This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

The Calibration of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Dust Emission as a Star Formation Rate Indicator in the AKARI NEP Survey

Helen Kyung Kim Department of Physics and Astronomy
University of California, Los Angeles
475 Portola Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095
Matthew A. Malkan Department of Physics and Astronomy
University of California, Los Angeles
475 Portola Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095
Toshinobu Takagi Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, JAXA,
Sagamihara, Kanagawa 252-5210, Japan
Nagisa Oi Faculty of Science Division II, Tokyo University of Science,
Kagurazaka, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8601, Japan
Denis Burgarella Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, CNES, LAM, Marseille, France Takamitsu Miyaji Instituto de Astronomía sede Ensenada
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
Km 107, Carret. Tij.-Ens., Ensenada, 22060, BC, Mexico
Hyunjin Shim Department of Earth Science Education, Kyungpook National University
Daegu 41566, Republic of Korea
Hideo Matsuhara Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, JAXA,
Sagamihara, Kanagawa 252-5210, Japan
Tomotsugu Goto Institute of Astronomy, National Tsing Hua University
101, Section 2. Kuang-Fu Road, Hsinchu, 30013, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
Yoichi Ohyama Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Academia Sinica,
11F of Astronomy-Mathematics Building, No.1, Sec. 4,
Roosevelt Road, Taipei 10617, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
Veronique Buat Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, CNES, LAM, Marseille, France Seong Jin Kim Institute of Astronomy, National Tsing Hua University
101, Section 2. Kuang-Fu Road, Hsinchu, 30013, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
Abstract

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) dust emission has been proposed as an effective extinction-independent star formation rate (SFR) indicator in the mid-infrared (MIR), but this may depend on conditions in the interstellar medium. The coverage of the AKARI/Infrared Camera (IRC) allows us to study the effects of metallicity, starburst intensity, and active galactic nuclei on PAH emission in galaxies with fν(L18W)19f_{\nu}(L18W)\lesssim 19 AB mag. Observations include follow-up, rest-frame optical spectra of 443 galaxies within the AKARI North Ecliptic Pole survey that have IRC detections from 7-24 μ\mum. We use optical emission line diagnostics to infer SFR based on Hα\alpha and [O II]λλ3726,3729\lambda\lambda 3726,3729 emission line luminosities. The PAH 6.2 μ\mum and PAH 7.7 μ\mum luminosities (L(PAH 6.2μm)L(PAH\ 6.2\ \mu m) and L(PAH 7.7μm)L(PAH\ 7.7\ \mu m), respectively) derived using multi-wavelength model fits are consistent with those derived from slitless spectroscopy within 0.2 dex. L(PAH 6.2μm)L(PAH\ 6.2\ \mu m) and L(PAH 7.7μm)L(PAH\ 7.7\ \mu m) correlate linearly with the 24 μ\mum-dust corrected Hα\alpha luminosity only for normal, star-forming “main-sequence” galaxies. Assuming multi-linear correlations, we quantify the additional dependencies on metallicity and starburst intensity, which we use to correct our PAH SFR calibrations at 0<z<1.20<z<1.2 for the first time. We derive the cosmic star formation rate density (SFRD) per comoving volume from 0.15z10.15\lesssim z\lesssim 1. The PAH SFRD is consistent with that of the far-infrared and reaches an order of magnitude higher than that of uncorrected UV observations at z1z\sim 1. Starburst galaxies contribute 0.7\gtrsim 0.7 of the total SFRD at z1z\sim 1 compared to main-sequence galaxies.

Star formation (1569), Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (1280), Interstellar dust (836), Infrared galaxies (790), Infrared photometry (792), Spectral energy distribution (2129), Spectroscopy (1558), Photometry (1234), Galaxy evolution (594), Starburst galaxies (1570), Active galaxies (17)

1 Introduction

The star formation rate (SFR) is one of the key parameters that describes a galaxy’s growth and evolution, tracing the conversion of baryonic matter in the interstellar medium (ISM) into stellar radiation. The calibration of various SFR indicators across the electromagnetic spectrum has been extensively studied for the past three decades (Kennicutt & Evans, 2012; Calzetti, 2013). The Balmer recombination lines, most notably Hα\alpha λ\lambda6563, and the rest-frame UV continuum emission from massive stars have been established as standard indicators at z=0z=0 and z1z\gtrsim 1, respectively. However, the SFRs derived from rest-frame optical/UV lines are prone to large uncertainties in the presence of interstellar dust, which absorbs stellar photons and re-radiates in the infrared. The total infrared luminosity, which measures the integrated dust continuum (81000\sim 8-1000 μ\mum) heated by O, B, A, and F-type stars, is also commonly used to trace star formation, but may overestimate the SFR in post-starburst galaxies (Hayward et al., 2014). Therefore, multi-wavelength data are crucial for providing a “big picture” view of the energy generation in galaxies and for overcoming the limitations of relying on a single SFR indicator.

The brightness of the cosmic infrared background suggests at least half the luminous energy generated by stars has been reprocessed into the IR by dust (Lagache & Dole, 2006; Stecker et al., 2016), and that dust-obscured star formation was more important at higher redshifts than today (Buat et al., 2007). At zz\sim1, infrared luminous galaxies (L(81000μm)1011LL(8-1000\ \mu m)\geq 10^{11}\ L_{\odot}) contribute \sim70% of the cosmic infrared luminosity density (Le Floc’h et al., 2005), but the individual dusty galaxies producing this IR light are not well understood, partly due to the requirement of deep wide-field mid-IR surveys to find them, and then the extreme difficulty of studying their dust spectra. The only mission able to accomplish these tasks was the AKARI space telescope with its Infrared Camera (IRC), which devoted a substantial fraction of its entire lifetime to intensive mapping of the 0.5 deg2 area of North Ecliptic Pole (NEP) Deep field (orange scalloped circle in Figure 1 of Takeuchi et al., 2007; Murata et al., 2013). AKARI-NEP’s >>6000 faint galaxy mid-IR 9-point spectra are a 1.5 order-of-magnitude increase over all other samples (e.g., Spitzer/IRS) combined. The NEP-Deep field is in a prime location that has been observed very intensively at all other wavelengths from the X-ray and UV to radio wavelengths (e.g., Matsuhara et al., 2006; Kim et al., 2021). Figure 1 highlights the continuous mid-infrared coverage of AKARI/IRC photometry from 2-24 μ\mum, compared to WISE, Spitzer/IRAC and MIPS. The superimposed spectrum is that of a modeled star-forming galaxy at the median redshift of our spectroscopic sample (z=0.308z=0.308).

Refer to caption
Figure 1: Filter transmission curves from WISE and Spitzer/IRAC and MIPS (top) and AKARI/IRC (bottom) superimposed on a modeled mid-IR spectrum of a star-forming galaxy at z=0.308z=0.308.

The luminosities of the 3.3, 6.2, 7.7, 8.6, and 11.3 μ\mum PAH emission features have been proposed as extinction-independent SFR indicators (Peeters et al., 2004; Brandl et al., 2006; Houck et al., 2007; Castro et al., 2014; Lai et al., 2020). The wavelength coverage from the IRC-derived spectral energy distributions (SEDs) is uniquely suited to study the strongest of these: the PAH 7.7 μ\mum blend composed of emission features at 7.42, 7.60, and 7.85 μ\mum, which can contribute 42\sim 42% of the total PAH luminosity in star-forming galaxies (Shipley et al., 2013). However, studies of ultra-luminous infrared galaxies (ULIRGs: L(8-1000 μ\mum) \geq 101210^{12} L) at z<0.9z<0.9 targeted by Spitzer/IRS have diverse mid-infrared spectra, with the majority of ULIRGs having depressed PAH 6.2 and 7.7 μ\mum equivalent widths, which is likely due to UV photons from buried AGN or compact star formation destroying small dust grains (Spoon et al., 2007; Imanishi et al., 2007; Desai et al., 2007). But on the other hand, at z1z\sim 1, some ULIRGs have been observed with “enhanced” peak PAH 7.7 μ\mum luminosities per total infrared luminosity relative to local ULIRGs (Takagi et al., 2010).

The strength of PAH emission is also believed to depend on the gas-phase metallicity of the interstellar medium (ISM). Engelbracht et al. (2005) found decreased 8 μ\mum-to-24 μ\mum flux density ratios in local star-forming galaxies with 12+log(O/H) \lesssim 8.2, possibly due to decreased PAH contribution to the 8 μ\mum bandpass. Draine et al. (2007) determined that the PAH index, defined as the fraction of the total dust mass in PAH grains with fewer than 10310^{3} carbon atoms (qPAHq_{PAH}), is lower for galaxies with 12+log(O/H) \leq 8.1 observed in the Spitzer Nearby Galaxy Survey (SINGS). Some possible physical explanations for reduced PAH strength include: UV dissociation of PAH molecules due to less dust shielding, increased destruction within shock-heated gas, and decreased efficiency in PAH production from carbon stars and planetary nebulae (Draine et al., 2007).

Given the effects of metallicity and radiation from AGN and starburst galaxies, observations of rest-frame UV/optical emission lines (e.g., ([O II], Hβ\beta, [O III], Hα\alpha, [N II]) in mid-IR-detected sources are crucial for calibrating PAH dust emission as a star formation rate indicator. Emission line diagnostics provide the tools to classify sources, measure gas-phase metallicity and dust extinction, and measure accurate spectroscopic redshifts for SEDs.

In this work, we present SFR calibrations based on PAH luminosity, corrected for metallicity and starburst intensity. In Section 2, we describe our spectroscopic and photometric observations, data reduction processes, emission line measurements, galaxy classification, and SED fitting procedure. In section 3, we present our methodology for measuring PAH luminosities. We confirm their validity by direct comparison with mid-infrared spectra of the same galaxies. In Section 4, we discuss the effects of starburst intensity, metallicity, and AGN strength on PAH luminosity; we derive SFR prediction equations as a function of PAH luminosity calibrated against dust-corrected Hα\alpha and [O II]λλ3726,3729\lambda\lambda 3726,3729 line luminosities. In Section 5, we apply our SFR equations to estimate the cosmic star formation rate density (SFRD) from 0z1.20\lesssim z\lesssim 1.2 and compare our results to UV and FIR-based calibrations. In Section 6 we discuss our PAH SFR results in the context of other studies, and how our calibrations may be used to analyze future JWST observations. Lastly, in Section 7, we provide a summary of conclusions.

2 Follow-up and Supporting Observations

To measure key physical properties of AKARI/IRC-detected sources, we obtained follow-up optical and near-infrared spectra in the AKARI NEP-Deep and NEP-Wide fields. The main goals of our spectroscopic analysis include: measuring reliable spectroscopic redshifts, classifying sources as star-forming galaxies or AGN, measuring metallicity, measuring dust extinction with the Balmer recombination lines, and calibrating the dust-corrected Hα\alpha and [O II]λλ3726,3729\lambda\lambda 3726,3729 SFR against the PAH luminosity. In this section, we present our multi-object spectroscopy from Keck II/DEIMOS and Keck I/MOSFIRE spectrographs, as well as supplementary spectra taken by the AKARI collaboration from MMT/Hectospec, WIYN/Hydra, and Subaru/FMOS.

2.1 Keck II/DEIMOS spectroscopic sample

From 2008-2016, we observed 19 slitmasks with Keck II/DEep Imaging Multi-Object Spectrograph (DEIMOS; Faber et al., 2003) targeting the AKARI NEP-Deep field. When selecting targets for each slit in the later years, we prioritized mid-infrared AKARI/IRC sources with detected flux measurements at 9 and 18 μ\mum, and assigned secondary priorities to high-redshift galaxies (photometric redshift zphot1z_{phot}\sim 1; Oi et al., 2014) and optical counterparts of Chandra X-ray sources (Krumpe et al., 2015). The spectrograph was configured with the 600ZD grating and GG495 order blocking filter (central wavelength λc=7500\lambda_{c}=7500 Å) for the two slitmasks observed on August 24, 2014, and the 900ZD grating and GG455 order blocking filter (λc=6800\lambda_{c}=6800 Å) for the remaining four slitmasks observed in 2015-2016. A typical slitmask contained 80\sim 80 slits that were 1′′ in width. The spectral range covered approximately 4850 Å λ10050\lesssim\lambda\lesssim 10050 Å, depending on the location of the slit. The spectral resolution was R2000R\sim 2000, which corresponds to full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) Δλ3.75\Delta\lambda\sim 3.75 Å at the central wavelength λc=7500\lambda_{c}=7500 Å, as confirmed by the observed widths of night-sky lines. Prior to observing each night, we acquired one set of Ne, Ar, Kr, and Xe arc lamp spectra and three flat field exposures of the detectors illuminated by an internal incandescent lamp. In addition, we observed standard star Feige 15 (RA 01h49m09.5s01^{h}49^{m}09.5^{s}, Dec +133311.4′′+13^{\circ}33^{{}^{\prime}}11.4^{{}^{\prime\prime}}) in long-slit mode for flux calibration. We reduced the raw data from 2014-2016 using the UCB DEEP2 spec2d reduction pipeline (Cooper et al., 2012; Newman et al., 2013), which processed the flatfields and calibration arcs, fit a polynomial wavelength solution to the pixel locations of arc lines, subtracted night-sky emission, and extracted one- and two-dimensional spectra. The extended flux along the slit was included, but most spectra were unresolved in the spatial direction.

The AKARI NEP collaboration observed eight DEIMOS slitmasks in July 2011, with the focus of targeting galaxy cluster candidates with AKARI/IRC MIR detections in the NEP-Deep field (PI: Tomotsugu Goto; Shogaki et al., 2018). 553 targets were selected based on Subaru/Suprime-Cam (Imai et al., 2007; Wada et al., 2008) R-band and Z-band brightness cuts such that Z<23Z<23 mag and R>21.5R>21.5 mag. Slitmasks contained 5080\sim 50-80 slits of 1′′ width. The instrument configuration consisted of the 600ZD grating and GG455 order blocking filter, yielding a spectral resolution of R2000R\sim 2000. A set of calibration images consisting of a Ne, Ar, Kr, Xe arc lamp image and five flat field lamp images was acquired for each slitmask. Bright spectrophotometric standard stars BD+33264233^{\circ}2642 and Feige 110 were observed for 90 seconds each in long-slit mode. Weather conditions were clear on both nights, with 0.6′′ seeing. The data were reduced using the spec2d pipeline described above (Shogaki et al., 2018).

We then flux-calibrated the one-dimensional object spectra from 2011-2016 using standard IRAF routines as follows. The raw frames were overscan-trimmed and bias-subtracted using the mscred.ccdproc routine. A normalized flat field was created using mscred.flatcombine, noao.twodspec.longslit.response, and textttmscred.mscjoin, and the standard star spectra were flat-fielded with mscred.ccdproc. A wavelength-calibrated standard star image was produced using noao.twodspec.longslit.identify, reidentify, fitcoords, and transform on the arc images to determine the wavelength solution and noao.imred.kpnoslit.doslit on the standard star. Then, the sensitivity function was derived using noao.twodspec.longslit.standard, sensfunc, and calibrate on the standard star. Lastly, the sensitivity function was input into the routine noao.onedspec.calibrate to apply extinction corrections and flux calibrations to the reduced one-dimensional object spectra.

To estimate the photometric accuracy of the flux-calibrated spectra, we calculated the average flux density of the spectra within the CFHT/MegaCam r-band filter (5690-6930 Å):

fν[erg/s/cm2/Hz]=1cFTλ𝑑λTλ𝑑λ,f_{\nu}\ [erg/s/cm^{2}/Hz]=\frac{1}{c}\frac{\int FT\lambda\,d\lambda}{\int T\lambda\,d\lambda}, (1)

where FF is the galaxy spectrum in erg/s/cm2/Å, TT is the filter response function, λ\lambda is the wavelength in Å, and cc is the speed of light in Å/s. We compared our measurements to observed photometric CFHT r-band flux densities and applied a typical offset correction 0.10.25\sim 0.1-0.25 dex to account for slit losses. After applying the correction, the emission line fluxes have an uncertainty of 10\sim 10%.

The sample contains 68 Hα\alpha and 259 [O II] emission line candidates with at least four MIR detections/upper limits in the 7-24 μ\mum filters. The ranges in redshift, stellar mass, and TIR luminosity of the combined unique 296 sources are 0.05<z<1.360.05<z<1.36, 2.1×1082.1\times 10^{8} M<M<9.3×1011M_{\odot}<M_{*}<9.3\times 10^{11} MM_{\odot}, and 1.1×1091.1\times 10^{9} L<L(TIR)<2.2×1012L_{\odot}<L(TIR)<2.2\times 10^{12} LL_{\odot}. Table 1 summarizes the newly reduced and calibrated multi-slit spectroscopy from this work.

Table 1: Summary of observations using the Keck I and Keck II telescopes
Instrument UT Date RA (J200) Dec (J200) PA FWHM texpt_{exp} NtN_{t}
(hh:mm:ss) (dd:mm:ss) (deg) (′′) (min)
DEIMOS 2008-08-01 17:57:21.3 +66:28:45.7 0.00 0.5 51.0 81
DEIMOS 2008-08-01 17:56:24.6 +66:32:26.1 -10.00 0.6 51.0 80
DEIMOS 2008-08-01 17:55:08.4 +66:42:34.5 -20.00 0.8 51.0 81
DEIMOS 2008-08-01 17:56:26.7 +66:45:40.0 -30.00 0.9 60.0 82
DEIMOS 2008-08-01 17:54:34.3 +66:29:37.4 -35.00 0.7 80.0 79
DEIMOS 2011-07-03 17:53:51.9 +66:44:55.6 359.82 0.6 120.0 66
DEIMOS 2011-07-03 17:55:49.7 +66:45:30.1 359.82 0.6 120.0 61
DEIMOS 2011-07-03 17:56:28.2 +66:41:00.1 359.83 0.6 120.0 55
DEIMOS 2011-07-04 17:57:01.8 +66:30:00.1 359.82 0.6 90.0 65
DEIMOS 2011-07-04 17:56:12.8 +66:30:05.8 359.80 0.6 90.0 64
DEIMOS 2011-07-04 17:54:54.9 +66:29:39.9 359.80 0.6 90.0 65
DEIMOS 2011-07-04 17:53:44.2 +66:27:54.6 359.82 0.6 90.0 83
DEIMOS 2011-07-04 17:57:08.4 +66:43:24.0 37.85 0.6 105.0 66
DEIMOS 2014-08-24 17:55:15.7 +66:38:36.3 130.07 0.6 120.0 83
DEIMOS 2014-08-24 17:54:37.8 +66:29:14.9 160.17 0.6 120.0 83
DEIMOS 2015-09-14 17:52:59.5 +66:30:37.7 145.04 0.8 120.0 78
DEIMOS 2015-09-15 17:55:01.9 +66:43:32.3 156.56 0.9 120.0 88
DEIMOS 2016-09-09 17:55:39.0 +66:29:59.1 150.03 0.9 80.0 77
DEIMOS 2016-09-10 17:53:26.0 +66:41:40.9 94.02 0.9 80.0 78
MOSFIRE 2017-08-02 17:55:46.3 +66:37:26.1 300.03 1.2 61.6 22
MOSFIRE 2017-08-02 17:55:35.4 +66:37:20.6 20.00 0.4 87.5 26
MOSFIRE 2017-08-03 17:53:43.9 +66:27:12.0 340.22 0.5 69.6 23
MOSFIRE 2017-08-03 17:52:39.6 +66:34:16.1 15.00 0.5 63.6 25
MOSFIRE 2017-08-03 17:55:40.8 +66:36:59.8 335.00 0.5 45.7 23

Note. — The exposure time only includes reduced frames. NtN_{t} is the number of targeted science objects (excluding alignment stars).

2.2 Keck I/MOSFIRE sample

In 2017, we targeted higher redshift galaxies in the AKARI NEP-Deep field, with the Multi-Object Spectrometer For Infra-Red Exploration (MOSFIRE; McLean et al., 2010, 2012) on the Keck I telescope. Based on photometric redshifts provided by the AKARI-NEP team (Oi et al., 2014), we observed four slitmasks in the J-band (1.153–1.352 μ\mum) and one slitmask in the Y-band (0.972–1.125 μ\mum) to target Hα\alpha/[NII] in AKARI/IRC sources at 0.7<z<1.10.7<z<1.1 and 0.5<z<0.80.5<z<0.8, respectively. Each mask had 25\sim 25 slits with slit width of 0.7′′, and resolution of R3300R\sim 3300. Weather conditions were clear and dry on August 2nd and mostly clear with some high clouds on August 3rd. Calibration images consisted of Ne, Ar arc lamps (1.5 sec each) and internal flat fields (11 sec each). Slitmasks were observed in Multiple Correlated Double Sampling (MCDS) mode with 16 reads, and a dither position offset of ±\pm1.5′′ was used. Standard stars FS 139 (RA 16h33m52.9s16^{h}33^{m}52.9^{s}, Dec +542823′′+54^{\circ}28{{}^{\prime}}23{{}^{\prime\prime}}) and HD 162208 were observed in long-slit mode.

We used the standard MOSFIRE Data Reduction Pipeline (DRP) to reduce the spectroscopic data. The pipeline creates a pixel flatfield, performs slit edge tracing, calibrates the wavelength scale, performs background subtraction, rectifies the slits, and extracts the 1D spectra. We flux-calibrated the 1D spectra by using the standard star. First we smoothed the standard star spectrum and interpolated over telluric absorption lines. Then we modeled the star as a blackbody based on its effective temperature, and normalized the curve to the star’s Ks-band magnitude from the Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS), factoring in the filter response function. The factor to convert from counts/second to erg/s/cm2/Å is then proportional to the ratio of the normalized blackbody function to the calibration star spectrum. We accounted for slit losses by comparing each galaxy’s average flux density to CFHT/WIRCAM J-band photometry.

Our MOSFIRE sample contains 14 Hα\alpha and 9 [O II] emission-line candidates with at least four MIR detections/upper limits in the 7–24 μ\mum filters. The ranges in redshift, stellar mass, and TIR luminosity of the combined unique 15 sources are 0.54<z<1.040.54<z<1.04, 8.5×1098.5\times 10^{9} M<M<1.1×1011M_{\odot}<M_{*}<1.1\times 10^{11} MM_{\odot}, and 5.5×10105.5\times 10^{10} L<L(TIR)<8.6×1011L_{\odot}<L(TIR)<8.6\times 10^{11} LL_{\odot}.

2.3 Takagi et al. (2010) sample

In addition to our 2011-2016 Keck II/DEIMOS observations, we obtained reduced DEIMOS spectra and emission line flux measurements from observations in semester 2008A through the AKARI-NEP collaboration (PI: Toshinobu Takagi). Targets included 242 AKARI-NEP mid-IR-selected sources with Subaru/Suprime-Cam R-band magnitude \lesssim 24 mag. Five slitmasks were observed using the 600ZD grating and GG495 order blocking filter. Standard stars HZ 44 and Feige 110 were observed with a long slit (1.5′′ slit width) using the same grating and filter setup as the targets. Data were reduced using the spec2d pipeline, and then flux-calibrated with standard IRAF routines. [O II]λλ3726,3729\lambda\lambda 3726,3729, Hβ\beta, [O III]λ5007\lambda 5007, Hα\alpha, and [N II]λ6584\lambda 6584 emission lines were fit using Gaussian models with the IDL/MPFIT routine. Double Gaussians were used to fit the resolved [O II] doublet, Hβ\beta emission with underlying absorption, and Hα\alpha with broad and narrow line components in AGN. The continuum was modeled with a linear fit. Hα\alpha and [N II]λλ6548,6584\lambda\lambda 6548,6584 were fit simultaneously with three Gaussians. The Takagi et al. sample contains 48 Hα\alpha and 126 [O II] emission line candidates with at least four MIR detections in the 7–24 μ\mum filters. The ranges in redshift, stellar mass, and TIR luminosity of the combined unique 152 sources are 0.09<z<1.350.09<z<1.35, 9.5×1089.5\times 10^{8} M<M<3.1×1011M_{\odot}<M_{*}<3.1\times 10^{11} MM_{\odot}, and 8.3×1088.3\times 10^{8} L<L(TIR)<3.1×1012L_{\odot}<L(TIR)<3.1\times 10^{12} LL_{\odot}.

2.4 Shim et al. (2013) sample

We also include spectroscopic redshifts and emission line fluxes from the Shim et al. (2013) sample, which consists of spectroscopy of hundreds of low-redshift galaxies and AGN (z0.4z\lesssim 0.4) in the AKARI NEP-Wide field. This provides rest-frame UV/optical emission line detections from MMT/Hectospec and WIYN/HYDRA multi-object spectrographs. The authors primarily selected targets with MIR detections at 11 μ\mum and 15 μ\mum. Secondary target selection criteria are summarized in their Table 1, and include AGN candidates, Herschel FIR sources, and PAH-luminous galaxies. The Shim et al. sample contains 498 Hα\alpha and 571 [O II] emission line galaxieses with at least four MIR detections/upper limits in the 7–24 μ\mum filters and secure redshifts (i.e., quality flag of 4). The ranges in redshift, stellar mass, and TIR luminosity of the combined unique 711 sources are 0.03<z<1.290.03<z<1.29, 1.9×1081.9\times 10^{8} M<M<9.9×1011M_{\odot}<M_{*}<9.9\times 10^{11} MM_{\odot}, and 4.3×1084.3\times 10^{8} L<L(TIR)<3.2×1012L_{\odot}<L(TIR)<3.2\times 10^{12} LL_{\odot}.

2.5 Oi et al. (2017) sample

We supplement our high-redshift MOSFIRE data with near-infrared Hα\alpha detections from Oi et al. (2017), who studied the mass-metallicity relation in luminous infrared galaxies at z0.9z\sim 0.9. Their sample consists of Subaru/FMOS Hα\alpha/[N II] multi-object spectroscopy in the J-long band (1.11–1.35 μ\mum), of AKARI mid-infrared sources in the NEP-Deep field. Target galaxies were selected to have detections at 11 μ\mum, 15 μ\mum, and/or 18 μ\mum, and estimated photometric redshifts zphot1z_{phot}\sim 1. Hα\alpha/[N II] fluxes are given for 28 secure Hα\alpha emitters and Hα\alpha fluxes are given for 36 “non-secure” Hα\alpha detections (i.e., objects where a single emission line was observed and assumed to be Hα\alpha.) Some of the non-secure Hα\alpha objects have since been re-observed in optical wavelengths by AKARI NEP collaborators using MMT/Hectospec, WIYN/Hydra, Keck II/DEIMOS, and GTC/OSIRIS, allowing us to confirm that 10/36 are indeed Hα\alpha detections based on the detection of other strong emission lines at shorter wavelengths (e.g., [OII], Hγ\gamma, Hβ\beta, [OIII]). In addition, we find that the emission line from object 61016583, assumed by the Oi et al. to be Hα\alpha, is [O III]λ\lambda5007 at z=1.357z=1.357. For reference, we list the updated secure Hα\alpha objects in Table 9 in the Appendix. Our SFR calibration sample includes 37 FMOS objects with Hα\alpha detections and at least four MIR detections/upper limits in the 7–24 μ\mum filters. The ranges in redshift, stellar mass, and TIR luminosity are 0.70<z<1.030.70<z<1.03, 2.1×1092.1\times 10^{9} M<M<1.5×1011M_{\odot}<M_{*}<1.5\times 10^{11} MM_{\odot}, and 8.1×10108.1\times 10^{10} L<L(TIR)<1.5×1012L_{\odot}<L(TIR)<1.5\times 10^{12} LL_{\odot}.

2.6 Validation sample: Ohyama et al. (2018) SPICY galaxies

The AKARI/IRC slitless SpectroscoPIC surveY (SPICY) obtained infrared spectra of all sources with 9 μ\mum flux density brighter than 0.3 mJy in 14 NEP fields of 10×1010{{}^{\prime}}\times 10{{}^{\prime}}. The primary goal was to study PAH emission in galaxies at z0.5z\lesssim 0.5 (Ohyama et al., 2018) within the NEP-Deep and Wide fields. Low-resolution spectra (R50R\sim 50) were acquired with the short-wavelength MIR camera on the IRC, which covers a wavelength range of 513μ5-13\ \mum. Ohyama et al. identified 48 galaxies with detectable PAH 6.2, 7.7, and 8.6 μ\mum features. All 48 galaxies have AKARI/IRC photometry, with 83% having detections in the N2, N3, N4, S7, S9W, S11, L15, and L18W filters (218μ\sim 2-18\ \mum). Of the 48 PAH galaxies in the sample, 41 galaxies have optical spectroscopic detections and 33 galaxies have detected Hα\alpha emission from Keck II/DEIMOS (this work) or MMT/Hectospec (PI: Ho Seong Hwang). Figure 2 illustrates typical SPICY spectra of star-forming galaxies from Ohyama et al. (2018). We use these 41 galaxies as our validation sample, to test the consistency and accuracy of our photometrically-derived PAH luminosity measurements. The ranges in redshift, stellar mass, and TIR luminosity of the 41 sources are 0.06<z<0.490.06<z<0.49, 2×1092\times 10^{9} M<M<2×1011M_{\odot}<M_{*}<2\times 10^{11} MM_{\odot}, and 2.1×1092.1\times 10^{9} L<L(TIR)<3.9×1011L_{\odot}<L(TIR)<3.9\times 10^{11} LL_{\odot}.

Refer to caption
Figure 2: Examples of AKARI SPICY spectra of star-forming galaxies from Ohyama et al. (2018) with PAH emission detections. Underlying curves represent Lorentzian fits to the PAH 6.2, 7.7, 8.6, and 11.3 μ\mum emission features (Ohyama et al., 2018).

2.7 Emission line measurements

Figure 3 shows examples of the quality of our DEIMOS and MOSFIRE spectra. The top panel shows a MOSFIRE galaxy detected in the J-band that has red- and blue-shifted lines in Hα\alpha and [N II] due to rotational kinematics. The second panel is an example of a typical star-forming galaxy observed with DEIMOS with Hα\alpha, [N II], and [S II] emission lines. The third panel shows a Seyfert galaxy with double-peaked emission in Hβ\beta and [O III]. The signal-to-noise is also high enough to resolve the doublet in Hγ\gamma (not shown). The fourth panel shows broad blue wings in [O III] emission, suggestive of outflows from an AGN.

Refer to caption
Figure 3: Example observations illustrating the quality and variety of selected sections of our high resolution spectra. The galaxy in the top panel was observed with Keck I/MOSFIRE J-band, and the bottom three were observed with Keck II/DEIMOS. The Hα\alpha/[N II] complex is clearly detected in the top two spectra, while the Hβ\beta/[O III] complex is seen in the bottom two.

We used the Specpro software (Masters & Capak, 2011) to visually inspect each spectrum and to determine an initial redshift guess based on a template of emission and absorption lines. This initial redshift served as the seed for our python routine that used non-linear least-squares fitting. We used Gaussian fits to measure redshifts, emission line fluxes, and equivalent widths for [O II]λλ\lambda\lambda3726,3729, Hγ\gamma, Hβ\beta, [O III]λλ\lambda\lambda4959,5007, Hα\alpha, [N II]λλ\lambda\lambda6548,6584, and [S II]λλ\lambda\lambda6716,6731. In general, a linear local continuum was added. For Hγ\gamma and Hβ\beta, the continuum was modeled with a Voigt profile in order to account for underlying stellar absorption.

For multi-component Gaussian fits, the following constraints were used in order to limit the number of free parameters. When resolved, the [[O II]]λλ\lambda\lambda3726,3729 doublet was fit with a double Gaussian, with the central wavelength and width of [O II]λ\lambda3729 fixed relative to [O II]λ\lambda3726. The [[O III]λλ]\lambda\lambda4959,5007 lines were fit with a double Gaussian such that the width of [O III]λ\lambda4959 was fixed to that of the stronger line λ\lambda5007, the central wavelength was fixed relative to the expected separation, and the amplitude was fixed to the theoretical value of [O III]λ\lambda5007/2.98 (Osterbrock, 1989). For the Hα\alpha, [[N II]λλ]\lambda\lambda6548,6584 complex, a triple Gaussian was used; the amplitude of [N II]λ\lambda6548 was fixed to be [N II]λ\lambda6584/3.071 (Osterbrock, 1989), the central wavelengths of [N II] were fixed relative to Hα\alpha, and the width of [N II]λ\lambda6548 was fixed to be that of λ\lambda6584. For Seyfert galaxies where a broad Hα\alpha component was detected (FWHM \gtrsim 1000 km/s), an additional underlying Gaussian was added.

2.7.1 Metallicity Measurements

We estimate the oxygen abundance111We use the terms “oxygen abundance” and “metallicity” interchangeably in this work. of the ionized interstellar medium, 12+log(O/H), by using the N2 (log [N II]λ\lambda6584/Hα\alpha), O3N2 (log ([O III]λ\lambda5007/Hβ\beta)/([N II]λ\lambda6584/Hα\alpha)), and O32 (log ([O III]λ\lambda5007/[O II]λλ\lambda\lambda3726,3729) indicators. For the N2 and O3N2 indicators, we use the calibrations by Pettini & Pagel (2004), given by:

\text12+log(O/H)N2=8.9+0.57×\textN2\text{12+log(O/H)}_{N2}=8.9+0.57\times\text{N2}\\ (2)
\text12+log(O/H)O3N2=8.730.32×\textO3N2\text{12+log(O/H)}_{O3N2}=8.73-0.32\times\text{O3N2} (3)

where the 1-σ\sigma calibration uncertainties are 0.18 dex and 0.14 dex for N2 and O3N2, respectively. When using the N2 indicator, we limit measurements to objects with N2 <0.3<-0.3 to avoid saturation in nitrogen. For the O32 indicator, we use the calibration given by Jones et al. (2015):

\text12+log(O/H)O32=8.34390.4640×\textO32\text{12+log(O/H)}_{O32}=8.3439-0.4640\times\text{O32} (4)

which has an uncertainty of 0.11 dex. For reference, solar metallicity is such that 12+log(O/H) = 8.69 (Asplund et al., 2009).

Table 2 lists the total number of Hα\alpha and [O II] detections with at least four photometric detections (including upper limits from 7–24 μ\mum) and empirical metallicity measurements using either the N2 index (for Hα\alpha and [N II]-observed sources) and/or O32 index (for [O II] sources).

Table 2: Number of Hα\alpha and [O II] detections from combined observations.
Instrument NN(Hα\alpha) NN([O II])
Keck/DEIMOS 72 196
Keck/MOSFIRE 9 7
MMT/Hectospec, WIYN/Hydra(a) 334 422
Subaru/FMOS(b) 22 \text
437 625

Note. — All galaxies have at least four photometric detections (including upper limits) from 7-24 μ\mum and empirical metallicity measurements using the emission line ratios [N II]/Hα\alpha (for Hα\alpha and [N II]-measured sources) and/or O32 (for [O II] sources). References: (a) Shim et al. (2013), (b) Oi et al. (2017).

2.8 AGN selection

To avoid contamination from AGN in our SFR calculations, and to study the impact that the presence of an AGN has on PAH dust luminosity, we classify our source spectra. We identify AGN candidates using a combination of spectroscopic diagnostics, mid-infrared colors, and X-ray cross-matching. An object is considered to be an AGN if it meets at least one of the four following criteria:

  1. 1.

    the spectrum has broad permitted emission lines (i.e., FWHM \gtrsim 1000 km/s) consistent with a Type 1 Seyfert galaxy;

  2. 2.

    the object is a Type 2 Seyfert galaxy or LINER identified with the “BPT” line ratio diagram such that log([OIII]/Hβ\beta)>>0.61/(log([NII]/Hα\alpha)-0.02-0.1833×\timeszz) + 1.2+0.03×\timeszz (Kewley et al. (2013), Equation 1);

  3. 3.

    for MIR-selected AGN, the AKARI/IRC colors are such that N2-N4>>0 and S7-S11>>0 [AB magnitude] (Lee et al., 2007; Shim et al., 2013); and/or

  4. 4.

    the object has a Chandra X-ray counterpart within 2.5′′ (Krumpe et al., 2015).

The left panel of Figure 4 shows the usual BPT-[NII] emission line ratio diagram for our sources. Based on this diagram, there are 215 star-forming galaxies (“BPT-SF”) and 154 AGN candidates (“BPT-AGN”). Based on the MIR colors, there are 779 star-forming galaxies (“MIR-SF”) and 157 AGN candidates (“MIR-AGN”). BPT-classified SF galaxies with N2, N4, S7, and S11 filter detections are 99% consistent with their mid-infrared color classifications; 160 BPT-SF galaxies are also MIR-SF galaxies, while only two BPT-SF galaxies are classified as MIR-AGN. However, the likelihood that a BPT-AGN is classified as a MIR-SF galaxy is high: 121 BPT-AGN are classified as MIR-SF galaxies and 8 are classified as MIR-AGN. This is probably because MIR color selection is stricter, tending to exclude objects with low AGN fraction, and many Seyfert 2’s which the BPT diagram reveals. Thus, an MIR-selected AGN is powerful enough to be certainly identified as a BPT-AGN (left panel). The converse is not always true; some BPT-classified AGN have active nuclei which are too faint to contribute much mid-IR continuum. Both panels are color-coded by their AGN fraction as determined through SED fitting (Section 3.1).

Refer to caption
Figure 4: Left: BPT-[NII] diagram based on the redshift-dependent Kewley et al. (2013) equation. The line that separates star formation from AGN at z=0z=0 is shown for reference. Right: Mid-infrared classification with AKARI colors for objects with S/N>>3 detections in each filter. AGN candidates are found in the region where N2-N4>>0 and S7-S11>>0 (dashed lines). Both panels are color-coded by their mid-infrared AGN fraction determined from CIGALE SED fits (Section 3.1).

3 IRC Measurement of the PAH luminosity

3.1 Spectral energy distribution modeling

We matched our Hα\alpha detections with their multi-wavelength photometric counterparts, using a matching radius of the full width at half maximum of the telescope point spread function. When available, we merged photometry from the following telescopes: Chandra (Krumpe et al., 2015), GALEX FUV and NUV (Burgarella et al., 2019), CFHT/MegaCam u, g’, r’, i’, z’ (Oi et al., 2014; Hwang et al., 2007), Subaru/Hyper-Suprime Cam g/r/i/z/Y (Oi et al., 2021), CFHT/WIRCAM J and KS (Oi et al., 2014), KPNO/FLAMINGOS J and H (Jeon et al., 2014), AKARI/IRC N2, N3, N4, S7, S9W, S11, L15, L18W, L24 (Kim et al., 2012; Murata et al., 2013), Spitzer/IRAC1 (3.6 μ\mum) and IRAC2 (4.5 μ\mum) (Nayyeri et al., 2018), WISE 12 μ\mum and WISE 22 μ\mum (Wright et al., 2010; Jarrett et al., 2011; Cutri et al., 2021), Herschel/PACS green (100 μ\mum) and PACS red (160 μ\mum) (Pearson et al., 2019), and Herschel/SPIRE 250 μ\mum, 350 μ\mum, 500 μ\mum bands (Pearson et al., 2017). We note that some of these datasets do not cover the entire AKARI NEP-Wide field, but our multi-wavelength coverage of the NEP-Deep field is reasonably complete.

We modeled spectral energy distributions (SEDs) with the CIGALE software (Code Investigating GALaxy Emission), which is based on the assumption of energy balance between stellar radiation absorbed by dust in the UV/optical and dust emission output in the mid to far-infrared (Boquien et al., 2019; Yang et al., 2020). This implicitly requires that our view of the extinction is similar to what observers along most other lines-of-sight to the galaxy would also measure. CIGALE uses Bayesian analysis that combines stellar population models, AGN and ISM templates222We note that CIGALE includes the option to include user-input nebular emission line fluxes (e.g., Hα\alpha, [N II]), which would further constrain the metallicity and qPAHq_{PAH} parameters. However, we do not include emission line fluxes in this work, but recommend this option for future studies., and various libraries to determine the best parameters across all possible spectra. We assumed an exponentially decaying star formation history, Chabrier (2003) IMF, Calzetti et al. (2000) dust attenuation model, Draine et al. (2014) dust emission template, and Fritz et al. (2006) AGN emission model. The dust emission model characterizes PAH emission strength based on the qPAHq_{PAH} parameter, which is defined as the fraction of the total dust mass in PAH grains with fewer than 103 carbon atoms. For reference, average Milky Way dust has qPAHq_{PAH}\approx 4.6% (Draine & Li, 2007). We note that the Chandra X-ray data were only used to identify X-ray AGN and were not included in the CIGALE fits.

We define the AGN fraction, fracAGNfrac_{AGN}, as the ratio of the AGN luminosity to the total luminosity integrated between 5–10 μ\mum. For star-forming galaxies, we assume fracAGN=0frac_{AGN}=0. Otherwise, for AGN candidates and unclassified objects (i.e., objects with incomplete spectroscopic/photometric data), we allowed fracAGNfrac_{AGN} to vary. Figure 4 is color-coded by the AGN fraction. The median AGN fraction for BPT-AGN candidates is 0.05 with interquartile range of 0.01–0.13, compared to a median of 0.33 for MIR-AGN candidates with interquartile range of 0.12–0.48. This difference demonstrates the efficacy of the BPT diagram to select AGN with lower fracAGNfrac_{AGN} than the AKARI color-color diagram.

We used a 32-core processor through Amazon Web Services (AWS) cloud computing333https://aws.amazon.com/ to run our models at a rate of \sim30,000 models/second. For the final sample, we limit objects to those with 0.5<\textreducedχ2<100.5<\text{reduced}\chi^{2}<10. Objects with reduced χ2<0.5\chi^{2}<0.5 were excluded in order to avoid models with overfitting. Table 3 summarizes our input SED parameters. In Figure 5, we illustrate the multi-wavelength coverage of our photometric data (purple circles) and show some diverse examples of CIGALE best-fit SEDs which have a range of PAH strengths in the mid-infrared. The light blue region from 2-24 μ\mum highlights the observed wavelength range of the AKARI/IRC, and the dotted vertical line indicates the observed wavelength for the PAH 7.7 μ\mum blend. The model spectrum (solid black line) represents the sum over the attenuated stellar emission, dust emission, and AGN emission components. Although we include the contribution from nebular emission when modeling SEDs, we omit it in the figure for simplicity.

The total infrared luminosity, L(TIR)L(TIR), has been extensively used in the literature as a SFR indicator, and is known to correlate with PAH luminosity (Takagi et al., 2010). We calculate L(TIR)L(TIR) for individual objects by shifting the best-fit SED to the rest frame and integrating from 8–1000 μ\mum. In the Appendix, we test the dependence of FIR photometry on the integrated L(TIR)L(TIR) and find that L(TIR)L(TIR) measurements with and without FIR data are consistent with a root-mean-square (RMS) dispersion of 0.096 dex (Figure 25). Therefore, we estimate that our L(TIR)L(TIR) measurements are accurate to within \sim20%.

Refer to caption
Figure 5: Examples of typical CIGALE SED fits, including: (a) star forming “main-sequence’ galaxy with solar metallicity and strong PAH emission; (b) metal-rich starburst galaxy (RSB=11) with weak PAH emission; (c) metal-poor starburst galaxy (RSB=18) with weak PAH emission; (d) Type-II BPT-AGN with weak PAH emission.
Table 3: Input parameters for CIGALE SED fitting
Parameter Description Value
Star Formation History: SFR(t)et/τSFR(t)\propto e^{-t/\tau}
τ\tau (Myr) e-folding time of main stellar population 100, 300, 1000, 2000, 3000, 5000, 10000, 15000, 30000
ageage (Myr) age of main stellar population 3, 8, 20, 50, 125, 300, 800, 2000, 5000, 13000
Stellar Populations
IMF Initial Mass Function Chabrier (2003)
ZZ Metallicity 0.02 (solar)
Separation age (Myr) separation age between young and old stellar populations 10
Nebular Emission
log(UU) ionization parameter -2.0
fescf_{esc} fraction of Lyman continuum photons escaping the galaxy 0.0
fdustf_{dust} fraction of Lyman continuum photons absorbed by dust 0.0
Dust Attenuation: Calzetti et al. (2000)
E(B-V)lines color excess of nebular line emission 0.0-1.6 in steps of 0.2
ff ratio of E(B-V)continuum to E(B-V)lines 0.44
UV extinction bump wavelength central wavelength of UV bump in nm 217.5
UV bump width FWHM of UV bump in nm 35.0
Dust Emission: Draine et al. (2014)
qPAHq_{PAH} (%) mass fraction of PAH 0.47, 1.12, 2.50, 3.90, 4.58, 5.26, 5.95, 6.63, 7.32
UminU_{min} minimum radiation field 1.0, 5.0
α\alpha power-law slope dU/dMUαdU/dM\propto U^{\alpha} 2.0
γ\gamma fraction illuminated from UminU_{min} to UmaxU_{max} 0.2
AGN Emission: Fritz et al. (2006)
rr ratio ratio of the maximum to minimum radii of the dust torus 60.0
τ9.7\tau_{9.7} optical depth at 9.7 μ\mum 1.0, 6.0
opening angle opening angle of dust torus 100.0
ψ\psi angle between equatorial axis and line of sight 0.001, 89.990
fracAGNfrac_{AGN} AGN fraction 0.0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.25, 0.3, 0.35, 0.4, 0.45, 0.5

3.2 Calibration sample characteristics

Our final PAH-derived SFR calibration sample consists of main-sequence and starburst galaxies with Hα\alpha and/or [O II] emission lines and metallicities measured using the N2, O3N2, and/or O32 line ratio indices. The sample includes 319 galaxies with Hα\alpha detections and 332 galaxies with [O II] detections. There are a total of 443 unique sources. We summarize the main properties of this sample in Figure 6. The redshift, stellar mass, and total IR luminosity range from 0.048<z<<z<1.025, 108.7 M<< M <<1011.2 M, and 108.710^{8.7} L<< L(TIR) <<1012 L, respectively. Table 4 lists the emission line fluxes and physical properties for a portion of galaxies within the calibration sample. The full table is published online.

Refer to caption
Figure 6: Distributions of main properties of the final SFR(PAH) calibration sample with Hα\alpha and/or [O II] emission line detections. From left to right: spectroscopic redshift, stellar mass, total infrared luminosity, metallicity based on N2 index, metallicity based on O32 index, and attenuation in Hα\alpha based on SED fitting.
Table 4: Calibration sample emission line fluxes and physical properties
Object RA Dec Redshift f([OII])f([O\ II]) σf([OII])\sigma_{f([O\ II])} f(Hβ)f(H\beta) σf(Hβ)\sigma_{f(H\beta)} f([OIII]λ5007)f([O\ III]\lambda 5007) σf([OIII]λ5007)\sigma_{f([O\ III]\lambda 5007)} f(Hα)f(H\alpha) σf(Hα)\sigma_{f(H\alpha)} f([NII]λ6584)f([N\ II]\lambda 6584) σf([NII]λ6584)\sigma_{f([N\ II]\lambda 6584)} log (MM)\left(\frac{M_{*}}{M_{\odot}}\right) log (L(TIR)L)\left(\frac{L(TIR)}{L_{\odot}}\right) L(PAH 6.2μm)L(PAH\ 6.2\ \mu m) L(PAH 7.7μm)L(PAH\ 7.7\ \mu m)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18)
61017806 269.047 66.632 0.487 0.00 0.00 2.58 0.08 0.10 12.44 0.24 3.70 0.26 10.38 4.47×10424.47\times 10^{42} 1.45×10431.45\times 10^{43}
61018416 268.719 66.648 0.395 1.38 0.11 0.97 0.06 0.11 6.61 0.15 2.83 0.16 10.36 3.25×10423.25\times 10^{42} 1.14×10431.14\times 10^{43}
61019580 268.737 66.680 0.116 0.00 0.00 5.34 0.11 0.19 22.66 0.12 6.02 0.15 9.36 8.05×10408.05\times 10^{40} 2.71×10412.71\times 10^{41}
61019692 268.836 66.685 0.390 0.00 0.00 1.59 0.05 0.10 7.73 0.12 2.63 0.12 9.92 1.12×10421.12\times 10^{42} 3.88×10423.88\times 10^{42}
61020407 268.616 66.704 0.454 1.96 0.12 2.37 0.08 0.09 14.71 0.22 6.31 0.28 10.03 4.97×10424.97\times 10^{42} 1.73×10431.73\times 10^{43}

Note. — Column names are as follows: (1) Object name; (2) Right ascension in degrees; (3) Declination in degrees; (4) Spectroscopic redshift; (5)-(14) Emission line fluxes and mean errors in 101610^{-16} erg s-1 cm-2; (15) Stellar mass; (16) Total infrared luminosity; (17)-(18) PAH luminosities in erg s-1. The errors in the PAH 6.2 μ\mum and 7.7 μ\mum luminosities are discussed in Section 3.4.1. This table is published in its entirety in the machine-readable format. A portion is shown here for guidance regarding its form and content.

Figure 7 shows the specific star formation rate (sSFR) as a function of redshift of all galaxy candidates with Hα\alpha and/or [O II] detections. The sSFR, the mass-normalized star formation rate, is given by Kennicutt (1998) as

sSFR[yr1]=[1.72×1010×(L(TIR)/L)]/[(M/M)/0.61],sSFR\ [yr^{-1}]=[1.72\times 10^{-10}\times(L(TIR)/L_{\odot})]/[(M_{*}/M_{\odot})/0.61], (5)

where L(TIR)L(TIR) is the total IR luminosity of the best-fit SED integrated from rest-frame 8–1000 μ\mum and (M/M)/0.61 is the stellar mass converted from Chabrier (2003) to Kennicutt (1983) IMF. “Main-sequence” galaxies are defined as objects with 13×tcosmic2.213\times t^{-2.2}_{cosmic}\leq sSFR [1/Gyr] 52×tcosmic2.2\leq 52\times t^{-2.2}_{cosmic}, where tcosmict_{cosmic} is the cosmic time elapsed since the Big Bang in Gyr (Elbaz et al., 2011). “Starburst” galaxies and “quenched” galaxies lie above and below this region, respectively. To classify starburst galaxies, we adopt the RSBR_{SB} starburst parameter from Elbaz et al. (2011), which describes the “starburst excess” relative to main-sequence star formation and is defined as the ratio of the sSFR to the main-sequence sSFR. With their definition, starburst galaxies have RSB2R_{SB}\gtrsim 2 (blue star symbols), main-sequence galaxies have 0.5RSB20.5\lesssim R_{SB}\lesssim 2 (black triangle symbols), and quenched galaxies have RSB0.5R_{SB}\lesssim 0.5 (red circle symbols).

Refer to caption
Figure 7: Specific star formation rate as a function of redshift for galaxies with Hα\alpha and/or [O II] detections in the calibration sample.

In Figure 8, we plot the observed N3 and L18W magnitudes as a function of redshift for galaxies within our calibration sample (red circle symbols). Of the 443 star-forming galaxies in the calibration sample, 424 galaxies have detected N3 magnitudes (left panel), and 369 galaxies have detected L18W magnitudes (right). For reference, photometric detections of galaxies in the AKARI/IRC NEP-Deep field with photometric redshifts are shown as black dots (Oi et al., 2014). The blue dashed lines in the figure indicate that our sample is flux-limited down to \simeq 20 AB mag at 3 μ\mum and \simeq 19 AB mag at 18 μ\mum up to z0.7z\sim 0.7, which corresponds to a stellar mass limit of M109.5M_{*}\gtrsim 10^{9.5} MM_{\odot}.

Refer to caption
Figure 8: Observed AKARI/IRC magnitudes at 3 and 18 μ\mum (N3 and L18W filters, respectively) as a function of redshift. Main-sequence and starburst galaxies from our calibration sample are shown as red circles. Observations from the AKARI NEP-Deep field survey (Oi et al., 2014) are shown as faint black dots. Blue dashed lines indicate approximate flux limits.

3.3 Extinction-corrected Hα\alpha and [O II] Luminosity

We calculate dust-corrected Hα\alpha luminosities using three methods: the 24 μ\mum rest-frame monochromatic luminosity (λ\lambdaLλ(24 μ\mum)) correction, the Balmer decrement (Hα\alpha/Hβ\beta), and the color excess E(B-V) derived with CIGALE. The empirical 24 μ\mum correction to Hα\alpha defined by Kennicutt (1998) is given as:

L(Hα)24μm=L(Hα)obs+0.02×λLλ(24μm)\text[erg/s]L(H\alpha)_{24\ \mu m}=L(H\alpha)_{obs}+0.02\times\lambda L_{\lambda}(24\ \mu m)\ \text{[erg/s]} (6)

where L(Hα)obsL(H\alpha)_{obs} is the observed Hα\alpha luminosity and luminosities are in erg/s. We calculate λ\lambdaLλ(24 μ\mum) as the rest-frame luminosity density of the best-fit SED model at 24 μ\mum multiplied by the effective wavelength. The intrinsic Hα\alpha luminosity is given by:

L(Hα)=L(Hα)obs×100.4A(Hα)L(H\alpha)=L(H\alpha)_{obs}\times 10^{0.4A(H\alpha)} (7)

where A(Hα)A(H\alpha) is the attenuation in Hα\alpha in magnitudes. For star-forming galaxies with Hα\alpha and Hβ\beta flux measurements, A(Hα)A(H\alpha) is given by the Balmer decrement (BD):

A(Hα)BD\text[mag]=3.33×1.97×\textlog((F(Hα)/F(Hβ))obs2.86)A(H\alpha)_{BD}\ \text{[mag]}=3.33\times 1.97\times\text{log}\left(\frac{(F(H\alpha)/F(H\beta))_{obs}}{2.86}\right) (8)

where (F(Hα\alpha)/F(Hβ\beta))obs is the observed flux ratio, and we assume the Calzetti et al. (2000) attenuation law and an intrinsic flux ratio of 2.86 (Case B recombination and T=104 K; Osterbrock (1989)). The SED-derived A(Hα)A(H\alpha) is given by:

A(Hα)CIGALE\text[mag]=2.45×E(BV)linesA(H\alpha)_{CIGALE}\ \text{[mag]}=2.45\times E(B-V)_{lines} (9)

where E(B-V)lines is the color excess of the nebular lines’ light, and we assume a standard Milky Way extinction curve.

Figure 9 shows a comparison of intrinsic Hα\alpha luminosities for the galaxies in the calibration sample with Hα\alpha and Hβ\beta flux measurements. Heavily dust-reddened objects with A(Hα)>3A(H\alpha)>3 mag as calculated via the Balmer decrement are shown by red squares. In these objects, the dust-corrected Hα\alpha luminosity deviates significantly from those derived via the 24 μ\mum luminosity and predicted CIGALE extinction, as shown in panels (a) and (b). However, as shown by panel (c), the corrections given by the 24 μ\mum and CIGALE methods produce similar intrinsic Hα\alpha luminosities, which is most likely due to their shared dependence on MIR photometry. The scatter between the Balmer decrement correction and 24 μ\mum luminosity correction has been observed in other studies (e.g., Boselli et al., 2015, Shipley et al., 2016). They attribute the discrepancy as being due to uncertainty in the underlying stellar absorption correction for objects with weak Hβ\beta emission.

Refer to caption
Figure 9: Intercomparison of corrected Hα\alpha luminosities derived from our three different de-reddening methods (Equations 6-9). The “BD” subscript refers to the Balmer decrement (Hα\alpha/Hβ\beta).

To correct the [O II] luminosity for dust extinction, we adopt the calibration given in Kennicutt (1998):

L([OII])24μm=L([OII])obs+0.029×λLλ(24μm),L([O\ II])_{24\ \mu m}=L([O\ II])_{obs}+0.029\times\lambda L_{\lambda}(24\ \mu m), (10)

where the luminosities are in erg/s. The [O II] SFR is then given by Kennicutt (1998) as:

SFR[M/yr]=8.1×1042L([OII])24μm[erg/s]SFR\ [M_{\odot}/yr]=8.1\times 10^{-42}L([O\ II])_{24\ \mu m}\ [erg/s] (11)

assuming a Salpeter IMF. We discuss limitations of using the [O II] luminosity to measure SFR in the Appendix.

3.4 Measurement of PAH luminosity

We input the rest-frame, best-fit SEDs from CIGALE into PAHFIT (Smith et al., 2007; Smith & Draine, 2012) in order to model the dust emission and continuum from 5-35 μ\mum, and to extract the PAH luminosities. The input best-fit SEDs include the attenuated stellar emission, nebular emission, and dust emission (i.e., modeled AGN emission is removed for AGN candidates). Then, we resample the model spectrum into the Spitzer/IRS wavelength grid. PAHFIT uses a physical decomposition model to simulate the MIR continuum with a sum of modified blackbodies and starlight, and the PAH dust blends with Drude profiles. Because it does not take AGN emission into account, we only consider SED components from the total attenuated stellar light, nebular emission, and dust emission. For the PAH features, we fixed the central wavelengths and FWHM to their standard values and allowed the amplitudes to vary. Figure 10 shows a typical PAHFIT result for a star-forming galaxy. The integrated intensity of the Drude profile is equal to

I(r)=πc2brγrλr,I^{(r)}=\frac{\pi c}{2}\frac{b_{r}\gamma_{r}}{\lambda_{r}}, (12)

where λr\lambda_{r} is the central wavelength of the PAH feature, γr\gamma_{r} is the fractional FWHM, and brb_{r} is the central amplitude (Smith et al., 2007). For example, the luminosities for the PAH 6.2 μ\mum and 7.7 μ\mum emission features are given by:

L(\textPAH 6.2μm)[erg/s]=107×4πdL2πc2×(0.030b6.22μm6.22μm)L(\text{PAH}\ 6.2\ \mu m)\ [erg/s]=10^{7}\times 4\pi d_{L}^{2}\frac{\pi c}{2}\times\left(\frac{0.030\ b_{6.22\mu m}}{6.22\ \mu m}\right) (13)
L(\textPAH 7.7μm)[erg/s]=107×4πdL2πc2×\displaystyle L(\text{PAH}\ 7.7\ \mu m)\ [erg/s]=10^{7}\times 4\pi d_{L}^{2}\frac{\pi c}{2}\times
(0.126b7.42μm7.42μm+0.044b7.60μm7.60μm+0.053b7.85μm7.85μm)\displaystyle\left(\frac{0.126\ b_{7.42\mu m}}{7.42\ \mu m}+\frac{0.044\ b_{7.60\mu m}}{7.60\ \mu m}+\frac{0.053\ b_{7.85\mu m}}{7.85\ \mu m}\right) (14)

with amplitudes brb_{r} in units of W/m2/Hz, luminosity distance dLd_{L} in meters, and cc in μ\mum/s.

Refer to caption
Figure 10: Example of a typical PAHfit result for a main-sequence galaxy at zz=0.36 (ID: J180123.2+654950.0; The SED is shown in Figure 5(a)), fit to the model SED (circle points). The solid red line shows the best-fit result. Drude profile fits to the PAH dust emission features are shown in blue. The solid purple line underlying the emission represents the continuum, which is the summation of the individual blackbody components shown in yellow.

3.4.1 Validation of PAH luminosity measurements

Figure 11 compares our PAH luminosity measurements for the 6.2 μ\mum and 7.7 μ\mum features to those by Ohyama et al. (2018) in their SPICY spectra of the same galaxies. The figure demonstrates the validity of our method for measuring L(PAH 6.2μm)L(PAH\ 6.2\ \mu m) and L(PAH 7.7μm)L(PAH\ 7.7\ \mu m), with systematic offsets of only 0.1\sim 0.1 dex and 0.2\sim 0.2 dex, respectively. The small root-mean-square (RMS) dispersions, σL(PAH 6.2μm)=\sigma_{L(PAH\ 6.2\ \mu m)}= 0.19 dex and σL(PAH 7.7μm)=\sigma_{L(PAH\ 7.7\ \mu m)}= 0.14 dex, represent the approximate errors in our PAH luminosity measurements. Our measurements of L(PAH 7.7μm)L(PAH\ 7.7\ \mu m) have a larger systematic offset from Ohyama et al.’s measurements compared to those of L(PAH 6.2μm)L(PAH\ 6.2\ \mu m), which is likely due to the difficulty in constraining the underlying continuum beneath the wide 7.7 μ\mum blend in noisy spectra. Their method uses a single broad Lorentzian to fit the 7.7 μ\mum blend from low resolution spectra, which may overestimate the flux somewhat. We note that although Ohyama et al. (2018) initially fit some IRC spectra of brighter sources with PAHFIT, they adopted a simpler model that could better detect faint PAH features in low-resolution IRC spectra (R50R\simeq 50), compared to the Spitzer/IRS spectra (60<R<13060<R<130) for which PAHFIT was designed.

Refer to caption
Figure 11: Top panel: Comparison between measured PAH luminosity from Ohyama et al. (2018) SPICY sample and inferred luminosity from our CIGALE and PAHFIT method for 6.2 μ\mum (left) and 7.7 μ\mum (right) blends. The solid line represents the least-squares linear fit to the data with slope fixed to unity. Bottom panel: Residuals as a function of the measured PAH luminosity with the dotted lines indicating the RMS dispersion in dex.

We further tested the importance of mid-infrared photometry on SED fitting by re-running CIGALE on the sample of 48 SPICY galaxies without the MIR AKARI, WISE, and IRAC bands. We then compared the output qPAHq_{PAH} and SFR values with and without the MIR data. When comparing the qPAHq_{PAH} parameter, the results produced a scatter diagram, highlighting the necessity of including MIR data in determining qPAHq_{PAH} (and PAH luminosity). The SFRs derived from CIGALE without MIR data were comparable to the original results for about 50% of the galaxies; however, for the remaining half, the SFRs calculated without MIR data were highly uncertain because these galaxies also lacked UV and FIR photometry.

In addition to the PAH luminosity, we also calculated the peak luminosity at 7.7 μ\mum, νLν(7.7μ\nu L\nu(7.7\mum), which is sometimes used as a proxy for the PAH luminosity in the literature because it can be estimated photometrically (e.g., Takagi et al., 2010). The relation for the peak luminosity is:

νLν(7.7μm)=Fν(7.7μm)×4πdL2ν(7.7μm),\nu L_{\nu}(7.7\mu m)=F_{\nu}(7.7\mu m)\times 4\pi d_{L}^{2}\nu(7.7\mu m), (15)

where Fν(7.7μm)F_{\nu}(7.7\mu m) is the best-fit spectrum from PAHFIT evaluated at 7.7 μ\mum (i.e., the sum of the blackbody continuua and Drude profiles at 7.7 μ\mum) and ν(7.7μm)\nu(7.7\mu m) is the frequency at 7.7 μ\mum in Hz. We use these peak luminosities in Section 6 to compare our results to Takagi et al. (2010).

The convenience of estimating PAH flux from measurements in just a few broadband filters, particularly the IRAC-4 8 μ\mum band, has been studied by many authors. For example, Figueira et al. (2022) attempted this with a limited set of IRAC and MIPS photometry. However, they found that the rest-frame 8 μ\mum band luminosity did not correlate well with SFR, and the logarithmic slope they found, 0.81, was much less than linear. They speculated that their difficulty may have stemmed from their inability to separate the PAH 7.7 μ\mum flux from the underlying continuum components in that wavelength region.

Marble et al. (2010) derived PAH fluxes for a local sample of SINGS galaxies based on the Spitzer/IRAC 3.6, 4.5, 5.8, and 8 μ\mum bands and MIPS 24 μ\mum. We compare our 7.7 μ\mum PAH luminosity to their photometric-based PAH luminosity, known as the “aromatic feature emission” of the 8 μ\mum blend (L8afeL_{8}^{afe}), by selecting SPICY galaxies with z<0.1z<0.1 and estimating the observed Spitzer flux densities with CIGALE. The resulting sub-sample contains 13 objects. Figure 12 shows the comparison between L8afeL_{8}^{afe} and our measured L(PAH 7.7μm)L(PAH\ 7.7\ \mu m) (left panel) and L(PAH 7.7μm)L(PAH\ 7.7\ \mu m) from Ohyama et al. (2018). Our results are consistent with Marble et al. (2010), with a slight offset of 0.150.2\sim 0.15-0.2 dex. This offset is likely due to L8afeL_{8}^{afe} including the 8.33 and 8.61 μ\mum features in addition to the 7.7 μ\mum blend, leading to an overestimation of the 7.7 μ\mum luminosity. The result from Ohyama et al. (2018) is likely more consistent with Marble et al. (2010) due to the simplified Lorentzian profile that was used to fit the 7.7 μ\mum feature, again leading to a slight overestimate in the flux density.

Refer to caption
Figure 12: Comparison between the aromatic feature emission luminosities at 8 μ\mum from Marble et al. (2010) and our PAH 7.7 μ\mum luminosities (left panel) and those of Ohyama et al. (2018) (right panel) for SPICY galaxies at z<0.1z<0.1. The RMS scatter in the left panel is 58% (or, approximately 10% after a 0.2 dex offset is applied to the residuals), while the RMS scatter in the right panel is 32%.

3.4.2 Limitations on constraining PAH line ratios

Throughout this work, we present our results using both the 6.2 μ\mum and 7.7 μ\mum luminosities. It is important to note that these luminosities and their resulting SFR calibrations are not completely independent of each other due to our use of the CIGALE templates. In all of these templates, L(PAH 6.2μm)/L(PAH 7.7μm)0.3L(PAH\ 6.2\ \mu m)/L(PAH\ 7.7\ \mu m)\simeq 0.3. A separate photometric approach would be needed to constrain the variability in 6.2 μ\mum/7.7 μ\mum. However, assuming that the SED templates give descriptions of the PAH dust emission in star-forming galaxies, which we tested with the SPICY sample, we believe that it is valuable to present both indicators for future research, with this caveat. For example, the 6.2 μ\mum feature is narrower than the 7.7 μ\mum blend and may be easier to measure in some cases.

4 Analysis

4.1 Effects of starburst intensity, metallicity, and AGN fraction

Refer to caption
Figure 13: PAH 6.2 μ\mum (left column) and 7.7 μ\mum (right column) luminosities vs. observed Hα\alpha and [O II] luminosities in star-forming galaxies, colored by the logarithm of the starburst intensity, RSBR_{SB}.

To determine how well PAH luminosities predict SFR, we correlate the PAH 6.2 μ\mum and 7.7 μ\mum luminosities with the reddening-corrected Hα\alpha and [O II] luminosities. Figure 13 shows the PAH 6.2 μ\mum and 7.7 μ\mum luminosity as a function of observed (reddened) Hα\alpha and [O II] luminosity. The four panels show a positive correlation between PAH luminosity and observed Hα\alpha and [O II] luminosity, with considerable scatter due to reddening effects which have not yet been taken into account. For reference, the symbols are colored by the logarithm of the starburst intensity, RSBR_{SB}. Despite the large scatter, there is a visible trend such that galaxies with higher RSBR_{SB} generally have depreciated PAH luminosity for a given observed Hα\alpha or [O II] luminosity (or enhanced Hα\alpha or [O II] for a given PAH luminosity).

Figures 14 shows the PAH 7.7 μ\mum luminosity as a function of the de-reddened Hα\alpha luminosity. We fit linear relations of the form log L(PAH 7.7μm)L(PAH\ 7.7\ \mu m) = c0c_{0} + c1c_{1} ×\timeslog L(Hα)L(H\alpha) to the star-forming sample. Quenched galaxies (i.e., RSB<0.5R_{SB}<0.5; see Section 3.2) are shown for reference as red square symbols but are excluded from the fits. The three panels in Figure 14 show results for different methods of correcting the observed Hα\alpha luminosity as discussed in Section 3.3. Compared to Figure 13, the scatter between L(PAH 7.7μm)L(PAH\ 7.7\ \mu m) and L(Hα)24μmL(H\alpha)_{24\ \mu m} is significantly reduced; the RMS dispersion of the fit is 0.31 dex. The dotted line in panel (a) represents the linear relation from Shipley et al. (2016) derived from Spitzer/IRS galaxies with solar metallicity at z<0.4z<0.4. For the majority of galaxies, L(PAH 7.7μm)L(PAH\ 7.7\ \mu m) is linearly correlated with L(Hα)24μmL(H\alpha)_{24\ \mu m} (i.e., slope \sim 1). However, we find that a small minority, 47/319 (15%), of the galaxies deviate from the fit by -0.4 dex, contributing to the uncertainty in the normalization and non-linear slope. This deviation is consistent with Calzetti et al. (2007), who attribute it to low metallicity and decline to provide a calibration for 8 μ\mum emission as a local star formation rate indicator on this basis. Panels (b) and (c) show that the correlations between L(PAH 7.7μm)L(PAH\ 7.7\ \mu m) and L(Hα)L(H\alpha) are non-linear with the Balmer decrement and SED fitting corrections, with the Balmer decrement method resulting in the most scatter.

The majority of the quenched galaxies shown in panel (a) of Figure 14 (red square symbols) lie along or slightly above the linear correlation between L(PAH 7.7μm)L(PAH\ 7.7\ \mu m) and dust-corrected L(Hα)L(H\alpha), which is consistent with the physical scenario where intense starbursts lead to the destruction of PAH dust grains due to UV dissociation (Draine et al., 2007); in an environment with low RSBR_{SB}, there are significantly fewer young, massive O and B stars compared to actively star-forming galaxies. Based on a sample of local SDSS galaxies, Smercina et al. (2018) found that the dominant PAH emission in post-starburst galaxies can overestimate the SFR relative to traditional ionized gas tracers in the mid-infrared that are typically present in H II regions (e.g., [Ne II]+[Ne III]). French et al. (2023) similarly found that the TIR luminosity overestimates the SFR relative to Hα\alpha, [Ne II]+[Ne III], and other ionized gas tracers when the star formation history is abruptly truncated, which is believed to be the scenario in post-starburst galaxies.

Refer to caption
Figure 14: Comparison of PAH 7.7 μ\mum luminosity vs. intrinsic Hα\alpha luminosity of main-sequence and starburst galaxies for different dust extinction correction methods: (a) rest-frame 24 μ\mum luminosity correction from Kennicutt et al. (2009); (b) Balmer decrement; (c) SED fitting. The solid lines represent linear fits.

Figure 15 shows the correlations between the PAH 6.2 μ\mum and 7.7 μ\mum luminosities with the dust-corrected Hα\alpha luminosity for the star-forming sample, with main-sequence and starburst galaxies fit separately. For main sequence galaxies, the linear and unity slope fits for the PAH 7.7 μ\mum luminosities are consistent with the relations found by Shipley et al. The linear relations for L(PAH 6.2μm)L(PAH\ 6.2\ \mu m) in main-sequence galaxies are also consistent within \sim0.25 dex. The figure demonstrates that starburst galaxies have lower PAH luminosities for a given intrinsic Hα\alpha luminosity. If we assume unity slope in the linear fits, the trend for starburst galaxies has a systematic offset of \sim0.35 dex relative to that of main-sequence galaxies for both PAH 6.2 μ\mum and 7.7 μ\mum features, suggesting that starburst galaxies are either PAH-deficient for fixed Hα\alpha luminosity or Hα\alpha-enhanced for fixed PAH luminosity.

The offset between starburst galaxies and main-sequence galaxies is also present in the correlation between PAH luminosity and dust-corrected [O II] luminosity, as shown in Figure 16. Starburst galaxies are systematically lower by a factor of 0.3 dex. We also find that linear fits to the main-sequence sample of the form log L(PAH)=c0+c1×L(PAH)=c_{0}+c_{1}\times log L([OII])L([OII]) result in a shallower slope compared to fits with respect to L(Hα)L(H\alpha) such that L(PAH)L([OII])0.9L(PAH)\propto L([OII])^{0.9}.

Refer to caption
Figure 15: Relation between PAH 6.2 μ\mum and 7.7 μ\mum luminosities and intrinsic Hα\alpha luminosity for star-forming galaxies. Main-sequence galaxies (black triangles) are shown in the left column, and starburst galaxies (blue stars) are shown in the right column. “Extreme” starburst galaxies (i.e., L(TIR)/L(8μm)>20L(TIR)/L(8\ \mu m)>20) are shown as red triangles. The solid and dashed lines represent linear and fixed unity fits, respectively. The dash-dotted line represents the linear relation given by Shipley et al. (2016).
Refer to caption
Figure 16: Relations between PAH 6.2 μ\mum and 7.7 μ\mum luminosities and intrinsic (de-reddened) [O II] luminosities for star-forming galaxies. Symbols and lines are the same as for Figure 15.

We further examine the dependence of PAH luminosity on starburst intensity and AGN strength by plotting the log ratio of PAH luminosity to intrinsic Hα\alpha and [O II] luminosity as a function of PAH equivalent width (EW) in Figure 17. The equivalent width is calculated as the flux of the PAH emission feature (given by PAHFIT) divided by the flux density of the continuum components, which includes the starlight, evaluated at the central wavelength of the feature. We note that it is difficult to constrain the values for EW(PAH 7.7μm)EW(PAH\ 7.7\ \mu m) for individual galaxies because the calculation relies heavily on assumptions for the underlying continuum shape and blend of Drude profiles. However, the exact equivalent widths do not affect our overall interpretations. The top row of the figure shows the correlations for star-forming galaxies, color-coded by starburst parameter. The bottom row shows the correlations for AGN candidates, color-coded by AGN fraction. Objects with low PAH equivalent width (i.e., EW(PAH 6.2μm)1μEW(PAH\ 6.2\ \mu m)\lesssim 1\ \mum or EW(PAH 7.7μm)EW(PAH\ 7.7\ \mu m)\lesssim 4μ4\ \mum) scatter downwards from the L(PAH 6.2/7.7μm)L(PAH\ 6.2/7.7\ \mu m) and dust-corrected L(Hα)L(H\alpha)/L([OII])L([O\ II]) fits. The figure demonstrates that galaxies with higher starburst intensity (RSBR_{SB}) have lower L(PAH 6.2μm)L(PAH\ 6.2\ \mu m) and L(PAH 7.7μm)L(PAH\ 7.7\ \mu m) for a given L(Hα)24μmL(H\alpha)_{24\ \mu m} and that AGN with higher AGN fraction have lower L(PAH 6.2μm)L(PAH\ 6.2\ \mu m) and L(PAH 7.7μm)L(PAH\ 7.7\ \mu m) for a given L([OII])24μmL([OII])_{24\ \mu m}. The offset such that galaxies with high fracAGNfrac_{AGN} have low log L(PAH)/L([OII])L(PAH)/L([O\ II]) across all equivalent widths is likely due to the destruction of PAH dust grains by hard radiation from AGN. Given that ionization from AGN limits the efficacy of using the intrinsic Hα\alpha and [O II] luminosities to trace star formation, we exclude AGN from all SFR calibrations.

Refer to caption
Figure 17: Effects of starburstiness (log ratio of SFR to main sequence, RSBR_{SB}, shown with color bar on top row) and AGN fraction (bottom row) on the correlation between PAH luminosity and intrinsic Hα\alpha and [O II] luminosity.
Refer to caption
Figure 18: Kernel density estimate of the PAH luminosity to intrinsic Hα\alpha luminosity as a function of starburstiness (left) and qPAHq_{PAH} (right) for main-sequence and starburst galaxies. The data are grouped according to the estimated PAH 7.7 μ\mum equivalent width. Marginal distributions are shown on the top and right sides of each plot.

To further illustrate the effect of starburstiness on PAH intensity, we show the kernel density estimate and marginal distributions of the PAH 7.7 μ\mum luminosity to intrinsic Hα\alpha luminosity as a function of RSBR_{SB} on the left column of Figure 18. The log L(PAH 7.7μm)L(PAH\ 7.7\ \mu m)/L(Hα)24μmL(H\alpha)_{24\ \mu m} ratio is anti-correlated with RSBR_{SB}. In addition, galaxies with higher RSBR_{SB} are associated with lower PAH 7.7 μ\mum equivalent width (4\lesssim 4 μ\mum), as shown by the orange contours. The Spearman rank-order correlation coefficient between EW(PAH 7.7μm)EW(PAH\ 7.7\ \mu m) and RSBR_{SB} is -0.48 with p-value of 2×10262\times 10^{-26}, indicating a moderate monotonically decreasing correlation. The anti-correlation between log L(PAH)/L(Hα)L(PAH)/L(H\alpha) and RSBR_{SB} is consistent with the scenario in which PAH dust grains are destroyed by UV dissociation in compact star-forming regions (Peeters et al., 2004; Murata et al., 2014). For example, Murata et al. (2014) observe a deficit in νL(8)/νL(4.5)\nu L(8)/\nu L(4.5) for star-forming galaxies with log RSB>0.5R_{SB}>0.5, which they interpret as a deficit of PAH emission in starburst galaxies.

The right column of Figure 18 illustrates the correlation between log L(PAH 7.7μm)L(PAH\ 7.7\ \mu m)/L(Hα)24μmL(H\alpha)_{24\ \mu m} and qPAHq_{PAH} parameter derived from best-fit SED models. The qPAHq_{PAH} parameter is highly correlated with PAH equivalent width; the Spearman rank-order correlation coefficient between EW(PAH 7.7μm)EW(PAH\ 7.7\ \mu m) and qPAHq_{PAH} is 0.8 with a p-value of 1.6×10981.6\times 10^{-98}. We note, however, that the strong linear correlation between log L(PAH 7.7μm)L(PAH\ 7.7\ \mu m)/L(Hα)24μmL(H\alpha)_{24\ \mu m} and qPAHq_{PAH} was to be expected given the correlation between L(PAH)L(PAH) and qPAHq_{PAH} based on assumptions in the SED modeling.

In Figure 19, we investigate the dependence of PAH intensity on metallicity. Here, we calculate the PAH intensity as the ratio of L(PAH 7.7μm)L(PAH\ 7.7\ \mu m) to SFR(Hα)24μmSFR(H\alpha)_{24\ \mu m}, both averaged over stellar mass. The stellar masses range from M/M<109M/M_{\odot}<10^{9} to M/M>1010.5M/M_{\odot}>10^{10.5} in bins of 0.5 dex. The figure shows the correlation between PAH intensity and average metallicity, <<12+log(O/H)>>, calculated using either the N2 (top panel) or O3N2 (bottom panel) index. Main-sequence galaxies (i.e., 0.5<RSB<20.5<R_{SB}<2) and starburst galaxies (i.e., RSB>2R_{SB}>2) are shown as circle and star symbols, respectively. Table 5 lists the number of main-sequence and starburst galaxies included in each bin. There is a positive correlation between PAH 7.7 μ\mum intensity and metallicity in both main-sequence and starburst galaxies, with starburst galaxies having systematically lower PAH 7.7 μ\mum intensity per stellar mass.

There has been some concern that these “strong-line” ratios might give systematically incorrect metallicities. One possibility, for example, is that the N/O ratio in strongly star-forming galaxies might deviate from the solar value (Masters et al., 2014; Henry et al., 2021; Spinoglio et al., 2022). However, we do not find any clear systematic differences between the metallicities estimated with or without the [OIII] line in Figure 19. Another concern is that electron-temperature based metallicities (using the [OIII]4363 emission line which is too weak to measure in our spectra) might yield systematically lower metallicities than our strong-line methods (Shin et al., 2021; Ly et al., 2016a, b). However, even if a systematic offset of a few tenths of a dex were applied to all of our [O/H] estimates, our finding of a relative increase of PAH strength with metallicity is not significantly changed, other than in the normalization.

Refer to caption
Figure 19: Ratio of the PAH 7.7 μ\mum luminosity to the dust-corrected Hα\alpha SFR, both averaged over stellar mass, as a function of average metallicity using the N2 (top) and O3N2 (bottom) indices. Average metallicity is calculated as <<12+log(O/H)>>. Symbols are color-coded based on stellar mass bins as follows, with metallicity monotonically increasing with stellar mass: M/M<109M/M_{\odot}<10^{9} (blue), 109<M/M<109.510^{9}<M/M_{\odot}<10^{9.5} (orange), 109.5<M/M<101010^{9.5}<M/M_{\odot}<10^{10} (green), 1010<M/M<1010.510^{10}<M/M_{\odot}<10^{10.5} (red), M/M>1010.5M/M_{\odot}>10^{10.5} (purple). Light grey horizontal lines indicate the metallicity ranges per bin.
Table 5: Number of star-forming galaxies in each stellar mass bin to calculate PAH intensity as a function of average metallicity in Figure 19.
stellar mass bin N2 index O3N2 index
NMSN_{MS} NSBN_{SB} NMSN_{MS} NSBN_{SB}
M/M<109M/M_{\odot}<10^{9} 2 6 2 6
109<M/M<109.510^{9}<M/M_{\odot}<10^{9.5} 15 28 7 23
109.5<M/M<101010^{9.5}<M/M_{\odot}<10^{10} 62 52 37 48
1010<M/M<1010.510^{10}<M/M_{\odot}<10^{10.5} 69 44 37 31
M/M>1010.5M/M_{\odot}>10^{10.5} 18 3 14 0

In Figure 20, we compare the PAH contribution to the total IR luminosity in star-forming galaxies and AGN by showing the distributions of the total PAH luminosity, L(PAH)L(PAH), to L(TIR)L(TIR) for objects with at least one Herschel FIR detection. We define L(PAH)L(PAH) as the sum of luminosities from PAH emission features at 6.2, 7.7, 8.6, 11.3, 12.6, and 17 μ\mum. Star-forming galaxies are shown in the top panel and AGN are shown in the bottom panels, with the bottom-most panel separating out “weak” AGN (i.e., fracAGN<0.1frac_{AGN}<0.1) from stronger AGN (i.e., fracAGN>0.1frac_{AGN}>0.1). We find that L(PAH 7.7μm)L(PAH\ 7.7\ \mu m) contributes a median 45\sim 45% of the total PAH luminosity, and that the total PAH luminosity in turn can contribute up to 20\sim 20% of L(TIR)L(TIR). The median L(PAH)/L(TIR)L(PAH)/L(TIR) for star-forming galaxies (main-sequence and starburst galaxies) is 0.08 with an interquartile range of 0.05 to 0.14. The median in the AGN sample is lower at 0.06 with an interquartile range of 0.03 to 0.10. Objects that are more AGN-dominant with fracAGN>0.1frac_{AGN}>0.1 have lower L(PAH)/L(TIR)L(PAH)/L(TIR) with a median 0.04. For star-forming galaxies, the 10-90% range in L(PAH)/L(TIR)L(PAH)/L(TIR) is 0.03 to 0.18, and is plotted as the pale blue shaded region in all three panels in Figure 20. Our results are consistent with those of Shipley et al. (2013). A simple interpretation is that up to half of the TIR luminosity in AGN may be produced by the AGN itself, rather than from star formation. Previous detailed studies of the far-IR suggest that most of this AGN luminosity emerges at wavelengths shortward of 100 μ\mum (Spinoglio et al., 2002).

Refer to caption
Figure 20: Distributions of the ratio of total PAH luminosity to the total infrared luminosity for star-forming galaxies (top panel) and AGN (middle panel). The bottom panel shows the histograms of PAH/TIR separately for the “strong” and “weak” AGN that were shown together in the middle panel. For reference, the pale blue shaded region in all three panels represents the 10-90% range in L(PAH)/L(TIR)L(PAH)/L(TIR) for the star-forming galaxies.

4.2 The PAH SFR calibration

In this section, we develop our PAH SFR calibration based on the dust-corrected Hα\alpha and [O II] luminosities. Given that the AGN fraction is a significant driver of L(PAH)/L(Hα)L(PAH)/L(H\alpha) and L(PAH)/L([OII])L(PAH)/L([OII]), as demonstrated in Figure 17, our calibration sample excludes AGN and is limited to the 443 unique star-formation-dominated galaxies (Section 3.2). Therefore, fracAGNfrac_{AGN} is not included in the following fits.

Assuming that PAH luminosity corrections for metallicity and starburst intensity are both simply linear, we perform a multi-linear regression to the PAH luminosity with the dust-corrected Hα\alpha luminosity, RSB parameter, and metallicity as the independent variables in the form of: log L(PAH) [erg/s] = c0c_{0} + c1×c_{1}\times log RSB + c2×c_{2}\times(12+log(O/H)index - 8.6) + c3×c_{3}\times[log L(Hα)24μmL(H\alpha)_{24\ \mu m} - 42] [erg/s], where the constant 8.6 is the median metallicity and 42 is the median logarithm of the intrinsic Hα\alpha luminosity. The relation for predicting the 7.7 μ\mum PAH luminosity as the dependent variable is:

\textlogL(PAH 7.7μm)[erg/s]=(43.18±0.02)\displaystyle\text{log}\ L(PAH\ 7.7\ \mu m)\ [erg/s]=(43.18\pm 0.02)
(0.67±0.04)(\textlogRSB)\displaystyle-(0.67\pm 0.04)(\text{log}\ R_{SB})
+(0.42±0.12)(12+\textlog(O/H)N28.6)\displaystyle+(0.42\pm 0.12)(12+\text{log}(O/H)_{N2}-8.6)
+(1.07±0.03)[\textlogL(Hα)24μm42][erg/s]\displaystyle+(1.07\pm 0.03)[\text{log}\ L(H\alpha)_{24\ \mu m}-42]\ [erg/s] (16)

where -0.30 \leq log RSBR_{SB} \leq 1.95, 8.1 \leq 12+log(O/H)N2 \leq 8.7, 40.0\textlogL(Hα)24μm[erg/s]43.340.0\leq\text{log}\ L(H\alpha)_{24\ \mu m}\ [erg/s]\leq 43.3. The redshift range is 0.05 \leq zz \leq 1.03. Table 6 lists the results of the linear fits for L(PAH 6.2 μ\mum) and L(PAH 7.7 μ\mum) for both metallicity indicators. We note that the maximum threshold of log RSB=1.95R_{SB}=1.95 is a result of the outliers with upper limits on the PAH luminosity; only nine objects in the SFR calibration sample have RSB>10R_{SB}>10. The median value of RSBR_{SB} is 1.94 with an interquartile range of 1.01–3.48. We note that (Whitcomb et al., 2020) also found that increasing metallicity correlates with an increase in the PAH luminosity for a given star formation rate. Similarly, (Kouroumpatzakis et al., 2021) found that PAH luminosity for a given star formation rate increases with metallicity and decreases with the strength of star formation normalized by stellar mass (similar to our RSBR_{SB} parameter).

To calculate the Hα\alpha SFR calibrations, we substitute the SFR equation given by Kennicutt et al. into the multi-linear fit results:

SFR[M/yr]=7.9×1042L(Hα)24μm[erg/s]SFR\ [M_{\odot}/yr]=7.9\times 10^{-42}L(H\alpha)_{24\ \mu m}\ [erg/s] (17)

where the normalization factor assumes a Salpeter (1955) IMF. We note that more modern SFR calibrations assume a Kroupa (2001) or Chabrier (2003) IMF; based on equation 2 in Speagle et al. (2014), equation 17 can be converted to a Kroupa or Chabrier IMF by dividing by a factor of 1.6 and 1.7, respectively. The form of the PAH SFR calibration is then:

logSFR[M/yr]=c0+c1×logRSB\displaystyle log\ SFR\ [M_{\odot}/yr]=c_{0}+c_{1}\times log\ R_{SB}
+c2×(12+log(O/H)index8.6)\displaystyle+c_{2}\times(12+log(O/H)_{index}-8.6)
+c3×[logL(PAHn)42][erg/s]\displaystyle+c_{3}\times[log\ L(PAH_{n})-42]\ [erg/s] (18)

where the index nn in L(PAHnL(PAH_{n}) is equal to either 6.2 μ\mum or 7.7 μ\mum. To calculate the [O II] SFR calibrations, we similarly substitute Equation 11 into the multi-linear fit results, where the Hα\alpha luminosity is replaced with L([OII])24μmL([O\ II])_{24\ \mu m}. The coefficients for the SFR calibrations are listed in Tables 6 and 7. The results show that the SFR is linearly predicted by the PAH luminosity (i.e., c31c_{3}\sim 1) when corrected for starburst intensity and metallicity.

Table 6: Multi-linear fit results for the PAH 6.2 μ\mum and 7.7 μ\mum luminosities and Hα\alpha star formation rates.
y c0c_{0} c1c_{1} (starburstiness) c2c_{2} (metallicity) c3c_{3} metallicity calibration
log L(PAH 6.2 μ\mum) 42.63±\pm0.02 -0.61±\pm0.04 0.38±\pm0.12 1.07±\pm0.03 N2
log SFR(PAH 6.2 μ\mum) -39.12±\pm0.02 0.57±\pm0.04 -0.35±\pm0.12 0.94±\pm0.03 N2
log L(PAH 6.2 μ\mum) 42.61±\pm0.03 -0.60±\pm0.06 0.27±\pm0.12 1.09±\pm0.04 O3N2
log SFR(PAH 6.2 μ\mum) -38.15±\pm0.03 0.55±\pm0.05 -0.25±\pm0.12 0.92±\pm0.04 O3N2
log L(PAH 7.7 μ\mum) 43.18±\pm0.02 -0.67±\pm0.04 0.42±\pm0.12 1.07±\pm0.03 N2
log SFR(PAH 7.7 μ\mum) -39.32±\pm0.02 0.62±\pm0.04 -0.39±\pm0.12 0.93±\pm0.03 N2
log L(PAH 7.7 μ\mum) 43.15±\pm0.03 -0.65±\pm0.05 0.32±\pm0.12 1.09±\pm0.04 O3N2
log SFR(PAH 7.7 μ\mum) -38.59±\pm0.03 0.60±\pm0.05 -0.29±\pm0.12 0.92±\pm0.04 O3N2

Note. — Luminosity equations are in the form of y [erg/s] = c0c_{0} + c1×c_{1}\timeslog RSBR_{SB} + c2×c_{2}\times(12+log(O/H)index-8.6) + c3×c_{3}\times(log L(Hα)24μmL(H\alpha)_{24\ \mu m} - 42) [erg/s]. SFR equations are in the form of y [M/yr]= c0c_{0} + c1×c_{1}\timeslog RSB + c2×c_{2}\times(12+log(O/H)index-8.6) + c3×c_{3}\timeslog L(PAHn) [erg/s], where L(PAHn) refers to either 6.2 μ\mum or 7.7 μ\mum PAH luminosities. The gas-phase metallicity 12+log(O/H) is calculated via the N2 or O3N2 index (Pettini & Pagel, 2004). The SFR equations assume a Salpeter IMF; to convert to a Kroupa or Chabrier IMF, the constant c0c_{0} would be subtracted by log(1.61) 0.21\approx 0.21 (Kroupa) or log(1.71) 0.23\approx 0.23 (Chabrier).

Table 7: Multi-linear fit results for the PAH 6.2 μ\mum and 7.7 μ\mum luminosities and [O II] star formation rates.
y c0c_{0} c1c_{1} (starburstiness) c2c_{2} (metallicity) c3c_{3} metallicity calibration
log L(PAH 6.2 μ\mum) 42.59±\pm0.02 -0.61±\pm0.04 0.33±\pm0.14 1.06±\pm0.04 N2
log SFR(PAH 6.2 μ\mum) -39.19±\pm0.02 0.57±\pm0.05 -0.31±\pm0.14 0.94±\pm0.04 N2
log L(PAH 6.2 μ\mum) 42.51±\pm0.02 -0.51±\pm0.04 0.39±\pm0.12 1.00±\pm0.03 O32
log SFR(PAH 6.2 μ\mum) -41.53±\pm0.02 0.50±\pm0.04 -0.39±\pm0.12 1.00±\pm0.03 O32
log L(PAH 7.7 μ\mum) 43.13±\pm0.03 -0.66±\pm0.05 0.40±\pm0.15 1.06±\pm0.04 N2
log SFR(PAH 7.7 μ\mum) -39.82±\pm0.03 0.63±\pm0.05 -0.38±\pm0.15 0.94±\pm0.04 N2
log L(PAH 7.7 μ\mum) 43.05±\pm0.02 -0.54±\pm0.04 0.43±\pm0.13 1.00±\pm0.03 O32
log SFR(PAH 7.7 μ\mum) -41.97±\pm0.02 0.54±\pm0.04 -0.43±\pm0.13 1.00±\pm0.03 O32

Note. — Luminosity equations are in the form of y [erg/s] = c0c_{0} + c1×c_{1}\timeslog RSBR_{SB} + c2×c_{2}\times(12+log(O/H)index-dd) + c3×c_{3}\times(log L([OII])24μmL([O\ II])_{24\ \mu m} - 42) [erg/s]. SFR equations are in the form of y [M/yr]= c0c_{0} + c1×c_{1}\timeslog RSB + c2×c_{2}\times(12+log(O/H)index-dd) + c3×c_{3}\timeslog L(PAHn) [erg/s], where L(PAHn) refers to either 6.2 μ\mum or 7.7 μ\mum PAH luminosities, and d=8.6d=8.6 for the N2 index and d=8.5d=8.5 for the O32 index. The gas-phase metallicity 12+log(O/H) is calculated via the N2 or O32 index (Pettini & Pagel, 2004; Jones et al., 2015). The SFR equations assume a Salpeter IMF; to convert to a Kroupa or Chabrier IMF, the constant c0c_{0} would be subtracted by log(1.61) 0.21\approx 0.21 (Kroupa) or log(1.71) 0.23\approx 0.23 (Chabrier).

We additionally tested for dependence on redshift and total infrared luminosity by including them as parameters in the multi-linear fit. However, we found that there was no significant dependence on either parameter; the coefficients for both parameters were close to zero with large uncertainties. To investigate the relative contributions of starburst intensity vs. metallicity in the multi-linear fit, we tested fits by removing either parameter, resulting in fits in the form of log L(PAH) = c0c_{0} + c1×c_{1}\times log RSB + c3×c_{3}\times[log L(Hα)24μmL(H\alpha)_{24\ \mu m} - 42] [erg/s] for the “starburst-only” fit and log L(PAH) = c0c_{0} + c2×c_{2}\times(12+log(O/H)index - 8.6) + c3×c_{3}\times[log L(Hα)24μmL(H\alpha)_{24\ \mu m} - 42] [erg/s] for the “metallicity-only” fit. We found that for the starburst-only fit, the c1c_{1} coefficients and uncertainties were consistent with those reported in our complete multi-linear fit results, whereas for the metallicity-only fit, the c2c_{2} coefficients were 2.53\sim 2.5-3 times higher than the original results, indicating that the correction for the RSBR_{SB} parameter is more dominant than that for 12+log(O/H). However, both starburst-only and metallicity-only fits resulted in less linearity between L(PAH) and L(Hα\alpha) (i.e., c3c_{3} deviated more from 1). Therefore, we conclude that the complete multi-linear fits, that correct for both starburst intensity and metallicity as parameters, provide the most reliable results.

Our methodology implicitly assumes that all of our galaxies have the same ratio of 7.7/6.2 μ\mum PAH luminosity as in the CIGALE templates. This ratio can be determined from the c0c_{0} coefficients in Table 6 to be about 3.4–3.6. This is an assumption that is not derivable from our AKARI mid-IR photometry. We are not able to independently determine the Table 6 correlations for the 6.2 μ\mum PAH luminosity. There is evidence that stronger 6.2 μ\mum emission is produced by more highly ionized PAHs. However, since the same trend is seen for the 7.7 μ\mum emission (Maragkoudakis et al., 2022), it turns out that the 7.7/6.2 μ\mum ratio has little variation with PAH ionization or other galaxy properties. Larger PAH molecules are thought to emit slightly higher 7.7/6.2 μ\mum ratios. However, in LIRGs and ULIRGs which are the main targets of this study, the observed 7.7/6.2 μ\mum ratios are all close to 3.6. The small scatter in this ratio, of 0.05\sim 0.05 dex (McKinney et al., 2021), indicates that CIGALE is indeed giving us reasonably accurate 6.2 μ\mum luminosities. We therefore include the 6.2 μ\mum PAH / SFR correlations in Tables 6 and 7 as a convenient aid for future researchers who will measure that emission feature.

The PAH SFR calibrations highlight four main results:

  1. 1.

    The PAH luminosity per intrinsic Hα\alpha or [O II] luminosity is increasingly deficient (or the Hα\alpha and [O II] luminosities per PAH luminosity is enhanced) as RSBR_{SB} increases or metallicity decreases.

  2. 2.

    The PAH SFR calibration does not depend on the total infrared luminosity.

  3. 3.

    There is no apparent redshift evolution in the PAH SFR calibration from the local universe out to z1.2z\sim 1.2.

  4. 4.

    Although starburst intensity, RSBR_{SB}, has a stronger effect than metallicity on the correlation between PAH luminosity and intrinsic Hα\alpha or [O II] luminosity, both are important for reliably calibrating the PAH SFR.

4.3 Possible physical interpretation

Although this paper has focused on empirical analysis of observational data, the results described above may shed light on possible physical mechanisms that can suppress PAH emission. In particular, we can offer two speculations about why the PAH luminosity–for a given SFR–is significantly reduced in galaxies with active star-bursts (RSBR_{SB}), and in those having active galactic nuclei (fracAGN0.05frac_{AGN}\geq 0.05). PAHs are very large molecules, and are therefore vulnerable to destruction by various energetic processes that can occur in the interstellar medium. In the nearby Orion star-forming complex there is direct evidence for PAH destruction by sputtering, and/or by photo-dissociation (Giard et al., 1994). Observations and models of H II region spectra indicates that PAH destruction occurs in regions of elevated strength and hardness of the interstellar radiation field (Lebouteiller et al., 2011), both of which are expected in AGN and extreme starbursts.

5 Star formation rate density from 0 << zz << 1.2

The largest source of uncertainty in UV-based cosmic star formation rate density (SFRD) measurements arises from correcting for dust attenuation (Burgarella et al., 2005; Kobayashi et al., 2013). For example, Salim et al. (2007) show that there is significant scatter between AFUVA_{FUV} and the rest-frame FUV-NUV color for their sample of \sim50,000 local, optically-selected galaxies with GALEX photometry. The scatter is especially prominent for starburst galaxies, which can deviate from the trend found for normal star-forming galaxies by 1\gtrsim 1 mag. SFRD indicators based on IR observations are particularly invaluable towards the epoch of peak cosmic star formation when much of this activity was heavily dust-obscured. Takeuchi et al. (2007) estimate that the FIR luminosity density is approximately 15 times higher than that of the FUV at z1z\sim 1. However, studies have shown the FIR SFR to be less certain for galaxies whose UV to optical emission is dominated by old stellar populations or AGN (Kennicutt, 1998).

We apply our extinction-independent PAH 7.7 μ\mum SFR calibrations to estimate the star formation rate density to z1.2z\sim 1.2 for star-forming galaxies with metallicity detections. We use the rest-frame 8 μ\mum and 12 μ\mum luminosity functions (LF) from Goto et al. (2010), which were derived using AKARI/IRC sources in the NEP-Deep field. The luminosity functions assume a double power law given by:

Φ(L)dL/L=Φ(LL)1αdL/L,(L<L)\Phi(L)dL/L^{*}=\Phi^{*}\left(\frac{L}{L^{*}}\right)^{1-\alpha}dL/L^{*},\ (L<L^{*}) (19)
Φ(L)dL/L=Φ(LL)1βdL/L,(L>L)\Phi(L)dL/L^{*}=\Phi^{*}\left(\frac{L}{L^{*}}\right)^{1-\beta}dL/L^{*},\ (L>L^{*}) (20)

where Φ\Phi^{*} is the normalization in Mpc-3 dex-1, LL^{*} is the characteristic luminosity or “knee” of the luminosity function in L, LL is the monochromatic luminosity νLν\nu L_{\nu}(8 μ\mum) or νLν\nu L_{\nu}(12 μ\mum), and α\alpha and β\beta are the slopes of the luminosity function at the low- and high-luminosity sides. We adopt the best-fit parameters given in Table 2 of Goto et al. (2010). The luminosity density is then given as the integral:

Ω=0.1L10LLΦ(L)𝑑L\Omega=\int_{0.1L^{*}}^{10L^{*}}L\Phi(L)\,dL (21)

where we define the lower and upper limits to be within an order of magnitude of LL^{*}. We calculate the 8 μ\mum luminosity density in redshift bins of 0.38<<zz<<0.58 (S11) and 0.65<<zz<<0.90 (L15), and the 12 μ\mum LF in bins of 0.15<<zz<<0.35 (L15), 0.38<<zz<<0.62 (L18W), and 0.84<<zz<<1.16 (L24), where the corresponding AKARI/IRC filters are given in parentheses. At 0<<zz<<0.3, we use the 8 μ\mum luminosity density given by Huang et al. (2007) where Ω8μm\Omega_{8\mu m}=3.1×\times107 L Mpc-3.

Refer to caption
Figure 21: Top panels: Correlations between PAH 7.7 μ\mum luminosity and monochromatic luminosity at 8 μ\mum (left) and 12 μ\mum (right) for star-forming galaxies. Dashed lines represent linear fits with fixed unity slope. Bottom panels: Residuals of the fit as a function of monochromatic luminosity with dotted lines indicating the RMS dispersion in dex. Each galaxy is color-coded by the relative abundance of its small PAH dust grains, shown by the vertical scale on the right. The outliers correspond to low qPAHq_{PAH} sources and represent upper limits.

We use linear fits with fixed unity slope to convert PAH luminosity to monochromatic luminosity at 8 and 12 μ\mum, as shown in Figure 21. The correlations are given by:

\textlogL(PAH 7.7μm)=(0.70±0.01)+\textlogνLν(8μm)\text{log}\ L(PAH\ 7.7\ \mu m)=(-0.70\pm 0.01)+\text{log}\ \nu L_{\nu}(8\ \mu m) (22)
\textlogL(PAH 7.7μm)=(0.57±0.01)+\textlogνLν(12μm)\text{log}\ L(PAH\ 7.7\ \mu m)=(-0.57\pm 0.01)+\text{log}\ \nu L_{\nu}(12\ \mu m) (23)

where νLν\nu L_{\nu}(8 μ\mum) and νLν\nu L_{\nu}(12 μ\mum) are in erg/s. The scatter in the linear fits represented by the RMS dispersion in the residuals is approximately 0.13 and 0.18 dex for the 8 μ\mum and 12 μ\mum relations, respectively (bottom panels). These relations suggest that the PAH 7.7 μ\mum luminosity may be estimated to within 30% by multiplying the rest-frame broadband luminosity at 8 μ\mum by a factor of 0.2 (unless the galaxy is an extreme starburst). The outliers with residuals 0.5\lesssim-0.5 are starburst galaxies with exceptionally high IR8 (=L(TIR)/L(8μm)20L(TIR)/L(8\ \mu m)\gtrsim 20) and represent only 7% of the overall starburst galaxy sample. However, as shown by the color bar, these PAH-weak outliers also have SEDs which CIGALE fitted with the minimum qPAHq_{PAH} value (qPAH0.47q_{PAH}\approx 0.47), and therefore represent upper limits due to modeling constraints.

Then, we substitute equations 22 and 23 for L(PAH 7.7μm)L(PAH\ 7.7\ \mu m) into our SFR calibrations to derive a function of SFR(RSBR_{SB}, 12+log(O/H), νLν\nu L_{\nu}(8 μ\mum)) or SFR(RSBR_{SB}, 12+log(O/H), νLν\nu L_{\nu}(12 μ\mum)). The SFRD (ρSFR\rho_{SFR}) is calculated in each redshift bin as:

ρSFR=c0+c1×\textlogRSB+c2×(12+\textlog(O/H)8.6)+c3×(c4+Ω8μm)\rho_{SFR}=c_{0}+c_{1}\times\langle\text{log}\ R_{SB}\rangle+c_{2}\times\langle(12+\text{log(O/H)}-8.6)\rangle+c_{3}\times\left(c_{4}+\Omega_{8\mu m}\right) (24)
ρSFR=c0+c1×\textlogRSB+c2×(12+\textlog(O/H)8.6)+c3×(c5+Ω12μm)\rho_{SFR}=c_{0}+c_{1}\times\langle\text{log}\ R_{SB}\rangle+c_{2}\times\langle(12+\text{log(O/H)}-8.6)\rangle+c_{3}\times\left(c_{5}+\Omega_{12\mu m}\right) (25)

in Myr-1Mpc-3, where the constant coefficients c0,,c3c_{0},...,c_{3} are given by the SFR calibrations in Table 6, c4c_{4} and c5c_{5} are the best-fit intercepts from equations 22 and 23, respectively. Ω8μm\Omega_{8\mu m} and Ω12μm\Omega_{12\mu m} are the luminosity densities in LMpc-3 calculated from equation 21 based on νLν(8μm)\nu L_{\nu}(8\ \mu m) and νLν(12μm)\nu L_{\nu}(12\ \mu m) and converted to L units. The averages \textlogRSB\langle\text{log}\ R_{SB}\rangle and \langle12+log(O/H)\rangle are averaged over each redshift bin. Table 8 shows the number of star-forming galaxies integrated in each bin for a given PAH 7.7 μ\mum and optical emission line calibrator.

Table 8: Number of star-forming galaxies integrated in each redshift bin to calculate the star formation rate density.
LF redshift bin NtotN_{tot} (NMSN_{MS}, NSBN_{SB})
Hα\alpha N2 Hα\alpha O3N2 [O II] N2 [O II] O32
8 μ\mum 0.02<<zz<<0.3 203 (129, 74) 131 (70, 61) 120 (77, 43) 98 (59, 39)
8 μ\mum 0.28<<zz<<0.47 105 (51, 54) 89 (38, 51) 85 (46, 39) 135 (66, 69)
8 μ\mum 0.65<<zz<<0.90 10 (1, 9) 3 (1, 2) 1 (1, 0) 17 (8, 9)
12 μ\mum 0.15<<zz<<0.35 183 (106, 77) 132 (67, 65) 131 (80, 51) 112 (67, 45)
12 μ\mum 0.38<<zz<<0.62 30 (10, 20) 29 (7, 22) 23 (8, 15) 120 (39, 81)
12 μ\mum 0.84<<zz<<1.16 7 (1, 6) 1 (0, 1) 1 (0, 1) 0

Figure 22 shows the redshift evolution of the PAH 7.7 μ\mum-derived SFRD based on the Hα\alpha calibration and N2/O3N2 metallicity indicators. We calculate the SFRD for the combined main-sequence and starburst galaxy sample in each redshift bin (filled circles) and show the separate contributions from main-sequence galaxies only (triangle symbols) and starburst galaxies only (star symbols). The redshifts plotted are the median redshifts per bin. The SFRDs derived from either the 8 μ\mum and 12 μ\mum LFs are consistent with each other within the uncertainties.

For reference, we plot the best-fit cosmic star formation history from Madau & Dickinson (2014) (MD14; grey line). In addition, we plot the SFRD calculated from FUV and FIR observations from Burgarella et al. (2013) (B+13) who use calibrations from Kennicutt (1998). We find that the PAH 7.7 μ\mum star formation rate density includes significant contribution from dust-obscured star formation absorbed in the UV. In fact, at z1z\sim 1, the PAH SFRD is an order of magnitude higher than the FUV SFRD. Our results are consistent with the total (UV+FIR) SFRD, and suggest that when corrected for metallicity and starburst intensity, the PAH 7.7 μ\mum luminosity traces the total star formation (i.e., obscured and unobscured) in actively star-forming galaxies. In addition, the contribution from starburst galaxies to the SFRD becomes more significant at higher zz relative to main-sequence galaxies. Our results are consistent with past attempts to estimate the SFR based on Herschel/PACS detections. The SFR calibration with the O3N2 index (bottom panel) is consistent with that of the N2 index. The MD14 cosmic star formation rates are \sim 20 – 30% lower than ours.

We also show the redshift evolution for the PAH 7.7 μ\mum-derived SFRD, based on the de-reddened [O II] luminosity calibration and N2 (top panel) and O32 (bottom panel) metallicity indicators in Figure 23. Although more data are needed at z0.8z\gtrsim 0.8 to constrain the shape of the SFRD, the PAH SFRD derived from the L[OII]L[O\ II] calibration is consistent with that of Hα\alpha.

Refer to caption
Figure 22: Star formation rate density as a function of redshift for the N2 (top) O3N2 (bottom) metallicity indicators, using the PAH 7.7 μ\mum calibration tied to metallicity, RSBR_{SB}, and dust-corrected Hα\alpha. Three dotted lines of different colors connect the estimates based on the 8 and 12 μ\mum and FUV luminosity functions. The best-fit function from Madau & Dickinson (2014) is shown in light grey.
Refer to caption
Figure 23: Star formation rate density as a function of redshift for the N2 (top) O32 (bottom) metallicity indicator using the PAH 7.7 μ\mum calibration tied to metallicity, RSBR_{SB}, and dust-corrected [O II]. Symbols and lines are the same as in the previous figure.

6 Discussion

6.1 Comparison with previous studies

To our knowledge, this study is the first to derive PAH SFR calibrations from AKARI/IRC 2–24 μ\mum photometry. We extend the relationship between PAH luminosity and SFR by determining the dependence of the SFR calibration on metallicity and starburst intensity. Shipley et al. (2016) derived PAH SFR calibrations using a sample of Spitzer/IRS galaxies at z<0.4z<0.4. We find that their linear fits to L(PAH)L(PAH) vs. L(Hα)L(H\alpha) are consistent with our results for main-sequence galaxies up to z1.2z\sim 1.2, but must be corrected in starburst galaxies, which have systematically higher L(TIR)/L(8μm)L(TIR)/L(8\ \mu m) ratios. This discrepancy is most likely because starburst galaxies were excluded from their sample due to having low S/N ratios. Based on Figure 17, we estimate that Shipley et al.’s calibration sample is limited to main-sequence galaxies with EW(PAH 6.2μm)1EW(PAH\ 6.2\ \mu m)\gtrsim 1 μ\mum and EW(PAH 7.7μm)4EW(PAH\ 7.7\ \mu m)\gtrsim 4 μ\mum.

Takagi et al. (2010) studied “PAH-luminous” starburst galaxies at z0.5z\sim 0.5 and z1z\sim 1 in the AKARI NEP-Deep survey that were selected using color cuts based on the 15 μ\mum/9 μ\mum and 11 μ\mum/7 μ\mum flux ratios. Applying the same color criteria to our star-forming galaxies in the NEP-Deep region, we select 22 such galaxies at 0.39<z<0.620.39<z<0.62 (z~=0.47\tilde{z}=0.47) and 16 galaxies at 0.76<z<1.230.76<z<1.23 (z~=1.01\tilde{z}=1.01). Figure 24 shows the correlation between the photometric monochromatic luminosity at 7.7 μ\mum, νLν,phot(7.7μm)\nu L_{\nu,phot}(7.7\ \mu m) and L(TIR)L(TIR), color-coded by RSBR_{SB}. Galaxies shown by square symbols represent “PAH-selected galaxies” that satisfy Takagi et al.’s criteria. To calculate the photometric monochromatic luminosity, we scaled our peak luminosity measurements by a factor of 10-0.24 (see Appendix). Most objects lie along the local relation for less luminous starbursts, indicating that MIR-selected galaxies up to 1012 L are “PAH-normal” rather than “PAH-enhanced” for a given TIR luminosity.

Refer to caption
Figure 24: Peak photometric monochromatic PAH 7.7 μ\mum luminosity as a function of total infrared luminosity for star-forming galaxies in the NEP-Deep region. The points in boxes meet the selection criteria of “PAH enhancement” from Takagi et al. The solid line represents the relation found by Houck et al. (2007) for local starburst galaxies. Symbols are color-coded by the logarithm of the starburst intensity.

6.2 Applications with JWST

The James Webb Space Telescope Mid-Infrared Instrument (JWST/MIRI) has an observing wavelength range of 5–28 μ\mum, which includes spectroscopy that resolves the PAH 6.2 μ\mum and 7.7 μ\mum features to z3z\sim 3. To apply our PAH SFR calibrations to JWST observations, follow-up spectroscopy in the near-IR such as with Keck I/MOSFIRE (Shivaei et al., 2017) or JWST/NIRSPEC would also be useful to determine the gas metallicity with rest-frame optical emission lines. Far-infrared photometry would be needed to measure the total infrared luminosity and infer the starburst intensity/compactness of star formation, although extrapolations from multi-wavelength SED fitting may be used provided there are sufficient data in the observed optical to near-infrared wavelengths. In addition, joint observations with Hubble Space Telescope will be able to constrain the sSFR. PAH-based SFR calibrations that do not correct for metallicity or starburstiness would underestimate the true SFR in metal-poor and starburst galaxies.

7 Summary

In this work, we explore PAH dust emission as an extinction-independent star formation rate indicator, a major scientific goal of the AKARI mission. We combine ground-based, optical and near-infrared spectroscopy with AKARI/Infrared Camera multi-band photometry to measure the infrared spectra of 500\sim 500 galaxies in the AKARI NEP field. We present the first results of PAH 6.2 and 7.7 μ\mum SFR calibrations with corrections for metallicity and starburst intensity, applicable to star-forming galaxies. Our calibration sample consists of 443 main-sequence and starburst galaxies from the AKARI/IRC NEP survey at 0.05z1.030.05\leq z\leq 1.03, with a broad range of stellar masses (M108.71011.2M_{*}\sim 10^{8.7}-10^{11.2} MM_{\odot}), total infrared luminosities (L(TIR)108.71012L)L(TIR)\sim 10^{8.7}-10^{12}\ L_{\odot}), and SFRs (0.06500M\sim 0.06-500\ M_{\odot}yr-1). These mid-infrared-selected galaxies were observed to have strong emission lines with optical/NIR spectroscopy, including Keck II/DEIMOS and Keck I/MOSFIRE observations, which we newly presented in this work. A summary of our main conclusions are as follows:

  • To measure the PAH luminosity of AKARI/IRC galaxies, we first derive best-fit spectral energy distributions with CIGALE to model the mid-IR dust emission. Then from the best-fit, rest-frame SEDs, we decompose the PAH emission features by using PAHFIT. Our photometrically derived PAH 6.2 and 7.7 μ\mum luminosities are consistent with AKARI/IRC slitless spectroscopic measurements to within 20-40%.

  • The PAH luminosity per dust-corrected Hα\alpha and [O II]λλ3726,3729\lambda\lambda 3726,3729 luminosity increases as a function of metallicity, and decreases as a function of starburst intensity (RSBR_{SB}) and AGN fraction. Starburst galaxies (i.e., galaxies with RSB>2R_{SB}>2) are systematically deficient in L(PAH)L(PAH) per dust-corrected L(Hα)L(H\alpha) and L([OII])L([O\ II]) relative to main-sequence galaxies by a factor of 0.34 and 0.3 dex, respectively. Based on multi-linear fits, we derive, for the first time, corrections for metallicity and starburst intensity to the PAH luminosity and SFR. Due to the effect of AGN on L(PAH)L(PAH) per dust-corrected L(Hα)L(H\alpha) and L([OII])L([O\ II]), our PAH SFR calibrations may not be applicable to AGN systems. In addition, we find that the PAH SFR calibration is independent of total infrared luminosity and redshift (at least up to z1z\sim 1).

  • We apply our PAH SFR calibrations to the extensive dataset of AKARI to study the dust-obscured cosmic star formation rate density per comoving volume. We combine our correlations between L(PAH 7.7μm)L(PAH\ 7.7\ \mu m) vs. νLν(8μm)\nu L_{\nu}(8\ \mu m) and νLν(12μm)\nu L_{\nu}(12\ \mu m) with luminosity functions at 8 and 12 μ\mum to derive the SFRD as a function of PAH luminosity. The SFRD as predicted by our PAH 7.7 μ\mum SFR calibration is a factor of 5 higher at z0.15z\sim 0.15 and a factor of 10\sim 10 higher at z1z\sim 1 than observed FUV estimates due to dust attenuation, with significant contribution from starburst galaxies at z0.6z\gtrsim 0.6. Compared to infrared-based SFR indicators, our PAH SFRD is consistent with FIR and TIR estimates from 0.15z10.15\lesssim z\lesssim 1 (Burgarella et al., 2013).

  • Future studies that involve PAH luminosity as a SFR indicator, such as those conducted with JWST, would need to correct for the effects of metallicity and starburst intensity; otherwise, the PAH SFR would be underestimated in metal-poor or starburst galaxies.

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank the anonymous referee whose helpful comments greatly improved this work. Some of the data presented herein were obtained at the W. M. Keck Observatory, which is operated as a scientific partnership among the California Institute of Technology, the University of California and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The Observatory was made possible by the generous financial support of the W. M. Keck Foundation. This research has made use of the Keck Observatory Archive (KOA), which is operated by the W. M. Keck Observatory and the NASA Exoplanet Science Institute (NExScI), under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The authors wish to recognize and acknowledge the very significant cultural role and reverence that the summit of Maunakea has always had within the indigenous Hawaiian community. We are most fortunate to have the opportunity to conduct observations from this mountain. The analysis pipeline used to reduce the DEIMOS data was developed at UC Berkeley with support from NSF grant AST-0071048. H. K. gratefully acknowledges financial support from the S.O.S. program of the National Radio Astronomy Observatory, grant number SOSPA6-024. T. M. is supported by UNAM-DGAPA PAPIIT (IN111319, IN114423) and CONACyT Grant Ciencias Básicas 252531.

References

  • Asplund et al. (2009) Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., Sauval, A. J., & Scott, P. 2009, ARA&A, 47, 481, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145222
  • Boquien et al. (2019) Boquien, M., Burgarella, D., Roehlly, Y., et al. 2019, A&A, 622, A103, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834156
  • Boselli et al. (2015) Boselli, A., Fossati, M., Gavazzi, G., et al. 2015, A&A, 579, A102, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201525712
  • Brandl et al. (2006) Brandl, B. R., Bernard-Salas, J., Spoon, H. W. W., et al. 2006, ApJ, 653, 1129, doi: 10.1086/508849
  • Buat et al. (2007) Buat, V., Marcillac, D., Burgarella, D., et al. 2007, A&A, 469, 19, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20066685
  • Burgarella et al. (2005) Burgarella, D., Buat, V., & Iglesias-Páramo, J. 2005, MNRAS, 360, 1413, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09131.x
  • Burgarella et al. (2013) Burgarella, D., Buat, V., Gruppioni, C., et al. 2013, A&A, 554, A70, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321651
  • Burgarella et al. (2019) Burgarella, D., Mazyed, F., Oi, N., et al. 2019, PASJ, 71, 12, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psy134
  • Calzetti (2013) Calzetti, D. 2013, in Secular Evolution of Galaxies, ed. J. Falcón-Barroso & J. H. Knapen, 419, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1208.2997
  • Calzetti et al. (2000) Calzetti, D., Armus, L., Bohlin, R. C., et al. 2000, ApJ, 533, 682, doi: 10.1086/308692
  • Calzetti et al. (2007) Calzetti, D., Kennicutt, R. C., Engelbracht, C. W., et al. 2007, ApJ, 666, 870, doi: 10.1086/520082
  • Castro et al. (2014) Castro, A., Miyaji, T., Shirahata, M., et al. 2014, PASJ, 66, 110, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psu096
  • Chabrier (2003) Chabrier, G. 2003, PASP, 115, 763, doi: 10.1086/376392
  • Cooper et al. (2012) Cooper, M. C., Newman, J. A., Davis, M., Finkbeiner, D. P., & Gerke, B. F. 2012, spec2d: DEEP2 DEIMOS Spectral Pipeline, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1203.003. http://ascl.net/1203.003
  • Cutri et al. (2021) Cutri, R. M., Wright, E. L., Conrow, T., et al. 2021, VizieR Online Data Catalog, II/328
  • Desai et al. (2007) Desai, V., Armus, L., Spoon, H. W. W., et al. 2007, ApJ, 669, 810, doi: 10.1086/522104
  • Draine & Li (2007) Draine, B. T., & Li, A. 2007, ApJ, 657, 810, doi: 10.1086/511055
  • Draine et al. (2007) Draine, B. T., Dale, D. A., Bendo, G., et al. 2007, ApJ, 663, 866, doi: 10.1086/518306
  • Draine et al. (2014) Draine, B. T., Aniano, G., Krause, O., et al. 2014, ApJ, 780, 172, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/780/2/172
  • Elbaz et al. (2011) Elbaz, D., Dickinson, M., Hwang, H. S., et al. 2011, A&A, 533, A119, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201117239
  • Engelbracht et al. (2005) Engelbracht, C. W., Gordon, K. D., Rieke, G. H., et al. 2005, ApJ, 628, L29, doi: 10.1086/432613
  • Faber et al. (2003) Faber, S. M., Phillips, A. C., Kibrick, R. I., et al. 2003, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 4841, Instrument Design and Performance for Optical/Infrared Ground-based Telescopes, ed. M. Iye & A. F. M. Moorwood, 1657–1669, doi: 10.1117/12.460346
  • Figueira et al. (2022) Figueira, M., Pollo, A., Małek, K., et al. 2022, A&A, 667, A29, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141701
  • French et al. (2023) French, K. D., Smercina, A., Rowlands, K., et al. 2023, ApJ, 942, 25, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aca46e
  • Fritz et al. (2006) Fritz, J., Franceschini, A., & Hatziminaoglou, E. 2006, MNRAS, 366, 767, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.09866.x
  • Giard et al. (1994) Giard, M., Bernard, J. P., Lacombe, F., Normand, P., & Rouan, D. 1994, A&A, 291, 239
  • Goto et al. (2010) Goto, T., Takagi, T., Matsuhara, H., et al. 2010, A&A, 514, A6, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200913182
  • Hayward et al. (2014) Hayward, C. C., Lanz, L., Ashby, M. L. N., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 445, 1598, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1843
  • Henry et al. (2021) Henry, A., Rafelski, M., Sunnquist, B., et al. 2021, ApJ, 919, 143, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1105
  • Houck et al. (2007) Houck, J. R., Weedman, D. W., Le Floc’h, E., & Hao, L. 2007, ApJ, 671, 323, doi: 10.1086/522689
  • Huang et al. (2007) Huang, J. S., Ashby, M. L. N., Barmby, P., et al. 2007, ApJ, 664, 840, doi: 10.1086/519241
  • Hwang et al. (2007) Hwang, N., Lee, M. G., Lee, H. M., et al. 2007, ApJS, 172, 583, doi: 10.1086/519216
  • Imai et al. (2007) Imai, K., Matsuhara, H., Oyabu, S., et al. 2007, AJ, 133, 2418, doi: 10.1086/513513
  • Imanishi et al. (2007) Imanishi, M., Dudley, C. C., Maiolino, R., et al. 2007, ApJS, 171, 72, doi: 10.1086/513715
  • Jarrett et al. (2011) Jarrett, T. H., Cohen, M., Masci, F., et al. 2011, ApJ, 735, 112, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/735/2/112
  • Jeon et al. (2014) Jeon, Y., Im, M., Kang, E., Lee, H. M., & Matsuhara, H. 2014, ApJS, 214, 20, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/214/2/20
  • Jones et al. (2015) Jones, T., Martin, C., & Cooper, M. C. 2015, ApJ, 813, 126, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/813/2/126
  • Kennicutt (1983) Kennicutt, R. C., J. 1983, ApJ, 272, 54, doi: 10.1086/161261
  • Kennicutt (1998) Kennicutt, Robert C., J. 1998, ARA&A, 36, 189, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.36.1.189
  • Kennicutt et al. (2009) Kennicutt, Robert C., J., Hao, C.-N., Calzetti, D., et al. 2009, ApJ, 703, 1672, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/703/2/1672
  • Kennicutt & Evans (2012) Kennicutt, R. C., & Evans, N. J. 2012, ARA&A, 50, 531, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125610
  • Kewley et al. (2004) Kewley, L. J., Geller, M. J., & Jansen, R. A. 2004, AJ, 127, 2002, doi: 10.1086/382723
  • Kewley et al. (2013) Kewley, L. J., Maier, C., Yabe, K., et al. 2013, ApJ, 774, L10, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/774/1/L10
  • Kim et al. (2012) Kim, S. J., Lee, H. M., Matsuhara, H., et al. 2012, A&A, 548, A29, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219105
  • Kim et al. (2021) Kim, S. J., Oi, N., Goto, T., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 500, 4078, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3359
  • Kobayashi et al. (2013) Kobayashi, M. A. R., Inoue, Y., & Inoue, A. K. 2013, ApJ, 763, 3, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/763/1/3
  • Kouroumpatzakis et al. (2021) Kouroumpatzakis, K., Zezas, A., Maragkoudakis, A., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 506, 3079, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1917
  • Kroupa (2001) Kroupa, P. 2001, MNRAS, 322, 231, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04022.x
  • Krumpe et al. (2015) Krumpe, M., Miyaji, T., Brunner, H., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 446, 911, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu2010
  • Lagache & Dole (2006) Lagache, G., & Dole, H. 2006, in The Fabulous Destiny of Galaxies: Bridging Past and Present, 189. https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0509556
  • Lai et al. (2020) Lai, T. S. Y., Smith, J. D. T., Baba, S., Spoon, H. W. W., & Imanishi, M. 2020, ApJ, 905, 55, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abc002
  • Le Floc’h et al. (2005) Le Floc’h, E., Papovich, C., Dole, H., et al. 2005, ApJ, 632, 169, doi: 10.1086/432789
  • Lebouteiller et al. (2011) Lebouteiller, V., Bernard-Salas, J., Whelan, D. G., et al. 2011, ApJ, 728, 45, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/728/1/45
  • Lee et al. (2007) Lee, H. M., Im, M., Wada, T., et al. 2007, PASJ, 59, S529, doi: 10.1093/pasj/59.sp2.S529
  • Ly et al. (2016a) Ly, C., Malhotra, S., Malkan, M. A., et al. 2016a, ApJS, 226, 5, doi: 10.3847/0067-0049/226/1/5
  • Ly et al. (2016b) Ly, C., Malkan, M. A., Rigby, J. R., & Nagao, T. 2016b, ApJ, 828, 67, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/828/2/67
  • Madau & Dickinson (2014) Madau, P., & Dickinson, M. 2014, ARA&A, 52, 415, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125615
  • Maragkoudakis et al. (2022) Maragkoudakis, A., Boersma, C., Temi, P., Bregman, J. D., & Allamandola, L. J. 2022, ApJ, 931, 38, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac666f
  • Marble et al. (2010) Marble, A. R., Engelbracht, C. W., van Zee, L., et al. 2010, ApJ, 715, 506, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/715/1/506
  • Masters & Capak (2011) Masters, D., & Capak, P. 2011, PASP, 123, 638, doi: 10.1086/660023
  • Masters et al. (2014) Masters, D., McCarthy, P., Siana, B., et al. 2014, ApJ, 785, 153, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/785/2/153
  • Matsuhara et al. (2006) Matsuhara, H., Wada, T., Matsuura, S., et al. 2006, PASJ, 58, 673, doi: 10.1093/pasj/58.4.673
  • McKinney et al. (2021) McKinney, J., Armus, L., Pope, A., et al. 2021, ApJ, 908, 238, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abd6f2
  • McLean et al. (2010) McLean, I. S., Steidel, C. C., Epps, H., et al. 2010, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 7735, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy III, ed. I. S. McLean, S. K. Ramsay, & H. Takami, 77351E, doi: 10.1117/12.856715
  • McLean et al. (2012) McLean, I. S., Steidel, C. C., Epps, H. W., et al. 2012, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 8446, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy IV, ed. I. S. McLean, S. K. Ramsay, & H. Takami, 84460J, doi: 10.1117/12.924794
  • Murata et al. (2013) Murata, K., Matsuhara, H., Wada, T., et al. 2013, A&A, 559, A132, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321505
  • Murata et al. (2014) Murata, K., Matsuhara, H., Inami, H., et al. 2014, A&A, 566, A136, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201423744
  • Nayyeri et al. (2018) Nayyeri, H., Ghotbi, N., Cooray, A., et al. 2018, ApJS, 234, 38, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aaa07e
  • Newman et al. (2013) Newman, J. A., Cooper, M. C., Davis, M., et al. 2013, ApJS, 208, 5, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/208/1/5
  • Ohyama et al. (2018) Ohyama, Y., Wada, T., Matsuhara, H., et al. 2018, A&A, 618, A101, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731470
  • Oi et al. (2017) Oi, N., Goto, T., Malkan, M., Pearson, C., & Matsuhara, H. 2017, PASJ, 69, 70, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psx053
  • Oi et al. (2014) Oi, N., Matsuhara, H., Murata, K., et al. 2014, A&A, 566, A60, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322561
  • Oi et al. (2021) Oi, N., Goto, T., Matsuhara, H., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 500, 5024, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3080
  • Osterbrock (1989) Osterbrock, D. E. 1989, Astrophysics of gaseous nebulae and active galactic nuclei
  • Pearson et al. (2017) Pearson, C., Cheale, R., Serjeant, S., et al. 2017, Publication of Korean Astronomical Society, 32, 219, doi: 10.5303/PKAS.2017.32.1.219
  • Pearson et al. (2019) Pearson, C., Barrufet, L., Campos Varillas, M. d. C., et al. 2019, PASJ, 71, 13, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psy107
  • Peeters et al. (2004) Peeters, E., Spoon, H. W. W., & Tielens, A. G. G. M. 2004, ApJ, 613, 986, doi: 10.1086/423237
  • Pettini & Pagel (2004) Pettini, M., & Pagel, B. E. J. 2004, MNRAS, 348, L59, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07591.x
  • Salim et al. (2007) Salim, S., Rich, R. M., Charlot, S., et al. 2007, ApJS, 173, 267, doi: 10.1086/519218
  • Salpeter (1955) Salpeter, E. E. 1955, ApJ, 121, 161, doi: 10.1086/145971
  • Shim et al. (2013) Shim, H., Im, M., Ko, J., et al. 2013, ApJS, 207, 37, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/207/2/37
  • Shin et al. (2021) Shin, K., Ly, C., Malkan, M. A., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 501, 2231, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3307
  • Shipley et al. (2016) Shipley, H. V., Papovich, C., Rieke, G. H., Brown, M. J. I., & Moustakas, J. 2016, ApJ, 818, 60, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/818/1/60
  • Shipley et al. (2013) Shipley, H. V., Papovich, C., Rieke, G. H., et al. 2013, ApJ, 769, 75, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/769/1/75
  • Shivaei et al. (2017) Shivaei, I., Reddy, N. A., Shapley, A. E., et al. 2017, ApJ, 837, 157, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa619c
  • Shogaki et al. (2018) Shogaki, A., Matsuura, S., Oi, N., et al. 2018, in The Cosmic Wheel and the Legacy of the AKARI Archive: From Galaxies and Stars to Planets and Life, ed. T. Ootsubo, I. Yamamura, K. Murata, & T. Onaka, 367–370
  • Smercina et al. (2018) Smercina, A., Smith, J. D. T., Dale, D. A., et al. 2018, ApJ, 855, 51, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaafcd
  • Smith & Draine (2012) Smith, J. D., & Draine, B. 2012, PAHFIT: Properties of PAH Emission, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1210.009. http://ascl.net/1210.009
  • Smith et al. (2007) Smith, J. D. T., Draine, B. T., Dale, D. A., et al. 2007, ApJ, 656, 770, doi: 10.1086/510549
  • Speagle et al. (2014) Speagle, J. S., Steinhardt, C. L., Capak, P. L., & Silverman, J. D. 2014, ApJS, 214, 15, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/214/2/15
  • Spinoglio et al. (2002) Spinoglio, L., Andreani, P., & Malkan, M. A. 2002, ApJ, 572, 105, doi: 10.1086/340302
  • Spinoglio et al. (2022) Spinoglio, L., Fernández-Ontiveros, J. A., Malkan, M. A., et al. 2022, ApJ, 926, 55, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac37b7
  • Spoon et al. (2007) Spoon, H. W. W., Marshall, J. A., Houck, J. R., et al. 2007, ApJ, 654, L49, doi: 10.1086/511268
  • Stecker et al. (2016) Stecker, F. W., Scully, S. T., & Malkan, M. A. 2016, ApJ, 827, 6, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/827/1/6
  • Takagi et al. (2003) Takagi, T., Arimoto, N., & Hanami, H. 2003, MNRAS, 340, 813, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06342.x
  • Takagi et al. (2010) Takagi, T., Ohyama, Y., Goto, T., et al. 2010, A&A, 514, A5, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200913466
  • Takeuchi et al. (2007) Takeuchi, T. T., Buat, V., & Burgarella, D. 2007, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 380, Deepest Astronomical Surveys, ed. J. Afonso, H. C. Ferguson, B. Mobasher, & R. Norris, 559, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0611796
  • Wada et al. (2008) Wada, T., Matsuhara, H., Oyabu, S., et al. 2008, PASJ, 60, S517, doi: 10.1093/pasj/60.sp2.S517
  • Whitcomb et al. (2020) Whitcomb, C. M., Sandstrom, K., Murphy, E. J., & Linden, S. 2020, ApJ, 901, 47, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abaef6
  • Wright et al. (2010) Wright, E. L., Eisenhardt, P. R. M., Mainzer, A. K., et al. 2010, AJ, 140, 1868, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/140/6/1868
  • Yang et al. (2020) Yang, G., Boquien, M., Buat, V., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 491, 740, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz3001

Appendix A Subaru/FMOS Hα\alpha detections

Table 9 lists the 10 additional Hα\alpha sources from Oi et al. (2017) that are newly identified as secure detections based on other emission line detections that confirm the spectroscopic redshift.

Table 9: Updated additional secure Hα\alpha detections from Subaru/FMOS.
AKARI ID RA (deg) Dec (deg) Redshift F(Hα\alpha) [101610^{-16} erg/s/cm2]
61021137 269.24127 66.72676 0.949 0.34±\pm0.13
61014814 269.13637 66.55578 1.030 0.22±\pm0.11
61016430 269.00271 66.59490 1.003 1.45±\pm0.27
61009352 268.98370 66.40349 0.902 0.82±\pm0.14
61023314 268.83595 66.80321 0.925 0.78±\pm0.23
61010363 268.77946 66.43416 0.902 0.58±\pm0.12
61023651 268.71468 66.81580 0.715 0.68±\pm0.09
61023133 268.64746 66.79599 0.714 0.55±\pm0.12
61012206 268.34379 66.48484 1.026 0.63±\pm0.22
61015448 268.91175 66.57122 1.003 1.02±\pm0.23

Appendix B Measurement of total infrared luminosity

In this section, we describe our procedure for testing the dependence of our L(TIR) measurements on FIR photometry. We selected 82 star-forming galaxies from the NEP-Wide survey with one to five FIR flux density measurement(s) from Herschel/PACS and/or SPIRE. Then, using the same input parameters described in Table 3, we modeled SEDs using CIGALE twice – including and excluding the FIR data. Figure 25 shows the resulting comparison between L(TIR) when the FIR data are included and excluded. For 78% of galaxies, the L(TIR) measurements agree to within \lesssim 12%. In a minority of galaxies, removing the FIR data results in significant under-estimation of the TIR luminosity. There was no correlation between the scatter and the number of FIR filter detections. We conclude that our estimates of L(TIR) are generally accurate, even for those galaxies which lack Herschel detections.

Refer to caption
Figure 25: Comparison between L(TIR) measurements when including and removing Herschel FIR photometry in SED fitting. The dashed line represents a perfect 1:1 correlation, and has not been fitted to the data.

Appendix C Measurement of peak PAH 7.7 μ\mum luminosity

The PAH luminosity measurements presented in Ohyama et al. (2018) are determined by the integrated Lorentzian fits to the SPICY spectra. To compare their measurements to other works that rely on rest-frame SEDs, Ohyama et al. (2018) define the “photometric monochromatic luminosity,” νLν,photo(7.7μm)\nu L_{\nu,photo}(7.7\ \mu m), and the “spectroscopic monochromatic luminosity,” νLν,spec(7.7μm)\nu L_{\nu,spec}(7.7\ \mu m). Both the photometric and spectroscopic monochromatic luminosity include contributions from the underlying continuum and measure the peak PAH 7.7 μ\mum luminosity. However, the photometric monochromatic luminosity at 7.7 μ\mum is the peak PAH 7.7 μ\mum luminosity based on broad-band SED fitting (Takagi et al., 2003), while the spectroscopic monochromatic luminosity is based on the SPICY spectra. According to the scaling relation in their Section 3.3.1, νLν,photo(7.7μm)\nu L_{\nu,photo}(7.7\ \mu m) is a factor of 0.6 dex higher than their integrated PAH 7.7 μ\mum luminosity due to the different luminosity definitions and continuum contribution. Based on our L(PAH 7.7μm)L(PAH\ 7.7\ \mu m) measurements, νLν,photo(7.7μm)\nu L_{\nu,photo}(7.7\ \mu m) as measured by Ohyama et al. is 0.7\sim 0.7 dex higher than our integrated PAH 7.7 μ\mum luminosities, which is consistent with the errors.

Figure 26 shows a comparison of our method for measuring the peak 7.7 μ\mum luminosity vs. the monochromatic spectroscopic and photometric luminosities given by Ohyama et al. (2018) in 41 SPICY galaxies in our sample. We find that our peak νLν(7.7μm)\nu L_{\nu}(7.7\ \mu m) measurements are consistent with Ohyama et al.’s spectroscopic monochromatic 7.7 μ\mum luminosities within 13% (left panel). In contrast, there is a 0.24 dex offset between our peak νLν(7.7μm)\nu L_{\nu}(7.7\ \mu m) measurements and the photometric monochromatic 7.7 μ\mum luminosities (right panel), indicating that our values should be multiplied by a factor of 10-0.24 when comparing to photometric-based methods that rely on broad-band SED fitting.

Refer to caption
Figure 26: Comparison between our measured peak PAH 7.7 μ\mum luminosity vs. spectroscopic monochromatic luminosity (left) and photometric monochromatic luminosity (right) by Ohyama et al. (2018) for SPICY galaxies. Linear fits are shown as solid lines. The dotted lines show exact agreement between the two luminosity estimates.

Appendix D Comparison between [O II] and Hα\alpha SFR

Although the [O II] luminosity calibration from Kennicutt (1998) is commonly used as an alternative SFR diagnostic in galaxies where Hα\alpha is redshifted out of the visible range (0.4z1.50.4\lesssim z\lesssim 1.5), the [O II] emission line is sensitive to reddening and metallicity, which can cause disagreement between SFR([O II]) and SFR(Hα\alpha) (Kewley et al., 2004). In light of these effects, we compare SFR([O II]) and SFR(Hα\alpha) in Figure 27, where we correct for reddening using the rest-frame 24 μ\mum luminosity calibration given in Kennicutt (1998). For the majority of galaxies, the SFR calibrations are consistent with a 0.06 dex offset and dispersion of 20%.

Refer to caption
Figure 27: Comparison between [O II] and Hα\alpha SFR for calibration sample, dust-corrected assuming the monochromatic 24 μ\mum luminosity correction given by Kennicutt (1998) equations. A linear fit to the data is shown by the solid line.