This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Strong coupling of lattice and orbital excitations in quantum magnet Ca10Cr7O28: Anomalous temperature dependence of Raman phonons

Srishti Pal [email protected] Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru 560012, India    Arnab Seth International Centre for Theoretical Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bengaluru 560089, India School of Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA    Anzar Ali Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER) Mohali, Knowledge City, Sector 81, Mohali 140306, India    Yogesh Singh Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER) Mohali, Knowledge City, Sector 81, Mohali 140306, India    D. V. S. Muthu Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru 560012, India    Subhro Bhattacharjee International Centre for Theoretical Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bengaluru 560089, India    A. K. Sood Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru 560012, India
Abstract

We report low-temperature Raman signatures of the Heisenberg quantum magnet Ca10Cr7O28, showing clear anomalies in phonon mode frequencies and linewidths below \sim100 K. This crossover temperature lies in between the Jahn-Teller (JT) temperature scale (>> room temperature) and the temperature scale associated with the spin exchange interactions (<< 12 K). Our experimental observation is well captured by a novel secondary JT transition associated with a cooperative reorientation of the orbitals giving rise to anomalies in the temperature dependence of Raman frequencies and linewidths. Such orbital reorganisation, in turn, affects the spin-spin exchange interactions that decide the fate of the magnet at lower temperatures and hence provide important clues to understand the energetics of the possible lower temperature quantum paramagnetic phase.

Recent advances have invigorated vitality to the intricate interplay of different degrees of freedom giving rise to intervening coupling schemes in frustrated spin systems Ramirez (1994); Balents (2010); Liu et al. (2016). In particular, the role of these couplings in shaping the fate of geometrically frustrated spin-1/2 antiferromagnets – originally conceptualized Anderson (1973) as suitable platforms for realising quantum spin liquid (QSL) states Savary and Balents (2016); Lee (2008); Zhou et al. (2017); Knolle and Moessner (2019) – have been thoroughly investigated both experimentally as well as on theoretical grounds on a large number of known geometrically frustrated motifs such as triangular Shimizu et al. (2003); Yamashita et al. (2009); Itou et al. (2008); Li et al. (2015), kagomé Helton et al. (2007); Føak et al. (2012); Fu et al. (2015), or pyrochlore Gingras and McClarty (2014); Scheie et al. (2020). One important factor bearing the potential to alter the spin exchange interactions in these frustrated magnets with complex structures is orbital interactions Koo and Whangbo (2000). Some of the magnetic perovskites like KCuF3, LaMnO3, and BaVS3 had previously been studied for their coupling between the magnetic and orbital orderings responsible in minimizing the destabilizing two-electron two-orbital interactions Oleś et al. (2000); Whangbo and Koo (2002); Whangbo et al. (2002).

In this regard, the quasi-two-dimensional Heisenberg quantum magnet Ca10Cr7O28 Balz et al. (2016, 2017a, 2017b); Alshalawi et al. (2022) on bi-layer kagome lattice presents a rather unique case disparate from the previously studied candidate geometrically frustrated QSLs. The compound with actual stoichiometry Ca10(CrVO4)6(CrVIO4Arčon et al. (1998) contains magnetically isolated distorted kagome bilayers of spin-12\frac{1}{2} Cr5+ ions with both ferromagnetic (FM) and antiferromagnetic (AFM) isotropic Heisenberg exchange couplings Balz et al. (2017a); Balodhi and Singh (2017). The magnetic Hamiltonian constructed as a combination of experimental phenomenology and first principle calculations that accounts for the inequivalent FM (significantly stronger) and AFM isotropic Heisenberg couplings (ΣJ\Sigma J\lesssim 1 meV) Balz et al. (2017b) results in a mean-field Curie-Weiss temperature of θCW\theta_{CW}\approx 4 K Balodhi and Singh (2017) that is corroborated by experiments which show a broad cusp like feature around TT\approx 3.1 K in the magnetic specific heat Balz et al. (2016). However, the system shows no sign of long-range magnetic order or any spin-glass freezing down to 19 mK with a fluctuating spin liquid ground state as confirmed from bulk susceptibility, heat capacity, μ\muSR, or neutron scattering measurements Balz et al. (2016, 2017a, 2017b); Ni et al. (2018); Sonnenschein et al. (2019) as well as from theoretical studies Biswas and Damle (2018); Sonnenschein et al. (2019); Pohle et al. (2021). Due to the complex structure of this compound, more careful observation needs to be performed to disentangle the contribution of spin and orbital moments to the underlying magnetic Hamiltonian, and also possibly the role of lattice degrees of freedom.

In this letter, we report our Raman scattering results on the Ca10Cr7O28 system down to \sim4 K, revealing strong anomalies in temperature dependence of phonon frequencies and linewidths, at the crossover temperature TCT_{C}\sim100 K, much above the temperature scale (\sim10 K) associated with the spin-exchange interactions– hence cannot arise from the non-trivial spin-phonon coupling since the spins, for all practical purposes are deep inside the thermal paramagnet,i.e., effectively at infinite temperature (T/ΘCW1)T/\Theta_{CW}\gg 1). Therefore, these Raman anomalies are very much different from the temperature-induced magnetic ordering transitions Dediu et al. (2000); Zhang et al. (2001) which are strictly absent in the Ca10Cr7O28 system Balz et al. (2017a). This raises the central question about the origin of this energy-scale and the associated Raman-active phonon renormalisation and here we show that this is naturally attributed to phonon-orbital coupling via a cascade of Jahn-Teller effects– both single ion and cooperative.

To begin the search for the physics of 100100 K energy scale, it is worth noting that the system contains Jahn-Teller (J-T) active Jahn and Teller (1937) Cr5+ ion sites offering moderately distorted CrVO4 tetrahedra even at room temperature and down to 2 K without any further structural distortion throughout the temperature range as reported in earlier studies Gyepesová and Langer (2013); Balz et al. (2017a). Therefore, the 100 K phonon anomalies cannot be attributed to the thermal order-disorder crossover from static to dynamic J-T effect which is associated with symmetry raising type structural transitions Martín-Carrón and de Andrés (2001a, b); Malcherek et al. (2017). Hence, we turn our focus on the co-operative J-T effect driven by the interaction between localized orbitals and the crystal lattice Gehring and Gehring (1975). Such Raman fingerprints in terms of splitting of Raman bands for the co-operative J-T effect have previously been reported in rare-earth compounds like DyVO4, DyAsO4, and TbVO4 Elliott et al. (1972) where the transitions are associated with only small lattice strains and splitting of the ground electronic states of the active ions. Here we present our detailed experimental observation of this intermediate temperature phenomena and support it with theoretical calculations under the framework of co-operative J-T effect to derive the phonon renormalization induced by an orbital reordering phenomenon Ament et al. (2011); Saitoh et al. (2001) emerging from significant coupling between the vibrational and orbital degrees of freedom. Such reordering has direct implication on the spin physics of this frustrated magnet at even lower temperature via drastic renormalisation of the spin-spin exchanges.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: The two panels show phonon fits to the Raman spectra at 295 K and 4 K. Experimental data are indicated by black curves. Blue and red curves are individual phonon modes and the cumulative fits, respectively. ‘*’ represents the new mode appearing at 4 K.
Refer to caption
Figure 2: Temperature dependence of (a) frequencies and (b) linewidths of selected phonon modes. The orange curves are fits to cubic anharmonic model with ωanh(p)=ω0+A[1+2n(ω02)]\omega_{anh}^{(p)}=\omega_{0}+A\left[1+2n\left(\frac{\omega_{0}}{2}\right)\right] and Πanh(p)=Γ0+B[1+2n(ω02)]\Pi_{anh}^{(p)}=\Gamma_{0}+B\left[1+2n\left(\frac{\omega_{0}}{2}\right)\right]. Details of the parameters are given in the SI Sup (2023).

Raman spectra of Ca10Cr7O28 at 4 K and 295 K are shown in Fig. 1 along with the phonon fits. Factor group analysis of trigonal (R3c) Ca10Cr7O28 yields 139 Raman active phonon modes (ΓRaman\Gamma_{Raman} = 46 A1gA_{1g} + 93 EgE_{g}) among which 9 modes could be detected at 295 K in the frequency range 75 - 1000 cm-1. From earlier reports on compounds containing CrVO4 tetrahedra Aoki et al. (2000); Aoki and Konno (2001), we assign the low (M1-M4) and high (M5-M9) frequency vibrational bands of Ca10Cr7O28 as bending and stretching modes of the CrVO4 tetrahedra, respectively.

The phonon modes are fitted with symmetric Lorentzian profile function for the entire range of temperature. The phonon spectrum remains unchanged with decreasing temperature except only at the lowest temperature of 4 K where one new weak mode at \sim640 cm-1 [indicated by (*) in the lower panel of Fig. 1] could be detected. Appearance of this weak mode may be associated with crossovers in the spin channels Biswas and Damle (2018); Pohle et al. (2021) whose fingerprints could also be observed in earlier specific heat studies Balz et al. (2016).

The temperature evolution of frequencies and FWHMs for selected phonon modes are shown in Fig. 2(a)-(b). The solid orange curves are fits from 100 K to 295 K to the simple cubic anharmonic model Klemens (1966) (see SI Sup (2023) for fitting details). The dashed ones are their extensions to lower temperature ranges. It is worth noting that except for M8, frequencies and FWHMs of all other modes exhibit anomalous behaviour with temperature. While frequencies of M1, M2 and FWHMs of M1, M2, M5, and M6 show clear deviations from the expected cubic anharmonicity below \sim100 K, frequencies of M5 and M6 modes are anomalous throughout the entire temperature range and hence, could not be fitted with the cubic anharmonic model. While M5 frequency shows a discontinuity around 100 K with a change in the slope, M6 frequency experiences slope change around 100 K with striking similarity in its temperature profile with that of its linewidth. Apart from the strong anomalies in frequencies and linewidths, the phonon modes show subtle anomalous behaviour in the temperature dependence of their integrated susceptibilities as shown in SI Sup (2023).

As remarked above, the crossover temperature of \sim100 K associated with the strong phonon anomalies in the Ca10Cr7O28 system is too high to be linked with the spin-exchange interactions with a temperature scale of \sim10 K and below. Also, the neutron time-of-flight (TOF) powder diffraction patterns Balz et al. (2017a) confirmed absence of any structural phase transition down to 2 K. However, an interesting observation regarding Ca10Cr7O28 crystal system is that its CrVO4 tetrahedra are distorted at room temperature, bearing four different Cr-O bond lengths (see SI Sup (2023)). This can be understood by noting that the Cr5+, in a tetrahedral crystal field has one electron in the ege_{g} orbitals and hence is a Jahn-Teller (J-T) active ion Jahn and Teller (1937). The degeneracy of the atomic orbitals are, therefore, susceptible to J-T splitting associated with the distortion of the tetrahedra (see Figure S2 in SI Sup (2023)).

The above experimental phenomenology pose the following question: Is the \sim100 K scale seen by the phonons related to the J-T rearrangement of the orbitals due to various orbital-lattice couplings? Indeed, the different vibrational modes allow for such secondary cooperative J-T distortions. Below, we explore the possibility of such physics to explain the phenomenology of Ca10Cr7O28 via minimal symmetry allowed Hamiltonians.

A minimal model that captures the above J-T distortion includes the spin-1/2, SiαS^{\alpha}_{i}, and the two ege_{g}-orbitals ((|d3z2r2,|dx2y2)(|+,|)(|d_{3z^{2}-r^{2}}\rangle,|d_{x^{2}-y^{2}}\rangle)\equiv(|+\rangle,|-\rangle)) τiα\tau^{\alpha}_{i} on the Cr5+ sites as well as the Raman active phonons, ϵip\epsilon^{p}_{i} (pp denotes the normal modes) with appropriate symmetries. The associated spin-orbital-phonon Hamiltonian is given by H=HS,τ,ϵ+HϵH=H_{S,\tau,\epsilon}+H_{\epsilon}, where HϵH_{\epsilon} is the harmonic phonon Hamiltonian and

HS,τ,ϵ=ij[Kijαβ+Jijαβ𝐒i𝐒j]τiατjβ+iΓp,βϵipτiβ\displaystyle H_{S,\tau,\epsilon}=\sum_{\langle ij\rangle}\left[K^{\alpha\beta}_{ij}+J^{\alpha\beta}_{ij}{\bf S}_{i}\cdot{\bf S}_{j}\right]\tau^{\alpha}_{i}\tau^{\beta}_{j}+\sum_{i}\Gamma^{p,\beta}\epsilon_{i}^{p}\tau_{i}^{\beta} (1)

with JijαβJ^{\alpha\beta}_{ij} and KijαβK_{ij}^{\alpha\beta} denote the bare spin-spin and orbital-orbital exchange interactions respectively between two neighbouring Cr5+ ions; Γp,β\Gamma^{p,\beta} is the coupling of the orbitals with the phonon modes. Note that, due to the absence of atomic spin-orbit coupling (expected to be small for 3d transition metals), the spin-spin interactions are rotationally symmetric while the dependence on the orbital labels is constrained by lattice symmetries. The second term denotes the symmetry allowed linear coupling between the orbitals and the phonon modes that is present in a J-T active ion and is responsible for the distortion via ϵp=Γp,βCpτβ\epsilon^{p}=-\frac{\Gamma^{{p},\beta}}{C_{p}}\tau^{\beta} (CpC_{p} is the spring constant of the phonon) along the direction determined by largest J-T coupling Γp,β\Gamma^{p,\beta} for the softest elastic mode. This in-turn decides the specific splitting of the orbitals, i.e., τα0\langle\tau^{\alpha}\rangle\neq 0.

Below the temperature scale of this primary J-T splitting, the other J-T coupling constants, as well as the orbital-coupling scale can induce further secondary J-T transitions which can be rendered cooperative due to KijαβK_{ij}^{\alpha\beta}. These successive J-T transitions, therefore, lead to rearrangement of the orbital ordering which we, as explained below, attribute to the experimentally observed Raman anomalies around T100T\sim 100 K.

Orbital fluctuations at intermediate temperatures.

Consider the intermediate temperature range where the Raman anomalies are observed : ΘCW(10K)T<TH(>300K)\Theta_{CW}(\sim 10~{}{\rm K})\ll T<T_{H}(>300~{}K), where ΘCW10\Theta_{CW}\sim 10 K and THT_{H} are respectively the Curie-Weiss and the primary J-T transition temperatures. In this temperature range, the spins form a thermal paramagnet i.e., 𝐒i=0\langle{\bf S}_{i}\rangle=0, and are completely incoherent. Therefore, their only effect is to renormalise the couplings KijαβK_{ij}^{\alpha\beta} in Eq. 1 via short-ranged spin-spin correlations. However, the orbital ordering has set in due to the primary J-T effect. Let us assume that this ordering is along τz\tau^{z} (we do not know the actual direction of distortion from the powder samples). Therefore, the effective Hamiltonian in the intermediate temperature range is given by

H~=\displaystyle\tilde{H}= ij𝒦ijαβτiατjβ+Δ1iτiz+iΓp,βϵipτiβ+H~ϵ\displaystyle\sum_{\langle ij\rangle}\mathcal{K}^{\alpha\beta}_{ij}\tau^{\alpha}_{i}\tau^{\beta}_{j}+\Delta_{1}\sum_{i}\tau^{z}_{i}+\sum_{i}\Gamma^{p,\beta}\epsilon_{i}^{p}\tau^{\beta}_{i}+\tilde{H}_{\epsilon} (2)

where 𝒦ijαβ=Kijαβ+Jijαβ𝐒i𝐒j\mathcal{K}_{ij}^{\alpha\beta}=K_{ij}^{\alpha\beta}+J_{ij}^{\alpha\beta}\langle{\bf S}_{i}\cdot{\bf S}_{j}\rangle is the effective exchange for the orbitals; Δ1\Delta_{1} characterises the splitting of the orbitals due to the primary J-T effect. In principle, there will also be a symmetry allowed term of the form Δ2iτix\Delta_{2}\sum_{i}\tau^{x}_{i} coming from the lattice distortion at the primary J-T transition, but the effect of such terms is straight forward– they smear out sharp features of phase transitions arising from Eq. 2 and makes way for smooth crossover as seen in experiments Martín-Carrón and de Andrés (2001a); Zhang et al. (2001); Malcherek et al. (2017).

In Eq. 2, the sum pp now runs over the other phonon modes that can potentially lead to secondary co-operative J-T mediated reordering via 𝒦ijαβ\mathcal{K}_{ij}^{\alpha\beta}; and H~ϵ\tilde{H}_{\epsilon} is the harmonic phonon Hamiltonian for the phonons in the distorted state below the primary J-T transition. Assuming a single secondary mode favouring an ordering along τx\tau^{x}, the mean-field phase diagram Stinchcombe (1973) is easy to work out and given in the SI Sup (2023) (see Figure S3). In the mean-field approximation, the orbital reordering sets in below a temperature, Tc=(μxx𝒦~xx)δtanh1(δ)T_{c}=\left(\mu^{xx}-\tilde{\mathcal{K}}^{xx}\right)\frac{\delta}{\tanh^{-1}(\delta)}, where δ=Δ1/(μxx𝒦~xx)\delta=\Delta_{1}/\left(\mu^{xx}-\tilde{\mathcal{K}}^{xx}\right), 𝒦~xx=𝒦xxD\tilde{\mathcal{K}}^{xx}=\mathcal{K}^{xx}D (DD = coordination number) and μxx=Γp,xΓp,xCp\mu^{xx}=\frac{\Gamma^{p,x}\Gamma^{p,x}}{C_{p}} are effective coupling constants. We associate TcT_{c} to 100\sim 100 K with the experimentally observed onset scale of the phonon anomalies.

Refer to caption
Figure 3: (a) Frequency shift due to the orbital reordering. Blue, black, red, and magenta curves are obtained by choosing (Bxx;pp,Bzz;pp,Bxz;pp)ω0(B^{xx;pp},B^{zz;pp},B^{xz;pp})\omega_{0} to be (0.1,0.1,0.1)(0.1,0.1,0.1), (0.1,0.1,0.1)(0.1,0.1,-0.1), (0.1,0.1,0.1)(-0.1,0.1,-0.1), and (0.1,0.1,0.1)(0.1,-0.1,0.1), respectively. (b) Linewidth renormalisation of phonon. For blue and red curves, we choose Γ0=0.01𝒦~xx,xx=xz=0.7𝒦~xx\Gamma_{0}=0.01\tilde{\mathcal{K}}^{xx},~{}\mathcal{M}_{xx}=\mathcal{M}_{xz}=-0.7\tilde{\mathcal{K}}^{xx} and Γ0=0.01𝒦~xx,xx=0.6𝒦~xx,xz=0.4𝒦~xx\Gamma_{0}=0.01\tilde{\mathcal{K}}^{xx},~{}\mathcal{M}_{xx}=-0.6\tilde{\mathcal{K}}^{xx},~{}\mathcal{M}_{xz}=-0.4\tilde{\mathcal{K}}^{xx}, respectively and set all other parameters to zero. For both the panels, δ=0.5\delta=0.5.

Phonon anomaly due to secondary J-T transition.

In the intermediate temperature regime, the phonon anomalies observed in our vibrational Raman scattering experiments can be analysed using the phonon-orbital coupling Hamiltonian which is given in details in the SI (see Eq. S5). For this, we note that in addition to Γp,α\Gamma^{p,\alpha}, the orbital-phonon coupling has another source i.e., the coupling constant, 𝒦ijαβ\mathcal{K}_{ij}^{\alpha\beta}, which are dependent on the dynamic distortions of the tetrahedra and hence we have, similar to the usual magnetoelastic coupling,

𝒦ijαβ=𝒦¯ijαβ+Aijαβ;p(ϵip+ϵjp)+Bijαβ;pqϵipϵjq\displaystyle\mathcal{K}^{\alpha\beta}_{ij}=\bar{\mathcal{K}}_{ij}^{\alpha\beta}+A_{ij}^{\alpha\beta;p}(\epsilon_{i}^{p}+\epsilon_{j}^{p})+B_{ij}^{\alpha\beta;pq}\epsilon_{i}^{p}\epsilon_{j}^{q} (3)

where Aijαβ;pA_{ij}^{\alpha\beta;{p}} and Bijαβ;pqB_{ij}^{\alpha\beta;pq} are coupling constants whose different components are constrained by the residual symmetries. Using this in the orbital Hamiltonian, HorbH_{orb}, we obtain the orbital-phonon coupling that is central to the vibrational Raman scattering (see SI Sup (2023)). The phonon renormalistion can then be computed perturbatively due to these interactions.

The renormalisation of phonon frequency and linewidth are respectively given by,

Δω(p)=ω(p)ω0=Δωanh(p)+Δωorb(p)\displaystyle\Delta\omega^{(p)}=\omega^{(p)}-\omega_{0}=\Delta\omega^{(p)}_{anh}+\Delta\omega^{(p)}_{orb} (4)
Π(p)=Πanh(p)+Πorb(p)\displaystyle\Pi^{(p)}=\mid\Pi^{(p)}_{anh}+\Pi^{(p)}_{orb}\mid (5)

where the subscript “anh{anh}” and “orb{orb}” represent the contributions due to the anharmonic effects and orbital reordering, respectively. While the anharmonic contribution to the phonon parameters are usually determined from the fitting of the experimental data at high temperatures (see SI Sup (2023)), the orbital contribution can be computed within Einstein (independent bond) approximation. The leading order renormalisation of the frequency is given by

Δωorb(p)\displaystyle\Delta\omega_{orb}^{(p)} Bijβγ;ppτiβτjγ\displaystyle\propto B_{ij}^{\beta\gamma;pp}\langle\tau_{i}^{\beta}\tau_{j}^{\gamma}\rangle (6)

where \langle\cdots\rangle denotes the averaging over a Gibbs ensemble at temperature 1/β1/\beta. The phonon frequency renormalization due to orbital reordering, therefore, is determined by the equal-time orbital-correlators on nearest neighbours. Within our minimal model, approximating τixτjxτx2\langle\tau^{x}_{i}\tau^{x}_{j}\rangle\approx\langle\tau^{x}\rangle^{2}, τizτjzτz2\langle\tau^{z}_{i}\tau^{z}_{j}\rangle\approx\langle\tau^{z}\rangle^{2} and τixτjzτxτz\langle\tau^{x}_{i}\tau^{z}_{j}\rangle\approx\langle\tau^{x}\rangle\langle\tau^{z}\rangle below TcT_{c}, we obtain results that are plotted in Fig. 3 (top panel) as a function of temperature for various representative choices of the coupling constants. In particular, as is clear from these plots that the softening or hardening of the phonon is determined by the sign of the coupling Bijβγ;ppB_{ij}^{\beta\gamma;pp}. We see both these behaviour for different phonons that are consistent with the experimental observation [see Fig. 2(a)]. An estimate of these coupling constants, however, requires a more microscopic calculation which is beyond the purview of the present symmetry-based arguments.

Turning to the linewidths, we calculate it via well-known methods of diagrammatic perturbation theory whence the linewidth is given by the imaginary part of the phonon self-energy arising due to its scattering with τiα\tau^{\alpha}_{i}s and determined by, to the leading order, the dynamic orbital correlation functions 𝒞μν(𝐫,τ)=T^(τ𝐫μ(τ)τ𝟎ν(0))τ𝐫μ(τ)τ𝟎ν(0)\mathcal{C}_{\mu\nu}({\bf r},\tau)=\langle\hat{T}\left(\tau_{\bf r}^{\mu}(\tau)\tau_{\bf 0}^{\nu}(0)\right)\rangle-\langle\tau^{\mu}_{\bf r}(\tau)\rangle\langle\tau^{\nu}_{\bf 0}(0)\rangle.

The resultant leading order Raman linewidths are given by Seth (2022)

Πorb(p)(ω)μ,ν=x,zμνIm[𝒞~μν(𝐤=0,ω+i0+)]\displaystyle\Pi_{orb}^{(p)}\left(\omega\right)\sim\sum_{\mu,\nu=x,z}\mathcal{M}_{\mu\nu}\text{Im}\left[\tilde{\mathcal{C}}_{\mu\nu}\left({\bf k}=0,\omega+i0^{+}\right)\right] (7)

where 𝒞~μν(𝐤,ω+i0+)\tilde{\mathcal{C}}_{\mu\nu}({\bf k},\omega+i0^{+}) is the fourier transform of 𝒞μν(𝐫,τ)\mathcal{C}_{\mu\nu}({\bf r},\tau) and MμνM_{\mu\nu} is the form factor whose form can be found in the SI Sup (2023) (see Eq. S8). For simplicity, in Fig. 3 (bottom panel) we plot the temperature dependence of the linewidth assuming these coefficients to be temperature independent, and therefore this is now completely controlled by the two-point dynamic correlators of the orbitals. We note that such behaviour is in direct conformity with the experimental observation [see Fig. 2(b)].

In conclusion, we have explored temperature-induced Raman anomalies in polycrystalline samples of the Heisenberg quantum magnet Ca10Cr7O28. The phonon mode frequencies, linewidths, and integrated intensities reveal clear anomalies across \sim100 K, a temperature scale much higher than the one associated with the spin-exchange interactions of the system (<< 10 K). Considering the fact that the system is Jahn-Teller distorted above room temperature, we develop our theoretical understanding to realize the Raman anomalies to originate from an orbital reordering phenomenon, renormalizing the phonon self-energy via cooperative Jahn-Teller effect. As we have used polycrystalline sample in our studies, we could not do an extensive assignment of different phonon modes to different vibrations (symmetries). In future, polarization-dependent Raman studies on single crystals can help to understand the origin of different nature of anomalies for different phonon modes. Also, resonant inelastic X-ray scattering measurements can be performed on the system as a function of temperature to capture the orbital ordering. In the passing, we note that, once the orbitals are ordered at low temperature (T<100T<100 K), the effective spin-Hamiltonian is obtained from Eq. 1 as Hspin=ij𝒥ij𝐒i𝐒j+H_{\rm spin}=\sum_{ij}\mathcal{J}_{ij}{\bf S}_{i}\cdot{\bf S}_{j}+\cdots where 𝒥ij=αβJijαβτiατjβ\mathcal{J}_{ij}=\sum_{\alpha\beta}J_{ij}^{\alpha\beta}\langle\tau^{\alpha}_{i}\rangle\langle\tau^{\beta}_{j}\rangle are the effective low-temperature spin-spin exchanges and \cdots refer to other constant terms. This should result in variation of the Curie-Weiss temperature and can account for the low effective spin-spin exchanges observed in Ca10Cr7O28 which, in turn, dictates the fate of the spin state at lower temperatures. Thus, the secondary J-T physics plays an important role in ultimately deciding the the possible QSL state in the material.

Acknowledgements.
AKS thanks DST for financial support under the National Science Chair Professorship. AS and SB acknowledge funding from Max Planck Partner group Grant at ICTS, Swarna jayanti fellowship grant of SERB-DST (India) Grant No. SB/SJF/2021-22/12 and the Department of Atomic Energy, Government of India, under Project No. RTI4001.

References