This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Schoenberg’s Theory of Totally Positive Functions and the Riemann Zeta Function

Karlheinz Gröchenig Faculty of Mathematics
University of Vienna
Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1
A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[email protected]
Abstract.

We review Schoenberg’s characterization of totally positive functions and its connection to the Laguerre-Polya class. This characterization yields a new condition that is equivalent to the truth of the Riemann hypothesis.

K. G. was supported in part by the project P31887-N32 of the Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

In a series of papers in the 1950s Schoenberg investigated the properties of totally positive functions [10, 29, 30, 31, 34]. He found several characterizations and used total positivity to prove fundamental properties of splines [34, 33]. The purpose of this note is to survey some aspects of Schoenberg’s work on totally positive functions, to advertize the connection between totally positive functions and the Riemann hypothesis, and to provide some mathematical entertainment.

One may speculate whether Schoenberg himself thought about the Riemann zeta function. He was the son-in-law of the eminent number theorist Edmund Landau, he collaborated with Polya, he knew deeply the work of Polya and Schur about the Laguerre-Polya class of entire functions that remains influential in the study of the Riemann hypothesis. Yet, to my knowledge, he never mentioned any number theory in his work on totally positive functions and splines; by the same token, Schoenberg’s name is not mentioned in analytic number theory.

Totally positive functions. A measurable function Λ\Lambda on \mathbb{R} is totally positive, if for every nn\in\mathbb{N} and every two sets of increasing numbers x1<x2<<xnx_{1}<x_{2}<\dots<x_{n} and y1<y2<<yny_{1}<y_{2}<\dots<y_{n} the matrix (Λ(xjyk))j,k=1,,n\Big{(}\Lambda(x_{j}-y_{k})\Big{)}_{j,k=1,\dots,n} has non-negative determinant:

(1) det(Λ(xjyk))j,k=1,,n0.\det(\Lambda(x_{j}-y_{k})\Big{)}_{j,k=1,\dots,n}\geq 0\,.

If in addition Λ\Lambda is integrable, then Λ\Lambda is called a Polya frequency function.

If Λ\Lambda is totally positive and not equal to eax+be^{ax+b}, there exist an exponential ecxe^{cx}, such that Λ1(x)=ecxΛ(x)\Lambda_{1}(x)=e^{cx}\Lambda(x) is a Polya frequency function, i.e., Λ1\Lambda_{1} is totally positive and integrable [31, Lemma 4]. It is usually no loss of generality to restrict to Polya frequency functions.

The class of totally positive functions played and plays an important role in approximation theory, in particular in spline theory [34], and in statistics [11, 19]. In a different and rather surprising direction, totally positive functions appear in the representation theory of infinite dimensional motion groups [23]. Recently, totally positive functions appeared in sampling theory and in time-frequency analysis [15, 13, 14], where they were instrumental in the derivation of optimal results.

The Laguerre-Polya class. An entire function Ψ\Psi of order at most 22 belongs to the Laguerre-Polya class, if its Hadamard factorization is of the form

(2) Ψ(s)=Csmeγs2+δsj=1(1+δjs)eδjss,\Psi(s)=Cs^{m}e^{-\gamma s^{2}+\delta s}\,\prod_{j=1}^{\infty}(1+\delta_{j}s)e^{-\delta_{j}s}\qquad s\in\mathbb{C}\,,

where δj1\delta_{j}^{-1}\in\mathbb{R} are the zeros of Ψ\Psi, mm is the order of the zero at 0, γ0\gamma\geq 0, δ\delta\in\mathbb{R}, and

(3) 0<γ+j=1δj2<.0<\gamma+\sum_{j=1}^{\infty}\delta_{j}^{2}<\infty\,.

Thus the Laguerre-Polya class consists of entire functions of order two with convergence exponent two with only real zeros. While the study of the distribution of zeros of entire functions is a perennial topic in complex analysis and of interest in its own right [21], the Laguerre-Polya class has gained special prominence in analytic number theory: the Riemann hypothesis says that a relative of the Riemann zeta function belongs to the Laguerre-Polya class.

Schoenberg’s characterization of totally positive functions. The fundamental results about totally positive functions were derived by Schoenberg in a series of papers [29, 30, 31, 34]. A comprehensive treatment is contained in Karlin’s monograph [19, Ch. 7].

The notions of totally positive functions and Laguerre-Polya class are seemingly unrelated, yet there is a deep connection between them through the following characterization of Schoenberg [31].

Theorem 1.

(i) If Λ\Lambda is a Polya frequency function, then its (two-sided) Laplace transform converges in a vertical strip {z:α<Rez<β},α<0<β\{z\in\mathbb{C}:\alpha<\mathrm{Re}\,z<\beta\},\alpha<0<\beta, and

(4) Λ(x)esx𝑑x=1Ψ(s)\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\Lambda(x)e^{-sx}\,dx=\frac{1}{\Psi(s)}

is the reciprocal of a function Ψ\Psi in the Laguerre-Polya class with Ψ(0)>0\Psi(0)>0.

(ii) Conversely, if Ψ\Psi is in the Laguerre-Polya class with Ψ(0)>0\Psi(0)>0, then its reciprocal 1/Ψ1/\Psi is the Laplace transform of a Polya frequency function Λ\Lambda.

This is a fascinating theorem, because it relates two function classes that seem to bear absolutely no resemblance to each other. Schoenberg’s theorem establishes a bijection between the class of Polya frequency functions, the Laguerre-Polya class, and yields a parametrization by the set (0,)××2()(0,\infty)\times\mathbb{R}\times\ell^{2}(\mathbb{Z}).

By using the Fourier transform instead of the Laplace transform, Schoenberg’s theorem can be recast as follows: A function Λ\Lambda is totally positive and integrable, if and only if its Fourier transform possesses the factorization

(5) Λ^(τ)=Ceγτ2+2πiδτj=1(1+2πiδjτ)1e2πiδjτ\hat{\Lambda}(\tau)=Ce^{-\gamma\tau^{2}+2\pi i\delta\tau}\,\prod_{j=1}^{\infty}(1+2\pi i\delta_{j}\tau)^{-1}e^{2\pi i\delta_{j}\tau}

where C>0C>0, γ0\gamma\geq 0, δ,δj\delta,\delta_{j}\in\mathbb{R} and j=1δj2<\sum_{j=1}^{\infty}\delta_{j}^{2}<\infty (and the product in (5) may also be finite).

If we drop the condition of integrability and exclude exponential functions, then the representation (5) still holds for every totally positive function, but their Laplace transform of Λ\Lambda converges in some vertical strip {z:α<Rez<β}\{z\in\mathbb{C}:\alpha<\mathrm{Re}\,z<\beta\} that does not contain 0.

A similar result holds for one-sided totally positive functions [31, Thm. 2].

Theorem 2.

(i) If Λ\Lambda is a Polya frequency function with support in [0,)[0,\infty), then its Laplace transform converges in a half-plane {z:α<Rez},α>0\{z\in\mathbb{C}:-\alpha<\mathrm{Re}\,z\},\alpha>0, and

(6) 0Λ(x)esx𝑑x=1Ψ(s)\int_{0}^{\infty}\Lambda(x)e^{-sx}\,dx=\frac{1}{\Psi(s)}

is the reciprocal of an entire function Ψ\Psi with Hadamard factorization

(7) Ψ(s)=Ceδsj=1(1+δjs),\Psi(s)=Ce^{\delta s}\prod_{j=1}^{\infty}(1+\delta_{j}s)\,,

with δ,δj0,δj<\delta\in\mathbb{R},\delta_{j}\geq 0,\sum\delta_{j}<\infty.

(ii) Conversely, if Ψ\Psi possesses the factorization (7), then its reciprocal 1/Ψ1/\Psi is the Laplace transform of a Polya frequency function Λ\Lambda with support in [0,)[0,\infty).

Elementary examples. If Λ^(τ)=(1+2πiδτ)1\hat{\Lambda}(\tau)=(1+2\pi i\delta\tau)^{-1}, then Λ(x)=δ1ex/δχ[0,)(x)\Lambda(x)=\delta^{-1}e^{-x/\delta}\chi_{[0,\infty)}(x) is the one-sided exponential function. For Λ^(τ)=eπγτ2\hat{\Lambda}(\tau)=e^{-\pi\gamma\tau^{2}} for γ>0\gamma>0, we obtain the Gaussian Λ(x)=γ1/2eπx2/γ\Lambda(x)=\gamma^{-1/2}e^{-\pi x^{2}/\gamma}. In both cases, it is easy to check directly that these functions are totally positive.

The proof of the implication (ii) of Theorem 1 is based on the (non-trivial) fact that the convolution Λ=Λ1Λ2\Lambda=\Lambda_{1}\ast\Lambda_{2} of two Polya frequency functions Λ1,Λ2\Lambda_{1},\Lambda_{2} is again a Polya frequency function. The converse in Theorem 1 lies much deeper, and Schoenberg used heavily several results of Polya about functions in the Laguerre-Polya class [24, 27]. See the end of this note for the essential step of the argument.

Schoenberg’s motivation was the characterization and deeper understanding of totally positive functions, and thus the implication (i) and the factorization (5) can be considered his main insight about totally positive functions. However, instead of reading Schoenberg’s theorem as a characterization of totally positive functions, one may read it as a characterization of the Laguerre-Polya class. A function Ψ\Psi with Ψ(0)>0\Psi(0)>0 and Ψeas+b\Psi\neq e^{as+b} is in the Laguerre-Polya class, if and only if the Fourier transform of 1/Ψ1/\Psi is a Polya frequency function.

The Riemann hypothesis and totally positive functions. Let ζ(s)=n=1ns\zeta(s)=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}n^{-s} for s,Res>1,s\in\mathbb{C},\mathrm{Re}\,s>1, be the Riemann zeta function and let

(8) ξ(s)\displaystyle\xi(s) =12s(s1)πs/2Γ(s2)ζ(s)\displaystyle=\tfrac{1}{2}s(s-1)\pi^{-s/2}\Gamma\Big{(}\frac{s}{2}\Big{)}\,\zeta(s)
(9) Ξ(s)\displaystyle\Xi(s) =ξ(12+is)\displaystyle=\xi\Big{(}\frac{1}{2}+is\Big{)}

be the Riemann xi-functions (where Γ\Gamma is the usual gamma function). Then the functional equation for the Riemann zeta function is expressed by the symmetry

(10) ξ(s)=ξ(1s) and Ξ(s)=Ξ(s)\xi(s)=\xi(1-s)\qquad\text{ and }\qquad\Xi(s)=\Xi(-s)

for the xi-functions.

The Riemann hypothesis conjectures that all non-trivial zeros of the zeta function lie on the critical line 1/2+it1/2+it. See the monographs [18, 17, 35], the two volumes about equivalents of the Riemann hypothesis [3, 4] or the survey articles [2, 5].

Expressed in terms of the xi-functions, the Riemann hypothesis states that Ξ\Xi has only real zeros, in other words, Ξ\Xi belongs to the Laguerre-Polya class. Thus many investigations of the zeta function involve complex analysis related to the Laguerre-Polya class. Schoenberg’s theorem immediately leads to the following equivalent condition for the Riemann hypothesis to hold.

Theorem 3.

The Riemann hypothesis holds, if and only if there exists a Polya frequency function Λ\Lambda, such that

(11) 1Ξ(s)=Λ(x)esx𝑑x for s,|Res|<t0,\frac{1}{\Xi(s)}=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\Lambda(x)e^{-sx}\,dx\qquad\text{ for }s\in\mathbb{C},|\mathrm{Re}\,s|<t_{0}\,,

where 1/2+it01/2+it_{0} is the first zero of the zeta function on the critical line.

Let us make this statement a bit more explicit by taking the Fourier transform instead of the Laplace transform.

Theorem 4.

The Riemann hypothesis holds, if and only if

(12) Λ(x)=12π1ξ(12+τ)eixτ𝑑τ\Lambda(x)=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{1}{\xi(\tfrac{1}{2}+\tau)}e^{-ix\tau}\,d\tau

is a Polya frequency function.

The growth of ξ\xi in the complex plane is [35] |ξ(s)|=𝒪(eA|s|ln|s|),|\xi(s)|=\mathcal{O}\Big{(}e^{A|s|\ln|s|}\Big{)}\,, and on the positive real line

lnξ(σ)12σlogσσ>1.\ln\xi(\sigma)\asymp\tfrac{1}{2}\sigma\log\sigma\qquad\sigma>1\,.

Consequently 1ξ(σ)Ce|σ|log|σ|/2\frac{1}{\xi(\sigma)}\leq Ce^{-|\sigma|\log|\sigma|/2} decays super-exponentially. Since ζ\zeta and thus ξ\xi do not have any real zeros in the interval [0,1][0,1] and ζ>0\zeta>0 on (1,)(1,\infty), the function ξ\xi is therefore strictly positive on \mathbb{R} and 1/ξ1/\xi is integrable. Thus its Fourier transform is well-defined.

Using s=2πiτs=2\pi i\tau, we can rewrite (13) as a Fourier transform. The inversion formula for the Fourier transform now yields

Λ(x)\displaystyle\Lambda(x) =1Ξ(2πiτ)e2πixτ𝑑τ\displaystyle=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{1}{\Xi(2\pi i\tau)}e^{2\pi ix\tau}\,d\tau
=1ξ(1/22πτ)e2πixτ𝑑τ,\displaystyle=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{1}{\xi(1/2-2\pi\tau)}e^{2\pi ix\tau}\,d\tau\,,

which is (12).

Using the symmetry of Ξ\Xi, there is an alternative formulation of Theorem 3 with the restricted Laguerre-Polya class defined in (7). Since Ξ\Xi is symmetric, it can be written as Ξ(s)=Ξ1(s2)\Xi(s)=\Xi_{1}(-s^{2}) for an entire function Ξ1\Xi_{1} of order 1/21/2. Furthermore, Ξ\Xi has only real zeros, if and only if Ξ1\Xi_{1} has only negative zeros (with convergence exponent at most 11). The characterization of one-sided Polya frequency functions yields the following equivalence.

Theorem 5.

The Riemann hypothesis holds, if and only if there exists a Polya frequency function Λ\Lambda with support in [0,)[0,\infty), such that

(13) 1Ξ1(s)=0Λ(x)esx𝑑x for s,Res>α,\frac{1}{\Xi_{1}(s)}=\int_{0}^{\infty}\Lambda(x)e^{-sx}\,dx\qquad\text{ for }s\in\mathbb{C},\mathrm{Re}\,s>\alpha\,,

for some α<0\alpha<0.

These equivalences seem to be new. Schoenberg’s name is not even mentioned in  [3, 4] on equivalents of the Riemann hypothesis.

It is interesting that the characterization of Theorem 4 is “orthogonal” to most research on ζ\zeta and to the well-known criteria for the Riemann hypothesis. Theorem 4 requires only the values of ζ\zeta on the real line to probe the secrets of ζ\zeta in the critical strip. This fact is remarkable, but the price to pay is the added difficulty to extract any meaningful statements about ξ\xi on the critical strip from its restriction to \mathbb{R}. This seems much harder, if not impossible.

To work with Theorem 4, one would need a viable expression for the Fourier-Laplace transform of 1/ξ1/\xi, but there seems to be none. The 11-positivity in (1) says that Λ0\Lambda\geq 0, which is equivalent to the Fourier transform Λ^=1/ξ\hat{\Lambda}=1/\xi to be positive definite by Bochner’s theorem. Explicitly, we would need to know that, for all choices of cj,τj,j=1,,nc_{j}\in\mathbb{C},\tau_{j}\in\mathbb{R},j=1,\dots,n, and all nn\in\mathbb{N}, we have j,k=1ncjck¯ξ(12+τjτk)10\sum_{j,k=1}^{n}c_{j}\overline{c_{k}}\xi(\tfrac{1}{2}+\tau_{j}-\tau_{k})^{-1}\geq 0. Not even this property of 1/ξ1/\xi seems to be known. It is therefore unlikely that much is gained by Theorems 35.

By contrast, the Fourier transform of Ξ(x)\Xi(x) on the critical line (!) was already known to Riemann (see [35, 2.16.1]) and is the starting point of a program to prove the Riemann hypothesis that goes back to Polya [25]. After important work of de Bruijn, Hejhal, and Newman this line of thought has recently culminated in the resolution of the Newman conjecture by Rodgers and Tao [28].

Some non-trivial Polya frequency functions. Perhaps Schoenberg had also the Riemann hypothesis in mind, when he investigated Polya frequency functions. The examples in [29, 31] of totally positive functions smell of the zeta function.

(i) The zero set {0,1,2,}\{0,-1,-2,\dots\} with multiplicity one yields the entire function

(14) Ψ(s)=eγssn=1(1+sn)es/n,\Psi(s)=e^{\gamma s}s\prod_{n=1}^{\infty}(1+\frac{s}{n})\,e^{-s/n}\,,

where γ\gamma is the Euler constant. By a classical result Ψ\Psi is the reciprocal of the Γ\Gamma-function Γ(s)=0xs1ex𝑑x\Gamma(s)=\int_{0}^{\infty}x^{s-1}e^{-x}\,dx. Consequently, the Laplace transform of Ψ(s)1=Γ(s)\Psi(s)^{-1}=\Gamma(s) is a totally positive function. Indeed, using the substitution x=etx=e^{-t} in the definition of Γ\Gamma, one obtains

(15) Γ(s)=eexesx𝑑xRes>0.\Gamma(s)=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{-e^{-x}}e^{-sx}\,dx\,\qquad\mathrm{Re}\,s>0\,.

Theorem 1 implies that

Λ(x)=eex\Lambda(x)=e^{-e^{-x}}

is totally positive. By removing the pole of Γ\Gamma at 0, we obtain

sΓ(s)=Λ(x)esx𝑑x=exeexesx𝑑x,Res>1.s\Gamma(s)=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\Lambda^{\prime}(x)e^{-sx}\,dx=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{-x}\,e^{-e^{-x}}e^{-sx}\,dx\,,\qquad\mathrm{Re}s>-1\,.

Consequently Λ1(x)=exex\Lambda_{1}(x)=e^{-x-e^{-x}} is a Polya frequency function.

(ii) The zero set \mathbb{Z} with simple zeros yields Ψ(s)=sinπsπ\Psi(s)=\frac{\sin\pi s}{\pi}. By Theorem 1, 1/Ψ1/\Psi is the Laplace transform of a totally positive function on a suitable strip of convergence. Schoenberg’s calculation yields the totally positive function

Λ(x)=11+ex.\Lambda(x)=\frac{1}{1+e^{-x}}\,.

(iii) Finally the zero set {n2:n}\{-n^{2}:n\in\mathbb{N}\} yields the entire function

Ψ(s)=sn=1(1+sn2)=1πssinπs.\Psi(s)=s\prod_{n=1}^{\infty}(1+\frac{s}{n^{2}})=-\frac{1}{\pi}\sqrt{-s}\sin\pi\sqrt{-s}\,.

The associated totally positive function is the Jacobi theta function

Λ(x)={j=(1)jej2x for x>00 for x0.\Lambda(x)=\begin{cases}\sum_{j=-\infty}^{\infty}(-1)^{j}e^{-j^{2}x}&\text{ for }x>0\\ 0&\text{ for }x\leq 0\,.\end{cases}

All three functions show up prominently in the treatment of the functional equation of the zeta function: Γ\Gamma is contained in the definition of the xi-function, sin\sin in the formulation of the functional equation, and a Jacobi theta function is used in several proofs of the functional equation (Riemann’s original proof, see [35]).

Intrinsic characterization of Polya frequency functions. The fundamental property of Polya frequency functions is their smoothing property or variation diminishing property. The relevance of smoothing properties for many applications is outlined in Schoenberg’s survey [32]. In this context the variation of a real-valued function on \mathbb{R} is measured either by the number of sign changes or by the number of real zeros. Formally, given f:f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R} let

(16) v(f)=max#{n:xj,x0<x1<<xn with f(xj)f(xj+1)<0},v(f)=\max\#\{n\in\mathbb{N}:\exists x_{j}\in\mathbb{R},x_{0}<x_{1}<\dots<x_{n}\text{ with }f(x_{j})f(x_{j+1})<0\}\,,

and let N(f)N(f) be the number of real zeros of ff counted with multiplicity.

Given a function Λ\Lambda, let TΛT_{\Lambda} be the convolution operator TΛf=fΛT_{\Lambda}f=f\ast\Lambda. Schoenberg’s second characterization of Polya frequency functions is as follows [30].

Theorem 6.

Let Λ\Lambda be integrable and continuous. Then Λ\Lambda is variation diminishing, i.e.,

v(TΛf)v(f)v(T_{\Lambda}f)\leq v(f)\

for all functions that are locally Riemann integrable, if and only if either Λ\Lambda or Λ-\Lambda is a Polya frequency function.

This characterization is “intrinsic” in the sense that it uses only the properties of the matrices occurring in the definition (1) of total positivity.

With a perturbation argument one can replace sign changes with zeros and obtains the following consequence.

Corollary 7.

Let Λ\Lambda be a Polya frequency function. Then for every real-valued polynomial pp the convolution TΛT_{\Lambda} is zero-decreasing, i.e.,

N(TΛp)N(p).N(T_{\Lambda}p)\leq N(p)\,.

Intrinsic characterizations of the Laguerre-Polya class. There are several characterizations of the Laguerre-Polya class that require only their properties as entire functions. This is part of classical complex analysis and the results are due to Polya and Schur [24, 27] building on work of Laguerre, Hadamard, and many others. These results relate the properties of the zero set to properties of the power series expansion of an entire function. Before formulating a sequence of equivalences, we note that every formal power series F(s)j=0ajsjF(s)\sim\sum_{j=0}^{\infty}a_{j}s^{j} yields a differential operator F(D)p(x)=j=0ajDjp(x)F(D)p(x)=\sum_{j=0}^{\infty}a_{j}D^{j}p(x) with D=ddxD=\frac{d}{dx}. The differential operator is well-defined at least on polynomials, and the mapping FF(D)F\mapsto F(D) is an algebra homomorphism and thus provides a simple functional calculus.

Theorem 8.

Let Ψ(s)=j=0βjj!sj\Psi(s)=\sum_{j=0}^{\infty}\frac{\beta_{j}}{j!}s^{j} be an entire function. Then the following are equivalent:

(i) Ψ\Psi belongs to the Laguerre-Polya class.

(ii) Ψ\Psi can be approximated uniformly on compact sets by polynomials with only real zeros.

(iii) For all nn\in\mathbb{N} the polynomials pn(x)=j=0nβj(nj)xjp_{n}(x)=\sum_{j=0}^{n}\beta_{j}\binom{n}{j}x^{j} and qn(x)=j=0nβj(nj)xnjq_{n}(x)=\sum_{j=0}^{n}\beta_{j}\binom{n}{j}x^{n-j} have only real zeros.

(iv) If p(x)=j=0mcjxjp(x)=\sum_{j=0}^{m}c_{j}x^{j} is a polynomial with only real, non-positive zeros, then the polynomial q(x)=βjcjxjq(x)=\sum\beta_{j}c_{j}x^{j} has only real zeros.

If, in addition, Ψ(0)>0\Psi(0)>0 and 1Ψ(s)=j=0γjj!sj\frac{1}{\Psi(s)}=\sum_{j=0}^{\infty}\frac{\gamma_{j}}{j!}s^{j}, then the following property is equivalent to (i) – (iv).

(v) The transform p1Ψ(D)pp\mapsto\frac{1}{\Psi(D)}p is zero-decreasing, i.e., the polynomial q(x)=1Ψ(D)p(x)=j=0γjj!p(j)(x)q(x)=\frac{1}{\Psi(D)}p(x)=\sum_{j=0}^{\infty}\frac{\gamma_{j}}{j!}p^{(j)}(x) has at most as many real zeros as pp (real-valued):

N(1Ψ(D)p)N(p).N\Big{(}\frac{1}{\Psi(D)}p\Big{)}\leq N(p)\,.

Applying condition (iv) to the polynomials xn1(1+x)2x^{n-1}(1+x)^{2}, one obtains a necessary condition on the Taylor coefficients of a function in the Laguerre-Polya class, namely the so-called Turan inequalities.

Corollary 9.

If Ψ(s)=j=0βjj!sj\Psi(s)=\sum_{j=0}^{\infty}\frac{\beta_{j}}{j!}s^{j} belongs to the Laguerre-Polya class, then

βn2βn1βn+10 for all n\beta_{n}^{2}-\beta_{n-1}\beta_{n+1}\geq 0\qquad\text{ for all }n\in\mathbb{N}

Applying condition (v) to polynomials of the form p(x)=(k=1nakxk)2p(x)=(\sum_{k=1}^{n}a_{k}x^{k})^{2} and working out Ψ(D)1p\Psi(D)^{-1}p, one obtains the following necessary condition for the Laguerre-Polya class [24, p. 235].

Corollary 10.

Assume that Ψ\Psi belongs to the Laguerre-Polya class, Ψ(0)>0\Psi(0)>0, Ψ(s)eas+b\Psi(s)\neq e^{as+b} and 1/Ψ1/\Psi has the Taylor expansion 1Ψ(s)=j=0γjj!sj\frac{1}{\Psi(s)}=\sum_{j=0}^{\infty}\frac{\gamma_{j}}{j!}s^{j}. Then for every nn\in\mathbb{N} the n×nn\times n Hankel matrix (γj+k)j,k=0,,n1\big{(}\gamma_{j+k}\big{)}_{j,k=0,\dots,n-1} is positive definite (and thus invertible).

However, the positivity of the Hankel matrices is not sufficient for Ψ\Psi to be in the Laguerre-Polya class, as was proved already by Hamburger [16].

Theorem 8 and its corollaries are all contained in the seminal papers of Polya and Schur [24, 27] from 1914 and 1915 and have inspired a century of exciting mathematics. Each of the equivalent conditions in Theorem 8 is a point of departure for the study of the Riemann hypothesis.

No list can do justice to all contributions between 1914 and 2020, so let us mention only a few directions whose origin is in Polya’s work. Further references and more detailed history can be found in the cited articles.

Condition (iii) applied to the Riemann function Ξ\Xi yields an important equivalence of the Riemann hypothesis. The polynomials in condition (iii) are nowadays called Jensen polynomials. In modern language (iii) says that “the Jensen polynomials for the Riemann function Ξ(s)\Xi(s) must be hyperbolic”. Significant recent progress on this equivalence is reported in [12].

The relations between the Jensen polynomials, the multiplier sequences of condition (iv), and the Turan inequalities and their generalizations have been studied in depth by Craven, Csordas, and Varga [7, 6, 9] who found many additional equivalences to the Riemann hypothesis. A particular highlight is their proof that Ξ\Xi, or rather the Taylor coefficients of Ξ(s)\Xi(\sqrt{s}) satisfy the Turan inequalities [8], thereby resolving a 60 year old conjecture going back to — Polya.

Finally let us mention that total positivity enters the investigation of the Laguerre-Polya class in yet another way. A entire function belongs to the restricted Laguerre-Polya class defined by (7), if and only if the sequence of its Taylor coefficients (an)(a_{n}) is a Polya frequency sequence [1]. This means that the infinite upper triangular Toeplitz matrix AA with entries Ajk=akjA_{jk}=a_{k-j}, if kjk\geq j and Ajk=0A_{jk}=0, if k<jk<j has only positive minors. This aspect of total positivity has been used in [20, 22] for the investigation of the zeta function.

From total positivity to the Laguerre-Polya class. By comparing the two intrinsic characterizations in Theorems 6 and 8 one may guess that the respective conditions on zero diminishing must play the decisive role in the proof of Theorem 1(i). To give the gist of this argument, we cannot do better than repeat Schoenberg’s beautiful argument.

First, since Λ\Lambda is assumed to be a Polya frequency function, Λ\Lambda must decay exponentially [31, Lemma 2], therefore its moments of all orders exist. Let

μn=xnΛ(x)𝑑x\mu_{n}=\int_{\mathbb{R}}x^{n}\Lambda(x)\,dx

be the nn-th moment. By expanding the exponential esx=j=1(s)jj!xje^{-sx}=\sum_{j=1}^{\infty}\frac{(-s)^{j}}{j!}x^{j} we express the Laplace transform of Λ\Lambda as a power series

(17) esxΛ(x)𝑑x=j=0(1)jj!μjsj:=F(s).\int_{\mathbb{R}}e^{-sx}\Lambda(x)\,dx=\sum_{j=0}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^{j}}{j!}\mu_{j}\,s^{j}\,:=F(s)\,.

Since Λ0\Lambda\not\equiv 0 and Λ0\Lambda\geq 0, we have F(0)>0F(0)>0, and its reciprocal also possesses a power series expansion around 0 with a positive radius of convergence

Ψ(s)=1F(s)=j=0βjj!sj.\Psi(s)=\frac{1}{F(s)}=\sum_{j=0}^{\infty}\frac{\beta_{j}}{j!}\,s^{j}\,.

Next, we consider the convolution of Λ\Lambda with a polynomial pp of degree NN and relate it to the moments of Λ\Lambda:

q(x)\displaystyle q(x) =(Λp)(x)=p(xt)Λ(t)𝑑t=(j=0N(t)jj!p(j)(x))Λ(t)𝑑t\displaystyle=(\Lambda\ast p)(x)=\int_{\mathbb{R}}p(x-t)\Lambda(t)\,dt=\int_{\mathbb{R}}\Big{(}\sum_{j=0}^{N}\frac{(-t)^{j}}{j!}p^{(j)}(x)\Big{)}\Lambda(t)\,dt
=j=0n(1)jj!μjp(j)(x)=F(D)p(x).\displaystyle=\sum_{j=0}^{n}\frac{(-1)^{j}}{j!}\mu_{j}\,p^{(j)}(x)=F(D)p(x)\,.

By Corollary 7 the number of real zeros of qq (counted with multiplicity) does not exceed the number of real zeros of pp,

(18) N(q)=N(F(D)p)N(p).N(q)=N(F(D)p)\leq N(p)\,.

Using the functional calculus, we can invert F(D)F(D) and recover pp from q=Λpq=\Lambda\ast p via

p(x)=1F(D)q(x)=Ψ(D)q(x)=j=0βjj!q(j)(x).\displaystyle p(x)=\frac{1}{F(D)}q(x)=\Psi(D)q(x)=\sum_{j=0}^{\infty}\frac{\beta_{j}}{j!}\,q^{(j)}(x)\,.

For the monomial q(x)=xnq(x)=x^{n} we obtain the polynomial

qn(x)=Ψ(D)xn=j=0nβj(nj)xnjq_{n}(x)=\Psi(D)x^{n}=\sum_{j=0}^{n}\beta_{j}\binom{n}{j}x^{n-j}\,

of degree nn. Since xn=F(D)qnx^{n}=F(D)q_{n}, (18) implies the count of zeros (with multiplicities)

n=N(xn)N(qn)n.n=N(x^{n})\leq N(q_{n})\leq n\,.

For every nn, qnq_{n} therefore has only real zeros. This is precisely condition (iii) of Theorem 8, and we conclude that Ψ\Psi is in the Laguerre-Polya class.

Summary. Schoenberg’s characterization of totally positive functions implies a condition equivalent to the Riemann hypothesis. The characterization is interesting in itself because it involves only the values of the Riemann zeta function on the real axis. To the best of our knowledge, the characterization of the Laguerre-Polya class by means of totally positive functions has not yet been tested on the Riemann zeta function.

References

  • [1] M. Aissen, I. J. Schoenberg, and A. M. Whitney. On the generating functions of totally positive sequences. I. J. Analyse Math., 2:93–103, 1952.
  • [2] E. Bombieri. The classical theory of zeta and LL-functions. Milan J. Math., 78(1):11–59, 2010.
  • [3] K. Broughan. Equivalents of the Riemann hypothesis. Vol. 1, volume 164 of Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2017. Arithmetic equivalents.
  • [4] K. Broughan. Equivalents of the Riemann hypothesis. Vol. 2, volume 165 of Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2017. Analytic equivalents.
  • [5] J. B. Conrey. The Riemann hypothesis. Notices Amer. Math. Soc., 50(3):341–353, 2003.
  • [6] T. Craven and G. Csordas. Jensen polynomials and the Turán and Laguerre inequalities. Pacific J. Math., 136(2):241–260, 1989.
  • [7] G. Csordas. Fourier transforms of positive definite kernels and the Riemann ξ\xi-function. Comput. Methods Funct. Theory, 15(3):373–391, 2015.
  • [8] G. Csordas, T. S. Norfolk, and R. S. Varga. The Riemann hypothesis and the Turán inequalities. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 296(2):521–541, 1986.
  • [9] G. Csordas and R. S. Varga. Necessary and sufficient conditions and the Riemann hypothesis. Adv. in Appl. Math., 11(3):328–357, 1990.
  • [10] H. B. Curry and I. J. Schoenberg. On Pólya frequency functions. IV. The fundamental spline functions and their limits. J. Analyse Math., 17:71–107, 1966.
  • [11] B. Efron. Increasing properties of Pólya frequency functions. Ann. Math. Statist., 36:272–279, 1965.
  • [12] M. Griffin, K. Ono, L. Rolen, and D. Zagier. Jensen polynomials for the Riemann zeta function and other sequences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 116(23):11103–11110, 2019.
  • [13] K. Gröchenig, J. L. Romero, and J. Stöckler. Sampling theorems for shift-invariant spaces, Gabor frames, and totally positive functions. Invent. Math., 211(3):1119–1148, 2018.
  • [14] K. Gröchenig, J. L. Romero, and J. Stöckler. Sharp results on sampling with derivatives in shift-invariant spaces and multi-window Gabor frames. Constr. Approx., 51(1):1–25, 2020.
  • [15] K. Gröchenig and J. Stöckler. Gabor frames and totally positive functions. Duke Math. J., 162(6):1003–1031, 2013.
  • [16] H. Hamburger. Bemerkungen zu einer Fragestellung des Herrn Pólya. Math. Z., 7(1-4):302–322, 1920.
  • [17] A. Ivić. The Riemann zeta-function. Dover Publications, Inc., Mineola, NY, 2003. Theory and applications, Reprint of the 1985 original [Wiley, New York; MR0792089 (87d:11062)].
  • [18] H. Iwaniec. Lectures on the Riemann zeta function, volume 62 of University Lecture Series. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2014.
  • [19] S. Karlin. Total positivity. Vol. I. Stanford University Press, Stanford, Calif, 1968.
  • [20] O. M. Katkova. Multiple positivity and the Riemann zeta-function. Comput. Methods Funct. Theory, 7(1):13–31, 2007.
  • [21] B. J. Levin. Distribution of zeros of entire functions, volume 5 of Translations of Mathematical Monographs. American Mathematical Society, Providence, R.I., revised edition, 1980. Translated from the Russian by R. P. Boas, J. M. Danskin, F. M. Goodspeed, J. Korevaar, A. L. Shields and H. P. Thielman.
  • [22] J. Nuttall. Wronskians, cumulants, and the Riemann hypothesis. Constr. Approx., 38(2):193–212, 2013.
  • [23] D. Pickrell. Mackey analysis of infinite classical motion groups. Pacific J. Math., 150(1):139–166, 1991.
  • [24] G. Pólya. Algebraische Untersuchungen über ganze Funktionen vom Geschlechte Null und Eins. J. Reine Angew. Math., 145: 224–249, 1915.
  • [25] G. Pólya. Bemerkung Über die Integraldarstellung der Riemannschen ξ\xi-Funktion. Acta Math., 48(3-4):305–317, 1926.
  • [26] G. Pólya. Collected papers. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.-London, 1974. Vol. II: Location of zeros, Edited by R. P. Boas, Mathematicians of Our Time, Vol. 8.
  • [27] G. Pólya and J. Schur. Über zwei Arten von Faktorenfolgen in der Theorie der algebraischen Gleichungen. J. Reine Angew. Math., 144:89–113, 1914.
  • [28] B. Rodgers and T. Tao. The de Bruijn–Newman constant is non-negative. Forum Math. Pi, 8:e6, 62, 2020.
  • [29] I. J. Schoenberg. On totally positive functions, Laplace integrals and entire functions of the Laguerre-Polya-Schur type. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 33:11–17, 1947.
  • [30] I. J. Schoenberg. On Pólya frequency functions. II. Variation-diminishing integral operators of the convolution type. Acta Sci. Math. (Szeged), 12:97–106, 1950.
  • [31] I. J. Schoenberg. On Pólya frequency functions. I. The totally positive functions and their Laplace transforms. J. Analyse Math., 1:331–374, 1951.
  • [32] I. J. Schoenberg. On smoothing operations and their generating functions. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 59:199–230, 1953.
  • [33] I. J. Schoenberg. Cardinal spline interpolation. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, Pa., 1973. Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics, No. 12.
  • [34] I. J. Schoenberg and A. Whitney. On Pólya frequence functions. III. The positivity of translation determinants with an application to the interpolation problem by spline curves. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 74:246–259, 1953.
  • [35] E. C. Titchmarsh. The theory of the Riemann zeta-function. The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New York, second edition, 1986. Edited and with a preface by D. R. Heath-Brown.