Scattering of low energy neutrinos and antineutrinos by neon and argon
Abstract
The theory of scattering of low energy neutrinos and antineutrinos by atomic electrons has recently been developed (I. B. Whittingham, Phys. Rev. D 013008 (2022)) using the Bound Interaction Picture in configuration space to fully implement the relationship between the neutrino helicities and the orbital and spin angular momenta of the atomic electrons. The energy spectra of ionization electrons produced by scattering of neutrinos and antineutrinos with energies of 5, 10, 20, and 30 keV by hydrogen, helium and neon were calculated using Dirac screened Coulombic eigenfunctions. This paper reports further applications of this theory, to a new calculation of the energy spectra for neon, as the original calculation used some screening constants which underestimated the effects of screening in the inner subshells, and to scattering by argon. The results are presented as ratios to the corresponding quantities for scattering by free electrons. The new spectra ratios for neon are larger than the original ratios by to , with the greatest increases occurring for 10 keV neutrinos and antineutrinos. Integrated spectra ratios range from 0.16 to 0.59 for neon, and from 0.15 to 0.48 for argon, as the neutrino energy increases from 5 to 30 keV.
I Introduction
There is significant interest in the low energy O(10 keV) scattering of electron neutrinos and antineutrinos by atomic electrons
(1) |
for which the binding of the atomic electron cannot be ignored and one can expect modifications of the free electron scattering formulae. One example is the study of possible electromagnetic properties of neutrinos, such as magnetic and electric dipole moments, using low energy scattering of neutrinos and antineutrinos [1, 2]. For a review of neutrino-atom collisions, see [3].
Of particular interest is the ionization of atoms by neutrinos and antineutrinos. Ionization cross sections calculated for H, He and Ne were found [4] to be smaller than the corresponding free electron cross sections, and the calculations were then extended [5] to the electron spectra for H, He and Ne, and integrated ionization cross sections for H, He, Ne and Xe.
These calculations treat the -electron scattering process as a probability weighted scattering by a free electron of mass , where
(2) |
is the energy of the initial bound electron, where is the binding energy, and the momentum is determined by the probability amplitude , where is the momentum-space atomic wave function. Spin-independent non-relativistic atomic wave functions are used for the initial electron and Coulombic effects on the final electron are ignored. These calculations destroy the relationship between the neutrino helicities and the orbital and spin angular momenta of the atomic electrons. Some of these issues have been addressed by [6, 7, 8] and their approach is closest in spirit to the present calculations.
The theory of scattering of neutrinos and antineutrinos by bound electrons which maintains the full collision dynamics has recently been developed [9]. The scattering is formulated in configuation space using the Bound Interaction Picture [10, 11], rather than the usual formulation in the Interaction Picture in momentum space as appropriate to scattering by free electrons. The energy spectra of ionization electrons produced by scattering of neutrinos and antineutrinos with energies of 5, 10, 20, and 30 keV by hydrogen, helium and neon were calculated using Dirac screened Coulombic eigenfunctions. The results were significantly different to those of [5] and indicated that binding effects from both the initial bound state and the final continuum state are important.
Very recently, a second quantization formalism has been developed [12] to include atomic effects in the electron recoil signal for dark matter or neutrino scattering. Although the neutrino scattering amplitude includes more general interactions than the - and - exchange of the Standard Model, the formalism treats the atomic electrons as non-relativistic and includes the electron spin through a non-relativistic approximation to the four-component Dirac eigenfunction which ignores coupling between the spin and orbital angular momenta.
This paper reports further applications of the Bound Interaction Picture theory [9], to a new calculation of the energy spectra for neon, as the original calculation used some screening constants which underestimated the effects of screening in the inner subshells, and to scattering by argon as it is the basis of current and near-future experiments sensitive to neutrino-electron scattering.
The general formalism for the scattering of neutrinos and antineutrinos by atomic electrons is summarized in Sec. II, and the radial matrix elements which occur in the atomic electron scattering tensor discussed in Sec. III. Results for the energy spectra of the ionization electrons produced in scattering from neon and argon are presented and discussed in Sec. IV, and Sec. V contains a summary and conclusions for the investigation.
II General formalism for neutrino scattering by atomic electrons
The scattering of neutrinos by atomic electrons involves both - and - boson exchange. The total -matrix in the Bound Interaction Picture for scattering at low momentum transfers , where , is [9]
(3) |
where the atomic electron scattering amplitude is
(4) | |||||
the quantity
(5) |
incorporates energy conservation, is the momentum transfer from the neutrino, and
(6) |
is the neutrino scattering amplitude. Here is the positive energy eigenfunction for an electron in a state of the external field specified by the quantum numbers , and are the plane wave spinors describing a neutrino with momentum and helicity . The natural unit system is used throughout, the scalar product of two 4-vectors is , the Dirac matrices satisfy , and .
The electron mixing parameters are
(7) |
where
(8) |
and is the weak mixing angle.
For scattering of antineutrinos, is replaced by
(9) |
where is the antineutrino plane wave spinor, and is replaced by .
We assume the atomic electron moves in a spherically symmetric potential , for which the Dirac equation has eigenfunctions of the form [13]
(10) |
where are spherical polar coordinates, and are the spinor spherical harmonics
(11) |
Here is a Clebsch-Gordon coefficient, and are the two component Pauli spinors. The total angular momentum and orbital angular momentum are obtained from the quantum number by
(12) |
where takes all non-zero integral values. The radial functions satisfy
(13) |
The energy spectrum of the ionized electrons is [9]
(14) |
where
and it is understood that . The neutrino scattering tensor is
(16) | |||||
where . The atomic electron scattering tensor is
(17) | |||||
where and . The quantities , etc involve [9] various angular momentum coupling coefficients and the radial integrals
(18) |
The scattering of antineutrinos involves
(19) | |||||
where is the antineutrino plane wave spinor, and .
III Radial matrix elements
The radial integrals (II) involve the Dirac radial functions and for the initial bound electron and the final continuum electron. We assume a potential of a Coulombic form , where is an effective nuclear charge. The radial Dirac equations (13) then have analytic solutions [13] in terms of confluent hypergeometric functions .
As scattering by electrons in the ground states of Ne and Ar involve only K-, L- and M- shell electrons, we can use the simplified expressions [13, 14]
(32) | |||||
where
(33) |
and the initial state energy is
(34) |
The dimensionless coefficients for the K-shell (), LI - subshell (), LII -subshell (), LIII -subshell (), MI - subshell (), MII -subshell (), and MIII -subshell () are listed in Table I.
Subshell | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The screening effects of the electrons in the filled K- shell, L-subshells and M-subshells are represented by an effective nuclear charge of the form , a procedure that should be reasonable for small principal quantum number and small [15]. These screening constants are taken from the fits [16] of Dirac single electron eigenfunctions to empirical binding energies. For neon, they are 2.016 (K-shell), 6.254 (LI -subshell), and 7.482 (LII- and LIII- subshells). For argon, the constants are 2.721 (K-shell), 8.248 (LI -subshell), 9.470 (LII- and LIII- subshells), 13.603 (MI -subshell), and 14.771 (MII- and MIII- subshells).
The final electron continuum states involve the hypergeometric function where , , , and
(35) |
We choose to integrate the Dirac equation directly to obtain the continuum states rather than evaluate the hypergeometric functions as and are complex and the computation of would involve the summation of a slowly convergent complex series for each required value of . For each shell and subshell calculation, the continuum state electrons are assumed to move in the same potential as the bound state electrons [17].
IV Results and discussion
The energy spectra of the ionization electrons have been calculated as a function of the electron kinetic energy . Results are obtained for scattering of 5, 10, 20, and 30 keV neutrino energies by the ground state systems Ne() and Ar(), where the electrons are considered as independent scattering centers.
The energy spectra are compared to those for scattering from free electrons, for which [4]
(36) | |||||
where and the maximum kinetic energy is
(37) |
The total cross section for scattering off free electrons is [4]
(38) | |||||
Results for and scattering by Ne are given in Table II, and by Ar in Table III. The energy spectra and cross sections are expressed as ratios
(39) |
and , to the corresponding quantities for scattering by free electrons. Tables and plots of the energy spectra for scattering from free electrons are given in [9].
(keV) | (keV) | (keV) | (keV) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
0.01 | 0.2175 (0.2134) | 0.3867 (0.3821) | 0.4977 (0.4882) | 0.5720 (0.5578) |
0.1 | 0.2041 (0.2004) | 0.3943 (0.3896) | 0.5258 (0.5171) | 0.6155 (0.6020) |
0.2 | 0.1880 (0.1848) | 0.3983 (0.3933) | 0.5358 (0.5282) | 0.6272 (0.6148) |
0.3 | 0.1716 (0.1690) | 0.3982 (0.3929) | 0.5383 (0.5320) | 0.6287 (0.6187) |
0.4 | 0.1566 (0.1546) | 0.3930 (0.3876) | 0.5370 (0.5321) | 0.6249 (0.6168) |
0.5 | 0.1444 (0.1430) | 0.3794 (0.3745) | 0.5330 (0.5296) | 0.6170 (0.6121) |
0.6 | 0.1359 (0.1350) | 0.3524 (0.3490) | 0.5264 (0.5245) | 0.6055 (0.6044) |
0.7 | 0.1305 (0.1302) | 0.3102 (0.3093) | 0.5140 (0.5139) | 0.5901 (0.5934) |
0.8 | 0.1263 (0.1268) | 0.2636 (0.2655) | 0.4750 (0.4788) | 0.5666 (0.5748) |
0.9 | 0.1210 (0.1226) | 0.2300 (0.2347) | 0.3710 (0.3815) | 0.4792 (0.4957) |
1.0 | 0.1136 (0.1166) | 0.2021 (0.2108) | 0.2745 (0.2922) | 0.3051 (0.3302) |
(eV) | 95.969 | 376.65 | 1451.9 | 3152.4 |
0.1612 (0.1600) | 0.3549 (0.3540) | 0.5051 (0.5050) | 0.5910 (0.5909) |
(keV) | (keV) | (keV) | (keV) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
0.01 | 0.1867 (0.1845) | 0.2855 (0.2813) | 0.4318 (0.4228) | 0.4964 (0.4859) |
0.1 | 0.1875 (0.1851) | 0.2929 (0.2888) | 0.4493 (0.4404) | 0.5223 (0.5124) |
0.2 | 0.1856 (0.1830) | 0.2945 (0.2907) | 0.4502 (0.4417) | 0.5275 (0.5183) |
0.3 | 0.1792 (0.1767) | 0.2929 (0.2894) | 0.4451 (0.4374) | 0.5256 (0.5171) |
0.4 | 0.1669 (0.1647) | 0.2890 (0.2861) | 0.4361 (0.4297) | 0.5169 (0.5095) |
0.5 | 0.1493 (0.1478) | 0.2842 (0.2818) | 0.4240 (0.4192) | 0.5007 (0.4948) |
0.6 | 0.1311 (0.1301) | 0.2801 (0.2781) | 0.4096 (0.4069) | 0.4756 (0.4726) |
0.7 | 0.1170 (0.1166) | 0.2712 (0.2699) | 0.3917 (0.3918) | 0.4419 (0.4429) |
0.8 | 0.1067 (0.1068) | 0.2352 (0.2360) | 0.3693 (0.3730) | 0.4002 (0.4065) |
0.9 | 0.09465 (0.09562) | 0.1865 (0.1898) | 0.3251 (0.3339) | 0.3494 (0.3630) |
1.0 | 0.07822 (0.08011) | 0.1499 (0.1559) | 0.2164 (0.2316) | 0.2220 (0.2449) |
(eV) | 95.969 | 376.65 | 1451.9 | 3152.4 |
0.1533 (0.1524) | 0.2730 (0.2719) | 0.4138 (0.4128) | 0.4779 (0.4799) |
The energy spectra ratios for scattering of neutrinos by Ne and Ar are shown in Figs 1 and 2 respectively. Plots for scattering of antineutrinos are not shown as they differ only very slightly from those for scattering by neutrinos. The energy spectra ratios become constant at low kinetic energies and can safely be extrapolated to lower kinetic energies.
The present spectra for Ne have the same general form as those calculated in [5], but have a much smoother structure and are significantly lower, representing a stronger dependence on atomic binding effects.


The largest binding energy of 3.2059 keV, for the K-shell of argon, is less than the lowest incident neutrino energy of = 5 keV considered in the present calculations. Consequently, all occupied shells and subshells contribute to the energy spectra although, for the lower neutrino energies, the contributions from the inner shell and subshells will be small. For neon, the K-shell contributions at 5 keV and 10 keV are only O() and O() respectively. At all neutrino energies, the LI subshell gives the largest contribution, and the LII and LIII contributions are quite similar. For argon, the K-shell contributions at 5 keV and 10 keV are O() and O() respectively, and the L-subshell contributions at 5 keV are O(). The MI subshell contribution is dominant at all energies, the LII and LIII contributions are similar, as are the MII and MIII contributions.
The major computational challenge is to obtain satisfactory convergence in the sum over , as the convergence decreases with increasing . The imposed practical limit ensured the fractional contributions of the neglected terms were less than for keV in the Ne spectra, and for keV in the Ne spectra. However, for the higher energies, the convergence decreased and the contributions of the neglected terms increased to for the L subshells of Ne, and for the M subshells of Ar, so the numbers shown for these higher energies are slight underestimates.
The binding effects in the spectra increase with atomic number, decrease with increasing and, for each , are most significant at the high electron energy end of the spectrum. The sharp decrease in the spectra at the high energy end is due to the minimizaion of the range of the integration in (14) at . Also, for this region, , so that the high energy tail will increase as increases.
The integrated cross sections
(40) |
where and , can be estimated from the calculated energy spectra. We assume the spectra at are the same as at . These integrated cross sections are given in the tables, expressed as ratios to the integrated cross sections (Eqn (38)) for free electrons.
V Summary and conclusions
The recently developed [9] theory of scattering of low energy neutrinos and antineutrinos by atomic electrons, which uses the Bound Interaction Picture in configuration space to fully implement the relationship between the neutrino helicities and the orbital and spin angular momenta of the atomic electrons, has been applied here to the scattering by the ground state systems Ne() and Ar().
The energy spectra of the ionization electrons produced in the scattering of electron neutrinos and antineutrinos with energies 5, 10, 20 and 30 keV have been calculated. Results are also obtained for the integrated cross sections. Screened point-Coulomb radial eigenfunctions have been used, with the continuum state eigenfunctions calculated by direct integration of the Dirac equations. The results here for Ne replace those given in [9] which were calculated using some screening constants which underestimated the effects of screening in the inner subshells. The new spectra ratios for neon are larger than the original ratios by to , with the greatest increases occurring at = 10 keV.
The calculated energy spectra show that binding effects increase with atomic number, decrease with increasing and, for each , are greatest at the high electron energy end of the spectrum. The neutrino and antineutrino energy spectra are very similar, with small difference of .
Binding effects are still very significant at keV, the integrated spectra ratios being and for Ne and Ar respectively. Extension of the calculations to higher neutrino energies to study the further decrease of binding effects would require a substantial increase in the maximum value of used as the convergence is very slow at higher energies, which is not practical.
The largest uncertainty in the present calculations arises from the choice of the potential for the atomic electron, and the consequent form of the radial functions and used in the evaluation of the radial matrix elements (II). The choice of a Coulombic potential with an effective nuclear charge to account for electron screening effects is convenient and should be accurate for the small values of and occurring in the ground states of neon and argon [15]. However, if increased accuracy is required, or extension to, for example, xenon is considered, then self-consistent relativistic radial eigenfunctions [18, 19] would be needed.
Relativistic self-consistent field theory includes [18] the effects of magnetic interactions between electrons and retardation of the inter-electronic Coulomb repulsion, as described by the Breit operator. This operator is treated as a first order perturbation to an unperturbed Hamiltonian which is a sum of the Dirac central field Coulombic Hamiltonians for each electron and the total Coulombic inter-electronic interaction. The magnetic and retardation terms are of order compared to the inter-electronic repulsion term, which is of order . Their contribution is therefore of order and increases strongly with . Detailed calculations are discussed in section 7.2 of [14].
The scattering of dark matter (DM) particles by atomic electrons is a promising method for detecting the particles forming the DM component of the Milky Way, and the theoretical treatment of this process shares many features with that for neutrino scattering by atomic electrons. The response of argon and xenon targets has been studied by [20] by treating the atomic electrons and DM particle as non-relativistic, with a general interaction constructed to satisfy Galilean and rotational invariance. The DarkSide-50 experiment [21] uses an argon target and they have presented a non-relativistic analysis for a vector mediator based upon atomic and DM form factors. The conversion of a sterile neutrino DM particle into an active neutrino via inelastic scattering with an atomic electron has been considered by [12] using a non-relativistic second quantization formalism based upon a four-fermion coupling and a mediator which could be scalar, pseudo-scalar, vector or axial vector.
The formalism developed in [9], which considers only vector and axial vector couplings, could be readily adapted to the -mediated scattering of a fermionic WIMP DM particle such as the neutralino . The neutrino scattering tensor would be replaced by the appropriate tensor for the neutralino, the admixture of vector and axial vector contributions altered to accommodate the neutralino couplings, and changes made to the normalization factors for the plane wave spinors. Generalization to scalar and pseudo-scalar couplings is possible but would require substantial modifications to the formalism, especially to the angular momentum matrix elements.
Acknowledgements.
The author would like to thank Michael Meehan for assistance with the figures.References
- [1] C. Giunti and A. Studenikin, Neutrino electromagnetic interactions: A window to new physics, Rev. Modern Phys. 87, 531 (2015)
- [2] J. Jeong, J. E. Kim and S. Youn, Electromagnetic properties of neutrinos from scattering on bound electrons in atoms, Int. J. Mod. Phys A 36, 2150182 (2021)
- [3] K. A. Kouzakov and A. I. Studenikin, Theory of neutrino-atom collisions: The history, present status, and BSM physics, Advances in High Energy Physics 2014, 569409 (2014)
- [4] G. J. Gounaris, E. A. Paschos and P. I. Porfyriadis, The ionization of H, He or Ne atoms using neutrinos or antineutrinos at keV energies, Phys. Lett. B 525, 63 (2002)
- [5] G. J. Gounaris, E. A. Paschos and P. I. Porfyriadis, Electron spectra in the ionization of atoms by neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 70, 113008 (2004)
- [6] J.-W. Chen, H.-C. Chi, K.-N. Huang, C.-P. Liu, H.-T. Shiao, L. Singh, H. T. Wong, C.-L. Wu, and C.-P. Wu, Atomic ionization of germanium by neutrinos from ab initio approach, Phys. Lett. B 731, 159 (2014)
- [7] Jiunn-Wei Chen, Hsin-Chang Chi, Keh-Ning Huang, Hau Bin Li, C.-P. Liu, Lakhwinder Singh, Henry T. Wong, Chih-Liang Wu, and Chih-Pan Wu, Constraining neutrino electromagnetic properties by germanium detectors, Phys. Rev. D 91, 013005 (2015)
- [8] Jiunn-Wei Chen, Hsin-Chang Chi, C.-P. Liu, and Chih-Pan Wu, Low energy electronic recoil in xenon detectors by solar neutrinos, Phys. Lett. B 774, 656 (2017)
- [9] I. B. Whittingham, Scattering of low enery neutrinos and antineutrinos by atomic electrons, Phys. Rev. D 105, 013008 (2022)
- [10] W. H. Furry, On bound states and scattering in positron theory, Phys. Rev. 81, 115 (1951)
- [11] I. B. Whittingham, Incoherent scattering of gamma rays in heavy atoms, J. Phys. A:Gen. Phys. 4, 21 (1971)
- [12] Shao-Feng Ge, Pedro Pasquini, and Jie Sheng, Solar active - sterile neutrino conversion with atomic effects at dark matter direct detection experiments, JHEP05 (2022) 088
- [13] M. E. Rose Relativistic Electron Theory (New York, Wiley, 1961)
- [14] T. P. Das Relativistic Quantum Mechanics of Electrons (New York, Harper & Row, 1973)
- [15] H. A. Bethe and E. E. Salpeter Quantum Mechanics of One- and Two- Electron Atoms (Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 1957)
-
[16]
D. Thomas https://www.uoguelph.ca/chemistry
/thomas/index - [17] J. H. Schofield, Theoretical photoionization cross sections from 1 to 1500 keV, Lawrence Livermore Laboratory report UCRL-51326 (1973), https://doi.org/10.2172/4545040.
- [18] Yong-Ki Kim, Self-Consistent-Field Theory for Closed-Shell Atoms, Phys. Rev. 154, 17 (1967)
- [19] F. C. Smith and W. R. Johnson, Relativistic self-consistent fields with exchange, Phys. Rev. 160, 136 (1967)
- [20] Riccardo Catena, Timon Emken, Nicola A. Spaldin, and Walter Tarinto, Atomic responses to general dark matter-electron interactions, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033195 (2020)
- [21] P. Agnes et al. (DarkSide), Constraints on Sub-GeV Dark-Matter Electron Scattering from the DarkSide-50 Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 111303 (2018)