Robba’s method on Exponential sums
Abstract.
In this article, we use Robba’s method to give an estimate of the Newton polygon for the -function and we can draw the Newton polygon in some special cases.
1. Introduction
The basic objects of this study are exponential sums on a torus of dimension defined over a finite field with . Our methods are based on the work of Dwork, Adolphson and Sperber. In [4], Robba gives an explicit calculation of one variable twisted exponential sums. In fact, his method can be applied to the case of multi-variables.
Let be a primitive -th root of unity. Let be the additive character of given by . Let be a Laurent polynomial and write
We assume that for all . Define exponential sums
where are the extensions of of degree . The -function is defined by
In [1, section 2], Adolphson and Sperber use Dwork’s method to prove that is a polynomial when is nondegenerate. Moreover, they give a low bound of the Newton polygon of in [1, section 3], which we call Hodge polygon in this article. In our study, we want to give a more precise result about the Newton polygon when has only terms, that is . Note that if we assume that is invertible in , we can found a solution such that for all . From now on, we assume that , and
Let be the Newton polyhedron at of which is defined to be the convex hull in of the set and let be the convex cone generated by in . Let be the volume of with respect to Lebesgue measure on . We say is nondegenerate with respect to if for any face of not containing the origin, the Laurent polynomials , have no common zero in , where . Set . Note that implies that is nondegenerate. Since we have assumed that is invertible, any element can be uniquely written
(1.1) |
We define a weight on
Note that the set of all elements such that all in the expression (1.1) form a fundamental domain of the lattice . Denote it by . Note that and imply that has a natural -action. For any , define
where is the fractional part of for each . We say is -stable under weight function if for any . Now we give our main result.
Theorem 1.1.
Suppose that with and . The Newton polygon of coincides with the Hodge polygon of if and only if is -stable under weight function.
Wan uses the Gauss sum to give an explicit formula of the -function for the diagonal Laurent polynomial. Then he uses Stickelberger’s theorem to give a proof of above theorem. See [5, Theorem 3.4]. In this article, we use Robba’s method to prove above theorem. Indeed, Robba’s method can also be applied to prove [1, Theorem 3.10] and it is easier than the method used in [1, §3].
2. p-adic estimates
Let be the -adic numbers. Let be the completion of the algebraic closure of . Denote by “ord” the additive valuation on normalized by . The norm on is given by for any .
Note that there is an integer such that . In [1, section 1], Adolphson and Sperber introduce a filtration on given by
The associated graded ring is
where
For , let be the image of in . Let be the ideal generated by in . By [1, Theorem 2.14] and [1, Theorem 2.18], in form a regular sequence in and . For each integer , we have a decomposition
(2.1) |
Set =.
For a non-negative integer , set
Note that this is a finite number for each . Set
Lemma 2.1.
With the notation above. Suppose that is nondegenerate. Then for all integer . Moreover, we have
Proof.
Note that has a finite basis and .
Definition 2.2.
The Hodge polygon of is defined to be the convex polygon in with vertices and
Consider the Artin-Hasse exponential series: By [2, Lemma 4.1], the series has a zero at such that and . Set
The series is a splitting function in Dwork’s terminology [2, §4a]. In particular, we have , and . Fix an -th root of in . Let , and the ring of integers of . Let be the Techmüller lifting of and set
Consider the following spaces of -adic functions
Set . Define
Define an operator on formal Laurent series by
Let . For , define operators
By [1, Corollary 2.9], we have
By [1, Therorem 2.18, Theorem A.1], is a free basis of . For any , define by the relations
For any , define by the relations
The main purpose is to give estimate for the -adic valuations of the coefficients .
For any , there is a unique such that
Set .
Lemma 2.3.
For any , we have if , if .
Proof.
The first assertion follows from the facts that
and for any and . Suppose that . By [1, Proposition 3.1], there exit and such that
Hence, we have
∎
Proposition 2.4.
For any , we have
means that .
Proof.
Note that
By Lemma 2.3, when . Hence, we have
(2.2) |
Assume that with . Note that
where satisfies the equation
(2.3) |
If , the above equation has no integer solution which implies that . If , suppose that with for all . Note that for all and . By (2.3), we have for each . Hence, by Lemma 2.3 and the estimate , we have
If , there is some such that , we have
If , we have for all . Note that
We have for any . Hence
By (2.2), we have
∎
Theorem 2.5.
Suppose that and . The Newton polygon of coincides with the Hodge polygon if and only if is -stable under weight function.
Proof.
By [1, Corollary 3.11], the Newton polygon of lies above the Hodge polygon of with same endpoints and the matrix is invertible. By Proposition 2.4, if and only if . Hence there is exactly one non zero element in every column and row of . Let be the orbit of under the -action with exactly elements. Suppose that , where . By Proposition 2.4, we have
where . Thus
where the above product runs through all the obits of under the -action and with
Set and
Note that the Newton polygon of always lies above the Newton polygon of and the Newton polygon of the polynomial is . Hence coincides with the Newton polygon of if and only if the Newton polygons of and coincide for each .
When is -stable under weight function. We have for each . Hence, the Newton polygons of and coincides for each .
Conversely, if the Newton polygons of and coincide for each . Since both polygons have same endpoints, we have for each . Hence is -stable under weight function. ∎
References
- [1] Alan Adolphson and Steven Sperber. Exponential sums and Newton polyhedra: Cohomology and estimates. Annals of Mathematics, 130(2):367–406, 1989.
- [2] Bernard Dwork. On the zeta function of a hypersurface. Publications Mathématiques de l’IHÉS, 12:5–68, 1962.
- [3] Anatoli G Kouchnirenko. Polyedres de Newton et nombres de Milnor. Inventiones mathematicae, 32(1):1–31, 1976.
- [4] Philippe Robba. Index of -adic differential operators III. Application to twisted exponential sums. Astérisque, 119(120):191–266, 1984.
- [5] Daqing Wan. An Introduction to the theory of Newton polygons for L-functions of exponential sums, to appear. Preprint available at http://www. math. uci. edu/dwan/Overview. html, 1999.