This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Reconciling Multi-messenger Constraints with Chiral Symmetry Restoration thanks: Presented at Quark Matter 2022

Michał Marczenko
Krzysztof Redlich, Chihiro Sasaki
speakere-mail: [email protected] Incubator of Scientific Excellence - Centre for Simulations of Superdense Fluids, University of Wrocław, plac Maksa Borna 9, 50-204 Wrocław, Poland Institute of Theoretical Physics, University of Wrocław, plac Maksa Borna 9, 50-204 Wrocław, Poland
Abstract

We consider the parity doublet model for nucleonic and delta matter to investigate the structure of neutron stars. We show that it is possible to reconcile the multi-messenger astronomy constraints within a purely hadronic equation of state (EOS), which accounts for the self-consistent treatment of the chiral symmetry restoration in the baryonic sector. We demonstrate that the characteristics of the EOS required by the astrophysical constraints do not necessarily imply the existence of a hadron-quark phase transition in the stellar core.

1 Introduction

The advancements of multi-messenger astronomy on different sources have led to remarkable improvements in constraining the equation of state (EoS) of dense, strongly interacting matter. The modern observatories for measuring masses and radii of compact objects, the gravitational wave interferometers of the LIGO-VIRGO Collaboration (LVC) [1], and the X-ray observatory Neutron Star Interior Composition Explorer (NICER) provide new powerful constraints on their mass-radius (M-R) profile [2, 3, 4, 5]. These stringent constraints allow for a detailed study of the neutron star (NS) properties and ultimately the microscopic properties of the EoS. In particular, the existence of 2M2~{}M_{\odot} NSs requires that the EoS must be stiff at intermediate to high densities to support them from gravitational collapse. At the same time, the tidal deformability (TD) constraint of a canonical 1.4M1.4~{}M_{\odot} NS from the GW170817 event implies that the EoS has to be fairly soft at intermediate densities, which may be indicative for a phase transition in the cores of NSs. This transition is commonly associated with a possible onset of deconfined quark matter. This conclusion has been achieved by systematic analyses of recent astrophysical observations within simplistic approaches (see, e.g., [6]). Although such schemes are instructive, they are not microscopic approaches. They provide interesting heuristic guidance, but cannot replace more realistic dynamical models for the EoS, which accounts for the fundamental properties of quantum chromodynamics (QCD), the theory of strong interactions, i.e., a self-consistent treatment of the chiral symmetry restoration in the baryonic sector. The recent LQCD results exhibit a clear manifestation of the parity doubling structure for the low-lying baryons around the chiral crossover [7], Imprints of chiral symmetry restoration are also expected to occur in the baryonic sector of cold and dense matter. Such properties can be described in the framework of the parity doublet model [8, 9]. The model has been applied to hot and dense hadronic matter, and neutron stars (see, e.g, [10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16]).

In this work, we utilize the parity doublet model for nucleonic and Δ\Delta matter [17] to investigate the implications on the structure of neutron stars.

2 Equation of State

The thermodynamic potential of the model in the mean-field approximation reads [10, 18]

Ω=Vσ+Vω+Vρ+x=N,ΔΩx,\Omega=V_{\sigma}+V_{\omega}+V_{\rho}+\sum_{x=N,\Delta}\Omega_{x}\rm, (1)

where Ωx\Omega_{x} is the kinetic part of the thermodynamic potential, and xx labels positive-parity and negative-parity spin-1/21/2 nucleons, i.e., N{p,n;p,n}N\in\{p,n;p^{\star},n^{\star}\}, and spin-3/23/2 Δ\Delta’s, i.e., Δ{Δ++,+,0,;Δ++,+,0,}\Delta\in\{\Delta_{++,+,0,-};\Delta^{\star}_{++,+,0,-}\}. Note that the negative-parity states are marked with the asterisk. The potentials ViV_{i} are commonly used mean-field potentials. The masses of the positive- and negative-parity chiral partners are given by

m±x=12[(g1x+g2x)2σ2+4(m0x)2(g1xg2x)σ],m^{x}_{\pm}=\frac{1}{2}\left[\sqrt{\left(g_{1}^{x}+g_{2}^{x}\right)^{2}\sigma^{2}+4\left(m_{0}^{x}\right)^{2}}\mp\left(g^{x}_{1}-g^{x}_{2}\right)\sigma\right]\textrm{,} (2)

where ±\pm sign denotes parity and x=N,Δx=N,\Delta. When chiral symmetry is restored, the masses in each parity doublet become degenerate: m±x(σ=0)=m0xm_{\pm}^{x}(\sigma=0)=m_{0}^{x}, where m0xm_{0}^{x} is the chirally invariant mass parameter. The positive-parity nucleons are identified as N(938)N(938) states. Their negative-parity counterparts are identified as N(1535)N(1535) resonance [19]. The positive-parity Δ\Delta states are identified with Δ(1232)\Delta(1232) resonance. Their negative-parity chiral partners, Δ\Delta^{\star}, are identified with Δ(1700)\Delta(1700) resonance [19]. Detailed description of the model and numerical values of the parameters used in this contribution can be found in [18].

In the present work, we study the influence of Δ\Delta matter on the EoS and compliance with astrophysical constraints, i.e., Mmax=(2.08±0.07)MM_{\rm max}=(2.08\pm 0.07)~{}M_{\odot} [20], as well as M-R and Λ1.4=190120+390\Lambda_{1.4}=190^{+390}_{-120} from GW170817 [1].

3 Results

Refer to caption
Figure 1: Thermodynamic pressure, PP, under the NS conditions, as a function of the energy density, ϵ\epsilon. The dashed lines correspond to the purely nucleonic EoSs. The solid lines correspond to the case m0N=m0Δm_{0}^{N}=m_{0}^{\Delta}. The region spanned between the two lines marks the results obtained for m0N<m0Δm_{0}^{N}<m_{0}^{\Delta}. The region enclosed by solid (dashed) and dotted lines show solutions where Δ\Delta matter enters the EoS through a first-order (crossover) transition. The orange- and grey-shaded regions show the constraints obtained by [21] and [1], respectively.

Fig. 1 shows the calculated EoSs under the NS conditions for selected values of m0N=550m_{0}^{N}=550, 600600, 650650, 700700~{}MeV. To illustrate the effect of Δ\Delta matter on the EoS at intermediate densities, we show results obtained for purely nucleonic EoS (dashed line) together with the case m0Δ=m0Nm_{0}^{\Delta}=m_{0}^{N} (solid line). The regions bounded by the two results correspond to the range spanned by solutions with m0N<m0Δm_{0}^{N}<m_{0}^{\Delta} in each case. In general, the low-density behavior in each case is similar, until the deviations from the purely nucleonic EoSs are induced by the onset of Δ\Delta matter. The swift increase of the energy density is directly linked to the partial restoration of the chiral symmetry within the hadronic phase and resembled in the in-medium properties of dense matter in the parity doublet model. Most notably, it is associated with a drastic decrease of the mass of the negative-parity states in each parity doublet toward their asymptotic values, m0xm_{0}^{x}. Interestingly, the softening is followed by a subsequent stiffening, as compared to the purely nucleonic result, and the EoS reaches back the constraints at higher densities. This effect is readily pronounced for m0Δ=m0Nm_{0}^{\Delta}=m^{N}_{0}. For other parametrizations shown in the figure, the EoSs fall into the region derived by the constraint.

In Fig. 2, we show the allowed combinations of m0Nm^{N}_{0} and m0Δm^{\Delta}_{0} for which the TD and 2M2~{}M_{\odot} constraints are met. The green circles indicate configurations that fulfill the lower bound for the maximum mass constraint, Mmax=(2.08±0.07)MM_{\rm max}=(2.08\pm 0.07)~{}M_{\odot} [20]. The red crosses indicate configurations that are in accordance with the upper bound for the TD constraint, Λ1.4=190120+390\Lambda_{1.4}=190^{+390}_{-120} [1]. The gray-shaded area shows the region where the two constraints are fulfilled simultaneously. The orange points show configurations with the largest value of m0Δm^{\Delta}_{0} for which the Δ\Delta matter appears through the first-order transition.

Refer to caption
Figure 2: Allowed combinations of the model parameters, m0Nm^{N}_{0} and m0Δm^{\Delta}_{0}.

The constraint derived in [21] feature a notable change of the logarithmic slope of p(ϵ)p(\epsilon) around ϵQGP400700MeV/fm3\epsilon_{\rm QGP}\approx 400-700~{}\rm MeV/fm^{3} (see Fig. 1), which is the estimate for the deconfinement transition at high temperatures [22]. It can be quantified by the polytropic index, i.e., γ=dlogp/dlogϵ\gamma=d\log p/d\log\epsilon. In [21], authors chose the criterion for the onset of quark matter in the core of NSs to be γ<1.75\gamma<1.75. Interestingly, at higher densities, our results feature a similar change of the slope, regardless of the appearance of Δ\Delta matter. In Fig. 3, we show as an example the polytropic index γ\gamma obtained in the parity doublet model for m0N=650m_{0}^{N}=650~{}MeV. Remarkably, γ\gamma drops well below the threshold value of 1.751.75 around ϵQGP\epsilon_{\rm QGP}. Thus, the polytropic index γ\gamma does not provide a robust criterion and does not necessarily signal the onset of deconfined quark matter in the NS cores.

Refer to caption
Figure 3: Polytropic index as function of energy density for m0=650m_{0}=650~{}MeV. Red, dashed line marks the threshold value for the onset of quark matter from Ref. [21]. The purple band shows the energy-density range ϵQGP=400700\epsilon_{\rm QGP}=400-700~{}MeV for the onset of quark matter from lattice QCD [22].

4 Conclusion

We have analyzed the properties of neutron stars and found that the multi-messenger constraints can be accommodated within a purely hadronic EoS for nucleonic matter including Δ(1232)\Delta(1232) resonance being subject to chiral symmetry restoration. As we have demonstrated in this work, the characteristics of the bulk EoS, such as the change of the logarithmic slope in the EoS, do not necessarily imply the existence of a hadron-quark phase transition as proposed in recent studies, e.g., [21]. We conclude that due to the anticipated near-future advances in multi-messenger astronomy, it will become inevitable to link the observed properties of NSs and their mergers to fundamental properties of strong interactions described by QCD, including chiral symmetry restoration, as well as emergence of conformal matter [23].

Acknowledgements

This work is supported partly by the Polish National Science Centre (NCN) under OPUS Grant No. 2018/31/B/ST2/01663 (K.R. and C.S.), Preludium Grant No. 2017/27/N/ST2/01973 (M.M.), and the program Excellence Initiative–Research University of the University of Wrocław of the Ministry of Education and Science (M.M). K.R. also acknowledges the support of the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education.

References

  • [1] B. P. Abbott et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 121, no. 16, p. 161101, 2018.
  • [2] T. E. Riley et al., Astrophys. J., vol. 887, no. 1, p. L21, 2019.
  • [3] M. C. Miller et al., Astrophys. J., vol. 887, no. 1, p. L24, 2019.
  • [4] T. E. Riley et al., Astrophys. J. Lett., vol. 918, no. 2, p. L27, 2021.
  • [5] M. C. Miller et al., Astrophys. J. Lett., vol. 918, no. 2, p. L28, 2021.
  • [6] M. G. Alford, S. Han, and M. Prakash, Phys. Rev., vol. D88, no. 8, p. 083013, 2013.
  • [7] G. Aarts, C. Allton, D. De Boni, and B. Jäger, Phys. Rev., vol. D99, no. 7, p. 074503, 2019.
  • [8] C. E. De Tar and T. Kunihiro, Phys. Rev., vol. D39, p. 2805, 1989.
  • [9] D. Jido, M. Oka, and A. Hosaka, Prog. Theor. Phys., vol. 106, pp. 873–908, 2001.
  • [10] M. Marczenko, K. Redlich, and C. Sasaki, Astrophys. J. Lett., vol. 925, no. 2, p. L23, 2022.
  • [11] D. Zschiesche, L. Tolos, J. Schaffner-Bielich, and R. D. Pisarski, Phys. Rev., vol. C75, p. 055202, 2007.
  • [12] M. Marczenko and C. Sasaki, Phys. Rev., vol. D97, no. 3, p. 036011, 2018.
  • [13] M. Marczenko, D. Blaschke, K. Redlich, and C. Sasaki, Phys. Rev., vol. D98, no. 10, p. 103021, 2018.
  • [14] C. Sasaki and I. Mishustin, Phys. Rev., vol. C82, p. 035204, 2010.
  • [15] M. Marczenko, D. Blaschke, K. Redlich, and C. Sasaki, Astron. Astrophys., vol. 643, p. A82, 2020.
  • [16] M. Marczenko, K. Redlich, and C. Sasaki, Phys. Rev. D, vol. 103, no. 5, p. 054035, 2021.
  • [17] Y. Takeda, Y. Kim, and M. Harada, Phys. Rev., vol. C97, no. 6, p. 065202, 2018.
  • [18] M. Marczenko, K. Redlich, and C. Sasaki, Phys. Rev. D, vol. 105, no. 10, p. 103009, 2022.
  • [19] P. A. Zyla et al., PTEP, vol. 2020, no. 8, p. 083C01, 2020.
  • [20] E. Fonseca et al., Astrophys. J. Lett., vol. 915, no. 1, p. L12, 2021.
  • [21] E. Annala, T. Gorda, A. Kurkela, J. Nättilä, and A. Vuorinen, Nature Phys., vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 907–910, 2020.
  • [22] A. Bazavov et al., Phys. Rev., vol. D90, p. 094503, 2014.
  • [23] M. Marczenko, L. McLerran, K. Redlich, and C. Sasaki, arXiv:2207.13059, 7 2022.