This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Symmetric quandle colorings and ribbon concordance

Nicholas Cazet
Abstract.

A quandle can always trivially color an orientable surface-link. This note shows that the surface-link 1011,110_{1}^{-1,-1} of Yoshikawa’s table cannot be colored by a symmetric dihedral quandle of order 4, and explains how this obstructs a generalized ribbon concordance between another link of two projective planes 811,18_{1}^{-1,-1} that does admit a coloring by the same symmetric dihedral quandle.

Section 1 gives preliminary definitions, Section 2 describes how to color ch-diagrams with symmetric quandles, and Section 3 uses symmetric quandle coloring to obstruct the existence of a ribbon concordance between the surface-links 811,18_{1}^{-1,-1} and 1011,110_{1}^{-1,-1} from Yoshikawa’s table [ch] and discusses how the symmetric 3-cocycle invariant can make a similar obstruction.

Refer to caption
Figure 1. Cross-cap broken sheet diagrams of the 2 unknotted projective planes.

1. preliminaries

A surface-link is a closed surface smoothly embedded in 4\mathbb{R}^{4} up to ambient isotopy. A surface-knot is a connected surface-link. A 2-knot is a surface-knot diffeomorphic to S2S^{2}. A surface-knot is unknotted if it bounds a handlebody or is the connected sum of some number of unknotted projective planes. Broken sheet diagrams of the two unknotted projective planes, distinguished by their self-intersection numbers or normal Euler numbers, are shown in Figure 1.

Refer to caption
Figure 2. Connected sum with an unknotted projective plane G#PG^{\prime}\#P.

Let F0F_{0} and F1F_{1} be surface-links with components of the same genus and orientability. If there is a concordance CC (F0×[0,1]F1×[0,1])(\cong F_{0}\times[0,1]\cong F_{1}\times[0,1]) in S4×[0,1]S^{4}\times[0,1] between F1S4×{1}F_{1}\subset S^{4}\times\{1\} and F0S4×{0}F_{0}\subset S^{4}\times\{0\} such that the restriction to CC of the projection S4×[0,1][0,1]S^{4}\times[0,1]\to[0,1] is a Morse function with critical points of index 0 and 1 only, then F1F_{1} is ribbon concordant to F0F_{0} denoted

F1F0.F_{1}\geq F_{0}.

If F1F0F_{1}\geq F_{0}, then there is a set of nn 1-handles on a split union of F0F_{0} and nn trivial 2-knots such that F1F_{1} is obtained by surgeries along these handles. Gordon originally introduced ribbon concordance between classical knots in [gordonribbon].

2. Coloring ch-diagrams

A singular link diagram is an immersed link diagram in the plane with crossings and traverse double points called vertices. At each vertex assign a marker, a local choice of two non-adjacent regions in the complement of the vertex. Such a marked singular link diagram is called a ch-diagram [CKS, kamada2017surface, kamadakim, ch]. One of the two smoothings of a vertex connects the two regions of the marker, the positive resolution L+L^{+}, and one separates the marker’s regions, the negative resolution LL^{-}, see Figure 3. If LL^{-} and L+L^{+} are unlinks, then the ch-diagram is said to be admissible. Admissible ch-diagrams represent surface-links and induce broken sheet diagrams and every surface-link defines an admissible ch-diagram.

\begin{overpic}[unit=.46mm,scale={.6}]{smoothing2.pdf}\put(37.0,-2.0){$L^{-}$}\put(233.0,-2.0){$L^{+}$} \par\end{overpic}
Figure 3. Smoothings of a marked vertex.

Including the 3 Reidemeister moves of classical link diagrams, there are 8 moves on ch-diagrams called Yoshikawa moves [ch, kamada2017surface]. Two admissible ch-diagrams represent equivalent surface-links if and only if they are Yoshikawa move equivalent. The ch-index of a ch-diagram is the number of marked vertices plus the number of crossings. The ch-index of a surface-link FF, denoted ch(FF), is the minimum of ch-indices ch(D)(D) among all admissible ch-diagrams DD representing FF. A sufrace-link FF is said to be weakly prime if FF is not the connected sum of any two surfaces F1F_{1} and F2F_{2} such that ch(Fi)(F_{i}) << ch(F)(F). Yoshikawa classified weakly prime surface-links whose ch-index is 10 or less in [ch]. He generated a table of their representative ch-diagrams up to orientation and mirror. His notation is of the form Ikg1,,gcI_{k}^{g_{1},\dots,g_{c}} where II is the surface-link’s ch-index and |g1|,,|gc||g_{1}|,\dots,|g_{c}| are the genera of its components with gi<0g_{i}<0 implying the component is non-orientable.

\begin{overpic}[unit=.35mm,scale={.8}]{notcolor.pdf}\put(203.0,81.0){$b$}\put(200.0,22.0){$a$}\put(164.0,56.0){$c$}\put(248.0,58.0){*}\put(150.0,43.0){*} \end{overpic}
Figure 4. Ch-diagrams of 811,18_{1}^{-1,-1} and 1011,110_{1}^{-1,-1}.

There is a translation of Reidemeister moves in a motion picture to sheets in a broken sheet diagram. Associate the time parameter of a Reidemeister move with the height of a local broken sheet diagram. A Reidemeister III move gives a triple point diagram, a Reidemeister I move corresponds to a branch point, and a Reidemeister II move corresponds to a maximum or minimum of a double point curve, see [kamadakim]. Triple points of the induced broken sheet diagram are in correspondence with the Reidemeister III moves in the motion picture. Include sheets containing saddles for each saddle point in the motion picture to generate a broken sheet diagram of the entire surface-link.

\begin{overpic}[unit=.5mm,scale={.6}]{saddles2.pdf} \par\end{overpic}
Figure 5. Induced saddle sheet.

Consider an admissible ch-diagram. There are finite sequences of Reidemeister moves that take LL^{-} and L+L^{+} to crossing-less diagrams OO^{-} and O+O^{+}. Translate these Reidemeister moves to a broken sheet diagram. In between the still of LL^{-} and L+L^{+} and for each marked vertex include sheets containing the saddles traced by transitioning from LL^{-} to L+L^{+} in the local picture of Figure 3. These saddles are pictured in Figure 5. Finally, cap-off OO^{-} and O+O^{+} with embedded disks to produce a broken sheet diagram.

An (X,ρ)(X,\rho)-coloring of a ch-diagram is a (X,ρ)(X,\rho)-coloring of the link diagram such that the arcs meeting at a vertex are given the same color and their two orientations related by a basic inversion are shown in Figure 6. There is a one-to-one correspondence between colorings of ch-diagram and the colorings of the surface-link it represents. The Reidemeister moves in the trivialization of LL^{-} and L+L^{+} uniquely extend the ch-diagram’s coloring to the induced broken sheet diagram. Kamada, Kim, and Leem give a detailed account of coloring ch-diagrams and calculating their symmetric quandle cocycle invariant in [kamadakim].

Refer to caption
Figure 6. Possible orientations at a marked vertex.

3. Symmetric quandles and ribbon concordance

Let D0D_{0} and D1D_{1} be broken sheet diagrams of the surface-knots F0F_{0} and F1F_{1}. Let i=1nSi\cup_{i=1}^{n}S_{i} be a disjoint union of broken sheet diagrams each representing an unknotted surface-knot. Suppose that D1D_{1} is obtained from D0(i=1nSi)D_{0}\cup(\cup_{i=1}^{n}S_{i}) by surgery along sufficiently thin 1-handles j=1mhj\cup_{j=1}^{m}h_{j} that intersect D0(i=1nSi)D_{0}\cup(\cup_{i=1}^{n}S_{i}) along meridian 2-disks of hjh_{j}. Then,

F1F0.F_{1}\succ F_{0}.

Figure 7 shows an example. When each SiS_{i} is an embedded sphere and each 1-handle hjh_{j} attaches D0D_{0} to SjS_{j} with n=mn=m, the relation \succ is ribbon concordance \geq.

\begin{overpic}[unit=.35mm,scale={.9}]{general2.pdf}\put(135.0,12.0){$D_{0}$}\put(94.0,30.0){$h_{1}$}\put(28.0,19.0){$S_{1}$}\put(365.0,29.0){$S_{2}$}\put(245.0,73.0){$h_{2}$}\put(305.0,40.0){$h_{3}$} \end{overpic}
Figure 7. Handle surgery on D0(i=12Si)D_{0}\cup(\cup_{i=1}^{2}S_{i}).
Proposition 3.1.

For any symmetric quandle (X,ρ)(X,\rho) and (X,ρ)(X,\rho)-set YY, if F1F0F_{1}\succ F_{0} then F1F_{1} is (X,ρ)Y(X,\rho)_{Y}-colorable only if F0F_{0} is (X,ρ)Y(X,\rho)_{Y}-colorable.

Proof.

Suppose that D1D_{1} is obtained from D0(i=1nSi)D_{0}\cup\left(\cup_{i=1}^{n}S_{i}\right) by surgeries along 1-handles j=1mhj\cup_{j=1}^{m}h_{j} that intersect D0D_{0} in meridional disks. A (X,ρ)Y(X,\rho)_{Y}-coloring of D1D_{1} restricts to a (X,ρ)X(X,\rho)_{X}-coloring of the punctured diagram cl(D0j=1mhj)cl(D_{0}-\cup_{j=1}^{m}h_{j}). The coloring of the punctured diagram uniquely extends to a (X,ρ)X(X,\rho)_{X}-coloring of D0D_{0}. ∎

Theorem 3.2.

811,11011,18_{1}^{-1,-1}\nsucc 10_{1}^{-1,-1}

Proof.

The symmetric quandle (R4,ρ)(R_{4},\rho) where ρ(0)=2\rho(0)=2 and ρ(1)=3\rho(1)=3 colors 811,18_{1}^{-1,-1}. Kamada and Oshiro used a non-trivial (R4,ρ)(R_{4},\rho)-coloring and a symmetric quandle cocycle to calculate the triple point number of 811,18_{1}^{-1,-1} and its generalizations [sym]. It will be shown that (R4,ρ)(R_{4},\rho) does not color 1011,110_{1}^{-1,-1}, the result then follows from Proposition 3.1.

Note the arbitrary colors a,b,cR4a,b,c\in R_{4} and orientations given to 1011,110_{1}^{-1,-1} in Figure 4. Two relations can be read from the starred crossings, ab=ρ(a)a^{b}=\rho(a) and bc=ρ(a)b^{c}=\rho(a). Using the definition of the quandle operation for R4R_{4}, ab=2ba=ρ(a)a^{b}=2b-a=\rho(a) and bc=2cb=ρ(a)b^{c}=2c-b=\rho(a). The first relation is equivalent to 2b=a+ρ(a)2b=a+\rho(a) which is either 0 or 2. If a=0a=0 or a=2a=2, then a+ρ(a)=2a+\rho(a)=2 and bb must be odd. If a=1a=1 or a=3a=3, then a+ρ(a)=0a+\rho(a)=0 and bb must be even. Therefore, the colors a,bR4a,b\in R_{4} cannot both be even or odd.

The second relation is equivalent to 2c=b+ρ(a)2c=b+\rho(a). The involution ρ\rho does not change the parity of the color. Therefore, b+ρ(a)b+\rho(a) must be odd since aa and bb differ in parity. This contradicts the evenness of b+ρ(a)b+\rho(a) from 2c=b+ρ(a)2c=b+\rho(a). Thus, no such a,b,cR4a,b,c\in R_{4} exist and (R4,ρ)(R_{4},\rho) cannot color 1011,110_{1}^{-1,-1}.

The symmetric quandle 3-cocycle invariant can also be used to obstruct ribbon concordance. For every symmetric quandle (X,ρ)(X,\rho) and (X,ρ)(X,\rho)-set YY there is an associated chain and cochain complex. Symmetric quandle 3-cocycles are cocycles of this cochain complex and represent cohomology classes of HQ,ρ3(X;A)YH^{3}_{Q,\rho}(X;A)_{Y} for any abelian group AA, see [carter2009symmetric, kamada2017surface, sym].

Let CC be an (X,ρ)Y(X,\rho)_{Y}-coloring of a broken sheet diagram DD. For a triple point tt of DD, choose 1 of the 8 3-dimensional complementary regions around tt and call the region specified. There are 12 semi-sheets around a triple point. Let SBS_{B}, SMS_{M}, and STS_{T} be the 3 of them that face the specified region, where SBS_{B}, SMS_{M}, and STS_{T} are semi-sheets of the bottom, middle, and top sheet respectively. Let nBn_{B}, nMn_{M}, and nTn_{T} be the normal orientations of SBS_{B}, SMS_{M}, and STS_{T}. Through basic inversions, it is assumed that each normal orientation points away from the specified region. Let x1,x2,x_{1},x_{2}, and x3x_{3} be the elements of XX assigned to the semi-sheets SBS_{B}, SMS_{M}, and STS_{T} whose normal orientations nBn_{B}, nMn_{M}, and nTn_{T} point away from the specified region. Additionally, let yy be the color of the specified region. The color of the triple point tt is Ct=(y,x1,x2,x3).C_{t}=(y,x_{1},x_{2},x_{3}).

\begin{overpic}[unit=.35mm,scale={.35}]{triplepointorientation.pdf}\put(82.0,82.5){$x_{1}$} \put(55.0,77.0){$x_{2}$} \put(73.0,55.0){$x_{3}$}\put(65.0,58.0){*} \end{overpic}
Figure 8. A positive, colored triple point.

Let ϕ:(Y×X3)A\phi:\mathbb{Z}(Y\times X^{3})\to A be a symmetric quandle 3-cocycle of (X,ρ)Y(X,\rho)_{Y} with coefficients in AA. For a (X,ρ)Y(X,\rho)_{Y}-coloring CC, the ϕ𝑤𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡{\it\phi-weight} of the triple point tt is defined by εϕ(y,x1,x2,x3)\varepsilon\phi(y,x_{1},x_{2},x_{3}) such that ε\varepsilon is +1 (or -1) if the triple of the normal orientations (nT,nM,nB)(n_{T},n_{M},n_{B}) is (or is not) coherent with the orientation of S34S^{3}\subset\mathbb{R}^{4} at the triple point and is denoted Wϕ(t;C)W_{\phi}(t;C). The triple point of Figure 8 is positive. The ϕ𝑤𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡{\it\phi-weight} of a diagram DD with respect to a symmetric quandle coloring CC is

Wϕ(D;C)=τWϕ(t;C)A,W_{\phi}(D;C)=\sum_{\tau}W_{\phi}(t;C)\in A,

where tt runs over all triple points of DD. The value Wϕ(D;C)W_{\phi}(D;C) is an invariant of an (X,ρ)Y(X,\rho)_{Y}-colored surface-link (F,C)(F,C) [sym, oshiro]. Denote Wϕ(D;C)W_{\phi}(D;C) by Wϕ(F;C)W_{\phi}(F;C).

The symmetric quandle cocycle invariant of a broken sheet diagram DD representing a surface-link FF is the multi-set

Φϕ(D)={Wϕ(D;C):CCol(X,ρ)X(D)}.\Phi_{\phi}(D)=\{W_{\phi}(D;C):C\in\text{Col}_{(X,\rho)_{X}}(D)\}.

The multi-set Φϕ(D)\Phi_{\phi}(D) is an invariant of the (X,ρ)Y(X,\rho)_{Y}-colored surface-link FF [sym]. Since the invariant is independent of broken sheet representative, denote Φϕ(D)\Phi_{\phi}(D) by Φϕ(F)\Phi_{\phi}(F).

Theorem 3.3.

If F1F0F_{1}\succ F_{0}, then Φϕ(F1)mΦϕ(F0)\Phi_{\phi}(F_{1})\stackrel{{\scriptstyle m}}{{\subset}}\Phi_{\phi}(F_{0}) for any symmetric quandle 3-cocycle ϕ\phi.

Proof.

For any element aΦϕ(F1)a\in\Phi_{\phi}(F_{1}), there is an (X,ρ)Y(X,\rho)_{Y}-coloring C1Col(X,ρ)(D1)C_{1}\in Col_{(X,\rho)}(D_{1}) with a=Wϕ(C1)=tWϕ(t;C1)a=W_{\phi}(C_{1})=\sum_{t}W_{\phi}(t;C_{1}) on D1D_{1}. Since the intersection of D0D_{0} and each 1-handle consists of small 2-disk, the (X,ρ)Y(X,\rho)_{Y}-coloring C1C_{1} restricted to the punctured diagram D0(j=1nhj)D_{0}-(\cup_{j=1}^{n}h_{j}) determines the (X,ρ)(X,\rho)-coloring of D0D_{0} uniquely, C0Col(X,ρ)(D0)C_{0}\in\text{Col}_{(X,\rho)}(D_{0}). Since the set of triple points of D1D_{1} is coincident with that of D0D_{0}, and since Wϕ(t;C0)=Wϕ(t;C1)W_{\phi}(t;C_{0})=W_{\phi}(t;C_{1}) for any triple point tt, a=tWϕ(t;C0)=Wϕ(D0;C0)Φϕ(D0).a=\sum_{t}W_{\phi}(t;C_{0})=W_{\phi}(D_{0};C_{0})\in\Phi_{\phi}(D_{0}).

The Kinoshita conjecture posits that all knotted projective planes have a trivial projective summand.

Remark 3.4.

If the Kinoshita conjecture is true, then a symmetric quandle whose good involution has no fixed points cannot color a projective plane.

Proof.

The cross-cap diagrams of the unkotted projective planes can only be monochromatically colored with a fixed point of the good involution. ∎

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Maggie Miller for helpful discussion and guidance.

References