This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Schwinger Pair Production in QCD from Flavor-Dependent Contact Interaction Model of Quarks

Aftab Ahmad, Akif Farooq Institute of Physics, Gomal University, 29220, D.I. Khan, Khyber Pakhtunkhaw, Pakistan. [email protected], [email protected]
Abstract

We study the Schwinger mechanism in QCD i.e., the quark-antiquark pair production rate Γ\Gamma in the presence of pure electric field strength eEeE, for a higher number of colors NcN_{c} and flavors NfN_{f}. In this context, our unified formalism is based on the Schwinger-Dyson equations, flavor-dependent symmetry preserving vector-vector contact interaction model of quarks, and an optimal time regularization scheme. For fixed Nc=3N_{c}=3 and Nf=2N_{f}=2, the dynamically quark mass decreases as we increase eEeE and near at and above the pseudo-critical electric field eEceE_{c}, the chiral symmetry is restored and quarks becomes unconfined. The pair production rate Γ\Gamma becomes stable and grows quickly above eEceE_{c}. For fixed Nc=3N_{c}=3 and upon increasing NfN_{f} the dynamical mass suppresses and as a result, the eEceE_{c} reduces to its smaller values, the pair production rate Γ\Gamma tends to initiates and grows quickly for smaller values of eEceE_{c}. In contrast, for fixed Nf=2N_{f}=2 and upon increasing NcN_{c}, the dynamical chiral symmetry is restored for larger and larger values of eEceE_{c} and at Nc4N_{c}\geq 4, the transition changes from smooth cross-over to the first order at some critical endpoint (Nc,p,eEc,pN_{c,p},eE_{c,p}). Consequently, the quark-antiquark production rate Γ\Gamma needs higher values of eEceE_{c} for the stable and quick growth as we increase NcN_{c}. Our findings are satisfactory and in agreement with already predicted results for pair production rate (for fixed Nc=3N_{c}=3 and Nf=2N_{f}=2) by other reliable effective models of QCD.

Keywords: Chiral symmetry breaking, confinement, electric field, Schwinger-Dyson equations, QCD phase diagram

1 Introduction

Historically, the phenomenon of electron-positron pair production from a non-perturbative vacuum in the presence of electric field strength eEeE (where ee is an electric charge) was first introduced by Fritz Sauter [1], Heisenberg and Euler [2]. However, the complete theoretical framework provided by Julian Schwinger in the field of quantum electrodynamics (QED) [3], and named after him as the Schwinger effect or Schwinger mechanism. Later on, this phenomenon has been widely studied in the field of quantum chromodynamics (QCD), see for example, Refs. [4, 5, 6, 7, 8]. As we know that the QCD is a theory of strong color force among the quarks and gluons possess two special properties: The asymptotic freedom (i.e., the quarks interacts weakly at a short distancesor high energy scale) and the quark confinement (i.e., the quarks interacts strongly at a large distance or low energy scale). The Schwinger effect in QCD is thus, the production of quark-antiquark pairs in the presence of a strong electric field eEeE. The quark-antiquark pair production can be calculated from the Schwinger pair production rate Γ\Gamma and is, defined as the probability, per unit time and per unit volume that a quark-antiquark pair is created by the constant electric field eEeE.
Another important property of low-energy QCD is the dynamical chiral symmetry breaking, which is related to the dynamical mass generation of the quarks. The strong electric field tends to restore the dynamical chiral symmetry and as a result, the dynamically generated quark mass suppresses with the increase of eEeE. It can be understood by realizing that being closer together, the quark and antiquark pairs are reaching the asymptotic freedom regime faster by reducing the interaction strength as the intensity of the electric field eEeE increases. Such a phenomenon is sometimes referred to as the chiral electric inhibition effect [9, 6, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14], or the chiral electric rotation effect [15] or inverse electric catalysis(IEC) [16, 17, 18]. The nature of the dynamical chiral symmetry breaking–restoration and confinement–deconfinement phase transition is of second-order when the bare quark mass m=0m=0 (i.e., in the chiral limit) while cross-over when m0m\neq 0. It has been argued in Refs.  [13, 14, 17] that the pair production rate Γ\Gamma, increases quickly near some pseudo-critical electric field eEceE_{c}, where the chiral symmetry is restored.
The study of the effect of the electric field on the chiral phase transition plays a significant role in Heavy-Ion Collision experiments. In such experiments, the magnitude of the electric and magnetic fields produced with the same order of magnitude (1018\sim 10^{18} to 102010^{20}Gauss) [19, 20, 21, 22] in the event-by-event collisions using Au ++ Au at RHIC-BNL, and in a non-central Heavy-Ion collision of Pb ++ Pb in ALICE-LHC. Besides, experiments with asymmetric Cu ++ Au collisions, it is believed that the strong electric field is supposed to be created in the overlapping region [23, 24, 25]. It happens because there are different numbers of electric charges in each nuclei, which may be due to the charge dipole formed in the early stage of the collision. Some other phenomena like the chiral electric separation effect [26, 27], the particle polarization effect [28, 29, 30], etc., which may emerge due to the generation of vector and/or axial current in the presence of strong electromagnetic fields.
It is illustrative to approximate the created number of charged quark-antiquark pairs in the QGP produces in Heavy Ion collision, because in the QGP phase the dynamical chirl symmetry restores and the deconfinement occurs. According to advance numerical simulations, the electric fields created in Au ++ Au collisions at center-of-mass energy s=200\sqrt{s}=200 GeV due to the fluctuation is of the order eEmπ2eE\sim m^{2}_{\pi} while in Pb++Pb collisions at s=2.76\sqrt{s}=2.76 TeV is of the order eE20mπ2eE\sim 20m^{2}_{\pi} [20]. Then by assuming the space-time volume of the QGP is of the order (5fm)4\sim(5{\rm fm})^{4}, the total pair creation number is NRHIC=3.5N_{\rm RHIC}=3.5, and NLHC=1400N_{\rm LHC}=1400 [31], gives us a clear indication of the importance of Schwinger pair production of quark and antiquark in Heavy Ion Collisions.
It is well understood that the QCD exhibits confinement and chiral symmetry breaking with the small number of light quark flavors NfN_{f}. However, for larger NfN_{f}, Lattice QCD simulation [32, 33, 34, 35, 36], as well as the continuum methods of QCD  [37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 18, 43], predicted that there is a critical value Nfc8N^{c}_{f}\approx 8 above which the chiral symmetry is restored and quarks become unconfined. It has been discussed in detail in Ref. [18] that the critical number of flavors NfcN^{c}_{f} suppresses with the increase of temperature TT and enhances with the increasing magnetic field eBeB. Even the QCD phase diagram at finite temperature TT and density μ\mu suppresses with the increase of light quark flavors, see for an instance Ref. [42]. Besides the higher number of light quark flavors, QCD with a larger number of colors NcN_{c} in the fundamental SU(Nc)SU(N_{c}) representation also plays a significant role. It has been demonstrated in Ref. [18, 42] that the chiral symmetry is dynamically broken above a critical value Ncc2.2N^{c}_{c}\approx 2.2, as a result, the dynamically generated mass increases near and above NccN^{c}_{c}. Increasing the number of colors also enhances the critical temperature TcT_{c} and the critical chemical potential μc\mu_{c} of the chiral phase transition in the QCD phase diagram  [18]. Both NcN_{c} and magnetic field eBeB strengthen the generation of the dynamical masses of the quarks  [42].
It will be more significant to study the dynamical chiral symmetry breaking and Schwinger effect in pure electric field background for a higher number of light quark flavors NfN_{f} and for a large number of colors NcN_{c}, which has not yet been studied so far, as far as we know. It may have a stronger impact not only on the theoretical ground but also in Heavy-Ion Collision experiments where a large number of light flavors of quark-antiquark pairs are produced. Our main objective of this work is to study the quark-antiquark pair production rate in the presence of a pure electric field eEeE background for a higher number of light quark flavors NfN_{f} and colors NfN_{f}. For this purpose, we use the Schwinger-Dyson equation in the rainbow-ladder truncation, in the Landau gauge, the symmetry preserving flavour-dependent confining vector-vector contact interaction model of quarks [18], and the Schwinger optimal time regularization scheme [3]. The pseudo-critical electrical field strength eEceE_{c}, the critical number of flavors NfcN^{c}_{f} and the critical number of colors NccN^{c}_{c} for chiral symmetry breaking-restoration can be obtained from the peak of the correspondence gradient of dynamical quark mass, whereas the confinement-deconfinement can be triggered from the peaks of correspondence gradient of the confining length scale [44, 18, 42]. It should be noted that the chiral symmetry restoration and deconfinement occur simultaneously in this model [45, 44, 18, 42].
This manuscript is organized as follows: In Sec. 2, we present the general formalism for the flavor-dependent contact interaction model and QCD gap equation. In Sec. 3, We discuss the gap equation and the the Schwinger pair production rate in the presence of electric field eEeE for a large number of flavors NfN_{f} and colors NcN_{c}. In Sec. 4, we present the numerical solution of the gap equation and the Schwinger pair production rate in the presence of eEeE for a higher number of NfN_{f} and NcN_{c}. In the last Sec. 5, we present the summary and future perspective of our work.

2 General formalism and flavor-dependent Contact Interaction model

The Schwinger-Dyson equations (SDE) for the dressed-quark propagator SS, is given by:

S1(p)\displaystyle S^{-1}(p) =S01(p)+Σ(p),\displaystyle=S^{-1}_{0}(p)+\Sigma(p)\,, (1)

where S0(p)=(+m+iϵ)1S_{0}(p)=(\not{p}+m+i\epsilon)^{-1}, is the bare quark propagator and S(p)=(+M+iϵ)1S(p)=(\not{p}+M+i\epsilon)^{-1} is the dressed quark propagator. The Σ(p)\Sigma(p) is the self energy and is given by

Σ(p)=d4k(2π)4g2Dμν(q)λa2γμS(k)λa2Γν(p,k),\displaystyle\Sigma(p)=\int\frac{d^{4}k}{(2\pi)^{4}}g^{2}D_{\mu\nu}(q)\frac{\lambda^{a}}{2}\gamma_{\mu}S(k)\frac{\lambda^{a}}{2}\Gamma_{\nu}(p,k)\,, (2)

where Γν(k,p)\Gamma_{\nu}(k,p) is the dressed quark-gluon vertex and g2g^{2} is the QCD coupling constant. The Dμν(q)=D(q)(δμνqμqνq2)D_{\mu\nu}(q)=D(q)(\delta_{\mu\nu}-\frac{q_{\mu}q_{\nu}}{q^{2}}) is the gluon propagator in the Landau gauge with δμν\delta_{\mu\nu} is the metric tensor in Euclidean space, D(q)D(q) is the gluon scalar function and q=kpq=k-p is the gluon four momentum. The mm is the current quark mass, which may set equal to zero (i.e., m=0m=0) in the chiral limit. The λa\lambda^{a}’s are the Gell-Mann matrices and in the SU(Nc){\rm SU(N_{c})} representation, the Gell-Mann’s matrices satisfies the following identity:

a=18λa2λa2=12(Nc1Nc)I,\displaystyle\sum^{8}_{a=1}\frac{{\lambda}^{a}}{2}\frac{{\lambda}^{a}}{2}=\frac{1}{2}\left(N_{c}-\frac{1}{N_{c}}\right)I, (3)

here II is the unit matrix. In this work, we use the symmetry preserving flavor-dependent confining contact interaction model [42, 43] for the gluon propagator (in Landau gauge) in the infrared region where the gluons dynamically acquire a mass mgm_{g} [46, 47, 48, 49, 50], is given by

g2Dμν(k)\displaystyle g^{2}D_{\mu\nu}(k) =\displaystyle= 4παirmG21(Nf2)𝒩fcδμν=δμναeff1(Nf2)𝒩fc,\displaystyle\frac{4\pi\alpha_{\rm ir}}{m_{G}^{2}}\sqrt{1-\frac{(N_{f}-2)}{\mathcal{N}_{f}^{c}}}\delta_{\mu\nu}=\delta_{\mu\nu}\alpha_{\rm eff}\sqrt{1-\frac{(N_{f}-2)}{\mathcal{N}_{f}^{c}}}\,, (4)

the αir=0.93π\alpha_{\rm ir}=0.93\pi is the infrared enhanced interaction strength parameter, mg=800m_{g}=800 MeV is the gluon mass scale [51]. The 𝒩fc=Nfc+η\mathcal{N}_{f}^{c}=N^{c}_{f}+\eta is some guess values of critical number of flavors. In Ref. [42, 43], the value of η\eta has been set and it ranging from 1.82.31.8-2.3, to obtained the desired number of critical number Nfc8N^{c}_{f}\approx 8 above which the dynamical symmetry restored and deconfinement occurred. It has been argued in the Ref. [42] that the appearance of the parameter η\eta is because of the factor (Nf2)(N_{f}-2) in Eq. (4).
With a particular choice of the flavor-dependent model Eq. (4), the dynamical quark mass function is merely a constant and the the dressed quark propagator takes into a very simple form [52]:

S1(p)=iγp+Mf.\displaystyle S^{-1}(p)=i\gamma\cdot p+M_{f}\;. (5)

It is because the wave function renormalization trivially tends to unity in this case, and the quark mass function MM become momentum independent:

Mf=mf+αeffαNfNc2Λd4k(2π)4Tr[Sf(k)].M_{f}=m_{f}+\frac{\alpha_{\rm eff}\alpha^{N_{c}}_{N_{f}}}{2}\int^{\Lambda}\frac{d^{4}k}{(2\pi)^{4}}{\rm Tr}[S_{f}(k)]\;. (6)

Where MfM_{f} is the dynamical mass and αNfNc=1(Nf2)𝒩fc(Nc1Nc)\alpha^{N_{c}}_{N_{f}}=\sqrt{1-\frac{(N_{f}-2)}{\mathcal{N}_{f}^{c}}}\left(N_{c}-\frac{1}{N_{c}}\right). After simplifying Eq. (6), we have

Mf=mf+2αeffαNfNcd4k(2π)4Mk2+M2.\displaystyle M_{f}=m_{f}+2\alpha_{\rm eff}\alpha^{N_{c}}_{N_{f}}\int\frac{d^{4}k}{(2\pi)^{4}}\frac{M}{k^{2}+M^{2}}\;. (7)

The quark-anitquark condensate which serves as an order parameter for the dynamical chiral symmetry breaking in this truncation, can be written as

q¯q=Mfmf2αeff.\displaystyle-\langle\bar{q}q\rangle=\frac{M_{f}-m_{f}}{2\alpha_{\rm eff}}\;. (8)

Using d4k=(1/2)k2dk2sin2θdθsinϕdϕdψd^{4}k=(1/2)k^{2}dk^{2}\sin^{2}\theta d\theta\sin\phi d\phi d\psi, performing the trivial integration’s and using the variable s=k2s=k^{2} in Eq. (7), we have

Mf=mf+αeffαNfNc8π20𝑑sss+Mf2.\displaystyle M_{f}=m_{f}+\frac{\alpha_{\rm eff}\alpha^{N_{c}}_{N_{f}}}{8\pi^{2}}\int^{\infty}_{0}ds\frac{s}{s+M_{f}^{2}}\,. (9)

The above integral in Eq. (9) is divergent and we need to regularize it. In the present scenario we use the Schwinger proper-time regularization procedure [3]. In this procedure, we take the exponent integrand’s denominator and then introduce an additional infrared cutoff, in addition to the conventional ultraviolet that is normally used in NJL model Studies. Accordingly, the confinement is implemented through an infrared cut-off  [53]. The significance of adopting the mentioned regularization procedure is, the quadratic and logarithmic divergences remove and the axial-vector Ward-Takahashi identity [54, 55] is satisfied. From Eq. (9), the integrand’s denominator reduced to:

1s+Mf2\displaystyle\frac{1}{s+M^{2}_{f}} =\displaystyle= 0𝑑τeτ(s+Mf2)τuv2τir2𝑑τeτ(s+Mf2)\displaystyle\int^{\infty}_{0}d\tau{\rm e}^{-\tau(s+M^{2}_{f})}\rightarrow\int^{\tau_{ir}^{2}}_{\tau_{uv}^{2}}d\tau{\rm e}^{-\tau(s+M^{2}_{f})} (10)
=\displaystyle= eτuv2(s+Mf2)eτir2(s+Mf2)s+Mf2.\displaystyle\frac{{\rm e}^{-\tau_{uv}^{2}(s+M^{2}_{f})}-{\rm e}^{-\tau_{ir}^{2}(s+M^{2}_{f})}}{s+M^{2}_{f}}\;.

Here, τuv=Λuv1\tau_{uv}=\Lambda^{-1}_{uv} is an ultra-violet regulator, which plays the dynamical role and sets the scale for all dimensional quantities. The τir=Λir1\tau_{ir}=\Lambda^{-1}_{ir} stands for the infrared regulator whose non zero value implements confinement by ensuring the absence of quarks production thresholds  [56]. Hence τir\tau_{ir} referred to as the confinement scale [44]. From Eq. (10), it is now clear that the location of the original pole is at s=M2s=-M^{2}, which is canceled by the numerator. Thus the propagator is free from real as well as the complex poles, which is consistent with the definition of confinement i.e., “an excitation described by a pole-less propagator would never reach its mass-shell” [53].
After integration over ‘s’, the gap equation Eq. (9) is reduced to:

Mf\displaystyle M_{f} =\displaystyle= mf+Mf3αeffαNfNc8π2Γ(1,τuvMf2,τirMf2),\displaystyle m_{f}+\frac{M_{f}^{3}\alpha_{\rm eff}\alpha^{N_{c}}_{N_{f}}}{8\pi^{2}}\Gamma(-1,\tau_{uv}M_{f}^{2},\tau_{ir}M_{f}^{2})\,, (11)

where

Γ(a,y1,y2)=Γ(a,y1)Γ(a,y2)\Gamma(a,y_{1},y_{2})=\Gamma(a,y_{1})-\Gamma(a,y_{2})\, (12)

with Γ(a,y)=ytα1et𝑑t\Gamma(a,y)=\int_{y}^{\infty}t^{\alpha-1}{\rm e}^{-t}dt, is the incomplete Gamma function. The above equation Eq. (11), is the gap equation in vacuum which is regularized in the Schwinger proper time regularization scheme with two regulators. The confinement in this model can be triggered from the confining length scale [44, 18, 42]:

τ~ir=τirMMf,\displaystyle\tilde{\tau}_{ir}=\tau_{ir}\frac{M}{M_{f}}, (13)

where M=M(3,2)M=M(3,2) is the dynamical mass for fixed Nc=3N_{c}=3, Nc=2N_{c}=2. Here Mf=M(Nc,Nf){M}_{f}=M(N_{c},N_{f}) is the generalized color NcN_{c} and flavor NfN_{f} dependent dynamical mass. As, the τir\tau_{ir} is introduced in the model to mimic confinement by ensuring the absence of quarks production thresholds, so in the presence of NfN_{f} and NcN_{c}, it is required to vary slightly with both NfN_{f} and NcN_{c}. Thus the entanglement between dynamical chiral symmetry breaking and confinement is expressed through an explicit NfN_{f} and NcN_{c}-dependent regulator i.e., τ~ir=τir(Nc,Nf)\tilde{\tau}_{ir}=\tau_{ir}(N_{c},N_{f}), in the infrared. For chiral quarks (i.e., mf=0m_{f}=0), the confining scale τ~ir\tilde{\tau}_{ir} diverges at the chiral symmetry restoration region. Next we discuss the general formalism of the gap equation and the Schwinger pair production rate in the in the presence of electric field and in the presence of electric field eEeE and for higher NfN_{f} and NcN_{c}.

3 Gap equation and Schwinger pair production rate in the presence of electric field

In this section, we discuss the gap equation in the presence of a uniform and homogeneous pure electric field eEeE. In QCD Lagrangian, the interaction with pure electric field AμextA^{ext}_{\mu} embedded in the covariant derivative,

Dμ=μiQfAμext,\displaystyle D_{\mu}=\partial_{\mu}-iQ_{f}A_{\mu}^{\rm ext}, (14)

with Qf=(qu=+2/3,qd=1/3)eQ_{f}=(q_{u}=+2/3,q_{d}=-1/3)e is refers to the electric charges of uu and dd-quark, respectively. We choose the symmetric gauge vector potential Aμext=δμ0x3EA^{ext}_{\mu}=-\delta_{\mu 0}x_{3}E, to obtain the resulting electric field along the z-axis. The gap equation in the presence of pure electric field continues to form Eq. (6), where Sf(k)S_{f}(k) is now dressed with electric field eEeE, that is, Sf(k)Sf~(k){S_{f}}(k)\rightarrow\tilde{S_{f}}(k) [3, 11, 13, 15, 57], and is given as

Sf~(k)=0𝑑τeτ(Mf2+(k42+k32)tan(|QfE|τ)|QfE|τ+k12+k22)\displaystyle\tilde{S_{f}}(k)=\int^{\infty}_{0}d\tau{\rm e}^{-\tau\bigg{(}M_{f}^{2}+(k_{4}^{2}+k_{3}^{2})\frac{{\rm tan}(|Q_{f}E|\tau)}{|Q_{f}E|\tau}+k_{1}^{2}+k_{2}^{2}\bigg{)}}
×[Mf+iγ4(k4+tan(|QfEτ|))k3γ3(k3+tan(|QfEτ|)k4)(γ2k2γ1k1)\displaystyle\times\bigg{[}M_{f}+i\gamma^{4}\bigg{(}k_{4}+{\rm tan}(|Q_{f}E\tau|)\bigg{)}k_{3}-\gamma^{3}(k_{3}+{\rm tan}(|Q_{f}E\tau|)k_{4})-\bigg{(}\gamma^{2}k_{2}-\gamma^{1}k_{1}\bigg{)}
×(1+tan(|QfE|τ)γ4γ3)].\displaystyle\times\bigg{(}1+{\rm tan}(|Q_{f}E|\tau)\gamma^{4}\gamma^{3}\bigg{)}\bigg{]}\,. (15)

Where γ\gamma’s are the Dirac gamma matrices. Taking the trace “Tr” of the of the propagator Eq. (15), inserting it in Eq. (6) and after carrying out the the integration over kk’s, the gap equation in the electric field eEeE and with the flavor-dependent contact interaction model of quark [42] is given by

Mf\displaystyle M_{f} =\displaystyle= mf+αeffαNfNc8π2f0dττ2MfeτMf2[|QfE|tan(|QfE|τ)].\displaystyle m_{f}+\frac{\alpha_{\rm eff}\alpha^{N_{c}}_{N_{f}}}{8\pi^{2}}\sum_{f}\int^{\infty}_{0}\frac{d\tau}{\tau^{2}}M_{f}{\rm e}^{-\tau M_{f}^{2}}\bigg{[}\frac{|Q_{f}E|}{{\rm tan}(|Q_{f}E|\tau)}\bigg{]}\,. (16)

Next, we separate the vacuum and electric field dependent part by using the vacuum subtraction scheme[11, 13], as given by

Mf\displaystyle M_{f} =\displaystyle= mf+αeffαNfNc8π2f0dττ2MfeτMf2\displaystyle m_{f}+\frac{\alpha_{\rm eff}\alpha^{N_{c}}_{N_{f}}}{8\pi^{2}}\sum_{f}\int^{\infty}_{0}\frac{d\tau}{\tau^{2}}M_{f}{\rm e}^{-\tau M_{f}^{2}} (17)
+αeffαNfNc8π2f0dττ2MfeτMf2[|QfE|τtan(|QfE|τ)1].\displaystyle+\frac{\alpha_{\rm eff}\alpha^{N_{c}}_{N_{f}}}{8\pi^{2}}\sum_{f}\int^{\infty}_{0}\frac{d\tau}{\tau^{2}}M_{f}{\rm e}^{-\tau M_{f}^{2}}\bigg{[}\frac{|Q_{f}E|\tau}{{\rm tan}(|Q_{f}E|\tau)}-1\bigg{]}\,.

The vacuum integral can be regularized with the two regulators as in Eq. (11), and thus the Eq. (17) can be reduced to:

Mf\displaystyle M_{f} =\displaystyle= mf+Mf3αeffαNfNc8π2Γ(1,τuv2Mf2,τir2Mf2)\displaystyle m_{f}+\frac{M_{f}^{3}\alpha_{\rm eff}\alpha^{N_{c}}_{N_{f}}}{8\pi^{2}}\Gamma(-1,\tau^{2}_{uv}M_{f}^{2},\tau^{2}_{ir}M_{f}^{2}) (18)
+αeffαNfNc8π2f0dττ2MfeτMf2[|QfE|τtan(|QfE|τ)1].\displaystyle+\frac{\alpha_{\rm eff}\alpha^{N_{c}}_{N_{f}}}{8\pi^{2}}\sum_{f}\int^{\infty}_{0}\frac{d\tau}{\tau^{2}}M_{f}{\rm e}^{-\tau M_{f}^{2}}\bigg{[}\frac{|Q_{f}E|\tau}{{\rm tan}(|Q_{f}E|\tau)}-1\bigg{]}\,.

The Eq. (18) can also be written as

Mfmfαeff\displaystyle\frac{M_{f}-m_{f}}{\alpha_{\rm eff}} =\displaystyle= Mf3αNfNc8π2Γ(1,τuv2Mf2,τir2Mf2)\displaystyle\frac{M_{f}^{3}\alpha^{N_{c}}_{N_{f}}}{8\pi^{2}}\Gamma(-1,\tau^{2}_{uv}M_{f}^{2},\tau^{2}_{ir}M_{f}^{2}) (19)
+αNfNc8π2f0dττ2MfeτMf2[|QfE|τtan(|QfE|τ)1].\displaystyle+\frac{\alpha^{N_{c}}_{N_{f}}}{8\pi^{2}}\sum_{f}\int^{\infty}_{0}\frac{d\tau}{\tau^{2}}M_{f}{\rm e}^{-\tau M_{f}^{2}}\bigg{[}\frac{|Q_{f}E|\tau}{{\rm tan}(|Q_{f}E|\tau)}-1\bigg{]}\,.

As we have already regularized the integral in Eq. (18), using the vacuum subtraction scheme but we still have poles associated with the tangent term in the denominator of our gap equation when |QfE|τ=nπ|Q_{f}E|\tau=n\pi with n=1,2,3..,n=1,2,3.....,. Upon taking the principle value (real value) of the integral [11], given in Eq. (19), we have

0dττ2eτMf2(|QfE|τtan(|QfE|τ)1)\displaystyle\int^{\infty}_{0}\frac{d\tau}{\tau^{2}}{\rm e}^{-\tau M_{f}^{2}}\bigg{(}\frac{|Q_{f}E|\tau}{{\rm tan}(|Q_{f}E|\tau)}-1\bigg{)} =\displaystyle= |QfE|ReJ(iMf2/2|QfE|),\displaystyle|Q_{f}E|ReJ(iM^{2}_{f}/2|Q_{f}E|)\,, (20)

with

J(ζ)=2i[(ζ12)logζζlogΓ(ζ)+12log2π]].\displaystyle J(\zeta)=2i\bigg{[}(\zeta-\frac{1}{2}){\rm log}\zeta-\zeta-{\rm log}\Gamma(\zeta)+\frac{1}{2}{\rm log}2\pi]\bigg{]}\,. (21)

The effective potential Ω\Omega, can be obtained by integrating the Eq. (19) over dynamical mass MfM_{f}:

Ω\displaystyle\Omega =\displaystyle= (Mfmf)22αeffαNfNcMf432π2[eτMf2τuv4eτMf2τir4Mf4Γ(1,τuv2Mf2,τir2Mf2)]\displaystyle\frac{(M_{f}-m_{f})^{2}}{2\alpha_{\rm eff}}-\frac{\alpha^{N_{c}}_{N_{f}}{M_{f}}^{4}}{32\pi^{2}}\bigg{[}\frac{{\rm e}^{-\tau M_{f}^{2}}}{\tau^{4}_{uv}}-\frac{{\rm e}^{-\tau M_{f}^{2}}}{\tau^{4}_{ir}}-M_{f}^{4}\Gamma(-1,\tau^{2}_{uv}M_{f}^{2},\tau^{2}_{ir}M_{f}^{2})\bigg{]} (22)
αNfNc16π2f0dττ3MfeτMf2[|QfE|τtan(|QfE|τ)1].\displaystyle-\frac{\alpha^{N_{c}}_{N_{f}}}{16\pi^{2}}\sum_{f}\int^{\infty}_{0}\frac{d\tau}{\tau^{3}}M_{f}{\rm e}^{-\tau M_{f}^{2}}\bigg{[}\frac{|Q_{f}E|\tau}{{\rm tan}(|Q_{f}E|\tau)}-1\bigg{]}\,.

We noted that there are infinite poles in the effective potential Ω\Omega too which are due to the contribution of the Schwinger pair production in the presence of the tangent (electric field-related) term . These poles yields the effective potential to be complex with its imaginary part giving the Schwinger pair production rate [3, 16, 13, 14]. The third term in the Eq. (22) can be further simplified by using the following trigonometric relation:

πτtan(πτ)1=n=12τ2τ2n2.\displaystyle\frac{\pi\tau}{{\rm tan}(\pi\tau)}-1=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{2\tau^{2}}{\tau^{2}-n^{2}}\,. (23)

Using Eq. (23) in Eq. (23), we have

Ω\displaystyle\Omega =\displaystyle= (Mfmf)22αeffαNfNcMf432π2[eτMf2τuv4eτMf2τir4Mf4Γ(1,τuv2Mf2,τir2Mf2)]\displaystyle\frac{(M_{f}-m_{f})^{2}}{2\alpha_{\rm eff}}-\frac{\alpha^{N_{c}}_{N_{f}}{M_{f}}^{4}}{32\pi^{2}}\bigg{[}\frac{{\rm e}^{-\tau M_{f}^{2}}}{\tau^{4}_{uv}}-\frac{{\rm e}^{-\tau M_{f}^{2}}}{\tau^{4}_{ir}}-M_{f}^{4}\Gamma(-1,\tau^{2}_{uv}M_{f}^{2},\tau^{2}_{ir}M_{f}^{2})\bigg{]} (24)
αNfNc16π2f0dττ3MfeτMf2n=12τ2τ2π2n2(|QfE|)2.\displaystyle-\frac{\alpha^{N_{c}}_{N_{f}}}{16\pi^{2}}\sum_{f}\int^{\infty}_{0}\frac{d\tau}{\tau^{3}}M_{f}{\rm e}^{-\tau M_{f}^{2}}\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{2\tau^{2}}{\tau^{2}-\frac{\pi^{2}n^{2}}{(|Q_{f}E|)^{2}}}\,.

The Schwinger pair production rate Γ\Gamma, corresponds to the imaginary part of the effective potential Eq. (24), and is thus, given by

Γ=2ImΩ=fn=1αNfNc4π(|QfE|)2enπMf2/|QfE|(nπ)2,\displaystyle\Gamma=-2{\rm Im}\Omega=\sum_{f}\sum^{\infty}_{n=1}\frac{\rm\alpha^{N_{c}}_{N_{f}}}{4\pi}\frac{(|Q_{f}E|)^{2}{\rm e}^{-n\pi M^{2}_{f}/|Q_{f}E|}}{(n\pi)^{2}}\,, (25)

which does not depend on the number of color NcN_{c} or the number of flavors NfN_{f} explicitly. However, since the dynamical quark mass MfM_{f} depends on both NfN_{f} and NcN_{c} as it is obvious from the gap equation Eq. (17), they will affect the quark-antiquark pair production rate Γ\Gamma implicitly through MfM_{f}. The numerical solution of the gap equation and the Schwinger pair production rate will be discussed in the next section.

4 Numerical Results

In this section, we present the numerical results of the gap equation at zero electric field and in the presence of electric field for higher NcN_{c} and NfN_{f}. We use the following set of flavor-dependent contact interaction model parameters [42] i.e., τir=(0.24GeV)1\tau_{{ir}}=(0.24~{}\mathrm{GeV})^{-1}, τuv=(0.905GeV)1\tau_{uv}=(0.905~{}\mathrm{GeV})^{-1}, and bare quark mass mu=md=0.007m_{u}=m_{d}=0.007 GeV. For fixed Nc=3N_{c}=3 and Nf=2N_{f}=2, we have obtained the dynamical mass Mu,d=0.367M_{u,d}=0.367 GeV and the condensate q¯qu,d1/3=0.243-\langle\bar{q}q\rangle^{1/3}_{u,d}=0.243 GeV3. It should be noted that these parameters were fitted to reproduce the light mesons properties [49].
Next, we solve the gap equation Eq.(11) for various NfN_{f} and at fix Nc=3N_{c}=3 as shown in the Fig. 1. The dynamical mass monotonically decreases as we increase the NfN_{f} as depicted in Fig. 1(a). The plot inside the Fig. 1(a), represents the flavor-gradient of the dynamical mass NfMf\partial_{N_{f}}M_{f}, whose peak is at Nfc8N^{c}_{f}\approx 8, which is a critical number of flavors where near and above the dynamical chiral symmetry restored. In Fig. 1(b), we show the dynamical mass as a function of the number of colors NcN_{c} for fix Nf=2N_{f}=2. This plot represents that the dynamical chiral symmetry broken near or above some critical value of Ncc2.2N^{c}_{c}\approx 2.2. The Ncc2.2N^{c}_{c}\approx 2.2 is obtained from the peak of the color-gradient of the mass function NcMf\partial_{N_{c}}M_{f}. These findings are consistent with results obtained in [42, 43].

Refer to caption
(a)
Refer to caption
(b)
Figure 1: (6(a)) Behavior of the dynamical quark mass MM and its flavor-gradient NfM\partial_{N_{f}}M as a function of number of flavors NfN_{f} for fixed number of Nc=3N_{c}=3. The dynamical mass MM decreases as we increase NfN_{f} and at some critical value Nfc=8N^{c}_{f}=8, the dynamical chiral symmetry is restored.
(6(b)) The behavior of the dynamical quark mass MM and its color-gradient NcM\partial_{N_{c}}M as a function of number of colors NcN_{c} and for fixed Nf=2N_{f}=2. From the peak of the NcM\partial_{N_{c}}M, it is clear that the dynamical chiral symmetry is broken above Ncc=2.2N^{c}_{c}=2.2.

The inverse of the confining length scale τ~ir1\tilde{\tau}^{-1}_{ir} and its flavor-gradient plotted for various NfN_{f} and for fixed Nc=3N_{c}=3 are plotted in Fig. 2(a). The confinement can be triggered from flavor-gradient Nfτ~ir1\partial_{N_{f}}\tilde{\tau}^{-1}_{ir}, whose peak is at Nfc8N^{c}_{f}\approx 8, and is approximated as a critical number of flavors above which the quark become unconfined. In Fig. 2(b), we show the inverse confining length scale τ~ir1\tilde{\tau}^{-1}_{ir} as a function of the various number of colors NcN_{c} for fix Nf=2N_{f}=2. This plot represents that the confinement occurs near and above at some critical value of Ncc2.2N^{c}_{c}\approx 2.2. The critical Ncc2.2N^{c}_{c}\approx 2.2 for the confinement is obtained from the peak of the color gradient Ncτ~ir1\partial_{N_{c}}\tilde{\tau}^{-1}_{ir}.

Refer to caption
(a)
Refer to caption
(b)
Figure 2: (6(a)) Behavior of the inverse of confining length scale τ~ir1\tilde{\tau}^{-1}_{ir} and its flavor-gradient Nfτ~ir1\partial_{N_{f}}\tilde{\tau}^{-1}_{ir} as a function of number of flavors NfN_{f} for fixed Nc=3N_{c}=3. (6(b)) The behavior τ~ir1\tilde{\tau}^{-1}_{ir} and its color-gradient  Ncτ~ir1\partial_{N_{c}}\tilde{\tau}^{-1}_{ir} as a function of the number of colors NcN_{c} and for fixed Nf=2N_{f}=2.

Next, we solve the gap equation Eq. (17), in the presence of electric field eEeE and plotted the dynamical mass as a function of eEeE, for the various number of flavors NfN_{f} and for fix Nc=3N_{c}=3 as depicted in Fig. 3(a). The dynamical mass decreases as we increase the electric field eEeE as we expected. Upon increasing the NfN_{f}, the plateau of dynamical quark mass as a function of eEeE suppresses for larger values of NfN_{f}. There is no dynamical mass generation above Nfc=8N^{c}_{f}=8, this is because both electric field eEeE and NfN_{f} restore the dynamical chiral symmetry and quarks becomes unconfined.
In Fig. 3(b), we plotted the dynamical quark mass as a function of electric field strength eEeE for various NcN_{c} and for fixed Nf=2N_{f}=2. The increasing NcN_{c} enhances the plateau of the dynamical mass as a function of eEeE. For Nc4N_{c}\geq 4, the mass plots show the discontinuities in the dynamical symmetry restoration region where the nature of smooth cross-over phase transition changes to the first order. This may be due to the strong competition that occurs between eEeE and NcN_{c} (i.e. strong electric field tends to restore the dynamical chiral symmetry whereas larger NcN_{c} enhance the dynamical chiral symmetry breaking.

Refer to caption
(a)
Refer to caption
(b)
Figure 3: (LABEL:fig:_a) The dynamical quark mass as a function of electric field strength eEeE, for various NfN_{f} and for fixed Nc=3N_{c}=3. The plateau of the dynamical mass suppresses as we increase NfN_{f}. (6(b)) shows the behavior of the dynamical quark mass as a function of electric field strength eEeE for various NcN_{c} and for fixed Nf=2N_{f}=2. The increasing NcN_{c} enhances the plateau of the dynamical mass as a function of eEeE. For Nc4N_{c}\geq 4, the cross-over phase transition changes to the first order.

The Schwinger pair production rate “Γ\Gamma” Eq. (25), as a function of electric field strength eEeE, for various NfN_{f} and for fix Nc=3N_{c}=3 is shown in the Fig. 4(a). This figure clearly demonstrate that after some critical value eEceE_{c}, where near at and above the dynamical symmetry restored and the deconfinement occurred, the pair production rate “Γ\Gamma” grows faster due to the weakening of the chiral condensates. In this situation, the QCD vacuum becomes more unstable and the pair of quark-antiquark becomes more likely to produces. Upon increasing the number of flavors NfN_{f}, the pair production rate grows faster and shifted towards the lower values of electric field eEeE. This is because, both the eEeE and NfN_{f} restore the dynamical chiral symmetry. Although, there is an unstable slow enhancement of pair production rate for small NfN_{f} but become stable and faster for higher values of NfN_{f} In Fig. 4(b), we plotted the quark-antiquark pair production rate“Γ\Gamma” as a function of eEeE for various NcN_{c} but at this time we fix the number of flavors Nf=2N_{f}=2. Upon increasing the number of colors NcN_{c}, the production rate grows slowly and higher values of eEeE are needed for a stable and faster production rate. This is because, NcN_{c} enhances the dynamical chiral symmetry breaking. For Nc4N_{c}\geq 4, the discontinuity occurs in the production rate near and above the chiral symmetry restoration and deconfinement region. This may be due to the strong competition between NcN_{c} and eEeE, i.e., on one hand, the strong electric field eEeE tends to restore the dynamical chiral symmetry whereas the NcN_{c} tends to break it.

Refer to caption
(a)
Refer to caption
(b)
Figure 4: (6(a)) The Schwinger pair production rate Γ\Gamma as a function of electric field strength eEeE, for various NfN_{f} and for fixed Nc=3N_{c}=3. Upon increasing NfN_{f}, the pair production rate grows faster even at small values of eEeE. (6(b)) The behavior of production rate Γ\Gamma as a function of eEeE for various NcN_{c} at fixed Nf=2N_{f}=2. Upon increasing the number of colors NcN_{c} the production rate grows slowly and higher values of eEeE needed for quick and stable pair production rate.

We then obtained the pseudo-critical electric field eEceE_{c} for the chiral symmetry breaking -restoration from the electric field-gradient eEMf\partial_{eE}M_{f} as a function of eEeE for various NfN_{f} and at fixed Nc=3N_{c}=3, as depicted in Fig. 5(a). The peaks of the  eEMf\partial_{eE}M_{f} shift towards lower values of the electric field eEeE. In Fig. 5(b), we plotted the electric field gradient  eEMf\partial_{eE}M_{f} as a function of eEeE for various NcN_{c} and at fixed Nf=2N_{f}=2. Upon increasing NcN_{c}, the peaks shift towards higher values of eEeE.

Refer to caption
(a)
Refer to caption
(b)
Figure 5: (6(a)) The electric-gradient of the dynamical mass eEM\partial_{eE}M as a function NfN_{f} for fixed Nc=3N_{c}=3. The peaks shifted towards the lower values of electric field eEeE upon the increasing NfN_{f}. (6(b)) The electric-gradient NcM\partial_{N_{c}}M as a function of NcN_{c} for fixed Nf=2N_{f}=2. The peak of the NcM\partial_{N_{c}}M, shifts toward higher values of eEeE as NcN_{c} increases. For Nc4N_{c}\geq 4, the peaks in NcM\partial_{N_{c}}M diverges and dicontinous.

We then obtained the pseudo-critical electric field eEceE_{c} for the chiral symmetry restoration/deconfinement different NfN_{f}, and draw a phase diagram in NfeEN_{f}-eE plane a shown in the Fig. 6(a). The pseudo-critical electric field eEceE_{c} decreases as we increase NfN_{f}, the nature of the chiral phase transition is of smooth cross-over. In Fig. 6(b), we sketch the phase diagram in NceEcN_{c}-eE_{c} plane, the critical eEceE_{c} grows upon increasing the number of colors NcN_{c}. The transition is of smooth cross-over until the critical endpoint (Nc,p=4,eEc,p=0.54GeV2)(N_{c,p}=4,eE_{c,p}=0.54GeV^{2}) where it suddenly changes to the first-order. The phase diagram also shows that the quark-antiquark pair production grows quickly after pseudo-critical electric field eEceE_{c} and how it varies with the flavors and colors. Our finding for Nc=3N_{c}=3 and Nf=2N_{f}=2, agrees well with the growth of the quark-antiquark production rate studied through another effective model of low energy QCD [31, 14].

Refer to caption
(a)
Refer to caption
(b)
Figure 6: (6(a)) The phase diagram NfeEcN_{f}-eE_{c} plane for the dynamical chiral symmetry breaking/restoration or confinement-deconfinement transition. The pseudo-critical eEceE_{c} decreases upon increasing the number of light quark flavors NfN_{f}. (6(b)) The phase diagram in NceEcN_{c}-eE_{c} plane; here the critical eEeE increase upon increasing the number of color NcN_{c}. The transition is of smooth cross-over until the critical endpoint (Nc,pc,,eEc,p)(N^{c}_{c,p},,eE_{c,p}) where it suddenly changes to the first-order.

In the next section, we discuss the summery and future perspectives of the this work.

5 Summery and Perspectives

In this work, we have studied the impact of pure electric field on the color-flavor chiral phase transitions and investigated the Schwinger quark-antiquark pair production rate Γ\Gamma for the higher number of colors NcN_{c} and number flavors NfN_{f}. For this purpose, we implemented the Schwinger-Dyson formulation of QCD, with a gap equation kernel comprising a symmetry-preserving vector-vector flavor-dependent contact interaction model of quarks in a rainbow-ladder truncation. Subsequently, we adopted the well-known Schwinger proper-time regularization procedure. The outcome of this study is presented as follows:
First, we reproduced the results of dynamical chiral symmetry restoration for large NfN_{f} with fixed Nf=3N_{f}=3, where we evaluated the critical number of flavors Nfc8N^{c}_{f}\approx 8. Further, we explore the dynamical symmetry breaking for a higher number of colors NcN_{c} but kept Nf=2N_{f}=2 and found the critical number of colors Ncc2.2N^{c}_{c}\approx 2.2. Second, we consider the influence of the pure electric field eEeE, where we have explored the dynamical chiral symmetry restoration and deconfinement for various numbers of flavors NfN_{f} and colors NcN_{c}. The plateau of the mass as a function of the electric field is noted to suppress upon increasing the number of flavors. Whereas upon increasing the number of colors, the dynamical mass as a function of eEeE enhances and at some Nc4N_{c}\geq 4, we found the discontinuity in the chiral symmetry restoration region. Next, We obtained the Schwinger pair production (quark-antiquark) rate Γ\Gamma as a function of the pure electric field eEeE for various NfN_{f} and NcN_{c}. For fixed Nc=3N_{c}=3, and upon varying the NfN_{f}, we found that quark-antiquark production rate Γ\Gamma grows quickly when we cross a pseudo-critical electric field eEceE_{c}. As a result, the pair production rate tends to initiates at lower values of eEeE for larger values of NfN_{f}. Hence, the pseudo-critical electric field eEceE_{c} reduced in magnitude upon increasing the number of flavors NfN_{f}. This is because both NfN_{f} and eEeE restored the dynamical chiral symmetry. While for fixed Nf=2N_{f}=2 and upon increasing NcN_{c}, the Schwinger pair production tends to initiate at larger values of eEeE for higher values of NcN_{c}. It is interesting to note that for N4N\geq 4, the discontinuity occurred in the production rate in the region where the chiral symmetry is restored. This may be due to the strong competition that occurred between eEeE and NcN_{c}. Thus, the pseudo-critical eEceE_{c} enhances as the number of colors NcN_{c} increases. The transition is of smooth cross-over until the critical endpoint (Nc,p=4,eEc,p=0.54GeV2)(N_{c,p}=4,eE_{c,p}=0.54GeV^{2}), where it suddenly changes to the first order. Our finding for Nc=3N_{c}=3 and Nf=2N_{f}=2 agrees well with the behaviour of the pair production rate studied through other effective models of low energy QCD. Qualitatively and quantitatively, the predictions of the presented flavor-dependent contact interaction model for fixed N=3N_{=}3 and Nf=2N_{f}=2 agree well with results obtained from other effective QCD models. Soon, we plan to extend this work to study the Schwinger pair production rate in hot and dense matter QCD in the presence of background fields. We are also interested in extending this work to study the properties of light hadrons in the background fields etc.

6 Acknowledgments

We acknowledge A. Bashir and A. Raya for their guidance and valuable suggestions in the process of completion of this work. We also thank to the colleagues of the Institute of Physics, Gomal University (Pakistan).

References

References

  • [1] Sauter F 1931 Z. Phys. 69 742–764
  • [2] Heisenberg W and Euler H 1936 Z. Phys. 98 714–732 (Preprint physics/0605038)
  • [3] Schwinger J S 1951 Phys. Rev. 82 664–679
  • [4] Yildiz A and Cox P H 1980 Phys. Rev. D 21 1095
  • [5] Cox P H and Yildiz A 1985 Phys. Rev. D 32 819–820
  • [6] Suganuma H and Tatsumi T 1991 Annals Phys. 208 470–508
  • [7] Suganuma H and Tatsumi T 1993 Prog. Theor. Phys. 90 379–404
  • [8] Tanji N 2009 Annals Phys. 324 1691–1736 (Preprint 0810.4429)
  • [9] Klevansky S P and Lemmer R H 1988 Phys. Rev. D38 3559–3565
  • [10] Klimenko K G 1992 Theor. Math. Phys. 90 1–6 [Teor. Mat. Fiz.90,3(1992)]
  • [11] Klevansky S P 1992 Rev. Mod. Phys. 64 649–708
  • [12] Babansky A Yu, Gorbar E V and Shchepanyuk G V 1998 Phys. Lett. B419 272–278 (Preprint hep-th/9705218)
  • [13] Cao G and Huang X G 2016 Phys. Rev. D 93 016007 (Preprint 1510.05125)
  • [14] Tavares W R and Avancini S S 2018 Phys. Rev. D 97 094001 (Preprint 1801.10566)
  • [15] Wang L and Cao G 2018 Phys. Rev. D97 034014 (Preprint 1712.09780)
  • [16] Ruggieri M and Peng G X 2016 Phys. Rev. D93 094021 (Preprint 1602.08994)
  • [17] Tavares W R, Farias R L S and Avancini S S 2020 Phys. Rev. D 101 016017 (Preprint 1912.00305)
  • [18] Ahmad A 2021 Chin. Phys. C 45 073109 (Preprint 2009.09482)
  • [19] Bzdak A and Skokov V 2012 Phys. Lett. B710 171–174 (Preprint 1111.1949)
  • [20] Deng W T and Huang X G 2012 Phys. Rev. C 85 044907 (Preprint 1201.5108)
  • [21] Bloczynski J, Huang X G, Zhang X and Liao J 2013 Phys. Lett. B718 1529–1535 (Preprint 1209.6594)
  • [22] Bloczynski J, Huang X G, Zhang X and Liao J 2015 Nucl. Phys. A939 85–100 (Preprint 1311.5451)
  • [23] Hirono Y, Hongo M and Hirano T 2014 Phys. Rev. C 90 021903 (Preprint 1211.1114)
  • [24] Voronyuk V, Toneev V D, Voloshin S A and Cassing W 2014 Phys. Rev. C 90 064903 (Preprint 1410.1402)
  • [25] Deng W T and Huang X G 2015 Phys. Lett. B 742 296–302 (Preprint 1411.2733)
  • [26] Huang X G and Liao J 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 232302 (Preprint 1303.7192)
  • [27] Jiang Y, Huang X G and Liao J 2015 Phys. Rev. D91 045001 (Preprint 1409.6395)
  • [28] Karpenko I and Becattini F 2017 Eur. Phys. J. C77 213 (Preprint 1610.04717)
  • [29] Xia X L, Li H, Tang Z B and Wang Q 2018 Phys. Rev. C98 024905 (Preprint 1803.00867)
  • [30] Wei D X, Deng W T and Huang X G 2019 Phys. Rev. C99 014905 (Preprint 1810.00151)
  • [31] Cao G and Zhuang P 2015 Phys. Rev. D 92 105030 (Preprint 1505.05307)
  • [32] Appelquist T et al. (LSD) 2014 Phys. Rev. D 90 114502 (Preprint 1405.4752)
  • [33] Hayakawa M, Ishikawa K I, Osaki Y, Takeda S, Uno S and Yamada N 2011 Phys. Rev. D 83 074509 (Preprint 1011.2577)
  • [34] Cheng A, Hasenfratz A, Petropoulos G and Schaich D 2013 JHEP 07 061 (Preprint 1301.1355)
  • [35] Hasenfratz A and Schaich D 2018 JHEP 02 132 (Preprint 1610.10004)
  • [36] Appelquist T et al. (Lattice Strong Dynamics) 2019 Phys. Rev. D 99 014509 (Preprint 1807.08411)
  • [37] Bashir A, Raya A and Rodriguez-Quintero J 2013 Physical Review D 88 054003
  • [38] Appelquist T, Cohen A G and Schmaltz M 1999 Phys. Rev. D 60 045003 (Preprint hep-th/9901109)
  • [39] Hopfer M, Fischer C S and Alkofer R 2014 JHEP 11 035 (Preprint 1405.7031)
  • [40] Doff A and Natale A A 2016 Phys. Rev. D 94 076005 (Preprint 1610.02564)
  • [41] Binosi D, Roberts C D and Rodriguez-Quintero J 2017 Phys. Rev. D 95 114009 (Preprint 1611.03523)
  • [42] Ahmad A, Bashir A, Bedolla M A and Cobos-Martínez J J 2021 J. Phys. G 48 075002 (Preprint 2008.03847)
  • [43] Ahmad A and Murad A 2022 Chin. Phys. C 46 083109 (Preprint 2201.09980)
  • [44] Ahmad A and Raya A 2016 J. Phys. G43 065002 (Preprint 1602.06448)
  • [45] Marquez F, Ahmad A, Buballa M and Raya A 2015 Phys. Lett. B747 529–535 (Preprint 1504.06730)
  • [46] Langfeld K, Kettner C and Reinhardt H 1996 Nucl. Phys. A 608 331–355 (Preprint hep-ph/9603264)
  • [47] Cornwall J M 1982 Phys. Rev. D 26 1453
  • [48] Aguilar A C, Binosi D and Papavassiliou J 2016 Front. Phys. (Beijing) 11 111203 (Preprint 1511.08361)
  • [49] Gutierrez-Guerrero L X, Bashir A, Cloet I C and Roberts C D 2010 Phys. Rev. C81 065202 (Preprint 1002.1968)
  • [50] Kohyama H 2016 (Preprint 1602.09056)
  • [51] Boucaud P, Leroy J P, Yaouanc A L, Micheli J, Pene O and Rodriguez-Quintero J 2012 Few Body Syst. 53 387–436 (Preprint 1109.1936)
  • [52] Ahmad A, Ayala A, Bashir A, Gutiérrez E and Raya A 2015 J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 651 012018
  • [53] Ebert D, Feldmann T and Reinhardt H 1996 Phys. Lett. B388 154–160 (Preprint hep-ph/9608223)
  • [54] Ward J C 1950 Phys. Rev. 78 182
  • [55] Takahashi Y 1957 Nuovo Cim. 6 371
  • [56] Roberts C D, Bhagwat M S, Holl A and Wright S V 2007 Eur. Phys. J. ST 140 53–116 (Preprint 0802.0217)
  • [57] Cao G 2021 Eur. Phys. J. A 57 264 (Preprint 2103.00456)