Sofic Lie Algebras
Abstract
We introduce and study soficity for Lie algebras, modelled after linear soficity in associative algebras.
We introduce equivalent definitions of soficity, one involving metric ultraproducts and the other involving almost representations.
We prove that any Lie algebra of subexponential growth is sofic.
We also prove that a Lie algebra over a field of characteristic 0 is sofic if and only if its universal enveloping algebra is linearly sofic.
Finally, we give explicit families of almost representations for the Witt and Virasoro algebras.
Key words and phrases: linearly sofic algebra, universal enveloping algebra, metric ultraproduct, subexponential growth
Mathematics Subject Classification: 17B35, 03C20, 17B68
1 Introduction
Sofic groups were first introduced by Misha Gromov [Gro99] in relation to the Gottschalk surjunctiviy surjecture conjecture (1976). The were later named sofic by Weiss [Wei00]. We recall the definitions of sofic groups via ultraproducts. For more details of ultraproducts in relation to soficity, see §2 of [Pes08].
For , we denote the symmetric group on letters by . We consider the normalized Hamming distance
Definition 1.1.
A group is sofic if there exists and ultrafilter on and a sequence of natural numbers such that embeds into the metric ultraproduct .
In [ES05], this definition was reformulated without the notion of ultraproducts. It was shown that a group is sofic if and only if it can be locally embedded in some symmetric group almost homomorphically, up to some arbitrarily small error. Similar ultraproducts can be constructed from any family of groups equipped with bi-invariant metrics, such as unitary groups over (where subgroups are called hyperlinear).
In particular, for any field , the group can be endowed the normalized rank metric
Groups embedable into ultraproducts of with this metric are called linearly sofic. In [AP17] the notion of linear soficity was extended to associative algebras by considering metric ultraproducts of . In particular, it was shown that a group is linearly sofic if and only if its group algebra is linearly sofic.
The goal of this paper to do analogous work for Lie algebras. Our first section deals with the ultraproduct construction and definition of soficity for Lie algebras as well as basic properties. We then provide an equivalent characterization for soficity using almost representations for our Lie algebra.
We also provide examples of sofic Lie algebras using families of almost representations. In particular we prove one of our primary results
Theorem 4.2.
Any Lie algebra of subexponential growth is sofic.
We also provide explicit almost representations to show soficity for the Witt and Virasoro algebras. This is analogous to soficity in groups and associative algebras, where amenability, and therefore subexponential growth, implies soficity.
Finally, we show that soficity for Lie algebras and associative algebras is compatible.
Theorem 5.2.
Let be a Lie algebra over a field of characteristic 0. Then is sofic if and only if its universal enveloping algebra is sofic.
This result should be compared to other work on the growth of Lie algebras, notably the theorem in [Smi76] showing that Lie algebras of subexponential growth have universal enveloping algebras of subexponential growth.
2 Ultraproducts
We define our notion of soficity for Lie algebras using the ultra product construction, similar to that of sofic groups and associative algebras. For , we call the function
the normalized rank function. Let be a non-principal ultrafilter on and be a sequence of natural numbers such that . We can extend the ’s to a function
In [AP17], the pre-image was shown to be an ideal. Thus we can construct the ultra-product of the matrix rings, denoted
As an associative algebra, this ultra-product has a natural Lie algebra structure via the commuatator bracket, which we denote
Definition 2.1.
We denote the metric ultraproduct of the Lie algebras as , called a universal sofic Lie algebra.
For any subalgebra , we can restrict the normalized rank map and hence create different metric ultraproducts.
Lemma 2.1.
For any field ,
Proof.
Clearly, we can embed . Moreover, for any sequence , we can consider the second sequence . Then
so in the ultra-product. Thus the natural embedding is a surjection. ∎
We now define the map object of this paper.
Definition 2.2.
A Lie algebra over a field is called linearly sofic if there exists a Lie algebra embedding of into some metric ultraproduct of some ’s.
Proposition 2.2.
For an algebraically closed field , the associative algebra is simple.
Proof.
If is a principal ultrafilter, this is trivially true. So we assume that is free.
Denote . Suppose . Let . Since , there exists such that . Thus, if is a representative for , there exists some such that for every .
Let be the Jordan normal form of . Then row equivalent to
where . Thus, there exists such that
Define via
Then if , we have that , the ideal generated by . Moreover, we notice that for ,
Let . Since is a free ultrafilter, must be infinite. Therefore, there exists an infinite subset such that . Notice that since otherwise, making a principal ultrafilter. Therefore and . ∎
Corollary 2.2.1.
For an algebraically closed field , the non-trivial ideals of are contained in its center.
Proof.
This follows from Theorem 2 of [Her61]. ∎
3 Almost representations
Just as with sofic groups and linearly sofic associative algebras, linearly sofic Lie algebras can be defined via families of maps that are Lie algebra homomorphisms up to a small error. We follow a similar approach to section 11.2 of [AP17].
Definition 3.1.
Let be a Lie algebra, a finite dimensional subspace, a finite dimensional vector space, and . A linear map is called and -almost representation of if there exists a subspace such that:
-
1.
for all such that ,
-
2.
-.
Clearly a morphism from a Lie algebra to a universal sofic Lie algebra gives rise to a family of almost representations of the Lie algebra. Similarly, a family of almost representations on a covering of a Lie algebra gives a morphism to a universal sofic Lie algebra. However, not all families of almost representations will correspond to embeddings. In particular, some elements of our Lie algebra will have to be mapped to arbitrarily small rank transformations via the family of almost representations. This gives rise to to the following subspace of our Lie algebra.
Definition 3.2.
For a Lie algebra , the sofic radical of , denote , is defined as follows: if for every , there exists a finite dimensional containing and such that if and is an -almost representation, then
The sofic radical is essentially the collection of ”bad” elements of our Lie algebra when it comes to trying to make embeddings of it into a universal sofic Lie algebra. This view is summarized by the following lemma and corollary.
Lemma 3.1.
For a Lie algebra , if and only if for every Lie algebra homomorphism
we have that .
Proof.
Suppose and let be a Lie algebra homomorphism with lifts . Fix and choose and finite dimensional from the definition of the sofic radical. Choose . Then there exists such that is an -almost representation for for every . Therefore . In other words, for every . Therefore . Since was arbitrary, we get that .
Now suppose that . Then there exists such that for any finite dimensional containing and , there exists and -almost representation such that .
Let be an increasing sequence of finite dimensional subspaces of containing that cover . Then there exists a sequence of that converges to 0 and -almost representations such that . Define a map by where
Choose a non-principal ultrafilter of and let be the composition of with the quotient map. Then since , we have that is a Lie algebra homomorphism and . ∎
From this lemma, we get the following corollary
Corollary 3.1.1.
For a Lie algebra , is an ideal. Moreover, .
Proof.
The lemma show that
where
so it is clear that is an ideal.
Now suppose and let be a pre-image of . Then so there exists a Lie algebra homomorphism such that . Since , we can get a map by composing with the quotient . Then we have that so . ∎
We can now use the sofic radical to characterize sofic Lie algebras.
Theorem 3.2.
A Lie algebra is sofic if and only if .
Proof.
The forward implication is trivial so we only show the reverse implication.
Let be a Lie algebra such that . Then for every , there exists a Lie algebra homomorphism such that .
Let be a basis for as a vector space. We shall construct maps such that for every .
Let . Now suppose for , we have a map as above. Then
If the dimension is 0, let . Otherwise, choose a non-zero element in the intersection. In this case, we define . Then if , we have that . Thus for some . However, so .
Now we construct a map such that . Let . Tensor each component of with an appropriately sized identity matrix gives us maps where if and otherwise. Let be a lift of for .
Define a map by
Let .
A direct calculation gives us that for any
where is a lift of .
Therefore , so we have that is injective. ∎
4 Examples of Sofic Lie Algebras
By using the sofic radical, we can determine if particular Lie algebras is sofic.
Proposition 4.1.
Any abelian Lie algebra is sofic.
Proof.
Suppose is an abelian Lie algebra over a field and suppose that . Then for any finite dimensional subspace and , there exists an -almost representation such that and . Thus so . ∎
For groups, those of subexponential growth are amenable and therefore sofic. We show the same result holds true for Lie alebras.
Theorem 4.2.
Any Lie algebra of subexponential growth is sofic.
Proof.
Let be a Lie algebra of subeponential growth generated by the set . Let denote the words in of length at most . We inductively create a basis for as follows. Let be a basis for . For , let be the preimage in of a basis for . We also define to be the subspace of spanned by words of length at most and .
For , we define a linear map where
We notice on that for and ,
Let us show that for a fixed that
Since is of subexponential growth, we have that is a function of subexponential growth from [Smi76]. To see this suppose that is a function of subexponential growth and . We have that if
Then there exists such that
Therefore and is therefore not of subexponential growth.
Thus for any and , we can find such that
Now suppose , is a finite dimensional subspace containing , and . Then there exists such that . Thus for a sufficiently large , we have an -almost representation for . On , we have that works like left multiplication by , considered as an element of . Thus . By our choice of to make an -almost representation, we have that
Hence the normalized rank of is greater than .
Thus for any non-zero , any finite dimensional subspace , and , we can find an -almost representation for such that the normalized rank of is at least 1/2. Specifically, we can choose to be a -almost representation. Therefore so and is sofic. ∎
We now provide explicit families of almost representations for two particular Lie algebras. Though both of the examples are of subexponential growth, their families of almost homomorphisms are not based on their subspaces of words of particular length.
Example 4.3.
The Witt algebra , which is the Lie algebra of derivations for , is sofic.
We can cover by the finitely dimensional subspaces
where . We also consider the finite dimensional vector spaces
For , define a linear map via
and
for . For any and , can be made sufficiently large so as to make and -almost homomorphism.
Example 4.4.
The Virasoro algebra , which is the unique central extension of , is sofic.
To construct the family of almost representations, we need to use the Verma modules of . For more information on the Verma modules, see [WY86].
We have a basis of given by the ’s from and a central element . Define the subspaces and
Given , we define the Verma module to be the space
where the action of on is given by
For , we consider the subspaces
We then define linear maps via and
Just as in the case with , for a fixed and , we can choose large enough to make an -almost representation.
5 Soficity of Universal Enveloping Algebras
In [AP17], it was shown that a group is linearly sofic if and only if its corresponding group algebra is itself linearly sofic. For Lie algebras, we have a similar construction with universal enveloping algebras. This section is spent on showing equivalence of soficity for Lie algebras and universal enveloping algebras.
We first need the following result from [AP17].
Proposition 5.1.
Let be a unital algebra and an ultrafilter. If we have a set of unital algebra morphisms from to , then there exists a unital algebra homomorphism such that
We can now tackle our main result:
Theorem 5.2.
Let be a Lie algebra over a field of characteristic 0. Then is sofic if and only if is sofic.
Proof.
Since embeds in the reverse direction is trivial. Thus we only prove the forward direction.
Since is sofic, there exists a Lie algebra homomorphism
Let and
for . Define a new Lie algebra homomorphism by , , and . Since finite tensor product of matrix rings are again matrix rings, we use the proposition to get a unital algebra homomorphism
such that
We claim that is injective.
Let be a basis. First suppose that is a monomial for . Then by construction
for all . Notice that will consist of a linear sum of pure tensors of and products of the ’s. In fact, we have two sets of pure tensors: one set consisting of those with at least one 1 and at least one degree 2 or greater monomial and the other set consisting of pure tensors with only linear monomials and no 1’s, i.e. pure tensors of the form for some . In fact we get exactly one such pure tensor for every . Call the first set the lower order tensors and the second set the high order tensors.
Now notice that is a sum of low order tensors of with one of the 1’s removed. Thus, viewing as ( times), we can tensor the equation
by 1 in spots and adding up all the new equations shows that the low order tensors of sum to 0. Therefore, we get that
Now suppose that . Then we can see that in the sum of pure tensors in , every pure tensor has at least one 1 in it. Thus repeating the same process of the tensor the equation with in spots and summing up, we get back to the equation .
Now we are ready to prove injectivity of . Suppose that . Put an order on the indexing set of the basis for . Then by the Poincaré-Birkoff-Witt Theorem, we can uniquely write as
where , for , for every , , and . By applying , we get rid of every term but , so we see that . Let
be the degree of the -th monomial and let . Since we know that is injective on , we get a contradiction if . Thus assume that .
Repeating the same process we did on monomials, take the equation , tensor it with 1 in the possible spots and add up all the equations. Then we subtract that sum from the equation . For every such that , the terms coming from the -th monomial will vanish in the new equation. Thus we are on left with the monomials of degree exactly . The equation we are left with is a linear combination of pure tensors of the form . Since our monomials are ordered, the only way to have such pure tensors are equal is if they come from the same original monomial. Therefore we have a non-trivial linear combination. However, is linearly independent since is injective, so all the weights in the linear combination must be 0. Since is characteristic, we get that for every such that . This is a contradiction so no such exists and . ∎
Remark 5.2.1.
This equivalence of soficity is particularly useful when combined with Proposition 11.6 from [AP17] stating amenable algebras without zero divisors are sofic. A particular application is a simplification of Theorem 4.2 for Lie algebras over fields of characteristic 0. Indeed, if is such a Lie algebra, by Theorem 7 of [Smi76], is also of subexponential growth. From [Ele03], we see that is amenable algebra with no zero divisors. Therefore , and thus , is sofic.
References
- [AP17] Goulnara Arzhantseva and Liviu Paŭnescu. Linear sofic groups and algebras. Transactions of The American Mathematical Society, 369(4):2285–2310, April 2017.
- [Ele03] Gábor Elek. The amenability of affine algebras. Journal of Algebra, 264:469–478, 2003.
- [ES05] Gábor Elek and Endre Szabó. Hyperlinearity, essentially free actions and l2-invariants. the sofic property. Mathematische Annalen, 332(2):421–441, apr 2005.
- [Gro99] Misha Gromov. Endomorphism of symbolic algebraic varieties. Journal of the European Mathematical Society, 1(2):109–197, 1999.
- [Her61] Isreal Herstein. Lie and jordan structures in simple associative algebras. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 67(6):517–531, 1961.
- [Pes08] Vladimir Pestov. Hyperlinear and sofic groups: a brief guide. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, 14(4):449–480, December 2008.
- [Smi76] Martha K. Smith. Universal enveloping algebras with subexponential but not polynomially bounded growth. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 60:22–24, October 1976.
- [Wei00] Benjamin Weiss. Sofic groups and dynamical systems. The Indian Journal of Statistics, 62(3):350–359, 2000.
- [WY86] Minoru Wakimoto and Hirofumi Yamada. The fock representations of the virasoro algebra and the hirota equations of the modified kp hierarchies. Hiroshima Math Journal, 16:427–441, 1986.