This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Scattering of low energy neutrinos and antineutrinos by neon and argon

Ian B. Whittingham College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia 4811
Abstract

The theory of scattering of low energy neutrinos and antineutrinos by atomic electrons has recently been developed (I. B. Whittingham, Phys. Rev. D 𝟏𝟎𝟓\mathbf{105} 013008 (2022)) using the Bound Interaction Picture in configuration space to fully implement the relationship between the neutrino helicities and the orbital and spin angular momenta of the atomic electrons. The energy spectra of ionization electrons produced by scattering of neutrinos and antineutrinos with energies of 5, 10, 20, and 30 keV by hydrogen, helium and neon were calculated using Dirac screened Coulombic eigenfunctions. This paper reports further applications of this theory, to a new calculation of the energy spectra for neon, as the original calculation used some screening constants which underestimated the effects of screening in the inner subshells, and to scattering by argon. The results are presented as ratios to the corresponding quantities for scattering by ZZ free electrons. The new spectra ratios for neon are larger than the original ratios by 0.03\approx 0.03 to 0.14\approx 0.14, with the greatest increases occurring for 10 keV neutrinos and antineutrinos. Integrated spectra ratios range from 0.16 to 0.59 for neon, and from 0.15 to 0.48 for argon, as the neutrino energy increases from 5 to 30 keV.

I Introduction

There is significant interest in the low energy O(10 keV) scattering of electron neutrinos and antineutrinos by atomic electrons

νe(ν¯e)+eνe(ν¯e)+e,\nu_{e}(\bar{\nu}_{e})+e^{-}\rightarrow\nu_{e}(\bar{\nu}_{e})+e^{-}, (1)

for which the binding of the atomic electron cannot be ignored and one can expect modifications of the free electron scattering formulae. One example is the study of possible electromagnetic properties of neutrinos, such as magnetic and electric dipole moments, using low energy scattering of neutrinos and antineutrinos [1, 2]. For a review of neutrino-atom collisions, see [3].

Of particular interest is the ionization of atoms by neutrinos and antineutrinos. Ionization cross sections calculated for H, He and Ne were found [4] to be smaller than the corresponding free electron cross sections, and the calculations were then extended [5] to the electron spectra for H, He and Ne, and integrated ionization cross sections for H, He, Ne and Xe.

These calculations treat the νe\nu_{e}-electron scattering process as a probability weighted scattering by a free electron of mass m~\tilde{m}, where

m~2=Eei2𝐩ei2,\tilde{m}^{2}=E_{e_{i}}^{2}-\mathbf{p}_{e_{i}}^{2}, (2)

Eei=me+ϵE_{e_{i}}=m_{e}+\epsilon is the energy of the initial bound electron, where ϵ\epsilon is the binding energy, and the momentum 𝐩ei\mathbf{p}_{e_{i}} is determined by the probability amplitude |Ψnilimi(𝐩ei)|2|\Psi_{n_{i}l_{i}m_{i}}(\mathbf{p}_{e_{i}})|^{2}, where Ψnilimi(𝐩ei)\Psi_{n_{i}l_{i}m_{i}}(\mathbf{p}_{e_{i}}) is the momentum-space atomic wave function. Spin-independent non-relativistic atomic wave functions are used for the initial electron and Coulombic effects on the final electron are ignored. These calculations destroy the relationship between the neutrino helicities and the orbital and spin angular momenta of the atomic electrons. Some of these issues have been addressed by [6, 7, 8] and their approach is closest in spirit to the present calculations.

The theory of scattering of neutrinos and antineutrinos by bound electrons which maintains the full collision dynamics has recently been developed [9]. The scattering is formulated in configuation space using the Bound Interaction Picture [10, 11], rather than the usual formulation in the Interaction Picture in momentum space as appropriate to scattering by free electrons. The energy spectra of ionization electrons produced by scattering of neutrinos and antineutrinos with energies of 5, 10, 20, and 30 keV by hydrogen, helium and neon were calculated using Dirac screened Coulombic eigenfunctions. The results were significantly different to those of [5] and indicated that binding effects from both the initial bound state and the final continuum state are important.

Very recently, a second quantization formalism has been developed [12] to include atomic effects in the electron recoil signal for dark matter or neutrino scattering. Although the neutrino scattering amplitude includes more general interactions than the WW- and ZZ- exchange of the Standard Model, the formalism treats the atomic electrons as non-relativistic and includes the electron spin through a non-relativistic approximation to the four-component Dirac eigenfunction which ignores coupling between the spin and orbital angular momenta.

This paper reports further applications of the Bound Interaction Picture theory [9], to a new calculation of the energy spectra for neon, as the original calculation used some screening constants which underestimated the effects of screening in the inner subshells, and to scattering by argon as it is the basis of current and near-future experiments sensitive to neutrino-electron scattering.

The general formalism for the scattering of neutrinos and antineutrinos by atomic electrons is summarized in Sec. II, and the radial matrix elements which occur in the atomic electron scattering tensor discussed in Sec. III. Results for the energy spectra of the ionization electrons produced in scattering from neon and argon are presented and discussed in Sec. IV, and Sec. V contains a summary and conclusions for the investigation.

II General formalism for neutrino scattering by atomic electrons

The scattering of neutrinos by atomic electrons involves both WW- and ZZ- boson exchange. The total SS-matrix in the Bound Interaction Picture for νe\nu_{e} scattering at low momentum transfers k2MA2k^{2}\ll M_{A}^{2}, where A=W,ZA=W,Z, is [9]

Sfi(ν)=πiGF2δ(Efi(ν))Mnf,ni(e)(𝐪)αM(ν)(𝐩νf,sf,𝐩νi,si)αS_{fi}^{(\nu)}=-\pi i\frac{G_{\mathrm{F}}}{\sqrt{2}}\delta(E_{fi}^{(\nu)})M^{(e)}_{n_{f},n_{i}}(\mathbf{q})^{\alpha}M^{(\nu)}(\mathbf{p}_{\nu_{f}},s_{f},\mathbf{p}_{\nu_{i}},s_{i})_{\alpha} (3)

where the atomic electron scattering amplitude is

Mnf,ni(e)(𝐪)α\displaystyle M^{(e)}_{n_{f},n_{i}}(\mathbf{q})^{\alpha} =\displaystyle= d3xei(𝐩νi𝐩νf)𝐱\displaystyle\int d^{3}x\;e^{i(\mathbf{p}_{\nu_{i}}-\mathbf{p}_{\nu_{f}})\cdot\mathbf{x}} (4)
×ϕ¯nf(+)(𝐱)γα(v¯e+a¯eγ5)ϕni(+)(𝐱),\displaystyle\times\bar{\phi}^{(+)}_{n_{f}}(\mathbf{x})\gamma^{\alpha}(\bar{v}_{e}+\bar{a}_{e}\gamma_{5})\phi^{(+)}_{n_{i}}(\mathbf{x}),

the quantity

δ(Efi(ν))δ(Enf+EνfEniEνi).\delta(E_{fi}^{(\nu)})\equiv\delta(E_{n_{f}}+E_{\nu_{f}}-E_{n_{i}}-E_{\nu_{i}}). (5)

incorporates energy conservation, 𝐪=𝐩νi𝐩νf\mathbf{q}=\mathbf{p}_{\nu_{i}}-\mathbf{p}_{\nu_{f}} is the momentum transfer from the neutrino, and

M(ν)(𝐩νf,sf,𝐩νi,si)α=u¯(sf)(𝐩νf)γα(1γ5)u(si)(𝐩νi)M^{(\nu)}(\mathbf{p}_{\nu_{f}},s_{f},\mathbf{p}_{\nu_{i}},s_{i})_{\alpha}=\bar{u}^{(s_{f})}(\mathbf{p}_{\nu_{f}})\gamma_{\alpha}(1-\gamma_{5})u^{(s_{i})}(\mathbf{p}_{\nu_{i}}) (6)

is the neutrino scattering amplitude. Here ϕn(+)(𝐱)\phi^{(+)}_{n}(\mathbf{x}) is the positive energy eigenfunction for an electron in a state of the external field A(ext)A^{(\mathrm{ext})} specified by the quantum numbers nn, and u(s)(𝐩ν)u^{(s)}(\mathbf{p}_{\nu}) are the plane wave spinors describing a neutrino with momentum 𝐩ν\mathbf{p}_{\nu} and helicity ss. The natural unit system =c=1\hbar=c=1 is used throughout, the scalar product of two 4-vectors is ABgαβAαBβ=A0B0𝐀𝐁A\cdot B\equiv g^{\alpha\beta}A_{\alpha}B_{\beta}=A_{0}B_{0}-\mathbf{A}\cdot\mathbf{B}, the Dirac matrices γα,(α=0,1,2,3)\gamma^{\alpha},(\alpha=0,1,2,3) satisfy {γα,γβ}=2gαβ\{\gamma^{\alpha},\gamma^{\beta}\}=2g^{\alpha\beta}, and γ5iγ0γ1γ2γ3\gamma_{5}\equiv i\gamma^{0}\gamma^{1}\gamma^{2}\gamma^{3}.

The electron mixing parameters are

v¯e=ve+2,a¯e=ae2,\bar{v}_{e}=v_{e}+2,\quad\bar{a}_{e}=a_{e}-2, (7)

where

ve=1+4sin2θW,ae=1,v_{e}=-1+4\sin^{2}\theta_{W},\quad a_{e}=1, (8)

and θW\theta_{W} is the weak mixing angle.

For scattering of antineutrinos, M(ν)M^{(\nu)} is replaced by

M(ν¯)(𝐩νf,sf,𝐩νi,si)α=v¯(si)(𝐩νi)γα(1γ5)v(sf)(𝐩νf),M^{(\bar{\nu})}(\mathbf{p}_{\nu_{f}},s_{f},\mathbf{p}_{\nu_{i}},s_{i})_{\alpha}=\bar{v}^{(s_{i})}(\mathbf{p}_{\nu_{i}})\gamma_{\alpha}(1-\gamma_{5})v^{(s_{f})}(\mathbf{p}_{\nu_{f}}), (9)

where v(s)(𝐩ν)v^{(s)}(\mathbf{p}_{\nu}) is the antineutrino plane wave spinor, and δ(Efi(ν))\delta(E_{fi}^{(\nu)}) is replaced by δ(Efi(ν¯))\delta(E_{fi}^{(\bar{\nu})}).

We assume the atomic electron moves in a spherically symmetric potential V(r)=eA(ext)(r)V(r)=eA^{(\mathrm{ext})}(r), for which the Dirac equation has eigenfunctions of the form [13]

ϕκ,μ,E(r,θ,φ)=1r(gκ,E(r)χκμ(Ω)ifκ,E(r)χκμ(Ω)).\phi_{\kappa,\mu,E}(r,\theta,\varphi)=\frac{1}{r}\left(\begin{array}[]{l}g_{\kappa,E}(r)\chi^{\mu}_{\kappa}(\Omega)\\ if_{\kappa,E}(r)\chi^{\mu}_{-\kappa}(\Omega)\end{array}\right). (10)

where (r,θ,φ)=(r,Ω)(r,\theta,\varphi)=(r,\Omega) are spherical polar coordinates, and χκμ(Ω)\chi^{\mu}_{\kappa}(\Omega) are the spinor spherical harmonics

χκμ(Ω)=msC(lκ,12,j,μms,ms,μ)Ylκμms(Ω)χms.\chi^{\mu}_{\kappa}(\Omega)=\sum_{m_{s}}C(l_{\kappa},\frac{1}{2},j,\mu-m_{s},m_{s},\mu)Y^{\mu-m_{s}}_{l_{\kappa}}(\Omega)\chi_{m_{s}}. (11)

Here C(j1,j2,j3,m1,m2,m3)C(j_{1},j_{2},j_{3},m_{1},m_{2},m_{3}) is a Clebsch-Gordon coefficient, and χms\chi_{m_{s}} are the two component Pauli spinors. The total angular momentum jj and orbital angular momentum lκl_{\kappa} are obtained from the quantum number κ\kappa by

j=|κ|12,lκ={κκ>0κ1κ<0,lκ=lκκ|κ|,j=|\kappa|-\frac{1}{2},l_{\kappa}=\left\{\begin{array}[]{cl}\kappa&\kappa>0\\ -\kappa-1&\kappa<0\end{array},\right.l_{-\kappa}=l_{\kappa}-\frac{\kappa}{|\kappa|}, (12)

where κ\kappa takes all non-zero integral values. The radial functions satisfy

(d/dr+κ/r(E+meV(r))EmeV(r)d/drκ/r)(gκ,E(r)fκ,E(r))=0.\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}d/dr+\kappa/r&-(E+m_{e}-V(r))\\ E-m_{e}-V(r)&d/dr-\kappa/r\end{array}\right)\left(\begin{array}[]{c}g_{\kappa,E}(r)\\ f_{\kappa,E}(r)\end{array}\right)=0. (13)

The energy spectrum of the ionized electrons is [9]

dσ(ν)dEf=GF28π116meEνi2𝑑q2Lfi(𝐪~,pνi,pνf),\frac{d\sigma^{(\nu)}}{dE_{f}}=\frac{G_{\mathrm{F}}^{2}}{8\pi}\frac{1}{16m_{e}E_{\nu_{i}}^{2}}\int dq^{2}L_{fi}(\tilde{\mathbf{q}},p_{\nu_{i}},p_{\nu_{f}}), (14)

where

Lfi(𝐪~,pνi,pνf)\displaystyle L_{fi}(\tilde{\mathbf{q}},p_{\nu_{i}},p_{\nu_{f}}) =\displaystyle= Re[Lfi(e)(𝐪~)βα]Re[L(ν)(pνi,pνf)βα]\displaystyle\mathrm{Re}[L^{(e)}_{fi}(\tilde{\mathbf{q}})^{\beta\alpha}]\mathrm{Re}[L^{(\nu)}(p_{\nu_{i}},p_{\nu_{f}})_{\beta\alpha}]
Im[Lfi(e)(𝐪~)βα]Im[L(ν)(pνi,pνf)βα]\displaystyle-\mathrm{Im}[L^{(e)}_{fi}(\tilde{\mathbf{q}})^{\beta\alpha}]\mathrm{Im}[L^{(\nu)}(p_{\nu_{i}},p_{\nu_{f}})_{\beta\alpha}]

and it is understood that Eνf=Ei+EνiEfE_{\nu_{f}}=E_{i}+E_{\nu_{i}}-E_{f}. The neutrino scattering tensor is

L(ν)(pνi,pνf)βα\displaystyle L^{(\nu)}(p_{\nu_{i}},p_{\nu_{f}})^{\beta\alpha} \displaystyle\equiv [u¯(sf)(𝐩νf)γβ(1γ5)u(si)(𝐩νi)]\displaystyle[\bar{u}^{(s_{f})}(\mathbf{p}_{\nu_{f}})\gamma^{\beta}(1-\gamma_{5})u^{(s_{i})}(\mathbf{p}_{\nu_{i}})]^{\dagger} (16)
×u¯(sf)(𝐩νf)γα(1γ5)u(si)(𝐩νi)\displaystyle\times\bar{u}^{(s_{f})}(\mathbf{p}_{\nu_{f}})\gamma^{\alpha}(1-\gamma_{5})u^{(s_{i})}(\mathbf{p}_{\nu_{i}})
=\displaystyle= 8(pνiβpνfα+pνiαpνfβpνipνfgβα\displaystyle 8(p_{\nu_{i}}^{\beta}\,p_{\nu_{f}}^{\alpha}+p_{\nu_{i}}^{\alpha}\,p_{\nu_{f}}^{\beta}-p_{\nu_{i}}\cdot p_{\nu_{f}}\,g^{\beta\alpha}
+iϵρβλαpνi,ρpνf,λ),\displaystyle+i\epsilon^{\rho\beta\lambda\alpha}\,p_{\nu_{i,\rho}}\,p_{\nu_{f,\lambda}}),

where si=sf=1/2s_{i}=s_{f}=-1/2. The atomic electron scattering tensor is

Lfi(e)(𝐪~)βα\displaystyle L^{(e)}_{fi}(\tilde{\mathbf{q}})^{\beta\alpha} =\displaystyle= κf,l¯,lill¯(2l¯+1)(2l+1)[v¯e2Lveveβα\displaystyle\sum_{\kappa_{f},\bar{l},l}i^{l-\bar{l}}(2\bar{l}+1)(2l+1)\left[\bar{v}_{e}^{2}L^{\beta\alpha}_{v_{e}v_{e}}\right. (17)
+a¯e2Laeaeβα+v¯ea¯e(Lveaeβα+Laeveβα)],\displaystyle\left.+\bar{a}_{e}^{2}L^{\beta\alpha}_{a_{e}a_{e}}+\bar{v}_{e}\bar{a}_{e}(L^{\beta\alpha}_{v_{e}a_{e}}+L^{\beta\alpha}_{a_{e}v_{e}})\right],

where 𝐪~(0,0,q)\tilde{\mathbf{q}}\equiv(0,0,q) and q|𝐪|q\equiv|\mathbf{q}|. The quantities LveveβαL^{\beta\alpha}_{v_{e}v_{e}}, etc involve [9] various angular momentum coupling coefficients and the radial integrals

Ilgg(q)\displaystyle I^{gg}_{l}(q) \displaystyle\equiv 𝑑rgκf,Ef(r)jl(qr)gκi,Ei(r),\displaystyle\int dr\,g^{*}_{\kappa_{f},E_{f}}(r)j_{l}(qr)g_{\kappa_{i},E_{i}}(r),
Ilgf(q)\displaystyle I^{gf}_{l}(q) \displaystyle\equiv 𝑑rgκf,Ef(r)jl(qr)fκi,Ei(r),\displaystyle\int dr\,g^{*}_{\kappa_{f},E_{f}}(r)j_{l}(qr)f_{\kappa_{i},E_{i}}(r),
Ilfg(q)\displaystyle I^{fg}_{l}(q) \displaystyle\equiv 𝑑rfκf,Ef(r)jl(qr)gκi,Ei(r),\displaystyle\int dr\,f^{*}_{\kappa_{f},E_{f}}(r)j_{l}(qr)g_{\kappa_{i},E_{i}}(r),
Ilff(q)\displaystyle I^{ff}_{l}(q) \displaystyle\equiv 𝑑rfκf,Ef(r)jl(qr)fκi,Ei(r).\displaystyle\int dr\,f^{*}_{\kappa_{f},E_{f}}(r)j_{l}(qr)f_{\kappa_{i},E_{i}}(r). (18)

The scattering of antineutrinos involves

L(ν¯)(pνi,pνf)βα\displaystyle L^{(\bar{\nu})}(p_{\nu_{i}},p_{\nu_{f}})^{\beta\alpha} \displaystyle\equiv [v¯(si)(𝐩νi)γβ(1γ5)v(sf)(𝐩νf)]\displaystyle[\bar{v}^{(s_{i})}(\mathbf{p}_{\nu_{i}})\gamma^{\beta}(1-\gamma_{5})v^{(s_{f})}(\mathbf{p}_{\nu_{f}})]^{\dagger} (19)
×v¯(si)(𝐩νi)γα(1γ5)v(sf)(𝐩νf)\displaystyle\times\bar{v}^{(s_{i})}(\mathbf{p}_{\nu_{i}})\gamma^{\alpha}(1-\gamma_{5})v^{(s_{f})}(\mathbf{p}_{\nu_{f}})
=\displaystyle= L(ν)(pνf,pνi)βα,\displaystyle L^{(\nu)}(-p_{\nu_{f}},-p_{\nu_{i}})^{\beta\alpha},
=\displaystyle= [L(ν)(pνi,pνf)βα],\displaystyle[L^{(\nu)}(p_{\nu_{i}},p_{\nu_{f}})^{\beta\alpha}]^{*},

where v(s)(𝐩ν)v^{(s)}(\mathbf{p}_{\nu}) is the antineutrino plane wave spinor, and si=sf=+1/2s_{i}=s_{f}=+1/2.

III Radial matrix elements

The radial integrals (II) involve the Dirac radial functions gκ,E(r)g_{\kappa,E}(r) and fκ,E(r)f_{\kappa,E}(r) for the initial bound electron and the final continuum electron. We assume a potential of a Coulombic form V(r)=αZeff/rV(r)=-\alpha Z_{\mathrm{eff}}/r, where ZeffZ_{\mathrm{eff}} is an effective nuclear charge. The radial Dirac equations (13) then have analytic solutions [13] in terms of confluent hypergeometric functions F11(a,c,z){}_{1}F_{1}(a,c,z).

As scattering by electrons in the ground states of Ne and Ar involve only K-, L- and M- shell electrons, we can use the simplified expressions [13, 14]

(gκi,Ei(r)fκi,Ei(r))\displaystyle\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}g_{\kappa_{i},E_{i}}(r)\\ f_{\kappa_{i},E_{i}}(r)\end{array}\right) =\displaystyle= Ni(me+EimeEi)(2λir)γieλir\displaystyle N_{i}\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}\sqrt{m_{e}+E_{i}}\\ -\sqrt{m_{e}-E_{i}}\end{array}\right)(2\lambda_{i}r)^{\gamma_{i}}e^{-\lambda_{i}r} (32)
×[(c0a0)+(c1a1)λir\displaystyle\times\left[\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}c_{0}\\ a_{0}\end{array}\right)+\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}c_{1}\\ a_{1}\end{array}\right)\lambda_{i}r\right.
+(c2a2)(λir)2]\displaystyle\left.+\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}c_{2}\\ a_{2}\end{array}\right)(\lambda_{i}r)^{2}\right]

where

λime2Ei2,γiκi2ζ2,ζαZeff,\lambda_{i}\equiv\sqrt{m_{e}^{2}-E_{i}^{2}},\quad\gamma_{i}\equiv\sqrt{\kappa_{i}^{2}-\zeta^{2}},\quad\zeta\equiv\alpha Z_{\mathrm{eff}}, (33)

and the initial state energy EiE_{i} is

En,κi=me[1+(ζn|κi|+γi)2]1/2.E_{n,\kappa_{i}}=m_{e}\left[1+\left(\frac{\zeta}{n-|\kappa_{i}|+\gamma_{i}}\right)^{2}\right]^{-1/2}. (34)

The dimensionless coefficients (ci,ai,Ni)(c_{i},a_{i},N_{i}) for the K-shell (n=1,κi=1n=1,\kappa_{i}=-1), LI - subshell (n=2,κi=1n=2,\kappa_{i}=-1), LII -subshell (n=2,κi=+1n=2,\kappa_{i}=+1), LIII -subshell (n=2,κi=2n=2,\kappa_{i}=-2), MI - subshell (n=3,κi=1n=3,\kappa_{i}=-1), MII -subshell (n=3,κi=+1n=3,\kappa_{i}=+1), and MIII -subshell (n=3,κi=2n=3,\kappa_{i}=-2) are listed in Table I.

Table 1: Parameters defining the K-, L- and M-shell Coulombic radial eigenfunctions for Ne and Ar, expressed in terms of ζ=αZ\zeta=\alpha Z and γ=κ2ζ2\gamma=\sqrt{\kappa^{2}-\zeta^{2}}.
Subshell EnκE_{n\kappa} λ\lambda NiN_{i} a0a_{0} c0c_{0} a1a_{1} c1c_{1} a2a_{2} c2c_{2}
KK γ\gamma ζ\zeta (ζΓ(2γ+1))1/2\left(\frac{\zeta}{\Gamma(2\gamma+1)}\right)^{1/2} 11 11 0 0 0 0
LIL_{\mathrm{I}} (γ+12)1/2\left(\frac{\gamma+1}{2}\right)^{1/2} ζ2E\frac{\zeta}{2E} 12[λ(2γ+1)E(2E+1)Γ(2γ+1)]1/2\frac{1}{2}\left[\frac{\lambda(2\gamma+1)}{E(2E+1)\Gamma(2\gamma+1)}\right]^{1/2} 2(E+1)2(E+1) 2E2E 2(2E+12γ+1)-2\left(\frac{2E+1}{2\gamma+1}\right) 2(2E+12γ+1)-2\left(\frac{2E+1}{2\gamma+1}\right) 0 0
LIIL_{\mathrm{II}} (γ+12)1/2\left(\frac{\gamma+1}{2}\right)^{1/2} ζ2E\frac{\zeta}{2E} 12[λ(2γ+1)E(2E1)Γ(2γ+1)]1/2\frac{1}{2}\left[\frac{\lambda(2\gamma+1)}{E(2E-1)\Gamma(2\gamma+1)}\right]^{1/2} 2E2E 2(E1)2(E-1) 2(2E12γ+1)-2\left(\frac{2E-1}{2\gamma+1}\right) 2(2E12γ+1)-2\left(\frac{2E-1}{2\gamma+1}\right) 0 0
LIIIL_{\mathrm{III}} γ2\frac{\gamma}{2} ζ2\frac{\zeta}{2} (λΓ(2γ+1))1/2\left(\frac{\lambda}{\Gamma(2\gamma+1)}\right)^{1/2} 11 11 0 0 0 0
MIM_{\mathrm{I}} γ+24γ+5\frac{\gamma+2}{\sqrt{4\gamma+5}} ζ4γ+5\frac{\zeta}{\sqrt{4\gamma+5}} λ[λ(γ+1)(2γ+1)2ζ(ζ+λ)Γ(2γ+1)]1/2\lambda\left[\frac{\lambda(\gamma+1)(2\gamma+1)}{2\zeta(\zeta+\lambda)\Gamma(2\gamma+1)}\right]^{1/2} 3+ζλ3+\frac{\zeta}{\lambda} 1+ζλ-1+\frac{\zeta}{\lambda} 42γ+1(2+ζλ)-\frac{4}{2\gamma+1}\left(2+\frac{\zeta}{\lambda}\right) 4ζλ(2γ+1)-\frac{4\zeta}{\lambda(2\gamma+1)} 2(γ+1)(2γ+1)(1+ζλ)\frac{2}{(\gamma+1)(2\gamma+1)}\left(1+\frac{\zeta}{\lambda}\right) a2a_{2}
MIIM_{\mathrm{II}} γ+24γ+5\frac{\gamma+2}{\sqrt{4\gamma+5}} ζ4γ+5\frac{\zeta}{\sqrt{4\gamma+5}} λ[λ(γ+1)(2γ+1)2ζ(ζλ)Γ(2γ+1)]1/2\lambda\left[\frac{\lambda(\gamma+1)(2\gamma+1)}{2\zeta(\zeta-\lambda)\Gamma(2\gamma+1)}\right]^{1/2} 1+ζλ1+\frac{\zeta}{\lambda} 3+ζλ-3+\frac{\zeta}{\lambda} 4ζλ(2γ+1)-\frac{4\zeta}{\lambda(2\gamma+1)} 42γ+1(2ζλ)\frac{4}{2\gamma+1}\left(2-\frac{\zeta}{\lambda}\right) 2(γ+1)(2γ+1)(1ζλ)-\frac{2}{(\gamma+1)(2\gamma+1)}\left(1-\frac{\zeta}{\lambda}\right) a2a_{2}
MIIIM_{\mathrm{III}} γ+12γ+5\frac{\gamma+1}{\sqrt{2\gamma+5}} ζ2γ+5\frac{\zeta}{\sqrt{2\gamma+5}} λ[λ(2γ+1)2ζ(ζ+2λ)Γ(2γ+1)]1/2\lambda\left[\frac{\lambda(2\gamma+1)}{2\zeta(\zeta+2\lambda)\Gamma(2\gamma+1)}\right]^{1/2} 3+ζλ3+\frac{\zeta}{\lambda} 1+ζλ1+\frac{\zeta}{\lambda} 22γ+1(2+ζλ)-\frac{2}{2\gamma+1}\left(2+\frac{\zeta}{\lambda}\right) 22γ+1(2+ζλ)-\frac{2}{2\gamma+1}\left(2+\frac{\zeta}{\lambda}\right) 0 0

The screening effects of the electrons in the filled K- shell, L-subshells and M-subshells are represented by an effective nuclear charge of the form Zeff=ZsiZ_{\mathrm{eff}}=Z-s_{i}, a procedure that should be reasonable for small principal quantum number nn and small nln-l [15]. These screening constants sis_{i} are taken from the fits [16] of Dirac single electron eigenfunctions to empirical binding energies. For neon, they are 2.016 (K-shell), 6.254 (LI -subshell), and 7.482 (LII- and LIII- subshells). For argon, the constants are 2.721 (K-shell), 8.248 (LI -subshell), 9.470 (LII- and LIII- subshells), 13.603 (MI -subshell), and 14.771 (MII- and MIII- subshells).

The final electron continuum states involve the hypergeometric function F11(a,c,z){}_{1}F_{1}(a,c,z) where a=γf+1+iya=\gamma_{f}+1+iy, c=2γf+1c=2\gamma_{f}+1, z=2ipfrz=2ip_{f}r, and

γfκf2ζ2,pfEf2me2,yζEfpf.\gamma_{f}\equiv\sqrt{\kappa_{f}^{2}-\zeta^{2}},\quad p_{f}\equiv\sqrt{E_{f}^{2}-m_{e}^{2}},\quad y\equiv\frac{\zeta E_{f}}{p_{f}}. (35)

We choose to integrate the Dirac equation directly to obtain the continuum states rather than evaluate the hypergeometric functions as aa and zz are complex and the computation of F11(a,c,z){}_{1}F_{1}(a,c,z) would involve the summation of a slowly convergent complex series for each required value of zz. For each shell and subshell calculation, the continuum state electrons are assumed to move in the same potential as the bound state electrons [17].

IV Results and discussion

The energy spectra dσ/dEfd\sigma/dE_{f} of the ionization electrons have been calculated as a function of the electron kinetic energy ϵf=Efme\epsilon_{f}=E_{f}-m_{e}. Results are obtained for scattering of 5, 10, 20, and 30 keV neutrino energies by the ground state systems Ne(1s22s22p61s^{2}2s^{2}2p^{6}) and Ar(1s22s22p63s23p61s^{2}2s^{2}2p^{6}3s^{2}3p^{6}), where the electrons are considered as independent scattering centers.

The energy spectra are compared to those for scattering from free electrons, for which [4]

(dσ(ν)dEf)(Free)\displaystyle\left(\frac{d\sigma^{(\nu)}}{dE_{f}}\right)_{(\mathrm{Free})} =\displaystyle= GF2me8πEνi2{(v¯ea¯e)2Eνi2\displaystyle\frac{G_{F}^{2}m_{e}}{8\pi E_{\nu_{i}}^{2}}\left\{(\bar{v}_{e}-\bar{a}_{e})^{2}E_{\nu_{i}}^{2}\right. (36)
+(v¯e+a¯e)2(Eνi+meEf)2\displaystyle+(\bar{v}_{e}+\bar{a}_{e})^{2}(E_{\nu_{i}}+m_{e}-E_{f})^{2}
+me(v¯e2a¯e2)(meEf)},\displaystyle\left.+m_{e}(\bar{v}_{e}^{2}-\bar{a}_{e}^{2})(m_{e}-E_{f})\right\},

where meEfme+ϵfmaxm_{e}\leq E_{f}\leq m_{e}+\epsilon_{f}^{\mathrm{max}} and the maximum kinetic energy is

ϵfmax=2Eνi2me+2Eνi.\epsilon_{f}^{\mathrm{max}}=\frac{2E_{\nu_{i}}^{2}}{m_{e}+2E_{\nu_{i}}}. (37)

The total cross section for scattering off free electrons is [4]

σ(Free)(ν)\displaystyle\sigma^{(\nu)}_{(\mathrm{Free})} =\displaystyle= GF2meEνi8π[(v¯ea¯e)22Eνime+2Eνi\displaystyle\frac{G_{F}^{2}m_{e}E_{\nu_{i}}}{8\pi}\left[(\bar{v}_{e}-\bar{a}_{e})^{2}\frac{2E_{\nu_{i}}}{m_{e}+2E_{\nu_{i}}}\right. (38)
+13(v¯e+a¯e)2{1me3(me+2Eνi)3}\displaystyle+\frac{1}{3}(\bar{v}_{e}+\bar{a}_{e})^{2}\left\{1-\frac{m_{e}^{3}}{(m_{e}+2E_{\nu_{i}})^{3}}\right\}
(v¯e2a¯e2)2meEνi(me+2Eνi)2].\displaystyle\left.-(\bar{v}_{e}^{2}-\bar{a}_{e}^{2})\frac{2m_{e}E_{\nu_{i}}}{(m_{e}+2E_{\nu_{i}})^{2}}\right].

The expressions for ν¯e\bar{\nu}_{e} scattering can be obtained by the interchange a¯ea¯e\bar{a}_{e}\leftrightarrow-\bar{a}_{e} in (36) and (38).

Results for νe\nu_{e} and ν¯e\bar{\nu}_{e} scattering by Ne are given in Table II, and by Ar in Table III. The energy spectra and cross sections are expressed as ratios

R(ν)(Ef)=dσ(ν)/dEfZ(dσ(ν)/dEf)(Free),R^{(\nu)}(E_{f})=\frac{d\sigma^{(\nu)}/dE_{f}}{Z(d\sigma^{(\nu)}/dE_{f})_{(\mathrm{Free})}}, (39)

and σ(ν)/Zσ(Free)(ν)\sigma^{(\nu)}/Z\sigma^{(\nu)}_{(\mathrm{Free})}, to the corresponding quantities for scattering by ZZ free electrons. Tables and plots of the energy spectra for scattering from free electrons are given in [9].

Table 2: Energy spectra dσ(ν)/dEfd\sigma^{(\nu)}/dE_{f} of the ionization electrons from scattering of incident neutrinos of energy EνiE_{\nu_{i}} by neon. The results are expressed as ratios to the spectra 10(dσ(ν)/dEf)(Free)10(d\sigma^{(\nu)}/dE_{f})_{(\mathrm{Free})} for scattering by 10 free electrons and are given as a function of the kinetic energy ϵf\epsilon_{f} of the electron . Also shown are the integrated spectra σ(ν)\sigma^{(\nu)} expressed as a ratio to the integrated spectra 10σ(Free)(ν)10\sigma^{(\nu)}_{(\mathrm{Free})} for 10 free electrons. Results for scattering of antineutrinos are given in parentheses.
ϵf/ϵfmax\epsilon_{f}/\epsilon_{f}^{\mathrm{max}} Eνi=5E_{\nu_{i}}=5 (keV) Eνi=10E_{\nu_{i}}=10 (keV) Eνi=20E_{\nu_{i}}=20 (keV) Eνi=30E_{\nu_{i}}=30 (keV)
0.01 0.2175 (0.2134) 0.3867 (0.3821) 0.4977 (0.4882) 0.5720 (0.5578)
0.1 0.2041 (0.2004) 0.3943 (0.3896) 0.5258 (0.5171) 0.6155 (0.6020)
0.2 0.1880 (0.1848) 0.3983 (0.3933) 0.5358 (0.5282) 0.6272 (0.6148)
0.3 0.1716 (0.1690) 0.3982 (0.3929) 0.5383 (0.5320) 0.6287 (0.6187)
0.4 0.1566 (0.1546) 0.3930 (0.3876) 0.5370 (0.5321) 0.6249 (0.6168)
0.5 0.1444 (0.1430) 0.3794 (0.3745) 0.5330 (0.5296) 0.6170 (0.6121)
0.6 0.1359 (0.1350) 0.3524 (0.3490) 0.5264 (0.5245) 0.6055 (0.6044)
0.7 0.1305 (0.1302) 0.3102 (0.3093) 0.5140 (0.5139) 0.5901 (0.5934)
0.8 0.1263 (0.1268) 0.2636 (0.2655) 0.4750 (0.4788) 0.5666 (0.5748)
0.9 0.1210 (0.1226) 0.2300 (0.2347) 0.3710 (0.3815) 0.4792 (0.4957)
1.0 0.1136 (0.1166) 0.2021 (0.2108) 0.2745 (0.2922) 0.3051 (0.3302)
ϵfmax\epsilon_{f}^{\mathrm{max}} (eV) 95.969 376.65 1451.9 3152.4
σ(ν)/σ(Free)(ν)\sigma^{(\nu)}/\sigma^{(\nu)}_{(\mathrm{Free})} 0.1612 (0.1600) 0.3549 (0.3540) 0.5051 (0.5050) 0.5910 (0.5909)
Table 3: Energy spectra dσ(ν)/dEfd\sigma^{(\nu)}/dE_{f} of the ionization electrons from scattering of incident neutrinos of energy EνiE_{\nu_{i}} by argon. The results are expressed as ratios to the spectra 18(dσ(ν)/dEf)(Free)18(d\sigma^{(\nu)}/dE_{f})_{(\mathrm{Free})} for scattering by 18 free electrons and are given as a function of the kinetic energy ϵf\epsilon_{f} of the electron . Also shown are the integrated spectra σ(ν)\sigma^{(\nu)} expressed as a ratio to the integrated spectra 18σ(Free)(ν)18\sigma^{(\nu)}_{(\mathrm{Free})} for 18 free electrons. Results for scattering of antineutrinos are given in parentheses.
ϵf/ϵfmax\epsilon_{f}/\epsilon_{f}^{\mathrm{max}} Eνi=5E_{\nu_{i}}=5 (keV) Eνi=10E_{\nu_{i}}=10 (keV) Eνi=20E_{\nu_{i}}=20 (keV) Eνi=30E_{\nu_{i}}=30 (keV)
0.01 0.1867 (0.1845) 0.2855 (0.2813) 0.4318 (0.4228) 0.4964 (0.4859)
0.1 0.1875 (0.1851) 0.2929 (0.2888) 0.4493 (0.4404) 0.5223 (0.5124)
0.2 0.1856 (0.1830) 0.2945 (0.2907) 0.4502 (0.4417) 0.5275 (0.5183)
0.3 0.1792 (0.1767) 0.2929 (0.2894) 0.4451 (0.4374) 0.5256 (0.5171)
0.4 0.1669 (0.1647) 0.2890 (0.2861) 0.4361 (0.4297) 0.5169 (0.5095)
0.5 0.1493 (0.1478) 0.2842 (0.2818) 0.4240 (0.4192) 0.5007 (0.4948)
0.6 0.1311 (0.1301) 0.2801 (0.2781) 0.4096 (0.4069) 0.4756 (0.4726)
0.7 0.1170 (0.1166) 0.2712 (0.2699) 0.3917 (0.3918) 0.4419 (0.4429)
0.8 0.1067 (0.1068) 0.2352 (0.2360) 0.3693 (0.3730) 0.4002 (0.4065)
0.9 0.09465 (0.09562) 0.1865 (0.1898) 0.3251 (0.3339) 0.3494 (0.3630)
1.0 0.07822 (0.08011) 0.1499 (0.1559) 0.2164 (0.2316) 0.2220 (0.2449)
ϵfmax\epsilon_{f}^{\mathrm{max}} (eV) 95.969 376.65 1451.9 3152.4
σ(ν¯)/σ(Free)(ν¯)\sigma^{(\bar{\nu})}/\sigma^{(\bar{\nu})}_{(\mathrm{Free})} 0.1533 (0.1524) 0.2730 (0.2719) 0.4138 (0.4128) 0.4779 (0.4799)

The energy spectra ratios for scattering of neutrinos by Ne and Ar are shown in Figs 1 and 2 respectively. Plots for scattering of antineutrinos are not shown as they differ only very slightly from those for scattering by neutrinos. The energy spectra ratios become constant at low kinetic energies and can safely be extrapolated to lower kinetic energies.

The present spectra for Ne have the same general form as those calculated in [5], but have a much smoother structure and are significantly lower, representing a stronger dependence on atomic binding effects.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: Energy spectra ratios R(ν)(Ef)R^{(\nu)}(E_{f}) (Eqn (39)), as a function of electron kinetic energy ϵf\epsilon_{f}, of ionization electrons resulting from scattering of neutrinos by ground state neon. Results are shown for scattering of 5 keV (solid line), 10 keV (dashed line), 20 keV (dash-dotted line), and 30 keV (dotted line) incident neutrino energies.
Refer to caption
Figure 2: Energy spectra ratios R(ν)(Ef)R^{(\nu)}(E_{f}) (Eqn (39)), as a function of electron kinetic energy ϵf\epsilon_{f}, of ionization electrons resulting from scattering of neutrinos by ground state argon. Results are shown for scattering of 5 keV (solid line), 10 keV (dashed line), 20 keV (dash-dotted line), and 30 keV (dotted line) incident neutrino energies.

The largest binding energy of 3.2059 keV, for the K-shell of argon, is less than the lowest incident neutrino energy of EνiE_{\nu_{i}}= 5 keV considered in the present calculations. Consequently, all occupied shells and subshells contribute to the energy spectra although, for the lower neutrino energies, the contributions from the inner shell and subshells will be small. For neon, the K-shell contributions at 5 keV and 10 keV are only O(10310^{-3}) and O(10210^{-2}) respectively. At all neutrino energies, the LI subshell gives the largest contribution, and the LII and LIII contributions are quite similar. For argon, the K-shell contributions at 5 keV and 10 keV are O(10510^{-5}) and O(10310^{-3}) respectively, and the L-subshell contributions at 5 keV are O(10210^{-2}). The MI subshell contribution is dominant at all energies, the LII and LIII contributions are similar, as are the MII and MIII contributions.

The major computational challenge is to obtain satisfactory convergence in the sum over κf\kappa_{f}, as the convergence decreases with increasing ϵf\epsilon_{f}. The imposed practical limit |κf|50|\kappa_{f}|\leq 50 ensured the fractional contributions of the neglected terms were less than 1×1041\times 10^{-4} for ϵf1.4\epsilon_{f}\lesssim 1.4 keV in the Ne spectra, and for ϵf0.6\epsilon_{f}\lesssim 0.6 keV in the Ne spectra. However, for the higher energies, the convergence decreased and the contributions of the neglected terms increased to 1×1031\times 10^{-3} for the L subshells of Ne, and 1×1021\times 10^{-2} for the M subshells of Ar, so the numbers shown for these higher energies are slight underestimates.

The binding effects in the spectra increase with atomic number, decrease with increasing EνiE_{\nu_{i}} and, for each EνiE_{\nu_{i}}, are most significant at the high electron energy end of the spectrum. The sharp decrease in the spectra at the high energy end is due to the minimizaion of the range 2Eνf2E_{\nu_{f}} of the q2q^{2} integration in (14) at EfmaxE_{f}^{\mathrm{max}}. Also, for this region, qEνiq\approx E_{\nu_{i}}, so that the high energy tail will increase as EνiE_{\nu_{i}} increases.

The integrated cross sections

σ(ν)=ElEu𝑑Efdσ(ν)dEf,\sigma^{(\nu)}=\int_{E_{l}}^{E_{u}}dE_{f}\,\frac{d\sigma^{(\nu)}}{dE_{f}}, (40)

where El=meE_{l}=m_{e} and Eu=me+ϵfmaxE_{u}=m_{e}+\epsilon_{f}^{\mathrm{max}}, can be estimated from the calculated energy spectra. We assume the spectra at Ef=meE_{f}=m_{e} are the same as at me+0.01ϵfmaxm_{e}+0.01\epsilon_{f}^{\mathrm{max}}. These integrated cross sections are given in the tables, expressed as ratios to the integrated cross sections Zσ(Free)(ν)Z\sigma^{(\nu)}_{(\mathrm{Free})} (Eqn (38)) for ZZ free electrons.

V Summary and conclusions

The recently developed [9] theory of scattering of low energy neutrinos and antineutrinos by atomic electrons, which uses the Bound Interaction Picture in configuration space to fully implement the relationship between the neutrino helicities and the orbital and spin angular momenta of the atomic electrons, has been applied here to the scattering by the ground state systems Ne(1s22s22p61s^{2}2s^{2}2p^{6}) and Ar(1s22s22p63s23p61s^{2}2s^{2}2p^{6}3s^{2}3p^{6}).

The energy spectra dσ/dEfd\sigma/dE_{f} of the ionization electrons produced in the scattering of electron neutrinos and antineutrinos with energies 5, 10, 20 and 30 keV have been calculated. Results are also obtained for the integrated cross sections. Screened point-Coulomb radial eigenfunctions have been used, with the continuum state eigenfunctions calculated by direct integration of the Dirac equations. The results here for Ne replace those given in [9] which were calculated using some screening constants which underestimated the effects of screening in the inner subshells. The new spectra ratios for neon are larger than the original ratios by 0.03\approx 0.03 to 0.14\approx 0.14, with the greatest increases occurring at EνiE_{\nu_{i}} = 10 keV.

The calculated energy spectra show that binding effects increase with atomic number, decrease with increasing EνiE_{\nu_{i}} and, for each EνiE_{\nu_{i}}, are greatest at the high electron energy end of the spectrum. The neutrino and antineutrino energy spectra are very similar, with small difference of 1%\lesssim 1\%.

Binding effects are still very significant at Eνi=30E_{\nu_{i}}=30 keV, the integrated spectra ratios being 0.6\lesssim 0.6 and 0.5\lesssim 0.5 for Ne and Ar respectively. Extension of the calculations to higher neutrino energies to study the further decrease of binding effects would require a substantial increase in the maximum value of |κf||\kappa_{f}| used as the κf\kappa_{f} convergence is very slow at higher energies, which is not practical.

The largest uncertainty in the present calculations arises from the choice of the potential V(r)V(r) for the atomic electron, and the consequent form of the radial functions g(r)g(r) and f(r)f(r) used in the evaluation of the radial matrix elements (II). The choice of a Coulombic potential with an effective nuclear charge Zeff=ZsiZ_{\mathrm{eff}}=Z-s_{i} to account for electron screening effects is convenient and should be accurate for the small values of nn and nln-l occurring in the ground states of neon and argon [15]. However, if increased accuracy is required, or extension to, for example, xenon is considered, then self-consistent relativistic radial eigenfunctions [18, 19] would be needed.

Relativistic self-consistent field theory includes [18] the effects of magnetic interactions between electrons and retardation of the inter-electronic Coulomb repulsion, as described by the Breit operator. This operator is treated as a first order perturbation to an unperturbed Hamiltonian which is a sum of the Dirac central field Coulombic Hamiltonians for each electron and the total Coulombic inter-electronic interaction. The magnetic and retardation terms are of order (v/c)2(v/c)^{2} compared to the inter-electronic repulsion term, which is of order (α2Z)mec2(\alpha^{2}Z)m_{e}c^{2}. Their contribution is therefore of order (α4Z3)mec2(\alpha^{4}Z^{3})m_{e}c^{2} and increases strongly with ZZ. Detailed calculations are discussed in section 7.2 of [14].

The scattering of dark matter (DM) particles by atomic electrons is a promising method for detecting the particles forming the DM component of the Milky Way, and the theoretical treatment of this process shares many features with that for neutrino scattering by atomic electrons. The response of argon and xenon targets has been studied by [20] by treating the atomic electrons and DM particle as non-relativistic, with a general interaction constructed to satisfy Galilean and rotational invariance. The DarkSide-50 experiment [21] uses an argon target and they have presented a non-relativistic analysis for a vector mediator based upon atomic and DM form factors. The conversion of a sterile neutrino DM particle into an active neutrino via inelastic scattering with an atomic electron has been considered by [12] using a non-relativistic second quantization formalism based upon a four-fermion coupling and a mediator which could be scalar, pseudo-scalar, vector or axial vector.

The formalism developed in [9], which considers only vector and axial vector couplings, could be readily adapted to the ZZ-mediated scattering of a fermionic WIMP DM particle such as the neutralino χ\chi. The neutrino scattering tensor Lβα(ν)L^{(\nu)}_{\beta\alpha} would be replaced by the appropriate tensor Lβα(χ)L^{(\chi)}_{\beta\alpha} for the neutralino, the admixture of vector and axial vector contributions altered to accommodate the neutralino couplings, and changes made to the normalization factors for the plane wave spinors. Generalization to scalar and pseudo-scalar couplings is possible but would require substantial modifications to the formalism, especially to the angular momentum matrix elements.

Acknowledgements.
The author would like to thank Michael Meehan for assistance with the figures.

References

  • [1] C. Giunti and A. Studenikin, Neutrino electromagnetic interactions: A window to new physics, Rev. Modern Phys. 87, 531 (2015)
  • [2] J. Jeong, J. E. Kim and S. Youn, Electromagnetic properties of neutrinos from scattering on bound electrons in atoms, Int. J. Mod. Phys A 36, 2150182 (2021)
  • [3] K. A. Kouzakov and A. I. Studenikin, Theory of neutrino-atom collisions: The history, present status, and BSM physics, Advances in High Energy Physics 2014, 569409 (2014)
  • [4] G. J. Gounaris, E. A. Paschos and P. I. Porfyriadis, The ionization of H, He or Ne atoms using neutrinos or antineutrinos at keV energies, Phys. Lett. B 525, 63 (2002)
  • [5] G. J. Gounaris, E. A. Paschos and P. I. Porfyriadis, Electron spectra in the ionization of atoms by neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 70, 113008 (2004)
  • [6] J.-W. Chen, H.-C. Chi, K.-N. Huang, C.-P. Liu, H.-T. Shiao, L. Singh, H. T. Wong, C.-L. Wu, and C.-P. Wu, Atomic ionization of germanium by neutrinos from ab initio approach, Phys. Lett. B 731, 159 (2014)
  • [7] Jiunn-Wei Chen, Hsin-Chang Chi, Keh-Ning Huang, Hau Bin Li, C.-P. Liu, Lakhwinder Singh, Henry T. Wong, Chih-Liang Wu, and Chih-Pan Wu, Constraining neutrino electromagnetic properties by germanium detectors, Phys. Rev. D 91, 013005 (2015)
  • [8] Jiunn-Wei Chen, Hsin-Chang Chi, C.-P. Liu, and Chih-Pan Wu, Low energy electronic recoil in xenon detectors by solar neutrinos, Phys. Lett. B 774, 656 (2017)
  • [9] I. B. Whittingham, Scattering of low enery neutrinos and antineutrinos by atomic electrons, Phys. Rev. D 105, 013008 (2022)
  • [10] W. H. Furry, On bound states and scattering in positron theory, Phys. Rev. 81, 115 (1951)
  • [11] I. B. Whittingham, Incoherent scattering of gamma rays in heavy atoms, J. Phys. A:Gen. Phys. 4, 21 (1971)
  • [12] Shao-Feng Ge, Pedro Pasquini, and Jie Sheng, Solar active - sterile neutrino conversion with atomic effects at dark matter direct detection experiments, JHEP05 (2022) 088
  • [13] M. E. Rose Relativistic Electron Theory (New York, Wiley, 1961)
  • [14] T. P. Das Relativistic Quantum Mechanics of Electrons (New York, Harper & Row, 1973)
  • [15] H. A. Bethe and E. E. Salpeter Quantum Mechanics of One- and Two- Electron Atoms (Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 1957)
  • [16] D. Thomas https://www.uoguelph.ca/chemistry
    /thomas/index
  • [17] J. H. Schofield, Theoretical photoionization cross sections from 1 to 1500 keV, Lawrence Livermore Laboratory report UCRL-51326 (1973), https://doi.org/10.2172/4545040.
  • [18] Yong-Ki Kim, Self-Consistent-Field Theory for Closed-Shell Atoms, Phys. Rev. 154, 17 (1967)
  • [19] F. C. Smith and W. R. Johnson, Relativistic self-consistent fields with exchange, Phys. Rev. 160, 136 (1967)
  • [20] Riccardo Catena, Timon Emken, Nicola A. Spaldin, and Walter Tarinto, Atomic responses to general dark matter-electron interactions, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033195 (2020)
  • [21] P. Agnes et al. (DarkSide), Constraints on Sub-GeV Dark-Matter Electron Scattering from the DarkSide-50 Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 111303 (2018)