This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

The detection of a hot molecular core in the extreme outer Galaxy

Takashi Shimonishi Center for Transdisciplinary Research, Niigata University, Ikarashi-ninocho 8050, Nishi-ku, Niigata, 950-2181, Japan Environmental Science Program, Department of Science, Faculty of Science, Niigata University, Ikarashi-ninocho 8050, Nishi-ku, Niigata, 950-2181, Japan Natsuko Izumi Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Academia Sinica, No. 1, Section 4, Roosevelt Road, Taipei 10617, Taiwan Kenji Furuya National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, Osawa 2-21-1, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan Chikako Yasui National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, California Office, 100 W. Walnut St., Suite 300, Pasadena, CA 91124, USA
Abstract

Interstellar chemistry in low metallicity environments is crucial to understand chemical processes in the past metal-poor universe. Here we report the first detection of a hot molecular core in the extreme outer Galaxy, which is an excellent laboratory to study star formation and interstellar medium in a Galactic low-metallicity environment. The target star-forming region, WB89-789, is located at the galactocentric distance of 19 kpc. Our ALMA observations have detected a variety of carbon-, oxygen-, nitrogen-, sulfur-, and silicon-bearing species, including complex organic molecules (COMs) containing up to nine atoms, towards a warm (>>100 K) and compact (<< 0.03 pc) region associated with a protostar (\sim8 ×\times 103 L). A comparison of fractional abundances of COMs relative to CH3OH between the outer Galactic hot core and an inner Galactic counterpart shows a remarkable similarity. On the other hand, the molecular abundances in the present source do not resemble those of low-metallicity hot cores in the Large Magellanic Cloud. The detection of another embedded protostar associated with high-velocity SiO outflows is also reported.

astrochemistry – ISM: molecules – stars: protostars – ISM: jets and outflows – radio lines: ISM
software: CASA (McMullin et al., 2007))

1 Introduction

Understanding the star formation and interstellar medium (ISM) at low metallicity is crucial to unveil physical and chemical processes in the past Galactic environment or those in high-redshift galaxies, where the metallicity was significantly lower compared to the present-day solar neighborhood.

Hot cores are one of the early stages of star formation and they play a key role in the formation of chemical complexity of the ISM. Physically, hot cores are defined as having small source size (\lesssim0.1 pc), high density (\gtrsim106 cm-3), and warm gas/dust temperature (\gtrsim100 K) (e.g., van Dishoeck & Blake, 1998; Kurtz et al., 2000). Chemistry of hot cores is characterized by sublimation of ice mantles, which accumulated in the course of star formation. In cold molecular clouds and prestellar cores, gaseous molecules and atoms are frozen onto dust grains. With increasing dust temperatures by star formation activities, chemical reaction among heavy species become active on grain surfaces to form larger complex molecules (e.g., Garrod & Herbst, 2006). In addition, sublimated molecules, such as CH3OH and NH3, are subject to further gas-phase reactions (e.g., Nomura & Millar, 2004; Taquet et al., 2016). As a result, warm and dense gas around protostars become chemically rich, and embedded protostars are observed as one of the most powerful molecular line emitters, which is called a hot core. They are important targets for astrochemical studies of star-forming regions, because a variety of molecular species, including complex organic molecules (COMs), are often detected in hot cores (Herbst & van Dishoeck, 2009, and references therein). Thus detailed studies on chemical properties of hot cores are important for understanding complex chemical processes triggered by star formation.

Recent ALMA (Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array) observations of hot molecular cores in a nearby low metallicity galaxy, the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC), have suggested that the metallicity has a significant effect on their molecular compositions (Shimonishi et al., 2016b, 2020; Sewiło et al., 2018); cf., the metallicity of the LMC is \sim1/2-1/3 of the solar neighborhood. A comparison of molecular abundances between LMC and Galactic hot cores suggests that organic molecules (e.g., CH3OH, a classical hot core tracer) show a large abundance variation in low-metallicity hot cores (Shimonishi et al., 2020). There are organic-poor hot cores that are unique in the LMC (Shimonishi et al., 2016b), while there are relatively organic-rich hot cores, where the abundances of organic molecules roughly scale with the metallicity (Sewiło et al., 2018). Astrochemical simulations for low-metallicity hot cores suggest that dust temperature during the initial ice-forming stage would play a key role for making the chemical diversity of organic molecules (Acharyya & Herbst, 2018; Shimonishi et al., 2020). On the other hand, sulfur-bearing molecules such as SO2 and SO are commonly detected in known LMC hot cores and their molecular abundances roughly scale with the metallicity of the LMC. Although the reason is still under debate, the results suggest that SO2 can be an alternative molecular species to trace hot core chemistry in metal-poor environments.

The above results suggest that molecular abundances in hot cores do not always simply scale with the elemental abundances of their parent environments. However, it is still unclear if the observed chemical characteristics of LMC hot cores are common in other low metallicity environments or they are uniquely seen only in the LMC. Currently, known low-metallicity hot core samples are limited to those in the LMC. It is thus vital to understand universal characteristics of interstellar chemistry by studying chemical compositions of star-forming cores in diverse metallicity environments.

Recent surveys (e.g., Anderson et al., 2015, 2018; Izumi et al., 2017; Wenger et al., 2021) have found a number of (\sim10-20) star-forming region candidates in the extreme outer Galaxy, which is defined as having galactocentric distance (DGCD_{GC}) larger than 18 kpc (Yasui et al., 2006; Kobayashi et al., 2008). The extreme outer Galaxy has a very different environment from those in the solar neighborhood, with lower metallicity (less than -0.5 dex, Fernández-Martín et al., 2017; Wenger et al., 2019), lower gas density (e.g., Nakanishi & Sofue, 2016), and small or no perturbation from spiral arms. Such an environment is of great interest for studies of the star formation and ISM in the early phase of the Milky Way formation and those in dwarf galaxies (Ferguson et al., 1998; Kobayashi et al., 2008). The low metallicity environment is in common with the Magellanic Clouds, and thus the extreme outer Galaxy is an ideal laboratory to test the universality of the low metallicity molecular chemistry observed in the LMC and SMC.

Among star-forming regions in the extreme outer Galaxy, WB89-789 (IRAS 06145+1455; 06h17m24.s\fs2, 14°\arcdeg54\arcmin42\arcsec, J2000) has particularly young and active nature (Brand & Wouterloot, 1994). It is located at the galactocentric distance of 19.0 kpc and the distance from Earth is 10.7 kpc (based on optical spectroscopy of a K3 III star, Brand & Wouterloot, 2007). The metallicity of WB89-789 is estimated to be a factor of four lower than the solar value according to the Galactic oxygen abundance gradient reported in the literature (Fernández-Martín et al., 2017; Wenger et al., 2019; Bragança et al., 2019; Arellano-Córdova et al., 2020, 2021). The region is associated with dense clouds traced by CS and CO (Brand & Wouterloot, 2007). The total mass of the cloud is estimated to be 6 ×\times 103 M for a \sim10 pc diameter area (Brand & Wouterloot, 1994). An H2O maser is detected towards the region (Wouterloot et al., 1993), but no centimeter radio continuum is found (Brand & Wouterloot, 2007). Several class I protostar candidates are identified by previous infrared observations (Brand & Wouterloot, 2007).

We here report the first detection of a hot molecular core in the extreme outer Galaxy based on submillimeter observations towards WB89-789 with ALMA. Section 2 describes the details of the target source, observations, and data reduction. The observed molecular line spectra and images, as well as analyses of physical and chemical properties of the source, are presented in Section 3. Discussion about the properties of the hot core and comparisons of molecular abundances with known Galactic and LMC hot cores are given in Section 4. This section also presents the detection of another embedded protostar with high-velocity outflows in the WB89-789 region. The conclusions are given in Section 5.

Table 1: Observation summary
Observation On-source Mean Number Baseline Channel
Date Time PWVaaPrecipitable water vapor. of Min Max Bem sizebbThe average beam size of continuum achieved by TCLEAN with the Briggs weighting and the robustness parameter of 0.5. Note that we use a common circular restoring beam size of 0.\farcs50 for Band 6 and 7 data to construct the final images. MRSccMaximum Recoverable Scale. Spacing
(min) (mm) Antennas (m) (m) (\arcsec ×\times \arcsec) (\arcsec)
Band 6 2018 Dec 6 – 115.5 0.5–1.5 45–49 15.1 783.5 0.41 ×\times 0.50 5.6 0.98 MHz
(250 GHz) 2019 Apr 16 (1.2 km s-1)
Band 7 2018 Apr 30 – 64.1 0.6–1.0 43-44 15.1 500.2 0.46 ×\times 0.52 5.4 0.98 MHz
(350 GHz) 2018 Aug 22 (0.85 km s-1)

2 Target, observations, and data reduction

2.1 Target

The target star-forming region is WB89-789 (Brand & Wouterloot, 1994). The region contains three Class I protostar candidates identified by near-infrared observations (Brand & Wouterloot, 2007), and one of them is a main target of the present ALMA observations. The region observed with ALMA is indicated on a near-infrared two-color image shown in Figure 1. The observed position is notably reddened compared with other parts of WB89-789.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: Near-infrared two-color image of the WB89-789 star-forming region based on 2MASS data (Skrutskie et al., 2006). Blue is JJ-band (1.25 μ\mum) and red is KsK_{s}-band (2.16 μ\mum). The image size is 100″×\times 100″. The green square indicates the field-of-view of the ALMA submillimeter images shown in Figures 45.

2.2 Observations

Observations were conducted with ALMA in 2018 and 2019 as a part of the Cycle 5 (2017.1.01002.S) and Cycle 6 (2018.1.00627.S) programs (PI: T. Shimonishi). A summary of the present observations is shown in Table 1. The pointing center of antennas is RA = 06h17m23s and Dec = 14°\arcdeg54\arcmin41\arcsec (ICRS). The total on-source integration time is 115.5 minutes for Band 6 data and 64.1 minutes for Band 7. Flux and bandpass calibrators are J0510+1800, J0854+2006, and J0725-0054 for Band 6, while J0854+2006 and J0510+1800 for Band 7, respectively. Phase calibrators are J0631+2020 and J0613+1708 for Band 6 and J0643+0857 and J0359+1433 for Band 7. Four spectral windows are used to cover the sky frequencies of 241.40–243.31, 243.76-245.66, 256.90–258.81, and 258.76–260.66 GHz for Band 6, while 337.22–339.15, 339.03-340.96, 349.12–351.05, and 350.92–352.85 GHz for Band 7. The channel spacing is 0.98 MHz, which corresponds to 1.2 km s-1 for Band 6 and 0.85 km s-1 for Band 7. The total number of antennas is 45–49 for Band 6 and 43–44 for Band 7. The minimum–maximum baseline lengths are 15.1–783.5 m for Band 6 and 15.1–500.2 m for Band 7. A full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) of the primary beam is about 25\arcsec for Band 6 and 18\arcsec for Band 7.

2.3 Data reduction

Raw data is processed with the Common Astronomy Software Applications (CASA) package. We use CASA 5.4.0 (Band 6) and 5.1.1 (Band 7) for the calibration and CASA 5.5.0 for the imaging. The synthesized beam sizes of 0.\farcs39–0.\farcs42 ×\times 0.\farcs49–0.\farcs52 with a position angle of -36 degree for Band 6 and 0.\farcs45–0.\farcs46 ×\times 0.\farcs51–0.\farcs52 with a position angle of - 54 degree for Band 7 are achieved with the Briggs weighting and the robustness parameter of 0.5. In this paper, we use a common circular restoring beam size of 0.\farcs50, which corresponds to 0.026 pc (5350 au) at the distance of WB89-789. The synthesized images are corrected for the primary beam pattern using the impbcor task in CASA. The continuum image is constructed by selecting line-free channels. Before the spectral extraction, the continuum emission is subtracted from the spectral data using the CASA’s uvcontsub task.

The spectra and continuum flux are extracted from the 0.\farcs50 diameter circular region centered at RA = 06h17m24.s\fs073 and Dec = 14°\arcdeg54\arcmin42.\farcs27 (ICRS), which corresponds to the submillimeter continuum center of the target and is equivalent to the hot core position. Hereafter, the source is referred to as WB89-789 SMM1.

Table 2: Summary of detected molecular species
2 atoms 3 atoms 4 atoms 5 atoms 6 atoms 7 atoms 8 atoms 9 atoms
CN HDO H2CO c-C3H2 CH3OH CH3CHO HCOOCH3 CH3OCH3
NO H13CO+ HDCO HC3N 13CH3OH c-C2H4O C2H5OH
CS HC18O+ D2CO H2CCO CH2DOH C2H5CN
C34S H13CN HNCO HCOOH CH3CN
C33S HC15N H2CS NH2CO
SO CCH
34SO SO2
33SO 34SO2
SiO OCS
13OCS

3 Results and analysis

3.1 Spectra

Figures 23 show submillimeter spectra extracted from the continuum center of WB89-789 SMM1. Spectral lines are identified with the aid of the Cologne Database for Molecular Spectroscopy111https://www.astro.uni-koeln.de/cdms (CDMS, Müller et al., 2001, 2005) and the molecular database of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory222http://spec.jpl.nasa.gov (JPL, Pickett et al., 1998).

Line parameters are measured by fitting a Gaussian profile to detected lines. We estimate the peak brightness temperature, the FWHM, the LSR velocity, and the integrated intensity for each line based on the fitting. For spectral lines for which a Gaussian profile does not fit well, their integrated intensities are calculated by directly integrating the spectrum over the frequency region of emission. Full details of the line fitting can be found in Appendix A (Tables of measured line parameters) and Appendix B (Figures of fitted spectra). The table also contains the estimated upper limits on important non-detection lines.

A variety of carbon-, oxygen-, nitrogen-, sulfur-, and silicon-bearing species, including COMs containing up to nine atoms, are detected from WB89-789 SMM1 (see Table 2). Multiple high excitation lines (upper state energy >>100 K) are detected for many species. Measured line widths are typically 3–6 km s-1. Most of lines consist of a single velocity component, but SiO has doppler shifted components at VsysV_{sys} ±\pm 5 km s-1 as indicated in Figure 14 in Appendix B.

Refer to caption
Figure 2: ALMA band 6 spectra extracted from the the 0.\farcs50 (0.026 pc) diameter region centered at the present hot molecular core in the extreme outer Galaxy, WB89-789 SMM1. Detected emission lines are labeled. Unidentified lines are indicated by “?”. The source velocity of 34.5 km s-1 is assumed.
Refer to caption
Figure 3: Same as in Figure 2, but for ALMA Band 7.

3.2 Images

Figures 45 show synthesized images of continuum and molecular emission lines observed toward the target region. The images are constructed by integrating spectral data in the velocity range where the emission is detected. Most molecular lines, except for those of molecular radicals CN, CCH, and NO, have their intensity peak at the continuum center, which corresponds to the position of a hot core. Simple molecules such as H13CO+, H13CN, CS, and SO are extended compared to the beam size. Secondary intensity peaks are also seen in those species. Complex molecules and HDO are concentrated at the hot core position. A characteristic symmetric distribution is seen in SiO. Further discussion about the distribution of the observed emission is presented in Section 4.2.

Refer to caption
Figure 4: Integrated intensity distributions of molecular emission lines. Gray contours represent the 1.2 mm continuum distribution and the contour levels are 5σ\sigma, 10σ\sigma, 20σ\sigma, 40σ\sigma, 100σ\sigma of the rms noise (0.044 mJy/beam). Low signal-to-noise ratio regions (S/N <<2) are masked. The spectra discussed in the text are extracted from the region indicated by the black open circle. The blue cross represents the 1.2 mm continuum center. The synthesized beam size is shown by the gray filled circle in each panel. North is up, and east is to the left.
Refer to caption
Figure 5: Same as in Figure 4.

3.3 Derivation of column densities, gas temperatures, and molecular abundances

3.3.1 Rotation diagram analysis

Column densities and rotation temperatures are estimated based on the rotation diagram analysis for the molecular species where multiple transitions with different excitation energies are detected (Figure 6). We here assume an optically thin condition and the local thermodynamic equilibrium (LTE). We use the following formulae based on the standard treatment of the rotation diagram analysis (e.g., Sutton et al., 1995; Goldsmith & Langer, 1999):

log(Nugu)=(logeTrot)(Euk)+log(NQ(Trot)),\log\left(\frac{N_{u}}{g_{u}}\right)=-\left(\frac{\log e}{T_{\mathrm{rot}}}\right)\left(\frac{E_{u}}{k}\right)+\log\left(\frac{N}{Q(T_{\mathrm{rot}})}\right), (1)

where

Nugu=3kTb𝑑V8π3νSμ2,\frac{N_{u}}{g_{u}}=\frac{3k\int T_{\mathrm{b}}dV}{8\pi^{3}\nu S\mu^{2}},\\ (2)

and NuN_{u} is a column density of molecules in the upper energy level, gug_{u} is the degeneracy of the upper level, kk is the Boltzmann constant, Tb𝑑V\int T_{\mathrm{b}}dV is the integrated intensity estimated from the observations, ν\nu is the transition frequency, SS is the line strength, μ\mu is the dipole moment, TrotT_{\mathrm{rot}} is the rotational temperature, EuE_{u} is the upper state energy, NN is the total column density, and Q(Trot)Q(T_{\mathrm{rot}}) is the partition function at TrotT_{\mathrm{rot}}. All the spectroscopic parameters required in the analysis are extracted from the CDMS or JPL database. Derived column densities and rotation temperatures are summarized in Table 3.

Most molecular species are well fitted by a single temperature component. Data points in diagrams of CH3CN and C2H5CN are relatively scattered. For CH3OH, CH3CN, HNCO, SO2, and HCOOCH3, transitions with relatively large Sμ2S\mu^{2} values at low EuE_{u} (<<300 K) are excluded from the fit in order to avoid possible effect of optical thickness (see gray points in Fig. 6).

Complex organic molecules, HDO, and SO2 show high rotation temperatures (>>130 K). This suggests that they are originated from a warm region associated with a protostar. On the other hand, C33S and D2CO, and H2CS show lower temperatures, suggesting that they arise from a colder region in the outer part of the protostellar envelope.

Refer to caption
Figure 6: Results of rotation diagram analyses. Upper limit points are shown by the downward arrows. The solid lines represent the fitted straight line. Derived column densities and rotation temperatures are shown in each panel. The open squares are excluded in the fit because they significantly deviate from other data points. The gray squares are also excluded in the fit because of their large Sμ2S\mu^{2} values. CH3OH is fitted by using only E-type transitions, which are shown in blue. For HCOOH, trans- (square) and cis- (circle) species are plotted together. See Section 3.3.1 for details.

3.3.2 Column densities of other molecules

Column densities of molecular species for which rotation diagram analysis is not applicable are estimated from Equation 1 after solving it for NN. Their rotation temperatures are estimated as follows, by taking into account that the sight-line of WB89-789 SMM1 contains both cold and warm gas components as described in Section 3.3.1.

The rotation temperature of C33S is applied to those of CS and C34S, considering a similar distribution of isotopologues. Similarly, the rotation temperature of D2CO is applied to H2CO and HDCO, and that of SO2 to 34SO2. For other species, we assume that molecules with an extended spatial distribution trace a relatively low-temperature region rather than a high-temperature gas associated with a hot core. CN, CCH, H13CO+, HC18O+, H13CN, HC15N, NO, SiO, 34SO, 33SO, and c-C3H2 correspond to this case. We assume a rotation temperature of 35 K for those species, which is roughly equivalent to that of C33S.

High gas temperatures are observed for COMs, SO2, and HDO, which are associated with a compact hot core region. Average temperature of those species is \sim200 K. We assume this temperature for column density estimates (including upper limit) of c-C2H4O, HC3N, 13CH3CN, 13OCS, and CH3SH. Estimated column densities are summarized in Table 3.

We have also estimated column densities of selected species based on non-LTE calculations with RADEX (van der Tak et al., 2007). For input parameters, we use the H2 gas density of 2.1 ×\times 107 cm-3 according to our estimate in Section 3.3.3 and the background temperature of 2.73 K. Kinetic temperatures are assumed to be the same as temperatures tabulated in Table 3. The line intensities and widths are taken from the tables in Appendix A 333The following lines are used for non-LTE calculation with RADEX; H13CO+(3–2), HC18O+(4–3), H2CO(51,5–41,4), c-C3H2(32,1–21,2), CN(N = 3–2, J = 52\frac{5}{2}32\frac{3}{2}, F = 52\frac{5}{2}52\frac{5}{2}), H13CN(3–2), HC15N(3–2), HC3N(27–26), NO(J = 72\frac{7}{2}52\frac{5}{2}, Ω\Omega = 12\frac{1}{2}, F = 92\frac{9}{2}+72\frac{7}{2}-), CH3CN(140–130), SiO(6–5), CS(5–4), OCS(20–19), H2CS(71,6–61,5), SO(NJN_{J} = 66–55), and CH3OH(75 E–65 E). . We assume an empirical 10%\% uncertainty for input line intensities. The resultant column densities are summarized in Table 3. The calculated non-LTE column densities are reasonably consistent with the LTE estimates.

3.3.3 Column density of H2, dust extinction, and gas mass

A column density of molecular hydrogen (NH2N_{\mathrm{H_{2}}}) is estimated from the dust continuum data. We use the following equation to calculate NH2N_{\mathrm{H_{2}}} based on the standard treatment of optically thin dust emission:

NH2=Fν/Ω2κνBν(Td)ZμmH,N_{\mathrm{H_{2}}}=\frac{F_{\nu}/\Omega}{2\kappa_{\nu}B_{\nu}(T_{d})Z\mu m_{\mathrm{H}}}, (3)

where Fν/ΩF_{\nu}/\Omega is the continuum flux density per beam solid angle as estimated from the observations, κν\kappa_{\nu} is the mass absorption coefficient of dust grains coated by thin ice mantles at 1200/870 μ\mum as taken from Ossenkopf & Henning (1994) and we here use 1.07 cm2 g-1 for 1200 μ\mum and 1.90 cm2 g-1 for 870 μ\mum, TdT_{d} is the dust temperature and Bν(Td)B_{\nu}(T_{d}) is the Planck function, ZZ is the dust-to-gas mass ratio, μ\mu is the mean atomic mass per hydrogen (1.41, according to Cox, 2000), and mHm_{\mathrm{H}} is the hydrogen mass. We use the dust-to-gas mass ratio of 0.002, which is obtained by scaling the Galactic value of 0.008 by the metallicity of the WB89-789 region.

A line of sight towards a hot core contain dust grains with different temperatures because of the temperature gradient in a protostellar envelope. Representative dust temperature (i.e. mass-weighted average temperature) would fall somewhere in between that of a warm inner region and a cold outer region. Shimonishi et al. (2020) presented a detailed analysis of effective dust temperature in the sight-line of a low-metallicity hot core in the LMC, based on a comparison of NH2N_{\mathrm{H_{2}}} derived by submillimeter dust continuum with the above method, model fitting of spectral energy distributions (SEDs), and the 9.7 μ\mum silicate dust absorption depth. The paper concluded that TdT_{d} = 60 K for the dust continuum analysis yields the NH2N_{\mathrm{H_{2}}} value which is consistent with those obtained by other different methods. This temperature corresponds to an intermediate value between a cold gas component (\sim50 K) represented by SO and a warm component (\sim150 K) represented by CH3OH and SO2 in this LMC hot core. The present hot core, WB89-789 SMM1, harbors similar temperature components as discussed in Sections 3.3.1 and 3.3.2. We thus applied TdT_{d} = 60 K for the present source. The continuum brightness of SMM1 is measured to be 11.33 ±\pm 0.05 mJy/beam for 1200 μ\mum and 28.0 ±\pm 0.2 mJy/beam for 870 μ\mum (3σ\sigma uncertainty). Based on the above assumption, we obtain NH2N_{\mathrm{H_{2}}} = 1.6 ×\times 1024 cm-2 for 1200 μ\mum and NH2N_{\mathrm{H_{2}}} = 1.2 ×\times 1024 cm-2 for the 870 μ\mum. The NH2N_{\mathrm{H_{2}}} value changes by a factor of up to 1.6 when the assumed TdT_{d} is varied between 40 K and 90 K.

Alternatively, a column density of molecular hydrogen can be determined by the model fitting of the observed spectral energy distribution (SED). The best-fit SED discussed in Section 4.1 yields AVA_{V} = 184 mag. We here use a standard value of NHN_{\mathrm{H}}/E(BV)E(B-V) = 5.8 ×\times 1021 cm-2 mag-1 (Draine, 2003) and a slightly high AVA_{V}/E(BV)E(B-V) ratio of 4 for dense clouds (Whittet et al., 2001). Taking into account a factor of four lower metallicity, we obtain NH2N_{\mathrm{H_{2}}}/AVA_{V} = 2.9 ×\times 1021 cm-2 mag-1, where we assume that all the hydrogen atoms are in the form of H2. Using this conversion factor, we obtain NH2N_{\mathrm{H_{2}}} = 5.3 ×\times 1023 cm-2. This NH2N_{\mathrm{H_{2}}} is similar to the NH2N_{\mathrm{H_{2}}} derived from the aforementioned method assuming TdT_{d} = 150 K. Such TdT_{d} may be somewhat high as a typical dust temperature in the line of sight, but it is not very unrealistic value given the observed temperature range of molecular gas towards WB89-789 SMM1.

In this paper, we use NH2N_{\mathrm{H_{2}}} = 1.1 ×\times 1024 cm-2 as a representative value, which corresponds to the average of NH2N_{\mathrm{H_{2}}} derived by the dust continuum data and the SED fitting. This NH2N_{\mathrm{H_{2}}} corresponds to AVA_{V} = 380 mag using the above conversion factor. Assuming the source diameter of 0.026 pc and the uniform spherical distribution of gas around a protostar, we estimate the gas number density to be nH2n_{\mathrm{H_{2}}} = 2.1 ×\times 107 cm-3, where the total gas mass of 13 M is enclosed.

3.3.4 Fractional abundances and isotope abundance ratios

Fractional abundances with respect to H2 are shown in Table 4, which are calculated based on column densities estimated in Sections 3.3.13.3.3. The fractional abundances normalized by the CH3OH column density are also discussed in Sections 4.3-4.4, because of the non-negligible uncertainty associated with NH2N_{\mathrm{H_{2}}} (see Section 3.3.3).

Abundances of HCO+, HCN, SO, CS, OCS, and CH3OH are estimated from their isotopologues, H13CO+, H13CN, 34SO, C34S, O13CS, and 13CH3OH. Detections of isotopologue species for SO, CS, OCS, and CH3OH imply that the main species would be optically thick. Isotope abundance ratios of 12C/13C = 150 and 32S/33S = 35 are assumed, which are obtained by extrapolating the relationship between isotope ratios and galactocentric distances reported in Wilson & Rood (1994) and Humire et al. (2020) to DGCD_{GC} = 19 kpc.

Abundance ratios are derived for several rare isotopologues; we obtain CH2DOH/CH3OH = 0.011 ±\pm 0.002, D2CO/HDCO = 0.45 ±\pm 0.10, 34SO/33SO = 5 ±\pm 1, C34S/C33S = 2 ±\pm 1, and 32SO2/34SO2 = 20 ±\pm 4. The 32SO2/34SO2 ratio in WB89-789 SMM1 is similar to the solar 32S/34S ratio (22, Wilson & Rood, 1994), although we expect a slightly higher value in the outer Galaxy due to the 32S/34S gradient in the Galaxy (Chin et al., 1996; Humire et al., 2020). Astrophysical implication for the deuterated species are discussed in Section 4.4.

The rotation diagram of CH3CN is rather scattered. Although its isotopologue line is not detected, optical thickness might affect the column density estimate, as CH3CN is often optically thick in hot cores (e.g., Fuente et al., 2014). To obtain a possible range of its column density, we use the rotation diagram of 12CH3CN data to estimate a lower limit and the non-detection of the 13CH3CN(190–180) line at 339.36630 GHz (EuE_{u} = 163 K) for an upper limit.

We have also repeated the analysis for the spectra extracted from a 0.1 pc (1.\farcs93) diameter region at the hot core position, for the sake of comparison with LMC hot cores (see Section 4.4). Those abundances are also summarized in Table 4. The abundances for a 0.1 pc area do not drastically vary from those for a 0.026 pc area. Molecules with compact spatial distribution (e.g., COMs) tend to decrease their abundances by a factor of \sim2–3 in the 0.1 pc data due to the beam dilution effect. In contrast, those with extended spatial distributions and intensity peaks outside the hot core region (H13CO+, CCH, CN, and NO) increases by a factor of \sim2 in the 0.1 pc data.

Table 3: Estimated rotation temperatures, column densities, and source sizes
Molecule TTrot NN(X) NN(X) non-LTE Size
(K) (cm-2) (cm-2) (\arcsec)
H2  \cdots 1.1 ×\times 1024  \cdots 0.85ccSize of continuum emission.
H13CO+ 35 (7.0 ±\pm 0.1) ×\times 1012 (7.6 ±\pm 0.9) ×\times 1012 >>1.5ddAssociated with extended component.
HC18O+ 35 (5.8 ±\pm 0.9) ×\times 1011 (5.7 ±\pm 0.6) ×\times 1011 1.18ddAssociated with extended component.
CCH 35 (2.7 ±\pm 0.1) ×\times 1014  \cdots >>2ddAssociated with extended component.
c-C3H2 35 (9.5 ±\pm 2.2) ×\times 1013 (8.2 ±\pm 0.9) ×\times 1013aaAssuming ortho/para ratio of three. >>1ddAssociated with extended component.
H2CO 39 (1.1 ±\pm 0.1) ×\times 1014 (1.3 ±\pm 0.1) ×\times 1014aaAssuming ortho/para ratio of three. >>1.5ddAssociated with extended component.
HDCO 39 (5.1 ±\pm 0.3) ×\times 1013  \cdots >>1ddAssociated with extended component.
D2CO 395+6{}^{+6}_{-5} (2.3 ±\pm 0.5) ×\times 1013  \cdots  \cdots >>1ddAssociated with extended component.
CN 35 (3.3 ±\pm 0.2) ×\times 1014 (2.5 ±\pm 0.3) ×\times 1014 >>2ddAssociated with extended component.
H13CN 35 (1.2 ±\pm 0.1) ×\times 1013 (1.1 ±\pm 0.1) ×\times 1013 0.92ddAssociated with extended component.
HC15N 35 (6.3 ±\pm 0.2) ×\times 1012 (5.8 ±\pm 0.6) ×\times 1012 0.75ddAssociated with extended component.
HC3N 200 (2.7 ±\pm 0.3) ×\times 1013 (2.1 ±\pm 0.2) ×\times 1013 0.65
NO 35 (9.0 ±\pm 2.5) ×\times 1014 (8.9 ±\pm 0.9) ×\times 1014 >>1.5ddAssociated with extended component.
HNCO 23715+17{}^{+17}_{-15} (3.0 ±\pm 0.2) ×\times 1014  \cdots 0.54
CH3CN 27911+12{}^{+12}_{-11} (1.8 ±\pm 0.1) ×\times 1014 (8.6 ±\pm 0.8) ×\times 1013 0.51
13CH3CN 200 <<5 ×\times 1012  \cdots  \cdots
C2H5CN 13015+20{}^{+20}_{-15} (6.3 ±\pm 1.7) ×\times 1013  \cdots 0.52
NH2CO 1407+8{}^{+8}_{-7} (4.2 ±\pm 0.7) ×\times 1013  \cdots 0.56
SiO 35 (2.5 ±\pm 0.2) ×\times 1012 (2.5 ±\pm 0.3) ×\times 1012 0.65
CS 36 (1.5 ±\pm 0.2) ×\times 1014 (2.0 ±\pm 0.3) ×\times 1014 >>1.5
C34S 36 (3.1 ±\pm 0.1) ×\times 1013  \cdots 0.70
C33S 363+4{}^{+4}_{-3} (1.5 ±\pm 0.2) ×\times 1013  \cdots 0.61
OCS 1065+6{}^{+6}_{-5} (6.5 ±\pm 0.5) ×\times 1014 (6.4 ±\pm 0.7) ×\times 1014 0.55
13OCS 200 (8.7 ±\pm 2.4) ×\times 1013  \cdots 0.45
H2CS 432+3{}^{+3}_{-2} (1.5 ±\pm 0.1) ×\times 1014 (1.4 ±\pm 0.2) ×\times 1014aaAssuming ortho/para ratio of three. 0.62
SO 351+1{}^{+1}_{-1} (4.0 ±\pm 0.3) ×\times 1014 (4.5 ±\pm 0.5) ×\times 1014 0.70ddAssociated with extended component.
34SO 35 (5.9 ±\pm 0.1) ×\times 1013  \cdots 0.66
33SO 35 (1.1 ±\pm 0.1) ×\times 1013  \cdots 0.53
SO2 1665+5{}^{+5}_{-5} (1.2 ±\pm 0.1) ×\times 1015  \cdots 0.53
34SO2 166 (5.9 ±\pm 0.9) ×\times 1013  \cdots 0.51
CH3SH 200 <<3 ×\times 1014  \cdots  \cdots
HDO 21712+14{}^{+14}_{-12} (2.2 ±\pm 0.2) ×\times 1015  \cdots 0.52
CH3OH 2454+4{}^{+4}_{-4} (1.9 ±\pm 0.1) ×\times 1016 (2.6 ±\pm 0.1) ×\times 1016bbAssuming E-CH3OH/A-CH3OH ratio of unity (Wirström et al., 2011). 0.51
13CH3OH 1819+10{}^{+10}_{-9} (2.8 ±\pm 0.2) ×\times 1015  \cdots 0.46
CH2DOH 15515+18{}^{+18}_{-15} (4.6 ±\pm 0.3) ×\times 1015  \cdots 0.52
HCOOCH3 1815+6{}^{+6}_{-5} (8.6 ±\pm 0.4) ×\times 1015  \cdots 0.51
CH3OCH3 1374+5{}^{+5}_{-4} (2.6 ±\pm 0.1) ×\times 1015  \cdots 0.52
C2H5OH 13612+14{}^{+14}_{-12} (9.6 ±\pm 1.3) ×\times 1014  \cdots 0.50
CH3CHO 19234+52{}^{+52}_{-34} (6.4 ±\pm 0.8) ×\times 1014  \cdots 0.49
trans-HCOOH 719+11{}^{+11}_{-9} (2.7 ±\pm 0.6) ×\times 1014  \cdots 0.58
cis-HCOOH 6921+50{}^{+50}_{-21} (2.4 ±\pm 1.2) ×\times 1013  \cdots 0.49
H2CCO 9211+14{}^{+14}_{-11} (1.0 ±\pm 0.2) ×\times 1014  \cdots 0.55
c-C2H4O 200 (8.9 ±\pm 2.0) ×\times 1013  \cdots 0.47

Note. — Uncertainties and upper limits are of the 2 σ\sigma level and do not include systematic errors due to adopted spectroscopic constants. See Sections 3.3.1-3.3.3 and 4.2 for details.

Table 4: Estimated fractional abundances
Molecule NN(X)/NH2N_{\mathrm{H_{2}}}
0.026 pc area 0.1 pc area
HCO+aaEstimated from 13C isotopologue with 12C/13C = 150 (9.5 ±\pm 3.2) ×\times 10-10 (1.5 ±\pm 0.3) ×\times 10-9
H2CO (1.0 ±\pm 0.3) ×\times 10-10 (1.2 ±\pm 0.1) ×\times 10-10
HDCO (4.7 ±\pm 1.3) ×\times 10-11 (3.9 ±\pm 0.2) ×\times 10-11
D2CO (2.1 ±\pm 0.7) ×\times 10-11 (2.0 ±\pm 0.3) ×\times 10-11
C2H (2.5 ±\pm 0.7) ×\times 10-10 (5.8 ±\pm 1.2) ×\times 10-10
c-C3H2 (8.6 ±\pm 3.1) ×\times 10-11 (5.9 ±\pm 1.2) ×\times 10-11
CN (3.0 ±\pm 0.8) ×\times 10-10 (6.6 ±\pm 1.3) ×\times 10-10
HCNaaEstimated from 13C isotopologue with 12C/13C = 150 (1.7 ±\pm 0.6) ×\times 10-9 (1.2 ±\pm 0.3) ×\times 10-9
HC3N (2.5 ±\pm 0.7) ×\times 10-11 (1.4 ±\pm 0.1) ×\times 10-11
NO (8.1 ±\pm 3.2) ×\times 10-10 (1.6 ±\pm 0.1) ×\times 10-9
HNCO (2.7 ±\pm 0.8) ×\times 10-10 (7.1 ±\pm 0.6) ×\times 10-11
CH3CNbbRotation diagram analysis of CH3CN is used to derive a lower limit and the non-detection of 13CH3CN for an upper limit. (4.2 ±\pm 2.7) ×\times 10-10 (3.7 ±\pm 2.8) ×\times 10-10
C2H5CN (5.8 ±\pm 2.2) ×\times 10-11 (2.4 ±\pm 0.9) ×\times 10-11
NH2CHO (3.8 ±\pm 1.2) ×\times 10-11 (1.8 ±\pm 0.1) ×\times 10-11
SiO (2.2 ±\pm 0.6) ×\times 10-12 (1.2 ±\pm 0.1) ×\times 10-12
CSccEstimated from 34S isotopologue with 32S/34S = 35 (9.7 ±\pm 3.3) ×\times 10-10 (6.4 ±\pm 1.3) ×\times 10-10
SOccEstimated from 34S isotopologue with 32S/34S = 35 (1.9 ±\pm 0.5) ×\times 10-9 (1.3 ±\pm 0.3) ×\times 10-9
OCSaaEstimated from 13C isotopologue with 12C/13C = 150 (1.2 ±\pm 0.5) ×\times 10-8 (4.1 ±\pm 1.4) ×\times 10-9
H2CS (1.4 ±\pm 0.4) ×\times 10-10 (9.0 ±\pm 1.0) ×\times 10-11
SO2 (1.1 ±\pm 0.3) ×\times 10-9 (2.9 ±\pm 0.1) ×\times 10-10
CH3SH <<3 ×\times 10-10 <<2 ×\times 10-10
HDO (2.0 ±\pm 0.6) ×\times 10-9 (7.7 ±\pm 0.9) ×\times 10-10
CH3OHaaEstimated from 13C isotopologue with 12C/13C = 150 (3.8 ±\pm 1.3) ×\times 10-7 (1.7 ±\pm 0.3) ×\times 10-7
CH2DOH (4.2 ±\pm 1.2) ×\times 10-9 (1.5 ±\pm 0.2) ×\times 10-9
HCOOCH3 (7.8 ±\pm 2.2) ×\times 10-9 (3.0 ±\pm 0.2) ×\times 10-9
CH3OCH3 (2.3 ±\pm 0.6) ×\times 10-9 (1.0 ±\pm 0.1) ×\times 10-9
C2H5OH (8.7 ±\pm 2.7) ×\times 10-10 (3.3 ±\pm 0.8) ×\times 10-10
CH3CHO (5.8 ±\pm 1.8) ×\times 10-10 (2.1 ±\pm 0.4) ×\times 10-10
HCOOHddSum of transtrans- and ciscis-species. (2.7 ±\pm 1.0) ×\times 10-10 (1.2 ±\pm 0.4) ×\times 10-10
H2CCO (9.2 ±\pm 3.0) ×\times 10-11 (3.7 ±\pm 0.9) ×\times 10-11
c-C2H4O (8.1 ±\pm 2.8) ×\times 10-11 (5.9 ±\pm 1.2) ×\times 10-11

Note. — Uncertainties and upper limits are of the 2σ\sigma level. Column densities of molecules for a 0.026 pc area are summarized in Table 3. An empirical uncertainty of 30 %\% is assumed for NH2N_{\mathrm{H_{2}}}.

Refer to caption
Figure 7: The SED of WB89-789 SMM1. The plotted data are obtained by the ESO 2.2 m telescope (pluses, black; Brand & Wouterloot, 2007), the WISE all-sky survey (open diamonds, light green; Wright et al., 2010), AKARI FIS all-sky survey (open diamonds, blue; Yamamura et al., 2010), and ALMA (filled star, red, this work). The angular resolution of each data is indicated in brackets. The gray dashed line indicates the best-fitted SED with the model of Robitaille et al. (2007).

4 Discussion

4.1 Hot molecular core and protostar associated with WB89-789 SMM1

The nature of WB89-789 SMM1 is characterized as (i) the compact distribution of warm gas (\sim0.03 pc, see Section 4.2), (ii) the high gas temperature that can trigger the ice sublimation (\geq100 K, Section 3.3.1), (iii) the high density (2 ×\times 107 cm-3, Section 3.3.3), (iv) the association with a luminous protostar (see below), and (v) the presence of chemically rich molecular gas. Those properties suggest that the source is associated with a hot molecular core.

Figure 7 shows a SED of SMM1, where the data are collected from available databases and literatures (Brand & Wouterloot, 2007; Wright et al., 2010; Yamamura et al., 2010). The bolometric luminosity of the source is estimated to be 8.4 ×\times 103 L based on the SED fitting with the model of Robitaille et al. (2007). This luminosity is equivalent to a stellar mass of about 10 M according to the mass-luminosity relationship of zero age main sequence (ZAMS) stars (Zinnecker & Yorke, 2007).

Note that far-infrared data, which is important for the luminosity determination of embedded sources, is insufficient for SMM1. Only upper limits are provided due to the low angular resolution of available AKARI FIS all-sky survey data. Thus the derived luminosity (and therefore mass) may be lower than the current estimate. Future high spatial resolution infrared observations in those missing wavelengths are highly required.

Alternatively, we can estimate the luminosity of SMM1 by scaling the luminosity of a low-metallicity LMC hot core, ST16, whose SED is well determined based on a comprehensive infrared dataset from 1 to 1200 μ\mum (Shimonishi et al., 2020). This LMC hot core has a total luminosity of 3.1 ×\times 105 L and a KsK_{s}-band magnitude ([KsK_{s}]) of 13.4 mag at 50 kpc, while SMM1 has [KsK_{s}] = 14.7 mag at 10.7 kpc. Scaling the luminosity of ST16 with the distance and KsK_{s}-band magnitude, we obtain 4.3 ×\times 103 L for SMM1, which is a factor of two lower than the estimate by the SED fitting. In either case, present estimates suggest that the luminosity of SMM1 would correspond to the lower-end of high-mass ZAMS or upper-end of intermediate-mass ZAMS.

Refer to caption
Figure 8: Schematic illustration of the molecular gas distribution and the temperature structure in WB89-789 SMM1.

4.2 Distribution of molecular line emission and dust continuum

The observed emission lines and continuum show different spatial distributions depending on species. Those distributions have important clues to understand their origins. A schematic illustration of the temperature structure and molecular gas distribution in WB89-789 SMM1 are shown in Figure 8 based on the discussion in this section.

We have estimated the spatial extent of observed emission by fitting a two-dimensional Gaussian to the continuum center (Table 3). Compact distributions (FWHM = 0.\farcs5–0.\farcs6, 0.026–0.031 pc), that is comparable with the beam size, are seen in HDO, COMs, CH3CN, HNCO, OCS, and high-excitation SO2 lines. HC3N is slightly extended (FWHM = 0.\farcs65). They are concentrated at the hot core position, suggesting that they are originated from a warm region where ice mantles are sublimated.

SO, 34SO, 33SO, and low-excitation SO2 show relatively compact distributions (FWHM = 0.\farcs5–0.\farcs7, 0.026–0.036 pc) at the hot core position, but also show a secondary peak at the south side of the hot core. This secondary peak coincides with the peak of the NO emission. Other sulfur-bearing species such as C34S, C33S, and H2CS show compact distributions (FWHM = 0.\farcs6–0.\farcs0.7, 0.031–0.052 pc) centered at the hot core.

A characteristic distribution that is symmetric to the hot core position is seen in SiO. It shows a compact emission (FWHM = 0.\farcs65) at the hot core center, but also shows other peaks at the north-east and south-west sides of the hot core. Those secondary peaks are slightly elongated. SiO is a well-known shock tracer. The observed structure would be originated from the shocked gas produced by bipolar protostellar outflows. A driving source of the outflows would be a protostar embedded in a hot core, since the distribution of SiO is symmetric to the hot core position.

Even extended distributions (FWHM >> 1.\farcs0) are seen in CN, CCH, H13CO+, HC18O+, H13CN, HC15N, NO, CS, H2CO, and HDCO, D2CO, and low-excitation CH3OH. Gas-phase reactions and non-thermal desorption of icy species would have non-negligible contribution to the formation of those species, because they are widely distributed beyond the hot core. We note that dust continuum, H13CN, HC15N have a moderately sharp peak (FWHM << 1.\farcs0) at the hot core position in addition to the extended component. c-C3H2 shows a patchy distribution, whose secondary peak at the south-west of the hot core does not coincide with those of other species.

Molecular radicals (CN, CCH, and NO) do not have their emission peak at the hot core position. This would suggest that the chemistry outside the hot core region largely contributes to their production. CN and CCH are known to be abundant in photodissociation regions (PDRs), because atomic carbon is efficiently provided by photodissociation of CO under moderate UV fields (e.g., Fuente et al., 1993; Sternberg & Dalgarno, 1995; Jansen et al., 1995; Rodriguez-Franco et al., 1998; Pety et al., 2017). In the present source, their emission shows a similar spatial distribution. A similar distribution between CN and CCH has been also observed in a LMC hot core (Shimonishi et al., 2020); they argue that CN and CCH would trace PDR-like outflow cavity structures that are irradiated by the UV light from a protostar associated with a hot core. We speculate that this is also the case for WB89-789 SMM1.

Figure 9 shows velocity maps (moment 1) of CN and CCH lines. CN and CCH emission are elongated in the south-west direction from the hot core (see also Figure 4). The figure also shows a possible direction of protostellar outflows expected from the spatial distribution of SiO. The elongated directions of CN and CCH coincide with the inferred direction of outflows. In addition, the elongated south-west parts of CN and CCH are blue-shifted by \sim1–2 km s-1 compared to the hot core position. This may be due to outflow gas motion, although CN and CCH would trace an outflow cavity wall rather than outflow gas itself. Actually the observed velocity shift is smaller than a typical value of high-velocity wing components in massive protostellar outflows (\geq 5 km s-1, e.g., Beuther et al., 2002; Maud et al., 2015). Future observations of optically-thick outflow tracers such as CO are necessary to confirm the presence of high-velocity gas associated with protostellar outflows.

Refer to caption
Figure 9: Velocity maps (moment 1) of CN and CCH lines. The color scale indicates the offset velocity relative to the systemic velocity of 34.5 km s-1. A possible direction of outflows expected from the distributions of SiO is shown by the red arrows. Contours represent the integrated intensity distribution and the contour levels are 8%\%, 20%\%, 40%\%, and 60%\% of the peak value. Low signal-to-noise regions (S/N <<5) are masked. The blue cross represents the 1.2 mm continuum center.

4.3 Molecular abundances: Comparison with Galactic hot cores

Figure 10 shows a comparison of molecular abundances between WB89-789 SMM1 and other known Galactic hot cores. The data for an intermediate-mass hot core, NGC7192 FIRS2, is adopted from Fuente et al. (2014). The abundances are based on the 220 GHz region observations for a 0.009 pc diameter area centered at the hot core. The luminosity of NGC7192 FIRS2 (\sim500 L) corresponds to that of a 5 M ZAMS. The data for a high-mass source, the Orion hot core, is adopted from Sutton et al. (1995), which is based on the 340 GHz region observations for a 0.027 pc diameter area at the hot core. The abundance of HNCO is taken from Schutte & Greenberg (1997).

The molecular abundances in WB89-789 SMM1 is generally lower than those of inner Galactic counterparts. The degree of the abundance decrease is roughly consistent with the lower metallicity of the WB89-789 region as indicated by the scale bar in Figure 10. Particularly, SMM1 and the intermediate-mass hot core NGC7192 FIRS2 show similar molecular abundances after taking into account the four times lower metallicity of the former source. For the comparison with Orion, it seems that HC3N, C2H5CN, and SO2 are significantly less abundant in SMM1 even taking into account the lower metallicity, while CH3OH is overabundant in SMM1 despite the low metallicity.

Refer to caption
Figure 10: Comparison of molecular abundances between an outer Galactic hot core (black, WB89-789 SMM1), an intermediate-mass hot core (green, NGC7192 FIRS2), and a high-mass hot core (cyan, Orion). An abundance difference by a factor of four is indicated by the black solid line with hats. The area with thin vertical lines indicate the error bar. No data is available for HDO in NGC7192 FIRS2. See Section 4.3 for details.
Refer to caption
Figure 11: Comparison of molecular abundances normalized by the CH3OH column density for (a) WB89-789 SMM1 vs. NGC7192 FIRS2 and (b) WB89-789 SMM1 vs. ST16 (LMC). Carbon- and oxygen-bearing species are shown by the blue squares, nitrogen-bearing species in green, and sulfur-bearing species in red. The dotted lines in the panel (a) represent an abundance ratio of 2:1 and 1:2 for WB89-789 SMM1 : NGC7192 FIRS2, while the solid line represent that of 1:1. Similarly, the dotted lines in the panel (b) represent a ratio of 100:1, 10:1, 1:10, and 1:100 for WB89-789 SMM1:ST16, while 1:1 for the solid line. The leftward triangles in the panel (b) indicate the upper limit for ST16. See Section 4.3 for details.

To further focus on chemical complexity at low metallicity, Figure 11 shows a comparison of fractional abundances of COMs normalized by the CH3OH column density for WB89-789 SMM1 and NGC7192 FIRS2. Such a comparison is useful for investigating chemistry of organic molecules in warm and dense gas around protostars (Herbst & van Dishoeck, 2009; Drozdovskaya et al., 2019), because CH3OH is believed to be a parental molecule for the formation of even larger COMs (e.g., Nomura & Millar, 2004; Garrod & Herbst, 2006). In addition, CH3OH is a product of grain surface reaction, thus warm CH3OH gas mainly arise from a high-temperature region, where ices are sublimated and characteristic hot core chemistry proceeds. Furthermore, the normalization by CH3OH can cancel the metallicity effect in the abundance comparison.

The NN(X)/NN(CH3OH) ratios are remarkably similar between WB89-789 SMM1 and NGC7192 FIRS2 as shown in Figure 11 (a). The ratios of SMM1 coincide with those of NGC7192 FIRS2 within a factor of 2 for the most molecular species. The correlation coefficient is calculated to be 0.94, while it is 0.96 if CH3CN is excluded. It seems that CH3CN deviates from the overall trend, although the uncertainty is large due to the opacity effect (see 3.3.4). C2H5OH also slightly deviates from the trend. The reason for their behavior is still unclear, but it may be related to the formation pathway of those molecules.

The above two comparisons suggest that chemical compositions of the hot core in the extreme outer Galaxy scale with the metallicity. In the WB89-789 region, the metallicity is expected to be four times lower compared to the solar neighborhood. The observed abundances of COMs in the SMM1 hot core is lower than the other Galactic hot cores, but the decrease is proportional to this metallicity. Furthermore, similar NN(COMs)/NN(CH3OH) ratios suggest that CH3OH is an important parental species for the formation of larger COMs in a hot core, as suggested by aforementioned theoretical studies.

CH3OH ice is believed to form on grain surfaces and several formation processes are proposed by laboratory experiments; i.e., hydrogenation of CO, ultraviolet photolysis and radiolysis of ice mixtures (e.g., Hudson & Moore, 1999; Watanabe et al., 2007). It is known that CH3OH is already formed in quiescent prestellar cores before star formation occurs (Boogert et al., 2011). Solid CH3OH will chemically evolve to larger COMs by a combination of photolysis, radiolysis, and grain heating during the warm-up phase that leads to the formation of a hot core (Garrod & Herbst, 2006). High-temperature gas-phase chemistry of sublimated CH3OH would also contribute to the COMs formation (Nomura & Millar, 2004; Taquet et al., 2016). The present results suggest that various COMs can form even in a low-metallicity environment, if their parental molecule, CH3OH, is efficiently produced in a star-forming core. We here note that observations of ice mantle compositions are not reported for the outer Galaxy so far . Future infrared observations of ice absorption bands towards embedded sources in the outer Galaxy are important.

Refer to caption
Figure 12: Comparison of molecular abundances between an outer Galactic hot core, WB89-789 SMM1 (black), and three LMC hot cores, ST11 (red), ST16 (orange), and N113 A1 (light yellow). Abundances of SMM1 are calculated for a 0.1 pc diameter region. The area with thin vertical lines indicate the error bar. The bar with a color gradient indicate an upper limit. The absence of bars indicate the lack of available data. See Section 4.4 for details.

4.4 Molecular abundances: Comparison with LMC hot cores

It is still unknown if the observed simply-metallicity-scaled chemistry of COMs in the WB89-789 SMM1 hot core is common in other hot core sources in the outer Galaxy. A comparison of the present data with those of hot cores in the LMC would provide a hint for understanding the universality of low-metallicity hot core chemistry. The metallicity of the LMC is reported to be lower than the solar value by a factor of two to three (e.g., Dufour et al., 1982; Westerlund, 1990; Russell & Dopita, 1992; Choudhury et al., 2016), which is in common with the outer Galaxy.

Figure 12 shows a comparison of molecular abundances between WB89-789 SMM1 and three LMC hot cores. The plotted molecular column densities for LMC hot cores are adopted from Shimonishi et al. (2016a) for ST11, Shimonishi et al. (2020) for ST16, and Sewiło et al. (2018) fro N113 A1. Another LMC hot core in Sewiło et al. (2018), N113 B3, have similar molecular abundances with those of N113 A1. The NH2N_{\mathrm{H_{2}}} value of ST11 and N113 A1 is re-estimated using the same dust opacity data and dust temperature (TdT_{d} = 60 K) as in this work; We obtained NH2N_{\mathrm{H_{2}}} = 1.2 ×\times 1024 cm-2 for ST11 and NH2N_{\mathrm{H_{2}}} = 9.2 ×\times 1023 cm-2 for N113 A1. The dust temperature assumed in ST16 is 60 K as described in Section 3.3.3. Molecular column densities are estimated for circular/elliptical regions of 0.12 ×\times 0.12 pc, 0.10 ×\times 0.10 pc, and 0.21 ×\times 0.13 pc for ST11, ST16, and N113 A1, respectively. For a fair comparison, we have re-calculated NH2N_{\mathrm{H_{2}}} and molecular column densities of SMM1 for a 0.1 pc (1.\farcs93) diameter region. Those abundances are plotted in Figure 12 and summarized in Table 4.

The chemical composition of the outer Galaxy hot core does not resemble those of LMC hot cores as seen in Figure 12. The dissimilarity is also seen in the NN(X)/NN(CH3OH) comparison between SMM1 and ST16 as shown in Figure 11 (b), where the correlation coefficient is calculated to be 0.69.

Shimonishi et al. (2020) argue that SO2 will be a good tracer of low-metallicity hot core chemistry, because (i) it is commonly detected in LMC hot cores with similar abundances, and (ii) it is originated from a compact hot core region. SO also shows similar abundances within LMC hot cores. In WB89-789 SMM1, however, the abundances of SO2 and SO relative to H2 are lower by a factor of 28 and 5 compared with LMC hot cores. The measured rotation temperatures of SO2 are similar between those hot cores, i.e., 166 K (SO2) for SMM1, 232 K (SO2) and 86 K (34SO2) for ST16, 190 K (SO2) and 95 K (34SO2) for ST11. The SO2 column densities for ST16 and ST11 are estimated from 34SO2, while that for SMM1 is from SO2. However, the SO2 column density of SMM1 increases only by a factor of up to three when it is estimated from 34SO2 (see Section 3.3.4). Thus the low SO2 abundance in the outer Galactic hot core would not be due to the optical thickness.

In contrast to the S-O bond bearing species, the C-S bond bearing species such as CS, H2CS , and OCS do not show significant abundance decrease in WB89-789 SMM1. Thus it is not straightforward to attribute the low abundance of SO2 (and perhaps SO) to the low elemental abundance ratio of sulfur in the outer Galaxy. Hot core chemistry models suggest that SO2 is mainly produced in high-temperature gas-phase reactions in warm gas, using H2S sublimated from ice mantles (Charnley, 1997; Nomura & Millar, 2004). This also applies to the SO2 formation in low-metallicity sources as shown in astrochemical simulations for LMC hot cores (Shimonishi et al., 2020). We speculate that the different behavior of SO2 in outer Galaxy and LMC hot cores may be related to differences in the evolutionary stage of hot cores. A different luminosity of host protostars may also contribute to the different sulfur chemistry; i.e., \sim8 ×\times 103 L for WB89-789-SMM1, while several ×\times 105 L for LMC hot cores. A different cosmic-ray ionization rate between the outer Galaxy and the LMC may also affect the chemical evolution, although the rate is not known for the outer Galaxy.

Among nitrogen-bearing molecules, NO shows interesting behavior in LMC hot cores. After corrected for the metallicity, NO is overabundant in LMC hot cores compared with Galactic counterparts despite the low elemental abundance of nitrogen in the LMC (Shimonishi et al., 2020). Only NO shows such behavior among the nitrogen-bearing molecules observed in LMC hot cores. In WB89-789 SMM1, however, such an overabundance of NO is not observed. The NO abundance of SMM1 is 1.6 ×\times 10-9 for a 0.1 pc region data. This is a factor of five lower than a typical NO abundance in Galactic high-mass hot cores (8 ×\times 10-9, Ziurys et al., 1991), which is consistent with a factor of four lower metallicity in WB89-789. The present high-spatial resolution data have revealed that NO does not mainly arise from a hot core region, as shown in Figure 4. It has an intensity peak at the south part of the hot core, where low-excitation lines of SO and SO2 also have a secondary peak (Section 4.2). Thus, shock chemistry or photochemistry, rather than high-temperature chemistry, would contribute to the production of NO in low-metallicity protostellar cores. In that case, a lower luminosity of SMM1 than those of LMC hot cores may contribute to the different behavior of NO.

For other nitrogen-bearing molecules, HNCO and CH3CN, a clear difference is not identified between outer Galactic and LMC hot cores, although the number of data points is limited and the abundance uncertainty is large. The reason of the unusually low abundance of SiO in SMM1 is unknown. It may be related to different shock conditions or grain compositions, because dust sputtering by shock is mainly responsible for the production of SiO gas.

Formation of COMs is one of the important standpoints for low-metallicity hot core chemistry. It is reported that CH3OH show a large abundance variation in LMC hot cores (Shimonishi et al., 2020). There are organic-poor hot cores such as ST11 and ST16, while N113 A1 and B3 are organic-rich. The CH3OH abundance of WB89-789 SMM1 is higher than those of any known LMC hot cores. The abundances of HCOOCH3 and CH3OCH3 in SMM1 are comparable with those of an organic-rich LMC hot core, N113 A1. Th detection of many other COMs in SMM1 suggests the source have experienced rich organic chemistry despite its low-metallicity nature.

Astrochemical simulations for LMC hot cores suggest that dust temperature at the initial ice-forming stage have a major effect on the abundance of CH3OH gas in the subsequent hot core stage (Acharyya & Herbst, 2018; Shimonishi et al., 2020). Simulations of grain surface chemistry dedicated to the LMC environment also suggest that dust temperature is one of the key parameters for the formation of CH3OH in dense cores (Acharyya & Herbst, 2015; Pauly & Garrod, 2018). This is because (i) CH3OH is mainly formed by the grain surface reaction, and (ii) the hydrogenation reaction of CO, which is a dominant pathway for the CH3OH formation, is sensitive to the dust temperature due to the high volatility of atomic hydrogen. For this reason, it is inferred that organic-rich hot cores had experienced a cold stage (\lesssim 10K) that is sufficient for the CH3OH formation before the hot core stage, while organic-poor ones might have missed such a condition for some reason. Alternatively, the slight difference in the hot core’s evolutionary stage may contribute to the CH3OH abundance variation, because the high-temperature gas-phase chemistry is rapid and it can decrease CH3OH gas at a late stage (e.g., Nomura & Millar, 2004; Garrod & Herbst, 2006; Vasyunin & Herbst, 2013; Balucani et al., 2015).

Low-metallicity hot core chemistry simulations in Shimonishi et al. (2020) argue that the maximum achievable abundances of CH3OH gas in a hot core stage significantly decrease as the visual extinction of the initial ice-forming stage decreases. On the other hand, the simulations show that the CH3OH gas abundance is simply metallicity-scaled if the initial ice-forming stage is sufficiently shielded. In a well-shielded initial condition, the grain surface is cold enough to trigger the CO hydrogenation, and the resultant CH3OH abundance is roughly regulated by the elemental abundances. The observed metallicity-scaled chemistry of COMs in WB89-789 SMM1 implies that the source had experienced such an initial condition before the hot core stage.

Deuterium chemistry is widely used in interpreting chemical and physical history of interstellar molecules (e.g., Caselli & Ceccarelli, 2012; Ceccarelli et al., 2014). The measured CH2DOH/CH3OH ratio in WB89-789 SMM1 is 1.1 ±\pm 0.2 %\%, which is comparable to the higher end of those ratios observed in high-mass protostars and the lower end of those in low-mass protostars (e.g., see Fig.2 in Drozdovskaya et al., 2021). The ratio is orders of magnitude higher than the deuterium-to-hydrogen ratio in the solar neighborhood (2 ×\times 10-5; Linsky et al., 2006; Prodanović et al., 2010) and that in the big-bang nucleosynthesis (3 ×\times 10-5; Burles, 2002, references therein). This suggests that the efficient deuterium fractionation occurred upon the formation of CH3OH in SMM1. The D2CO/HDCO ratio is 45 ±\pm 10 %\%, which is comparable to those observed in low-mass and high-mass protostars (e.g., Zahorecz et al., 2021). This would suggest that physical conditions for deuterium fractionation could be similar between WB89-789 SMM1 and inner Galactic protostars. Note that higher spatial resolution observations and detailed multiline analyses would affect the measured abundance of deuterated species as reported in Persson et al. (2018) for the case of a nearby low-mass protostar. The H2CO column density derived in this work may be a lower limit because the line is often optically thick, thus we do not discuss the abundance ratio relative to H2CO.

It is known that the deuterium fractionation efficiently proceeds at low temperature (e.g., Roberts et al., 2003; Caselli & Ceccarelli, 2012; Taquet et al., 2014; Furuya et al., 2016). This is because the key reaction for the trigger of deuterium fractionation, H3+{}^{+}_{3} + HD \rightarrow H2D+ + H2 + 232 K, is exothermic and its backward reaction cannot proceed below 20 K. In addition, gaseous neutral species such as CO and O efficiently destruct H2D+, thus their depletion at low temperature further enhances the deuterium fractionation (e.g., Caselli & Ceccarelli, 2012). A sign of high deuterium fractionation observed in WB89-789 SMM1 suggests that the source had experienced such a cold environment during its formation. This picture is consistent with the implication obtained from the metallicity-scaled chemistry of COMs, which also suggests the occurrence of a cold and well-shielded initial condition as discussed above.

Although the low metallicity is common between the outer Galaxy and the LMC, their star-forming environments would be different; the LMC has more harsh environments as inferred from active massive star formation over the whole galaxy, while that for the outer Galaxy might be quiescent due to its low star formation activity. Those environmental differences need to be taken into account for further understanding of the chemical evolution of star-forming regions at low metallicity. Future extensive survey of protostellar objects towards the outer Galaxy is thus vitally important for further discussion. Astrochemical simulations dedicated to the environment of the outer Galaxy, and the application to lower-mass protostars, are also important.

4.5 Another embedded protostar traced by high-velocity SiO gas

We have also detected a compact source associated with high-velocity SiO gas at the east side of WB89-789 SMM1. Hereafter, we refer to this source as WB89-789-SMM2. According to the SiO emission, the source is located at RA = 06h17m24.s\fs246 and Dec = 1454\arcmin43.\farcs25 (ICRS), which is 2.\farcs7 (0.14 pc) away from SMM2. Figure 13(a) shows the SiO(6-5) spectrum extracted from a 0.\farcs6 diameter region centered at the above position. The SiO line is largely shifted to the blue and red sides relative to the systemic velocity in a symmetric fashion. The peaks of the shifted emission are located at VsysV_{sys} ±\pm 25 km s-1.

Refer to caption
Figure 13: (a) SiO(6-5) spectrum of WB89-789-SMM2. The dotted line indicates a systemic velocity of 34.5 km s-1. High-velocity (VsysV_{sys} ±\pm25 km s-1) SiO components are seen at the blue-/red-shifted sides of the systemic velocity. (b) Velocity map (moment 1) of the SiO(6-5) line. The color scale indicates the offset velocity relative to the systemic velocity. Gray contours represent the intensity distribution of SiO(6-5) integrated from 0 to 60 km s-1, and the contour levels are 1.5σ\sigma, 4σ\sigma, and 12σ\sigma of the rms level. The yellow star indicates the SiO center of SMM2, while the blue cross indicates the hot core position (SMM1). The subset panel shows the 1200 μ\mum continuum image for a 1.\farcs2 ×\times 1.\farcs2 region centered at SMM2. See Section 4.5 for details.

Figure 13(b) shows a velocity map and integrated intensity distribution of SiO(6-5). In the figure, to focus on SiO in WB89-789-SMM2, the intensity is integrated over much wider velocity range (0–60 km s-1) compared with that adopted in Figure 4 (31–38 km s-1). The velocity map clearly indicates that the velocity structure of SiO in SMM2 is spatially symmetric to the SiO center. At this position, a local peak is seen in 1200 μ\mum continuum as shown in the figure, suggesting the presence of an embedded source. SMM2 does not show any emission lines of COMs, and no alternative molecular lines are identified at the frequencies of doppler-shifted SiO emission. Also taking into account the clear spectral and spatial symmetry, the observed lines must be attributed to high-velocity SiO gas.

The spectral characteristics of the observed high-velocity SiO resemble those of extremely high velocity (EHV) outflows observed in Class 0 protostars (Bachiller et al., 1991; Tafalla et al., 2010, 2015; Tychoniec et al., 2019). The EHV flows are known to appear as a discrete high-velocity (VV \gtrsim30 km s-1) peak, and observed in the youngest stage of star formation (Bachiller, 1996; Matsushita et al., 2019, references therein). The EHV flows extends up to several thousands au from the central protostar in SiO, and usually have collimated bipolar structures (e.g., Bachiller et al., 1991; Hirano et al., 2010; Tychoniec et al., 2019; Matsushita et al., 2019). The beam size of the present data is about 5000 au, thus such structures will not be spatially resolved. Actually, a symmetric spatial distribution of blue-/red-shifted SiO is only marginally resolved into two beam size regions (Fig. 13(b)). A spatial extent of SiO emission is about 1\arcsec (0.052 pc). Assuming an outflow velocity of 25 km s-1, we estimate a dynamical timescale of EHV flows to be at least 2000 years. This is roughly consistent with dynamical timescales of other EHV sources, which range from a few hundred to a few thousand years (Bachiller, 1996, references therein).

A 1200 μ\mum continuum flux in a 0.\farcs6 diameter region centered at SMM2 is 0.60 ±\pm 0.05 mJy/beam. Assuming TdT_{d} = 20 K, we obtain NH2N_{\mathrm{H_{2}}} = 3.2 ×\times 1023 cm-2. This is equivalent to a gas number density of nH2n_{\mathrm{H_{2}}} = 4.9 ×\times 106 cm-3. If we assume a higher TdT_{d}, i.e. 40 K, then the derived column density is 2.5 times lower than the 20 K case. In either case, the continuum data suggests the presence of high-density gas at this position.

Previous single-dish observations of CO detected extended (\sim20\arcsec) molecular outflows in the WB89-789 region (Brand & Wouterloot, 1994, 2007). The center of the outflow gas coincides with the position of the IRAS source (IRAS 06145+1455; 06h17m24.s\fs2, 14°\arcdeg54\arcmin42\arcsec, J2000). This position is consistent with those of SMM1 or SMM2, given the large beam size of CO(3-2) observations (14\arcsec) in Brand & Wouterloot (2007). The observed CO outflow gas has an extended blue-shifted component (20 << VLSRV_{LSR} << 31 km s1s^{-1}) towards the south-east direction from the center, while a red-shifted component (37 << VLSRV_{LSR} << 55 km s1s^{-1}) is extended towards the north-west direction (see Figure 9 in Brand & Wouterloot, 2007). This outflow direction coincides with that of the high-velocity SiO outflows observed in this work. The SiO outflows from SMM2 may have a common origin with the large-scale CO outflows.

In summary, it is likely that a compact, high-density, and embedded object is located at the position of WB89-789-SMM2. Presumably, a protostar associated with SMM2 is driving the observed high-velocity SiO gas flows. Its short dynamical timescale and similarity with EHV flows suggest that the object is at the youngest stage of star formation (Class 0/I). Non-detection of warm gas emission also supports its young nature. We note that the detailed structure of high-velocity SiO gas is not spatially resolved, and CO lines, which often trace high-velocity outflows, are not covered in the present data. Future high-spatial resolution observations of CO and other outflow tracers are key to further clarify the nature of WB89-789-SMM2.

5 Summary

The extreme outer Galaxy is an excellent laboratory to study star formation and interstellar medium in a Galactic low-metallicity environment. The following conclusions are obtained in this work.

  1. 1.

    A hot molecular core is for the first time detected in the extreme outer Galaxy (WB89-789-SMM1), based on submillimeter observations with ALMA towards the WB89-789 star-forming region located at the galactocentric distance of 19 kpc.

  2. 2.

    A variety of carbon-, oxygen-, nitrogen-, sulfur-, and silicon-bearing species, including complex organic molecules containing up to nine atoms and larger than CH3OH, are detected towards a warm (>>100 K) and compact (<< 0.03 pc) region associated with a protostar (\sim8 ×\times 103 L). The results suggest that a great molecular complexity exists even in a lower metallicity environment of the extreme outer Galaxy.

  3. 3.
  4. 4.

    Fractional abundances of CH3OH and other COMs relative to H2 generally scale with the metallicity of WB89-789, which is a factor of four lower than the solar value.

  5. 5.

    A comparison of fractional abundances of COMs relative to the CH3OH column density between the outer Galactic hot core and a Galactic intermediate-mass hot core show a remarkable similarity. The results suggest the metallicity-scaled chemistry for the formation of COMs in this source. CH3OH is an important parental molecule for the COMs formation even in a lower metallicity environment.

  6. 6.

    On the other hand, the molecular abundances of the present hot core do not resemble those of LMC hot cores. We speculate that different luminosities or star-forming environments between outer Galactic and LMC hot cores may contribute to this.

  7. 7.

    According to astrochemical simulations of low-metallicity hot cores, the observed metallicity-scaled chemistry of COMs in WB89-789-SMM1 implies that the source had experienced well-shielded and cold ice-forming stage before the hot core stage.

  8. 8.

    We have also detected another compact source (WB89-789-SMM2) associated with high-velocity SiO gas (VsysV_{sys} ±\pm 25 km s-1) in the same region. The characteristics of the source resemble those of EHV outflows observed in Class 0 protostars. Physical properties and dynamical timescale of this outflow source are discussed.

This paper makes use of the following ALMA data: ADS/JAO.ALMA#\#2017.1.01002.S ALMA is a partnership of ESO (representing its member states), NSF (USA) and NINS (Japan), together with NRC (Canada), MOST and ASIAA (Taiwan), and KASI (Republic of Korea), in cooperation with the Republic of Chile. The Joint ALMA Observatory is operated by ESO, AUI/NRAO and NAOJ. This work has made extensive use of the Cologne Database for Molecular Spectroscopy and the molecular database of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory. This work makes use of data products from the Two Micron All Sky Survey, which is a joint project of the University of Massachusetts and the Infrared Processing and Analysis Center/California Institute of Technology, funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the National Science Foundation. This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 19H05067, 21H00037, and 21H01145.

References

  • Acharyya & Herbst (2015) Acharyya, K., & Herbst, E. 2015, ApJ, 812, 142
  • Acharyya & Herbst (2018) —. 2018, ApJ, 859, 51
  • Anderson et al. (2015) Anderson, L. D., Armentrout, W. P., Johnstone, B. M., et al. 2015, ApJS, 221, 26
  • Anderson et al. (2018) Anderson, L. D., Armentrout, W. P., Luisi, M., et al. 2018, ApJS, 234, 33
  • Arellano-Córdova et al. (2020) Arellano-Córdova, K. Z., Esteban, C., García-Rojas, J., & Méndez-Delgado, J. E. 2020, MNRAS, 496, 1051
  • Arellano-Córdova et al. (2021) —. 2021, MNRAS, 502, 225
  • Bachiller (1996) Bachiller, R. 1996, ARA&A, 34, 111
  • Bachiller et al. (1991) Bachiller, R., Martin-Pintado, J., & Fuente, A. 1991, A&A, 243, L21
  • Balucani et al. (2015) Balucani, N., Ceccarelli, C., & Taquet, V. 2015, MNRAS, 449, L16
  • Beuther et al. (2002) Beuther, H., Schilke, P., Sridharan, T. K., et al. 2002, A&A, 383, 892
  • Boogert et al. (2011) Boogert, A. C. A., Huard, T. L., Cook, A. M., et al. 2011, ApJ, 729, 92
  • Bragança et al. (2019) Bragança, G. A., Daflon, S., Lanz, T., et al. 2019, A&A, 625, A120
  • Brand & Wouterloot (1994) Brand, J., & Wouterloot, J. G. A. 1994, A&AS, 103, 503
  • Brand & Wouterloot (2007) —. 2007, A&A, 464, 909
  • Burles (2002) Burles, S. 2002, Planet. Space Sci., 50, 1245
  • Caselli & Ceccarelli (2012) Caselli, P., & Ceccarelli, C. 2012, A&A Rev., 20, 56
  • Ceccarelli et al. (2014) Ceccarelli, C., Caselli, P., Bockelée-Morvan, D., et al. 2014, in Protostars and Planets VI, ed. H. Beuther, R. S. Klessen, C. P. Dullemond, & T. Henning, 859
  • Charnley (1997) Charnley, S. B. 1997, ApJ, 481, 396
  • Chin et al. (1996) Chin, Y.-N., Henkel, C., Whiteoak, J. B., Langer, N., & Churchwell, E. B. 1996, A&A, 305, 960
  • Choudhury et al. (2016) Choudhury, S., Subramaniam, A., & Cole, A. A. 2016, MNRAS, 455, 1855
  • Cox (2000) Cox, A. N. 2000, Allen’s astrophysical quantities (Springer)
  • Draine (2003) Draine, B. T. 2003, ARA&A, 41, 241
  • Drozdovskaya et al. (2019) Drozdovskaya, M. N., van Dishoeck, E. F., Rubin, M., Jørgensen, J. K., & Altwegg, K. 2019, MNRAS, 490, 50
  • Drozdovskaya et al. (2021) Drozdovskaya, M. N., Schroeder I, I. R. H. G., Rubin, M., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 500, 4901
  • Dufour et al. (1982) Dufour, R. J., Shields, G. A., & Talbot, Jr., R. J. 1982, ApJ, 252, 461
  • Ferguson et al. (1998) Ferguson, A. M. N., Gallagher, J. S., & Wyse, R. F. G. 1998, AJ, 116, 673
  • Fernández-Martín et al. (2017) Fernández-Martín, A., Pérez-Montero, E., Vílchez, J. M., & Mampaso, A. 2017, A&A, 597, A84
  • Fuente et al. (1993) Fuente, A., Martin-Pintado, J., Cernicharo, J., & Bachiller, R. 1993, A&A, 276, 473
  • Fuente et al. (2014) Fuente, A., Cernicharo, J., Caselli, P., et al. 2014, A&A, 568, A65
  • Furuya et al. (2016) Furuya, K., van Dishoeck, E. F., & Aikawa, Y. 2016, A&A, 586, A127
  • Garrod & Herbst (2006) Garrod, R. T., & Herbst, E. 2006, A&A, 457, 927
  • Goldsmith & Langer (1999) Goldsmith, P. F., & Langer, W. D. 1999, ApJ, 517, 209
  • Herbst & van Dishoeck (2009) Herbst, E., & van Dishoeck, E. F. 2009, ARA&A, 47, 427
  • Hirano et al. (2010) Hirano, N., Ho, P. P. T., Liu, S.-Y., et al. 2010, ApJ, 717, 58
  • Hudson & Moore (1999) Hudson, R. L., & Moore, M. H. 1999, Icarus, 140, 451
  • Humire et al. (2020) Humire, P. K., Thiel, V., Henkel, C., et al. 2020, A&A, 642, A222
  • Izumi et al. (2017) Izumi, N., Kobayashi, N., Yasui, C., Saito, M., & Hamano, S. 2017, AJ, 154, 163
  • Jansen et al. (1995) Jansen, D. J., Spaans, M., Hogerheijde, M. R., & van Dishoeck, E. F. 1995, A&A, 303, 541
  • Kobayashi et al. (2008) Kobayashi, N., Yasui, C., Tokunaga, A. T., & Saito, M. 2008, ApJ, 683, 178
  • Kurtz et al. (2000) Kurtz, S., Cesaroni, R., Churchwell, E., Hofner, P., & Walmsley, C. M. 2000, Protostars and Planets IV, 299
  • Linsky et al. (2006) Linsky, J. L., Draine, B. T., Moos, H. W., et al. 2006, ApJ, 647, 1106
  • Matsushita et al. (2019) Matsushita, Y., Takahashi, S., Machida, M. N., & Tomisaka, K. 2019, ApJ, 871, 221
  • Maud et al. (2015) Maud, L. T., Moore, T. J. T., Lumsden, S. L., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 453, 645
  • McMullin et al. (2007) McMullin, J. P., Waters, B., Schiebel, D., Young, W., & Golap, K. 2007, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 376, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVI, ed. R. A. Shaw, F. Hill, & D. J. Bell, 127
  • Müller et al. (2005) Müller, H. S. P., Schlöder, F., Stutzki, J., & Winnewisser, G. 2005, Journal of Molecular Structure, 742, 215
  • Müller et al. (2001) Müller, H. S. P., Thorwirth, S., Roth, D. A., & Winnewisser, G. 2001, A&A, 370, L49
  • Nakanishi & Sofue (2016) Nakanishi, H., & Sofue, Y. 2016, PASJ, 68, 5
  • Nomura & Millar (2004) Nomura, H., & Millar, T. J. 2004, A&A, 414, 409
  • Ossenkopf & Henning (1994) Ossenkopf, V., & Henning, T. 1994, A&A, 291, 943
  • Pauly & Garrod (2018) Pauly, T., & Garrod, R. T. 2018, ApJ, 854, 13
  • Persson et al. (2018) Persson, M. V., Jørgensen, J. K., Müller, H. S. P., et al. 2018, A&A, 610, A54
  • Pety et al. (2017) Pety, J., Guzmán, V. V., Orkisz, J. H., et al. 2017, A&A, 599, A98
  • Pickett et al. (1998) Pickett, H. M., Poynter, R. L., Cohen, E. A., et al. 1998, J. Quant. Spec. Radiat. Transf., 60, 883
  • Prodanović et al. (2010) Prodanović, T., Steigman, G., & Fields, B. D. 2010, MNRAS, 406, 1108
  • Roberts et al. (2003) Roberts, H., Herbst, E., & Millar, T. J. 2003, ApJ, 591, L41
  • Robitaille et al. (2007) Robitaille, T. P., Whitney, B. A., Indebetouw, R., & Wood, K. 2007, ApJS, 169, 328
  • Rodriguez-Franco et al. (1998) Rodriguez-Franco, A., Martin-Pintado, J., & Fuente, A. 1998, A&A, 329, 1097
  • Russell & Dopita (1992) Russell, S. C., & Dopita, M. A. 1992, ApJ, 384, 508
  • Schutte & Greenberg (1997) Schutte, W. A., & Greenberg, J. M. 1997, A&A, 317, L43
  • Sewiło et al. (2018) Sewiło, M., Indebetouw, R., Charnley, S. B., et al. 2018, ApJ, 853, L19
  • Shimonishi et al. (2016a) Shimonishi, T., Dartois, E., Onaka, T., & Boulanger, F. 2016a, A&A, 585, A107
  • Shimonishi et al. (2020) Shimonishi, T., Das, A., Sakai, N., et al. 2020, ApJ, 891, 164
  • Shimonishi et al. (2016b) Shimonishi, T., Onaka, T., Kawamura, A., & Aikawa, Y. 2016b, ApJ, 827, 72
  • Skrutskie et al. (2006) Skrutskie, M. F., Cutri, R. M., Stiening, R., et al. 2006, AJ, 131, 1163
  • Sternberg & Dalgarno (1995) Sternberg, A., & Dalgarno, A. 1995, ApJS, 99, 565
  • Sutton et al. (1995) Sutton, E. C., Peng, R., Danchi, W. C., et al. 1995, ApJS, 97, 455
  • Tafalla et al. (2015) Tafalla, M., Bachiller, R., Lefloch, B., et al. 2015, A&A, 573, L2
  • Tafalla et al. (2010) Tafalla, M., Santiago-García, J., Hacar, A., & Bachiller, R. 2010, A&A, 522, A91
  • Taquet et al. (2014) Taquet, V., Charnley, S. B., & Sipilä, O. 2014, ApJ, 791, 1
  • Taquet et al. (2016) Taquet, V., Wirström, E. S., & Charnley, S. B. 2016, ApJ, 821, 46
  • Tychoniec et al. (2019) Tychoniec, Ł., Hull, C. L. H., Kristensen, L. E., et al. 2019, A&A, 632, A101
  • van der Tak et al. (2007) van der Tak, F. F. S., Black, J. H., Schöier, F. L., Jansen, D. J., & van Dishoeck, E. F. 2007, A&A, 468, 627
  • van Dishoeck & Blake (1998) van Dishoeck, E. F., & Blake, G. A. 1998, ARA&A, 36, 317
  • Vasyunin & Herbst (2013) Vasyunin, A. I., & Herbst, E. 2013, ApJ, 769, 34
  • Watanabe et al. (2007) Watanabe, N., Mouri, O., Nagaoka, A., et al. 2007, ApJ, 668, 1001
  • Wenger et al. (2019) Wenger, T. V., Balser, D. S., Anderson, L. D., & Bania, T. M. 2019, ApJ, 887, 114
  • Wenger et al. (2021) Wenger, T. V., Dawson, J. R., Dickey, J. M., et al. 2021, ApJS, 254, 36
  • Westerlund (1990) Westerlund, B. E. 1990, A&A Rev., 2, 29
  • Whittet et al. (2001) Whittet, D. C. B., Gerakines, P. A., Hough, J. H., & Shenoy, S. S. 2001, ApJ, 547, 872
  • Wilson & Rood (1994) Wilson, T. L., & Rood, R. 1994, ARA&A, 32, 191
  • Wirström et al. (2011) Wirström, E. S., Geppert, W. D., Hjalmarson, Å., et al. 2011, A&A, 533, A24
  • Wouterloot et al. (1993) Wouterloot, J. G. A., Brand, J., & Fiegle, K. 1993, A&AS, 98, 589
  • Wright et al. (2010) Wright, E. L., Eisenhardt, P. R. M., Mainzer, A. K., et al. 2010, AJ, 140, 1868
  • Yamamura et al. (2010) Yamamura, I., Makiuti, S., Ikeda, N., et al. 2010, VizieR Online Data Catalog, II/298
  • Yasui et al. (2006) Yasui, C., Kobayashi, N., Tokunaga, A. T., Terada, H., & Saito, M. 2006, ApJ, 649, 753
  • Zahorecz et al. (2021) Zahorecz, S., Jimenez-Serra, I., Testi, L., et al. 2021, A&A, 653, A45
  • Zinnecker & Yorke (2007) Zinnecker, H., & Yorke, H. W. 2007, ARA&A, 45, 481
  • Ziurys et al. (1991) Ziurys, L. M., McGonagle, D., Minh, Y., & Irvine, W. M. 1991, ApJ, 373, 535
\restartappendixnumbering

Appendix A Measured line parameters

Tables 513 summarize measured line parameters (see Section 3.1 for details). The tabulated uncertainties and upper limits are of 2σ\sigma level and do not include systematic errors due to continuum subtraction. Upper limits are estimated assuming Δ\DeltaVV = 4 km s-1.

\startlongtable
Table 5: Line Parameters for HDO, H13CO+, HC18O+, CCH, c-C3H2, H2CO, HDCO, D2CO
Molecule Transition EuE_{u} Frequency TbrT_{br} Δ\DeltaVV Tbr𝑑V\int T_{br}dV VLSRV_{LSR} RMS Note
(K) (GHz) (K) (km/s) (K km/s) (km/s) (K)
HDO 21,1–21,2 95 241.56155 0.99 ±\pm 0.03 4.8 5.05 ±\pm 0.29 34.6 0.04  \cdots
HDO 73,4–64,3 837 241.97357 0.28 ±\pm 0.02 2.1 0.63 ±\pm 0.12 34.1 0.04  \cdots
H13CO+ 3–2 25 260.25534 5.85 ±\pm 0.02 2.3 14.23 ±\pm 0.13 34.1 0.03  \cdots
HC18O+ 4–3 41 340.63069 0.64 ±\pm 0.05 1.9 1.29 ±\pm 0.20 34.1 0.07  \cdots
CCH N = 4–3, J = 92\frac{9}{2}72\frac{7}{2}, F = 5–4 42 349.33771 4.39 ±\pm 0.04 2.6 12.32 ±\pm 0.24 33.7 0.08 (1)
CCH N = 4–3, J = 72\frac{7}{2}52\frac{5}{2}, F = 4–3 42 349.39928 3.54 ±\pm 0.04 2.8 10.49 ±\pm 0.26 33.7 0.08 (1)
c-C3H2 32,1–21,2 18 244.22215 0.23 ±\pm 0.02 4.8 1.18 ±\pm 0.27 33.6 0.04  \cdots
c-C3H2 53,2–44,1 45 260.47975 0.09 ±\pm 0.02 1.6 0.15 ±\pm 0.10 32.9 0.03 (2)
H2CO 51,5–41,4 62 351.76864 7.02 ±\pm 0.05 3.7 27.32 ±\pm 0.40 34.2 0.08  \cdots
HDCO 42,3–32,2 63 257.74870 0.94 ±\pm 0.02 2.8 2.80 ±\pm 0.14 34.3 0.03  \cdots
HDCO 42,2–32,1 63 259.03491 0.97 ±\pm 0.02 2.9 3.00 ±\pm 0.18 34.3 0.03  \cdots
D2CO 41,3–31,2 35 245.53275 0.64 ±\pm 0.03 2.3 1.54 ±\pm 0.15 34.2 0.04  \cdots
D2CO 62,5–52,4 80 349.63061 0.76 ±\pm 0.04 2.4 1.92 ±\pm 0.23 33.9 0.08  \cdots

Note. — (1) Blend of two hyperfine components.

\startlongtable
Table 6: Line Parameters for N-bearing molecules
Molecule Transition EuE_{u} Frequency TbrT_{br} Δ\DeltaVV Tbr𝑑V\int T_{br}dV VLSRV_{LSR} RMS Note
(K) (GHz) (K) (km/s) (K km/s) (km/s) (K)
H13CN 3–2 25 259.01180 3.25 ±\pm 0.02 4.2 14.45 ±\pm 0.19 34.3 0.03  \cdots
HC15N 3–2 25 258.15700 1.95 ±\pm 0.02 3.6 7.45 ±\pm 0.19 34.3 0.03  \cdots
CN N = 3–2, J = 52\frac{5}{2}52\frac{5}{2}, F = 32\frac{3}{2}32\frac{3}{2} 33 339.44678 0.30 ±\pm 0.04 2.6 0.82 ±\pm 0.22 34.6 0.07  \cdots
CN N = 3–2, J = 52\frac{5}{2}52\frac{5}{2}, F = 52\frac{5}{2}52\frac{5}{2} 33 339.47590 0.39 ±\pm 0.04 1.7 0.71 ±\pm 0.17 34.0 0.07  \cdots
CN N = 3–2, J = 52\frac{5}{2}52\frac{5}{2}, F = 72\frac{7}{2}72\frac{7}{2} 33 339.51664 0.73 ±\pm 0.04 1.8 1.38 ±\pm 0.18 34.1 0.07  \cdots
CN N = 3–2, J = 52\frac{5}{2}32\frac{3}{2}, F = 52\frac{5}{2}52\frac{5}{2} 33 340.00813 0.95 ±\pm 0.04 2.1 2.16 ±\pm 0.20 33.9 0.07  \cdots
CN N = 3–2, J = 52\frac{5}{2}32\frac{3}{2}, F = 32\frac{3}{2}32\frac{3}{2} 33 340.01963 0.93 ±\pm 0.04 1.8 1.81 ±\pm 0.17 34.1 0.07  \cdots
CN N = 3–2, J = 52\frac{5}{2}32\frac{3}{2}, F = 72\frac{7}{2}52\frac{5}{2} 33 340.03155 3.08 ±\pm 0.04 2.7 8.71 ±\pm 0.25 33.8 0.07  \cdots
CN N = 3–2, J = 52\frac{5}{2}32\frac{3}{2}, F = 52\frac{5}{2}32\frac{3}{2} 33 340.03541 3.04 ±\pm 0.04 2.1 6.87 ±\pm 0.26 33.7 0.07 (1)
CN N = 3–2, J = 72\frac{7}{2}52\frac{5}{2}, F = 92\frac{9}{2}72\frac{7}{2} 33 340.24777 4.38 ±\pm 0.03 2.4 11.32 ±\pm 0.22 33.4 0.07 (1)
CN N = 3–2, J = 72\frac{7}{2}52\frac{5}{2}, F = 52\frac{5}{2}52\frac{5}{2} 33 340.26177 0.91 ±\pm 0.04 1.9 1.85 ±\pm 0.18 34.1 0.07  \cdots
CN N = 3–2, J = 72\frac{7}{2}52\frac{5}{2}, F = 72\frac{7}{2}72\frac{7}{2} 33 340.26495 1.02 ±\pm 0.04 2.0 2.12 ±\pm 0.18 33.9 0.07  \cdots
NO J = 72\frac{7}{2}52\frac{5}{2}, Ω\Omega = 12\frac{1}{2}, F = 92\frac{9}{2}+72\frac{7}{2}- 36 351.04352 0.29 ±\pm 0.03 2.5 0.78 ±\pm 0.22 33.7 0.08  \cdots
NO J = 72\frac{7}{2}52\frac{5}{2}, Ω\Omega = 12\frac{1}{2}, F = 72\frac{7}{2}+52\frac{5}{2}- 36 351.05171 0.50 ±\pm 0.04 2.1 1.10 ±\pm 0.20 34.3 0.08 (2)
HNCO 114,7–104,6 720 241.49864 0.32 ±\pm 0.08 4.8 1.20 ±\pm 0.13 33.8 0.04 (2)
HNCO 113,9–103,8 445 241.61930 0.51 ±\pm 0.02 4.1 2.19 ±\pm 0.25 33.6 0.04 (2)
HNCO 112,10–102,9 240 241.70385 <<0.60  \cdots <<2.6  \cdots 0.04 (3)
HNCO 110,11–100,10 70 241.77403 0.93 ±\pm 0.02 4.9 4.87 ±\pm 0.26 34.6 0.04  \cdots
HNCO 111,10–101,9 113 242.63970 0.79 ±\pm 0.02 5.0 4.18 ±\pm 0.27 34.7 0.04  \cdots
HNCO 161,16–151,15 186 350.33306 0.69 ±\pm 0.04 5.1 3.73 ±\pm 0.44 34.5 0.08  \cdots
HNCO 164,13–154,12 794 351.24085 <<0.25  \cdots <<1.1  \cdots 0.08 (3)
HNCO 163,14–153,13 518 351.41680 0.33 ±\pm 0.04 5.2 1.83 ±\pm 0.45 34.4 0.08 (2)
HNCO 162,15–152,14 314 351.53780 0.43 ±\pm 0.03 5.4 2.47 ±\pm 0.49 34.1 0.08  \cdots
HNCO 162,14–152,13 314 351.55157 0.46 ±\pm 0.03 5.8 2.82 ±\pm 0.53 35.2 0.08  \cdots
HNCO 160,16–150,15 143 351.63326 0.72 ±\pm 0.04 4.0 3.02 ±\pm 0.41 34.6 0.08  \cdots
HNCO 231,23–240,24 333 351.99487 0.33 ±\pm 0.03 5.5 1.91 ±\pm 0.47 35.9 0.08  \cdots
CH3CN 1410–1310 806 257.03344 0.14 ±\pm 0.02 2.4 0.36 ±\pm 0.10 34.0 0.03 (2)
CH3CN 149–13-9 671 257.12704 <<0.35  \cdots <<1.5  \cdots 0.03 (2) (4)
CH3CN 148–138 549 257.21088 0.24 ±\pm 0.01 6.3 1.64 ±\pm 0.27 34.9 0.03 (2)
CH3CN 147–137 442 257.28494 0.42 ±\pm 0.02 4.9 2.20 ±\pm 0.21 34.3 0.03 (2)
CH3CN 146–13-6 350 257.34918 0.90 ±\pm 0.02 4.7 4.51 ±\pm 0.20 34.4 0.03 (2)
CH3CN 145–135 271 257.40358 <<1.00  \cdots <<4.3  \cdots 0.03 (2) (3)
CH3CN 144–134 207 257.44813 1.14 ±\pm 0.02 4.3 5.22 ±\pm 0.19 34.4 0.03 (2)
CH3CN 143–13-3 157 257.48279 1.55 ±\pm 0.02 4.6 7.55 ±\pm 0.20 34.5 0.03 (2)
CH3CN 142–132 121 257.50756 1.56 ±\pm 0.02 4.4 7.34 ±\pm 0.20 34.6 0.03 (2)
CH3CN 141–131 100 257.52243 1.63 ±\pm 0.02 3.8 6.61 ±\pm 0.18 34.7 0.03 (2)
CH3CN 140–130 93 257.52738 1.69 ±\pm 0.02 4.3 7.79 ±\pm 0.18 34.4 0.03  \cdots
CH3CN 196–18-6 425 349.21231 0.73 ±\pm 0.04 3.9 3.07 ±\pm 0.35 34.2 0.08 (2)
CH3CN 195–185 346 349.28601 0.81 ±\pm 0.04 3.4 2.97 ±\pm 0.30 34.3 0.08 (2)
CH3CN 194–184 282 349.34634 0.92 ±\pm 0.03 4.3 4.18 ±\pm 0.40 34.4 0.08 (2)
CH3CN 193–18-3 232 349.39330 1.24 ±\pm 0.03 4.1 5.38 ±\pm 0.39 34.4 0.08 (5)
CH3CN 192–182 196 349.42685 1.04 ±\pm 0.04 4.2 4.72 ±\pm 0.37 34.6 0.08 (2)
CH3CN 191–181 175 349.44699 1.25 ±\pm 0.03 4.1 5.42 ±\pm 0.38 34.5 0.08 (5)
CH3CN 190–180 168 349.45370 1.23 ±\pm 0.04 3.9 5.10 ±\pm 0.38 34.2 0.08  \cdots
13CH3CN 190–180 163 339.36630 <<0.11  \cdots <<0.45  \cdots 0.05  \cdots
HC3N 27–26 165 245.60632 1.55 ±\pm 0.03 4.2 7.02 ±\pm 0.25 34.3 0.04  \cdots

Note. — (1) Blend of three hyperfine components. (2) Blend of three two components. (3) Blend with CH3OH. (4) Blend with HCOOCH3. (5) Blend of four hyperfine components.

\startlongtable
Table 7: Line Parameters for Si- and S-bearing molecules
Molecule Transition EuE_{u} Frequency TbrT_{br} Δ\DeltaVV Tbr𝑑V\int T_{br}dV VLSRV_{LSR} RMS Note
(K) (GHz) (K) (km/s) (K km/s) (km/s) (K)
SiO 6–5 44 260.51801 0.64 ±\pm 0.02 2.7 1.86 ±\pm 0.13 34.1 0.03  \cdots
SO NJN_{J} = 66–55 56 258.25583 5.34 ±\pm 0.02 3.6 20.20 ±\pm 0.19 34.1 0.03  \cdots
SO NJN_{J} = 33–23 26 339.34146 0.49 ±\pm 0.04 3.4 1.76 ±\pm 0.34 34.0 0.07  \cdots
SO NJN_{J} = 87–76 81 340.71416 3.85 ±\pm 0.04 3.9 15.81 ±\pm 0.39 34.2 0.07  \cdots
34SO NJN_{J} = 33–23 25 337.89225 <<0.15  \cdots <<0.6  \cdots 0.07  \cdots
34SO NJN_{J} = 89–78 77 339.85727 0.69 ±\pm 0.04 4.4 3.26 ±\pm 0.38 33.0 0.07  \cdots
33SO NJN_{J} = 67–56 47 259.28403 0.34 ±\pm 0.07 6.8 0.81 ±\pm 0.06 33.5 0.03 (1) (2)
CS 5–4 35 244.93556 14.57 ±\pm 0.03 3.2 49.51 ±\pm 0.20 33.9 0.04  \cdots
C33S 5–4 35 242.91361 1.31 ±\pm 0.02 3.7 5.18 ±\pm 0.21 34.2 0.04  \cdots
C33S 7–6 65 340.05257 1.05 ±\pm 0.04 3.9 4.35 ±\pm 0.34 34.3 0.07  \cdots
C34S 7–6 65 337.39646 2.46 ±\pm 0.04 3.3 8.65 ±\pm 0.31 34.1 0.07  \cdots
H2CS 71,6–61,5 60 244.04850 2.91 ±\pm 0.03 3.0 9.37 ±\pm 0.19 34.2 0.04  \cdots
H2CS 101,10–91,9 102 338.08319 1.68 ±\pm 0.04 3.9 7.04 ±\pm 0.36 34.2 0.07  \cdots
OCS 20–19 123 243.21804 1.82 ±\pm 0.03 4.2 8.17 ±\pm 0.24 34.3 0.04  \cdots
OCS 28–27 237 340.44927 1.26 ±\pm 0.04 4.0 5.40 ±\pm 0.39 34.5 0.07  \cdots
OCS 29–28 254 352.59957 1.05 ±\pm 0.04 4.5 5.01 ±\pm 0.40 34.3 0.08  \cdots
O13CS 20–19 122 242.43543 0.20 ±\pm 0.02 4.8 1.00 ±\pm 0.32 34.9 0.04  \cdots
SO2 52,4–41,3 24 241.61580 0.88 ±\pm 0.02 5.1 4.79 ±\pm 0.28 34.2 0.04 (3)
SO2 268,18–277,21 480 243.24543 <<0.10  \cdots <<0.4  \cdots 0.04  \cdots
SO2 140,14–131,13 94 244.25422 1.15 ±\pm 0.02 6.3 7.67 ±\pm 0.33 34.2 0.04  \cdots
SO2 263,23–254,22 351 245.33923 0.41 ±\pm 0.02 2.8 1.21 ±\pm 0.15 34.5 0.04  \cdots
SO2 103,7–102,8 73 245.56342 1.04 ±\pm 0.02 5.3 5.86 ±\pm 0.27 34.3 0.04  \cdots
SO2 73,5–72,6 48 257.09997 0.96 ±\pm 0.02 5.6 5.76 ±\pm 0.24 34.2 0.03 (4)
SO2 324,28–323,29 531 258.38872 0.46 ±\pm 0.02 4.1 2.01 ±\pm 0.21 33.9 0.03  \cdots
SO2 207,13–216,16 313 258.66697 0.32 ±\pm 0.07 3.4 0.76 ±\pm 0.08 33.1 0.03 (2)
SO2 93,7–92,8 63 258.94220 0.91 ±\pm 0.02 5.4 5.26 ±\pm 0.23 34.4 0.03  \cdots
SO2 184,14–183,15 197 338.30599 0.65 ±\pm 0.03 4.4 3.09 ±\pm 0.37 34.0 0.07  \cdots
SO2 201,19–192,18 199 338.61181 <<0.90  \cdots <<3.8  \cdots 0.07 (5)
SO2 282,26–281,27 392 340.31641 0.48 ±\pm 0.03 6.0 3.02 ±\pm 0.50 34.5 0.07  \cdots
SO2 53,3–42,2 36 351.25722 0.75 ±\pm 0.04 5.9 4.73 ±\pm 0.51 34.1 0.08  \cdots
SO2 144,10–143,11 136 351.87387 0.70 ±\pm 0.03 4.4 3.32 ±\pm 0.38 34.0 0.08  \cdots
34SO2 140,14–131,13 94 244.48152 0.34 ±\pm 0.02 1.5 0.54 ±\pm 0.09 33.6 0.04  \cdots
13CH3SH 141,14–131,13 A 131 350.00956 <<0.15  \cdots <<0.7  \cdots 0.08  \cdots

Note. — (1) Blend of four hyperfine components. (2) The integrated intensity is calculated by directly integrating the spectrum. (3) Partial blend with HNCO. (4) Blend with HCOOCH3. (5) Blend with CH3OH.

\startlongtable
Table 8: Line Parameters for CH3OH, 13CH3OH, and CH2DOH
Molecule Transition EuE_{u} Frequency TbrT_{br} Δ\DeltaVV Tbr𝑑V\int T_{br}dV VLSRV_{LSR} RMS Note
(K) (GHz) (K) (km/s) (K km/s) (km/s) (K)
CH3OH 253 A-–252 A+ 804 241.58876 0.72 ±\pm 0.02 4.5 3.49 ±\pm 0.25 34.5 0.04  \cdots
CH3OH 50 E–40 E 48 241.70016 2.45 ±\pm 0.03 4.0 10.57 ±\pm 0.24 34.2 0.04  \cdots
CH3OH 5-1 E–4-1 E 40 241.76723 3.70 ±\pm 0.03 3.2 12.53 ±\pm 0.20 34.2 0.04  \cdots
CH3OH 50 A+–40 A+ 35 241.79135 4.15 ±\pm 0.03 3.0 13.29 ±\pm 0.19 34.1 0.04  \cdots
CH3OH 54 A-–44 A- 115 241.80652 1.46 ±\pm 0.02 4.3 6.65 ±\pm 0.23 34.7 0.04 (1)
CH3OH 5-4 E–4-4 E 123 241.81325 1.33 ±\pm 0.02 4.3 6.13 ±\pm 0.23 34.7 0.04  \cdots
CH3OH 53 A+–43 A+ 85 241.83272 2.08 ±\pm 0.02 4.2 9.35 ±\pm 0.25 34.3 0.04 (2)
CH3OH 52 A-–42 A- 73 241.84228 2.13 ±\pm 0.02 5.0 11.37 ±\pm 0.26 33.7 0.04 (1)
CH3OH 5-3 E–4-3 E 98 241.85230 1.54 ±\pm 0.02 4.4 7.13 ±\pm 0.23 34.6 0.04  \cdots
CH3OH 51 E–41 E 56 241.87903 2.26 ±\pm 0.03 3.9 9.26 ±\pm 0.23 34.4 0.04  \cdots
CH3OH 52 A+–42 A+ 73 241.88767 1.82 ±\pm 0.03 3.9 7.63 ±\pm 0.23 34.5 0.04  \cdots
CH3OH 5-2 E–4-2 E 61 241.90415 2.94 ±\pm 0.03 3.8 11.83 ±\pm 0.21 34.0 0.04 (1)
CH3OH 14-1 E–13-2 E 249 242.44608 1.28 ±\pm 0.02 4.8 6.55 ±\pm 0.25 34.6 0.04 (3)
CH3OH 243 A-–242 A+ 746 242.49024 0.88 ±\pm 0.02 4.6 4.30 ±\pm 0.25 34.4 0.04  \cdots
CH3OH 51 A-–41 A- 50 243.91579 2.75 ±\pm 0.02 3.6 10.69 ±\pm 0.21 34.3 0.04  \cdots
CH3OH 223 A-–222 A+ 637 244.33037 1.06 ±\pm 0.02 4.9 5.54 ±\pm 0.27 34.6 0.04  \cdots
CH3OH 91 E–80 E , νt\nu_{t} = 1 396 244.33798 1.08 ±\pm 0.02 4.7 5.38 ±\pm 0.25 34.6 0.04  \cdots
CH3OH 18-6 E–17-7 E , νt\nu_{t} = 1 889 245.09450 0.31 ±\pm 0.02 4.1 1.35 ±\pm 0.26 34.3 0.04  \cdots
CH3OH 213 A-–212 A+ 586 245.22302 1.22 ±\pm 0.03 4.2 5.50 ±\pm 0.24 34.4 0.04  \cdots
CH3OH 183 A+–182 A- 447 257.40209 1.50 ±\pm 0.02 6.0 9.52 ±\pm 0.25 34.0 0.03 (4)
CH3OH 193 A+–192 A- 491 258.78025 1.22 ±\pm 0.02 5.4 7.05 ±\pm 0.23 34.1 0.03  \cdots
CH3OH 172 A-–161 A- , νt\nu_{t} = 1 653 259.27369 0.79 ±\pm 0.02 4.2 3.54 ±\pm 0.19 34.6 0.03  \cdots
CH3OH 241 E–240 E 717 259.58140 0.62 ±\pm 0.02 4.4 2.89 ±\pm 0.18 34.7 0.03  \cdots
CH3OH 20-8 E–21-7 E 808 260.06432 0.43 ±\pm 0.02 3.8 1.75 ±\pm 0.17 34.8 0.03  \cdots
CH3OH 203 A+–202 A- 537 260.38146 1.22 ±\pm 0.01 4.7 6.02 ±\pm 0.25 34.3 0.03  \cdots
CH3OH 74 A+–64 A+ , νt\nu_{t} = 2 679 337.27356 0.59 ±\pm 0.04 4.3 2.68 ±\pm 0.49 34.5 0.07 (1)
CH3OH 7-2 E–6-2 E , νt\nu_{t} = 2 710 337.27918 0.54 ±\pm 0.03 2.7 1.54 ±\pm 0.48 34.8 0.07  \cdots
CH3OH 70 A+–60 A+ , νt\nu_{t} = 2 573 337.28432 0.78 ±\pm 0.03 5.3 4.36 ±\pm 0.45 34.7 0.07  \cdots
CH3OH 71 A+–61 A+ , νt\nu_{t} = 1 390 337.29748 0.97 ±\pm 0.03 4.1 4.25 ±\pm 0.39 35.3 0.07 (1)
CH3OH 72 E–62 E , νt\nu_{t} = 2 651 337.30264 0.65 ±\pm 0.03 4.2 2.94 ±\pm 0.39 34.5 0.07  \cdots
CH3OH 7-1 E–6-1 E , νt\nu_{t} = 2 597 337.31236 0.57 ±\pm 0.04 4.7 2.87 ±\pm 0.41 34.3 0.07  \cdots
CH3OH 76 A+–66 A+ , νt\nu_{t} = 1 533 337.46370 0.62 ±\pm 0.04 5.5 3.62 ±\pm 0.47 34.6 0.07 (1)
CH3OH 100 E–9-9 E , νt\nu_{t} = 1 916 337.47259 0.40 ±\pm 0.04 5.6 2.38 ±\pm 0.47 33.8 0.07  \cdots
CH3OH 7-6 E–6-6 E , νt\nu_{t} = 1 558 337.49056 0.71 ±\pm 0.04 4.3 3.23 ±\pm 0.36 34.8 0.07 (5)
CH3OH 73 E–63 E , νt\nu_{t} = 1 482 337.51914 0.80 ±\pm 0.04 4.3 3.68 ±\pm 0.38 34.9 0.07  \cdots
CH3OH 75 A+–65 A+ , νt\nu_{t} = 1 485 337.54612 0.84 ±\pm 0.04 4.7 4.19 ±\pm 0.39 34.7 0.07 (1)
CH3OH 74 E–64 E , νt\nu_{t} = 1 428 337.58168 <<1.00  \cdots <<4.3  \cdots 0.07 (6)
CH3OH 7-2 E–6-2 E , νt\nu_{t} = 1 429 337.60529 0.87 ±\pm 0.03 3.8 3.51 ±\pm 0.53 35.0 0.07  \cdots
CH3OH 7-3 E–6-3 E , νt\nu_{t} = 1 387 337.61066 1.01 ±\pm 0.03 3.7 4.03 ±\pm 0.32 34.6 0.07 (1)
CH3OH 72 A+–62 A+ , νt\nu_{t} = 1 363 337.62575 1.03 ±\pm 0.04 3.4 3.71 ±\pm 0.30 34.7 0.07  \cdots
CH3OH 72 A-–62 A- , νt\nu_{t} = 1 364 337.63575 1.00 ±\pm 0.03 4.1 4.34 ±\pm 0.39 34.6 0.07  \cdots
CH3OH 70 E–60 E , νt\nu_{t} = 1 365 337.64391 1.26 ±\pm 0.03 7.9 10.58 ±\pm 0.70 34.3 0.07 (2)
CH3OH 73 A+–63 A+ , νt\nu_{t} = 1 461 337.65520 0.98 ±\pm 0.03 3.2 3.34 ±\pm 0.33 34.4 0.07 (1)
CH3OH 74 A+–64 A+ , νt\nu_{t} = 1 546 337.68561 0.92 ±\pm 0.04 4.0 3.89 ±\pm 0.37 34.9 0.07 (2)
CH3OH 7-1 E–6-1 E , νt\nu_{t} = 1 478 337.70757 0.83 ±\pm 0.04 4.9 4.39 ±\pm 0.44 34.5 0.07  \cdots
CH3OH 70 A+–60 A+ , νt\nu_{t} = 1 488 337.74883 0.88 ±\pm 0.04 4.2 3.96 ±\pm 0.36 34.9 0.07  \cdots
CH3OH 20-6 E–21-5 E 676 337.83780 0.45 ±\pm 0.04 3.5 1.69 ±\pm 0.30 34.6 0.07  \cdots
CH3OH 71 A-–61 A- , νt\nu_{t} = 2 748 337.87755 0.51 ±\pm 0.04 3.2 1.75 ±\pm 0.28 34.6 0.07  \cdots
CH3OH 71 A-–61 A- , νt\nu_{t} = 1 390 337.96944 0.89 ±\pm 0.04 4.4 4.13 ±\pm 0.38 34.5 0.07  \cdots
CH3OH 70 E–60 E 78 338.12449 2.19 ±\pm 0.04 3.4 7.84 ±\pm 0.30 34.4 0.07  \cdots
CH3OH 7-1 E–6-1 E 71 338.34459 2.91 ±\pm 0.04 3.5 10.81 ±\pm 0.32 34.2 0.07  \cdots
CH3OH 76 E–66 E 244 338.40461 0.98 ±\pm 0.04 3.8 4.00 ±\pm 0.33 34.7 0.07  \cdots
CH3OH 70 A+–60 A+ 65 338.40870 3.41 ±\pm 0.03 2.9 10.59 ±\pm 0.28 34.1 0.07  \cdots
CH3OH 7-6 E–6-6 E 254 338.43097 0.88 ±\pm 0.03 4.6 4.25 ±\pm 0.38 34.6 0.07  \cdots
CH3OH 76 A+–66 A+ 259 338.44237 1.04 ±\pm 0.04 4.3 4.79 ±\pm 0.36 34.7 0.07 (1)
CH3OH 7-5 E–6-5 E 189 338.45654 1.12 ±\pm 0.03 4.7 5.62 ±\pm 0.39 34.5 0.07  \cdots
CH3OH 75 E–65 E 201 338.47523 1.15 ±\pm 0.03 4.1 5.02 ±\pm 0.34 34.6 0.07  \cdots
CH3OH 75 A+–65 A+ 203 338.48632 1.22 ±\pm 0.03 4.9 6.42 ±\pm 0.42 34.5 0.07 (1)
CH3OH 7-4 E–6-4 E 153 338.50407 1.31 ±\pm 0.03 4.7 6.52 ±\pm 0.41 34.8 0.07  \cdots
CH3OH 74 E–64 E 161 338.53026 1.30 ±\pm 0.04 4.2 5.87 ±\pm 0.35 34.4 0.07  \cdots
CH3OH 73 A+–63 A+ 115 338.54083 1.95 ±\pm 0.04 5.5 11.45 ±\pm 0.47 33.3 0.07 (1)
CH3OH 7-3 E–6-3 E 128 338.55996 1.40 ±\pm 0.04 4.5 6.74 ±\pm 0.38 34.4 0.07  \cdots
CH3OH 73 E–63 E 113 338.58322 1.46 ±\pm 0.04 4.3 6.70 ±\pm 0.37 34.6 0.07  \cdots
CH3OH 71 E–61 E 86 338.61494 1.95 ±\pm 0.04 4.4 9.18 ±\pm 0.38 34.4 0.07  \cdots
CH3OH 72 A+–62 A+ 103 338.63980 1.60 ±\pm 0.04 4.1 6.97 ±\pm 0.34 34.5 0.07  \cdots
CH3OH 7-2 E–6-2 E 91 338.72290 2.52 ±\pm 0.04 4.1 10.98 ±\pm 0.35 34.9 0.07 (1)
CH3OH 213 E–212 E , νt\nu_{t} = 1 951 339.42217 <<0.18  \cdots <<0.8  \cdots 0.07  \cdots
CH3OH 22 A+–31 A+ 45 340.14114 1.08 ±\pm 0.03 4.4 5.05 ±\pm 0.38 35.2 0.07  \cdots
CH3OH 166 A-–175 A- 509 340.39366 0.90 ±\pm 0.04 4.0 3.87 ±\pm 0.34 34.7 0.07  \cdots
CH3OH 111 E–100 E , νt\nu_{t} = 1 444 340.68397 0.98 ±\pm 0.03 5.1 5.29 ±\pm 0.46 34.8 0.07  \cdots
CH3OH 153 E–164 E , νt\nu_{t} = 1 695 350.28649 0.70 ±\pm 0.03 4.9 3.65 ±\pm 0.42 34.6 0.08  \cdots
CH3OH 40 E–3-1 E 36 350.68766 1.87 ±\pm 0.04 4.6 9.18 ±\pm 0.40 34.1 0.08  \cdots
CH3OH 183 E–182 E , νt\nu_{t} = 1 812 350.72388 <<0.25  \cdots <<1.1  \cdots 0.08  \cdots
CH3OH 11 A+–00 A+ 17 350.90510 2.38 ±\pm 0.04 3.7 9.29 ±\pm 0.33 34.4 0.08  \cdots
CH3OH 95 E–104 E 241 351.23648 0.97 ±\pm 0.04 4.7 4.82 ±\pm 0.40 34.5 0.08  \cdots
13CH3OH 42 A-–51 A- 60 242.37315 0.17 ±\pm 0.02 5.1 0.93 ±\pm 0.27 36.3 0.04  \cdots
13CH3OH 153 A+–152 A- 322 257.42179 0.48 ±\pm 0.02 3.9 2.02 ±\pm 0.18 34.5 0.03  \cdots
13CH3OH 163 A+–162 A- 358 258.15300 0.59 ±\pm 0.02 4.6 2.90 ±\pm 0.19 34.8 0.03 (7)
13CH3OH 173 A+–172 A- 396 259.03649 <<0.20  \cdots <<0.9  \cdots 0.03 (8)
13CH3OH 21 E–10 E 28 259.98653 0.54 ±\pm 0.02 2.9 1.68 ±\pm 0.16 34.5 0.03 (9)
13CH3OH 130 A+–121 A+ 206 338.75995 0.60 ±\pm 0.04 3.7 2.33 ±\pm 0.32 34.4 0.07  \cdots
13CH3OH 11 A+–00 A+ 17 350.10312 0.58 ±\pm 0.04 3.1 1.87 ±\pm 0.28 34.7 0.08  \cdots
13CH3OH 81 E–72 E 103 350.42158 0.49 ±\pm 0.04 4.6 2.38 ±\pm 0.41 34.0 0.08  \cdots
CH2DOH 112,9o1o_{1}–111,10o1o_{1} 177 242.03360 0.32 ±\pm 0.03 1.8 0.60 ±\pm 0.14 33.2 0.04  \cdots
CH2DOH 52,3e0e_{0}–51,4e0e_{0} 48 243.22599 0.56 ±\pm 0.02 2.9 1.74 ±\pm 0.17 35.5 0.04  \cdots
CH2DOH 42,2e0e_{0}–41,3e0e_{0} 38 244.84113 0.35 ±\pm 0.02 4.2 1.55 ±\pm 0.25 34.4 0.04  \cdots
CH2DOH 102,8o1o_{1}–101,9o1o_{1} 153 244.98885 0.13 ±\pm 0.02 3.9 0.54 ±\pm 0.22 34.7 0.04  \cdots
CH2DOH 52,3o1o_{1}–51,4o1o_{1} 68 257.39451 0.26 ±\pm 0.02 2.2 0.61 ±\pm 0.10 34.4 0.03  \cdots
CH2DOH 42,3e1e_{1}–31,3o1o_{1} 48 257.89567 0.30 ±\pm 0.02 2.3 0.72 ±\pm 0.09 34.6 0.03  \cdots
CH2DOH 42,3e0e_{0}–41,4e0e_{0} 38 258.33711 0.42 ±\pm 0.02 2.8 1.25 ±\pm 0.12 34.3 0.03  \cdots
CH2DOH 90,9e0e_{0}–81,8e0e_{0} 96 337.34866 0.63 ±\pm 0.04 2.8 1.84 ±\pm 0.25 35.1 0.07  \cdots
CH2DOH 61,6e0e_{0}–50,5e0e_{0} 48 338.95711 0.39 ±\pm 0.04 3.5 1.46 ±\pm 0.32 35.1 0.07  \cdots
CH2DOH 152,14o1o_{1}–151,14e1e_{1} 292 339.48572 0.24 ±\pm 0.03 2.2 0.56 ±\pm 0.20 34.9 0.07  \cdots
CH2DOH 62,4e1e_{1}–51,4o1o_{1} 72 340.12709 0.42 ±\pm 0.03 3.5 1.55 ±\pm 0.43 34.8 0.07  \cdots
CH2DOH 131,13e0e_{0}–120,12e1e_{1} 196 340.24344 0.57 ±\pm 0.03 2.9 1.76 ±\pm 0.33 34.2 0.07 (10)
CH2DOH 22,1e0e_{0}–11,0e0e_{0} 23 340.34829 0.29 ±\pm 0.04 3.7 1.15 ±\pm 0.32 34.1 0.07  \cdots
CH2DOH 134,9e1e_{1}–133,11o1o_{1} 267 349.18383 0.24 ±\pm 0.04 2.2 0.57 ±\pm 0.22 34.3 0.08  \cdots
CH2DOH 124,8e1e_{1}–123,10o1o_{1} 239 349.35613 0.22 ±\pm 0.04 3.1 0.75 ±\pm 0.30 35.3 0.08  \cdots
CH2DOH 114,8e1e_{1}–113,8o1o_{1} 213 349.49521 0.22 ±\pm 0.04 3.7 0.85 ±\pm 0.32 34.3 0.08 (11)
CH2DOH 114,7e1e_{1}–113,9o1o_{1} 213 349.50887 0.47 ±\pm 0.04 1.6 0.80 ±\pm 0.22 34.8 0.08  \cdots
CH2DOH 104,6e1e_{1}–103,8o1o_{1} 190 349.64360 0.32 ±\pm 0.04 2.8 0.97 ±\pm 0.28 34.4 0.08  \cdots
CH2DOH 94,5e1e_{1}–93,7o1o_{1} 168 349.76168 0.30 ±\pm 0.04 7.2 2.31 ±\pm 0.62 36.4 0.08 (12)
CH2DOH 84,5e1e_{1}–83,5o1o_{1} 149 349.86211 0.34 ±\pm 0.04 6.0 2.15 ±\pm 0.55 33.4 0.08 (12)
CH2DOH 74,4e1e_{1}–73,4o1o_{1} 132 349.95168 0.48 ±\pm 0.03 3.4 1.73 ±\pm 0.29 34.3 0.08 (12)
CH2DOH 64,3e1e_{1}–63,3o1o_{1} 117 350.02735 0.64 ±\pm 0.04 2.4 1.60 ±\pm 0.26 34.2 0.08 (12)
CH2DOH 54,2e1e_{1}–53,2o1o_{1} 104 350.09024 0.57 ±\pm 0.04 2.0 1.21 ±\pm 0.23 34.2 0.08 (12)
CH2DOH 44,1e1e_{1}–43,1o1o_{1} 94 350.14130 0.33 ±\pm 0.03 4.0 1.41 ±\pm 0.37 33.8 0.08 (12)
CH2DOH 62,5e1e_{1}–51,5o1o_{1} 72 350.45387 0.53 ±\pm 0.03 2.6 1.46 ±\pm 0.28 34.2 0.08  \cdots
CH2DOH 51,4e1e_{1}–50,5e0e_{0} 49 350.63207 0.58 ±\pm 0.04 3.2 1.98 ±\pm 0.32 35.2 0.08  \cdots
CH2DOH 22,1o1o_{1}–11,0o1o_{1} 42 351.60685 <<0.15  \cdots <<0.7  \cdots 0.08  \cdots
CH2DOH 81,8e0e_{0}–71,7e0e_{0} 80 351.79643 0.54 ±\pm 0.04 2.5 1.44 ±\pm 0.30 34.4 0.08  \cdots
CH2DOH 22,0o1o_{1}–11,1o1o_{1} 42 352.34437 <<0.15  \cdots <<0.7  \cdots 0.08  \cdots
CH2DOH 81,8e1e_{1}–71,7e1e_{1} 93 352.80196 0.40 ±\pm 0.04 2.6 1.10 ±\pm 0.23 34.4 0.08  \cdots

Note. — (1) Blend of two CH3OH lines with similar spectroscopic constants. (2) Blend of three CH3OH lines with similar spectroscopic constants. (3) Possible blend with C2H5OH. (4) Blend with CH3CN. (5) Blend with HCOOCH3. (6) Blend with 34SO. (7) Partial blend with HC15N. (8) Possible blend with HDCO. (9) Blend with CH3OCH3. (10) Partial blend with CN. (12) Blend of two CH2DOH lines with similar spectroscopic constants.

\startlongtable
Table 9: Line Parameters for C2H5OH
Molecule Transition EuE_{u} Frequency TbrT_{br} Δ\DeltaVV Tbr𝑑V\int T_{br}dV VLSRV_{LSR} RMS Note
(K) (GHz) (K) (km/s) (K km/s) (km/s) (K)
C2H5OH 1411,3–1311,2 297 242.17548 0.15 ±\pm 0.02 5.4 0.87 ±\pm 0.40 34.7 0.04 (1)
C2H5OH 149,5–139,4 248 242.22129 0.16 ±\pm 0.02 5.5 0.93 ±\pm 0.29 33.7 0.04 (1)
C2H5OH 148,6–138,5 228 242.27115 0.13 ±\pm 0.02 4.1 0.57 ±\pm 0.23 34.6 0.04 (1)
C2H5OH 147,8–137,7 209 242.34984 0.30 ±\pm 0.02 4.1 1.30 ±\pm 0.23 35.7 0.04 (1)
C2H5OH 1410,4–1310,3 266 242.42987 0.36 ±\pm 0.02 1.6 0.62 ±\pm 0.08 35.3 0.04 (2)
C2H5OH 146,9–136,8 193 242.47550 0.35 ±\pm 0.02 4.3 1.60 ±\pm 0.23 34.6 0.04 (1)
C2H5OH 147,8–137,7 204 242.52422 0.37 ±\pm 0.02 1.5 0.57 ±\pm 0.08 34.9 0.04 (1)
C2H5OH 146,9–136,8 188 242.62561 0.42 ±\pm 0.02 1.5 0.67 ±\pm 0.08 34.6 0.04 (1)
C2H5OH 145,10–135,9 180 242.68502 0.13 ±\pm 0.02 3.6 0.51 ±\pm 0.19 34.6 0.04 (1)
C2H5OH 145,9–135,8 180 242.69305 0.35 ±\pm 0.02 1.5 0.56 ±\pm 0.08 34.7 0.04  \cdots
C2H5OH 143,12–133,11 160 242.77011 0.15 ±\pm 0.02 3.4 0.55 ±\pm 0.17 35.2 0.04  \cdots
C2H5OH 145,10–135,9 175 242.81644 0.09 ±\pm 0.02 3.3 0.33 ±\pm 0.18 33.8 0.04 (3)
C2H5OH 145,9–135,8 175 242.82512 0.10 ±\pm 0.02 3.9 0.42 ±\pm 0.21 35.6 0.04  \cdots
C2H5OH 144,11–134,10 169 242.99597 0.28 ±\pm 0.03 3.1 0.91 ±\pm 0.19 34.2 0.04  \cdots
C2H5OH 144,11–134,10 164 243.12034 0.38 ±\pm 0.02 1.5 0.58 ±\pm 0.08 35.2 0.04  \cdots
C2H5OH 144,10–134,9 169 243.20653 0.36 ±\pm 0.02 1.7 0.64 ±\pm 0.09 34.3 0.04  \cdots
C2H5OH 141,13–131,12 152 244.63396 0.24 ±\pm 0.02 3.8 0.99 ±\pm 0.21 34.5 0.04  \cdots
C2H5OH 143,11–133,10 160 245.32715 0.39 ±\pm 0.02 1.4 0.60 ±\pm 0.08 34.6 0.04  \cdots
C2H5OH 161,15–152,14 117 257.06090 0.26 ±\pm 0.02 5.3 1.49 ±\pm 0.23 34.1 0.03  \cdots
C2H5OH 143,11–132,11 156 259.32264 0.09 ±\pm 0.02 4.3 0.40 ±\pm 0.19 34.2 0.03 (3)
C2H5OH 159,6–149,5 261 259.53913 0.28 ±\pm 0.02 2.4 0.71 ±\pm 0.10 34.4 0.03 (1)
C2H5OH 157,9–147,8 222 259.69790 0.11 ±\pm 0.02 4.7 0.57 ±\pm 0.21 34.4 0.03 (1)
C2H5OH 1510,5–1410,4 279 259.75653 0.27 ±\pm 0.02 2.4 0.69 ±\pm 0.14 34.9 0.03 (1)
C2H5OH 159,6–149,5 255 259.77714 0.28 ±\pm 0.02 1.5 0.43 ±\pm 0.07 34.5 0.03 (1)
C2H5OH 158,8–148,7 235 259.81444 0.29 ±\pm 0.02 2.3 0.72 ±\pm 0.10 34.0 0.03 (1)
C2H5OH 156,10–146,9 206 259.85218 0.30 ±\pm 0.02 2.3 0.74 ±\pm 0.10 34.7 0.03 (1)
C2H5OH 157,9–147,8 216 259.88507 0.28 ±\pm 0.02 3.1 0.93 ±\pm 0.13 34.7 0.03 (1)
C2H5OH 153,13–143,12 172 260.04664 0.28 ±\pm 0.02 2.2 0.64 ±\pm 0.10 35.2 0.03  \cdots
C2H5OH 155,11–145,10 192 260.10761 0.09 ±\pm 0.01 4.7 0.43 ±\pm 0.24 34.5 0.03 (3)
C2H5OH 155,10–145,9 192 260.12276 0.11 ±\pm 0.02 4.6 0.52 ±\pm 0.20 34.5 0.03  \cdots
C2H5OH 153,13–143,12 168 260.14168 0.29 ±\pm 0.02 3.5 1.06 ±\pm 0.15 34.9 0.03  \cdots
C2H5OH 155,10–145,9 187 260.26613 0.27 ±\pm 0.02 2.5 0.71 ±\pm 0.11 33.9 0.03  \cdots
C2H5OH 154,12–144,11 181 260.45773 0.12 ±\pm 0.02 4.4 0.57 ±\pm 0.19 35.1 0.03  \cdots
C2H5OH 154,12–144,11 176 260.59133 0.28 ±\pm 0.02 2.4 0.74 ±\pm 0.10 34.5 0.03  \cdots
C2H5OH 202,19–192,18 234 338.88792 0.39 ±\pm 0.04 5.0 2.07 ±\pm 0.43 35.5 0.07 (4)
C2H5OH 167,9–166,10 176 338.67173 0.35 ±\pm 0.04 4.7 1.76 ±\pm 0.40 33.4 0.07 (1)
C2H5OH 147,7–146,8 150 339.06106 0.28 ±\pm 0.03 4.0 1.21 ±\pm 0.34 34.5 0.07 (1)
C2H5OH 137,6–136,7 138 339.20154 0.38 ±\pm 0.03 1.9 0.79 ±\pm 0.25 33.9 0.07 (1)
C2H5OH 127,5–126,6 127 339.31253 0.24 ±\pm 0.03 4.9 1.24 ±\pm 0.40 35.9 0.07  \cdots
C2H5OH 117,4–116,5 117 339.39844 0.25 ±\pm 0.03 4.0 1.07 ±\pm 0.33 34.6 0.07 (1)
C2H5OH 87,1–86,2 92 339.54409 0.30 ±\pm 0.04 2.1 0.67 ±\pm 0.20 34.4 0.07 (1)
C2H5OH 94,6–83,5 58 339.97892 0.24 ±\pm 0.04 3.8 0.97 ±\pm 0.32 35.0 0.07  \cdots
C2H5OH 204,16–194,15 252 350.36506 0.40 ±\pm 0.04 3.9 1.65 ±\pm 0.33 35.7 0.08 (5)
C2H5OH 202,19–191,18 179 350.53435 0.30 ±\pm 0.04 3.3 1.06 ±\pm 0.29 34.9 0.08  \cdots
C2H5OH 135,8–124,8 163 351.96548 0.25 ±\pm 0.03 2.0 0.55 ±\pm 0.18 35.3 0.08  \cdots

Note. — (1) Blend of two C2H5OH lines with similar spectroscopic constants. (2) Blend of four C2H5OH lines with similar spectroscopic constants. (4) Blend of three C2H5OH lines with similar spectroscopic constants. (5) Possible blend with CH3CHO.

\startlongtable
Table 10: Line Parameters for HCOOCH3
Molecule Transition EuE_{u} Frequency TbrT_{br} Δ\DeltaVV Tbr𝑑V\int T_{br}dV VLSRV_{LSR} RMS Note
(K) (GHz) (K) (km/s) (K km/s) (km/s) (K)
HCOOCH3 204,17–194,16 A νt\nu_{t} = 1 322 242.61007 0.35 ±\pm 0.02 2.4 0.92 ±\pm 0.14 34.3 0.04  \cdots
HCOOCH3 195,14–185,13 A 130 242.89603 0.74 ±\pm 0.02 3.6 2.85 ±\pm 0.19 34.5 0.04  \cdots
HCOOCH3 194,15–184,14 A νt\nu_{t} = 1 313 244.06667 0.35 ±\pm 0.02 3.4 1.28 ±\pm 0.18 34.4 0.04  \cdots
HCOOCH3 2010,10–1910,9 E νt\nu_{t} = 1 378 244.11242 0.13 ±\pm 0.02 4.0 0.56 ±\pm 0.22 33.9 0.04  \cdots
HCOOCH3 2012,8–1912,7 A νt\nu_{t} = 1 407 244.19830 0.17 ±\pm 0.02 4.8 0.89 ±\pm 0.25 34.5 0.04 (1)
HCOOCH3 2010,11–1910,10 A νt\nu_{t} = 1 377 244.52854 0.38 ±\pm 0.02 3.0 1.21 ±\pm 0.16 34.7 0.04 (1)
HCOOCH3 204,17–194,16 E 135 244.58034 0.74 ±\pm 0.02 4.6 3.64 ±\pm 0.24 34.7 0.04  \cdots
HCOOCH3 204,17–194,16 A 135 244.59405 0.78 ±\pm 0.02 3.6 3.02 ±\pm 0.19 34.8 0.04  \cdots
HCOOCH3 2011,10–1911,9 E νt\nu_{t} = 1 391 244.72966 0.29 ±\pm 0.03 2.2 0.67 ±\pm 0.12 34.1 0.04  \cdots
HCOOCH3 209,12–199,11 A νt\nu_{t} = 1 365 244.84534 0.43 ±\pm 0.02 2.9 1.33 ±\pm 0.17 34.3 0.04 (1)
HCOOCH3 194,15–184,14 E νt\nu_{t} = 1 313 244.90213 0.30 ±\pm 0.02 3.6 1.17 ±\pm 0.19 34.4 0.04  \cdots
HCOOCH3 2010,11–1910,10 E νt\nu_{t} = 1 377 245.08271 0.15 ±\pm 0.02 4.0 0.65 ±\pm 0.22 35.3 0.04  \cdots
HCOOCH3 208,12–198,11 E νt\nu_{t} = 1 354 245.26174 0.17 ±\pm 0.02 5.0 0.88 ±\pm 0.26 34.7 0.04  \cdots
HCOOCH3 208,13–198,12 A νt\nu_{t} = 1 354 245.34255 0.34 ±\pm 0.02 3.2 1.14 ±\pm 0.19 34.2 0.04  \cdots
HCOOCH3 209,12–199,11 E νt\nu_{t} = 1 365 245.54388 0.28 ±\pm 0.02 2.5 0.75 ±\pm 0.13 35.0 0.04  \cdots
HCOOCH3 2015,5–1915,4 A 273 245.65121 0.42 ±\pm 0.02 3.2 1.43 ±\pm 0.17 34.7 0.04 (1)
HCOOCH3 2015,5–1915,4 E 273 245.65678 0.29 ±\pm 0.02 3.1 0.98 ±\pm 0.17 34.5 0.04  \cdots
HCOOCH3 2015,6–1915,5 E 273 245.67298 0.33 ±\pm 0.02 2.4 0.83 ±\pm 0.13 34.1 0.04  \cdots
HCOOCH3 232,22–222,21 A νt\nu_{t} = 1 343 256.99936 0.36 ±\pm 0.02 4.2 1.62 ±\pm 0.18 34.8 0.03  \cdots
HCOOCH3 231,22–221,21 A νt\nu_{t} = 1 343 257.01547 0.36 ±\pm 0.02 3.6 1.39 ±\pm 0.16 34.3 0.03  \cdots
HCOOCH3 219,12–209,11 E νt\nu_{t} = 1 377 257.04978 0.46 ±\pm 0.02 4.5 2.18 ±\pm 0.19 34.2 0.03  \cdots
HCOOCH3 205,15–195,14 E 143 257.22661 0.69 ±\pm 0.02 4.1 3.03 ±\pm 0.17 34.6 0.03  \cdots
HCOOCH3 205,15–195,14 A 143 257.25267 0.76 ±\pm 0.02 4.4 3.58 ±\pm 0.21 34.4 0.03 (1)
HCOOCH3 219,13–209,12 A νt\nu_{t} = 1 377 257.29779 0.42 ±\pm 0.02 3.7 1.66 ±\pm 0.16 34.0 0.03 (1)
HCOOCH3 204,16–194,15 E νt\nu_{t} = 1 325 257.58889 0.38 ±\pm 0.02 4.6 1.86 ±\pm 0.21 35.4 0.03  \cdots
HCOOCH3 223,20–213,19 E 152 257.69033 0.72 ±\pm 0.02 3.7 2.88 ±\pm 0.16 34.6 0.03  \cdots
HCOOCH3 223,20–213,19 A 152 257.69949 0.73 ±\pm 0.02 3.5 2.75 ±\pm 0.15 34.5 0.03  \cdots
HCOOCH3 218,13–208,12 E νt\nu_{t} = 1 366 257.83109 0.27 ±\pm 0.02 3.7 1.05 ±\pm 0.16 34.1 0.03  \cdots
HCOOCH3 218,14–208,13 A νt\nu_{t} = 1 366 257.88987 0.24 ±\pm 0.02 2.3 0.59 ±\pm 0.11 33.8 0.03  \cdots
HCOOCH3 218,13–208,12 A νt\nu_{t} = 1 366 257.90613 0.26 ±\pm 0.02 2.4 0.66 ±\pm 0.11 35.3 0.03  \cdots
HCOOCH3 2116,5–2016,4 E 306 257.91989 0.25 ±\pm 0.02 3.5 0.93 ±\pm 0.15 34.0 0.03  \cdots
HCOOCH3 2116,6–2016,5 E 306 257.93383 0.21 ±\pm 0.02 3.2 0.73 ±\pm 0.15 34.7 0.03  \cdots
HCOOCH3 2115,6–2015,5 A 285 258.00176 0.46 ±\pm 0.02 3.2 1.55 ±\pm 0.14 34.4 0.03 (1)
HCOOCH3 241,24–231,23 A νt\nu_{t} = 1 345 258.01075 0.63 ±\pm 0.01 3.9 2.58 ±\pm 0.18 34.5 0.03 (2)
HCOOCH3 2115,7–2015,6 E 285 258.02424 0.30 ±\pm 0.02 2.2 0.69 ±\pm 0.11 35.0 0.03  \cdots
HCOOCH3 219,13–209,12 E νt\nu_{t} = 1 377 258.03797 0.31 ±\pm 0.02 1.4 0.48 ±\pm 0.06 33.7 0.03  \cdots
HCOOCH3 241,24–231,23 E νt\nu_{t} = 1 345 258.05504 0.69 ±\pm 0.02 4.9 3.57 ±\pm 0.21 35.0 0.03 (1)
HCOOCH3 222,20–212,19 E 152 258.08104 0.85 ±\pm 0.02 5.4 4.93 ±\pm 0.23 34.3 0.03  \cdots
HCOOCH3 222,20–212,19 A 152 258.08949 0.76 ±\pm 0.02 3.9 3.14 ±\pm 0.18 34.6 0.03  \cdots
HCOOCH3 2114,7–2014,6 A 266 258.12119 0.69 ±\pm 0.02 4.5 3.26 ±\pm 0.20 33.9 0.03 (2)
HCOOCH3 2114,8–2014,7 E 266 258.14209 0.35 ±\pm 0.02 3.8 1.41 ±\pm 0.16 34.7 0.03  \cdots
HCOOCH3 2113,8–2013,7 A 248 258.27743 0.84 ±\pm 0.01 6.3 5.64 ±\pm 0.36 36.0 0.03 (2)
HCOOCH3 2112,9–2012,8 E 232 258.47645 0.47 ±\pm 0.01 5.1 2.58 ±\pm 0.24 35.3 0.03  \cdots
HCOOCH3 2112,9–2012,8 A 232 258.48298 0.62 ±\pm 0.02 5.8 3.84 ±\pm 0.27 34.9 0.03 (1)
HCOOCH3 232,22–222,21 E 156 258.49087 0.79 ±\pm 0.02 3.9 3.27 ±\pm 0.17 34.7 0.03  \cdots
HCOOCH3 232,22–222,21 A 156 258.49624 0.83 ±\pm 0.01 5.0 4.38 ±\pm 0.28 34.4 0.03 (1)
HCOOCH3 231,22–221,21 E 156 258.50273 0.81 ±\pm 0.01 3.5 3.00 ±\pm 0.18 34.6 0.03  \cdots
HCOOCH3 231,22–221,21 A 156 258.50818 0.85 ±\pm 0.02 3.3 2.97 ±\pm 0.14 34.5 0.03  \cdots
HCOOCH3 215,17–205,16 A νt\nu_{t} = 1 341 258.70105 0.33 ±\pm 0.02 2.7 0.93 ±\pm 0.12 34.3 0.03  \cdots
HCOOCH3 2111,10–2011,9 E 217 258.74625 0.50 ±\pm 0.02 3.5 1.84 ±\pm 0.15 35.0 0.03  \cdots
HCOOCH3 2111,11–2011,10 A 217 258.75667 0.62 ±\pm 0.02 4.9 3.20 ±\pm 0.21 34.9 0.03 (1)
HCOOCH3 2111,11–2011,10 E 217 258.76997 0.59 ±\pm 0.02 4.8 3.03 ±\pm 0.20 35.1 0.03 (1)
HCOOCH3 213,18–203,17 A νt\nu_{t} = 1 333 258.77532 0.35 ±\pm 0.02 2.9 1.07 ±\pm 0.12 35.1 0.03  \cdots
HCOOCH3 217,14–207,13 A νt\nu_{t} = 1 356 259.00387 0.39 ±\pm 0.02 4.3 1.77 ±\pm 0.32 34.2 0.03  \cdots
HCOOCH3 217,14–207,13 E νt\nu_{t} = 1 356 259.02583 0.29 ±\pm 0.02 2.2 0.67 ±\pm 0.09 34.6 0.03  \cdots
HCOOCH3 2110,11–2010,10 E 203 259.11395 0.46 ±\pm 0.02 4.3 2.09 ±\pm 0.19 34.6 0.03  \cdots
HCOOCH3 2110,12–2010,11 A 203 259.12818 0.77 ±\pm 0.02 4.1 3.37 ±\pm 0.17 34.7 0.03 (1)
HCOOCH3 2110,12–2010,11 E 203 259.13793 0.45 ±\pm 0.02 3.4 1.63 ±\pm 0.14 34.6 0.03  \cdots
HCOOCH3 213,18–203,17 E νt\nu_{t} = 1 333 259.26499 0.28 ±\pm 0.02 3.3 0.99 ±\pm 0.14 34.2 0.03  \cdots
HCOOCH3 204,16–194,15 A 139 259.52181 0.68 ±\pm 0.02 4.1 2.98 ±\pm 0.17 35.0 0.03  \cdots
HCOOCH3 219,12–209,11 E 190 259.62930 0.46 ±\pm 0.02 3.6 1.76 ±\pm 0.16 34.7 0.03  \cdots
HCOOCH3 219,13–209,12 A 190 259.64653 0.85 ±\pm 0.02 4.8 4.37 ±\pm 0.21 33.8 0.03 (1)
HCOOCH3 219,13–209,12 E 190 259.65308 0.53 ±\pm 0.02 3.5 2.01 ±\pm 0.15 34.4 0.03  \cdots
HCOOCH3 213,18–203,17 E 147 260.24450 0.66 ±\pm 0.02 4.1 2.89 ±\pm 0.17 34.7 0.03  \cdots
HCOOCH3 218,14–208,13 A 179 260.39273 0.59 ±\pm 0.02 3.5 2.22 ±\pm 0.15 34.6 0.03  \cdots
HCOOCH3 218,13–208,12 A 179 260.41533 0.57 ±\pm 0.02 4.0 2.42 ±\pm 0.17 34.6 0.03  \cdots
HCOOCH3 278,20–268,19 A 267 337.50352 0.39 ±\pm 0.04 2.9 1.19 ±\pm 0.29 34.8 0.07  \cdots
HCOOCH3 278,19–268,18 A 267 338.35579 0.37 ±\pm 0.04 3.4 1.33 ±\pm 0.31 34.7 0.07  \cdots
HCOOCH3 277,21–267,20 E 258 338.39632 0.53 ±\pm 0.03 4.4 2.46 ±\pm 0.39 34.9 0.07 (1)
HCOOCH3 137,7–126,6 A 86 339.18591 0.19 ±\pm 0.04 1.5 0.30 ±\pm 0.14 34.3 0.07 (3)
HCOOCH3 137,6–126,7 A 86 339.19634 0.21 ±\pm 0.03 2.7 0.63 ±\pm 0.25 34.7 0.07 (3)
HCOOCH3 293,26–283,25 A νt\nu_{t} = 1 450 339.88222 0.24 ±\pm 0.04 3.8 0.99 ±\pm 0.34 34.6 0.07  \cdots
HCOOCH3 285,24–275,23 E 257 340.74199 0.58 ±\pm 0.04 4.9 3.03 ±\pm 0.42 34.3 0.07  \cdots
HCOOCH3 285,24–275,23 A 257 340.75476 0.41 ±\pm 0.03 5.3 2.33 ±\pm 0.45 34.7 0.07  \cdots
HCOOCH3 295,25–285,24 E νt\nu_{t} = 1 460 349.68548 0.26 ±\pm 0.04 2.1 0.58 ±\pm 0.21 35.1 0.08  \cdots
HCOOCH3 304,27–294,26 A νt\nu_{t} = 1 467 350.13257 0.71 ±\pm 0.03 2.0 1.48 ±\pm 0.30 33.5 0.08  \cdots
HCOOCH3 303,27–293,26 A νt\nu_{t} = 1 467 350.30254 0.33 ±\pm 0.04 4.2 1.48 ±\pm 0.39 34.0 0.08  \cdots
HCOOCH3 304,27–294,26 E νt\nu_{t} = 1 467 350.55020 0.33 ±\pm 0.04 3.7 1.27 ±\pm 0.37 33.9 0.08  \cdots
HCOOCH3 276,21–266,20 E 252 350.91952 0.49 ±\pm 0.03 4.4 2.27 ±\pm 0.52 34.6 0.08  \cdots
HCOOCH3 276,21–266,20 A 252 350.94733 0.53 ±\pm 0.04 3.9 2.21 ±\pm 0.35 34.4 0.08  \cdots
HCOOCH3 287,22–277,21 E 275 350.99804 0.50 ±\pm 0.04 4.3 2.29 ±\pm 0.37 34.8 0.08  \cdots
HCOOCH3 287,22–277,21 A 275 351.01591 0.49 ±\pm 0.04 4.9 2.57 ±\pm 0.43 35.2 0.08  \cdots
HCOOCH3 295,25–285,24 E 274 351.51710 0.40 ±\pm 0.04 4.7 1.99 ±\pm 0.40 35.2 0.08  \cdots
HCOOCH3 295,25–285,24 A 274 351.52916 0.41 ±\pm 0.04 4.6 2.02 ±\pm 0.39 35.0 0.08  \cdots
HCOOCH3 288,20–278,19 E 284 351.82345 0.39 ±\pm 0.04 4.0 1.67 ±\pm 0.35 34.6 0.08  \cdots
HCOOCH3 288,20–278,19 A 284 351.84219 0.44 ±\pm 0.04 3.4 1.59 ±\pm 0.30 35.0 0.08  \cdots
HCOOCH3 304,27–294,26 E 281 352.28276 0.41 ±\pm 0.04 3.0 1.31 ±\pm 0.28 34.6 0.08  \cdots
HCOOCH3 304,27–294,26 A 281 352.29258 0.40 ±\pm 0.04 4.5 1.87 ±\pm 0.38 34.7 0.08  \cdots
HCOOCH3 303,27–293,26 E 281 352.40468 0.51 ±\pm 0.04 2.0 1.09 ±\pm 0.17 34.1 0.08  \cdots
HCOOCH3 303,27–293,26 A 281 352.41414 0.53 ±\pm 0.04 3.7 2.09 ±\pm 0.32 34.4 0.08  \cdots
HCOOCH3 331,33–321,32 A νt\nu_{t} = 1 479 352.81684 0.32 ±\pm 0.04 3.0 1.00 ±\pm 0.26 33.7 0.08 (1)

Note. — (1) Blend of two HCOOCH3 lines with similar spectroscopic constants. (2) Blend of three HCOOCH3 lines with similar spectroscopic constants.

\startlongtable
Table 11: Line Parameters for CH3OCH3
Molecule Transition EuE_{u} Frequency TbrT_{br} Δ\DeltaVV Tbr𝑑V\int T_{br}dV VLSRV_{LSR} RMS Note
(K) (GHz) (K) (km/s) (K km/s) (km/s) (K)
CH3OCH3 53,2–42,3 EE 26 241.52872 0.59 ±\pm 0.02 5.0 3.12 ±\pm 0.26 33.3 0.04 (1)
CH3OCH3 53,2–42,3 AA 26 241.53103 0.58 ±\pm 0.02 5.2 3.23 ±\pm 0.32 36.3 0.04  \cdots
CH3OCH3 213,18–204,17 EE 226 241.63730 0.25 ±\pm 0.02 4.7 1.25 ±\pm 0.29 34.8 0.04 (1)
CH3OCH3 131,13–120,12 EE 81 241.94654 0.92 ±\pm 0.02 4.2 4.12 ±\pm 0.23 34.5 0.04 (2)
CH3OCH3 232,22–231,23 EE 253 244.50830 0.16 ±\pm 0.02 4.2 0.72 ±\pm 0.24 33.5 0.04  \cdots
CH3OCH3 232,22–231,23 AA 253 244.51274 0.12 ±\pm 0.02 3.3 0.40 ±\pm 0.17 34.5 0.04  \cdots
CH3OCH3 182,16–173,15 EE 164 257.04988 0.46 ±\pm 0.02 4.4 2.16 ±\pm 0.19 34.4 0.03 (2)
CH3OCH3 273,25–272,26 EE 356 257.61453 0.09 ±\pm 0.02 8.1 0.79 ±\pm 0.37 34.0 0.03 (2) (3)
CH3OCH3 141,14–130,13 EE 93 258.54906 1.17 ±\pm 0.02 4.4 5.43 ±\pm 0.19 34.2 0.03 (2)
CH3OCH3 175,12–174,13 EE 175 259.31195 0.46 ±\pm 0.07 9.0 3.34 ±\pm 0.16 35.0 0.03 (2)
CH3OCH3 63,4–52,3 EE 32 259.48973 0.47 ±\pm 0.01 3.0 1.48 ±\pm 0.20 34.4 0.03 (1)
CH3OCH3 63,4–52,3 AA 32 259.49375 0.39 ±\pm 0.01 2.9 1.21 ±\pm 0.19 34.4 0.03  \cdots
CH3OCH3 235,19–234,20 EE 287 259.69007 0.41 ±\pm 0.02 4.3 1.87 ±\pm 0.18 34.1 0.03 (2)
CH3OCH3 215,17–214,18 EE 246 259.73215 0.47 ±\pm 0.02 5.8 2.87 ±\pm 0.25 34.4 0.03 (2)
CH3OCH3 205,16–204,17 EE 227 259.98441 0.53 ±\pm 0.01 3.5 1.99 ±\pm 0.20 35.6 0.03 (2)
CH3OCH3 245,20–244,21 EE 309 260.00439 0.43 ±\pm 0.02 5.0 2.33 ±\pm 0.21 34.0 0.03 (2)
CH3OCH3 195,15–194,16 EE 208 260.32922 0.46 ±\pm 0.02 4.1 2.03 ±\pm 0.21 34.4 0.03 (2)
CH3OCH3 255,21–254,22 EE 332 260.61685 0.35 ±\pm 0.02 3.0 1.13 ±\pm 0.15 35.0 0.03 (2)
CH3OCH3 212,19–203,18 AA 220 337.42046 0.57 ±\pm 0.04 3.2 1.95 ±\pm 0.32 34.6 0.07  \cdots
CH3OCH3 74,4–63,3 AE 48 337.72300 0.55 ±\pm 0.04 2.3 1.33 ±\pm 0.28 35.1 0.07  \cdots
CH3OCH3 74,3–63,3 EE 48 337.73219 0.40 ±\pm 0.04 4.5 1.88 ±\pm 0.38 35.4 0.07  \cdots
CH3OCH3 74,4–63,4 EE 48 337.77802 0.40 ±\pm 0.03 3.8 1.59 ±\pm 0.32 33.8 0.07  \cdots
CH3OCH3 74,3–63,4 AA 48 337.78721 0.71 ±\pm 0.03 5.8 4.41 ±\pm 0.51 34.8 0.07  \cdots
CH3OCH3 191,18–182,17 EE 176 339.49153 0.60 ±\pm 0.04 3.9 2.50 ±\pm 0.33 34.5 0.07  \cdots
CH3OCH3 103,7–92,8 EE 63 340.61262 0.45 ±\pm 0.03 7.0 3.35 ±\pm 0.59 35.1 0.07  \cdots
CH3OCH3 112,9–101,10 EE 66 349.80618 0.31 ±\pm 0.04 4.6 1.52 ±\pm 0.41 33.6 0.08  \cdots

Note. — (1) Blend of three CH3OCH3 lines with similar spectroscopic constants. (2) Blend of four CH3OCH3 lines with similar spectroscopic constants.

\startlongtable
Table 12: Line Parameters for C2H5CN and NH2CHO
Molecule Transition EuE_{u} Frequency TbrT_{br} Δ\DeltaVV Tbr𝑑V\int T_{br}dV VLSRV_{LSR} RMS Note
(K) (GHz) (K) (km/s) (K km/s) (km/s) (K)
C2H5CN 273,25–263,24 173 241.62587 0.13 ±\pm 0.02 4.9 0.69 ±\pm 0.29 33.3 0.04  \cdots
C2H5CN 279,18–269,17 253 241.93218 0.23 ±\pm 0.03 3.6 0.86 ±\pm 0.21 33.9 0.04 (1)
C2H5CN 2712,15–2612,14 322 241.95905 0.12 ±\pm 0.02 3.1 0.40 ±\pm 0.16 34.2 0.04 (2)
C2H5CN 278,20–268,19 234 241.97045 0.30 ±\pm 0.02 1.8 0.56 ±\pm 0.10 33.5 0.04 (2)
C2H5CN 2713,14–2613,13 350 241.99710 0.12 ±\pm 0.02 3.2 0.40 ±\pm 0.17 33.2 0.04 (2)
C2H5CN 277,21–267,20 217 242.05249 0.23 ±\pm 0.02 4.0 0.97 ±\pm 0.22 34.2 0.04 (2)
C2H5CN 276,22–266,21 203 242.20698 0.30 ±\pm 0.02 6.3 2.03 ±\pm 0.34 31.7 0.04 (2)
C2H5CN 274,24–264,23 181 242.66469 0.32 ±\pm 0.03 2.4 0.83 ±\pm 0.17 33.9 0.04  \cdots
C2H5CN 143,11–132,12 55 245.02365 0.32 ±\pm 0.02 2.3 0.77 ±\pm 0.14 35.1 0.04  \cdots
C2H5CN 300,30–290,29 194 257.31064 0.11 ±\pm 0.02 3.7 0.43 ±\pm 0.16 34.2 0.03  \cdots
C2H5CN 301,30–290,29 194 257.58361 0.20 ±\pm 0.02 1.5 0.32 ±\pm 0.06 33.6 0.03  \cdots
C2H5CN 299,21–289,20 277 259.86276 0.11 ±\pm 0.02 3.5 0.42 ±\pm 0.15 33.9 0.03 (2)
C2H5CN 2912,17–2812,16 347 259.86989 0.35 ±\pm 0.02 1.4 0.53 ±\pm 0.08 33.4 0.03 (2)
C2H5CN 2913,16–2813,15 374 259.90664 0.09 ±\pm 0.02 3.2 0.31 ±\pm 0.14 33.5 0.03 (2) (3)
C2H5CN 296,24–286,23 227 260.22166 0.24 ±\pm 0.02 3.1 0.80 ±\pm 0.15 34.8 0.03  \cdots
C2H5CN 295,25–285,24 215 260.53569 0.27 ±\pm 0.02 3.7 1.04 ±\pm 0.16 34.3 0.03  \cdots
NH2CHO 130,13–121,12 91 244.85421 <<0.08  \cdots <<0.3  \cdots 0.04  \cdots
NH2CHO 132,12–131,13 104 258.63638 0.10 ±\pm 0.02 3.9 0.40 ±\pm 0.17 35.6 0.03 (3)
NH2CHO 122,10–112,9 92 260.18909 0.36 ±\pm 0.02 4.4 1.67 ±\pm 0.19 34.7 0.03  \cdots
NH2CHO 169,7–159,6 380 339.68606 0.36 ±\pm 0.03 4.3 1.63 ±\pm 0.36 33.2 0.07 (4)
NH2CHO 168,8–158,7 329 339.71519 0.30 ±\pm 0.04 3.9 1.27 ±\pm 0.34 35.2 0.07 (4)
NH2CHO 167,10–157,9 284 339.77954 0.36 ±\pm 0.04 3.3 1.26 ±\pm 0.29 33.9 0.07 (5)
NH2CHO 166,11–156,10 246 339.90250 0.29 ±\pm 0.04 4.9 1.49 ±\pm 0.42 34.0 0.07 (5)
NH2CHO 163,14–153,13 166 340.48963 0.37 ±\pm 0.04 4.2 1.65 ±\pm 0.36 34.0 0.07  \cdots
NH2CHO 164,13–154,12 186 340.53439 0.36 ±\pm 0.04 5.2 1.98 ±\pm 0.44 34.1 0.07  \cdots
NH2CHO 164,12–154,11 186 340.69074 0.46 ±\pm 0.03 2.5 1.19 ±\pm 0.27 33.7 0.07  \cdots
NH2CHO 162,14–152,13 153 349.47820 0.36 ±\pm 0.04 3.6 1.41 ±\pm 0.33 33.9 0.08  \cdots
NH2CHO 92,8–81,7 58 349.63403 <<0.30  \cdots <<1.3  \cdots 0.08  \cdots

Note. — (1) Blend of four C2H5CN lines with similar spectroscopic constants. (2) Blend of two C2H5CN lines with similar spectroscopic constants. (4) Blend of four NH2CHO lines with similar spectroscopic constants. (5) Blend of two NH2CHO lines with similar spectroscopic constants.

\startlongtable
Table 13: Line Parameters for HCOOH, H2CCO, and c-C2H4O
Molecule Transition EuE_{u} Frequency TbrT_{br} Δ\DeltaVV Tbr𝑑V\int T_{br}dV VLSRV_{LSR} RMS Note
(K) (GHz) (K) (km/s) (K km/s) (km/s) (K)
trans-HCOOH 121,12–111,11 84 257.97501 0.52 ±\pm 0.02 5.5 3.00 ±\pm 0.23 34.5 0.03  \cdots
trans-HCOOH 154,12–144,11 181 338.14384 0.42 ±\pm 0.03 5.0 2.26 ±\pm 0.43 34.6 0.07  \cdots
trans-HCOOH 153,13–143,12 158 338.20186 0.36 ±\pm 0.03 4.4 1.70 ±\pm 0.39 34.7 0.07  \cdots
trans-HCOOH 154,11–144,10 181 338.24882 0.35 ±\pm 0.04 2.8 1.04 ±\pm 0.26 34.7 0.07  \cdots
trans-HCOOH 153,12–143,11 159 340.22910 0.31 ±\pm 0.04 5.8 1.92 ±\pm 0.49 35.1 0.07  \cdots
cis-HCOOH 130,13–121,12 95 244.23510 0.33 ±\pm 0.02 1.6 0.57 ±\pm 0.09 35.7 0.04  \cdots
cis-HCOOH 91,9–80,8 49 244.24786 0.27 ±\pm 0.02 2.5 0.73 ±\pm 0.16 34.2 0.04 (1)
H2CCO 124,9–114,8 284 242.30938 0.12 ±\pm 0.02 3.0 0.36 ±\pm 0.16 34.3 0.04 (2)
H2CCO 120,12–110,11 76 242.37573 0.23 ±\pm 0.02 4.0 0.99 ±\pm 0.27 33.8 0.04  \cdots
H2CCO 123,10–113,9 193 242.39845 0.41 ±\pm 0.03 3.1 1.35 ±\pm 0.19 34.4 0.04 (2)
H2CCO 122,11–112,10 128 242.42466 <<0.10  \cdots <<0.4  \cdots 0.04  \cdots
H2CCO 122,10–112,9 128 242.53616 0.13 ±\pm 0.02 3.2 0.43 ±\pm 0.19 35.5 0.04  \cdots
H2CCO 121,11–111,10 89 244.71227 0.61 ±\pm 0.03 3.4 2.24 ±\pm 0.20 34.4 0.04  \cdots
H2CCO 131,13–121,12 100 260.19198 0.67 ±\pm 0.02 3.1 2.21 ±\pm 0.18 34.6 0.03  \cdots
H2CCO 171,17–161,16 160 340.19308 0.41 ±\pm 0.03 4.8 2.08 ±\pm 0.61 34.6 0.07 (3)
c-C2H4O 112,10–101,9 104 338.77198 0.35 ±\pm 0.03 4.2 1.57 ±\pm 0.35 34.6 0.07 (4)

Note. — (1) Partial blend with SO2. (2) Blend of two H2CCO lines with similar spectroscopic constants. (3) Partial blend with C2H5OH. (4) Blend of two c-C2H4O lines with similar spectroscopic constants.

Appendix B Fitted spectra

Figures 1424 show the results of the spectral line fitting (see Section 3.1 for details).

Refer to caption
Figure 14: ALMA spectra of the detected molecular emission lines. The blue lines represent fitted Gaussian profiles. For the molecules with multiple line detection, the spectra are sorted in ascending order of the upper state energy (the emission line with the lowest upper state energy is shown in the upper left panel and that with the highest energy is in the lower right panel). For SiO, the positions of primary and secondary peaks are indicated by arrows.
Refer to caption
Figure 15: Same as in Figure 14 but for nitrogen-bearing molecules.
Refer to caption
Figure 16: Same as in Figure 14 but for nitrogen-bearing molecules (continued).
Refer to caption
Figure 17: Same as in Figure 14 but for sulfur-bearing molecules.
Refer to caption
Figure 18: Same as in Figure 14 but for CH3OH.
Refer to caption
Figure 19: Same as in Figure 14 but for CH3OH (continued) and 13CH3OH.
Refer to caption
Figure 20: Same as in Figure 14 but for C2H5OH.
Refer to caption
Figure 21: Same as in Figure 14 but for HCOOCH3.
Refer to caption
Figure 22: Same as in Figure 14 but for HCOOCH3 (continued).
Refer to caption
Figure 23: Same as in Figure 14 but for HCOOCH3 (continued), CH3OCH3, and CH3CHO.
Refer to caption
Figure 24: Same as in Figure 14 but for HCOOH, H2CCO, and c-C2H4O.