This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Robustness of Helical Hinge States of Weak Second-Order Topological Insulators

C. Wang [email protected] Center for Joint Quantum Studies and Department of Physics, School of Science, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China    X. R. Wang [email protected] Physics Department, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST), Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong HKUST Shenzhen Research Institute, Shenzhen 518057, China
Abstract

Robustness of helical hinge states of three-dimensional weak second-order topological insulators (WSOTIs) against disorders is studied. The pure WSOTI is obtained from a weak 2\mathbb{Z}_{2} first-order topological insulator through a surface band inversion. Both bulk states and surface states in the WSOTI are gapped, and in-gap valley-momentum locked helical hinge states are topologically protected by the surface valley-Chern number. In the presence of weak disorders, helical hinge states are robust against disorders while the quantized conductance of the states is fragile due to the inter-valley scattering. As disorder increases, the system undergoes a series of quantum phase transitions: from the WSOTI to the weak first-order topological insulator, then to a diffusive metal and finally to an Anderson insulator. Our results thus fully establish the WSOTI phase as a genuine state of matters and open a door for the second-order valleytronics that allows one to control the valley degree of freedom through helical hinge states.

Introduction.-Topological insulators (TIs) characterized by topological invariants and robust boundary states have attracted great interest because of their exotic properties. The band invention resulting in non-zero Chern numbers of a band is the central theme of topological materials. The non-zero topological invariants give rise to a bulk-boundary correspondence and the necessity of gapless boundary states in the band gap. The standard paradigm of the first-order TIs (FOTIs) claims that a dd-dimensional insulator with band inversion has (d1)(d-1)-dimensional in-gap boundary states haldane_prl_1988 ; kane_prl_2005 ; kane_prl_20051 ; bernevig_science_2006 ; konig_science_2007 ; Roth_science_2009 ; hasan_rmp_2010 ; Moore_nature_2010 ; qi_rmp_2011 ; chang_science_2013 . In three-dimensions (3D), FOTIs are strong (weak) when the number of surface Dirac cones is odd (even). A weak FOTI (WFOTI) has zero principle 2\mathbb{Z}_{2} index ν0\nu_{0}, at least one non-zero weak indexes (ν1,ν2,ν3)(\nu_{1},\nu_{2},\nu_{3}), and an even number of Dirac cones on surfaces not perpendicular to (ν1,ν2,ν3)(\nu_{1},\nu_{2},\nu_{3}). With this understanding of FOTIs, most recent activities have been focused on higher-order TIs with a generalized bulk-boundary correspondence zhang_prl_2013 ; benalcazar_science_2017 ; peng_prb_2017 ; langbehn_prl_2017 ; song_prl_2017 ; schindler_sciadv_2018 ; ezawa_prl_2018 ; liu_prl_2019 ; Zhangrx_prl_2019 ; zhang_prl_2019 ; lee_prl_2019 ; varjas_prl_2019 ; luo_prl_2019 ; kudo_prl_2019 ; chen_pra_2019 ; Queiroz_prl_2019 ; li_npj_2019 ; chen_prl_2020 ; araki_prb_2019 ; su_cpb_2019 ; agarwala_prr_2020 ; agarwala_arxiv_2020 . The new paradigm is that, with band inversions on a dd-dimensional manifold and its sub-manifolds, gapped bands in the manifold and its sub-manifolds of dimensions larger than dnd-n can have gapless states in a boundary sub-manifold of dimension dnd-n. For example, a 3D second-order TI has gapless states on the sample hinges inside its bulk and surface band gaps benalcazar_science_2017 ; langbehn_prl_2017 ; song_prl_2017 ; schindler_sciadv_2018 ; liu_prl_2019 ; Zhangrx_prl_2019 ; Queiroz_prl_2019 . These hinge states have been predicted and observed in real materials, e.g., bismuth crystals schindler_natphys_2018 and magnetic axion insulator Bi2-xSmxSe3 yue_natphys_2019 .

As a well-accepted paradigm, hinge states appear at the intersections of two surfaces of different topological classes when the surface Dirac cones of a 3D FOTI are gapped. Hinge states could be either chiral langbehn_prl_2017 or helical song_prl_2017 ; schindler_sciadv_2018 ; Zhangrx_prl_2019 ; Queiroz_prl_2019 , depending on whether the number of surface Dirac cones is odd or even. Robustness of those states against disorders is a fundamental issue because disorders exist inevitable in all materials and hinge states must survive in disorders in order to be a genuine state. Chiral hinge states can survive in random media due to the absence of backward scattering wang_arxiv_2020 , while inter-spin/valley scatterings are allowed in helical hinge states and may result in the disappearance of these states through Anderson localizations at an infinitesimally weak disorder. The occurrence of this scenario, however, contradicts a general belief that the in-gap hinge states should persist at finite disorders until the surface state gap closes sheng_prl_2006 ; li_prl_2009 ; trifunovic_prx_2019 . Hence, whether disorder-induced backward scatterings can destroy the helical hinge states is not clear and should be examined.

In this letter, we report a weak second-order TI (WSOTI) generated from a WFOTI through band inversion of surface states and with mirror symmetry. Different from other reported helical hinge states song_prl_2017 ; Zhangrx_prl_2019 ; schindler_sciadv_2018 ; Queiroz_prl_2019 that lock the momentum with spins, carriers in different valleys of WSOTIs move to the opposite directions along a hinge. In clean cases, such helical hinge states are characterized by the quantized valley-Chern number. They survive in the presence of weak but finite disorders, similar to the surface states in WFOTIs. Helical hinge states can be identified by the dominate occupation probability on hinges and negligible occupation probability in the bulks and on the surfaces. With increasing disorders, a gap-closing transition from WSOTI to WFOTI happens at a critical disorder Wc1W_{c1} at which gaps of surface Dirac cones close. Moreover, with further increasing disorders from Wc1W_{c1}, the WFOTI becomes a diffusive metal (DM), and finally an Anderson insulator (AI). Electronic transport through helical hinge states is also studied. We find that the quantum resistance is the sum of an intrinsic contribution from the topological states and an extrinsic part from the inter-valley scatterings that is proportional to system sizes. These results cast the authenticity of helical hinge states that provide a way to manipulate the valley degree of freedom.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: (a) Schematic plot of a WSOTI. Hinge states (black arrows) of different valleys are antiparallel. (b) Energy spectrum E(k3)E(k_{3}) of Eq. (1) for M=t,B=0.2tM=t,B=0.2t. Colors encode log10p2\log_{10}p_{2}. Red dotted line locates E=0.02tE=0.02t. (b) Spatial distribution of the in-gap helical states k3=ka,b,c,dk_{3}=k_{a,b,c,d} shown in (b). Colors encode log10|ψ𝒊|2\log_{10}|\psi_{\bm{i}}|^{2}.

Clean WSOTI.-A clean WSOTI can be modelled by the following Hamiltonian in the momentum space

hbulk(𝒌)=tsink2Γ1+(Mt(cosk2+cosk3))Γ2+tsink3Γ3+tsink1Γ4+BΓ31.\begin{gathered}h_{\text{bulk}}(\bm{k})=t\sin k_{2}\Gamma^{1}+(M-t(\cos k_{2}+\cos k_{3}))\Gamma^{2}\\ +t\sin k_{3}\Gamma^{3}+t\sin k_{1}\Gamma^{4}+B\Gamma^{31}.\end{gathered} (1)

Here, Γμ=1,2,3,4,5=(s1σ1,s2σ1,s3σ1,I2σ3,I2σ2)\Gamma^{\mu=1,2,3,4,5}=(s_{1}\otimes\sigma_{1},s_{2}\otimes\sigma_{1},s_{3}\otimes\sigma_{1},I_{2}\otimes\sigma_{3},I_{2}\otimes\sigma_{2}) are the four-by-four non-unique gamma matrices with sμs_{\mu} and σμ\sigma_{\mu} being the Pauli matrices acting on spin and orbital spaces, respectively. I𝒟I_{\mathcal{D}} is the identity matrix of dimension 𝒟\mathcal{D}. Hopping energy t=1t=1 is chosen as the energy unit. Equation (1) is invariant under the reflection symmetry of Γ54=I2σ1\Gamma^{54}=I_{2}\otimes\sigma_{1}, i.e., Γ54h(k1,k2,k3)Γ54=h(k1,k2,k3)\Gamma^{54}h(k_{1},k_{2},k_{3})\Gamma^{54}=h(-k_{1},k_{2},k_{3}). For B=0B=0 and M(0,2)M\in(0,2), Eq. (1) is a reflection-symmetric WFOTI with the reflection plane on x=0x=0 and characterized by the 2\mathbb{Z}_{2} indexes (ν0,ν1ν2ν3)=(0,001)(\nu_{0},\nu_{1}\nu_{2}\nu_{3})=(0,001) fu_prb_2007 ; chiu_prb_2013 ; morimoto_prb_2013 . Such 2\mathbb{Z}_{2} index guarantees two Dirac cones on the surfaces not perpendicular to the vector (0,0,1)(0,0,1), e.g., yzyz-facets. For B>0B>0, the last term within the surface state subspace acts like an effective Dirac mass langbehn_prl_2017 . To see it, we derive the low-energy effective Hamiltonian of the surface Dirac cones on the yzyz-facets with open boundary condition (OBC) applied in the xx-direction. Such effective Hamiltonian, expanded around two Dirac cones (valleys) 𝑲=(0,0)\bm{K}=(0,0) and 𝑲=(±π,±π)\bm{K}^{\prime}=(\pm\pi,\pm\pi), reads (See Supplemental Materials supp )

hsurface(𝒑=(p2,p3))=[h𝕊(𝒑)00𝒯h𝕊(𝒑)𝒯1]\begin{gathered}h_{\text{surface}}(\bm{p}_{\parallel}=(p_{2},p_{3}))=\begin{bmatrix}h_{\mathbb{S}}(\bm{p}_{\parallel})&0\\ 0&\mathcal{T}h_{\mathbb{S}}(\bm{p}_{\parallel})\mathcal{T}^{-1}\end{bmatrix}\end{gathered} (2)

with h𝕊(𝒑)=tp2τ1+tp3τ3+(Bt2p22/2)τ2h_{\mathbb{S}}(\bm{p}_{\parallel})=tp_{2}\tau_{1}+tp_{3}\tau_{3}+(B-t^{\prime 2}p^{2}_{2}/2)\tau_{2}. τ1,2,3\tau_{1,2,3} are the Pauli matrices in the basis of the zero-energy surface states wave functions. The upper and lower blocks are for 𝑲\bm{K} and 𝑲\bm{K}^{\prime} related by the pseudo- time-reversal symmetry represented by 𝒯=iτ2𝒞\mathcal{T}=-i\tau_{2}\mathcal{C} with 𝒞\mathcal{C} being complex conjugate. In what follows, we denote 𝑲\bm{K} and 𝑲\bm{K}^{\prime} by ηi=±1\eta_{i}=\pm 1. If the two facets are separated by a distance, the Newton mass tt^{\prime} decays exponentially with the distance such that the band inversion is prevented. While, if they encounter at the reflection plane x=0x=0, t=t/2t^{\prime}=t/2. Equation (2) has been widely used to describe quantum spin Hall systems, e.g. HgTe/CdTe quantum well, where the helical states come in Kramer pairs with spin-momentum locked bernevig_science_2006 . Analogously, we expect helical states appear on the reflection plane as well but with a valley-momentum locked, i.e., electrons in hinge channels that behave as massless relativistic particles with a given valley pseudo-spin is locked to its propagating direction, see Fig. 1(a).

Figure 1(b) shows the energy spectrum E(k3)E(k_{3}) of model (1) on a rectangle sample of size L/2×L/2×LL_{\parallel}/\sqrt{2}\times L_{\parallel}/\sqrt{2}\times L_{\perp} with periodic boundary condition (PBC) in zz-direction and OBCs on surfaces perpendicular to (110)(110) and (11¯0)(1\bar{1}0). Colors in Fig. 1(b) encode the common logarithmic of participation ratio, defined as 𝒫2(E)=1/𝒊|ψ𝒊(E)|4\mathcal{P}_{2}(E)=1/\sum_{\bm{i}}|\psi_{\bm{i}}(E)|^{4}. Here |ψ𝒊(E)||\psi_{\bm{i}}(E)| is the normalized wave function amplitude of energy EE at site 𝒊\bm{i}. 𝒫2\mathcal{P}_{2} measures the number of sites occupied by state of EE wang_pra_1989 ; wang_prl_2015 ; pixley_prl_2015 and allows one to distinguish hinge states from the bulk and surface states easily. Clearly, for M=tM=t and B=0.2tB=0.2t, two pairs of gapless hinge modes appear. Those near k3=0k_{3}=0 (k3=πk_{3}=\pi) are described by the up (down) block of Eq. (2) supp . Wave function distributions of four specific hinge states ka,b,c,dk_{a,b,c,d} of energy E=0.02tE=0.02t are shown in Fig. 1(c). States of kak_{a} and kbk_{b} (kck_{c} and kdk_{d}), respectively propagating along ±z\pm z-directions, are localized on the same hinge x=0,y=L/2x=0,y=L_{\parallel}/2 (x=0,y=L/2x=0,y=-L_{\parallel}/2).

In quantum spin Hall systems where spin szs_{z} is a good quantum number, spin-Chern numbers play the role of topological invariant. Similarly, we employ the valley-Chern number CvalleyC_{\text{valley}} to measure the topology of the surface states in clean limit that tells the emergence of helical hinge states. CvalleyC_{\text{valley}}, widely used in layered-graphene systems by studying the valley Hall effect zhang_prl_2011 ; ezawa_prb_2013 ; zhang_pnas_2013 , is defined as

Cvalley=C𝑲C𝑲\begin{gathered}C_{\text{valley}}=C_{\bm{K}}-C_{\bm{K}^{\prime}}\end{gathered} (3)

with C𝑲C_{\bm{K}} and C𝑲C_{\bm{K}^{\prime}} being the valley-Chern number for 𝑲\bm{K} and 𝑲\bm{K}^{\prime}, respectively. The summation of the Berry curvature over all occupied states of electrons in a valley ηi\eta_{i} gives Cηi=ηisgn[B]/2=±1/2C_{\eta_{i}}=\eta_{i}\text{sgn}[B]/2=\pm 1/2 supp . Thus, the valley-Chern number is quantized to 1.

Stability against disorders.-To study the robustness of the helical hinge states against disorders, we add a random on-site potential V=𝒊c𝒊v𝒊I4c𝒊V=\sum_{\bm{i}}c^{\dagger}_{\bm{i}}v_{\bm{i}}I_{4}c_{\bm{i}} to the lattice model of Hamiltonian Eq. (1), where c𝒊c^{\dagger}_{\bm{i}} (c𝒊c_{\bm{i}}) is the electron creation (annihilation) operator at site 𝒊\bm{i}. v𝒊v_{\bm{i}} distributes randomly in the range of [W/2,W/2][-W/2,W/2]. Disorders break the lattice translational symmetry so that CvalleyC_{\text{valley}} is not good any more. Yet, we can still use the L=L=LL_{\parallel}=L_{\perp}=L dependence of ηW,L(E)=𝒊Hinge|ψ𝒊,E(W,L)|2\eta_{W,L}(E)=\langle\sum_{\bm{i}\in\text{Hinge}}|\psi_{\bm{i},E}(W,L)|^{2}\rangle to characterize hinge states, where the sum is over all the lattice sites on two hinges of x=0,y=±L/2x=0,y=\pm L/2 and \langle\cdots\rangle denotes ensemble average. ηW,L(E)\eta_{W,L}(E) measures the distribution on the hinges. Naturally, for states with dominated occupation probability on hinges, ηW,L(E)\eta_{W,L}(E) approaches a finite value for L1L\gg 1; while for surface and bulk states, ηW,L(E)\eta_{W,L}(E) should decrease with LL algebraically.

Refer to caption
Figure 2: (a) ηW,L\eta_{W,L} as a function of WW for various LL. (b) ρ(E)\rho(E) for L=200L=200 and various WW: solid (dash) lines are for W<Wc1W<W_{c1} (W>Wc1W>W_{c1}). Here, M=tM=t, B=0.2tB=0.2t, and L=L=LL_{\parallel}=L_{\perp}=L.

Let us focus on E=0E=0. The obtained ηW,L\eta_{W,L} as a function of WW for various LL are shown in Fig. 2(a) wf ; kwant ; scipy . Apparently, there exists a critical disorder Wc1/t1.2±0.2W_{c1}/t\simeq 1.2\pm 0.2 below which all curves merge and form a plateau at ηW,L0.65\eta_{W,L}\simeq 0.65, see the orange line. Mergence and plateau of ηW,L\eta_{W,L} are strong indications of helical hinge states at a finite disorder. For W>Wc1W>W_{c1}, ηW,L\eta_{W,L} decreases with LL. As shown below, they are surface states for W>Wc1W>W_{c1}, featured by a finite size-independent occupation probability on surfaces as LL\to\infty.

More insights can be obtained by investigating how disorders affect the gap of surface states through the self-consistent Born approximation (SCBA) chen_prl_2015 ; liu_prl_2016 , where the self-energy is given by

Σ=W2/(48π2)BZ[(E+i0)I4hsurface(𝒑)Σ]1𝑑𝒑.\begin{gathered}\Sigma=W^{2}/(48\pi^{2})\int_{\text{BZ}}[(E+i0)I_{4}-h_{\text{surface}}(\bm{p}_{\parallel})-\Sigma]^{-1}d\bm{p}_{\parallel}.\end{gathered} (4)

We write Σ\Sigma as Σ=Σ0I4+μ=15Σμγμ\Sigma=\Sigma_{0}I_{4}+\sum^{5}_{\mu=1}\Sigma_{\mu}\gamma^{\mu} with γ1,2,3,4,5=(τ1I2,τ3I2,τ2σ3,τ2σ3,τ1σ3,τ3σ3)\gamma^{1,2,3,4,5}=(\tau_{1}\otimes I_{2},\tau_{3}\otimes I_{2},\tau_{2}\otimes\sigma_{3},\tau_{2}\otimes\sigma_{3},\tau_{1}\otimes\sigma_{3},\tau_{3}\otimes\sigma_{3}). For E=0E=0, Σ1,3,4,5=0\Sigma_{1,3,4,5}=0 and Σ0\Sigma_{0} is a pure imaginary number, i.e., Σ0=i(1/τ)\Sigma_{0}=i(-1/\tau). Then, we obtain supp ; shindou_prb_2009

1τ=1τW248π2t2BZd𝒑p22+p32+(B~p22/4)21/τ2,\begin{gathered}\dfrac{1}{\tau}=\dfrac{1}{\tau}\dfrac{W^{2}}{48\pi^{2}t^{2}}\int_{\text{BZ}}\dfrac{d\bm{p}_{\parallel}}{p^{2}_{2}+p^{2}_{3}+(\tilde{B}-p^{2}_{2}/4)^{2}-1/\tau^{2}},\end{gathered} (5)

where the Dirac mass is renormalized as B~=B+Σ2\tilde{B}=B+\Sigma_{2}. Here, τ\tau is the life-time of the zero-energy surface states, i.e., ρsurface(E=0)1/τ\rho_{\text{surface}}(E=0)\propto 1/\tau. For W<Wc1W<W_{c1}, 1/τ=01/\tau=0 and surface states are gapped at E=0E=0. While for W>Wc1W>W_{c1}, finite τ\tau solutions are allowed and ρsurface(E=0)0\rho_{\text{surface}}(E=0)\neq 0. Thus, with increasing WW, we expect the WSOTI undergoes a gap-closing transition at the critical disorder Wc1W_{c1} whose approximate solution is determined from Eq. (5) with B~=B\tilde{B}=B is Wc1=t(24π/(ln[162/B]))1/2W_{c1}=t(24\pi/(\ln[16\sqrt{2}/B]))^{1/2} supp . The closed-form solution indicates that Wc1W_{c1} increases with BB, which measures the width of surface gap, and explains qualitatively Fig. 2(a).

Refer to caption
Figure 3: (a) R\langle R\rangle as a function of WW for L=L=L=16,20,24,32L_{\perp}=L_{\parallel}=L=16,20,24,32 (from down to up). (b) R\langle R\rangle versus LL_{\perp} for W/t=0.3,0.5,1,0.8,1.2W/t=0.3,0.5,1,0.8,1.2 (from down to up) and L=10L_{\parallel}=10. Dot lines are fitted by Eq. (6). Inset: The obtained LmL_{m} as a function WW. Black solid line is a fit of Lm=ct2/W2L_{m}=ct^{2}/W^{2} with c=92c=92. Cyan dash lines locate the intrinsic resistance h/(2Cvalleye2)h/(2C_{\text{valley}}e^{2}). Here, M=tM=t and B=0.2tB=0.2t.

Dispersion relation of the hinge states in clean limit is linear in p3p_{3} near two valleys (see Supplemental Materials supp ). Since disorders do not change the linear dispersion relation within the framework of SCBA, we expect a constant density of helical hinge states for |E|<Δ1|E|<\Delta_{1} with Δ1\Delta_{1} being the gap of surface states for W<Wc1W<W_{c1}. This behavior is confirmed by numerical calculations of the average density of states (DOS), defined as ρ(E)=(q=18L3δ(EEq))/(8L3)\rho(E)=\langle(\sum^{8L^{3}}_{q=1}\delta(E-E_{q}))\rangle/(8L^{3}) with EqE_{q} being the eigenvalues of the systems. We calculate ρ(E)\rho(E) through the kernel polynomial method kpm ; DOS and plot those for L=200L=200 and various W/tW/t from 0.3 to 1.8 in Fig. 2(b). Indeed, ρ(E)\rho(E) is independent of WW and EE within |E|<Δ1|E|<\Delta_{1} and W<Wc1W<W_{c1}, while Δ1\Delta_{1} decreases with WW. For W>Wc11.2tW>W_{c1}\simeq 1.2t, the constant ρ(E)\rho(E) fades, and ρ(E=0)\rho(E=0) increases with WW. Hence, the constant DOS can be another fingerprint of the helical hinge states, akin to chiral hinge states wang_arxiv_2020 .

Electronic transport.-We have also investigated the electronic transport through helical hinge states by using the Landauer-Bttiker formula conductance ; macKinnon_zphb_1985 to calculate the two-terminal resistance RR of the Hall bar connected by two semi-infinite leads along zz-direction. We focus on W<Wc1W<W_{c1} and E=0E=0. Figure 3(a) plots the R\langle R\rangle versus WW for various L=L=LL_{\parallel}=L_{\perp}=L. For W=0W=0, RR displays perfect quantum plateau at h/(2e2)h/(2e^{2}). In the presence of disorders, R\langle R\rangle notably increases with WW and LL, even for very small disorders. Furthermore, we investigate how R\langle R\rangle depends on system sizes. Figure 3(b) shows R\langle R\rangle as a function of LL_{\perp} for various WW and a fixed LL_{\parallel}. We find that R\langle R\rangle is linearly increased with LL_{\perp} and can be well described by the following formula

R=he2(12Cvalley+LLm)\begin{gathered}\langle R\rangle=\dfrac{h}{e^{2}}\left(\dfrac{1}{2C_{\text{valley}}}+\dfrac{L_{\perp}}{L_{m}}\right)\end{gathered} (6)

with LmL_{m} being a characteristics length, but independent of LL_{\parallel}, see data in Supplemental Materials supp . Remarkably, very similar features have also been observed in quantum spin Hall systems with spin dephasings jiang_prl_2009 .

Equation (6) can be understood as follows. Unlike chiral hinge states, helical hinge states always suffer from the inter-valley scattering caused by short-range disorders such that the resistance plateau at W=0W=0 are destroyed. Indeed, one can treat Eq. (6) as a combination of an intrinsic resistance h/(2Cvalleye2)h/(2C_{\text{valley}}e^{2}) coming from the non-trivial topology of surface states and an extrinsic resistance due to the inter-valley scattering. The latter should be proportional to LL_{\perp} and independent of LL_{\parallel}. While, LmL_{m} is a length acting like mean free length, i.e., LmvgτmL_{m}\sim v_{g}\tau_{m} with 1/τm1/\tau_{m} being the inter-valley scattering rate and vgv_{g} being the group velocity. Through Fermi Golden rule, we obtain Lmt2/W2L_{m}\sim t^{2}/W^{2} (see Supplemental Materials supp ), which accords well with numerical data, as shown in the inset of Fig. 3(b).

Refer to caption
Figure 4: (a) ρbulk(E)\rho_{\text{bulk}}(E) for various W>Wc1W>W_{c1} and L=L=L=200L=L_{\parallel}=L_{\perp}=200. Solid (dash) lines are for W<Wc2W<W_{c2} (W>Wc2W>W_{c2}). (b) ζW,L\zeta_{W,L} versus WW for various L=L=LL=L_{\parallel}=L_{\perp}. Here, M=tM=t and B=0.2tB=0.2t.

Strong disorders.-To have a complete picture, we study the fate of WSOTIs under stronger disorders. For W>Wc1W>W_{c1}, the surface energy gap Δ1\Delta_{1} is closed while the bulk energy gap Δ2\Delta_{2} remains finite. The system becomes a WFOTI. The conclusion is confirmed by demonstrating that the mid-bulk-gap states are localized on the surfaces. Akin to WSOTIs, WFOTIs survive up to a higher disorder Wc2W_{c2} at which Δ2=0\Delta_{2}=0 and the system transforms into a DM beyond Wc2W_{c2}. Figure 4(a) shows the calculated density of bulk states ρbulk(E)\rho_{\text{bulk}}(E), obtained by applying with PBCs on all directions so that no surface and hinge states are allowed, for various disorders W>Wc1W>W_{c1}. Clearly, there is always a finite bulk gap for W<Wc23tW<W_{c2}\simeq 3t. Also, these results demonstrate that the non-zero ρ(E)\rho(E) around E=0E=0 for W>Wc1W>W_{c1} shown in Fig. 2(b) is from the contributions of surface states.

Stronger evidence of the WFOTI-DM transition is given in Fig. 4(b), which displays ζW,L=𝒊Surface|ψ𝒊,E=0(W,L)|2\zeta_{W,L}=\langle\sum_{\bm{i}\in\text{Surface}}|\psi_{\bm{i},E=0}(W,L)|^{2}\rangle as a function of WW for various L=L=LL_{\parallel}=L_{\perp}=L. One should not be confused ζW,L\zeta_{W,L}, the distribution of state E=0E=0 on surfaces, with ηW,L\eta_{W,L} of the distribution on hinges. The identification of the nature of state E=0E=0 thus can be guided by the following observations: (1) For hinge and surface states, ζW,L\zeta_{W,L} proceeds toward a finite constant in LL\to\infty; (2) For bulk states, ζW,L\zeta_{W,L} decreases with LL and scales with LL as 1/L1/L for large enough systems. Following such criteria, we determine Wc23tW_{c2}\simeq 3t such that the system is a WFOTI for Wc2>WWc1W_{c2}>W\geq W_{c1}, while becomes a DM for WWc2W\geq W_{c2}.

Anderson localization occurs at an extremely strong disorders Wc3>Wc2W_{c3}>W_{c2}, and the system becomes an insulator for W>Wc3W>W_{c3}. We numerically determine Wc3/t=20±1W_{c3}/t=20\pm 1 and the critical exponent ν=1.5±0.1\nu=1.5\pm 0.1 through the finite-size scaling analysis of the ensemble-average PR, 𝒫2(E=0)\mathcal{P}_{2}(E=0), see Supplemental Materials supp . The obtained critical exponent ν\nu is closed to that of Gaussian unitary ensemble established before wang_arxiv_2020 ; kawarabayashi_prb_1998 .

Material relevance.-The WSOTI is a direct consequence of the band inversion of surface states of WFOTIs. Remarkably, a recent experiment verified the emergency of WFOTI phase in quasi-one-dimensional bismuth iodide with the same Z2Z_{2}-index studied here noguchi_nature_2019 . Besides, it is found that band inversion of surface states can happen in bismuth with respect to certain crystal symmetries schindler_natphys_2018 ; yue_natphys_2019 . We thus expect bismuth is an ideal material to search for the helical hinge states. Rather than electronic systems, WSOTIs may be also found in other systems like photons, where the WFOTI has already been visualized yang_nature_2019 and a band inversion can be artificially induced in principle.

Conclusion.-In short, we have theoretically demonstrated the genuineness of WSOTIs with valley-momentum locked helical hinge states. Such hinge states are featured by the quantized valley-Chern number in clean limit and are robust against disorders until the band gap of surface states collapses. However, the normal quantized conductance of 1D channel is destroyed by disorders. With further increasing disorder, quantum transitions from WSOTI to WFOTI and from WFOTI to DM happen in order. At very strong disorders, the system becomes a insulator through the Anderson localization transition.

Acknowledgements.
This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants No. 11774296, 11704061 and 11974296) and Hong Kong RGC (Grants No. 16301518 and 16301619). CW acknowledges the kindly help from Jie Lu.

References

  • (1) F. D. M. Haldane, Model for a Quantum Hall Effect without Landau Levels: Condensed-Matter Realization of the “Parity Anomaly”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2015 (1988).
  • (2) C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele, Z2{Z}_{2} Topological Order and the Quantum Spin Hall Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 146802 (2005).
  • (3) C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele, Quantum Spin Hall Effect in Graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 226801 (2005).
  • (4) B. A. Bernevig, T. L. Hughes, and S.-C. Zhang, Quantum Spin Hall Effect and Topological Phase Transition in HgTe Quantum Wells, Science 314, 1757 (2006).
  • (5) M. König, S. Wiedmann, C. Bröune, A. Roth, H. Buhmann, L. W. Molenkamp, X.-L. Qi, and S.-C. Zhang, Quantum Spin Hall Insulator State in HgTe Quantum Wells, Science 318, 766 (2007).
  • (6) A. Roth, C. Brüne, H. Buhmann, L. W. Molenkamp, J. Maciejko, X.-L. Qi, S.-C. Zhang, Nonlocal Transport in the Quantum Spin Hall State, Science 325, 294 (2009).
  • (7) M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Colloquium: Topological insulators, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045 (2010).
  • (8) J. E. Moore, The birth of topological insulators, Nature (London) 464, 194 (2010).
  • (9) X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Topological insulators and superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057 (2011).
  • (10) C.-Z. Chang, J. Zhang, X. Feng, J. Shen, Z. Zhang, M. Guo, K. Li, Y. Ou, P. Wei, L.-L. Wang, Z.-Q. Ji, Y. Feng, S. Ji, X. Chen, J. Jia, X. Dai, Z. Fang, S.-C. Zhang, K. He, Y. Wang1, L. Lu, X.-C. Ma, Q.-K. Xue, Experimental Observation of the Quantum Anomalous Hall Effect in a Magnetic Topological Insulator, Science 340, 167 (2013).
  • (11) F. Zhang, C.L. Kane, and E.J. Mele, Surface State Magnetization and Chiral Edge States on Topological Insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 046404 (2013).
  • (12) W. A. Benalcazar, B. A. Bernevig, and T. L. Hughes, Quantized electric multipole insulators, Science 357, 61 (2017).
  • (13) Y. Peng, Y. Bao, and F. von Oppen, Boundary Green functions of topological insulators and superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 95, 235143 (2017).
  • (14) J. Langbehn, Y. Peng, L. Trifunovic, F. von Oppen, and P. W. Brouwer, Reflection-Symmetric Second-Order Topological Insulators and Superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 246401 (2017).
  • (15) Z. Song, Z. Fang, and C. Fang, (d2)(d-2)-Dimensional Edge States of Rotation Symmetry Protected Topological States, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 246402 (2017).
  • (16) F. Schindler, A. M. Cook, M. G. Vergniory, Z. Wang, S. S. P. Parkin, B. A. Bernevig, and T. Neupert, Higher-Order Topological Insulators, Sci. Adv. 4, eaat0346 (2018).
  • (17) M. Ezawa, Higher-Order Topological Insulators and Semimetals on the Breathing Kagome and Pyrochlore Lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 026801 (2018).
  • (18) T. Liu, Y.-R. Zhang, Q. Ai, Z. Gong, K. Kawabata, M. Ueda, and F. Nori, Second-Order Topological Phases in Non-Hermitian Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 076801 (2019).
  • (19) R.-X. Zhang, W. S. Cole, and S. Das Sarma, Helical Hinge Majorana Modes in Iron-Based Superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 187001 (2019).
  • (20) Z. Zhang, M. R. Lopez, Y. Cheng, X. Liu, and J. Christensen, Non-Hermitian Sonic Second-Order Topological Insulator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 195501 (2019).
  • (21) C. H. Lee, L. Li, and J. Gong, Hybrid Higher-Order Skin-Topological Modes in Nonreciprocal Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 016805 (2019).
  • (22) R. Queiroz and A. Stern, Splitting the Hinge Mode of Higher-Order Topological Insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 036802 (2019).
  • (23) X.-W. Luo and C. Zhang, Higher-Order Topological Corner States Induced by Gain and Loss, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 073601 (2019).
  • (24) D. Varjas, A. Lau, K. Pöyhönen, A. R. Akhmerov, D. I. Pikulin, and I. C. Fulga, Topological Phases without Crystalline Counterparts, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 196401 (2019).
  • (25) K. Kudo, T. Yoshida, and Y. Hatsugai, Higher-Order Topological Mott Insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 196402 (2019).
  • (26) H. Chen and X. C. Xie, Interaction-driven topological switch in a PP-band honeycomb lattice, Phys. Rev. A 100, 013601 (2019).
  • (27) H. Araki, T. Mizoguchi, and Y. Hatsugai, Phase diagram of a disordered higher-order topological insulator: A machine learning study, Phys. Rev. B 99, 085406 (2019).
  • (28) Z.-X. Li, Y. Cao, P. Yan, X. R. Wang, Higher-order topological solitonic insulators, npj Comput. Mater. 5, 107 (2019).
  • (29) Z. Su, Y. Kang, B. Zhang, Z. Zhang, and H. Jiang, Disorder induced phase transition in magnetic higher-order topological insulator: A machine learning study, Chin. Phys. B 28, 117301 (2019).
  • (30) R. Chen, C.-Z. Chen, J.-H. Gao, B. Zhou, and D.-H. Xu, Higher-Order Topological Insulators in Quasicrystals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 036803 (2020).
  • (31) A. Agarwala, V. Juričić, and B. Roy, Higher-order topological insulators in amorphous solids, Phys. Rev. Research 2, 012067(R) (2020).
  • (32) A. Agarwala and B. Roy, Higher-order topological insulators in amorphous solids, arXiv:2002.09475.
  • (33) F. Schindler, Z. Wang, M. G. Vergniory, A. M. Cook, A. Murani, S. Sengupta, A. Y. Kasumov, R. Deblock, S. Jeon, I. Drozdov, H. Bouchiat, S. Guéron, A. Yazdani, B. A. Bernevig, and T. Neupert, Higher-order topology in bismuth, Nat. Phys. 14, 918 (2018)
  • (34) C. Yue, Y. Xu, Z. Song, H Weng, Y.-M. Lu, C. Fang, and X. Dai, Symmetry-enforced chiral hinge states and surface quantum anomalous Hall effect in the magnetic axion insulator Bi2–xSmxSe3, Nat. Phys. 15, 577 (2019).
  • (35) C. Wang and X. R. Wang, arXiv:2005.06740v2.
  • (36) D. N. Sheng, Z. Y. Weng, L. Sheng, and F. D. M. Haldane, Quantum Spin-Hall Effect and Topologically Invariant Chern Numbers Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 036808 (2006).
  • (37) J. Li, R.-L. Chu, J. K. Jain, and S.-Q. Shen, Topological Anderson Insulator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 136806 (2009).
  • (38) L. Trifunovic and P. W. Brouwer, Higher-Order Bulk-Boundary Correspondence for Topological Crystalline Phases, Phys. Rev. X 9, 011012 (2019).
  • (39) L. Fu and C. L. Kane, Topological insulators with inversion symmetry, Phys. Rev. B 76, 045302 (2007).
  • (40) C.-K. Chiu, H. Yao, and S. Ryu, Classification of topological insulators and superconductors in the presence of reflection symmetry, Phys. Rev. B 88, 075142 (2013).
  • (41) T. Morimoto and A. Furusaki, Topological classification with additional symmetries from Clifford algebras, Phys. Rev. B 88, 125129 (2013).
  • (42) See Supplemental Materials at http://link.aps.org/supplemental.
  • (43) X. R. Wang, Y. Shapir, and M. Rubinstein, Analysis of multiscaling structure in diffusion-limited aggregation: A kinetic renormalization-group approach, Phys. Rev. A 39, 5974 (1989).
  • (44) C. Wang, Y. Su, Y. Avishai, Y. Meir, and X. R. Wang, Band of Critical States in Anderson Localization in a Strong Magnetic Field with Random Spin-Orbit Scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 096803 (2015).
  • (45) J.H. Pixley, P. Goswami, and S. Das Sarma, Anderson Localization and the Quantum Phase Diagram of Three Dimensional Disordered Dirac Semimetals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 076601 (2015).
  • (46) F. Zhang, J. Jung, G. A. Fiete, Q. Niu, and A. H. MacDonald, Spontaneous Quantum Hall States in Chirally Stacked Few-Layer Graphene Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 156801 (2011)
  • (47) M. Ezawa, Topological Kirchhoff law and bulk-edge correspondence for valley Chern and spin-valley Chern numbers, Phys. Rev. B 88, 161406 (2013).
  • (48) F. Zhang, A. H. MacDonaldb, and E. J. Melea, Valley Chern numbers and boundary modes in gapped bilayer graphene, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (USA) 110, 10546 (2013).
  • (49) We use the retarded Lanczos method to find the eigenfunction of the nearest level around E=0E=0 of the disordered bar and calculate ηW,L\eta_{W,L} and ζW,L\zeta_{W,L} accordingly. In our scenario, we first use the KWANT package kwant to construct a Hamiltonian matrix HH out of tight-binding model Eq. (1). We then solve the eigenequation Hψ=EψH\psi=E\psi using the SCIPY library scipy to obtain the required eigenenergies and eigenfunctions.
  • (50) C. W. Groth, M. Wimmer, A. R. Akhmerov, and X. Waintal, Kwant: A software package for quantum transport, New J. Phys. 16, 063065 (2014).
  • (51) P. Virtanen, R. Gommers, T. E. Oliphant, M. Haberland, T. Reddy, D. Cournapeau, E. Burovski, P. Peterson, W. Weckesser, J. Bright et al., SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python, Nat. Methods 17, 261 (2020).
  • (52) C.-Z. Chen, J. Song, H. Jiang, Q.-F. Sun, Z. Wang, and X. C. Xie Disorder and Metal-Insulator Transitions in Weyl Semimetals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 246603 (2015).
  • (53) S. Liu, T. Ohtsuki, and R. Shindou, Effect of Disorder in a Three-Dimensional Layered Chern Insulator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 066401 (2016).
  • (54) R. Shindou and S. Murakami, Effects of disorder in three-dimensional Z2Z_{2} quantum spin Hall systems, Phys. Rev. B 79, 045321 (2009).
  • (55) A. Weiße, G. Wellein, A. Alvermann, and H. Fehske, The kernel polynomial method, Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 275 (2006).
  • (56) The average ρ(E)\rho(E) of the disordered bar of L=200L=200 for various WW that are obtained from 10 ensembles with 1024 Chebyshev moments.
  • (57) The dimensionless resistance of a disordered bar between two clean semi-infinite leads at a given Fermi level EE can be calculated by R=h/(e2Tr[TT])R=h/(e^{2}\text{Tr}[TT^{\dagger}]) with TT being the transmission matrix macKinnon_zphb_1985 .
  • (58) A. MacKinnon, The calculation of transport properties and density of states of disordered solids, Z. Phys. B 59, 385 (1985).
  • (59) H. Jiang, S. Cheng, Q.-f. Sun, and X. C. Xie, Topological Insulator: A New Quantized Spin Hall Resistance Robust to Dephasing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 036803 (2009).
  • (60) T. Kawarabayashi, B. Kramer, and T. Ohtsuki, Anderson transitions in three-dimensional disordered systems with randomly varying magnetic flux, Phys. Rev. B 57, 11842 (1998).
  • (61) R. Noguchi, T. Takahashi, K. Kuroda1, M. Ochi, T. Shirasawa, M. Sakano, C. Bareille, M. Nakayama, M. D. Watson, K. Yaji, et. al., A weak topological insulator state in quasi-onedimensional bismuth iodide, Nature 566, 518 (2019).
  • (62) Y. Yang, Z. Gao, H. Xue, L. Zhang, M. He, Z. Yang, R. Singh, Y. Chong, B. Zhang, and H. Chen, Realization of a three-dimensional photonic topological insulator, Nature 565, 622 (2019).