Resonances as Viscosity Limits for Exponentially Decaying Potentials
Abstract
We show that the complex absorbing potential (CAP) method for computing scattering resonances applies to the case of exponentially decaying potentials. That means that the eigenvalues of , converge, as , to the poles of the meromorphic continuation of uniformly on compact subsets of , , .
1 Introduction
The complex absorbing potential (CAP) method has been used as a computational tool for finding scattering resonances – see Riss–Meyer RiMe and Seideman–Miller semi for an early treatment and Jagau et al Jag for some recent developments. For potentials the method was justified by Zworski Zw-vis . In xiong2020 the author extended it to potentials which are dilation analytic near infinity. In this paper we show that the CAP method is also valid for potentials which are exponentially decaying. While the key component of Zw-vis and xiong2020 was the method of complex scaling (see Hunziker hunziker1986 , Sjöstrand–Zworski sjostrand1991 for an account and references), here we use complex scaling on the Fourier transform side following Nakamura nakamura1990 and Kameoka–Nakamura Nakamura .
Thus, we consider the Schrödinger operator acting on whose potential is exponentially decaying, this means that there exist such that
(1.1) |
Let be the resolvent of , initially defined for . The exponentially weighted resolvent can be meromorphically continued to the strip , see Froese froese , Gannot gannot and a review in §2. Resonances of are the poles in this meromorphic continuation.
We now introduce a regularized operator,
(1.2) |
(We write .) It is easy to see, with details reviewed in §4, that is a non-normal unbounded operator on with a discrete spectrum. When , is reduced to the rescaled Davies harmonic oscillator – see §3, whose spectrum is given by
where denotes the set of nonnegative integers. Thus we will restrict our attentions to . Suppose that
(1.3) |
Zworski Zw-vis proved that resonances can be defined as the limit points of as , in the case of compactly supported potentials. We generalize this result to the case of exponentially decaying potentials. More precisely, we have
Theorem 1.
For any and such that the rectangle
(1.4) |
we have, uniformly on ,
where are the resonances of .
Notation. We use the following notation: means that where the norm (or any seminorm) is in the space , and the constant depends on . When either or are absent then the constant is universal or the estimate is scalar, respectively. When then the operator has its norm bounded by . Also when no confusion is likely to result, we denote the operator where is a function by .
2 meromorphic continuation
In this section we will introduce a meromorphic continuation of the weighted resolvent from to the strip under the assumption (1.1). As in froese , we define the resonances of as the poles of this meromorphic continuation, with agreement of multiplicities. For a detailed presentation, we refer to froese .
Let be the free resolvent. For , the resolvent equation
implies
Since , then for large, is invertible by a Neumann series argument and
(2.1) |
We will show that the right side of has a meromorphic continuation. For that, we recall some bounds of the free resolvent with exponential weights, see gannot for details, to prove the following lemma:
Lemma 1.
For any and ,
is a meromorphic family of operators on with poles of finite rank.
Proof.
Choose satisfying for large , it is well known that for each , the weighted resolvent:
extends analytically across to the strip , see (gannot, , §1) and references given there. Moreover, Gannot (gannot, , §1) proved that for any and there exists such that
(2.2) |
In particular, for and ,
is an analytic family of operators . Since by (1.1), it is easy to see that is compact. Hence,
is an analytic family of compact operators for . Recalling that is invertible for , then by the analytic Fredholm theory – see (res, , §C.4), is a meromorphic family of operators in the same range of . ∎
From now on, we identify the resonances , in given in (1.4), with the poles of , with agreement of multiplicities. More precisely, the multiplicity of resonance is given by
(2.3) |
where the integral is over a positively oriented circle enclosing and containing no poles other than .
3 resolvent estimates for the Davies harmonic oscillator
The operator , was used by Davies Dav to illustrate properties of non-normal differential operators. We recall some known facts about and its resolvent. As established in Dav , is an unbounded operator on with the discrete spectrum given by
(3.1) |
In particular , then one can study the resolvent of outside . Unlike the normal operators, there does not exist any constant such that . Instead, according to Hitrik–Sjöstrand–Viola HSV , (Zw-vis, , §3) and references given there, for , there exists such that
(3.2) |
In this section we will show how exponential weights dramatically improve the bound (3.2) for in the rectangle given by (1.4), which will be crucial in the proof of Theorem 1.
First, note that , where denotes the Fourier transform . Inspired by nakamura1990 and Nakamura , we introduce a family of spectral deformations in the Fourier space as follows.
For any fixed given in (1.4), we choose with near and for such that
(3.3) |
and define the map
(3.4) |
then is smooth with the Jacobian:
(3.5) |
Let be an orthogonal matrix with -th column , then we have
(3.6) |
For , we consider a family of deformations:
(3.7) |
and the corresponding unitary operators defined by
(3.8) |
Using (3.6), we can compute explicitly, i.e.
(3.9) |
then by (3.3), is invertible as for , , the inverse is given by
(3.10) |
Now we consider the deformed operators of :
(3.11) |
where , , . To extend to , we define
(3.12) |
In view of (3.3) and (3.9), and extend analytically to . Therefore, we obtain that , given by the second equation in (3.11), extends analytically to .
Then we introduce some preliminary results about the spectrum of :
Proposition 1.
There exists constant such that for all and ,
Proof.
We note that for , by (3.3),
Thus, (3.9) implies that for some constant . Since
by (3.5), and , together with (3.9), we conclude that
(3.13) |
Here . Hence we have
(3.14) |
where . Let , then is a semiclassical differential operator – see Zworski (Zw, , §4), with the symbol
(3.15) |
where are coordinates of , since is a symmetric matrix. Choose as an order function, we recall the symbol class from (Zw, , §4.4),
(3.16) |
Then by (3.3), (3.7) and (3.13), we have . Hence it suffices to show that there exists constant such that for ,
For a detailed introduction of general elliptic theory, we refer to (Zw, , §4).
Using (3.4) we calculate:
(3.17) |
Then for , by (3.3), we have
(3.18) |
To obtain similar bounds for the argument and modulus of , we recall (3.6) to compute
(3.19) |
where with the same orthogonal matrix as in (3.6). By (3.3), for , we have
Hence, for all ,
(3.20) |
and by applying the following basic inequality with (3.3) to (3.19),
(3.21) |
we also obtain that for all ,
(3.22) |
Since for and by (3.20), using (3.21) together with (3.18) and (3.22), we have
(3.23) |
Then by (3.15), we conclude that there exists such that for all , , which completes the proof. ∎

Proposition 2.
For any satisfying
(3.24) |
there exists such that for all ,
Proof.
As in the proof of Proposition 1, it suffices to show that there exists such that for ,
Recalling by (3.20), in order to apply (3.21), we claim that
(3.25) |
We notice that for , by (3.17), thus , in other words, there exists some large such that (3.25) holds for with . It remains to show that (3.25) holds for all and . We argue by contradiction: if it does not hold, there must exist , such that , i.e.
which immediately implies . Let and write , then we have
(3.26) | ||||
(3.27) |
Since and by (3.24), then (3.26) implies that
Let , by (3.3),
thus . Recalling that is non-decreasing, we have , which contradicts (3.27). Hence (3.25) holds, using (3.21) and (3.22), we obtain that
Since for ,
there exists such that whenever . We also note that, by (3.24),
thus for . Hence , where determined by . Then by (3.15), we conclude that there exist and such that
(3.28) |
which completes the proof. ∎
Now we state the main result of this section:
Lemma 2.
For any and such that the rectangle
there exist constant and such that uniformly for ,
Proof.
We consider the matrix element
where is the standard inner product. It suffices to show that there exist such that uniformly for ,
(3.29) |
Recalling (3.1), both and are invertible for . Then we have
(3.30) |
Let and , recalling the formula
then and , where .
First we consider, for , and defined by (3.8), the integral kernel of the map :
We claim that has an analytic extension to . Since extends analytically to the strip , it suffices to show that , which is a direct consequence of and by (3.4). Then for , using (3.3) and (3.9), we can estimate as follows:
thus
(3.31) |
Hence, by Schur’s criterion, , first defined for , with the integral kernel , extends to as an analytic family of operators . In particular,
are two analytic families of functions in .
Now we define
for , with given by (3.11), where we write instead of . Then by Proposition 1, there exists such that for all , and with ,
However, for , since is unitary, by (3.30) we have
Thus by analyticity, whenever , . In particular, for fixed satisfying (3.24),
In view of Proposition 2 and (3.1), both and are analytic in . Without loss of generality, we may assume that in (1.4), then
where and coincide. Hence by analyticity, we conclude that for each ,
(3.32) |
By the elliptic theory of semiclassical differential operators – see (Zw, , §4.7), (3.28) implies that there exists such that for all ,
(3.33) |
Recalling (3.31), by Schur’s criterion, we obtain that
(3.34) |
Combining (3.32), (3.33) and (3.34), also noticing that can be determined by , we obtain (3.29) with , which completes the proof. ∎
4 eigenvalues of the regularized operator
In this section we will review the meromorphy of the resolvent
with in (1.2), in a similar form to the meromorphic continuation of the weighted resolvent given by (2.1).
First we write and recall
(4.1) |
which follows from (semiclassical) ellipticity. Then
(4.2) |
In view of (4.1), is invertible for , . Since is analytic in , see (3.1), is compact by (1.1), we have is an analytic family of compact operators for . Hence is a meromorphic family of operators in the same range of . Using (4.2), we conclude that is meromorphic for (in fact is meromorphic for by the Gohberg–Sigal factorization theorem - see (res, , §C.4)), with poles , i.e. are the eigenvalues of in . Then we have
Lemma 3.
For each ,
is a meromorphic family of operators on with poles of finite rank. Moreover,
(4.3) |
where the integral is over a positively oriented circle enclosing and containing no poles other than possibly , satisfies
(4.4) |
Remark. The multiplicity of an eigenvalue of can be defined by the right side of (4.4), thus Lemma 3 implies that the poles of coincide with given in (1.3), with agreement of multiplicities.
Proof.
Following the above argument, it easy to see that is an analytic family of compact operators for . Then
is a meromorphic family of operators, since is invertible for , by (4.1). In this range of , is also invertible by the Neumann series argument, thus we have
(4.5) |
Since both sides of (4.5) are meromorphic for , by meromorphy, we conclude that (4.5) holds for all , as an identity between meromorphic families of operators.
To obtain the multiplicity formula, we fix any with , then there exists a neighborhood in this half plane and finite rank operators , such that is analytic in . Let be a positively oriented circle enclosing and containing no poles of other than possibly , thus it also contains no poles of other than possibly as a consequence of (4.5). On the one hand, we can compute
(4.6) |
On the other hand, by (4.5), we have
(4.7) |
Now we compare (4.6) and (4.7), since each has finite rank, we can apply cyclicity of the trace to obtain the multiplicity formula (4.4). ∎
5 Proof of convergence
The proof of convergence is based on Lemma 1, Lemma 3, with an application of the Gohberg–Sigal–Rouché theorem, see Gohberg–Sigal gohberg1971operator and (res, , Appendix C.).
We now state a more precise version of Theorem 1 involving the multiplicities given in (2.3) and (4.3) as follows:
Theorem 2.
Proof.
In view of Lemma 1, the poles of are isolated in the region , thus there are finitely many with , denoted by . We choose such that , are disjoint discs in , then for any fixed and each with , we have
for some constant .
In order to apply the Gohberg–Sigal–Rouché theorem, we need to estimate :
1. Choose satisfying in and , here , we define and calculate:
(5.1) |
2. The first term can be written as . Let , then
where . By Lemma 2, there exists such that for any , . Thus,
Similarly, we can bound by the right side above. Hence for any ,
(5.2) |
3. We can estimate the third term in (5.1) by a similar argument. (2.2) implies that
Hence, arguing as above, we obtain that
(5.3) |
4. We note that
and recall Zw-vis that there exists (independent of ) such that
which is proved using the method of complex scaling, see (Zw-vis, , §5) for details. Hence
(5.4) |
By (5.2) and (5.3), we can first fix sufficiently large such that
Then by (5.4), there exists such that for all ,
We may assume that , thus by (5.1), we conclude that for each ,
on .
Acknowledgements.
The author would like to thank Maciej Zworski for helpful discussions. I am also grateful to the anonymous referee for the careful reading of the first version and for the valuable comments. This project was supported in part by the National Science Foundation grant 1500852.DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
The data that supports the findings of this study are available within the article.
References
- (1) UV Riss and H-D Meyer. Reflection-free complex absorbing potentials. Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, 28:1475, (1995).
- (2) Tamar Seideman and William H Miller. Calculation of the cumulative reaction probability via a discrete variable representation with absorbing boundary conditions. The Journal of chemical physics, 96:4412, (1992).
- (3) Thomas-C Jagau, Dmitry Zuev, Ksenia B Bravaya, Evgeny Epifanovsky, and Anna I Krylov. A fresh look at resonances and complex absorbing potentials: Density matrix-based approach. The journal of physical chemistry letters, 5:310, (2014).
- (4) Maciej Zworski. Scattering resonances as viscosity limits. In Algebraic and Analytic Microlocal Analysis, page 635. Springer, (2013).
- (5) Haoren Xiong. Resonances as viscosity limits for exterior dilation analytic potentials. arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.12490, (2020).
- (6) Walter Hunziker. Distortion analyticity and molecular resonance curves. In Annales de l’IHP Physique théorique, volume 45, page 339, (1986).
- (7) Johannes Sjöstrand and Maciej Zworski. Complex scaling and the distribution of scattering poles. Journal of the American Mathematical Society, 4:729, (1991).
- (8) Shu Nakamura. Distortion analyticity for two-body schrödinger operators. In Annales de l’IHP Physique théorique, volume 53, page 149, (1990).
- (9) Kentaro Kameoka and Shu Nakamura. Resonances and viscosity limit for the wigner-von neumann type hamiltonian. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.07001, (2020).
- (10) Richard Froese. Upper bounds for the resonance counting function of schrödinger operators in odd dimensions. Canadian Journal of Mathematics, 50:538, (1998).
- (11) Oran Gannot. From quasimodes to resonances: exponentially decaying perturbations. Pacific Journal of Mathematics, 277:77, (2015).
- (12) Semyon Dyatlov and Maciej Zworski. Mathematical theory of scattering resonances, volume 200. American Mathematical Soc., (2019).
- (13) E Brian Davies. Pseudo–spectra, the harmonic oscillator and complex resonances. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 455:585, (1999).
- (14) Michael Hitrik, Johannes Sjöstrand, and Joe Viola. Resolvent estimates for elliptic quadratic differential operators. Analysis & PDE, 6:181, (2013).
- (15) Maciej Zworski. Semiclassical analysis, volume 138. American Mathematical Soc., (2012).
- (16) IC U. Gohberg and E. I. Sigal. An operator generalization of the logarithmic residue theorem and the theorem of rouché. Mathematics of the USSR-Sbornik, 13:603, (1971).