This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Relativistic X-ray reflection and highly ionized absorption in the spectrum of NS LMXB 1A 1744-361

Aditya S. Mondal1, B. Raychaudhuri1, G. C. Dewangan2 1Department of physics, Visva-Bharati, Santiniketan, West Bengal-731235, India
2Inter-University Centre for Astronomy & Astrophysics (IUCAA), Pune, 411007 India
E-mail: [email protected]
Abstract

We present the results from the spectral and timing analysis of the accreting neutron star 1A 1744-361 from the NuSTAR observation performed in its 2022 outbursts. The unabsorbed bolometric X-ray luminosity during this observation in the energy band 0.1100keV0.1-100{\rm~{}keV}{} is 3.9×10373.9\times 10^{37} erg s-1, assuming a distance of 99 kpc. During this observation, the source was in the banana branch of the atoll track. The source spectrum exhibits relativistic disc reflection and clear absorption features when an absorbed blackbody and cut-off power-law model describes the continuum emission. The 350keV3-50{\rm~{}keV}{} source spectrum is well fitted using a model combination consisting of an absorbed single-temperature blackbody and a reflection model along with the addition of a warm absorber component. The inner-disk radius, RinR_{in}, obtained from the reflection fit is (1.612.86)RISCO=(8.414.9)Rg\sim(1.61-2.86)R_{ISCO}=(8.4-14.9)R_{g} (17.631.217.6-31.2 km for a 1.4M1.4M_{\odot} NS). This measurement allowed us to further constrain the magnetic field strength to B0.94×109B\lesssim 0.94\times 10^{9}G. The strong absorption features 6.91keV\sim 6.91{\rm~{}keV}{} and 7.99keV\sim 7.99{\rm~{}keV}{} imply the presence of highly ionized absorbing material with a column density NHN_{H} of 3×1022\sim 3\times 10^{22} cm-2, emanating from the accretion disk in the form of disc wind with an outflow velocity of vout0.021c6300v_{out}\simeq 0.021c\simeq 6300 km s-1.

keywords:
accretion, accretion discs - stars: neutron - X-rays: binaries - stars: individual 1A 1744-361

1 Introduction

A Neutron star Low-mass X-ray binary (NS LMXB) consists of an NS and a low-mass (1M\lesssim 1M_{\odot}) donor star. In NS LMXB systems, mass accreting from the donor star onto the NS by Roche-lobe overflow forms structures such as an accretion disc. It emits electromagnetic radiation in a wide range of wavelengths, from radio to X-rays. NS LMXBs may be persistent accreator or transient systems based on their long-term variabilities. Persistent NS LMXBs are characterized by persistent luminosity in X-rays and may have an X-ray luminosity of LX1036ergs1L_{X}\gtrsim 10^{36}{\rm~{}erg\ s}^{-1}{} (Ludlam et al. 2019, 2017). Whereas some NS LMXBs exhibit an outburst, a sudden and explosive brightening phenomenon, and such LMXBs are called X-ray Transients. Transient LMXBs undergo recurrent bright (LX1036ergs1L_{X}\gtrsim 10^{36}{\rm~{}erg\ s}^{-1}{}) outbursts lasting from days to weeks and then return to long intervals of X-ray quiescence (LX1034ergs1L_{X}\lesssim 10^{34}{\rm~{}erg\ s}^{-1}{}) lasting from months to years (Degenaar & Wijnands, 2010). Persistent and transient NS LMXBs are classified into two classes: Z and Atoll sources based on their behavior on the X-ray hardness intensity diagram (HID) and color-color diagram (CCD) (Hasinger & van der Klis, 1989). Z sources are usually very bright and sometimes radiate at Eddington luminosity (LEddL_{Edd}). Atoll sources are generally less bright (L0.5LEddL\lesssim 0.5L_{Edd}). Based on their luminosity, the state of Atoll sources is further divided into ‘banana branch’ and ‘island branch’, and usually, they correspond to the High-soft (HS) and Low-hard (LH) state, respectively. The banana branch has been further divided into lower banana and upper banana at lower and higher luminosities.

The source 1A 1744-361 is a transient NS LMXB discovered by the Ariel V satellite in 1976 during its outburst state (Davison et al., 1976; Carpenter et al., 1977). Since then, several outbursts have been observed from the source between the years 1989 and 2005 with a number of missions like RXTE, Chandra, and INTEGRAL. Emelyanov et al. (2001) discovered 33 likely type-I bursts in the field containing 1A 1744-361 in 2001. However, those were not unambiguously identified as thermonuclear bursts. At a later time, the first thermonuclear (Type I) burst from 1A 1744-361 was discovered by Bhattacharyya et al. (2006a) using the 2005 RXTE PCA data. It confirmed the suggestion of Emelyanov et al. (2001) that the source harbors a rapidly rotating NS as a compact object. During this burst Bhattacharyya et al. (2006a) discovered millisecond period brightness oscillation, which provided the spin frequency of the NS of 530\sim 530 Hz. The lack of strong indication of photospheric radius expansion during the burst suggested a 9 kpc upper limit of the source distance (Bhattacharyya et al., 2006a). From the studies of energy-dependent dips in the 2003 PCA data Bhattacharyya et al. (2006a) also found that this source is a dipping LMXB. The binary orbital period of the source estimated by Bhattacharyya et al. (2006a) is 97±2297\pm 22 minutes. From the timing analysis, Bhattacharyya et al. (2006b) found that the source 1A 1744-361 shows Atoll behavior during the outbursts. After July 2005, the source’s outburst activities were detected on June 2008, November 2009, and August 2013 (Bahramian et al., 2013). Recently, MAXI/GSC detected an outburst from the field, including 1A 1744-361 on 30th May 2022 (Kobayashi et al., 2022). SWIFT/XRT subsequently confirmed the outburst originating from the known neutron star low-mass X-ray binary 1A 1744-361 (Kennea et al., 2022). At later times, the source was observed by the missions NICER and NuSTAR during 3rd June 2022 and 8th June 2022, respectively (Ng et al., 2022; Pike et al., 2022).

Spectral studies of 1A 1744-361 were performed in the past using data from the satellites RXTE and Chandra (Bhattacharyya et al., 2006b; Gavriil et al., 2012). Bhattacharyya et al. (2006b) performed the spectral analysis of this source using the RXTE/PCA data, and they found that a Comptonized blackbody model describes the persistent spectrum of this source well. They reported the first detection of a broad (0.6keV\sim 0.6{\rm~{}keV}{}) iron emission feature at 6\sim 6 keV and an iron absorption edge at 8\sim 8 keV. They mentioned that the energies of the absorption edge are consistent with those expected from ionized iron. Gavriil et al. (2012) reported on the Chandra High Energy Transmission Grating (HETG) spectra of this source during its 2008 July outburst. They found that its persistent emission is well modeled by a blackbody (kT1.0keVkT\sim 1.0{\rm~{}keV}{}) plus power law (Γ1.7\Gamma\sim 1.7) with an absorption edge. They also found a significant absorption line at 6.961±0.0026.961\pm 0.002 keV, consistent with the Fe XXVI (hydrogen-like Fe) 212-1 transition. They placed an upper limit on the velocity of a redshifted flow of v<221v<221 km s-1. They further confirmed the suggestion of Bhattacharyya et al. (2006b) that this source is an Atoll source. The mission NuSTAR observed the source on 8th June 2022, and the preliminary spectral results have been reported by Pike et al. (2022). They found that the 3.040.0keV3.0-40.0{\rm~{}keV}{} energy spectrum is well-described by a combination of relativistic disk reflection of a power law with a high energy cut-off, with an intervening warm absorber. They also reported the detection of narrow absorption lines at 6.95±0.026.95\pm 0.02 keV and 8.01±0.038.01\pm 0.03 keV. The time-averaged 0.510.00.5-10.0 keV NICER spectrum during its 2022 outburst is well-fitted by an absorbed cut-off power law and blackbody component with a Gaussian absorption line component (Ng et al., 2022). The Gaussian absorption line has centroid energy 6.9880.015+0.0126.988^{+0.012}_{-0.015} keV and width 0.004keV\sim 0.004{\rm~{}keV}{} .

In this work, we represent a systematic and in-depth spectral and timing analysis of this source using the available NuSTAR observation performed on 8th June 2022. We aim to characterize the shape of the X-ray spectrum accurately and search for any emission and/or absorption features in it, as there was a hint of the same from the previous analysis. Studies of the same allow us to derive information on the physical and geometrical parameters of the system. We have organized the paper as follows: in Section 2 we describe the observation and data reduction. In Section 3 and Section 4 we present the details of the timing and spectral analysis, respectively. In section 5, we discuss the results obtained from the analysis.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 1: Left panel: 379keV3-79{\rm~{}keV}{} NuSTAR/FPMA light curve of the source with a binning of 100s. The source shows a small variations in intensity during this observation. Right panel: the Color-color diagram of the source that is consistent with the banana branch of the Atoll sources.

2 observation and data reduction

Nuclear Spectroscopic Telescope ARray (NuSTAR; Harrison et al. 2013) observed the source 1A 1744-361 only once on 8th June 2022 for a total exposure of 34\sim 34 ks. We have used this observation (obsID: 90801312001) for our analysis.

The NuSTAR data were collected in the 3793-79 keV energy band using two identical co-aligned telescopes equipped with the focal plane modules FPMA and FPMB. We reduced the data using the standard data analysis software NUSTARDAS v2.1.1 task included in HEASOFT v6.29 and using the latest CALDB version available. We used the task nupipeline to generate the calibrated and screened event files. For the source, we extracted events from a circular region centered on the source, with a radius of 100′′100^{\prime\prime} for both the FPMA and FPMB. We also extracted background events from a circle of the same radius from the area of the same chip with the lowest apparent source contamination for both instruments. We then used the tool nuproducts to build the filtered event files, the background subtracted light curves, the spectra, and the arf and rmf files. This nuproducts software ensures that all the instrumental effects, including loss of exposure due to dead-time, are correctly accounted for. We grouped the FPMA and FPMB spectral data with a minimum of 5050 counts per bin which allows the use of χ2\chi^{2} statistics. Finally, we fitted spectra from the FPMA and FPMB simultaneously, leaving a floating cross-normalization constant.

Refer to caption
Figure 2: The top and the middle panels show the source count rate with time in the 3103-10  keV and 107910-79  keV energy bands, respectively. The bottom panel shows the variation of the hardness ratio which is defined here as the 107910-79  keV count rate divided by the 3103-10  keV count rate with time.

3 Temporal Analysis

The left panel of Figure 1 shows the 100s bin-size NuSTAR light curve of the source in the 3793-79  keV energy band. The light curve exhibits variations in intensity throughout the observation and a short flare at an elapsed time around 2020 ks. The variability of the X-ray flux is commonly explained by the partial covering of the NS system by ionized absorbers (Buisson et al., 2021; Ducci et al., 2023; Saavedra et al., 2023). We did not observe either Type-I X-ray bursts or absorption dips in the NuSTAR light curve of this source, although those have been detected earlier (Bhattacharyya et al., 2006a). The average count rate of the source during this observation is 80\sim 80 count s-1, while a small increment (factor of 1.4\sim 1.4) in the count rate is observed during the flaring. We further constructed the colour-colour diagram (CCD) of the source using light curves in the 363-6 keV, 6106-10 keV, and 102010-20 keV energy bands. We defined the soft-colour as the ratio of count rates in 6106-10 keV and 363-6 keV, and hard colour as the ratio of count rates in 102010-20 keV and 6106-10 keV. We present the resulting diagram in the right panel of Figure 1. It is evident from the CCD that the source is in the ’upper-banana’ state during this observation. The CCD of this source is very similar to the other known Atoll source 4U 1608-522 and GX 9+9 (Takahashi et al., 2011; Chatterjee et al., 2023). In addition, we extracted light curves with 100s bins in the 3103-10  keV and 107910-79  keV energy bands and calculated the hardness ratio (HR). The variation of the 3103-10 keV and 107910-79 keV count rates and HR as a function of time are shown in the top, middle, and lower panel of Figure 2, respectively. We note that the HR remains roughly constant with time throughout this observation except for the short time interval near the elapsed time of 20\sim 20 ks where flaring occurs. It further establishes the commonly observed fact that in the banana state of the Atoll sources, the hardness is relatively constant over a wide range of luminosity (van der Klis, 1995; Church et al., 2014).

Refer to caption
Figure 3: The source spectrum in the energy band 3.050.0keV3.0-50.0{\rm~{}keV}{} obtained from the NuSTAR FPMA and FPMB is presented here. The continuum emission is fitted with the absorbed bbody and the cutoffpl model, shown with the dotted lines. Fit ratio associated with this continuum model is shown in the bottom panel of this plot. The presence of disc reflection and clear absorption features are evident in the spectrum.

4 spectral analysis

We used the spectral analysis package XSPEC v12.12.0v12.12.0 (Arnaud, 1996) to fit the NuSTAR FPMA and FPMB spectra simultaneously between 3.03.0 to 50.050.0  keV energy band, while above 5050 keV is dominated by the background. We added a model constant to account for cross-calibration of the two instruments FPMA and FPMB. The value of constant for FPMA was fixed to 11 and allowed it to vary for the FPMB. We used TBabs to model the Galactic absorption along the line of sight with wilm abundances (Wilms et al., 2000) and vern (Verner et al., 1996) photoelectric cross section. Spectral uncertainties are quoted at the 9090 percent confidence intervals (e.g., Δχ2=2.7\Delta\chi^{2}=2.7 for one interesting parameter) unless otherwise stated.

4.1 Continuum modeling

In order to probe the spectral shape of the source, we started by fitting the NuSTAR spectrum with simple phenomenological models. We first tried a combination of an absorbed power-law (cutoffpl) component and a single-temperature blackbody component (bbody). The cutoffpl model is used to describe the Comptonized emission (nonthermal) from the corona, and the bbody component accounts for the thermal emission from the NS surface/boundary layer. This combination of models has previously been used by Gavriil et al. (2012) for this source and by many authors to model the continuum emission successfully for atoll sources (Falanga et al. 2004; Lin et al. 2007). We found that this two-component model approximates the continuum reasonably well, the poor quality of the fit (χ2/dof=3712/849\chi^{2}/dof=3712/849) is mainly due to the presence of strong reflection features. We obtained a blackbody temperature kTbb1.21keVkT_{bb}\sim 1.21{\rm~{}keV}{}, a power-law photon index Γ1.19\Gamma\sim 1.19 and the cut-off energy Ecut4.95E_{cut}\sim 4.95 keV. The observed cut-off energy is typical for the atoll sources in the banana states (Church et al., 2014). We also noted that the Comptonized emission is the dominant emission comprising 60%\sim 60\% of the total 370keV3-70{\rm~{}keV}{} flux. The residual of this model is shown in Figure 3. The fit residual reveals the presence of several narrow emission and/or absorption features in 69\sim 6-9 keV, also an indication of an asymmetric Ke K line profile 6.4keV\sim 6.4{\rm~{}keV}{} and a possible Compton hump 1020\sim 10-20 keV. These features clearly indicate the strong disc reflection and the presence of ionized absorbing material in the system. Bhattacharyya et al. (2006b) found the evidence of a broad iron emission feature at 6keV\sim 6{\rm~{}keV}{} and an iron absorption edge at 8keV\sim 8{\rm~{}keV}{} from the RXTE observation. In addition, an ionized Fe absorption line 6.96keV\sim 6.96{\rm~{}keV}{} has been reported by Gavriil et al. (2012).

Refer to caption
Figure 4: The unfolded spectral data, the best-fit model const*TBabs*(bbody+RELXILL). The lower panel of this plot shows the ratio of the data to the model in units of σ\sigma. Strong absorption features at 7\sim 7 keV and 8\sim 8 keV are clearly detected.

4.2 Self-consistent reflection fitting

When hard X-rays (Comptonized emission) irradiate the accretion disc, they produce a reflection spectrum that includes fluorescence lines, recombination, and other emission (Fabian et al., 1989). In most X-ray sources, the incident emission for the reflection spectrum is generally a hard power-law spectrum. However, in NS systems, the emission from the NS surface/boundary layer may be significant and contribute to the reflection (Cackett et al., 2008; Ludlam et al., 2019, 2017). To reproduce both Comptonization and reflection spectra correctly, we replaced the cutoffpl with RELXILL (García et al., 2014). The model uses a cutoff power-law as an illuminating continuum for the reflection spectrum. This means that the component assumed to illuminate the accretion disc is consistent with the emergent reflection spectrum. The model parameters of RELXILL are as follows: q1q_{1} and q2q_{2} are the inner and outer disc emissivity indices, respectively, RbreakR_{break} is the break radius of the two emissivity indices, RinR_{in} and RoutR_{out} are the inner and outer radii of the disc, respectively, ii is the inclination of the system, aa is the dimensionless spin parameter, Γ\Gamma is the photon index of the input cutoff power-law, logξ\xi is the log of the ionization parameter, AFeA_{Fe} is the iron abundance of the system, EcutE_{cut} is the cutoff energy, rreflr_{refl} is the reflection fraction, and norm represents the normalization of the model. During the fitting with RELXILL, we imposed the following: a single emissivity index q1=q2=3q_{1}=q_{2}=3 (a value commonly found in X-ray binaries), a redshift of z=0z=0 as it is a Galactic source, a spin of a=0.25a=0.25 as the source has a spin frequency of 530530 Hz (considering a0.47/Pmsa\simeq 0.47/P_{ms} (Braje et al., 2000) where PmsP_{ms} is the spin period in ms), and a large outer disc radius of Rout=1000RgR_{out}=1000\;R_{g} (where Rg=GM/c2)R_{g}=GM/c^{2}). The parameters RinR_{in}, ii, AFeA_{Fe}, logξ\xi, Γ\Gamma, EcutE_{cut} were left free to vary. The addition of the model RELXILL improved the fit significantly to χ2/dof=1878/844\chi^{2}/dof=1878/844 (Δχ2=1834\Delta\chi^{2}=-1834 for the 55 additional parameters). The corresponding spectrum for the model constant*TBabs*(bbody+RELXILL) and the residuals are shown in Figure 4. The residuals showed a strong deviation from the model at 7\sim 7 keV and 8\sim 8 keV. These features suggest the presence of strong absorption lines at 7\sim 7 keV and 8\sim 8 keV in the spectrum, as indicated by Bhattacharyya et al. (2006b)

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 5: Left panel: The source spectrum is shown when the absorption features are fitted with two gaussian absorption models gabs i.e.,const*TBabs*gabs*gabs(bbody+RELXILL). Right panel: Source spectrum after introducing one edge component along with two gabs, i.e.,const*TBabs*edge*gabs*gabs(bbody+RELXILL). The lower panels of each plot show the ratio of the data to the model in units of σ\sigma.

4.3 Residuals as absorption lines

We identified strong and broad absorption lines at 7\sim 7 keV and a moderately broad absorption feature at 8\sim 8 keV in the spectrum. We tried to fit them with Gaussian absorption profiles gabs in XSPEC. Initially, we added two gabs components, with all parameters free, to the existing model. The model constant*TBabs*gabs*gabs(bbody+RELXILL) improved the fit markedly to χ2/dof=1073/838\chi^{2}/dof=1073/838 (with Δχ2=805\Delta\chi^{2}=805 for the 66 additional parameters). The residual corresponding to this fit is shown in the left panel of Figure 5. The one Gaussian absorption feature has centroid energy centered at Egabs=6.90±0.02E_{gabs}=6.90\pm 0.02 keV and width σ=0.13±0.03\sigma=0.13\pm 0.03  keV. The other Gaussian absorption line has centroid energy at Egabs=7.99±0.03E_{gabs}=7.99\pm 0.03 keV and width σ=0.080.05+0.07\sigma=0.08_{-0.05}^{+0.07}  keV. However, some residuals still existed 9\sim 9 keV as shown in Figure 5. To model this feature we added an absorption edge with energy and optical depth as free parameters. The result with the model constant*TBabs*gabs*gabs*edge(bbody+RELXILL) was a further significant improvement in the fit to χ2/dof=884/836\chi^{2}/dof=884/836 (with Δχ2=189\Delta\chi^{2}=-189 for the 22 additional parameters). We measured the absorption edge energy at 8.79±0.148.79\pm 0.14 keV and optical depth 0.0380.012+0.0220.038^{+0.022}_{-0.012}. The best-fitting spectral parameters are listed in Table 1, and the associated residual is shown in the right panel of Figure 5.

Refer to caption
Figure 6: The spectrum is fitted with the model const*TBabs*zxipcf(bbody+RELXILL). The lower panel of this plot shows the ratio of the data to the model in units of σ\sigma. The individual model components are also shown.

4.4 Photo-ionized absorption

Detection of several absorption features suggests the possibility that a local partially ionized absorber is located between the observer and the system as suggested by Boirin et al. (2005). To verify this scenario, we replaced the Gaussian absorption profiles and absorption edge with a physically motivated warm absorber component zxipcf, considering that the absorption lines are due to a photo-ionized plasma. The zxipcf component uses a grid of XSTAR photoionized absorption models to describe the absorption of the incoming radiation by the plasma. The model considers a partial covering absorption characterized by covering fraction fcovf_{cov} of incoming photons by an ionized absorber whose ionization is described by logξ\xi. Besides these two parameters, the other main parameters of this model are the equivalent hydrogen column, NHN_{H} and the redshift, zz, of the absorbing material. We initially tried to fit this model, keeping all the parameters free except the redshift parameter zz (assumed zero shift). The model constant*TBabs*ZXIPCF*(bbody+RELXILL) showed a drastic improvement in the fit, leading to χ2/dof=1090/841\chi^{2}/dof=1090/841 (with Δχ2=788\Delta\chi^{2}=-788 for the 33 additional parameters). However, some residuals still existed in the 6.08.06.0-8.0  keV energy band, and we performed the fit again, considering zz as a free parameter. It significantly improved the fit to χ2/dof=1002/840\chi^{2}/dof=1002/840 (with Δχ2=88\Delta\chi^{2}=-88 for the 11 additional parameter). We note that a model wherein the flow is required to have a redshift is significantly worse. Data and residual for this model are shown in Figure 6, and the best-fitting parameters of the zxipcf model are reported in Table 1. The absorption features are well described with this warm absorber model. The rest of the parameter values obtained from this fit are consistent with those obtained earlier from the phenomenological fit with gabs and absorption edge. We note that similar fit statistics (χν21.28\chi^{2}_{\nu}\sim 1.28) has been reported by Pike et al. (2022) using similar combination of models for this source. We further used command steppar in XSPEC to search the best fit for RinR_{in} and ii for the model constant*TBabs*gabs*gabs*edge(bbody+RELXILL) and constant*TBabs*ZXIPCF*(bbody+RELXILL). The left and right panels in Figure 7 show the Δχ2\Delta\chi^{2} of the fit versus the inner disc radius and the disc inclination for both models.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 7: The plots show the change in the goodness of fit for the inner disc radius (RinR_{in}) and disc inclination angle (ii). The left panel shows the variation of Δχ2(=χ2χmin2)\Delta\chi^{2}(=\chi^{2}-\chi_{min}^{2}) as a function of RinR_{in} (varied between 11 to 6RISCO6\>R_{ISCO}) obtained from two different model combination. The right panel shows the variation of Δχ2(=χ2χmin2)\Delta\chi^{2}(=\chi^{2}-\chi_{min}^{2}) as a function of ii obtained from different models. We varied the disc inclination angle between 0 degrees and 8080 degrees.
Table 1: Fit results: Best-fitting spectral parameters of the NuSTAR observation of the source 1A 1744-361 using Model 1: const*TBabs*gabs*gabs*edge(bbody+RELXILL) and Model 2:const*TBabs*ZXIPCF(bbody+RELXILL)
Component Parameter (unit) Model 1 Model 2
Constant FPMB (wrt FPMA) 1.006±0.0011.006\pm 0.001 1.006±0.0011.006\pm 0.001
tbabs NHN_{H}(×1022cm2\times 10^{22}\;\text{cm}^{-2}) 0.480.18+0.130.48_{-0.18}^{+0.13} 0.340.12+0.130.34_{-0.12}^{+0.13}
zxipcf NH,absN_{H,abs}(×1022cm2\times 10^{22}\;\text{cm}^{-2}) 2.940.42+0.342.94_{-0.42}^{+0.34}
log ξabs\xi_{abs} 3.540.03+0.083.54_{-0.03}^{+0.08}
fcovf_{cov} 0.91\lesssim 0.91
redshift (zz) 0.0210.003+0.001-0.021_{-0.003}^{+0.001}
bbody kTbb(keV)kT_{bb}({\rm~{}keV}) 1.880.10+0.061.88_{-0.10}^{+0.06} 1.870.05+0.031.87_{-0.05}^{+0.03}
Norm (×103\times 10^{-3}) 4.000.72+0.884.00_{-0.72}^{+0.88} 4.150.59+0.384.15_{-0.59}^{+0.38}
relxill ii (degrees) 323+532_{-3}^{+5} 35±235\pm 2
RinR_{in}(×RISCO\times R_{ISCO}) 2.33\lesssim 2.33 2.000.39+0.862.00_{-0.39}^{+0.86}
logξ\rm{log}\>\xi(erg cm s-1) 4.610.13+0.054.61_{-0.13}^{+0.05} 4.420.05+0.094.42_{-0.05}^{+0.09}
Γ\Gamma 1.170.04+0.071.17_{-0.04}^{+0.07} 1.180.02+0.051.18_{-0.02}^{+0.05}
AFeA_{Fe} (×solar)\times\;\text{solar}) 7.31\lesssim 7.31 6.40±0.926.40\pm 0.92
Ecut(keV)E_{cut}({\rm~{}keV}) 5.100.04+0.075.10_{-0.04}^{+0.07} 5.11±0.035.11\pm 0.03
freflf_{refl} 5.442.535.44_{-2.53}^{\dagger} 6.310.93+1.416.31_{-0.93}^{+1.41}
norm (×104\times 10^{-4}) 6.91±0.016.91\pm 0.01 5.570.52+2.805.57_{-0.52}^{+2.80}
gabs Egabs(keV)E_{gabs}({\rm~{}keV}) 6.90±0.026.90\pm 0.02
σgabs(keV)\sigma_{gabs}({\rm~{}keV}) 0.13±0.030.13\pm 0.03
Strength (×102\times 10^{-2}) 5.17±0.015.17\pm 0.01
gabs Egbs(keV)E_{gbs}({\rm~{}keV}) 7.99±0.037.99\pm 0.03
σgabs(keV)\sigma_{gabs}({\rm~{}keV}) 0.080.05+0.070.08_{-0.05}^{+0.07}
Strength (×102\times 10^{-2}) 3.100.51+1.103.10_{-0.51}^{+1.10}
edge EedgeE_{edge} 8.790.15+0.128.79_{-0.15}^{+0.12}
Optical depth (τ)(\tau) 0.040.01+0.020.04_{-0.01}^{+0.02}
cflux FbbodyF_{bbody}^{*} (×109\times 10^{-9} ergs/s/cm2) 0.34±0.020.34\pm 0.02 0.36±0.020.36\pm 0.02
FrelxillF_{relxill}^{*} (×109\times 10^{-9} ergs/s/cm2) 2.01±0.012.01\pm 0.01 1.99±0.011.99\pm 0.01
FtotalF_{total}^{*} (×109\times 10^{-9} ergs/s/cm2) 2.35±0.012.35\pm 0.01 2.35±0.012.35\pm 0.01
χ2/dof\chi^{2}/dof 884/836884/836 1002/8401002/840

Note: The outer radius of the RELXILL spectral component was fixed to 1000Rg1000\;R_{g}. We fixed emissivity index q1=q2=3q1=q2=3. The spin parameter (aa) was fixed to 0.250.25 as the spin frequency of the NS is 530530 Hz. All the unabsorbed fluxes are calculated in the energy band 370keV3-70{\rm~{}keV}{} using the cflux model component. upper bound error calculation is invalid.

5 Discussion

We present the spectral and timing analysis results of the accreting neutron star 1A 1744-361 from the NuSTAR observation during its 2022 outbursts. During this observation, the source is detected with an average count rate of 80counts1\sim 80{\rm~{}count\ s}^{-1}. A small flaring activity occured at 20\sim 20 ks after the start of the observation. The CCD indicates that the source was in the banana branch of the atoll track during this observation. The HR of the source lies in the range 0.050.150.05-0.15, also indicative of the banana state of the source. The unabsorbed bolometric X-ray flux during this observation in the energy band 0.1100keV0.1-100{\rm~{}keV}{} is 4.0×1094.0\times 10^{-9} erg s-1 cm-2. This implies an unabsorbed bolometric luminosity of 3.9×10373.9\times 10^{37} erg s-1, assuming a distance of 99 kpc. This value corresponds to 10%\sim 10\% of the Eddington luminosity (LEddL_{Edd}) which is 3.8×1038\sim 3.8\times 10^{38} erg s-1 for a canonical 1.4M1.4\>M_{\odot} NS (Kuulkers et al., 2003). The luminosity is consistent with those of the atoll sources in the banana branch. All these observed characteristics indicate that the source was neither in the extremely low-hard state nor the very high-intensity (high-soft) state. We found that the continuum X-ray emission is well described by a blackbody (kTbb1.3keVkT_{bb}\sim 1.3{\rm~{}keV}{}) plus power-law (Γ1.2\Gamma\sim 1.2) with a cut-off energy at 5.0keV\sim 5.0{\rm~{}keV}{}. The observed cut-off energy is typical for the atoll sources in the banana states. The spectrum of this source exhibited the presence of broad Fe-K emission line in 67keV6-7{\rm~{}keV}{}, a Compton hump 1020keV10-20{\rm~{}keV}{}, and robust absorption features in 79keV7-9{\rm~{}keV}{}. The broad Fe-K emission line and Compton hump are commonly explained by the disc reflection of the coronal emission (i.e., hard X-ray photons) subject to the strong relativistic distortion (Fabian et al., 1989). The strong absorption features indicate the presence of a local partially ionized absorber in the line of sight. The absorption by the plasma from the accretion disc generates absorption lines (Neilsen & Lee, 2009). Therefore, in our spectral modeling, we employed disc reflection of hard X-ray emission and absorption of the incoming radiation in the photo-ionized plasma.

We found that the 3.050.0keV3.0-50.0{\rm~{}keV}{} source spectrum is adequately fitted using a model combination consisting of an absorbed single-temperature blackbody model (bbody) and a reflection model (relxill) along with the addition of a warm absorber model (zxipcf). In this combination of model, the inner-disk radius, RinR_{in}, obtained from the relxill is (1.612.86)RISCO=(8.414.9)Rg\sim(1.61-2.86)R_{ISCO}=(8.4-14.9)R_{g} (17.631.217.6-31.2 km for a 1.4M1.4M_{\odot} NS), where RISCO=5.2RgR_{ISCO}=5.2R_{g} for a spinning NS with a=0.25a=0.25). The source shows comparatively a larger inner disc radius and is consistent with other NS LMXBs (Miller et al. 2011; Papitto et al. 2013; King et al. 2016; Iaria et al. 2016; Mondal et al. 2021). The value of RinR_{in} indicates that the accretion disc is neither truncated very close to nor far from the NS consistent with the observed flux/mass accretion rate. The photon index (Γ=1.18±0.03\Gamma=1.18\pm 0.03) obtained from the final spectral fit further shows that the source is neither in the soft nor in the very hard spectral state. The best-fitting model gives a relatively low inclination 350\sim 35^{0}, not consistent with the dipping features previously observed in the light curve of this source. The reflection spectrum revealed that the accretion disc is highly ionized with logξ4.4\xi\sim 4.4, and the iron abundance is high comparable to the solar composition (AFe=6.40±0.92A_{Fe}=6.40\pm 0.92). The relativistic reflection model relxill yielded values fully compatiable with those from the previous phenomenologica modeling with gabs and edge.

Apart from the disc reflection features, this observation showed the presence of prominent Fe absorption features between the energy ranges 6.98.8keV6.9-8.8{\rm~{}keV}{} (see Figure 4). We used the Gaussian absorption model gabs to estimate the features of the lines. The centroid energies of these lines are measured at 6.90keV\sim 6.90{\rm~{}keV}{} and 7.99keV\sim 7.99{\rm~{}keV}{}. We further measured an absorption edge at energy 8.79keV\sim 8.79{\rm~{}keV}{}. The strength of the absorption lines is measured in terms of the equivalent width (EW). The EW of the 6.90keV\sim 6.90{\rm~{}keV}{} Fe line was 60±260\pm 2 eV, and for the 7.99keV\sim 7.99{\rm~{}keV}{} Fe line was 40±140\pm 1 eV. The most abundant elements seen in absorption in the X-ray spectra of LMXBs are Fe XXV (rest-frame energy 6.70keV6.70{\rm~{}keV}{}) and Fe XXVI (rest-frame energy 6.97keV6.97{\rm~{}keV}{}), which can be red/blue shifted in case of an in/outflow. Thus, the line detected 6.90keV\sim 6.90{\rm~{}keV}{} could represent absorption in a modest inflow or in a strong outflow. The in/outflow velocity (vv) of the absorbing material can be determined via (E0Ei)/Ei=v/c(E_{0}-E_{i})/E_{i}=v/c, where EiE_{i} and E0E_{0} are the observed and rest energy of the line, respectively. If the strong absorption feature we detect 6.90keV\sim 6.90{\rm~{}keV}{} is indeed the blueshifted Fe XXV Kα\alpha line (rest energy E0=6.70keVE_{0}=6.70{\rm~{}keV}{}), then we measure an outflow velocity of 8700\sim 8700 km s-1. In addition, we estimated the full-width half-maximum (FWHM) of the intrinsic 6.90keV\sim 6.90{\rm~{}keV}{} absorption line of 0.306\sim 0.306  keV. It corresponds to an equivalent resolved velocity of 13280\sim 13280 km s-1. However, considering 6.90\sim 6.90  keV line as blueshifted Fe XXV predicts a strong Fe XXVI at commensurate blueshift (7.18\sim 7.18  keV), which is not seen. Thus, the observed line at 7.99keV\sim 7.99{\rm~{}keV}{} probably is the blueshifted line from the Kβ\beta transition of He-like, Fe XXV ion, compatible with rest energy 7.78keV\sim 7.78{\rm~{}keV}{}. We found that the absorption edge at energy 8.79keV\sim 8.79{\rm~{}keV}{} is consistent with a He-like Fe XXV absorption edge.

The prominent absorption features are suggestive of the presence of a local partially ionized absorber. For this reason, we implemented the model zxipcf that accounts for the contribution of the partially ionized local absorber. Moreover, the line-by-line fitting is not sufficient to address the question of inflow/outflow to the system; a physical self-consistency is required (Miller et al., 2016). We found that the partially covering absorber has a significant absorbing column density of NH=2.940.42+0.34×1022N_{H}=2.94_{-0.42}^{+0.34}\times 10^{22} cm-2. The absorbing material covers a fraction of 90%\sim 90\% of the central X-ray source, characterized by a high ionization parameter (logξ3.6\xi\sim 3.6). The value of the ionization parameter is consistent with Gavriil et al. (2012), determined by the XSTAR simulations. This model further gives a redshift of z=0.0210.003+0.001z=-0.021_{-0.003}^{+0.001}, i.e. implying an outflow velocity of 60007200\simeq 6000-7200 km s-1. This indicates that the absorption is best associated with a moderate outflow from the NS system.

We note that relativistic X-ray reflection and photoionized absorption have been simultaneously detected in bright Z-type NS LMXB GX 13+1 (Ueda et al. 2004; Díaz Trigo et al. 2012; Saavedra et al. 2023). The spectral behavior of the source 1A 1744-361 is very similar, as observed for the atoll source GX 13+1 by Saavedra et al. (2023). They detected broad (σ0.15\sigma\sim 0.15) absorption lines around 6.87\sim 6.87 and 8.03keV\sim 8.03{\rm~{}keV}{} from the NuSTAR spectrum of GX 13+1 and attributed those to the Fe XXVI Kα\alpha and Ni XXVIII absorption line, respectively. If the observed line energies are compared to the rest energies of Fe XXVI Kα\alpha and Ni XXVIII absorption line, it indicates a redshifted flow. However, from the modeling with a physically motivated warm absorber model, they suggested an outflow from the system with a velocity 1000\lesssim 1000 km s-1. They attributed the absorption features to a photo-ionized plasma emanating from the accretion disc in the form of wind/jets. Blueshifted narrow absorption lines have been previously observed in many NS LMXBs and are interpreted as outflowing disc winds (Ueda et al., 2004; Miller et al., 2011; Degenaar et al., 2014; Bozzo et al., 2016). The amount of blueshift (6300\sim 6300 km s-1) observed for the source 1A 1744-361 is comparatively larger than the typically observed values i.e., 4003000400-3000 km s-1 (Díaz Trigo & Boirin, 2016). However, the highest velocities claimed for NS LMXBs so far are 900014000\sim 9000-14000 km s-1 (Degenaar et al., 2014; Miller et al., 2016). For the NS LMXB 1RXS J180408.9-342058, Degenaar et al. (2016) measured an outflow velocity as high as 25800\sim 25800 km s-1 even at a low inclination angle of i300i\sim 30^{0}. Whereas redshifted flow, i.e., inward to the NS systems, is not commonly observed, and the origin of the same is still poorly understood. Kubota et al. (2018) reported a redshift of 4000±1400\sim 4000\pm 1400 km s-1 for the high-mass X-ray binary SMC X-1 and discussed some possibilities of the astrophysical origin of the absorption lines.

A rough estimation of the distance of the ionized absorbing material (rr) from the centre of the system could be evaluated by means of the ionization parameter ξ\xi. According to Díaz Trigo et al. (2012), the distance rr is defined as

r=LξNH,warmabsdr,r=\frac{L}{\xi\>N_{H,warmabs}}\frac{d}{r}, (1)

where LL is the unabsorbed luminosity in ergs s-1, ne=NH,warmabs/dn_{e}=N_{H,warmabs}/d is the electron density of the ionized plasma, and dd is the thickness of the slab of ionizing absorbing material. Using the spectral-fitting results and considering typical values of d/rd/r ranging from 0.10.1 to 11, we estimate rr between 1.0×(105106)\sim 1.0\times(10^{5}-10^{6}) km. This value is in excellent agreement with the value previously obtained by Gavriil et al. (2012) using the Chandra data. Moreover, this value for rr is safely within the accretion disc radius found earlier by Gavriil et al. (2012). It suggests that the absorption features are most likely emanating from a disc wind far from the central source. However, the complete geometry of the putative absorber in 1A 1744-361 needs to be clearly understood.

The best-fit spectral parameters were further used to compute physical properties like mass accretion rate (m˙\dot{m}), the maximum radius of the boundary layer (RBL,maxR_{BL,max}), and magnetic field strength (BB) of the NS in the system. We first estimated the mass accretion rate per unit area, using Equation (2) of Galloway et al. (2008)

m˙= 6.7×103(Fpcbol109ergcm2s1)(d10kpc)2(MNS1.4M)1×(1+z1.31)(RNS10km)1gcm2s1.\begin{split}\dot{m}=&\>6.7\times 10^{3}\left(\frac{F_{p}\>c_{\text{bol}}}{10^{-9}\text{erg}\>\text{cm}^{-2}\>\text{s}^{-1}}\right)\left(\frac{d}{10\>\text{kpc}}\right)^{2}\left(\frac{M_{\text{NS}}}{1.4M_{\odot}}\right)^{-1}\\ &\times\left(\frac{1+z}{1.31}\right)\left(\frac{R_{\text{NS}}}{10\>\text{km}}\right)^{-1}\text{g}\>\text{cm}^{-2}\>\text{s}^{-1}.\end{split} (2)

The above equation yields a mass accretion rate of 4.4×109My14.4\times 10^{-9}\;M_{\odot}\;\text{y}^{-1} at a persistent flux Fp=2.35×109F_{p}=2.35\times 10^{-9} erg s-1 cm-2, assuming the bolometric correction cbol1.38c_{bol}\sim 1.38 for the nonpulsing sources (Galloway et al., 2008). Here we assume 1+z=1.311+z=1.31 (where zz is the surface redshift) for an NS with mass (MNSM_{NS}) 1.4 MM_{\odot} and radius (RNSR_{NS}) 1010 km. To estimate the maximum radial extension of the boundary layer from the NS surface based on the mass accretion rate, we used Equation (2) of Popham & Sunyaev (2001). We found the maximum value of the boundary layer to extend to RBL6.53RgR_{BL}\sim 6.53\;R_{g}, assuming MNS=1.4MM_{NS}=1.4\>M_{\odot} and RNS=10R_{NS}=10 km. The actual value may be larger than this if we account for the viscous effects and the spin of this layer. The radial extent of the boundary layer regions is consistent with the disc position.

An upper limit of the magnetic field strength of the NS can be estimated using the upper limit of RinR_{in} measured from the reflection fit. Equation (1) of Cackett et al. (2009) gives the following expression for the magnetic dipole moment,

μ=3.5×1023kA7/4x7/4(M1.4M)2×(fangηFbol109ergcm2s1)1/2D3.5kpcGcm3.\begin{split}\mu=&3.5\times 10^{23}k_{A}^{-7/4}x^{7/4}\left(\frac{M}{1.4M_{\odot}}\right)^{2}\\ &\times\left(\frac{f_{ang}}{\eta}\frac{F_{bol}}{10^{-9}\text{erg}\>\text{cm}^{-2}\>\text{s}^{-1}}\right)^{1/2}\frac{D}{3.5\>\text{kpc}}\text{G}\;\text{cm}^{3}.\end{split} (3)

We assumed a geometrical coefficient kA=1k_{A}=1, an anisotropy correction factor fang=1f_{ang}=1, and the accretion efficiency in the Schwarzschild metric η=0.2\eta=0.2 (as reported in Cackett et al. 2009 and Sibgatullin & Sunyaev 2000) and used 0.11000.1-100 keV flux as the bolometric flux (FbolF_{bol}) of 4.0×109\sim 4.0\times 10^{-9} erg s-1 cm-2. Cackett et al. (2009) modified RinR_{in} as Rin=xGM/c2R_{in}=x\>GM/c^{2} introducing a scale factor xx. Using the upper limit of RinR_{in} (15Rg\lesssim 15\>R_{g}), we obtained μ0.47×1027\mu\leq 0.47\times 10^{27} G cm3. This corresponds to an upper limit of the magnetic field strength of B0.94×109B\lesssim 0.94\times 10^{9} G at the magnetic poles (for an NS mass of 1.4M1.4\>M_{\odot}, a radius of 1010 km, and a distance of 99 kpc). To the best of our knowledge, there has not been any previous estimation of the RinR_{in}, m˙\dot{m}, μ\mu, BB of this NS system. Hence, there exists no scope for comparison of the results obtained in the present analysis with other previous works.

In this work, we aimed to focus on detecting disc reflection and absorption, thereby constraining its accretion geometry through spectro-timing analysis. We note that the continuum emission can alternatively be described with different combinations of model components. Apart from the presence of the Comptonization component, previous studies detected the presence of a broad emission line and absorption features in the spectra of 1A 1744-361 (Bhattacharyya et al., 2006b; Gavriil et al., 2012) and we focused on these features. We primarily inspected that the reflection and absorption features were insensitive to the specific choice of the continuum models. However, the choice of reflection and absorption model may have some impact on the spectral parameters. In our spectral fitting, we have found that power law is dominant in the phenomenological fit and provided most of the hard X-ray flux. This flux illuminates the accretion disc and produces the reflection spectrum. The choice of the reflection model is based on this observed fact. However, different reflection models based on different illuminating spectra may be tested in the reflection fits. We note that it is challenging to constrain all the reflection parameters if we implement the reflection models, which assumes different illuminating spectra. In addition, a further correlation between the ionization and column density of the absorber and the equivalent width of the broad iron line can be drawn in future studies.

6 Acknowledgements

This research has made use of data and/or software provided by the High Energy Astrophysics Science Archive Research Centre (HEASARC). This research also has made use of the NuSTAR data analysis software (NuSTARDAS) jointly developed by the ASI Space Science Data Center (SSDC, Italy) and the California Institute of Technology (Caltech, USA). ASM and BR would like to thank Inter-University Centre for Astronomy and Astrophysics (IUCAA) for their facilities extended to him under their Visiting Associate Programme.

7 Data availability

This research has made use of data obtained from the HEASARC, provided by NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center. The observational data set with Obs. IDs 9080131200190801312001 (NuSTAR) dated 8th June 2022 is in public domain put by NASA at their website https://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov.

References

  • Arnaud (1996) Arnaud K. A., 1996, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 101, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V, Jacoby G. H., Barnes J., eds., p. 17
  • Bahramian et al. (2013) Bahramian A., Heinke C. O., Sivakoff G. R., 2013, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 5301, 1
  • Bhattacharyya et al. (2006a) Bhattacharyya S., Strohmayer T. E., Markwardt C. B., Swank J. H., 2006a, ApJl, 639, L31
  • Bhattacharyya et al. (2006b) Bhattacharyya S., Strohmayer T. E., Swank J. H., Markwardt C. B., 2006b, ApJ, 652, 603
  • Boirin et al. (2005) Boirin L., Méndez M., Díaz Trigo M., Parmar A. N., Kaastra J. S., 2005, A&A, 436, 195
  • Bozzo et al. (2016) Bozzo E., Oskinova L., Feldmeier A., Falanga M., 2016, A&A, 589, A102
  • Braje et al. (2000) Braje T. M., Romani R. W., Rauch K. P., 2000, ApJ, 531, 447
  • Buisson et al. (2021) Buisson D. J. K. et al., 2021, MNRAS, 503, 5600
  • Cackett et al. (2009) Cackett E. M., Altamirano D., Patruno A., Miller J. M., Reynolds M., Linares M., Wijnands R., 2009, ApJl, 694, L21
  • Cackett et al. (2008) Cackett E. M. et al., 2008, ApJ, 674, 415
  • Carpenter et al. (1977) Carpenter G. F., Eyles C. J., Skinner G. K., Wilson A. M., Willmore A. P., 1977, MNRAS, 179, 27P
  • Chatterjee et al. (2023) Chatterjee R., Agrawal V. K., Jayasurya K. M., Katoch T., 2023, MNRAS, 521, L74
  • Church et al. (2014) Church M. J., Gibiec A., Bałucińska-Church M., 2014, MNRAS, 438, 2784
  • Davison et al. (1976) Davison P., Burnell J., Ives J., Wilson A., Carpenter G., 1976, IAUC, 2925, 2
  • Degenaar et al. (2016) Degenaar N. et al., 2016, MNRAS, 461, 4049
  • Degenaar et al. (2014) Degenaar N., Miller J. M., Harrison F. A., Kennea J. A., Kouveliotou C., Younes G., 2014, ApJl, 796, L9
  • Degenaar & Wijnands (2010) Degenaar N., Wijnands R., 2010, A&A, 524, A69
  • Díaz Trigo & Boirin (2016) Díaz Trigo M., Boirin L., 2016, Astronomische Nachrichten, 337, 368
  • Díaz Trigo et al. (2012) Díaz Trigo M., Sidoli L., Boirin L., Parmar A. N., 2012, A&A, 543, A50
  • Ducci et al. (2023) Ducci L., Malacaria C., Romano P., Bozzo E., Berton M., Santangelo A., Congiu E., 2023, A&A, 674, A100
  • Emelyanov et al. (2001) Emelyanov A. N., Aref’ev V. A., Churazov E. M., Gilfanov M. R., Sunyaev R. A., 2001, Astronomy Letters, 27, 781
  • Fabian et al. (1989) Fabian A. C., Rees M. J., Stella L., White N. E., 1989, MNRAS, 238, 729
  • Falanga et al. (2004) Falanga M., Farinelli R., Goldoni P., Frontera F., Goldwurm A., Stella L., 2004, A&A, 426, 979
  • Galloway et al. (2008) Galloway D. K., Muno M. P., Hartman J. M., Psaltis D., Chakrabarty D., 2008, ApJS, 179, 360
  • García et al. (2014) García J. et al., 2014, ApJ, 782, 76
  • Gavriil et al. (2012) Gavriil F. P., Strohmayer T. E., Bhattacharyya S., 2012, ApJ, 753, 2
  • Harrison et al. (2013) Harrison F. A. et al., 2013, ApJ, 770, 103
  • Hasinger & van der Klis (1989) Hasinger G., van der Klis M., 1989, A&A, 225, 79
  • Iaria et al. (2016) Iaria R. et al., 2016, A&A, 596, A21
  • Kennea et al. (2022) Kennea J. A., Evans P. A., Negoro H., 2022, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 15408, 1
  • King et al. (2016) King A. L. et al., 2016, ApJl, 819, L29
  • Kobayashi et al. (2022) Kobayashi K. et al., 2022, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 15407, 1
  • Kubota et al. (2018) Kubota M., Odaka H., Tamagawa T., Nakano T., 2018, ApJl, 868, L26
  • Kuulkers et al. (2003) Kuulkers E., den Hartog P. R., in’t Zand J. J. M., Verbunt F. W. M., Harris W. E., Cocchi M., 2003, A&A, 399, 663
  • Lin et al. (2007) Lin D., Remillard R. A., Homan J., 2007, ApJ, 667, 1073
  • Ludlam et al. (2017) Ludlam R. M. et al., 2017, ApJ, 836, 140
  • Ludlam et al. (2019) Ludlam R. M. et al., 2019, ApJ, 873, 99
  • Miller et al. (2011) Miller J. M., Maitra D., Cackett E. M., Bhattacharyya S., Strohmayer T. E., 2011, ApJl, 731, L7
  • Miller et al. (2016) Miller J. M., Raymond J., Cackett E., Grinberg V., Nowak M., 2016, ApJl, 822, L18
  • Mondal et al. (2021) Mondal A. S., Raychaudhuri B., Dewangan G. C., 2021, MNRAS, 504, 1331
  • Neilsen & Lee (2009) Neilsen J., Lee J. C., 2009, Nature, 458, 481
  • Ng et al. (2022) Ng M. et al., 2022, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 15424, 1
  • Papitto et al. (2013) Papitto A. et al., 2013, MNRAS, 429, 3411
  • Pike et al. (2022) Pike S. N., Jaodand A., Ludlam R. M., Tomsick J. A., 2022, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 15429, 1
  • Popham & Sunyaev (2001) Popham R., Sunyaev R., 2001, ApJ, 547, 355
  • Saavedra et al. (2023) Saavedra E. A., García F., Fogantini F. A., Méndez M., Combi J. A., Luque-Escamilla P. L., Martí J., 2023, MNRAS, 522, 3367
  • Sibgatullin & Sunyaev (2000) Sibgatullin N. R., Sunyaev R. A., 2000, Astronomy Letters, 26, 699
  • Takahashi et al. (2011) Takahashi H., Sakurai S., Makishima K., 2011, ApJ, 738, 62
  • Ueda et al. (2004) Ueda Y., Murakami H., Yamaoka K., Dotani T., Ebisawa K., 2004, ApJ, 609, 325
  • van der Klis (1995) van der Klis M., 1995, X-ray Binaries, 252
  • Verner et al. (1996) Verner D. A., Ferland G. J., Korista K. T., Yakovlev D. G., 1996, ApJ, 465, 487
  • Wilms et al. (2000) Wilms J., Allen A., McCray R., 2000, ApJ, 542, 914