Spin orbit torque nano-oscillators by dipole field-localized spin wave modes
Abstract
We demonstrate a high-quality spin orbit torque nano-oscillator comprised of spin wave modes confined by the magnetic field by the strongly inhomogeneous dipole field of a nearby micromagnet. This approach enables variable spatial confinement and systematic tuning of magnon spectrum and spectral separations for studying the impact of multi-mode interactions on auto-oscillations. We find these dipole field-localized spin wave modes exhibit good characteristic properties as auto-oscillators—narrow linewidth and large amplitude—while persisting up to room temperature. We find that the linewidth of the lowest-lying localized mode is approximately proportional to temperature in good agreement with theoretical analysis of the impact of thermal fluctuations. This demonstration of a clean oscillator with tunable properties provides a powerful tool for understanding the fundamental limitations and linewidth contributions to improve future spin-Hall oscillators.
I Introduction
Spin Hall effect (SHE)-spin torque can drive magnetic auto-oscillations or excite propagating spin waves Divinskiy et al. (2018); Fulara et al. (2019); Demidov et al. (2020); Evelt et al. (2018); Fulara et al. (2020) in a ferromagnet Demidov et al. (2012); Liu et al. (2012); Collet et al. (2016), potentially enabling a dc current-tunable microwave source Kiselev et al. (2003); Shao et al. (2021), neuromorphic computing Dieny et al. (2020); Zahedinejad et al. (2020) and spin orbit torque magnonics Divinskiy et al. (2018); Fulara et al. (2019); Demidov et al. (2020); Evelt et al. (2018); Fulara et al. (2020). However, nonlinear magnon scattering can degrade the quality of spin-Hall oscillators broadening linewidth, and hampering the achievement of auto-oscillation Collet et al. (2016); Duan et al. (2014); Barsukov et al. (2019). A ferromagnetic film with spatially extended dimensions harbors a large number of degenerate spin wave modes which can enable nonlinear magnon scattering that redistributes energy between modes, hampering coherent oscillation of a desired mode Duan et al. (2014); Demidov et al. (2011, 2017). These adverse effects can be reduced either by avoiding the degeneracy Divinskiy et al. (2017); Demidov et al. (2012) e.g. via spatial localization or by suppressing the nonlinear mode coupling Divinskiy et al. (2019); Evelt et al. (2018). Spatial localization in, e.g., nanoconstrictions and planar nano-gap contacts Demidov et al. (2012, 2014, 2015a); Liu et al. (2013); Demidov et al. (2015b); Haidar et al. (2019); Awad et al. (2017); Sato et al. (2019); Hache et al. (2020); Spicer et al. (2018); Zahedinejad et al. (2018); Dvornik et al. (2018) produces discrete modes whose frequencies lie below the spin wave dispersion for the extended sample thus reducing scattering channels Demidov et al. (2012); Duan et al. (2014); Fulara et al. (2020) and enabling auto-oscillation. Alternative to geometrical confinement, a localized region of reduced internal magnetic field generated by the dipole field of a nearby micromagnetic particle confines the spin wave modes in a nanoscale magnetic field well Adur et al. (2014); Chia et al. (2012); Lee et al. (2010); Zhang et al. (2017) thus enabling auto-oscillation. Dipole-field localized modes offer advantages as spin-Hall oscillators Zhang et al. (2017): First, in contrast to most geometrically confined oscillator modes, our field confinement offers in-situ tunability. In particular, the lateral confinement and field well depth are tunable by particle parameters—size, moment, particle-sample separation—the latter of which can be altered in-operando, and is continuously controllable if the particle is mounted on a cantilever whose height is variable. This provides an in-situ tunability of the magnon spectrum and mode separations, and hence tuning of nonlinear magnon scattering to control performance of the oscillators. Second, these dipole-field localized modes are confined by magnetic field rather than by sample boundaries thus avoiding artifacts from fabrication imperfection, so they can provide cleaner confinement.
Here, we demonstrate spin-Hall auto-oscillations of localized spin wave modes spatially confined by the magnetic dipole field of a nearby Ni particle above a Py/Pt stripe. Multiple well-resolved localized modes are driven into narrow-linewidth, large-amplitude auto-oscillations persistent up to room temperature (RT). The auto-oscillating localized modes exhibit a minimum linewidth of 5 MHz at 80 K which increases to 18 MHz at RT. We observe a linewidth for the first localized mode that is approximately proportional to temperature and primarily limited by thermal fluctuations. This high quality oscillator with its in-operando tunability of spatial confinement provides a powerful tool for systematic study of the fundamental aspects of spin-Hall oscillators, including the impact of multi-mode interactions, for advancing the future oscillators.
II METHODS

Py (5 nm)/ Pt (5 nm) films are deposited on an undoped-Si substrate by e-beam evaporation. The Py/Pt strips are defined with e-beam lithography using Cr as a hard mask Duan (2013) for ion milling. A Ti/Ag/Au coplanar stripline (CPS) is fabricated on the Py/Pt strip via photolithography. Figure 1(a) shows a scanning electron microscopy image of our device. 3 -width strips provide tapered transitions to the 700 nm 1 region of interest in the center where current density is much higher. This geometry reduces heating and contact resistance. A 150 nm-thick spacer deposited on the device defines its separation from a 1 Ni particle located on top, in the center of the active region, with 200 nm accuracy in the strip width direction [see supplement for further details]. We measured two nominally identical devices labeled as Device #1 and Device #2. They show similar results with minimal device-to-device variation [see supplement]. We report measurements performed at temperatures from 80 K to RT with an external field applied in the film plane at an angle with respect to the orientation of the current flow along the length of the strip. As depicted in Figure 1(b), the spin Hall effect D’Yakonov and Perel’ (1971); Hirsch (1999) in Pt converts a charge current density into a spin current density , which exerts an anti-damping spin torque Berger (1996); Slonczewski (1996) on the Py magnetization. We apply dc charge currents exceeding the critical current needed to fully compensate the damping and excite the auto-oscillation. The microwave power emitted by the device is detected via anisotropic magnetoresistance (AMR) effect, and measured by a low-noise amplifier and spectrum analyzer Duan et al. (2014); Thadani (2009).
We use a nearby micromagnetic particle to introduce a spatially localized minimum in the internal static field—a field well—in the sample Adur et al. (2014); Chia et al. (2012); Lee et al. (2010); Zhang et al. (2017). The lowest-frequency spin wave modes at the bottom of the well are discrete localized modes (LM) whose frequencies lie well below the spin wave continuum. In addition, a large number of spin wave modes, both sample-confined modes and highest-order localized modes with high mode densities, reside at the top of the field-well at much higher frequencies. The depth of the field-well, typically several hundreds of Gauss, determines the spectral separation between lowest-lying localized modes and the high density higher-frequency modes. The spatial confinement provided by the field-well determines the spectral separations between the various discrete localized modes. The four lowest-frequency localized modes are localized width modes LM1 ( = 1, = 1), LM2 ( = 2, = 1), a localized length mode LM3 ( = 1, = 2), and a localized width mode LM4 ( = 3, = 1) Zhang et al. (2017). Figure 1(c) shows micromagnetic simulated mode profiles of the lowest-four localized modes in the 700 nm 1 active region. The mode area of LM1 is about 350 nm 600 nm.
III RESULTS and Discussion
III.1 Auto-oscillation of localized modes: characteristic properties

Figure 2(a) shows an auto-oscillation color map (as a function of bias current) and representative spectra of Device #2 at = 700 G, = RT. Below 5.4 mA, there is no signal. Above 5.4 mA, we see a group of several auto-oscillatory modes, corresponding to localized modes that are driven into auto-oscillations [see subsequent further analysis]. The measurements here are done at RT, demonstrating that localized modes function well as RT auto-oscillators which distinguishes them from some existing spin-Hall oscillators Duan et al. (2014); Liu et al. (2013). If we focus on the first, i.e., lowest-frequency, localized mode, the full width at half maximum (FWHM) linewidth, fitted on a linear power scale, decreases to a minimum value of 5 MHz at 8.5 mA at 80 K [Figure 2(b)], which is a typical value for good single spin-Hall oscillators Duan et al. (2014); Liu et al. (2013); Demidov et al. (2014, 2015a, 2015b); Yang et al. (2015); Dürrenfeld et al. (2017); Mazraati et al. (2016); Awad et al. (2020); Mazraati et al. (2018); Chen et al. (2019, 2021), and a much lower value can be achieved in mutually synchronized oscillator arrays Zahedinejad et al. (2020). And even at RT, a linewidth of 18 MHz is still a small value, showing that oscillators derived from dipole field localized modes are highly coherent. The signal amplitude initially increases with current. The maximum power of the first localized mode is 0.27 pW at RT, and is 2.5 pW at 80 K [see Figure 3(c) or 4(a)], comparable to the 4.6 pW signal size of the bulk mode ( = 700 G, = 80 K) in a bare 700 nm 1 Py/Pt strip device without a particle. This observation of pW signals from localized modes, even though the signal is only from the reduced local mode area and suffers from current shunting indicates our localized modes are driven into large-amplitude oscillations. The higher-order localized modes become more evident at lower temperatures. A few higher-order localized modes grow into large signals, and are as sharp as the first localized mode.
III.2 Mode nature

Here, we compare spin torque ferromagnetic resonance (ST-FMR) Liu et al. (2011), auto-oscillation and micromagnetic simulation to determine mode nature. Figure 3(a) shows the ST-FMR spectra of Device #1 at 6 GHz with increasing currents. At currents above 2 mA, we see several well-resolved localized modes in the 600–1000 G field range. The localized modes are not individually resolvable below 2 mA (including negative currents), because the linewidth of the modes, controlled by spin Hall torque, exceeds or is just comparable to their separation Zhang et al. (2017). The signal around 500 G comes from sample-confined modes (SCM) that extend throughout the whole sample but are modified by the field of the particle Zhang et al. (2017). Increasing current shifts the resonances of localized modes to higher fields due to Oersted field Zhang et al. (2017), Joule heating Zhang et al. (2017) and more importantly nonlinear enhancement of the cone angle at high currents Zhang et al. (2017); Slavin and Tiberkevich (2009). We compare resonances of several of the lowest-lying localized modes from ST-FMR and auto-oscillation measurements [see supplement for auto-oscillation color maps of Device #1] to confirm the nature of the auto-oscillatory modes. The frequency versus field dispersion from both measurements coincide with each other [Figure 3(b)], which confirms that the auto-oscillatory modes arise directly from the localized modes that are confined by the particle-field. Then, we perform micromagnetic modeling Adur et al. (2014, 2015); Du et al. (2014); Obukhov et al. (2008); Zhang et al. (2017) at = 700 G and compare the resonances with auto-oscillation peaks in Figure 2(a). The simulated resonance frequencies for LM1 to LM4 are shown as dashed lines in Figure 2(a), identifying the first four localized modes [see supplement for mode identification at other temperatures]. The parameters used in the simulation are: 4 = 8.9 kG, determined from the in-situ Py/Pt film, the effective magnetization of the unsaturated Ni particle 4 = 2400 G which is a free parameter Chia et al. (2012); Zhang et al. (2017), and the modeling is done at = 0. The corresponding localized modes are also labeled in ST-FMR spectra [Figure 3(a)]. We note that the energies of LM3 and LM4 are close, so that their peaks are not distinguishable in ST-FMR. Mode LM2 appears at high currents in ST-FMR and does not present a strong auto-oscillation signal. This could be because the spatial phase reversal in the transverse magnetization of =2 mode profile causes partial cancellation in some of the AMR signals Mecking et al. (2007). Further details about the observed localized modes in auto-oscillation spectra can be complicated. For LM1–4, we observe all four modes at 700 G, and only observe LM1 and one of the LM3,4 peaks at several other fields [see supplement for color maps at different fields].
We comment on the modes excited in auto-oscillations. Only the localized modes and second harmonics of the localized modes [see supplement for full spectrum] are observed. We observe no auto-oscillation signals at the frequencies corresponding to sample-confined modes, while there are signals around those resonance conditions in ST-FMR spectra. This is probably a consequence of the large degeneracies of the modes in this frequency range, both the sample-confined modes and highest-order localized modes.
III.3 Evolution of properties with current
To systematically study the evolution of the auto-oscillation with current, we subtract a background obtained from the spectrum at 0 mA on a linear scale. We then determine the characteristic parameters of LM1 at = 700 G, = RT (Device #2) and plot them as a function of current, as shown in Figure 3(c). The current-evolution trends that we observed are similar to ones in existing spin-Hall oscillators Duan et al. (2014); Liu et al. (2013). A critical current is defined as that at which damping is fully compensated by the spin torque. We extract the critical current via a linear fit of inverse power vs. current Tiberkevich et al. (2007). Microwave emission signals can be observed even before the , due to thermal fluctuations Slavin and Tiberkevich (2009). Above the critical current, the magnetization precession enters the nonlinear regime as its cone angle increases. In the nonlinear regime, the frequency is a function of the power : Slavin and Tiberkevich (2009). Where, is the frequency in small-angle approximation. is the nonlinear frequency shift coefficient, and is typically negative for in-plane field geometries. With increasing current, the power increases leading the frequency to shift to lower values. The shift is slow below , because the power is small from thermally excited precessions, becoming rapid above as a consequence of the much larger auto-oscillation power. Below , it is in linear regime, so the linewidth is linearly reduced by the antidamping torque. If we only consider nonlinear auto-oscillation theory of a single mode as in conventional spin torque oscillators Slavin and Tiberkevich (2009), the linewidth would be expected to remain small after the linear reduction. However, here at high currents, linewidth broadens, and power drops, which is experimentally observed in other spin-Hall oscillators Duan et al. (2014); Liu et al. (2013), and could be due to nonlinear magnon scattering through the remaining scattering channels Duan et al. (2014).
III.4 Temperature dependence

We further measure current evolution of auto-oscillations at = 700 G at different temperatures (Device #2). The mode structures are qualitatively the same as the ones in Figure 2 [see supplement]. Figure 4(a) shows the extracted FWHM linewidth and integrated power of the first localized mode as a function of current for different temperatures. As temperature increases, the required bias current decreases, likely due to an increased spin current conversion efficiency by SHE Liu et al. (2013). The maximum power decreases with increasing temperature, which is generally observed in other spin-Hall oscillators Duan et al. (2014); Liu et al. (2013).
To determine the temperature dependence of the oscillation linewidth, we exploit the calibrated dependence of the device’s resistance on temperature. This gives the actual temperature of the device in the presence of inevitable Joule heating above the bath temperature by high drive currents which is obtained by measuring the resistance of device Liu et al. (2013) [see supplement]. We analyze the behaviors at current corresponding to the minimum linewidth Chen et al. (2020); Schneider et al. (2009) as a function of the actual temperature at = 700 G. Figure 4(b) shows that the linewidth of the first localized mode varies linearly with temperature. The damping has been fully compensated, but the linewidth of auto-oscillators is a measure of the coherence of the system and the precession periodicity Sankey (2007); Thadani (2009). At finite temperatures, thermal fluctuations deflect the magnetization transverse to (amplitude fluctuations) and along (phase fluctuations) its precession trajectory, and leads to a spread of the frequencies Slavin and Tiberkevich (2009); Chen et al. (2016). The generated linewidth due to thermal fluctuations is expected to be proportional to the temperature Slavin and Tiberkevich (2009). Such a theory accounts well for our data, and indicates that the linewidth of our localized mode oscillator is limited dominantly by thermal fluctuations. A linear fit to the linewidth data yields an intercept of -0.52 0.12 MHz, close to zero. We compare the temperature-dependence of our observed linewidth with existing auto-oscillators. Ours is the only report of a linear temperature-dependence of linewidth among spin-Hall based oscillators Duan et al. (2014); Liu et al. (2013); Demidov et al. (2014, 2015a); Yang et al. (2015); Demidov et al. (2015b); Dürrenfeld et al. (2017); Mazraati et al. (2016) with one exception Chen et al. (2020). Even among conventional spin torque oscillators, most temperature dependence studies present unexpected behaviors, more complex than proportional, indicating the existence of other broadening effects Muduli et al. (2012); Sankey et al. (2005); Georges et al. (2009); Mistral et al. (2006). Existing reports Schneider et al. (2009); Bortolotti et al. (2012); Sierra et al. (2012) of linear temperature dependencies exhibit large negative or positive intercept. The non-zero intercept is attributed to an additional temperature-independent broadening mechanism Schneider et al. (2009); Bortolotti et al. (2012); Sierra et al. (2012), possibly due to inhomogeneities. Our intercept (both its magnitude and as a percentage of total linewidth) is the smallest among all these results which may reflect the avoided fabrication-induced broadening afforded by magnetic confinement. We note that the influence of edge damage can be studied by moving the field well toward the edge of the sample to observe the impact of the edge on oscillator performance. Our method of scannable magnetic confinement provides a new approach to understanding problems like these and examining the hypotheses. Additionally, our linewidth, approximately proportional to temperature, agrees well with Slavin’s thermal fluctuations theory. These results suggest our dipole-field confined oscillator closely approaches a nearly ideal oscillator.
Beyond fabrication edge imperfections, thermally activated mode hopping Liu et al. (2013) (causing exponential temperature dependence) and nonlinear magnon scattering Demidov et al. (2011); Duan et al. (2014) can contribute to the linewidth; field-localization of modes is advantageous in relation to these contributions as well. First, localized modes confined by the particle-field have large spectral separation from the high density of modes at higher frequencies as well as increased spectral separation between different localized modes, and so increase the energy barrier for mode hopping. Second, the tight spatial confinement increases the separation between the discrete lowest-lying localized modes thus weakening the mechanism of nonlinear magnon scattering.
IV CONCLUSIONS
In summary, a new type of spin-Hall oscillator that is spatially confined by a localizing magnetic field is demonstrated. We observe multiple dipole field-localized spin wave modes driven into auto-oscillation by spin-Hall torque. These localized modes oscillators exhibit good properties: narrow-linewidth, large-amplitude and persistence up to RT. The auto-oscillating localized modes exhibit a linewidth of 5 MHz at 80 K which increases to 18 MHz at RT. We observe that the linewidth of the first localized mode is approximately proportional to temperature, limited dominantly by thermal fluctuations. These results indicate a clean oscillator system which provides opportunity to study auto-oscillators in their intrinsic regime. The concurrence of good properties, proportionality to temperature and field-localization demonstrates the advantages of field-localization method.
For future applications, the dipole-field localization provides an alternative confining mechanism that can assist further studies and help resolve issues in spin-Hall auto-oscillators, e.g. their spatial self-broadening Demidov et al. (2016). In addition, the demonstrated unique strength of localized modes spin-Hall oscillator here can be expanded by putting the particle on a cantilever to scan the localized mode oscillator ( and directions) and tune well spatial confinement and depth (-direction). We observed signals with sufficiently strong signal-noise-ratio that allows the strip to be widened to a few microns for imaging. Spatial confinement studies tuned by varying cantilever tip-sample separation can reveal the impact of multi-mode interactions on spin-orbit torque auto-oscillation. Finally, the particle-confined localized modes oscillator combined with spatial-scannability can be utilized to study synchronization Awad et al. (2017) and interactions between spatially separate auto-oscillators by varying their lateral separation.
Acknowledgements.
This research was primarily supported by the Center for Emergent Materials, an NSF MRSEC, under award number DMR-2011876. This work was supported in part by an allocation of computing time from the Ohio Supercomputer Center. We also acknowledge technical support and assistance provided by the NanoSystems Laboratory at the Ohio State University partially supported by DMR-2011876.Supplementary Information
Spin orbit torque nano-oscillators by dipole field-localized spin wave modes
A. Comparison between two devices with little device-to-device variation
Device #1 and Device #2 are patterned on the same substrate with the same dimensions. The particles are carefully selected such that their sizes are very close. As shown in the scanning electron microscope (SEM) images in Figure S1, the particle size of Device #1 is 907 nm 837 nm, while the particle size of Device #2 is 917 nm in diameter. The particle-sample separation can be controlled accurately using thin film deposition and atomic force microscopy (AFM) thickness calibration. Figure S2 shows the auto-oscillation results of Device #1. The first localized mode reaches minimum FWHM linewidth of 20 MHz at RT, and 5 MHz at 80 K. The maximum power is 0.23 pW at RT, and 5.1 pW at 80 K. By comparing Figure S2 with Figure 2 (main text), the experimental results from two devices closely resemble each other with minimal device-to-device variation regarding mode structures and oscillator property of minimum linewidth. The spectral separations between localized modes are about the same. There are only two slight differences. First, the resonance frequencies of the localized modes in Device #1 are 0.4 GHz smaller than the frequencies in Device #2. This is due to the slightly larger moment of particle in Device #1. Second, the bias currents in Device #1 are 0.3 0.5 mA higher than currents in Device #2, and could be due to the slight device-to-device variations. Such closely resembling results support that the localized modes confined by particle-field are away from sample edges, and has avoided variations from the fabrication edge imperfections.


B. Auto-oscillation color maps at different fields

C. Full spectrum and second harmonics
Figure S4 shows the full spectrum with larger frequency range at 700 G, which gives information on which modes are excited in auto-oscillations. The group of the modes at frequency below 6.4 GHz are from localized modes. It is empty from 6.4 to 8.5 GHz, and then there are two high-frequency peaks. The frequencies of the two high-frequency peaks are twice the frequency of the two localized modes, denoted by markers, and therefore are second harmonics of those localized modes. The empty frequency region corresponds to the resonance conditions of the sample-confined modes (SCM). There are signals around those resonance conditions in ST-FMR spectra, but not in auto-oscillation spectra. This result can also be seen by comparing the ST-FMR result in Fig. 3(a) in main text and the auto-oscillation color map at 500 G in Fig. S3(a). Such results are reasonable because there are very high mode densities around those resonance conditions, with both sample-confined modes and higher-order localized modes. The degeneracies between a large number of modes and nonlinear four magnon scattering between multiple modes cause no modes into auto-oscillations.

D. Actual temperature vs. bath temperature Liu et al. (2013)

E. Temperature-dependence color maps and representative spectra

F. Bare strip data
We measured bare 700 nm 1 Py/Pt stripe without particle as supplementary measurements. The modes in a sub-micron stripe are bulk modes including quasi-uniform mode (QM), backward volume width modes at higher-field side of QM Duan et al. (2015), and surface modes at lower-field side of QM. Figure S7(a) shows ST-FMR spectra with increasing currents at 80 K, at = 6 GHz. We observed one main peak from quasi-uniform mode, and several smaller peaks from high- bulk modes. By comparing these spectra with spectra of Device #1 with a particle in Figure 3(a) (main text), it is clear that qualitatively different modes are excited from those different spectra. The Mode A and Mode B peaks become very sharp at high currents, and will be onset for auto-oscillation first, as shown in auto-oscillation color maps at = 580 G in Figure S7(b) and 700 G in Figure S7(c). Modes A, B, C and D are labeled in both ST-FMR and auto-oscillation spectra, correspondingly.

G. Further details of Nickel particle gluing
To glue the Ni particle to the center of the sample, we use optical microscope with micro-manipulators (Alessi REL-3200). A sharp glass tip, made by using a laser-based glass puller (Sutter Instrument P-2000) is inserted in the micro-manipulator. We put a drop of G1 epoxy, 1um-diameter Ni spherical particles (SkySpring Nanomaterials, Inc.) and our sample on a glass slide. We dip glass tip a few microns in to the epoxy to pick up a small droplet and put it on the sample. We then find a desired magnetic particle under the microscope and use another glass tip to pick it up with electrostatic forces. After putting the particle to the center of the sample, the exact position can be further adjusted by the glass tip from different directions. The device is then stored in box to avoid oxidization before the epoxy is cured. This gluing method is modified from a procedure from Ref. Herman (2011).
In the measurements, the soft Ni particle aligns with the external field, with its dipole field anti-align with the external field, creating a spatial field well.
References
References
- Divinskiy et al. (2018) B. Divinskiy, V. E. Demidov, S. Urazhdin, R. Freeman, A. B. Rinkevich, and S. O. Demokritov, Advanced Materials 30, 1802837 (2018).
- Fulara et al. (2019) H. Fulara, M. Zahedinejad, R. Khymyn, A. A. Awad, S. Muralidhar, M. Dvornik, and J. Åkerman, Science Advances 5, eaax8467 (2019).
- Demidov et al. (2020) V. E. Demidov, S. Urazhdin, A. Anane, V. Cros, and S. O. Demokritov, Journal of Applied Physics 127, 170901 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0007095 .
- Evelt et al. (2018) M. Evelt, L. Soumah, A. Rinkevich, S. Demokritov, A. Anane, V. Cros, J. Ben Youssef, G. de Loubens, O. Klein, P. Bortolotti, and V. Demidov, Phys. Rev. Applied 10, 041002 (2018).
- Fulara et al. (2020) H. Fulara, M. Zahedinejad, R. Khymyn, M. Dvornik, S. Fukami, S. Kanai, H. Ohno, and J. Åkerman, Nature Communications 11, 4006 (2020).
- Demidov et al. (2012) V. E. Demidov, S. Urazhdin, H. Ulrichs, V. Tiberkevich, A. Slavin, D. Baither, G. Schmitz, and S. O. Demokritov, Nat. Mater. 11, 1028 (2012).
- Liu et al. (2012) L. Liu, C.-F. Pai, D. C. Ralph, and R. A. Buhrman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 186602 (2012).
- Collet et al. (2016) M. Collet, X. de Milly, O. d’Allivy Kelly, V. V. Naletov, R. Bernard, P. Bortolotti, J. Ben Youssef, V. E. Demidov, S. O. Demokritov, J. L. Prieto, M. Muñoz, V. Cros, A. Anane, G. de Loubens, and O. Klein, Nature Communications 7, 10377 (2016).
- Kiselev et al. (2003) S. I. Kiselev, J. C. Sankey, I. N. Krivorotov, N. C. Emley, R. J. Schoelkopf, R. A. Buhrman, and D. C. Ralph, Nature 425, 380 (2003).
- Shao et al. (2021) Q. Shao, P. Li, L. Liu, H. Yang, S. Fukami, A. Razavi, H. Wu, K. Wang, F. Freimuth, Y. Mokrousov, M. D. Stiles, S. Emori, A. Hoffmann, J. Åkerman, K. Roy, J.-P. Wang, S.-H. Yang, K. Garello, and W. Zhang, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 57, 1 (2021).
- Dieny et al. (2020) B. Dieny, I. L. Prejbeanu, K. Garello, P. Gambardella, P. Freitas, R. Lehndorff, W. Raberg, U. Ebels, S. O. Demokritov, J. Åkerman, A. Deac, P. Pirro, C. Adelmann, A. Anane, A. V. Chumak, A. Hirohata, S. Mangin, S. O. Valenzuela, M. C. Onbaşlı, M. d’Aquino, G. Prenat, G. Finocchio, L. Lopez-Diaz, R. Chantrell, O. Chubykalo-Fesenko, and P. Bortolotti, Nature Electronics 3, 446 (2020).
- Zahedinejad et al. (2020) M. Zahedinejad, A. A. Awad, S. Muralidhar, R. Khymyn, H. Fulara, H. Mazraati, M. Dvornik, and J. Åkerman, Nature Nanotechnology 15, 47 (2020).
- Duan et al. (2014) Z. Duan, A. Smith, L. Yang, B. Youngblood, J. Lindner, V. E. Demidov, S. O. Demokritov, and I. N. Krivorotov, Nat. Commun. 5, 5616 (2014).
- Barsukov et al. (2019) I. Barsukov, H. K. Lee, A. A. Jara, Y.-J. Chen, A. M. Gonçalves, C. Sha, J. A. Katine, R. E. Arias, B. A. Ivanov, and I. N. Krivorotov, Science Advances 5, eaav6943 (2019).
- Demidov et al. (2011) V. E. Demidov, S. Urazhdin, E. R. J. Edwards, M. D. Stiles, R. D. McMichael, and S. O. Demokritov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 107204 (2011).
- Demidov et al. (2017) V. Demidov, S. Urazhdin, G. de Loubens, O. Klein, V. Cros, A. Anane, and S. Demokritov, Physics Reports 673, 1 (2017).
- Divinskiy et al. (2017) B. Divinskiy, V. E. Demidov, A. Kozhanov, A. B. Rinkevich, S. O. Demokritov, and S. Urazhdin, Applied Physics Letters 111, 032405 (2017).
- Divinskiy et al. (2019) B. Divinskiy, S. Urazhdin, S. O. Demokritov, and V. E. Demidov, Nature Communications 10, 5211 (2019).
- Demidov et al. (2014) V. E. Demidov, S. Urazhdin, A. Zholud, A. V. Sadovnikov, and S. O. Demokritov, Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 172410 (2014).
- Demidov et al. (2015a) V. E. Demidov, S. Urazhdin, A. Zholud, A. V. Sadovnikov, A. N. Slavin, and S. O. Demokritov, Sci. Rep. 5, 8578 (2015a).
- Liu et al. (2013) R. H. Liu, W. L. Lim, and S. Urazhdin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 147601 (2013).
- Demidov et al. (2015b) V. E. Demidov, S. Urazhdin, B. Divinskiy, A. B. Rinkevich, and S. O. Demokritov, Applied Physics Letters 107, 202402 (2015b).
- Haidar et al. (2019) M. Haidar, A. A. Awad, M. Dvornik, R. Khymyn, A. Houshang, and J. Åkerman, Nature Communications 10, 2362 (2019).
- Awad et al. (2017) A. A. Awad, P. Dürrenfeld, A. Houshang, M. Dvornik, E. Iacocca, R. K. Dumas, and J. Åkerman, Nature Physics 13, 292 (2017).
- Sato et al. (2019) N. Sato, K. Schultheiss, L. Körber, N. Puwenberg, T. Mühl, A. A. Awad, S. S. P. K. Arekapudi, O. Hellwig, J. Fassbender, and H. Schultheiss, Physical Review Letters 123, 057204 (2019).
- Hache et al. (2020) T. Hache, Y. Li, T. Weinhold, B. Scheumann, F. J. T. Gonçalves, O. Hellwig, J. Fassbender, and H. Schultheiss, Applied Physics Letters 116, 192405 (2020).
- Spicer et al. (2018) T. M. Spicer, P. S. Keatley, T. H. J. Loughran, M. Dvornik, A. A. Awad, P. Dürrenfeld, A. Houshang, M. Ranjbar, J. Åkerman, V. V. Kruglyak, and R. J. Hicken, Physical Review B 98, 214438 (2018).
- Zahedinejad et al. (2018) M. Zahedinejad, H. Mazraati, H. Fulara, J. Yue, S. Jiang, A. A. Awad, and J. Åkerman, Applied Physics Letters 112, 132404 (2018).
- Dvornik et al. (2018) M. Dvornik, A. A. Awad, and J. Åkerman, Physical Review Applied 9, 014017 (2018).
- Adur et al. (2014) R. Adur, C. Du, H. Wang, S. A. Manuilov, V. P. Bhallamudi, C. Zhang, D. V. Pelekhov, F. Yang, and P. C. Hammel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 176601 (2014).
- Chia et al. (2012) H.-J. Chia, F. Guo, L. M. Belova, and R. D. McMichael, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 087206 (2012).
- Lee et al. (2010) I. Lee, Y. Obukhov, G. Xiang, A. Hauser, F. Yang, P. Banerjee, D. V. Pelekhov, and P. C. Hammel, Nature 466, 845 (2010).
- Zhang et al. (2017) C. Zhang, Y. Pu, S. A. Manuilov, S. P. White, M. R. Page, E. C. Blomberg, D. V. Pelekhov, and P. C. Hammel, Phys. Rev. Applied 7, 054019 (2017).
- Duan (2013) Z. Duan, Tuning the Damping of Spin Wave Modes by Spin Hall Current in Permalloy/Platinum Wires, Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Irvine (2013).
- D’Yakonov and Perel’ (1971) M. I. D’Yakonov and V. I. Perel’, JETP Lett. 13, 467 (1971).
- Hirsch (1999) J. E. Hirsch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1834 (1999).
- Berger (1996) L. Berger, Phys. Rev. B 54, 9353 (1996).
- Slonczewski (1996) J. C. Slonczewski, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 159, L1 (1996).
- Thadani (2009) K. Thadani, Spin-Torque-Driven Microwave Frequency Dynamics In Magnetic Nanopillar Devices, Ph.D. thesis, Cornell University (2009).
- Yang et al. (2015) L. Yang, R. Verba, V. Tiberkevich, T. Schneider, A. Smith, Z. Duan, B. Youngblood, K. Lenz, J. Lindner, A. N. Slavin, and I. N. Krivorotov, Sci. Rep. 5, 16942 (2015).
- Dürrenfeld et al. (2017) P. Dürrenfeld, A. A. Awad, A. Houshang, R. K. Dumas, and J. Åkerman, Nanoscale 9, 1285 (2017).
- Mazraati et al. (2016) H. Mazraati, S. Chung, A. Houshang, M. Dvornik, L. Piazza, F. Qejvanaj, S. Jiang, T. Q. Le, J. Weissenrieder, and J. Åkerman, Applied Physics Letters 109, 242402 (2016).
- Awad et al. (2020) A. A. Awad, A. Houshang, M. Zahedinejad, R. Khymyn, and J. Åkerman, Applied Physics Letters 116, 232401 (2020).
- Mazraati et al. (2018) H. Mazraati, S. R. Etesami, S. A. H. Banuazizi, S. Chung, A. Houshang, A. A. Awad, M. Dvornik, and J. Åkerman, Physical Review Applied 10, 054017 (2018).
- Chen et al. (2019) L. Chen, S. Urazhdin, Y. Du, and R. Liu, Physical Review Applied 11, 064038 (2019).
- Chen et al. (2021) L. Chen, Y. Chen, K. Zhou, H. Li, Y. Pu, Y. Xu, Y. Du, and R. Liu, Nanoscale 13, 7838 (2021).
- Tiberkevich et al. (2007) V. Tiberkevich, A. Slavin, and J.-V. Kim, Applied Physics Letters 91, 192506 (2007).
- Liu et al. (2011) L. Liu, T. Moriyama, D. C. Ralph, and R. A. Buhrman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 036601 (2011).
- Slavin and Tiberkevich (2009) A. Slavin and V. Tiberkevich, IEEE Trans. Magn. 45, 1875 (2009).
- Adur et al. (2015) R. Adur, C. Du, S. A. Manuilov, H. Wang, F. Yang, D. V. Pelekhov, and P. C. Hammel, J. Appl. Phys. 117, 17E108 (2015).
- Du et al. (2014) C. Du, R. Adur, H. Wang, S. A. Manuilov, F. Yang, D. V. Pelekhov, and P. C. Hammel, Phys. Rev. B 90, 214428 (2014).
- Obukhov et al. (2008) Y. Obukhov, D. V. Pelekhov, J. Kim, P. Banerjee, I. Martin, E. Nazaretski, R. Movshovich, S. An, T. J. Gramila, S. Batra, and P. C. Hammel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 197601 (2008).
- Mecking et al. (2007) N. Mecking, Y. S. Gui, and C.-M. Hu, Phys. Rev. B 76, 224430 (2007).
- Chen et al. (2020) L. Chen, S. Urazhdin, K. Zhou, Y. Du, and R. Liu, Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 024034 (2020).
- Schneider et al. (2009) M. L. Schneider, W. H. Rippard, M. R. Pufall, T. Cecil, T. J. Silva, and S. E. Russek, Phys. Rev. B 80, 144412 (2009).
- Sankey (2007) J. Sankey, Microwave-Frequency Characterization of Spin Transfer and Individual Nanomagnets, Ph.D. thesis, Cornell University (2007).
- Chen et al. (2016) T. Chen, R. K. Dumas, A. Eklund, P. K. Muduli, A. Houshang, A. A. Awad, P. Dürrenfeld, B. G. Malm, A. Rusu, and J. Åkerman, Proceedings of the IEEE 104, 1919 (2016).
- Muduli et al. (2012) P. K. Muduli, O. G. Heinonen, and J. Åkerman, Phys. Rev. B 86, 174408 (2012).
- Sankey et al. (2005) J. C. Sankey, I. N. Krivorotov, S. I. Kiselev, P. M. Braganca, N. C. Emley, R. A. Buhrman, and D. C. Ralph, Phys. Rev. B 72, 224427 (2005).
- Georges et al. (2009) B. Georges, J. Grollier, V. Cros, A. Fert, A. Fukushima, H. Kubota, K. Yakushijin, S. Yuasa, and K. Ando, Phys. Rev. B 80, 060404 (2009).
- Mistral et al. (2006) Q. Mistral, J.-V. Kim, T. Devolder, P. Crozat, C. Chappert, J. A. Katine, M. J. Carey, and K. Ito, Applied Physics Letters 88, 192507 (2006).
- Bortolotti et al. (2012) P. Bortolotti, A. Dussaux, J. Grollier, V. Cros, A. Fukushima, H. Kubota, K. Yakushiji, S. Yuasa, K. Ando, and A. Fert, Applied Physics Letters 100, 042408 (2012).
- Sierra et al. (2012) J. F. Sierra, M. Quinsat, F. Garcia-Sanchez, U. Ebels, I. Joumard, A. S. Jenkins, B. Dieny, M.-C. Cyrille, A. Zeltser, and J. A. Katine, Applied Physics Letters 101, 062407 (2012).
- Demidov et al. (2016) V. E. Demidov, M. Evelt, V. Bessonov, S. O. Demokritov, J. L. Prieto, M. Muñoz, J. Ben Youssef, V. V. Naletov, G. de Loubens, O. Klein, M. Collet, P. Bortolotti, V. Cros, and A. Anane, Scientific Reports 6, 32781 (2016).
- Duan et al. (2015) Z. Duan, I. N. Krivorotov, R. E. Arias, N. Reckers, S. Stienen, and J. Lindner, Phys. Rev. B 92, 104424 (2015).
- Herman (2011) M. R. Herman, Studying Paramagnetic Impurities in Diamond with Magnetic Resonance Force Microscopy, Ph.D. thesis, The Ohio State University (2011).