The production in the process
Abstract
We have studied the reaction within the effective Lagrangian approach, and our results show that there may be a peak, at least a bump structure around 2180 MeV associated to the resonance in the mass distribution. We suggest to search for the resonance in this reaction, which would be helpful to shed light on its nature.
keywords:
; photo-production; effective Lagrangian approach1 INTRODUCTION
The state was observed by the Babar Collaboration via the process [1], and later confirmed by Belle, BESII, and BESIII Collaborations [2, 3, 4, 5]. However, the available information of the , only obtained from the collision experiments, is not enough to distinguish different interpretations, such as , tetraquark state, hybrid, or molecule. The information about the production in other processes will be helpful to shed light on its nature.
As we know, the associate production of hadrons by photon has been extensively studied since it provides an excellent tool to learn details of the hadron spectrum [6, 7, 8, 9]. The intense photon beams can be used to study the strangeonium-like states because of the strong affinity of the photon for . It should be pointed out that, in Fig. 25 of Ref. 10, the distribution of the reaction shows an enhancement around 2150 MeV exists, which could be associated to a resonance with the same quantum numbers as , i.e. . Thus, it is natural to associate this structure to the , which implies that the photo-production should be accessible experimentally. In addition, [11] indicates that the coupling of the to the channel is of the same order of magnitude as its coupling to channel, which suggests that the has a sizeable coupling to the channel. All the above factors encourage us to study the production in the reaction of within the effective Lagrangian approach.
2 FORMALISMS

In this section, we will present the mechanisms for the reaction,
(1) |
by considering the tree level diagram as depicted in Fig. 1. We consider the background contribution of the -channel and exchanges with the final state producing through the intermediate states and , as shown in Fig. 1(a). The can be directly produced by -channel and exchanges, and then decays to , which is shown in Fig. 1(b).
Then the differential cross section for the reaction can be expressed as,
(2) | |||||
with
(3) |
where , , and are the energies of the , , and outgoing proton, respectively, and is the photon energy in the laboratory frame. The details of the scattering amplitudes are given in Ref. 12.
3 RESULT AND DISCUSSION


With the above formalisms, we calculate the total and differential cross sections for the reaction by using a Monte Carlo multi-particle phase space integration program. The mass distribution of the reaction with MeV is shown in the left panel of Fig. 2. As we can see, there is a peak structure around 2180 MeV, which is associated to the resonance . As shown in Ref. 12, there still exists a bump structure even with the low limit of the couplings of the .
It should be pointed out that for the photo-production, there is a contribution from Pomeron exchange, whose effect is dominant at large center-of-mass energy and forward angle. However, in this paper only the mass distribution is relevant to the signal of , and the comprehensive mechanism involved the Pomeron exchange dose not change too much the shape of the mass distribution.
4 Conclusions
Motivated by the small enhancement around MeV in the mass distribution of the reaction measured by Omega Photon Collaboration, and the clues that the branching ratio Br is of the same order as Br, we propose to search for the resonance in the reaction. Our calculations show that there will be a peak, at least a bump structure around 2180 MeV in the mass distribution of reaction.
Finally, it should be noted that the GlueX Collaboration has proposed to search for the in the photoproduction [14], and the reaction has been selected as a particularly suitable process to search for strangeonium states by the CLAS12 Collaboration [15]. Our predictions should be useful for the future experimental study.
Acknowledgements
This work is partly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 11505158, 11605158. It is also supported by the Academic Improvement Project of Zhengzhou University.
References
- [1] B. Aubert et al. [BaBar Collaboration], Phys. Rev. D 74, 091103 (2006).
- [2] C. P. Shen et al. [Belle Collaboration], Phys. Rev. D 80, 031101 (2009).
- [3] M. Ablikim et al. [BES Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 102003 (2008).
- [4] M. Ablikim et al. [BESIII Collaboration], Phys. Rev. D 91, 052017 (2015).
- [5] M. Ablikim et al. [BESIII Collaboration], Phys. Rev. D 99, 012014 (2019).
- [6] J. J. Xie, E. Wang, and J. Nieves, Phys. Rev. C 89, 015203 (2014).
- [7] E. Wang, J. J. Xie, and J. Nieves, Phys. Rev. C 90, 065203 (2014).
- [8] E. Wang, J. J. Xie, W. H. Liang, F. K. Guo, and E. Oset, Phys. Rev. C 95, 015205 (2017).
- [9] Y. Y. Wang, L. J. Liu, E. Wang, and D. M. Li, Phys. Rev. D 95, 096015 (2017).
- [10] J. Busenitz et al., Phys. Rev. D 40, 1 (1989).
- [11] M. Tanabashi et al. [Particle Data Group], Phys. Rev. D 98, 030001 (2018).
- [12] C. G. Zhao, G. Y. Wang, G. N. Li, E. Wang and D. M. Li, Phys. Rev. D 99, no. 11, 114014 (2019).
- [13] J. Q. Fan, S. F. Chen, and B. C. Liu, Phys. Rev. C 99, 025203 (2019).
- [14] A. AlekSejevs et al. [GlueX Collaboration], arXiv:1305.1523 [nucl-ex].
- [15] A. Filippi [CLAS Collaboration], EPJ Web Conf. 96, 01013 (2015).