This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

The aa-number, pp-rank and Cartier points of genus 44 curves

Catalina Camacho-Navarro

Universidad de Costa Rica [email protected]
Abstract

We study genus 44 curves over finite fields and two invariants of the pp-torsion part of their Jacobians: the aa-number (aa) and pp-rank (ff). We collect and analyze statistical data of curves over 𝔽p\mathbb{F}_{p} for p=3,5,7,11p=3,5,7,11 and their invariants. Then, we study the existence of Cartier points, which are also related to the structure of J​[p]J[p]. For curves with 0≀a<g0\leq a<g, the number of Cartier points is bounded, and it depends on aa and ff.

Keywords: cartier points, genus 4, a-number, p-rank, Hasse-Witt Matrix.

1 Introduction

Let XX be a smooth projective genus gg curve over a field kk of characteristic pp. The Torelli map associates XX with its Jacobian JXJ_{X}, a principally polarized abelian variety of dimension gg. The map embeds the moduli space β„³g\mathcal{M}_{g} of curves of genus gg into π’œg\mathcal{A}_{g}, the moduli space of principally polarized abelian varieties of dimension gg over kk. In consequence, it allows us to study the stratification of β„³g\mathcal{M}_{g} by looking at the group scheme structure of JX​[p]J_{X}[p], the pp-torsion part of the Jacobian. This is called the Ekedahl–Oort stratification. For g=2,3g=2,3, the Torelli locus is open and dense in π’œg\mathcal{A}_{g}. For pβ‰₯3p\geq 3 and g≀3g\leq 3 this can be used to show that all Ekedahl–Oort types occur for the Jacobians of smooth curves X/𝔽¯pX/\overline{\mathbb{F}}_{p} ([9]). The same is not known for gβ‰₯4g\geq 4.

Motivated by this and other similar open questions related to the pp-torsion part of the Jacobian, we study smooth irreducible curves with g=4g=4. We focus on the non-hyperelliptic kind. In particular, we look at the aa-number and the pp-rank, which are two invariants of JX​[p]J_{X}[p].

In order to obtain a database of smooth, irreducible, genus 44 non-hyperelliptic curves, we restrict our analysis to what we define as curves in standard form. Recall that if XX is a curve with the above properties, then it has a model given by the zero locus of a quadratic and a cubic homogeneous polynomials in k​[x,y,z,w]k[x,y,z,w]. Kudo and Harashita show in [6] that under some assumptions, the defining equations can be simplified to reduce the number of cases. The curves given by these simplified equations are curves in standard form.

We gather a statistical sample of curves in standard form defined over 𝔽p\mathbb{F}_{p} for p∈{3,5,7,11}p\in\{3,5,7,11\}. For each of them we find the Hasse–Witt matrix HH and use it to compute the aa-number and pp-rank: the aa-number is gβˆ’rank​(H)g-\text{rank}(H) and the pp-rank is f=rank​(H​H(p)​⋯​H(pgβˆ’1))f=\text{rank}\left(HH^{(p)}\cdots H^{\left(p^{g-1}\right)}\right). As one should expect, the majority of curves appear in the sample are ordinary, and the percentages decrease as the aa-number increases (or similarly, as the pp-rank decreases).

We also explore in this paper the concept of Cartier point. We say that P∈X​(kΒ―)P\in X(\overline{k}) is a Cartier point if the hyperplane of regular differentials of XX vanishing at PP is stable under the Cartier operator. Baker introduces the definition in [1] and remarks that they are related to the pp-torsion points of the Jacobian.

If XX has aa-number 0≀a<g0\leq a<g then there is an upper bound on the number of Cartier points of XX given by Baker [1]. When aβ‰ 0a\neq 0, we classify Cartier points in Type 1 and Type 2 (see DefinitionΒ 6.5). The maximum number of Type 1 points depends on the aa-number and the maximum number of Type 2 points depends on the pp-rank. We are interested in determining the conditions under which these bounds are attained when XX is non-ordinary. Therefore, we develop algorithms to find all of the Cartier points on curves in standard form and apply them to our database.

The Cartier points are particularly interesting when a=gβˆ’1a=g-1, because we can assign multiplicity to each of them. This is why we later focus on curves with a=3a=3. We find all of the curves in standard form with a=3a=3, defined over 𝔽p\mathbb{F}_{p} for p=3,5p=3,5 and a subset of them over 𝔽7\mathbb{F}_{7}. We explore the possible degrees and multiplicity distributions of these points.

Here are some of the most relevant conclusions from our work, concerning non-hyperelliptic genus 44 curves in standard form:

  1. 1.

    In our smooth sample, the are no curves with (a,f)=(1,0)(a,f)=(1,0) over 𝔽p\mathbb{F}_{p} for p∈{3,5,7,11}p\in\{3,5,7,11\}. (CorollaryΒ 5.1).

  2. 2.

    There are, up to 𝔽3\mathbb{F}_{3}-isomorphism, exactly 27 curves with aa-number 33 over 𝔽3\mathbb{F}_{3} in standard form. All of them have pp-rank 11. (CorollariesΒ 5.3 andΒ 5.2).

  3. 3.

    There are, up to 𝔽5\mathbb{F}_{5}-isomorphism, exactly 134134 curves with a=3a=3 over 𝔽5\mathbb{F}_{5}. (CorollaryΒ 5.5).

  4. 4.

    In our smooth sample, no curve with aa-number 22 reaches the bound of 66 Type 11 Cartier points. Moreover, the maximum number of Type 11 points attained on curves with aa-number 22 is 33 for p∈{5,7,11}p\in\{5,7,11\} and 22 for p=3p=3. (Corollary 6.16).

  5. 5.

    In our smooth sample no curve with pp-rank 22 or 33 reaches the bound of 66 Type 22 Cartier points. The maximum number of points that occurs is 33 and 44, respectively. (CorollaryΒ 6.18).

  6. 6.

    When a=3a=3, the bound on Type 1 points is sharp for p∈{5,7,11}p\in\{5,7,11\} and the total bound for both Types is sharp for p=7p=7. (Corollaries 6.17 and 6.19).

  7. 7.

    There are no curves in standard form over 𝔽3\mathbb{F}_{3} with a=3a=3 that attain either of the upper bounds for Cartier points. (LemmaΒ 7.1).

2 Acknowledgements

This paper is part of my doctoral dissertation. The work presented here would not have been possible without the support of my advisor Rachel Pries. I would like to thank Dr. Pries for suggesting this topic and sharing her knowledge throughout my time in graduate school. I was financially supported by University of Costa Rica while I worked on this project.

3 Preliminaries

This section includes the background information related to the Cartier operator, Hasse–Witt matrix, pp-rank and aa-number of a curve. Unless otherwise stated, pp will be an odd prime number and kk a perfect field of characteristic pp.

3.1 The pp-rank

Let XX be a smooth irreducible genus gg curve over kk. Denote by JXJ_{X} the Jacobian variety associated to XX. Then JXJ_{X} is an abelian variety of dimension gg isomorphic to PicX/k0\text{Pic}^{0}_{X/k}, equipped with a principal polarization.

The pp-torsion part of the Jacobian, denoted by JX​[p]J_{X}[p], is a group scheme and here we will study two invariants associated to it. The first one is the pp-rank, defined as the integer ff such that #​JX​[p]​(k)=pf\#J_{X}[p](k)=p^{f}. The pp-torsion subgroup of an abelian variety of dimension gg has order at most gg, hence 0≀f≀g0\leq f\leq g.

3.2 Cartier and Frobenius operators and the aa-number

Suppose that xx is a separating variable of k​(X)/kk(X)/k, then every t∈k​(X)t\in k(X) can be written as

t=t0p+t1p​x+…+tpβˆ’1p​xpβˆ’1,\displaystyle t=t_{0}^{p}+t_{1}^{p}x+\ldots+t_{p-1}^{p}x^{p-1}, (1)

with ti∈k​(X)t_{i}\in k(X).

Definition 3.1.

The Cartier operator π’ž\mathcal{C} is defined on Ξ©X1\Omega_{X}^{1} for tt as above by

π’žβ€‹(t​d​x)=tpβˆ’1​d​x.\displaystyle\mathcal{C}(tdx)=t_{p-1}dx. (2)

The Cartier operator is 1/p1/p-linear, meaning that π’žβ€‹(ap​ω1+bp​ω2)=aβ€‹π’žβ€‹(Ο‰1)+bβ€‹π’žβ€‹(Ο‰2)\mathcal{C}(a^{p}\omega_{1}+b^{p}\omega_{2})=a\mathcal{C}(\omega_{1})+b\mathcal{C}(\omega_{2}), for a,ba,b in k​(X)k(X) and Ο‰1,Ο‰2∈ΩX1\omega_{1},\omega_{2}\in\Omega_{X}^{1}. It induces a well defined map π’ž\mathcal{C} on the kk-vector space of regular differentials H0​(X,Ξ©X1)H^{0}(X,\Omega_{X}^{1}).

Definition 3.2.

If B={Ο‰1,…,Ο‰g}B=\left\{\omega_{1},\ldots,\omega_{g}\right\} is a kk-basis for H0​(X,Ξ©X1)H^{0}(X,\Omega_{X}^{1}) and π’žβ€‹(Ο‰j)=βˆ‘i=1gci​j​ωi\mathcal{C}(\omega_{j})=\sum_{i=1}^{g}{c_{ij}\omega_{i}} then the Cartier–Manin matrix of XX with respect to this basis is the matrix (ci​jp)i​j(c_{ij}^{p})_{ij}.

Definition 3.3.

The absolute Frobenius of XX is the morphism β„±:Xβ†’X\mathcal{F}:X\to X given by the identity on the underlaying topological space and t↦tpt\mapsto t^{p} on π’ͺX\mathcal{O}_{X}. Let β„±X\mathcal{F}_{X} be the induced endomorphism in H1​(X,π’ͺX)H^{1}(X,\mathcal{O}_{X}). We call β„±X\mathcal{F}_{X} the Frobenius endomorphism.

The Frobenius endomorphism is pp-linear, that is β„±X​(a​ξ)=ap​ℱX​(ΞΎ)\mathcal{F}_{X}(a\xi)=a^{p}\mathcal{F}_{X}(\xi) for all a∈ka\in k and all ξ∈H1​(X,π’ͺX)\xi\in H^{1}(X,\mathcal{O}_{X}).

Definition 3.4.

Let Bβ€²={ΞΎ1,…,ΞΎg}B^{\prime}=\{\xi_{1},\ldots,\xi_{g}\} be a kk-basis of H1​(X,π’ͺX)H^{1}(X,\mathcal{O}_{X}) and β„±X​(ΞΎj)=βˆ‘i=1gai​j​ξi\mathcal{F}_{X}(\xi_{j})=\sum_{i=1}^{g}a_{ij}\xi_{i} for some ai​j∈ka_{ij}\in k. Then the Hasse–Witt matrix of XX with respect to Bβ€²B^{\prime} is the matrix (ai​j)i​j(a_{ij})_{ij}.

The space H1​(X,π’ͺX)H^{1}(X,\mathcal{O}_{X}) is the dual of H0​(X,Ξ©X1)H^{0}(X,\Omega_{X}^{1}) and there is a perfect paring <,><,> on H1​(X,π’ͺX)Γ—H0​(X,Ξ©X1)H^{1}(X,\mathcal{O}_{X})\times H^{0}(X,\Omega_{X}^{1}) such that <β„±XΞΎ,Ο‰>=<ΞΎ,π’žΟ‰>p<\mathcal{F}_{X}\xi,\omega>=<\xi,\mathcal{C}\omega>^{p}.

When BB and Bβ€²B^{\prime} are dual basis,the Cartier–Manin matrix MM with respect to BB is the transpose of the Hasse–Witt matrix HH with respect to Bβ€²B^{\prime}.

By Serre [13], the pp-rank ff is the stable rank of the Frobenius and since this operator is pp-linear, it implies that

f=rank​(H​H(p)​⋯​H(pgβˆ’1)),f=\text{rank}\left(HH^{(p)}\cdots H^{\left(p^{g-1}\right)}\right), (3)

where H(i)H^{(i)} is the matrix obtained by raising every entry of HH to the ii-th power.

The second invariant of JX​[p]J_{X}[p] that we study here is the aa-number, defined as the rank of the Cartier operator (see Oort [7]), i.e.,

a=gβˆ’rank​(H)=gβˆ’rank​(M).a=g-\text{rank}(H)=g-\text{rank}(M). (4)

It is known that 0≀a+f≀g0\leq a+f\leq g. Generically f=gf=g, in which case XX is said to be ordinary. The other extreme case is when XX is superspecial and it occurs when a=ga=g or equivalently, when the Cartier operator is identically 0 on H0​(X,Ξ©X1)H^{0}(X,\Omega_{X}^{1}).

In SectionΒ 4.2 we follow the work from [6] to describe how to explicitly find the Hasse–Witt matrix, when XX is the complete intersection of two homogeneous polynomials and use it to compute the pp-rank and aa-number.

3.3 Previous results

In this section we review some of the main and more recent results with respect to genus gg curves of positive characteristic and possible values for the aa-number and pp-rank that occur.

Theorem 3.5 (Ekedahl [2],Theorem 1.1).

Let XX be a smooth curve of genus gg over an algebraically closed field kk of characteristic p>0p>0. If XX is superspecial then

  1. 1.

    g≀12​(p2βˆ’p)g\leq\frac{1}{2}(p^{2}-p) and

  2. 2.

    g≀12​(pβˆ’1)g\leq\frac{1}{2}(p-1) if XX is hyperelliptic and (p,g)β‰ (2,1).(p,g)\neq(2,1).

Baker gives in [1] an alternative proof for TheoremΒ 3.5, based on the existence of Cartier points (see SectionΒ 6 for definition). Let mm be the rank of the Cartier operator. Re ([12], Theorem 3.1 and Proposition 3.1) provides a generalization of this result to any value of mm. The author proves that in fact g≀(m+1)​p​(pβˆ’1)2+p​mg\leq(m+1)p\frac{(p-1)}{2}+pm and if XX is also hyperelliptic then g<p+12+m​pg<\frac{p+1}{2}+mp.

Zhou ([14], Theorem 1.1) gives a strengthening of this result for the case when m=1m=1 that gives a bound for gg of p+p​(pβˆ’1)2p+\frac{p(p-1)}{2}. Moreover, Frei ([3], Theorem 3.1]) proved that if gβ‰₯pg\geq p where pp is an odd prime, then there are no smooth hyperelliptic curves of genus gg defined over a field of characteristic pp with aa-number equal to gβˆ’1g-1.

There are examples, however, of curves with aa-number gβˆ’1g-1 that are non-hyperelliptic. Also Zhou finds in [15] a family of Artin–Schreier curves with these properties.

More generally, Pries [10] proves the existence of smooth curves with aa-number 1,21,2 and 33, under certain conditions.

4 Genus 44 non-hyperelliptic curves

There are currently many open questions concerning the existence of curves with certain pp-ranks and aa-numbers, given a fixed genus gg. For instance, there exist curves of genus 22 and 3 with any possible pp-rank and aa-number over fields of characteristic pp, with the exception of superspecial curves of genus 22 when p=2p=2 and superspecial curves of genus 33 when p=2,3p=2,3. For gβ‰₯4g\geq 4, however, it is not known if this happens. For example, consider Question 3.6 in [11]: For all pp, does there exist a smooth curve of genus 44 with pp-rank 0 and aa-number at least 22?

One can find in the literature partial answers to the last and similar questions. For example, if p=3p=3 then by Ekedahl’s Theorem (3.5), there is no curve of genus 44, with aa-number 4. In [16], Zhou (building on work from [3], [4] and [10]) shows, by studying a family of Artin–Schreier curves that in characteristic 3, there are genus 44 curves with aa-number aa and pp-rank ff for all a≀2a\leq 2 and f≀af\leq a and for (a,f)=(3,1)(a,f)=(3,1).

In fact, the author computes the Ekedahl-Oort types to show that the corresponding locus of β„³g\mathcal{M}_{g} is non empty of codimension at most 6. In SectionΒ 6.3.1 we provide additional examples of genus 44 curves with aa-number 33 and pp-rank 11 over 𝔽3\mathbb{F}_{3}. We know by Frei Β [3] that there are no aa-number 33 and pp-rank 0 genus 44 hyperelliptic curves, so one can ask whether it is possible to have a non-hyperelliptic genus 44 with those invariants.

Kudo and Harashita [6] also studied genus 44 curves, they prove two results related to non-hyperelliptic superspecial curves of genus 44. In particular they show that there are no superspecial genus 44 curves in characteristic 77, and that over 𝔽25\mathbb{F}_{25} they are all isomorphic to

2​y​w+z2=0,x3+a1​y3+a2​w3+a3​z​w2=0,2yw+z^{2}=0,x^{3}+a_{1}y^{3}+a_{2}w^{3}+a_{3}zw^{2}=0,

in ℙ𝔽253\mathbb{P}_{\mathbb{F}_{25}}^{3}, where a1,a2βˆˆπ”½25Γ—a_{1},a_{2}\in\mathbb{F}^{\times}_{25} and a3βˆˆπ”½25.a_{3}\in\mathbb{F}_{25}.

4.1 Defining equations of genus 44 non-hyperelliptic curves

If XX is a genus 44, smooth, irreducible and non-hyperelliptic curve, then the canonical map embeds XX into β„™k3\mathbb{P}^{3}_{k} as the intersection of the zero loci of a quadratic and a cubic homogeneous polynomial in four variables (see [5]), that we detail below.

We restrict our computations to what we will define as genus 44 curves in standard form. These are based on equations given by Kudo and Harashita [6].

4.1.1 Quadratic forms and reduction of cubics

As explained in [6], any irreducible quadratic form in k​[x,y,z,w]k[x,y,z,w] is equivalent to one of F1=2​x​w+2​y​zF_{1}=2xw+2yz, F2=2​x​w+y2βˆ’Ο΅β€‹z2F_{2}=2xw+y^{2}-\epsilon z^{2} or Fd=2​y​w+z2F_{d}=2yw+z^{2} with some Ο΅βˆ‰(kΓ—)2\epsilon\notin(k^{\times})^{2}. Therefore we can assume that XX has a model given by V​(F,G)V(F,G), with FF being one of F1F_{1}, F2F_{2} or FdF_{d}, and GG a homogeneous polynomial of degree 33. The cubic GG can be reduced by changes of variables, induced by the action of the orthogonal similitude groups associated to the quadratic forms. This is done in detail in Section 4 of [6]. The simplified equations provide the following definition.

Definition 4.1.

Let F1=2​x​w+2​y​zF_{1}=2xw+2yz, F2=2​x​w+y2βˆ’Ο΅β€‹z2F_{2}=2xw+y^{2}-\epsilon z^{2} or Fd=2​y​w+z2F_{d}=2yw+z^{2} with Ο΅βˆ‰(kΓ—)2\epsilon\notin(k^{\times})^{2}. We say that a curve XX of genus 44 over kk is in standard form if it is non-hyperelliptic, irreducible, smooth and X=V​(F,G)X=V(F,G) with

(Case D) F=FdF=F_{d} and

G\displaystyle G =a0​x3+(a1​y2+a2​z2+a3​w2+a4​y​z+a5​z​w)​x+a6​y3+a7​z3+a8​w3+a9​y​z2\displaystyle=a_{0}x^{3}+(a_{1}y^{2}+a_{2}z^{2}+a_{3}w^{2}+a_{4}yz+a_{5}zw)x+a_{6}y^{3}+a_{7}z^{3}+a_{8}w^{3}+a_{9}yz^{2}
+b1​z2​w+b2​z​w2,\displaystyle+b_{1}z^{2}w+b_{2}zw^{2},

for ai∈ka_{i}\in k and a0,a6∈kΓ—a_{0},a_{6}\in k^{\times}, with b1,b2∈{0,1}b_{1},b_{2}\in\{0,1\} and the leading coefficient of r=a1​y2+a2​z2+a3​w2+a4​y​z+a5​z​wr=a_{1}y^{2}+a_{2}z^{2}+a_{3}w^{2}+a_{4}yz+a_{5}zw is 11 or r=0r=0; or

(Case N1i) F=F1F=F_{1} and

G\displaystyle G =(a1​y+a2​z)​x2+a3​y​z​x+y3+a4​z3+b1​y2​z+a5​y​z2\displaystyle=(a_{1}y+a_{2}z)x^{2}+a_{3}yzx+y^{3}+a_{4}z^{3}+b_{1}y^{2}z+a_{5}yz^{2}
+(a6​y2+a7​y​z+b2​z2)​w+(a8​y+a9​z)​w2+a10​w3,\displaystyle+(a_{6}y^{2}+a_{7}yz+b_{2}z^{2})w+(a_{8}y+a_{9}z)w^{2}+a_{10}w^{3},

for ai∈ka_{i}\in k with a1β‰ 0a_{1}\neq 0, a2β‰ 0a_{2}\neq 0 and for b1∈{0}βˆͺkΓ—/(kΓ—)2b_{1}\in\{0\}\cup k^{\times}/(k^{\times})^{2} and b2∈{0,1}b_{2}\in\{0,1\}; or

(Case N1ii) F=F1F=F_{1} and

G=\displaystyle G= (a1y+a2z)x2+a3yzx+b1y2z+b2yz2+(a4y2+a5yz+b3z2)w+(a6y+\displaystyle(a_{1}y+a_{2}z)x^{2}+a_{3}yzx+b_{1}y^{2}z+b_{2}yz^{2}+(a_{4}y^{2}+a_{5}yz+b_{3}z^{2})w+(a_{6}y+
a7z)w2+a8w3,\displaystyle a_{7}z)w^{2}+a_{8}w^{3},

for ai∈ka_{i}\in k with a1​a2β‰ 0a_{1}a_{2}\neq 0 and for b1,b3∈{0,1}b_{1},b_{3}\in\{0,1\} and b2∈{0}βˆͺkΓ—/(kΓ—)2b_{2}\in\{0\}\cup k^{\times}/(k^{\times})^{2}; or

(Case N2) F=F2F=F_{2} and

G=(a1y+a2z)x2+a3(y2βˆ’Ο΅z2)x+b1y(y2βˆ’Ο΅z2)+a4y(y2+3Ο΅z2)+a5z(3y2+Ο΅z2)+(a6y2+a7yz+b2z2)w+(a8y+a9z)w2+a10w3,\displaystyle\begin{split}G=&(a_{1}y+a_{2}z)x^{2}+a_{3}(y^{2}-\epsilon z^{2})x+b_{1}y(y^{2}-\epsilon z^{2})+a_{4}y(y^{2}+3\epsilon z^{2})+a_{5}z(3y^{2}\\ &+\epsilon z^{2})+(a_{6}y^{2}+a_{7}yz+b_{2}z^{2})w+(a_{8}y+a_{9}z)w^{2}+a_{10}w^{3},\end{split}

for ai∈ka_{i}\in k, with (a1,a2)β‰ (0,0)(a_{1},a_{2})\neq(0,0) and b1,b2∈{0,1}b_{1},b_{2}\in\{0,1\} and Ο΅\epsilon a non-trivial fixed representative of kΓ—/(kΓ—)2k^{\times}/(k^{\times})^{2},

We remark that every genus 44 non-hyperelliptic can be written asX=V​(F,G)X=V(F,G), where FF is one of F1,F2,FdF_{1},F_{2},F_{d}. Moreover, GG can be simplified to standard form if the curve has least 37 points. If the F=FdF=F_{d} then it is enough that #​k>5\#k>5 ([6] Lemmas 4.3.1, 4.4.1 and 4.5.1).

4.2 Hasse–Witt Matrix of genus 44 non-hyperelliptic curves

Let X=V​(F,G)X=V(F,G) be the complete intersection on β„™k3\mathbb{P}^{3}_{k} defined by homogeneous polynomials FF and GG in k​[x,y,z,w]k[x,y,z,w] of degrees dd and cc, respectively. Following [5] and [1] we see that H1​(X,π’ͺX)β‰…H3​(β„™3,π’ͺβ„™3​(βˆ’cβˆ’d))H^{1}(X,\mathcal{O}_{X})\cong H^{3}(\mathbb{P}^{3},\mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}}^{3}(-c-d)), where the basis ℬ\mathcal{B} of H1​(X,π’ͺX)H^{1}(X,\mathcal{O}_{X}) that corresponds to the coordinates x,y,z,wx,y,z,w is associated to the basis of H3​(β„™3,π’ͺβ„™3​(βˆ’cβˆ’d))H^{3}(\mathbb{P}^{3},\mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}}^{3}(-c-d)) given by

{xk​yl​zm​wn:(k,l,m,n)∈(β„€<0)4​ andΒ βˆ’kβˆ’lβˆ’mβˆ’n=c+d}.\displaystyle\{x^{k}y^{l}z^{m}w^{n}:(k,l,m,n)\in(\mathbb{Z}_{<0})^{4}\text{ and }-k-l-m-n=c+d\}. (5)

Using this fact, Kudo and Harashita present an algorithm to compute the Hasse–Witt of such curves, which can be generalized to compute the corresponding matrix for any complete intersection over a perfect field of positive characteristic.

Proposition 4.2 (Kudo and Harashita [6], Proposition 3.1.4).

Let XX of genus gg be defined as above and suppose (F​G)pβˆ’1=βˆ‘ci1,i2,i3,i4​xi1​yi2​zi3​wi4(FG)^{p-1}=\sum c_{i_{1},i_{2},i_{3},i_{4}}x^{i_{1}}y^{i_{2}}z^{i_{3}}w^{i_{4}}. Then the Hasse–Witt matrix of XX is given by

(cβˆ’kj​p+ki,βˆ’lj​p+li,βˆ’mj​p+m1​iβˆ’nj​p+ni)i,j.\displaystyle\left(c_{-k_{j}p+k_{i},-l_{j}p+l_{i},-m_{j}p+m_{1}i-n_{j}p+n_{i}}\right)_{i,j}. (6)

This formula gives a matrix HH that represents the action of β„±X\mathcal{F}_{X} by left matrix multiplication. Let 𝐯\mathbf{v} be the column vector corresponding to an element of H1​(X,π’ͺX)H^{1}(X,\mathcal{O}_{X}) expressed in terms of the basis ℬ\mathcal{B}. Then the image of 𝐯\mathbf{v} under β„±X\mathcal{F}_{X} is given by H⋅𝐯(p)H\cdot\mathbf{v}^{(p)}, since β„±X\mathcal{F}_{X} is pp-linear.

In the next section, we use PropositionΒ 4.2 together with the equations from SectionΒ 4 to compute examples of non-hyperelliptic smooth curves of genus 44 with aa-number 33.

5 A database of curves in standard form over 𝔽p\mathbb{F}_{p}

In this section we construct a database of genus 4 curves in standard form (DefinitionΒ 4.1) over 𝔽p\mathbb{F}_{p} for p∈{3,5,7,11}p\in\{3,5,7,11\}. We restrict our data collection to non-ordinary and non-superspecial curves, that is, curves with aa-number equal to 1,21,2 or 33. First let us explain the notation used:

  • β€’

    Let aβ†’βˆˆπ”½p20{\vec{a}}\in\mathbb{F}_{p}^{20}. We denote by Gaβ†’G_{{\vec{a}}} the cubic whose coefficients correspond to the entries of aβ†’{\vec{a}}, assigned to the monomials of degree 3 in 𝔽p​[x,y,z,w]\mathbb{F}_{p}[x,y,z,w] in graded lexicographic order, which means that we consider x>y>z>wx>y>z>w and to order the monomials we first compare the exponents of xx, then those of yy and so on.

  • β€’

    For each one of the cases D, N1i, N1ii and N2 in DefinitionΒ 4.1 we define a subset of 𝔽p20\mathbb{F}_{p}^{20} such that for all aβ†’{\vec{a}} in that subset, the cubic Gaβ†’G_{{\vec{a}}} has conditions. We denote each subset by 𝐃p,𝐍𝟏𝐒p,𝐍𝟏𝐒𝐒p\mathbf{D}_{p},\mathbf{N1i}_{p},\mathbf{N1ii}_{p} and 𝐍𝟐p\mathbf{N2}_{p}.

As a reference, the cardinality of each of the sets above is shown in TableΒ 1.

Table 1: Cardinality of the sets 𝐃p\mathbf{D}_{p}, 𝐍𝟏𝐒p\mathbf{N1i}_{p}, 𝐍𝟏𝐒𝐒p\mathbf{N1ii}_{p}, 𝐍𝟐p\mathbf{N2}_{p}.
Set Cardinality
𝐃p\mathbf{D}_{p} 4​p3​(pβˆ’1)​(p5+pβˆ’2)4p^{3}(p-1)(p^{5}+p-2)
𝐍𝟏𝐒p\mathbf{N1i}_{p} 6​p8​(pβˆ’1)26p^{8}(p-1)^{2}
𝐍𝟏𝐒𝐒p\mathbf{N1ii}_{p} 12​p6​(pβˆ’1)212p^{6}(p-1)^{2}
𝐍𝟐p\mathbf{N2}_{p} 4​p8​(p2βˆ’1)4p^{8}(p^{2}-1)

To construct a curve in standard form we select an element aβ†’{\vec{a}} in one of the subsets above together with the corresponding F∈{F1,F2,Fd}F\in\{F_{1},F_{2},F_{d}\} and verify if V​(F,Gaβ†’)V(F,G_{\vec{a}}) is non-singular, irreducible and has genus 44. In practice, we implement the algorithm in Magma, where we check each of the conditions as follows:

  • β€’

    Irreducibility: using the intrinsic Magma function IsIrreducible, which verifies the condition over the base field by a GrΓΆbner basis computation.

  • β€’

    Genus: the command Genus finds the arithmetic genus of the projective normalization of the curve.

  • β€’

    Nonsingularity: Implementing Algorithm DetermineNonSingularity (Algorithm 3.2.1 in [6]), which is based on solving a radical membership problem on the minors of the Jacobian matrix of V​(F,Gaβ†’)V(F,G_{\vec{a}}). The later is done by a RadicalMembership algorithm ([6], Appendix A)

Next, suppose that X=V​(F,Gaβ†’)X=V(F,G_{\vec{a}}) is a curve in standard form, then we need to determine its aa-number and pp-rank. We do this by computing the Hasse–Witt matrix HH of XX with respect to the basis of H1​(X,π’ͺX)H^{1}(X,\mathcal{O}_{X}) given by (5), as in PropositionΒ 4.2. The aa-number is equal to 4βˆ’rank​(H)4-\text{rank}(H) and the pp-rank ff is the rank of H​H(p)​⋯​H(pgβˆ’1)HH^{(p)}\cdots H^{\left(p^{g-1}\right)}. In our case, since FF and Gaβ†’G_{\vec{a}} are defined over 𝔽p\mathbb{F}_{p}, then f=rank​(Hg)f=\text{rank}(H^{g}).

5.1 Collecting the data

We apply the above procedure to random samples of tuples in 𝐃p\mathbf{D}_{p}, 𝐍𝟏𝐒p\mathbf{N1i}_{p}, 𝐍𝟏𝐒𝐒p\mathbf{N1ii}_{p} and 𝐍𝟐p\mathbf{N2}_{p} for p∈{3,5,7,11}p\in\{3,5,7,11\} in order to gather statistical information. We construct the sample using the intrinsic Random function in Magma. In addition, we classify the curves by aa-number and pp-rank.

When we analyze the samples of curves in our data, we will often compare the number of curves with certain pp-rank and/or aa-number with the total of smooth curves in standard form obtained. In our search we classify the curves with aa-number 0,1,20,1,2 and 33. We ignore the curves with a=4a=4 because they represent a very small proportion of the curves and hence they do not affect the percentages in a significant way.

Also, our focus will be studying the occurrence of Cartier points (see SectionΒ 6), and we already know that superspecial curves have infinitely many of them (Baker [1]). Here is how we will refer to our different samples:

  • β€’

    Total set: the set 𝐃p\mathbf{D}_{p}, 𝐍𝟏𝐒p\mathbf{N1i}_{p}, 𝐍𝟏𝐒𝐒p\mathbf{N1ii}_{p} or 𝐍𝟐p\mathbf{N2}_{p}, depending on the case.

  • β€’

    Sampled set: the curves of the sets above that are included in our random search.

  • β€’

    Smooth sample: the set of cubics from the sampled set that give smooth, irreducible, genus 44 curves (excluding superspecial curves).

  • β€’

    Singular sample: the set of cubics from the sampled set that give curves that fail either one of the conditions for smoothness, irreducibility or genus.

If we do not specify the subcase, then Sampled set, Smooth sample and Singular sample will refer to the total samples throughout the four cases.

5.2 Summary of results of sampling search

In this section we display the overall results from the sampling search. The sizes of our final Sampled sets by case are shown in TableΒ 2.

Table 2: Total sampled sizes over 𝔽p\mathbb{F}_{p}.
pp D N1i N1ii N2 Total sample
33 52704 92123 34992 6447 186266
55 179728 179970 179434 179970 719102
77 215957 225193 206890 214998 863038
1111 89999 91100 89999 90000 361098

In TableΒ 3 we list the number of curves with pp-ranks f=0,1,2,3f=0,1,2,3 and aa-number a=1,2,3a=1,2,3, over 𝔽p\mathbb{F}_{p} for p∈{3,5,7,11}p\in\{3,5,7,11\}. We include the totals for the singular samples and the ordinary curves (that is, those with aa-number 0). From this classification we have the following statement:

Corollary 5.1.

In our data set of genus 44 curves in standard form there are no curves with pp-rank 0 and aa-number 11, when p∈{3,5,7,11}p\in\{3,5,7,11\}.

Proof.

See Table 3. ∎

Table 3: Sample of curves in standard over 𝔽p\mathbb{F}_{p}.
aa ff 3 5 7 11
Sampled set 186266 719102 863038 361098
Singular sample 92654 251584 191925 81845
0 56983 370476 529394 253627
1 0 0 0 0 0
1 1 1679 3592 1652 217
1 2 4134 14615 10687 2146
1 3 23485 74585 76142 23044
Total 29298 92792 88481 25407
2 0 1157 183 44 3
2 1 2095 790 231 21
2 2 3379 3231 1624 194
Total 6631 4204 1899 218
3 0 0 10 0 0
3 1 700 36 5 1
Total 700 46 5 1
Smooth sample 93612 467518 619779 279253

Next we discuss the results from the search for each pp. We include the sizes of the total set, sampled set, smooth sample and singular sample, normalized by logp\log_{p}. Then we show the break down of curves with a=1,2,3a=1,2,3 and specify the percentage of the sampled set and smooth sample they represent.

5.2.1 Case p=3p=3 .

We checked a total of 186266186266 tuples, which corresponds to approximately 71%71\% of all the possible tuples. We saw that 50.26%50.26\% of them gave smooth curves and 19.66%19.66\% of the total had aa-number a=1,2,3a=1,2,3. Notice that we were able to sort all of the cubics from the total sets 𝐃3\mathbf{D}_{3} and 𝐍𝟏𝐒𝐒3\mathbf{N1ii}_{3}.

5.2.2 Case p=5p=5.

We selected a random sample of 719102719102 tuples in 𝐃5,𝐍𝟏𝐒5,𝐍𝟏𝐒𝐒5\mathbf{D}_{5},\mathbf{N1i}_{5},\mathbf{N1ii}_{5} and 𝐍𝟐5\mathbf{N2}_{5}. This is around 1.49%1.49\% of the total set. A 61.01%61.01\% of that sample corresponds to the Smooth sample, and 13.49%13.49\% of the total are non-ordinary curves.

5.2.3 Case p=7p=7.

We analyzed a random sample of 863038863038 pairs of tuples in 𝐃7\mathbf{D}_{7}, 𝐍𝟏𝐒7\mathbf{N1i}_{7}, 𝐍𝟏𝐒𝐒7\mathbf{N1ii}_{7} and 𝐍𝟐7\mathbf{N2}_{7}, which corresponds to 0.06%0.06\% of the total. The smooth sample from this set has 619779619779 tuples and 9038590385 of them are curves in standard form with aa-number 1,21,2 or 33. These correspond to 71.81%71.81\% and 10.47%10.47\% of the total, respectively.

5.2.4 Case p=11p=11

In this case we did a random search that included 361098361098 tuples in 𝐃11,𝐍𝟏𝐒11\mathbf{D}_{11},\mathbf{N1i}_{11}, 𝐍𝟏𝐒𝐒11\mathbf{N1ii}_{11} and 𝐍𝟐11\mathbf{N2}_{11}, this is approximately 0.0002%0.0002\% of the total set. Of this sample, 77.33%77.33\% are smooth and 7.10%7.10\% of the total are non-ordinary.

5.3 The case a=3a=3

In order to focus on the analysis of some aspects of genus 44 curves with aa-number 33, we apply the procedure above to all the tuples in 𝐃p,𝐍𝟏𝐒p,𝐍𝟏𝐒𝐒p\mathbf{D}_{p},\mathbf{N1i}_{p},\mathbf{N1ii}_{p} and 𝐍𝟐p\mathbf{N2}_{p}, but only store the smooth, irreducible curves with a=3a=3. We did this for p=3,5p=3,5. The search is also done for p=7p=7 but only for tuples in 𝐃7\mathbf{D}_{7} and a subset of 𝐍𝟏𝐒7\mathbf{N1i}_{7}, because of the long computing times. It is important to remark that after the search, we classify the curves by 𝔽p\mathbb{F}_{p}-isomorphism classes.

In the cases p=3,5p=3,5 we also have a complete list of all curves in standard form that have aa-number 33. For p=7p=7 we have a subset of them: the ones in case D and those in case N1i where (b1,b2)=(0,0)(b_{1},b_{2})=(0,0), we denote these lists by 7(D) and 7(N1i’). The information on these curves, classified by isomorphism classes, is shown in TableΒ 4. A first conclusion that we can draw from this data is the following:

Corollary 5.2.

There are no genus 44 curves in standard form over 𝔽3\mathbb{F}_{3} with pp-rank 0 and aa-number 33.

Table 4: Isomorphism classes of curves in standard form with a=3a=3 over 𝔽p\mathbb{F}_{p}.
pp-rank 3 5 7(D) 7(N1i’)
0 0 36 9 2
1 27 98 56 27
Total 27 134 65 29

5.3.1 Case p=3p=3

There are a total of 11881188 vectors aβ†’{\vec{a}} in 𝐃3\mathbf{D}_{3}, 𝐍𝟏𝐒3\mathbf{N1i}_{3}, 𝐍𝟏𝐒𝐒3\mathbf{N1ii}_{3} and 𝐍𝟐3\mathbf{N2}_{3} that give curves of genus 44 and aa-number 33 over 𝔽3\mathbb{F}_{3}. We give a summary of the number of vectors classified by case and some restrictions that occur in the case D. We use Magma to classify these curves in 𝔽3\mathbb{F}_{3}-isomorphism classes, which we detail in TableΒ 5 and LemmaΒ 5.4.

Table 5: Isomorphism classes of genus 44 and a=3a=3 curves over 𝔽3\mathbb{F}_{3}.
Case #\# Isomorphism classes #\# pp-rank 11 #\# pp-rank 0
D 6 6 0
N1(i) 7 7 0
N1(ii) 3 3 0
N2 11 11 0
Total 27 27 0
Corollary 5.3.

There are, up to 𝔽3\mathbb{F}_{3}-isomorphism, exactly 2727 curves of genus 44 with a=3a=3 in standard form.

Proof.

See Table 5. ∎

Lemma 5.4.

Let XX be a curve in standard form with aa-number 33 defined over 𝔽3\mathbb{F}_{3}. Then XX is isomorphic to one of the following:

  • β€’

    V​(Fd,G)V(F_{d},G) with G=x3+y3+x​y​z+c1​y​z2+x​w2+c2​w3,G=x^{3}+y^{3}+xyz+c_{1}yz^{2}+xw^{2}+c_{2}w^{3}, where c1βˆˆπ”½3Γ—c_{1}\in\mathbb{F}_{3}^{\times} and c2βˆˆπ”½3c_{2}\in\mathbb{F}_{3}.

  • β€’

    V​(F1,G)V(F_{1},G) with G=x2​y+c1​y3+x2​z+c2​y2​w+c3​w3+c4​z3+z2​w,G=x^{2}y+c_{1}y^{3}+x^{2}z+c_{2}y^{2}w+c_{3}w^{3}+c_{4}z^{3}+z^{2}w, where c1∈{0,1}c_{1}\in\{0,1\}, c2,c3βˆˆπ”½3Γ—c_{2},c_{3}\in\mathbb{F}_{3}^{\times} and c4βˆˆπ”½3c_{4}\in\mathbb{F}_{3}.

  • β€’

    V​(F2,G)V(F_{2},G) with G=x2​y+c1​y3+c2​x2​z+c3​z3+c4​y​z​w+c5​w3+c6​(z2​w+y2​w),G=x^{2}y+c_{1}y^{3}+c_{2}x^{2}z+c_{3}z^{3}+c_{4}yzw+c_{5}w^{3}+c_{6}(z^{2}w+y^{2}w), where c1,c3βˆˆπ”½3c_{1},c_{3}\in\mathbb{F}_{3}, c2,c4,c5βˆˆπ”½3Γ—c_{2},c_{4},c_{5}\in\mathbb{F}_{3}^{\times} and c6∈{0,1}c_{6}\in\{0,1\}.

5.3.2 Case p=5p=5

From the exhaustive search we conclude that there are 134134 𝔽5\mathbb{F}_{5}-isomorphism classes of standard form curves over 𝔽5\mathbb{F}_{5} with aa-number 33. TableΒ 6 contains the summary of the isomorphism classes and the number of curves with pp-rank 11 and pp-rank 0.

Table 6: Isomorphism classes of genus 44 and a=3a=3 curves over 𝔽5\mathbb{F}_{5}.
Case #\# Isomorphism classes #\# pp-rank 11 #\# pp-rank 0
D 59 46 13
N1(i) 60 48 12
N1(ii) 6 4 2
N2 9 0 9
Total 134 98 36
Corollary 5.5.

There are, up to 𝔽5\mathbb{F}_{5}-isomorphism, exactly 134134 curves of genus 44 and a=3a=3 in standard form.

Proof.

See Table 6. ∎

5.3.3 Case p=7p=7

The exhaustive search for all curves in standard form with a=3a=3 proved to be too time consuming for p=7p=7. So it was only possible to find the curves in the case D and a subset of N1 curves. We conclude from this search that there are at least 9494 𝔽7\mathbb{F}_{7}-isomorphism classes of curves of aa-number 33, where 6565 correspond to the case D and 2929 to the N1. Now, we know by Lemma 4.5.1 in [6] that any smooth, irreducible, genus 44 curve X=V​(Fd,G)X=V(F_{d},G) can be written in standard form. This is because condition (A3) is satisfied over 𝔽7\mathbb{F}_{7} and GG can be reduced by a change of variables to the form of DefinitionΒ 4.1. This implies that the list of curves that we found in the case D actually includes all of the curves where the quadratic polynomial is degenerate.

Corollary 5.6.

There are, up to 𝔽7\mathbb{F}_{7}-isomorphism, exactly 6565 genus 44 and aa-number 33, smooth, irreducible, non-hyperelliptic curves over 𝔽7\mathbb{F}_{7}, given as V​(F,G)V(F,G), where GG is a cubic homogeneous polynomial and FF is a degenerate quadratic form. In addition, there are, up to 𝔽7\mathbb{F}_{7}-isomorphism, at least 2929 genus 44 curve in standard form over 𝔽7\mathbb{F}_{7} with aa-number 33 where FF is non-degenerate.

Proof.

See Table 7. ∎

In the case D there are 14401440 curves with aa-number 33, which are divided into 6565 classes, 5656 of them have pp-rank 11 and 99 have pp-rank 0. The subset of curves of the case N1i that we computed corresponds to those where the the cubic is of the form where b1=b2=0b_{1}=b_{2}=0 (see DefinitionΒ 4.1). There are 432432 of these GG such that V​(F1,G)V(F_{1},G) is a smooth genus 44 smooth curve with aa-number 33, only 1616 have pp-rank 0. These curves are distributed in 2929 𝔽7{\mathbb{F}}_{7}-isomorphism class with 22 of them having pp-rank 0 and 2727 of pp-rank 11.

Table 7: Isomorphism classes of genus 44 and a=3a=3 curves over 𝔽7\mathbb{F}_{7}.
Case #\# Isomorphism classes #\# pp-rank 11 #\# pp-rank 0
D 65 56 9
N1i’ 29 27 2
Total 94 83 11

6 Cartier points

6.1 Definition and properties

TheoremΒ 3.5 states that the genus of a superspecial curve in characteristic pp is bounded by p​(pβˆ’1)/2p(p-1)/2. Ekedahl [2] bases the proof of this result on the fact that a curve is superspecial if and only if its Jacobian is isomorphic to the product of supersingular elliptic curves (Oort, [8]). Baker, on the other hand, presents in [1] an alternative proof which makes use of an equivalent definition: a curve is superspecial if and only if the Cartier operator annihilates H0​(X,Ξ©X1)H^{0}(X,\Omega_{X}^{1}). The other component of his proof is the existence of linear systems of dimension 11, associated to a certain type of points on XX, defined as Cartier points.

Definition 6.1.

A closed point PP of XX is said to be a Cartier point if the hyperplane of regular differentials vanishing at PP is stable under the Cartier operator.

The following result yields TheoremΒ 3.5 as a corollary.

Theorem 6.2 (Baker [1], Theorem 2.8).

Let XX be a curve of genus gg over an algebraically closed field of characteristic pp.

  1. 1.

    If XX has at least pp distinct Cartier points, no two of which differ by a pp-torsion point on JXJ_{X}, then g≀p​(pβˆ’1)/2g\leq p(p-1)/2.

  2. 2.

    If XX is hyperelliptic of genus gg, pp is odd, and some hyperelliptic branch point of XX is a Cartier point, then g≀(pβˆ’1)/2g\leq(p-1)/2.

Notation 6.3.

Let kk be a field of characteristic pp. Let XX be a non-hyperelliptic curve of genus gg over kk embedded in ℙ​(H0​(X,Ξ©X1))=β„™gβˆ’1\mathbb{P}(H^{0}(X,\Omega_{X}^{1}))=\mathbb{P}^{g-1} by a basis ℬ′={Ο‰1,…,Ο‰g}\mathcal{B}^{\prime}=\{\omega_{1},\ldots,\omega_{g}\} of H0​(X,Ξ©X1)H^{0}(X,\Omega_{X}^{1}). Suppose x1,…,xgx_{1},\ldots,x_{g} are the coordinates of β„™gβˆ’1\mathbb{P}^{g-1} given by this basis and that ℬ\mathcal{B} is the basis of H1​(X,π’ͺX)H^{1}(X,\mathcal{O}_{X}) dual to ℬ′\mathcal{B}^{\prime}. Given a point P=[a1:β‹―:ag]P=[a_{1}:\cdots:a_{g}] of XX we denote by 𝐯P\mathbf{v}_{P} the vector (a1,…,ag)T(a_{1},\ldots,a_{g})^{T} in H1​(X,π’ͺX)H^{1}(X,\mathcal{O}_{X}) expressed in terms of ℬ\mathcal{B}.

From here on, we consider the Hasse–Witt matrix HH of XX to be in terms of the basis ℬ\mathcal{B}, unless otherwise stated.

Proposition 6.4.

Let XX be a non-hyperelliptic curve of genus gg over kk embedded in β„™gβˆ’1\mathbb{P}^{g-1} as in NotationΒ 6.3. A point P=[a1:β‹―:ag]P=[a_{1}:\cdots:a_{g}] of X​(kΒ―)X(\overline{k}) is a Cartier point if and only if there exists c∈kΒ―c\in\overline{k} such that

H​𝐯P(p)=c​𝐯P,H\mathbf{v}_{P}^{(p)}=c\mathbf{v}_{P}, (7)

where 𝐯P(i)\mathbf{v}_{P}^{(i)} indicates that each entry of the vector is raised to the ii-th power.

Proof.

Since XX is embedded in β„™gβˆ’1\mathbb{P}^{g-1} by {Ο‰1,…,Ο‰g}\{\omega_{1},\ldots,\omega_{g}\} then Ο‰i​(P)=ai\omega_{i}(P)=a_{i}, for i=1,…,gi=1,\ldots,g. A regular 11-form Ο‰=b1​ω1+β‹―+bg​ωg\omega=b_{1}\omega_{1}+\cdots+b_{g}\omega_{g} vanishes at PP if and only if

b1​a1+β‹―+bg​ag=0.b_{1}a_{1}+\cdots+b_{g}a_{g}=0. (8)

Then the hyperplane of 11-forms vanishing at PP is

LP:={(b1,…,bg)T:b1​a1+β‹―+bg​ag=0}.L_{P}:=\left\{(b_{1},\ldots,b_{g})^{T}:b_{1}a_{1}+\cdots+b_{g}a_{g}=0\right\}. (9)

Let LP0L_{P}^{0} be the annihilator of LPL_{P}. We know that this is a 11-dimensional subspace of H0​(X,Ξ©X1)βˆ—β‰…H1​(X,π’ͺX){H^{0}(X,\Omega_{X}^{1})}^{*}\cong H^{1}(X,\mathcal{O}_{X}), so it is generated by the vector 𝐯=(a1,…,ag)T\mathbf{v}=(a_{1},\ldots,a_{g})^{T}.

Now, LPL_{P} is stable under the action of π’ž\mathcal{C} if π’žβ€‹(Ο‰)∈LP\mathcal{C}(\omega)\in L_{P}, for every Ο‰βˆˆLP\omega\in L_{P}. By duality, this is equivalent to β„±X​(𝐯P)=c​𝐯P\mathcal{F}_{X}(\mathbf{v}_{P})=c\mathbf{v}_{P}, that is, H​𝐯P(p)=c​𝐯P.H\mathbf{v}_{P}^{(p)}=c\mathbf{v}_{P}.

∎

Definition 6.5.

We say that a Cartier point P∈XP\in X as above is of Type 11 if c=0c=0 and of Type 22 otherwise.

Notice that if kk is not algebraically closed, then the Cartier points of X/kX/k might not be defined over kk, but over some extension. In general we consider Cartier points as points in X​(kΒ―)X(\overline{k}). The next lemma gives us a way to find Type 11 points.

Lemma 6.6.

A point PP is a Type 11 Cartier point of XX if and only if H(1/p)​𝐯P=0H^{(1/p)}\mathbf{v}_{P}=0.

Proof.

By definition PP is a Type 11 point of XX if and only if H​𝐯(p)=0H\mathbf{v}^{(p)}=0. By applying the inverse of the pp-th Frobenius morphism we see that this is equivalent to H(1/p)​𝐯P=0H^{(1/p)}\mathbf{v}_{P}=0. ∎

Corollary 6.7.

Supose XX is defined over 𝔽p\mathbb{F}_{p}. Then P∈XP\in X is a Type 11 point if and only if H​𝐯P=0H\mathbf{v}_{P}=0.

Suppose that XX is defined over 𝔽q\mathbb{F}_{q}, with pr=qp^{r}=q for some positive integer rr. For a point Q∈XQ\in X we denote by σ​(Q)\sigma(Q) the action of the rr-th power of the Frobenius morphism on QQ.

Lemma 6.8.

Let QQ be a Cartier point of X/𝔽qX/\mathbb{F}_{q} and let P=σ​(Q)P=\sigma(Q). Then QQ is a Cartier point of XX if and only if PP is a Cartier point of XX. Furthermore, if H​𝐯Q(p)=c​𝐯QH\mathbf{v}_{Q}^{(p)}=c\mathbf{v}_{Q}, then H​𝐯P(p)=cq​𝐯PH\mathbf{v}_{P}^{(p)}=c^{q}\mathbf{v}_{P}.

Proof.

First we note that PP is also a point on XX, because X=V​(F,G)X=V(F,G) and FF and GG are defined over 𝔽q\mathbb{F}_{q}. Let HH be the Hasse–Witt matrix of XX. After scaling, we can assume that 𝐯Q(q)=𝐯P\mathbf{v}_{Q}^{(q)}=\mathbf{v}_{P}. Then

H​𝐯Q(p)=c​𝐯Q⇔(H​𝐯Q(p))(q)=(c​𝐯Q)(q)⇔H​(𝐯Q(q))(p)=cq​(𝐯Q)(q)⇔H​𝐯P(p)=cq​𝐯P,\begin{array}[]{ccl}H\mathbf{v}_{Q}^{(p)}=c\mathbf{v}_{Q}&\Leftrightarrow&(H\mathbf{v}_{Q}^{(p)})^{(q)}=(c\mathbf{v}_{Q})^{(q)}\\ &\Leftrightarrow&H(\mathbf{v}_{Q}^{(q)})^{(p)}=c^{q}(\mathbf{v}_{Q})^{(q)}\\ &\Leftrightarrow&H\mathbf{v}_{P}^{(p)}=c^{q}\mathbf{v}_{P},\end{array}

where the second equivalence is true because XX is defined over 𝔽q\mathbb{F}_{q} then so is HH. ∎

We apply LemmaΒ 6.8 to reduce the search of Cartier points to a computation of eigenvectors.

Lemma 6.9.

Suppose XX is defined over 𝔽p\mathbb{F}_{p} with Hasse–Witt matrix HH. Let QQ be a Cartier point of XX defined over 𝔽pe\mathbb{F}_{p^{e}} for some positive integer ee. There exists Ξ»βˆˆπ”½p\lambda\in\mathbb{F}_{p} such that He​𝐯Q=λ​𝐯QH^{e}\mathbf{v}_{Q}=\lambda\mathbf{v}_{Q}.

Proof.

Since QQ is a Cartier point in of XX then H​𝐯Q(p)=c​𝐯QH\mathbf{v}_{Q}^{(p)}=c\mathbf{v}_{Q} for some cβˆˆπ”½Β―pc\in\overline{\mathbb{F}}_{p}. Now, since Q∈X​(𝔽pe)Q\in X(\mathbb{F}_{p^{e}}), then cβˆˆπ”½pec\in\mathbb{F}_{p^{e}}. Let Pi:=Οƒi​(Q)P_{i}:=\sigma^{i}(Q), then P1,P2,…,Pe=QP_{1},P_{2},\ldots,P_{e}=Q are distinct Cartier points. Also, after scaling we can assume that 𝐯Pi(p)=𝐯Pi+1\mathbf{v}_{P_{i}}^{(p)}=\mathbf{v}_{P_{i+1}}. After applying ii times the result from LemmaΒ 6.8 with q=pq=p, we get that H​𝐯Pi(p)=cpi​𝐯PiH\mathbf{v}_{P_{i}}^{(p)}=c^{p^{i}}\mathbf{v}_{P_{i}}. To ease notation, we write 𝐯i\mathbf{v}_{i} instead of 𝐯Pi\mathbf{v}_{P_{i}}. Then

He​𝐯e=\displaystyle H^{e}\mathbf{v}_{e}= He​𝐯eβˆ’1(p)=Heβˆ’1​(H​𝐯eβˆ’1(p))=Heβˆ’1​(cpeβˆ’1​𝐯eβˆ’1)=cpeβˆ’1​Heβˆ’1​𝐯eβˆ’2(p).\displaystyle H^{e}\mathbf{v}_{e-1}^{(p)}=H^{e-1}\left(H\mathbf{v}_{e-1}^{(p)}\right)=H^{e-1}\left(c^{p^{e-1}}\mathbf{v}_{e-1}\right)=c^{p^{e-1}}H^{e-1}\mathbf{v}_{e-2}^{(p)}.

By an inductive process, we get that He​𝐯Q=cpeβˆ’1+peβˆ’2​⋯+p+1​𝐯Q=cpeβˆ’1pβˆ’1​𝐯QH^{e}\mathbf{v}_{Q}=c^{p^{e-1}+p^{e-2}\cdots+p+1}\mathbf{v}_{Q}=c^{\frac{p^{e}-1}{p-1}}\mathbf{v}_{Q}. Let Ξ»:=cpeβˆ’1pβˆ’1\lambda:=c^{\frac{p^{e}-1}{p-1}}. Since cβˆˆπ”½pec\in\mathbb{F}_{p^{e}} then Ξ»\lambda is a (pβˆ’1)(p-1)-root of unity, if cβ‰ 0c\neq 0 and Ξ»=0\lambda=0 if c=0c=0. Hence Ξ»βˆˆπ”½p\lambda\in\mathbb{F}_{p}.

∎

Baker provides in [1] an upper bound for the number of Cartier points on a smooth irreducible curve that is not ordinary nor superspecial.

Proposition 6.10 (Baker, [1] Prop. 3.3).

Let XX be a smooth, irreducible curve of genus gg with pp-rank ff, which is not ordinary nor superspecial.

  1. 1.

    The number of Type 22 points on XX is bounded by

    b:=bg,p,f,Ξ΄X=min⁑(2​gβˆ’2,Ξ΄X​pfβˆ’1pβˆ’1),\displaystyle b:=b_{g,p,f,\delta_{X}}=\min\left(2g-2,\delta_{X}\frac{p^{f}-1}{p-1}\right),

    where Ξ΄X\delta_{X} is 22 if XX is hyperelliptic and 11 otherwise.

  2. 2.

    The number of Type 11 points on XX is bounded by 2​gβˆ’22g-2. Furthermore, if the aa-number of XX is gβˆ’1g-1 then there is at least one Type 11 Cartier point on XX.

Let us explore the geometric meaning of this bound, following the proof of PropositionΒ 6.10 in [1]. We will only be concerned with non-hyperelliptic curves, so here Ξ΄X=1\delta_{X}=1.

We know by PropositionΒ 6.4 that P∈X​(kΒ―)P\in X(\overline{k}) is a Cartier point if and only if there exists c∈kΒ―c\in\overline{k} such that H​𝐯P(p)=c​𝐯PH\mathbf{v}_{P}^{(p)}=c\mathbf{v}_{P}. If c=0c=0 then this equation is equivalent to H​𝐯P(1/p)=0H\mathbf{v}_{P}^{(1/p)}=0. Hence the Type 11 points are those in the intersection of X​(kΒ―)X(\overline{k}) and the subspace spanned by the kernel of H(1/p)H^{(1/p)} in β„™gβˆ’1\mathbb{P}^{g-1}. This subspace is linear and has codimension at least 11, so it is contained in a hyperplane. From where we conclude that the number of points in the intersection is at most the degree of the curve 2​gβˆ’22g-2.

On the other hand, if cβ‰ 0c\neq 0 then we can rewrite Equation (7) as H​𝐰(p)=𝐰H\mathbf{w}^{(p)}=\mathbf{w} by setting 𝐰=λ​𝐯P\mathbf{w}=\lambda\mathbf{v}_{P} for Ξ»\lambda equal to some (pβˆ’1)(p-1)-th root of cβˆ’1c^{-1}. Now the element of H1​(X,π’ͺX)H^{1}(X,\mathcal{O}_{X}) given by 𝐰\mathbf{w} is fixed by the Frobenius operator. By definition the pp-rank ff is the dimension of the subspace of H1​(X,π’ͺX)H^{1}(X,\mathcal{O}_{X}) where β„±\mathcal{F} is bijective. So there are pfβˆ’1p^{f}-1 non trivial solutions, that yield at most pfβˆ’1pβˆ’1\frac{p^{f}-1}{p-1} Type 22 points. After maybe doing a base extension on XX one can choose a basis of H0​(X,Ξ©X1)H^{0}(X,\Omega_{X}^{1}) given by {ΞΎ1,…,ΞΎg}\{\xi_{1},\ldots,\xi_{g}\} such that π’žβ€‹(ΞΎi)=ΞΎi\mathcal{C}(\xi_{i})=\xi_{i} for 1≀i≀f1\leq i\leq f. Assume that the coordinates of a Type 22 point are given by this basis. Then,some coordinate, say xgx_{g} of every such point must be zero, since f<gf<g. Then the point lies on the hyperplane xg=0x_{g}=0. Again, there can only be 2​gβˆ’22g-2 such points, so the number of Type 22 points is min⁑{2​gβˆ’2,pfβˆ’1pβˆ’1}\min\{2g-2,\frac{p^{f}-1}{p-1}\}.

As a direct consequence of the existence of the upper bound on the number of Cartier points, we also get a bound on the degree of the field of definition of the point. In particular, we have CorollaryΒ 6.11 for the case k=𝔽qk=\mathbb{F}_{q}.

Corollary 6.11.

Let XX be a genus gg non-hyperelliptic curve that is not ordinary nor superspecial, defined over 𝔽q\mathbb{F}_{q}.

  • β€’

    If PP is a Type 11 Cartier point of XX, then P∈X​(𝔽qe)P\in X(\mathbb{F}_{q^{e}}) with 1≀e≀2​gβˆ’21\leq e\leq 2g-2.

  • β€’

    If PP is a Type 22 Cartier point of XX, then P∈X​(𝔽qe)P\in X(\mathbb{F}_{q^{e}}) with 1≀e≀b1\leq e\leq b, where bb is as in PropositionΒ 6.10.

Proof.

Let PP be a Cartier point of XX. Let ee be the minimum positive integer such that P∈X​(𝔽qe)P\in X(\mathbb{F}_{q^{e}}). By LemmaΒ 6.8, the ee distinct points {P,Οƒ(P),Οƒ2(P),…,,Οƒeβˆ’1(P)}\{P,\sigma(P),\sigma^{2}(P),\ldots,,\sigma^{e-1}(P)\} are all Cartier points of the same type. By PropositionΒ 6.10, there are at most 2​gβˆ’22g-2 Type 11 points and bb Type 22 points. Hence, if PP is a Type 11 point (resp. Type 22), then e≀2​gβˆ’2e\leq 2g-2 (resp. e≀be\leq b).

∎

6.1.1 Type 11 points in the case a=gβˆ’1a=g-1

The behavior of the Cartier points when the aa-number is gβˆ’1g-1 has an additional feature which is the multiplicity. In this case, the subspace SS generated by the kernel of H(1/p)H^{(1/p)} is a hyperplane, then assuming X⊈SX\nsubseteq S, the intersection X∩SX\cap S is proper. Then we can define the intersection multiplicity of PP in X∩SX\cap S, that is, of the Type 11 Cartier points.

If X∩S={P1,…,Pn}X\cap S=\{P_{1},\ldots,P_{n}\} and mim_{i} denotes the multiplicity of the point PiP_{i}, then βˆ‘i=1nmi=2​gβˆ’2\sum_{i=1}^{n}m_{i}=2g-2. Hence the possible multiplicity distributions of the Type 1 points correspond to the partitions of 2​gβˆ’22g-2. Both the multiplicity and the degree of PP are preserved under Οƒ\sigma, so if did_{i} is the degree of the point PiP_{i}, then Pi,σ​(Pi),Οƒ2​(Pi),…,Οƒdiβˆ’1​(Pi)P_{i},\sigma(P_{i}),\sigma^{2}(P_{i}),\ldots,\sigma^{d_{i}-1}(P_{i}) are did_{i} distinct points of the same degree and multiplicity.

6.2 Cartier points on genus 44 curves

Suppose q=prq=p^{r} for some positive integer rr and let X=V​(F,G)X=V(F,G) be a non-ordinary and non-superspecial smooth, irreducible genus 44 non-hyperelliptic curve over 𝔽q\mathbb{F}_{q}. We want to determine the sharpness of the bound given by Baker in PropositionΒ 6.10 for the number of Cartier points on XX. We will first make some remarks about the possible bounds depending on the aa-number and the pp-rank.

Corollary 6.12 (Type 22 Cartier points and the pp-rank).

Let XX be a non-hyperelliptic curve of genus 44 defined over 𝔽q\mathbb{F}_{q} with pp-rank ff.

  1. (i)

    There are at most six Type 22 points on XX and they are defined over 𝔽qe\mathbb{F}_{q^{e}} for some 1≀e≀61\leq e\leq 6. Moreover:

  2. (ii)

    if f=0f=0, then there are no Type 22 points;

  3. (iii)

    if f=1f=1, then there is at most one Type 22 point and it must be defined over 𝔽q\mathbb{F}_{q};

  4. (iv)

    if f=2f=2, then there are at most six Type 22 points, at most three if p=2p=2 and at most four if p=3p=3.

Proof.

Parts (i), (ii) and (iv) are direct consequences of the discussion following PropositionΒ 6.10. Indeed, the minimum of 2​gβˆ’2=62g-2=6 and pfβˆ’1pβˆ’1\frac{p^{f}-1}{p-1} is 6, unless f≀1f\leq 1 or p=2,3p=2,3 and f=2f=2.

For (iii) let QQ be a Type 22 Cartier point of XX and suppose that σ​(Q)β‰ Q\sigma(Q)\neq Q. By LemmaΒ 6.8 we have that σ​(Q)\sigma(Q) is another Cartier point of Type 2, which is a contradiction. ∎

Corollary 6.13 (Type 11 points and the aa-number).

If XX is non-hyperelliptic of genus 44 with aa-number 1,21,2 or 33 defined over 𝔽q\mathbb{F}_{q}, then

  1. (i)

    XX has at most six Cartier points of Type 11 and they are defined over 𝔽qe\mathbb{F}_{q^{e}} for some e≀6e\leq 6. Moreover,

  2. (ii)

    if a=1a=1, then there is at most one Type 11 Cartier point

  3. (iii)

    if a=3a=3, there are exactly six Type 11 Cartier points on XX, counting with multiplicity.

Proof.

Part (i) follows from PropositionΒ 6.10 and CorollaryΒ 6.11, using 2​gβˆ’2=62g-2=6. Now, if a=1a=1, the kernel of H(1/p)H^{(1/p)} has dimension 11, because aa equals dim(ker⁑(H))\dim(\ker(H)). Then ker⁑(H)\ker(H) spans a point in β„™3\mathbb{P}^{3}, and this is the only possible Type 11 point. When a=3a=3, on the other hand, the subspace spanned by the same kernel is a hyperplane, so its intersection with XX consists on exactly as many points as the degree of the curve. ∎

6.2.1 Computing Cartier points

We explain here an algorithm to find the Cartier points on smooth, irreducible genus 44 non-hyperelliptic curves over 𝔽p\mathbb{F}_{p}, given their quadratic and cubic defining homogeneous polynomials. Before we detail the procedure, we will revisit some facts about Cartier points. Let X=V​(F,G)X=V(F,G) be a curve as before.

  1. 1.

    Let HH be the Hasse–Witt matrix of XX as in PropositionΒ 4.2. Recall that HH represents the action of Frobenius on H1​(X,π’ͺX)H^{1}(X,\mathcal{O}_{X}) with respect to the basis that corresponds to the coordinates x,y,z,wx,y,z,w. This implies that we can use HH and PropositionΒ 6.4 to find the Cartier points of XX, by solving H​𝐯(p)=c​𝐯H\mathbf{v}^{(p)}=c\mathbf{v}.

  2. 2.

    If P∈X​(𝔽pe)P\in X(\mathbb{F}_{p^{e}}) is a Cartier point, then there exists some Ξ»βˆˆπ”½p\lambda\in\mathbb{F}_{p} such that He​𝐯P=λ​𝐯PH^{e}\mathbf{v}_{P}=\lambda\mathbf{v}_{P} (LemmaΒ 6.9).

  3. 3.

    If PP is a Type 11 point, then H​𝐯P=0H\mathbf{v}_{P}=0 (CorollaryΒ 6.7).

  4. 4.

    The eigenvalues of HeH^{e} are exactly the ee-powers of the eigenvalues of HH. If Ξ»\lambda is as in (2), then there exists an eigenvalue ΞΌ\mu of HH such that Ξ»=ΞΌeβˆˆπ”½p\lambda=\mu^{e}\in\mathbb{F}_{p}.

  5. 5.

    Let h​(x)h(x) be the characteristic polynomial of HH. The splitting field of h​(x)h(x) is either 𝔽p\mathbb{F}_{p}, 𝔽p2\mathbb{F}_{p^{2}} or 𝔽p3\mathbb{F}_{p^{3}}. Indeed, h​(x)h(x) has degree 44, but since HH has rank at most 33, then xx is a factor of h​(x)h(x).

We use these facts to compute the Type 11 and Type 22 Cartier points of XX. AlgorithmΒ 6.15 is restricted to the case when q=pq=p, to simplify the computations.

Algorithm 6.14.

[Type 11 Cartier points] Input: FF and GG in 𝔽q​[x,y,z,w]\mathbb{F}_{q}[x,y,z,w].
Output: List of Type 11 Cartier points of X=V​(F,G)X=V(F,G).

  1. 1.

    Compute the Hasse–Witt matrix HH of XX, as in PropositionΒ 4.2.

  2. 2.

    Let M=H(1/p)M=H^{(1/p)}. Construct the linear forms Li=(M)i,1​x+(M)i,2​y+(M)i,3​z+(M)i,4​wL_{i}=(M)_{i,1}x+(M)_{i,2}y+(M)_{i,3}z+(M)_{i,4}w, for 1≀i≀41\leq i\leq 4.

  3. 3.

    Let II be the ideal generated by {L1,L2,L3,L4,F,G}\{L_{1},L_{2},L_{3},L_{4},F,G\} and let T=V​(I)T=V(I).

  4. 4.

    For each 1≀e≀61\leq e\leq 6, find the points in Te=T​(𝔽qe)T_{e}=T(\mathbb{F}_{q^{e}}).

  5. 5.

    The set of Type 11 points is ⋃e(Te)\bigcup_{e}(T_{e}).

Algorithm 6.15.

[Type 22 Cartier points]

Input: FF and GG in 𝔽p​[x,y,z,w]\mathbb{F}_{p}[x,y,z,w].
Output: List of Type 22 Cartier points of X=V​(F,G)X=V(F,G).

  1. 1.

    Compute the Hasse–Witt matrix HH of XX, as in PropositionΒ 4.2.

  2. 2.

    Compute h​(x)h(x), the characteristic polynomial of HH and find the roots of h​(x)h(x) in its splitting field. For each ΞΌ\mu non-zero root of h​(x)h(x) and each 1≀e≀61\leq e\leq 6 such that ΞΌeβˆˆπ”½p\mu^{e}\in\mathbb{F}_{p}:

    1. (a)

      Let M=Heβˆ’ΞΌe​IM=H^{e}-\mu^{e}I, where II is the identity matrix.

    2. (b)

      For 1≀i≀41\leq i\leq 4, construct the linear forms Li=(M)i,1​x+(M)i,2​y+(M)i,3​z+(M)i,4​wL_{i}=(M)_{i,1}x+(M)_{i,2}y+(M)_{i,3}z+(M)_{i,4}w.

    3. (c)

      Let II be the ideal generated by L1,L2,L3,L4,F,GL_{1},L_{2},L_{3},L_{4},F,G and let T=V​(I)T=V(I).

    4. (d)

      For each point in T​(𝔽pe)T(\mathbb{F}_{p^{e}}), compute H​𝐯P(p)H\mathbf{v}_{P}^{(p)}. If this gives a scalar multiple of 𝐯\mathbf{v}, then PP is a Type 22 Cartier point.

6.3 Cartier points on standard curves over 𝔽p\mathbb{F}_{p}

In this section we present the results from our search of curves in standard form, related to their aa-number, pp-rank and Cartier points, both of Type 11 (T1) and Type 22 (T2).

The upper bound of Type 11 points: Our data reflects that, as expected, it is hard to find curves that attain the bounds on the number of Type 11 Cartier points. For instance when the aa-number is 1, a curve can have at most one Type 11 point, but most curves have zero (see TableΒ 8). When a=2a=2 the bound is six, but as stated in CorollaryΒ 6.16, all of the curves in our sample have three or fewer Type 11 Cartier points.

The bound on Type 11 points is also six when a=3a=3, but here we see a different behavior. This is mainly because in this case, the Type 11 points come from intersecting the curve with a hyperplane, which guarantees exactly six points, counting with multiplicity. Even though our statistical data does not give a large sample of aa-number 33 curves over 𝔽7\mathbb{F}_{7} and 𝔽11\mathbb{F}_{11}, we can see in TablesΒ 10 andΒ 8 that most curves attain the bound, except when p=3p=3.

The upper bound on Type 22 points: Similarly, it seems unlikely for a curve with pp-rank f>0f>0 to reach the upper bound of Type 22 points. This is true even when f=1f=1 and thus the bound is one. We can see in TableΒ 9 that the majority of curves with pp-rank 11 have no such points. The same happens when f=2f=2. In this case the bound is six, but we did not find any curve with more than two Type 22 points, except when p=5p=5, where there exist two curves with six Type 22 points.

It is important to recall that the bound for Type 22 points in characteristic 33 is 44, not 66, and there are in fact 1616 pp-rank 33 curves that reach this bound.

Here we present the overall results from obtained from our data. The details corresponding to each of p∈{3,5,7,11}p\in\{3,5,7,11\} are given in the following subsections.

Corollary 6.16.

In our sample of smooth curves, no curve with aa-number 22 reaches the bound of six Type 11 Cartier points. Moreover, the maximum number of Type 11 Cartier points attained for curves with aa-number 22 is three for p∈{5,7,11}p\in\{5,7,11\} and two for p=3p=3.

Proof.

See Table 8. ∎

Corollary 6.17.

The bound on the number of Type 1 points is sharp for non-hyperelliptic smooth genus 44 curves over 𝔽p\mathbb{F}_{p} when

  • β€’

    p∈{3,5,7,11}p\in\{3,5,7,11\} and a=1a=1.

  • β€’

    p∈{5,7,11}p\in\{5,7,11\} and a=3a=3.

Proof.

See Table 8. ∎

Corollary 6.18.

In our sample of smooth curves, no curve with pp-rank 22 or 33 reaches the bound of six Type 22 Cartier points when p∈{5,7,11}p\in\{5,7,11\}.

Proof.

See Table 9. ∎

Table 8: Summary of Type 11 points on samples of standard form curves.
aa-number #T1 3 5 7 11
1 0 23971 88896 86563 25205
1 1 5327 3896 1918 202
Total 29298 92792 88481 25407
% that attains UB 18.18 % 4.20 % 2.17 % 0.80 %
2 0 1690 3158 1595 191
2 1 3268 832 262 25
2 2 1673 149 37 1
2 3 0 65 5 1
Total 6631 4204 1899 218
% that attains UB 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 %
3 0 0 0 0 0
3 1 660 4 0 0
3 2 40 4 0 0
3 3 0 14 0 0
3 4 0 0 1 0
3 5 0 0 0 0
3 6 0 24 4 1
Total 700 46 5 1
% that attains UB 0 % 52.17 % 80.00 % 100 %
Sample size 186266 719102 863038 361098
Table 9: Summary of Type 22 points on samples of standard form curves.
ff #T2 3 5 7 11
0 0 1157 193 44 3
1 0 4276 4272 1853 239
1 1 198 146 35 0
Total 4474 4418 1888 239
2 0 7137 17072 12071 2320
2 1 353 737 235 20
2 2 23 35 5 0
2 3 0 2 0 0
Total 7513 17846 12311 2340
3 0 21951 71423 74504 22837
3 1 1394 3032 1597 204
3 2 117 113 41 3
3 3 14 15 0 0
3 4 9 2 0 0
Total 23485 74585 76142 23044
Sample size 186266 719102 863038 361098

We know by CorollaryΒ 6.13 that the upper bound on the number of Type 11 Cartier points is given by 2​gβˆ’2=62g-2=6 if a=2,3a=2,3 and 11 if a=1a=1. We want to determine for which a,fa,f and pp these bounds are attained. For example, this does not happen for any of the curves with a=2a=2 that we found. In TableΒ 8, we break down the number of curves over 𝔽p\mathbb{F}_{p} by the number of Type 11 points they have.

On the other hand, the upper bound on the number of Type 22 points depends on the pp-rank: it is min⁑{2​gβˆ’2,pfβˆ’1pβˆ’1}\min\{2g-2,\frac{p^{f}-1}{p-1}\}. As stated in CorollaryΒ 6.16, and observed in TableΒ 9, it is unlikely that a curve of pp-rank 22 or 33 reaches the bound of six Type 22 points.

6.3.1 Case p=3p=3

From the sample of 186266186266 curves over 𝔽3\mathbb{F}_{3} a total of 3547235472 have aa-number 1,21,2 or 33. There are only two instances in which we identified curves that realize the (non-zero) upper bound on Type 11 and Type 22 points. These are when a=1a=1, for Type 11 points, and when f=3f=3 for Type 22 points, and the bounds are 11 and 44, respectively. Even so, we can observe in TablesΒ 8 and Β 9 that most curves tend to have fewer Cartier points.

6.3.2 Case p=5p=5

Recall that we sampled a total of 719102719102 tuples over 𝔽5\mathbb{F}_{5} and obtained 9704297042 curves of aa-number 1≀a≀31\leq a\leq 3. Only 38963896 out of the 8889688896 curves with a=1a=1 have a Type 11 Cartier point. This is expected because for each curve, there is only one point PP such that H​𝐯P=0H\mathbf{v}_{P}=0, so it is unlikely for this point to also be on the curve.

6.3.3 Case p=7p=7

We sampled a total of 863200863200 random tuples, obtaining 619872619872 curves in standard form and 9040390403 of them with aa-numbers 1,21,2 or 33. We note that the upper bounds for the number of Type 11 points are realized when a=1a=1 and a=3a=3, but not for a=2a=2, where the maximum number of points attained is three. With respect to the Type 22 points, the (non-zero) upper bounds are only attained when the pp-rank is 11. In particular, we get the following result:

Corollary 6.19.

Baker’s bound on the total number of Cartier points for genus 44 curves with a=3a=3 and pp-rank 11 is attained over 𝔽7\mathbb{F}_{7}.

In our data there is only one curve with aa-number 33 where both the bounds of Type 11 and Type 22 points are attained, we show it in ExampleΒ 8.1. We also include ExampleΒ 8.2, in which we see a curve with only 44 Type 11 points. The Hasse–Witt matrix in each example is computed with the basis given in PropositionΒ 4.2.

6.3.4 Case p=11p=11

The size of the random sample in this case is of 361098361098 tuples. Note that, once again, the upper bound for the Type 11 points is attained for some cases where a=1,3a=1,3. On the other hand, none of the curves realize the bound of Type 22 points (except, of course when f=0f=0). One important observation is that, from all sampled tuples, only one of them resulted in a curve with aa-number 33. This curve also achieves the maximum of 66 Type 11 points.

7 Cartier points on curves over 𝔽p\mathbb{F}_{p} with aa-number 33

In TableΒ 10 we display the information of curves in standard form over 𝔽p\mathbb{F}_{p} for p∈{3,5,7}p\in\{3,5,7\}, obtained from the exhaustive search. For p=3,5p=3,5 the search was done over all the possible tuples. For p=7p=7 we found all the curves in standard form in the degenerate case and all of those in the case N1i when the coefficients of y2​zy^{2}z and z2​wz^{2}w are 0. We denote these lists by 7(D) and 7(N1i’), respectively. In the second column, we list the total number of isomorphism classes of curves with aa-number 33 found for each pp. The third column indicates the total number of curves that attain the maximum of six Type 11 Cartier points. The last two columns correspond to the number of curves that reach the maximum of Type 22 points, over the total with the respective pp-rank. Notice that all curves with f=0f=0 trivially reach this bound, since the bound is 0.

Table 10: Isomorphism classes in standard form with aa-number 33 over 𝔽p\mathbb{F}_{p}.
pp Classes Attain max. of T1 Attain max. of T2
a=3a=3 a=3a=3 f=0f=0 f=1f=1
(6)(6) (0)(0) (1)(1)
3 27 0 0/0 0/27
5 134 80 36/36 5/98
7(D) 65 48 9/9 0/56
7(N1i’) 29 23 2/2 1/27

In the case p=3p=3 all curves have either one or two Type 11 points maximum; for p=5p=5, the curves show one, two three or six points, and for p=7p=7 we saw evidence of curves with any number of Type 11 points ranging from one to six. In addition, over 𝔽5\mathbb{F}_{5}, every possible degree distribution for curves with six (distinct) Type 11 points occurs. Also, all except one of them occur among our sample over 𝔽7\mathbb{F}_{7}.

7.1 Case p=3p=3

We will now discuss the curves in standard form over 𝔽3\mathbb{F}_{3} of aa-number 33. Since we have a complete list of all of the isomorphism classes of these curves, we know that all of them have pp-rank 11.

In LemmaΒ 5.4 we specify representatives for the isomorphism classes of curves in standard form over 𝔽3\mathbb{F}_{3} with aa-number 33. It turns out the all the curves from the same kind have the equal multiplicity and degree distribution of Type 11 points, as a consequence we get the next lemma. We show explicitly the points in Tables Β 11,Β 12 andΒ 13.

Lemma 7.1.

A curve X=V​(F,G)X=V(F,G) in standard form with aa-number 33 over 𝔽3\mathbb{F}_{3} has no Type 22 Cartier points and

  • β€’

    if F=Fd=2​y​w+z2F=F_{d}=2yw+z^{2}, then XX has exactly one Type 11 point of multiplicity 6;

  • β€’

    if F=F1=2​x​w+2​y​zF=F_{1}=2xw+2yz, then XX has exactly two Type 11 points of multiplicity 3, each defined over 𝔽3\mathbb{F}_{3};

  • β€’

    if F=F2=2​x​w+y2+z2F=F_{2}=2xw+y^{2}+z^{2}, then XX has exactly two Type 11 points of multiplicity 3, each defined over 𝔽9.\mathbb{F}_{9}.

Proof.

See Tables 11, 12 and 13. ∎

The proof of LemmaΒ 7.1 follows from our classification of curves in standard form into isomorphism classes and direct computation of Cartier points. Here we give an overview of the heuristics that go into this procedure, in the degenerate case. The other two cases can be worked out in a similar way.

Example 7.2 (Cartier points in the case D).

Let X=V​(F,G)X=V(F,G) be a curve from TableΒ 11. We know that F=2​y​w+z2F=2yw+z^{2} and that GG is of the form

G=x3+y3+x​y​z+c1​y​z2+x​w2+c2​w3,G=x^{3}+y^{3}+xyz+c_{1}yz^{2}+xw^{2}+c_{2}w^{3},

where c1βˆˆπ”½3Γ—c_{1}\in\mathbb{F}_{3}^{\times} and c2βˆˆπ”½3c_{2}\in\mathbb{F}_{3}. We will show that XX has no Type 22 Cartier points and that [2βˆ’c1βˆ’c2:1:2:1][2-c_{1}-c_{2}:1:2:1] is the unique Type 11 Cartier point.

By PropositionΒ 4.2, the Hasse-Witt matrix of XX is

H=[0000012100000000].H=\begin{bmatrix}0&0&0&0\\ 0&1&2&1\\ 0&0&0&0\\ 0&0&0&0\\ \end{bmatrix}. (10)

We can see right away that XX has no Type 22 Cartier points, since, up to scalar multiplication, the only vector such that H​𝐯=c​𝐯H\mathbf{v}=c\mathbf{v} for some cβˆˆπ”½3c\in\mathbb{F}_{3} is 𝐯=(0,1,0,0)T\mathbf{v}=(0,1,0,0)^{T}, but these are not the coordinates of a point on XX.

Now, the hyperplane SS generated by the kernel of HH is the zero locus of L=y+2​z+wL=y+2z+w. Then by substituting y=zβˆ’wy=z-w in F=0F=0 we get z2+2​z​w+w2=0z^{2}+2zw+w^{2}=0. If w=0w=0, then z=y=0z=y=0, but [1:0:0:0]βˆ‰X[1:0:0:0]\not\in X, so assume w=1w=1. Then z=2z=2 and y=1y=1 and the Type 11 points of XX are of the form P=[Ξ±:1:2:1]P=[\alpha:1:2:1]. To find Ξ±\alpha we evaluate GG at PP and get Ξ±=2βˆ’c1βˆ’c2\alpha=2-c_{1}-c_{2}. So there is a unique Type 11 point, which must have multiplicity 66.

In TablesΒ 11,Β 12 andΒ 13 we show the cubic polynomial for a representative of each isomorphism class in the cases D, N1 and N2, respectively. The curves are of the form X=V​(F,G)X=V(F,G). We also specify the Type 11 Cartier points.

Table 11: Isomorphism classes of D curves with a=3a=3 over 𝔽3\mathbb{F}_{3}.
Representative GG Type 1 point
x3+y3+x​y​z+y​z2+x​w2x^{3}+y^{3}+xyz+yz^{2}+xw^{2} [1:1:2:1][1:1:2:1]
x3+y3+x​y​zβˆ’y​z2+x​w2x^{3}+y^{3}+xyz-yz^{2}+xw^{2} [0:1:2:1][0:1:2:1]
x3+y3+x​y​z+y​z2+x​w2+w3x^{3}+y^{3}+xyz+yz^{2}+xw^{2}+w^{3} [0:1:2:1][0:1:2:1]
x3+y3+x​y​zβˆ’y​z2+x​w2+w3x^{3}+y^{3}+xyz-yz^{2}+xw^{2}+w^{3} [2:1:2:1][2:1:2:1]
x3+y3+x​y​z+y​z2+x​w2βˆ’w3x^{3}+y^{3}+xyz+yz^{2}+xw^{2}-w^{3} [2:1:2:1][2:1:2:1]
x3+y3+x​y​zβˆ’y​z2+x​w2βˆ’w3x^{3}+y^{3}+xyz-yz^{2}+xw^{2}-w^{3} [1:1:2:1][1:1:2:1]
Table 12: Isomorphism classes of N1 curves with a=3a=3 over 𝔽3\mathbb{F}_{3}.
Representative GG Type 1 points
x2​y+y3+x2​z+y2​w+z2​wβˆ’w3x^{2}y+y^{3}+x^{2}z+y^{2}w+z^{2}w-w^{3} [1:2:1:1],[0:0:2:1][1:2:1:1],[0:0:2:1]
x2​y+y3+x2​zβˆ’y2​w+z2​wβˆ’w3x^{2}y+y^{3}+x^{2}z-y^{2}w+z^{2}w-w^{3} [0:2:0:1],[0:0:1:1][0:2:0:1],[0:0:1:1]
x2​y+y3+x2​z+z3+y2​w+z2​w+w3x^{2}y+y^{3}+x^{2}z+z^{3}+y^{2}w+z^{2}w+w^{3} [1:2:1:1],[1:1:2:1][1:2:1:1],[1:1:2:1]
x2​y+y3+x2​z+z3βˆ’y2​w+z2​w+w3x^{2}y+y^{3}+x^{2}z+z^{3}-y^{2}w+z^{2}w+w^{3} [0:0:1:1],[2:2:2:1][0:0:1:1],[2:2:2:1]
x2​y+y3+x2​zβˆ’z3+y2​w+z2​w+w3x^{2}y+y^{3}+x^{2}z-z^{3}+y^{2}w+z^{2}w+w^{3} [0:0:2:1],[1:0:1:0][0:0:2:1],[1:0:1:0]
x2​y+y3+x2​zβˆ’z3+y2​w+z2​wβˆ’w3x^{2}y+y^{3}+x^{2}z-z^{3}+y^{2}w+z^{2}w-w^{3} [1:1:2:1],[1:0:1:0][1:1:2:1],[1:0:1:0]
x2​y+y3+x2​zβˆ’z3βˆ’y2​w+z2​w+w3x^{2}y+y^{3}+x^{2}z-z^{3}-y^{2}w+z^{2}w+w^{3} [2:1:1:1],[1:0:1:0][2:1:1:1],[1:0:1:0]
x2​y+x2​z+y2​w+z2​w+w3x^{2}y+x^{2}z+y^{2}w+z^{2}w+w^{3} [1:2:1:1],[1:1:2:1][1:2:1:1],[1:1:2:1]
x2​y+x2​z+y2​w+z2​wβˆ’w3x^{2}y+x^{2}z+y^{2}w+z^{2}w-w^{3} [0:2:0:1],[0:0:2:1][0:2:0:1],[0:0:2:1]
x2​y+x2​zβˆ’y2​w+z2​w+w3x^{2}y+x^{2}z-y^{2}w+z^{2}w+w^{3} [0:2:0:1],[2:1:1:1][0:2:0:1],[2:1:1:1]
Table 13: Isomorphism classes of N2 curves with a=3a=3 over 𝔽3\mathbb{F}_{3}, with Ξ²2+2​β+2=0\beta^{2}+2\beta+2=0.
Representative GG Type 1 points
x2​y+y3+x2​zβˆ’z3βˆ’y​z​wβˆ’w3x^{2}y+y^{3}+x^{2}z-z^{3}-yzw-w^{3} [Ξ²5:1:Ξ²3:1],[Ξ²7:1:Ξ²:1][\beta^{5}:1:\beta^{3}:1],[\beta^{7}:1:\beta:1]
x2​y+x2​zβˆ’y​z​wβˆ’w3x^{2}y+x^{2}z-yzw-w^{3} [0:Ξ²5:Ξ²7:1],[0:Ξ²7:Ξ²5:1][0:\beta^{5}:\beta^{7}:1],[0:\beta^{7}:\beta^{5}:1]
x2​y+y3+x2​zβˆ’z3βˆ’y​z​w+w3x^{2}y+y^{3}+x^{2}z-z^{3}-yzw+w^{3} [Ξ²2:0:Ξ²:1],[Ξ²6:0:Ξ²3:1][\beta^{2}:0:\beta:1],[\beta^{6}:0:\beta^{3}:1]
x2​y+x2​zβˆ’z3βˆ’y​z​w+w3x^{2}y+x^{2}z-z^{3}-yzw+w^{3} [Ξ²2:0:Ξ²:1],[Ξ²6:0:Ξ²3:1][\beta^{2}:0:\beta:1],[\beta^{6}:0:\beta^{3}:1]
x2​y+y3+x2​z+z3βˆ’y​z​w+w3x^{2}y+y^{3}+x^{2}z+z^{3}-yzw+w^{3} [1:Ξ²2:Ξ²6:1],[1:Ξ²6:Ξ²2:1][1:\beta^{2}:\beta^{6}:1],[1:\beta^{6}:\beta^{2}:1]
x2​yβˆ’y3+x2​zβˆ’z3βˆ’y​z​wβˆ’w3x^{2}y-y^{3}+x^{2}z-z^{3}-yzw-w^{3} [Ξ²7:Ξ²2:1:0],[Ξ²5:Ξ²6:1:0][\beta^{7}:\beta^{2}:1:0],[\beta^{5}:\beta^{6}:1:0]
x2​y+x2​z+z3βˆ’y2​wβˆ’y​z​w+z2​w+w3x^{2}y+x^{2}z+z^{3}-y^{2}w-yzw+z^{2}w+w^{3} [2:0:Ξ²2:1],[2:0:Ξ²6:1][2:0:\beta^{2}:1],[2:0:\beta^{6}:1]
x2​yβˆ’y3+x2​zβˆ’y2​wβˆ’y​z​w+z2​wβˆ’w3x^{2}y-y^{3}+x^{2}z-y^{2}w-yzw+z^{2}w-w^{3} [Ξ²7:Ξ²5:1:1],[Ξ²5:Ξ²7:1:1][\beta^{7}:\beta^{5}:1:1],[\beta^{5}:\beta^{7}:1:1]
x2​yβˆ’x2​zβˆ’y2​w+y​z​w+z2​w+w3x^{2}y-x^{2}z-y^{2}w+yzw+z^{2}w+w^{3} [Ξ²2:Ξ²3:Ξ²7:1],[Ξ²6:Ξ²:Ξ²5:1][\beta^{2}:\beta^{3}:\beta^{7}:1],[\beta^{6}:\beta:\beta^{5}:1]
x2​y+x2​zβˆ’z3βˆ’y2​wβˆ’y​z​w+z2​w+w3x^{2}y+x^{2}z-z^{3}-y^{2}w-yzw+z^{2}w+w^{3} [Ξ²2:Ξ²3:Ξ²7:1],[Ξ²6:Ξ²:Ξ²5:1][\beta^{2}:\beta^{3}:\beta^{7}:1],[\beta^{6}:\beta:\beta^{5}:1]
x2​yβˆ’x2​zβˆ’z3βˆ’y2​w+y​z​w+z2​wβˆ’w3x^{2}y-x^{2}z-z^{3}-y^{2}w+yzw+z^{2}w-w^{3} [0:2:Ξ²2:1],[0:2:Ξ²6:1][0:2:\beta^{2}:1],[0:2:\beta^{6}:1]

7.2 Case p=5p=5

We found the set of Cartier points on all curves in standard form over 𝔽5\mathbb{F}_{5} with aa-number 33. There are some behaviors that are different from the case p=3p=3. For instance, there are isomorphism classes of curves that attain the bound on the number of Cartier points, both with f=1f=1 and f=0f=0. It also happens that some of them have Type 22 Cartier points (see TableΒ 14 and PropositionΒ 7.4). Another feature is that every degree distribution occurs when there are six distinct Type 1 points.

Table 14: Number of Type 11 and 22 Cartier points over 𝔽5\mathbb{F}_{5}.
Case Curves with nn Type 11 points Curves with Type 22
11 2 3 4 5 6 1
D 14 0 26 0 0 19 0
N1i 3 7 0 0 0 50 4
N1ii 0 1 0 0 0 5 1
N2 2 11 0 0 0 6 0
Total 19 9 26 0 0 80 5
Example 7.3.

There are only 55 isomorphism classes of curves in standard form with aa-number 33 over 𝔽5\mathbb{F}_{5} that have a Type 22 Cartier point. Here we show the cubic polynomial of each curve, together with the Type 22 point. All of these curves have only one Type 11 Cartier point, which implies there are no pp-rank 11 curves over 𝔽5\mathbb{F}_{5} that reach the bound of seven total Cartier points.

  • β€’

    x2​y+y3+x2​z+2​x​y​z+2​y​z2+z3+2​y2​w+2​y​z​w+y​w2+w3x^{2}y+y^{3}+x^{2}z+2xyz+2yz^{2}+z^{3}+2y^{2}w+2yzw+yw^{2}+w^{3}, [1:0:3:0][1:0:3:0].

  • β€’

    2​x2​y+y3+x2​z+x​y​zβˆ’y​z2βˆ’z3+2​y​z​wβˆ’2​y​w2+z​w2βˆ’w32x^{2}y+y^{3}+x^{2}z+xyz-yz^{2}-z^{3}+2yzw-2yw^{2}+zw^{2}-w^{3}, [0:0:1:2][0:0:1:2].

  • β€’

    2​x2​y+y3+2​x2​z+x​y​z+y2​zβˆ’2​y​z2βˆ’2​z3+2​y2​wβˆ’y​z​w+y​w2βˆ’2​z​w2βˆ’2​w32x^{2}y+y^{3}+2x^{2}z+xyz+y^{2}z-2yz^{2}-2z^{3}+2y^{2}w-yzw+yw^{2}-2zw^{2}-2w^{3}, [1:3:2:4][1:3:2:4].

  • β€’

    x2​y+y3βˆ’2​x2​z+y2​zβˆ’y​z2βˆ’y2​wβˆ’y​z​w+z2​wβˆ’y​w2βˆ’2​z​w2βˆ’2​w3x^{2}y+y^{3}-2x^{2}z+y^{2}z-yz^{2}-y^{2}w-yzw+z^{2}w-yw^{2}-2zw^{2}-2w^{3}, [1:2:0:0][1:2:0:0].

  • β€’

    x2​y+2​x2​zβˆ’2​x​y​z+y2​z+y​z2βˆ’2​y2​w+2​y​z​w+z2​w+y​w2βˆ’2​z​w2βˆ’2​w3x^{2}y+2x^{2}z-2xyz+y^{2}z+yz^{2}-2y^{2}w+2yzw+z^{2}w+yw^{2}-2zw^{2}-2w^{3}, [1:4:1:1][1:4:1:1].

Proposition 7.4.

There are no curves in standard form over 𝔽5\mathbb{F}_{5} with pp-rank 11 and aa-number 33 that reach Baker’s bound of seven Cartier points.

There are, up to 𝔽5\mathbb{F}_{5}-isomorphism, 1717 curves in standard form with pp-rank 0 and aa-number 11 that reach the bound of six Type 11 Cartier points.

Proof.

If a genus 44 curve with a=3a=3 has pp-rank 0 then by PropositionΒ 6.10, it has at most six Cartier points. If the pp-rank is 11, then the curve has at most seven Cartier points: six of Type 11 and one of Type 22. We use AlgorithmsΒ 6.14 andΒ 6.15 to compute the Cartier points on all N1, N2 and D curves with a=3a=3 over 𝔽5\mathbb{F}_{5} and find that only seventeen curves with pp-rank 0 have a total of six Cartier points. ExampleΒ 7.3 shows that the only curves with Type 22 Cartier points have fewer than six Type 11 points, hence the total of Cartier points is less than the upper bound for all the pp-rank 11 curves. ∎

7.3 Case p=7p=7

As mentioned in SectionΒ 5.2.3, for p=7p=7 we also computed all the aa-number 33 curves of type D and of type N1i with (b1,b2)=(0,0)(b_{1},b_{2})=(0,0). TableΒ 15 shows the number of Cartier points on these curves.

Table 15: Number of Cartier points on known D and N1 genus 44 curves over 𝔽7\mathbb{F}_{7}.
Case #Curves with nn Type 11 points #Curves with Type 22
11 2 3 4 5 6 1
D 0 0 3 9 5 48 0
N1i’ 0 11 0 3 2 23 11
Total 0 1 3 12 7 71 1

8 Examples

In this section we show five examples where we explicitly compute all the Cartier points of curves (or families of curves) with genus 44.

Example 8.1.

Let X=V​(F,G)X=V(F,G) be a genus 44 curve over 𝔽7\mathbb{F}_{7} where

F\displaystyle F =2​y​z+2​x​w,\displaystyle=2yz+2xw,
G\displaystyle G =2​x2​y+y3+x2​z+y2​z+3​z3+2​y​z​w+z2​w+4​y​w2+6​z​w2+4​w3.\displaystyle=2x^{2}y+y^{3}+x^{2}z+y^{2}z+3z^{3}+2yzw+z^{2}w+4yw^{2}+6zw^{2}+4w^{3}.

Notice that XX belongs to the N1 case from DefinitionΒ 4.1. We will see how this curves attains Baker’s bound on Cartier points. First, the Hasse–Witt matrix of XX is

[2361000000000000].\displaystyle\begin{bmatrix}2&3&6&1\\ 0&0&0&0\\ 0&0&0&0\\ 0&0&0&0\\ \end{bmatrix}.

Thus the aa-number is 33 and the pp-rank 11, in which case the total bound on the number of Cartier point is 77. By solving H​𝐯=c​𝐯H\mathbf{v}=c\mathbf{v} we see that the Type 22 point is [1:0:0:0][1:0:0:0].

Also, the Type 11 points are those in the intersection of XX and the hyperplane 2​x+3​y+6​z+w=02x+3y+6z+w=0. There are two such points defined over 𝔽7\mathbb{F}_{7}, they are [0:0:1:1][0:0:1:1] and [2:4:3:1][2:4:3:1]. The other four points are two pairs of Οƒ\sigma-conjugate defined over 𝔽49\mathbb{F}_{49} which are [6:Ξ±26:Ξ±22:1],[6:Ξ±38:Ξ±10:1][6:\alpha^{26}:\alpha^{22}:1],[6:\alpha^{38}:\alpha^{10}:1] and [4:Ξ±33:Ξ±23:1],[4:Ξ±39:Ξ±17:1][4:\alpha^{33}:\alpha^{23}:1],[4:\alpha^{39}:\alpha^{17}:1], for Ξ±\alpha such that Ξ±2+6​α+3=0\alpha^{2}+6\alpha+3=0.

Example 8.2.

Let X=V​(F,G)X=V(F,G) be a genus 44 curve over 𝔽7\mathbb{F}_{7} where

F\displaystyle F =y2+4​z2+2​x​w.\displaystyle=y^{2}+4z^{2}+2xw.
G\displaystyle G =3​x2​y+4​x​y2+3​y3+5​y2​z+2​x​z2+y​z2+5​z3+y2​w+6​y​z​w+5​z​w2+2​w3.\displaystyle=3x^{2}y+4xy^{2}+3y^{3}+5y^{2}z+2xz^{2}+yz^{2}+5z^{3}+y^{2}w+6yzw+5zw^{2}+2w^{3}.

The Hasse–Witt matrix of XX is

H=[1416565200001416].\displaystyle H=\begin{bmatrix}1&4&1&6\\ 5&6&5&2\\ 0&0&0&0\\ 1&4&1&6\\ \end{bmatrix}.

In this case, XX has pp-rank 11, but the only eigenvector of HH, up to scaling is (1,5,0,1)T(1,5,0,1)^{T}, and this does not give a point on XX. On the other hand, there are four Type 11 points: [0:Ξ±14:Ξ±34:1][0:\alpha^{14}:\alpha^{34}:1],[Ξ±7:Ξ±36:Ξ±34:1][\alpha^{7}:\alpha^{36}:\alpha^{34}:1], [0:Ξ±2:Ξ±46:1][0:\alpha^{2}:\alpha^{46}:1], [Ξ±:Ξ±12:Ξ±46:1][\alpha:\alpha^{12}:\alpha^{46}:1], where Ξ±2+6​α+3=0\alpha^{2}+6\alpha+3=0. The first two have multiplicity one and the others have multiplicity 2.

Example 8.3.

Let X=V​(F,G)X=V(F,G) be a genus 44 curve over 𝔽11\mathbb{F}_{11} where

F=\displaystyle F= z2+2​y​w,\displaystyle z^{2}+2yw,
G=\displaystyle G= 9​x3+x​y2+4​y3+9​x​y​z+2​x​z2+8​z3+7​x​z​w+8​x​w2+z​w2+3​w3.\displaystyle 9x^{3}+xy^{2}+4y^{3}+9xyz+2xz^{2}+8z^{3}+7xzw+8xw^{2}+zw^{2}+3w^{3}.

The Hasse–Witt matrix of XX is

H=[1531072104210694917].\displaystyle H=\begin{bmatrix}1&5&3&10\\ 7&2&10&4\\ 2&10&6&9\\ 4&9&1&7\end{bmatrix}.

This curve has aa-number 33 and pp-rank 11. There are no Type 22 points. Indeed, the only solution, up to scalar multiplication of H​𝐯=c​𝐯H\mathbf{v}=c\mathbf{v} is 𝐯=(1,7,2,4)T\mathbf{v}=(1,7,2,4)^{T}, and this does not give a point over XX.

The Type 11 points are those on the intersection of XX and the hyperplane with equation x+5​y+3​z+10​w=0x+5y+3z+10w=0, that is [6:9:9:1][6:9:9:1], [7+2​α+7​α2+9​α3+10​α4:6+4​α+5​α2+4​α3+1​α4:10+4​α2+5​α3+6​α4:1][7+2\alpha+7\alpha^{2}+9\alpha^{3}+10\alpha^{4}:6+4\alpha+5\alpha^{2}+4\alpha^{3}+1\alpha^{4}:10+4\alpha^{2}+5\alpha^{3}+6\alpha^{4}:1] with Ξ±5+10​α2+9=0\alpha^{5}+10\alpha^{2}+9=0, and its four conjugate points.

Example 8.4.

Let XX be the genus 44 curve over 𝔽5\mathbb{F}_{5} embedded in β„™3\mathbb{P}^{3} as the zero locus of

F=2​y​w+z2, ​G=a​x3+x​w2+b​y3+c​w3+z​w2,F=2yw+z^{2},\text{ }G=ax^{3}+xw^{2}+by^{3}+cw^{3}+zw^{2}, (11)

with a,bβˆˆπ”½5Γ—a,b\in\mathbb{F}_{5}^{\times} and cβˆˆπ”½5c\in\mathbb{F}_{5}. By PropositionΒ 4.2 the Hasse-Witt matrix of XX is

H=[000003​a​b24​a​b4​a00000000].H=\begin{bmatrix}0&0&0&0\\ 0&3ab^{2}&4ab&4a\\ 0&0&0&0\\ 0&0&0&0\\ \end{bmatrix}. (12)

If H​𝐯=c​𝐯H\mathbf{v}=c\mathbf{v} for some cβ‰ 0c\neq 0, then 𝐯\mathbf{v} must be in the subspace spanned by (0,1,0,0)T(0,1,0,0)^{T}. But [0:1:0:0][0:1:0:0] is not a point on XX. Therefore, XX has no Type 22 point.

Now, suppose P=[x0,y0,z0,w0]P=[x_{0},y_{0},z_{0},w_{0}] is a Type 11 Cartier point of XX, and let 𝐯=𝐯P\mathbf{v}=\mathbf{v}_{P}. Since PP is also on the hyperplane generated by the kernel of HH, then 3​b2​y0+4​b​z0+4​w0=03b^{2}y_{0}+4bz_{0}+4w_{0}=0, from where w0=3​b2​y0+4​b​z0w_{0}=3b^{2}y_{0}+4bz_{0}. By evaluating FF at PP we see that

b2​y2+3​b​y​z+z2=0,b^{2}y^{2}+3byz+z^{2}=0,

hence z0=2​b​y0z_{0}=2by_{0}. Note that y0β‰ 0y_{0}\neq 0, because otherwise P=[1:0:0:0]P=[1:0:0:0], and this is not a point on XX. So we can assume that y0=1y_{0}=1, and then P=[x0:1:2b:b2]P=[x_{0}:1:2b:b^{2}]. Evaluating PP at GG we get that

a​x03+x0+3​b+c​b=0.ax_{0}^{3}+x_{0}+3b+cb=0.

Therefore, XX has 1,21,2 or 33 Type 11 Cartier points (counting without multiplicity), one for each of the roots of a​x3+x+3​b+c​bax^{3}+x+3b+cb, that can be defined over 𝔽5\mathbb{F}_{5}, 𝔽52\mathbb{F}_{5^{2}} or 𝔽53\mathbb{F}_{5^{3}}.

Example 8.5.

Let XX be the genus 44 curve over 𝔽5{\mathbb{F}}_{5} embedded in β„™3\mathbb{P}^{3} as the zero locus of

F=2​y​w+z2, ​G=3​a2​x3+x​w2+b​x​y​z+b2​a​y3+a​w3+z​w2,F=2yw+z^{2},\text{ }G=3a^{2}x^{3}+xw^{2}+bxyz+b^{2}ay^{3}+aw^{3}+zw^{2}, (13)

with a,bβˆˆπ”½5Γ—a,b\in\mathbb{F}_{5}^{\times}. The curve XX is smooth and irreducible if aβ‰ ba\neq b. By PropositionΒ 4.2 the Hasse-Witt matrix of XX is

H=[004​a​b34​b002​a3​b22​a20000004​b34​a3​b].H=\begin{bmatrix}0&0&4ab^{3}&4b\\ 0&0&2a^{3}b^{2}&2a^{2}\\ 0&0&0&0\\ 0&0&4b^{3}&4a^{3}b\\ \end{bmatrix}. (14)

So XX has aa-number and pp-rank 11. There are no points on XX such that the corresponding vector 𝐯\mathbf{v} is a solution to H​𝐯(5)=c​𝐯H\mathbf{v}^{(5)}=c\mathbf{v} for cc in 𝔽5Γ—{\mathbb{F}}_{5}^{\times}.

Now, suppose that P=[x0,y0,z0,w0]P=[x_{0},y_{0},z_{0},w_{0}] is a Type 11 point. Then PP is in the hyperplane given by a​b2​z+w=0ab^{2}z+w=0, hence w0=4​a​b2​zw_{0}=4ab^{2}z. If z0=0z_{0}=0, then w0=0w_{0}=0 and since G​(P)=0G(P)=0, we have 3​a2​x03+a​b2​y03=03a^{2}x_{0}^{3}+ab^{2}y_{0}^{3}=0. Clearly x0x_{0} and y0y_{0} cannot be zero, so let y0=1y_{0}=1 and then P=[x0:1:0:0]P=[x_{0}:1:0:0] for x0x_{0} a root of 3​a​x3+b2=03ax^{3}+b^{2}=0. This gives a Type 1 point over 𝔽5\mathbb{F}_{5} and two over 𝔽25\mathbb{F}_{25}.

On the other hand, if we assume z0=1z_{0}=1 then w0=4​a​b2w_{0}=4ab^{2} and by substituting PP in F=0F=0 we obtain y0=3​a3​b2y_{0}=3a^{3}b^{2}. Therefore P=[x0:3a3b2:1:4ab2]P=[x_{0}:3a^{3}b^{2}:1:4ab^{2}], with x0x_{0} a root of 3​a2​x3+x​(a2+3​a3​b3)+3​a2+4​b23a^{2}x^{3}+x(a^{2}+3a^{3}b^{3})+3a^{2}+4b^{2}. For all possible (a,b)(a,b), this polynomial has three distinct roots, either over 𝔽5\mathbb{F}_{5}, 𝔽25\mathbb{F}_{25} or 𝔽125\mathbb{F}_{125}.

References

  • Baker [2000] Baker, M.Β H. (2000). Cartier points on curves. Internat. Math. Res. Notices, (7):353–370.
  • Ekedahl [1987] Ekedahl, T. (1987). On supersingular curves and abelian varieties. Math. Scand., 60(2):151–178.
  • Frei [2018] Frei, S. (2018). The aa-number of hyperelliptic curves. In Women in numbers Europe II, volumeΒ 11 of Assoc. Women Math. Ser., pages 107–116. Springer, Cham.
  • Glass and Pries [2005] Glass, D. and Pries, R. (2005). Hyperelliptic curves with prescribed pp-torsion. Manuscripta Math., 117(3):299–317.
  • Hartshorne [1977] Hartshorne, R. (1977). Algebraic geometry. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, No. 52. Springer-Verlag, New York-Heidelberg.
  • Kudo and Harashita [2017] Kudo, M. and Harashita, S. (2017). Superspecial curves of genus 4 in small characteristic. Finite Fields Appl., 45:131–169.
  • Li and Oort [1998] Li, K.-Z. and Oort, F. (1998). Moduli of supersingular abelian varieties, volume 1680 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
  • Oort [1975] Oort, F. (1975). Which abelian surfaces are products of elliptic curves? Math. Ann., 214:35–47.
  • Pries [2008] Pries, R. (2008). A short guide to pp-torsion of abelian varieties in characteristic pp. In Computational arithmetic geometry, volume 463 of Contemp. Math., pages 121–129. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI.
  • Pries [2009] Pries, R. (2009). The pp-torsion of curves with large pp-rank. Int. J. Number Theory, 5(6):1103–1116.
  • Pries [2019] Pries, R. (2019). Current results on Newton polygons of curves. In Open problems in arithmetic algebraic geometry, volumeΒ 46 of Adv. Lect. Math. (ALM), pages 179–207. Int. Press, Somerville, MA.
  • Re [2001] Re, R. (2001). The rank of the Cartier operator and linear systems on curves. J. Algebra, 236(1):80–92.
  • Serre [1972] Serre, J.-P. (1972). PropriΓ©tΓ©s galoisiennes des points d’ordre fini des courbes elliptiques. Inventiones mathematicae, 15(4):259 331.
  • Zhou [2017] Zhou, Z. (2017). A bound on the genus of a curve with Cartier operator of small rank. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:1710.01058.
  • Zhou [2019] Zhou, Z. (2019). On the existence of curves with prescribed $a$-number. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:1901.08375.
  • Zhou [2020] Zhou, Z. (2020). Ekedahl-Oort strata on the moduli space of curves of genus four. Rocky Mountain J. Math., 50(2):747–761.