This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Smooth metrics can hide thin shells

Justin C. Feng Center for Gravitational Physics, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA
Abstract

In this note, I consider a class of metric tensors with smooth components that naively appear to describe dynamical wormholes with vanishing spacetime curvature. I point out that the smoothness of the metric tensor components is deceptive, and that in general relativity, such metrics must be sourced by exotic thin shells.

This note is motivated by the dynamical generalization of a flat “defect wormhole” metric that appears in Klinkhamer (2023a); *Klinkhamer:2023sau; *Klinkhamer:2023avf; *Klinkhamer:2023nok, which has attracted some attention lately Wang (2023); Ahmed (2023). The construction of the static metric is rather straightforward. Consider the line element for flat spacetime, written in spherical coordinates (I employ the (,+,+,+)(-,+,+,+) signature throughout):

ds2=dt2+dr2+r2d2Ω,ds^{2}=-dt^{2}+dr^{2}+r^{2}d^{2}\Omega, (1)

where d2Ω:=dθ2+sin2θdϕ2d^{2}\Omega:=d\theta^{2}+\sin^{2}\theta d\phi^{2} is the standard line element on the unit 2-sphere. Now perform a coordinate transformation defined by the relation:

r=λ2+ρ2,r=\sqrt{\lambda^{2}+\rho^{2}}, (2)

where λ\lambda is assumed to be a positive real parameter and ρ{,}\rho\in\{-\infty,\infty\}. One obtains the line element Klinkhamer (2023a, b):

ds2=dt2+ρ2λ2+ρ2dρ2+(λ2+ρ2)d2Ω,ds^{2}=-dt^{2}+\frac{\rho^{2}}{\lambda^{2}+\rho^{2}}d\rho^{2}+(\lambda^{2}+\rho^{2})d^{2}\Omega, (3)

which describes a spacetime with topology R×R×S2R\times R\times S^{2} and two asymptotically flat regions, one in the limit ρ\rho\rightarrow\infty, and another in the limit ρ\rho\rightarrow-\infty. A direct evaluation for generic ρ\rho yields a vanishing Riemann tensor, so that one might naively interpret Eq. (3) as describing a flat wormhole with a throat at ρ=0\rho=0.

Upon adding a time dependence λλ(t)\lambda\rightarrow\lambda(t) in Eq. (2), one obtains the dynamical generalization of Eq. (3):

ds2=\displaystyle ds^{2}= [1[λ(t)λ(t)]2λ2+ρ2]dt2+2λ(t)λ(t)λ(t)2+ρ2dtdρ\displaystyle-\left[1-\frac{[\lambda(t)\lambda^{\prime}(t)]^{2}}{\lambda^{2}+\rho^{2}}\right]dt^{2}+\frac{2\lambda(t)\lambda^{\prime}(t)}{\lambda(t)^{2}+\rho^{2}}dtd\rho (4)
+ρ2λ(t)2+ρ2dρ2+[λ(t)2+ρ2]d2Ω.\displaystyle+\frac{\rho^{2}}{\lambda(t)^{2}+\rho^{2}}d\rho^{2}+\left[\lambda(t)^{2}+\rho^{2}\right]d^{2}\Omega.

Since the Riemann tensor vanishes for generic ρ\rho, one might naively imagine that the geometry described by Eq. (4) is everywhere flat, but if that were the case, the function λ(t)\lambda(t) (the areal radius of the throat ρ=0\rho=0) would be unconstrained by the Einstein equation. Such a feature would be disastrous for general relativity, rendering the initial value problem ill-posed, in conflict with accepted theorems, for instance Thm. 10.2.2 of Wald (1984), which establishes that given smooth initial data, there exists a unique spacetime that is a solution to the Einstein equation and is continuously dependent on the initial data.

So what gives? It turns out that the smoothness of the metric tensor components is deceptive—a closer inspection of Eq. (3) at ρ=0\rho=0 reveals hints of the deception. In particular, r(ρ)r(\rho) in Eq. (2) is not bijective in a neighborhood of ρ=0\rho=0 containing both positive and negative values of ρ\rho, and the dρ2d\rho^{2} term in Eq. (3) vanishes at ρ=0\rho=0, rendering the metric degenerate there, as pointed out in Klinkhamer (2023a); *Klinkhamer:2023sau; *Klinkhamer:2023avf (though degenerate metrics can in some cases indicate coordinate singularities, at θ=0\theta=0 for instance). A more suggestive hint comes from the observation Mukohyama that the expansion scalar for a null radial geodesic congruence changes sign as the congruence passes through the throat ρ=0\rho=0; the same property is used to show that spherically symmetric wormholes violate energy conditions (see Morris and Thorne (1988) and Sec. 13.4.2 of Visser (1995)). Indeed, the mystery unravels when explicitly computing limits of the extrinsic curvature tensor Kμν:=12£n(gμνnμnν)K_{\mu\nu}:=\tfrac{1}{2}\pounds_{n}(g_{\mu\nu}-n_{\mu}n_{\nu}) for constant ρ\rho surfaces (which are timelike), where £n\pounds_{n} is the Lie derivative with respect to nμn^{\mu}, the unit normal vector to a surface of constant ρ\rho:

limρ+0Kμν\displaystyle\lim_{\rho_{+}\rightarrow 0}K_{\mu\nu} =diag(0,0,λ,λsin2θ)\displaystyle=\text{diag}(0,0,\lambda,\lambda\sin^{2}\theta) (5)
limρ0Kμν\displaystyle\lim_{\rho_{-}\rightarrow 0}K_{\mu\nu} =diag(0,0,λ,λsin2θ).\displaystyle=\text{diag}(0,0,-\lambda,-\lambda\sin^{2}\theta).

ρ+0\rho_{+}\rightarrow 0 indicates the limit for ρ>0\rho>0, and ρ0\rho_{-}\rightarrow 0 indicates the limit for ρ<0\rho<0. The extrinsic curvature tensor for the family of constant ρ\rho surfaces is discontinuous in ρ\rho at ρ=0\rho=0, signaling the presence of a distributional contribution to the curvature (see Israel (1966) and Sec. 3.7 of Poisson (2004)). The Einstein tensor acquires a nonvanishing term proportional to δ(ρ)\delta(\rho), and it follows from the Einstein equation that the line element (3) is sourced by a (necessarily exotic) thin shell at ρ=0\rho=0.

One can draw two conclusions from this result. The first is that the line elements (3) and (4) describe thin shell wormholes Visser (1989, 1995), which have been studied extensively in classical general relativity (see Alcubierre (2017) and references therein) and as toy models in quantum gravity Redmount and Suen (1993); *Redmount:1993ue. The second is the eponymous conclusion that metric tensors with smooth components can hide thin shell sources—one should check for the presence of thin shells at hypersurfaces on which a metric becomes degenerate.

Acknowledgements — I thank S. Mukohyama, R. A. Matzner, and F. R. Klinkhamer for clarifying remarks and feedback.

References