Illia Donhauzer, corresponding author, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia [email protected]
Andriy Olenko, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia [email protected]
This research was supported under the Australian Research Council’s Discovery Projects funding scheme (project number DP220101680). I.Donhauzer and A.Olenko also would like to thank for partial support provided by the La Trobe SEMS CaRE grant.
Stochastic diffusion within expanding space-time
Abstract The paper examines stochastic diffusion within an expanding space-time framework. It starts with providing a rationale for the considered model and its motivation from cosmology where the expansion of space-time is used in modelling various phenomena. Contrary to other results in the literature, the considered in this paper general stochastic model takes into consideration the expansion of space-time. It leads to a stochastic diffusion equations with coefficients that are non-constant and evolve with the expansion factor. Then, the Cauchy problem with random initial conditions is posed and investigated. The exact solution to a stochastic diffusion equation on the expanding sphere is derived. Various probabilistic properties of the solution are studied, including its dependence structure, evolution of the angular power spectrum and local properties of the solution and its approximations by finite truncations. The paper also characterises the extremal behaviour of the random solution by establishing upper bounds on the probabilities of large deviations. Numerical studies are undertaken to illustrate the obtained theoretical results and demonstrate the evolution of the random solution.
Keywords Stochastic partial differential equation, Spherical random field, Approximation errors, Excursion probability, Cosmic microwave background
Mathematics Subject Classification 35R01 35R60 60G60 60G15 60H15 33C55 35P10 35Q85 41A25
1 Introduction
The NASA mission WMAP and the ESA (European Space Agency) mission Planck have been instrumental in collecting highly accurate cosmological data, resulting in a precise map depicting the distribution of Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMB) [4, 5]. It is expected that new experiments, in particular, within CMB-S4 Collaboration and ESA’s Euclid mission, will provide measurements of the CMB at unprecedented precision.
The CMB spectrum indicates that since the last scattering around 380,000 years after the big bang, the universe has been transparent to electromagnetic radiation. However the universe is not transparent to charged cosmic ray particles. They are deviated by magnetic fields as they pass close to galaxies. Recent estimates of the number of galaxies in the observable universe range from to . In any angular aperture of observation, there will be part of at least one galaxy. Extragalactic cosmic ray particles reach the earth in a small number of showers each year. They are distinguished from local galactic cosmic rays by their high particle energy, greater than . This corresponds to charged particles typically arriving at more than half the speed of light. They have likely been travelling for a very long time in cosmic terms, during which they would have been deviated by a number of galaxies. This results in a long-term diffusive redistribution of matter throughout the universe.
This dynamical process is very complicated. Effective diffusion occurs partly by scattering due to magnetic fields [22] and also by motion of the magnetic field lines themselves [25]. It has also been argued that the temperature gradients formed from galaxies can effectively repel particles, enough to avoid gravitational capture [37].
Due to the long distances between galaxy clusters, scattering is intermittent, reasonably described by a fractional -stable Lévy distribution with tail probabilities of order for exceeding a large displacement, and the distribution due to a local disturbance broadening asymptotically in proportion to Such a distribution can result from a fractional super-diffusion that is of order . Data from intra-galactic cosmic rays evidence values of less than 0.5 [15].
The cosmological missions have yielded high resolution maps of CMB. The necessity of modelling and analysing them have recently attracted increasing attention to the theory of spherical random fields. From the mathematical point of view and for modelling purposes, a map depicting the distribution of CMB can be regarded as a single realization of a random field on a sphere of a large radius. The sphere plays a role of the underlying space and expands in time. For the Dark-energy-dominated era, the expansion factor has the exponential form [11]. This expansion impacts the stochastic diffusion and should be incorporated in a model for the evolution of CMB. Contrary to the other models in the literature, this paper takes into consideration the expansion of space-time, which leads to a stochastic diffusion equation with coefficients that are non-constant and evolve with the expansion factor.
We refer to the monograph [31] for the systematic exposition of the main results of the theory of spherical random fields. The paper [26] studied isotropic random fields on high-dimensional spheres and established connections between the smoothness of the covariance kernel and the decay of their angular power spectrum, derived conditions for almost sure sample continuity and sample differentiability of spherical random fields, and obtained sufficient conditions for their continuity in terms of the decay of the angular power spectrum.
Another important direction of the modern theory of random fields is the exploration of extremes of random fields including fields given on manifolds, see the classical results in [38], [17], [35] and their modern generalisations. The monograph [14] examined extremes of sub-Gaussian fields while the expected Euler characteristic method developed by Adler and Taylor was demonstrated in [6]. The publication [16] provided the asymptotics of excursion probabilities for both smooth and non-smooth spherical Gaussian fields. Some inequalities for excursion probabilities for spherical sub-Gaussian random fields were obtained in [36]. Another approach utilized limit theorems for sojourn measures, see [28] and [30].
Stochastic partial differential equations (SPDE) are the main tool to model the evolution of spherical random fields over time. They have been extensively studied, see, for example, [19], [26], [34] and the references therein. Several models were recently presented in [7, 12, 13, 27] that employed stochastic hyperbolic diffusion equations and modelled various types of evolution of spherical random fields.
This article integrates the aforementioned approaches and extend them to the context of SPDEs within an expanding space-time. The equations studied in this paper differ from the mentioned SPDEs and are given as a hyperbolic diffusion on the expanding sphere. Motivated by cosmological applications, the exponential expansion is used in the considered model, which leads to a stochastic diffusion equation with non-constant coefficients.
The article also conducts the numerical analysis of the solution of the considered model. The numerical analysis section investigates the evolution of the solution of the studied SPDE over space-time, the structure of its space-time dependencies, and its extremes. The CMB intensity map from the mission Planck and its spectrum are used as initial conditions. The numerical analysis confirms and visualizes the obtained theoretical results.
The main novelties of the paper include:
-
•
The consideration of diffusion within an expanding space-time framework;
-
•
The examination of equations with non-constant coefficients dependent on the expansion factor values;
-
•
An exploration of both the local and asymptotic properties of the solutions and their respective approximations;
-
•
An analysis of excursion probabilities associated with the solutions and their approximations.
The paper is structured as follows: Section 2 provides the main definitions and notations. Section 3 presents the diffusion model within an expanding time-space universe. Then, this section investigates the initial-value problem for this diffusion equation and explores the properties of the derived non-random solutions. Section 3 is dedicated to the examination of the equation with random initial conditions. The solution to the equation and its associated covariance function are derived. Section 5 investigates properties of stochastic solutions and their corresponding approximations. Sections 6 studies excursion probabilities related to the solutions and their approximations. Finally, Section 7 presents simulation studies that illustrate the properties of the solutions and the obtained results.
2 Main definitions and notations
This section reviews the main definitions and notations used in this paper and provides required background knowledge from the theory of random fields.
with subindices represents a generic finite positive constant. The values of constants are not necessarily the same in each appearance and may be changed depending on the expression. is the Euclidean norm in stands for the Lebesgue measure on the unit sphere
The notation is used to define Euclidean coordinates of points, while the notation is used for the corresponding spherical coordinates. They are related by the following transformations
In what follows, denotes the angular distance between two points with spherical coordinates and on the unit sphere
By we denote the Hilbert space of square integrable functions on with the following canonical inner product [9, Page 8]
where denotes a complex conjugate of and the induced norm
The spherical harmonics are given as
where
are the associated Legendre polynomials with the indices and and is the th Legendre polynomial
The spherical harmonics form an orthogonal basis in the Hilbert space i.e.
where is the Kronecker delta function.
The addition formula for the spherical harmonics states that
(1) |
For any it holds
where
A spherical random field is a collection of random variables given on a common complete probability space and indexed by parameters In this paper, we consider real-valued spherical random fields that are continuous and twice-differentiable with probability
By we denote the Hilbert space of spherical random fields that have a finite norm
A spherical random field is called isotropic if its finite-dimensional distributions are invariant with respect to rotation transformations, i.e. if
for any and any rotation matrix
An isotropic spherical random field allows a representation as the following Laplace series [26]
(2) |
where the convergence is in the space i.e..
The random variables are given by the next stochastic integrals defined in the mean-square sense
(3) |
Note that a spherical random field takes a constant random value, i.e. with probability 1, if and only if a.s. for Indeed, by the properties of spherical harmonics, for the integrals in (3) equal to a.s. for The inverse statement is trivial due to (2).
If is a centered real-valued Gaussian random field, then it allows the representation (2), where are Gaussian random variables such that
The sequence is called the angular power spectrum of the isotropic random field The series (2) converges in the sense if it holds true [26, Section 2] that
(4) |
We assume that condition (4) remains valid throughout all subsequent sections of the paper.
The Bessel function of the first kind is given by the following series [3, 9.1.10]
It has a finite value at the origin if and a singularity if
3 Spherical diffusion in expanding space-time
This section provides a justification for the model and obtain certain properties of solutions to the non-random version of the considered diffusion equations.
The universe is observed to have spatial cross sections with zero curvature. The Friedmann–Lemaître–
Robertson–Walker metric (FLRW) on the sphere of radius is
in the spherical space coordinates and the cosmic time coordinate where the term is the expansion factor. Note that for the Dark-energy-dominated era [23, 24], the expansion factor has the exponential form of the maximally symmetric de Sitter universe, [11, 42].
The spherical diffusion is given by the following equation
(5) |
where is the covariant derivative operator and are the elements of the contravariant metric tensor where the indices take values from 0 to 2. We also impose the following initial conditions
(6) |
The covariant derivatives do not commute when they act on vectors, see [10]. However, the Laplace-Beltrami operator on the sphere can be expanded unambiguously in terms of partial derivatives as
(7) |
where is the covariant metric tensor. For the above defined FLRW metric, is the diagonal matrix with the elements and the contravariant metric tensor is the inverse of
Changing to a conformal time coordinate
the FLRW metric becomes
where and the covariant metric tensor becomes the diagonal matrix with the elements
Using (7) and the above expression of the covariant metric tensor in terms of the conformal time, the equation (5) can be written in the following form
(8) |
As for it holds that and the initial conditions (6) become
(9) |
The equation (8) is different compared to the models studied in the literature, see [7, 12, 13, 27] and the references therein. Namely, for the underlying FLRW space-time metric the coefficient of the term in (8) is not constant and depends on the evolution of the expansion factor
Theorem 1.
where
(10) |
and 0 denotes a point on the unit sphere with the spherical coordinates
Proof.
Let be the solution of (8), then, after multiplying the equation by one gets
where and is a separation constant. Thus, and as it is -periodic, must be an integer.
Now separating the independent variable one gets
By substituting this equation for is equivalent to the next associated Legendre equation [8, page 648]
The solution of the above equation has a singularity if If then the general solution is where and are the associated Legendre polynomial and the Legendre function of the second kind. As is singular at
As the equation for the separated independent variable is
(11) |
Let us first solve the above equation for and denote the solution by By denoting the equation (11) is equivalent to
from which follows that and where the superscript means that the constants and correspond to the solution of (11) with .
Denote the general solution of the above equation by for Then, by [41, page 97] one gets
As then, the general solution of (8) is
(12) |
where
(13) |
Due to the spherical harmonic closure relations [33, 1.17.25], the initial conditions (9) are equivalent to the following system of conditions
(14) |
for all
Let us consider the case The above conditions become
One can see that and
For the conditions (14) become
The last system is equivalent to
where
Thus,
After straightforward algebraic manipulations, one can see that
Using the Wronskian expression (see [33, 10.5]), one gets
From which it follows that
By subsequently applying the identities and , one gets Thus,
Analogous transformations for the functions lead to
The following results derive some properties of the functions which will be used later.
Lemma 1.
For a fixed and any constant the following asymptotic behaviour holds true
(15) |
as where the terms may depend on
Proof.
For the Bessel’s function of the first kind with the following holds true uniformly in
where is a constant depending on see [32, Theorem 4.1].
An approximation for follows from the analogous estimates and the relationship [41, Section 3.6]
where and are the Hankel functions of the first and second kind respectively. A straightforward modification of the proof of [32, Theorem 4.1] gives that, uniformly in for the Bessel’s function of the second kind it holds true
(16) |
∎
Lemma 2.
For a fixed the following asymptotic behaviour holds true
where the terms may depend on
Proof.
Let us consider separately the following expression
Thus,
∎
Lemma 3.
The functions are uniformly bounded on and
Proof.
Note that First, let us consider the absolute value of the first summand in (10)
It is bounded by some constant for all values of and Indeed, as is a bounded function [32]. The terms are uniformly bounded for all as the function is bounded on for any fixed The later boundedness follows from the continuity of on and the inequality (16).
The absolute value of the second summand in (10) can be estimated as
(17) |
which is obtained by using the boundedness of the function The boundedness of the function on the right-hand side of (17) follows from the asymptotic behaviour see [3, 9.1.11], (16) and the continuity of the function on the interval ∎
4 Solution for stochastic spherical diffusion equation
In this section we consider the case of equations from Section 3 with the initial conditions determined by an isotropic Gaussian random field.
Namely, we consider the following initial condition and its spherical harmonics expansion
(18) |
(19) |
where are Gaussian random variables. Without lost of generality, we assume that the random field is centered
Lemma 4.
If the angular power spectrum of the Gaussian isotropic random field satisfies the condition
(20) |
then a.s.
Proof.
Lemma 4 provides the sufficient conditions for the random field to be a.s. twice continuously differentiable with respect to In the following results we assume that is a.s. twice continuously differentiable or that the conditions of Lemma 4 hold true.
Lemma 5.
Let be a covariance function of an isotropic a.s. continuous Gaussian random field There exists such for all if and only if for all and with probability 1.
Proof.
As the sufficiency is straightforward, let us proceed with the necessity.
Note that for any two spherical points and at the angular distance it holds
which implies that with probability 1. Due to the isotropy of the random field it is also true for any spherical points. ∎
Theorem 2.
The solution of the initial random value problem (8), (18), (19) is given by the following random series
(21) |
The covariance function of is given by
(22) |
where is the th Legendre polynomial, and is the angular distance between the points and
Remark 1.
Proof.
The solution of the initial value problem (8), (18), (19) is a spherical convolution of the function obtained in Theorem 1 and the random field provided that the corresponding Laplace series converges in the Hilbert space
Let the two functions and on the sphere belong to the space and have the Fourier-Laplace coefficients
The non-commutative spherical convolution of and is defined as the Laplace series (see [18])
(23) |
with the Fourier-Laplace coefficients given by
provided that the series in (23) converges in the corresponding Hilbert space.
Thus, the random solution of equation (8) with the initial conditions (18) and (19) can be written as a spherical random field with the following Laplace series representation
5 Properties of stochastic solutions and their approximations
This section investigates time-smoothness properties of the solution and truncation errors of its approximation.
For the following truncated series are used to approximate the solution of the random initial value problem in Theorem 2
(24) |
The next result provides the upper bounds for the corresponding approximation error.
Theorem 3.
Proof.
The truncation error field is a centered Gaussian random field, i.e. for all and It follows from (21), (24) and the orthogonality of that
Then, due to the addition theorem for the spherical harmonics
The statement of the theorem follows from Lemma 3.
∎
Theorem 4.
then for each and
where the constant does not depend on
Proof.
For let us consider
By (10) and applying the Cauchy inequality, one obtains that
where
and
First, let us estimate Let then
By the mean value theorem
where the maximum is taken over the interval As one obtains
As is a bounded function on and the next upper bound holds true
For by setting and using analogous calculations one obtains that
as is bounded on and when
Using the asymptotics of the functions and it is straightforward to verify that the constants and are bounded as and for all . Thus, Analogously, which, by the assumption (4), implies the statement of the theorem. ∎
6 On excursion probabilities
This section studies the excursion probabilities for the random solution obtained in section 4. The main approach used in this section is based on the metric entropy theory. This section also studies errors of approximations of extremes of by extremes of the truncated field The approximation converges to in the space as However, in general, this type of convergence does not imply that the extremes of can be effectively approximated using the extremes of This section obtains estimates of probabilities of large deviations between the extremes of and
We first provide some results that will be used later to study properties of the distributions of extremes. In what follows is a subset of
Theorem 5 ([6, Theorem 2.1.1.]).
Let be a centered a.s. bounded Gaussian field, then for
where or, equivalently,
for
Let us recall some results from the metric entropy theory. The canonical metric generated by is
Let be a ball in with the center at and the radius Then, the following Fernique’s inequality holds true [39, Theorem 2.5.]
where is a probability measure on is the diameter of in the metric , and is a universal constant [40]. We will use this inequality to estimate In the following results is fixed.
By (22), the canonical pseudometric generated by on the sphere is
(25) |
where is the angular distance between the points and
Let us define ”balls on the sphere” in terms of the above pseudometric
Let us also introduce the function
(26) |
For the simplicity of the exposition, let us denote the covariance function of by
where is the angular distance between the points and Note, that by (25) and are linked by the formula
Theorem 6.
Proof.
By applying Fernique’s inequality, it follows that
The selection of as the normalised uniform distribution on the sphere results in the upper bound
As is an isotropic field, is the same for all and can be replaced with . Note that is not necessarily a spherical cap as is not necessarily strictly increasing in . However, always contains a non-degenerate (not reduced to a single point) spherical cap. Indeed, is -continuous with respect to and due to condition (27), see [26, Lemma 4.3]. Then, its decomposition (21) into spherical harmonics has the coefficients that are non-zero with probability 1, see Lemma 3. Hence, is not a constant random variable over a set of and and it follows from Lemma 5 that the spherical cap is non-degenerate.
The value of is the polar angle of the largest such cap. From the comparison of the corresponding areas it follows that and
Now let us provide mild conditions that guarantee the convergence of the above integral for any fixed
The Gaussian random field is a.s. continuous and isotropic and the corresponding spherical cap is non-degenerated. Due to Lemma 5, the continuous covariance function is non-constant in any neighbourhood of the origin. Thus, by the definitions (25) and (26) when
From it follows that
and
which means that the integral in is finite if and only if
The above holds true if there is and such that for all it holds which gives Then, it follows from the definition (26) of that Denoting we get that for and all small enough it holds
and
Now we are ready to state the main results of this section.
Theorem 7.
For each fixed the following estimate holds true
where
If
with then
for where the latter integral is finite.
Proof.
Now, let us estimate of probabilities of large deviations between extremes of the solution field and its approximation The truncation error field is a centered Gaussian random field. Analogously to the considered results, it generates the canonic pseudometric on and the function is associated to which is given by Analogously to the previous results one obtains:
Corollary 1.
For each fixed the following estimate holds true
(30) |
where
If there exists such that
(31) |
then
for where the latter integral is finite.
Proof.
As the random field is centered Gaussian, it holds for that
By
The random field is -continuous in and by condition (31). By applying Fernique’s inequality with the normalized uniform distribution one obtains
7 Numerical studies
This section presents numerical studies of the solution of the initial value problem (8), (18) and (19) and its truncated approximation from Section 5.
Numerical computations were performed using the software R version 4.3.1 and Python version 3.11.5. The HEALPix representation (http://healpix.sourceforge.net) and the Python package ”healpy” were used for computations. The Python package ”pyshtools” was used to simulate spherical random fields. The R package ”rcosmo”, see [20] and [21], was used for visualisations. The R and Python code are freely available in the folder ”Research materials” from the website https://sites.google.com/site/olenkoandriy/. For the numerical studies, we use a map of CMB intensities obtained by the ESA mission Planck, these data are available in [1] as well as its angular power spectrum in [2].
7.1 Functions
The evolution in time of the solution is governed by the functions given by (10). These functions are also the multiplication factors defining the change of the angular power spectrum of the solution with time . Lemma 2 showed that for a fixed the multiplication factors have a wave structure for large Figure 1(a) depicts multiplication factors as functions of the argument for the fixed time moments and One can see that as the functions of the argument form waves whose periods decrease in time. On the other hand, Figure 1(b) displays as functions of the argument for the fixed values of indices and In this case, the functions form waves whose amplitudes decrease as they propagate. Figure 1(b) also demonstrates that their periods decrease with


7.2 Initial condition
In this section numerical studies of the solution of the initial value problem (8), (18) and (19) use the initial condition field consisting of the measurements of CMB intensities. From the mathematical point of view, these values of the CMB intensities form a single realization of a spherical isotropic Gaussian random field. Thus, its spherical harmonics representation (2) can be derived. The Python’s package ”healpy” was used to numerically calculate values of the coefficients from the map of CMB intensities. In the following numerical examples the values for and and the corresponding initial condition were used.
7.3 Evolution of the solution
This section provides numerical simulations for the evolution in space and time according to the model (8), (18) and (19), studies spatio-temporal dependencies, evolution of the angular spectrum, and the behaviour of the corresponding extremes. For illustrative purposes, the constants were set equal to
The structure of the CMB data is quite complex with various hot and cold areas located close to each other. Figure 2(a) shows the map of CMB, used as the initial condition for the considered problem (8) (18), and (19). The representation (21) was used to obtain the solution for From the visualisation of in Figure 2(b), one can see that the solution becomes smoother and large deviations (both positive and negative) from the overall mean are decreasing in time.






Figure 3(a) demonstrates how spatial dependencies change with increasing angular distance between spherical locations. The spatial correlation function decreases rapidly with the increase of the angular distance Figures 3(a) and 3(b) show the change of spatial correlations for and
Figures 3(c) and 3(d) plot values of the spherical harmonic coefficients of the realizations in Figure 2 for levels up to 200. It is evident from large levels that for the coefficients became smaller compared to the corresponding coefficients for the case The plots suggest that the magnitudes of the coefficients are decreasing with

We also employed the angular power spectrum of CMB provided by ESA [2]. It is depicted in Figure 4 when . Then, the spherical angular power spectrum for the case of was computed. The plots of spherical angular power spectra for and show that they remain almost identical for small values of and flatten out when and increase. This observation aligns with the obtained theoretical findings and cosmological theories positing that higher multipoles undergo more rapid changes.
To illustrate the structure of space-time dependencies, we also produced a 3D-plot showing normalized covariances (divided by as a function of angular distance and time In Figure 5, when and increase, the normalized covariance function rapidly decreases for small values of and in both space and time; whereas, for other values, the decay of covariances is rather slow. One can see that the variance of the solution is decaying with rapidly for small values of

7.4 Excursion probabilities
To analyse the excursion probabilities we used the solutions with the initial value field possessing the power spectrum shown in Figure 4 for the case By setting the value and by using the relationships (25) and (26), one can compute the canonical pseudometric generated by on the sphere, along with the associated function The results of these computations are illustrated in Figure 6. The plots demonstrate a rapid increase of the function in the neighbourhood of the origin. This observed behaviour of the canonical pseudometric can be attributed to the rapid change of the spatial covariance function at the origin, see Figure 3(a) and consult (25) on their relations.


By using the Python package ”pyshtools” and the values of the angular power spectrum provided by ESA, we simulate 300 realizations of spherical Gaussian random fields. Then, those realizations were used as the initial conditions for the problem (8), (18), and (19). By decomposing each of these 300 realizations into a series of spherical harmonics and by applying the formula (21) with , we obtained 300 realizations of the solution for


Figure 7 shows the sample distribution of obtained by using the realizations of the solution. It is known that the distribution of the supremum of a Gaussian process on an interval is positively skewed as its median is less than or equal to its mean, see [29, Section 12]. The similar behaviour for the case of spherical Gaussian random fields is observed in Figure 7. Figure 8 provides the estimated excursion probabilities and the corresponding upper bound given in Theorem 7. The observed pattern is analogous for this type of estimators. For small values of the upper bound appears conservative, however, it rapidly approaches the excursion probability as increases. Figure 8 illustrates the areas for potential improving of this bound.
8 Conclusions and future work
The paper investigated spherical diffusion within an expanding space-time framework. It derived solutions to the deterministic and stochastic diffusion equations, specifically focusing on the exponential growth case. The findings offer insights into the asymptotic and local characteristics of the solutions. Additionally, the paper explored the extremal properties of these solutions. Given the validity of Borell-TIS and Fernique’s inequalities for general sets, a similar methodology can be employed to investigate extremes of solutions on more complex manifolds. Applications of the theoretical findings were demonstrated through simulation studies by modelling evolutionary scenarios and examining properties of the obtained estimates with the CMB intensities as the initial condition. In future research, it would be interesting to further study properties of this model and the corresponding solutions and to extend the developed approach to other SPDEs.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of
the paper.
Funding This research was supported under the Australian Research Council’s Discovery Projects funding scheme (project number DP220101680). I.Donhauzer and and A.Olenko also would like to thank for partial support provided by the La Trobe SEMS CaRE grant.
References
- [1] http://irsa.ipac.caltech.edu/data/Planck/release_2/all-sky-maps/maps/component-maps/cmb/COM_CMB_IQU-smica_1024_R2.02_full.fits.
- [2] https://irsa.ipac.caltech.edu/data/Planck/release_2/ancillary-data/previews/ps_index.html.
- [3] M. Abramowitz and I. Stegun. Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables. US Government printing office, Washington, 1968.
- [4] R. Adam, P. Ade, N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Alves, F. Argüeso, M. Arnaud, F. Arroja, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, et al. Planck 2015 results-I. Overview of products and scientific results. Astron. Astrophys., 594:A1, 2016.
- [5] P. Ade, N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, P. Aluri, M. Arnaud, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, A. J. Banday, R. Barreiro, et al. Planck 2015 results-XVI. Isotropy and statistics of the CMB. Astron. Astrophys., 594:A16, 2016.
- [6] R. Adler and J. Taylor. Random Fields and Geometry. Springer, New York, 2007.
- [7] V. Anh, P. Broadbridge, A. Olenko, and Y. Wang. On approximation for fractional stochastic partial differential equations on the sphere. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess., 32:2585–2603, 2018.
- [8] G. Arfken and H. Weber. Mathematical Methods for Physicists. Academic Press, New York, 1972.
- [9] K. Atkinson and W. Han. Spherical Harmonics and Approximations on the Unit Sphere: An Introduction. Springer Science, New York, 2012.
- [10] P. Broadbridge, S. Becirevic, and D. Hoxley. Non-Particulate Quantum States of the Electromagnetic Field in Expanding Space-Time. IntechOpen, 2023.
- [11] P. Broadbridge and K. Deutscher. Solution of non-autonomous Schrödinger equation for quantized de Sitter Klein-Gordon oscillator modes undergoing attraction-repulsion transition. Symmetry, 12(6):943, 2020.
- [12] P. Broadbridge, A. D. Kolesnik, N. Leonenko, and A. Olenko. Random spherical hyperbolic diffusion. J. Stat. Phys., 177:889–916, 2019.
- [13] P. Broadbridge, A. D. Kolesnik, N. Leonenko, A. Olenko, and D. Omari. Spherically restricted random hyperbolic diffusion. Entropy, 22(2):217, 2020.
- [14] V. Buldygin and Y. Kozachenko. Metric Characterization of Random Variables and Random Processes. American Mathematical Soc., Providence, 2000.
- [15] S. Buonocore and M. Sen. Anomalous diffusion of cosmic rays: A geometric approach. AIP Adv., 11(5):055221.
- [16] D. Cheng and Y. Xiao. Excursion probability of Gaussian random fields on sphere. Bernoulli, 22(2):1113–1130, 2016.
- [17] R. Dudley. The sizes of compact subsets of Hilbert space and continuity of Gaussian processes. J. Funct. Anal., 1(3):290–330, 1967.
- [18] J. Dunkel and P. Hänggi. Relativistic Brownian motion. Phys. Rep., 471(1):1–73, 2009.
- [19] M. D’Ovidio. Coordinates changed random fields on the sphere. Journal of Statistical Physics, 154:1153–1176, 2014.
- [20] D. Fryer, M. Li, and A. Olenko. rcosmo: R package for analysis of spherical, HEALPix and cosmological data. R J., 12(1):206–225, 2020.
- [21] D. Fryer, A. Olenko, M. Li, and Y. Wang. rcosmo: Cosmic microwave background data analysis. R package version 1.1.3. Available at CRAN, 2021.
- [22] J. Han. Observing interstellar and intergalactic magnetic fields. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys., 55:111–157, 2017.
- [23] J. Hill. On the formal origins of dark energy. Zeitschrift für angewandte Mathematik und Physik, 69(5):133, 2018.
- [24] J. Hill. Some further comments on special relativity and dark energy. Zeitschrift für angewandte Mathematik und Physik, 70(1):5, 2019.
- [25] J. Jokipii and E. Parker. Stochastic aspects of magnetic lines of force with application to cosmic-ray propagation. Astrophys. J., 155:777–799, 1969.
- [26] A. Lang and C. Schwab. Isotropic Gaussian random fields on the sphere: regularity, fast simulation and stochastic partial differential equations. Ann. Appl. Probab., 25:3047–3094, 2015.
- [27] N. Leonenko, A. Olenko, and J. Vaz. On fractional spherically restricted hyperbolic diffusion random field. arXiv: 2310.03933, 2023.
- [28] N. Leonenko and M. Ruiz-Medina. Sojourn functionals for spatiotemporal Gaussian random fields with long memory. J. Appl. Probab., 60(1):148–165, 2023.
- [29] M. Lifshits. Gaussian Random Functions. Springer, Dordrecht, 1995.
- [30] V. Makogin and E. Spodarev. Limit theorems for excursion sets of subordinated Gaussian random fields with long-range dependence. Stochastics, 94(1):111–142, 2022.
- [31] D. Marinucci and G. Peccati. Random Fields on the Sphere: Representation, Limit Theorems and Cosmological Applications. Cambridge University Press, 2011.
- [32] A. Olenko. Upper bound on and its applications. Integral Transforms Spec. Funct., 17(6):455–467, 2006.
- [33] F. Olver, A. O. Daalhuis, D. Lozier, B. Schneider, R. Boisvert, C. Clark, B. S. B. Mille and, H. Cohl, and M. McClain, eds. NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions, 2020. http://dlmf.nist.gov/.
- [34] E. Orsingher. Stochastic motions on the 3-sphere governed by wave and heat equations. J. Appl. Probab., 24(2):315–327, 1987.
- [35] V. Piterbarg. Asymptotic Methods in the Theory of Gaussian Processes and Fields. American Mathematical Society, Providence, 1996.
- [36] L. Sakhno. Estimates for distributions of suprema of spherical random fields. Stat. Optim. Inf. Comput., 11(2):186–195, 2023.
- [37] P. Shtykovskiy and M. Gilfanov. Thermal diffusion in the intergalactic medium of clusters of galaxies. Mon. Notices Royal Astron. Soc., 401(2):1360–1368, 2010.
- [38] M. Talagrand. Sharper Bounds for Gaussian and Empirical Processes. Ann. Probab., 22(1):28 – 76, 1994.
- [39] M. Talagrand. Majorizing measures: the generic chaining. Ann. Probab., 24(3):1049–1103, 1996.
- [40] M. Talagrand. Upper and Lower Bounds for Stochastic Processes. Springer, 2014.
- [41] G. Watson. A Treatise on the Theory of Bessel Functions. Cambridge University Press, 1944.
- [42] S. Weinberg. Cosmology. Oxford University Press, 2008.