This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Statistics for Iwasawa invariants of elliptic curves

Debanjana Kundu Department of Mathematics
University of British Columbia
Vancouver BC, V6T 1Z2, Canada.
[email protected]
 and  Anwesh Ray Department of Mathematics
University of British Columbia
Vancouver BC, V6T 1Z2, Canada.
[email protected]
Abstract.

We study the average behaviour of the Iwasawa invariants for the Selmer groups of elliptic curves, setting out new directions in arithmetic statistics and Iwasawa theory.

Key words and phrases:
Iwasawa invariants, Selmer groups of elliptic curves
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification:
Primary 11R23, 11R45, 11G05

1. Introduction

Iwasawa theory began as the study of class groups over infinite towers of number fields. In [18], B. Mazur initiated the study of Iwasawa theory of elliptic curves. The main object of study is the pp-primary Selmer group of an elliptic curve EE, taken over the cyclotomic p\mathbb{Z}_{p}-extension of \mathbb{Q}. Mazur conjectured that when pp is a prime of good ordinary reduction, the pp-primary Selmer group is cotorsion as a module over the Iwasawa algebra, denoted by Λ\Lambda. This conjecture was settled by K. Kato, see [13, Theorem 17.4].

Note that the Iwasawa algebra Λ\Lambda is isomorphic to the power series ring pT\mathbb{Z}_{p}\llbracket T\rrbracket. The algebraic structure of the Selmer group (as a Λ\Lambda-module) is encoded by certain invariants which have been extensively studied. First consider the case when EE has good ordinary reduction at pp. By the pp-adic Weierstrass Preparation Theorem, the characteristic ideal of the Pontryagin dual of the Selmer group is generated by a unique element fE(p)(T)f_{E}^{(p)}(T), that can be expressed as a power of pp times a distinguished polynomial. The μ\mu-invariant is the power of pp dividing fE(p)(T)f_{E}^{(p)}(T) and the λ\lambda-invariant is its degree. R. Greenberg has conjectured that when the residual representation on the pp-torsion subgroup of EE is irreducible, then the μ\mu-invariant of the Selmer group vanishes, see [11, Conjecture 1.11]. Further, if the pp-primary part of the Tate-Shafarevich group, denoted by (E/)[p]\Sha(E/\mathbb{Q})[p^{\infty}], is finite, then one can show that the λ\lambda-invariant is at least as large as the Mordell-Weil rank of EE (see Lemma 3.3). However, this λ\lambda may indeed be strictly larger than the rank, and one of our main objectives is to determine its behaviour on average .

When EE has supersingular reduction at pp, the Selmer group is not Λ\Lambda-cotorsion. This makes the analysis of the algebraic structure of the torsion part of the Selmer group particularly difficult. Instead, we consider the plus and minus Selmer groups introduced by S. Kobayashi in [15], which are known to be Λ\Lambda-cotorsion. The Iwasawa invariants μ+\mu^{+} and λ+\lambda^{+} (resp. μ\mu^{-} and λ\lambda^{-}) of the plus (resp. minus) Selmer group are defined in an analogous manner. In the supersingular case as well, there is much computational evidence towards the conjecture that the μ\mu-invariants μ+\mu^{+} and μ\mu^{-} vanish. Once again, under standard hypotheses on the Tate-Shafarevich group, both λ+\lambda^{+} and λ\lambda^{-} are known to be greater than or equal to the Mordell-Weil rank of EE (see Lemma 3.3).

The main goal of this article is prove results about the variation of the Iwasawa invariants as the pair (E,p)(E,p) varies such that EE has good reduction (ordinary or supersingular) at pp. More precisely, we analyze the following two separate but interrelated problems.

  1. (1)

    For a fixed elliptic curve EE, how do the Iwasawa invariants vary as pp varies over all odd primes pp at which EE has good reduction?

  2. (2)

    For a fixed prime pp, how do the Iwasawa invariants vary as EE varies over all elliptic curves (with good reduction at pp)?

Greenberg studied the first question when E/E_{/\mathbb{Q}} has rank zero and pp varies over the primes of good ordinary reduction (see [11, Theorems 4.1 and 5.1]). In Theorem 3.8, we generalize this result to include the case of supersingular primes. We show that a conjecture of J. Coates and R. Sujatha on the vanishing of μ\mu-invariants of fine Selmer groups holds for density one primes (see Corollary 3.10). Under natural assumptions, we prove similar results for higher rank elliptic curves (see Theorems 3.13 and 3.16). The results in both ordinary and supersingular cases lead us to make the following conjecture (which is proved for elliptic curves of rank zero).

Conjecture.

Let E/E_{/\mathbb{Q}} be an elliptic curve of rank rEr_{E}. For 100%100\% of the primes pp at which EE has good ordinary reduction (resp. supersingular), μ=0\mu=0 and λ=rE\lambda=r_{E} (resp. μ+=μ=0\mu^{+}=\mu^{-}=0 and λ+=λ=rE\lambda^{+}=\lambda^{-}=r_{E}).

The second question is at the intersection of arithmetic statistics and Iwasawa theory. The area of arithmetic statistics concerns the behaviour of number theoretic objects in families, and offers a probabilistic model that seeks to explain numerous phenomena in the statistical behaviour of Selmer groups. The investigations in this paper show that there is promise in the analysis of the average behaviour of Iwasawa invariants. The main results we prove are Theorems 4.3, 4.4 and 4.5. Our results indicate that it is reasonable to expect that for a fixed prime pp, as we vary over all rank 0 elliptic curves over \mathbb{Q} with good ordinary (resp. supersingular) reduction at pp ordered by height, a positive proportion of them have trivial pp-primary Selmer group (considered over the cyclotomic p\mathbb{Z}_{p}-extension of \mathbb{Q}). In fact, the results suggest that the proportion of elliptic curves of rank 0 with trivial pp-primary Selmer group approaches 100%100\% as pp\rightarrow\infty (see Conjecture 4.7).

2. Background and Preliminaries

2.1.

Let Γ:=Gal(cyc/)p\Gamma\mathrel{\mathop{\ordinarycolon}}=\operatorname{Gal}(\mathbb{Q}^{\operatorname{cyc}}/\mathbb{Q})\simeq\mathbb{Z}_{p}. The Iwasawa algebra Λ\Lambda is the completed group algebra pΓ:=limnp[Γ/Γpn]\mathbb{Z}_{p}\llbracket\Gamma\rrbracket\mathrel{\mathop{\ordinarycolon}}=\varprojlim_{n}\mathbb{Z}_{p}[\Gamma/\Gamma^{p^{n}}]. After fixing a topological generator γ\gamma of Γ\Gamma, there is an isomorphism of rings ΛpT\Lambda\cong\mathbb{Z}_{p}\llbracket T\rrbracket, by sending γ1\gamma-1 to the formal variable TT.

Let M be a cofinitely generated cotorsion Λ\Lambda-module. The Structure Theorem of Λ\Lambda-modules asserts that the Pontryagin dual of M, denoted by M\rm{M}^{\vee}, is pseudo-isomorphic to a finite direct sum of cyclic Λ\Lambda-modules. In other words, there is a map of Λ\Lambda-modules

M(i=1sΛ/(pmi))(j=1tΛ/(hj(T)))\textrm{M}^{\vee}\longrightarrow\left(\bigoplus_{i=1}^{s}\Lambda/(p^{m_{i}})\right)\oplus\left(\bigoplus_{j=1}^{t}\Lambda/(h_{j}(T))\right)

with finite kernel and cokernel. Here, mi>0m_{i}>0 and hj(T)h_{j}(T) is a distinguished polynomial (i.e. a monic polynomial with non-leading coefficients divisible by pp). The characteristic ideal of M\rm{M}^{\vee} is (up to a unit) generated by the characteristic element,

fM(p)(T):=pimijhj(T).f_{\rm{M}}^{(p)}(T)\mathrel{\mathop{\ordinarycolon}}=p^{\sum_{i}m_{i}}\prod_{j}h_{j}(T).

The μ\mu-invariant of M is defined as the power of pp in fM(p)(T)f_{\rm{M}}^{(p)}(T). More precisely,

μp(M):={0 if s=0i=1smi if s>0.\mu_{p}(\textrm{M})\mathrel{\mathop{\ordinarycolon}}=\begin{cases}0&\textrm{ if }s=0\\ \sum_{i=1}^{s}m_{i}&\textrm{ if }s>0.\end{cases}

The λ\lambda-invariant of M is the degree of the characteristic element, i.e.

λp(M):=j=1tdeghj(T).\lambda_{p}(\textrm{M})\mathrel{\mathop{\ordinarycolon}}=\sum_{j=1}^{t}\deg h_{j}(T).

2.2.

Let EE be an elliptic curve over \mathbb{Q} with good reduction at pp. It shall be assumed throughout that the prime pp is odd. Let NN denote the conductor of EE and set SS to denote the set of primes which divide NpNp. Let S\mathbb{Q}_{S} be the maximal algebraic extension of \mathbb{Q} which is unramified at the primes vSv\notin S. Set E[p]E[p^{\infty}] to be the Galois module of all pp-power torsion points in E(¯)E({}\mkern 3.0mu\overline{\mkern-3.0mu\mathbb{Q}}).

First, consider the case when EE has good (ordinary or supersingular) reduction at pp. Let vv be a prime in SS. For any finite extension L/L/\mathbb{Q} contained in cyc\mathbb{Q}^{\operatorname{cyc}}, write

Jv(E/L)=w|vH1(Lw,E)[p]J_{v}(E/L)=\bigoplus_{w|v}H^{1}\left(L_{w},E\right)[p^{\infty}]

where the direct sum is over all primes ww of LL lying above vv. Then, the pp-primary Selmer group over \mathbb{Q} is defined as follows

Selp(E/):=ker{H1(S/,E[p])vSJv(E/)}.\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/\mathbb{Q})\mathrel{\mathop{\ordinarycolon}}=\ker\left\{H^{1}\left(\mathbb{Q}_{S}/\mathbb{Q},E[p^{\infty}]\right)\longrightarrow\bigoplus_{v\in S}J_{v}(E/\mathbb{Q})\right\}.

This Selmer group fits into a short exact sequence

(2.1) 0E()p/pSelp(E/)(E/)[p]0,0\rightarrow E(\mathbb{Q})\otimes\mathbb{Q}_{p}/\mathbb{Z}_{p}\rightarrow\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/\mathbb{Q})\rightarrow\Sha(E/\mathbb{Q})[p^{\infty}]\rightarrow 0,

see [5]. Here, (E/)\Sha(E/\mathbb{Q}) is the Tate-Shafarevich group

(E/):={H1(¯/,E[p])lH1(¯l/l,E[p])}.\Sha(E/\mathbb{Q})\mathrel{\mathop{\ordinarycolon}}=\left\{H^{1}({}\mkern 3.0mu\overline{\mkern-3.0mu\mathbb{Q}}/\mathbb{Q},E[p^{\infty}])\rightarrow\prod_{l}H^{1}({}\mkern 3.0mu\overline{\mkern-3.0mu\mathbb{Q}}_{l}/\mathbb{Q}_{l},E[p^{\infty}])\right\}.

Now, define

Jv(E/cyc)=limJv(E/L)J_{v}(E/\mathbb{Q}^{\operatorname{cyc}})=\varinjlim J_{v}(E/L)

where LL ranges over the number fields contained in cyc\mathbb{Q}^{\operatorname{cyc}} and the inductive limit is taken with respect to the restriction maps. Taking direct limits, the pp-primary Selmer group over cyc\mathbb{Q}^{\operatorname{cyc}} is defined as follows

Selp(E/cyc):=ker{H1(S/cyc,E[p])vSJv(E/cyc)}.\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/\mathbb{Q}^{\operatorname{cyc}})\mathrel{\mathop{\ordinarycolon}}=\ker\left\{H^{1}\left(\mathbb{Q}_{S}/\mathbb{Q}^{\operatorname{cyc}},E[p^{\infty}]\right)\longrightarrow\bigoplus_{v\in S}J_{v}(E/\mathbb{Q}^{\operatorname{cyc}})\right\}.

As mentioned in the introduction, when pp is a prime of good supersingular reduction, the Pontryagin dual of Selp(E/cyc)\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/\mathbb{Q}^{\operatorname{cyc}}) is not Λ\Lambda-torsion. In this case, one studies the plus and minus Selmer groups which we describe below.

Let E/E_{/\mathbb{Q}} be an elliptic curve with supersingular reduction at pp. Denote by ncyc\mathbb{Q}_{n}^{\operatorname{cyc}} the nn-th layer in the cyclotomic p\mathbb{Z}_{p}-extension, with 0cyc:=\mathbb{Q}_{0}^{\operatorname{cyc}}\mathrel{\mathop{\ordinarycolon}}=\mathbb{Q}. Set E^\widehat{E} to be the formal group of EE over p\mathbb{Z}_{p}. Let LL be a finite extension of p\mathbb{Q}_{p} with valuation ring 𝒪L\mathcal{O}_{L}, let E^(L)\widehat{E}(L) denote E^(𝔪L)\widehat{E}(\mathfrak{m}_{L}), where 𝔪L\mathfrak{m}_{L} is the maximal ideal in LL. Write 𝔭\mathfrak{p} for the (unique) prime above pp in cyc\mathbb{Q}^{\operatorname{cyc}}, and for the prime above pp in every finite layer of the cyclotomic tower. Define the plus and minus norm groups as follows

E^+(n,𝔭cyc):={PE^(n,𝔭cyc)trn/m+1(P)E^(m,𝔭cyc), for 0m<n and m even },\widehat{E}^{+}(\mathbb{Q}_{n,\mathfrak{p}}^{\operatorname{cyc}})\mathrel{\mathop{\ordinarycolon}}=\left\{P\in\widehat{E}(\mathbb{Q}_{n,\mathfrak{p}}^{\operatorname{cyc}})\mid\operatorname{tr}_{n/m+1}(P)\in\widehat{E}(\mathbb{Q}_{m,\mathfrak{p}}^{\operatorname{cyc}}),\text{ for }0\leq m<n\text{ and }m\text{ even }\right\},
E^(n,𝔭cyc):={PE^(n,𝔭cyc)trn/m+1(P)E^(m,𝔭cyc), for 0m<n and m odd },\widehat{E}^{-}(\mathbb{Q}_{n,\mathfrak{p}}^{\operatorname{cyc}})\mathrel{\mathop{\ordinarycolon}}=\left\{P\in\widehat{E}(\mathbb{Q}_{n,\mathfrak{p}}^{\operatorname{cyc}})\mid\operatorname{tr}_{n/m+1}(P)\in\widehat{E}(\mathbb{Q}_{m,\mathfrak{p}}^{\operatorname{cyc}}),\text{ for }0\leq m<n\text{ and }m\text{ odd }\right\},

where trn/m+1:E^(n,𝔭cyc)E^(m+1,𝔭cyc)\operatorname{tr}_{n/m+1}\mathrel{\mathop{\ordinarycolon}}\widehat{E}(\mathbb{Q}_{n,\mathfrak{p}}^{\operatorname{cyc}})\rightarrow\widehat{E}(\mathbb{Q}_{m+1,\mathfrak{p}}^{\operatorname{cyc}}) denotes the trace map with respect to the formal group law on E^\widehat{E}. The completion 𝔭cyc\mathbb{Q}^{\operatorname{cyc}}_{\mathfrak{p}} is the union of completions n1n,𝔭cyc\bigcup_{n\geq 1}\mathbb{Q}^{\operatorname{cyc}}_{n,\mathfrak{p}}, and set E^±(𝔭cyc):=n1E^±(n,𝔭cyc)\widehat{E}^{\pm}(\mathbb{Q}_{\mathfrak{p}}^{\operatorname{cyc}})\mathrel{\mathop{\ordinarycolon}}=\bigcup_{n\geq 1}\widehat{E}^{\pm}(\mathbb{Q}_{n,\mathfrak{p}}^{\operatorname{cyc}}). Define

Jp±(E/cyc):=H1(𝔭cyc,E[p])E^±(𝔭cyc)p/p,J_{p}^{\pm}(E/\mathbb{Q}^{\operatorname{cyc}})\mathrel{\mathop{\ordinarycolon}}=\frac{H^{1}(\mathbb{Q}_{\mathfrak{p}}^{\operatorname{cyc}},E[p^{\infty}])}{\widehat{E}^{\pm}(\mathbb{Q}_{\mathfrak{p}}^{\operatorname{cyc}})\otimes\mathbb{Q}_{p}/\mathbb{Z}_{p}},

where the inclusion

E^±(𝔭cyc)p/pH1(𝔭cyc,E[p])\widehat{E}^{\pm}(\mathbb{Q}_{\mathfrak{p}}^{\operatorname{cyc}})\otimes\mathbb{Q}_{p}/\mathbb{Z}_{p}\hookrightarrow H^{1}(\mathbb{Q}_{\mathfrak{p}}^{\operatorname{cyc}},E[p^{\infty}])

is induced via the Kummer map. For vS{p}v\in S\setminus\{p\}, set Jv±(E/cyc)J_{v}^{\pm}(E/\mathbb{Q}^{\operatorname{cyc}}) to be equal to Jv(E/cyc)J_{v}(E/\mathbb{Q}^{\operatorname{cyc}}). The plus and minus Selmer groups are defined as follows

Selp±(E/cyc):=ker{H1(S/cyc,E[p])vSJv±(E/cyc)}.\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}^{\pm}(E/\mathbb{Q}^{\operatorname{cyc}})\mathrel{\mathop{\ordinarycolon}}=\ker\left\{H^{1}\left(\mathbb{Q}_{S}/\mathbb{Q}^{\operatorname{cyc}},E[p^{\infty}]\right)\rightarrow\bigoplus_{v\in S}J_{v}^{\pm}(E/\mathbb{Q}^{\operatorname{cyc}})\right\}.

For each choice of sign {+,}{\ddagger}\in\{+,-\}, set fE(p),(T)f_{E}^{(p),{\ddagger}}(T) to denote the characteristic element of Selp(E/cyc)\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}^{{\ddagger}}(E/\mathbb{Q}^{\operatorname{cyc}})^{\vee}, with μp(E)\mu_{p}^{{\ddagger}}(E), λp(E)\lambda_{p}^{{\ddagger}}(E) defined analogously.

Let EE be an elliptic curve with good (ordinary or supersingular) reduction at p5p\geq 5. In order to state results in both ordinary and supersingular case at once, we set for the remainder of the article the following notation,

Selp(E/cyc):={Selp±(E/cyc)if E has supersingular reduction at p, where =±,Selp(E/cyc)if E has ordinary reduction at p.\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}^{{\ddagger}}(E/\mathbb{Q}^{\operatorname{cyc}})\mathrel{\mathop{\ordinarycolon}}=\begin{cases}\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}^{\pm}(E/\mathbb{Q}^{\operatorname{cyc}})&\textrm{if }E\textrm{ has supersingular reduction at }p,\textrm{ where }{\ddagger}=\pm,\\ \operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/\mathbb{Q}^{\operatorname{cyc}})&\textrm{if }E\textrm{ has ordinary reduction at }p.\end{cases}

2.3.

Next, we introduce the fine Selmer group. Let EE be an elliptic curve over \mathbb{Q} and pp be any odd prime. At each prime vSv\in S, set

𝒦v(E/cyc):=η|vH1(ηcyc,E[p]).\mathcal{K}_{v}(E/\mathbb{Q}^{\operatorname{cyc}})\mathrel{\mathop{\ordinarycolon}}=\bigoplus_{\eta|v}H^{1}(\mathbb{Q}^{\operatorname{cyc}}_{\eta},E[p^{\infty}]).

The pp-primary fine Selmer group of EE is defined as follows

Selp0(E/cyc):=ker{H1(S/cyc,E[p])vS𝒦v(E/cyc)}.\operatorname{Sel}^{0}_{p^{\infty}}(E/\mathbb{Q}^{\operatorname{cyc}})\mathrel{\mathop{\ordinarycolon}}=\ker\left\{H^{1}(\mathbb{Q}_{S}/\mathbb{Q}^{\operatorname{cyc}},E[p^{\infty}])\longrightarrow\bigoplus_{v\in S}\mathcal{K}_{v}(E/\mathbb{Q}^{\operatorname{cyc}})\right\}.

By the result of Kato mentioned in the introduction, the Pontryagin dual of Selp0(E/cyc)\operatorname{Sel}^{0}_{p^{\infty}}(E/\mathbb{Q}^{\operatorname{cyc}}) is known to be a cotorsion Λ\Lambda-module independent of the reduction type at pp. Further, it is conjectured that this fine Selmer group is a cotorsion p\mathbb{Z}_{p}-module (i.e. the corresponding μ\mu-invariant vanishes), see [6, Conjecture A].

2.4.

In what follows, M will be a cofinitely generated cotorsion Λ\Lambda-module. Note that Hi(Γ,M)H^{i}(\Gamma,\rm{M}) is always zero for i2i\geq 2.

Lemma 2.1.

Let M be a cofinitely generated cotorsion Λ\Lambda-module. Then,

corankpMΓ=corankpMΓ.\operatorname{corank}_{\mathbb{Z}_{p}}\rm{M}^{\Gamma}=\operatorname{corank}_{\mathbb{Z}_{p}}\rm{M}_{\Gamma}.
Proof.

Note that H1(Γ,M)H^{1}(\Gamma,\rm{M}) may be identified with MΓ\rm{M}_{\Gamma} (see [19, Proposition 1.7.7]). It follows from [12, Theorem 1.1] that

corankΛM=corankpH0(Γ,M)corankpH1(Γ,M).\operatorname{corank}_{\Lambda}\rm{M}=\operatorname{corank}_{\mathbb{Z}_{p}}H^{0}(\Gamma,\rm{M})-\operatorname{corank}_{\mathbb{Z}_{p}}H^{1}(\Gamma,\rm{M}).

Since M\rm{M} is assumed to be cotorsion over Λ\Lambda, the result follows. ∎

When the cohomology groups H0(Γ,M)H^{0}(\Gamma,\rm{M}) and H1(Γ,M)H^{1}(\Gamma,\rm{M}) are finite, the (classical) Euler characteristic χ(Γ,M)\chi(\Gamma,\rm{M}) is defined as the alternating product

χ(Γ,M)=i0(#Hi(Γ,M))(1)i.\chi(\Gamma,\rm{M})=\prod_{i\geq 0}\left(\#H^{i}(\Gamma,\rm{M})\right)^{(-1)^{i}}.

On the other hand, when the cohomology groups Hi(Γ,M)H^{i}(\Gamma,\rm{M}) are not finite, there is a generalized version denoted by χt(Γ,M)\chi_{t}(\Gamma,\rm{M}). Since H1(Γ,M)H^{1}(\Gamma,\rm{M}) is isomorphic to the group of coinvariants H0(Γ,M)=MΓH_{0}(\Gamma,\rm{M})=\rm{M}_{\Gamma}, there is a natural map

ΦM:MΓMΓ\Phi_{\rm{M}}\mathrel{\mathop{\ordinarycolon}}\rm{M}^{\Gamma}\rightarrow\rm{M}_{\Gamma}

sending xMΓx\in\rm{M}^{\Gamma} to the residue class of xx in MΓ\rm{M}_{\Gamma}. We say that the truncated Euler characteristic is defined if the kernel and cokernel of ΦM\Phi_{\rm{M}} are finite. In this case, the χt(Γ,M)\chi_{t}(\Gamma,\rm{M}) is defined to be the following quotient,

χt(Γ,M):=#cok(ΦM)#ker(ΦM).\chi_{t}(\Gamma,\rm{M})\mathrel{\mathop{\ordinarycolon}}=\frac{\#\operatorname{cok}(\Phi_{\rm{M}})}{\#\ker(\Phi_{\rm{M}})}.

It is easy to check that when χ(Γ,M)\chi(\Gamma,\rm{M}) is defined, so is χt(Γ,M)\chi_{t}(\Gamma,\rm{M}). In fact,

χt(Γ,M)=χ(Γ,M).\chi_{t}(\Gamma,\rm{M})=\chi(\Gamma,\rm{M}).

Express the characteristic element fM(p)(T)f_{\rm{M}}^{(p)}(T) as a polynomial,

fM(p)(T)=c0+c1T++cdTd.f_{\rm{M}}^{(p)}(T)=c_{0}+c_{1}T+\dots+c_{d}T^{d}.

Let rMr_{\rm{M}} denote the order of vanishing of fM(p)(T)f_{\rm{M}}^{(p)}(T) at T=0T=0. For a,bpa,b\in\mathbb{Q}_{p}, we write aba\sim b if there is a unit up×u\in\mathbb{Z}_{p}^{\times} such that a=bua=bu.

Lemma 2.2 (S. Zerbes).

Let M be a cofinitely generated cotorsion Λ\Lambda-module. Assume that the kernel and cokernel of ΦM\Phi_{\rm{M}} are finite. Then,

  1. (1)

    rM=corankp(MΓ)=corankp(MΓ){r_{\rm{M}}}=\operatorname{corank}_{\mathbb{Z}_{p}}(\rm{M}^{\Gamma})=\operatorname{corank}_{\mathbb{Z}_{p}}(\rm{M}_{\Gamma}).

  2. (2)

    crM0c_{r_{\rm{M}}}\neq 0.

  3. (3)

    crMχt(Γ,M)c_{r_{\rm{M}}}\sim\chi_{t}(\Gamma,\rm{M}).

Proof.

See [37, Lemma 2.11]. ∎

In particular, the classical Euler characteristic χ(Γ,M)\chi(\Gamma,\rm{M}) is defined if and only if rM=0r_{\rm{M}}=0. When this happens, the constant coefficient c0χ(Γ,M)c_{0}\sim\chi(\Gamma,\rm{M}).

We specialize the discussion on Euler characteristics to Selmer groups of elliptic curves. Let {\ddagger} be a choice of sign and recall the definition of Selp(E/cyc)\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}^{{\ddagger}}(E/\mathbb{Q}^{\operatorname{cyc}}). When EE has good ordinary reduction at pp, the choice of {\ddagger} is irrelevant. Denote by χt(Γ,E[p])\chi_{t}^{{\ddagger}}(\Gamma,E[p^{\infty}]) (resp. χ(Γ,E[p])\chi^{{\ddagger}}(\Gamma,E[p^{\infty}])) the truncated (resp. classical) Euler characteristic of the Selmer group Selp(E/cyc)\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}^{{\ddagger}}(E/\mathbb{Q}^{\operatorname{cyc}}). The invariants μp(E)\mu_{p}^{{\ddagger}}(E) and λp(E)\lambda_{p}^{{\ddagger}}(E) simply refer to μp(E)\mu_{p}(E) and λp(E)\lambda_{p}(E) when EE has good ordinary reduction at pp. When EE has good ordinary reduction at pp, we shall drop the sign {\ddagger} from the notation. It follows from Lemma 2.2 that the truncated Euler characteristic is always an integer.

3. Results for a fixed elliptic curve and varying prime

In this section, we study the variation of the classical and the truncated Euler characteristic as pp varies. Fix a pair (E,p)(E,p) such that

  1. (1)

    pp is odd.

  2. (2)

    EE is defined over \mathbb{Q} and has good reduction at pp.

We record some lemmas which are required throughout this section. Recall that when EE has good ordinary reduction, Selp(E/cyc)\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}^{{\ddagger}}(E/\mathbb{Q}^{\operatorname{cyc}}) simply refers to Selp(E/cyc)\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/\mathbb{Q}^{\operatorname{cyc}}).

Theorem 3.1.

Let {+,}{\ddagger}\in\{+,-\} be a choice of sign. Let E/E_{/\mathbb{Q}} be an elliptic curve with good reduction at p>2p>2. Then, there is a natural map

Selp(E/)Selp(E/cyc)Γ\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/\mathbb{Q})\rightarrow\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}^{{\ddagger}}(E/\mathbb{Q}^{\operatorname{cyc}})^{\Gamma}

with finite kernel and cokernel.

Proof.

When EE has good ordinary reduction at pp, this follows from Mazur’s control theorem, see [18] or [11, Theorem 1.2]. In the good supersingular reduction case, the result follows from the proof of [9, Lemma 3.9] (see also [24, Proposition 5.1]). ∎

The following lemma gives a criterion for when the classical Euler characteristic χ(Γ,E[p])\chi^{{\ddagger}}(\Gamma,E[p^{\infty}]) is well-defined.

Lemma 3.2.

Let {+,}{\ddagger}\in\{+,-\} be a choice of sign. Let E/E_{/\mathbb{Q}} be an elliptic curve with good reduction at p>2p>2. The following are equivalent.

  1. (1)

    The classical Euler characteristic χ(Γ,E[p])\chi^{{\ddagger}}(\Gamma,E[p^{\infty}]) is well-defined.

  2. (2)

    Selp(E/cyc)Γ\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}^{{\ddagger}}(E/\mathbb{Q}^{\operatorname{cyc}})^{\Gamma} is finite.

  3. (3)

    The Selmer group Selp(E/)\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/\mathbb{Q}) is finite.

  4. (4)

    The Mordell-Weil group E()E(\mathbb{Q}) is finite, i.e. the Mordell-Weil rank is 0.

Proof.

Recall that the Selmer group Selp(E/cyc)\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}^{{\ddagger}}(E/\mathbb{Q}^{\operatorname{cyc}}) is a cotorsion Λ\Lambda-module. By Lemma 2.1, Selp(E/cyc)Γ\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}^{{\ddagger}}(E/\mathbb{Q}^{\operatorname{cyc}})^{\Gamma} is finite if and only if Selp(E/cyc)Γ\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}^{{\ddagger}}(E/\mathbb{Q}^{\operatorname{cyc}})_{\Gamma} is finite. This shows that (1)\eqref{31c1} and (2)\eqref{31c2} are equivalent.

Theorem 3.1 asserts that there is a natural map

Selp(E/)Selp(E/cyc)Γ,\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/\mathbb{Q})\rightarrow\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}^{{\ddagger}}(E/\mathbb{Q}^{\operatorname{cyc}})^{\Gamma},

with finite kernel and cokernel. Hence, the conditions (2)\eqref{31c2} and (3)\eqref{31c3} are equivalent. By the work of V. Kolyvagin, (E/)\Sha(E/\mathbb{Q}) is known to be finite when E()E(\mathbb{Q}) is finite (see [16]). Thus, it follows from (2.1) that conditions (3)\eqref{31c3} and (4)\eqref{31c4} are equivalent. ∎

Lemma 3.3.

Let {+,}{\ddagger}\in\{+,-\} be a choice of sign. Let E/E_{/\mathbb{Q}} be an elliptic curve with good reduction at p>2p>2. Assume that χt(Γ,E[p])\chi_{t}^{{\ddagger}}(\Gamma,E[p^{\infty}]) is well-defined and (E/)[p]\Sha(E/\mathbb{Q})[p^{\infty}] is finite. Let rEr_{E} denote the Mordell-Weil rank of E()E(\mathbb{Q}). Then, rEr_{E} is equal to the order of vanishing of fE(p),(T)f_{E}^{(p),{\ddagger}}(T) at T=0T=0. In particular, we have that λp(E)rE\lambda_{p}^{{\ddagger}}(E)\geq r_{E}.

Proof.

Since it is assumed that (E/)[p]\Sha(E/\mathbb{Q})[p^{\infty}] is finite, it follows from (2.1)\eqref{sesSelmer} that

rE=corankpSelp(E/).r_{E}=\operatorname{corank}_{\mathbb{Z}_{p}}\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/\mathbb{Q}).

By Lemma 2.2, it suffices to show that

rE=corankpSelp(E/cyc)Γ.r_{E}=\operatorname{corank}_{\mathbb{Z}_{p}}\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}^{{\ddagger}}(E/\mathbb{Q}^{\operatorname{cyc}})^{\Gamma}.

Therefore the result follows from Theorem 3.1. ∎

Lemma 3.4.

Let M be a cofinitely generated and cotorsion Λ\Lambda-module such that ϕM\phi_{\rm{M}} has finite kernel and cokernel. Let rMr_{\rm{M}} be the order of vanishing of fM(p)(T)f_{\rm{M}}^{(p)}(T) at T=0T=0. Then, the following are equivalent.

  1. (1)

    χt(Γ,M)=1\chi_{t}(\Gamma,\rm{M})=1,

  2. (2)

    μ(M)=0\mu(\rm{M})=0 and λ(M)=rM\lambda(\rm{M})=r_{\rm{M}}.

Proof.

Suppose that χt(Γ,M)=1\chi_{t}(\Gamma,\rm{M})=1. Write fM(p)(T)=TrMgM(p)(T)f_{\rm{M}}^{(p)}(T)=T^{r_{\rm{M}}}g_{\rm{M}}^{(p)}(T) where gM(p)(T)Λg_{\rm{M}}^{(p)}(T)\in\Lambda and gM(0)0g_{\rm{M}}(0)\neq 0. By Lemma 2.2,

|gM(p)(0)|p1=χt(Γ,M)=1.\mathinner{\!\left\lvert g_{\rm{M}}^{(p)}(0)\right\rvert}_{p}^{-1}=\chi_{t}(\Gamma,\rm{M})=1.

In particular, fM(p)(T)f_{\rm{M}}^{(p)}(T) and gM(p)(T)g_{\rm{M}}^{(p)}(T) are distinguished polynomials. Since gM(p)(0)g_{\rm{M}}^{(p)}(0) is a unit, it follows that gM(p)(T)g_{\rm{M}}^{(p)}(T) is a unit. Since gM(p)(T)g_{\rm{M}}^{(p)}(T) is a distinguished polynomial, it follows that

gM(p)(T)=1 and fM(p)(T)=TrM.g_{\rm{M}}^{(p)}(T)=1\text{ and }f_{\rm{M}}^{(p)}(T)=T^{r_{\rm{M}}}.

Therefore, μ(M)=0\mu(\rm{M})=0 and λ(M)=degfM(p)(T)=rM\lambda(\textrm{M})=\deg f_{M}^{(p)}(T)=r_{M}.

Conversely, suppose that μ(M)=0\mu(\rm{M})=0 and λ(M)=rM\lambda(\textrm{M})=r_{\rm{M}}. Since μ(M)=0\mu(\rm{M})=0, it follows that fM(p)(T)f_{\rm{M}}^{(p)}(T) and gM(p)(T)g_{\rm{M}}^{(p)}(T) are distinguished polynomials. The degree of fM(p)(T)f_{\rm{M}}^{(p)}(T) is λM=rM\lambda_{\rm{M}}=r_{\rm{M}}. It follows that gM(p)(T)g_{\rm{M}}^{(p)}(T) is a constant polynomial and hence, gM(p)(T)=1g_{\rm{M}}^{(p)}(T)=1. By Lemma 2.2,

χt(Γ,M)=|gM(0)|p1=1.\chi_{t}(\Gamma,\textrm{M})=\mathinner{\!\left\lvert g_{\textrm{M}}(0)\right\rvert}_{p}^{-1}=1.

Proposition 3.5.

Let {+,}{\ddagger}\in\{+,-\} be a choice of sign. Let E/E_{/\mathbb{Q}} be an elliptic curve of Mordell-Weil rank rEr_{E} with good reduction at p>2p>2. Suppose that these additional conditions hold.

  1. (i)

    The truncated Euler characteristic χt(Γ,E[p])\chi_{t}^{{\ddagger}}(\Gamma,E[p^{\infty}]) is defined.

  2. (ii)

    (E/)[p]\Sha(E/\mathbb{Q})[p^{\infty}] is finite.

Then the following statements are equivalent

  1. (1)

    χt(Γ,E[p])=1\chi_{t}^{{\ddagger}}(\Gamma,E[p^{\infty}])=1,

  2. (2)

    μp(E)=0\mu_{p}^{{\ddagger}}(E)=0 and λp(E)=rE\lambda_{p}^{{\ddagger}}(E)=r_{E}.

Proof.

Lemma 3.3 asserts that rEr_{E} is equal to the order of vanishing of fE(p),(T)f_{E}^{(p),{\ddagger}}(T) at T=0T=0. The assertion follows from Lemma 3.4. ∎

3.1. Elliptic curves over \mathbb{Q} with rank zero

In this subsection, we study the variation of the classical Euler characteristic as pp varies over primes of good reduction.

Corollary 3.6.

Let EE be an elliptic curve over \mathbb{Q} with good reduction at p>2p>2 for which the Mordell-Weil rank of EE is zero. The following are equivalent.

  1. (1)

    χ(Γ,E[p])=1\chi^{{\ddagger}}(\Gamma,E[p^{\infty}])=1,

  2. (2)

    μp(E)=0\mu_{p}^{{\ddagger}}(E)=0 and λp(E)=0\lambda_{p}^{{\ddagger}}(E)=0.

  3. (3)

    Selp(E/cyc)\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}^{{\ddagger}}(E/\mathbb{Q}^{\operatorname{cyc}}) is finite.

  4. (4)

    Selp(E/cyc)=0\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}^{{\ddagger}}(E/\mathbb{Q}^{\operatorname{cyc}})=0.

Proof.

Since EE is assumed to have rank zero, the Tate-Shafarevich group (E/)\Sha(E/\mathbb{Q}) is finite. It follows from Lemma 3.2 that the Euler characteristic χ(Γ,E[p])\chi^{{\ddagger}}(\Gamma,E[p^{\infty}]) is well-defined, and by Proposition 3.5 that (1)\eqref{35p1} and (2)\eqref{35p2} are equivalent. From the Structure Theorem of finitely generated Λ\Lambda-modules, it is clear that (2)\eqref{35p2} and (3)\eqref{35p3} are equivalent conditions. It is known that Selp(E/cyc)\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}^{{\ddagger}}(E/\mathbb{Q}^{\operatorname{cyc}}) contains no proper finite index submodules (see [11, Proposition 4.14] for the case when pp is ordinary and [9, Theorem 3.14] for when pp is supersingular). Hence, (3)\eqref{35p3} and (4)\eqref{35p4} are equivalent. ∎

Let E/E_{/\mathbb{Q}} be an elliptic curve. Denote by SbadS^{\operatorname{bad}} the finite set of primes at which EE has bad reduction. Denote by SgoodS^{\operatorname{good}} the primes at which EE has good reduction (i.e., either ordinary reduction or supersingular reduction); write Sgood=SordSssS^{\operatorname{good}}=S^{\operatorname{ord}}\cup S^{\operatorname{ss}}. When EE has good reduction at a fixed prime pp, we set E~\widetilde{E} to denote the reduced curve over 𝔽p\mathbb{F}_{p}.

The following result was initially proved by Greenberg for good ordinary primes.

Theorem 3.7.

Let EE be an elliptic curve over \mathbb{Q} such that E()E(\mathbb{Q}) is finite. Let ΣSord\Sigma\subset S^{\operatorname{ord}} be the set of primes at which pp divides #E~(𝔽p)\#\widetilde{E}(\mathbb{F}_{p}). Let ΣSord\Sigma^{\prime}\subset S^{\operatorname{ord}} be the finite set of primes pp such that either

  1. (1)

    p=2p=2.

  2. (2)

    pp divides #(E/)\#\Sha(E/\mathbb{Q}).

  3. (3)

    pp divides the Tamagawa product lSbadcl(E)\prod_{l\in S^{\operatorname{bad}}}c_{l}(E).

Then for all primes pSord(ΣΣ)p\in S^{\operatorname{ord}}\setminus(\Sigma\cup\Sigma^{\prime}), we have that Selp(E/cyc)=0\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/\mathbb{Q}^{\operatorname{cyc}})=0.

Observe that Σ\Sigma^{\prime} is always a finite set. However, the set of primes Σ\Sigma, referred to as the set of anomalous primes, is known to be a set of Dirichlet density zero. The Lang-Trotter Conjecture predicts that the proportion of anomalous primes p<Xp<X is CXlogXC\cdot\frac{\sqrt{X}}{\log X} for some constant CC. It has recently been shown that all but a density zero set of elliptic curves have infinitely many anomalous primes [1, Corollary 4.3]. However, in special cases one can in fact show that C=0C=0 [25, §1.1]. By the Hasse inequality, a prime p7p\geq 7 is anomalous for an elliptic curve defined over \mathbb{Q} if and only if ap=p+1#E~(𝔽p)=1a_{p}=p+1-\#\widetilde{E}(\mathbb{F}_{p})=1. When p7p\geq 7 and an elliptic curve has 2-torsion, apa_{p} is even and hence C=0C=0. For more examples where the set Σ\Sigma is finite, and detailed discussion on this subject, we refer the reader to [18, 20, 23].

Proof of Theorem 3.7.

Since the Mordell-Weil rank of EE is assumed to be zero, the Euler characteristic χ(Γ,E[p])\chi(\Gamma,E[p^{\infty}]) is well-defined. The following formula for the Euler characteristic is well known (see [5, Theorem 3.3])

(3.1) χ(Γ,E[p])#(E/)[p]×(lSbadcl(E))×(#E~(𝔽p))2(#E()[p])2.\chi(\Gamma,E[p^{\infty}])\sim\frac{\#\Sha(E/\mathbb{Q})[p^{\infty}]\times\left(\prod_{l\in S^{\operatorname{bad}}}c_{l}(E)\right)\times\left(\#\widetilde{E}(\mathbb{F}_{p})\right)^{2}}{\left(\#E(\mathbb{Q})[p^{\infty}]\right)^{2}}.

Since the Euler characteristic is an integer, the result follows immediately from Corollary 3.6. ∎

We prove a similar result for primes of supersingular reduction.

Theorem 3.8.

Let EE be an elliptic curve over \mathbb{Q} such that E()E(\mathbb{Q}) is finite. Let ΥSss\Upsilon\subset S^{\operatorname{ss}} be the finite set of primes pp such that either

  1. (1)

    p=2p=2.

  2. (2)

    pp divides #(E/)\#\Sha(E/\mathbb{Q}).

  3. (3)

    pp divides the Tamagawa product lSbadcl(E)\prod_{l\in S^{\operatorname{bad}}}c_{l}(E).

Then for all primes pSssΥp\in S^{\operatorname{ss}}\setminus\Upsilon, we have that

Selp+(E/cyc)=0 and Selp(E/cyc)=0.\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}^{+}(E/\mathbb{Q}^{\operatorname{cyc}})=0\text{ and }\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}^{-}(E/\mathbb{Q}^{\operatorname{cyc}})=0.
Proof.

Since E()E(\mathbb{Q}) is assumed to be finite, the Euler characteristic χ±(Γ,E[p])\chi^{\pm}(\Gamma,E[p^{\infty}]) is well-defined. Since EE has supersingular reduction at pp, E[p]E[p] is irreducible as a G\operatorname{G}_{\mathbb{Q}}-module; hence, E()[p]E(\mathbb{Q})[p] is the trivial group. Finiteness of E()E(\mathbb{Q}) implies that E()p/p=0E(\mathbb{Q})\otimes\mathbb{Q}_{p}/\mathbb{Z}_{p}=0. Therefore

#Selp(E/)=#(E/)[p].\#\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/\mathbb{Q})=\#\Sha(E/\mathbb{Q})[p^{\infty}].

By [17, Theorem 5.15], we know that

(3.2) χ±(Γ,E[p])=#(E/)[p]×(lSbadcl(E)).\chi^{\pm}(\Gamma,E[p^{\infty}])=\#\Sha(E/\mathbb{Q})[p^{\infty}]\times\left(\prod_{l\in S^{\operatorname{bad}}}c_{l}(E)\right).

The result follows from Corollary 3.6. ∎

Remark 3.9.

It is clear that the μ\mu and λ\lambda invariants do not change for each of the layers of the cyclotomic p\mathbb{Z}_{p}-extension. Let E/E_{/\mathbb{Q}} be a rank 0 elliptic curve and pSord(ΣΣ)p\in S^{\operatorname{ord}}\setminus(\Sigma\cup\Sigma^{\prime}) or pSssΥp\in S^{\operatorname{ss}}\setminus\Upsilon. Since λp(E)rE\lambda_{p}^{{\ddagger}}(E)\geq r_{E}, the Mordell-Weil rank of the elliptic curve must remain zero at each layer in the cyclotomic p\mathbb{Z}_{p}-extension.

The following result gives evidence for the conjecture of Coates and Sujatha on the vanishing of the μ\mu-invariant of fine Selmer groups. In fact, more is true.

Corollary 3.10.

Let EE be a rank 0 elliptic curve defined over \mathbb{Q}. Then, the pp-primary fine Selmer group Selp0(E/cyc)\operatorname{Sel}^{0}_{p^{\infty}}(E/\mathbb{Q}^{\operatorname{cyc}}) is trivial for density one primes.

Proof.

Given any elliptic curve, it has good reduction at all but finitely many primes. When pp is a prime of good (ordinary or supersingular) reduction, note that the pp-primary fine Selmer group is a subgroup of Selp(E/cyc)\operatorname{Sel}^{{\ddagger}}_{p^{\infty}}(E/\mathbb{Q}^{\operatorname{cyc}}). The result is immediate from Theorems 3.7 and 3.8. ∎

3.2. Elliptic curves over \mathbb{Q} with positive rank

Next, we consider the case when the elliptic curve EE has positive rank.

When EE has good ordinary reduction at pp, there is a notion of the pp-adic height pairing, which is the pp-adic analog of the usual height pairing, and was studied extensively in [27, 28]. This pairing is conjectured to be non-degenerate, and the pp-adic regulator Rp(E/)R_{p}(E/\mathbb{Q}) is defined to be the determinant of this pairing.

Theorem 3.11.

[B. Perrin-Riou [22], P. Schneider [28, Theorem 2’]] Let E/E_{/\mathbb{Q}} be an elliptic curve of Mordell-Weil rank rEr_{E} with good ordinary reduction at pp. Assume that

  1. (1)

    (E/)[p]\Sha(E/\mathbb{Q})[p^{\infty}] is finite.

  2. (2)

    the pp-adic height pairing is non-degenerate, i.e., the pp-adic regulator is non-zero.

Then, the order of vanishing of fE(p)(T)f_{E}^{(p)}(T) at T=0T=0 is equal to rE:=rankE()r_{E}\mathrel{\mathop{\ordinarycolon}}=\operatorname{rank}E(\mathbb{Q}). Express fE(p)(T)f_{E}^{(p)}(T) as TrEgE(p)(T)T^{r_{E}}g_{E}^{(p)}(T). Then, gE(p)(0)0g_{E}^{(p)}(0)\neq 0 and

gE(p)(0)(Rp(E/)prE)×#(E/)[p]×(lSbadcl(E))×(#E~(𝔽p))2(#E()[p])2.g_{E}^{(p)}(0)\sim\frac{\left(\frac{R_{p}(E/\mathbb{Q})}{p^{r_{E}}}\right)\times\#\Sha(E/\mathbb{Q})[p^{\infty}]\times\left(\prod_{l\in S^{\operatorname{bad}}}c_{l}(E)\right)\times\left(\#\widetilde{E}(\mathbb{F}_{p})\right)^{2}}{\left(\#E(\mathbb{Q})[p^{\infty}]\right)^{2}}.

The above theorem implies that the right hand side of the equation is an integer since the left hand side is. This result does not assume that the truncated Euler characteristic is well-defined. The statement is proven in greater generality, in fact, for abelian varieties over number fields.

Corollary 3.12.

Let E/E_{/\mathbb{Q}} be an elliptic curve of Mordell-Weil rank rEr_{E} with good ordinary reduction at pp. Assume that

  1. (1)

    (E/)[p]\Sha(E/\mathbb{Q})[p^{\infty}] is finite.

  2. (2)

    the pp-adic Height pairing is non-degenerate.

  3. (3)

    the truncated Euler characteristic χt(Γ,E[p])\chi_{t}(\Gamma,E[p^{\infty}]) is defined.

Then, we have that

χt(Γ,E[p])(Rp(E/)prE)×#(E/)[p]×(lSbadcl(E))×(#E~(𝔽p))2(#E()[p])2.\chi_{t}(\Gamma,E[p^{\infty}])\sim\frac{\left(\frac{R_{p}(E/\mathbb{Q})}{p^{r_{E}}}\right)\times\#\Sha(E/\mathbb{Q})[p^{\infty}]\times\left(\prod_{l\in S^{\operatorname{bad}}}c_{l}(E)\right)\times\left(\#\widetilde{E}(\mathbb{F}_{p})\right)^{2}}{\left(\#E(\mathbb{Q})[p^{\infty}]\right)^{2}}.
Proof.

The assertion a direct consequence of Theorem 3.11 and Lemma 2.2. ∎

To analyze Iwasawa invariants on average, we shall apply Theorem 3.11. Let E/E_{/\mathbb{Q}} be an elliptic curve. As before, we denote by SordS^{\operatorname{ord}} the set of primes pp at which EE has good ordinary reduction. Let Σ\Sigma be the set of anomalous primes and Σ\Sigma^{\prime} the finite set of primes for which

  1. (1)

    p=2p=2,

  2. (2)

    pp divides #(E/)\#\Sha(E/\mathbb{Q}).

  3. (3)

    pp divides the Tamagawa product lSbadcl(E)\prod_{l\in S^{\operatorname{bad}}}c_{l}(E).

Denote by vpv_{p} the pp-adic valuation on p\mathbb{Q}_{p} normalized by vp(p)=1v_{p}(p)=1. Let ΠSord\Pi\subset S^{\operatorname{ord}} be the set of primes pp at which vp(Rp(E/))rEv_{p}(R_{p}(E/\mathbb{Q}))\geq r_{E}. In other words, it is the set of primes for which pp divides (Rp(E/)prE)\left(\frac{R_{p}(E/\mathbb{Q})}{p^{r_{E}}}\right). When rE=0r_{E}=0, the pp-adic regulator Rp(E/)=1R_{p}(E/\mathbb{Q})=1, therefore the set Π\Pi is empty. On the other hand, the set of primes Π\Pi need not be empty when rE1r_{E}\geq 1. The following result generalizes Theorem 3.7 and is an easy consequence of Theorem 3.11.

Theorem 3.13.

Let E/E_{/\mathbb{Q}} be an elliptic curve such that rE1r_{E}\geq 1. Then for all primes pSord(ΣΣΠ)p\in S^{\operatorname{ord}}\setminus(\Sigma\cup\Sigma^{\prime}\cup\Pi), we have that fE(p)(T)=TrEf_{E}^{(p)}(T)=T^{r_{E}}. In particular, μp(E)=0\mu_{p}(E)=0 and λp(E)=rE\lambda_{p}(E)=r_{E}.

Proof.

Express the characteristic element fE(p)(T)f_{E}^{(p)}(T) as TrEgE(p)(T)T^{r_{E}}g_{E}^{(p)}(T). Theorem 3.11 asserts that gE(p)(0)0g_{E}^{(p)}(0)\neq 0 and

gE(p)(0)(Rp(E/)prE)×#(E/)[p]×(lSbadcl(E))×(#E~(𝔽p))2(#E()[p])2.g_{E}^{(p)}(0)\sim\frac{\left(\frac{R_{p}(E/\mathbb{Q})}{p^{r_{E}}}\right)\times\#\Sha(E/\mathbb{Q})[p^{\infty}]\times\left(\prod_{l\in S^{\operatorname{bad}}}c_{l}(E)\right)\times\left(\#\widetilde{E}(\mathbb{F}_{p})\right)^{2}}{\left(\#E(\mathbb{Q})[p^{\infty}]\right)^{2}}.

Thus, gE(p)(0)g_{E}^{(p)}(0) is a pp-adic unit for pSord(ΣΣΠ)p\in S^{\operatorname{ord}}\setminus(\Sigma\cup\Sigma^{\prime}\cup\Pi). Therefore, gE(p)(T)g_{E}^{(p)}(T) is a unit in Λ\Lambda. Since fE(p)(T)f_{E}^{(p)}(T) is a product of a distinguished polynomial with a power of pp, it follows that gE(p)(T)=1g_{E}^{(p)}(T)=1 and fE(p)(T)=TrEf_{E}^{(p)}(T)=T^{r_{E}}. ∎

While it is known that the set Σ\Sigma^{\prime} is finite and Σ\Sigma is a density zero set of primes, the same is not known for Π\Pi. For N1N\geq 1, let ΠN\Pi^{\leq N} be the set of primes pΠp\in\Pi for which 5pN5\leq p\leq N. Calculations in [4] suggest that the set Π\Pi is likely to have Dirichlet density zero, at least for elliptic curves of rank 11 (see also [36]). We compute Π1000\Pi^{\leq 1000} for the first 10 elliptic curves E/E/\mathbb{Q} of rank 22 (ordered by conductor). The calculations in the following table were done on sage.

Cremona Label Π1000\Pi^{\leq 1000} Cremona Label Π1000\Pi^{\leq 1000}
1.1. 389a389a \emptyset 6.6. 643a643a \emptyset
2.2. 433a433a {13}\{13\} 7.7. 655a655a {7,31}\{7,31\}
3.3. 446d446d {7}\{7\} 8.8. 664a664a {59}\{59\}
4.4. 563a563a \emptyset 9.9. 681c681c \emptyset
5.5. 571b571b \emptyset 10.10. 707a707a {29}.
Remark 3.14.

For elliptic curves E/E_{/\mathbb{Q}} with rE=1r_{E}=1, the above theorem asserts that for primes outside a set (possibly of Dirichlet density zero), the characteristic element fE(p)(T)=Tf_{E}^{(p)}(T)=T. Under the hypotheses that the pp-adic height pairing on E(ncyc)E(\mathbb{Q}_{n}^{\operatorname{cyc}}) is non-degenerate for all nn and that #(E/ncyc)[p]\#\Sha(E/\mathbb{Q}_{n}^{\operatorname{cyc}})[p^{\infty}] is finite for all nn, we know that fSel0(p)(T)=1f_{\operatorname{Sel}^{0}}^{(p)}(T)=1 (see [35, pp. 104-105]). Thus, in this case, the fine Selmer group Selp0(E/cyc)\operatorname{Sel}^{0}_{p^{\infty}}(E/\mathbb{Q}^{\operatorname{cyc}}) is not only cofinitely generated as a p\mathbb{Z}_{p}-module, but in fact it is finite. On the other hand, when rE>1r_{E}>1 even though the fine Selmer group should be cofinitely generated as a p\mathbb{Z}_{p}-module, it is not expected to be finite.

Next, we consider the supersingular case. Let E/E_{/\mathbb{Q}} be an elliptic curve with good supersingular reduction at p3p\geq 3. Note that pp divides ap:=p+1#E~(𝔽p)a_{p}\mathrel{\mathop{\ordinarycolon}}=p+1-\#\widetilde{E}(\mathbb{F}_{p}). Hasse’s bound states that |ap|<2p\mathinner{\!\left\lvert a_{p}\right\rvert}<2\sqrt{p}; hence if p5p\geq 5, it forces that ap=0a_{p}=0. However, when p=3p=3, it is indeed possible for ap0a_{p}\neq 0. For simplicity, we shall assume that ap=0a_{p}=0. In this setting, the Main conjectures were formulated in [15]. When ap=0a_{p}=0, the Main conjecture has been proved in a preprint of X. Wan (see [33]). Let {+,}{\ddagger}\in\{+,-\} be a choice of sign. Perrin Riou [21] formulated a pp-adic L-function in the supersingular case, which is closely related to the plus and minus pp-adic LL-function defined by R. Pollack. The pp-adic Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture formulated by D. Bernardi and Perrin-Riou in [2] predicts a formula for the leading term of the pp-adic L-function. This conjecture is reformulated in terms of Pollack’s pp-adic LL-functions in [32].

Let logp\log_{p} be a branch of the pp-adic logarithm, χ\chi the pp-adic cyclotomic character, and rEr_{E} be the Mordell-Weil rank of EE. Let {+,}{\ddagger}\in\{+,-\}, and denote by Rp(E/)R^{{\ddagger}}_{p}(E/\mathbb{Q}) the signed pp-adic regulator (defined up to pp-adic unit). The convention in loc. cit. is to choose a generator γ\gamma of the cyclotomic p\mathbb{Z}_{p} extension, and divide the regulator (defined w.r.t. the choice of γ\gamma) by logp(χ(γ))rE\log_{p}(\chi(\gamma))^{r_{E}}. We are however, not interested in the exact value of the regulator, but only the value up to a pp-adic unit. Therefore, we simply work with the fraction (Rp(E/)prE)\left(\frac{R^{{\ddagger}}_{p}(E/\mathbb{Q})}{p^{r_{E}}}\right). Lemma 3.3 asserts that the order of vanishing of fE(p),(T)f_{E}^{(p),{\ddagger}}(T) at T=0T=0 is equal to rEr_{E}. Express fE(p),(T)f_{E}^{(p),{\ddagger}}(T) as a product TrEgE(p),(T)T^{r_{E}}g_{E}^{(p),{\ddagger}}(T). The following conjecture is equivalent to the pp-adic Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture.

Conjecture 3.15.

Let EE be an elliptic curve with good supersingular reduction at the prime pp and {+,}{\ddagger}\in\{+,-\}. Then,

gE(p),(0)(Rp(E/)prE)×#(E/)[p]×(lSbadcl(E)).g_{E}^{(p),{\ddagger}}(0)\sim\left(\frac{R_{p}^{{\ddagger}}(E/\mathbb{Q})}{p^{r_{E}}}\right)\times\#\Sha(E/\mathbb{Q})[p^{\infty}]\times\left(\prod_{l\in S^{\operatorname{bad}}}c_{l}(E)\right).

Let ΠSss\Pi^{{\ddagger}}\subset S^{\operatorname{ss}} be the set of primes pp at which vp(Rp(E/))rEv_{p}(R_{p}^{{\ddagger}}(E/\mathbb{Q}))\geq r_{E}. In other words, it is the set of primes for which pp divides (Rp(E/)prE)\left(\frac{R_{p}^{{\ddagger}}(E/\mathbb{Q})}{p^{r_{E}}}\right). The following result is proved using the same strategy as that of Theorem 3.13, so we skip the proof.

Theorem 3.16.

Assume that Conjecture 3.15 holds. Let E/E_{/\mathbb{Q}} be an elliptic curve with Mordell-Weil rank rE1r_{E}\geq 1. Let pp be a prime at which EE has good supersingular reduction. Then for all primes pSss(ΣΣΠ)p\in S^{\operatorname{ss}}\setminus(\Sigma\cup\Sigma^{\prime}\cup\Pi^{{\ddagger}}), we have that fE(p),(T)=TrEf_{E}^{(p),{\ddagger}}(T)=T^{r_{E}}. In particular, μp(E)=0\mu_{p}^{{\ddagger}}(E)=0 and λp(E)=rE\lambda_{p}^{{\ddagger}}(E)=r_{E}.

It seems reasonable to make the following conjecture.

Conjecture 3.17.

Let E/E_{/\mathbb{Q}} be an elliptic curve of rank rEr_{E} with good (ordinary or supersingular) reduction at pp. For 100%100\% of the primes, μp(E)=0\mu_{p}^{{\ddagger}}(E)=0 and λp(E)=rE\lambda_{p}^{{\ddagger}}(E)=r_{E}.

Remark 3.18.

Let E/E_{/\mathbb{Q}} be an elliptic curve with rE1r_{E}\geq 1. If pp is a prime at which the pp-adic regulator has valuation equal to prEp^{r_{E}}, the same argument as Remark 3.9 shows that the rank of the elliptic curve remains unchanged in every layer of the cyclotomic p\mathbb{Z}_{p}-extension.

4. Results for a fixed prime and varying elliptic curve

In this section, we fix a prime p5p\geq 5 and study the variation of Iwasawa invariants as EE ranges over all elliptic curves of rank zero with good reduction at pp. Recall that any elliptic curve EE over \mathbb{Q} admits a unique Weierstrass equation

(4.1) E:y2=x3+Ax+BE\mathrel{\mathop{\ordinarycolon}}y^{2}=x^{3}+Ax+B

where A,BA,B are integers and gcd(A3,B2)\gcd(A^{3},B^{2}) is not divisible by any twelfth power. Since p5p\geq 5, such an equation is minimal. We order elliptic curves by height and expect that similar results shall hold when they are ordered by conductor or discriminant. Recall that the height of EE satisfying the minimal equation (4.1)\eqref{weier} is given by H(E):=max(|A|3,|B|2)H(E)\mathrel{\mathop{\ordinarycolon}}=\max\left(\mathinner{\!\left\lvert A\right\rvert}^{3},\mathinner{\!\left\lvert B\right\rvert}^{2}\right).

Let \mathcal{E} be set of isomorphism classes of all elliptic curves over \mathbb{Q}. Let 𝒥\mathcal{J} be the set of elliptic curves EE over \mathbb{Q} satisfying the following two properties

  1. (1)

    EE has rank zero,

  2. (2)

    EE has good reduction (ordinary or supersingular) at pp.

The set 𝒥\mathcal{J} is the (disjoint) union of two sets 𝒥ord\mathcal{J}^{\operatorname{ord}} and 𝒥ss\mathcal{J}^{\operatorname{ss}}, consisting of rank 0 elliptic curves with ordinary and supersingular reduction at pp, respectively. For X>0X>0, write (X)\mathcal{E}(X) for the set of isomorphism classes of elliptic curves over \mathbb{Q} of height <X<X. If 𝒮\mathcal{S} is a subset of \mathcal{E}, set 𝒮(X)=𝒮(X)\mathcal{S}(X)=\mathcal{S}\cap\mathcal{E}(X). It is conjectured that when ordered by height, discriminant or conductor, half of the elliptic curves over \mathbb{Q} have rank 0 (see for example [10, Conjecture B] or [14, p. 15]). If E𝒥E\in\mathcal{J} has good ordinary reduction at pp, then the Euler characteristic formula (3.1)\eqref{ecf1} states that

(4.2) χ(Γ,E[p])#(E/)[p]×(lcl(E))×(#E~(𝔽p))2#(E()[p])2.\chi(\Gamma,E[p^{\infty}])\sim\frac{\#\Sha(E/\mathbb{Q})[p^{\infty}]\times\left(\prod_{l}c_{l}(E)\right)\times\left(\#\widetilde{E}(\mathbb{F}_{p})\right)^{2}}{\#\left(E(\mathbb{Q})[p^{\infty}]\right)^{2}}.

Note that in the above equation, #E()[p]=1\#E(\mathbb{Q})[p^{\infty}]=1 if p11p\geq 11. On the other hand, if E𝒥E\in\mathcal{J} has good supersingular reduction at pp, then by (3.2)\eqref{ecf2}, we have that

(4.3) χ±(Γ,E[p])#(E/)[p]×(lcl(E)).\chi^{\pm}(\Gamma,E[p^{\infty}])\sim\#\Sha(E/\mathbb{Q})[p^{\infty}]\times\left(\prod_{l}c_{l}(E)\right).

Denote by cl(p)(E)c_{l}^{(p)}(E) the pp-part of cl(E)c_{l}(E), given by cl(p)(E):=pvp(cl(E))c_{l}^{(p)}(E)\mathrel{\mathop{\ordinarycolon}}=p^{v_{p}(c_{l}(E))}. The key observation in this section is that to analyze the variation of the Euler characteristic (and hence μ\mu and λ\lambda-invariants) of elliptic curves, it suffices to study the average behaviour of the following quantities for fixed pp and varying E𝒥E\in\mathcal{J},

  1. (1)

    sp(E):=#(E/)[p]s_{p}(E)\mathrel{\mathop{\ordinarycolon}}=\#\Sha(E/\mathbb{Q})[p^{\infty}],

  2. (2)

    τp(E):=lcl(p)(E)\tau_{p}(E)\mathrel{\mathop{\ordinarycolon}}=\prod_{l}c_{l}^{(p)}(E),

  3. (3)

    δp(E):=#(E~(𝔽p)[p])\delta_{p}(E)\mathrel{\mathop{\ordinarycolon}}=\#\left(\widetilde{E}(\mathbb{F}_{p})[p]\right).

Definition 4.1.

Let 1(X)\mathcal{E}_{1}(X), 2(X)\mathcal{E}_{2}(X), and 3(X)\mathcal{E}_{3}(X) be the subset of elliptic curves in (X)\mathcal{E}(X) for which pp divides sp(E)s_{p}(E), τp(E)\tau_{p}(E) and δp(E)\delta_{p}(E) respectively.

Note that no assumptions are made on the rank of elliptic curves in (X)\mathcal{E}(X) or i(X)\mathcal{E}_{i}(X). On the other hand, for elliptic curves E𝒥E\in\mathcal{J}, the rank is zero.

The primary goal is to obtain upper bounds for

𝔡p(i):=lim supX#i(X)#(X)\mathfrak{d}_{p}^{(i)}\mathrel{\mathop{\ordinarycolon}}=\limsup_{X\rightarrow\infty}\frac{\#\mathcal{E}_{i}(X)}{\#\mathcal{E}(X)}

for i=2,3i=2,3 (with no constraints on the rank of the elliptic curves).

In [8], C. Delauney gave heuristics for the average number of elliptic curves with sp(E)1s_{p}(E)\neq 1. These heuristics are stated in terms of elliptic curves ordered by conductor. However, they indicate that 𝔡p(1)\mathfrak{d}_{p}^{(1)} goes to 0 as pp\rightarrow\infty rather fast. Since there is still not much known about this particular question, we are unable to make further clarifications about the behaviour of 𝔡p(1)\mathfrak{d}_{p}^{(1)}. However, we expect that the analysis of this part of the formula is the most difficult.

Let κ=(a,b)𝔽p×𝔽p\kappa=(a,b)\in\mathbb{F}_{p}\times\mathbb{F}_{p} be such that the discriminant Δ(κ):=4a3+27b2\Delta(\kappa)\mathrel{\mathop{\ordinarycolon}}=4a^{3}+27b^{2} is nonzero. The elliptic curve Eκ:y2=x3+ax+bE_{\kappa}\mathrel{\mathop{\ordinarycolon}}y^{2}=x^{3}+ax+b defined over 𝔽p\mathbb{F}_{p} is smooth. Let d(p)d(p) be the number of pairs κ=(a,b)𝔽p×𝔽p\kappa=(a,b)\in\mathbb{F}_{p}\times\mathbb{F}_{p} such that

  1. (1)

    Δ(κ)0\Delta(\kappa)\neq 0.

  2. (2)

    Eκ:y2=x3+ax+bE_{\kappa}\mathrel{\mathop{\ordinarycolon}}y^{2}=x^{3}+ax+b has a point over 𝔽p\mathbb{F}_{p} of order pp.

For the primes pp in the range 5p<5005\leq p<500, computations on sage show that d(p)1d(p)\leq 1 and d(p)=1d(p)=1 for p{5,7,61}p\in\{5,7,61\}. We remark that d(p)d(p) is closely related to the Kronecker class number of 14p1-4p (see [29, p. 184]). The estimate (4.4)\eqref{cremonasadek} follows from the method of M. Sadek [26], or the results of J. Cremona and Sadek, see [7].

Theorem 4.2.

Let p5p\geq 5 be a fixed prime number. Then

(4.4) 𝔡p(2)lp(l1)2lp+2,\mathfrak{d}_{p}^{(2)}\leq\sum_{l\neq p}\frac{(l-1)^{2}}{l^{p+2}},

where the sum is taken over prime numbers lpl\neq p, and

(4.5) 𝔡p(3)ζ(10)d(p)p2.\mathfrak{d}_{p}^{(3)}\leq\zeta(10)\cdot\frac{d(p)}{p^{2}}.

We provide a proof of (4.4) in Theorem 4.11 and of (4.5) in Theorem 4.14. Note that ζ(10)=π1093555\zeta(10)=\frac{\pi^{10}}{93555} is approximately equal to 1.0011.001. This quantity arises since the proportion of Weierstrass equations ordered by height which are minimal is 1ζ(10)\frac{1}{\zeta(10)} (see [7]). To avoid confusion, we state the results for good ordinary and good supersingular elliptic curves separately. First, we state the result for elliptic curves with good ordinary reduction at pp.

Theorem 4.3.

Let p5p\geq 5 be a fixed prime number. Let 𝒵ord\mathcal{Z}^{\operatorname{ord}} denote the set of rank 0 elliptic curves EE with good ordinary reduction at pp for which the following equivalent conditions are satisfied

  1. (1)

    χ(Γ,E[p])=1\chi(\Gamma,E[p^{\infty}])=1,

  2. (2)

    Selp(E/cyc)=0\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/\mathbb{Q}^{\operatorname{cyc}})=0.

Then,

lim supX#𝒵ord(X)#(X)lim supX#𝒥ord(X)#(X)𝔡p(1)lp(l1)2lp+2ζ(10)d(p)p2.\limsup_{X\rightarrow\infty}\frac{\#\mathcal{Z}^{\operatorname{ord}}(X)}{\#\mathcal{E}(X)}\geq\limsup_{X\rightarrow\infty}\frac{\#\mathcal{J}^{\operatorname{ord}}(X)}{\#\mathcal{E}(X)}-\mathfrak{d}_{p}^{(1)}-\sum_{l\neq p}\frac{(l-1)^{2}}{l^{p+2}}-\zeta(10)\cdot\frac{d(p)}{p^{2}}.
Proof.

It follows from Corollary 3.6 that χ(Γ,E[p])=1\chi(\Gamma,E[p^{\infty}])=1 and Selp(E/cyc)\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}(E/\mathbb{Q}^{\operatorname{cyc}}) are equivalent. By the Euler characteristic formula (4.2)\eqref{ecfrdinary},

lim supX#𝒵ord(X)#(X)lim supX#𝒥ord(X)#(X)𝔡p(1)𝔡p(2)𝔡p(3).\limsup_{X\rightarrow\infty}\frac{\#\mathcal{Z}^{\operatorname{ord}}(X)}{\#\mathcal{E}(X)}\geq\limsup_{X\rightarrow\infty}\frac{\#\mathcal{J}^{\operatorname{ord}}(X)}{\#\mathcal{E}(X)}-\mathfrak{d}_{p}^{(1)}-\mathfrak{d}_{p}^{(2)}-\mathfrak{d}_{p}^{(3)}.

The result follows from Theorem 4.2. ∎

Next, we prove an analogous result in the case when EE varies over elliptic curves with good supersingular reduction at pp.

Theorem 4.4.

Let p5p\geq 5 be a fixed prime number. Let 𝒵ss\mathcal{Z}^{\operatorname{ss}} be the rank 0 elliptic curves EE with good supersingular reduction at pp, for which the following equivalent conditions are satisfied

  1. (1)

    χ±(Γ,E[p])=1\chi^{\pm}(\Gamma,E[p^{\infty}])=1

  2. (2)

    Selp±(E/cyc)=0\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}^{\pm}(E/\mathbb{Q}^{\operatorname{cyc}})=0.

Then,

lim supX#𝒵ss(X)#(X)lim supX#𝒥ss(X)#(X)𝔡p(1)lp(l1)2lp+2.\limsup_{X\rightarrow\infty}\frac{\#\mathcal{Z}^{\operatorname{ss}}(X)}{\#\mathcal{E}(X)}\geq\limsup_{X\rightarrow\infty}\frac{\#\mathcal{J}^{\operatorname{ss}}(X)}{\#\mathcal{E}(X)}-\mathfrak{d}_{p}^{(1)}-\sum_{l\neq p}\frac{(l-1)^{2}}{l^{p+2}}.
Proof.

The proof is identical to that of Theorem 4.3. It is a direct consequence of Corollary 3.6, Theorem 4.2, and the Euler characteristic formula (4.3)\eqref{ecfss}. ∎

We prove a result which applies for all elliptic curves with good reduction.

Theorem 4.5.

Let p5p\geq 5 be a fixed prime number. Let 𝒵\mathcal{Z} be the set of rank 0 elliptic curves EE with good reduction at pp, for which Selp(E/cyc)=0\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}^{{\ddagger}}(E/\mathbb{Q}^{\operatorname{cyc}})=0. Then,

lim supX#𝒵(X)#(X)lim supX#𝒥(X)#(X)𝔡p(1)lp(l1)2lp+2ζ(10)d(p)p2.\limsup_{X\rightarrow\infty}\frac{\#\mathcal{Z}(X)}{\#\mathcal{E}(X)}\geq\limsup_{X\rightarrow\infty}\frac{\#\mathcal{J}(X)}{\#\mathcal{E}(X)}-\mathfrak{d}_{p}^{(1)}-\sum_{l\neq p}\frac{(l-1)^{2}}{l^{p+2}}-\zeta(10)\cdot\frac{d(p)}{p^{2}}.
Proof.

Let 𝒴\mathcal{Y}\subset\mathcal{E} consist of the elliptic curves EE for which sp(E)τp(E)δp(E)1s_{p}(E)\tau_{p}(E)\delta_{p}(E)\neq 1. It follows from the Euler characteristic formulas (4.2)\eqref{ecfrdinary} and (4.3)\eqref{ecfss} that 𝒵\mathcal{Z} is contained in 𝒴\mathcal{E}\setminus\mathcal{Y}. By Theorem 4.3 that

lim supX#𝒴(X)#(X)𝔡p(1)+lp(l1)2lp+2+ζ(10)d(p)p2\limsup_{X\rightarrow\infty}\frac{\#\mathcal{Y}(X)}{\#\mathcal{E}(X)}\leq\mathfrak{d}_{p}^{(1)}+\sum_{l\neq p}\frac{(l-1)^{2}}{l^{p+2}}+\zeta(10)\cdot\frac{d(p)}{p^{2}}

and the result follows. ∎

Remark 4.6.

On average, the proportion of elliptic curves over p\mathbb{Z}_{p} with good reduction at pp (ordered by height) is (11p)(1-\frac{1}{p}), see [7]. Also, it is expected that 1/21/2 the elliptic curves have rank 11 when ordered by height. Therefore, it is reasonable to expect that

lim supX#𝒥(X)#(X)=12(11p).\limsup_{X\rightarrow\infty}\frac{\#\mathcal{J}(X)}{\#\mathcal{E}(X)}=\frac{1}{2}\left(1-\frac{1}{p}\right).

Heuristics of Delauney suggest that 𝔡p(1)\mathfrak{d}_{p}^{(1)} should approach zero quite rapidly as pp\rightarrow\infty. The result indicates that the proportion of elliptic curves for which the Selmer group is zero is >0>0 and the proportion approaches 1/21/2 as pp\rightarrow\infty.

We are led to make the following conjecture.

Conjecture 4.7.

Let pp be a fixed prime. Denote by 𝒥p\mathcal{J}_{p} the set of rank 0 elliptic curves with good reduction at pp, and by 𝒵p\mathcal{Z}_{p} the subset of elliptic curves for which Selp(E/cyc)=0\operatorname{Sel}_{p^{\infty}}^{{\ddagger}}(E/\mathbb{Q}^{\operatorname{cyc}})=0. Then,

lim infp(lim supX𝒵p(X)𝒥p(X))=1.\liminf_{p\rightarrow\infty}\left(\limsup_{X\rightarrow\infty}\frac{\mathcal{Z}_{p}(X)}{\mathcal{J}_{p}(X)}\right)=1.
Remark 4.8.

In the rank one case, such an analysis is difficult. This is because of the term arising from the pp-adic regulator in the formula for the truncated Euler characteristic. At the time of writing, the authors are not aware of any results or heuristics for the average behaviour of the pp-adic valuation of Rp(E/)R_{p}(E/\mathbb{Q}) as EE ranges over all elliptic curves of rank 11 with good ordinary reduction at pp.

Theorem 4.2 is proved in the remainder of the section.

4.1. Average results on Tamagawa numbers

Let p5p\geq 5 be a fixed prime, and ll be a prime different from pp. In this section, we estimate the proportion of elliptic curves E/E/\mathbb{Q} up to height XX with Kodaira type IpI_{p} at ll. These estimates are well known, but we include them for the sake of completeness, see [26, 7]. Recall that when the Kodaira symbol at the prime ll is IpI_{p}, the Tamagawa number clc_{l} is divisible by pp [31, p. 448]. Let (X)\mathcal{E}(X) be the set of isomorphism classes of all elliptic curves over \mathbb{Q} with height X\leq X. This is in one-to-one correspondence with the set

{|A|X3,|B|X(A,B)×:4A3+27B20for all primes q if q4|A,then q6B}.\begin{Bmatrix}&\mathinner{\!\left\lvert A\right\rvert}\leq\sqrt[3]{X},\ \mathinner{\!\left\lvert B\right\rvert}\leq\sqrt{X}\\ (A,B)\in\mathbb{Z}\times\mathbb{Z}\mathrel{\mathop{\ordinarycolon}}&\quad 4A^{3}+27B^{2}\neq 0\\ &\textrm{for all primes }q\textrm{ if }q^{4}|A,\textrm{then }q^{6}\nmid B\end{Bmatrix}.
Lemma 4.9 (A. Brumer).

With notation as above,

#(X)=4X5/6ζ(10)+O(X).\#\mathcal{E}(X)=\frac{4X^{5/6}}{\zeta(10)}+O\left(\sqrt{X}\right).
Proof.

See [3, Lemma 4.3]. ∎

Consider the set lIp(X)\mathcal{E}^{I_{p}}_{l}(X), i.e. the set of elliptic curves over \mathbb{Q} with bad reduction at ll, height X\leq X, and Kodaira type IpI_{p}. The Kodaira symbol forces the bad reduction to be of multiplicative type. It follows from Tate’s algorithm that this set is in one-to-one correspondence with

(4.6) {|A|X3,|B|X(A,B)×:lA,lB,lp4A3+27B3(A,B)(0,0)/q4×/q6 for any prime q}.\begin{Bmatrix}&\mathinner{\!\left\lvert A\right\rvert}\leq\sqrt[3]{X},\ \mathinner{\!\left\lvert B\right\rvert}\leq\sqrt{X}\\ (A,B)\in\mathbb{Z}\times\mathbb{Z}\mathrel{\mathop{\ordinarycolon}}&l\nmid A,\ l\nmid B,\ l^{p}\mathrel{\|}4A^{3}+27B^{3}\\ &(A,B)\neq(0,0)\in\mathbb{Z}/q^{4}\times\mathbb{Z}/q^{6}\textrm{ for any prime }q\end{Bmatrix}.

We include both upper and lower bounds, however, we only apply upper bounds in our analysis. The following calculations have been done in the preprint [26, Lemma 4.1]. We clarify the arguments and include them here for completeness.

Lemma 4.10 (Sadek).

Let X>0X>0 and lil_{i} be the ii-th prime. Let k>0k>0 be the largest positive integer such that Lk=i=1kliX12L_{k}=\prod_{i=1}^{k}l_{i}\leq\sqrt[12]{X}. Then,

4lp(l1)2i=1k(li101)(X3lp+1Lk4Xlp+1Lk6X5/69l2p+2Lk10lk9)#lIp(X)\displaystyle 4l^{p}(l-1)^{2}\prod_{i=1}^{k}(l_{i}^{10}-1)\left(\left\lfloor\frac{\sqrt[3]{X}}{l^{p+1}L_{k}^{4}}\right\rfloor\left\lfloor\frac{\sqrt{X}}{l^{p+1}L_{k}^{6}}\right\rfloor-\frac{X^{5/6}}{9l^{2p+2}L_{k}^{10}l_{k}^{9}}\right)\leq\#\mathcal{E}_{l}^{I_{p}}(X)
4lp(l1)2i=1k(li101)(X3lp+1Lk4Xlp+1Lk6+X33lp+1Lk4lk3+X5lp+1Lk6lk5)\displaystyle\leq 4l^{p}(l-1)^{2}\prod_{i=1}^{k}(l_{i}^{10}-1)\left(\left\lfloor\frac{\sqrt[3]{X}}{l^{p+1}L_{k}^{4}}\right\rfloor\left\lfloor\frac{\sqrt{X}}{l^{p+1}L_{k}^{6}}\right\rfloor+\frac{\sqrt[3]{X}}{3l^{p+1}L_{k}^{4}l_{k}^{3}}+\frac{\sqrt{X}}{5l^{p+1}L_{k}^{6}l_{k}^{5}}\right) .
Proof.

To obtain the estimate on the size of the set lIp(X)\mathcal{E}_{l}^{I_{p}}(X), we use the description of the set in (4.6). Observe that lp+14A3+27B2l^{p+1}\nmid 4A^{3}+27B^{2}, hence the condition 4A3+27B204A^{3}+27B^{2}\neq 0 is inherent in the definition of lIp(X)\mathcal{E}_{l}^{I_{p}}(X).

Consider the congruence equation 4A3+27B20(modl)4A^{3}+27B^{2}\equiv 0\pmod{l}. It has l1l-1 non-singular solutions, which lift to lp1(l1)l^{p-1}(l-1) solutions modulo lpl^{p} (see for example [34, §3.4.1]). Note that the description of the set in (4.6) says that lAl\nmid A and lBl\nmid B; thereby allowing us to ignore the point (0,0)(0,0).

In view of (4.6), we are interested in solutions modulo lpl^{p} that fail to satisfy the congruence equation modulo lp+1l^{p+1}. Since the l1l-1 non-singular solutions lift to lp1(l1)l^{p-1}(l-1) solutions modulo lpl^{p} and lp(l1)l^{p}(l-1) solutions modulo lp+1l^{p+1}, it follows that the number of pairs (A,B)/lp+1×/lp+1(A,B)\in\mathbb{Z}/l^{p+1}\times\mathbb{Z}/l^{p+1} such that

  1. (1)

    (A,B)(0,0)modl(A,B)\not\equiv(0,0)\mod{l},

  2. (2)

    4A3+27B20modlp4A^{3}+27B^{2}\equiv 0\mod{l^{p}},

  3. (3)

    4A3+27B20modlp+14A^{3}+27B^{2}\not\equiv 0\mod{l^{p+1}},

is equal to

l2(lp1(l1))lp(l1)=lp(l1)2.l^{2}\cdot(l^{p-1}(l-1))-l^{p}(l-1)=l^{p}(l-1)^{2}.

Therefore, lIp(X)\mathcal{E}_{l}^{I_{p}}(X) has lp(l1)2l^{p}(l-1)^{2} pairs of residue classes in /lp+1×/lp+1\mathbb{Z}/l^{p+1}\times\mathbb{Z}/l^{p+1}. Next, we need to count the number of lifts of each such pair under the additional condition that (A,B)(0,0)/li4×/li6(A,B)\neq(0,0)\in\mathbb{Z}/l_{i}^{4}\times\mathbb{Z}/l_{i}^{6} for each prime lil_{i}. Note that the number of pairs (A,B)(A,B) satisfying this additional condition is (li101)(l_{i}^{10}-1).

It follows that the number of pairs (A,B)(A,B) in the box [X3,X3]×[X,X][-\sqrt[3]{X},\sqrt[3]{X}]\times[-\sqrt{X},\sqrt{X}] such that (A,B)(0,0)/lp+1×/lp+1(A,B)\neq(0,0)\in\mathbb{Z}/l^{p+1}\times\mathbb{Z}/l^{p+1}, (A,B)(0,0)/li4×/li6(A,B)\neq(0,0)\in\mathbb{Z}/l_{i}^{4}\times\mathbb{Z}/l_{i}^{6} and 4A3+27B20modlp4A^{3}+27B^{2}\equiv 0\mod l^{p} is

4lp(l1)2i=1k(li101)X3lp+1Lk4Xlp+1Lk6.4l^{p}(l-1)^{2}\prod_{i=1}^{k}\left(l_{i}^{10}-1\right)\left\lfloor\frac{\sqrt[3]{X}}{l^{p+1}L_{k}^{4}}\right\rfloor\left\lfloor\frac{\sqrt{X}}{l^{p+1}L_{k}^{6}}\right\rfloor.

Our estimate so far might include pairs (A,B)(A,B) such that it is (0,0)/q4×/q6(0,0)\in\mathbb{Z}/q^{4}\times\mathbb{Z}/q^{6} when lk<qX12l_{k}<q\leq\sqrt[12]{X}. So, we must exclude the integral pairs which reduce to (0,0)/q4×/q6(0,0)\in\mathbb{Z}/q^{4}\times\mathbb{Z}/q^{6} for lk<qX12l_{k}<q\leq\sqrt[12]{X}. Therefore, we need to remove

4lp(l1)2i=1k(li101)lk<qX12X3lp+1q4Lk4Xlp+1q6Lk64l^{p}(l-1)^{2}\prod_{i=1}^{k}\left(l_{i}^{10}-1\right)\sum_{l_{k}<q\leq\sqrt[12]{X}}\left\lfloor\frac{\sqrt[3]{X}}{l^{p+1}q^{4}L_{k}^{4}}\right\rfloor\left\lfloor\frac{\sqrt{X}}{l^{p+1}q^{6}L_{k}^{6}}\right\rfloor

many pairs from our count. Putting this together, we get

#lIp(X)\displaystyle\#\mathcal{E}_{l}^{I_{p}}(X) =4lp(l1)2i=1k(li101)X3lp+1Lk4Xlp+1Lk6\displaystyle=4l^{p}(l-1)^{2}\prod_{i=1}^{k}\left(l_{i}^{10}-1\right)\left\lfloor\frac{\sqrt[3]{X}}{l^{p+1}L_{k}^{4}}\right\rfloor\left\lfloor\frac{\sqrt{X}}{l^{p+1}L_{k}^{6}}\right\rfloor
4lp(l1)2i=1k(li101)lk<qX12X3lp+1q4Lk4Xlp+1q6Lk6.\displaystyle-4l^{p}(l-1)^{2}\prod_{i=1}^{k}\left(l_{i}^{10}-1\right)\sum_{l_{k}<q\leq\sqrt[12]{X}}\left\lfloor\frac{\sqrt[3]{X}}{l^{p+1}q^{4}L_{k}^{4}}\right\rfloor\left\lfloor\frac{\sqrt{X}}{l^{p+1}q^{6}L_{k}^{6}}\right\rfloor.

To obtain the expression as in the statement of the lemma, we will need to manipulate the following term

lk<qX12X3lp+1q4Lk4Xlp+1q6Lk6.\sum_{l_{k}<q\leq\sqrt[12]{X}}\left\lfloor\frac{\sqrt[3]{X}}{l^{p+1}q^{4}L_{k}^{4}}\right\rfloor\left\lfloor\frac{\sqrt{X}}{l^{p+1}q^{6}L_{k}^{6}}\right\rfloor.

First we consider its upper bound.

lk<qX12X3lp+1q4Lk4Xlp+1q6Lk6\displaystyle\sum_{l_{k}<q\leq\sqrt[12]{X}}\left\lfloor\frac{\sqrt[3]{X}}{l^{p+1}q^{4}L_{k}^{4}}\right\rfloor\left\lfloor\frac{\sqrt{X}}{l^{p+1}q^{6}L_{k}^{6}}\right\rfloor X5/6l2(p+1)Lk10lk<qX121/q10\displaystyle\leq\frac{X^{5/6}}{l^{2(p+1)}L_{k}^{10}}\sum_{l_{k}<q\leq\sqrt[12]{X}}1/q^{10}
X5/6l2(p+1)Lk10lk1/x10𝑑x\displaystyle\leq\frac{X^{5/6}}{l^{2(p+1)}L_{k}^{10}}\int_{l_{k}}^{\infty}1/x^{10}dx
X5/69l2(p+1)lk9Lk10.\displaystyle\leq\frac{X^{5/6}}{9l^{2(p+1)}l_{k}^{9}L_{k}^{10}}.

Now for the lower bound, observe that

lk<qX12X3lp+1q4Lk4Xlp+1q6Lk6\displaystyle\sum_{l_{k}<q\leq\sqrt[12]{X}}\left\lfloor\frac{\sqrt[3]{X}}{l^{p+1}q^{4}L_{k}^{4}}\right\rfloor\left\lfloor\frac{\sqrt{X}}{l^{p+1}q^{6}L_{k}^{6}}\right\rfloor lk<qX12(X3lp+1q4Lk41)(Xlp+1q6Lk61)\displaystyle\geq\sum_{l_{k}<q\leq\sqrt[12]{X}}\left(\frac{\sqrt[3]{X}}{l^{p+1}q^{4}L_{k}^{4}}-1\right)\left(\frac{\sqrt{X}}{l^{p+1}q^{6}L_{k}^{6}}-1\right)
X3lp+1Lk4lk<qX121/q4Xlp+1Lk6lk<qX121/q6\displaystyle\geq-\frac{\sqrt[3]{X}}{l^{p+1}L_{k}^{4}}\sum_{l_{k}<q\leq\sqrt[12]{X}}1/q^{4}-\frac{\sqrt{X}}{l^{p+1}L_{k}^{6}}\sum_{l_{k}<q\leq\sqrt[12]{X}}1/q^{6}
X33lp+1Lk4lk3X5lp+1Lk6lk5.\displaystyle\geq-\frac{\sqrt[3]{X}}{3l^{p+1}L_{k}^{4}l_{k}^{3}}-\frac{\sqrt{X}}{5l^{p+1}L_{k}^{6}l_{k}^{5}}.

The result is now immediate. ∎

The following result follows from the previous lemmas in this section.

Theorem 4.11.

With notation as above,

lim supX#lIp(X)#(X)\displaystyle\limsup_{X\rightarrow\infty}\frac{\#\mathcal{E}^{I_{p}}_{l}(X)}{\#\mathcal{E}(X)} (l1)2lp+2.\displaystyle\leq\frac{(l-1)^{2}}{l^{p+2}}.
Proof.

The result follows from using the upper bound of lIp(X)\mathcal{E}_{l}^{I_{p}}(X) and Lemma 4.9. ∎

Remark 4.12.

When the elliptic curves are ordered by conductor (rather than height), the same bounds have been obtained in [30, Theorem 1.6].

4.2. Average results on anomalous primes

We fix a prime p5p\geq 5. Let 𝒲\mathcal{W} consist of tuples (A,B)×(A,B)\in\mathbb{Z}\times\mathbb{Z}, where (A,B)(A,B) is identified with the (minimal) Weierstrass equation

y2=x3+Ax+B.y^{2}=x^{3}+Ax+B.

Denote by 𝒲(X)\mathcal{W}(X) the set of Weierstrass equations for which the height is X\leq X. Note that (X)\mathcal{E}(X) is a subset of 𝒲(X)\mathcal{W}(X) such that

(4.7) limX(X)𝒲(X)=1ζ(10)\lim_{X\rightarrow\infty}\frac{\mathcal{E}(X)}{\mathcal{W}(X)}=\frac{1}{\zeta(10)}

(see [7]). Thus 99.9%99.9\% of Weierstrass equations are globally minimal.

Let κ=(a,b)𝔽p×𝔽p\kappa=(a,b)\in\mathbb{F}_{p}\times\mathbb{F}_{p} with Δ(κ)0\Delta(\kappa)\neq 0. Let EκE_{\kappa} be the elliptic curve defined by the Weierstrass equation

Eκ:y2=x3+ax+b.E_{\kappa}\mathrel{\mathop{\ordinarycolon}}y^{2}=x^{3}+ax+b.

Note that κ\kappa is not uniquely determined by EκE_{\kappa}.

Lemma 4.13.

Let κ\kappa be a pair and 𝒲κ(X)𝒲(X)\mathcal{W}_{\kappa}(X)\subset\mathcal{W}(X) be the subset of Weierstrass equations y2=x3+Ax+By^{2}=x^{3}+Ax+B such that the pair (A,B)(A,B) reduces to κ\kappa. Then,

lim supX𝒲κ(X)(X)ζ(10)p2.\limsup_{X\rightarrow\infty}\frac{\mathcal{W}_{\kappa}(X)}{\mathcal{E}(X)}\leq\frac{\zeta(10)}{p^{2}}.
Proof.

Observe that 𝒲(0,0)\mathcal{W}_{(0,0)} is the lattice in ×\mathbb{Z}\times\mathbb{Z} with lattice basis (p,0)(p,0) and (0,p)(0,p). Since 𝒲κ\mathcal{W}_{\kappa} is simply a translation of 𝒲(0,0)\mathcal{W}_{(0,0)}, it follows that

limX𝒲κ(X)𝒲(X)=1p2.\lim_{X\rightarrow\infty}\frac{\mathcal{W}_{\kappa}(X)}{\mathcal{W}(X)}=\frac{1}{p^{2}}.

The result follows from (4.7)\eqref{99.9 are glob min}. ∎

Denote by 𝔖\mathfrak{S} the set of pairs κ=(a,b)𝔽p×𝔽p\kappa=(a,b)\in\mathbb{F}_{p}\times\mathbb{F}_{p} such that EκE_{\kappa} contains a point of order pp over 𝔽p\mathbb{F}_{p}. Recall that d(p):=#𝔖d(p)\mathrel{\mathop{\ordinarycolon}}=\#\mathfrak{S}. Let 𝒲(X)𝒲(X)\mathcal{W}^{\prime}(X)\subset\mathcal{W}(X) be the set of Weierstrass equations y2=x3+Ax+By^{2}=x^{3}+Ax+B which reduce to EκE_{\kappa} for some κ𝔖\kappa\in\mathfrak{S}.

Theorem 4.14.

We have that 𝔡p(3)ζ(10)d(p)p2\mathfrak{d}_{p}^{(3)}\leq\zeta(10)\cdot\frac{d(p)}{p^{2}}.

Proof.

It follows from Lemma 4.13 that

lim supX𝒲(X)(X)ζ(10)d(p)p2.\limsup_{X\rightarrow\infty}\frac{\mathcal{W}^{\prime}(X)}{\mathcal{E}(X)}\leq\zeta(10)\cdot\frac{d(p)}{p^{2}}.

Recall that 3(X)𝒲(X)\mathcal{E}_{3}(X)\subseteq\mathcal{W}^{\prime}(X). The result follows. ∎

Acknowledgments

DK thanks J. Balakrishnan, I. Varma, and N. Kaplan for helpful discussions. She acknowledges the support of the PIMS Postdoctoral Fellowship. AR is grateful to R. Sujatha for informing him of the compelling role of the generalized Euler characteristic in Iwasawa theory. We thank the referee for timely reading of the paper and expert suggestions.

References

  • [1] L. Babinkostova, J. C. Bahr, Y. H. Kim, E. Neyman, and G. K. Taylor. Anomalous primes and the elliptic Korselt criterion. J. Number Theory, 201:108–123, 2019.
  • [2] D. Bernardi and B. Perrin-Riou. pp-adic variant of the Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture (the supersingular case). Proceedings of the Académie des sciences. Séry 1, Mathématics, 317(3):227–232, 1993.
  • [3] A. Brumer. The average rank of elliptic curves I. Invent. Math., 109(1):445–472, 1992.
  • [4] J. Coates and G. McConnell. Iwasawa theory of modular elliptic curves of analytic rank at most 1. J. London Math. Soc., 50(2):243–264, 1994.
  • [5] J. Coates and R. Sujatha. Galois cohomology of elliptic curves. Narosa, 2000.
  • [6] J. Coates and R. Sujatha. Fine Selmer groups of elliptic curves over pp-adic Lie extensions. Math. Annalen, 331(4):809–839, 2005.
  • [7] J. Cremona and M. Sadek. Local and global densities for Weierstrass models of elliptic curves. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.08454, 2020.
  • [8] C. Delaunay. Heuristics on Tate-Shafarevitch groups of elliptic curves defined over \mathbb{Q}. Experimental Mathematics, 10(2):191–196, 2001.
  • [9] B. Du Kim. The plus/minus Selmer groups for supersingular primes. J. Australian Math. Soc., 95(2):189–200, 2013.
  • [10] D. Goldfeld. Conjectures on elliptic curves over quadratic fields. In Number Theory Carbondale 1979, pages 108–118. Springer, 1979.
  • [11] R. Greenberg. Arithmetic Theory of Elliptic Curves: Lectures given at the 3rd Session of the Centro Internazionale Matematico Estivo (CIME) held in Cetaro, Italy, July 12-19, 1997. Springer, 1999.
  • [12] S. Howson. Euler characteristics as invariants of Iwasawa modules. Proc. London Math. Soc., 85(3):634–658, 2002.
  • [13] K. Kato. pp-adic Hodge theory and values of zeta functions of modular forms. Astérisque, 295:117–290, 2004.
  • [14] N. M. Katz and P. Sarnak. Random matrices, Frobenius eigenvalues, and monodromy, volume 45. American Mathematical Soc., 1999.
  • [15] S. Kobayashi. Iwasawa theory for elliptic curves at supersingular primes. Invent. Math., 152(1):1–36, 2003.
  • [16] V. A. Kolyvagin. Finiteness of and for a subclass of Weil curves. Mathematics of the USSR-Izvestiya, 32(3):523, 1989.
  • [17] A. Lei and R. Sujatha. On Selmer groups in the supersingular reduction case. Tokyo Journal of Mathematics, 43(2):455–479, 2020.
  • [18] B. Mazur. Rational points of abelian varieties with values in towers of number fields. Invent. Math., 18(3-4):183–266, 1972.
  • [19] J. Neukirch, A. Schmidt, and K. Wingberg. Cohomology of number fields, volume 323. Springer, 2013.
  • [20] L. D. Olson. Hasse invariants and anomalous primes for elliptic curves with complex multiplication. J. Number Theory, 8(4):397–414, 1976.
  • [21] B. Perrin-Riou. Fonctions L{L}, pp-adiques d’une courbe elliptique et points rationnels. In Annales de l’institut Fourier, volume 43, pages 945–995, 1993.
  • [22] B. Perrin-Riou. Théorie d’Iwasawa des représentations pp-adiques sur un corps local. Invent. Math., 115(1):81–149, 1994.
  • [23] H. Qin. Anomalous primes of the elliptic curve ED:y2=x3+D{E_{D}}\mathrel{\mathop{\ordinarycolon}}y^{2}=x^{3}+{D}. Proc. London Math. Soc., 112(2):415–453, 03 2016.
  • [24] A. Ray and R. Sujatha. Euler characteristics and their congruences for multi-signed Selmer groups. arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.05387, 2020.
  • [25] P. C. Ridgdill. On the frequency of finitely anomalous elliptic curves. PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts Amherst, 2010.
  • [26] M. Sadek. Counting elliptic curves with bad reduction over a prescribed set of primes. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.02056, 2017.
  • [27] P. Schneider. p-adic height pairings I. Invent. Math., 69(3):401–409, 1982.
  • [28] P. Schneider. p-adic height pairings II. Invent. Math., 79(2):329–374, 1985.
  • [29] R. Schoof. Nonsingular plane cubic curves over finite fields. Journal of combinatorial theory, Series A, 46(2):183–211, 1987.
  • [30] A. N. Shankar, A. Shankar, and X. Wang. Families of elliptic curves ordered by conductor. Compos. Math., to appear.
  • [31] J. H. Silverman. The arithmetic of elliptic curves, volume 106. Springer, 2009.
  • [32] F. Sprung. A formulation of pp-adic versions of the Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer conjectures in the supersingular case. Research in Number Theory, 1(1):1–13, 2015.
  • [33] X. Wan. Iwasawa main conjecture for supersingular elliptic curves and BSD conjecture. arXiv preprint arXiv:1411.6352, 2014.
  • [34] M. Watkins. Some heuristics about elliptic curves. Experimental Mathematics, 17(1):105–125, 2008.
  • [35] C. Wuthrich. The fine Selmer group and height pairings. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, 2004.
  • [36] C. Wuthrich. On pp-adic heights in families of elliptic curves. J. London Math. Soc., 70(1):23–40, 2004.
  • [37] S. L. Zerbes. Generalised Euler characteristics of Selmer groups. Proc. London Math. Soc., 98(3):775–796, 2009.