This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Strong Mg ii and Fe ii Absorbers at 2.2 <z<<~{}z~{}< 6.0

Siwei Zou Kavli Institute for Astronomy and Astrophysics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China Linhua Jiang Kavli Institute for Astronomy and Astrophysics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China Department of Astronomy, School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China Yue Shen Department of Astronomy, University of Illinois at UrbanaChampaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA National Center for Supercomputing Applications, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA Jin Wu Kavli Institute for Astronomy and Astrophysics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China Department of Astronomy, School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China Eduardo Bañados Max Planck Institut für Astronomie, Königstuhl 17, D-69117, Heidelberg, Germany Xiaohui Fan Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, 933 N Cherry Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA Luis C. Ho Kavli Institute for Astronomy and Astrophysics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China Department of Astronomy, School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China Dominik A. Riechers Cornell University, Space Sciences Building, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA Bram Venemans Max Planck Institut für Astronomie, Königstuhl 17, D-69117, Heidelberg, Germany Marianne Vestergaard Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, 933 N Cherry Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Jagtvej 128, DK-2200 Copenhagen, Denmark Fabian Walter Max Planck Institut für Astronomie, Königstuhl 17, D-69117, Heidelberg, Germany Feige Wang Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, 933 N Cherry Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA Chris J. Willott NRC Herzberg, 5071 West Saanich Road, Victoria, BC V9E 2E7, Canada Ravi Joshi Kavli Institute for Astronomy and Astrophysics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China Xue-Bing Wu Kavli Institute for Astronomy and Astrophysics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China Department of Astronomy, School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China Jinyi Yang Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, 933 N Cherry Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
Abstract

We present a study of strong intervening absorption systems in the near-IR spectra of 31 luminous quasars at z>5.7z>5.7. The quasar spectra were obtained with Gemini GNIRS that provide continuous wavelength coverage from \sim0.9 to \sim2.5 μ\mum. We detect 32 strong Mg ii doublet absorbers with rest-frame equivalent width Wr(λW_{r}(\lambda2796) >1.0>1.0 Å at 2.2<z<6.02.2<z<6.0. Each Mg ii absorber is confirmed by at least two associated Fe ii absorption lines in the rest-frame wavelength range of 16002600\sim 1600-2600 Å. We find that the comoving line density (dN/dXdN/dX) of the strong Fe ii-bearing Mg ii absorbers decreases towards higher redshift at z>3z>3, consistent with previous studies. Compared with strong Mg ii absorbers detected in damped Lyα\alpha systems at 2 <z<<z< 4, our absorbers are potentially less saturated and show much larger rest-frame velocity widths. This suggests that the gas traced by our absorbers are potentially affected by galactic superwinds. We analyze the Hubble Space Telescope near-IR images of the quasars and identify possible associated galaxies for our strong absorbers. There are a maximum two galaxy candidates found within 5\arcsec radius of each absorber. The median F105W-band magnitude of these galaxy candidates is 24.8 mag, which is fainter than the LL^{*} galaxy luminosity at zz\sim 4. By using our observed dN/dXdN/dX of strong Mg ii absorbers and galaxy candidates median luminosity, we suggest that at high redshift, strong Mg ii absorbers tend to have a more disturbed environment but smaller halo size than that at z<z< 1.

Quasar absorption line spectroscopy (1317); Circumgalactic medium(1879); High-redshift galaxies(734)
journal: ApJfacilities: Gemini(GNIRS)

1 Introduction

The Circumgalactic medium (CGM) is defined as the gas around the disk or interstellar medium of a galaxy typically within the virial radius of the galaxy. Previous studies suggested that the physical conditions of the gas in the CGM are influenced by both cold accretion inflows and galactic outflows (see Tumlinson et al. (2017) for a review and references therein). Studies of absorption lines towards bright background sources such as quasars provide a unique and powerful tool to study the physical conditions of the gas. Among these absorption lines, the low-ionization Mg ii λλ\lambda\lambda2796,2803 doublet is found to be associated with cool components (T\sim104 K) in CGM (Bergeron & Boissé, 1991; Steidel et al., 2002). Observationally, the connection between the Mg ii absorption and CGM is studied using quasar-galaxy pairs at low redshift. By comparing the kinematics of absorbers and galaxies, Mg ii has been shown to trace both metal-enriched infalling gas (Chen et al., 2010; Lovegrove & Simcoe, 2011; Kacprzak et al., 2011; Rubin et al., 2012; Bouché et al., 2013; Zabl et al., 2019), and outflows from luminous star-forming galaxies (Bouché et al., 2006; Martin & Bouché, 2009; Noterdaeme et al., 2010; Ménard & Fukugita, 2012; Schroetter et al., 2016, 2019). Zabl et al. (2019) studied 9 quasar-galaxy pairs that were selected from 79 Mg ii absorbers at zz\sim1. They found that the halo gas probed by Mg ii lines is approximately aligned with the galaxy’s angular momentum vector, which suggests that the Mg ii gas co-rotates with galaxy disks. Using the same catalog of Mg ii absorbers, Schroetter et al. (2019) selected 26 quasar-galaxy pairs and studied their azimuthal angle, which is the angle between the galaxy’s major axis and quasar location (see e.g. Zabl et al. 2019 Figure 1). The bimodality of azimuthal angles suggests that the outflows are bi-conical in nature.

Strong Mg ii systems, defined by their rest-frame equivalent width WrW_{r}, are found to trace cosmic star formation rate (SFR) (Ménard et al., 2011). Observations have shown that Mg ii absorbers are associated with a large amount of neutral gas (Lanzetta et al., 1987; Steidel et al., 1995, 1997; Rao et al., 2006; Nestor et al., 2007). Rao et al. (2006) studied 197 Mg ii systems and their H i profiles at 0.11 <z<<z< 1.65 using HubbleSpaceTelescopeHubble~{}Space~{}Telescope (HSTHST) UV spectroscopy. Their results show that all the damped Lyα\alpha (DLA) systems ( log N(H i) [cm]2>{}^{-2}]> 20.3) have WrW_{r} (λ\lambda2796) >> 0.6 Å. As DLA systems are regarded as the progenitors of star-forming galaxies today, consequently, strong Mg ii absorption systems are thought to be correlated with star formation as well. As pointed out in Matejek & Simcoe (2012), systems traced by strong Mg ii absorbers tend to belong to galaxies with high SFRs. In the literature, some studies define systems with Wr(λW_{r}(\lambda2796) >> 0.3 Å as strong systems, while others use Wr(λW_{r}(\lambda2796) >1.0>1.0 Å. In this paper, we use the latter as the definition of strong Mg ii absorbers.

To trace star formation with strong Mg ii absorption systems, the first parameter to calculate is the pathlength number density. The pathlength can be redshift (dzdz) or co-moving pathlength (dXdX), for which

X(z)=0z(1+z)2H0H(z)𝑑z.X(z)=\int^{z}_{0}(1+z^{\prime})^{2}\frac{H_{0}}{H(z^{\prime})}dz. (1)

The number of absorbers per unit redshift (per absorption distance) dN/dzdN/dz (dN/dXdN/dX) has been studied in strong Mg ii systems at low to high redshift. The evolution of the co-moving line density dN/dXdN/dX is above and beyond passive evoultion due to the expansion of the Universe. At z<2z<2, Zhu & Ménard (2013) found that the dN/dzdN/dz of Mg ii absorbers rises with increasing redshift. At z>2z>2, Matejek & Simcoe (2012) and Chen et al. (2017) (hereafter M12 and C17 respectively) show that the comoving dN/dzdN/dz of strong Mg ii (Wr>W_{r}> 1 Å) decreases with increasing redshift, by analyzing 110 absorbers at 1.98 \leq zz \leq 5.3. In contrast, the comoving dN/dzdN/dz of weak Mg ii systems with Wr(λW_{r}(\lambda2796) <1<1 Å is nearly constant over cosmic time (Nestor et al., 2005; Matejek & Simcoe, 2012; Chen et al., 2017), which is quite different from that of strong systems.

In this paper, we present a sample of strong Mg ii absorbers detected in the near-IR spectra of 31 quasars at z>5.7z>5.7 and study the evolution of their number density at 2.2<z<6.02.2<z<6.0. We also explore possible connections between the absorbers and properties of the associated galaxies. This paper is presented as follows. We introduce our sample and absorption detection method in Section 2. The results are presented in Section 3. We discuss possible galaxy counterparts in Section 4. Throughout the paper, all magnitudes are expressed in the AB system. The standard cosmology parameters are used: H0H_{0} = 70 km s-1 Mpc-1, ΩΛ\Omega_{\Lambda} = 0.7 and Ωm\Omega_{m} = 0.3.

2 Data and detection of Mg ii absorbers

The quasar near-IR spectra used in this paper were from a large Gemini-GNIRS program (Shen et al., 2019). Shen et al. observed most of the 52 quasars at z>z> 5.7 (Jiang et al., 2016) and this program was carried out during 15B-17A semester. By excluding those quasars that already have reasonable good quality spectra, the final sample consists of 50 quasars. Most of these 50 quasars were initially selected from SDSS with a color cut of iz>i-z> 2.2 and have no detection in ugrugr bands (Jiang et al., 2016). The observations were executed using the standard ABBA method. A cross-dispersion mode was used to cover the wavelength range from 0.85 to 2.5 μ\mum. We use a slit width of 0.675\arcsec that delivers a resolving power R \sim 800 (\sim 376 km s-1) (GNIRS mean resolution) with a pixel scale of 0.15″/pix. The spectral resolution is estimated from the average FWHM of weak and unblended emission lines in the arc file. The emission redshifts of quasars in the sample were measured from a series of lines (Mg ii, C iii], Si iii, Al iii, C iv, He ii, O iii], Si iv), which takes the velocity shifts of each line into account (Shen et al., 2019). The updated redshifts may differ from the original redshifts in the discovery papers, which are with optical spectra only (see Table 1). The median emission redshift uncertainty is \sim 300 km s-1. The GNIRS data were reduced by the combination of two pipelines, PyRAF-based XDGNIRS (Mason et al., 2015) and the IDL-based XIDL package. The details are described in Shen et al. (2019).

We clarify that the quasar colors in our sample are consistent with that at lower redshift, hence, there is very limited bias caused by the background quasars for absorption candidates selection. Color bias of the background quasars in large samples would possibly affect the foreground absorbers selection. For example, in Prochaska et al. (2009), they found an elevated incidence of Lyman limit opacity in the intergalactic medium. This is related to the SDSS quasar selection bias at zz = 3.5 to z=3.6z=3.6. Considering our sample size and quasar colors, this effect, if any, would be within errors and not affect significantly the absorption study results. Also, we did not select absorption candidates based on any presumptions of N (H i). The selection process of absorption candidates is presented in details in Section 2.1.

2.1 Detection Algorithm

We selected 31 quasars with signal-to-noise ratios (S/N) greater than 10. The S/N is a mean S/N per resel measured from the ‘clean’ continuum region of the spectra without strong OH skylines or water vapor absorption features. The mean S/N values of all spectra are presented in Table 1. Given the low resolution (R\sim 800) of GNIRS spectra, we did not use the lower-S/N spectra. We first fitted each quasar spectrum with a continuum. The continuum was selected interactively with knots in the absorption free wavelength region. The region between two knots was fitted with a spline curve. Then the spectrum was normalized with this continuum. We then used our algorithm to automatically search and identify metal absorbers in the normalized spectra. The absorption feature was identified with a Gaussian kernel filter, which has a rest-frame velocity FWHM between 376 km s-1 and 600 km s-1 (six pixels, empirically selected). If WrW_{r} of this Gaussian kernel is greater than 0.8 Å, which is our detection limit (e.g. observe equivalent width \sim 3 Å around wavelength 10,000 Å) for Mg ii line, then it was considered as an absorption feature. The WrW_{r} was measured from the flux summation over Δλ\Delta\lambda where the Gaussian kernel is within 3% of the continuum. For Mg ii doublet, the two kernels of the doublet are separated by \sim 770 km s-1 and cross-correlated with the spectrum simultaneously. The selection criteria of Mg ii candidates relate to Wr,σ(Wr)W_{r},\sigma(W_{r}) and S/N in the continuum. We calculated the σ(Wr\sigma(W_{r}) by using a method by Vollmann & Eversberg (2006). For a normalized spectrum, the WrW_{r} of an absorption line is defined as:

Wr=λ2λ1(1F)𝑑λΔλr(1F¯),W_{r}=\int_{\lambda_{2}}^{\lambda_{1}}(1-F)d\lambda\approx\Delta\lambda_{r}(1-\overline{F}),\\ (2)

where Δλr\Delta\lambda_{r} = (λ2λ1)/(1+z)(\lambda_{2}-\lambda_{1})/(1+z) is the rest-frame absorption line width. F¯\overline{F} is the mean normalized flux density of the absorption line. Equation 2 can be expanded in a Taylor series:

Wr=Wr(F¯)+WrF¯σ(F),W_{r}=W_{r}(\overline{F})+\frac{\partial W_{r}}{\partial\overline{F}}\sigma(F), (3)

According to Equation 2, there is WrF¯=Δλ\frac{\partial W_{r}}{\partial\overline{F}}=-\Delta\lambda. Together with σ(F)\sigma(F) = F¯S/Nc\frac{\overline{F}}{\textrm{S/N}_{c}}, we have

σ(Wr)=Δλ×F¯(S/N)c.\sigma(W_{r})=\Delta\lambda\times\frac{\overline{F}}{(\mathrm{S/N)}_{c}}. (4)

(S/N)c is the average S/N per resel of ±\pm 10 pixels adjacent to Δλ\Delta\lambda. The specific Mg ii candicates selection criteria are in the following:

1) Wr(λW_{r}(\lambda2796) / σ(Wr)>\sigma~{}(W_{r})~{}> 3.

2) Wr(λW_{r}(\lambda2796) >> 0.8 Å and Wr(λW_{r}(\lambda2803) >> 0.4 Å,

3) S/N >> 3 per resel in three or more contiguous pixels beyond the Δλ\Delta\lambda region.

We searched for Mg ii systems in all 31 quasar spectra using the above criteria and obtained 110 candidates. Afterward, at least two Fe ii lines (at 1608, 1611, 2344, 2374, 2586, or 2600 Å) were visually inspected at the same redshift to further confirm the identified Mg ii doublet. In the end, we confirmed 32 Mg ii and Fe ii absorbers at 2.2 <z<<z< 6.0. The spectra of the absorbers are presented in Figure 1. We found that all these Mg ii absorbers have Wr(λW_{r}(\lambda2796) >> 1.0 Å, and 13 of them are very strong with Wr(λW_{r}(\lambda2796) >> 2.0 Å. The median WrW_{r} is 1.86 Å. The redshift distribution (with a median zz = 3.743) of these absorbers is shown in Figure 2.

Table 1: Summary of 32 strong absorbers.
(1) Quasar (2) zemz_{em} (3) zabsz_{abs} (4) WrW_{r}(λ\lambda2796) (5) WrW_{r}(λ\lambda2803) (6) WrW_{r}(λ\lambda2600) (7) Δv\Delta v (8) Δvobs\Delta v_{\textrm{obs}} (9) S/N
(Å) (Å) (Å) (km s-1) (km s-1)
P000+26 5.733 3.708 1.05±\pm0.28 0.90±\pm0.23 - <<152 <<435 18
J0002+2550 5.818 3.059 1.92±\pm0.38 1.86±\pm0.16 - 478±\pm38 707±\pm22 18
J0008-0626 5.929 - - - - - - 10
J0028+0457 5.982 4.845 2.24±\pm0.76 1.65±\pm0.58 - 379±\pm37 717±\pm20 10
3.282 1.51±\pm0.48 1.76±\pm0.49 0.91±\pm0.43 232±\pm36 640±\pm18
J0050+3445 6.251 3.435 3.44±\pm0.88 2.02±\pm0.56 1.05±\pm0.39 609±\pm39 820±\pm24 10
J0203+0012 5.709 - - - - - - 16
J0300-2232 5.684 4.100 2.06±\pm0.86 1.51±\pm0.63 0.67±\pm0.32 353±\pm37 690±\pm20 13
J0353+0104 6.057 - - - - - - 13
J0810+5105 5.805 - - - - - - 13
J0836+0054 5.834 3.745 2.46±\pm0.44 1.84±\pm0.42 0.66±\pm0.29 548±\pm39 785±\pm24 20
J0840+5624 5.816 5.595 2.74±\pm0.25 2.57±\pm0.10 0.71±\pm0.28 194±\pm36 661±\pm18 17
J0842+1218 6.069 5.050 1.66±\pm0.57 1.25±\pm0.36 2.04±\pm0.54 316±\pm37 660±\pm20 13
2.540 2.68±\pm0.51 1.75±\pm0.73 0.90±\pm0.36 310±\pm37 661±\pm20
2.392 2.01±\pm0.30 1.91±\pm0.24 1.21±\pm0.50 334±\pm37 709±\pm20
J0850+3246 5.730 3.333 1.65±\pm0.46 1.18±\pm0.32 1.15±\pm0.33 165±\pm37 494±\pm20 17
3.094 1.10±\pm0.34 0.38±\pm0.35 1.03±\pm0.38 200±\pm37 440±\pm20
J0927+2001 5.770 - - - - - - 10
J1044-0125 5.780 2.278 2.01±\pm0.31 1.76±\pm0.32 0.71±\pm0.23 155±\pm34 398±\pm14 19
J1137+3549 6.009 5.013 1.73±\pm0.57 1.32±\pm0.45 0.96±\pm0.48 481±\pm38 702±\pm22 10
J1148+0702 6.344 4.369 4.23±\pm0.52 2.88±\pm0.43 3.61±\pm0.54 410±\pm38 690±\pm22 12
3.495111This Mg ii doublet is strongly blended, so measurements have inevitably large uncertainties. 6.50±\pm1.20 6.3±\pm0.70 1.64±\pm0.46 >>865 >>1059 13
J1148+5251 6.416 6.009 1.10±\pm0.34 0.75±\pm0.27 1.63±\pm0.18 207±\pm38 611±\pm22 18
4.944 1.24±\pm0.46 1.21±\pm0.42 0.34±\pm0.29 <<103 <<613
3.557 1.62±\pm0.30 1.74±\pm0.21 0.74±\pm0.25 349±\pm35 400±\pm16
J1207+0630 6.028 3.808 1.63±\pm0.40 1.50±\pm0.45 1.66±\pm0.47 456±\pm36 663±\pm18 10
J1243+2529 5.842 - - - - - - 11
J1250+3130 6.138 4.201 3.06±\pm0.52 2.68±\pm0.51 0.73±\pm0.52 179±\pm38 530±\pm22 12
3.860 1.78±\pm0.60 1.01±\pm0.49 1.80±\pm0.58 297±\pm35 630±\pm16
2.292 2.37±\pm0.42 1.92±\pm0.47 - 381±\pm37 699±\pm20
J1257+6349 5.992 - - - - - - 11
J1335+3533 5.870 4.530 1.21±\pm0.45 1.27±\pm0.30 1.33±\pm0.47 323±\pm38 545±\pm22 15
J1425+3254 5.862 3.136 1.08±\pm0.39 1.12±\pm0.58 1.04±\pm0.32 171±\pm38 507±\pm22 14
3.001 1.22±\pm0.62 0.92±\pm0.65 1.10±\pm0.46 170±\pm38 503±\pm22
J1429+5447 6.119 - - - - - - 12
J1545+6028 5.794 4.152 2.32±\pm0.35 2.03±\pm0.23 0.65±\pm0.21 191±\pm36 475±\pm18 20
3.616 2.03±\pm0.49 1.05±\pm0.50 0.79±\pm0.42 160±\pm35 564±\pm16
J1602+4228 6.083 - - - - - - 13
J1609+3041 6.146 3.896 1.33±\pm0.23 1.54±\pm0.27 1.66±\pm0.23 132±\pm35 391±\pm16 12
J1621+5155 5.637 - - - - - - 20
J1623+3112 6.254 - - - - - - 12
J2310+1855 5.956 4.244 1.86±\pm0.35 0.98±\pm0.21 1.90±\pm0.25 221±\pm34 555±\pm14 18
4.013 1.19±\pm0.21 1.20±\pm0.26 0.83±\pm0.33 <<165 <<388

(1)Quasars. (2) Emission redshift of the quasars. (3) Absorption redshift of Mg ii systems, measurement errors of zabsz_{abs} are smaller than 0.001. (4) Equivalent widths of Mg ii (λ\lambda2796) lines, which are from a Voight profile. The errors are measured by method introduced in Section 2.1. Same for column (5) and (6). (5) Equivalent width of Mg ii (λ\lambda2803) lines. (6) Equivalent width of Fe ii (λ\lambda2600) lines. (7) Velocity width of Mg ii (λ\lambda2796) lines. Instrument broadening was removed. The error of Δv\Delta v was computed from the quadratic sum root of 1 σ\sigma error of FWHMarc and FWHMobs, which are FWHMs of arc files and observed absorption profiles. (8) Observed velocity width of Mg ii (λ\lambda2796) lines. (9) Mean S/N of the spectra.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: All strong Mg ii absorbers in this work. Absorption line redshift zz and WrW_{r} (Å) are labeled for each absorber. The median WrW_{r} for the all the Mg ii absorbers is 1.78 Å and median absorbers redshfit is zz = 3.743. The black and grey curves are the normalized spectra and noise spectra, respectively. The red curves are the best-fitted Voigt profiles. Each absorber is centered at the absorption profile of Mg ii λ\lambda2796.
Refer to caption
Figure 2: Redshift distribution of strong Mg ii absorbers (Wr>W_{r}> 1 Å) in this work (hashed). The redshift distribution of Chen et al. (2017) is scaled by a factor of 0.30 for comparison (in gray).
Figure 3: (a). Velocity widths (Δv\Delta v) histogram of 50 mock Mg ii doublets spectra with R = 800 (hashed) and R = 6000 (grey), respectively. Definition and measurement of Δv\Delta v are described in Section 2.2. The R = 6000 spectra are Voigt profiles with FWHM = 270 km s-1. Then they were convolved into R = 800. Noise was added with a normal distribution and S/N was set to 10. The median Δv\Delta v measured with the method described in Section 2.2 for R = 800 and R = 6000 spectra are 423 ±\pm 20 km s-1 and 424 ±\pm 22 km s-1. (b). Fe ii (λ\lambda2374) line at zz = 3.495 towards J1148+0702 from a Megellan–FIRE Spectrum. The input spectral resolution is around 6000 (black curve). The broadened red curve is the resolution–convoluted spectra with R=800=800. Velocity widths measured with input and broadened spectra are 566 km s-1 and 531 km s-1, respectively.
Refer to caption
Figure 4: Mg ii (λ\lambda2796) velocity width (Δv\Delta v) against rest-frame equivalent width (WrW_{r}). The blue line is the linear relation of our sample with 2σ\sigma limit: 75.63 km s-1 Å×1Wr{}^{-1}\times W_{r} + 141.19 km s-1 in equation 5.

2.2 Measurements

We also measured WrW_{r} of an absorption candidate from a Voigt profile fit. The line is fitted using the VoigtFit package (Krogager, 2018). During the visual inspection process, we noticed that our detection algorithm detected a few absorbers as candidates but they are strongly blended, e.g. Mg ii (λ\lambda2803) lines at zz = 3.059 (J0002+2550), zz = 5.595 (J0840+5624), zz = 4.201 (J1250+3130) and zz = 4.530 (J1335+3533). Due to this blending, the WrW_{r} would be overestimated from the flux boxcar summation. The Doppler parameter bb values of the fits are between 20–60 km s-1. Because that the relatively low resolution would introduce large uncertainties on the bb and column density measurements, we only use Voigt fits to calculate the WrW_{r}, which is independent of spectral resolution. We compared the measurements from the fits and the flux summation. Except for systems with obvious blending, the differences between the two measurements have a median of 0.13 Å and a maximum of 0.5 Å.

We then measured the velocity width from the best-fitted parameters. The intrinsic rest-frame velocity width Δv\Delta v was determined by the instrument broadening and observed velocity width Δvobs\Delta v_{\mathrm{obs}}. The observed Δvobs\Delta v_{\mathrm{obs}} was measured between the leftmost and rightmost pixels with optical depth τ<0.1\tau<0.1. The optical depth τ\tau equals ln (1/FF), where FF is the normalized flux at this wavelength. This measurement is similar to the standard Δv90\Delta v_{90} definition (Prochter et al., 2006). The idea is to include all satellite absorption and to have a good representation of the kinematic extent of the absorption. We measured instrument broadening from lamp/arc lines used for wavelength calibration. The average FWHM of the arc lines FWHMarc is roughly 376 ±\pm 31 km s-1(with 1 σ\sigma error). The rest-frame intrinsic FWHM was calculated by FWHM=FWHMobs2FWHMarc2{\rm FWHM}=\sqrt{{\rm FWHM_{obs}}^{2}-{\rm FWHM_{arc}}^{2}} / (1+z1+z), where FWHMobs is the observed FWHM of the line. Then we assume the ratio of intrinsic FWHM and Δv\Delta v is the same as the ratio of observed FWHM and Δvobs\Delta v_{\mathrm{obs}}, i.e. Δv\Delta v = FWHM×(Δvobs/FWHMobs)\times(\Delta v_{\mathrm{obs}}/{\rm FWHM_{obs}}).

To minimize the low resolution impact on our velocity spread measurements, we create 50 mock Mg ii absorption spectra and convolved them into FIRE resolution of R = 6000 (i.e. 50 km s-1) and GNIRS resolution of R \sim 800 (i.e. 376 km s-1), respectively. Then we measured the Δv\Delta v from the mock spectra with different resolutions using the same method described above. The measurements are consistent within errors \sim 20 km s-1 (see Figure 3). We also used a FIRE spectra of Fe ii (λ\lambda 2374) system at z=z= 3.495 towards QSO J0148+0702. We degraded the spectral resolution into R = 800. The velocity width measurement difference between the original and degraded spectra is within 30 km s-1.

The intrinsic and observed velocity widths of all the detected absorbers are shown in Table 1 column (7) and (8), respectively. We found that 15 out of 32 absorbers have Δv>300\Delta v>300 km s-1. We fit the relation between Δv\Delta v and WrW_{r} using a polynomial curve fitting technique considering the errors from two variables (see Figure 4).

Δv=75.63kms1Å1×Wr+141.19kms1.\Delta v=75.63\>\mathrm{km~{}s^{-1}}{\textrm{\AA}^{-1}}\times W_{r}+141.19\>\mathrm{km~{}s^{-1}}. (5)

2.3 Comparison with C17

We compared measurements of five overlapping sightlines (J0203+0012, J0836+0054, J0842+1218, J1148+0702 and J2310+1855) between our sample and the FIRE sample in C17. The details are presented in the following and Table 2.

All Mg ii systems in J0203+0012 and the one at zz = 2.299 toward J0836+0054 reported in C17 are below 1 Å, which are beyond our detection limit. The WrW_{r}, Δv\Delta v and zz measurements of the system at zz = 3.745 toward J0836+0054 are consistent. For J0841+1218, three systems were detected in this work and C17 at z=5.050,2.540,2.392z=5.050,2.540,2.392. The WrW_{r}, Δv\Delta v and zz measurements are consistent with errors. For J1148+0702, we detected two systems at zz = 4.369 (Wr(λW_{r}(\lambda2796) = 4.23 ±\pm 0.52 Å) and zz = 3.495 (Wr(λW_{r}(\lambda2796) = 6.50 ±\pm 1.20 Å). The measurements of the system at zz = 4.369 are consistent with that in C17. The system at zz = 3.495 has extremely large velocity width (>> 800 km s-1 for Mg ii (λ\lambda2796) line) and the absorptions are strongly blended within the doublet. Thus, the WrW_{r} and Δv\Delta v measurements of this system inevitably have large uncertainties. We did not use this measurement when calculating the relation in Equation 5. For J2310+1855, the two systems at zz = 3.299 and 2.351 detected in C17 have Wr<W_{r}< 1.0 Å, which are beyond our detection ability. The one at zz = 2.243 is located in a noisy region where the line are not able to be detected in our spectrum. We detected two systems at zz = 4.244 and zz = 4.013, which are not included in C17. The first one has Wr(λW_{r}(\lambda2796) = 1.86 ±\pm 0.35 Å and Δv\Delta v = 221 ±\pm 34 km s-1. The second one has Wr(λW_{r}(\lambda2796) = 1.19 ±\pm 0.21 Å and Δv<\Delta v< 165 km s-1 (see the last two panels in Figure 1). The system at zz = 4.244 was present in an inspection of the spectrum used in C17, but was rejected by their automated search algorithm because Wr(λW_{r}(\lambda2803) >> Wr(λW_{r}(\lambda2796) , likely because of blending in the Mg ii (λ\lambda2803) line from interloping systems at lower redshift. The system at zz = 4.013 has severe telluric noise in FIRE spectrum (R. Simcoe, private communication).

In summary, except for the systems have Wr(λW_{r}(\lambda2796) << 1 Å or where the spectra S/N is too low, our absorption redshfit, equivalent width and velocity spread measurements are consistent with that in C17 within errors. Though it is possible that, for systems have Δvobs<\Delta v_{\textrm{obs}}< 400 km s-1 (close to GNIRS resolution), our velocity widths uncertainties would be large.

3 Results

Table 2: Measurements of the overlapping sightlines between this work and C17. J0203+0012 is not in this table, because the WrW_{r} measurements of all systems detected in C17 are beyond our detection limit.
(1) Quasar (2) zabsz_{abs} (3) WrW_{r}(λ\lambda2796) GNIRS (4)WrW_{r}(λ\lambda2796) C17 (5)Δv\Delta v GNIRS (6) Δv\Delta v C17
(Å) (Å) (km s-1) (km s-1)
J0836+0054 3.745 2.46±\pm0.44 2.51±\pm0.02 548±\pm39 510.4
J0842+1218 5.050 1.66±\pm0.57 1.81±\pm0.15 301±\pm37 245.1
2.540 2.68±\pm0.51 2.16±\pm0.10 310±\pm37 384.5
2.392 2.01±\pm0.30 1.44±\pm0.25 279±\pm37 193.8
J1148+0702 4.369 4.23±\pm0.52 4.78±\pm0.11 410±\pm38 371.9
3.495 6.50±\pm1.20 4.82±\pm0.19 >>865 899.2
J2310+1855 4.244 1.86±\pm0.35 221±\pm34
4.013 1.19±\pm0.21 << 165

(1) Quasars. (2) Mg ii absorption redshifts. (3) Rest-frame equivalents of Mg ii (λ\lambda2796) measured in GNIRS. (4) Rest-frame equivalents of Mg ii (λ\lambda2796) in C17. (5) Velocity widths measured in GNIRS. (6) Velocity widths measured in C17.

The near-IR spectra are strongly contaminated by OH skylines and telluric absorption. To conduct population statistics analysis for absorbers, we need to correct the incompleteness caused by the contamination. In this section, we first correct these effects and then present the statistical dN/dzdN/dz and dN/dXdN/dX for our Mg ii sample.

3.1 Completeness

Refer to caption
Figure 5: Measurement errors of Wr(λW_{r}(\lambda2796) and redshift (zz) from our simulation. The errors of WrW_{r} and zz are 0.15 Åand 0.002, respectively. The errors were calculated by comparing the inserted and measured values of 1000 mock Mg ii absorbers.
Refer to caption
Figure 6: Average pathlength-weighted completeness C¯(Wr,z)\overline{C}(W_{r},z) for 31 sightlines in the sample with W0.8W\geq 0.8 (light blue), 1 (black) and 3 Å  (red), respectively. Two strong water vapor regions are labeled with vertical grey regions.

For each quasar spectrum, we performed a Monte Carlo simulation by inserting uniformly distributed, virtual Mg ii doublets in the wavelength range between 8500 Å  and 20,000Å, corresponding to the absorber redshift of 2.0 and 6.2, respectively. The inserted Wr(λW_{r}(\lambda2796) varies between 1.0 and 4.5 Å, which is the observed WrW_{r} range of our detected Mg ii absorbers (except for the strongly blended one toward J1148+0702). For each WrW_{r}, its velocity width follows the relation Δv\Delta v = 103.37 km s-1 Å×1Wr{}^{-1}\times W_{r} + 399.60 km s-1, which we measured from the Δvobs\Delta v_{\textrm{obs}} and WrW_{r}. Two strong water vapor regions (1.35 - 1.42 μ\mum between JJ and HH and 1.82 - 1.93 μ\mum between HH and KK band) are discarded in the statistical analysis of dN/dzdN/dz and dN/dXdN/dX. Then we use the algorithm introduced in Section 2.1 to detect the inserted virtual absorbers. We measured the uncertainties between inserted and retrieved measurements from 1000 mock inserted Mg ii systems. The measurement errors of WrW_{r} and zz are 0.015 Å and 0.002, respectively (see Figure 5). This bias would be affect the final completeness significantly. The detection result is denoted as a Heaviside function H(z,Wr)H(z,W_{r}):

H(z,Wr)={1,if the absorber is detected,0,if the absorber is not detected.H(z,W_{r})=\left\{\begin{array}[]{cl}1,&\text{if the absorber is detected},\\ 0,&\text{if the absorber is not detected}.\end{array}\right. (6)

The redshift-weighted density g(z,Wr)g(z,W_{r}) is a function of WrW_{r} and zz denoted as

g(z,Wr)=i=1NH(z,Wr),g(z,W_{r})=\sum^{N}_{i=1}H(z,W_{r}), (7)

where NN is the total number of sightlines. The total path g(z)g(z) is obtained as the integral of the path density over the whole range that we selected (see Figure 7):

g(z)=W0g(z,Wr)𝑑z,g(z)=\int_{W_{0}}^{\infty}g(z,W_{r})dz, (8)

where W0W_{0} is the WrW_{r} limit. For each sightline, its completeness is the detection rate of the inserted absorbers. The completeness of pathlength is a function of redshift and WrW_{r},

C(z,Wr)=g(z,Wr)/N.C(z,W_{r})=g(z,W_{r})/N. (9)

We show the pathlength-averaged completeness C¯(z,Wr)\overline{C}(z,W_{r}) for the selected 31 sightlines with Wr(λW_{r}(\lambda2796) >> 0.8 Å, 1 Å and >> 3 Å in Figure 6. For Wr(λW_{r}(\lambda2796) >> 1 Å  the completeness is around 40% \sim 80% in the JJ band (1.17–1.37 μ\mum), and around 20% \sim 60% in the HH band (1.49–1.80 μ\mum). The low completeness in the HH band is due to the contamination of strong sky lines.

Refer to caption
Figure 7: The total absorption path g(Wr)g(W_{r}) against rest-frame equivalent width WrW_{r}.

Even if the S/N of a spectrum is high enough to detect weak lines, visual inspection may miss some weak absorbers. The probability for users to confirm true absorbers is defined as user acceptance. In M13 and C17, the user acceptance rate is defined as a function of S/N and has been considered in their calculations. M13 suggests that when S/N >> 10, the user acceptance is close to 1 and the rejection fraction of false-positive candidates is close to 0.

Zhu & Ménard (2013) identified 40,000 Mg ii absorbers from SDSS at 0.4 <z<<z< 2.3. By requiring the simultaneous detection of Fe ii lines (λλ\lambda\lambda 2344, 2383, 2586, 2600) for each Mg ii absorption line, they recovered close to 100% of strong absorbers in the Pittsburgh catalogs (Quider et al., 2011). In this work, we focus on the strong system with Wr(λW_{r}(\lambda2796) 1\geq 1 Å  for which we also confirm detection of Fe ii candidate lines at the same absorption redshift. Given this and that our database consists of spectra with S/N >> 10, we assume that our visual inspection is correct at a rate of ca 95%. In the case that one or two Fe ii candidate lines reside in the water vapor region and are affected significantly by OH lines, the bias would be within this rate given the wide wavelength coverage of Fe ii candidate lines. We calculated the Fe ii lines association with strong Mg ii systems in M13. We found that there are 35 out of 37 (94.5%) strong Mg ii systems (Wr(λW_{r}(\lambda2796) >> 1 Å) associated with at least three clear Fe ii lines. Additionally, spurious detection caused e.g. by C iv doublets Wr(λW_{r}(\lambda1548 >> 0.5 Å) are not detected in our spectra. Therefore, the false positive detection rate from the weaker lines is close to 0.

3.2 dN/dzdN/dz and dN/dXdN/dX

We calculate the incompleteness-corrected line-of-sight density of strong Mg ii absorbers at different redshift bins. The results at four redshift bins between 2.2 and 6.0 are shown in Figure 8 and Table 3. The relation between dN/dzdN/dz and redshift can be expressed as,

dNdz=N0×(1+z)β,\frac{dN}{dz}=N_{0}\times(1+z)^{\beta}, (10)

where N0N_{0} is the normalization and β\beta is the slope. We apply the Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) method to the relation and find that N0N_{0} and β\beta are 1.882±\pm3.252 and –0.952±\pm1.108, respectively.

Previous studies (e.g., M13 and C17) have found that the dN/dzdN/dz of strong Mg ii absorbers generally decreases with increasing redshift at 2<z<62<z<6. In particular, the dN/dzdN/dz or dN/dXdN/dX at z>4.5z>4.5 drops rapidly (see Figure 8). Codoreanu et al. (2017) studied Mg ii systems using four quasars from VLT-Xshooter and found that the dN/dzdN/dz is relatively flat at 2<z42<z\leq 4. This is likely due to the larger uncertainties from their small sample, as they have pointed out in the paper. As shown in Figure 8, our results are consistent with the previous results within errors. The trend at 2<z<42<z<4 is not clear due to the large errors, but the density decreases significantly at z>4.5z>4.5.

Refer to caption
Figure 8: Line density dN/dzdN/dz (upper panel) and comoving line density dN/dXdN/dX (lower panel) of the Mg ii absorbers in our sample. Our results are plotted as green curves and diamonds. The purple triangles are the data from Chen et al. (2017) and the grey dots represent data of Matejek & Simcoe (2012). The orange triangles represent a sample of Codoreanu et al. (2017). The relation presented by M13 is (in purple) dN/dzdN/dz = (1.301±\pm1.555)×\times(1+z)0.746±0.857z)^{-0.746\pm 0.857}. Relation in C17 is (in grey) dN/dzdN/dz = (2.298±\pm1.561) ×\times(1+z)1.020±0.475z)^{-1.020\pm 0.475}. The orange dashed line is relation in Codoreanu et al. (2017): dN/dzdN/dz = (0.14±\pm0.09)×\times(1+z)0.48±0.20z)^{0.48\pm 0.20}.

3.3 Kinematics and saturation

Refer to caption
Figure 9: Properties of the absorbers in our sample and comparison with previous studies: a SDSS sample of Mg ii systems z<2z<2 from Zhu & Ménard (2013), a sample of DLA–Mg ii systems from XQ-100 survey (Berg et al., 2017), and a sample of Mg ii associated with neutral atomic carbon (C i) absorbers in Zou et al. (2018). (a) Velocity width Δv\Delta v against Wr(λW_{r}(\lambda2796) . The purple triangles are the data from C17. Our Mg ii systems are very likely affected by galactic superwinds. (b) Wr(λW_{r}(\lambda2803) - Wr(λW_{r}(\lambda2796) relation for different samples. The two dashed line represents the ratio of Wr(λW_{r}(\lambda2803) /Wr(λW_{r}(\lambda2796) = 1.0, 0.5, respectively. Our Mg ii lines exhibit potential less saturation than other two samples. (c) Ratio of Wr(λW_{r}(\lambda2600) /Wr(λW_{r}(\lambda2796) against Wr(λW_{r}(\lambda2796) . Our strong Mg ii systems show relatively smaller Wr(λW_{r}(\lambda2600) /Wr(λW_{r}(\lambda2796) ratios, one possible reason is that Mg ii clouds at higher redshift are in the interactions of multiple unresolved subcomponents.

The evolution of Mg ii incidence has implications for the origin of Mg ii absorbers. One possible scenario is that superwinds give rise to strong Mg ii absorbers in starburst galaxies (Bond et al., 2001; Heckman, 2001; Bouché et al., 2006). Superwinds are gas bubbles generated by starbursts. They escape from gravitational wells and then blow into galaxy halos. Low-ions such as Mg ii and Na i reside in the shells of these superwinds. Another possible scenario is that strong Mg ii systems would reside in a galaxy groups environment. For example, Gauthier (2013) find their ultra-strong Mg ii absorber (Wr(λW_{r}(\lambda2796) = 4.2 Å) at zz = 0.5624 is associated with five galaxies within 60 kpc.

Table 3: Pathlength density of Mg ii absorbers.
(1) Δz\Delta z (2) C¯(%)\overline{C}(\%) (3) dN/dzdN/dz (4) dN/dXdN/dX
2.220 – 3.000 47.1 0.386±\pm0.153 0.117±\pm0.048
3.000 – 3.828 49.6 0.672±\pm0.268 0.179±\pm0.071
4.185 – 5.000 29.7 0.612±\pm0.280 0.144±\pm0.067
5.000 – 5.436 31.6 0.192±\pm0.120 0.042±\pm0.024
6.000 – 6.200 25.1 0.121±\pm0.100 0.026±\pm0.020

(1) Each redshfit bin selected to calculate the pathlength density. (2) Average pathlength-weighted completeness over 31 sightlines. (3) Number of absorbers per unit redshift dzdz. (4) Number of absorbers per comoving absorption distance dXdX.

To further investigate the possible scenarios for the origin of our strong Mg ii systems, we compare the velocity widths of our Mg ii systems with those at similar and lower redshift. We compare with three samples in the literature: a blindly-searched Mg ii sample from SDSS DR12 (Zhu & Ménard, 2013) at 0.4 <z<<z< 2.3, Mg ii systems associated with a DLA sample from the XQ-100 survey at 2 <z<<z< 4 (Berg et al., 2017), and Mg ii systems traced by a neutral atomic carbon (C i) sample at 1.5 <z<<z< 2.7 (Zou et al., 2018). The comparison is plotted in Figure 9.

We found that the velocity widths of our Mg ii absorbers are larger than those associated with DLAs with similar equivalent widths at 2<z<4<z<4, this feature is also seen in C17 strong Mg ii systems. In the C17 sample of 287 absorbers, 104 of which have Wr(λW_{r}(\lambda2796) >> 1 Å, and 58 out of 104 have Δv>\Delta v> 300 km s-1. Note that the Δv\Delta v given in C17 is defined as the total velocity interval under the continuum. Even if only 90% of their intervals are considered, half of the strong absorbers still have Δv>\Delta v> 300 km s-1. In the DLA-tracing Mg ii sample, 18 out of 29 Mg ii absorbers have Wr>W_{r}> 1 Å  but only one has velocity width greater than 300 km s-1. Moreover, large velocity widths for Mg ii absorbers are also seen in the C i-tracing Mg ii absorbers at 1.5 <z<<z< 2.7. The velocity widths were measured by the same method decribed in Setion 2.2. In the 17 systems of C i-tracing Mg ii absorbers, 15 of which have Wr>W_{r}> 1 Å  and 13 out of 15 (87%) have Δv>\Delta v> 300 km s-1. C i has been shown to effectively trace molecular and cold gas at z2z\sim 2, and thus star formation activities. As discussed in Zou et al. (2018), the C i systems can be highly disturbed by superwinds or the interactions between several galaxies. Therefore, large velocity widths of our Mg ii absorber suggest that our systems are potentially strongly affected by the galactic superwinds and/or the interaction within galaxy groups.

The two dashed lines in panel (b) are for Wr(λW_{r}(\lambda2803) /Wr(λW_{r}(\lambda2796) = 1 and 0.5 respectively. The ratio greater than one implies that Mg ii doublets are strongly saturated. In our sample, about 42% of the absorbers have this line ratio greater than 0.8. This fraction is 55\sim 55% in the 0.4 <z<<z< 2.3 SDSS sample. Our Mg ii systems are slightly less saturated than the absorbers at z<z< 2.3.

Another piece of possible supportive evidence is the equivalent width ratio of Fe ii and Mg ii lines (Wr(λW_{r}(\lambda2600) /Wr(λW_{r}(\lambda2796) ). We compare our sample with the DLA-tracing Mg ii sample at 2<z<4<z<4 and a sample from Rodríguez Hidalgo et al. (2012) at low redshift. Rodríguez Hidalgo et al. (2012) analyzed 87 Mg ii system with Wr(λW_{r}(\lambda2796) >> 0.3 Å at 0.2 <z<<z< 2.5. They found that strong systems (Wr(λW_{r}(\lambda2796) >> 1 Å) do not have small Wr(λW_{r}(\lambda2600) /Wr(λW_{r}(\lambda2796) ratios in their sample. In panel (c) of Figure 9, our sample covers a wide range of the Wr(λW_{r}(\lambda2600) /Wr(λW_{r}(\lambda2796) ratios. In particular, four systems among the strongest Mg ii absorbers have smaller ratios (WrW_{r} (λ\lambda2600)/WrW_{r} (λ\lambda2796) << 0.5) than most of the other systems in the sample. The small Wr(λW_{r}(\lambda2600) /Wr(λW_{r}(\lambda2796) values can be due to many reasons, e.g. kinematics evolution, dust depletion and intrinsic [Mg/Fe] abundance in the gas phase. We here propose that the kinematic evolution of the profiles of the very strong absorbers is a possible reason. Which means, at high redshift, the number of unresolved sub-components associated with strong Mg ii absorbers may grow.

Table 4: Photometry of possible galaxies counterparts around our targets selected. The selection criteria is Δv>\Delta v> 300 km s-1or Wr(λW_{r}(\lambda2796) >>1.5 Å.
Quasar zabsz_{abs} Targets NO. R.A. Dec. F105WF105W MM DD gg ii rr zz
(mag) (mag) (kpc) (mag) (mag) (mag) (mag)
J0002+2550 3.059 1 00:02:39.24 +25:50:36.7 24.74±\pm0.08 –19.15±\pm0.08 20.2 >>25.78
J0050+3445 3.435 1 00:50:06.99 +34:45:22.8 24.83±\pm0.08 –19.20±\pm0.08 29.7 25.44±\pm0.10 25.64±\pm0.11
2 00:50:06.71 +34:45:18.5 23.96±\pm0.04 –20.07±\pm0.04 30.8 25.43±\pm0.10 24.89±\pm0.13
J0842+1218 5.050 1 08:42:29.55 +12:18:52.5 24.72±\pm0.08 –19.72±\pm0.08 17.1 >>25.64
2.540 1 24.72±\pm0.08 –18.94±\pm0.08 17.1
2.392 1 24.72±\pm0.08 –18.87±\pm0.08 21.9
J1207+0630 3.808 1 12:07:37.61 +06:30:11.3 24.83±\pm0.12 –19.31±\pm0.12 21.5 >>25.62
3.808 2 12:07:37.55 +06:30:13.9 25.10±\pm0.16 –19.04±\pm0.12 30.1
J1250+3130 4.201 1 12:50:51.93 +31:30:23.6 25.49±\pm0.16 –18.76±\pm0.16 11.4 >>25.61
3.860 1 25.49±\pm0.16 –18.66±\pm0.16 11.8
2.292 1 25.49±\pm0.16 –18.04±\pm0.16 13.7
J1335+3533 4.530 1 13:35:50.68 +35:33:11.5 23.69±\pm0.04 –20.63±\pm0.04 30.7
J2310+1855 4.244 1 23:10:38.73 +18:55:17.2 24.26±\pm0.05 –20.00±\pm0.05 22.6 25.55±\pm0.14 24.34±\pm0.25
4.244 2 23:10:38.95 +18:55:22.6 25.10±\pm0.11 –19.15±\pm0.11 21.4 26.18±\pm0.25

The 1 or 2 labels in the third column are galaxy candidates number in Figures 8 and 9. Two detection limit in g band for J0002+2550, J0842+1218, J1207+0630, and J1250+3130 are measured from public DECaLs imaging data. The g; r bands magnitudes for J0500+3445 and r; z bands magnitudes for J2310+1855 are measured from CFHT–MegaPrime.

4 Discussion

Our strong Mg ii systems exhibit large rest-frame velocity widths and potential less saturation, the Mg ii gas is potentially strongly affected by galactic superwinds or the interaction within galaxy groups. Previous studies suggest that both star-forming and passive galaxies may host Mg ii absorbers. Star-forming galaxies tend to host stronger absobers. Zibetti et al. (2007) studied 2,800 Mg ii systems having Wr(λW_{r}(\lambda2796) >0.8>0.8 Å at 0.37 <z<<z< 1 and associated galaxies within 20-100 kpc. They tentatively conclude that Wr(λW_{r}(\lambda2796) << 1.1 Å systems are associated with passive galaxies, while Wr(λW_{r}(\lambda2796) >> 1 Å systems tends to associated with star-forming galaxies. Lan et al. (2014) selected 2,000 galaxy-Mg ii absorber pairs at z<z< 0.5 and found that, within 50 kpc, strong absorbers tend to be associated with star-forming galaxies. In this section, we will investigate the gas properties of the Mg ii clouds, including gas cross-section, absorbing halo size, and the galaxy impact parameter.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 10: Image cutouts of J0050+3445 and J2310+1855. The g,ig,i band images of J0500+3445 and r,zr,z band images of J2310+1855 are from CFHT MegaPrime. The F105WF105W-band images are from HST. Image size is 20×\arcsec\times20\arcsec, the yellow circle is in a 5 \arcsec radius. The candidate absorber galaxies are denoted as 1 and 2.

4.1 HST images

We have a small sample of HST snapshot images observed in the WFC3/IR F105W band (Program ID: 12184, PI: X. Fan). The images cover 7 of our quasars with strong absorbers with Wr(λW_{r}(\lambda2796) >> 1.5 Å or Δv>\Delta v> 300 km s -1, namely J0002+2550, J0050+3445, J0842+1218, J1207+0630, J1335+3533, J2310+1855. The median redshift of the absorbers is 3.982. For each quasar, there is at least one candidate galaxy with \geq7σ\sigma detection (\leq 25.5 mag) within a 5\arcsec circular radius in the HST image (see Table 4 and Figures 10, 11). The photometry is performed using SExtractor (Bertin & Arnouts, 1996). All these galaxies are fainter than 24 mag in F105W, which is fainter than LL^{*} galaxies at zz\sim 4 (mm^{*} = 23.31 ±\pm 0.08) (Bouwens et al., 2015). The median magnitude in F105W for our sample is 24.78.

The rest-frame band of F105W at the median redshift of Mg ii (zz = 3.743) is UU band. The LBGs UV-continuum slope γ\gamma (fλf_{\lambda} = λγ\lambda^{\gamma}) measured by Bouwens et al. (2012) at z4z\sim 4 is around -2, therefore we have ubu-b\sim 0. If the galaxy is a passive galaxy, it is unable to be detected with present images. We then obtained LB/LB=L_{B}/L_{B}^{*}= 0.25, where LBL_{B} and LBL_{B}^{*} are the BB band luminosity of our galaxy candidates and LL^{*} galaxies, respectively. The result is consistent with the estimates of the Mg ii associated galaxy luminosity in M13.

Because we only have a single photometric band measurement, we do not know their redshifts or whether they are associated with the detected absorption systems. We search the archival images of the Dark Energy Camera Legacy Survey (DECaLS) (Dey et al., 2019) and find that four quasar fields are covered by DECaLS (J0002+2550, J0842+1218, J1207+0630, J1250+3130). None of the above galaxies are detected in the grzgrz bands. The 2σ\sigma detection limit in the gg band (the deepest band) is roughly 25.5 mag (see also Table 4). The red gg–F105W color implies that these galaxies are likely at high redshift. We further estimate the surface density of z>z> 2.5 galaxies brighter than 25.5 mag in a few HST  fields (Bouwens et al., 2015) and find that the expected number of random galaxies in a 5\arcsec circular area is about 0.1. This is significantly lower than our density of >1>1, suggesting that the galaxies detected in F105W above are likely associated with the strong absorbers. We can see that within 50 kpc of each absorber, we detected maximum two galaxy candidates. If multiple galaxies are associated with strong Mg ii systems at high redshift, we need higher resolution spectra to disentangle the absorbing gas kinematic structure and deeper images to search for galaxy candidates nearby.

4.2 Gas halo size and galaxy impact parameter

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 11: HST F105WF105W band image cutouts for J0002+2550, J0842+1218, J1207+0630, J1250+3130, J1335+3533, J1429+5447 and J1602+4228. Each figure size is 20×\arcsec\times20\arcsec, the yellow circle is in a 5 \arcsec radius. The possible nearby galaxy are denoted as 1 or 2.

We have limited our search of galaxy candidates within a 5\arcsec (42.36 kpc at zz = 2.2) radius, and we detected at least one candidate for each absorber within an impact parameter D=50D=50 kpc. This median distance of 23.31 kpc is smaller than the median distance, <D><D> = 48.7 kpc found in the local Universe (Schulze et al., 2012; Nielsen et al., 2013a, b, 2018), suggesting that strong Mg ii absorbers likely have smaller impact parameters at higher redshift. We can also calculate the absorbing halo gas size from the measured dN/dXdN/dX and LB/LBL_{B}/L_{B}^{*} using the relation from Kacprzak et al. (2008). The comoving line density (dN/dz)(dN/dz) can be expressed as the product of the absorber physical cross-section σ\sigma and volume co-moving number density n(z)n(z),

dNdz=cH0σn(z)dXdz,\frac{dN}{dz}=\frac{c}{H_{0}}\sigma n(z)\frac{dX}{dz}, (11)

where c/H0{H_{0}} is the constant of proportionality and

dXdz=(1+z)2Ωm(1+z)3+ΩΛ.\frac{dX}{dz}=\frac{(1+z)^{2}}{\sqrt{\Omega_{m}(1+z)^{3}+\Omega_{\Lambda}}}. (12)

The gas cross-section is expressed as σ\sigma = πRx2\pi R_{x}^{2}, where RxR_{x} is the absorbing gas halo size. The volume number density n(z)n(z) can be expressed as a function of associated galaxy luminosity:

n(z)=Φ×Γ(x,y),n(z)=\Phi^{*}\times\Gamma(x,y), (13)

where Φ\Phi^{*} is the number density of LL^{*} galaxies in the galaxy luminosity function. Γ(x,y)\Gamma(x,y) is an incomplete Gamma function with x=2βα+1x=2\beta-\alpha+1, where α\alpha is the faint-end slope of Schechter function and β\beta is the factor of a relation between RxR_{x} and associated galaxy luminosity (Steidel et al., 1995): Rx=R×(L/L)βR_{x}=R_{*}\times(L/L^{*})^{\beta}. yy is the ratio of the detected galaxy minimum luminosity to LL^{*}. Therefore RxR_{x} is:

Rx=dN/dXπΦΓ(x,y).R_{x}=\sqrt{\frac{dN/dX}{\pi\Phi^{*}\Gamma(x,y)}}. (14)

We take α=1.64±0.04\alpha=-1.64\pm 0.04 from Bouwens et al. (2015), β=0.35\beta=0.35, our measured y=LB/LB=y=L_{B}/L_{B}^{*}= 0.25 and dN/dzdN/dz at <z><z> = 3.5, ΦB\Phi^{*}_{B} = 1.97 ×0.28+0.34103{}^{+0.34}_{-0.28}\times 10^{-3} Mpc -3 (Bouwens et al., 2015) to calcualte the RxR_{x}. The β\beta value is from Chen et al. (2010), which analysed 47 Mg ii associated galaxies at z<z< 0.5 and with 0.1 <<Wr(λW_{r}(\lambda2796) << 2.34 Å. We assume the slope does not change at higher redshift. The RxR_{x} is then estimated as follows:

Rx(kpc)={37,β=0.35,y=0.05;8,β=0.35,y=0.25.R_{x}\textrm{(kpc)}=\left\{\begin{array}[]{cl}37,&\beta=0.35,y=0.05;\\ 8,&\beta=0.35,y=0.25.\end{array}\right. (15)

With our measured LB/LB=L_{B}/L_{B}^{*}= 0.25, RxR_{x} is smaller than the possible DD. This is based on the assumption that the covering fraction fcf_{c} of the gas is unity. Covering fraction of the absorbing gas is defined as the ratio of absorbers associated galaxies and all galaxies at the same redshift bin. Lan (2020) found that covering fraction of strong Mg ii systems evolves with redshift at 0.4 <z<<z< 1.3, similarly to the evolution of star-formation rate of galaxies. In the study of Chen et al. (2010), the Mg ii-absorbing halo gas covering fraction is 70% for Wr(λW_{r}(\lambda2796) >> 0.3 Å. Nielsen et al. (2018) studied 74 galaxies at 0.113 <z<<z< 0.888 with \langleWr(λW_{r}(\lambda2796) \rangle = 0.65 Å, and found fcf_{c} = 0.68 for isolated galaxies. Since we have 1-2 galaxy candidate within 5\arcsec of the absorber, we adopt the fcf_{c} = 0.68. The covering fraction corrected size RR_{*} is 9.23 kpc (Rx2R_{x}^{2} = fcR2f_{c}R_{*}^{2}), which is still smaller than the <D><D> = 23.31 kpc.

In summary, we searched for associated galaxies around our strong Mg ii absorbers at zz = 3–5.1 within 50 kpc and found 1–2 candidates for each absorber. The galaxy candidates are brighter than 25.5 mag and have a median magnitude of 24.78 in F105W band. Theses candidates have a median impact paramter <D><D> = 23.31 kpc, which is smaller than that at z<z< 1. If we assume that the RxR_{x}LL slope and fcf_{c} for strong Mg ii absorbers at zz = 3–5.1 are similar to that at z<z< 1, with a fixed associated galaxy luminosity L=0.25LL=0.25L* and a covering fraction of fcf_{c} = 0.68, the fcf_{c}-corrected absorbing halo gas RR_{*} is smaller than the <D><D>. In another word, within 50 kpc, high redshift strong Mg ii absorbers tend to have a more disturbed environment but smaller halo size than that at z<1z<1.

4.3 Individual Systems

In this subsection, we present a few individual systems with peculiar absorption features or having images in other bands.

J0050+3445. We detected a Mg ii absorber at zz = 3.435 with Wr(λW_{r}(\lambda2796) =3.44 ±\pm 0.88Å. There are two galaxy candidates within 5\arcsec from the quasar, labeled as 1 and 2 in Figure 10. We measure the gg and rr band magnitudes of the two objects using archived Canada France Hawaii Telescope (CFHT) MegaPrime images. The magnitudes of galaxy 1 are gg = 25.44 ±\pm 0.10 and ii =25.64 ±\pm 0.11. The magnitudes of galaxy 2 are gg = 25.43 ±\pm 0.10 and ii =24.89 ±\pm 0.13. The Lyα\alpha emission line at zz = 3.435 is redshifted to 5391 Å (gg band), so galaxy 2 with gig-i = 0.54 is more likely to be the absorber.

J2310+1855. We detected strong Mg ii and Fe ii at zz= 4.244. In Figure 10 there are two galaxies within 5\arcsec (25 kpc) from the quasar. The magnitudes of galaxy 1 are rr = 25.55 ±\pm 0.14, zz =24.34 ±\pm 0.25, and F105WF105W = 24.26 ±\pm 0.05. The magnitudes of galaxy 2 are rr = 26.18 ±\pm 0.25 and F105WF105W = 25.10 ±\pm 0.11. It is not detected in zz. Based on their colors, galaxy 1 is more likely to be the absorber host at z=4.244z=4.244. In addition, there is a bright object next to galaxy 1. But its mzm_{z} = 22.15 is much brighter than LL^{*} at zz\sim 4, so we did not consider it.

J1148+0702. We detected Mg ii and Fe ii at zz= 4.369 and zz = 3.495, the latter one has extremely large velocity spread for a Mg ii doublet. This one at zz = 4.369 has a very strong Mg ii (Wr(λW_{r}(\lambda2796) >> 4 Å ) absorber with the strongest Fe ii (Wr(λ2600)W_{r}(\lambda 2600) = 4.45 ±\pm 0.82 Å ) absorption in our sample. Both Mg ii and Fe ii lines are strongly saturated. As discussed in Joshi et al. (2017), strong Mg ii and Fe ii in the same system may indicate star formation nearby. We do not have HST images for this quasar. The Mg ii and Fe ii absorption profiles are presented in Figure 12.

Refer to caption
Figure 12: Velocity profile of J1148+0702 at zz = 4.369. This system has Mg ii absorption (Wr(λW_{r}(\lambda2796) = 4.23 ±\pm 0.52 Å) and the strongest Fe ii absorption (Wr(λW_{r}(\lambda2600) = 3.61 ±\pm 0.54 Å) in the whole sample. However, there is no image data for this quasar in HST, CFHT, DECaLS and Pan-STARRS archives.

5 Conclusion

We have analyzed the near-IR spectra of 31 luminous quasars at z>5.7z>5.7, selected from a sample of 50 quasars observed by Gemini GNIRS. We identified 32 Mg ii and Fe ii absorbers with Mg ii WrW_{r}(2796) >1.0>1.0 Å at 2.2<z<6.02.2<z<6.0. We calculated the line density dN/dzdN/dz and comoving line density dN/dXdN/dX of the strong Mg ii absorbers and found that they decrease towards higher redshift at z>3z>3. This can be described by the relation dN/dzdN/dz = (1.882±\pm3.252)×(1+z)0.952±1.108\times(1+z)^{-0.952\pm 1.108}. The trend is consistent with previous results, and follows the evolution of the cosmic star formation rate, implying the correlation between strong Mg ii absorbers with the star formation of galaxies at high redshift.

We found that 15/32 of our Mg ii systems have large velocity widths with Δv>\Delta v> 300 km s-1, which is much larger than those detected in DLA systems with similar equivalent widths at 2<z<<z< 4 and Mg ii systems at z<z< 2. Such large velocity widths are also seen in a sample of neutral-carbon selected Mg ii systems at 1.5 <z<<z< 2.7. This potentially implies that strong Mg ii systems at high redshift are influenced by galactic superwinds and/or interaction within galaxy groups. Also, our Mg ii systems exhibit slightly less-saturation in terms of the equivalent width ratio of Fe ii and Mg ii lines (Wr(λW_{r}(\lambda2600) /Wr(λW_{r}(\lambda2796) ). For DLA systems, Wr(λW_{r}(\lambda2600) /Wr(λW_{r}(\lambda2796) 0.5\sim 0.5. This ratio is roughly between 0.25 and 1.75 in our sample. Our Mg ii absorbers are possibly less saturated than DLA-Mg ii at 2 <z<<z< 4 and those at z<z< 2.3 with similar equivalent widths. This is potentially caused by the interaction of more sub-components of our strong Mg ii systems.

We have used several HST images (together with archival DECaLS and CFHT images) to identify potential absorber galaxies within 50 kpc from quasars. For Mg ii systems have Δv>\Delta v> 300 km s-1or Wr(λW_{r}(\lambda2796) >> 1.5 Å, there are 1-2 galaxy candidates within the 5\arcsec radius. The median F105W-band magnitudes is 24.83 mag, which is fainter than the LL^{*} galaxy luminosity at zz\sim 4. If the Mg ii-absorbing halo gas and associated galaxy luminosity relation at z=z= 3–5 is similar to that at z<z< 1, the Mg ii absorbing gas size RxR_{x} is smaller than DD.

We thank the very constructive comments and suggestions from the anonymous referee. We thank Patrick Petitjean for useful comments and Robert A. Simcoe for discussion on FIRE data. We acknowledge support from the National Science Foundation of China (11533001, 11721303, 11890693, 11991052), the National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFA0400702, 2016YFA0400703), and the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) through a China-Chile Joint Research Fund #1503 administered by the CAS South America Center for Astronomy in Santiago, Chile. Y.S. acknowledges support from an Alfred P. Sloan Research Fellowship and National Science Foundation grant No. AST-1715579. M.V. gratefully acknowledges financial support from the Independent Research Fund Denmark via grant number DFF 8021-00130. We acknowledge the public data from the Dark Energy Camera Legacy Survey (DECaLS), the Beijing-Arizona Sky Survey (BASS), and the Mayall zz-band Legacy Survey (MzLS). We thank observations obtained with MegaPrime/MegaCam, a joint project of CFHT and CEA/DAPNIA, at the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope (CFHT) which is operated by the National Research Council (NRC) of Canada, the Institut National des Science de l’Univers of the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) of France, and the University of Hawaii.

References

  • Berg et al. (2017) Berg, T. A. M., Ellison, S. L., Prochaska, J. X., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 464, L56
  • Bergeron & Boissé (1991) Bergeron, J., & Boissé, P. 1991, A&A, 243, 344
  • Bertin & Arnouts (1996) Bertin, E., & Arnouts, S. 1996, A&AS, 117, 393
  • Bond et al. (2001) Bond, N. A., Churchill, C. W., Charlton, J. C., & Vogt, S. S. 2001, ApJ, 562, 641
  • Bouché et al. (2013) Bouché, N., Murphy, M. T., Kacprzak, G. G., et al. 2013, Science, 341, 50
  • Bouché et al. (2006) Bouché, N., Murphy, M. T., Péroux, C., Csabai, I., & Wild, V. 2006, MNRAS, 371, 495
  • Bouwens et al. (2012) Bouwens, R. J., Illingworth, G. D., Oesch, P. A., et al. 2012, ApJ, 754, 83
  • Bouwens et al. (2015) —. 2015, ApJ, 803, 34
  • Chen et al. (2010) Chen, H.-W., Helsby, J. E., Gauthier, J.-R., et al. 2010, ApJ, 714, 1521
  • Chen et al. (2017) Chen, S.-F. S., Simcoe, R. A., Torrey, P., et al. 2017, ApJ, 850, 188
  • Codoreanu et al. (2017) Codoreanu, A., Ryan-Weber, E. V., Crighton, N. H. M., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 472, 1023
  • Dey et al. (2019) Dey, A., Schlegel, D. J., Lang, D., et al. 2019, AJ, 157, 168
  • Gauthier (2013) Gauthier, J.-R. 2013, MNRAS, 432, 1444
  • Heckman (2001) Heckman, T. M. 2001, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 240, Galactic Superwinds at Low and High Redshift, ed. J. E. Hibbard, M. Rupen, & J. H. van Gorkom, 345
  • Jiang et al. (2016) Jiang, L., McGreer, I. D., Fan, X., et al. 2016, ApJ, 833, 222
  • Joshi et al. (2017) Joshi, R., Srianand, R., Noterdaeme, P., & Petitjean, P. 2017, MNRAS, 465, 701
  • Kacprzak et al. (2011) Kacprzak, G. G., Churchill, C. W., Evans, J. L., Murphy, M. T., & Steidel, C. C. 2011, MNRAS, 416, 3118
  • Kacprzak et al. (2008) Kacprzak, G. G., Churchill, C. W., Steidel, C. C., & Murphy, M. T. 2008, AJ, 135, 922
  • Krogager (2018) Krogager, J.-K. 2018, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1803.01187
  • Lan (2020) Lan, T.-W. 2020, ApJ, 897, 97
  • Lan et al. (2014) Lan, T.-W., Ménard, B., & Zhu, G. 2014, ApJ, 795, 31
  • Lanzetta et al. (1987) Lanzetta, K. M., Turnshek, D. A., & Wolfe, A. M. 1987, ApJ, 322, 739
  • Lovegrove & Simcoe (2011) Lovegrove, E., & Simcoe, R. A. 2011, ApJ, 740, 30
  • Martin & Bouché (2009) Martin, C. L., & Bouché, N. 2009, ApJ, 703, 1394
  • Mason et al. (2015) Mason, R. E., Rodríguez-Ardila, A., Martins, L., et al. 2015, ApJS, 217, 13
  • Matejek & Simcoe (2012) Matejek, M. S., & Simcoe, R. A. 2012, ApJ, 761, 112
  • Ménard & Fukugita (2012) Ménard, B., & Fukugita, M. 2012, ApJ, 754, 116
  • Ménard et al. (2011) Ménard, B., Wild, V., Nestor, D., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 417, 801
  • Nestor et al. (2005) Nestor, D. B., Turnshek, D. A., & Rao, S. M. 2005, ApJ, 628, 637
  • Nestor et al. (2007) Nestor, D. B., Turnshek, D. A., Rao, S. M., & Quider, A. M. 2007, ApJ, 658, 185
  • Nielsen et al. (2013a) Nielsen, N. M., Churchill, C. W., & Kacprzak, G. G. 2013a, ApJ, 776, 115
  • Nielsen et al. (2013b) Nielsen, N. M., Churchill, C. W., Kacprzak, G. G., & Murphy, M. T. 2013b, ApJ, 776, 114
  • Nielsen et al. (2018) Nielsen, N. M., Kacprzak, G. G., Pointon, S. K., Churchill, C. W., & Murphy, M. T. 2018, ApJ, 869, 153
  • Noterdaeme et al. (2010) Noterdaeme, P., Petitjean, P., Ledoux, C., et al. 2010, A&A, 523, A80
  • Prochaska et al. (2009) Prochaska, J. X., Worseck, G., & O’Meara, J. M. 2009, ApJ, 705, L113
  • Prochter et al. (2006) Prochter, G. E., Prochaska, J. X., & Burles, S. M. 2006, ApJ, 639, 766
  • Quider et al. (2011) Quider, A. M., Nestor, D. B., Turnshek, D. A., et al. 2011, AJ, 141, 137
  • Rao et al. (2006) Rao, S. M., Turnshek, D. A., & Nestor, D. B. 2006, ApJ, 636, 610
  • Rodríguez Hidalgo et al. (2012) Rodríguez Hidalgo, P., Wessels, K., Charlton, J. C., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 427, 1801
  • Rubin et al. (2012) Rubin, K. H. R., Prochaska, J. X., Koo, D. C., & Phillips, A. C. 2012, ApJ, 747, L26
  • Schroetter et al. (2016) Schroetter, I., Bouché, N., Wendt, M., et al. 2016, ApJ, 833, 39
  • Schroetter et al. (2019) Schroetter, I., Bouché, N. F., Zabl, J., et al. 2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1907.09967
  • Schulze et al. (2012) Schulze, S., Fynbo, J. P. U., Milvang-Jensen, B., et al. 2012, A&A, 546, A20
  • Shen et al. (2019) Shen, Y., Wu, J., Jiang, L., et al. 2019, ApJ, 873, 35
  • Steidel et al. (1995) Steidel, C. C., Bowen, D. V., Blades, J. C., & Dickinson, M. 1995, ApJ, 440, L45
  • Steidel et al. (1997) Steidel, C. C., Dickinson, M., Meyer, D. M., Adelberger, K. L., & Sembach, K. R. 1997, ApJ, 480, 568
  • Steidel et al. (2002) Steidel, C. C., Kollmeier, J. A., Shapley, A. E., et al. 2002, ApJ, 570, 526
  • Tumlinson et al. (2017) Tumlinson, J., Peeples, M. S., & Werk, J. K. 2017, ARA&A, 55, 389
  • Vollmann & Eversberg (2006) Vollmann, K., & Eversberg, T. 2006, Astronomische Nachrichten, 327, 862
  • Zabl et al. (2019) Zabl, J., Bouché, N. F., Schroetter, I., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 485, 1961
  • Zhu & Ménard (2013) Zhu, G., & Ménard, B. 2013, ApJ, 770, 130
  • Zibetti et al. (2007) Zibetti, S., Ménard, B., Nestor, D. B., et al. 2007, ApJ, 658, 161
  • Zou et al. (2018) Zou, S., Petitjean, P., Noterdaeme, P., et al. 2018, A&A, 616, A158