Some observations on deformed Donaldson–Thomas connections
Abstract.
A deformed Donaldson–Thomas (dDT) connection is a Hermitian connection of a Hermitian line bundle over a -manifold satisfying a certain nonlinear PDE. This is considered to be the mirror of a (co)associative cycle in the context of mirror symmetry. It can also be considered as an analogue of a -instanton. In this paper, we see that some important observations that appear in other geometric problems are also found in the dDT case as follows.
(1) A dDT connection exists if a 7-manifold has full holonomy and the -structure is “sufficiently large”. (2) The dDT equation is described as the zero of a certain multi-moment map. (3) The gradient flow equation of a Chern-Simons type functional of Karigiannis and Leung, whose critical points are dDT connections, agrees with the version of the dDT equation on a cylinder with respect to a certain metric on a certain space. This can be considered as an analogue of the observation in instanton Floer homology for 3-manifolds.
Key words and phrases:
mirror symmetry, gauge theory, -manifold, deformed Donaldson–Thomas connections2020 Mathematics Subject Classification:
53C07, 58E15, 53D371. Introduction
Let be a -manifold with a -structure . For the definition of -structures, see for example [kawai2021mirror, Section 2.2]. We use the same sign convention there. Denote by , and the induced Riemannian metric, volume form and Hodge star operator, respectively. Let be a smooth complex Hermitian line bundle over . We denote by the affine space of Hermitian connections on . Given , we regard its curvature as a -valued closed -form on .
Definition 1.1.
A Hermitian connection satisfying
(1.1) |
is called a deformed Donaldson-Thomas (dDT) connection.
DDT connections appeared in the context of mirror symmetry. They were introduced in [lee2009geometric] as “mirrors” of calibrated (associative) submanifolds. Historically, deformed Hermitian Yang–Mills (dHYM) connections were introduced first in [lyz2000FM] as “mirrors” of special Lagrangian submanifolds. There is also a similar notion of dDT connections for a manifold with a -structure ([lee2009geometric, kawai2021FM]). As the names indicate, dDT connections can also be considered as analogues of Donaldson–Thomas connections (-instantons).
Thus it is natural to expect that dDT connections would have similar properties to
associative submanifolds and -instantons.
We show that it is indeed the case in [kawai2020deformation, kawai2021mirror].
For example, the moduli space of dDT connections
is -dimensional and canonically orientable if we perturb the -structure.
Any dDT connection on a compact -manifold is a global minimizer of the “mirror volume”
and its value is topological by the “mirror” of associator equality.
We could also prove similar statements in the case
in [kawai2021deformationSpin(7), kawai2021mirror].
Moreover,
dDT connections are given by critical points of the Chern-Simons type functional
in [karigiannis2009hodge, Theorem 5.13].
The variational characterization is known only for the case,
and no such characterization is known for the case.
This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we study the existence of a dDT connection. Known examples of dDT connections are either trivial or constructed in [lotay2020examples, fowdar2022examples], and are very few in number. So it would be important to consider the existence problem. We first see that the formal “large radius limit” of the defining equation of dDT connections is that of -instantons. Thus it is natural to expect that dDT connections for a “sufficiently large” -structure will behave like -instantons. Moreover, it is known that any complex Hermitian line bundle admits a -instanton on a compact holonomy -manifold. Then we show the following from these facts.
Theorem 1.2 (Theorem 2.2).
Suppose that is a compact holonomy -manifold. Let be a smooth complex Hermitian line bundle over . If the -structure is “sufficiently large”, there exists a dDT connection.
In Section 3, we formulate the dDT equation in terms of a multi-moment map. The multi-moment map is a generalization of the moment map introduced in [Madsen2012multi, Madsen2013closed]. The dHYM equation is described as the zero of a certain moment map on a infinite dimensional symplectic manifold ([collins2021moment, Section 2], [collins2021survey, Section 2.1]). Analogously, we show that the dDT equation is described as the zero of a certain multi-moment map.
Theorem 1.3 (Theorem 3.4).
The dDT equation is described as the zero of a certain multi-moment map.
In Section 4, we study the gradient flow of the Karigiannis-Leung functional introduced in [karigiannis2009hodge] whose critical points are dDT connections. It is known that the gradient flow equation of the Chern-Simons functional on an oriented 3-manifold agrees with the ASD equation on . This is an important observation in instanton Floer homology for 3-manifolds. We show that there is an analogous relation between dDT equations for - and -manifolds using the Karigiannis-Leung functional. This will establish a new link between 3, 4-manifold theory and -, -geometry, and we might define analogues of instanton Floer homology using dDT connections.
Theorem 1.4 (Theorem 4.3).
The gradient flow equation of a Chern-Simons type functional of Karigiannis and Leung, whose critical points are dDT connections, agrees with the version of the dDT equation on a cylinder with respect to a certain metric on a certain space.
2. Large radius limit
In this section, we show the existence of a dDT connection if a 7-manifold has full holonomy and the -structure is “sufficiently large”.
Suppose that is a compact holonomy -manifold. Let be a smooth complex Hermitian line bundle over . Set
where is any fixed connection and is the space of 1-forms on . Denote by the group of unitary gauge transformations of , which acts on . Explicitly,
where is the space of -valued smooth functions, and the action is defined by . When for , we have
(2.1) |
Thus the -orbit through is given by , where
(2.2) |
Note that the curvature 2-form is invariant under the action of .
Consider the family of -structures
all of which induce holonomy metrics. The defining equation of dDT connections with respect to is given by
Thus, formally taking the ”large radius limit”, which means the leading behaviour of as , we obtain
This is exactly the defining equation of -instantons. Thus it is natural to expect that dDT connections for a sufficiently large -structure will behave like -instantons. The following would be well-known for -instantons on a smooth complex Hermitian line bundle, but we give the proof for completeness.
Lemma 2.1.
On a compact holonomy -manifold , there is a unique -instanton on a smooth complex Hermitian line bundle up to the action of .
Proof.
For any , we have . So it defines a cohomology class , which is known to be equal to . Then there exists a 1-form such that is harmonic by Hodge theory.
Denote by the subspace of the space of -forms corresponding to the -dimensional irreducible representation of . For more details, see for example [kawai2021mirror, Section 2.2]. Denote by the space of harmonic -forms on and set . Then by [joyce2000compact, Theorem 10.2.4], we have . Thus we have
which implies that .
If for is also a -instanton, we have , which is equivalent to
(2.3) |
Since , we have . Since by [joyce2000compact, Theorem 10.2.4] again and -valued exact 1-forms are contained in , the -instanton is unique up to the action of . ∎
Using this, we can show the following.
Theorem 2.2.
Suppose that is a compact holonomy -manifold. Let be a smooth complex Hermitian line bundle over . Then for sufficiently large , there exists a dDT connection with respect to .
Proof.
Define a map by
Then , which is a point by Lemma 2.1, is the moduli space of -instantons with respect to and for is the moduli space of dDT connections with respect to .
We want to apply the implicit function theorem to show the statement. Fix a -instanton , whose existence is guaranteed by Lemma 2.1. Denote by the linearization of at . Then we have
Lemma 2.3.
We have
Proof.
The first equation is proved as in \tagform@2.3. For the second equation, the Hodge decomposition implies that . For any , we have
where we use the fact that is closed. This implies that . Then
Since is spanned by for , the proof is completed. ∎
By the Hodge decomposition and , we have . By this and Lemma 2.3, we see that is an isomorphism. Hence, we can apply the implicit function theorem (after the Banach completion) and we see that for sufficiently small .
Finally, we explain how to recover the regularity of elements in after the Banach completion. Since the curvature is invariant under the addition of closed 1-forms, there exists such that
() |
for sufficiently small . In particular, is given by , which is an overdetermined elliptic equation. To be overdetermined elliptic is an open condition, so we see that is also overdetermined elliptic for sufficiently small . Hence we can find a smooth element in around and the proof is completed. ∎
3. The multi-moment map
It is known that there is a moment map picture in the dHYM case. In particular, the dHYM equation is described as the zero of a certain moment map on a infinite dimensional symplectic manifold. See for example [collins2021moment, Section 2] or the survey article [collins2021survey, Section 2.1]. Analogously, we show that the dDT equation is described as the zero of a certain multi-moment map. First, recall the definition of the multi-moment map in [Madsen2012multi, Madsen2013closed].
Definition 3.1.
Let be a smooth manifold and be a closed 3-form on . Suppose that a Lie group acts on preserving . Denote by the Lie algebra of and set
where is the linear map induced by the Lie bracket. (Note that if is abelian.) Denote by the vector field on generated by . For a two vector , set
Denote by the canonical pairing.
Then a map is called a multi-moment map if it is -equivariant and satisfies
for any .
Let be a compact 7-manifold with a coclosed -structure () and be a smooth complex Hermitian line bundle over . Let be the space of Hermitian connections of . Define a map by
Then the space of dDT connections is given by . Denote by the group of unitary gauge transformations of acting canonically as in \tagform@2.1. Since , the Lie algebra of is identified with the space of -valued functions on . Note that since is abelian. Define a 3-form on by
where and . We first show the following as required in Definition 3.1.
Lemma 3.2.
The 3-form is -invariant and closed.
Proof.
Take any , , where , and . Identify with a vector field on by
for . We first show the -invariance of . That is,
(3.1) |
By \tagform@2.1, we compute
(3.2) |
Since , we obtain \tagform@3.1.
Next, we show the closedness of . Note that . Then it follows that
(3.3) | ||||
(3.4) |
Since
(3.5) | ||||
(3.6) |
we have
which implies that . ∎
We also need the following lemma.
Lemma 3.3.
We have
Proof.
Take any 1-form . We first show that for any , there exists an open neighborhood of and smooth functions on such that
(3.7) |
Indeed, take any local coordinates of and set
We can take a cutoff function such that has compact support in and on an open neighborhood of . Then setting and , which are smooth functions on , we obtain \tagform@3.7.
Since is an open cover of and is compact, there exists such that covers . Denote by the partition of unity subordinate to . Set
Then we have . Indeed, take any . We may assume that and for . Then for by \tagform@3.7 and for . Hence
∎
Denote by the space of closed 6-forms on . Define a map by
for and .
Theorem 3.4.
Define a -invariant map by
Then we have for any .
Since we assume that , we see that for any . By Lemma 3.3, is injective. Hence we have . In this sense, we can regard the dDT equation as the zero of a multi-moment map.
Proof.
First note that the vector field generated by is given by
at . Hence for any and , we have
(3.8) | ||||
(3.9) | ||||
(3.10) |
where is the linearization of at . Hence we obtain
(3.11) | ||||
(3.12) |
∎
In the dHYM case, the “ functional” defined in [collins2021moment, Remark 2.15] or [collins2021survey, Lemma 2.6 (ii)] is convex along geodesics and the critical points are solutions of the dHYM equation. Hence it plays an important role in the existence problem.
In the dDT case, there is a functional whose critical points are dDT connections. See Section 4.2. However, no metric has yet been found that makes the functional convex along geodesics. Since no such results have been found for associative submanifolds, it might be difficult to relate the functional to the existence problem.
However, as we see in the next section, we have an observation as in the case of instanton Floer homology for 3-manifolds by using the functional in Section 4.2. We might develop the theory like instanton Floer homology using dDT connections.
4. Gradient flow of the Karigiannis-Leung functional
It is known that the gradient flow equation of the Chern-Simons functional on an oriented 3-manifold agrees with the ASD equation on . See for example [Donaldson2002, Section 2.5.3]. This is an important observation in instanton Floer homology for 3-manifolds. We show that there is an analogous relation between dDT equations for - and -manifolds.
Let be a 7-manifold with a -structure and be a smooth complex Hermitian line bundle over . Let be a family of Hermitian connections of . We identify this with a connection of , where is the projection. If we set
where , we have and the curvature of is given by
4.1. The -dDT condition on
The product admits a canonical -structure. We write down the condition that is a -dDT connection, a dDT connection for a manifold with a -structure. For simplicity, set
Lemma 4.1.
The connection is a -dDT connection if and only if
(4.1) | ||||
(4.2) |
Proof.
Denote by and the Hodge star operators on and , respectively. Then, is a -dDT connection (in the sense of [kawai2021FM, Definition 1.3]) if and only if
(4.3) |
for any by [kawai2021FM, Lemma 3.4]. Since
\tagform@4.3 is equivalent to
(4.4) | |||
(4.5) |
We compute
and
(4.6) | ||||
(4.7) | ||||
(4.8) |
Since , we have
(4.9) |
Then, we see that \tagform@4.4 is equivalent to \tagform@4.1. Similarly, since
(4.10) | ||||
(4.11) |
we see that \tagform@4.5 is equivalent to \tagform@4.2. ∎
Hence, eliminating from \tagform@4.1 by \tagform@4.2, we obtain
(4.12) |
Remark 4.2.
If , \tagform@4.1 and \tagform@4.2 are equivalent to \tagform@4.12 by Proposition A.3.
4.2. The Karigiannis-Leung functional
Karigiannis and Leung [karigiannis2009hodge] introduced the functional whose critical points are dDT connections. We first review it.
Let be a compact 7-manifold with a coclosed -structure () and let be a smooth complex Hermitian line bundle. Denote by the space of Hermitian connections of . Define a 1-form on by
for and . Then we see that
if and only if is a dDT connection.
We can show that is closed as in the proof of Lemma 3.2.
Since is contractible, there exists such that .
Hence we see that dDT connections are critical points of .
Now, we study the relation between -dDT connections on and the Karigiannis-Leung functional . Set
This type of the subset is also considered in the dHYM case. For example, see the survey article [collins2021survey, Definition 2.1]. By the mirror of the associator equality in [kawai2021mirror, Theorem 5.1], it will be natural to call a Hermitian connection satisfying almost calibrated as in the dHYM case.
Define a metric on by
where , is the induced volume form from , and is the induced metric on the space of differential forms from . Here, is an endomorphism of defined by for , where is the induced metric (on ) from . Note that is skew-symmetric with respect to . Explicitly, if we denote by the induced metric (on ) from , we have and is the induced metric from .
The following is the main theorem of this paper.
Theorem 4.3.
The gradient flow equation of with respect to on agrees with the -dDT equation on .
Proof.
We first deduce the gradient flow equation and compare it with the computation in Section 4.1. Take any and . Set
Denote by the induced metric on the space of differential forms from . Then we compute
(4.13) |
By Proposition A.1, we have
where
(4.14) |
Since
where is the transpose of with respect to , we have
(4.15) |
Then by \tagform@4.13 and \tagform@4.15, the gradient vector field of with respect to is given by
Thus a family satisfies the gradient flow of with respect to if and only if
(4.16) |
where , , and . Then we see that \tagform@4.16 is equivalent to \tagform@4.12. By Remark 4.2, this is equivalent to the -dDT equation on . ∎
By Theorem 4.3, we will have to consider the deformation theory of the -dDT connections on next for the analogue of instanton Floer homology for 3-manifolds. Deformations of -dDT connections on a compact manifold with a -structure are studied in [kawai2021deformationSpin(7), Theorem 1.2], but there are some technical assumptions. We will have to deal with more technical issues, including these, to develop the deformation theory on a cylinder.
Appendix A Algebraic Computations
In this appendix, we give some algebraic computations needed in the proof of Theorem 4.3.
Set and let be the standard inner product on . Denote by the standard Hodge star operator on . For a 2-form , define by
for . Then, is skew-symmetric, and hence, , where is the identity matrix. We also have
where we is the transpose of with respect to . Define a 3-form by
where is a standard oriented basis of with the dual basis of and is short for . The stabilizer of is known to be the exceptional -dimensional simple Lie group . The elements of preserve the standard inner product and volume form . The group acts canonically on , and is decomposed as , where is a -dimensional irreducible subrepresentation of in . For more details, see for example [kawai2021mirror, Section 2.2]. Set
for .
Proposition A.1.
For a 2-form , set . Then we have
(A.1) |
Proof.
Since , we only have to compute . Set
We have , which implies that . Then we compute
(A.2) |
Since
(A.3) | ||||
(A.4) |
we have
(A.5) |
Lemma A.2.
We have
(A.6) | ||||
(A.7) |
Proof.
We can prove the first equation as in [kawai2020deformation, Lemma C.2]. For any , set
We compute
(A.8) |
which implies the first equation. Similarly, for any , we have
Since by for example [kawai2020deformation, Lemma B.1], we obtain
which implies the second equation. ∎
Then by \tagform@A.5, Lemma A.2 and the equation , we obtain
(A.9) | ||||
(A.10) | ||||
(A.11) |
and the proof is completed. ∎
Proposition A.3.
For a 1-form and a 2-form such that ,
(A.12) | ||||
(A.13) |
if and only if
(A.14) |
Proof.
Eliminating from \tagform@A.12 by \tagform@A.13, we obtain \tagform@A.14. Conversely, \tagform@A.14 implies \tagform@A.13 by the following Lemma A.4. By \tagform@A.14, the left hand side of \tagform@A.12 is computed as
(A.15) |
which vanishes by \tagform@A.13. ∎
Lemma A.4.
For any 2-form , we have
Proof.
Fix any and set
We compute and . We have
(A.16) | ||||
(A.17) |
where we use . We also have
as , and
(A.18) | ||||
(A.19) | ||||
(A.20) | ||||
(A.21) |
where we use and . By [kawai2020deformation, (B.7)], we have
(A.22) |
Then
(A.23) | ||||
(A.24) |
Hence we obtain
(A.25) |
Next, we compute . By Lemma A.2, we have
(A.27) | ||||
(A.28) |
Since
(A.29) | ||||
(A.30) | ||||
(A.31) | ||||
(A.32) |
we have
(A.33) |
We compute
(A.34) | ||||
(A.35) |
By \tagform@A.22, it follows that
Since , we have
We also have
and
Hence we obtain
(A.36) |
Then by \tagform@A.25 and \tagform@A.36, we obtain
(A.38) |
where we use by [kawai2020deformation, Lemma B.1]. Then it follows that
Since by Lemma A.2, the proof is completed. ∎