This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

The determination of α\alpha-spectroscopic factors and ANC of 16O states using 12C(20Ne,16O)16O reaction at ElabE_{lab}=150 MeV incident energy

Ashok Kumar Mondal1    C. Basu1 [email protected]    S. Adhikari2    C. Bhattacharya3    T. K. Rana3    S. Kundu3    S. Manna3    R. Pandey3    P. Roy3    A. Sen3    J. K. Meena3    A. K. Saha3    J. K. Sahoo3    Dipali Basak1    Tanmay Bar1    Haridas Pai1    A. Bisoi4    A. K. Mitra1    Piyasi Biswas1 1Nuclear Physics Division, Saha Institute Of Nuclear Physics, HBNI, 1/AF Bidhan Nagar, Kolkata- 700064, INDIA. 2Techno India University, EM-4/1, Sector-V, Salt Lake, Kolkata-700091, INDIA. 3Variable Energy Cyclotron Centre, Kolkata - 700064, INDIA. 4Indian Institute of Engineering Science and Technology, Shibpur, Howrah -711103, INDIA.
Abstract

The 12C(20Ne,16O)16O α\alpha-transfer reaction at ElabE_{lab}=150 MeV is first time used to determine the ANC of the 6.92 MeV and 7.12 MeV states of 16O. The 20Ne+12C potential parameters are also obtained from elastic scattering. The direct reaction code FRESCO is used to determine the α\alpha-spectroscopy factor (SαS_{\alpha}) of the three states of 16O (6.92 MeV, 7.12 MeV and 11.52 MeV) and ANC of the two states (6.92 MeV and 7.12 MeV) of 16O. The extracted ANC and SαS_{\alpha} are compareable to previous measurements.

pacs:
Valid PACS appear here

I Introduction

The Asymptotic Normalization Co-efficient (ANC) method [1,2] is an indirect method to study astrophysical reactions at low energies. Such reactions take place in stars at relative energies much below the Coulomb barrier of the two interacting nuclei (except in neutron induced reactions). As a result, the cross-sections are very small and their direct measurement with reasonable accuracy is very difficult or almost impossible with presently available techniques. R-matrix extrapolation [3] of the cross-section measured at higher energy to the Gamow energy is the solution of this problem. Additionally, if the main component of the capture cross-section is external capture then the determination of the ANC can evalute the S-factor at zero energy. The 12C(α\alpha,γ\gamma) reaction is such a reaction for which the ANC method is most suitable [4]. The rate of this reaction greatly affects the resulting ratio of 12C to 16O and also the final fate of the star (i.e., black hole or neutron star). At 300 keV (Gamow energy) the cross-section of this reaction is of the order of 101710^{-17} barn and its direct measurement is almost impossible. The only method to determine the 12C(α\alpha,γ\gamma)16O reaction cross-section at 300 keV is by R-matrix extrapolation . The extrapolation relies on the α\alpha-spectroscopic properties of 16O states [5,6,7,8,9,10]. One can allow these parameters to vary freely in the extrapolation process. But a more physical away is to determine these parameters from some indirect method such as the ANC technique. The alpha capture in the 12C(α\alpha,γ\gamma)16O reaction is an external capture process and proceeds through mainly two sub-threshold states (6.92 MeV (2+) and 7.12 MeV (1-)) of 16O. The ANC of these two sub-threshold states play a crucial role in determination of the capture cross-section. The 12C(6Li,d) and 12C(7Li,t) α\alpha-transfer reactions [2, 5, 7, 11, 12] have been mainly used to determine the ANC at both below and above Coulomb barrier energies. Besides, 12C(11B,7Li)16O reaction has been also used for the same purpose [13]. Though, at sub-Coulomb energeis the determination of ANC is more model independent, the above barrier measurements are more convenient due to larger cross-sections.

In this work, a new reaction 12C(20Ne,16O)16O is used for the first time to determine the SαS_{\alpha} and ANC of 16O states and using this ANC of 16O states we have extracted SE2S_{E2} value at 300 keV by R-matrix extrapolation. The measurements are carried out at an incident energy of 150 MeV.

II Experimental Details

The experiment was carried out at the K130 room temperature Cyclotron centre at VECC, Kolkata. The 1 m scattering chamber at channel 2 was used for the measurements. Three Δ\DeltaE-E telescopes were setup inside the chamber. One telescope consisted of Δ\DeltaE-E setup with (50 mm x 50 mm) silicon strip detectors. The Δ\DeltaE strip detector was 50 μ\mum thick and the E strip ( double sided) 500 μ\mum. The other telescopes (T1 and T2) were 15 μ\mum- 1000 μ\mum surface barrier detectors. The target was self supporting 660 μ\mugm/cm2cm^{2} 12C foils. A gold target was mounted in the ladder for energy calibration purpose. The beam current was stable at around 10-20 pnA.There were 16 strips in the Δ\DeltaE detector with 100 μ\mum dead layer between adjacent strips. The centre to centre distance between adjacent strip was 3 mm. The strip telescope covered angles from 14.82o to 34.18o whereas the low threshold surface barrier telescopes were used to measure the cross-sections at backward angles from 30o to 52o. Typical energy resolutions of the Δ\DeltaE and E strip detectors were 40 keV and 60 keV respectively. The solid angles subtended by the telescopes at the target centre were 0.796 msr(strip detector),0.128 msr(T1 telescope) and 0.2716 msr (T2 telescope) respectively. The 20Ne + 12C reaction have been measured in the angular range 15o{15}^{o} to 52o{52}^{o} at ElabE_{lab}=150 MeV energy. The distance between target and strip detector Δ\DeltaE-E telescopes was 184.15 mm and with surface barrier telescopes were 235 mm. The dimension of the collimator in the strip detector was 50 mm x 9 mm (rectangular) and for T1 and T2, 3 mm diameter circular and 3 mm x 5 mm rectangular respectively. VME data aquisition system was used in the experiment.

III Results and Discussion

In this experiment N20e10+{}^{20}{Ne}^{10^{+}} beam of energy ElabE_{lab}=150 MeV was incident on a 12C target and the 2-D spectrum for a representative case of 19.82o for the strip telescope is shown in fig.1 and that for the telescope T1 at 36o is shown in fig.2.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: 2-D energy spectrum of the strip detector Δ\DeltaE-E telescope for the 20Ne+12C system at Θlab\Theta_{lab}=19.82o for EN20elab{}^{lab}_{{}^{20}Ne}=150 MeV.
Refer to caption
Figure 2: 2-D energy spectrum of the SB detector Δ\DeltaE-E telescope T1 for the 20Ne+12C system at Θlab\Theta_{lab}=36o for EN20elab{}^{lab}_{{}^{20}Ne}=150 MeV.
Refer to caption
Figure 3: Energy spectrum of elastic scattering of 20Ne from 12C at Θlab\Theta_{lab}=19.82o for EN20elab{}^{lab}_{{}^{20}Ne}=150 MeV using strip detector Δ\DeltaE-E telescope. Here at higher energies there is the strong elastic peak of 20Ne and at lower energies there are 20Ne nonelastic fragments.



Refer to caption
(a) Θlab\Theta_{lab}=19.82o
Refer to caption
(b) Θlab\Theta_{lab}=20.77o
Refer to caption
(c) Θlab\Theta_{lab}=21.73o
Refer to caption
(d) Θlab\Theta_{lab}=22.68o
Refer to caption
(e) Θlab\Theta_{lab}=23.64o
Figure 4: Energy spectrum of the 16O in strip detector Δ\DeltaE-E telescope for the 12C(20Ne,16O)16O reaction at different angles for EN20elab{}^{lab}_{{}^{20}Ne}=150 MeV which are fitted by moving source model [14]. The red line fit the low energy continuous background using moving source model.

Emitted fragments (2\geqZ\leq10) are clearly seperated as seen in these plots. Fig.3 shows the projected elastic and nonelastic fragments at the angle Θlab\Theta_{lab}=19.82o. Gating on the Z=8 curve from the 2-D spectrum in fig.1 and projecting on the energy axis, we obtain the energy spectrum of the emitted 16O fragments. These spectra at various angles are shown in fig.4. The spectrum has a broad continuous low energy section and some discrete peaks at higher energy. These discrete peaks can results from transfer reactions or compound emissions populating discrete low lying states of 16O. The three discrete peaks were identified at 6.92 MeV, 7.12 MeV and 11.52 MeV. In order to obtain the cross-sections of these three states, the cross-section of the continuous part has to be estimated as they contribute to the background of the discrete peaks.

The shape of the continuous part suggest a statistical process. In order to calculate the cross-section for emission of such heavy fragments (Z=8) from statistical process, we used the moving source model [14]. The parameters in this model are N0N_{0}, ZECE_{C}, E1E_{1}, and T, Where N0N_{0} is an overall normalization constant, ECE_{C} is the kinetic energy gained by the light particle of charge Z due to the Coulomb repulsion from the target, E1E_{1} is the kinetic energy of a particle at rest in the moving frame and T is the source temperature. The value of these parameters required to calculate the 16O spectrum at various angles are given in the Table I. The cross-sections of the discrete peaks are estimated by subtracting the background calculated from moving source model and are plotted in fig.7.



Refer to caption
(a) Θlab\Theta_{lab}=19.82o
Refer to caption
(b) Θlab\Theta_{lab}=20.77o
Refer to caption
(c) Θlab\Theta_{lab}=21.73o
Refer to caption
(d) Θlab\Theta_{lab}=22.68o
Refer to caption
(e) Θlab\Theta_{lab}=23.64o
Figure 5: Fitting of the 6.92 MeV and 7.12 MeV peaks of the 16O after substracting the low energy continuous background by moving source model [14] at different angles.
Table 1: The parameters in moving source model at various angles are given below.
Lab angle N0N_{0} ZECE_{C} (MeV) E1E_{1} (MeV) T (MeV)
19.82 239786 ±\pm 86754 36.15 ±\pm 0.173 45 0.677 ±\pm 0.0301
20.77 4581 ±\pm 833 46.19 ±\pm 0.166 28 0.91 ±\pm 0.0423
21.73 3322 ±\pm 54 53.25 ±\pm 0.126 20 0.9 ±\pm 0.035
22.68 2025 ±\pm 30 58.67 ±\pm 0.0912 13 0.85 ±\pm 0.032
23.64 696 ±\pm 9 67.19 ±\pm 0.0.036 1.89 ±\pm 0.56 1.45 ±\pm 0.052

Indirect method uses transfer reactions to determine the ANC of the bound states of the nuclei of interest. In this work, the transfer reaction ( 12C(20Ne,16O)16O) is chosen to produce 16O through α\alpha-transfer, the ANC of whose states have to be determined. The measured cross-sections are then compared to a single particle transfer reaction model such as the DWBA (Distorted Wave Born Approximation)[1] theory. The α\alpha-spectroscopic factor (SαS_{\alpha}) of a nuclear state can be extracted from α\alpha-transfer reaction by a normalization of the experimental data with the theoretical cross-section. Thus,

(dσdΩ)Expt=S1Sα(dσdΩ)Theo(\frac{d\sigma}{d\Omega})_{Expt}=S_{1}S_{\alpha}(\frac{d\sigma}{d\Omega})_{Theo} (1)

where S1S_{1} is the spectroscopic factor for the α\alpha + 16O configuration of the 20Ne ground state and SαS_{\alpha} is the α\alpha + 12C spectroscopic factor for a state of 16O. The square of the ANC (C2) of a particular state is related to the alpha spectroscopic factor (SαS_{\alpha}) via the single particle ANC b2 as

C2=Sαb2C^{2}=S_{\alpha}b^{2} (2)

The single particle ANC b is the normalization of the bound state wave function of 16O at large radii with respect to the Whittaker function and is calculated from a suitable binding potential.

In fig.7, the measured 16O angular distribution (symbol) is shown for the 6.92 MeV, 7.12 MeV and 11.52 MeV states. The calculated cross-sections (solid lines) are obtained by using the code FRESCO [15] (version fres2.9) in the framework of the DWBA theory. The required exit channel (16O + 16O) potential and the core-core 16O + 12C potential are obtained respectively from [6] and [16]. The entrance channel potential are extracted from elastic scattering data measured in the present work. The α\alpha + 16O and α\alpha + 12C binding real potentials have a Gaussian form factor. The depth of the potential is adjusted to fit the respective seperation energies of α\alpha in 20Ne and 16O. The optical model analysis for the elastic scattering data is performed with a Woods-Saxon (WS) potential i.e

U(r)=Vo1+exp(rRoao)+iW1+exp(rRwaw)U(r)=\frac{-V_{o}}{1+exp(\frac{r-R_{o}}{a_{o}})}+\frac{-iW}{1+exp(\frac{r-R_{w}}{a_{w}})}

where VoV_{o}, RoR_{o} and aoa_{o} are real potential parameters and W, RwR_{w} and awa_{w} are imaginary potential parameters (Where RcR_{c}= 1.2AT1/3A_{T}^{1/3}).
Elastic scattering of 20Ne on 12C at ElabE_{lab}=150 MeV from 40o40^{o} to 65o65^{o} in the C.M system is used to extract the potential parameters for the 20Ne+12C system. The open black square in fig.6 are the experimental elastic scattering data measured in the present work and dotted red line is the SFRESCO fit [15]. The extracted potential parameters are shown in Table.2. This parameters are used in SαS_{\alpha} and the calculation of 12C(20Ne,16O)16O transfer cross-section for the ANC of 16O states.

Refer to caption
Figure 6: Angular distribution of 12C(20Ne,20Ne)12C elastic scattering cross-section at ElabE_{l}ab=150 MeV from 40o40^{o} to 65o65^{o} in C.M system. Here open black square are experimental elastic scattering cross-section data with error and dotted red line is the SFRESCO calculation.

Refer to caption
(a) 6.92 MeV state of 16O
Refer to caption
(b) 7.12 MeV state 16O
Refer to caption
(c) 11.52 MeV state 16O
Figure 7: Comparison of DWBA calculations using FRESCO of 12C(20Ne,16O)16O α\alpha-transfer angular distribution of 6.92 MeV, 7.12 MeV and 11.52 MeV states of 16O with experimental data. The black square are experimental data with error and solid red line is the FRESCO calculation and solid blue line is the FRESCO calculation after normalisation to the experimental data for (a) 6.92 MeV, (b) 7.12 MeV and (c) 11.52 MeV states of 16O respectively.

The SαS_{\alpha} of the 6.92 MeV, 7.12 MeV and 11.52 MeV states are extracted by a normalization of the experimental angular distributions (in Fig.7) in terms of the calculated values using equation (1). The spectroscopic factor of 20Ne is adopted as 0.229 from [18]. The potential parameters used in the FRESCO calculations are shown in Table II. and Table III. The comparision of the calculations with data yields the SαS_{\alpha} and the ANC values which are shown in Table IV. and Table V.

Error analysis of the extracted ANC and spectroscopic factors have been carried out. The sources of error in the spectroscopic factor are from experimental and theoretical DWBA cross-sections. The errors in the experimental cross-section are estimated from statistical and systematic errors. The statistical error is about 10%\%. The source of systematic errors are from beam energy fluctuation, target thickness uncertainty, beam current fluctuation, solid angle uncertainty etc. and is estimated to be 5%\%. The errors (statistical and systematic) are added in quadrature assuming them to be independenet errors to obtain the error in the spectroscopic factor. The source of the theoretical errors in the DWBA calculation are from the uncertainty in the entrance, exit and core-core potentials. The uncertainty in the ANC depends on the error in the spectroscopic factor and that in the single particle ANC (b). The two errors are added in quadrature to obtain the error in the extracted ANC value. The error in single particle ANC (b) is about 14%\%. Fig.8 shows the SE2S_{E2} curve with the 12C(α\alpha,γ\gamma) E2 capture data [23,24] have been described by a four level R-matrix fit (6.92 MeV sub-threshold state, 9.85 MeV state, 11.52 MeV state and a higher background equivalent state) assuming a radius R0R_{0}= 6.5 fm for the inner space using the AZURE2 code [25]. The fitting is carried out with all parameters fixed except the energy and width of the background state which are considered to be freely varying. The ANC of the 6.92 MeV state was fixed at (1.034 ±\pm 0.4)×\times 10510^{5} fm1/2fm^{-1/2} which is determined through the 12C(20Ne,16O)16O reaction in the present case. Its energy and Γγ\Gamma_{\gamma} have fixed to the values ErE_{r}= 0.2448 MeV and Γγ\Gamma_{\gamma}= 97 meV [26]. For the resonance parameters of the ExE_{x}= 9.85 MeV and ExE_{x}= 11.52 MeV states, we have used the value given in [27]. All the resonance parameters used in the R-matrix fit for the astrophysical S factor of the E2 component are given in the Table VI. The extracted SE2S_{E2} value from fig.8 at 300 keV is 52 ±\pm 25 keV b. Comparision of astrophysical S factors at 300 keV obtained in various experiments including this work for E2 components are given in the Table VII.

Table 2: The potential parameters obtained from the elastic 20Ne + 12C scattering at ElabE_{lab}=150 MeV in optical model analysis.
System Vo (MeV) ro (fm) ao (fm) W (MeV) rw (fm) aw (fm) Ref.
20Ne + 12C (WS) 85.00 1.383 0.63 10.65 1.5 0.56 [This work]
Table 3: The potential parameters required in the calculation are shown.
System Vo (MeV) ro (fm) ao (fm) W (MeV) rw (fm) aw (fm) Ro (fm) rc (fm) Ref.
20Ne + 12C (WS) 85.00 1.383 0.63 10.65 1.5 0.56 - 1.25 [This work]
16O + 16O (WS) 135.0 1.73 0.835 27.0 2.3 0.6 - 1.25 [6]
16O + 12C (WS) 282.2 0.586 0.978 13.86 1.183 0.656 - - [16]
α\alpha + 12C (WS) 85.9 0.916 2.7 - - - - - [17]
α\alpha + 16O (WS) 13.496 2.303 5.4 - - - - - [-]
Table 4: Comparison of spectroscopic factors of the 16O states deduced from our calculation with earlier works.
State of 16O (MeV) Present work S. Adhikari [5] Oulebsir [19] Bellhout [20] Bechetti Keely [7] Cobern [8]
6.92 0.786 ±\pm 0.56 0.32 ±\pm 0.07 0.15 ±\pm 0.05 0.37 ±\pm 0.11 1.35 [9] and 4.134 [10] 0.68 1.10
7.12 0.0196 ±\pm 0.017 0.22 ±\pm 0.07 0.07 ±\pm 0.03 0.11 ±\pm 0.03 0.080.06+0.040.08^{+0.04}_{-0.06} [10] - 0.2
11.52 5.89 ±\pm 1.56 - - - - - -
Table 5: Comparison of ANC of 6.92 MeV and 7.12 MeV states of 16O ontained from present work with earlier works.
Experiment C2C^{2} (2+2^{+}) (101010^{10} fm1fm^{-1})       C2C^{2} (11^{-}) (102810^{28} fm1fm^{-1})
This work ( 1.07 ±\pm 0.16 ) ( 6.56 ±\pm 1.45 )
A. Mondal [21,22] 1.14 76.8
S. Adhikari [5] (3.0 ±\pm 0.122) ( 303.8 ±\pm 22.09 )
Brune [2] (1.29 ±\pm 0.23) ( 4.33 ±\pm 0.84 )
Avila [12] (1.48 ±\pm 0.16) ( 4.39 ±\pm 0.59 )
Belhout [20] (1.961.27+1.411.96^{+1.41}_{-1.27}) ( 3.48 ±\pm 2.0 )
Oulebsir [19] (2.07 ±\pm 0.8) ( 4.0 ±\pm 1.38 )
Refer to caption
Figure 8: Astrophysical S factor for the 12C(α\alpha,γ\gamma)16O reaction with R-matrix calculations of the E2 component. The solid square and solid star points are the experimental data from [23] and [24] respectively. The solid red line is the R-matrix fit using ANC value of the 6.92 MeV state determined in the present work.
Table 6: Resonance parameters used in the R-matrix fit of the astrophysical S factor of the E2 component. The values in the brackets are the fixed resonance parameters.
JπJ^{\pi} ExE_{x} (MeV) ErE_{r} (MeV)      ANC (C) in fm1/2fm^{-1/2} or Γα\Gamma_{\alpha} (keV)      Γγ\Gamma_{\gamma} (keV)
2+2^{+} 6.92 [-0.244] C=[(1.228 ±\pm 0.6)×\times 10510^{5}] [9.7×\times 10510^{-5}]
2+2^{+} 9.85 [2.683] Γα\Gamma_{\alpha}=[0.76] [5.7×\times 10610^{-6}]
2+2^{+} 11.52 [4.339] Γα\Gamma_{\alpha}=[83.0] [6.1×\times 10410^{-4}]
2+2^{+} Background 7.84 Γα\Gamma_{\alpha}= 0.257 1.3×\times 10410^{-4}
Table 7: Comparision of astrophysical S factors at 300 keV obtained in various experiments including this work for E2 components.
S factor This Work Oulebsir[19] Brune[2] Tischauser[27] Hammer[28] Kunz[23] NACRE[29] Ouellet[24]
(0.3 MeV)
SE2S_{E2} (keV b) 52 ±\pm 25 50 ±\pm 19 4423+1944^{+19}_{-23} 53 ±\pm 13 81 ±\pm 22 85 ±\pm 30 120 ±\pm 60 36 ±\pm 6

IV Conclusions

In this experiment we have measured 12C(20Ne,16O)16O angular distribution for the population of α\alpha-transfer states at ElabE_{lab}=150 MeV. The ANC of the 6.92 MeV and 7.12 MeV states of 16O are determined for the first time using this reaction. The extraction of ANC were done by using the direct reaction code FRESCO. The required entrance channel potential of 20Ne+12C was determined from the elastic scattering data measured in the same experiment. We have extracted SE2S_{E2} value at 300 keV by R-matrix calculation using ANC value of 6.92 MeV state which is determined from this reaction.

V Acknowledgement

The authors acknowledge the help and support of all VECC Cyclotron staff, Jonaki Panja and Taniya Basu for the experiment.

References

  • (1) I.J. Thompson, F.M. Nunes, Nuclear Reactions for Astrophysics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 2009.
  • (2) C. Brune, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 4025.
  • (3) R. E. Azuma, et al., Phys. Rev.C 81, 045805 (2010).
  • (4) R. Kunz et al., The Astrophysical Journal, 567 (2002) 643-650.
  • (5) S. Adhikari et al., Phys. Lett. B 704 (2011) 308-311.
  • (6) H.G. Bohlen et al., Z. Phys. A 346, 189-200 (1993).
  • (7) N. Keeley et al., Phys. Rev. C 67, 044604 (2003).
  • (8) M. E. Cobern, D. J. Pisano, and P. D. Parker, Phys. Rev. C 14, 491 (1976).
  • (9) F.D. Becchetti, D. Overway, and J. Janecke,  ̵̈ Nucl. Phys. A 344, 336 (1980).
  • (10) F.D. Becchetti and J. Janecke,  ̵̈ Nucl. Phys. A 305, 313 (1978).
  • (11) S. Adhikari et al., Phys. Rev.C 89, 044618 (2014).
  • (12) M.L. Avila et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015) 071101.
  • (13) B. Guo et al., Astrophys. J. 756, 193 (2012).
  • (14) T.C. Awes et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 45 (1980) 513.
  • (15) I.J. Thompson et al., Comput. Phys. Rep. 7 (1988) 167.
  • (16) A.A. Ogloblin et al., Phys. Rev.C 62, 044601 (2000).
  • (17) C.A. Bertulani, Phys. Rev. C 49 (1994) 2688.
  • (18) Kiyoshi. KATO et al., Progress of Theoretical Physics, 59, 774 (1978).
  • (19) N. Oulebsir et al., Phys. Rev. C 85, 035804 (2012).
  • (20) A. Belhout et al., Nucl. Phys. A 793, 178 (2007).
  • (21) A. Mondal et al., Phys. Lett. B 772 (2017) 216.
  • (22) A. Mondal et al, Proc. of the DAE Symp. on Nucl. Phys. (India) 61, 604 (2016).
  • (23) R. Kunz et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3244 (2001).
  • (24) J. M. Ouellet et al. Phys. Rev. C 54, 1982 (1996).
  • (25) R.E. Azuma et al.,Phys.Rev. C 50, 1194 (1994).
  • (26) D.R. Tilley et al., Nucl. Phys. A 564, 1 (1993).
  • (27) P. Tischhauser et al., Phys. Rev. C 79, 055803 (2009).
  • (28) J.W. Hammer et al., Nucl. Phys. A 752, 514c (2005).
  • (29) C. Angulo et al., Nucl. Phys. A 656, 3 (1999).