):397–402, 1978.
  • [10] Y. Nozaki. Every lens space contains a genus one homologically fibered knot. Illinois J. Math. volume 62, Number 1–4 (2018), 99–111.
  • [11] N. Sekino. Lens spaces which are realizable as closures of homology cobordisms over planar surfaces. Illinois J. Math. volume 64, Number 4 (2020), 481–492.
  • [12] Wall, C.T.C.: Quadratic forms on finite groups, and related topics, Topology 2, 281–298 (1964).

GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES, THE UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO, 3-8-1 KOMABA, MEGURO–KU, TOKYO, 153-8914, JAPAN
  E-mail address: [email protected]