Superconductivity in the nodal-line compound La3Pt3Bi4
Abstract
Owing to the specific topological states in nodal-line semimetals, novel topological superconductivity is expected to emerge in these systems. In this letter, by combination of the first-principles calculations and resistivity, susceptibility and specific heat measurements, we demonstrate that La3Pt3Bi4 is a topologically nontrivial nodal-ring semimetal protected by the gliding-mirror symmetry even in the presence of spin-orbit coupling. Meanwhile, we discover bulk superconductivity with a transition temperature of 1.1 K, and an upper critical field of 0.41 T. These findings demonstrate that La3Pt3Bi4 provides a material platform for studying novel superconductivity in the nodal-ring system.
pacs:
I INTRODUCTION
Searching for topological superconductors (TSCs) with Majorana fermions has been one of the hottest topics in contemporary condensed matter physics. The discovery of unconventional superconductivity Hor et al. (2010); Kawai et al. (2020); Yonezawa et al. (2017); Sasaki et al. (2011); Tao et al. (2018) in the Cu-intercalated Bi2Se3, a topological insulator, has initiated intense interest for TSCs. Although the -wave superconductivity is considered to be an intrinsic TSC, in which the core of the vortex contains a localized quasiparticle with exactly zero energy Qi and Zhang (2011), the properties of several experimental candidates remain debatable Mackenzie and Maeno (2003); Pustogow et al. (2019). TSCs can also be realized at the interface of a heterostructure between a strong topological insulator (TI) and an -wave superconductor due to the proximity effect Fu and Kane (2008); Williams et al. (2012); Wang et al. (2012); Yang et al. (2012), where the control of the chemical reaction and lattice mismatch at the interface remains challenging. The most promising candidates for TSCs are those in which fully-gapped bulk superconductivity coexists with topologically protected gapless surface/edge states, such as FeTe1-xSex Fang et al. (2008); Wang et al. (2015), -PdBi2 Sakano et al. (2015) and 2M-WS2 Fang et al. (2019). Recently, nodal-line materials have received significant attention Burkov et al. (2011); Weng et al. (2016); Bzdušek et al. (2016), because they are predicted to exhibit several notable phenomena, including long-ranged Coulomb interaction, large surface polarization charge, . Kim et al. (2015); Huh et al. (2016); Hirayama et al. (2017); Ramamurthy and Hughes (2017) In particular, if superconductivity is induced in nodal-line materials Bian et al. (2016) with torus-shaped Fermi surfaces (FSs) derived from nodal loops, then topological crystalline and second-order topological superconductivity can be realized Shapourian et al. (2018). Unfortunately, the nodal-line structure is difficult to realize in materials because it generally become gapped if the spin-orbit coupling (SOC) is considered Fang et al. (2015); Ali et al. (2014); Yamakage et al. (2016). So far, nodal-line materials are rarely reported in the presence of SOC Carter et al. (2012); Chen et al. (2015); Liang et al. (2016); Sun et al. (2017), let alone the superconductors with such nodal lines Bian et al. (2016); Ikeda et al. (2020).
Recently, a possible nontrivial band topology has been reported and enthusiastically discussed based on the strongly correlated Ce3(Pt1-xPdx)3Bi4 system Dzsaber et al. (2017); Cao et al. (2020), thereby resulting in renewed focus on the Ln3T3X4 compounds (Ln = lanthanoid element, T = Cu, Au, Rh, Pd, Pt and X = Sb, Bi) Palewski and Suski (2003). As a member of Ln3T3X4 family, La3Pt3Bi4 crystallizes in a cubic Y3Au3Sb4-type structure with space group (No. 220), which contains six gliding-mirror symmetry operations. To perform a comparison on the Kondo insulator Ce3Pt3Bi4, measurements of resistivity, magnetic susceptibility, and specific heat of La3Pt3Bi4 above 2 K were performed, and no superconductivity was reported Kwei et al. (1992); Hundley et al. (1990, 1993); Pietrus et al. (2008). In this letter, we employed the density functional theory (DFT) to investigate the electronic band structure and its band topological properties of La3Pt3Bi4. The results indicate that La3Pt3Bi4 is a topologically nontrivial nodal-ring semimetal. Meanwhile, by performing resistivity, magnetic susceptibility, and specific heat measurements, we discover that La3Pt3Bi4 crystals exhibit bulk superconductivity with a transition temperature 1.1 K and an upper critical field 0(0) 0.41 T. These findings demonstrate that La3Pt3Bi4 provides a material platform for studying novel superconductivity in the nodal-ring system.
II EXPERIMENTAL AND COMPUTATIONAL METHODS

La3Pt3Bi4 crystals were grown using the method described in Ref. Dzsaber et al. (2017), and the crystals with typical dimensions of 0.1 0.1 1 mm3 were obtained Pietrus et al. (2008), as shown in the inset of Fig. 1(b). Based on single crystal -ray diffraction (Rigaku Gemini A Ultra), the crystal structure was confirmed to be a cubic [see Fig. 1(a)], with lattice parameters = = = 10.175(5) Å, which agrees well with the results reported in Ref. Kwei et al. (1992). Energy-dispersive -ray spectroscopy measurements were performed using a Zeiss Supra 55 scanning electron microscope to verify the crystal composition of La:Pt:Bi = 3:3:4 [see Fig. 1(b)]. The resistivity, and specific heat were measured using a Physical Properties Measurement System (PPMS-9), with a 3He refrigerator attachment down to 0.5 K. The dc magnetization of the crushed powders was measured using a commercial SQUID magnetometer ( MPMS3).
Electronic structure calculations of La3Pt3Bi4 were carried out using plane-wave basis DFT as implemented in the Vienna Abinit Simulation Package (VASP)Kresse and Hafner (1993); Kresse and Joubert (1999). The valence-ion interactions were approximated using the projected augmented wave methodBlöchl (1994), and the exchange-correlation functional was approximated using the Perdew, Burke, and Ernzerhoff flavor of the general gradient approximation Perdew et al. (1996). The SOC was considered throughout the calculation as a second variation to the total energy. The plane-wave basis energy cutoff was chosen to be 370 eV, and a -centered -mesh was used for Brillouine zone integration to ensure the convergence of the total energy to 1 meV/atom. The geometry was fully relaxed to all forces 1 meV/Å , and internal stress 0.1 kBar. Finally, the electronic structure obtained from VASP was fitted to a tight-binding Hamiltonian formed by the La-5, Pt-5, and Bi-6 orbitals using the Wannier projection methodSouza et al. (2001); Mostofi et al. (2008). The symmetrization of the resulting Hamiltonian and symmetry analysis of the band structure were performed using the WannSymm codeZhi et al. (2022). The symmetrized Hamiltonian was then employed to calculate the nodal structure and relevant topological invariants using the WannierTools codeWu et al. (2018).
III RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

First, we discuss the electronic band structure and its topological nature based on the DFT calculations. Figures 1(c) and 1(d) show the electronic band structure of La3Pt3Bi4 with SOC. The electronic states near the Fermi level are dominated by the Pt-5 and Bi-6 orbitals, as shown by the projected density of states (PDOS) in Figure 1(e). The total density of states (DOS) is states/(eVf.u.), or equivalently = 15.45 mJ/(molK2). By comparing to the experimentally observed value (please refer to the experimental results), we conclude that the electronic correlation is well described at the DFT level. Large SOC splitting is expected and observed in the resulting band structure. Assuming local Ce-4 states, the band structure is similar to that of Ce3Pt3Bi4 at higher temperatures, as expected Cao et al. (2020). At , the highest occupied states are doubly degenerate , which is extremely close to the Fermi level, and the next highest occupied states are quarterly degenerate around meV. All the states in the -- plane can be classified using the eigenstates of the gliding-mirror symmetry. The state consists of a pair of states with opposite eigenvalues () of the gliding-mirror symmetry, whereas the state consists of two pairs. Meanwhile, at point , all the states are doubly degenerate because the system preserves the time-reversal symmetry. These two states bear equal eigenvalues under the gliding-mirror symmetry. Therefore, between and , an odd number of band crossings must be formed by states with opposite eigenvalues of the gliding-mirror symmetry. A similar argument can also be applied to -. Furthermore, since these states can be classified using the gliding-mirror symmetry, they must form a loop in the -- gliding-mirror plane. Hence, the DFT band structure calculations show that La3Pt3Bi4 is a nodal-ring semimetal protected by the gliding-mirror symmetry, as discussed for the isostructure Ce3Pd3Bi4 in Ref. Cao et al. (2020). However, we must point out that the nodal rings in La3Pt3Bi4 are different from those in Ce3Pd3Bi4 at low temperaturesCao et al. (2020). The symmetry protected nodal rings in Ce3Pt3Bi4 are located near point; whereas they are located around point and point in La3Pt3Bi4. Such difference is related with partially localized nature of Ce-4 states in Ce3Pd3Bi4, effectively corresponding to a different electron fillings.
Using the symmetrized tight-binding Hamiltonian obtained with Wannier functions, we identified the nodal ring structure of La3Pt3Bi4 and calculated the Berry phase around the nodal rings [see Fig. 1(f)]. The nodes of La3Pt3Bi4 can be generally classified into four sets: 12 symmetrically equivalent small nodal rings around (type-A), 12 symmetrically equivalent large nodal rings across the border of Brillouin zones around points (type-B), 12 symmetrically equivalent small nodal rings around points, and individual high symmetry nodal points. Among them, only type-B is protected by the crystal symmetries, which are less than 50 meV below the Fermi level. Type-A nodal rings are not protected by the crystal symmetries, but are even closer (within 10 meV) to and large in the -space. Therefore, we primarily discuss these two types of nodal rings herein. Using the Wilson loop method, we calculated the Berry phase around both the type-A and type-B nodal rings using the -path, as shown by the green circles in Fig. 1(f). Both nodal rings yield Berry phase of , suggesting that both are topologically nontrivial. We note that the bands crossing lead to 8 Fermi surface sheets (Fig. 2), among which the 4 pockets around P (panel e of Fig. 2) and 2 pockets around (panel a and c of Fig. 2) are not related with the nodal rings. The rest two pockets (panel b and d of Fig. 2) are associated with nodal rings around and , respectively.

Next, we focus on the discovery of superconductivity in La3Pt3Bi4. Figure 3(a) shows the temperature dependence of the resistivity between 0.5 and 300 K for a La3Pt3Bi4 crystal. At = 300 K, the resistivity is about 185 cm. Upon cooling down from 300 K, the resistivity exhibits metallic characteristics with a continuous change in the slope. The residual resistivity ratio [ = (300 K)/(2 K)] is about 5, larger than that reported previously Hundley et al. (1990), indicating the high quality of our crystal. At 1.1 K, the resistivity starts to drop abruptly, then at 0.86 K, reaches zero, which is consistent with the onset of a diamagnetic transition [see Fig. 3(b)], indicating the occurrence of a superconducting transition. As shown in the right inset of Fig. 3(a), the temperature dependence of resistivity ( 20 K) in the normal state exhibits non-Fermi liquid (NFL) behavior. Since the electronic correlation effect is not so prominent, as evidenced by the comparison between DOS from DFT calculations and , the origin of such NFL behavior is possibly related with the topological nodal ring structure near Moon et al. (2013); Isobe et al. (2016). Figure 3(b) presents the temperature dependence of the susceptibility, (), below 1.2 K, measured with both zero-field cooling (ZFC) and field cooling (FC) processes. The superconducting volume fraction at 0.4 K is about 37%, indicating that bulk superconductivity emerges below in La3Pt3Bi4. It is worth noting that La3Pt3Bi4 is the first reported superconductor in the Ln3T3X4 (Ln = lanthanoid element, T = Cu, Au, Rh, Pd, Pt and X = Sb, Bi) family, implying that other member may be a superconductor as well; however, this must be confirmed through further investigations. We also note that the half-Heusler LaPtBi compound was found to be a non-centrosymmetric superconductor with a of 0.9 K, (0) = 1.5 T, and another candidate for TSC Goll et al. (2008); however, the superconducting properties, such as (0), specific heat jump at , as well as the properties in the normal state, such as the () behavior, differ from those exhibited by La3Pt3Bi4 reported herein.
Figure 3(c) shows the temperature dependence of the resistivity, (), around the superconducting transition measured at various magnetic fields applied perpendicular to the current. With increasing magnetic field, the superconducting transition gradually shifts to a lower temperature. We estimated the using the middle temperature of the superconducting transition (mid) and plotted (), as shown in the inset of Fig. 3(c). According to the Ginzburg-Landau (GL) theory, () can be fitted using the formula , to get the zero-temperature upper critical field (0) 0.41 T, where is the reduced temperature (), as shown by the blue line in the inset of Fig. 3(c). The estimated (0) is much lower than that of the half-Heusler LaPtBi compound ( 1.5 T) Goll et al. (2008). Furthermore, the superconducting coherence length for the La3Pt3Bi4 compound was estimated to be 28.4 nm using the formula , where (2.071 10-15 Wb) is the fluxoid quantum.
To measure the specific heat, (), we arranged several needle-like crystals on the measurement puck. as a function of , measured at zero magnetic field, is shown in Fig. 3(d). A significant specific heat jump was observed at approximately 0.8 K, thereby confirming again that La3Pt3Bi4 exhibits bulk superconductivity. We used the formula to fit the data (1.1 - 2 K) in the normal state to obtain the Sommerfeld coefficient = 17.3 mJ/(molK2) and the Debye constant = 9.9 mJ/(molK4), corresponding to the Debye temperature = 125 K. The electronic specific heat in the superconducting state was obtained by subtracting the phonon contribution term from the total , as shown in the inset of Fig. 3(d). The normalized specific heat jump at was estimated to be 1.21, which is smaller than the well-known BCS theory value (1.43).
Finally, we make a simple analysis of the superconductivity in La3Pt3Bi4 based on our experimental and calculation results. The electronic specific heat coefficient can be related with via in weakly correlated materials, where is the electron-phonon coupling strength. This leads to an estimation of in this material. Such small electron-phonon coupling results in negligible phonon mediated using BCS formula , where is the Debye temperature, and is the Coulomb repulsion pseudopotential (chosen within the normal range of 0.10 - 0.15). Therefore, despite of its low superconducting , it is highly possible that the pairing mechanism of La3Pt3Bi4 is unconventional.
IV CONCLUSIONS
In summary, by combining the first principles calculations and resistivity, susceptibility and specific heat measurements, we discovered bulk superconductivity with = 1.1 K, and (0) = 0.41 T in La3Pt3Bi4 compound. It was confirmed that La3Pt3Bi4 is a nodal-ring semimetal protected by the gliding-mirror symmetry. These results indicate that La3Pt3Bi4 provides a material platform for studying novel superconductivity in the nodal-ring system.
Acknowledgements.
This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology of China under Grant No. 2016YFA0300402 and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (Grant Nos. 11974095, 11874137, 12074335, 11874136), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities. The calculations were performed on the High Performance Computing Cluster of Center of Correlated Matters at Zhejiang University, and Tianhe-2 Supercomputing Center.References
- Hor et al. (2010) Y. S. Hor, A. J. Williams, J. G. Checkelsky, P. Roushan, J. Seo, Q. Xu, H. W. Zandbergen, A. Yazdani, N. P. Ong, and R. J. Cava, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 057001 (2010).
- Kawai et al. (2020) T. Kawai, C. Wang, Y. Kandori, Y. Honoki, K. Matano, T. Kambe, and G.-q. Zheng, Nature communications 11, 1 (2020).
- Yonezawa et al. (2017) S. Yonezawa, K. Tajiri, S. Nakata, Y. Nagai, Z. Wang, K. Segawa, Y. Ando, and Y. Maeno, Nature Physics 13, 123 (2017).
- Sasaki et al. (2011) S. Sasaki, M. Kriener, K. Segawa, K. Yada, Y. Tanaka, M. Sato, and Y. Ando, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 217001 (2011).
- Tao et al. (2018) R. Tao, Y.-J. Yan, X. Liu, Z.-W. Wang, Y. Ando, Q.-H. Wang, T. Zhang, and D.-L. Feng, Phys. Rev. X 8, 041024 (2018).
- Qi and Zhang (2011) X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057 (2011).
- Mackenzie and Maeno (2003) A. P. Mackenzie and Y. Maeno, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 657 (2003).
- Pustogow et al. (2019) A. Pustogow, Y. Luo, A. Chronister, Y.-S. Su, D. Sokolov, F. Jerzembeck, A. P. Mackenzie, C. W. Hicks, N. Kikugawa, S. Raghu, E. D. Bauer, and S. E. Brown, Nature 574, 72 (2019).
- Fu and Kane (2008) L. Fu and C. L. Kane, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 096407 (2008).
- Williams et al. (2012) J. R. Williams, A. J. Bestwick, P. Gallagher, S. S. Hong, Y. Cui, A. S. Bleich, J. G. Analytis, I. R. Fisher, and D. Goldhaber-Gordon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 056803 (2012).
- Wang et al. (2012) M.-X. Wang, C. Liu, J.-P. Xu, F. Yang, L. Miao, M.-Y. Yao, C. Gao, C. Shen, X. Ma, X. Chen, Z.-A. Xu, Y. Liu, S.-C. Zhang, D. Qian, J.-F. Jia, and Q.-K. Xue, Science 336, 52 (2012).
- Yang et al. (2012) F. Yang, F. Qu, J. Shen, Y. Ding, J. Chen, Z. Ji, G. Liu, J. Fan, C. Yang, L. Fu, and L. Lu, Phys. Rev. B 86, 134504 (2012).
- Fang et al. (2008) M. H. Fang, H. M. Pham, B. Qian, T. J. Liu, E. K. Vehstedt, Y. Liu, L. Spinu, and Z. Q. Mao, Phys. Rev. B 78, 224503 (2008).
- Wang et al. (2015) Z. Wang, P. Zhang, G. Xu, L. K. Zeng, H. Miao, X. Xu, T. Qian, H. Weng, P. Richard, A. V. Fedorov, H. Ding, X. Dai, and Z. Fang, Phys. Rev. B 92, 115119 (2015).
- Sakano et al. (2015) M. Sakano, K. Okawa, M. Kanou, H. Sanjo, T. Okuda, T. Sasagawa, and K. Ishizaka, Nature communications 6, 1 (2015).
- Fang et al. (2019) Y. Fang, J. Pan, D. Zhang, D. Wang, H. T. Hirose, T. Terashima, S. Uji, Y. Yuan, W. Li, Z. Tian, J. Xue, Y. Ma, W. Zhao, Q. Xue, G. Mu, H. Zhang, and F. Huang, Advanced Materials 31, 1901942 (2019).
- Burkov et al. (2011) A. A. Burkov, M. D. Hook, and L. Balents, Phys. Rev. B 84, 235126 (2011).
- Weng et al. (2016) H. Weng, X. Dai, and Z. Fang, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 28, 303001 (2016).
- Bzdušek et al. (2016) T. Bzdušek, Q. Wu, A. Rüegg, M. Sigrist, and A. A. Soluyanov, Nature 538, 75 (2016).
- Kim et al. (2015) Y. Kim, B. J. Wieder, C. L. Kane, and A. M. Rappe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 036806 (2015).
- Huh et al. (2016) Y. Huh, E.-G. Moon, and Y. B. Kim, Phys. Rev. B 93, 035138 (2016).
- Hirayama et al. (2017) M. Hirayama, R. Okugawa, T. Miyake, and S. Murakami, Nature communications 8, 1 (2017).
- Ramamurthy and Hughes (2017) S. T. Ramamurthy and T. L. Hughes, Phys. Rev. B 95, 075138 (2017).
- Bian et al. (2016) G. Bian, T.-R. Chang, R. Sankar, S.-Y. Xu, H. Zheng, T. Neupert, C.-K. Chiu, S.-M. Huang, G. Chang, I. Belopolski, D. S. Sanchez, M. Neupane, N. Alidoust, C. Liu, B. Wang, C.-C. Lee, H.-T. Jeng, C. Zhang, Z. Yuan, S. Jia, A. Bansil, F. Chou, H. Lin, and M. Z. Hasan, Nature communications 7, 1 (2016).
- Shapourian et al. (2018) H. Shapourian, Y. Wang, and S. Ryu, Phys. Rev. B 97, 094508 (2018).
- Fang et al. (2015) C. Fang, Y. Chen, H.-Y. Kee, and L. Fu, Phys. Rev. B 92, 081201(R) (2015).
- Ali et al. (2014) M. N. Ali, Q. D. Gibson, T. Klimczuk, and R. J. Cava, Phys. Rev. B 89, 020505(R) (2014).
- Yamakage et al. (2016) A. Yamakage, Y. Yamakawa, Y. Tanaka, and Y. Okamoto, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 85, 013708 (2016).
- Carter et al. (2012) J.-M. Carter, V. V. Shankar, M. A. Zeb, and H.-Y. Kee, Phys. Rev. B 85, 115105 (2012).
- Chen et al. (2015) Y. Chen, Y.-M. Lu, and H.-Y. Kee, Nature communications 6, 1 (2015).
- Liang et al. (2016) Q.-F. Liang, J. Zhou, R. Yu, Z. Wang, and H. Weng, Phys. Rev. B 93, 085427 (2016).
- Sun et al. (2017) Y. Sun, Y. Zhang, C.-X. Liu, C. Felser, and B. Yan, Phys. Rev. B 95, 235104 (2017).
- Ikeda et al. (2020) A. Ikeda, M. Kawaguchi, S. Koibuchi, T. Hashimoto, T. Kawakami, S. Yonezawa, M. Sato, and Y. Maeno, Phys. Rev. Materials 4, 041801(R) (2020).
- Dzsaber et al. (2017) S. Dzsaber, L. Prochaska, A. Sidorenko, G. Eguchi, R. Svagera, M. Waas, A. Prokofiev, Q. Si, and S. Paschen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 246601 (2017).
- Cao et al. (2020) C. Cao, G.-X. Zhi, and J.-X. Zhu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 166403 (2020).
- Palewski and Suski (2003) T. Palewski and W. Suski, “Pnictides and chalcogenides ii (ternary lanthanide pnictides). part b: 1:2:2, 1:4:12, 3:3:4 and other type compounds,” (2003), springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
- Kwei et al. (1992) G. H. Kwei, J. M. Lawrence, P. C. Canfield, W. P. Beyermann, J. D. Thompson, Z. Fisk, A. C. Lawson, and J. A. Goldstone, Phys. Rev. B 46, 8067 (1992).
- Hundley et al. (1990) M. F. Hundley, P. C. Canfield, J. D. Thompson, Z. Fisk, and J. M. Lawrence, Phys. Rev. B 42, 6842 (1990).
- Hundley et al. (1993) M. Hundley, A. Lacerda, P. Canfield, J. Thompson, and Z. Fisk, Physica B: Condensed Matter 186, 425 (1993).
- Pietrus et al. (2008) T. Pietrus, H. v. Löhneysen, and P. Schlottmann, Phys. Rev. B 77, 115134 (2008).
- Kresse and Hafner (1993) G. Kresse and J. Hafner, Phys. Rev. B 47, 558 (1993).
- Kresse and Joubert (1999) G. Kresse and D. Joubert, Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758 (1999).
- Blöchl (1994) P. E. Blöchl, Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953 (1994).
- Perdew et al. (1996) J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996).
- Souza et al. (2001) I. Souza, N. Marzari, and D. Vanderbilt, Phys. Rev. B 65, 035109 (2001).
- Mostofi et al. (2008) A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, Y.-S. Lee, I. Souza, D. Vanderbilt, and N. Marzari, Computer Physics Communications 178, 685 (2008).
- Zhi et al. (2022) G.-X. Zhi, C. Xu, S.-Q. Wu, F. Ning, and C. Cao, Computer Physics Communications 271, 108196 (2022).
- Wu et al. (2018) Q. Wu, S. Zhang, H.-F. Song, M. Troyer, and A. A. Soluyanov, Computer Physics Communications 224, 405 (2018).
- Moon et al. (2013) E.-G. Moon, C. Xu, Y. B. Kim, and L. Balents, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 206401 (2013).
- Isobe et al. (2016) H. Isobe, B.-J. Yang, A. Chubukov, J. Schmalian, and N. Nagaosa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 076803 (2016).
- Goll et al. (2008) G. Goll, M. Marz, A. Hamann, T. Tomanic, K. Grube, T. Yoshino, and T. Takabatake, Physica B: Condensed Matter 403, 1065 (2008).