This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Reentrant Melting of Lanes of Rough Circular Discs

Md. Samsuzzaman    A. Sayeed Department of Physics, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune-411007, India.    Arnab Saha Department of Physics, University Of Calcutta, 92 Acharya Prafulla Chandra Road, Kolkata-700009, India [email protected]
Abstract

We consider binary suspension of rough, circular particles in two dimensions under athermal conditions. The mean density of the system is kept constant. The suspension is subject to a time-independent external drive in response to which one half of the particles are pulled along the field direction whereas the other half is pushed in the opposite direction. Simulating the system with different magnitude of external drive in steady state, we obtain oppositely moving macroscopic lanes only for a moderate range of external drive. Below as well as above the range we obtain states with no lane. Hence we find that no-lane state re-enters along the axis of the external drive in the non-equilibrium phase diagram corresponding to the laning transition, with varying roughness of individual particles and external drive. Inter-particle friction (contact dissipation) due to the roughness of the individual particle is the main player behind the re-entrance of no-lane state at high external drives.

I Introduction

The relation between the microscopic processes and macroscopic behavior of a system is pertinent to many scientific discourse. Lane formation is a non-equilibrium self-organisation process observed in varied binary mixtures of two oppositely moving species. Under certain conditions, the microscopic elements of these two species segregate from a homogeneously mixed state to form oppositely moving macroscopic lanes composed of different species. This dynamical transition occurs in widely varying time and length scales starting from pedestrian dynamics helbing2005self ; helbing1998self , army ants couzin2003self , all the way to collective cell-dynamicsyamao2011multi ; kogler2015lane ; mccandlish2012spontaneous , driven binary plasma surko1989positron ; sutterlin2009dynamics , granular flows aranson2006patterns ; borzsonyi2009patterns ; mullin2000coarsening and driven colloids leunissen2005ionic ; vissers2011lane ; vissers2011band .

Colloids, when driven far from thermal equilibrium, exhibit diverse spatio-temporal patterns and novel transport properties due to intricate self-organization processes yethiraj2007tunable ; dobnikar2013emergent . One of such prototypes of non-equilibrium phenomena in driven binary colloids is lane formation. It has been studied extensively in theory dzubiella2002lane ; lowen2003nonequilibrium ; klymko2016microscopic ; wachtler2016lane ; rex2007lane ; rex2008influence ; rex2008kolloidale and in experiments leunissen2005ionic ; vissers2011lane ; vissers2011band . In this particular problem a homogeneously mixed binary colloid is considered where the constituent colloidal particles of different species move in opposite directions in response to an external drive. It has been shown that depending on various parameters of the system (e.g. average density, strength of external drive, temperature etc.), oppositely moving lanes composed of the particles of different species present in the suspension, can emerge from a homogeneously mixed state both by constant (i.e. time-independent) leunissen2005ionic ; vissers2011lane as well as time-periodic (e.g. ac drive) external drive vissers2011band . The colloidal lanes can appear perpendicular vissers2011band as well as parallel vissers2011lane to the external drive. In case of the lane formation parallel to the external drive the transition occurs when the magnitude of the external driving force exceeds a finite threshold valuedzubiella2002lane . As the lane forms, it has been shown that the correlation decays algebraically parallel to the drive and exponentially perpendicular to the drive poncet2017universal . The transition is first order dzubiella2002lane and has considerable finite size effects glanz2012nature . For example, in finite system though the transition is quite sharp, in thermodynamic limit when the system-size diverges, the correlation along the external drive does not, signifying a smooth crossover in this limit glanz2012nature . Another major finding is the re-entrance of no-lane state with increasing density and keeping other parameters (e.g. external force) fixed. For a fixed driving force (high enough to form lanes) with increasing particle density, first there occurs a transition from the no-lane state towards the laned state which is followed by a second transition which brings the no-lane state back as the particles get jammed at high densities chakrabarti2004reentrance .

Recently it has been realised that microscopic frictional contacts among the colloidal particles induced by surface roughness of the particles can produce novel macroscopic effects. An important example of such tribological effect is discontinuous shear thickening (DST) williamson2002some ; cheng2011imaging ; barnes1989shear ; mewis2012colloidal ; brown2009dynamic ; hsu2018roughness ; hsiao2019experimental where effective viscosity of the suspension increases abruptly by several orders of magnitude (i.e. much stronger dependence than Bagnold scaling bagnold1954experiments ) with increasing shear rate close to its critical value. DST is exhibited in a variety of suspensions with Brownian metzner1958flow ; hoffman1972discontinuous ; hoffman1974discontinuous ; bender1996reversible ; frith1996shear ; fagan1997rheology ; shrivastav2016heterogeneous ; boersma1990shear ; d1993scattering ; o2000stress ; maranzano2001effects ; maranzano2001effectsof as well as non-Brownian boersma1990shear ; lootens2004gelation ; lootens2005dilatant ; larsen2010elasticity ; bertrand2002shear ; brown2009dynamic ; brown2012role ; fall2010shear ; fall2012shear ; lemaitre2009dry characters suggesting DST as a universal behaviour of dense suspensions where thermal motion of the particles does not seem to contribute significantly (e.g. lemaitre2009dry ). Indeed, DST occurs in experiments with rigid non-Brownian neutrally buoyant particles suspended in a Newtonian fluid in the Stokes regime brown2009dynamic ; brown2012role . Here we also note that depending on the density and surface roughness of the particles, the inter-particle friction can also be pivotal in the collective dynamics of active systems such as pedestrian dynamics or in the dynamics of army ants.

Being motivated by above findings, we will explore here how the lane formation qualifies in the presence of inter-particle friction under athermal conditions. In order to introduce dissipative inter-particle force we will adapt a simple route introduced to model mechanics of foam durian1995foam which later become useful to explore other related problems: shear thinning in adhesive dispersions irani2019discontinuous , dissipation and rheology of soft-core discs under shear vaagberg2014dissipation , plasticity in sheared glassvarnik2014correlations , avalanche-size distribution in sheared amorphous solid under athermal condition lemaitre2009rate ; lemaitre2009dry , influence of attractive interaction in granular suspensions irani2014impact , jamming in confined, soft particles under gravity chaudhuri2012dynamical , effective temperature in driven systems o2004effective etc. Essentially it assumes that the inter-particle dissipative force that drags a particle, is proportional to the velocity of the particle relative to the velocities of its nearest neighbours which are in contact to the particle. In the presence of such inter-particle friction, here we will show that for a fixed density, in two dimensions, under athermal conditions, the lanes, which are formed as the external drive exceeds a threshold value (as also shown by the earlier studies on colloidal lane formation dzubiella2002lane ), will become unstable if the external drive is increased further. In other words, with finite inter-particle friction, at fixed average density but with increasing strength of external drive, there will be a re-entrance of no-lane state. Here we emphasize that the re-entrance of the no-lane state obtained here differs fundamentally from the colloidal re-entrance obtained earlier in chakrabarti2004reentrance as it was obtained at fixed external drive and with increasing average density of the system where jamming played a crucial role.

Next we will systematically detail our findings, starting from model description and then by describing and analysing the results obtained by simulating the model. For better understanding, at the end we come up with an intuitive phenomenology behind the re-entrance by which we propose a simpler toy model producing qualitatively similar results as obtained by simulating actual model equation.

II Model

We consider a binary suspension of ‘a’ and ‘b’ type particles in two dimensions where each of the components has NaN_{a} and NbN_{b} particles within area AA. The average density of the system ρ=(Na+Nb)/A\rho=(N_{a}+N_{b})/A. The average densities of each of the components are ρa=Na/A\rho_{a}=N_{a}/A and ρb=Nb/A\rho_{b}=N_{b}/A. Here we consider the 1:11:1 mixture where Na=Nb=NN_{a}=N_{b}=N.

The particles are interacting with each other via a conservative force derived from an effective pair potential UU that depends on the distance between the particles of the concerned pair. For simplicity we consider the symmetric case where Uaa=Ubb=Uab=UU_{aa}=U_{bb}=U_{ab}=U. The inter-particle interaction that we consider here is screened Coulomb interaction dzubiella2002lane ,

U(rij)=V0exp(κ(rijσ))(rij/σ).U(r_{ij})=V_{0}\frac{\exp(-\kappa(r_{ij}-\sigma))}{(r_{ij}/\sigma)}. (1)

Here rijr_{ij} is the distance between a pair of the particles denoted by the index ii and jj, V0V_{0} is the energy scale and σ\sigma is the particle diameter that sets a length scale. The inverse screening length κ=4σ\kappa=4\sigma governs the range of the interaction. This interaction is used to model charge-stabilised suspensions where κ\kappa is the range of the interaction which can be tuned, for example, chemicallycrocker1994microscopic .

Apart from the conservative inter-particle forces, the particles are also going through dissipative forces. One of them is originated from the frictional drag force 𝐅ip{\bf{F}}_{i}^{p} due to the surrounding fluid. It is proportional to velocity 𝐯i{\bf{v}}_{i} of the ii-th particle, i.e. 𝐅ip=γ𝐯i{\bf{F}}_{i}^{p}=-\gamma{\bf{v}}_{i} where γ=3πησ\gamma=3\pi\eta\sigma dhont1996introduction is the friction coefficient between the particle and the fluid that depends on the viscosity η\eta of the surrounding fluid. Here we assume that the effect of hydrodynamic interaction among the suspended particles are negligibly small which can be due to screening riese2000effective .

Another source of dissipative force that an individual particle can face, is from inter-particle friction. It is a short-ranged dissipative force that depends on the average relative velocity between a particle and its nearest neighbours which are in contact o2004effective ; lemaitre2009rate ; lemaitre2009dry ; vaagberg2014dissipation i.e., 𝐅iq=μNijH(uij)(𝐯i𝐯j){\bf{F}}_{i}^{q}=-\frac{\mu}{N_{i}}\sum_{j}H(u_{ij})({\bf{v}}_{i}-{\bf{v}}_{j}) where H(uij)=1H(u_{ij})=1 if uij=σrij0u_{ij}=\sigma-r_{ij}\geq 0 and H(uij)=0H(u_{ij})=0 otherwise. Here NiN_{i} is the number of nearest neighbours of iith particle for which H=1H=1. If Ni=0N_{i}=0, as there is no neighbouring particle, 𝐅iq=0{\bf{F}}_{i}^{q}=0.

Finally, the particles are also experiencing constant external field along a particular direction (here without loosing any generality we choose the direction to be 𝐱^\hat{\bf{x}}). Type ‘a’ particles are driven along +𝐱^+\hat{\bf{x}} and ‘b’ type particles are driven in opposite direction due to the external force 𝐅ext=Fext𝐱^i{\bf{F}}_{\text{ext}}=F_{\text{ext}}\hat{\bf{x}}_{i}. Clearly, it is only the response to the external force that distinguishes between ‘a’ and ‘b’ type particles. Therefore the equation of motion of the particles with unit mass is given by d2𝐫idt2=𝐅ip+𝐅iqjiU±𝐅ext\frac{d^{2}{\bf{r}}_{i}}{dt^{2}}={\bf{F}}^{p}_{i}+{\bf{F}}^{q}_{i}-\sum_{j}\nabla_{i}U\pm{\bf{F}}_{\text{ext}} where the positive sign is used when iNai\in N_{a} and negative sign is used when iNbi\in N_{b}. Thermal fluctuation is considered to be negligibly small in comparison to other forces as mentioned before.

We consider σ\sigma to be the unit for length and 1/γ1/\gamma to be the unit for time. With these units the left hand side of the equation of motion mentioned before, becomes γ2σd2𝐫~idt~2\gamma^{2}\sigma\frac{d^{2}{\tilde{\bf{r}}_{i}}}{d\tilde{t}^{2}} where 𝐫~i\tilde{\bf{r}}_{i} is dimensionless position vector of the particle at dimensionless time t~\tilde{t}. With these units the frictional drag from fluid becomes γ2σ𝐅~ip\gamma^{2}\sigma{\tilde{\bf{F}}}^{p}_{i} where 𝐅~ip{\tilde{\bf{F}}}^{p}_{i} is dimensionless velocity of iith particle. Similarly inter-particle friction becomes μγσ𝐅~iq=αγ2σ𝐅~iq\mu\gamma\sigma{\tilde{\bf{F}}}^{q}_{i}=\alpha\gamma^{2}\sigma{\tilde{\bf{F}}}^{q}_{i} where μ/γ=α\mu/\gamma=\alpha and 𝐅~iq{\tilde{\bf{F}}}^{q}_{i} is the dimensionless relative velocity between a particle and its nearest neighbours which are in contact. By dividing the both side of the equation of motion (mentioned earlier) with γ2σ\gamma^{2}\sigma and introducing dimensionless gradient operator as 1σ~i\frac{1}{\sigma}\tilde{\nabla}_{i} we obtain dimensionless inter-particle energy scale as U0=V0/γ2σ2U_{0}=V_{0}/\gamma^{2}\sigma^{2}. Similarly we obtain non-dimensionalised magnitude of the externally applied driving force as F~ext=Fext/γ2σ\tilde{F}_{\text{ext}}=F_{\text{ext}}/\gamma^{2}\sigma. Therefore the equation of motion with dimensionless quantities reads

d2𝐫~idt~2=𝐅~ip+α𝐅~iqj~iU~±𝐅~ext.\frac{d^{2}{\tilde{\bf{r}}}_{i}}{d\tilde{t}^{2}}={\tilde{\bf{F}}}^{p}_{i}+\alpha{\tilde{\bf{F}}}^{q}_{i}-\sum_{j}\tilde{\nabla}_{i}\tilde{U}\pm{\tilde{\bf{F}}}_{\text{ext}}. (2)

where U~=U0exp(κσ(r~ij1))r~ij\tilde{U}=U_{0}\frac{\exp(-\kappa\sigma(\tilde{r}_{ij}-1))}{\tilde{r}_{ij}}, r~ij=rij/σ\tilde{r}_{ij}=r_{ij}/\sigma. The average non-dimensional density is given by ρ~=ρσ2\tilde{\rho}=\rho\sigma^{2}. For brevity of notation, from now on, we will omit tilde from the dimensionless variables.

III Simulation Method

We have carried out simulation by integrating the equation of motion given in Eq.[2]. The data presented here are obtained by simulating N=2000N=2000 particles confined within a square box of area A=44σ×44σA=44\sigma\times 44\sigma with periodic boundary condition in both X and Y directions. The average density is suitable for the lane formation provided the external driving force exceeds a threshold value chakrabarti2004reentrance ; dzubiella2002lane . To update the position and velocity of the particles we use velocity verlet algorithm allen2017computer with time discretization δt=0.0001\delta t=0.0001, for a total simulation run of 6×1076\times 10^{7} iterations. Positions and velocities of the particles are recorded when the system reaches at non-equilibrium steady state after 50×10450\times 10^{4} simulation steps when the average lane order of the system does not alter significantly over time. Initially the positions and velocities of the particles are distributed randomly. Once 𝐅ext{\bf F}_{\text{ext}} is switched on, NaN_{a} and NbN_{b} particles are chosen randomly from 2N2N particles such that the initial configurations represent well-mixed binary mixture of aa and bb type particles. For all our simulations we have kept the values of A,NA,N (and thereby ρ),γ,V0,σ{\rho}),\gamma,V_{0},\sigma constant and vary |𝐅ext|=Fext|{\bf{F}}_{\text{ext}}|={F}_{\text{ext}} and α{\alpha}. The results presented here are averaged over time in non-equilibrium steady states and also over 3 realisations.

IV Results

We begin by analyzing the non-equilibrium steady states of the system obtained by varying FextF_{\text{ext}} and α\alpha. The states are characterised by the spatial organisation as well as the dynamical properties of the particles. Below we will develop the tools to characterise the steady states.

In a similar set-up with colloidal binary suspensions, it is known that the system phase-separate at finite temperature and the components move in opposite directions forming oppositely moving parallel lanes dzubiella2002lane . The transition from non-laned state to laned state in colloidal binary suspension starts to occur after a finite threshold of external driving force. The transition is reversible and exhibits significant hysteresis. It is classified as a first-order non-equilibrium transition dzubiella2002lane . Note that there are fundamental differences between the system that we are concerned here and the system discussed in dzubiella2002lane : the present model includes inter-particle contact dissipation and it does not involve thermal fluctuation which is relevant for non-Brownian suspensions ( e.g. o2004effective ). Our aim here is to explore the consequence of inter-particle friction on lane formation in two dimensions when the thermal fluctuation is negligibly small. To characterise the spatial organisation of the particle in the context of lane formation, we borrow the lane order parameter from dzubiella2002lane . We define the lane order parameter by assigning every particle a quantity ϕi\phi_{i} as,

ϕi\displaystyle\phi_{i} =\displaystyle= 1when|yjyi|>ρ1/2/2\displaystyle 1~{}~{}~{}{\text{when}}~{}~{}|y_{j}-y_{i}|>\rho^{-1/2}/2 (3)
=\displaystyle= 0elsewhere\displaystyle 0~{}~{}~{}{\text{elsewhere}}

where iNa,jNbi\in N_{a},j\in N_{b}. This can be termed as local (i.e. defined for individual particle at time tt) lane order parameter. We define the global (i.e. defined for the whole system at a given configuration at time tt) lane order parameter as,

ϕ=1Niϕi\phi=\frac{1}{N}\sum_{i}\phi_{i} (4)

which can then be averaged over time and realisations in steady states. Note that for a perfectly mixed, non-laned state ϕ\phi is zero. It increases from zero when the lanes start to appear. For a perfectly laned state ϕ\phi is unity.

We will see later that with increasing FextF_{\text{ext}}, after a certain threshold value (say FcF_{c}), particles phase separate forming oppositely moving lanes. This phenomena is similar to the binary colloidal suspension as in dzubiella2002lane . If FextF_{\text{ext}} is increased further the laned state continues up to a second threshold value of FextF_{\text{ext}} (say, FcF_{c}^{\prime}). If FextF_{\text{ext}} is increased beyond FcF_{c}^{\prime}, irrespective of their type, particles tend to accumulate randomly creating high as well as low density regimes. Hence the density profile of the system tends to be increasingly non-uniform with increasing FextF_{\text{ext}}. Eventually the lane structure is broken at high enough FextF_{\text{ext}} and we obtain the reentrance of non-laned state, which is the central theme of the present work. Therefore it is important to quantify the non-uniformity of the density distribution of the system. We will quantify the non-uniformity by calculating the standard deviation of the local density profile g(x,y)g(x,y) of the system. Here g(x,y)g(x,y) is the local probability density of finding a particle (irrespective of its type) between xx to x+dxx+dx and yy to y+dyy+dy. Clearly g(x,y)𝑑x𝑑y=2N\int g(x,y)dxdy=2N. Computationally gg is obtained by dividing the system into a number of cells and then by counting the number of particles in each cell. For a given configuration the standard deviation is given in Eq.5 where the angular bracket represents averaging over number of cells. It is noteworthy that the cell should not be very large as it becomes incapable to capture the non-uniformity of the density profile (extreme case : for the cell which is of the same size as the system, Σ\Sigma vanishes). It should not be very small as well i.e. it should be larger than the size of a single particle. The cell-size we choose here is 4σ24\sigma^{2}. Here we report Σ\Sigma after taking the averages over time and realisations in steady states.

Σ=(g(x,y)ρ)2\Sigma=\sqrt{\langle(g(x,y)-\rho)^{2}\rangle} (5)

We emphasize here that the types of the particles are not considered while calculating g(x,y)g(x,y). Hence, for the states with uniform distribution of particles, irrespective of whether they contain lanes or not, Σ\Sigma is very low. In other words, for states with uniform particle distribution, by measuring Σ\Sigma one cannot distinguish between laned and non-laned states. Σ\Sigma increases when particles, disregarding their types, get accumulated in random places, making the density profile non-uniform. Σ\Sigma is a measure of the non-uniformity in the position distribution of the particles.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: Lane order parameter ϕ\phi and standard deviation Σ\Sigma of the density profile are plotted with external drive FextF_{\text{ext}} for α=0,0.25,0.5,0.75\alpha=0,0.25,0.5,0.75 in (a), (b), (c), (d) panels respectively. ϕ\phi is in red and Σ\Sigma is in black. The threshold of the lane order ϕc\phi_{c} is shown by ϕ=ϕc\phi=\phi_{c} line in blue. The width of the blue region depicts the window ΔF=FcFc\Delta F=F_{c}^{\prime}-F_{c} within which ϕ>ϕc\phi>\phi_{c} i.e. quality lanes occur in the system. The yellow region is where ϕ<ϕc\phi<\phi_{c}. Fext=FcF_{\text{ext}}=F_{c} is the left boundary of the blue region, which is the first threshold value of FextF_{\text{ext}} beyond which quality lanes form in steady states and therefore ϕ\phi becomes larger than ϕc\phi_{c}. With finite inter-particle friction (i.e. α>0\alpha>0 ), Fext=FcF_{\text{ext}}=F_{c}^{\prime} is the right boundary of the blue region, which is the second threshold value of FextF_{\text{ext}} beyond which, lane quality drops and ϕ\phi becomes smaller than ϕc\phi_{c}. Clearly, without inter-particle friction (i.e. for α=0\alpha=0 ), once the lanes are formed their quality does not drop considerably with increasing FextF_{\text{ext}} and therefore ϕ\phi is larger than ϕc\phi_{c} for all values of FextF_{\text{ext}} considered here. It is apparent from panels (b) - (d) that for α>0\alpha>0, Σ\Sigma increases with FextF_{\text{ext}}, affecting the lane-quality. Hence ϕ\phi drops below ϕc\phi_{c} when Fext>FcF_{\text{ext}}>F_{c}^{\prime}. Hence the no-lane state, which was there for Fext<FcF_{\text{ext}}<F_{c}, re-enters when Fext>FcF_{\text{ext}}>F_{c}^{\prime}.

The variation of ϕ\phi and Σ\Sigma with external force for different α\alpha is plotted in figure 1. From the plots it is evident that with α>0\alpha>0 , ϕ\phi has non-monotonic dependence on FextF_{\text{ext}} . Initially when Fext=0F_{\text{ext}}=0, the aa and bb type particles are homogeneously mixed with each other and therefore it is a no-laned state with ϕ=0\phi=0. It increases with increasing FextF_{\text{ext}} and reaches at a plateau when FextF_{\text{ext}} goes beyond the threshold FcF_{c} . In this plateau region even if FextF_{\text{ext}} increases, ϕ\phi does not change considerably. This plateau continues till FextF_{\text{ext}} reaches at a second threshold value FcF_{c}^{\prime} . When Fext>FcF_{\text{ext}}>F_{c}^{\prime} , ϕ\phi starts to decrease considerably with increasing FextF_{\text{ext}}. Hence the non-laned state re-enters. To distinguish between laned and no-lane state we consider a threshold ϕc=0.75\phi_{c}=0.75 such that for laned states ϕ>ϕc\phi>\phi_{c} and for no-lane states ϕ<ϕc\phi<\phi_{c}. We note from the figure that for α=0\alpha=0, ϕ>ϕcFext>Fc\phi>\phi_{c}\forall F_{\text{ext}}>F_{c} which is the reminiscent of lane formation in binary colloidal suspensions as explored in dzubiella2002lane . For α>0\alpha>0, due to the re-entrance of no-lane state, ϕ>ϕc\phi>\phi_{c} for Fc<Fext<FcF_{c}<F_{\text{ext}}<F_{c}^{\prime} . Beyond this window of external drives ΔF=FcFc\Delta F=F_{c}^{\prime}-F_{c}, ϕ<ϕc\phi<\phi_{c}. It is evident from the figure that ΔF\Delta F decreases as α\alpha increases. In contrast to ϕ\phi, when α=0\alpha=0, Σ\Sigma does not change considerably with FextF_{\text{ext}}. This implies that though the particles of different species segregate to form lanes, irrespective of their species, they are uniformly distributed through out the system. On the other hand when α>0\alpha>0, in contrast to ϕ\phi, Σ\Sigma increases monotonically with FextF_{\text{ext}}. This signifies that in presence of inter-particle friction, with increasing FextF_{\text{ext}}, the density profile becomes increasingly non-uniform. Though for lower external drives (Fc<Fext<FcF_{c}<F_{\text{ext}}<F_{c}^{\prime}) this non-uniformity is not so detrimental to the lane-structure of the system such that it falls apart but at higher external forces (Fext>Fc)F_{\text{ext}}>F_{c}^{\prime}) it is. Hence, with α>0\alpha>0, at high external drives, ϕ\phi drops below ϕc\phi_{c} and one gets the no-lane state back.

V Phase Diagram

The re-entrant transition between laned and no-lane phases of the system is represented by the phase diagram in αFext\alpha-F_{\text{ext}} plane in figure2. With the heat map of ϕ\phi and the broken lines as the guide-to-eye in α\alpha-FextF_{\text{ext}} plane we represent the phases.

Refer to caption
Figure 2: A: It is the heat map of the lane order parameter ϕ\phi in FextαF_{\text{ext}}-\alpha plane. It indicates that with finite inter-particle friction (α>0\alpha>0), for very low and high FextF_{\text{ext}}, the system does not support any lane structure whereas it is supported by the optimum values of FextF_{\text{ext}}, occur in-between. Broken lines are drawn schematically as a guide-to-eye to indicate the laned and no-lane phases. The phase diagram is constructed with a total of 22 different values of FextF_{ext} and 20 different α\alpha. B–D : Typical configurations with increasing magnitude of external drive FextF_{\text{ext}}, shown by the long black arrow at the bottom. Red and blue colors of the particles indicate that the external drive applied along +𝐱^\hat{\bf x} and -𝐱^\hat{\bf x} directions.

For α=0\alpha=0 and very low FextF_{\text{ext}} (0<Fext<0.20<F_{\text{ext}}<0.2) no significant laning is observed (ϕ<ϕc\phi<\phi_{c}). As FextF_{\text{ext}} increases and crosses the threshold FcF_{c}, system enters into the laned state (ϕ>ϕc\phi>\phi_{c}) and it remains in the laned state for all values of FextF_{\text{ext}} . There is no signature of re-entrance of the no-lane state with increasing FextF_{\text{ext}} when α=0\alpha=0. This is also true as far as α\alpha remains small (α0.15\alpha\lesssim 0.15). Thus, a minimum external drive is required to segregate the particles into distinct lanes which can be inferred from the fact that the external drive has to be larger than the other forces between any two pair of the particles moving opposite to each other. .

The scenario changes drastically as α\alpha increases beyond 0.150.15 and the change is apparent for high FextF_{\text{ext}}. In this regime of α\alpha, as earlier, we observe that lanes appear into the system only when Fext>FcF_{\text{ext}}>F_{c}. FcF_{c} increases slightly as we increase α\alpha. This implies that as the contact dissipation between the particles increases we need higher external drive to move against each other to form lane. The qualitative difference appears as we increase FextF_{\text{ext}} further. We observe that when FextF_{\text{ext}} goes beyond a second threshold FcF_{c}^{\prime}, the lane quality falls. ϕ\phi becomes smaller than ϕc\phi_{c}. No-lane state re-enters. Thus, in the αFext\alpha-F_{\text{ext}} plane, along the axis of increasing FextF_{\text{ext}}, first we have a region of no lanes, then a region of lanes and finally another region of no-lane. This is the central theme of our paper, which highlights the fact that it is not possible to have good lanes even if we increase the external drive to very high values, in the presence of inter-particle friction. We also observe that though FcF_{c} increases slightly but FcF_{c}^{\prime} reduces considerably with increasing α\alpha. Hence the window ΔF\Delta F, responsible for laning, shrinks with increasing α\alpha.

The typical configurations with increasing FextF_{\text{ext}} are shown in the lower panels of Fig.2, from B to D. They demonstrate that for very low external drive, in steady state, lanes are not developed within the system (panel B).It is developed only after crossing the finite threshold value of the drive FcF_{c}. Typical laned configuration is shown in panel C. When the external drive is increased further and eventually Fext>FcF_{\text{ext}}>F_{c}^{\prime}, the lanes are broken due to interparticle friction and no-lane state re-enters. Typical steady state configuration in this regime is given in panel D.

VI Dynamical Property

The transport along the direction of the external field is affected due to the inter-particle friction. Lanes help transport. With finite inter-particle friction the lane order is reduced at high external drive. Hence it is intuitive that the transport along the external drive will be affected as we increase the field. We quantify the transport along the direction of the external field by computing the drift velocity along the field in steady state. The drift velocity is defined as dzubiella2002lane ,

Refer to caption
Figure 3: Average drift velocity is plotted with different external drive FextF_{\text{ext}}. For every FextF_{\text{ext}} the drift along the drive is maximum when α=0\alpha=0. It reduces gradually with increasing α\alpha.
vD2=limt(xi(t)xi(0))2t2v_{D}^{2}=\lim_{t\rightarrow\infty}\frac{\langle(x_{i}(t)-x_{i}(0))^{2}\rangle}{t^{2}} (6)

where xi(t)x_{i}(t) is the xx-position of ii-th particle of the system. We measure vDv_{D} after the system reaches at a steady state where ϕ\phi fluctuates around a constant mean. The angular bracket implies averaging over different particles and then taking the average over time and realisations in steady states. We observe that as expected, drift velocity along the direction of the external field is reduced with increasing inter-particle friction.

VII Discussion

So far we have shown that with increasing external drive, not only the transition from a no-lane state to a laned state occurs in a driven binary suspension of oppositely moving rough particles under athermal conditions but a transition in reverse direction (laned to no-lane state) also occurs when the external drive is large enough. This re-entrant transition occurs when the inter-particle friction due to the roughness of the particles, affects their dynamics significantly. We have also shown that with increasing external drive, the density profile of the rough (α>0\alpha>0) particles become gradually nonuniform. Hence the well-formed lanes start to break at high external drives. Here we will discuss how the inter-particle friction due to the roughness of the particles can make the density profile non-uniform at high external drive.

Consider a state of the system with FextFcF_{\text{ext}}\rightarrow F_{c}^{\prime-} and α>0\alpha>0. In this parameter space, oppositely moving lanes are well-developed and adjacent to each other in the system. Particles which are within a lane and far from the boundaries of the lane, are facing less resistance from its neighbours because all of them are moving along the same direction. For these particles, |𝐅iq|0{|\bf{F}}^{q}_{i}|\simeq 0. Though for the particles which are at the lane-boundaries they are facing resistance from the oppositely moving particles from the lane next to them. Therefore for them |𝐅|iq>0{|\bf{F}|}^{q}_{i}>0. Hence the effective friction faced by the interfacial particles between two lanes are more in comparison to the particles which are well inside a lane. This makes the interfacial particles slower in comparison to the other particles of a lane. Eventually it leads the effective friction to be space dependent, making the density distribution non-uniform, particularly at high external forces.

To test this, below we consider a toy equation of motion for the particles where, instead considering the inter-particle friction explicitly, we consider the effective friction G>0G>0 to be space-dependent. Considering a configuration of the system with well-developed lanes one may assign properties like G(x,y)=G(x,y+l)G(x,y)=G(x,y+l) and G(x,l)<G(x,l/2)G(x,l)<G(x,l/2) (where ll is the typical lane-width) to the effective friction. The inequality ensures that the effective friction inside a lane is less than the friction faced by the particles at the interface between two oppositely moving lanes.

It is noteworthy that the properties assigned to G(x,y)G(x,y) is relevant only when lanes are well-developed in the system i.e. when Fc<Fext<FcF_{c}<F_{\text{ext}}<F_{c}^{\prime}. In general, for all FextF_{\text{ext}}, GG can have complex dependence on position and relative velocity (relative to the neighbours) of a particle, deriving which is beyond the scope of the current paper. Instead we assume a functional form of GG that maintains the aforementioned properties for all values external drives. Though the strength of the periodic modulation of GG is small enough such that it cannot disturb the lane formation till FextFcF_{\text{ext}}\leq F_{c}^{\prime}. When Fext>FcF_{\text{ext}}>F_{c}^{\prime}, we will see that the periodic modulation in GG affects the lane structure and eventually the lane order decreases. This essentially indicates that in the presence of contact dissipation, the effective friction faced by a particle within a laned state can be spatially periodic and it can destabilise the lane structure beyond a certain threshold value of external drive FcF_{c}^{\prime}.

We assume following simple functional form of G(x,y)G(x,y) as,

G(x,y)=γ(1+asin(πy/l)2)G(x,y)=\gamma\left(1+a\sin{{}^{2}}\left(\pi y/l\right)\right)

where a>0a>0 is the amplitude of the periodic modulation of GG varying in space between its minimum value at the middle of a lane at y=nly=nl, given by Gmin=γG_{\text{min}}=\gamma and its maximum value at the interface between two oppositely moving lanes i.e. at y=(n+1/2)ly=(n+1/2)l, which is given by Gmax=γ(1+a)G_{\text{max}}=\gamma(1+a) (wheren=0,1,2,3n=0,1,2,3...). The equation of motion of ith particle will be

d2𝐫idt2=𝐅ipjiU±𝐅ext.\frac{d^{2}{{\bf{r}}}_{i}}{dt^{2}}={{\bf{F}}}^{p}_{i}-\sum_{j}\nabla_{i}U\pm{{\bf{F}}}_{\text{ext}}. (7)

where the effective friction (both from the fluid and from the neighbouring particles in contact) faced by the particle is given by 𝐅~ip=G(x,y)𝐯i{\tilde{\bf{F}}}^{p}_{i}=-G(x,y){\bf{v}}_{i}.We simulate the aforementioned model in the same parameter space as before and evaluate ϕ\phi with different |𝐅ext||{\bf F}_{\text{ext}}| to obtain the following figure 4,

Refer to caption
Figure 4: Here we have plotted steady state ϕ\phi with different external drive FextF_{\text{ext}} obtained by simulating Eq.7. The blue horizontal straight line represents ϕ=ϕc\phi=\phi_{c}. The blue rectangle represents the optimal values of FextF_{\text{ext}} for which ϕ>ϕc\phi>\phi_{c}. The left boundary (F=FcF=F_{c}) of the rectangle represents the lower threshold of the external drive below which ϕ<ϕc\phi<\phi_{c}. The right boundary (F=FcF=F_{c}^{\prime}) of the rectangle represents the upper threshold of the external drive beyond which states with ϕ<ϕc\phi<\phi_{c} re-enter.

From the figure it is apparent that the model with space dependent effective friction but without explicit inter-particle friction provides qualitatively same results as obtained in Fig. 1. Initially, for very small FextF_{\text{ext}}, no lane was observed and ϕ<ϕc\phi<\phi_{c}. Once Fext>FcF_{\text{ext}}>F_{c} (Fext=FcF_{\text{ext}}=F_{c} is the left boundary of the blue region in Fig. 4), lanes develop in steady states and hence ϕ>ϕc\phi>\phi_{c}. As we increase FextF_{\text{ext}} further, once Fext>FcF_{\text{ext}}>F_{c}^{\prime} (Fext=FcF_{\text{ext}}=F_{c}^{\prime} is the right boundary of the blue region in Fig.4), lanes start to break. Eventually ϕ\phi becomes less than the threshold ϕc\phi_{c} and no-lane state re-enters. It is important to mention here that though there is qualitative similarity between the results from the aforementioned space-dependent effective friction model (Eq.7) and the model with explicit inter-particle friction (Eq. 2) in context to the re-entrant transition between laned and no-lane states, the rigorous relation between these two approaches is not yet established and it is beyond the scope of the current paper.

VIII Conclusion

We consider a binary suspension of two types of particles in two dimensions, which move in opposite directions when subjected to a constant external drive. The particles are rough and the density of the system is high enough such that the inter-particle friction plays important role to the dynamics of the system. The thermal fluctuations are assumed to be insignificant in comparison to the other forces present in the system. We have shown that when the external drive goes beyond a threshold, the particles of different species segregate from the homogeneously mixed suspension to develop oppositely moving macroscopic lanes. The lane structure continues with increasing external drive up to a second threshold after which inter-particle friction starts to dominate. Consequently the system cannot support the lanes anymore and we obtain a no-lane state. Note that for very low external drive, the system, being homogeneously mixed, does not support lanes. Therefore, with finite inter-particle friction, we obtain the re-entrance of no-lane state along the axis of increasing external drive.

There are few important related topics which deserve detailed, separate study. Though we leave them out from the current paper but we will mention them here briefly.

Transformation from no-lane state to laned state in binary colloidal systems (without inter-particle contact dissipation) has significant finite size effect glanz2012nature . It important to study the finite size effect here as well particularly for the re-entrance of no-lane state at high external drive.

From the phase diagram 2 it is apparent that as α\alpha increases FcF_{c} and FcF_{c}^{\prime} come close to each other. Question is, if we increase α\alpha further (which is not included in the current phase diagram), will there be a certain α\alpha for which FcF_{c} and FcF_{c}^{\prime} merge to a single point in the phase diagram, beyond which no lane can be formed? If yes, what will be the characteristics of that point in context of the phase transition.

Last but not least, it will be interesting to study the laning transition in the suspension of rough micro-particles particles in the presence of thermal fluctuations.

We believe our findings here are amenable to experiments with dense non-Brownian systems having significant frictional contacts among the particles (e.g. hsu2018roughness ).

IX Acknowledgement

Arnab Saha (AS) thanks the start-up grant from UGC, UGCFRP and the Core Research Grant ( CRG/2019/001492) from DST, Govt. of India. AS thanks Gaurav P. Shrivastav and Pinaki Chaudhuri for careful reading and critical comments.

References

  • [1] Michael P Allen and Dominic J Tildesley. Computer simulation of liquids. Oxford university press, 2017.
  • [2] Igor S Aranson and Lev S Tsimring. Patterns and collective behavior in granular media: Theoretical concepts. Reviews of modern physics, 78(2):641, 2006.
  • [3] Ralph Alger Bagnold. Experiments on a gravity-free dispersion of large solid spheres in a newtonian fluid under shear. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 225(1160):49–63, 1954.
  • [4] HA Barnes. Shear-thickening (“dilatancy”) in suspensions of nonaggregating solid particles dispersed in newtonian liquids. Journal of Rheology, 33(2):329–366, 1989.
  • [5] Jonathan Bender and Norman J Wagner. Reversible shear thickening in monodisperse and bidisperse colloidal dispersions. Journal of Rheology, 40(5):899–916, 1996.
  • [6] Emanuel Bertrand, Jerome Bibette, and Véronique Schmitt. From shear thickening to shear-induced jamming. Physical Review E, 66(6):060401, 2002.
  • [7] Willem H Boersma, Jozua Laven, and Hans N Stein. Shear thickening (dilatancy) in concentrated dispersions. AIChE journal, 36(3):321–332, 1990.
  • [8] Tamás Börzsönyi, Robert E Ecke, and Jim N McElwaine. Patterns in flowing sand: understanding the physics of granular flow. Physical review letters, 103(17):178302, 2009.
  • [9] Eric Brown and Heinrich M Jaeger. Dynamic jamming point for shear thickening suspensions. Physical review letters, 103(8):086001, 2009.
  • [10] Eric Brown and Heinrich M Jaeger. The role of dilation and confining stresses in shear thickening of dense suspensions. Journal of Rheology, 56(4):875–923, 2012.
  • [11] J Chakrabarti, J Dzubiella, and H Löwen. Reentrance effect in the lane formation of driven colloids. Physical Review E, 70(1):012401, 2004.
  • [12] Pinaki Chaudhuri, Vincent Mansard, Annie Colin, and Lyderic Bocquet. Dynamical flow arrest in confined gravity driven flows of soft jammed particles. Physical review letters, 109(3):036001, 2012.
  • [13] Xiang Cheng, Jonathan H McCoy, Jacob N Israelachvili, and Itai Cohen. Imaging the microscopic structure of shear thinning and thickening colloidal suspensions. Science, 333(6047):1276–1279, 2011.
  • [14] Iain D Couzin and Nigel R Franks. Self-organized lane formation and optimized traffic flow in army ants. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 270(1511):139–146, 2003.
  • [15] John C Crocker and David G Grier. Microscopic measurement of the pair interaction potential of charge-stabilized colloid. Physical review letters, 73(2):352, 1994.
  • [16] P d’Haene, Joannes Mewis, and GG Fuller. Scattering dichroism measurements of flow-induced structure of a shear thickening suspension. Journal of colloid and interface science, 156(2):350–358, 1993.
  • [17] Jan KG Dhont. An introduction to dynamics of colloids. Elsevier, 1996.
  • [18] Jure Dobnikar, Alexey Snezhko, and Anand Yethiraj. Emergent colloidal dynamics in electromagnetic fields. Soft Matter, 9(14):3693–3704, 2013.
  • [19] Douglas J Durian. Foam mechanics at the bubble scale. Physical review letters, 75(26):4780, 1995.
  • [20] J Dzubiella, GP Hoffmann, and H Löwen. Lane formation in colloidal mixtures driven by an external field. Physical Review E, 65(2):021402, 2002.
  • [21] ME Fagan and CF Zukoski. The rheology of charge stabilized silica suspensions. Journal of Rheology, 41(2):373–397, 1997.
  • [22] Abdoulaye Fall, François Bertrand, Guillaume Ovarlez, and Daniel Bonn. Shear thickening of cornstarch suspensions. Journal of rheology, 56(3):575–591, 2012.
  • [23] Abdoulaye Fall, Anael Lemaitre, François Bertrand, Daniel Bonn, and Guillaume Ovarlez. Shear thickening and migration in granular suspensions. Physical review letters, 105(26):268303, 2010.
  • [24] William J Frith, P d’Haene, R Buscall, and Joannes Mewis. Shear thickening in model suspensions of sterically stabilized particles. Journal of rheology, 40(4):531–548, 1996.
  • [25] T Glanz and H Löwen. The nature of the laning transition in two dimensions. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 24(46):464114, 2012.
  • [26] Dirk Helbing, Lubos Buzna, Anders Johansson, and Torsten Werner. Self-organized pedestrian crowd dynamics: Experiments, simulations, and design solutions. Transportation science, 39(1):1–24, 2005.
  • [27] Dirk Helbing and Peter Molnar. Self-organization phenomena in pedestrian crowds. arXiv preprint cond-mat/9806152, 1998.
  • [28] RL Hoffman. Discontinuous and dilatant viscosity behavior in concentrated suspensions. i. observation of a flow instability. Transactions of the Society of Rheology, 16(1):155–173, 1972.
  • [29] RL Hoffman. Discontinuous and dilatant viscosity behavior in concentrated suspensions. ii. theory and experimental tests. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 46(3):491–506, 1974.
  • [30] Lilian C Hsiao and Shravan Pradeep. Experimental synthesis and characterization of rough particles for colloidal and granular rheology. Current opinion in colloid & interface science, 43:94–112, 2019.
  • [31] Chiao-Peng Hsu, Shivaprakash N Ramakrishna, Michele Zanini, Nicholas D Spencer, and Lucio Isa. Roughness-dependent tribology effects on discontinuous shear thickening. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(20):5117–5122, 2018.
  • [32] Ehsan Irani, Pinaki Chaudhuri, and Claus Heussinger. Impact of attractive interactions on the rheology of dense athermal particles. Physical review letters, 112(18):188303, 2014.
  • [33] Ehsan Irani, Pinaki Chaudhuri, and Claus Heussinger. Discontinuous shear-thinning in adhesive dispersions. Physical Review Fluids, 4(7):074307, 2019.
  • [34] Katherine Klymko, Phillip L Geissler, and Stephen Whitelam. Microscopic origin and macroscopic implications of lane formation in mixtures of oppositely driven particles. Physical Review E, 94(2):022608, 2016.
  • [35] Florian Kogler and Sabine HL Klapp. Lane formation in a system of dipolar microswimmers. EPL (Europhysics Letters), 110(1):10004, 2015.
  • [36] Ryan J Larsen, Jin-Woong Kim, Charles F Zukoski, and David A Weitz. Elasticity of dilatant particle suspensions during flow. Physical Review E, 81(1):011502, 2010.
  • [37] Anaël Lemaître and Christiane Caroli. Rate-dependent avalanche size in athermally sheared amorphous solids. Physical review letters, 103(6):065501, 2009.
  • [38] Anaël Lemaître, Jean-Noël Roux, and François Chevoir. What do dry granular flows tell us about dense non-brownian suspension rheology? Rheologica acta, 48(8):925–942, 2009.
  • [39] Mirjam E Leunissen, Christina G Christova, Antti-Pekka Hynninen, C Patrick Royall, Andrew I Campbell, Arnout Imhof, Marjolein Dijkstra, Rene Van Roij, and Alfons Van Blaaderen. Ionic colloidal crystals of oppositely charged particles. Nature, 437(7056):235–240, 2005.
  • [40] Didier Lootens, P Hébraud, E Lécolier, and H Van Damme. Gelation, shear-thinning and shear-thickening in cement slurries. Oil & gas science and technology, 59(1):31–40, 2004.
  • [41] Didier Lootens, Henri Van Damme, Yacine Hémar, and Pascal Hébraud. Dilatant flow of concentrated suspensions of rough particles. Physical review letters, 95(26):268302, 2005.
  • [42] Hartmut Löwen and Joachim Dzubiella. Nonequilibrium pattern formation in strongly interacting driven colloids. Faraday discussions, 123:99–105, 2003.
  • [43] Brent J Maranzano and Norman J Wagner. The effects of interparticle interactions and particle size on reversible shear thickening: Hard-sphere colloidal dispersions. Journal of Rheology, 45(5):1205–1222, 2001.
  • [44] Brent J Maranzano and Norman J Wagner. The effects of particle size on reversible shear thickening of concentrated colloidal dispersions. The Journal of chemical physics, 114(23):10514–10527, 2001.
  • [45] Samuel R McCandlish, Aparna Baskaran, and Michael F Hagan. Spontaneous segregation of self-propelled particles with different motilities. Soft Matter, 8(8):2527–2534, 2012.
  • [46] AB Metzner and Malcolm Whitlock. Flow behavior of concentrated (dilatant) suspensions. Transactions of the Society of Rheology, 2(1):239–254, 1958.
  • [47] Jan Mewis and Norman J Wagner. Colloidal suspension rheology. Cambridge University Press, 2012.
  • [48] T Mullin. Coarsening of self-organized clusters in binary mixtures of particles. Physical review letters, 84(20):4741, 2000.
  • [49] Vincent T O’Brie and Michael E Mackay. Stress components and shear thickening of concentrated hard sphere suspensions. Langmuir, 16(21):7931–7938, 2000.
  • [50] Corey S O’Hern, Andrea J Liu, and Sidney R Nagel. Effective temperatures in driven systems: static versus time-dependent relations. Physical review letters, 93(16):165702, 2004.
  • [51] Alexis Poncet, Olivier Bénichou, Vincent Démery, and Gleb Oshanin. Universal long ranged correlations in driven binary mixtures. Physical review letters, 118(11):118002, 2017.
  • [52] M Rex and H Löwen. Lane formation in oppositely charged colloids driven by an electric field: Chaining and two-dimensional crystallization. Physical review E, 75(5):051402, 2007.
  • [53] Martin Rex. Kolloidale Weiche Materie in äußeren Feldern: Theorie und Simulation. PhD thesis, 2008.
  • [54] Martin Rex and Hartmut Löwen. Influence of hydrodynamic interactions on lane formation in oppositely charged driven colloids. The European Physical Journal E, 26(1):143–150, 2008.
  • [55] Dirk O Riese, Gerard H Wegdam, Willem L Vos, Rudolf Sprik, Denis Fenistein, Jeroen HH Bongaerts, and Gerhard Grübel. Effective screening of hydrodynamic interactions in charged colloidal suspensions. Physical review letters, 85(25):5460, 2000.
  • [56] Gaurav Prakash Shrivastav, Pinaki Chaudhuri, and Jürgen Horbach. Heterogeneous dynamics during yielding of glasses: Effect of aging. Journal of Rheology, 60(5):835–847, 2016.
  • [57] Clifford M Surko, M Leventhal, and A Passner. Positron plasma in the laboratory. Physical Review Letters, 62(8):901, 1989.
  • [58] KR Sütterlin, A Wysocki, AV Ivlev, C Räth, HM Thomas, M Rubin-Zuzic, WJ Goedheer, VE Fortov, AM Lipaev, VI Molotkov, et al. Dynamics of lane formation in driven binary complex plasmas. Physical review letters, 102(8):085003, 2009.
  • [59] Daniel Vågberg, Peter Olsson, and S Teitel. Dissipation and rheology of sheared soft-core frictionless disks below jamming. Physical Review Letters, 112(20):208303, 2014.
  • [60] Fathollah Varnik, Suvendu Mandal, Vijaykumar Chikkadi, Dmitry Denisov, Peter Olsson, Daniel Vågberg, Dierk Raabe, and Peter Schall. Correlations of plasticity in sheared glasses. Physical Review E, 89(4):040301, 2014.
  • [61] Teun Vissers, Alfons van Blaaderen, and Arnout Imhof. Band formation in mixtures of oppositely charged colloids driven by an ac electric field. Physical review letters, 106(22):228303, 2011.
  • [62] Teun Vissers, Adam Wysocki, Martin Rex, Hartmut Löwen, C Patrick Royall, Arnout Imhof, and Alfons van Blaaderen. Lane formation in driven mixtures of oppositely charged colloids. Soft Matter, 7(6):2352–2356, 2011.
  • [63] CW Wächtler, F Kogler, and SHL Klapp. Lane formation in a driven attractive fluid. Physical Review E, 94(5):052603, 2016.
  • [64] RV Williamson. Some unusual properties of colloidal dispersions. The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 35(1):354–359, 2002.
  • [65] Masataka Yamao, Honda Naoki, and Shin Ishii. Multi-cellular logistics of collective cell migration. PloS one, 6(12):e27950, 2011.
  • [66] Anand Yethiraj. Tunable colloids: control of colloidal phase transitions with tunable interactions. Soft Matter, 3(9):1099–1115, 2007.