This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Temperature in Solar Sources of 3He-rich Solar Energetic Particles and Relation to Ion Abundances

Radoslav Bučík Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, TX 78238, USA Sargam M. Mulay School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK Glenn M. Mason Applied Physics Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University, Laurel, MD 20723, USA Nariaki V. Nitta Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Center, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA Mihir I. Desai Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, TX 78238, USA Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA Maher A. Dayeh Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, TX 78238, USA Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA
(Received 2020 September 15 ; Revised 2020 December 7 ; Accepted 2020 December 21)
Abstract

3He-rich solar energetic particles (SEPs) are believed to be accelerated in solar flares or jets by a mechanism that depends on the ion charge-to-mass (Q/MQ/M) ratio. It implies that the flare plasma characteristics (e.g., temperature) may be effective in determining the elemental abundances of 3He-rich SEPs. This study examines the relation between the suprathermal (\lesssim0.2 MeV nucleon-1) abundances of the He–Fe ions measured on the Advanced Composition Explorer and temperature in the solar sources for 24 3He-rich SEP events in the period 2010–2015. The differential emission measure technique is applied to derive the temperature of the source regions from the extreme ultraviolet imaging observations on the Solar Dynamics Observatory. The obtained temperature distribution peaks at 2.0–2.5 MK that is surprisingly consistent with earlier findings based on in-situ elemental abundance or charge state measurements. We have found a significant anti-correlation between 3He/4He ratio and solar source temperature with a coefficient -0.6. It is most likely caused by non-charge-stripping processes, as both isotopes would be fully ionized in the inferred temperature range. This study shows that the elemental ratios 4He/O, N/O, Ne/O, Si/O, S/O, Ca/O, Fe/O generally behave with temperature as expected from abundance enhancement calculations at ionization equilibrium. The C and Mg, the two species with small changes in the QQ/MM ratio in the obtained temperature range, show no such behavior with temperature and could be influenced by similar processes as for the 3He/4He ratio.

Solar energetic particles (1491) — Solar abundances (1474) — Solar flares (1496) — Solar extreme ultraviolet emission (1493)
journal: ApJ

1 Introduction

3He-rich solar energetic particles (SEPs) are characterized by enormous enhancements of rare species like 3He or ultra-heavy ions (mass >> 70 AMU) by factors up to 104 above the coronal or solar wind abundances (see, e.g., Kocharov & Kocharov, 1984; Mason, 2007; Reames, 2013, 2017, 2018, for a review). In a typical 3He-rich SEP event, 4He, 12C, 14N, 16O are unenhanced, while heavier species like 20Ne, 24Mg, 28Si, show enhancement that increases with the ion mass (Reames et al., 1994; Mason et al., 2004). The abundance of the light 3He isotope is in contrast with such enhancement pattern. Whereas, with He, the abundance of the lighter isotope is enhanced, with heavy ions, the heavier isotopes are enhanced (Mason et al., 1994; Wiedenbeck et al., 2010).

Solar sources of 3He-rich SEPs have been associated with extreme ultraviolet (EUV) coronal jets (see Bučík, 2020, and references therein), indicating acceleration in magnetic reconnection region involving field lines open to interplanetary (IP) space (Reames, 2002; Wang et al., 2006). The events show a high association (\sim99%) with type-III radio bursts (e.g., Reames & Stone, 1986; Nitta et al., 2006), the emission generated by low-energy electrons (<<30 keV; Krucker et al., 1999) escaping into IP space. Furthermore, 3He-rich SEP events have been accompanied by minor X-ray flares (mostly B- and C- class; e.g., Nitta et al., 2006, 2015; Mason et al., 2009; Bučík et al., 2016).

Early measurements of high ionic charge states (Luhn et al., 1987) indicated >>10 MK source temperature of 3He-rich SEPs. However, an increase of charge states with kinetic energy (e.g., DiFabio et al., 2008) has suggested that the mechanism responsible for high charge states is an additional ionization in a dense environment after/during acceleration (e.g., Reames et al., 1994; Klecker et al., 2007). Reames et al. (1994) examined 228 3He-rich events in August 1978 – April 1991 with 3He/4He >>0.1 at the energy range of 1.2–1.6 MeV nucleon-1. Their abundance enhancement pattern has suggested that C, N, O are fully ionized as 4He, but Ne, Mg, Si are only partially stripped of their orbital electrons. The data on equilibrium ionization states in astrophysical plasma shows that this can happen in a temperature range of \sim3–5 MK (Reames et al., 1994). In a more recent survey, Reames et al. (2014a, b, 2015) examined 111 Fe-rich impulsive events in April 1995 – April 2013 at the energy range 2–10 MeV nucleon-1, and reported the most probable temperature range of \sim2.5–3.2 MK. Note that several events have been reported with enhanced abundances of C and N, suggesting temperatures \sim0.5–1.5 MK (Mason et al., 2002, 2016). These temperatures may indicate that ions are accelerated very early (Mason et al., 2016) and (or) on open field lines where heating is minimal (Reames et al., 2015). The required low temperatures may also be due to a cool material observed in the form of a mini-filament in some 3He-rich SEP sources (Mason et al., 2016; Innes et al., 2016; Bučík et al., 2018a).

At low energies, below \sim0.2 MeV nucleon-1, both equilibrium and non-equilibrium charge states depend only on temperature (e.g., Kocharov et al., 2000; Kovaltsov et al., 2001) and not on charge stripping effects causing the energy dependence of heavy-ion charge states observed in 3He-rich events at higher energies, \sim0.2–1 MeV nucleon-1 (Klecker et al., 2007; DiFabio et al., 2008). Therefore, the source temperature in 3He-rich SEP events can be determined from measurements of charge states at low energies. DiFabio et al. (2008) have obtained temperatures in the range of 1.3 to 3 MK using low-energy (0.062–0.110 MeV nucleon-1) Fe charge states measurements in 14 3He-rich SEP events in May 1998 – September 2000.

The ionic charge states were inferred with help of measured isotopic ratio enhancements such as 22Ne/20Ne (Cohen et al., 1999a, b; Wiedenbeck et al., 2010). Wiedenbeck et al. (2010) have reported a corresponding source temperature of \sim4 MK for a single 3He-rich SEP event and Cohen et al. (1999a) have reported the same temperature for nine large SEP events that were heavy-ion rich but show small 3He abundance (3He/4He <<0.01 in most events).

Reames (1988) reported an increase of 2–3 MeV nucleon-1 heavy ion (C, Mg, Si, S, Fe) enhancements (relative to 4He) with soft X-ray temperature in the range 10–16 MK. The origin of the reported dependencies remains unclear since many of these species are fully stripped at these temperatures (Reames, 1988). Reames (1990) has suggested that plasma waves escaping from heated closed regions accelerate nearby 3He-rich SEPs, possibly causing an increase of heavy-ion enhancements. The 1.3–1.6 MeV nucleon-1 3He/4He ratio showed no correlation with soft X-ray temperature (Reames et al., 1988). The temperature was determined from ISEE soft X-ray measurements at the time of hard X-ray maximum or at the time of type-III radio burst (at 2 MHz that corresponds to \sim6 R) when hard X-rays were not observed or hard X-ray time profile was complex (Reames, 1988; Reames et al., 1988). The authors have pointed out that the correlation between elemental ratios and temperature does not strongly depend on the choice of this time. They have reported the average hard X-ray to 2 MHz radio peak delay of \sim1 min.

Table 1: Properties of 3He-rich SEP events and associated solar sources.
SEP Days 3He/4He Fe/O Type-III X-ray Flare logT\log T Ref.
Start date Start (UT) Class Start (UT) Location NOAA AR (K)
01 2010 Jun 12 163.75–166.33 0.02±0.002 0.93±0.08 00:54 M2.0 00:30 N23W50 11081 6.65 i
02 2010 Sep 02 245.92–247.13 2.85±\pm0.76 0.78±\pm0.71 10:48  \cdots  \cdots N24W62 11102 6.30 i
03 2010 Sep 17 260.71–261.00 0.10±\pm0.07  \cdots 00:16 B5.7 00:14 S20W02 11108 6.32 i
04 2010 Oct 17 290.88–292.63 0.46±\pm0.04 1.27±\pm0.23 08:55 C1.7 08:52 S18W32 11112 6.44 i, j, k
05 2010 Nov 14 318.63–321.38 0.20±\pm0.01 1.20±\pm0.18 023:50 C1.1 023:50 S23W28 11123 6.34 i, j, l
06 2010 Nov 17 321.67–322.42 2.75±\pm0.33 1.25±\pm0.34 08:08 B3.4 08:07 S23W72 11123 6.24 i, j, l
07 2011 Jan 27 027.88–030.50 0.08±\pm0.01 1.15±\pm0.18 08:41 B6.6 08:40 N14W80 11149 6.23 j
08 2011 Feb 18 049.25–051.75 0.11±\pm0.01 1.46±\pm0.10 021:32 C1.1 021:30 S19W46 11158 6.41 k, m
09 2011 Jul 08 189.00–190.00 0.42±\pm0.04 0.91±\pm0.15 014:27 B7.6 014:25 N15W91 11244 6.35 j, n
10 2011 Jul 09 190.00–191.00 2.35±\pm0.13 1.31±\pm0.20 016:25  \cdots  \cdots N16W43  \cdots 6.36 n, o
11 2011 Aug 01 213.08–213.63 0.02±\pm0.01 2.61±\pm0.47 018:58 C1.7 019:01 N15W50 11265 6.39 j
12 2011 Aug 26 238.46–240.25 0.42±\pm0.03 1.51±\pm0.13 00:42 B4.4 00:41 N15W62 11271 6.37 j
13 2011 Dec 24 358.75–359.13 0.06±\pm0.01 1.42±\pm0.26 11:55 C4.9 11:25 N16W92 11376 6.65 j
14 2012 Jan 03 003.42–004.08 0.16±\pm0.01 1.26±\pm0.11 01:49 B5.0 01:40 S20W63 11386 6.32 j
15 2012 May 14 135.83–137.13 0.02±\pm0.002 0.40±\pm0.04 09:38 C2.5 09:35 N09W46 11476 6.56 j, k
16 2012 Jun 08 160.71–161.75 0.38±\pm0.04 2.00±\pm0.33 07:13 C4.8 07:11 N13W40 11493 6.30 j, k
17 2012 Aug 02 215.54–217.00 0.72±\pm0.02 0.99±\pm0.09 03:00 B6.4 03:00 N12W58 11528 6.32 o
18 2012 Nov 20 325.46–326.00 7.84±\pm0.75 0.92±\pm0.19 01:28 B6.0 01:29 S18W60 11618 6.31 l, j, o
19 2013 Jul 17 198.13–199.50 0.26±\pm0.02 0.84±\pm0.17 020:16 B1.8 020:18 N19W69  \cdots 6.35 j
20 2014 Mar 29 088.33–089.00 0.11±\pm0.01 0.42±\pm0.08 023:46 M2.6 023:44 N18W25 12017 6.57 j
21 2014 Apr 18 108.25–108.88 0.66±\pm0.04 2.96±\pm0.24 021:58 C3.2 021:50 S15W24 12036 6.54 j, o
22 2014 May 04 124.21–125.75 0.11±\pm0.01 0.73±\pm0.11 020:16 C1.8 020:18 S08W38  \cdots 6.33 j
23 2014 May 16 136.54–137.75 4.69±\pm0.28 2.15±\pm0.27 04:01  \cdots  \cdots S12W44  \cdots 6.31 j, o
24 2015 Feb 06 037.25–037.88 0.81±\pm0.10 1.80±\pm0.27 023:30 B6.5 023:30 N14W19  \cdots 6.19 o

Note. — 3He/4He, Fe/O from ULEIS/ACE at 0.320–0.453 MeV nucleon-1. Previous day from SEP start date.

References. — (i) Bučík et al. (2016); (j) Nitta et al. (2015); (k) Reames et al. (2014a); (l) Chen et al. (2015); (m) Bučík et al. (2018b); (n) Bučík et al. (2014); (o) Mason et al. (2016)

It is believed that anomalous abundances of 3He-rich SEPs are the signature of a unique acceleration mechanism associated with magnetic reconnection in solar flare sites (e.g., Miller, 1998). The models of 3He-rich SEPs usually involve temperature in ion acceleration (e.g., Roth & Temerin, 1997; Liu et al., 2006; Mason & Klecker, 2018; Kartavykh et al., 2020). Temerin & Roth (1992) and Roth & Temerin (1997) have reported a model of 3He and heavy-ion acceleration by obliquely propagating electromagnetic ion cyclotron waves. Roth & Temerin (1997) have found that among discrete values of 2, 4, 6, and 10 MK, the abundance ratios are close to observed values at temperature 4 MK. In the model of 3He and 4He acceleration by parallel-propagating plasma waves, Liu et al. (2006) have found a temperature range of 0.8–3.0 MK (median and mean 1.4 MK and 1.6 MK, respectively) by fitting the observed spectra of 3He and 4He for six events. The mechanism of heavy-ion enhancement in 3He-rich events based on charge-to-mass (Q/MQ/M) dependence of Coulomb energy losses below the Bragg peak (\sim1 MeV nucleon-1) requires temperatures 0.1–0.6 MK (Mason & Klecker, 2018). In an approach that combines Q/MQ/M dependent Coulomb losses with Q/MQ/M dependent stochastic acceleration, the enrichment of heavy and ultra-heavy ions that is similar to the measured one can be obtained with temperatures of \sim1 MK (Kartavykh et al., 2008, 2020).

The temperature in solar sources of 3He-rich SEPs (that can be only determined indirectly) and the effect on ion abundances is largely unexplored. In this paper, we study 24 3He-rich SEP events in the period 2010–2015. To determine the temperature in 3He-rich source flares, we use EUV imaging observations that can monitor lower temperatures when ions are not fully stripped. Furthermore, to examine a linkage between the ion abundances and temperature in 3He-rich sources, we use low-energy (\lesssim0.2 MeV nucleon-1) measurements, where ion charge states are dominated by thermal collisions.

2 Instrumentation and event selection

The elemental abundances of the 3He-rich SEP events in this survey are measured with the time-of-flight mass spectrometer Ultra Low Energy Isotope Spectrometer (ULEIS; Mason et al., 1998) on the Advanced Composition Explorer (ACE; Stone et al., 1998). Depending on ion species, ULEIS roughly covers the energy range 0.1–10 MeV nucleon-1. For example, the Fe measurements can extend down to 0.04 MeV nucleon-1. The solar sources of 3He-rich SEPs are investigated using high-resolution observations from the Atmospheric Imaging Assembly (AIA; Lemen et al., 2012) on the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO; Pesnell et al., 2012). The AIA provides full-disk images of the Sun with 1.5\arcsec spatial and 12 s temporal resolution at seven EUV, two UV, and one visible-light band. The AIA data were processed with the standard AIA SolarSoft procedure aia_prep.pro available via SolarSoft library and normalized by the exposure time.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: Emission Measure (EM) maps for the 2012 June 8 event (event #16) at the start time of the type-III radio burst. The white rectangle surrounds the source region, where the temperature was determined. Color-coding indicates the total EM contained within a logT\log T range shown at the top of each panel.

Numerous 3He-rich SEP events were measured at L1 during the SDO era in solar cycle 24 (Reames et al., 2014b; Bučík et al., 2014, 2016, 2018b; Chen et al., 2015; Nitta et al., 2015; Mason et al., 2016), however, for this study, we select only some of these events. The reason is that seven previously reported events (2010 Sep 4, Nov 4; 2012 Jan 13; 2013 Dec 24; 2014 Feb 6, Apr 24, May 29) have the source close or behind the limb with weak or no activity observed from the Earth. Another five events (2010 Oct 19; 2011 Dec 14; 2012 Nov 18, Jul 3; 2014 Jan 1) have the AIA images saturated, and not usable for further analysis. Table 1 lists the properties of the examined 24 3He-rich SEP events and the associated solar sources. Column 1 indicates the event number, column 2 the SEP event start date, and column 3 the time intervals used for computing elemental ratios based on the ion intensities near 0.2 MeV nucleon-1. Columns 4 and 5 provide the event integrated (averaged) 3He/4He and Fe/O ratios, respectively, at the energy range of 0.320–0.453 MeV nucleon-1 where ion abundances have been often reported. Column 6 gives the type-III radio burst start time from WAVES/Wind (Bougeret et al., 1995) data with 60 s cadence. Columns 7 and 8 indicate the GOES 14–15 (Bornmann et al., 1996) X-ray flare class and start time, respectively. Column 9 gives the flare site in AIA images. Column 10 shows the NOAA active region (AR) number. The X-ray flare class, start time, and NOAA AR number were taken from the Edited Solar Events, compiled by the NOAA Space Weather Production Center (ftp://ftp.swpc.noaa.gov/pub/warehouse). Column 11 provides a decadic logarithm of the temperature in the solar source, derived from AIA channels by the differential emission measure (DEM) analysis. Specifically, the column gives the EM-weighted temperature (see Section 3.1). The last column indicates references to earlier studies of these events.

Refer to caption
Figure 2: (a) AIA/SDO 193 Å image for event #16 with the solar source in the yellow box at the start time of the type-III radio burst. (b) AIA/SDO 193 Å image for event #16 4 min later with a jet in the solar source. To enhance small-scale structures, the images are processed with the Multiscale Gaussian Normalization code mgn.pro (Morgan & Druckmüller, 2014). (c) The average EM profile for the solar source in the yellow box at the start time of the type-III radio burst. (d) WAVES/Wind radio spectrogram and GOES-15 X-ray fluxes (two curves). Color-coding in the radio spectrogram represents EE-intensity (dB >> background). The white patches in the radio spectrum mean the data gap. The vertical line marks the time of the temperature determination. The labels A, B, C, M, and X mark flare classes in the 1–8 Å channel.

In most of the investigated events (17 out of 24), there was an EUV jet observed in the associated solar source. Another type of activity includes EUV coronal wave (events #1, #4, #11), ejection (events #13, #21) or just EUV brightening (events #5, #22). Except for events #17 and #24, the solar sources for the remaining events have been identified in the earlier papers.

3 Results

3.1 Temperature determination

In this work, we determine the temperature at the start time of type-III radio bursts as observed by WAVES/Wind at 14 MHz that corresponds to \sim2 R according to the electron density model (Mann et al., 1999). The average temperature is extracted from a rectangular region around the source that shows EUV brightening at the type-III onset. In cases when the jet is the source, the region covers both the jet foot-point and the jet spire. Note that the EUV jet was not always well visible at the time of type-III radio burst, and the only activity observed was EUV brightening (events #14, 15, 16, 19, 20, 23). See Figure 2 for event #16.

We perform a DEM analysis to study the thermal structure of the plasma in the solar sources of 3He-rich SEPs. The DEM is a physical quantity related to the electron density and the temperature gradient of a plasma. It is determined from observations of emission lines on the assumptions that plasma is optically thin and in ionization equilibrium. The DEM is reconstructed from the multi-wavelength observations and the instrumental temperature response by the inversion method. We use the DEM inversion developed by Cheung et al. (2015) for EUV AIA imaging observations. We coalign AIA images in six channels (94, 131, 171, 193, 211, and 335 Å), which are sensitive to a range of coronal temperatures and use them as input in the DEM analysis. The method computes the temperature responses for six AIA channels (with the SolarSoft function aia_get_response.pro), using the CHIANTI atomic database (Dere et al., 2019) and coronal abundances (Feldman, 1992; Grevesse & Sauval, 1998; Landi et al., 2002). The DEM analysis is performed in the solar source and its surrounding area. The EM (the integral of DEM) is computed for each pixel position in the temperature interval logT\log T [K] == 5.4–7.5 (0.3–30 MK). Finally, the EM is spatially averaged over the rectangular region around the source.

Figure 1 illustrates the DEM analysis for the 3He-rich event 2012 June 8 (event #16). The figure shows EM maps at various temperature intervals. The solar source is surrounded by a white box. The box is positioned to cover both the hot core (see map at 3.2–5 MK) as well as two cooler peripheral structures (see map 0.5–0.8 MK) adjacent to the core that resembles open field lines. Note that an EUV jet was later ejected along one of those elongated structures (see Figure 2). Event #16 has one of the highest 3He/4He and Fe/O ratios in our sample (Table 1). Only events #21 and #23 show the higher common 3He and Fe enrichment.

Figure 2 displays 193 Å images of the solar source for event #16 at the start time of the type-III radio burst (panel a) and a later time (panel b) when a jet was clearly seen. Figure 2(c) plots the average EM curve calculated for the yellow boxed region shown in Figure 2(a). The average EM curve peaks at logT\log T [K] = 6.3 (\sim2 MK) with peak EM = 9.12×\times1026 cm-5. There is also low temperature plasma available at some pixel locations at the source region. Figure 2(d) shows the WAVES/Wind radio spectrogram and the GOES X-ray fluxes. The WAVES data are read and displayed using the package xwavesds.pro available at https://solar-radio.gsfc.nasa.gov/data/wind/idl/. At the highest WAVES frequencies, the type-III radio burst onset is observed at 07:13 UT and the emission peaked at 07:15 UT. According to the Edited Solar Events, the type-III radio burst with the start time at 07:13 UT was observed by Learmonth Solar Observatory at a frequency range of 25–180 MHz. Using data in Figure 2(c), we calculate the EM-weighted average temperature (see Eqn. 15 in Cheung et al., 2015) and find that it is logT\log T [K] = 6.3. The DEM inversion code gives temperature within an error of 20%. The errors arise from a number of instrumental effects and photon counting statistics.

Refer to caption
Figure 3: Histogram of solar source temperatures for the 3He-rich SEP events in this work (cyan shaded) and from DiFabio et al. (2008) (red line). Two vertical lines indicate the temperature range reported by Reames et al. (2014b).

Examining 24 events in this study, we obtain a temperature range of 1.5–4.5 MK with an average value of 2.5 MK and a median of 2.2 MK. A multi-thermal plasma is found in the solar source for event #20 where the EM curve shows a double peak with nearly the same intensities at logT\log T [K] = 6.4 (2.5 MK) and logT\log T [K] = 6.9 (7.9 MK). Figure 3 plots the histogram of the temperature distribution for the investigated 3He-rich events. The histogram shows that the temperature distribution peaks at 2.0–2.5 MK. The majority of 3He-rich SEP events (17 out of 24) have source temperature below 2.5 MK. These events are associated with small X-ray flares (mostly B-class; see Figure 4 or Table 1). Also added is the histogram of inferred temperatures from Fe charge state measurements reported by DiFabio et al. (2008) as well as the temperature range 2.5–3.2 MK determined from the abundance enhancement (Reames et al., 2014b). Note that four events of our study with source temperatures 2.0, 2.6, 2.8, and 3.6 MK are in the survey of 111 Fe-rich impulsive events of Reames et al. (2014a). The asymmetric shape of the two histograms may suggest a lower temperature boundary in 3He-rich solar sources.

Refer to caption
Figure 4: The event integrated 0.113–0.160 MeV nucleon-1 (blue squares) and 0.160–0.226 MeV nucleon-1 (red circles) 3He/4He ratio from ULEIS/ACE (left panel) and corresponding GOES 1–8 Å X-ray peak flux (right panel) vs. the EM-weighted temperature TT in the solar source from AIA/SDO. A triple of numbers means the Spearman rank correlation coefficient, the two-sided significance of its deviation from zero, and the number of events. The letters B, C, M, mark the GOES X-ray flare class. Note, the 3He/4He \sim4×\times10-4 in the solar wind (Gloeckler & Geiss, 1998) for comparison with 3He/4He ratios in the left panel.

3.2 3He abundance versus temperature

To examine the relationship between the elemental ratios and the temperature, we use only those events from Table 1 that are not affected by the background from the preceding event. Especially at low energies, small 3He-rich event ion intensities can be contaminated by intensity enhancement from prior large SEP, corotating, or IP shock events. Mason et al. (2004) have discussed that 4He is the most susceptible element for contamination, Fe and O are less susceptible, and 3He is the least susceptible. In events #3, #7, #8, #18, 4He shows no obvious increase from prior enhancement, and therefore 3He/4He presents a lower limit (real 3He enrichment is higher). In events #16, #22, 3He remained enhanced from the previous activity, and the calculated ratio is only an upper limit. In events #8, and #20, O shows no increase, and thus Fe/O presents a lower limit. Furthermore, only the ratios with a relative error \leq0.75 are used.

Refer to caption
Figure 5: The event integrated 0.113–0.160 MeV nucleon-1 (blue squares) and 0.160–0.226 MeV nucleon-1 (red circles) elemental ratios for different ion species from ULEIS/ACE vs. the EM-weighted temperature TT in the solar source from AIA/SDO. A triple of three numbers has the same meaning as in Figure 4. Since N ion is not well resolved at 0.113–0.160 MeV nucleon-1, only the high energy ratio is shown.

Figure 4(left) shows the event integrated 3He/4He ratio in the two lowest energy channels, 0.113–0.160 MeV nucleon-1 and 0.160–0.226 MeV nucleon-1, measured by ULEIS versus the EM-weighted temperature TT in the 3He-rich SEP sources obtained from AIA observations. There is a relatively high anti-correlation between these two quantities, with Spearman rank correlation coefficient of -0.62 (0.113–0.160 MeV nucleon-1) or -0.59 (0.160–0.226 MeV nucleon-1) with a low probability (p==0.01) of resulting from the random population. The obtained relation indicates a decrease of 3He enrichment with a source temperature. This could not be caused by charge-changing processes as the He isotopes would be fully ionized at the inferred temperatures (see Figure 7(left) for 4He). They would be fully ionized even at \sim0.1 MK. To explore this result further, we plot in Figure 4(right) GOES 1–8 Å X-ray peak flux versus the same temperature TT as for events in Figure 4(left). The three events are not shown because they have an X-ray flux below the background level. Note that X-ray flux refers to the whole solar disk while the temperature just to the small region around the source. Data in Figure 4(right) indicate a strong positive correlation between X-ray peak flux and the temperature TT in the examined 3He-rich SEP sources. Thus, a negative trend between the 3He/4He and the temperature may represent a dependence on X-ray (EUV) peak flux, wherein large flares produce small 3He enrichment. Previously, Reames et al. (1988) have reported an anti-correlation between 1.3–1.6 MeV nucleon-1 3He/4He and soft X-ray peak flux with correlation coefficients -0.66 (ISEE) and -0.55 (GOES) that are surprisingly similar to our values. Recall, that the authors find no evidence for a correlation between 3He/4He and soft X-ray temperature (10–16 MK) at the time of hard X-ray maximum.

Refer to caption
Figure 6: Left panel: Abundance enhancement relative to O for 3He-rich SEP events in this survey at 0.320–0.453 MeV nucleon-1, relative to coronal abundances from Reames (1995) (red, filled squares) and Reames (2019) (blue circles). Green open squares are values from Mason et al. (2004). Right panel: Abundance enhancement relative to O for 3He-rich SEP events in this survey at 0.160–0.226 MeV nucleon-1 (orange, filled half-circles) and 0.320–0.453 MeV nucleon-1 (blue circles), relative to coronal abundances (Reames, 2019) vs. Q/MQ/M ratio, using charge states calculated for the equilibrium plasma at 2.2 MK. The solid (dashed) line is a power-law fit that has a slope of γ=\gamma=-3.53 (-3.31).

3.3 Heavy-ion abundances versus temperature

Figure 5 explores the relation between the event integrated heavy-ion abundances relative to oxygen and the temperature in the solar source for two energy channels 0.113–0.160  MeV nucleon-1 and 0.160–0.226 MeV nucleon-1. Only two ratios show a clear relation to the temperature in the 3He-rich SEP source, 4He/O and S/O. The 4He/O shows a relatively high positive (0.46 and 0.57) and S/O a moderate negative (-0.44 and -0.48) correlation with the temperature. Both these correlations have high statistical significance (p\leq0.05). There is a weak negative correlation for N/O and Si/O, albeit with a low significance. The C/O is inconclusive, showing no correlation for the higher energy channel and a weak negative trend for the lower energy channel. All other ratios (Ne/O, Mg/O, Ca/O, Fe/O) show no correlation with temperature.

DiFabio et al. (2008) have reported a positive, moderate correlation (with a coefficient 0.46) between 0.24 MeV nucleon-1 Fe/O ratio and 0.062–0.110 MeV nucleon-1 Fe charge states (QQ\sim11–16) for a sample of 14 3He-rich SEP events. The authors pointed out that it is puzzling why the Fe/O ratio becomes larger towards the fully-stripped conditions (Q/MQ/M\sim0.5). Möbius et al. (2000) have also found an increase of Fe/O (0.58–2.3 MeV nucleon-1) ratio with Fe charge state (0.18–0.43 MeV nucleon-1) for seven 3He-rich SEP events. The authors conclude that such correlation currently has no satisfactory explanation. The reported correlations are inconsistent with our results. If we replace (not shown) in Figure 5 the temperature with the computed Fe charge states (QQ\sim11–16 for the range of observed temperatures), the correlation between the Fe/O ratio and Fe charge state remains zero.

3.4 Abundance enhancement factor

Figure 6(left) plots the abundance enhancement factor (X/O)/(X/O)coronal of element X for the 3He-rich SEP events at 0.320–0.453 MeV nucleon-1 versus mass. The enhancement factor is calculated from the unweighted average abundances divided by the mean coronal abundances taken from Reames (1995) and Reames (2019) as measured by 5–12 MeV nucleon-1 gradual SEP events. All abundances are normalized to oxygen. For comparison, shown are the values from Mason et al. (2004) survey of 20 3He-rich SEP events that are in the same energy bin and the reference coronal abundances from Reames (1995).

Refer to caption
Figure 7: A Q/MQ/M ratio (left panel) and an enhancement factor at 0.160–0.226 MeV nucleon-1 (γ=\gamma=-3.53) for a selected element X (right panel) vs. temperature TT as calculated at ionization equilibrium. Measured enhancements (filled circles) are plotted at 2.2 MK. The two vertical dotted lines mark the range of temperatures obtained for the examined 3He-rich sources.

A noticeable feature is that the survey presented here shows a higher enhancement factor for all elements with the highest deviation for 4He and 32S. Furthermore, the average (0.95±\pm0.31) and median (0.42) values of 3He/4He ratio at 0.320–0.453 MeV nucleon-1 are more than an order of magnitude higher than values reported by Mason et al. (2004). A probable reason for such discrepancies is in the selection of the events. Mason et al. (2004) have focused on 3He-rich flares with measurable ultra-heavy ions (78–220 AMU). It raises the question of whether 3He-rich SEPs with ultra-heavy populations present a specific subclass of the events. Contrary to Mason et al. (2004), 32S, 40Ca, 56Fe, are not ordered by the mass but show similar abundance enhancement. The same has been reported by Reames (1995) for Ca, Fe. Note that the Q/MQ/M dependence could be much more complicated than a monotonically changing function (Dwyer et al., 2001). Mason et al. (2016) have reported 16 3He-rich SEP events with an enhanced S/O ratio from the period 1999–2015. This study includes six of these events (six out of seven in the solar cycle 24), while the Mason et al. (2004) study involves only one such event. It is an obvious reason for the difference in S/O enhancement between the two surveys. The high values of 4He/O ratio (from \sim133 to \sim433 at 0.320–0.453 MeV nucleon-1) have been reported previously in four 3He-rich SEP events from nearly quiet Sun in 2007–2008 (Mason et al., 2009). The average 4He/O of this study in the same energy range is 147±\pm22 which is a factor of 2.7 higher than the value reported by Mason et al. (2004).

Figure 6(right) plots the abundance enhancement factor at energy ranges 0.160–0.226 MeV nucleon-1 and 0.320–0.453 MeV nucleon-1, using the reference coronal abundances from the latest compilation reported by Reames (2019), versus Q/MQ/M ratio, using charge states calculated for the equilibrium plasma at 2.2 MK, the median temperature for the examined 3He-rich SEP sources. To compute the charge states, we use the CHIANTI ionization equilibrium tables that are a compilation of the ionization fractions from different works (e.g., Arnaud & Rothenflug, 1985; Arnaud & Raymond, 1992; Mazzotta et al., 1998). A power-law (Q/MQ/M)γ fit to data points is shown and has a slope γ=\gamma=-3.53 for 0.160–0.226 MeV nucleon-1 and γ=\gamma=-3.31 for 0.320–0.453 MeV nucleon-1. The value of γ\gamma at 0.320–0.453 MeV nucleon-1 is in excellent agreement with the slope (γ=\gamma=-3.26) reported earlier by Mason et al. (2004), where Q/MQ/M ratios are calculated for 3.2 MK equilibrium plasma and the fit includes ultra-heavy species. A similar value of a power-law index γ=\gamma=-3.64 at 3–10 MeV nucleon-1 has been reported by Reames et al. (2014a), exploring 111 Fe-rich impulsive events.

To understand the variations of abundance ratios with temperature in Figure 5, we examine the enhancement factor (e.g., Cohen et al., 1999b) as a function of temperature (Mason et al., 2004). It can be obtained from Figure 6(right) that the enhancement factor for element X is [(Q/MQ/M)X/(Q/MQ/M)O]γ with O as a baseline element. Figure 7(left) shows the calculated equilibrium Q/MQ/M ratios as a function of temperature for selected elements using the CHIANTI atomic database. Note that for a particular element, the QQ is the mean charge state computed using the probabilities of all possible charge states at a given temperature. The Q/MQ/M ratio profiles in Figure 7(left) were used to calculate the enhancement factor relative to O. Figure 7(right) plots the calculated enhancement factor over a range of temperatures for 0.160–0.226 MeV nucleon-1 using power-law index γ=\gamma=-3.53. The measured enhancements in the energy range 0.160–0.226 MeV nucleon-1 are plotted at 2.2 MK. The largest deviation between predicted and measured enhancements are for S, Si, and 4He with factors of 5.0, 3.2, and 3.0, respectively. All other elements (C, N, Ne, Mg, Ca, Fe) show reasonable agreement with the deviations ranging between 1.5 to 2.3. Note that over the inferred temperature range also 4He and Si show reasonable agreement. Mason et al. (2004) have reported a better agreement where the largest deviations have a factor of 1.7.

Figure 7(right) demonstrates that the calculated enhancement factor for Fe, Ca, Si, Ne, and N has a complex profile with both decreasing and increasing parts in the temperature range of this survey. For example, Fe may have the same enhancements at 2.1 MK and 4.5 MK; or Si at 1.5 MK and 4.5 MK. It suggests that no simple trend may exist between the abundances of these elements (when normalized to oxygen) and the temperature. Indeed, the measurements in Figure 5 reveal no correlation for Fe/O, Ca/O, Ne/O, or the correlation is not statistically significant for N/O, Si/O. The statistically significant, moderate anti-correlation for S/O appears to be consistent with the monotonously decreasing profile of the enhancement factor computed for S. Note that the survey averaged enhancement for S shows the largest deviation from the predicted value. This is likely a consequence of the extreme S-enrichment which might not follow a simple (Q/MQ/M)γ-dependent pattern (see Figure 6(right)). The calculated enhancement factor for He, C, and Mg shows a relatively simple increase in the measured temperature range, predicting a positive trend with temperature. For He, the calculated enhancement factor equals the ratio with a constant numerator (Q/MQ/M)He and increasing denominator (Q/MQ/M)O (see Figure 7(left)) where the ratio has a negative exponent γ\gamma. This leads to an increase in calculated He enhancement shown in Figure 7(right). The measurements in Figure 5 show that only 4He/O has a significant positive correlation with temperature, C/O, and Mg/O do not.

4 Discussion

The remote-sensing approach with EUV observations performed for 3He-rich SEP sources at the time of type-III radio bursts provides a temperature range of 1.4–4.5 MK with a median of 2.2 MK. This value is in good agreement with a median temperature of 2.1 MK derived from in-situ Fe ion charge states at 0.062–0.110 MeV nucleon-1 (DiFabio et al., 2008). This agreement, on the other hand, implies that 3He-rich SEPs in this survey may be accelerated very close to the type-III radio burst onset times. Our temperature range is also consistent with the temperature of the source plasma (2.5–3.2 MK) that is accelerated in 3He-rich SEP events as deduced from the abundance measurements in 3–5 MeV nucleon-1 (Reames et al., 2014a, 2015).

We found a significant negative correlation between the 3He/4He ratio and the temperature in 3He-rich sources that may be associated with the strong link between the temperature and X-ray (EUV) peak flux. It is consistent with earlier work that has shown that 1.3–1.6 MeV nucleon-1 3He/4He (Reames et al., 1988) as well as 1–10 MeV nucleon-1 ultra-heavy ion enhancement (Reames & Ng, 2004) anti-correlates with soft X-ray peak intensity. The authors argued that in small flares, much of the energy is absorbed by the rare 3He and ultra-heavy elements, while in large flares, there is enough energy for the acceleration of more abundant elements, decreasing the relative abundances of the rare species. Remarkably, the negative trend between 3He/4He and the temperature found here does not show up at higher temperatures (>>10 MK) as reported by Reames et al. (1988). Liu et al. (2006) have reported a decrease of the 3He/4He ratio with increasing background plasma temperature as a result of thermal damping of waves that accelerate 4He. In their model (Figure 9, left in Liu et al., 2006), the 3He/4He ratio decrease slows down at higher temperatures and almost stops at >>10 MK. Thus, the negative correlation at low temperatures found in this study and zero correlation at high temperatures reported by Reames et al. (1988) may well correspond with this model.

The abundances of heavier elements, relative to oxygen, generally behave with the temperature as expected from the calculated enhancement factor using equilibrium charge states. The two elements, C and Mg, are an exception. Their relative abundances show no relation with temperature, although the computed enhancement factor suggests a positive trend. The C and Mg, together with 4He, are the elements with the smallest or no change in Q/MQ/M in the measured temperature range (see Figure 7(left)). However, this probably does not explain the missing temperature dependence for the relative abundances of C and Mg as 4He shows the strongest one. We may speculate that the processes (other than charge-changing) that cause a negative correlation for the 3He/4He ratio might eliminate the presumed positive correlation for C/O and Mg/O. Specifically, the effect of the size of the flare on less abundant C and Mg in comparison to O would cause the C/O and Mg/O to decrease with the temperature. The same effect would cause 4He/O to increase with temperature.

The choice of the time and location for the temperature determination may introduce uncertainty to the relationship between the temperature and ion abundances. It is unknown at what time ions are accelerated in 3He-rich SEP events. It is believed that it is in the impulsive phase of solar flares along with non-relativistic (\sim10–100 keV) electrons (Reames et al., 1985; Wang et al., 2012). Timing analysis of these small events would not be helpful due to significant errors in estimations of ion solar release time that can be tens of minutes (Mason et al., 2000; Wang et al., 2016). Furthermore, energetic ions in 3He-rich SEP events do not show optical signatures as energetic electrons that could narrow down the time of the ion acceleration. Also, it is not well-known at what particular place at the flare sites ions are accelerated (jet spire or foot-points). If particles are accelerated at the cooler jet spire, it is probably a larger area, involving the hotter foot-point region, that affects the ion charge states. Some recent works have investigated the temperature of jets associated with type-III radio bursts (Chen et al., 2013; Mulay et al., 2016, 2019). Mulay et al. (2016) have examined 20 AR jets and reported the temperature of the jet spire in the range of 1.6–2.0 MK. In a study of one AR jet, Mulay et al. (2019) found a similar low temperature of 2 MK at the spire and 5–8 MK hot plasma at the foot-point region. Chen et al. (2013) have examined the temporal evolution of the temperature in one jet. The authors have reported 7 MK hot foot-points and cooler (1.3–2.5 MK) jet spire at type III-radio burst onset. The temperature distribution in this survey peaks at slightly higher temperatures (2.0–2.5 MK) compared to the temperatures in the jet spire reported by Chen et al. (2013) and Mulay et al. (2016).

We confirm steep power-law dependence of abundance enhancement factor on Q/MQ/M for heavy-ion species (4He–Fe) as previously reported by Mason et al. (2004) and Reames et al. (2014a). The slope of the power-law dependence is in good agreement with these studies that involve ultra-heavy elements. The trend seen in the abundance enhancement factor is consistent with the most recent models on heavy ion acceleration by cyclotron resonance, showing that the efficiency of acceleration increases inversely with the Q/MQ/M (Kumar et al., 2017; Fu et al., 2020). In the model of ion scattering on reconnecting magnetic islands (Drake et al., 2009), the heavy-ion production rate can be expressed as a power-law in Q/MQ/M.

5 Conclusions

We have examined 24 3He-rich SEP events and for the first time (i) determined temperature in the event associated source flare using EUV imaging observations and (ii) analyzed the relationship between the suprathermal ion abundances and the EUV temperature. A similar analysis for >>1 MeV nucleon-1 ions was performed more than 30 years ago with temperature inferred from the soft X-ray observations of the whole solar disk. The study presented here shows

  1. 1.

    a remarkably good agreement between temperature inferred from EUV images and the temperature obtained from ion charge states and abundance measurements,

  2. 2.

    a negative correlation between 3He/4He ratio and the source temperature that is apparently caused by non-charge changing mechanisms,

  3. 3.

    the behavior of the elemental ratios 4He/O, N/O, Ne/O, Si/O, S/O, Ca/O, Fe/O with the source temperature as expected from the calculated enhancement factor assuming ionization equilibrium.

Work at SwRI was supported by NASA grants 80NSSC19K0079 and 80NSSC20K1255, and at JHU/APL by NASA grant NNX17AC05G/125225. This study benefits from discussions within the International Space Science Institute (ISSI) Team ID 425 ‘Origins of 3He-rich SEPs’. CHIANTI is a collaborative project involving George Mason University, the University of Michigan (USA), University of Cambridge (UK), and NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (USA). AIA data are courtesy of SDO (NASA) and the AIA consortium. The authors thank the open data policy of the WAVES/Wind instrument team. The GOES 14–15 X-ray data are produced in real time by the NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center (SWPC) and are distributed by the NOAA National Geophysical Data Center (NGDC).

References

  • Arnaud & Raymond (1992) Arnaud, M., & Raymond, J. 1992, ApJ, 398, 394, doi: 10.1086/171864
  • Arnaud & Rothenflug (1985) Arnaud, M., & Rothenflug, R. 1985, A&AS, 60, 425
  • Bornmann et al. (1996) Bornmann, P. L., Speich, D., Hirman, J., et al. 1996, in GOES-8 and Beyond, ed. E. R. Washwell, Vol. 2812, International Society for Optics and Photonics (SPIE), 291 – 298, doi: 10.1117/12.254076
  • Bougeret et al. (1995) Bougeret, J. L., Kaiser, M. L., Kellogg, P. J., et al. 1995, Space Sci. Rev., 71, 231, doi: 10.1007/BF00751331
  • Bučík (2020) Bučík, R. 2020, Space Sci. Rev., 216, 24, doi: 10.1007/s11214-020-00650-5
  • Bučík et al. (2014) Bučík, R., Innes, D. E., Mall, U., et al. 2014, Astrophys. J., 786, 71, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/786/1/71
  • Bučík et al. (2016) Bučík, R., Innes, D. E., Mason, G. M., & Wiedenbeck, M. E. 2016, Astrophys. J., 833, 63, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/833/1/63
  • Bučík et al. (2018a) Bučík, R., Innes, D. E., Mason, G. M., et al. 2018a, Astrophys. J., 852, 76, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa9d8f
  • Bučík et al. (2018b) Bučík, R., Wiedenbeck, M. E., Mason, G. M., et al. 2018b, Astrophys. J. Lett., 869, L21, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aaf37f
  • Chen et al. (2013) Chen, N., Ip, W.-H., & Innes, D. 2013, ApJ, 769, 96, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/769/2/96
  • Chen et al. (2015) Chen, N.-H., Bučík, R., Innes, D. E., & Mason, G. M. 2015, Astron. Astrophys., 580, A16, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201525618
  • Cheung et al. (2015) Cheung, M. C. M., Boerner, P., Schrijver, C. J., et al. 2015, ApJ, 807, 143, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/807/2/143
  • Cohen et al. (1999a) Cohen, C. M. S., Mewaldt, R. A., Leske, R. A., et al. 1999a, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 2697, doi: 10.1029/1999GL900560
  • Cohen et al. (1999b) Cohen, C. M. S., Cummings, A. C., Leske, R. A., et al. 1999b, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 149, doi: 10.1029/1998GL900218
  • Dere et al. (2019) Dere, K. P., Del Zanna, G., Young, P. R., Landi, E., & Sutherland, R. S. 2019, ApJS, 241, 22, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab05cf
  • DiFabio et al. (2008) DiFabio, R., Guo, Z., Möbius, E., et al. 2008, Astrophys. J., 687, 623, doi: 10.1086/591833
  • Drake et al. (2009) Drake, J. F., Cassak, P. A., Shay, M. A., Swisdak, M., & Quataert, E. 2009, Astrophys. J. Lett., 700, L16, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/700/1/L16
  • Dwyer et al. (2001) Dwyer, J. R., Mason, G. M., Mazur, J. E., et al. 2001, ApJ, 563, 403, doi: 10.1086/323692
  • Feldman (1992) Feldman, U. 1992, Phys. Scr, 46, 202, doi: 10.1088/0031-8949/46/3/002
  • Fu et al. (2020) Fu, X., Guo, F., Li, H., & Li, X. 2020, ApJ, 890, 161, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab6d68
  • Gloeckler & Geiss (1998) Gloeckler, G., & Geiss, J. 1998, Space Sci. Rev., 84, 275
  • Grevesse & Sauval (1998) Grevesse, N., & Sauval, A. J. 1998, Space Sci. Rev., 85, 161, doi: 10.1023/A:1005161325181
  • Innes et al. (2016) Innes, D. E., Bučík, R., Guo, L. J., & Nitta, N. 2016, Astron. Nachr., 337, 1024, doi: 10.1002/asna.201612428
  • Kartavykh et al. (2008) Kartavykh, Y. Y., Dröge, W., Klecker, B., et al. 2008, Astrophys. J., 681, 1653, doi: 10.1086/588649
  • Kartavykh et al. (2020) Kartavykh, Y. Y., Dröge, W., Klecker, B., Kovaltsov, G. A., & Ostryakov, V. M. 2020, Astrophys. J., 888, 48, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab584e
  • Klecker et al. (2007) Klecker, B., Möbius, E., & Popecki, M. A. 2007, Space Sci. Rev., 130, 273, doi: 10.1007/s11214-007-9207-1
  • Kocharov et al. (2000) Kocharov, L., Kovaltsov, G. A., Torsti, J., & Ostryakov, V. M. 2000, Astron. Astrophys., 357, 716
  • Kocharov & Kocharov (1984) Kocharov, L. G., & Kocharov, G. E. 1984, Space Sci. Rev., 38, 89, doi: 10.1007/BF00180337
  • Kovaltsov et al. (2001) Kovaltsov, G. A., Barghouty, A. F., Kocharov, L., Ostryakov, V. M., & Torsti, J. 2001, Astron. Astrophys., 375, 1075, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20010877
  • Krucker et al. (1999) Krucker, S., Larson, D. E., Lin, R. P., & Thompson, B. J. 1999, ApJ, 519, 864, doi: 10.1086/307415
  • Kumar et al. (2017) Kumar, R., Eichler, D., Gaspari, M., & Spitkovsky, A. 2017, Astrophys. J., 835, 295, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/835/2/295
  • Landi et al. (2002) Landi, E., Feldman, U., & Dere, K. P. 2002, ApJS, 139, 281, doi: 10.1086/337949
  • Lemen et al. (2012) Lemen, J. R., Title, A. M., Akin, D. J., et al. 2012, Sol. Phys., 275, 17, doi: 10.1007/s11207-011-9776-8
  • Liu et al. (2006) Liu, S., Petrosian, V., & Mason, G. M. 2006, Astrophys. J., 636, 462, doi: 10.1086/497883
  • Luhn et al. (1987) Luhn, A., Klecker, B., Hovestadt, D., & Moebius, E. 1987, ApJ, 317, 951, doi: 10.1086/165343
  • Mann et al. (1999) Mann, G., Jansen, F., MacDowall, R. J., Kaiser, M. L., & Stone, R. G. 1999, A&A, 348, 614
  • Mason (2007) Mason, G. M. 2007, Space Sci. Rev., 130, 231, doi: 10.1007/s11214-007-9156-8
  • Mason et al. (2000) Mason, G. M., Dwyer, J. R., & Mazur, J. E. 2000, Astrophys. J. Lett., 545, L157, doi: 10.1086/317886
  • Mason & Klecker (2018) Mason, G. M., & Klecker, B. 2018, Astrophys. J., 862, 7, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aac94c
  • Mason et al. (2002) Mason, G. M., Mazur, J. E., & Dwyer, J. R. 2002, Astrophys. J. Lett., 565, L51, doi: 10.1086/339135
  • Mason et al. (2004) Mason, G. M., Mazur, J. E., Dwyer, J. R., et al. 2004, Astrophys. J., 606, 555, doi: 10.1086/382864
  • Mason et al. (1994) Mason, G. M., Mazur, J. E., & Halmilton, D. C. 1994, ApJ, 425, 843, doi: 10.1086/174029
  • Mason et al. (2009) Mason, G. M., Nitta, N. V., Cohen, C. M. S., & Wiedenbeck, M. E. 2009, Astrophys. J. Lett., 700, L56, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/700/1/L56
  • Mason et al. (2016) Mason, G. M., Nitta, N. V., Wiedenbeck, M. E., & Innes, D. E. 2016, Astrophys. J., 823, 138, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/823/2/138
  • Mason et al. (1998) Mason, G. M., Gold, R. E., Krimigis, S. M., et al. 1998, Space Sci. Rev., 86, 409, doi: 10.1023/A:1005079930780
  • Mazzotta et al. (1998) Mazzotta, P., Mazzitelli, G., Colafrancesco, S., & Vittorio, N. 1998, A&AS, 133, 403, doi: 10.1051/aas:1998330
  • Miller (1998) Miller, J. A. 1998, Space Sci. Rev., 86, 79, doi: 10.1023/A:1005066209536
  • Möbius et al. (2000) Möbius, E., Klecker, B., Popecki, M. A., et al. 2000, in American Institute of Physics Conference Series, Vol. 528, Acceleration and Transport of Energetic Particles Observed in the Heliosphere, ed. R. A. Mewaldt, J. R. Jokipii, M. A. Lee, E. Möbius, & T. H. Zurbuchen, 131–134, doi: 10.1063/1.1324296
  • Morgan & Druckmüller (2014) Morgan, H., & Druckmüller, M. 2014, Sol. Phys., 289, 2945, doi: 10.1007/s11207-014-0523-9
  • Mulay et al. (2019) Mulay, S. M., Sharma, R., Valori, G., et al. 2019, A&A, 632, A108, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936369
  • Mulay et al. (2016) Mulay, S. M., Tripathi, D., Del Zanna, G., & Mason, H. 2016, A&A, 589, A79, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527473
  • Nitta et al. (2015) Nitta, N. V., Mason, G. M., Wang, L., Cohen, C. M. S., & Wiedenbeck, M. E. 2015, Astrophys. J., 806, 235, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/806/2/235
  • Nitta et al. (2006) Nitta, N. V., Reames, D. V., De Rosa, M. L., et al. 2006, Astrophys. J., 650, 438, doi: 10.1086/507442
  • Pesnell et al. (2012) Pesnell, W. D., Thompson, B. J., & Chamberlin, P. C. 2012, Sol. Phys., 275, 3, doi: 10.1007/s11207-011-9841-3
  • Reames (2019) Reames. 2019, Atoms, 7, 104, doi: 10.3390/atoms7040104
  • Reames (1988) Reames, D. V. 1988, Astrophys. J. Lett., 325, L53, doi: 10.1086/185109
  • Reames (1990) —. 1990, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser., 73, 235, doi: 10.1086/191456
  • Reames (1995) —. 1995, Advances in Space Research, 15, 41
  • Reames (2002) —. 2002, Astrophys. J. Lett., 571, L63, doi: 10.1086/341149
  • Reames (2013) —. 2013, Space Sci. Rev., 175, 53, doi: 10.1007/s11214-013-9958-9
  • Reames (2017) —. 2017, Solar Energetic Particles, Vol. 932 (Springer, Berlin), doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-50871-9
  • Reames (2018) —. 2018, Space Sci. Rev., 214, 61, doi: 10.1007/s11214-018-0495-4
  • Reames et al. (2014a) Reames, D. V., Cliver, E. W., & Kahler, S. W. 2014a, Sol. Phys., 289, 3817, doi: 10.1007/s11207-014-0547-1
  • Reames et al. (2014b) —. 2014b, Sol. Phys., 289, 4675, doi: 10.1007/s11207-014-0589-4
  • Reames et al. (2015) —. 2015, Sol. Phys., 290, 1761, doi: 10.1007/s11207-015-0711-2
  • Reames et al. (1988) Reames, D. V., Dennis, B. R., Stone, R. G., & Lin, R. P. 1988, Astrophys. J., 327, 998, doi: 10.1086/166257
  • Reames et al. (1994) Reames, D. V., Meyer, J. P., & von Rosenvinge, T. T. 1994, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser., 90, 649, doi: 10.1086/191887
  • Reames & Ng (2004) Reames, D. V., & Ng, C. K. 2004, Astrophys. J., 610, 510, doi: 10.1086/421518
  • Reames & Stone (1986) Reames, D. V., & Stone, R. G. 1986, Astrophys. J., 308, 902, doi: 10.1086/164560
  • Reames et al. (1985) Reames, D. V., von Rosenvinge, T. T., & Lin, R. P. 1985, Astrophys. J., 292, 716, doi: 10.1086/163203
  • Roth & Temerin (1997) Roth, I., & Temerin, M. 1997, ApJ, 477, 940, doi: 10.1086/303731
  • Stone et al. (1998) Stone, E. C., Frandsen, A. M., Mewaldt, R. A., et al. 1998, Space Sci. Rev., 86, 1, doi: 10.1023/A:1005082526237
  • Temerin & Roth (1992) Temerin, M., & Roth, I. 1992, Astrophys. J. Lett., 391, L105, doi: 10.1086/186408
  • Wang et al. (2016) Wang, L., Krucker, S., Mason, G. M., Lin, R. P., & Li, G. 2016, Astron. Astrophys., 585, A119, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527270
  • Wang et al. (2012) Wang, L., Lin, R. P., Krucker, S., & Mason, G. M. 2012, Astrophys. J., 759, 69, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/759/1/69
  • Wang et al. (2006) Wang, Y. M., Pick, M., & Mason, G. M. 2006, Astrophys. J., 639, 495, doi: 10.1086/499355
  • Wiedenbeck et al. (2010) Wiedenbeck, M. E., Cohen, C. M. S., Leske, R. A., et al. 2010, ApJ, 719, 1212, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/719/2/1212