This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Stable and oscillating solitons of 𝒫𝒯\mathcal{PT}-symmetric couplers with gain and loss in fractional dimension

Liangwei Zeng College of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Micro-Nano Photonic Information Technology, College of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China    Jincheng Shi State Key Laboratory of Transient Optics and Photonics, Xi’an Institute of Optics and Precision Mechanics of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi’an 710119, China    Xiaowei Lu [email protected] College of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Micro-Nano Photonic Information Technology, College of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China    Yi Cai College of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Micro-Nano Photonic Information Technology, College of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China    Qifan Zhu College of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Micro-Nano Photonic Information Technology, College of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China    Hongyi Chen College of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Micro-Nano Photonic Information Technology, College of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China    Hu Long College of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Micro-Nano Photonic Information Technology, College of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China    Jingzhen Li [email protected] College of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Micro-Nano Photonic Information Technology, College of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China
Abstract

Families of coupled solitons of 𝒫𝒯\mathcal{PT}-symmetric physical models with gain and loss in fractional dimension and in settings with and without cross-interactions modulation (CIM), are reported. Profiles, powers, stability areas, and propagation dynamics of the obtained 𝒫𝒯\mathcal{PT}-symmetric coupled solitons are investigated. By comparing the results of the models with and without CIM, we find that the stability area of the model with CIM is much broader than the one without CIM. Remarkably, oscillating 𝒫𝒯\mathcal{PT}-symmetric coupled solitons can also exist in the model of CIM with the same coefficients of the self- and cross-interactions modulations. In addition, the period of these oscillating coupled solitons can be controlled by the linear coupling coefficient.

Fractional calculus and 𝒫𝒯\mathcal{PT}-symmetry and Nonlinear Schrödinger equation and Coupled solitons

I Introduction

The nonlinear Schrödinger equation (NLSE) NLSE1 ; NLSE2 ; NLSE3 ; NLSE4 ; NLSE5 ; NLSE6 ; NLSE7 ; NLSE8 ; NLSE8b ; NLSE8c , which can be used to describe the dynamics of optical solitons in laser beam or matter-wave solitons in Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC), has drawn more and more attention in recent decades. It is also widely used in quantum mechanics NLSE9 , hydrodynamics NLSE10 , nonlinear optics NLSE3 ; NLSE7 , BEC NLSE3 ; NLSE7 as well as superconductivity NLSE11 . Note that it is easy to stabilize a one-dimensional soliton, since it is now widely known that the bright soliton is the exact solution of one-dimensional NLSE with uniform cubic self-focusing nonlinearity. However, the collapse will happen in two-dimensional NLSE with uniform cubic self-focusing nonlinearity COLLAPSE . A popular way to avoid such collapse is the introduction of the linear potentials LP1 ; LP2 ; LP3 , which can stabilize various kinds of solitons in all dimensions. Another way to create stable solitons in high dimensions is the introduction of nonlinearities, such as the employment of periodically modulated nonlinearities NLSE3 ; MN1 ; MN2 or spatially inhomogeneous defocusing nonlinearities DEF1 ; DEF2 ; DEF3 ; DEF4 ; DEF5 .

It is worth to mention that single NLSE can only describe the propagation of an optical soliton in a laser beam or the evolution of a matter-wave soliton in a BEC. As for the settings of two (or more) laser beams or BECs, the models of coupled NLSEs CNLSE1 ; CNLSE2 ; CNLSE3 ; CNLSE4 ; CNLSE5 ; CNLSE6 ; CNLSE7 have to be considered due to the coupled interactions of the laser beams or BECs. These models are widely studied in optical couplers, especially in the fields of optical fiber CNLSE8 ; CNLSE9 and waveguide CNLSE10 in recent years. Further, the models of couplers with parity-time- (𝒫𝒯\mathcal{PT}-) symmetry have drawn more and more attention, since Bender demonstrated that non-Hermitian Hamiltonians with 𝒫𝒯\mathcal{PT}-symmetry can have real spectra PT0 , which is an important extension of standard quantum mechanics. These physical models with 𝒫𝒯\mathcal{PT}-symmetry exhibit some novel physical properties due to their non-Hermitian Hamiltonians PT1 ; PT2 and various physical settings with 𝒫𝒯\mathcal{PT}-symmetry have been widely investigated during the past decade PT3 ; PT4 ; PT5 ; PT6 ; PT7 ; PT8 ; PT9 .

The fractional derivative Frac , firstly introduced by Laskin, is another great extension of the standard quantum mechanics Lask1 ; Lask2 ; Lask3 . Under such condition, the quantum mechanics becomes the fractional quantum mechanics, and the NLSE becomes the nonlinear fractional Schrödinger equation (NLFSE). Followed by the above landmark study of Laskin in the NLSE, various studies have been reported in recent years Frac00 ; Frac0 ; Frac1 ; Frac2 ; Frac3 ; Frac4 ; Frac5 ; Frac6 ; Frac7 ; Frac8 ; Frac9 ; Frac10 ; Frac11 ; Frac12 ; Frac13 ; Frac14 ; Frac15 ; Frac15b ; Frac16 ; Frac17 ; Frac18 ; Frac19 ; Frac19b ; Frac19c ; Frac20 ; Frac21 ; Frac22 ; Frac23 ; Frac24 ; Frac25 ; Frac26 ; Frac27 ; Frac28 , including the propagation of light beams Frac1 ; Frac2 , accessible solitons Frac5 ; Frac6 , gap solitons Frac7 ; Frac16 , vortex solitons Frac18 ; Frac19c ; Frac27 , solitons in nonlinear lattices Frac14 , and soliton clusters Frac19 ; Frac19b .

Despite so many researches that have been reported in the NLFSE, the coupled 𝒫𝒯\mathcal{PT}-symmetric NLFSEs with gain and loss, which can be used to describe the propagations of binary 𝒫𝒯\mathcal{PT}-symmetric laser beams or BECs with coupled interactions, have not been yet reported, to the best of our knowledge. This coupled model can be employed to study the optical waveguides and fiber couplers, which have great potential in optical communications. The objective of this work is to extend the NLFSE to its coupled form with 𝒫𝒯\mathcal{PT}-symmetry, from which we can explore the existence, stability and other properties of optical and matter-wave solitons in this model under fractional-order diffraction.

This paper is organized as follows. In Sec. II, we introduce the theoretical model and report some typical analytical solutions for coupled solitons. Sec. III, which presents numerical results for 𝒫𝒯\mathcal{PT}-symmetric coupled solitons, is divided into two parts. The numerical results for the model without cross-interactions modulations are given in Sec. III.1, and the corresponding numerical results for the model with cross-interactions modulations are reported in Sec. III.2. We find that the field profiles and stability domains of coupled solitons are strongly affected by the linear coupling coefficient, the fractional-order diffraction described by the Lévy index α\alpha, the propagation constant, and the cross-interactions modulation. It should be mentioned that these coupled solitons can exist only when the gain/loss parameter (γ\gamma) is less than the linear coupling coefficient (κ\kappa). Finally, the paper is summarized in Sec. IV.

II Theoretical model

The propagations of laser beams in 𝒫𝒯\mathcal{PT}-symmetric couplers with gain and loss under fractional-order diffraction can be described by the dimensionless coupled NLFSEs

{iU1z=12(2x2)α/2U1g|U1|2U1ϵ|U2|2U1κU2+iγU1,iU2z=12(2x2)α/2U2g|U2|2U2ϵ|U1|2U2κU1iγU2.\left\{\begin{aligned} i\frac{\partial U_{1}}{\partial z}=&\frac{1}{2}\left(-\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial x^{2}}\right)^{\alpha/2}U_{1}-\mathrm{g}\left|U_{1}\right|^{2}U_{1}-\epsilon\left|U_{2}\right|^{2}U_{1}\\ &-\kappa U_{2}+i\gamma U_{1},\\ i\frac{\partial U_{2}}{\partial z}=&\frac{1}{2}\left(-\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial x^{2}}\right)^{\alpha/2}U_{2}-\mathrm{g}\left|U_{2}\right|^{2}U_{2}-\epsilon\left|U_{1}\right|^{2}U_{2}\\ &-\kappa U_{1}-i\gamma U_{2}.\end{aligned}\right. (1)

Here U1,2U_{1,2} and zz represent the field amplitudes and propagation distance, respectively, g>0\mathrm{g}>0 and ϵ>0\epsilon>0 represent the coefficients of attractive self- and cross-interactions modulations of the components, respectively. Note that g<0\mathrm{g}<0 and ϵ<0\epsilon<0 denote the coefficients of repulsive self- and cross-interactions modulations of the components that can be used to generate dark solitons DARK . In this article, we focus on the formation of bright solitons, hence the case when g<0\mathrm{g}<0 and ϵ<0\epsilon<0 is not discussed here. The parameter κ>0\kappa>0 denotes the linear coupling coefficient, and γ>0\gamma>0, that is the coefficient of gain and loss, stands for the gain in one component and the loss in the other one. Note that (2/x2)α/2(-\partial^{2}/\partial x^{2})^{\alpha/2} denotes the fractional derivative, where α\alpha (1<α21<\alpha\leq 2) stands for the Lévy index. The definition of fractional derivative is as follows Lask1 ; Lask2 ; Lask3

(2x2)α/2U=12π+|s|α𝑑s×+𝑑ζexp[ip(xζ)]U(ζ).\begin{split}\left(-\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial x^{2}}\right)^{\alpha/2}U=&\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}|s|^{\alpha}ds\\ \times&\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}d\zeta\exp\left[ip\left(x-\zeta\right)\right]U(\zeta).\end{split} (2)

In particular, Eqs. (1) will degenerate to the generic 𝒫𝒯\mathcal{PT}-symmetric coupled nonlinear Schrödinger equations when α=2\alpha=2. As for BECs, U1,2U_{1,2} and zz should be replaced by the wave functions ϕ1,2\phi_{1,2} and time tt.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: Profiles of solitons (shown for components of U1U_{1}): (a) with different values of α\alpha at κ=0.8\kappa=0.8, γ=0.001\gamma=0.001, b=1.2b=1.2; (b) with different values of bb at α=1.8\alpha=1.8, κ=0.8\kappa=0.8, γ=0.001\gamma=0.001; (c) with different values of κ\kappa at α=1.8\alpha=1.8, γ=0.001\gamma=0.001, b=1b=1; (d) with different values of γ\gamma at α=1.8\alpha=1.8, κ=1\kappa=1, b=1.5b=1.5. The profiles of |U2||U_{2}| are similar to |U1||U_{1}|. ϵ=0\epsilon=0 are used in Figs. 1\sim3. g=1\mathrm{g}=1 are used throughout this paper.

With the real propagation constant bb (bb should be replaced by chemical potential μ-\mu in BECs), the stationary solutions of these 𝒫𝒯\mathcal{PT}-symmetric coupled solitons with gain and loss can be found by generic forms

{U1(x,z)=U(x)exp(ibziδ/2),U2(x,z)=U(x)exp(ibz+iδ/2).\left\{\begin{aligned} U_{1}(x,z)=U(x){\rm exp}(ibz-i\delta/2),\\ U_{2}(x,z)=U(x){\rm exp}(ibz+i\delta/2).\end{aligned}\right. (3)

Here δ\delta denotes the constant phase shift between the components, which is given by

δ=arcsin(γ/κ).\delta={\rm arcsin}(\gamma/\kappa). (4)

As is seen from Eqs. (3) and (4), the difference between the two components U1,2U_{1,2}, which is caused by their parameter of gain-loss, is their imaginary part exp(±iδ/2){\rm exp}(\pm i\delta/2). Due to their opposite parameter of gain-loss, these two components will have the opposite transition of energy in their propagations, which can be referred to the following Figs. 3, 6, 7, 8 and 9.

Here the real function U(x)U(x) satisfies the generic stationary NLFSE with a varying value of the propagation constant bb

(bκs)U=12(2x2)α/2UgU3ϵU3,-(b-\kappa_{s})U=\frac{1}{2}\left(-\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial x^{2}}\right)^{\alpha/2}U-\mathrm{g}U^{3}-\epsilon U^{3}, (5)
κs=κ2γ2.\kappa_{s}=\sqrt{\kappa^{2}-\gamma^{2}}. (6)

According to Eq. (6), it is easy to see that these coupled solitons can exist only when

γγmax=κ.\gamma\leq\gamma_{max}=\kappa. (7)

From Eq. (7), the largest value of the gain-loss coefficient in these 𝒫𝒯\mathcal{PT}-symmetric couplers is limited to the value of the linear coupling coefficient κ\kappa.

Refer to caption
Figure 2: (a) Soliton power PP versus α\alpha at κ=0.8\kappa=0.8, γ=0.001\gamma=0.001, b=1.2b=1.2. (b) PP versus bb at α=1.8\alpha=1.8, κ=0.8\kappa=0.8, γ=0.001\gamma=0.001. (c) PP versus κ\kappa at α=1.8\alpha=1.8, γ=0.001\gamma=0.001, b=1b=1. (d) Stability (white) and instability (gray) domains for the coupled solitons with κ=0.8\kappa=0.8, γ=0.001\gamma=0.001 in the (b,αb,\alpha) plane. The propagations of the solitons corresponding to the points marked by A1 and A2 are shown in Figs. 3(a,b) and 3(c,d), respectively.
Refer to caption
Figure 3: Propagations of coupled solitons with different values of bb at α=1.8\alpha=1.8, κ=0.8\kappa=0.8, γ=0.001\gamma=0.001: (a,b) with b=1b=1; (c,d) with b=1.35b=1.35. The left / right column displays the U1U_{1} / U2U_{2} component.

Particularly, analytical solution of Eq. (5) can be solved when α=2\alpha=2, which is given by

U=2(bκs)/(g+ϵ)sech(2(bκs)x),U=\sqrt{2(b-\kappa_{s})/(\mathrm{g}+\epsilon)}{\rm sech}\left(\sqrt{2(b-\kappa_{s})}x\right), (8)

where κs\kappa_{s} is defined by Eq. (6).

The soliton power PP of U1,2U_{1,2} is defined by P1=|U1|2𝑑xP_{1}=\int\left|U_{1}\right|^{2}dx, P2=|U2|2𝑑xP_{2}=\int\left|U_{2}\right|^{2}dx. In this paper, the modified squared-operator method MSOM and split-step Fourier method are employed to solve the stationary solutions for Eq. (5) and numerical simulations for Eqs. (1) respectively.

III Numerical results

In this section, we focus on presenting our numerical results of 𝒫𝒯\mathcal{PT}-symmetric coupled solitons with gain and loss under different parameters in the models of Eqs. (1) and Eq. (5), inlcuding the 𝒫𝒯\mathcal{PT}-symmetric coupled solitons with different linear coupling coefficients, fractional-order diffractions, propagation constants and cross-interactions modulations. Particularly, we find that the cross-interactions modulation can greatly affect these coupled solitons. Thus we divide our numerical results into two parts, namely the coupled solitons without/with cross-interactions modulations which can be referred to Sec. III.1 and Sec. III.2, respectively.

III.1 Coupled solitons without cross-interactions modulation

Refer to caption
Figure 4: Profiles of solitons (shown for components of U1U_{1}): (a) with different values of α\alpha at κ=0.8\kappa=0.8, ϵ=0.5\epsilon=0.5, γ=0.001\gamma=0.001, b=2b=2; (b) with different values of bb at α=1.7\alpha=1.7, κ=0.8\kappa=0.8, ϵ=0.5\epsilon=0.5, γ=0.001\gamma=0.001; (c) with different values of κ\kappa at α=1.7\alpha=1.7, ϵ=0.5\epsilon=0.5, γ=0.001\gamma=0.001, b=2b=2; (d) with different values of ϵ\epsilon at α=1.7\alpha=1.7, κ=0.8\kappa=0.8, γ=0.001\gamma=0.001, b=2b=2. The profiles of |U2||U_{2}| are similar to |U1||U_{1}|.
Refer to caption
Figure 5: (a) PP versus α\alpha at κ=0.8\kappa=0.8, ϵ=0.5\epsilon=0.5, γ=0.001\gamma=0.001, b=2b=2. (b) PP versus bb at α=1.7\alpha=1.7, κ=0.8\kappa=0.8, ϵ=0.5\epsilon=0.5, γ=0.001\gamma=0.001. (c) Stability (white) and instability (gray) domains for the coupled solitons with α=1.7\alpha=1.7, γ=0.001\gamma=0.001, b=1.5b=1.5 in the (ϵ,κ\epsilon,\kappa) plane. The propagations of the solitons corresponding to the points marked by B1 and B2 are shown in Figs. 6(a,b) and 6(c,d), respectively. (d) Stability (white) and instability (gray) domains for the coupled solitons with κ=0.8\kappa=0.8, ϵ=0.5\epsilon=0.5, γ=0.001\gamma=0.001 in the (b,αb,\alpha) plane. The propagations of the solitons corresponding to the points marked by C1 and C2 are displayed in Figs. 7(a,b) and 7(c,d), respectively.

The 𝒫𝒯\mathcal{PT}-symmetric physical model without cross-interactions modulation means that the coefficient ϵ=0\epsilon=0, which is a simple model but a nontrivial one. We now display the relevant numerical results in this setting. Note that the numerical results under this setting are shown in Figs. 1\sim3. According to Eq. (6), it is not difficult to find that these real 𝒫𝒯\mathcal{PT}-symmetric coupled solutions can only be supported under the condition of γκ\gamma\leq\kappa. For simplicity, note also that we use g=1\mathrm{g}=1 throughout this article. Profiles of the 𝒫𝒯\mathcal{PT}-symmetric coupled solitons with different values of the Lévy index α\alpha, different propagation constants bb, different linear coupling coefficients κ\kappa, and different values of the gain and loss parameter γ\gamma are shown in Figs. 1(a\simd), respectively. According to Eqs. (3), we see that the stationary solutions of solitons U1(x)U_{1}(x) and U2(x)U_{2}(x) have the same real part U(x)U(x) and conjugate imaginary parts exp(±iδ/2){\rm exp}(\pm i\delta/2), that is, U1(x)=U(x)exp(iδ/2)U_{1}(x)=U(x){\rm exp}(-i\delta/2), U2(x)=U(x)exp(iδ/2)U_{2}(x)=U(x){\rm exp}(i\delta/2). Note also that the propagation constant bb will disappear in the expressions of the stationary solutions of solitons U1(x)U_{1}(x) and U2(x)U_{2}(x) after we submit Eqs. (3) into Eqs. (1). According to the above expressions of U1(x)U_{1}(x) and U2(x)U_{2}(x), the profiles of the modulus |U2||U_{2}| are similar to those of the modulus |U1||U_{1}|, thus we display here only the profiles of |U1||U_{1}|. From Fig. 1(a), the amplitude of coupled solitons decreases and the width increases when α\alpha increases. According to Fig. 1(b), the amplitude of coupled solitons increases and the width decreases when bb increases. Note also that the amplitude of coupled solitons decreases and the width increases when κ\kappa increases, as presented in Fig. 1(c), similar to the situation in Fig. 1(a). In Fig. 1(d), the amplitude of coupled solitons increases with the increase of γ\gamma and the width of solitons decreases with the increase of γ\gamma.

We now focus on the soliton power of the obtained families of coupled solitons, including the relationships of the soliton power PP versus the Lévy index α\alpha, PP versus the propagation constant bb, and PP versus the linear coupling coefficient κ\kappa. We point out that the dependences of the soliton power of the |U2||U_{2}| component on the parameters of the model are similar to those of the |U1||U_{1}| component. Fig. 2(a) shows that the soliton power P1P_{1} increases with the increase of α\alpha, and the increasing speed gradually decreases. According to Fig. 2(b), the soliton power increases when bb increases, which shows that the relationship between soliton power and propagation constant satisfies the Vakhitov-Kolokolov (VK) stability criterion P/b>0\partial P/\partial b>0, which is a necessary but not sufficient condition for stable soliton solutions VK . The soliton power decreases with the increase of κ\kappa, as presented in Fig. 2(c). The stable and unstable domains of these 𝒫𝒯\mathcal{PT}-symmetric coupled solitons are very important, here, Fig. 2(d) displays the stability (white) and instability (gray) domains for the obtained coupled solitons in the (b,αb,\alpha) plane. From Fig. 2(d), we can find that the coupled solitons can be stable only when the Lévy index α1.2\alpha\geq 1.2. The propagation dynamics of the coupled solitons marked by the points A1 and A2 are presented in Figs. 3(a,b) and 3(c,d), respectively. The coupled solitons marked by the point A1 are stable, and both components of the coupled solitons are keeeping their amplitudes and shapes even after a long propagation distance (propagation distance z=1000z=1000), as displayed in Figs. 3(a,b). On the other hand, the coupled solitons marked by the point A2 are unstable, and both components of the coupled solitons are greately distorted after some propagation distance, as presented in Figs. 3(c,d).

Refer to caption
Figure 6: Propagations of coupled solitons with different values of κ\kappa at α=1.7\alpha=1.7, ϵ=0.7\epsilon=0.7, γ=0.001\gamma=0.001, b=1.5b=1.5: (a,b) with κ=0.8\kappa=0.8; (c,d) with κ=0.2\kappa=0.2. The left / right column displays the U1U_{1} / U2U_{2} component.

III.2 Coupled solitons with cross-interactions modulation

In this subsection, we focus on coupled solitons with cross-interactions modulation, that is, when ϵ>0\epsilon>0). It should be mentioned that the numerical results under this setting are displayed in Figs. 4\sim9. Fig. 4 shows the profiles of 𝒫𝒯\mathcal{PT}-symmetric coupled solitons with different parameters, including the solitons with different Lévy indices α\alpha, different propagation constants bb, different linear coupling coefficients κ\kappa, and different cross-interactions modulations ϵ\epsilon. The profiles of |U2||U_{2}| are similar to |U1||U_{1}|, therefore, we only display the profiles of |U1||U_{1}| in this subsection.

The amplitude of coupled solitons decreases and the width of increases when α\alpha increases, as shown in Fig. 4(a). In Fig. 4(b), the amplitude of coupled solitons increases while the width decreases with the increase of bb. According to Fig. 4(c), the amplitude of coupled solitons decreases and the width increases when κ\kappa increases. From Fig. 4(d), the amplitude and width of coupled solitons increase when ϵ\epsilon increases. Obviously, the results shown in Figs. 4(a\simc) are similar to their counterparts shown in Figs. 1(a\simc) (without cross-interactions modulation).

Fig. 5 displays the soliton power and relevant stability area of these 𝒫𝒯\mathcal{PT}-symmetric coupled solitons with cross-interactions modulation. Here, the soliton power of |U2||U_{2}| is similar to that of |U1||U_{1}|. Fig. 5(a) demonstrates that the soliton power P1P_{1} increases with the increase of α\alpha, and the growth speed gradually diminishes. From Fig. 5(b), the soliton power increases when bb increases, which demonstrates that the relationship between soliton power and propagation constant for the obtained coupled solitons also satisfies the VK stability criterion. The stable and unstable domains of the coupled solitons with cross-interactions modulation are also very important. Here, Figs. 5(c,d) show the stability (white) and instability (gray) domains for the coupled solitons in the (ϵ,κ\epsilon,\kappa) and (b,αb,\alpha) planes, respectively. According to Fig. 5(c), the coupled solitons can be stable only when κ\kappa is above a certain threshold, which is about 0.55 in this case. Fig. 5(d) demonstrates that these coupled solitons can be stable only when α1.2\alpha\geq 1.2. Further, by comparing the results of Fig. 5(d) and Fig. 2(d), we can clearly see that the stable domain of Fig. 5(d) is much broader than the one in Fig. 2(d). Note that other parameters in Fig. 5(d) and Fig. 2(d) are the same except for cross-interactions modulation ϵ\epsilon, therefore, we can draw a conclusion that ϵ\epsilon can greatly affect the stability and instability domains.

The propagation dynamics of the coupled solitons marked by the points (B1,B2) [in Fig. 5(c)] and (C1,C2) [in Fig. 5(d)] are presented in Figs. 6 and 7, respectively. The coupled solitons marked by the points B1 and C1 are stable, and both components of these coupled solitons are keeping their amplitudes and shapes even after long-distance propagations (after a propagation distance z=1000z=1000), as displayed in Figs. 6(a,b) and 7(a,b). On the other hand, the coupled solitons marked by the points B2 and C2 are unstable, and both components of these coupled solitons are greately distorted even after short-distance propagations, as presented in Figs. 6(c,d) and 7(c,d).

Refer to caption
Figure 7: Propagations of coupled solitons with different values of bb at α=1.6\alpha=1.6, κ=0.8\kappa=0.8, ϵ=0.5\epsilon=0.5, γ=0.001\gamma=0.001: (a,b) with b=1.5b=1.5; (c,d) with b=2.4b=2.4. The left / right column displays the U1U_{1} / U2U_{2} component.
Refer to caption
Figure 8: Stable propagations of oscillating solitons at α=1.8\alpha=1.8, ϵ=1\epsilon=1, b=2b=2: (a,b) with κ=0.02\kappa=0.02, γ=0.01\gamma=0.01; (c,d) with κ=0.04\kappa=0.04, γ=0.01\gamma=0.01; (e,f) with κ=0.04\kappa=0.04, γ=0.038\gamma=0.038. The left / right column displays the U1U_{1} / U2U_{2} component. Note that the oscillating period can be controlled only by varying the value of κ\kappa. The soliton power PP versus propagation distant zz for panels (a)\sim(c) are displayed in Figs. 9(a)\sim9(c), respectively.
Refer to caption
Figure 9: Soliton power PP versus zz for the propagation displayed in Figs. 8(a)\sim8(c). The yellow and blue lines stand for P1P_{1} and P2P_{2}, respectively. Note that the parameter γ\gamma can not affect the oscillating period T{\rm T}, while it can affect the convergence speed to the equilibrium state.

Next we turn to investigate the formation and propagation properties of the oscillating 𝒫𝒯\mathcal{PT}-symmetric coupled solitons in the model of cross-interactions modulation. It was mentioned before that g=1\mathrm{g}=1 is used throughout this paper; here we find that the unstable coupled solitons become oscillating coupled solitons when ϵ=1\epsilon=1. Some examples of the oscillating coupled solitons are displayed in Fig. 8, which shows the propagation dynamics of U1U_{1} in the left column and the corresponding propagation dynamics of U2U_{2} in the right column. Figs. 8(a,b) display the propagation dynamics of the oscillating coupled solitons with a long oscillating period, and Figs. 8(c\simf) present the propagation dynamics of the oscillating coupled solitons with a short oscillating period. According to Figs. 8(a,b), we see that when the amplitude of one component decreases, the amplitude of the other component would increase at the same time, which is related to the coefficient of gain and loss γ\gamma.

To further study the properties of these interesting oscillating 𝒫𝒯\mathcal{PT}-symmetric coupled solitons, we draw the relationships between their soliton power PP and propagation distance zz in Fig. 9 (whose propagation dynamics are presented in Fig. 8). In Fig. 9, the yellow and blue lines stand for P1 and P2, respectively. By comparing the results in Figs. 9(a,b), we can see that the oscillating period depends on the linear coupling coefficient κ\kappa, and it decreases when κ\kappa increases. In addition, we point out that the convergence speed of transforming the coupled solitons into oscillating coupled solitons is strongly related to the specific value of the gain/loss parameter γ\gamma. That is to say, the larger γ\gamma is, the faster the coupled solitons transform into the oscillating coupled solitons. It should be emphasized that we have verified the above conclusions by using different sets of parameters. Furthermore, we find that these oscillating 𝒫𝒯\mathcal{PT}-symmetric coupled solitons can be supported under the condition of g=ϵ>0\mathrm{g}=\epsilon>0, which is not limited to g=ϵ=1\mathrm{g}=\epsilon=1.

IV Conclusion

In this paper, we have investigated the existence and propagation dynamics of the families of coupled solitons in 𝒫𝒯\mathcal{PT}-symmetric physical models with gain and loss in fractional dimension, including the coupled models with and without cross-interactions modulation. The profiles, powers, stability domains, and propagation properties of these 𝒫𝒯\mathcal{PT}-symmetric coupled solitons are studied in both physical settings. According to our study, the profiles of such 𝒫𝒯\mathcal{PT}-symmetric coupled solitons are sensitive to the values of propagation constant, and the stable coupled solitons can only exist under the condition that the Lévy index is greater than a critical value. In addition, the obtained results reveal that the cross-interactions modulation can greatly affect the stability and instability domains of the coupled solitons. In other words, the stability area of the model with cross-interactions modulation is much broader than the one without cross-interactions modulation. Further, we have also studied the oscillating 𝒫𝒯\mathcal{PT}-symmetric coupled solitons that can be supported when the coefficients of the self- and cross-interactions modulations are the same. Besides, the oscillating period of these coupled solitons can be controlled by varying the value of the linear coupling coefficient, and the convergence speed of coupled solitons that are transforming into oscillating coupled solitons is only related to the value of the gain/loss parameter.

The physical model studied in this work can be extended to the (2+1)-dimensional setting, which is an interesting but a quite difficult problem due to the presence of the critical collapse COLLAPSE . Also, the introduction of linear periodic potentials into the physical model is another interesting issue to be investigated, because the coupled gap solitons CGS can form in that setting.

Acknowledgment

We thank Dumitru Mihalache and Jiawei Li for their help on improving the writing of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by National Major Instruments and Equipment Development Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 61827815), by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 62075138), and by Science and Technology Project of Shenzhen (Nos. JCYJ20190808121817100, JCYJ20190808164007485).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  • (1) Hasegawa, A., Kodama, Y.: Solitons in Optical Communications. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1995)
  • (2) Serkin, V.N., Hasegawa, A.: Novel Soliton Solutions of the Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation Model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4502-4505 (2000)
  • (3) Kartashov, Y.V., Malomed, B.A. Torner, L.: Solitons in nonlinear lattices. Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 247-305 (2011)
  • (4) Wang, L., Porsezian, K., He, J.: Breather and rogue wave solutions of a generalized nonlinear Schrödinger equation. Phys. Rev. E 87, 053202 (2013)
  • (5) Chiu, T.L., Liu, T.Y., Chan, H.N., Chow, K.W.: The dynamics and evolution of poles and rogue waves for nonlinear Schrödinger equations. Commun. Theor. Phys. 68, 290-294 (2017)
  • (6) Zeng, L., Zeng, J.: Gap-type dark localized modes in a Bose-Einstein condensate with optical lattices. Adv. Photonics 1, 046004 (2019)
  • (7) Kartashov, Y.V., Astrakharchik, G.E., Malomed, B.A., Torner, L.: Frontiers in multidimensional self-trapping of nonlinear fields and matter. Nat. Rev. Phys. 1, 185-197 (2019)
  • (8) Rao, J., He, J., Kanna, T., Mihalache, D.: Nonlocal M-component nonlinear Schrödinger equations: Bright solitons, energy-sharing collisions, and positons. Phys. Rev. E 102, 032201 (2020)
  • (9) Wang, Q., Deng, Z.Z.: Controllable propagation path of imaginary value off-axis vortex soliton in nonlocal nonlinear media. Nonlinear Dyn. 100, 1589-1598 (2020)
  • (10) Wang Q., Yang, J., Liang, G.: Controllable soliton transition and interaction in nonlocal nonlinear media. Nonlinear Dyn. 101, 1169-1179 (2020)
  • (11) Mohebbi, A., Abbaszadeh, M., Dehghan, M.: The use of a meshless technique based on collocation and radial basis functions for solving the time fractional nonlinear Schrödinger equation arising in quantum mechanics. Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem. 37, 475-485 (2013)
  • (12) Chan, H.N., Chow, K.W., Kedziora, D.J., Grimshaw, R. H. J., Ding E.: Rogue wave modes for a derivative nonlinear Schrödinger model. Phys. Rev. E 89, 032914 (2014)
  • (13) Ao, P., Thouless, D.J., Zhu, X.M.: Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation for Superconductors. Mod. Phys. Lett. B 9, 755-761 (1995)
  • (14) Kuznetsov, E.A., Dias, F.: Bifurcations of solitons and their stability. Phys. Rep. 507, 43-105 (2011)
  • (15) Christodoulides, D.N., Lederer, F., Silberberg, Y.: Discretizing light behaviour in linear and nonlinear waveguide lattices. Nature 424, 817-823 (2003)
  • (16) Morsch O., Oberthaler, M.: Dynamics of Bose-Einstein condensates in optical lattices. Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 179-215 (2006)
  • (17) Garanovich, I.L., Longhi, S., Sukhorukov, A.A., Kivshar, Y.S.: Light propagation and localization in modulated photonic lattices and waveguides. Phys. Rep. 518, 1-79 (2012)
  • (18) Kartashov, Y.V., Malomed, B.A., Vysloukh, V.A., Torner, L.: Two-dimensional solitons in nonlinear lattices. Opt.lett. 34, 770-772 (2009)
  • (19) Shi, J., Zeng, J.: Self-trapped spatially localized states in combined linear-nonlinear periodic potentials. Front. Phys. 15, 12602 (2020)
  • (20) Borovkova, O.V., Kartashov, Y.V., Torner, L., Malomed, B.A.: Bright solitons from defocusing nonlinearities. Phys. Rev. E 84, 035602 (2011)
  • (21) Driben, R., Kartashov, Y.V., Malomed, B.A., Meier, T., Torner, L.: Soliton gyroscopes in media with spatially growing repulsive nonlinearity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 020404 (2014)
  • (22) Driben, R., Kartashov, Y.V., Malomed, B.A., Meier, T., Torner, L.: Three-dimensional hybrid vortex solitons. New J. Phys. 16, 063035 (2014)
  • (23) Zeng, L., Zeng, J., Kartashov, Y.V., Malomed, B.A.: Purely Kerr nonlinear model admitting flat-top solitons. Opt. Lett. 44, 1206-1209 (2019)
  • (24) Zeng, L., Zeng, J.: Modulated solitons, soliton and vortex clusters in purely nonlinear defocusing media. Ann. Phys. 421, 168284 (2020)
  • (25) Afanasyev, V.V., Kivshar, Y.S., Konotop, V.V., Serkin, V.N.: Dynamics of coupled dark and bright optical solitons. Opt. Lett. 14, 805-807 (1989)
  • (26) Chen, Y., Snyder, A.W., Payne, D.N.: Twin core nonlinear couplers with gain and loss. IEEE J. Quantum Elect. 28, 239-245 (1992)
  • (27) Litchinitser, N.M., Gabitov, I.R., Maimistov, A.I.: Optical Bistability in a Nonlinear Optical Coupler with a Negative Index Channel. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 113902 (2007)
  • (28) Chan, H.N., Malomed, B.A., Chow, K.W., Ding, E.: Rogue waves for a system of coupled derivative nonlinear Schrödinger equations. Phys. Rev. E 93, 012217 (2016)
  • (29) Chan, H.N., Chow. K.W.: Rogue wave modes for the coupled nonlinear Schrödinger system with three components: A computational study. Appl. Sci. 7, 559 (2017)
  • (30) Xue, X., Zheng, X., Zhou, B.: Super-efficient temporal solitons in mutually coupled optical cavities. Nat. Photon. 13, 616-622 (2019)
  • (31) Chen, J., Zeng, J.: One-dimensional localized modes of spin-orbit-coupled Bose-Einstein condensates with spatially periodic modulated atom-atom interactions: Nonlinear lattices. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simulat. 85, 105217 (2020)
  • (32) Guo, R., Liu, Y.-F., Hao, H.-Q., Qi, F.-H.: Coherently coupled solitons, breathers and rogue waves for polarized optical waves in an isotropic medium. Nonlinear Dyn. 80, 1221-1230 (2015)
  • (33) Ögren, M., Abdullaev, F.K., Konotop, V.V.: Solitons in a 𝒫𝒯\mathcal{PT}-symmetric χ(2)\chi^{(2)} coupler. Opt. Lett. 42, 4079-4082 (2017)
  • (34) Zezyulin, D.A., Kartashov, Y.V., Konotop, V.V.: 𝒞𝒫𝒯\mathcal{CPT}-symmetric coupler with intermodal dispersion. Opt. Lett. 42, 1273-1276 (2017)
  • (35) Bender, C.M., Boettcher, S.: Real Spectra in Non-Hermitian Hamiltonians Having 𝒞𝒫𝒯\mathcal{CPT}-Symmetry. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5243-5246 (1998)
  • (36) Bender, C.M., Boettcher, S., Meisinger, P.N.: PT-symmetric quantum mechanics. J. Math. Phys. 40, 2201-2229 (1999)
  • (37) Konotop, V.V., Yang, J., Zezyulin, D.A.: Nonlinear waves in 𝒫𝒯\mathcal{PT}-symmetric systems. Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 035002 (2016)
  • (38) Ramezani, H., Kottos, T., El-Ganainy, R., Christodoulides, D.N.: Unidirectional nonlinear 𝒫𝒯\mathcal{PT}-symmetric optical structures. Phys. Rev. A 82, 043803 (2010)
  • (39) Jing, H., Özdemir, S.K., Lü, X.Y., Zhang, J., Yang, L., Nori, F.: 𝒫𝒯\mathcal{PT}-symmetric phonon laser. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 053604 (2014)
  • (40) Wimmer, M., Regensburger, A., Miri, M.A., Bersch, C., Christodoulides, D.N., Peschel, U.: Observation of optical solitons in PT-symmetric lattices. Nat. Commun. 6, 7782 (2015)
  • (41) Suchkov, S.V., Sukhorukov, A.A., Huang, J., Dmitriev, S.V., Lee, C., Kivshar, Y.S.: Nonlinear switching and solitons in PT-symmetric photonic systems. Laser Photon. Rev. 10, 177-213 (2016)
  • (42) Huang, M., Lee, R.K., Zhang, L., Fei, S.M., Wu, J.: Simulating broken 𝒫𝒯\mathcal{PT}-symmetric Hamiltonian systems by weak measurement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 080404 (2019)
  • (43) Zhou, H., Lee, J.Y., Liu, S., Zhen, B.: Exceptional surfaces in PT-symmetric non-Hermitian photonic systems. Optica 6, 190-193 (2019)
  • (44) Klauck, F., Teuber, L., Ornigotti, M., Heinrich, M., Scheel, S., Szameit, A.: Observation of PT-symmetric quantum interference. Nat. Photon. 13, 883-887 (2019)
  • (45) Herrmann, R.: Fractional Calculus: An Introduction for Physicists. World Scientific, Singapore, (2011)
  • (46) Laskin, N.: Fractional quantum mechanics and Lévy path integrals. Phys. Lett. A 268, 298-305 (2000)
  • (47) Laskin, N.: Fractional quantum mechanics. Phys. Rev. E 62, 3135-3145 (2000)
  • (48) Laskin, N.: Fractional Schrödinger equation. Phys. Rev. E 66, 056108 (2002).
  • (49) Stickler, B.A.: Potential condensed-matter realization of space-fractional quantum mechanics: The one-dimensional Lévy crystal. Phys. Rev. E 88, 012120 (2013)
  • (50) Longhi, S.: Fractional Schrödinger equation in optics. Opt. Lett. 40, 1117-1120 (2015)
  • (51) Zhang, Y., Liu, X., Belić, M.R., Zhong, W., Zhang, Y., Xiao, M.: Propagation dynamics of a light beam in a fractional Schrödinger equation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 180403 (2015)
  • (52) Zhang, L., Li, C., Zhong, H., Xu, C., Lei, D., Li, Y., Fan, D.: Propagation dynamics of super-Gaussian beams in fractional Schrödinger equation: From linear to nonlinear regimes. Opt. Express 24, 14406-14418 (2016)
  • (53) Zhang, Y., Zhong, H., Belić, M.R., Ahmed, N., Zhang, Y., Xiao, M.: Diffraction-free beams in fractional Schrödinger equation. Sci. Rep. 6, 23645 (2016)
  • (54) Zhang, Y., Zhong, H., Belić, M.R., Zhu, Y., Zhong, W., Zhang, Y., Christodoulides, D.N., Xiao, M.: 𝒫𝒯\mathcal{PT}-symmetry in a fractional Schrödinger equation. Laser Photon. Rev. 10, 526-531 (2016)
  • (55) Zhong, W.P., Belić, M.R., Malomed, B.A., Zhang, Y., Huang, T.: Spatiotemporal accessible solitons in fractional dimensions. Phys. Rev. E 94, 012216 (2016)
  • (56) Zhong, W.P., Belić, M.R., Zhang, Y.: Accessible solitons of fractional dimension. Ann. Phys. 368, 110-116 (2016)
  • (57) Huang, C., Dong, L.: Gap solitons in the nonlinear fractional Schrödinger equation with an optical lattice. Opt. Lett. 41, 5636-5639 (2016)
  • (58) Zhang, Y., Wang, R., Zhong, H., Zhang, J., Belić, M.R., Zhang, Y.: Optical Bloch oscillation and Zener tunneling in the fractional Schrödinger equation. Sci. Rep. 7, 17872 (2017)
  • (59) Zhang, L., He, Z., Conti, C., Wang, Z., Hu, Y., Lei, D., Li, Y., Fan, D.: Modulational instability in fractional nonlinear Schrödinger equation. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simulat. 48, 531-540 (2017)
  • (60) Zhang, Y., Wang, R., Zhong, H., Zhang, J., Belić, M.R., Zhang, Y.: Resonant mode conversions and Rabi oscillations in a fractional Schrödinger equation. Opt. Express 25, 32401-32410 (2017)
  • (61) Wang, Q., Li, J., Zhang, L., W, Xie.: Hermite-gaussian-like soliton in the nonlocal nonlinear fractional Schrödinger equation. EPL 122, 64001 (2018)
  • (62) Yao, X., Liu, X.: Off-site and on-site vortex solitons in space-fractional photonic lattices. Opt. Lett. 43, 5749-5752 (2018)
  • (63) Wang, Q., Deng Z.Z.: Elliptic Solitons in (1+2)-Dimensional Anisotropic Nonlocal Nonlinear Fractional Schrödinger Equation. IEEE Photonics J. 11, 1-8 (2019)
  • (64) Zeng, L., Zeng, J.: One-dimensional solitons in fractional Schrödinger equation with a spatially periodical modulated nonlinearity: nonlinear lattice. Opt. Lett. 44, 2661-2664 (2019)
  • (65) Xie, J., Zhu, X., He, Y.: Vector solitons in nonlinear fractional Schrödinger equations with parity-time-symmetric optical lattices. Nonlinear Dyn. 97, 1287-1294 (2019)
  • (66) Li, P., Li, J., Han, B., Ma, H., Mihalache, D.: 𝒫𝒯\mathcal{PT}-symmetric optical modes and spontaneous symmetry breaking in the space-fractional Schrödinger equation. Rom. Rep. Phys. 71, 106 (2019).
  • (67) Zeng, L., Zeng, J.: One-dimensional gap solitons in quintic and cubic-quintic fractional nonlinear Schrödinger equations with a periodically modulated linear potential. Nonlinear Dyn. 98, 985-995 (2019)
  • (68) Zhang, L., Zhang, X., Wu, H., Li, C., Pierangeli, D., Gao, Y., Fan, D.: Anomalous interaction of Airy beams in the fractional nonlinear Schrödinger equation. Opt. Express 27, 27936-27945 (2019)
  • (69) Dong, L., Huang, C.: Vortex solitons in fractional systems with partially parity-time-symmetric azimuthal potentials. Nonlinear Dyn. 98, 1019-1028 (2019)
  • (70) Zeng, L., Zeng, J.: Preventing critical collapse of higher-order solitons by tailoring unconventional optical diffraction and nonlinearities. Commun. Phys. 3, 26 (2020)
  • (71) Li, P., Malomed, B.A., Mihalache, D.: Metastable soliton necklaces supported by fractional diffraction and competing nonlinearities. Opt. Express 28, 34472-34488 (2020)
  • (72) Wang, Q., Liang, G.: Vortex and cluster solitons in nonlocal nonlinear fractional Schrödinger equation. J. Optics 22, 055501 (2020)
  • (73) Chen, J., Zeng, J.: Spontaneous symmetry breaking in purely nonlinear fractional systems. Chaos 30, 063131 (2020)
  • (74) Zeng, L., Zeng, J.: Fractional quantum couplers. Chaos Soliton Fract. 140, 110271 (2020)
  • (75) Shi, J., Zeng, J.: 1D Solitons in Saturable Nonlinear Media with Space Fractional Derivatives. Ann. Phys. (Berlin) 532, 1900385 (2020)
  • (76) Zhu, X., Yang, F., Cao, S., Xie, J., He, Y.: Multipole gap solitons in fractional Schrödinger equation with parity-time-symmetric optical lattices. Opt. Express 28, 1631-1639 (2020)
  • (77) Li, P., Dai, C.: Double Loops and Pitchfork Symmetry Breaking Bifurcations of Optical Solitons in Nonlinear Fractional Schrödinger Equation with Competing Cubic-Quintic Nonlinearities. Ann. Phys. (Berlin) 532, 2000048 (2020)
  • (78) Qiu, Y., Malomed, B.A., Mihalache, D., Zhu, X., Zhang, L., He, Y.: Soliton dynamics in a fractional complex Ginzburg-Landau model. Chaos Soliton Fract. 131, 109471 (2020)
  • (79) Li, P., Malomed, B.A., Mihalache, D.: Symmetry breaking of spatial Kerr solitons in fractional dimension. Chaos Soliton Fract. 132, 109602 (2020)
  • (80) Li, P., Malomed, B.A., Mihalache, D.: Vortex solitons in fractional nonlinear Schrödinger equation with the cubic-quintic nonlinearity. Chaos Soliton Fract. 137, 109783 (2020)
  • (81) Qiu, Y., Malomed, B.A., Mihalache, D., Zhu, X., Peng, X., He, Y.: Stabilization of single- and multi-peak solitons in the fractional nonlinear Schrödinger equation with a trapping potential. Chaos Soliton Fract. 140, 110222 (2020)
  • (82) Kivshar, Y.S., Luther-Davies, B.: Dark optical solitons: physics and applications. Phys. Rep. 298, 81-197 (1998)
  • (83) Yang, J.: Nonlinear Waves in Integrable and Nonintegrable Systems, SIAM, Philadelphia, (2010)
  • (84) Vakhitov, N.G., Kolokolov, A.A.: Stationary solutions of the wave equation in a medium with nonlinearity saturation. Radiophys. Quantum Electron. 16, 783-789 (1973)
  • (85) Kartashov, Y.V., Konotop, V.V., Abdullaev, F.K.: Gap solitons in a spin-orbit-coupled Bose-Einstein condensate. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 060402 (2013)