Recent Belle II Results on Hadronic Decays
Abstract
The investigation of meson decays to charmed and charmless hadronic final states is a keystone of the Belle II program. Analyses of such decays provide reliable and experimentally precise constraints on the weak interactions of quarks. They are sensitive to effects from non-SM physics, and further our knowledge about uncharted hadronic transitions. We present new results from combined analyses of Belle and Belle II data to determine the quark-mixing parameter (or ), and from the Belle II analyses of two-body decays that are related to the determination of (or ). We also present recent Belle II results on branching ratios and direct CP-violating asymmetries of several decays, which result in a competitive standard-model test based on the isospin sum rule and first observations of three new decays.
1 Introduction
Hadronic decays provide precise constraints on the parameters of the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) quark-mixing matrix and are sensitive probes of physics beyond the standard model (SM). Measurement of new decay channels expands our knowledge of the flavour sector. Belle IIΒ [1], located at the SuperKEKBΒ [2] asymmetric collider at KEK, is a hermetic solenoidal magnetic spectrometer surrounded by particle-identification detectors, an electromagnetic calorimeter, and muon detectors. Optimised for the reconstruction of bottom-antibottom pairs produced at the threshold in decays, Belle II has competitive, unique, or world-leading reach in many key quantities associated with hadronic decays. The CKM angle is a fundamental constraint for charge-parity (CP) violation in the SM and can be reliably determined in tree-level processes, with negligible loop-amplitude contributions. The angle is currently limiting the precision of non-SM tests based on global fits of the quark-mixing matrix unitarity and is best determined through measurement of and decays. For decays, an isospin sum ruleΒ [3] combines the branching fractions and CP asymmetries of the decays, providing a null test of the SM. The capability of investigating all the related final states jointly, under consistent experimental settings, is unique to Belle II.
The challenge in analysing these channels lies in the large amount of continuum background. Binary-decision-tree classifiers are used to discriminate between signal and continuum events using event topology, kinematic, and decay-length information.Β [4] The determination of the signal yields is mainly based on observables that exploit the specific properties of at-threshold production: the energy difference between the candidate and the beam energy, , and the beam-constrained mass , where and are the energy and momentum of the candidate, respectively, and is the beam energy, all in the center-of-mass frame.
2 Decays
The composition of a large fraction of the hadronic width is unknown, which limits significantly our capability to model decays in simulation, impacting the precision of many measurements. Belle II is pursuing a systematic program of exploration of hadronic decays. We report a preliminary measurement of the branching fraction of decayΒ [5], with a precision that is three times better than the previous best resultsΒ [6], and first observation of three new decay channels (, , )Β [5]. The branching fractions
are extracted from a Belle II sample using likelihood fits to the unbinned distributions of the energy difference , where the first uncertainties are statistical and the second are systematic. The invariant mass of the two kaons is investigated. For all four channels, the distribution exhibits a peaking structure in the low-mass region, which departs from the expected three-body phase space distribution. Structures are also observed in the Dalitz distributions (FigureΒ 1).

3 Determination of CKM Angle
The angle is studied through the interference of and transition amplitudes in tree-level hadron decays. The current world average is dominated by LHCb measurementsΒ [7, 8]. can be determined through different approaches featuring different final states from decays into charmed final states. The most precise Belle II result is obtained with self-conjugate final states (, )Β [9], where several intermediate resonances are involved in decays, resulting in variation of the CP asymmetry over the phase space. Two other approaches have also been pursued: one with Cabibbo-suppressed decays, and the other with the meson decaying to two-body CP eigenstates. In both analyses it is required that , ( for the latter), and a loose requirement on removes about 60% of the continuum background. The signal yields are extracted with fits of and the continuum suppression classifier.
3.1 Cabibbo-suppressed channels
Grossman, Ligeti, and Soffer (GLS)Β [10] proposed a method to measure with singly Cabibbo-suppressed decays of mesons, , where is the superposition of and mesons. The meson can have the same sign (SS) or opposite sign (OS) with respect to the from the decay. In this analysisΒ [11], the information about the dynamics of the decays is integrated with external inputs from CLEOΒ [12].
The fitting is performed in both the full phase space and in the region, where the invariant mass is close to that of , thus enhancing the interference and the precision on , due to the large strong-phase difference in decays. Combining Belle () and Belle II () data, the result is consistent, though not yet competitive to the result from LHCbΒ [13]. It can provide a constraint on when combined with results from other measurements.
Full phase space | region | |
---|---|---|
3.2 CP eigenstates
Gronau, London, and Wyler (GLW)Β [14, 15] proposed a method where the meson decays to (CP-even) or (CP-odd) eigenstates. The eigenstate has been accessible to -factories only. Belle () and Belle II () data are combined to give the final result, which is consistent but not competitive with results from BaBarΒ [16] and LHCbΒ [17]. The branching fraction ratios () and CP asymmetries () are
where the first uncertainties are statistical and the second are systematic. The statistical and systematic precisions are significantly better than the previous Belle measurementΒ [18], and the result could constrain in combination with other measurements. In particular, the first evidence for and having opposite signs is observed, showing clearly the effect of CP violation.
4 Toward CKM Angle
The least precisely known CKM angle is starting to limit the testing power of the CKM model. Belle II has the unique capability of measuring all and decays, from which can be determined. The combined information from these decays exploits isospin symmetry, reducing the effect of hadronic uncertainties. The candidates are required to have and ( for final states involving neutral pions), followed by continuum suppression that removes 90-99% of continuum background.
4.1 decays
The measurement of decays require a complex angular analysis. The fit is based on , , the dipion masses, and the helicity angle of the candidates. The preliminary Belle II results of and decays using of dataΒ [19, 20] are on par with the best performances from BelleΒ [21, 22] and BaBarΒ [23, 24]. Results are listed in TableΒ 2.
4.2 decays
Measurements of and decays are based on of Belle II data. The fit is performed over and , and the dominant systematic uncertainty arises from the efficiency. The first measurement of at Belle II is also reportedΒ [25], using of data. This decay is both CKM- and colour-suppressed, and has only photons in the final state, making it experimentally challenging to measure. The result obtained from a fit to , , and , however, achieves Belleβs precision despite using a dataset that is only one third of the size. This is due to the dedicated selection and continuum suppression studies that yield a much higher efficiency. Results are listed in TableΒ 2.
β | |||
β | β | ||
β | |||
β |
5 Isospin Sum Rule
The isospin sum rule is defined by
(1) |
where and are the branching fractions and the CP asymmetries, and Β [7] is the ratio of and lifetimes. The SM prediction of the sum rule is zero, with a precision of better than 1%, in the limit of isospin symmetry and no electroweak penguins contributions. Any large deviation from the SM prediction is an indication of non-SM physics. The experimental precision of the sum rule is limited by Β [7].
We studied all the final states associated with the sum rule: , , , and using of Belle II data. The analyses of the various decays follow a similar strategy, with common selections applied to the final states particles. candidates are required to satisfy , , and a loose requirement of that suppresses 90-99% of continuum background. A fit is performed on the - distribution, where the flavour tagging algorithmΒ [26] is employed to determine the flavour of the candidate in decay due to absence of primary charged particles. The distributions are shown in FigureΒ 2. The measured branching fractions and CP asymmetries, as well as the sum rule calculated using these measurements, are listed in TableΒ 3. They agree with the world averagesΒ [7] and have competitive precisions. In particular, the time-integrated and time-dependent results of are combined to achieve the worldβs best result for , and consequentially for a competitive precision that is limited by the statistical uncertainty.




6 Summary
In summary, we present five new results from Belle II: measurement of decays, analyses of with the GLS and GLW methods, precise measurements of two-body decays that contribute to the determination of , and the isospin sum rule with a competitive precision to the worldβs best result.
References
References
- [1] T. Abe. et al. (Belle II Collaboration) (2010), arXiv:1011.0352.
- [2] Kazunori Akai et al. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 907, 188 (2018).
- [3] M. Gronau, Phys. Lett. B 627, 82 (2005).
- [4] F. AbudinΓ©n et al. (Belle II Collaboration) (2023), arXiv:2303.08354.
- [5] Belle II Collaboration et al. (2023), arXiv:2305.01321.
- [6] A. Drutskoy et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 542, 171 (2002)
- [7] R. L. Workman et al. (Particle Data Group), Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022, 083C01 (2022)
- [8] LHCb collaboration et al., J. High Energy Phys. 2021, 141 (2021)
- [9] Belle and Belle II collaborations et al., J. High Energy Phys. 2022, 63 (2022)
- [10] Y. Grossman, Z. Ligeti, and A. Soffer, Phys. Rev. D 67, 071301 (2003)
- [11] Belle and Belle II collaborations et al. (2023), arXiv:2306.02940.
- [12] J. Insler et al. (CLEO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 94, 099905 (2016)
- [13] LHCb collaboration et al. J. High Energy Phys. 2020, 58 (2020)
- [14] M. Gronau and D. London, Phys. Lett. B 253, 483 (1991)
- [15] M. Gronau and D. Wyler, Phys. Lett. B 265, 172 (1991)
- [16] P. del Amo Sanchez et al. (BaBar Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 82, 072004 (2010)
- [17] R. Aaji et al. (LHCb Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 2021, 81 (2021).
- [18] K. Abe et al., Phys. Rev. D 73, 051106 (2006).
- [19] Belle II Collaboration et al. (2022), arXiv:2208.03554.
- [20] Belle II Collaboration et al. (2022), arXiv:2206.12362.
- [21] P. Vanhoefer et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 94, 099903 (2016)
- [22] J. Zhang et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 221801 (2003)
- [23] B. Aubert et al. (BaBar Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 76, 052007 (2007)
- [24] B. Aubert et al. (BaBar Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 141802 (2009)
- [25] Belle II Collaboration et al. (2023), arXiv:2303.08354.
- [26] F. AbudinΓ©n et al. (Belle II Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 283 (2022).