This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

The electromagnetic duality and the 3+1D O(6) non-linear sigma model with a level-1 Wess-Zumino-Witten term

Yen-Ta Huang1    Dung-Hai Lee1,2 Corresponding author: [email protected] 1 Materials Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
2 Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Abstract

We show that in (3+1)-D space-time dimensions, the O(6) non-linear sigma model, with a level-1 Wess-Zumino-Witten term, exhibits the electromagnetic duality. If we name the six components of the sigma field as the Neel and valence-bond-solid (VBS) order parameters, the hedgehogs of the Neel and VBS order play the role of monopole and charge. The duality corresponds to the exchange of monopole and charge hence the exchange of the Neel and VBS order. The condensation of monopole can trigger a direct Neel \leftrightarrow VBS phase transition. We conjecture that the critical point is self-dual, which is a generalization of the deconfined quantum critical point in (2+1)-D. In this theory, there exist two deconfined phases where the Neel/VBS hedgehogs are massive but cost finite energy. This leads to two fractionalized phases with particles carrying fractional spin or VBS quantum numbers and gapless gauge bosons.

Introduction Non-linear sigma (NLσ\sigma) models describe the dynamics of Goldstone mode. Due to the interaction between the Goldston bosons, NLσ\sigma models can develop a mass instead of being gapless [1]. A well-known example occurs in 1+1 dimensions, where the O(3)O(3) NLσ\sigma model is always gapful. On a different front, topological terms in the NLσ\sigma model can fundamentally modify the energy spectrum. For example, the O(3)O(3) NLσ\sigma model with θ\theta term is gapful for θ=2nπ\theta=2n\pi while it is gapless for θ=(2n+1)π\theta=(2n+1)\pi for nn\in\mathbb{Z} [2]. In addition to the topological θ\theta term, other topological terms, such as the Wess-Zumino-Witten [3] and the Hopf terms [4], are also known to change the Goldstone mode spectrum.

In Ref.[5], Senthil et al. proposed that despite the mismatch in symmetries, there can exist a continuous phase transition, which is dubbed “deconfined quantum critical point”, between the Neel and the valence-bond-solid (VBS) states in quantum magnets. Shortly after, it is proposed that the O(5) (3 Neel+2 VBS) NLσ\sigma model with a level-1 Wess-Zumino-Witten (WZW) term describes such a phase transition [6]. Recently, we point out that the same model can give rise to spin liquid and spin rotation symmetry breaking phases between the Neel and VBS order [7]. Moreover, an unexpected connection between the NLσ\sigma model approach, and the Schwinger boson approach [8] was revealed. This connection is interesting because, in the Schwinger boson approach, particles that fractionalize spins were built-in from the beginning. However, aside from the WZW term, the NLσ\sigma model in Ref.[7] only involves conventional order parameters. This connection between the WZW term and fractionalized particles is very intriguing, and it is natural to ask whether it can occur for higher dimensions.

The O(6)O(6) NLσ\sigma model with a level-1 Wess-Zumino-Witten (WZW) term in 3+1 space-time dimensions The action of this model read

S=12gd4x(μΩi)2WWZW[Ω^~]\displaystyle S={1\over 2g}\int\limits_{\mathcal{M}}d^{4}x\,\left(\partial_{\mu}\Omega_{i}\right)^{2}-W_{\rm WZW}[\tilde{\hat{\Omega}}] (1)
WWZW[Ω^~]\displaystyle W_{\rm WZW}[\tilde{\hat{\Omega}}] =2πi120π3ϵijklmnΩ~i𝑑Ω~j𝑑Ω~k\displaystyle=\frac{2\pi i}{120\pi^{3}}\int\limits_{\mathcal{B}}~{}\epsilon^{ijklmn}~{}\tilde{\Omega}_{i}\,d\tilde{\Omega}_{j}d\tilde{\Omega}_{k}
dΩ~ldΩ~mdΩ~n.\displaystyle d\tilde{\Omega}_{l}d\tilde{\Omega}_{m}d\tilde{\Omega}_{n}.

For easy reference, we shall name the first three components of Ω^\hat{\Omega} the Neel order parameters, and the last three components the valence bond solid (VBS) order parameters, i.e., Ω^=(n1,n2,n3,v1,v2,v3)\hat{\Omega}=(n_{1},n_{2},n_{3},v_{1},v_{2},v_{3}). These names are motivated by the fact that Eq.(LABEL:o6) governs the low-energy dynamics of a three-dimensional Mott insulator with competing Neel and valence-bond solid (VBS) order [9] (see supplemental material section I). However, for the majority of this paper, these are just names we use to refer to the components of the Ω^\hat{\Omega}.

In Eq.(LABEL:o6) the space-time manifold =S4\mathcal{M}=S^{4} is spanned by τ,x,y,z\tau,x,y,z and \mathcal{B} is spanned by τ,x,y,z\tau,x,y,z and u[0,1]u\in[0,1] such that =.\partial\mathcal{B}=\mathcal{M}. Ω^~(τ,x,y,u)\tilde{\hat{\Omega}}(\tau,x,y,u) represents a one-parameter-family extension of the Ω^(τ,x,y,z)\hat{\Omega}(\tau,x,y,z) such that at u=0u=0, the configuration is trivial, say, Ω^~(τ,x,y,z,0)=(0,0,0,0,1)\tilde{\hat{\Omega}}(\tau,x,y,z,0)=(0,0,0,0,1), and at u=1u=1 the Ω^(τ,x,y,z,1)=Ω^(τ,x,y,z)\hat{\Omega}(\tau,x,y,z,1)=\hat{\Omega}(\tau,x,y,z). It can be shown that exp(WWZW)\exp\left(-W_{WZW}\right) is independent of Ω^~\tilde{\hat{\Omega}} for u<1u<1 as long as the coefficient in front of the WZW term is an integer multiple of 2πi120π3\frac{2\pi i}{120\pi^{3}}.

The VBS hedgehog Consider the following Ω^~\tilde{\hat{\Omega}} configuration corresponding to a hedgehog in (v1,v2,v3)\left(v_{1},v_{2},v_{3}\right)

(Ω~4,Ω~5,Ω~6)=sinf(r)(sinθcosϕ,sinθsinϕ,cosθ)\displaystyle(\tilde{\Omega}_{4},\tilde{\Omega}_{5},\tilde{\Omega}_{6})=\sin f(r)(\sin\theta\cos\phi,\sin\theta\sin\phi,\cos\theta)
(Ω~1,Ω~2,Ω~3)=cosf(r)(n1(u,τ),n2(u,τ),n3(u,τ)),\displaystyle(\tilde{\Omega}_{1},\tilde{\Omega}_{2},\tilde{\Omega}_{3})=\cos f(r)(n_{1}(u,\tau),n_{2}(u,\tau),n_{3}(u,\tau)), (3)

where (r,θ,ϕ)(r,\theta,\phi) are the coordinates of the three dimensional space and τ\tau is the Euclidean time. In Eq.(3), (n1,n2,n3)(n_{1},n_{2},n_{3}) is a unit vector and f(r)f(r) is a smooth function satisfying f(r)=π/2f(r)=\pi/2 for r>rcr>r_{c} (hedgehog core size) and f(r)=0f(r)=0 at r=0r=0. It is trivial to show that i=16Ω~i2=1.\sum_{i=1}^{6}\tilde{\Omega}_{i}^{2}=1. Plug Eq.(3) into Eq.(LABEL:o6), it is straightforward to show that

WWZWWWZWVBS hh=2πi8πϵijkni𝑑nj𝑑nk.\displaystyle W_{\rm WZW}\rightarrow W^{\text{VBS hh}}_{\rm WZW}={2\pi i\over 8\pi}\int~{}\epsilon^{ijk}n_{i}dn_{j}dn_{k}. (4)

Eq.(4) is the Berry’s phase in the coherent state path integral of a spin 1/2 in 0+1 dimension. Therefore the hedgehog of the VBS order fractionalizes the spins! In the supplemental material section II, we present the microscopic theory of the hedgehog core.

If we define a two-component complex boson field

zT=(z1,z2)where|z1|2+|z2|2=1,\displaystyle z^{T}=(z_{1},z_{2})~{}~{}{\rm where~{}~{}}|z_{1}|^{2}+|z_{2}|^{2}=1, (5)

so that

n^=zσz,\displaystyle\hat{n}=z^{\dagger}\vec{\sigma}z, (6)

it is simple to show that[7]

WWZWVBS hh=i×𝑑τ(1izτz).\displaystyle W_{\rm WZW}^{\text{VBS hh}}=i\times\int d\tau\left({1\over i}z^{\dagger}\partial_{\tau}z\right). (7)

More generally, for a dynamic hedgehog where the world line forms a closed loop parametrized by ζ\zeta, Eq.(7) becomes

WWZWVBS hhi×𝑑ζ(1izζz).\displaystyle W_{\rm WZW}^{\text{VBS hh}}\rightarrow i\times\int d\zeta\left({1\over i}z^{\dagger}\partial_{\zeta}z\right). (8)

This implies the hedgehog current JμJ_{\mu} couples to a gauge field, namely,

id4xJμaμwhereaμ=1izμz.i\int d^{4}xJ^{\mu}a_{\mu}~{}~{}{\rm where}~{}~{}a_{\mu}={1\over i}z^{\dagger}\partial_{\mu}z.

The statistics of VBS hedgehogs We can determine the statistics of the VBS hedgehogs by computing the Berry phase associated with the hedgehog exchange. Because our space-time is S4S^{4}, the exchange process must be embedded in (i) vacuum creation of two pairs of hedgehog-anti-hedgehog, (ii) exchanging the two hedgehogs, and (iii) annihilating the hedgehogs with the anti-hedgehogs. The Berry phase contains two contributions: 1) that due to exchange of the hedgehogs and 2) that associated with the spin 1/2 in the cores of hedgehog and anti-hedgehog. To isolate the Berry phase due to the exchange, we lock the core spins in, say, the positive n3n_{3}-direction.

In the following, we present an argument suggesting that under the space-time configuration discussed above, the Berry phase due to hedgehog exchange is zero. The argument involves two steps: (i) using the result in Ref.[10], one can show that when any one of the six components of Ω^\hat{\Omega} is zero, the WZW term reduces to the topological θ\theta-term (with θ=π\theta=\pi) for the remaining five components. This topological term is non-zero only when the wrapping number associated with the mapping from the space-time to the order parameter manifold formed by the non-zero components, in this case, S4S^{4}, is non-zero. (ii) We note that in the present situation only four components of Ω^\hat{\Omega} are non-zero. By counting the dimension of the space-time image, we conclude that any such Ω^\hat{\Omega} cannot produce a non-zero wrapping number, hence the Berry phase vanishes. This argument suggests that the VBS hedgehogs are bosons. A similar argument can be used to deduce that the Neel hedgehog is bosons as well.

The CP1 theory of Neel order The NLσ\sigma model action for the Neel order parameter reads

SAF=12gAFd4x(μn^)2.\displaystyle S_{\rm AF}={1\over 2g_{\rm AF}}\int d^{4}x(\partial_{\mu}\hat{n})^{2}. (9)

It is well known that the above action can be rewritten as[11]

SAF=12gAFd4x|(μiaμ)z|2.\displaystyle S_{\rm AF}={1\over 2g_{\rm AF}}\int d^{4}x|(\partial_{\mu}-ia_{\mu})z|^{2}. (10)

where aμa_{\mu} is a compact dynamic gauge field and zz is the two-component complex boson field satisfying Eq.(5) and Eq.(6). Because the action in Eq.(10) is at most quadratic in aμa_{\mu} the saddle point is exact, namely,

δSAFδaμ=0aμ=1izμz.\displaystyle{\delta S_{\rm AF}\over\delta a_{\mu}}=0\Rightarrow a_{\mu}={1\over i}z^{\dagger}\partial_{\mu}z. (11)

In Eq.(10), the condensation of the zz boson Higgs the gauge field aμa_{\mu}, hence mods out the redundant local phase gauge of freedom zziφzz\rightarrow z^{i\varphi}z in Eq.(6). The resulting phase exhibits the Neel long-range order. Combining Eq.(8) and the above discussion suggests that the field theory for the VBS hedgehog is given by

SVBShh=d4x{12g1|(μiaμ)z|2+12g2(ϵμνρνaρ)2}.\displaystyle S_{\rm VBS~{}hh}=\int d^{4}x\left\{{1\over 2g_{1}}|(\partial_{\mu}-ia_{\mu})z|^{2}+{1\over 2g_{2}}(\epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho}\partial_{\nu}a_{\rho})^{2}\right\}.
(12)

Here zz represents the boson field for the VBS hedgehog. Once again, we see that when supplemented with the WZW term, the conventional Ginzburg-Landau theory is equivalent to a theory with fractionalized particles and gauge field.

The Neel hedgehog A parallel discussion with “VBS” and “Neel” switched implies that the Neel hedgehog carries the Berry phase of the VBS order parameter. Specifically after the switch Eq.(4) becomes

WWZWNeel hh=2πi8πϵijkvi𝑑vj𝑑vk.\displaystyle W^{\text{Neel~{}hh}}_{\rm WZW}={2\pi i\over 8\pi}\int~{}\epsilon^{ijk}v_{i}dv_{j}dv_{k}. (13)

If we define a two-component complex boson field

wT=(w1,w2)where|w1|2+|w2|2=1,andv^=wσw,\displaystyle w^{T}=(w_{1},w_{2})~{}{\rm where~{}}|w_{1}|^{2}+|w_{2}|^{2}=1,~{}{\rm and~{}}\hat{v}=w^{\dagger}\vec{\sigma}w,
(14)

it is simple to show that

WWZWNeel hh=i×𝑑τ(1iwτw).\displaystyle W_{\rm WZW}^{\text{Neel~{}hh}}=i\times\int d\tau\left({1\over i}w^{\dagger}\partial_{\tau}w\right). (15)

This implies the VBS hedgehog current KμK_{\mu} couples to a gauge field, namely,

id4xKμbμwherebμ=1iwμw.\displaystyle i\int d^{4}xK^{\mu}b_{\mu}~{}~{}{\rm where}~{}~{}b_{\mu}={1\over i}w^{\dagger}\partial_{\mu}w. (16)

The CP1 theory of VBS order The NLσ\sigma model action for the VBS order parameter read

SVBS=12gVBSd4x(μv^)2.\displaystyle S_{\rm VBS}={1\over 2g_{\rm VBS}}\int d^{4}x(\partial_{\mu}\hat{v})^{2}. (17)

Similar to Eq.(10) we can rewrite Eq.(17) as

SVBS=12gVBSd4x|(μibμ)w|2.\displaystyle S_{\rm VBS}={1\over 2g_{\rm VBS}}\int d^{4}x|(\partial_{\mu}-ib_{\mu})w|^{2}. (18)

where bμb_{\mu} is a compact dynamic gauge field and ww is the two-component complex boson field satisfying Eq.(14). In this case

δSVBSδbμ=0bμ=1iwμw.\displaystyle{\delta S_{\rm VBS}\over\delta b_{\mu}}=0\Rightarrow b_{\mu}={1\over i}w^{\dagger}\partial_{\mu}w. (19)

Analogous to the discussion after Eq.(10), the condensation of the ww bosons induces the VBS long-range order. The above discussion suggests that the field theory for the Neel hedgehog is given by

SNeelhh\displaystyle S_{\rm Neel~{}hh} =d4x{12g3|(μibμ)w|2+12g4(ϵμνρνbρ)2}.\displaystyle=\int d^{4}x\left\{{1\over 2g_{3}}|(\partial_{\mu}-ib_{\mu})w|^{2}+{1\over 2g_{4}}(\epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho}\partial_{\nu}b_{\rho})^{2}\right\}.

Here ww represents the boson field for the Neel hedgehog.111When Eq.(LABEL:Neelhedgehog) is used to describe the acutal VBS order of a Mott insulator, there is an additional term Saniso[wσw]S_{\rm aniso}[w^{\dagger}\vec{\sigma}w] which should be added to Eq.(LABEL:Neelhedgehog). This term describes the anisotropy imposed by the lattice of the Mott insulator. However, for our purpose the term Neel and VBS are just names we assign to the components of Ω^\hat{\Omega}, therefore the above anisotropy term is absent.

The monopoles One can ask what do the Neel and VBS hedgehog correspond to in terms of the fields in Eq.(12) and Eq.(LABEL:Neelhedgehog). Consider a static Neel hedgehog at the spatial origin, namely,

n^(r,θ,ϕ)=(sinθcosϕ,sinθsinϕ,cosθ)\hat{n}(r,\theta,\phi)=(\sin\theta\cos\phi,\sin\theta\sin\phi,\cos\theta)

where r,θ,ϕr,\theta,\phi are the spatial spherical coordinates. Through n^=zσz\hat{n}=z^{\dagger}\vec{\sigma}z, the corresponding zz is222Here due to the singular configuration of n^\hat{n} we need to take two patches to avoid the singularity around θ=0\theta=0 and θ=π\theta=\pi. Specifically the northern hemisphere patch is zN(r,θ,ϕ)=(cosθ2sinθ2eiϕ),z^{N}(r,\theta,\phi)=\begin{pmatrix}\cos{\theta\over 2}\\ \sin{\theta\over 2}e^{i\phi}\\ \end{pmatrix}, and the southern hemisphere patch is zS(r,θ,ϕ)=(cosθ2eiϕsinθ2).z^{S}(r,\theta,\phi)=\begin{pmatrix}\cos{\theta\over 2}e^{-i\phi}\\ \sin{\theta\over 2}\\ \end{pmatrix}. These two patches are related by a phase transformation zN=eiϕzSz^{N}=e^{i\phi}z^{S}. In terms of aj=1izjza_{j}={1\over i}z^{\dagger}\partial_{j}z the phase transformation is a gauge transformation. However in the following we shall compute the field strength fij=iajjaif_{ij}=\partial_{i}a_{j}-\partial_{j}a_{i} which is independent of the gauge. Therefore we can use either gauge to do the calculation.

z(r,θ,ϕ)=(cosθ2sinθ2eiϕ).z(r,\theta,\phi)=\begin{pmatrix}\cos{\theta\over 2}\\ \sin{\theta\over 2}e^{i\phi}\\ \end{pmatrix}.

Eq.(11) implies the corresponding gauge field (one-form) is a=1izdza={1\over i}z^{\dagger}dz whose field strength (two-form) is

f=da=12sinθdθdϕ.\displaystyle f=da={1\over 2}\sin\theta~{}d\theta d\phi. (21)

If we integrate Eq.(21) over any closed surface enclosing the hedgehog the result is 2π2\pi. Hence the Neel hedgehog is a monopole in aμa_{\mu}. The same calculation goes through if we change Neel to VBS and aμa_{\mu} to bμb_{\mu}, i.e., a VBS hedgehog is a monopole in bμb_{\mu}.

The electromagnetic duality These discussions suggest the monopole in bμb_{\mu} is the charge of aμa_{\mu} and the monopole in aμa_{\mu} is the charge of bμb_{\mu}. We summarize such relation in Table 1.

Neel VBS
Gauge field aμa_{\mu} bμb_{\mu}
VBS hedgehog charge monopole
Neel hedgehog monopole charge
Hedgehog field (z1z2)\begin{pmatrix}z_{1}\\ z_{2}\\ \end{pmatrix} (w1w2)\begin{pmatrix}w_{1}\\ w_{2}\\ \end{pmatrix}
Table 1: The electromagnetic duality of the O(6)O(6) NLσ\sigma model.

In this duality aμbμa_{\mu}\leftrightarrow b_{\mu}, zwz\leftrightarrow w and Neel order \leftrightarrow VBS order. Here \leftrightarrow means “is dual to”.

The Neel to VBS phase transition In the above duality, the condensation of, e.g., the bμb_{\mu} monopole will confine the bμb_{\mu} charge. According to Table 1 the bμb_{\mu} charge is the aμa_{\mu} monopole. Putting it differently, since the bμb_{\mu} monopole is the aμa_{\mu} charge, condensation of it will Higgs aμa_{\mu} hence confine the aμa_{\mu} monopole. Of course, the statement with aμa_{\mu} and bμb_{\mu} exchanged is true. If there is a direct continuous phase transition between the Neel (condensation of bμb_{\mu} monopole or aμa_{\mu} charge ) and VBS (condensation of bμb_{\mu} charge or aμa_{\mu} monopole) order, which is equivalent to a direct transition from the confinement to the Higgs phase in Eq.(12) and Eq.(LABEL:Neelhedgehog). At the critical point, neither the VBS nor the Neel hedgehog can condense but they can be both gapless. We conjecture that this happens at the self-dual point of the electromagnetic duality discussed in Table 1. The possibility of such a direct, continuous phase transition is supported by the Monte-Carlo simulation of the lattice version of Eq.(12) [12].

Refer to caption
Figure 1: (a,b) A v3v_{3} (blue arrow) domain wall situated at z=0z=0. The gray spheres schematically represent the Neel hedgehog. The hedgehog sitting in the domain wall (z=0z=0) has a red (a) and back (b) arrow in the core. This indicates the direction of the VBS order parameter. (c) The red and black curves represent the trajectories traversed by the core VBS order parameter in part (a) and part (b). (d) The Berry phase difference between (a) and (b) is one-half of the solid angle sustained by the blue surface.

Spin liquids In Ref.[12], it is also shown that in the plane spanned by g1g_{1}-g2g_{2} in Eq.(12), there exists a deconfined Coulomb phase where aμa_{\mu} gauge bosons are gapless. In this phase the aμa_{\mu} charge or bμb_{\mu} monopole is massive, but finite energy, excitations. Since the aμa_{\mu} charge is the spinon, this phase is a spin liquid. A similar argument applies to Eq.(LABEL:Neelhedgehog). In the deconfined phase, the bμb_{\mu} gauge bosons are gapless, and the bμb_{\mu} charge is a finite energy excitation. Since the bμb_{\mu} charge fractionalizes the VBS order parameter, this phase is a “VBS” liquid. The spin liquid phase discussed above is analogous to that found in Ref.[13] for O(3) NLσ\sigma model in (2+1)-D after the hedgehog suppression. In the phase diagram, these two fractionalized phases should sit symmetrically about the self-dual point.

The fractionalized phases discussed above are made possible by the fact that in 3+1 dimensions, the compact U(1) gauge theory has a deconfinement phase. This is very different from 2+1 dimensions, where compact U(1) gauge theory always confines [14]. In the latter case, deconfinement requires the condensation of an additional Higgs field carrying, e.g., two units of the aμa_{\mu}. This Higgs the gauge group of aμa_{\mu} to 2\mathbb{Z}_{2} which has a deconfined phase.
Dimension reduction and the relation to O(5) NLσ\sigma model with WZW term in 2+1D In general, given an O(n)O(n) NLσ\sigma model with WZW term in DD space-time dimensions, we can obtain an O(n1)O(n-1) NLσ\sigma model with WZW term in D1D-1 space-time dimensions by the following dimension reduction. The idea is to create a domain wall in the, say, last component of Ω^\hat{\Omega}. Specifically let us consider the following Ω^~\tilde{\hat{\Omega}} configuration where

Ω~6=sinf(z)\displaystyle\tilde{\Omega}_{6}=\sin f(z)
Ω~j=cosf(z)ω~j(τ,x,y,u)j=1,,5.\displaystyle\tilde{\Omega}_{j}=\cos f(z)\tilde{\omega}_{j}(\tau,x,y,u)~{}~{}j=1,...,5. (22)

Here f(z)f(z) is a smooth function satisfying f(z)=π2sign(z)f(z)={\pi\over 2}~{}{\rm sign}(z) for |z|>d|z|>d (the domain wall thickness) and f(z)=0f(z)=0 at z=0z=0. Plug Eq.(22) into Eq.(LABEL:o6) it is straightforward to show that WWZWWWZWdwW_{\rm WZW}\rightarrow W^{\rm dw}_{\rm WZW} where

WWZWdw=2πi64π2ϵabcdeω~a𝑑ω~b𝑑ω~c𝑑ω~d𝑑ω~e\displaystyle W^{\rm dw}_{\rm WZW}={2\pi i\over 64\pi^{2}}\int\epsilon^{abcde}\tilde{{\omega}}_{a}d\tilde{{\omega}}_{b}d\tilde{{\omega}}_{c}d\tilde{{\omega}}_{d}d\tilde{{\omega}}_{e}
(23)

Eq.(23) is precisely the WZW term of O(5)O(5) NLσ\sigma model in (2+1)-D. Adopting the name that (n1,n2,n3,v1,v2,v3)(n_{1},n_{2},n_{3},v_{1},v_{2},v_{3}) are the components of the O(6)O(6) NLσ\sigma model, and (n1,n2,n3,v1,v2)(n_{1},n_{2},n_{3},v_{1},v_{2}) are the components of the O(5)O(5) NLσ\sigma model, we next show that the space-time Neel hedgehog in the O(5)O(5) NLσ\sigma model carries a Berry’s phase that depends on the direction of the VBS order parameter (v1,v2)(v_{1},v_{2}) in the core.

Consider the space-time configuration of the O(6)O(6) NLσ\sigma model shown in Fig. 1(a),(b). Here a 2+12+1 dimensional domain wall in v3v_{3} spanned by τ\tau-xx-yy with width dd is centered at z=0z=0. A Neel hedgehog sits in the domain wall region with the core VBS order parameter points in different directions at z=0z=0 as shown in Fig. 1(a) and (b). According to Eq.(16) the hedgehog couples to the Berry connection 1iwzw{1\over i}w^{\dagger}\partial_{z}w (see section III of the supplemental material for more details). In the order parameter space spanned by v1v_{1}-v2v_{2}-v3v_{3}, the core VBS order parameter in Fig. 1(a) and (b) traces out the red and black trajectories, respectively (see Fig. 1(c)). The Berry phase difference is one-half of the soliton angle sustained by the blue surface shown in Fig. 1(d). This is precisely the hedgehog Berry’s phase discussed by Haldane [15]. In his case the x-y plane is a square lattice favoring 4 different VBS angles φ\varphi (v1+iv2=eiφv_{1}+iv_{2}=e^{i\varphi}), namely, φ=α,α+π/2,α+π,α+3π/2.\varphi=\alpha,\alpha+\pi/2,\alpha+\pi,\alpha+3\pi/2. (α=0\alpha=0 corresponds to the columnar VBS phase and α=π/4\alpha=\pi/4 the plaquette VBS phase). This gives rise to four relative hedgehog Berry’s phase, namely, 0,π/2,π,3π/20,\pi/2,\pi,3\pi/2, between the hedgehog with different VBS angles in the core, which causes destructive interference when hedgehog proliferate. The exception is hedgehogs with topological charge 4, which have the same Berry’s phase regardless of the core VBS order parameter. When such degree-4 hedgehogs proliferate and condense, it results in the four-fold degenerate VBS order.
Conclusion: In this paper we demonstrate that the O(6) NLσ\sigma model in (3+1)-D exhibits the electromagnetic duality. Novel phase transition and fractionalized phases associated with this duality are discussed.

References

  • [1] A. Polyakov, “Interaction of goldstone particles in 2 dimensions - applications to ferromagnets and massive yang-mills fields,” Phys. Lett. B, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 79–81, 1975.
  • [2] F. Haldane, “Continuum dynamics of the 1-D Heisenberg anti-ferromagnet - identification with the O(3) non-linear sigma-model,” Phys. Lett. A, vol. 93, no. 9, pp. 464–468, 1983.
  • [3] E. Witten, “Non-abelian bosonization in 2 dimensions,” Commun. Math. Phys., vol. 92, no. 4, pp. 455–472, 1984.
  • [4] A. Polyakov, “Fermi-Bose transmutations induced by gauge-fields,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 325–328, 1988.
  • [5] T. Senthil, A. Vishwanath, A. Balents, S. Sachdev, and M. Fisher, “Deconfined quantum critical points,” Science, vol. 303, no. 5663, pp. 1490–1494, 2004.
  • [6] A. Tanaka and X. Hu, “Many-body spin berry phases emerging from the π\pi-flux state: Competition between antiferromagnetism and the valence-bond-solid state,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 95, no. 3, 2005.
  • [7] Y.-T. Huang and D.-H. Lee, “Competing orders, the Wess-Zumino-Witten term, and spin liquids,” arXiv:2204.12485v1, 2022.
  • [8] S. Sachdev and N. Read, “Large N expansion for frustrated and doped quantum antiferromagnets,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. B, vol. 05, no. 01n02, pp. 219–249, 1991.
  • [9] Y.-T. Huang and D.-H. Lee, “Non-abelian bosonization in two and three spatial dimensions and applications,” Nucl. Phys. B, vol. 972, p. 115565, 2021.
  • [10] A. Abanov and P. Wiegmann, “Theta-terms in nonlinear sigma-models,” Nucl. Phys. B, vol. 570, no. 3, pp. 685–698, 2000.
  • [11] E. Witten, “Instantons, the quark-model, and the 1/N expansion,” Nucl. Phys. B, vol. 149, no. 2, pp. 285–320, 1979.
  • [12] K. Sawamura, T. Hiramatsu, K. Ozaki, I. Ichinose, and T. Matsui, “Four-dimensional CP1CP^{1}+U(1)U(1) lattice gauge theory for three-dimensional antiferromagnets: Phase structure, gauge bosons, and spin liquid,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 77, no. 22, 2008.
  • [13] O. Motrunich and A. Vishwanath, “Emergent photons and transitions in the O(3) sigma model with hedgehog suppression,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 70, no. 7, 2004.
  • [14] A. Polyakov, “Quark confinement and topology of gauge theories,” Nucl. Phys. B, vol. 120, no. 3, pp. 429–458, 1977.
  • [15] F. Haldane, “O(3) nonlinear sigma-model and the topological distinction between integer-spin and half-integer-spin antiferromagnets in 2 dimensions,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 61, no. 8, pp. 1029–1032, 1988.