This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

footnotetext: Key words: frontal, parallels, Legendre singularity, normal connection, normally flat frontal, tangent surface, open swallowtail, unfurled swallowtailfootnotetext: 2020 Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary 58C27; Secondly 58K40, 53B25, 53A07, 53D10. footnotetext: The author is supported by KAKENHI no. 19K03458.

Singularities of parallels to tangent developable surfaces

Goo Ishikawa Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0810, Japan. e-mail: [email protected]
Abstract

It is known that the class of developable surfaces which have zero Gaussian curvature in three dimensional Euclidean space is preserved by the parallel transformations. A tangent developable surface is defined as a ruled developable surface by tangent lines to a space curve and it has singularities at least along the space curve, called the directrix or the the edge of regression. Also the class of tangent developable surfaces are invariant under the parallel deformations. In this paper the notions of tangent developable surfaces and their parallels are naturally generalized for frontal curves in general in Euclidean spaces of arbitrary dimensions. We study singularities appearing on parallels to tangent developable surfaces of frontal curves and give the classification of generic singularities on them for frontal curves in 3 or 4 dimensional Euclidean spaces.

1 Introduction

Given a surface in 𝐑3\mathbf{R}^{3}, a “parallel surface” or a ”parallel” to the surface is simply defined as a surface which have the common family of normal affine lines with the original surface. In fact, given a surface (u,v)f(u,v)(u,v)\mapsto f(u,v) with a unit normal ν(u,v)\nu(u,v), its parallels are given by the surfaces f(u,v)+rν(u,v)f(u,v)+r\nu(u,v) with the parameter r𝐑r\in\mathbf{R}.

In general a line congruence, i.e., a two-dimensional family of affine lines in 𝐑3\mathbf{R}^{3} is called a system of rays if it forms a (possibly singular) Lagrangian surface in the space of affine lines in 𝐑3\mathbf{R}^{3} [1, 2]. The condition is equivalent to that the family is expressed in a parametric form as

(u,v)f(u,v)+rν(u,v)(r𝐑)(u,v)\mapsto f(u,v)+r\,\nu(u,v)\ (r\in\mathbf{R})

for some “frontal” surface (u,v)f(u,v)𝐑3(u,v)\mapsto f(u,v)\in\mathbf{R}^{3} and its unit normal field (u,v)ν(u,v)S2(u,v)\mapsto\nu(u,v)\in S^{2} so that (u,v)(f(u,v),ν(u,v))𝐑3×S2(u,v)\mapsto(f(u,v),\nu(u,v))\in\mathbf{R}^{3}\times S^{2} is Legendrian, i.e. it is an integral map for the standard contact structure on the unit tangent bundle 𝐑3×S2\mathbf{R}^{3}\times S^{2} of the Euclidean space 𝐑3\mathbf{R}^{3}.

Parallel deformations are regarded as an important and interesting transformations of surfaces in differential geometry. For instance, constant mean curvature surfaces and positive constant Gaussian curvature surfaces are related as parallels to each other. Parallels are studied deeply from geometric point of view of differential geometric surface theory (see [21] p.185, [18] p.225 for instance). It is characteristic also that, in the process of taking parallels, the surfaces may have singularities with a geometric origin. Singularites which appear in parallels are studied deeply from singularity theory viewpoint [5, 6, 17].

A surface in Euclidean 3-space is called developable if it is isometric to the plane and the class of developable surfaces. The class is characterized also as the surfaces with zero Gaussian curvature. Developable surfaces are roughly classified into cylinders, cones and tangent developable surfaces. A tangent developable surface is defined as a ruled surface by tangent lines to a space curve and has singularities at least along the space curve, called the directrix or the edge of regression ([11]). Note that the class of developable surfaces is preserved under the parallel transformation. Moreover any conical surface can be regarded as a tangent surface of the “vertex” i.e. a constant curve endowed with a tangential framing along the constant curve, while the class of cylindrical surfaces are preserved under the parallel transformations.

Then we are led naturally to ask which singularities appear on parallels to tangent developable surfaces of curves and the possibility to classify such generic singularities.

The notion of tangent developable surfaces is generalized to frontal curves. A possibly singular curve tf(t)t\mapsto f(t) is called a frontal curve if there exists a family of unit vector field τ(t)\tau(t) such that f(t)f^{\prime}(t) is a scalar multiple of τ(t)\tau(t) for any tt. A possibly singular surface (u,v)F(u,v)(u,v)\mapsto F(u,v) is called a frontal surface if there exists a family of unit vector field ν(u,v)\nu(u,v) such that ν(u,v)\nu(u,v) is orthogonal to both Fu(u,v)F_{u}(u,v) and Fv(u,v)F_{v}(u,v) for any (u,v)(u,v) (see §2).

Under the context mentioned above, we are going to study in this paper parallel frontals for the case when a system of rays in 𝐑3\mathbf{R}^{3} is “degenerate”, i.e. when the corresponding Lagrangian surface in the space of affine lines in 𝐑3\mathbf{R}^{3} is expressed as

(t,s)f(t)+sτ(t)+rν(t)(r𝐑),(t,s)\mapsto f(t)+s\tau(t)+r\nu(t)\ (r\in\mathbf{R}),

where f(t)f(t) is a frontal curve in 𝐑3\mathbf{R}^{3}, τ(t)\tau(t) is a unit tangential frame along ff and ν(t)\nu(t) is a unit normal to the surface (t,s)f(t)+sτ(t)(t,s)\mapsto f(t)+s\tau(t) of ff, the tangent developable surface, or simply, the tangent surface of ff. Here the degeneracy means that the direction vector field ν(t)\nu(t) for the normal lines is independent of ss.

The same idea is applied to frontal hypersurfaces or systems of rays in 𝐑n+1\mathbf{R}^{n+1} and also even to nn-dimensional frontal submanifolds or systems of “multi-dimensional rays” in 𝐑n+p\mathbf{R}^{n+p} when the frontal submanifolds are assumed to be “normally flat” (see §2 and [16]).

Then, in fact, we clarify that any parallels to the tangent surface of a curve turns to be again a tangent surface of some curve, under a mild condition, and thus the class of tangent developable surfaces of curves is in fact preserved by the surface transformation by taking parallels. Furthermore we show that the observation remains true for frontal curves not only in 𝐑3\mathbf{R}^{3} but also in 𝐑1+p,p2\mathbf{R}^{1+p},p\geq 2 in general (see §2 and [16]). Actually we obtain the explicit formula for directrixes which produce parallels by taking tangent lines in terms of differential geometric data on the original curve (Theorem 2.2). In this paper we proceed to classify singularities which appear in parallel surfaces to the tangent surfaces of generic frontal curves in 𝐑3\mathbf{R}^{3} and 𝐑4\mathbf{R}^{4} (Theorem 3.6 and Theorem 3.8).

In the next section §2 we make clear the framework of this paper, introducing Theorem 2.2, and in §3 we formulate our classification results in this paper (Theorems 3.5, 3.6 and 3.8). In §4 we prove Theorem 2.2 briefly and study singularities of parallels to tangent surfaces to curves in 𝐑n+p\mathbf{R}^{n+p} in general to show Theorems 3.5 3.6 and 3.8. In §5 and in §6 we study the classification problem of some singularities which appear in the list of Theorem 3.8.

All manifolds and mappings in this paper are assumed of class CC^{\infty} unless otherwise stated.

2 Parallels to normally flat frontals

Let MM be an nn-dimensional manifold and 𝐑n+p\mathbf{R}^{n+p} the (n+p)(n+p)-dimensional Euclidean space.

A map-germ f:(M,a)𝐑n+pf:(M,a)\to\mathbf{R}^{n+p} at a point aMa\in M is called a frontal-germ if there exists an orthonormal frame ν1,ν2,,νp:(M,a)T𝐑n+p\nu_{1},\nu_{2},\dots,\nu_{p}:(M,a)\to T\mathbf{R}^{n+p} along ff such that

νi(u)f(TuM)=0\nu_{i}(u)\cdot f_{*}(T_{u}M)=0

for any uMu\in M nearby aa and for any i=1,2,pi=1,2,\dots p ([14]). Hear \cdot means Euclidean inner product and f:TMT𝐑n+pf_{*}:TM\to T\mathbf{R}^{n+p} the differential of ff. Then we consider the subbundle NfN_{f} generated by ν1,ν2,,νp\nu_{1},\nu_{2},\dots,\nu_{p} as above in the pull-back bundle f(T𝐑n+p)f^{*}(T\mathbf{R}^{n+p}). We call NfN_{f} the normal bundle of the frontal-germ ff.

A mapping ff is called a frontal if the germ of ff at any point aMa\in M is a frontal-germ.

We remark that, in general, NfN_{f} is not uniquely determined if ff is very degenerate. We call a mapping ff defined on MM proper if the singular locus Σ(f)\Sigma(f), i.e. the non-immersive locus of ff, is nowhere dense in MM.

For a proper frontal f:M𝐑n+pf:M\to\mathbf{R}^{n+p}, the normal bundle NfN_{f} is uniquely determined on MM, because it is determined as the orthogonal complement to f(TM)f_{*}(TM) which is regarded as a subbundle of f(T𝐑n+p)f^{*}(T\mathbf{R}^{n+p}) over the regular locus MΣ(f)M\setminus\Sigma(f) of ff ([14] Proposition 6.2). Then, in turn, the tangent bundle of the frontal ff is defined as the orthogonal complement to NfN_{f} in f(T𝐑n+p)f^{*}(T\mathbf{R}^{n+p}) over the whole MM. Thus the pull-back bundle f(T𝐑n+p)f^{*}(T\mathbf{R}^{n+p}) is decomposed into the sum TfNfT_{f}\oplus N_{f} by the tangent bundle TfT_{f} of rank nn and the normal bundle NfN_{f} of rank pp.

A frontal ff is called normally flat (resp. tangentially flat) if the induced connection on NfN_{f} (resp. the induced connection on TfT_{f}) from the Euclidean connection on f(T𝐑n+p)f^{*}(T\mathbf{R}^{n+p}) is flat ([19, 22]). If ff is normally flat, then there exists an orthonormal frame {ν1,,νp}\{\nu_{1},\dots,\nu_{p}\} along ff such that the covariant derivative of each νi\nu_{i} by any vector field over MM belongs to TfT_{f}. We call such a frame a normally parallel orthonormal frame or Bishop frame of the normally flat frontal (see [4]). Normally parallel sections of NfN_{f} form a pp-dimensional vector space and any normally parallel section ν\nu of NfN_{f} is written as a linear combination ν=i=1priνi,(r1,,rp𝐑)\nu=\sum_{i=1}^{p}r_{i}\nu_{i},(r_{1},\dots,r_{p}\in\mathbf{R}) (See [16] Lemma 3.1). A normally parallel vector field ν\nu is said to be generic if r1,,rpr_{1},\dots,r_{p} are taken to be generic.

Frontal curves and hypersurfaces are normally flat. In [16], we define, for a given normally flat frontal in a Euclidean space, its parallel frontals using normally flat frame (Bishop frame). Moreover it is shown that the tangent surface of a frontal curve which is generated by tangent lines to the curve is normally flat, provided it is a frontal, and every parallel to the tangent surface turns to be right equivalent to the tangent surface of a frontal curve, called the directrix or the edge of regression.

Let f:M𝐑n+pf:M\to\mathbf{R}^{n+p} be a normally flat frontal, and {ν1,,νp}\{\nu_{1},\dots,\nu_{p}\} a Bishop frame of NfN_{f} defined over MM. Then we define the parallels to ff by

Pν(f)(t)=Pr(f)(t):=f(t)+ν(t),where ν(t)=i=1priνi(t),(r𝐑p).{\textstyle{\mbox{\rm P}}_{\nu}(f)(t)={\mbox{\rm P}}_{r}(f)(t):=f(t)+\nu(t),{\mbox{\rm where }}\nu(t)=\sum_{i=1}^{p}r_{i}\nu_{i}(t),\ (r\in\mathbf{R}^{p}).}

Then the parallels are normally flat and have the same Bishop frame with ff.

Parallels are basic and interesting objects to be studied in the cases of both hypersurfaces and curves [6, 8].

Let f:M𝐑n+pf:M\to\mathbf{R}^{n+p} be a frontal. If {τ1,,τn}\{\tau_{1},\dots,\tau_{n}\} is a frame of the tangent bundle TfT_{f} over MM, then the tangent map Tan(f):M×𝐑n𝐑n+p{\mbox{\rm Tan}}(f):M\times\mathbf{R}^{n}\to\mathbf{R}^{n+p} is defined by

Tan(f)(u,s)=f(u)+i=1nsiτi(u),uM,s𝐑n.{\textstyle{\mbox{\rm Tan}}(f)(u,s)=f(u)+\sum_{i=1}^{n}s_{i}\tau_{i}(u),\quad u\in M,s\in\mathbf{R}^{n}.}

The right equivalence class of Tan(f){\mbox{\rm Tan}}(f) is independent of the choice of {τ1,,τn}\{\tau_{1},\dots,\tau_{n}\}. When n=1n=1, then the tangent map is called a tangent surface.

Then we have that tangent surfaces of frontal curves are normally and tangentially flat:

Theorem 2.1

([16], Theorem 2.13)  Let II be an interval and f:I𝐑1+pf:I\to\mathbf{R}^{1+p} a frontal curve. Suppose the tangent surface Tan(f):I×𝐑𝐑1+p{\mbox{\rm Tan}}(f):I\times\mathbf{R}\to\mathbf{R}^{1+p} is a proper frontal, i.e. a frontal with nowhere dense singular points. Then Tan(f){\mbox{\rm Tan}}(f) is a normally and tangentially flat frontal.

Let f:I𝐑1+pf:I\to\mathbf{R}^{1+p} be a frontal curve. A point tIt\in I is called an inflection point of ff if there exists a unit frame τ:ISp(𝐑1+p)\tau:I\to S^{p}(\subset\mathbf{R}^{1+p}) of TfT_{f} such that tt is a singular point of τ\tau, regarded as a curve in the sphere SpS^{p}.

Suppose F=Tan(f):I×𝐑𝐑1+pF={\mbox{\rm Tan}}(f):I\times\mathbf{R}\to\mathbf{R}^{1+p} is a proper frontal and TF=TTan(f)T_{F}=T_{{\mbox{\rm Tan}}(f)} is the tangent bundle of Tan(f){\mbox{\rm Tan}}(f). Let τ\tau be a unit section of TfT_{f} regarded as a unit section of TTan(f)T_{{\mbox{\rm Tan}}(f)} along I×{0}I\times\{0\}. Note that Tan(f)(t,0)=f(t){\mbox{\rm Tan}}(f)(t,0)=f(t). Take an orthonormal frame {τ,μ}\{\tau,\mu\} of TTan(f)T_{{\mbox{\rm Tan}}(f)} along I×{0}I\times\{0\}. Then there exists unique function κ:I𝐑\kappa:I\to\mathbf{R} with τ(t)=κ(t)μ(t)\tau^{\prime}(t)=\kappa(t)\mu(t), which is called the curvature function of the frontal curve ff with respect the frame {τ,μ}\{\tau,\mu\}. Remark that t0It_{0}\in I is an inflection point of ff if and only if κ(t0)=0\kappa(t_{0})=0. Take a normally parallel orthonormal frame {ν1,,νp1}\{\nu_{1},\dots,\nu_{p-1}\} of NTan(f)N_{{\mbox{\rm Tan}}(f)} along I×{0}I\times\{0\}. Then there exist functions 1,,p1:I𝐑\ell_{1},\dots,\ell_{p-1}:I\to\mathbf{R} uniquely, which is called torsion functions of ff, such that μ(t)=κ(t)τ(t)+i=1p1i(t)νi(t)\mu^{\prime}(t)=-\kappa(t)\tau(t)+\sum_{i=1}^{p-1}\ell_{i}(t)\nu_{i}(t). The frame {ν1,,νp1}\{\nu_{1},\dots,\nu_{p-1}\} extends to a normally parallel orthonormal frame of NTan(f)N_{{\mbox{\rm Tan}}(f)} over I×𝐑I\times\mathbf{R} as νi(t,s)=νi(t)\nu_{i}(t,s)=\nu_{i}(t), by the constancy of NTan(f)N_{{\mbox{\rm Tan}}(f)} along {t}×𝐑\{t\}\times\mathbf{R}.

Now let us consider parallels Pr(Tan(f)){\mbox{\rm P}}_{r}({\mbox{\rm Tan}}(f)) of Tan(f){\mbox{\rm Tan}}(f) generated by {ν1,,νp1}\{\nu_{1},\dots,\nu_{p-1}\} of NTan(f)N_{{\mbox{\rm Tan}}(f)}. Then we have that parallels to tangent surfaces of frontal curves are again tangent surfaces of frontal curves as follows:

Theorem 2.2

([16], Theorem 2.17)  Let p2p\geq 2. Let f:I𝐑1+pf:I\to\mathbf{R}^{1+p} be a frontal curve without inflection point, and suppose Tan(f):I×𝐑𝐑1+p{\mbox{\rm Tan}}(f):I\times\mathbf{R}\to\mathbf{R}^{1+p} is a proper frontal. Then any parallel Pr(Tan(f)){\mbox{\rm P}}_{r}({\mbox{\rm Tan}}(f)) to Tan(f){\mbox{\rm Tan}}(f) is right equivalent to the tangent surface Tan(g){\mbox{\rm Tan}}(g) for a frontal curve g:I𝐑1+pg:I\to\mathbf{R}^{1+p}. In fact gg is given by

g(t)=f(t)+i=1p1ri(i(t)κ(t)τ(t)+νi(t)).g(t)=f(t)+\sum_{i=1}^{p-1}r_{i}\left(\frac{\ell_{i}(t)}{\kappa(t)}\,\tau(t)+\nu_{i}(t)\right).

If f(t)=a(t)τ(t)f^{\prime}(t)=a(t)\tau(t), then the velocity vector of gg is given by

g(t)=(a(t)+i=1p1ri{i(t)κ(t)})τ(t).g^{\prime}(t)=\left(a(t)+\sum_{i=1}^{p-1}r_{i}\left\{\frac{\ell_{i}(t)}{\kappa(t)}\right\}^{\prime}\right)\tau(t).
Example 2.3

Let f:(𝐑,0)𝐑3f:(\mathbf{R},0)\to\mathbf{R}^{3} be a curve defined by f(t)=(t,t36,t424)f(t)=(t,\frac{t^{3}}{6},\frac{t^{4}}{24}). Then τ(t)=(1,t22,t36)\tau(t)=(1,\frac{t^{2}}{2},\frac{t^{3}}{6}) and ff has an inflection point at t0=0t_{0}=0. The tangent surface is parametrized as

F(t,s)=(t+s,t36+st22,t424+st36).{\textstyle F(t,s)=(t+s,\ \frac{t^{3}}{6}+s\frac{t^{2}}{2},\ \frac{t^{4}}{24}+s\frac{t^{3}}{6}).}

The unit normal to FF is given by

ν(t,s)=(ν1(t),ν2(t),ν3(t))=12t6+36t2+144(t312,t2,1).{\textstyle\nu(t,s)=(\nu_{1}(t),\nu_{2}(t),\nu_{3}(t))=\frac{12}{\sqrt{t^{6}+36t^{2}+144}}(\frac{t^{3}}{12},-\frac{t}{2},1).}

Then the parallels Fr(t,s)=F(t,s)+rν(t)F_{r}(t,s)=F(t,s)+r\nu(t) are never right equivalent to Tan(fr){\mbox{\rm Tan}}(f_{r}) for any family of frontal curves fr:I𝐑3f_{r}:I\to\mathbf{R}^{3}.

The following bifurcation of fronts is realized by the parallel deformation of a tangent developable surface (Mond surface) of a curve of type (1,3,4)(1,3,4).

[Uncaptioned image]

Parallel deformation of a Mond surface

Example 2.4

Conical singularities can be obtained as tangent developable surfaces. Let τ:IS2𝐑3\tau:I\to S^{2}\subset\mathbf{R}^{3} be a spherical curve such that κ(t)\kappa(t) does not take 0 and 1(t)/κ(t)\ell_{1}(t)/\kappa(t) is not a constant. Set a=(1(t)/κ(t))a=-(\ell_{1}(t)/\kappa(t))^{\prime} and take a frontal curve f:I𝐑3f:I\to\mathbf{R}^{3} satisfying f(t)=a(t)τ(t)f^{\prime}(t)=a(t)\tau(t). Then the parallel P1(Tan(f)):I×𝐑𝐑3P_{1}({\mbox{\rm Tan}}(f)):I\times\mathbf{R}\to\mathbf{R}^{3} to Tan(f){\mbox{\rm Tan}}(f) degenerates to a conical surface.

3 Classification of generic singularities

To give the classification results in this paper for singularities of parallels to tangent surfaces of frontal curves, we recall several necessary notions.

We define, for a curve f:I𝐑1+pf:I\to\mathbf{R}^{1+p}, the (n+p)×k(n+p)\times k-Wronskian matrix of ff by

Wk(f)(t):=(dfdt(t),d2fdt2(t),d3fdt3(t),,dkfdtk(t)),W_{k}(f)(t):=\left(\dfrac{df}{dt}(t),\dfrac{d^{2}f}{dt^{2}}(t),\dfrac{d^{3}f}{dt^{3}}(t),\cdots,\dfrac{d^{k}f}{dt^{k}}(t)\right),

for any positive integer kk. Note that the rank of Wk(f)(t)W_{k}(f)(t) is independent of the choices of local coordinate on II and affine coordinates of 𝐑n+p\mathbf{R}^{n+p}.

Definition 3.1

Let a1,a2,,a1+pa_{1},a_{2},\dots,a_{1+p} be an strictly increasing sequence of positive integers, 1a1<a2<<a1+p1\leq a_{1}<a_{2}<\cdots<a_{1+p}. A curve f:I𝐑1+pf:I\to\mathbf{R}^{1+p} is said to be of type (a1,a2,,a1+p)(a_{1},a_{2},\dots,a_{1+p}) at tIt\in I if ai=min{krank(Wk(f)(t))=i},i=1,2,,1+pa_{i}=\min\{k\mid{\mbox{\rm rank}}(W_{k}(f)(t))=i\},i=1,2,\dots,1+p.

By Theorem 2.2, the singularity of a parallel of Tan(f){\mbox{\rm Tan}}(f) are described by the tangent surface Tan(g){\mbox{\rm Tan}}(g) of a curve gg, provided ff has no inflection points.

Definition 3.2

We call a frontal curve f:I𝐑1+pf:I\to\mathbf{R}^{1+p} generic if there exists an open dense subset in the space of maps I𝐑×SpI\to\mathbf{R}\times S^{p} with respect to Whitney CC^{\infty} topology such that f(t)=a(t)τ(t)f(t)=a(t)\tau(t) for some (a,τ)(a,\tau) belonging to the open dense subset.

For the basic notions of singularity theory of mappings, see [7, 3] for instance.

Proposition 3.3

Generic frontal curves I𝐑1+pI\to\mathbf{R}^{1+p} have no inflection points, provided p2p\geq 2. In fact a generic frontal curve is, at each point of II, of type (1,2,,p,1+p),(1,2,,p,2+p)(1,2,\dots,p,1+p),(1,2,\dots,p,2+p) or (2,3,,1+p,2+p)(2,3,\dots,1+p,2+p).

Note that generic plane frontal curves I𝐑2I\to\mathbf{R}^{2}, p=1p=1, may have inflection points, which are of type (1,3)(1,3).

Now we give the classification of types of singularities appearing in directrixes of parallels to tangent surfaces of generic frontal curves generated by its generic normally parallel normal fields.

Definition 3.4

A frontal curve f:I𝐑1+pf:I\to\mathbf{R}^{1+p} is called generic if f(t)=a(t)τ(t)f^{\prime}(t)=a(t)\tau(t) for a mapping (a,τ):I𝐑×Sp(a,\tau):I\to\mathbf{R}\times S^{p} which belongs to an open dense subset in the space C(I,𝐑×Sp)C^{\infty}(I,\mathbf{R}\times S^{p}) of CC^{\infty} mappings with respect to CC^{\infty}-topology ([7]).

Theorem 3.5

Let p2p\geq 2. Let f:I𝐑1+pf:I\to\mathbf{R}^{1+p} be a generic frontal curve and Tan(f):I×𝐑𝐑1+p{\mbox{\rm Tan}}(f):I\times\mathbf{R}\to\mathbf{R}^{1+p} the tangent surface of ff. Let ν:I×𝐑𝐑1+p\nu:I\times\mathbf{R}\to\mathbf{R}^{1+p} be a generic normally parallel normal field along Tan(f){\mbox{\rm Tan}}(f). Then the type of the directrix g:I𝐑1+pg:I\to\mathbf{R}^{1+p} of the parallel Tan(f)+rν:I×𝐑𝐑1+p{\mbox{\rm Tan}}(f)+r\nu:I\times\mathbf{R}\to\mathbf{R}^{1+p} for any (t,r)I×𝐑(t,r)\in I\times\mathbf{R} is given by

typecodimension(1,2,,p,1+p)0(1,2,,p,2+p)1(2,3,,1+p,2+p)1(2,3,,1+p,3+p)2(3,4,,2+p,3+p)2\begin{array}[]{|c|c|}\hline\cr{\mbox{\rm type}}&{\mbox{\rm codimension}}\\ \hline\cr(1,2,\dots,p,1+p)&0\\ (1,2,\dots,p,2+p)&1\\ (2,3,\dots,1+p,2+p)&1\\ (2,3,\dots,1+p,3+p)&2\\ (3,4,\dots,2+p,3+p)&2\\ \hline\cr\end{array}

Each number in the second column means the codimension of the locus of the type on the (t,r)(t,r)-plane I×𝐑I\times\mathbf{R}.

It is known that, in several cases, singularities of tangent surfaces Tan(g){\mbox{\rm Tan}}(g) are described by types of gg ([11, 13]).

We give in this paper the exact generic classification of parallels to tangent developables of frontal curves in 𝐑3\mathbf{R}^{3} and in 𝐑4\mathbf{R}^{4}.

Let p=2p=2. Then the possible types are (1,2,3),(1,2,4),(2,3,4),(2,3,5)(1,2,3),(1,2,4),(2,3,4),(2,3,5) and (3,4,5)(3,4,5) by Theorem 3.5. Therefore we have

Theorem 3.6

(Classification of singularities of generic parallels to tangent maps of frontal curves in 𝐑3\mathbf{R}^{3}.)  Let p=2p=2. Any singular point of parallels f(t)+sτ(t)+rν(t)f(t)+s\tau(t)+r\nu(t) along a unit normal ν\nu to the tangent surface f(t)+sτ(t)f(t)+s\tau(t) of a generic frontal curve f:I𝐑3f:I\to\mathbf{R}^{3} appears just on {s=0}\{s=0\}. The list of singularities on (t,0;r)I×{0}×𝐑(t,0;r)\in I\times\{0\}\times\mathbf{R} is given by, up to diffeomorphisms,

typesingularitiescodimension(1,2,3)cuspidal edge (CE2,3)1(1,2,4)folded umbrella (FU2,3)2(2,3,4)swallowtail (SW2,3)2(2,3,5)folded pleat (FP2,3)3(3,4,5)cuspidal swallowtail (CSW2,3)3\begin{array}[]{|c|c|c|}\hline\cr{\mbox{\rm type}}&{\mbox{\rm singularities}}&{\mbox{\rm codimension}}\\ \hline\cr(1,2,3)&{\mbox{\rm cuspidal edge (CE${}_{2,3}$)}}&1\\ (1,2,4)&{\mbox{\rm folded umbrella (FU${}_{2,3}$)}}&2\\ (2,3,4)&{\mbox{\rm swallowtail (SW${}_{2,3}$)}}&2\\ (2,3,5)&{\mbox{\rm folded pleat (FP${}_{2,3}$)}}&3\\ (3,4,5)&{\mbox{\rm cuspidal swallowtail (CSW${}_{2,3}$)}}&3\\ \hline\cr\end{array}

The first column indicates the possible types of the directrix. The second column shows the names of right-left diffeomorphism class of singularities of parallels. The third column gives codimension of the locus of the type on the (t,s;r)(t,s;r)-space I×𝐑×𝐑I\times\mathbf{R}\times\mathbf{R}.

[Uncaptioned image][Uncaptioned image][Uncaptioned image][Uncaptioned image][Uncaptioned image]

cuspidal edge            folded umbrella            swallowtail             folded pleat          cuspidal swallowtail

It is known that the diffeomorphism type of tangent developables to curves in 𝐑3\mathbf{R}^{3} of types in Theorem 3.6 is uniquely determined except for the case (2,3,5)(2,3,5) ([10]). The tangent surfaces of curves of type (2,3,5)(2,3,5) fall into two diffeomorphism classes, the generic folded pleat and the non-generic folded pleat ([12]). We call a map-germ the generic folded pleat if it is diffeomorphic (right-left equivalent) to a map-germ (𝐑2,0)(𝐑3,0)(\mathbf{R}^{2},0)\to(\mathbf{R}^{3},0) defined by

(u,t)(u,t3+ut+34t4+12ut2,35t5+13ut3+12t6+14ut4).(u,t)\mapsto(u,\ \ t^{3}+ut+\frac{3}{4}t^{4}+\frac{1}{2}ut^{2},\ \ \frac{3}{5}t^{5}+\frac{1}{3}ut^{3}+\frac{1}{2}t^{6}+\frac{1}{4}ut^{4}).

Note that the above normal form is diffeomorphic to that given in [12].

Remark 3.7

The folded pleat and the cuspidal swallowtail appear at an isolated point on the directrix instantaneously. There is a bifurcation of a folded pleat (resp. a cuspidal swallowtail) depicted as follows:

[Uncaptioned image]

A bifurcation of a folded pleat.

[Uncaptioned image]

A bifurcation of cuspidal swallowtail.

Here the folded pleat bifurcates to a swallowtail, a folded umbrella and a transversal intersection of a cuspidal edge with a regular surface (denoted by A2A1A_{2}A_{1}). The cuspidal swallowtail bifurcates to two swallowtails and two A2A1A_{2}A_{1} or to just a cuspidal edge.

Let p=3p=3. Then the possible types are

(1,2,3,4),(1,2,3,5),(2,3,4,5),(2,3,4,6),(3,4,5,6)(1,2,3,4),(1,2,3,5),(2,3,4,5),(2,3,4,6),(3,4,5,6)

by Theorem 3.5. Thus we have

Theorem 3.8

(Classification of singularities of generic parallels to tangent maps of frontal curves in 𝐑4\mathbf{R}^{4}.)  Let p=3p=3. Any singular point on parallels f(t)+sτ(t)+rν(t)f(t)+s\tau(t)+r\nu(t) along a generic normally parallel normal ν(t)\nu(t) of the tangent surface f(t)+sτ(t)f(t)+s\tau(t) of a generic frontal curve f:I𝐑4f:I\to\mathbf{R}^{4} appears just on {s=0}\{s=0\}. The list of singularities on (t,0;r)I×{0}×𝐑(t,0;r)\in I\times\{0\}\times\mathbf{R} is given by

typesingularitycodimension(1,2,3,4)cuspidal edge (CE2,4)1(1,2,3,5)cuspidal edge (CE2,4)2(2,3,4,5)open swallowtail (OSW2,4)2(2,3,4,6)unfurled swallowtail (USW2,4)3(3,4,5,6)cuspidal swallowtail (CSW2,4)3\begin{array}[]{|c|c|c|}\hline\cr{\mbox{\rm type}}&{\mbox{\rm singularity}}&{\mbox{\rm codimension}}\\ \hline\cr(1,2,3,4)&{\mbox{\rm cuspidal edge (CE${}_{2,4}$)}}&1\\ (1,2,3,5)&{\mbox{\rm cuspidal edge (CE${}_{2,4}$)}}&2\\ (2,3,4,5)&{\mbox{\rm open swallowtail (OSW${}_{2,4}$)}}&2\\ (2,3,4,6)&{\mbox{\rm unfurled swallowtail (USW${}_{2,4}$)}}&3\\ (3,4,5,6)&{\mbox{\rm cuspidal swallowtail (CSW${}_{2,4}$)}}&3\\ \hline\cr\end{array}

It is known the diffeomorphism type of tangent surfaces to curves of types (1,2,3,4),(1,2,3,5)(1,2,3,4),(1,2,3,5) and (2,3,4,5)(2,3,4,5) in 𝐑4\mathbf{R}^{4} is uniquely determined (see [13]). We show that it is also the case for (3,4,5,6)(3,4,5,6) (Proposition 5.1 of §5).

The singularities of tangent surfaces to curves of type (2,3,4,6)(2,3,4,6) turn to fall into several diffeomorphism classes (see §6). The generic normal form is given by

(t,u)(u,t3+ut,34t4+12ut2,37t7+15ut5),(t,u)\mapsto(u,\ \ t^{3}+ut,\ \ \frac{3}{4}t^{4}+\frac{1}{2}ut^{2},\ \ \frac{3}{7}t^{7}+\frac{1}{5}ut^{5}),

which is called the unfurled swallowtail.

[Uncaptioned image][Uncaptioned image][Uncaptioned image][Uncaptioned image]

CE                        OSW                       USW                        CSW

The following bifurcation occurs by parallel deformations of tangent surfaces of curves of type (2,3,5,6)(2,3,5,6) (resp. (3,4,5,6)(3,4,5,6)):

[Uncaptioned image]

Bifurcation of the unfurled swallowtail.

[Uncaptioned image]

Bifurcation of the cuspidal swallowtail in 𝐑4\mathbf{R}^{4}.

4 Parallels to tangent surfaces of frontal curves

We recall here a sufficient condition on a curve to be a frontal.

Lemma 4.1

Let f:(𝐑1,0)𝐑1+pf:(\mathbf{R}^{1},0)\to\mathbf{R}^{1+p} be a curve-germ. Suppose that

a1:=min{krank(Wk(f)(0))=1}<,a2:=min{krank(Wk(f)(0))=2}<.a_{1}:=\min\{k\mid{\mbox{\rm rank}}(W_{k}(f)(0))=1\}<\infty,\ a_{2}:=\min\{k\mid{\mbox{\rm rank}}(W_{k}(f)(0))=2\}<\infty.

Then we have the followings.

(1) ff is frontal and its tangent developable Tan(f):(𝐑,0)×𝐑𝐑1+p{\mbox{\rm Tan}}(f):(\mathbf{R},0)\times\mathbf{R}\to\mathbf{R}^{1+p} is a proper frontal. The singular locus of Tan(f){\mbox{\rm Tan}}(f) is equal to (𝐑,0)×{0}(\mathbf{R},0)\times\{0\} if a2a1=1a_{2}-a_{1}=1 and is equal to (𝐑,0)×{0}{0}×𝐑(\mathbf{R},0)\times\{0\}\cup\{0\}\times\mathbf{R} if a2a12a_{2}-a_{1}\geq 2 (Lemma 2.15 of [16]).

(2) Let τ\tau be a unit frame of TfT_{f} and take a unit frame μ\mu of TTan(f)|(𝐑,0)×0T_{{\mbox{\rm Tan}}(f)}|_{(\mathbf{R},0)\times 0} such that τ,μ\tau,\mu form an orthonormal frame of TTan(f)|(𝐑,0)×0T_{{\mbox{\rm Tan}}(f)}|_{(\mathbf{R},0)\times 0}. Extend τ,μ\tau,\mu to an orthonormal frame of TTan(f)T_{{\mbox{\rm Tan}}(f)} trivially by the constancy of TTan(f)T_{{\mbox{\rm Tan}}(f)} along t×𝐑t\times\mathbf{R} for any t(𝐑,0)t\in(\mathbf{R},0). Then τ(t)=κ(t)μ(t)\tau^{\prime}(t)=\kappa(t)\mu(t) for unique function κ(t)\kappa(t) on (𝐑,0)(\mathbf{R},0) and ord0κ=a2a11{\mbox{\rm ord}}_{0}\,\kappa=a_{2}-a_{1}-1. The curve ff has an inflection point at t=0t=0 if and only if a2a12a_{2}-a_{1}\geq 2.

Proof : (1) Note that 1a1<a21\leq a_{1}<a_{2}. There exist a CC^{\infty} coordinate tt of (𝐑,0)(\mathbf{R},0) and an affine coordinates x1,x2,,x1+px_{1},x_{2},\dots,x_{1+p} such that ff is given by

(x1f)(t)=ta1,(x2f)(t)=ta2+o(ta2),(xif)(t)=o(ta2)(i=3,,1+p).(x_{1}\circ f)(t)=t^{a_{1}},\ \ (x_{2}\circ f)(t)=t^{a_{2}}+o(t^{a_{2}}),\ \ (x_{i}\circ f)(t)=o(t^{a_{2}})\ (i=3,\dots,1+p).

Then we have a tangential field τ(t)\tau(t) for t0t\not=0 by setting τ(t)=1a1ta11f(t)\tau(t)=\frac{1}{a_{1}t^{a_{1}-1}}f^{\prime}(t), which extends uniquely to a CC^{\infty} tangential field τ:(𝐑,0)𝐑1+p\tau:(\mathbf{R},0)\to\mathbf{R}^{1+p} of form

τ(t)=(1,(a2/a1)ta2a1+o(ta2a1),τ3(t),,τ1+p(t)),\tau(t)=\left(1,(a_{2}/a_{1})t^{a_{2}-a_{1}}+o(t^{a_{2}-a_{1}}),\tau_{3}(t),\dots,\tau_{1+p}(t)\right),

with τi(t)=o(ta2a1),(i=3,,1+p)\tau_{i}(t)=o(t^{a_{2}-a_{1}}),(i=3,\dots,1+p). Therefore ff is a frontal. Then the tangent surface of ff is given by Tan(f)(t,s)=f(t)+sτ(t){\mbox{\rm Tan}}(f)(t,s)=f(t)+s\tau(t). We have that the Jacobian ideal of Tan(f){\mbox{\rm Tan}}(f) is principal and, in fact, is generated by sta2a11st^{a_{2}-a_{1}-1}. Therefore Tan(f){\mbox{\rm Tan}}(f) has a nowhere dense singular locus and it turns out to be a proper frontal (see [15], Lemma 2.3).

(2) We write τ(t)=a(t)τ(t)+κ(t)μ(t)\tau^{\prime}(t)=a(t)\tau(t)+\kappa(t)\mu(t) for some functions a,κa,\kappa. Since τ(t)τ(t)=0\tau^{\prime}(t)\cdot\tau(t)=0 and μ(t)τ(t)=0\mu(t)\cdot\tau(t)=0, we see a(t)=0a(t)=0. The tangent map Tan(f){\mbox{\rm Tan}}(f) is given by (t,s)f(t)+sτ(t)(t,s)\mapsto f(t)+s\tau(t) up to diffeomorphisms preserving (𝐑,0)×0(\mathbf{R},0)\times 0. The Jacobi matrix of Tan(f){\mbox{\rm Tan}}(f) is given by (f(t)+sτ(t),τ(t))(f^{\prime}(t)+s\tau^{\prime}(t),\tau(t)). The ideal generated by 2×22\times 2-minors of (f(t)+sτ(t),τ(t))(f^{\prime}(t)+s\tau^{\prime}(t),\tau(t)) is equal to that for sκ(t)(μ(t),τ(t))s\kappa(t)(\mu(t),\tau(t)) and it is generated by the function sκ(t)s\kappa(t). By the argument in (1), we see that the ideals generated by sta2a11st^{a_{2}-a_{1}-1} and by sκ(t)s\kappa(t). Therefore in particular we have that ord0κ=a2a11{\mbox{\rm ord}}_{0}\,\kappa=a_{2}-a_{1}-1. Moreover κ(0)=0\kappa(0)=0 if and only if a2a12a_{2}-a_{1}\geq 2 as required. \Box

The types appeared in Theorem 3.5 satisfy a2a1=1a_{2}-a_{1}=1. Therefore we see that generically a frontal curve ff has no inflection points and that Tan(f){\mbox{\rm Tan}}(f) is a proper frontal by Lemma 4.1.

Definition 4.2

A curve τ:I𝐑1+p\tau:I\to\mathbf{R}^{1+p} is said to be of primitive type (b1,b2,,bp,b1+p)(b_{1},b_{2},\dots,b_{p},b_{1+p}) if bi=min{krank(W~k(τ)(t0))=i},1i1+pb_{i}=\min\{k\mid{\mbox{\rm rank}}(\widetilde{W}_{k}(\tau)(t_{0}))=i\},1\leq i\leq 1+p, where W~k(τ)(t):=(τ(t),τ(t),,τ(k1)(t))\widetilde{W}_{k}(\tau)(t):=(\tau(t),\tau^{\prime}(t),\dots,\tau^{(k-1)}(t)), (1+p)×k(1+p)\times k-matrix, i.e. Wronskian of the primitive of τ\tau.

Lemma 4.3

Let f:I𝐑1+pf:I\to\mathbf{R}^{1+p} be a frontal curve and τ:I𝐑1+p\tau:I\to\mathbf{R}^{1+p} a tangential frame of ff with f(t)=a(t)τ(t)f^{\prime}(t)=a(t)\tau(t) for unique function m(t)m(t). If τ\tau is of primitive type (b1,b2,,bp,b1+p)(b_{1},b_{2},\dots,b_{p},b_{1+p}) at t=t0t=t_{0}, and ordt0a=m{\mbox{\rm ord}}_{t_{0}}a=m i.e. τ(t0)==τ(m1)(t0)=0,τ(m)(t0)0\tau(t_{0})=\cdots=\tau^{(m-1)}(t_{0})=0,\tau^{(m)}(t_{0})\not=0, then ff is of type (m+b1,m+b2,,m+bp,m+b1+p)(m+b_{1},m+b_{2},\dots,m+b_{p},m+b_{1+p}) at t=t0t=t_{0}.

Proof : From f(t)=a(t)τ(t)f^{\prime}(t)=a(t)\tau(t), we have f′′(t)=a(t)τ(t)+a(t)τ(t)f^{\prime\prime}(t)=a^{\prime}(t)\tau(t)+a(t)\tau^{\prime}(t), f′′′(t)=a′′(t)τ(t)+2a(t)τ(t)+a(t)τ′′(t)f^{\prime\prime\prime}(t)=a^{\prime\prime}(t)\tau(t)+2a^{\prime}(t)\tau^{\prime}(t)+a(t)\tau^{\prime\prime}(t) and so on. If ordt0a=m{\mbox{\rm ord}}_{t_{0}}a=m, then Wr(f)(t0)=OW_{r}(f)(t_{0})=O and we have (f(m+1)(t0),,f(m+k)(t0))=(τ(t0),,τ(k)(t0))A(t0)\left(f^{(m+1)}(t_{0}),\dots,f^{(m+k)}(t_{0})\right)=\left(\tau(t_{0}),\dots,\tau^{(k)}(t_{0})\right)\cdot A(t_{0}), where

A=(a(m)a(m+1)a(m+k1)0a(m)a(m+1)00a(m)a(m+1)000a(m)),A=\left(\begin{array}[]{ccccc}a^{(m)}&a^{(m+1)}&\cdots&\cdots&a^{(m+k-1)}\\ 0&a^{(m)}&a^{(m+1)}&\cdots&\cdots\vspace{0.2truecm}\\ \vdots&\vdots&\ddots&\ddots&\vdots\vspace{0.2truecm}\\ 0&0&\cdots&a^{(m)}&a^{(m+1)}\\ 0&0&\cdots&0&a^{(m)}\end{array}\right),

a k×kk\times k-matrix. Then Wm(f)(t0)=OW_{m}(f)(t_{0})=O and rankWm+k(f)(t0)=rankW~k(τ)(t0){\mbox{\rm rank}}\ W_{m+k}(f)(t_{0})={\mbox{\rm rank}}\ \widetilde{W}_{k}(\tau)(t_{0}). Therefore we have that ff is of type (a1,a2,,ap+1)=(b1+m,b2+m,,bp+1+m)(a_{1},a_{2},\dots,a_{p+1})=(b_{1}+m,b_{2}+m,\dots,b_{p+1}+m) at t0t_{0}. \Box

Proof of Proposition 3.3: Write f(t)=a(t)τ(t)f^{\prime}(t)=a(t)\tau(t) for a function a:I𝐑a:I\to\mathbf{R} and τ:ISp𝐑1+p\tau:I\to S^{p}\subset\mathbf{R}^{1+p}. Note that ff is obtained by integration from aa and τ\tau, and ff is determined up to constant. The spherical curve τ\tau is regarded as a curve in the projective space 𝐑Pp\mathbf{R}P^{p} as well and the type of τ\tau at a point tIt\in I as an affine curve is equal to (c1,c2,,cp)(c_{1},c_{2},\dots,c_{p}) if and only if the primitive type of τ\tau at tt as a curve in 𝐑1+p\mathbf{R}^{1+p} is equal to (1,1+c1,1+c2,,1+cp)(1,1+c_{1},1+c_{2},\dots,1+c_{p}). On the other hand it is known that generically a curve in 𝐑Pp\mathbf{R}P^{p} is of type (1,2,,p1,p)(1,2,\dots,p-1,p) or (1,2,,p1,p+1)(1,2,\dots,p-1,p+1) and the latter occurs only at an isolated point (see [20] and Corollary 5.2 of [13]). Note that the genericity condition is given by a transversality of jet sections to a closed semi-algebraic set in the jet space Jp+1(I,𝐑Pp)J^{p+1}(I,\mathbf{R}P^{p}) of codimension 2\geq 2. Thus by taking τ\tau generically we have that there exist discrete set DID\subset I such that τ\tau is of primitive type (1.2.,p,p+1)(1.2.\dots,p,p+1) at tIDt\in I\setminus D and (1,2,,p,p+2)(1,2,\dots,p,p+2) at tDt\in D. Then by taking the function aa generically we have that aa does not vanish at DD and any zero tt of aa on IDI\setminus D is simple, i.e. ordta=1{\mbox{\rm ord}}_{t}a=1. Therefore, by Lemma 4.3, we have generically that ff is of type (1.2.,p,1+p)(1.2.\dots,p,1+p), (1,2,,p,2+p)(1,2,\dots,p,2+p) or (2,3,,1+p,2+p)(2,3,\dots,1+p,2+p). \Box

Proof of Theorem 2.2: Let f:(𝐑,0)𝐑1+pf:(\mathbf{R},0)\to\mathbf{R}^{1+p} be a frontal curve and F=Tan(f):(𝐑,0)×𝐑𝐑1+pF={\mbox{\rm Tan}}(f):(\mathbf{R},0)\times\mathbf{R}\to\mathbf{R}^{1+p} the tangent developable of ff. Let {τ,μ,ν1,,νp1}\{\tau,\mu,\nu_{1},\dots,\nu_{p-1}\} be an orthonormal frame of FT𝐑1+pF^{*}T\mathbf{R}^{1+p} along ff. Here we demand that τ\tau is a unit section of TfT_{f}, {τ,μ}\{\tau,\mu\} is an orthonormal frame of TF|(𝐑,0)×0T_{F}|_{(\mathbf{R},0)\times 0} and {ν1,,νp1}\{\nu_{1},\dots,\nu_{p-1}\} is a parallel orthonormal frame of NF|(𝐑,0)×0N_{F}|_{(\mathbf{R},0)\times 0}. Then we extend {τ,μ,ν1,,νp1}\{\tau,\mu,\nu_{1},\dots,\nu_{p-1}\} trivially to the frame of FT𝐑1+pF^{*}T\mathbf{R}^{1+p} by the constancy of TF|t×𝐑T_{F}|_{t\times\mathbf{R}}. Then we have f(t)=a(t)τ(t)f^{\prime}(t)=a(t)\tau(t) and the structure equation of the moving frame:

(τ(t)μ(t)ν1(t)νp1(t))=(0κ(t)00κ(t)01(t)p1(t)01(t)000p1(t)00)(τ(t)μ(t)ν1(t)νp1(t))\left(\begin{array}[]{c}\tau^{\prime}(t)\\ \mu^{\prime}(t)\\ \nu^{\prime}_{1}(t)\\ \vdots\\ \nu^{\prime}_{p-1}(t)\end{array}\right)=\left(\begin{array}[]{ccccc}0&\kappa(t)&0&\cdots&0\\ -\kappa(t)&0&\ell_{1}(t)&\cdots&\ell_{p-1}(t)\\ 0&-\ell_{1}(t)&0&\cdots&0\\ \vdots&\vdots&\vdots&\ddots&\vdots\\ 0&-\ell_{p-1}(t)&0&\cdots&0\end{array}\right)\left(\begin{array}[]{c}\tau(t)\\ \mu(t)\\ \nu_{1}(t)\\ \vdots\\ \nu_{p-1}(t)\end{array}\right)

for uniquely determined functions a(t),k(t),1(t),,p1(t)a(t),k(t),\ell_{1}(t),\dots,\ell_{p-1}(t).

Let ν\nu be a normally parallel, not necessarily unit, normal field along Tan(f){\mbox{\rm Tan}}(f). Then ν=i=1p1riνi\nu=\sum_{i=1}^{p-1}r_{i}\nu_{i} for some ri𝐑(i=1,,p1)r_{i}\in\mathbf{R}\ (i=1,\dots,p-1). Consider the parallel

P(t,s):=Pν(F)(t,s)=F+ν=f(t)+sτ(t)+ν(t),P(t,s):={\mbox{\rm{P}}}_{\nu}(F)(t,s)=F+\nu=f(t)+s\tau(t)+\nu(t),

of F=Tan(f)F={\mbox{\rm Tan}}(f) generated by ν\nu. Then the Jacobi matrix of PP is given by

(f(t)+sτ(t)+i=1p1riνi(t),τ(t))=(a(t)τ(t)+{sκ(t)i=1p1rii(t)}μ(t),τ(t)),\left(f^{\prime}(t)+s\tau^{\prime}(t)+\sum_{i=1}^{p-1}r_{i}\nu_{i}^{\prime}(t),\ \tau(t)\right)=\left(a(t)\tau(t)+\left\{s\kappa(t)-\sum_{i=1}^{p-1}r_{i}\ell_{i}(t)\right\}\mu(t),\ \tau(t)\right),

the rank of which is equal to that of the matrix ({sκ(t)i=1p1rii(t)}μ(t),τ(t))\left(\left\{s\kappa(t)-\sum_{i=1}^{p-1}r_{i}\ell_{i}(t)\right\}\mu(t),\ \tau(t)\right). Therefore the singular locus Σ(P)\Sigma(P) of the parallel PP is given by {(t,s)(𝐑,0)×𝐑sκ(t)i=1p1rii(t)=0}\{(t,s)\in(\mathbf{R},0)\times\mathbf{R}\mid s\kappa(t)-\sum_{i=1}^{p-1}r_{i}\ell_{i}(t)=0\}. By the assumption, κ(t)\kappa(t) does not vanish. Therefore Σ(P)\Sigma(P) is parametrised by s=i=1p1rii(t)/κ(t)s=\sum_{i=1}^{p-1}r_{i}\ell_{i}(t)/\kappa(t). Set

g(t):=f(t)+i=1p1rii(t)κ(t)τ(t)+ν(t).g(t):=f(t)+\sum_{i=1}^{p-1}r_{i}\frac{\ell_{i}(t)}{\kappa(t)}\tau(t)+\nu(t).

Then

g(t)=f(t)+i=1p1ri(i(t)κ(t)τ(t))+ν(t)=a(t)τ(t)+i=1p1ri(i(t)κ(t))τ(t)+i=1p1ri(i(t)κ(t))κ(t)μ(t)+i=1p1ri(i(t)μ(t))=(a(t)+i=1p1ri{i(t)κ(t)})τ(t).\begin{array}[]{rcl}g^{\prime}(t)&=&f^{\prime}(t)+\sum_{i=1}^{p-1}r_{i}\left(\frac{\ell_{i}(t)}{\kappa(t)}\tau(t)\right)^{\prime}+\nu^{\prime}(t)\\ &=&a(t)\tau(t)+\sum_{i=1}^{p-1}r_{i}\left(\frac{\ell_{i}(t)}{\kappa(t)}\right)^{\prime}\tau(t)+\sum_{i=1}^{p-1}r_{i}\left(\frac{\ell_{i}(t)}{\kappa(t)}\right)\kappa(t)\mu(t)+\sum_{i=1}^{p-1}r_{i}(-\ell_{i}(t)\mu(t))\\ &=&\left(a(t)+\sum_{i=1}^{p-1}r_{i}\left\{\frac{\ell_{i}(t)}{\kappa(t)}\right\}^{\prime}\right)\tau(t).\end{array}

Thus gg has the same tangent frame τ\tau with ff. The tangent developable of gg is given by

Tan(g)(t,s)=f(t)+i=1p2rii(t)κ(t)τ(t)+ν(t)+sτ(t)=f(t)+(s+i=1p2rii(t)κ(t))τ(t)+ν(t).{\mbox{\rm Tan}}(g)(t,s)=f(t)+\sum_{i=1}^{p-2}r_{i}\frac{\ell_{i}(t)}{\kappa(t)}\tau(t)+\nu(t)+s\tau(t)=f(t)+\left(s+\sum_{i=1}^{p-2}r_{i}\frac{\ell_{i}(t)}{\kappa(t)}\right)\tau(t)+\nu(t).

Then by the diffeomorphism (t.s)(t,s+i=1p2rii(t)κ(t))(t.s)\mapsto(t,s+\sum_{i=1}^{p-2}r_{i}\frac{\ell_{i}(t)}{\kappa(t)}) on (𝐑,0)×𝐑(\mathbf{R},0)\times\mathbf{R}, we have that Pν(Tan(f)){\mbox{\rm{P}}}_{\nu}({\mbox{\rm Tan}}(f)) is right equivalent to Tan(g){\mbox{\rm Tan}}(g). \Box

Proof of Theorem 3.5: By Theorem 2.2, we have g(t)=(a(t)+i=1p1ri{i(t)κ(t)})τ(t)g^{\prime}(t)=\left(a(t)+\sum_{i=1}^{p-1}r_{i}\left\{\frac{\ell_{i}(t)}{\kappa(t)}\right\}^{\prime}\right)\tau(t). We set b(t)=a(t)+i=1p1ri{i(t)κ(t)}b(t)=a(t)+\sum_{i=1}^{p-1}r_{i}\left\{\frac{\ell_{i}(t)}{\kappa(t)}\right\}^{\prime}. Let us consider the system of equations:

{a0(t)+a1(t)r1++ap1(t)rp1=0,a0(t)+a1(t)r1++ap1(t)rp1=0,a0′′(t)+a1′′(t)r1++ap1′′(t)rp1=0,\left\{\begin{array}[]{ccccccccc}a_{0}(t)&+&a_{1}(t)\,r_{1}&+&\cdots&+&a_{p-1}(t)\,r_{p-1}&=&0,\\ a_{0}^{\prime}(t)&+&a_{1}^{\prime}(t)\,r_{1}&+&\cdots&+&a_{p-1}^{\prime}(t)\,r_{p-1}&=&0,\\ a_{0}^{\prime\prime}(t)&+&a_{1}^{\prime\prime}(t)\,r_{1}&+&\cdots&+&a_{p-1}^{\prime\prime}(t)\,r_{p-1}&=&0,\end{array}\right.

for a curve α:I𝐑p,α(t)=(a0(t),a1(t),,ap1(t))\alpha:I\to\mathbf{R}^{p},\alpha(t)=(a_{0}(t),a_{1}(t),\dots,a_{p-1}(t)) and r=(r1,r2,,rp1)𝐑p1r=(r_{1},r_{2},\dots,r_{p-1})\in\mathbf{R}^{p-1}. By the transversality theorem, the curves α\alpha satisfying the following properties form an open dense set: The set of rr satisfying the above system of equations for some tIt\in I form a semi-algebraic subset Σ\Sigma in I×𝐑p1I\times\mathbf{R}^{p-1} of dimension p3\leq p-3 and a0(t)0a_{0}(t)\not=0 for any tIt\in I. Then π(Σ)𝐑p1\pi(\Sigma)\subset\mathbf{R}^{p-1} is a semi-algebraic subset of dimension p3\leq p-3 in 𝐑p1{0}\mathbf{R}^{p-1}\setminus\{0\} which does not pass through the origin, where π:I×𝐑p1,π(t,r)=r\pi:I\times\mathbf{R}^{p-1},\pi(t,r)=r. Then Π(π(Σ))𝐑Pp2\Pi(\pi(\Sigma))\subset\mathbf{R}P^{p-2} is a semi-algebraic subset of dimension p3\leq p-3 in 𝐑Pp2\mathbf{R}P^{p-2}.

Now let f:I𝐑1+pf:I\to\mathbf{R}^{1+p} be any frontal. Set f=aτf^{\prime}=a\tau for a function a:I𝐑a:I\to\mathbf{R} and τ:ISp𝐑1+p\tau:I\to S^{p}\subset\mathbf{R}^{1+p}. Then perturb τ\tau to a generic map as in Proposition 3.3. Let τ(t),μ(t),ν1(t),,νp1(t)\tau(t),\mu(t),\nu_{1}(t),\dots,\nu_{p-1}(t) be the corresponding moving frame of ff and κ(t),1(t),,p1(t)\kappa(t),\ell_{1}(t),\dots,\ell_{p-1}(t) the system of invariants (curvature and torsions) of ff. Perturb a(t),κ(t),1(t),,p1(t)a(t),\kappa(t),\ell_{1}(t),\dots,\ell_{p-1}(t) such that a0(t)=a(t),a1(t)=(1(t)/κ(t)),,ap1(t)=(p1(t)/κ(t))a_{0}(t)=a(t),a_{1}(t)=(\ell_{1}(t)/\kappa(t))^{\prime},\dots,a_{p-1}(t)=(\ell_{p-1}(t)/\kappa(t))^{\prime} satisfies the genericity condition. Then we perturb the frame τ(t),μ(t),ν1(t),,νp1(t)\tau(t),\mu(t),\nu_{1}(t),\dots,\nu_{p-1}(t) by the structure equation. Finally f(t)f(t) is perturbed by integration of a(t)τ(t)a(t)\tau(t) for the perturbed a(t)a(t) and τ(t)\tau(t).

Take any R𝐑1+p,R0R\in\mathbf{R}^{1+p},R\not=0 with [R]𝐑Pp2Π(π(Σ))[R]\in\mathbf{R}P^{p-2}\setminus\Pi(\pi(\Sigma)) and set ν:=i=1p1Riνi\nu:=\sum_{i=1}^{p-1}R_{i}\nu_{i}. Then, for any parallel Prν=f+rνP_{r\nu}=f+r\nu, for any r𝐑r\in\mathbf{R}, we have Prν(t)=b(t)τ(t)P_{r\nu}^{\prime}(t)=b(t)\tau(t) with b(t)=a(t)+i=1p1rRi(i(t)/κ(t))b(t)=a(t)+\sum_{i=1}^{p-1}rR_{i}(\ell_{i}(t)/\kappa(t))^{\prime} such that b(t)b(t) has order 2\leq 2 for any tIt\in I.

We have that there exist discrete set DID\subset I such that τ\tau is of primitive type (1.2.,p,p+1)(1.2.\dots,p,p+1) at tIDt\in I\setminus D and (1,2,,p,p+2)(1,2,\dots,p,p+2) at tDt\in D. Moreover, we can arrange a(t)a(t) slightly so that the discrete point set {(a(t),a(t))tD}\{(a(t),a^{\prime}(t))\mid t\in D\} does not intersect with the union of lines tD𝐑(i=1p1Ri(i(t)/κ(t)),i=1p1Ri(i(t)/κ(t))′′)\bigcup_{t\in D}\mathbf{R}(\sum_{i=1}^{p-1}R_{i}(\ell_{i}(t)/\kappa(t))^{\prime},\sum_{i=1}^{p-1}R_{i}(\ell_{i}(t)/\kappa(t))^{\prime\prime}) in 𝐑2\mathbf{R}^{2}. Then we have (b(t),b(t))(0,0)(b(t),b^{\prime}(t))\not=(0,0) for any r𝐑r\in\mathbf{R} and tDt\in D. Thus b(t)b(t) has order 1\leq 1 for any tIDt\in I\setminus D. Therefore, by Lemma 4.3, we have the required result on the possible types appearing in directrixes. \Box

5 The cuspidal swallowtail surfaces in 𝐑4\mathbf{R}^{4}

The determinacy of generating families of Legendre varieties associated to curves of type (3,4,5,6)(3,4,5,6) is shown in [9]. See also [10]. Using it, we give the normal form of tangent surfaces to curves of type (3,4,5,6)(3,4,5,6) in 𝐑4\mathbf{R}^{4}.

Proposition 5.1

Tangent surfaces of curve-germs of type (3,4,5,6)(3,4,5,6) in 𝐑4\mathbf{R}^{4} has unique diffeomorphism type. In fact they are diffeomorphic to the germ (𝐑2,0)𝐑4(\mathbf{R}^{2},0)\to\mathbf{R}^{4} defined by

CSW2,4:(u,t)(u,t4+ut,45t5+12ut2,23t6+13ut3).{\mbox{\rm CSW}}_{2,4}:\ (u,t)\mapsto\left(u,\ \ t^{4}+ut,\ \ \frac{4}{5}t^{5}+\frac{1}{2}ut^{2},\ \ \frac{2}{3}t^{6}+\frac{1}{3}ut^{3}\right).

Proof of Proposition 5.1. By Theorem 1 of [9], it is known that the ruled 33-fold by osculating planes to any curve of type (3,4,5,6)(3,4,5,6) in 𝐑4\mathbf{R}^{4} is diffeomorphic to the envelope of the family of hyperplanes

t6+x1t3+x2t2+x3t+x4=0,t^{6}+x_{1}t^{3}+x_{2}t^{2}+x_{3}t+x_{4}=0,

with parameter tt. Then the tangent surface of the curve is diffeomorphic to the singular locus of the envelope. The envelope is given by (x1,x2,t)(x1,x2,x3,x4)(x_{1},x_{2},t)\mapsto(x_{1},x_{2},x_{3},x_{4}), where

x3=6t53x1t22x2t,x4=5t6+2x1t3+x2t2.x_{3}=-6t^{5}-3x_{1}t^{2}-2x_{2}t,\quad x_{4}=5t^{6}+2x_{1}t^{3}+x_{2}t^{2}.

The singular locus is given by x2=15t43x1tx_{2}=-15t^{4}-3x_{1}t and therefore by the map-germ

(x1,t)(x1,15t43x1t,24t5+3x1t2,10t6x1t3)=(x1,15(t4+15x1t),30(45t5+110x1t2),15(23t6+115x1t3)),\begin{array}[]{rcl}(x_{1},t)&\mapsto&\left(x_{1},\ -15t^{4}-3x_{1}t,24t^{5}+3x_{1}t^{2},\ -10t^{6}-x_{1}t^{3}\right)\\ &=&\left(x_{1},\ -15(t^{4}+\frac{1}{5}x_{1}t),30(\frac{4}{5}t^{5}+\frac{1}{10}x_{1}t^{2}),\ -15(\frac{2}{3}t^{6}+\frac{1}{15}x_{1}t^{3})\right),\end{array}

which is diffeomorphic to the normal form by setting u=15x1u=\frac{1}{5}x_{1}. \Box

6 The swallowtail and its openings in 𝐑4\mathbf{R}^{4}

The normal form of the swallowtail surface is given by

SW2,3:(t,u)(u,t3+ut,34t4+12ut2).{\mbox{\rm SW}}_{2,3}:\ (t,u)\mapsto\left(u,\ \ t^{3}+ut,\ \ \frac{3}{4}t^{4}+\frac{1}{2}ut^{2}\right).

The tangent surface to any curve of type (2,3,4,5)(2,3,4,5) is diffeomorphic to the open swallowtail, which is the “versal” opening of the swallowtail surface in 𝐑3\mathbf{R}^{3}.

OSW2,4:(t,u)(u,t3+ut,34t4+12ut2,35t5+13ut3),{\mbox{\rm OSW}}_{2,4}:\ (t,u)\mapsto\left(u,\ \ t^{3}+ut,\ \ \frac{3}{4}t^{4}+\frac{1}{2}ut^{2},\ \ \frac{3}{5}t^{5}+\frac{1}{3}ut^{3}\right),

For the details and proofs, see [13].

Related to Theorem 3.8, we are lead to study the classification for more degenerate “opening” of the swallowtail.

Theorem 6.1

The tangent surface Tan(f){\mbox{\rm Tan}}(f) of a curve ff of type (2,3,4,6)(2,3,4,6) is diffeomorphic to

(t,u)(u,t3+ut,34t4+12ut2,ψ(u,t3+ut)(37t7+15ut5)),(t,u)\mapsto\left(u,\ \ t^{3}+ut,\ \ \frac{3}{4}t^{4}+\frac{1}{2}ut^{2},\ \ \psi(u,t^{3}+ut)(\frac{3}{7}t^{7}+\frac{1}{5}ut^{5})\right),

for some function ψ:(𝐑2,0)𝐑\psi:(\mathbf{R}^{2},0)\to\mathbf{R}. If ψ\psi is identically zero, then the tangent surface Tan(f){\mbox{\rm Tan}}(f) is diffeomorphic to the embedded swallowtail

SW2,4:(t,u)(u,t3+ut,34t4+12ut2, 0),{\mbox{\rm SW}}_{2,4}:\ (t,u)\mapsto(u,\ \ t^{3}+ut,\ \ \frac{3}{4}t^{4}+\frac{1}{2}ut^{2},\ \ 0),

in 𝐑4\mathbf{R}^{4}. If ψ(0,0)0\psi(0,0)\not=0, then Tan(f){\mbox{\rm Tan}}(f) is diffeomorphic to

USW2,4:(t,u)(u,t3+ut,34t4+12ut2,37t7+15ut5),{\mbox{\rm USW}}_{2,4}:\ (t,u)\mapsto(u,\ \ t^{3}+ut,\ \ \frac{3}{4}t^{4}+\frac{1}{2}ut^{2},\ \ \frac{3}{7}t^{7}+\frac{1}{5}ut^{5}),
Remark 6.2

The three singularities SW2,4,OSW2,4{\mbox{\rm SW}}_{2,4},{\mbox{\rm OSW}}_{2,4} and USW2,4:(𝐑2,0)𝐑4{\mbox{\rm USW}}_{2,4}:(\mathbf{R}^{2},0)\to\mathbf{R}^{4} are not diffeomorphic to each other.

To show Theorem 6.1, let g(t,u)=(u,t3+ut)g(t,u)=(u,t^{3}+ut). Set

𝒥g:=du,d(t3+ut)2=du,(3t2+u)dt2,g:={h2dh𝒥g}{\mathcal{J}}_{g}:=\langle du,d(t^{3}+ut)\rangle_{{\mathcal{E}}_{2}}=\langle du,(3t^{2}+u)dt\rangle_{{\mathcal{E}}_{2}},\quad{\mathcal{R}}_{g}:=\{h\in{\mathcal{E}}_{2}\mid dh\in{\mathcal{J}}_{g}\}

(see [14, 15]) and set

g(i+1):={hti+12dhti𝒥g},(i=0,1,2,).{\mathcal{R}}_{g}^{(i+1)}:=\{h\in t^{i+1}{\mathcal{E}}_{2}\mid dh\in t^{i}{\mathcal{J}}_{g}\},\ (i=0,1,2,\dots).

Here 2{\mathcal{E}}_{2} means the 𝐑\mathbf{R}-algebra which consists of all CC^{\infty} function-germs (𝐑2,0)𝐑(\mathbf{R}^{2},0)\to\mathbf{R}. Then we have

2g(1)g(2).{\mathcal{E}}_{2}\supset{\mathcal{R}}_{g}^{(1)}\supset{\mathcal{R}}_{g}^{(2)}\supset\cdots.

Let T0:=t3+ut=(3t2+u)𝑑tT_{0}:=t^{3}+ut={\displaystyle\int}(3t^{2}+u)dt and

Ti:=ti(3t2+u)𝑑t=(3ti+2+uti)𝑑t=3i+3ti+3+1i+1uti+1,T_{i}:={\displaystyle\int}t^{i}(3t^{2}+u)dt={\displaystyle\int}(3t^{i+2}+ut^{i})dt=\frac{3}{i+3}t^{i+3}+\frac{1}{i+1}ut^{i+1},

for i=0,1,2,3,i=0,1,2,3,\dots. Then Tig(i+1)T_{i}\in{\mathcal{R}}_{g}^{(i+1)}.

Lemma 6.3

We have

g(i+1)={hti+12|httiTt2}=gti+12.{\mathcal{R}}_{g}^{(i+1)}=\left\{h\in t^{i+1}{\mathcal{E}}_{2}\ \left|\ \frac{\partial h}{\partial t}\in t^{i}\frac{\partial T}{\partial t}{\mathcal{E}}_{2}\right\}\right.={\mathcal{R}}_{g}\cap t^{i+1}{\mathcal{E}}_{2}.

Proof : Two inclusions \subseteq are clear. To show the converse inclusions, let hgti+12h\in{\mathcal{R}}_{g}\cap t^{i+1}{\mathcal{E}}_{2}. Then dh=adu+b(3t2+u)dtdh=adu+b(3t^{2}+u)dt for some a,b2a,b\in{\mathcal{E}}_{2}. Moreover h=ti+1kh=t^{i+1}k for some k2k\in{\mathcal{E}}_{2}. Then dh=ti+1dk+(i+1)tikdt=ti+1kudu+ti(tkt+(i+1)k)dtdh=t^{i+1}dk+(i+1)t^{i}kdt=t^{i+1}\frac{\partial k}{\partial u}du+t^{i}(t\frac{\partial k}{\partial t}+(i+1)k)dt. Then a=ti+1kua=t^{i+1}\frac{\partial k}{\partial u}, b(3t2+u)=ti(tkt+(i+1)k)b(3t^{2}+u)=t^{i}(t\frac{\partial k}{\partial t}+(i+1)k) and we have bti2b\in t^{i}{\mathcal{E}}_{2}. Therefore we have httiTt2\frac{\partial h}{\partial t}\in t^{i}\frac{\partial T}{\partial t}{\mathcal{E}}_{2} and dhti𝒥gdh\in t^{i}{\mathcal{J}}_{g}. Thus we have two inclusions \supseteq. \Box

By Lemma 2.4 (1’) of [10], we have

Lemma 6.4

The 2{\mathcal{E}}_{2}-module g(4){\mathcal{R}}_{g}^{(4)} is generated by T3,T4,T5T_{3},T_{4},T_{5} over g:22g^{*}:{\mathcal{E}}_{2}\to{\mathcal{E}}_{2}.

By direct calculations, we have

Lemma 6.5
T2j+1=j+26Tj12j+23juT2j1,(j=1,2,3,).T_{2j+1}=\frac{j+2}{6}T_{j-1}^{2}-\frac{j+2}{3j}uT_{2j-1},\quad(j=1,2,3,\dots).

In particular we have

T3=12T02uT1,T5=23T1223uT3=13uT02+23u2T0+23T12.T_{3}=\frac{1}{2}T_{0}^{2}-uT_{1},\quad T_{5}=\frac{2}{3}T_{1}^{2}-\frac{2}{3}uT_{3}=-\frac{1}{3}uT_{0}^{2}+\frac{2}{3}u^{2}T_{0}+\frac{2}{3}T_{1}^{2}.

Proof of Theorem 6.1: Let f:I𝐑4f:I\to\mathbf{R}^{4} be of type (2,3,4,6)(2,3,4,6) at t0It_{0}\in I. Then there exist a coordinate tt of II centred at t0t_{0} and a system of affine coordinates on 𝐑4\mathbf{R}^{4} centred at f(t0)f(t_{0}) such that ff is expressed as

f:x1=t2,x2=t3+φ2(t),x3=t4+φ3(t),x4=t6+φ4(t),f:x_{1}=t^{2},\ \ x_{2}=t^{3}+\varphi_{2}(t),\ \ x_{3}=t^{4}+\varphi_{3}(t),\ \ x_{4}=t^{6}+\varphi_{4}(t),

with ord0φ2>3,ord0φ3>4,ord0φ4>6{\mbox{\rm ord}}_{0}\varphi_{2}>3,{\mbox{\rm ord}}_{0}\varphi_{3}>4,{\mbox{\rm ord}}_{0}\varphi_{4}>6. Then a tangential frame of ff is given by

τ(t)=(1,32t+ψ2(t), 2t2+ψ3(t), 3t4+ψ4(t)),\tau(t)=\left(1,\ \ \frac{3}{2}t+\psi_{2}(t),\ \ 2t^{2}+\psi_{3}(t),\ \ 3t^{4}+\psi_{4}(t)\right),

with φ2(t)=2tψ2(t),φ3(t)=2tψ3(t),φ4(t)=2tψ4(t)\varphi_{2}^{\prime}(t)=2t\psi_{2}(t),\varphi_{3}^{\prime}(t)=2t\psi_{3}(t),\varphi_{4}^{\prime}(t)=2t\psi_{4}(t) and ord0ψ2>1,ord0ψ3>2,ord0ψ4>4{\mbox{\rm ord}}_{0}\psi_{2}>1,{\mbox{\rm ord}}_{0}\psi_{3}>2,{\mbox{\rm ord}}_{0}\psi_{4}>4. Then Tan(f)=f+sτ{\mbox{\rm Tan}}(f)=f+s\tau is given by

x1=t2+s,x2=t3+32st+φ2+sψ2,x3=t4+2st2+φ3+sψ3,x4=t6+3st4+φ4+sψ4.x_{1}=t^{2}+s,x_{2}=t^{3}+\frac{3}{2}st+\varphi_{2}+s\psi_{2},x_{3}=t^{4}+2st^{2}+\varphi_{3}+s\psi_{3},x_{4}=t^{6}+3st^{4}+\varphi_{4}+s\psi_{4}.

Set u=3(t3+3)u=-3(t^{3}+3). Then we have x1=3ux_{1}=-3u and

x2=12t312ut+φ213(3t2+u)ψ2=12(T+Φ2(t,u)),x3=t423ut2+φ313(3t2+u)ψ3=43(T1+Φ3(t,u)),x4=2t6ut4+φ413(3t2+u)ψ4=4(T3+Φ4(t,u)),\begin{array}[]{rcl}x_{2}&=&-\frac{1}{2}t^{3}-\frac{1}{2}ut+\varphi_{2}-\frac{1}{3}(3t^{2}+u)\psi_{2}=-\frac{1}{2}(T+\Phi_{2}(t,u)),\\ x_{3}&=&-t^{4}-\frac{2}{3}ut^{2}+\varphi_{3}-\frac{1}{3}(3t^{2}+u)\psi_{3}=-\frac{4}{3}(T_{1}+\Phi_{3}(t,u)),\\ x_{4}&=&-2t^{6}-ut^{4}+\varphi_{4}-\frac{1}{3}(3t^{2}+u)\psi_{4}=-4(T_{3}+\Phi_{4}(t,u)),\end{array}

with Φ2g(2),Φ3g(3)\Phi_{2}\in{\mathcal{R}}_{g}^{(2)},\Phi_{3}\in{\mathcal{R}}_{g}^{(3)} and Φ4g(5)\Phi_{4}\in{\mathcal{R}}_{g}^{(5)}. Note that T0g(1),T1g(2)T_{0}\in{\mathcal{R}}_{g}^{(1)},T_{1}\in{\mathcal{R}}_{g}^{(2)} and T3g(4)T_{3}\in{\mathcal{R}}_{g}^{(4)}. The germ of Tan(f){\mbox{\rm Tan}}(f) at 0 is diffeomorphic to F~:(𝐑2,0)(𝐑4,0)\widetilde{F}:(\mathbf{R}^{2},0)\to(\mathbf{R}^{4},0) defined by

x1=u,x2=T0+Φ2(t,u),x3=T1+Φ3(t,u),x4=T3+Φ4(t,u),x_{1}=u,\ \ x_{2}=T_{0}+\Phi_{2}(t,u),\ \ x_{3}=T_{1}+\Phi_{3}(t,u),\ \ x_{4}=T_{3}+\Phi_{4}(t,u),

by the affine transformation (x1,x2,x3,x4)(13x1,2x2,34x3,14x4)(x_{1},x_{2},x_{3},x_{4})\mapsto(\frac{1}{3}x_{1},-2x_{2},-\frac{3}{4}x_{3},-\frac{1}{4}x_{4}) on 𝐑4\mathbf{R}^{4}.

Denote by g~\widetilde{g} (resp. G~\widetilde{G}) the map-germ (𝐑2,0)(𝐑2,0)(\mathbf{R}^{2},0)\to(\mathbf{R}^{2},0) (resp. (𝐑2,0)(𝐑3,0)(\mathbf{R}^{2},0)\to(\mathbf{R}^{3},0)) defined by (t,u)(u,T0+Φ2)(t,u)\mapsto(u,T_{0}+\Phi_{2}) (resp. (t,u)(u,T0+Φ2,T1+Φ3(t,u))(t,u)\mapsto(u,T_{0}+\Phi_{2},T_{1}+\Phi_{3}(t,u))). Then, as a geometric meaning, g~\widetilde{g} (resp. G~\widetilde{G}, F~\widetilde{F}) corresponds to tangent map of curves of type (2,3)(2,3) (resp. (2,3,4)(2,3,4), (2,3,4,6)(2,3,4,6)). Moreover, as an algebraic aspect, we see that 𝒥g~=𝒥G~=𝒥F~=𝒥g{\mathcal{J}}_{\widetilde{g}}={\mathcal{J}}_{\widetilde{G}}={\mathcal{J}}_{\widetilde{F}}={\mathcal{J}}_{g} and therefore g~=G~=F~=g{\mathcal{R}}_{\widetilde{g}}={\mathcal{R}}_{\widetilde{G}}={\mathcal{R}}_{\widetilde{F}}={\mathcal{R}}_{g}. It is known that the tangent surfaces of curves of type (2,3,4)(2,3,4) are diffeomorphic to the swallowtail surface. In fact there exist a diffeomorphism-germ σ:(𝐑2,0)(𝐑2,0)\sigma:(\mathbf{R}^{2},0)\to(\mathbf{R}^{2},0) and Γ:(𝐑3,0)(𝐑3,0)\Gamma:(\mathbf{R}^{3},0)\to(\mathbf{R}^{3},0) such that ΓG~σ1=G\Gamma\circ\widetilde{G}\circ\sigma^{-1}=G, where G(t,u)=(u,T0,T1)G(t,u)=(u,T_{0},T_{1}), the normal form of the swallowtail. Moreover it is known that σ\sigma can be taken to preserve {t=0}\{t=0\}, which corresponds to the tangent line to the base point of the curve geometrically ([9, 10]). Then σ\sigma preserves both g{\mathcal{R}}_{g} and ti+12t^{i+1}{\mathcal{E}}_{2} for any ii, and therefore it preserves g(i+1)=gti+12{\mathcal{R}}_{g}^{(i+1)}={\mathcal{R}}_{g}\cap t^{i+1}{\mathcal{E}}_{2}.

Define Γ~:(𝐑4,0)(𝐑4,0)\widetilde{\Gamma}:(\mathbf{R}^{4},0)\to(\mathbf{R}^{4},0) by Γ~(x1,x2,x3,x4)=(Γ(x1,x2,x3),x4)\widetilde{\Gamma}(x_{1},x_{2},x_{3},x_{4})=(\Gamma(x_{1},x_{2},x_{3}),x_{4}). Then F~\widetilde{F} is diffeomorphic via (σ,Γ~)(\sigma,\widetilde{\Gamma}) to H:(𝐑2,0)(𝐑4,0)H:(\mathbf{R}^{2},0)\to(\mathbf{R}^{4},0) defined by (u,T0,T1,h(t,u))(u,T_{0},T_{1},h(t,u)) where h=(T3+Φ4(t,u))σ1h=(T_{3}+\Phi_{4}(t,u))\circ\sigma^{-1}. Then we have hg(4)h\in{\mathcal{R}}_{g}^{(4)}. Now, by Lemma 6.4, g(4){\mathcal{R}}_{g}^{(4)} is generated by T3,T4,T5T_{3},T_{4},T_{5} over gg^{*}. Therefore hh is expressed as

h(t,u)=φ(u,T0)T3+ψ(u,T0)T4+ρ(u,T0)T5,h(t,u)=\varphi(u,T_{0})T_{3}+\psi(u,T_{0})T_{4}+\rho(u,T_{0})T_{5},

for some function-germs φ,ψ,ρ:(𝐑2,0)𝐑\varphi,\psi,\rho:(\mathbf{R}^{2},0)\to\mathbf{R}. By Lemma 6.5, we have h(t,u)=Λ(u,T0,T1)+ψ(u,T0)T4h(t,u)=\Lambda(u,T_{0},T_{1})+\psi(u,T_{0})T_{4}, where Λ=φ(u,T0)(12T02uT1)+ρ(u,T0)(13uT02+23u2T0+23T12)\Lambda=\varphi(u,T_{0})(\frac{1}{2}T_{0}^{2}-uT_{1})+\rho(u,T_{0})(-\frac{1}{3}uT_{0}^{2}+\frac{2}{3}u^{2}T_{0}+\frac{2}{3}T_{1}^{2}). By the diffeomorphism (x1,x2,x3,x4)(x1,x2,x3,x4Λ(x1,x2,x3))(x_{1},x_{2},x_{3},x_{4})\mapsto(x_{1},x_{2},x_{3},x_{4}-\Lambda(x_{1},x_{2},x_{3})), we have that Tan(f){\mbox{\rm Tan}}(f) is diffeomorphic to the form (t,u)(u,T0,T1,ψ(u,T0)T4)(t,u)\mapsto(u,\ T_{0},\ T_{1},\ \psi(u,T_{0})T_{4}) as required. If ψ(0,0)0\psi(0,0)\not=0, then by the diffeomorphism (x1,x2,x3,x4)(x1,x2,x3,ψ(x1,x2)1x4)(x_{1},x_{2},x_{3},x_{4})\mapsto(x_{1},x_{2},x_{3},\psi(x_{1},x_{2})^{-1}x_{4}), we have that Tan(f){\mbox{\rm Tan}}(f) is diffeomorphic to USW2,4{\mbox{\rm USW}}_{2,4}. \Box

Example 6.6

Let fλ:(𝐑,0)(𝐑4,0)f_{\lambda}:(\mathbf{R},0)\to(\mathbf{R}^{4},0) be the family of curves defined by

fλ(t)=(x1(t),x2(t),x3(t),x4(t))=(t2,t3,t4,t6+λt7).f_{\lambda}(t)=(x_{1}(t),x_{2}(t),x_{3}(t),x_{4}(t))=(t^{2},\ t^{3},\ t^{4},\ t^{6}+\lambda t^{7}).

A tangent frame is given by τλ(t)=(1,23t,2t2,3t4+72λt5).\tau_{\lambda}(t)=(1,\frac{2}{3}t,2t^{2},3t^{4}+\frac{7}{2}\lambda t^{5}). Then, by setting u=3(t2+s)u=-3(t^{2}+s), we see that the tangent map Fλ(t,s)=Tan(fλ)(t,s)=f(t)+sτλ(t)F_{\lambda}(t,s)={\mbox{\rm Tan}}(f_{\lambda})(t,s)=f(t)+s\tau_{\lambda}(t) is diffeomorphic to F~λ:(𝐑2,0)(𝐑4,0)\widetilde{F}_{\lambda}:(\mathbf{R}^{2},0)\to(\mathbf{R}^{4},0) defined by

(t,u)(u,t3+ut,34t4+12ut2,12t6+14ut4+3524λ(37t7+15ut5)).(t,u)\mapsto\left(u,\ t^{3}+ut,\ \frac{3}{4}t^{4}+\frac{1}{2}ut^{2},\ \frac{1}{2}t^{6}+\frac{1}{4}ut^{4}+\frac{35}{24}\lambda(\frac{3}{7}t^{7}+\frac{1}{5}ut^{5})\right).

By eliminating 12t6+14ut4\frac{1}{2}t^{6}+\frac{1}{4}ut^{4} by the relation 12t6+14ut4=12(t3+ut)2u(34t4+12ut2)\frac{1}{2}t^{6}+\frac{1}{4}ut^{4}=\frac{1}{2}(t^{3}+ut)^{2}-u(\frac{3}{4}t^{4}+\frac{1}{2}ut^{2}), we have that the germ FλF_{\lambda} turns to be diffeomorphic to

(t,u)(u,t3+ut,34t4+12ut2,λ(37t7+15ut5)).(t,u)\mapsto\left(u,\ t^{3}+ut,\ \frac{3}{4}t^{4}+\frac{1}{2}ut^{2},\ \lambda(\frac{3}{7}t^{7}+\frac{1}{5}ut^{5})\right).

If λ=0\lambda=0, then we see that F0F_{0} is an embedded swallowtail and is not injective. If λ0\lambda\not=0, then we have that FλF_{\lambda} is diffeomorphic to generic USW2,4{\mbox{\rm generic USW}}_{2,4}, which is injective and therefore Fλ=Tan(fλ),λ0F_{\lambda}={\mbox{\rm Tan}}(f_{\lambda}),\lambda\not=0 is not diffeomorphic to F0=Tan(f0)F_{0}={\mbox{\rm Tan}}(f_{0}).

Remark 6.7

Note that the normal form of generic USW2,4{\mbox{\rm generic USW}}_{2,4} is diffeomorphic to the tangent surface to the curve of type (2,3,4,7),t(t2,t3,t4,t7)(2,3,4,7),t\mapsto(t^{2},t^{3},t^{4},t^{7}). The function ψ\psi of Theorem 6.1, in a certain sense, controls the partial opening of the swallowtail in 𝐑4\mathbf{R}^{4}. The geometric meaning of ψ\psi and the exact classification of singularities of the tangent surfaces to curves of type (2,3,4,6)(2,3,4,6) for non-generic cases are still open, as far as the author knows. The classification for the cases (2,3,4,2m+1),m3(2,3,4,2m+1),m\geq 3 seems to be involved to the problem.

References

  • [1] V.I. Arnold, Singularities of systems of rays, Uspekhi Mat. Nauk 38-2 (1983), 77–147. English transl. Russian Math. Surveys 38-2 (1983), 87–176.
  • [2] V.I. Arnold, Singularities of Caustics and Wave Fronts, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1990.
  • [3] V.I. Arnold, S.M. Gusein-Zade, A. Varchenko, Singularities of Differentiable Maps, I, Birkhäuser, 1985.
  • [4] R. L. Bishop, There is more than one way to frame a curve, Amer. Math. Monthly., 82 (1975), 246–251.
  • [5] J.W. Bruce, Wavefronts and parallels in Euclidean space, Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc., (1983), 93, 323–333.
  • [6] T. Fukui, M. Hasegawa, Singularities of parallel surfaces, Tohoku Math. J., 64 (2012), 387–408.
  • [7] M. Golubitsky, V. Guillemin, Stable Mappings and Their Singularities, Graduate Texts in Mathematics 14, Springer-Verlag, (1980).
  • [8] S. Honda, M. Takahashi, Bertrand and Mannheim curves of framed curves in the 3-dimensional Euclidean space, Turkish Journal of Mathematics, 44, (2020) 883–899.
  • [9] G. Ishikawa, Determinacy of the envelope of the osculating hyperplanes to a curve, Bull. London Math. Soc., 25 (1993), 603–610.
  • [10] G. Ishikawa, Developable of a curve and determinacy relative to osculation-type, Quart. J. Math. Oxford, 46 (1995), 437–451.
  • [11] G. Ishikawa, Singularities of developable surfaces, in London Math. Soc. Lecture Notes Series, 263 (1999), pp. 403–418.
  • [12] G. Ishikawa, Y. Machida, M. Takahashi, Asymmetry in singularities of tangent surfaces in contact-cone Legendre-null duality, Journal of Singularities, 3 (2011), 126–143.
  • [13] G. Ishikawa, Singularities of tangent varieties to curves and surfaces, Journal of Singularities, 6 (2012), 54–83.
  • [14] G. Ishikawa, Singularities of frontals, Advanced Studies in Pure Mathematics, 78, Math. Soc. Japan, (2018), pp.55–106.
  • [15] G. Ishikawa, Recognition problem of frontal singularities, Journal of Singularities, 21 (2020), 170–187.
  • [16] G. Ishikawa, Normal and tangent maps to frontals, Journal of Mathematical Sciences, 255-5 (2021), 664–677. arXiv:2009.06515 [math.DG] (2020).
  • [17] S. Izumiya, M. C. R. Fuster, Maria, A. S. Ruas, F. Tari, Differential Geometry from a Singularity Theory Viewpoint, World Scientific Publishing Co. (2015).
  • [18] T.A. Ivey, J.M. Landsberg, Cartan for Beginners, Amer. Math. Soc., (2003).
  • [19] S. Kobayashi, K. Nomizu, Foundations of Differential Geometry, Vol. I, Interscience Publishers, 1963.
  • [20] O.P. Scherbak, Projective dual space curves and Legendre singularities, Trudy Tbiliss Univ. 232 (233) (1982) 280–336.
  • [21] M. Spivak, A Comprehensive Introduction to Differential Geometry, Vol. III, 3rd. ed., Publish or Perish (1999).
  • [22] C.-L. Terng, Submanifolds with flat normal bundle, Math. Ann., 277 (1987), 95–111.

ISHIKAWA Goo,
Department of Mathematics, Hokkaido University,
Sapporo 060-0810, JAPAN.
e-mail : [email protected]