YITP-SB-2024-21 KEK-TH-2656
Strings and membranes from -theory five brane
Abstract
The -theory takes U-duality symmetry as a guiding principle, with the SL(5) U-duality symmetry being described as the world-volume theory of a 5-brane. Furthermore, by unifying the 6-dimensional world-volume Lorentz symmetry with the SL(5) spacetime symmetry, it extends to SL(6) U-duality symmetry. The SL(5) spacetime vielbein fields and the 5-brane world-volume vielbein fields are mixed under the SL(6) U-duality transformation. We demonstrate that consistent sectionings of the SL(6) 5-brane world-volume Lagrangian yield Lagrangians of the -string with O(D,D) T-duality symmetry, the conventional string, the 5-brane with GL(4) duality symmetry, and the non-perturbative M2-brane in supergravity theory. The GL(4) covariant Lagrangian of the 5-brane derived in this manner is a new, perturbatively quantizable theory.
1 Introduction
1.1 An overview of -theory formalism
Superstring theory is a strong candidate for a unified theory that describes the four fundamental forces in a unified framework. However, as it stands, there is not a single unified theory but six different theories: five superstring theories and M-theory. These six theories are interconnected through S-duality and T-duality, forming a single chain that creates a hexagon. Each of these six theories is described on distinct branes, complementarily expressing the unique characteristics of superstring theory. The question is what kind of theory could provide a unified description of these six theories.
S-duality and T-duality are unified under U-duality, which is determined by the group-theoretic inclusiveness of duality symmetries. Specifically, the S-duality symmetry GL(D+1) (an extension of spacetime diffeomorphism by GL(2) ) and the T-duality symmetry O(D,D) are encompassed within the U-duality symmetry represented by the exceptional group ED+1. The U-duality symmetry should comprehensively relate the six superstring theories. Therefore, the theory that unifies these six theories is expected to exhibit covariance under U-duality. We term a theory explicitly possessing such U-duality as ”-theory,” and we aim to establish a perturbative formulation of this theory to discuss its quantum aspects, see for a review [1].
In 1995, Witten proposed M-theory as a theory related to IIA superstring theory through S-duality (Witten). The low-energy limit of this theory is 11-dimensional supergravity. The diffeomorphism symmetry of this spacetime is GL(11), combining the 10-dimensional spacetime of the original string theory and the S-duality symmetry SL(2). We refer to a worldvolume theory explicitly exhibiting GL(D+1) symmetry as -theory. In 1996, Vafa proposed F-theory as a theory related to IIB superstring theory through S-duality [2]. For a review, see, for example [3].
In 1993, Siegel proposed a string theory guided by the T-duality symmetry O(D,D) [4, 5, 6]. This framework employs the idea of doubling spacetime coordinates, where the 2D-dimensional spacetime coordinates are treated as vectors in the O(D,D) representation[7]. The geometry generated by the O(D,D) covariant current algebra is the stringy gravity theory with -field, where gauge fields are parameters of the coset O(D,D) over the doubled Lorentz group. We refer to this as -theory and the T-duality covariant string as -string. Later, Hull, Zwiebach, and Hohm proposed a theory of O(D,D) covariant background fields, known as Double Field Theory (DFT) [8, 9]. This is the low-energy gravitational theory of -string theory. To consistently reduce the doubled 2D-dimensional spacetime coordinates to the physical D-dimensional spacetime, the section condition was employed, which is the Virasoro constraint =0. For reviews, see [10, 11]. Since IIA and IIB superstring theories are related by T-duality, -string theory was constructed [12, 13, 14, 15, 16]. All bosonic component fields represent supersymmetrized O(D,D) (the doubled non-degenerated super-Poincare group) while fermions represent only O(D-1,1)2. To incorporate S-duality the exceptional group U-duality symmetry is necessary. The exceptional group ED+1 relates to the D-dimensional subgroup of the doubled non-degenerated super-Poincare group.
Siegel, Linch and Polacek subsequently proposed brane theories guided by the U-duality symmetry ( ED+1 ) [12, 17, 18]. Since the representation of exceptional groups varies with dimension, the theory is labeled by the spacetime dimension when reduced to string theory. This is called D -theory. According to the classification of Lie algebras, removing a specific node in the Dynkin diagram of ED+1 reduces it to the GL(D+1) Dynkin diagram. This corresponds to reducing the spacetime dimensions of -theory using the Virasoro constraint, recovering the aforementioned -theory. Conversely, removing another node in the ED+1 Dynkin diagram reduces it to the O(D,D) Dynkin diagram. This corresponds to reducing the spacetime dimensions of -theory using the Gauss law constraint =0, recovering the aforementioned -theory. -theory is described by branes covariant under the exceptional group. Both the spacetime coordinates and world-volume coordinates of the branes are representations of the exceptional group, ensuring that the brane current algebra is covariant under the exceptional group. Moreover, a perturbative Lagrangian describing these branes on their worldvolume has been constructed. In the previous papers [17, 18, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 19, 20, 21, 22, 28, 23] we refer these models as “F-theory”, but we renamed our “F-theory” to -theory since our latest paper [1] as a generalization of F-theory for all dimensions with all duality symmetries.
Exceptional Field Theory (EFT) applies DFT concepts to exceptional groups [31, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 32, 33, 34]. The symmetry of exceptional groups was initially discovered as a partial dimensional symmetry of background fields in 11-dimensional supergravity [43, 44]. Active research continues on expressing exceptional groups through brane current algebra [45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52].
This paper focuses on the 5-brane that describes D=3 -theory with SL(5) U-duality symmetry. We clarify how the usual string, and -string and membrane of 11-dimensional supergravity (M2) emerge. Specifically, we derive the Lagrangians for the conventional non-perturbative M2-brane, the O(D,D)-covariant -string, and the conventional string from the -theory 5-brane (5) Lagrangian.
1.2 Summary
In this paper we focus on the SL(5) U-duality symmetry and clarify the relation between the -theory five brane (5-brane) and conventional branes. The 5-brane is a 5-brane with manifest SL(5) U-duality symmetry and it is described by the perturbative Lagrangian with the SL(5) two rank anti-symmetric tensor coordinate [1]. The 5 theory forms the apex, allowing a diamond-shaped contour to be drawn, with the -string with O(3,3) T-duality symmetry, 5-brane with GL(4) duality symmetry, and tring with GL(3) symmetry as the vertices of the diamond diagram. In this paper we present the sectioning procedure along the diamond contour. In addition to this we present reducing procedures from the -string Lagrangian to the conventional string Lagrangian and from the 5-brane Lagrangian to the conventional non-perturbative M2-brane Lagrangian [53]. We generalize the dimensional reduction of S-duality for the 11-dimensional supergravity to the type IIA supergravity [54] to T-duality in subsection 1.3. For S-duality, , the dimensional reduction is achieved by taking the limit in the metric. For T-duality, with the string length , the dimensional reduction is achieved by taking the in the metric, so that the O(D,D) spacetime for the -string reduces to the D-dimensional spacetime for the conventional string. We also propose the perturbative 5-brane Lagrangian in the supergravity background obtained from 5-brane (6.95).
In section 2 the relation among 5-brane, 5-brane, -string and tring theories is explained by diamond diagrams based on duality symmetries. The diamond diagram is a contour in the U-duality plane which is spanned by two parameters, the string coupling and the scale based on the string length. The branes are described by the field strengths where the spacetime coordinate has the gauge symmetry generated by the Gauß law constraint. These field strengths and gauge parameters as well as the world-volume coordinate and the spacetime coordinate are representations of duality symmetries. The world-volume diffeomorphism is generated by the Virasoro constraints . Dimensions to reduce are determined by solving the Virasoro constraints for spacetime and by solving the Gauß law constraints for world-volume.
In section 3 both the SL(5) and the SL(6) covariant Lagrangians of the 5-brane are given, where the SL(6) manifests the 5-brane world-volume Lorentz symmetry. The SL(6) vielbein includes both the SL(5) spacetime vielbein and the 6-dimensional world-volume vielbein, so the spacetime and world-volume are mixed under the new duality symmetry SL(6). The SL(6) formulation is useful to reduce to other branes: Since the string world-sheet directions and the spacetime directions are direct sum, the SL(6) vielbein is in a block diagonal form as shown in subsection 5.1. On the other hand, the brane world-volume directions share the spacetime directions unlike the string as shown in subsection 6.1.
In section 4 we begin by the O(D,D) string Hamiltonian, and apply the double zweibein method [55, 56] to obtain the -string Lagrangian. Then reducing procedure from the O(D,D) -string Lagrangian to the conventional string Lagrangian in D dimensions is presented analogously to subsection 1.3. We show that the Wess-Zumino term can be obtained by adding a total derivative term.
In section 5 we begin by the 5-brane Lagrangian and present the reduction procedure to -string Lagrangian. We rewrite the O(D,D) background gauge field in the SL(4) tensor index such a way that the SL(4) tensor coordinate of the -string couples. Then we apply the procedure given by section 4 to obtain the conventional tring Lagrangian.
In section 6 we begin by the SL(6) covariant 5-brane Lagrangian to lead the new perturbative 5-brane Lagrangian. We further reduce to the conventional M2-brane Lagrangian. The Nambu-Goto Lagrangian is obtained by the gauge choice of the world-volume vielbein, while the Wess-Zumino term is obtained by adding the total derivative term.
1.3 Dimensional reduction procedure
In [54] it has been pointed out that under an S-duality transformation between the 10-dimensional type IIA theory and the 11-dimensional supergravity theory, the structure of the supersymmetry algebra remains invariant, though the meaning of the central charge changes. The global superalgebra with supercharges , of different chiralities, 10 dimensional momenta and the central charge is given as , . The central charge is recognized as the D0-brane Ramond-Ramond (RR) charge in 10 dimensions and as the 11-th dimensional momentum in 11 dimensions. The 11-dimensional spacetime reduces into the 10-dimensional spacetime in the weak coupling limit ,
(1.1) |
with the 11-th dimensional coordinate and the string coupling . The 11-dimensional momentum is maintained as the D0-brane charge in the 10-dimeniosnal IIA theory after the dimensional reduction.
This is generalized to T-duality. We compare the superalgebra for the 2D-dimensional -string with manifest T-duality and the type II superalgebra for the conventional string in D dimensions. The global type II superalgebra with two supercharges , and the D-dimensional momentum is given as and with the central charge . It is recognized as the NS-NS charge in D dimensions, while the extra D dimensional momenta in 2D dimensions. If we restore in the momentum and the winding mode constituting O(D,D) vector , then their canonical conjugates are written as . In the small scale the winding modes become massless and easily excited, while in the large scale the winding mode gets heavy so only the momentum modes are excited. Manifest T-duality is broken by considering the particular background in such a way that the 2D-dimensional spacetime reduces into the D-dimensional spacetime in the limit
(1.2) |
Here is the extra D-dimensional coordinate and is the NS-NS gauge field. The extra D-dimensional momentum is maintained as the NS-NS charge after the dimensional reduction.
This dimensional reduction procedure corresponds to the gauge fixing of the dimensional reduction constraint which is the first class constraint in Hamiltonian formulation. The dimensional reduction constraint and the gauge fixing to reduce the conventional string are discussed in [57] for a flat space case. The dimensional reduction constraint is the component of the symmetry generator, . The gauge fixing condition reduce the set of conventional string operators, the physical momentum and left/right covariant derivatives . In Lagrangian formulation the momentum is replaced by . It is generalized to brane case, then the dimensional reduction constraint turns out to be the Virasoro constraint in which one of the momenta is replaced by the 0-mode [18], i.e. for zero-mode momenta and momenta including both the 0-mode and the non-0-modes , the dimensional reduction constraint is also written as .
Although the equation of motion derived from the doubled Lagrangian with using the selfduality condition coincides with the equation of motion derived from the original Lagrangian, the selfduality condition makes the doubled Lagrangian vanish [58]. The selfduality condition reduces the Lagrangian of the O(D,D) -string in flat space to 0 as
It is also mentioned that the naive section the -string Lagrangian in curved background does not reduce to the expected string Lagrangian in curved background as
The followings are also noted. Integrating out is possible for the constant background, but for general non-constant background cases the -path integral of produces the Jacobian factor in the path integral measure, which effectively produces the additional term in the action. Using the equation of motion is possible for the constant background again, but it does not reduce to the conventional string Lagrangian for the non-constant background . Imposing two conditions and is not consistent, since the integrability condition is not satisfied for the curved background for non-constant background. Studies to refine the reduction of conventional string Lagrangians have yielded several interesting approaches [58, 59, 60, 61, 48, 62].
Instead we propose the reducing procedure from -string Lagrangian to the conventional tring Lagrangian: (1) adding the total derivative term to derive the Wess-Zumino term, then (2) the dimensional reduction (1.2) as
(1.13) | |||||
This is the expected string Lagrangian up to the normalization factor two which can be absorbed by the Lagrange multiplier. The section conditions of spacetime fields are consistent with the Lagrangian where the section can be chosen as .
This procedure is similar to the usual dimensional reduction where the reduction is done in the local flat Lorentz coordinate. i.e. Suppose that we have a line element . We decompose the doubled coordinate into and in the local Lorenz frame, and then discard . Since the metric (-tensor) in local flat spacetime is already diagonal, in practice we can just apply this reduction by deleting certain blocks of -tensor similar to (1.2).
The main purpose of this paper is to perform this reduction for various specific cases. But in general, the reduction procedure could be schematically summarized as follows.
-
1.
We start with the current algebra with extended coordinates (both momentum and winding modes have their conjugate coordinates). The Hamiltonian is just the sum of selfdual and anti-selfdual constraints , where are the Hamiltonian constraints (and its dual counterpart), are the Virasoro constraints. is the Gauß law constraint which only exits for brane Hamiltonians.
-
2.
We find the Lagrangian by the Legendre transformation of the above Hamiltonian . This has been done in previous papers for various theories [1]. Schematically, it can be written as , where are the selfdual and anti-selfdual currents. They are coupled with vielbein, and thus they have flat indices. and are Lagrange multipliers which are functions of . One can gauge fix by the suitable choice of original parameters.
-
3.
Separate coordinates and currents into the physical part and the auxiliary part as , and where is the physical coordinate whatever string/brane we want to maintain and is the auxiliary coordinate. Then perform the dimensional reduction (1.2).
-
4.
The reduced Lagrangian could be explicitly shown to be to the string/brane action we want, but without the Wess-Zumino term. We found that adding a total derivative term to the Lagrangian gives the Wess-Zumino term
The current is modified after adding the total derivative, then it eventually would be reduced by the dimensional reduction (1.2). This is how we get the Wess-Zumino term.
2 Theories with manifest duality symmetries and sectionings
2.1 Diamond diagrams
The duality web of -symmetry of -theory is represented by a diamond diagram as studied in [18] in (2.19). The -symmetry of the coset group is duality symmetry. The coset parameter is the gauge field of the duality covariant geometry including the spacetime veilbein field, the NS-NS and R-R gauge fields of the superstring theory.
The relation of these duality groups is explained by the Dynkin diagrams [1]. Removing one node from the Dynkin diagram of ED+1(D+1) reduces to the one of GL(D+1) or O(D,D) depending of the position of the removed node. Further removing one node from the Dynkin diagram of GL(D+1) or O(D,D) reduces to the one of GL(D).
(2.18) | |||
(2.19) | |||
In this paper we focus on D=3 case where the -symmetry is SL(5) and the diamond diagram becomes Fig.2 in (2.40). This SL(5) duality symmetry is enlarged to SL(6) for the (5+1)-dimensional world-volume covariance in Lagrangian [1]. We named this enlarged symmetry “-symmetry”. This -theory unifies the spacetime and the world-volume, in a sense that the coset parameter of =SL(6)/GL(4) includes not only the spacetime vielbein field but also the world-volume vielbein field.
(2.39) | |||
(2.40) | |||
It is denoted that we use SO() instead of SO() for simplicity, so the Wick rotation is necessary for realizing the time component in this section and other places.
2.2 Representations
The duality covariant theories are described by the spacetime coordinate and the world-volume coordinate which are representations of the duality symmetries, -symmetry or -symmetry. Then the world-volume dimension is determined by the duality group. The Gauß law constraint generates the gauge symmetry of the duality covariant spacetime, therefore the brane current becomes the field strength.
The D=3 -theories are obtained from the D=3 -theory [17, 22]. We list representations of duality groups as below; the world-volume derivative , the gauge parameter , the spacetime coordinate , and the field strength (the current) ( , ). is the -symmetry invariant tensor which enters the current algebra.
(2.62) | |||
(2.63) |
The world-volume dimension of -theory is still where four dimensions are embedded in the 4 spacetime and one dimension is embedded in the internal space, so we denote as .
The field strengths and currents together with the gauge transformations are given concretely as follows.
-
1.
5-brane field strengths
-
(a)
World-volume covariant 5-brane field strength
The SL(6) -symmetry covariant -theory is described by a 5-brane with the manifest SL(6) new duality symmetry which manifests 6-dimensional world-volume Lorentz symmetry, namely world-volume covariant 5-brane.
(2.64) -
(b)
5-brane field strength
The SL(5) -symmetry covariant -theory is described by a 5-brane with manifest SL(5) U-duality symmetry, namely 5-brane.
(2.70)
-
(a)
-
2.
5-brane field strength
The GL(4) -theory is described by a 5-brane with the manifest GL(4) duality symmetry, namely 5-brane. We focus only on 4-dimensional subspace of the 5-dimensional world-volume which is embedded in the 4-dimensional spacetime. Physical currents are as follows.
(2.76) The following currents are auxiliary written by auxiliary coordinates , .
(2.82) These currents constitute the SL(5) -symmetry together with (2.76), and they are used to lead the non-perturbative M2-brane Lagrangian.
-
3.
-string currents
The O(3,3) -theory is described by a string with the manifest O(3,3) T-duality symmetry, namely -string.
(2.85) It is convenient to represent in terms of and .
(2.91) -
4.
-tring currents
The GL(3) -theory is described by a string with the manifest GL(3) spacetime diffeomorphism symmetry, namely a 3-dimensional string.
(2.94)
Some minus signs come from the mere notation . It is denoted that these currents are flat currents, and in later sections flat current symbols or will be used to distinguish from curved background currents.
2.3 Constraints and sectionings
The theories in Hamiltonian formulation are constructed by the current algebra with manifest duality symmetries [17]. The Spacetime translation is generated by the covariant derivative . The -brane current algebra with -symmetry covariance is given by
(2.95) |
Branes are governed by the brane Virasoro constraints and together with the Gauß law constraints which is required by the closure of the Virasoro algebra. is the -invariant metric. Theories are related by sectionings; The Virasoro constraint gives the section conditions to reduce the spacetime dimensions, and the Gauß law constraint is used to reduce the world-volume dimension as Fig.3 in (2.113).
(2.113) | |||
(2.114) | |||
The spacetime covariant derivatives, constraints and section conditions are given [17, 22] in Fig.3 (2.113) concretely as follows.
-
1.
5-brane in 10-dimensional spacetime
The 10-dimensional spacetime is described by the two rank anti-symmetric tensor covariant derivative as
(2.115) where is canonical conjugate of with with .
The SL(5) covariant current algebra of 5-brane is given by
(2.116) The 5-dimensional world-volume diffeomorphism is generated by the Virasoro constraints while the world-volume time diffeomorphism is generated by . The Gauß law constraint generates the gauge symmetry of the spacetime coordinate. These constraints are given by [1] as:
(2.120) The SL(5) covariant constraints and are background independent. These constraints are used as the dimensional reduction and section condition by replacing the spacetime momentum with the derivative of the 0-mode of the spacetime coordinate .
(2.126) These operators act on fields and as
(2.127) where fields may be functions on as and .
-
2.
5-brane in 4-dimensional spacetime
The dimensional reduction of the spacetime is obtained by solving the Virasoro constraint in (2.126) as
(2.128) This condition makes to be non-dynamical and reduced dimensionally. The remaining spacetime is 4 dimensions .
The 4-dimensional spacetime is described by the covariant derivative . The 6-dimensional covariant derivative is maintained to construct SL(5) current algebra
(2.131) with and which is not confused with the 0-mode momentum.
The SL(5) current algebra of 5-brane is
(2.135) where the last algebra forces to .
The Virasoro operators of 5-brane are
(2.140) These constraints lead to the following dimensional reductions and section conditions.
(2.144)
-
3.
-string in 6-dimensional spacetime
The dimensional reduction condition of the world-volume is obtained by solving the Gauß law constraint in (2.126) as
(2.145) These conditions make and to be non-dynamical (constant). The remaining spacetime is 6 dimensional .
The 6-dimensional spacetime is described by the covariant derivative . The 4-dimensional covariant derivative vanishes
(2.146) with .
The O(3,3) current algebra of -string is
The Virasoro operators of -string are
(2.149) with .
The Virasoro constraint lead to the following dimensional reduction and the section condition.
(2.153)
-
4.
tring in 3-dimensional spacetime
-
(a)
From -string to tring
The dimensional reduction of the spacetime is obtained by solving the Virasoro constraint in (2.153) as
(2.154) This condition makes to be non-dynamical (constant). The remaining spacetime is 3 dimensions .
-
(b)
From -brane to tring
The dimensional reduction condition of the world-volume is obtained by solving the Gauß law constraint in (2.144) as
(2.155) In the 4-dimensional spacetime is considered to be 0. These conditions make and to be non-dynamical (constant). The remaining spacetime is 3 dimensions .
The 3-dimensional spacetime is described by the covariant derivative . The 3-dimensional covariant derivative vanishes
(2.158) with and via -string and and via -brane.
The GL(3) current algebra becomes
(2.159) This is equivalent to the O(D,D) current algebra which is given by with and the O(D,D) invariant metric as
(2.160) The Virasoro operators become
(2.163) with the double Lorentz invariant metric . There is no further conditions of the Virasoro and the Gauß law constraints; .
-
(a)
3 5-brane Lagrangians
3.1 5-brane Lagrangian with SL(5) U-duality symmetry
The SL(5) U-duality symmetry is manifestly realized by the 5-brane. The spacetime background is described by the vielbein which is a SL(5)/SO(5) coset element satisfying
(3.1) |
with . The background metrices with tensor indices are
(3.2) |
The selfdual and anti-selfdual currents in a flat background and in a curved background in terms of (2.70) are given as
(3.5) | |||
(3.6) |
where becomes in a curved background. and are 5-brane world-volume vielbein fields which are introduced as Lagrange multipliers of Virasoro constraints.
3.2 World-volume covariant 5-brane Lagrangian with SL(6) duality symmetry
The =SL(5) U-duality symmetry is enlarged to =SL(6) by cooperating the 6-dimensional world-volume Lorentz covariance. The SL(6)/SO(6) coset parameter includes not only the target space vielbein SL(5)/SO(5) but also 6 components of the world-volume vielbein. The background vielbein SL(6)/SO(6) satisfies
(3.8) |
with .
This SL(6) covariant vielbein (3.8) includes the 5-brane world-volume vielbein fields and as
(3.13) |
with , and . It is denoted that the component of SL(6) vielbein (3.8) is different from the SL(5) vielbein in (3.13) up to the determinant factor. The number of degrees of freedom of the SL(6) vielbein is sum of the spacetime vielbein and the world-volume vielbein as
(3.14) |
This is generalized for a -brane of -theory symmetry with coset as
(3.15) |
The SL(6) covariant field strengths are given by a simple form; the one in a flat background ( the same as (2.64) ) and the one in a curved background as
(3.16) |
The selfdual and the anti-selfdual field strength (3.5) and (3.6) are written in terms of the SL(6) current (3.16) with and as
(3.17) |
Then the 5-brane Lagrangian (3.7) is rewritten in terms of the SL(6) covariant field strength (3.16). The world-volume covariant 5-brane Lagrangian is given [1] as
where , are Lagrange multipliers with symmetric traceless tensors ’s. The background metrices with tensor indices are
(3.19) |
4 Lagrangian of D-dimensional tring from O(D,D) -string
In this section we derive the O(D,D) -string Lagrangian from the O(D,D) Hamiltonian by the double zweibein method [55, 56]. Then the reduction procedure from the O(D,D) -string Lagrangian to the conventional string Lagrangian is presented.
4.1 O(D,D) -string
We begin with the sigma model string Lagrangian
(4.1) |
with . In the conformal gauge the Lagrangian becomes
(4.8) | |||||
(4.9) |
with , and .
The Hamiltonian is given by the Legendre transformation where the canonical momentum of is given by ,
The background field is the O(D,D) matrix written in terms of the vielbein as , SO(D1,1) and O(D,D)
(4.15) |
The background metric in the string Hamiltonian (4.1) is given as
(4.18) | |||||
(4.21) |
while its inverse is given by
(4.24) | |||||
(4.27) |
This O(D,D) background metric is utilized in the Lagrangian with manifest O(D,D) T-duality symmetry.
The O(D,D) covariant space is constructed in such a way that the O(D,D) covariant derivative algebra satisfies the same algebra of up to the normalization
(4.30) |
The covariant derivative is realized in terms of the doubled coordinate and with as
(4.31) |
which is left moving current in the doubled space. The right moving current is also introduced as
(4.32) |
which satisfies the same current algebra (4.30) with opposite sign. The number of canonical variables of the doubled space are 4D, while the physical one is 2D. The 2D equations is the usual selfduality condition to suppress 2D unphysical degrees of freedom, so we call “anti-selfdual current”. Another current is selfdual current.
There are two sets of Virasoro constraints written in terms of the selfdual current and the anti-selfdual current
(4.37) |
and satisfy the Virasoro algebra
(4.38) | |||||
while and satisfy the same Virasoro algebra with opposite signs on the right hand side.
As seen in the Hamiltonian in curved background (4.1) currents coupled to the vielbein as
(4.39) |
In curved background the Virasoro constraints become
(4.44) |
The O(D,D) covariant Hamiltonian is given by the sum of all these Virasoro constraints with Lagrange multipliers which are doubled zweibeins [55]
(4.45) | |||||
with and . We used the fact that the covariant derivatives are rewritten as and by the orthogonal condition (4.15). Matrices and are given as
(4.46) |
with the inverse of as
(4.47) |
The Legendre transformation of the Hamiltonian (4.45) with (4.46) leads to the following Lagrangian
(4.50) | |||||
with .
The Lagrangian in (4.50) can be written in terms of the selfdual current and the anti-selfdual current which is equal to in (4.50). The selfdual and anti-selfdual currents are given by
(4.53) |
The selfdual and anti-selfdual currents in the flat background, , are written as
(4.56) |
It is denoted that becomes in a curved background. The resultant O(D,D) covariant Lagrangian for a -string is given [55] as
(4.57) | |||||
The first term is the kinetic term, while the rest are constraints that are squares of the anti-selfdual currents. The Lagrange multipliers , and are related to the doubled zweibeins as
(4.61) |
4.2 String from O(D,D) -string
We break the O(D,D) T-duality symmetry of -string into the GL(D) symmetry of the usual string. The background gauge field of -string is O(D,D)/O(D1,1)2 coset parameter which includes the D-dimensional metric and field, while the background gauge field of a string is GL(D)/SO(D-1,1) coset parameter which includes only . In this subsection we use the coordinate with off-diagonal to describe -string, while the left/right moving coordinate with diagonal was used in the reference [55]. The Weyl/Lorentz gauge of the zweibein [55] is given as
(4.66) |
The left/right moving modes with the zweibein is . The selfdual and anti-selfdual currents (4.56) are expressed as
(4.69) |
with
(4.74) |
The condition of vanishing the anti-selfdual current in and gauge leads to the selfduality constraint in flat space as with . In the gauge and , corresponding to and , the O(D,D) covariant Lagrangian (4.57) is written as
(4.75) |
The orthogonality condition is used in the second equality, , so , is used in the last equality. In terms of coordinates it is given by
(4.80) | |||
(4.89) | |||
We break the O(D,D) symmetry into the GL(D) symmetry by the dimensional reduction (1.2). The resultant Lagrangian is the kinetic term of the usual string with the zweibein field;
(4.90) |
In order to obtain the Wess-Zumino term we add the total derivative term
(4.91) |
to the O(D,D) Lagrangian (4.80)
(4.92) | |||
By the dimensional reduction (1.2) the Lagrangian with the total derivative term reduces into the string Lagrangian in curved background with the Wess-Zumino term as the curved world-sheet version of (4.9),
(4.93) |
The zweibeins in (4.93) and (4.1) are related as
(4.94) |
5 Lagrangians of String via -string from 5-brane
In this section we derive the -string Lagrangian from the 5-brane Lagrangian. The obtained -string Lagrangian is described by the SL(4) two rank anti-symmetric tensor coordinate coupled to the string background. Then the reduction procedure from the -string Lagrangian to the conventional string Lagrangian is presented.
5.1 -string from 5-brane
The O(3,3) -string from 5-brane is described by the SL(4) two rank anti-symmetric tensor coordinate with and as listed in (2.63). The SL(6) two rank tensor coordinate is decomposed as SL(6) SL(5) SL(4) as with and . The 6-dimensional world-volume derivative is reduced into the string world-sheet derivatives as . The SL(6) field strength for the -string has the following components
(5.1) |
The SL(6) vielbein for the -string has a block diagonal form as
(5.8) |
The selfdual and the anti-selfdual currents are the following combinations of the SL(6) field strengths in (5.1) with (3.16) as
(5.9) |
The zweibein fields and are part of the SL(6) vielbein (5.8) in the new SL(6) duality symmetry formulation in (3.16), contrast to that the world-volume vielbein fields are separated from the SL(4) spacetime vielbein in the SL(5) formulation in (3.5) and (3.6) as
(5.10) |
with (4.66). The minus sign in the last equation is caused from . The O(3,3) invariant metric becomes SL(4) invariant metric . The current in (5.10) is written in terms of and as
(5.13) |
which is related to the O(D,D) vector currents (4.69) with .
In order to obtain the usual 3-dimensional string Lagrangian we express the spacetime vielbein SL(4)/SO(4) in terms of the 3-dimensional metric and the field. The O(3,3) vector index contraction and the SL(4) tensor index contraction are assumed to be equal up to the normalization as
We rewrite the O(D,D) vielbein in (4.24) in terms of tensor indices for D=3 case as
(5.17) | |||||
(5.20) |
with a normalization factor . The vielbein with the tensor indices can be written as the product of the one with the vector indices
The background gauge field in the tensor index is now
(5.28) | |||||
(5.31) |
where metric of the stability group is denoted as to distinguish from .
The -string Lagrangian is obtained from the world-volume covariant 5-Lagrangian (LABEL:ALagwithSL6)
(5.32) | |||||
with and . Although currents are written as field strengths, there is no gauge symmetry of the coordinate . The -string Lagrangian in the SL(4) tensor coordinate is given by
(5.33) | |||||
with the background metric in (5.31).
The -string Lagrangian in the gauge and as
(5.34) |
The SL(4) covariant Lagrangian (5.33) in the gauge and is given as
(5.39) | |||||
5.2 tring from -string
We break SL(4) symmetry of -string into GL(3) for the usual string, where the reduction of the spacetime coordinate is performed as . We repeat the same procedure of subsection 4.2. The SL(4) Lagrangian (LABEL:SL4kineticxy) is rewritten analogously to (4.75)
(5.41) |
By the dimensional reduction (1.2) the Lagrangian (LABEL:SL4kineticxy) reduces to the kinetic term of the string (4.90).
The total derivative term which is added to obtain the Wess-Zumino term (4.91) becomes
(5.42) |
Adding this term to the SL(4) Lagrangian (LABEL:SL4kineticxy)
(5.43) | |||
After the dimensional reduction (1.2), the Lagrangian with the total derivative term reduces into the usual string Lagrangian with the Wess-Zumino term (4.93),
6 Lagrangians of M2-brane via 5-brane from 5-brane
6.1 5-brane from 5-brane
The GL(4) 5-brane from 5-brane is described by the GL(4) vector coordinate [17] as listed in (2.63). The SL(6) two rank tensor coordinate is decomposed as SL(6) SL(5) GL(4) as and . The 6-dimensional world-volume derivative is reduced into the 5-brane world-sheet derivatives as . The SL(6) field strength for the 5-brane has the following components
(6.5) |
where the auxiliary coordinates and are preserved to begin with the SL(5) -symmetric -theory Lagrangian [22].
The SL(6) vielbein for the 5-brane with SL(5) -symmetry is given by
(6.10) |
It is stressed that the world-volume vielbein fields , and the spacetime vielbein cannot be in block diagonal form unlike -string case (5.8). The selfdual and anti-selfdual currents in curved background given by (3.6) based on (3.5) are the following combination of the SL(6) field strengths in (6.5) with (3.16) as
(6.11) |
The GL(4) covariant selfdual and anti-selfdual currents in flat space are derived from the ones of SL(5) (3.5) given in [1] as
(6.16) |
where becomes in a curved background. The brane world-volume derivatives are given as a generalization of the world-sheet zweibein dependence in (4.66) as
(6.21) | |||
(6.26) |
The 11-dimensional supergravity background includes the gravitational metric and the three form gauge field . We focus on the 4-dimensional subspace of the 11-dimensional space, where the background fields are and whose number of degrees of freedom is . The dimension of the coset SL(5)/SO(5) is also . The vector vielbein SL(5)/SO(5) with GL(4) indices where and is given by [63]
(6.32) | |||||
with . The tensor vielbein is the product of the vector vielbein (6.32) as
(6.37) | |||||
The background gauge field in tensor index is now
(6.41) | |||||
(6.44) | |||||
(6.49) |
Inverse of these background gauge fields are given by [63]
(6.54) | |||||
(6.59) | |||||
(6.62) | |||||
(6.65) | |||||
(6.70) |
The 5-brane Lagrangian is given by the SL(5) covariant Lagrangian (3.7) with replacing GL(4) indices as
(6.71) | |||||
The Lagrangian in terms of the curved currents is simpler than the one in terms of the flat currents . The concrete expression of the Lagrangian of the 5-brane in a curved background (6.71) is given as follows. We begin by the SL(5) covariant Lagrangian (3.7) in the gauge and ’s
(6.74) | |||
(6.79) | |||
(6.82) | |||
(6.87) | |||
(6.88) |
with
(6.89) | |||||
In the gauge Lagrangians take simple form as
(6.90) | |||||
with .
The SL(5) U-duality symmetry of the Lagrangian (6.90) is broken to GL(4) symmetry by the dimensional reduction similarly to (1.2). Then the kinetic term of the new perturbative Lagrangian for a 5-brane in the 4-dimensions is given by
The remaining one worldvolume dimension is embedded in the internal space which we do not discuss in this paper.
The total derivative terms to obtain the Wess-Zumino term for the 5-brane are given analogously to the string case (4.91) with the gauge as
(6.92) | |||
where the dependent terms are cancelled out because of the totally antisymmetricity of 5 indices
(6.93) |
Adding the total derivative term (6.92) to the 5-brane Lagrangian (6.71) in gauge , , ’s the Lagrangian for the -brane becomes
(6.94) |
Dimensional reduction gives the 5-brane Lagrangian with the Wass-Zumino term.
The obtained new 5-brane Lagrangian in the supergravity background (4.1) is
(6.95) |
6.2 Non-perturbative M2-brane from 5-brane
A non-perturbative membrane action in the 11-dimensional supergravity theory is given by [53]
(6.98) |
with the spacetime index and the world-volume index . The canonical coordinates are and , and the spacial world-volume coordinate derivative is with . The Hamiltonian is given by [63] where
(6.101) | |||||
Here is related to as for the background gauge field . includes and . The Virasoro constraint in (2.140) is related to the constraint in (6.101) which generates -diffeomorphism by multiplying the world-volume embedding operator in (6.109) as .
We focus on the 4-dimensional subspace where the supergravity background is a representation of the SL(5) U-duality symmetry, SL(5)/SO(5). The currents and are 4 and 6 components of SL(4) with , which are unified into a SL(5) tensor with . The currents for a M2-brane in 4-dimensional space (6.101) obtained from the membrane Lagrangian (6.98) are written as
(6.104) |
Commutators of (6.104) are given as
(6.108) |
The -brane current algebras with the non-perturbative winding modes are obtained similarly in [64].
Now let us compare the SL(5) current algebra of the non-perturbative M2-brane (6.108) with the one of the 5-brane (2.135) . The perturbative 5-brane current algebra in (2.135) reduces into the non-perturbative M2-brane algebra in (6.108) by reducing the 5-dimensional world-volume of the 5-brane into the 2-dimensional world-volume of the non-perturbative M2-brane as
(6.109) |
The operator is an embedding of the membrane world-volume to the 5-brane world-volume (where the 5-th brane coordinate is in the internal space). It has the constant form in the static gauge for the ground state [1].
Now we plug the world-volume projection (6.109) into the 5-brane Lagrangian (6.95). The first term in the gauge is given by
(6.110) |
with
(6.111) |
and the membrane vielbein and the 5-brane vielbein
(6.112) |
The second term is given by
(6.113) |
where the following relation is used in the last equality of (6.113)
(6.114) |
We choose the following gauge of the membrane worldvolume metric
(6.115) |
Using with the relation
(6.116) |
the kinetic term in (6.95) becomes
(6.117) | |||||
This is nothing but the Nambu-Goto Lagrangian for a membrane. The Wess-Zumino term is obtained by using the world-volume projection (6.109) into (6.95) as
(6.118) |
Together with the Nambu-Goto term (6.117) the non-perturbative M2-brane Lagrangian is obtained from the perturbative -brane as
(6.119) |
This is the expected M2-brane Lagrangian (6.98) where we set .
7 Discussion
In this paper we have shown how the conventional strings and membrane are obtained from -theory five brane with the SL(5) U-duality symmetry.
The following topics are interesting for future problems.
-
1.
From 5-brane to D-branes: The -theory background vielbein field includes the R-R gauge fields which couple to D-branes. The Nambu-Goto Lagrangian will be obtained analogously to the non-perturbative M2-brane Lagrangian as in subsection 6.2 with special care of the -field. The Wess-Zumino term will be obtained by adding total derivative term with the -field cloud, in such a way that the gauge transformation rule of the R-R gauge field involves the -field.
-
2.
From -theory branes to the non-perturbative M5- and NS5-branes: The superstring theories have the NS5-brane solutions which couple to the -field magnetically. M-theory has the M5-brane solution [65], and type IIB superstring theory has both the NS-NS 5-brane and D5-brane. These 5-brane Lagrangians will be derived from 5-brane and all 5-branes should be related by duality transformations. It is interesting to clarify the relation of the 5-brane WEB for Lagrangians analogous to the one for current algebras [66].
-
3.
From open -theory branes to heterotic strings and type I string: Lagrangians of open -theory brane [30] where SO(32) and E8E8 gauge groups are involved and other half BPS branes are interesting.
-
4.
Quantization of - and -branes: The main purpose to construct perturbative -brane Lagrangian is for simpler quantization. Quantum effects of string theory with winding modes of strings or branes are important to consider the Planck size physics such as the early universe singularity [15, 13]. Quantizaion of -theory will give a hint of unified description of string spectra and S-matrices [67, 68, 69, 70].
-
5.
Higher dimensional cases: -theories of D3 have U-duality symmetry ED+1 [71, 44, 72, 73] whose dimensions, so the numbers of dimension spacetime and the world-volume, are so large that it requires new interpretation of the unphysical spacetime and world-volume. Constructing -theory may give a hint of new description of string.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Olaf Hohm, Igor Bandos, Martin Roček and Yuqi Li for the fruitful discussions. M.H. would like to thank Yuho Sakatani for useful discussions. We also acknowledge the Simons Center for Geometry and Physics for its hospitality during “The Simons Summer Workshop in Mathematics and Physics 2023 and 2024” where this work has been developed. W.S. is supported by NSF award PHY-2210533. M.H. is supported in part by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C), JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers JP22K03603 and JP20K03604.
References
- [1] Machiko Hatsuda et al. “-theory — A brane world-volume theory with manifest U-duality” In JHEP 10, 2023, pp. 087 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP10(2023)087
- [2] Cumrun Vafa “Evidence for F theory” In Nucl. Phys. B 469, 1996, pp. 403–418 DOI: 10.1016/0550-3213(96)00172-1
- [3] Timo Weigand “F-theory” In PoS TASI2017, 2018, pp. 016 arXiv:1806.01854 [hep-th]
- [4] W. Siegel “Superspace duality in low-energy superstrings” In Phys. Rev. D 48, 1993, pp. 2826–2837 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.48.2826
- [5] W. Siegel “Two vierbein formalism for string inspired axionic gravity” In Phys. Rev. D 47, 1993, pp. 5453–5459 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.47.5453
- [6] W. Siegel “Manifest duality in low-energy superstrings” In International Conference on Strings 93, 1993 arXiv:hep-th/9308133
- [7] Arkady A. Tseytlin “Duality symmetric closed string theory and interacting chiral scalars” In Nucl. Phys. B 350, 1991, pp. 395–440 DOI: 10.1016/0550-3213(91)90266-Z
- [8] Chris Hull and Barton Zwiebach “Double Field Theory” In JHEP 09, 2009, pp. 099 DOI: 10.1088/1126-6708/2009/09/099
- [9] Olaf Hohm, Chris Hull and Barton Zwiebach “Generalized metric formulation of double field theory” In JHEP 08, 2010, pp. 008 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP08(2010)008
- [10] Gerardo Aldazabal, Diego Marques and Carmen Nunez “Double Field Theory: A Pedagogical Review” In Class. Quant. Grav. 30, 2013, pp. 163001 DOI: 10.1088/0264-9381/30/16/163001
- [11] Olaf Hohm, Dieter Lüst and Barton Zwiebach “The Spacetime of Double Field Theory: Review, Remarks, and Outlook” In Fortsch. Phys. 61, 2013, pp. 926–966 DOI: 10.1002/prop.201300024
- [12] Martin Poláček and Warren Siegel “T-duality off shell in 3D Type II superspace” In JHEP 06, 2014, pp. 107 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP06(2014)107
- [13] Martin Poláček and Warren Siegel “Pre-potential in the Type IIB superspace” In JHEP 01, 2017, pp. 059 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP01(2017)059
- [14] Machiko Hatsuda, Kiyoshi Kamimura and Warren Siegel “Superspace with manifest T-duality from type II superstring” In JHEP 06, 2014, pp. 039 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP06(2014)039
- [15] Machiko Hatsuda, Kiyoshi Kamimura and Warren Siegel “Ramond-Ramond gauge fields in superspace with manifest T-duality” In JHEP 02, 2015, pp. 134 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP02(2015)134
- [16] Machiko Hatsuda, Kiyoshi Kamimura and Warren Siegel “Type II chiral affine Lie algebras and string actions in doubled space” In JHEP 09, 2015, pp. 113 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP09(2015)113
- [17] William D. Linch and Warren Siegel “F-theory from Fundamental Five-branes” In JHEP 02, 2021, pp. 047 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP02(2021)047
- [18] William D. Linch and Warren Siegel “F-theory with Worldvolume Sectioning” In JHEP 04, 2021, pp. 022 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP04(2021)022
- [19] W. Siegel “F-theory with zeroth-quantized ghosts”, 2016 arXiv:1601.03953 [hep-th]
- [20] Warren Siegel and Yu-Ping Wang “F-theory amplitudes”, 2020 arXiv:2010.14590 [hep-th]
- [21] Chia-Yi Ju and Warren Siegel “Gauging Unbroken Symmetries in F-theory” In Phys. Rev. D 94.10, 2016, pp. 106004 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.94.106004
- [22] Warren Siegel and Di Wang “M Theory from F Theory”, 2020 arXiv:2010.09564 [hep-th]
- [23] William Linch and Warren Siegel “F-brane Superspace: The New World Volume”, 2017 arXiv:1709.03536 [hep-th]
- [24] William D. Linch and Warren Siegel “F-brane Dynamics”, 2016 arXiv:1610.01620 [hep-th]
- [25] William D Linch and Warren Siegel “Critical Super F-theories”, 2015 arXiv:1507.01669 [hep-th]
- [26] Warren Siegel and Di Wang “Enlarged exceptional symmetries of first-quantized F-theory”, 2018 arXiv:1806.02423 [hep-th]
- [27] William D. Linch and Warren Siegel “F-theory superspace” In JHEP 03, 2021, pp. 059 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP03(2021)059
- [28] Warren Siegel and Di Wang “F-theory superspace backgrounds”, 2019 arXiv:1910.01710 [hep-th]
- [29] Machiko Hatsuda and Warren Siegel “Perturbative F-theory 10-brane and M-theory 5-brane” In JHEP 11, 2021, pp. 201 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP11(2021)201
- [30] Machiko Hatsuda and Warren Siegel “Open F-branes” In JHEP 04, 2022, pp. 073 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP04(2022)073
- [31] David S. Berman and Malcolm J. Perry “Generalized Geometry and M theory” In JHEP 06, 2011, pp. 074 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP06(2011)074
- [32] Martin Cederwall, Joakim Edlund and Anna Karlsson “Exceptional geometry and tensor fields” In JHEP 07, 2013, pp. 028 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP07(2013)028
- [33] Martin Cederwall “Twistors and supertwistors for exceptional field theory” In JHEP 12, 2015, pp. 123 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP12(2015)123
- [34] Lilian Chabrol “Geometry of exceptional field theory and F-theory” In JHEP 08, 2019, pp. 073 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP08(2019)073
- [35] Andre Coimbra, Charles Strickland-Constable and Daniel Waldram “Supergravity as Generalised Geometry I: Type II Theories” In JHEP 11, 2011, pp. 091 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP11(2011)091
- [36] Andre Coimbra, Charles Strickland-Constable and Daniel Waldram “Supergravity as Generalised Geometry II: and M theory” In JHEP 03, 2014, pp. 019 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP03(2014)019
- [37] David S. Berman, Martin Cederwall, Axel Kleinschmidt and Daniel C. Thompson “The gauge structure of generalised diffeomorphisms” In JHEP 01, 2013, pp. 064 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP01(2013)064
- [38] Olaf Hohm and Henning Samtleben “Exceptional Form of D=11 Supergravity” In Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 2013, pp. 231601 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.231601
- [39] Olaf Hohm and Henning Samtleben “Exceptional Field Theory I: covariant Form of M-Theory and Type IIB” In Phys. Rev. D 89.6, 2014, pp. 066016 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.89.066016
- [40] Olaf Hohm and Henning Samtleben “Exceptional field theory. II. E7(7)” In Phys. Rev. D 89, 2014, pp. 066017 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.89.066017
- [41] Olaf Hohm and Henning Samtleben “Exceptional field theory. III. E8(8)” In Phys. Rev. D 90, 2014, pp. 066002 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.90.066002
- [42] David S. Berman, Chris D.. Blair, Emanuel Malek and Felix J. Rudolph “An action for F-theory: exceptional field theory” In Class. Quant. Grav. 33.19, 2016, pp. 195009 DOI: 10.1088/0264-9381/33/19/195009
- [43] M.. Duff “E8 x SO(16) SYMMETRY OF d = 11 SUPERGRAVITY”, 1985
- [44] E. Cremmer and B. Julia “The SO(8) Supergravity” In Nucl. Phys. B 159, 1979, pp. 141–212 DOI: 10.1016/0550-3213(79)90331-6
- [45] David Osten “Currents, charges and algebras in exceptional generalised geometry” In JHEP 06, 2021, pp. 070 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP06(2021)070
- [46] David Osten “On exceptional QP-manifolds” In JHEP 01, 2024, pp. 028 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP01(2024)028
- [47] David Osten “On the universal exceptional structure of world-volume theories in string and M-theory” In Phys. Lett. B 855, 2024, pp. 138814 DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138814
- [48] Yuho Sakatani and Shozo Uehara “Branes in Extended Spacetime: Brane Worldvolume Theory Based on Duality Symmetry” In Phys. Rev. Lett. 117.19, 2016, pp. 191601 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.191601
- [49] Chris D.. Blair and Edvard T. Musaev “Five-brane actions in double field theory” In JHEP 03, 2018, pp. 111 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP03(2018)111
- [50] Yuho Sakatani and Shozo Uehara “Exceptional M-brane sigma models and -symbols” In PTEP 2018.3, 2018, pp. 033B05 DOI: 10.1093/ptep/pty021
- [51] Chris D.. Blair “Open exceptional strings and D-branes” In JHEP 07, 2019, pp. 083 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP07(2019)083
- [52] Yuho Sakatani and Shozo Uehara “Born sigma model for branes in exceptional geometry” In PTEP 2020.7, 2020, pp. 073B05 DOI: 10.1093/ptep/ptaa081
- [53] E. Bergshoeff, E. Sezgin and P.. Townsend “Supermembranes and Eleven-Dimensional Supergravity” In Phys. Lett. B 189, 1987, pp. 75–78 DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(87)91272-X
- [54] Edward Witten “String theory dynamics in various dimensions” In Nucl. Phys. B 443, 1995, pp. 85–126 DOI: 10.1201/9781482268737-32
- [55] Machiko Hatsuda and Warren Siegel “O(D, D) gauge fields in the T-dual string Lagrangian” In JHEP 02, 2019, pp. 010 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP02(2019)010
- [56] Machiko Hatsuda and Warren Siegel “T-dual Superstring Lagrangian with double zweibeins” In JHEP 03, 2020, pp. 058 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP03(2020)058
- [57] Machiko Hatsuda, Kiyoshi Kamimura and Warren Siegel “Type II chiral affine Lie algebras and string actions in doubled space” In JHEP 2015.9 Springer ScienceBusiness Media LLC, 2015 DOI: 10.1007/jhep09(2015)113
- [58] E. Cremmer, B. Julia, H. Lü and C.N. Pope “Dualisation of dualities” In Nuclear Physics B 523.1–2 Elsevier BV, 1998, pp. 73–144 DOI: 10.1016/s0550-3213(98)00136-9
- [59] Christofer M Hull “A geometry for non-geometric string backgrounds” In JHEP 2005.10 Springer ScienceBusiness Media LLC, 2005, pp. 065–065 DOI: 10.1088/1126-6708/2005/10/065
- [60] Christopher M Hull “Doubled geometry and T-folds” In JHEP 2007.07 Springer ScienceBusiness Media LLC, 2007, pp. 080–080 DOI: 10.1088/1126-6708/2007/07/080
- [61] Kanghoon Lee and Jeong-Hyuck Park “Covariant action for a string in doubled yet gauged spacetime” In Nuclear Physics B 880 Elsevier BV, 2014, pp. 134–154 DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2014.01.003
- [62] Alex S. Arvanitakis and Chris D.. Blair “The exceptional sigma model” In JHEP 2018.4 Springer ScienceBusiness Media LLC, 2018 DOI: 10.1007/jhep04(2018)064
- [63] Machiko Hatsuda and Kiyoshi Kamimura “SL(5) duality from canonical M2-brane” In JHEP 11, 2012, pp. 001 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP11(2012)001
- [64] Machiko Hatsuda and Tetsuji Kimura “Canonical approach to Courant brackets for D-branes” In JHEP 06, 2012, pp. 034 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP06(2012)034
- [65] Machiko Hatsuda and Kiyoshi Kamimura “M5 algebra and SO(5,5) duality” In JHEP 06, 2013, pp. 095 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP06(2013)095
- [66] Machiko Hatsuda, Shin Sasaki and Masaya Yata “Five-brane current algebras in type II string theories” In JHEP 03, 2021, pp. 298 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP03(2021)298
- [67] Hai-dong Feng and Warren Siegel “Gauge-covariant S-matrices for field theory and strings” In Phys. Rev. D 71, 2005, pp. 106001 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.71.106001
- [68] Henriette Elvang, Daniel Z. Freedman and Michael Kiermaier “Solution to the Ward Identities for Superamplitudes” In JHEP 10, 2010, pp. 103 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP10(2010)103
- [69] Henriette Elvang, Daniel Z. Freedman and Michael Kiermaier “SUSY Ward identities, Superamplitudes, and Counterterms” In J. Phys. A 44, 2011, pp. 454009 DOI: 10.1088/1751-8113/44/45/454009
- [70] Warren Siegel “S-matrices from 4d worldvolume”, 2020 arXiv:2012.12938 [hep-th]
- [71] E. Cremmer and B. Julia “The N=8 Supergravity Theory. 1. The Lagrangian” In Phys. Lett. B 80, 1978, pp. 48 DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(78)90303-9
- [72] Guillaume Bossard et al. “E9 exceptional field theory. Part I. The potential” In JHEP 03, 2019, pp. 089 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP03(2019)089
- [73] Guillaume Bossard et al. “E9 exceptional field theory. Part II. The complete dynamics” In JHEP 05, 2021, pp. 107 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP05(2021)107