Roots of identity in finite groups of Lie type
Abstract.
Given an integer , we deploy the generating function techniques to compute the number of -th roots of identity in some of the well-known finite groups of Lie type, more precisely for finite general linear groups, symplectic groups, orthogonal groups of all types and unitary groups over finite fields of odd characteristics.
Key words and phrases:
word maps, finite groups of Lie type, -th root2020 Mathematics Subject Classification:
20G40, 20D061. Introduction
A significant amount of modern mathematics is centred around finding solutions to equations in objects belonging to different categories, for example, the category of groups, the category of associative algebras, the category of Lie algebras etc.. In the world of groups, these are known as word problems. It has come to the consideration of many great mathematicians of the current century, especially after the settlement of the long-standing Ore’s conjecture (which states that every element of a finite non-abelian simple group is a commutator). Let us recall the word problem in the context of group theory in brief. Fix a free group on generators. Then for any word and a group , we get a map , by means of evaluations. Several astonishing results have been established regarding these maps. A typical word problem asks if the map induced by the given word is surjective on the group or not. The other related problem i,e, Waring-type problem asks for the existence of such that . The most surprising result in this direction states that, for a given word , there exists such that for all finite non-abelian simple groups of size greater or equal to , we have , see the great work [31] by Shalev. Later he together with Larsen and Tiep improved the result by proving , in [18] and [20]. Unfortunately the number can not be reduced further. An easy example arises out of the power map, which is induced by the word , for some integer . The Waring-type problems have also been studied in case of Lie groups and Chevalley groups in [13], unipotent algebraic groups in [17], residually finite groups in [19], -adic and Adelic groups in [1] et cetera. For a survey of these results and further problems in the context of group theory, we refer the reader to the excellent survey due to Shalev [31] and the references therein.
There have been studies to find the number of elements which are images of the map in classical groups. This was done for the finite general linear groups in [16], for the finite symplectic and orthogonal groups in [29] and for finite unitary groups in [30]. The exceptional cases remain open. After knowing that an equation has a solution in the concerned object, it is desirable to ask how many solutions exist in this case. Some authors also call them as the problem of finding fibres of a word map. The enumeration of the solutions of has been carried out for symmetric and alternating groups in many works like [4], [28], [15], [14] et cetera. The problem of finding fibres of in some of the finite groups of Lie type has been studied by several authors, for example, proportions of elements in finite groups of Lie type have been estimated in [27], algorithms to identify abundant -singular elements in finite classical groups have been studied in [26], Proportions of -regular elements in finite classical groups have been studied in [2], abundant -singular elements in finite classical groups have been studied in [25] et ceetra. In this paper we derive the generating functions for the probability of an element satisfying , where is an integer greater than . We call these elements to be roots of identity. Note that if an element is a root of identity, then so are all its conjugates. Thus we first find the conjugacy class representatives which are -th root of identity. In this regard, we brush through a brief description of the conjugacy classes in Section 2. Hereafter in Section 3, we first compute the roots of identity which are either semisimple or unipotent. Finally using the Jordan decomposition of an element, in Section 4, we derive the generating functions for the number of -th roots of identity in finite classical groups of Lie type; more precisely in the general linear group, the symplectic group, the orthogonal group and the unitary group. Finally in Section 5, we derive an exact formula for the probability of a matrix to be -th root of identity in the case of the general linear group and the symplectic group, where is an odd non-defining prime and the defining prime satisfies .
Running assumption
Throughout the article it will be assumed that the finite fields under consideration are of odd characteristics.
Notation
The set of units in will be denoted by . By the notation , we will always denote the order of in the multiplicative group . The Euler’s totient function will be denoted by . We denote the set of irreducible monic polynomials over by . Let us also fix the notation for the set of all partitions of to be . By the symbol , we denote the quantity . For a partition , the number of occurrences of will be denoted as . The transpose of a partition will be denoted as . The number of partitions of a positive integer will be denoted as and those with lesser than or equal to equal to many (not necessarily distinct) parts will be denoted as .
2. The groups under consideration
In this section, we briefly recall the groups. Note that if an element is an -th root of identity, then so are its conjugates. Hence we embark to find first the conjugacy classes which are -th root of identity. This makes it necessary for us to know about the conjugacy classes and the centralizer of an element. We will follow the treatment of [11], [23], [36] and, [5]. For the case of the general linear group, it is easy to find the conjugacy representative for the conjugacy classes, but for other concerned groups, they are a little tricky. One may look into [34], [33] and, [35], to handle the other cases. Without further delay let us start with the subsection where we talk about the general linear group.
2.1. General linear group
Given a -dimensional vector space over , the set of all automorphisms of is denoted by . After fixing an appropriate basis, can be identified with . The conjugacy classes of is determined by functions by such that . The combinatorial data attached via this correspondence, for an element will be denoted by . The centralizer size is given by
This quantity sometimes can be shortened using a general expression, which we recall from [6, Theorem 2] below;
2.2. Symplectic and orthogonal groups
2.2.1. Symplectic group
Let be a vector space of dimension over . There is a unique non-degenerate alternating bilinear form on . We consider the form given by
The symplectic group is the subgroup of consisting of those elements which preserve this alternating form on . By fixing an appropriate basis, the matrix of the form is where and
Since all alternating forms are equivalent over , the symplectic groups obtained with respect to different forms are conjugate within .
2.2.2. Orthgonal Groups
Let be an -dimensional vector space over a finite field . Then there are at most two non-equivalent non-degenerate quadratic forms on . The orthogonal group consists of elements of which preserve a non-degenerate quadratic form .
When for some , up to equivalence there are two such forms denoted as and . These are as follows. Fix such that is irreducible. Then the two non-equivalent forms are given by
-
(1)
, and
-
(2)
.
The orthogonal group preserving will be denoted as , and the orthogonal group preserving will be denoted as .
When , for even there is only one (up to equivalence) quadratic form, namely and hence there is only one (up to conjugacy) orthogonal group. If is odd, then up to equivalence, there are two non-degenerate quadratic forms. But, these two forms give isomorphic orthogonal groups. We take . Thus, in case , up to conjugacy, we have only one orthogonal group. This will be denoted as .
As it is common in literature, we will use the notation to denote any of the orthogonal group above where . With respect to an appropriate basis, we will fix the matrices of the symmetric bilinear forms (associated to the quadratic forms ) as follows:
where , and , an matrix. Then, the orthogonal group in matrix form is
Adapting the notations of [8], we define the type of an orthogonal space as follows.
The type of an orthogonal space of dimension is
where satisfies , and . More generally, when is orthogonal direct sum , the type is defined by .
Now we describe the conjugacy classes and the centralizer of an element in finite symplectic and orthogonal groups. This is the classic work of [36].We recall briefly the results therein, which will be used further. A symplectic signed partition is a partition of a number , such that the odd parts have even multiplicity and even parts have a sign associated with it. The set of all symplectic signed partitions will be denoted as . An orthogonal signed partition is a partition of a number , such that all even parts have even multiplicity, and all odd parts have a sign associated with it. The set of all orthogonal signed partitions will be denoted as . The dual of a monic degree polynomial satisfying , is the polynomial given by .
According to [36], [32], the conjugacy classes of are parameterized by the functions , where denotes the set of all monic, non-constant, irreducible polynomials, is the set of all partitions of and is the set of all symplectic signed partitions of . Such a represent a conjugacy class of if and only if (a) , (b) , (c) iff (we distinguish this , by denoting it ) and, (d) . Also from [36], [32], we find that a similar kind of statement is true for the groups . The conjugacy classes of are parameterized by the functions , where denotes the set of all monic, non-constant, irreducible polynomials, is the set of all partitions of and is the set of all symplectic signed partitions of . Such a represent a conjugacy class of for , if and only if (a) , (b) , (c) iff (we distinguish this , by denoting it ) and, (d) . Class representative corresponding to given data can be found in [34], [33], [10] and we will mention them whenever needed. We mention the following results about the conjugacy class size (and hence the size of the centraliser) of elements corresponding to given data, which can be found in [36].
Lemma 2.1.
[36, pp. 36] Let be a matrix corresponding to the data . Then the conjugacy class of in is of size where and are defined as follows
where gets determined by the sign of the corresponding partition, , and
Lemma 2.2.
[36, pp. 39] Let be a matrix corresponding to the data . Then the conjugacy class of in is of size where and are defined as before, except when ,
where in gets determined by the corresponding sign of the part, of the partition.
The quantity will also be denoted as in case of symplectic groups and as in case of orthogonal groups when .
2.3. Unitary groups
Consider the field , and the involution defined as of the field. We further get an automorphism of , the polynomial ring over , by action on the coefficients of the polynomials. The image of will be denoted as . Consider the Hermitian form given by the matrix
Then we identify the unitary group (corresponding to the above Hermitian form) with the set
Since all non-degenerate Hermitian forms on an -dimensional vector space are unitarily congruent to the Hermitian form given by the above matrix, it is evident that all the unitary groups arising are conjugate with each other inside (see theorem of [12]). From the work of Wall, it is known that two elements are conjugate to each other if and only if they are conjugate in . These conjugacy classes are parameterized by special polynomials and partitions. We call a polynomial of degree to be -symmetric if where . A polynomial without a proper -symmetric factor will be called a -irrdeucible polynomial. Note that a -irreducible polynomial can be reducible in the usual sense. Denote by to be the set of all -irreducible polynomials. Let denote the set of all partitions of numbers . Then a conjugacy class in is determined by a function which satisfies (a) and, (b) . The centralizer six=ze can be found in [36] and we are not quoting it here.
3. Semisimple & unipotent roots of identity
3.1. Semisimple classes
Note that an element in is semisimple if and only if it has order coprime to . In this subsection, we classify all the semisimple elements, which give , when raised to the power . In this subsection, we will assume that . Let denote a product of distinct irreducible polynomials, and be the semisimple matrix with as its characteristic polynomial. Then if , then must have irreducible factors coming from irreducible factors of . We recall some results and definitions from [21]. For a positive integer , the splitting field of over a field is called the -th cyclotomic field over and denoted by . The roots of in are called the -th roots of unity over and the set of all these roots is denoted by .
Lemma 3.1.
[21, Theorem 2.42] Let be a positive integer and a field of characteristic . If , then is a cyclic group of order with respect to multiplication in .
A generator of the cyclic group is called primitive -th root of unity over . If and is a primitive -th root of unity over , the polynomial
is called the -th cyclotomic polynomial over . When , we have that , see [21, Theorem 2.45]. Note that if , for each irreducible factor of , there exists an such that . Thus we need to know how factors over . We recall the following result.
Lemma 3.2.
[21, Theorem 2.47(ii)] When and , then the cyclotomic polynomial factors into distinct monic irreducible polynomials in of the same degree , where is order of in .
Since , the polynomial is separable and hence for dividing , the cyclotomic polynomials and are coprime. Hence we have the following lemma.
Proposition 3.3.
Let and . Let denote the number of semisimple conjugacy classes , such that for some indices . Then we have that
(3.1) |
where denotes the multiplicative order of in .
Proof.
Let be a semisimple matrix satisfying . Then the characteristic polynomial of , divides . Since , using factorization of and Lemma 3.2, we get that the irreducible factors of are of degree for , where denotes the multiplicative order of in . Furthermore, implies that the polynomial is separable. Hence for dividing , we have that . Hence the result follows. ∎
To deduce the result on the probability of a semisimple element to be an -th root of identity, we need to know the order of the centralizer of each element. This has been discussed in Section 2.
Corollary 3.4.
Let and . Let denote the proportion of semisimple -th roots of identity in . Then we have that
where denotes the multiplicative order of in .
To calculate the number of semisimple conjugacy classes in , which are -th root of , we need to know the factorization of . Before proceeding further, for an integer , let us define
The set plays a crucial role in counting the semisimple elements in finite symplectic and orthogonal groups, which gives on raising the power to . We collect the following results from [37].
Lemma 3.5.
[37, Theorem 8, and Theorem 11] We have the following results.
-
(1)
An irreducible polynomial of degree over is SRIM iff
-
(2)
For the -th cyclotomic polynomial factors into product of all distinct SRIM polynomials of degree and order .
Corollary 3.6.
The polynomial has a (and hence all) -symmetric irreducible factor if and only if for some . Furthermore, if is odd, has no SRIM factor.
Proof.
By definition, is a -symmetric polynomial. Hence its factors are either irreducible -symmetric or product of the form , where and are irreducible. If is odd, then there is no irreducible -symmetric factor of , since all -symmetric irreducible polynomials are of even degree. So we assume that is even. So assume is even. The backward direction is the content of Lemma 3.5. In the other direction, assume that has a -symmetric polynomial, say . Then for some . But, by definition of , we have that and hence . ∎
Proposition 3.7.
Let and . Let denote the number of semisimple conjugacy classes , such that for some indices . Then we have that
(3.2) |
where denotes the multiplicative order of in .
Proof.
Let be a matrix satisfying . Then we have that, the minimal polynomial of over should divide . Since and further decomposes into irreducibles we need to do a case-by-case study. Because of Corollary 3.6 we have to use ’s. So first assume that , then each of the factors of determine a Symplectic matrix of which gives when raised to the power . Since has in total many irreducible factors, this justifies the first factor in the product.
Next, suppose . Then for any , a factor of , we need to pair up and to get a conjugacy class of , which contributes to the counting. Since is -symmetric, and occur together in the factorization of . Furthermore, is separable and hence all the irreducible factors are coprime to each other. Since and are combined together, the exponent of is taken to be . But in the process, we are grouping and together, resulting in the power of the factor being . This finishes the proof. ∎
Corollary 3.8.
Let and . Let denote the proportion of semisimple -th roots of identity in . Then we have that
where denotes the multiplicative order of in , and if and otherwise.
Proof.
Start with the case when is even. In this case, both and are -th roots of identity. Now let us assume that is an -th root of identity, such that is not an eigenvalue of . Then the characteristic polynomial of is a product of factors of , where and the polynomials are irreducible of degree more than . The rest of the proof follows from the description of the centralizers when the irreducible factor is a SRIM polynomial or not. In the latter case, we have that occurs together in the factorization of the characteristic polynomial of . For being even is not an -th root of identity, which proves the existence of the function in the formula. This finishes the proof. ∎
Corollary 3.9.
Let and and , where . Let and denote the proportion of semisimple -th roots of identity in and respectively. Let us define
Then we have that
and
where denotes the multiplicative order of in , and if and otherwise.
Proof.
The proof is almost similar to Corollary 3.8, but care needs to be taken as we are giving it in a combinatorial formula. This formula occurs because of the existence of different quadratic forms. Let be an orthogonal -th root of identity, preserving a non-degenerate quadratic form on an dimensional vector space , where is even or odd. Consider the characteristic polynomial of , which decomposes into irreducibles with factors being and irreducible or , with irreducible. We use the centralizer information from Section 2.
Let us start with the first equation. The characteristic polynomial of might have root to be or . But, if is odd, it will not have as a root. This justifies the presence of . Note that for being even and positive the coefficient of is sum of the probabilities in case of and . Furthermore for odd this is two times the probability in the case of , which occurs because of two quadratic forms. In case of odd , note that , which we are using in the formula. This proves the equality in the first equation.
We prove the next equation by modifying the first equation. We need the value of type of an orthogonal space, as was discussed in Section 2. This consideration doesn’t alter the first factor, as they correspond to the case whether and are -th roots of identity or not. In the right side of the first equation, for the self conjugate irreducible factors, replace by , according to their types. This proves the second equality. ∎
Let us now deduce the SCIM factors of in . According to [5, Lemma 2], if is a SCIM polynomial of odd degree , then for any root of , it satisfies . This means that . For a positive integer define
It is evident that if is a SCIM polynomial of degree , then . If , and is a primitive -th root of unity, then the set is of cardinality . Indeed, if for some , then . Hence is an even multiple of , which forces , see [37, Prposition 1]. For and a primitive -th root of unity, let us define
Then by [22, Theorem 3.4.8] this is an irreducible polynomial. We claim that is a SCIM polynomial. Note that , since . This implies that is also a root, and hence is a SCIM polynomial, see [9, pp. 23]. Using [21, Theorem 2.47], we conclude that for an irreducible polynomial of degree over , the following statements are equivalent;
-
(1)
is SCIM,
-
(2)
,
-
(3)
for some being a -th root of unity for some .
For , we have that , where runs over all -th primitive root of unity. It follows that in this case factors into a product of all SCIM polynomials. Using a similar argument as in Corollary 3.6 we conclude the following.
Lemma 3.10.
The polynomial has a (and hence all) -symmetric irreducible factor if and only if for some . Furthermore, if is even, has no SCIM factor.
Proposition 3.11.
Let and . Let denote the number of semisimple conjugacy classes , such that for some indices . Then we have that
(3.3) |
where denotes the multiplicative order of in .
Proof.
Let be a matrix satisfying . Then we have that, the minimal polynomial of over should divide . Since and further decomposes into irreducibles we examine this each case-by-case depending on whether is inside or outside for some , and use Lemma 3.10. So first assume that , then each of the factors of determine a Unitary matrix of which gives when raised to the power . Since has in total many irreducible factors, this justifies the first factor in the product.
Next, suppose . Then for any , a factor of , we need to pair up and to get a conjugacy class of , which contributes to the counting. Since is -symmetric (because and are roots of , as ), and occur together in the factorization of . Furthermore, is separable and hence all the irreducible factors are coprime to each other. Hence the exponent of is taken to be . But in the process, we are grouping and , resulting in the power of the factor being . This finishes the proof. ∎
Corollary 3.12.
Let and . Let denote the proportion of semisimple -th roots of identity in . Then we have to be equal to
(3.4) |
where denotes the multiplicative order of in .
Proof.
This follows easily from the information on centralizers and size of the conjugacy classes. The flow of reasoning is as same as Corollary 3.4, Corollary 3.8 and Corollary 3.9. Hence it is left to the reader. ∎
3.2. Unipotent classes
Recall that an element is a unipotent element if and only if is a power of the defining prime. Hence to find all unipotent elements of order , it is enough to find elements of order where and . In the following result, we find the conjugacy classes of unipotent elements of order when . In the other finite groups of Lie type two unipotent elements and need not be -conjugate, even if they are conjugate. But it so happens that the unipotent conjugacy class in other Finite groups of Lie type descend from those in . Thus it is necessary that we first resolve the case of . The treatments for the other groups will follow easily.
Proposition 3.13.
Let be a partition of , where . Consider to be the matrix corresponding to the Jordan canonical form of the unipotent matrix attached with . Then is of order if and only if .
Proof.
Note that is a nilpotent matrix with the -th entry for all and for all . Also is a nilpotent matrix satisfies . Given that is a nontrivial unipotent element, it must have order for some . Using the binomial theorem,
Since , the should satisfy . This proves both sides of the statement. ∎
Lemma 3.14.
Let denote the number of partitions of , with parts not exceeding . Then the generating function for in indeterminate is given by
4. Generating functions for all roots of identity
To detect an element , such that , we use the Jordan decomposition. First, let us write , where . Using Jordan decomposition (see [24]), we write , where is semisimple and is unipotent. It can be easily seen that if and only if and . Since we use the combinatorial data to conclude our results, it is important to know the unipotent part of , when is determined by a combinatorial data . For any element , we consider it inside ambient , and since the order of an element is unaltered under this consideration, we discuss the case for an element in only. The other cases will follow easily. Recall from Section 2, for an element , if the combinatorial data is given by , then the companion matrix corresponding to the combinatorial data is given by the sum of the blocks of the form
where is the companion matrix corresponding to , and is a matrix. Also, the size of this blocks are , where . It is well known that two matrices are conjugate to each other if and only if they are conjugate in , see [3]. Hence we consider the matrix in , up to conjugacy. Then the combinatorial data becomes , where . Hence to summarize we have the following result, using Proposition 3.13.
Lemma 4.1.
Let be the combinatorial data corresponding to and , . If is the Jordan decomposition of , then is an -th root of identity in if and only if is a -th root of identity in and each part of has size less than or equal to .
In this section, we use cycle indices for classical groups to conclude the final set of results. We will recall the cycle indices from [6] and [7] whenever needed and then deduce our results. We assume the polynomials to be in the indeterminate . Let be variables corresponding to pairs of polynomials and partitions. The cycle index for a group is defined to be
In the next couple of results, we are first going to recall the factorization of the cycle indices, due to the works of Jason Fulman. After that, we are going to substitute zero or one, on the basis of whether such an element contributes to the quantity or not. We present the first lemma now.
Lemma 4.2.
[7, pp. 55] For , we have
Theorem 4.3.
Let denote the number of elements in which are -th root of identity. Let , where . Then the generating function of the probability is given by
where denotes the multiplicative order of in .
Proof.
It follows from the proof of Proposition 3.3 and Proposition 3.13 that, for an element ,
-
(1)
the semisimple part has order if and only if the irreducible factors of the characteristic polynomial of divides for some ,
-
(2)
the unipotent part has order if and only if the partition corresponding to has all parts lesser than or equal to .
Hence in the formula of Lemma 4.2, we substitute to be when
-
(1)
all the polynomials occurring in are divisors of , for some ,
-
(2)
all the occurring in has highest part to be lesser than or equal to .
and put all other to be zero. The occurrence of the degrees follows easily. This proves the equality among both sides. ∎
The theorems for the case of finite symplectic, orthogonal and unitary groups will be stated without detailed proof, since the arguments will be as same as Theorem 4.3, so we won’t be repeating them. However, we will indicate the results from which the proofs follow.
Lemma 4.4.
[6] For , we have
Theorem 4.5.
Let denote the number of elements in which are -th root of identity. Let , where . Then the generating function of the probability is given by
Proof.
This follows from the proof of Corollary 3.8 and Proposition 3.13. The occurrence of can be justified as was done in Corollary 3.8. Finally, we need to use Lemma 4.4. ∎
Lemma 4.6.
[6] Define the cycle index for sum of the both type of orthogonal groups to be
This quantity factorises as
Theorem 4.7.
Let denote the number of elements in which are -th root of identity, where . Let , where . Then the generating function of the sum of the probabilities is given by
Proof.
The reason for clubbing these two probabilities is related to how the cycle indices for the different types of orthogonal groups are treated. This follows from the proof of Corollary 3.9 and Proposition 3.13. The occurrence of can be justified as was done in Corollary 3.9. Finally, we need to use Lemma 4.6. ∎
A formula for the generating function for the difference of the probabilities can be formulated easily, and using the same techniques we can obtain a formula for the generating function. This is omitted here. But, a treatment for a special case can be found in [9].
Theorem 4.9.
Let denote the number of elements in which are -th root of identity. Let , where . Then the generating function for the probability is given by
where denotes the multiplicative order of in .
Proof.
This follows from the proof of Corollary 3.12 and Proposition 3.13. Finally, we need to use Lemma 4.8. ∎
5. An example
In this section, we compute the exact probility when . All the groups are defined over . We concentrate mainly on the case when is a prime and , for example, . Then we get
Using Lemma 3.2, it will factor into many distinct monic polynomials of degree . In this case, the elements contributing to -th root of identity will all be semisimple (see the discussion at the beginning of Section 3).
5.1. The case of
Let denote the proportion of -th roots of identity in . Then using Corollary 3.4, we get that
We now divide the computation into two cases. The first is being odd. In this case, we should have an odd power of , coming from the first term of the product. Other contributing powers of will have all even power. Hence probability of being an -th root is
where runs over the subscripts of the parts of . When is even, using the same argument as before, we get the resulting probability to be
where runs over the subscripts of the parts of and is by convention.
5.2. The case of
Since is odd, we have that . We can have two possibilities, either for some , or for all . If for some , then we have that the probability of an element of to be -th root, using Corollary 3.8, is
and when , then the resulting probability will be
The cases for the orthogonal groups and the unitary group are similar and we omit them from the display.
References
- [1] Nir Avni, Tsachik Gelander, Martin Kassabov and Aner Shalev “Word values in -adic and adelic groups” In Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 45.6, 2013, pp. 1323–1330
- [2] László Babai, Simon Guest, Cheryl E. Praeger and Robert A. Wilson “Proportions of -regular elements in finite classical groups” In J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 88.1, 2013, pp. 202–226
- [3] Timothy C. Burness and Michael Giudici “Classical groups, derangements and primes” 25, Australian Mathematical Society Lecture Series Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2016, pp. xviii+346
- [4] S. Chowla, I.. Herstein and W.. Scott “The solutions of in symmetric groups” In Norske Vid. Selsk. Forh., Trondheim 25, 1952, pp. 29–31
- [5] Veikko Ennola “On the conjugacy classes of the finite unitary groups” In Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Ser. A I 313, 1962, pp. 13
- [6] Jason Fulman “Cycle indices for the finite classical groups” In J. Group Theory 2.3, 1999, pp. 251–289
- [7] Jason Fulman “Random matrix theory over finite fields” In Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.) 39.1, 2002, pp. 51–85
- [8] Jason Fulman, Peter M. Neumann and Cheryl E. Praeger “A generating function approach to the enumeration of matrices in classical groups over finite fields” In Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 176.830, 2005, pp. vi+90
- [9] Jason Fulman, Peter M. Neumann and Cheryl E. Praeger “A generating function approach to the enumeration of matrices in classical groups over finite fields” In Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 176.830, 2005, pp. vi+90
- [10] Samuel Gonshaw, Martin W. Liebeck and E.. O’Brien “Unipotent class representatives for finite classical groups” In J. Group Theory 20.3, 2017, pp. 505–525
- [11] J.. Green “The characters of the finite general linear groups” In Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 80, 1955, pp. 402–447
- [12] Larry C. Grove “Classical groups and geometric algebra” 39, Graduate Studies in Mathematics American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2002, pp. x+169
- [13] Chun Yin Hui, Michael Larsen and Aner Shalev “The Waring problem for Lie groups and Chevalley groups” In Israel J. Math. 210.1, 2015, pp. 81–100
- [14] Hideki Ishihara, Hiroyuki Ochiai, Yugen Takegahara and Tomoyuki Yoshida “-divisibility of the number of solutions of in a symmetric group” In Ann. Comb. 5.2, 2001, pp. 197–210
- [15] Tatsuhiko Koda, Masaki Sato and Yugen Takegahara “2-adic properties for the numbers of involutions in the alternating groups” In J. Algebra Appl. 14.4, 2015, pp. 1550052\bibrangessep21
- [16] Rijubrata Kundu and Anupam Singh “Generating functions for the powers in GL(n, q)” In Israel J. Math. 259.2, 2024, pp. 887–936
- [17] Michael Larsen and Dong Quan Ngoc Nguyen “Waring’s problem for unipotent algebraic groups” In Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 69.4, 2019, pp. 1857–1877
- [18] Michael Larsen and Aner Shalev “Word maps and Waring type problems” In J. Amer. Math. Soc. 22.2, 2009, pp. 437–466
- [19] Michael Larsen and Aner Shalev “Words, Hausdorff dimension and randomly free groups” In Math. Ann. 371.3-4, 2018, pp. 1409–1427
- [20] Michael Larsen, Aner Shalev and Pham Huu Tiep “The Waring problem for finite simple groups” In Ann. of Math. (2) 174.3, 2011, pp. 1885–1950
- [21] Rudolf Lidl and Harald Niederreiter “Finite fields” With a foreword by P. M. Cohn 20, Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997, pp. xiv+755
- [22] San Ling and Chaoping Xing “Coding theory” A first course Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004, pp. xii+222
- [23] I.. Macdonald “Numbers of conjugacy classes in some finite classical groups” In Bull. Austral. Math. Soc. 23.1, 1981, pp. 23–48
- [24] Gunter Malle and Donna Testerman “Linear algebraic groups and finite groups of Lie type” 133, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011, pp. xiv+309
- [25] Alice C. Niemeyer, Tomasz Popiel and Cheryl E. Praeger “Abundant -singular elements in finite classical groups” In J. Algebra 408, 2014, pp. 189–204
- [26] Alice C. Niemeyer, Tomasz Popiel and Cheryl E. Praeger “Algorithms to identify abundant -singular elements in finite classical groups” In Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 86.1, 2012, pp. 50–63
- [27] Alice C. Niemeyer and Cheryl E. Praeger “Estimating proportions of elements in finite groups of Lie type” In J. Algebra 324.1, 2010, pp. 122–145
- [28] Alice C. Niemeyer and Cheryl E. Praeger “On permutations of order dividing a given integer” In J. Algebraic Combin. 26.1, 2007, pp. 125–142
- [29] Saikat Panja and Anupam Singh “Powers in finite orthogonal and symplectic groups: A generating function approach” In Israel Journal of Mathematics, 2023, pp. To appear
- [30] Saikat Panja and Anupam Singh “Powers in finite unitary groups”, 2023 arXiv:2304.13735 [math.GR]
- [31] Aner Shalev “Word maps, conjugacy classes, and a noncommutative Waring-type theorem” In Ann. of Math. (2) 170.3, 2009, pp. 1383–1416
- [32] Ken-ichi Shinoda “The characters of Weil representations associated to finite fields” In J. Algebra 66.1, 1980, pp. 251–280
- [33] D.. Taylor “Conjugacy Classes in Finite Orthogonal Groups” online notes, 2020 URL: https://www.maths.usyd.edu.au/u/don/code/Magma/GOConjugacy
- [34] D.. Taylor “Conjugacy Classes in Finite Symplectic Groups” online notes, 2020 URL: https://www.maths.usyd.edu.au/u/don/code/Magma/SpConjugacy
- [35] D.. Taylor “Conjugacy Classes in Finite Unitary Groups” online notes, 2020 URL: https://www.maths.usyd.edu.au/u/don/code/Magma/GUConjugacy.pdf
- [36] G.. Wall “On the conjugacy classes in the unitary, symplectic and orthogonal groups” In J. Austral. Math. Soc. 3, 1963, pp. 1–62
- [37] Joseph L. Yucas and Gary L. Mullen “Self-reciprocal irreducible polynomials over finite fields” In Des. Codes Cryptogr. 33.3, 2004, pp. 275–281