This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Studying the doublet bands at the borders of the A130A\approx 130 island of chiral candidates: the 120I casethanks: Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (11675063, 11205068, 11847310 and 11475072)

Rui Guo ( )1  Yong-Hao Liu ( )1  Jian Li ( )1,2;1)  Wu-Ji Sun ( ޼ )1  Li Li ( )1
 Ying-Jun Ma ( )1;2)
[email protected] [email protected] 1College of Physics, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China
2Department of Physics, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI 49008, USA
Abstract

Based on the reported positive-parity doublet bands in 120I, the corresponding experimental characteristics including rotational alignment have been discussed and corresponding configuration assignment is reexamined. The self-consistent tilted axis cranking relativistic mean-field calculations indicates that this doublet bands is built on configuration πh11/2νh11/21\pi h_{11/2}\otimes\nu h^{-1}_{11/2}. In addition, adopting the two quasiparticles coupled with a triaxial rotor model, the excitation energies, energy staggering parameter S(I)S(I), B(M1)/B(E2)B(M1)/B(E2), effective angles, and KK plotsplots have been discussed and also compared with the available data. All of these results support the interpretation of chiral doublet bands for the positive-parity doublet bands in 120I, and hence identify this nucleus as the border of the A130A\approx 130 island of chiral candidates.

keywords:
chiral doublet bands, particle rotor model, cranking relativistic mean-field theory, high-jj particle hole configuration
pacs:
2

1.60.Ev, 21.60.Jz, 27.60.+j, 23.20.-g,

00footnotetext: ©\scriptstyle\copyright2019 Chinese Physical Society and the Institute of High Energy Physics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Institute of Modern Physics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and IOP Publishing Ltd

1 Introduction

Chirality is a topic of general interest in nature science, such as chemistry, biology, and physics. In nuclear structure physics, the occurrence of chirality was suggested for triaxially deformed nuclei in 1997 [2] and the predicted patterns of spectra exhibiting chirality — chiral doublet bands — were experimentally observed in 2001 [3], i.e., the existence of one pair of ΔI=1\Delta I=1 nearly degenerate bands with the same parity. Furthermore, the possible existence of two pairs or more of chiral doublet bands, i.e., multiple chiral doublet bands, in one nucleus was demonstrated and the acronym Mχ\chiD was introduced by searching for triaxial chiral configurations in Rh isotopes based on constrained relativistic mean-field calculations in Ref. [4]. Up to now, nuclear chirality has become a hot topic in the current frontier of nuclear structure physics, and many chiral candidate nuclei, including several multiple doublet candidate nuclei [5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16], have been reported experimentally in the A80,100,130A\sim 80,100,130 and 190190 mass regions of the nuclear chart; see e.g., the review Refs. [17, 18] and data tables [19].

[Uncaptioned image]\figcaption

(Color online) The reported candidate chiral nuclei in A130A\sim 130 mass region, taken from Refs [20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 9, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42].

Among the whole nuclear chart, most reported candidate chiral nuclei are located in A130A\sim 130 mass region, where an island of chiral candidates was previously suggested in Ref. [3] and the available reported candidates in I, Cs, La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Pm and Eu [20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 9, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42] could be seen in Fig. 1. Therefore, it is very interesting to investigate the boundary of the chiral island. In A130A\sim 130 mass region, the iodine isotopes lies on the lower edge of the present chiral island. In 2003, based on the similar energy spectrum, Moon et al. [43] suggested that there may be chiral doublet bands in 120I. In 2013, Li et al. extended both the yrast and side bands up to state 23+23^{+} and 17+17^{+} respectively [44]. Recently, following the experimental properties of doublet bands in Ref. [43], Moon et al. [45] discussed the chiral characteristics and doubling of states for the πh11/2νh11/2\pi h_{11/2}\otimes\nu h_{11/2} configuration based on the large-scale spherical shell model and total Routhian energy surface calculations, and further suggested a chiral-like pair band in 120I. Therefore, it is necessary to study the rotational mechanism for the occurrence of the chirality in 120I, and extend the boundary of the island of chirality.

On the theoretical side, different models of nuclear structure have been applied to study the nuclear chirality. Among them, the particle rotor model (PRM) [2, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54], and the titled axis cranking (TAC) model including various versions [55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60], are most widely used. In this article, the experimental characteristics and configuration assignments for the doublet bands in 120I, including energy differences, rotational alignment, and self-consistent tilted axis cranking relativistic mean-field (TAC-RMF) calculation [61, 62, 63, 58], are discussed first. Then, the triaxial quasiparticles rotor model (PRM) [46] will be adopted to investigate the rotational structure and possible chirality in the doublet bands. Finally, a brief summary is given.

2 Experimental characteristics and configuration assignments for the doublet bands

[Uncaptioned image]\figcaption

Partial level scheme of doublet bands in 120I including the linking transitions. Full level schemes could be found in Refs. [44, 64]. All the energy scales are in keV.

Partial level scheme for 120I derived from Refs. [44, 64] is shown in Fig. 2, where the yrast band and the side band, as well as the linking transitions between them are adopted from Ref. [44, 64]. The experiment was performed at the HI-13 tandem accelerator of the China Institute of Atomic Energy, and high-spin states in 120I were populated by using the fusion-evaporation reaction 114Cd(11B,5n) at a beam energy of 70 MeV. The yrast band built on the (10+10^{+}) level at 1008 keV has been extended up to the (23+)(23^{+}) state, while the side band also built on the (10+10^{+}) state and is extended up to (17+17^{+}). Apart from the similarity of energy spectra for the doublet bands, the existence of linking transitions multipolarities E2E2 and M1/E2M1/E2 between the two bands also support the judgment that the side band has the same parity and configuration as that of the yrast band.

To study the characteristics of the doublet bands, the rotational alignment of the doublet bands in 120I are shown in Fig. 2, compared with the neighboring chiral doublet bands in 122Cs [20] and 124Cs [21]. To subtract the angular momentum of the core, the Harris parameters [65], i.e., J0=17.02/J_{0}=17.0\hbar^{2}/MeV, J1=25.84/J_{1}=25.8\hbar^{4}/MeV3, are adopted. In Fig. 2, the large initial alignments (\sim66\hbar) for yrast band and side band in 120I indicate that the h11/2[550]1/2h_{11/2}[550]1/2^{-} proton which can donate large alignment (\sim5.55.5\hbar) is involved in the configuration of yrast band and side band. In the neighboring isotone 121Xe, the h11/2h_{11/2} neutron rotational band is closer to the yrast line than the d5/2d_{5/2} and d3/2d_{3/2} neutron rotational band [66]. Therefore, the odd neutron in 120I may have the priority to occupy the h11/2h_{11/2} orbit, and the same configuration πh11/2νh11/2\pi h_{11/2}\otimes\nu h_{11/2} as the assignments in Ref. [45] is favored for the doublet bands in 120I.

On the other side, it can be seen from Fig. 2 that the alignment values of the doublet bands in 120I are very close to the alignment values of the doublet bands in 122Cs and 124Cs, during the rotational frequency between 0.25 and 0.34 MeV. This indicates that the configurations of the doublet bands in 120I in the frequency range from 0.25 to 0.34 MeV should be same as that of doublet bands in 122Cs and 124Cs, i.e., the high-jj h11/2h_{11/2} proton particle and neutron hole configuration. Therefore, these doublet bands have similar band structure and angular momentum alignment, which support that they have the same configuration.

[Uncaptioned image]\figcaption

(Color online) Rotational alignment of yrast and side bands in 120I, compared with 122Cs and 124Cs. Harris parameters [65](J0=17.02/J_{0}=17.0\hbar^{2}/MeV, J1=25.84/J_{1}=25.8\hbar^{4}/MeV3) are used to subtract the angular momentum of the core.

In addition, it can be noticed that the alignment of yrast band in 120I suddenly increases by about 2 \hbar at around the rotational frequency 0.34 MeV, and then gradually decreases until 0.53 MeV where the backbending phenomenon occurs. It may be owing to non-aligned proton πg7/2\pi g_{7/2} and neutron νh11/2\nu h_{11/2} excitation in the core. Such excitation has been observed in the 118Te, i.e., the core of 120I, and its isotope 120Te [67, 68]. When the paired g7/2g_{7/2} protons are excited, the deformation of nucleus for 120I begins to change and gradually becomes oblate, and the moment of inertia becomes smaller, which is likely the reason for the decrease of alignment value at the rotational frequencies about 0.3-0.5 MeV, as discussed in Ref. [64].

To further investigate the configuration of the doublet bands in 120I, the TAC-RMF calculations have been performed. During the past few decades, the relativistic mean field (RMF) theory has been a great success in describing properties of nuclei and many nuclear phenomena [69, 70, 71, 18, 72]. Based on the RMF theory, the tilted axis cranking relativistic mean-field (TAC-RMF) theory has been developed for describing many nuclear rotational phenomenon such as magnetic, antimagnetic and chiral rotation [63, 18, 58, 73, 74]. In the TAC-RMF theory, nuclei are characterized by the relativistic fields S(𝒓)S(\bm{r}) and Vμ(𝒓)V^{\mu}(\bm{r}) in the Dirac equation in the rotating frame with a constant angular velocity vector 𝛀\bm{\Omega} as

[𝜶(i𝑽)+β(m+S)+V𝛀𝑱^]ψi=εiψi,[\bm{\alpha}\cdot(-i\nabla-\bm{V})+\beta(m+S)+V-\bm{\Omega}\cdot\bm{\hat{J}}]\psi_{i}=\varepsilon_{i}\psi_{i}, (1)

where 𝑱^=𝑳^+12𝚺^\bm{\hat{J}}=\bm{\hat{L}}+\frac{1}{2}\bm{\hat{\Sigma}} is the total angular momentum of the nucleon spinors, and εi\varepsilon_{i} represents the single-particle Routhians for nucleons. The detailed formalism and numerical techniques can be seen in Refs. [61, 62, 75]. A spherical harmonic oscillator basis with ten major shells is adopted to solve the Dirac equation. The point-coupling interaction PC-PK1 [76] is used for the Lagrangian. Due to the suppression of pairing effects for the high jj two-quasiparticle configuration, the pairing correlations are neglected for simplicity here. It should be noted that the pairing correlation implemented in a fully self-consistent and microscopic way in TAC-RMF plays an important role on the description of energy spectrum and electromagnetic transitions in nuclear rotation [77, 78, 79, 80]. Therefore, it is very desiring the unified and self-consistent investigations of nuclear chirality within the tilted axis cranking covariant density functional theory with the pairing correlation in the future.

[Uncaptioned image]\figcaption

(Color online) Single-proton (upper panel) and single-neutron (lower panel) Routhians near the Fermi surface in 120I as a function of the rotational frequency for configuration πh11/2νh11/21\pi h_{11/2}\otimes\nu h^{-1}_{11/2} in TAC-RMF calculation. The levels of νg7/2/d5/2\nu{g_{7/2}}/{d_{5/2}}, νh11/2\nu h_{11/2}, νd3/2/s1/2\nu{d_{3/2}/s_{1/2}} and πg9/2\pi{g_{9/2}} are marked by solid black, dashed red, solid green and blue lines, respectively. The filled olive circles indicate the occupied levels.

In Fig. 2, the single-particle Routhians for the protons (a) and neutrons (b) in 120I as a function of rotational frequency are shown. In principle, broken time-reversal symmetry by the cranking field will be recovered without cranking field at Ω=0\Omega=0, i.e., the levels will be degenerated again as already shown in Fig. 2. There are three protons and seventeen neutrons above the N=50N=50 shell in 120I. From Fig. 2(a), it is easy to see that the last unpaired proton is occupying in the lower part of h11/2h_{11/2} in ascending order of energy. From Fig. 2(b), it can be seen that the last unpaired neutron is kept fixed in the upper part of h11/2h_{11/2} for a large range of rotational frequency. The other remaining sixteen neutrons are treated self-consistently by filling the orbits according to their energies and distributed over the h11/2h_{11/2} and g7/2/d5/2{g_{7/2}}/{d_{5/2}} shells, respectively. In short, the high jj proton-particle and neutron-hole configurations favored the doublet bands in 120I, whereas seven neutrons occupying the h11/2h_{11/2} orbital means the character of neutron-hole is not ideal, which may be the reason that the valence neutron can not be obviously considered as a hole in character as discussed in Ref. [45].

It can be deduced from Fig. 2 that when the neutron number decreases in the iodine isotopes, i.e., the neutron number NN less than 77, the last odd neutron will occupy in the lower part of h11/2h_{11/2} shell and neutron h11/2h_{11/2} hole character may not be favored. Similarly, when the proton number ZZ is less than 53, there will be no proton occupying in the h11/2h_{11/2} orbit, and high-jj h11/2h_{11/2} proton particle also can not be expected. Considering the proper high-jj particle and hole configuration as a necessary condition for the appearance of the chiral doublet bands, 120I could be the edge of island of chiral candidates in A130A\sim 130 mass region. At the same time, it is naturally interesting to find and predict the nuclear chirality in more neighbouring nuclei of 120I.

3 Chiral structure in particle rotor model

[Uncaptioned image]\figcaption

(Color online) Comparison of energy differences E\triangle{E}, i.e., E(I)sideE(I)yrastE(I)_{side}-E(I)_{yrast} as a function of the spin for the doublet bands in 120I and 124,126,128,130Cs.

The present configuration assignments of high jj proton-particle and neutron-hole configurations for the doublet bands in 120I are favorable for the chirality. It can be found that configuration components are almost the same components of chiral bands in the neighboring odd-odd nuclei 124-128Cs. For this reason, a systematic comparison of their experimental features is performed. In Fig. 3, the energy differences ΔE\Delta{E} for the doublet bands, i.e., E(I)sideE(I)yrastE(I)_{side}-E(I)_{yrast}, in 120I and 124-128Cs are shown. It can be seen that the energy differences for these doublet bands are very similar. They exhibit a slight undulation and gradually decrease from 360 to 160 keV with the spin increases from 14 to 1717\hbar. 124Cs is especially similar to 120I, i.e., the energy differences ΔE\Delta{E} is almost the same (greater than 200 keV) and is relatively large than to 126,128,130Cs, which implies 120I and 124Cs [81] may have a similar chiral geometry, i.e., might correspond to a typical chiral vibration pattern. Furthermore, the gradual decrease in energy differences of 120I may indicate that the chiral vibration patterns of the nucleus gradually form and tend to stabilize the chirality.

To investigate the existence of nuclear chirality in 120I, the particle rotor model (PRM) with a quasi-proton and a quasi-neutron coupled with a triaxial rotor [46] has been adopted. PRM, as a quantal model describing a system in the laboratory reference frame and consisting of collective rotation as well as intrinsic single particle motions, can be straightforwardly applied to investigate the angular momentum geometries of chiral doublet bands. In PRM, the total Hamiltonian is diagonalized with total angular momentum as a good quantum number, and the energy splitting and quantum tunneling between the doublet bands can be obtained directly. Its Hamiltonian for an odd-odd nucleus can be written as [46]

H=Hcoll+Hintrp+Hintrn,\displaystyle H=H_{coll}+H^{p}_{intr}+H^{n}_{intr}, (2)

where pp and nn refer to proton and neuron, respectively. In addition,the configuration of multi-particles sitting in a high-jj shell can be simulated by adjusting the Fermi energy here with considering pairing correlation by BCS approximation [46]. For detailed formalism of PRM see Refs. [2, 46, 47, 48, 49].

The quadrupole deformation parameter β=0.36\beta=0.36 for the configuration πh11/2νh11/21\pi h_{11/2}\otimes\nu h^{-1}_{11/2} have been adopted, which is obtained from both triaxial relativistic mean-field (RMF) [4, 5, 7] and TAC-RMF calculations [61, 62, 82]. At the same time, the triaxial deformation parameter γ=20\gamma=20^{\circ} is employed to achieve better description of the experimental ratios of reduced transition probabilities B(M1)/B(E2)B(M1)/B(E2). The single-jj shell Hamiltonian parameter was taken as [83]

C=(12385π)2N+3j(j+1)A1/3β.\displaystyle C=\Big{(}\frac{123}{8}\sqrt{\frac{5}{\pi}}\Big{)}\frac{2N+3}{j(j+1)}A^{-1/3}\beta. (3)

In addition, the moment of inertia 𝒥=252/\mathcal{J}=25\hbar^{2}/MeV is adjusted according to the experimental energy spectra. Following the empirical formula Δ=12/A\Delta=12/\sqrt{A}, the pairing gap Δ=1.1\Delta=1.1 MeV is used for both protons and neutrons. As the valence proton Fermi level in 120I is supposed to be at the beginning of πh11/2\pi h_{11/2} subshell, the proton Fermi energy λp\lambda_{p} takes 3.518-3.518 MeV. Considering the neutron Fermi level lying in the middle of the ν11/2\nu_{11/2} subshell, the neutron Fermi energy λn\lambda_{n} takes 0.765 MeV with simulating the effect of multivalence neutrons, similar as in the Refs. [46, 84]. For the electromagnetic transition, the empirical intrinsic quadrupole moment Q0=(3/5π)R02Zeβ=4.3Q_{0}=(3/\sqrt{5\pi})R_{0}^{2}Ze\beta=4.3 eb. Gyromagnetic ratios for the collective rotator is given by gR=Z/A=0.44g_{R}=Z/A=0.44. gp=1.21g_{p}=1.21 and gn=0.21g_{n}=-0.21 are adopted for proton and neutron respectively obtained from the Schmidt magnetic moment formula of h11/2h_{11/2} orbital with effective spin gyromagnetic ratio gs=0.6gsfreeg_{s}=0.6\,g_{s}^{\mathrm{free}} used same as the Refs. [85, 15, 54].

[Uncaptioned image]\figcaption

(Color online) The excitation energy (upper panel) and staggering parameter S(I)=[E(I)E(I1)]/2IS(I)=[E(I)-E(I-1)]/2I (lower panel) as a function of spin for the yrast and side band in 120I. The filled (open) symbols connected by solid (dashed) lines indicate the experimental (theoretical) values. The yrast and side band are shown by circles and squares, respectively.

In Fig. 3, the calculated energy spectra E(I)E(I) and energy staggering parameter S(I)S(I), i.e., [E(I)E(I1)]/2I[E(I)-E(I-1)]/2I, within the PRM calculations for the doublet bands in 120I are presented, in comparison with the corresponding experimental results. One can easily see that the calculated energy spectra and energy staggering parameter S(I)S(I) well reproduce the experimental results in the spin region 101510-15\hbar. One of experimental fingerprint for nuclear chirality is that S(I)S(I) varies smoothly with the increasing spin, which results from a highly reduced Coriolis interaction [86]. As shown in Fig. 3, S(I)S(I) exhibits a fairly smooth variation, supporting the nuclear chirality for the present doublet bands [45]. In addition, it can be noted from Fig. 3 that S(I)S(I) of the doublet bands gradually approaches to each other with the increasing spin, and exhibits a slight staggering which gradually becomes weak. Moreover, the behaviors of S(I)S(I) are similar to that for the chiral bands in 124,126,128,130Cs, indicating that the Coriolis interaction may reduce little by little, thereby suggesting an aplanar rotation gradually appears in the triaxial nuclei. In other words, the chiral vibration pattern of the nucleus may gradually form and approach to static chirality.

[Uncaptioned image]\figcaption

(Color online) The calculated B(M1)/B(E2)B(M1)/B(E2) and the corresponding available data for the yrast and side band in 120I. The data extracted from Ref. [64] is marked as exp. 1 and the corresponding data from Ref. [45] is marked as exp. 2.

The calculated in-band B(M1)/B(E2)B(M1)/B(E2) ratios and the corresponding available data extracted from Ref. [64] (marked as exp. 1) for the yrast and side band in 120I are presented in Fig. 3. The corresponding data from ref. [45] (marked as exp. 2) is also given for comparison. It can be seen that the B(M1)/B(E2)B(M1)/B(E2) ratios of the doublet bands from Ref. [64] and Ref. [45] are very close to each other, and both meet the important experimental criteria of chiral double bands, that is, the B(M1)/B(E2)B(M1)/B(E2) ratios of chiral doublet bands should be similar and show staggering behavior with increasing spin. Besides, the feature of the B(M1)/B(E2)B(M1)/B(E2) is reproduced well by the present PRM calculation including the magnitude and staggering of the ratios with spin. The success in reproducing the energy spectra, the energy staggering parameter S(I)S(I) and transition probabilities for the doublet bands in 120I suggests that the present calculation must correctly account for the structure of the states at the spin region 101510-15\hbar.

To shed light on investigating the chiral picture of 120I, the effective angels θpn\theta_{pn}, θRp\theta_{Rp}, and θRn\theta_{Rn} obtained from the PRM calculations as a function of the spin for the doublet bands are displayed in Fig. 3. In the PRM, the effective angle θ\theta refers to the angle between the angular momentum orientations of the nuclei in the intrinsic reference frame. For instance, the effective angle θpn\theta_{pn}, which refers to the angle between the proton (𝐣p{\mathbf{j}_{p}}) and neutron (𝐣n{\mathbf{j}_{n}}) angular momenta, is defined as [28] cosθpn=𝐣p𝐣n/(jp2)(jn2)\cos\theta_{pn}=\langle\mathbf{j}_{p}\cdot\mathbf{j}_{n}\rangle/\sqrt{(j_{p}^{2})(j_{n}^{2})}, and similarly for θRp\theta_{Rp} and θRn\theta_{Rn}. Here, the subscripts p,np,n, and RR denote the proton, neutron, and rotor, respectively. By analyzing the effective angles, the chiral geometry represented by a remarkable and similar aplanar rotation between doublet bands can be revealed in a quantum way.

[Uncaptioned image]\figcaption

(Color online) The effective angles θpn\theta_{pn}, θRp\theta_{Rp}, and θRn\theta_{Rn} as a function of the spin for the doublet bands in 120I. See text for more details.

From Fig. 3, it is observed that the effective angles θpn\theta_{pn}, θRp\theta_{Rp}, and θRn\theta_{Rn} are greater than 6060^{\circ} around I=10I=10\hbar, i.e., the angular momenta jp{\textbf{j}_{p}}, jn{\textbf{j}_{n}}, and 𝐑\mathbf{R} are nearly perpendicular to each other at the band head, which also appears in 124,126Cs [81, 84]. In the spin region 101510-15\hbar, the values of three effective angles for both yrast and side bands are larger than 4545^{{\circ}}, which indicates a obvious aplanar rotation in 120I and provides additional support for the existence of chiral doublet bands in 120I.

For the sake of exhibiting the chiral picture more clearly and examine the evolution of the chiral geometry with angular momentum, the probability distributions for the projection K of the total angular momenta (K plots) of the doublet bands in 120I are calculated similarly as in Refs. [47, 87, 81, 88, 47]. The K plots, i.e, the probability distributions for the projection K of total angular momenta along long (l), intermediate (i), and short (s) axes are displayed in Fig. 3. At the band head I=10I=10\hbar, the probability distributions along the i axis, i.e., KiK_{\emph{i}} for the doublet bands are different. For yrast band the maximum probability KiK_{\emph{i}} appears at Ki=0K_{\emph{i}}=0, whereas the KiK_{\emph{i}} for side band is minimum at Ki=0K_{\emph{i}}=0, having its peak at Ki8K_{\emph{i}}\approx 8. This is in accordance with the interpretation of the chiral vibration with respect to the s-l plane where the zero-phonon state (yrast band) is symmetric with respect to Ki=0K_{\emph{i}}=0 and one-phone state (side band) is antisymmetric [47, 87].

As the angular momentum increases, KiK_{\emph{i}} for the doublet bands approaches each other at the spin region 141514-15\hbar, indicating that the chiral vibration through s-l is weakening and has a tendency towards the static chirality. Moreover, the maximum KsK_{\emph{s}} distribution appears at different position for the doublet bands, shows that the motion contains a vibration of the vector I through the l-i plane. Looking at the overall K plots, with the increasing spin, the peak value of Kl4K_{\emph{l}}\approx 4, while the peak values of both KiK_{\emph{i}} and KsK_{\emph{s}} increase slightly and are greater than 4, indicating that the total angular momentum gradually deviates from the l axis. This is very similar as 124Cs [81], interpreted as a typical chiral vibration pattern at the whole spin region based on the present calculations.

[Uncaptioned image]\figcaption

(Color online) The probability distributions for projection K of total angular momenta on the long (l), intermediate (i), and short (s) axis in PRM for the doublet bands in 120I.

4 Summary

Based on the reported positive-parity doublet bands in 120I, the experimental characteristics including rotational alignment have been extracted and discussed, and the corresponding configuration of the doublet bands is reexamined as πh11/2νh11/21\pi h_{11/2}\otimes\nu h^{-1}_{11/2} after performing the TAC-RMF calculations. For the sake of high-jj particle hole configuration, TAC-RMF calculation indicates that 120I locates at the borders of the A130A\approx 130 island of chiral candidates with configuration πh11/2νh11/21\pi h_{11/2}\otimes\nu h^{-1}_{11/2}. However, more neighbouring nuclei should be investigated to obtain more clear conclusion. Moreover, the positive-parity doublet bands based on the πh11/2\pi h_{11/2} \otimes νh11/21\nu h^{-1}_{11/2} configuration in 120I have been studied in two quasiparticles coupled with a triaxial rotor model. The calculated energy spectra, energy staggering parameter S(I)S(I), and the intraband B(M1)/B(E2)B(M1)/B(E2) are in good agreement with the available experimental data. In addition, the calculated effective angles between the angular momenta of the core, valence proton and neutron, and probability distributions for projection of total angular momenta also indicates an obvious chiral geometry of aplanar rotation. Thus we suggest the reported positive-parity doublet bands in 120I as candidate of chiral doublet bands.

Acknowledgements.
This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 11675063, No. 11205068, No. 11475072, and No. 11847310. The authors would like to thank Prof. J. Meng and S. Q. Zhang as well as Dr. Q. B. Chen for helpful discussions during the completion of this work.

 

References

  • [1]
  • [2] S. Frauendorf and J. Meng, Nucl. Phys. A. 617: 131 (1997)
  • [3] K. Starosta, T. Koike, C. J. Chiara, D. B. Fossan, D. R. LaFosse, A. A. Hecht, C. W. Beausang, M. A. Caprio, J. R. Cooper, R. Krücken, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86: 971 (2001).
  • [4] J. Meng, J. Peng, S. Q. Zhang, and S.-G. Zhou, Phys. Rev. C 73: 037303 (2006).
  • [5] J. Peng, H. Sagawa, S. Q. Zhang, J. M. Yao, Y. Zhang, and J. Meng, Phys. Rev. C 77: 024309 (2008).
  • [6] J. M. Yao, B. Qi, S. Q. Zhang, J. Peng, S. Y. Wang, and J. Meng, Phys. Rev. C 79: 067302 (2009).
  • [7] J. Li, S. Q. Zhang, and J. Meng, Phys. Rev. C 83: 037301 (2011)
  • [8] B. Qi, H. Jia, N. B. Zhang, C. Liu, and S. Y. Wang, Phys. Rev. C 88: 027302 (2013).
  • [9] A. D. Ayangeakaa, U. Garg, M. D. Anthony, S. Frauendorf, J. T. Matta, B. K. Nayak, D. Patel, Q. B. Chen, S. Q. Zhang, P. W. Zhao, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 110: 172504 (2013).
  • [10] I. Kuti, Q. B. Chen, J. Timár, D. Sohler, S. Q. Zhang, Z. H. Zhang, P. W. Zhao, J. Meng, K. Starosta, T. Koike, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 113: 032501 (2014).
  • [11] C. Liu, S. Y. Wang, R. A. Bark, S. Q. Zhang, J. Meng, B. Qi, P. Jones, S. M. Wyngaardt, J. Zhao, C. Xu, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 116: 112501 (2016).
  • [12] T. Roy, G. Mukherjee, M. Asgar, S. Bhattacharyya, S. Bhattacharya, C. Bhattacharya, S. Bhattacharya, T. Ghosh, K. Banerjee, S. Kundu, et al., Phys. Lett. B 782: 768 (2018).
  • [13] B. Qi, H. Jia, C. Liu, and S. Y. Wang, Phys. Rev. C 98: 014305 (2018).
  • [14] J. Li, Phys. Rev. C 97: 034306 (2018).
  • [15] Q. B. Chen, B. F. Lv, C. M. Petrache, and J. Meng, Phys. Lett. B 782: 744 (2018).
  • [16] J. Peng and Q. B. Chen, Phys. Rev. C 98: 024320 (2018).
  • [17] J. Meng and S. Q. Zhang, J. Phys. G 37: 064025 (2010).
  • [18] J. Meng (ed.), Relativistic Density Functional for Nuclear Structure (World Scientific, Singapore, 2016).
  • [19] B. Xiong and Y. Wang, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 125: 193 (2019).
  • [20] Y.-N. U, S. J. Zhu, M. Sakhaee, L. M. Yang, C. Y. Gan, L. Y. Zhu, R. Q. Xu, X. L. Che, M. L. Li, Y. J. Chen, et al., J. Phys. G 31: B1 (2005).
  • [21] K. Selvakumar, A. K. Singh, C. Ghosh, P. Singh, A. Goswami, R. Raut, A. Mukherjee, U. Datta, P. Datta, S. Roy, et al., Phys. Rev. C 92: 064307 (2015).
  • [22] S. Y. Wang, Y. Z. Liu, T. Komatsubara, Y. J. Ma, and Y. H. Zhang, Phys. Rev. C 74: 017302 (2006).
  • [23] E. Grodner, I. Sankowska, T. Morek, S. Rohoziński, C. Droste, J. Srebrny, A. Pasternak, M. Kisieliński, M. Kowalczyk, J. Kownacki, et al., Phys. Lett. B 703: 46 (2011).
  • [24] E. Grodner, J. Srebrny, A. A. Pasternak, I. Zalewska, T. Morek, C. Droste, J. Mierzejewski, M. Kowalczyk, J. Kownacki, M. Kisieliński, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 97: 172501 (2006).
  • [25] A. J. Simons, P. Joshi, D. G. Jenkins, P. M. Raddon, R. Wadsworth, D. B. Fossan, T. Koike, C. Vaman, K. Starosta, E. S. Paul, et al., J. Phys. G 31: 541 (2005).
  • [26] G. Rainovski, E. S. Paul, H. J. Chantler, P. J. Nolan, D. G. Jenkins, R. Wadsworth, P. Raddon, A. Simons, D. B. Fossan, T. Koike, et al., Phys. Rev. C 68: 024318 (2003).
  • [27] K. Y. Ma, J. B. Lu, D. Yang, H. D. Wang, Y. Z. Liu, X. G. Wu, Y. Zheng, and C. Y. He, Phys. Rev. C 85: 037301 (2012).
  • [28] K. Starosta, C. J. Chiara, D. B. Fossan, T. Koike, T. T. S. Kuo, D. R. LaFosse, S. G. Rohoziński, C. Droste, T. Morek, and J. Srebrny, Phys. Rev. C 65: 044328 (2002).
  • [29] R. Bark, A. Baxter, A. Byrne, G. Dracoulis, T. Kibédi, T. McGoram, and S. Mullins, Nucl. Phys. A 691: 577 (2001).
  • [30] S. Zhu, U. Garg, B. K. Nayak, S. S. Ghugre, N. S. Pattabiraman, D. B. Fossan, T. Koike, K. Starosta, C. Vaman, R. V. F. Janssens, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 91: 132501 (2003).
  • [31] E. Mergel, C. Petrache, G. Lo Bianco, H. Hübel, J. Domscheit, D. Roßbach, G. Schönwaßer, N. Nenoff, A. Neußer, A. Görgen, et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 15: 417 (2002).
  • [32] C. M. Petrache, S. Frauendorf, M. Matsuzaki, R. Leguillon, T. Zerrouki, S. Lunardi, D. Bazzacco, C. A. Ur, E. Farnea, C. Rossi Alvarez, et al., Phys. Rev. C 86: 044321 (2012).
  • [33] T. Koike, K. Starosta, C. J. Chiara, D. B. Fossan, and D. R. LaFosse, Phys. Rev. C 63: 061304 (2001).
  • [34] D. Tonev, G. d. Angelis, P. Petkov, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 96: 052501 (2006).
  • [35] D. J. Hartley, L. L. Riedinger, M. A. Riley, D. L. Balabanski, F. G. Kondev, R. W. Laird, J. Pfohl, D. E. Archer, T. B. Brown, R. M. Clark, et al., Phys. Rev. C 64: 031304 (2001).
  • [36] A. A. Hecht, C. W. Beausang, K. E. Zyromski, D. L. Balabanski, C. J. Barton, M. A. Caprio, R. F. Casten, J. R. Cooper, D. J. Hartley, R. Kr cken, et al., Phys. Rev. C 63: 051302 (2001).
  • [37] A. A. Hecht, C. W. Beausang, H. Amro, C. J. Barton, Z. Berant, M. A. Caprio, R. F. Casten, J. R. Cooper, D. J. Hartley, R. Kr cken, et al., Phys. Rev. C 68: 054310 (2003).
  • [38] Y. X. Zhao, T. Komatsubara, Y.J. Ma, Y.H. Zhang, S.Y. Wang, Y.Z. Liu, K. Furuno, Chin. Phys. Lett. 26: 082301 (2009).
  • [39] R. Guo, W.-J. Sun, J. Li, D. Yang, Y. Liu, C. Ru, and J. Chi, Phys. Rev. C 100: 034328 (2019).
  • [40] Y. Zheng, L. H. Zhu, X. G. Wu, et al., Phys. Rev. C 86: 014320 (2012).
  • [41] C. M. Petrache, Q. B. Chen, S. Guo, et al., Phys. Rev. C 94: 064309 (2016).
  • [42] K. Y. Ma, J. B. Lu, Z. Zhang, et al., Phys. Rev. C 97: 014305 (2018).
  • [43] C.-B. Moon, G. Dracoulis, R. A. Bark, A. Byrne, P. Davidson, A. Wilson, A. Baxter, T. Kibedi, and G. Lane, J. Korean Phys. Soc. 43: S100 (2003).
  • [44] L. Li, J. Sun, J. Li, D.-Y. Yu, G.-Y. Liu, W.-T. Zhang, K.-Y. Ma, D. Yang, Y.-J. Ma, X.-G. Wu, et al., Chin. Phys. Lett. 30: 062301 (2013).
  • [45] B. Moon, C.-B. Moon, G. Dracoulis, R. Bark, A. Byrne, P. Davidson, G. Lane, T. Kibédi, A. Wilson, C. Yuan, et al., Phys. Lett. B 782: 602 (2018).
  • [46] S. Q. Zhang, B. Qi, S. Y. Wang, and J. Meng, Phys. Rev. C 75: 044307 (2007).
  • [47] B. Qi, S. Zhang, J. Meng, S. Wang, and S. Frauendorf, Phys. Lett. B 675: 175 (2009).
  • [48] J. Peng, J. Meng, and S. Q. Zhang, Phys. Rev. C 68: 044324 (2003).
  • [49] T. Koike, K. Starosta, and I. Hamamoto, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93: 172502 (2004).
  • [50] Q. B. Chen, K. Starosta, and T. Koike, Phys. Rev. C 97: 041303 (2018).
  • [51] Q. B. Chen and J. Meng, Phys. Rev. C 98: 031303 (2018).
  • [52] E. Grodner, J. Srebrny, C. Droste, L. Próchniak, S. G. Rohoziński, M. Kowalczyk, M. Ionescu-Bujor, C. A. Ur, K. Starosta, T. Ahn, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 120: 022502 (2018).
  • [53] Q. B. Chen, N. Kaiser, U.-G. Meißner, and J. Meng, Phys. Rev. C 99: 064326 (2019).
  • [54] J. Peng and Q. B. Chen, Phys. Lett. B 793: 303 (2019).
  • [55] S. Frauendorf, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73: 463 (2001).
  • [56] P. Olbratowski, J. Dobaczewski, J. Dudek, and W. Płóciennik, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93: 052501 (2004).
  • [57] P. Olbratowski, J. Dobaczewski, and J. Dudek, Phys. Rev. C 73: 054308 (2006).
  • [58] P. W. Zhao, Phys. Lett. B 773: 1 (2017).
  • [59] V. I. Dimitrov, S. Frauendorf, and F. Dönau, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84: 5732 (2000).
  • [60] P. W. Zhao, Y. K. Wang, and Q. B. Chen, Phys. Rev. C 99: 054319 (2019).
  • [61] J. Peng, J. Meng, P. Ring, and S. Q. Zhang, Phys. Rev. C 78: 024313 (2008).
  • [62] P. W. Zhao, S. Q. Zhang, J. Peng, H. Z. Liang, P. Ring, and J. Meng, Phys. Lett. B 699: 181 (2011).
  • [63] J. Meng, J. Peng, S.-Q. Zhang, and P.-W. Zhao, Front. Phys. 8: 55 (2013).
  • [64] L. Li, Ph.D. thesis, Jilin University (2013).
  • [65] J. R. Hughes, D. B. Fossan, D. R. LaFosse, Y. Liang, P. Vaska, and M. P. Waring, Phys. Rev. C 44: 2390 (1991).
  • [66] J. Timar, J. Simpson, E. S. Paul, S. Araddad, C. W. Beausang, M. A. Bentley, M. J. Joyce, and J. F. Sharpey- Schafer, J. Phys. G 21: 783 (1995).
  • [67] S. Juutinen, A. Savelius, P. T. Greenlees, K. Helariutta, P. Jones, R. Julin, P. Jämsen, H. Kankaanpää, M. Muikku, M. Piiparinen, et al., Phys. Rev. C 61: 014312 (1999).
  • [68] S. Nag, A. K. Singh, A. N. Wilson, J. Rogers, H. H bel, A. B rger, S. Chmel, I. Ragnarsson, G. Sletten, B. Herskind, et al., Phys. Rev. C 85: 014310 (2012).
  • [69] P. Ring, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 37: 193 (1996).
  • [70] D. Vretenar, A. V. Afanasjev, G. A. Lalazissis, and P. Ring, Phys. Rep. 409: 101 (2005).
  • [71] J. Meng, H. Toki, S. G. Zhou, S. Q. Zhang, W. H. Long, and L. S. Geng, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 57: 470 (2006).
  • [72] M. Bender, P.-H. Heenen, and P.-G. Reinhard, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75: 121 (2003).
  • [73] W. J. Sun and Jian Li, Chin. Phys. C 43: 094104 (2019).
  • [74] R. Guo, W. J. Sun and Jian Li, et al., Phys. Rev. C 100: 034328 (2019).
  • [75] P. W. Zhao, J. Peng, H. Z. Liang, P. Ring, and J. Meng, Phys. Rev. C 85: 054310 (2012).
  • [76] P. W. Zhao, Z. P. Li, J. M. Yao, and J. Meng, Phys. Rev. C 82: 054319 (2010).
  • [77] P. W. Zhao, S. Q. Zhang, and J. Meng, Phys. Rev. C 92: 034319 (2015).
  • [78] Y. K. Wang, Phys. Rev. C 97: 064321 (2018).
  • [79] Z. Shi, Z. H. Zhang, Q. B. Chen, S. Q. Zhang, and J. Meng, Phys. Rev. C 97: 034317 (2018).
  • [80] L. Liu, Phys. Rev. C 99: 024317 (2019).
  • [81] S. Y. Wang, B. Qi, and D. P. Sun, Phys. Rev. C 82: 027303 (2010).
  • [82] W.-J. Sun, H.-D. Xu, J. Li, Y.-H. Liu, K.-Y. Ma, D. Yang, J.-B. Lu, and Y.-J. Ma, Chin. Phys. C 40: 084101 (2016).
  • [83] S. Y. Wang, B. Qi, and S. Q. Zhang, Chin. Phys. Lett. 26: 052102 (2009).
  • [84] S. Y. Wang, S. Q. Zhang, B. Qi, and J. Meng, Phys. Rev. C 75: 024309 (2007).
  • [85] B. Qi, S. Q. Zhang, S. Y. Wang, J. Meng and T. Koike, Phys. Rev. C 85, 034303 (2011).
  • [86] P. Joshi, M. P. Carpenter, D. B. Fossan, T. Koike, E. S. Paul, G. Rainovski, K. Starosta, C. Vaman, and R. Wadsworth, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98: 102501 (2007).
  • [87] B. Qi, S. Q. Zhang, S. Y. Wang, J. M. Yao, and J. Meng, Phys. Rev. C 79: 041302 (2009).
  • [88] C. Liu, S. Y. Wang, B. Qi, S. Wang, D. P. Sun, et al., Phys. Rev. C 100: 054309 (2019).