This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Radioactive Gamma-Ray Lines from Long-lived Neutron Star Merger Remnants

Meng-Hua Chen [email protected] (MHC) Kavli Institute for Astronomy and Astrophysics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China Li-Xin Li [email protected] (LXL) Kavli Institute for Astronomy and Astrophysics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China En-Wei Liang [email protected] (EWL) Guangxi Key Laboratory for Relativistic Astrophysics, School of Physical Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
Abstract

The observation of a kilonova AT2017gfo associated with the gravitational wave event GW170817 provides the first strong evidence that neutron star mergers are dominant contributors to the production of heavy rr-process elements. Radioactive gamma-ray lines emitted from neutron star merger remnants provide a unique probe for investigating the nuclide composition and tracking its evolution. In this work, we studied the gamma-ray line features arising from the radioactive decay of heavy nuclei in the merger remnants based on the rr-process nuclear reaction network and the astrophysical inputs derived from numerical relativity simulations. The decay chain of 50126{}^{126}_{50}Sn (T1/2=230T_{1/2}=230 kyr) \to 51126{}^{126}_{51}Sb (T1/2=12.35T_{1/2}=12.35 days) \to 52126{}^{126}_{52}Te (stable) produces several bright gamma-ray lines with energies of 415415, 667667, and 695695 keV, making it the most promising decay chain during the remnant phase. The photon fluxes of these bright gamma-ray lines reach 105\sim 10^{-5} γ\gamma cm-2 s-1 for Galactic merger remnants with ages less than 100100 kyr, which can be detected by the high energy resolution MeV gamma-ray detectors like the MASS mission.

gamma-ray lines, rr-process nucleosynthesis, neutron star mergers, kilonovae

1 Introduction

The rapid neutron-capture process (rr-process) has long been considered responsible for the production of heavy elements beyond iron in the universe (Burbidge et al., 1957; Cowan et al., 2021). Neutron-rich materials ejected from the merger of binary neutron stars or neutron star–black hole are ideal sites for rr-process nucleosynthesis (Lattimer & Schramm, 1974; Symbalisty & Schramm, 1982). Li & Paczyński (1998) first proposed that the radioactive decay of freshly synthesized heavy elements can thermalize the merger ejecta, leading to a rapidly evolving thermal transient known as a “kilonova”. Subsequent studies included the rr-process nuclear reaction network and found that kilonova emission is centered in the optical/near-infrared band (Metzger et al., 2010; Korobkin et al., 2012; Barnes & Kasen, 2013; Kasen et al., 2013; Barnes et al., 2016; Metzger, 2019). In the first binary neutron star merger event detected by the LIGO/Virgo collaboration (GW170817, Abbott et al., 2017a), a thermal transient source was observed (AT2017gfo, Abbott et al., 2017b; Arcavi et al., 2017; Coulter et al., 2017; Cowperthwaite et al., 2017; Drout et al., 2017; Evans et al., 2017; Kasen et al., 2017; Kasliwal et al., 2017; Pian et al., 2017; Shappee et al., 2017; Smartt et al., 2017). The light curve and colour evolution of AT2017gfo are consistent with theoretical predictions of the kilonova model, providing the first strong evidence in support of neutron star mergers as the dominant contributor to the production of heavy rr-process elements in the Universe (Kasen et al., 2017; Hotokezaka et al., 2018; Chen et al., 2024).

The radioactive decay of heavy elements in the merger ejecta during the optically thin phase may also produce a gamma-ray transient accompanying the kilonova (Hotokezaka et al., 2016; Li, 2019; Korobkin et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2020; Chen et al., 2021, 2022) and an MeV neutrino flash (Chen et al., 2023; An et al., 2023). Detecting radioactive gamma-ray photons from neutron star mergers can provide conclusive evidence for probing the nuclide composition and tracking its evolution. However, it is a great challenge to detect the radioactive gamma-ray emission during the kilonova phase. To convincingly observe radioactive gamma-ray lines generated by rr-process elements, extremely nearby merger events and more sensitive MeV gamma-ray detectors are required (Chen et al., 2021, 2022). Wu et al. (2019) suggested that detecting gamma-ray lines produced by the radioactive decay of long-lived heavy nuclei during the remnant phase within the Milky Way is the most promising strategy in the near-term. In this work, we included the rr-process nuclear reaction network and the astrophysical inputs derived from numerical relativity simulations to further investigate the gamma-ray line features generated by the radioactive decay of long-lived nuclei in the merger remnants.

According to the neutron star merger rate inferred from the LIGO/Virgo gravitational wave detectors, the occurrence rate of such mergers within the Milky Way ranges between 10\sim 10 and 100\sim 100 Myr-1 (Chen et al., 2024). Therefore, the age of young neutron star merger remnants in our Galaxy typically falls between 10\sim 10 and 100\sim 100 kyr. To detect the radioactive gamma-ray line from merger remnants at this typical age, the heavy nucleus 50126{}^{126}_{50}Sn with a half-life of 230230 kyr is the most promising heavy element. On one hand, 50126{}^{126}_{50}Sn resides close to the second rr-process peak, where its production typically occurs at a high yield level. On the other hand, the gamma-ray energy released by the decay chain of 50126{}^{126}_{50}Sn is 2.8\sim 2.8 MeV per decay event, significantly higher than that of other heavy elements during the remnant phase. Moreover, a new MeV gamma-ray mission has recently been proposed, the MeV Astrophysical Spectroscopic Surveyor (MASS; Zhu et al., 2024). With its high line sensitivity in the MeV band, MASS is expected to a powerful instrument for gamma-ray line detection, providing an opportunity to detect radioactive gamma-ray line from merger remnants within the Milky way. In this work, we will focus on investigating the radioactive gamma-ray lines generated by 50126{}^{126}_{50}Sn and explore their detectability by combining with the line sensitivity of MASS.

Radioactive gamma-ray lines produced by the long-lived nucleus 50126{}^{126}_{50}Sn from the Galactic supernova remnants have been investigated by Qian et al. (1998). They assumed that supernovae are the sites of rr-process nucleosynthesis. However, subsequent studies have revealed that supernovae are only capable of producing some of the lightest rr-process elements (Arcones & Thielemann, 2013; Wanajo, 2013). Conversely, neutron star mergers are considered more ideal astrophysical sites for rr-process nucleosynthesis, as confirmed by the observation of the kilonova AT2017gfo. The light curve and color evolution of AT2017gfo suggest that approximately 0.05M0.05~{}M_{\odot} of heavy rr-process elements were synthesized in the merger ejecta (Kasen et al., 2017; Chen & Liang, 2024). Subsequent analysis of the observed spectrum further identified the presence of the heavy element strontium (Watson et al., 2019). Furthermore, heavy element tellurium (which resides at the second rr-process peak) has been discovered in the kilonova associated with gamma-ray burst 230307A observed by James Webb Space Telescope (Levan et al., 2024). These observational results confirm that neutron star mergers are the dominant contributors to the production of heavy rr-process elements (Chen et al., 2024).

This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we provide the details of rr-process nucleosynthesis and describe the procedure used to calculate gamma-ray emission powered by the radioactive decay of rr-process elements. Section 3 presents the results of radioactive gamma-ray emission from neutron star merger remnants. Conclusions and discussions are presented in Section 4.

2 Methods

2.1 Nucleosynthesis

We use the nuclear reaction network code SkyNet for rr-process nucleosynthesis simulations (Lippuner & Roberts, 2017). The network includes 78437843 nuclide species and 1.4×105\sim 1.4\times 10^{5} nuclear reactions. The nuclear reaction rates used in SkyNet are taken from the JINA REACLIB database (Cyburt et al., 2010). Nuclear masses and radioactive decay data are obtained from AME2020 (Wang et al., 2021) and NUBASE2020 (Kondev et al., 2021), respectively. For nuclide species lacking experimental data, we use theoretical data derived from the Finite-Range Droplet Model (Möller et al., 2016). Neutron capture rates are calculated using the Hauser-Feshbach statistical code TALYS (Goriely et al., 2008). Nuclear fission processes are calculated using fission barriers from Möller et al. (2015) and fission fragment distributions from Kodama & Takahashi (1975). Gamma-ray radiation data of unstable nuclei are taken from the Evaluated Nuclear Data File library (EDNF/B-VIII.0: Brown et al., 2018).

Astrophysical inputs for rr-process nucleosynthesis calculations are in agreement with numerical relativity simulations provided by Radice et al. (2018). Table 1 lists the parameters used in our nucleosynthesis simulations. We selected four sets of astrophysical inputs derived from two different types of equation of state (EOS): BHBlp (representing a ‘stiffer’ EOS) and LS220 (representing a ‘softer’ EOS). Their electron fractions YeY_{\rm e} and specific entropies ss are 0.15\sim 0.15 and 15kB\sim 15~{}k_{\rm B}, respectively. Despite numerical relativity studies showing that the electron fraction of ejected materials typically ranges from 0.050.05 to 0.300.30, heavy element yields are not highly sensitive to the value of YeY_{\rm e} in cases of extreme neutron richness (Ye0.25Y_{\rm e}\lesssim 0.25), especially for the heavy elements around the second rr-process peak (Lippuner & Roberts, 2015).

Table 1: Astrophysical inputs for rr-process nucleosynthesis simulations. Parameter values are consistent with numerical relativity simulations provided by Radice et al. (2018). Two different types of equation of state (EOS) were considered in our simulations: BHBlp (a stiffer EOS) and LS220 (a softer EOS). Nucleosynthesis inputs for binary neutron star mergers include electron fraction (YeY_{\rm e}), specific entropy (ss), and expansion velocity (vv).
Model EOS M1+M2(M)M_{1}+M_{2}~{}(M_{\odot}) YeY_{\rm e} s(kB)s~{}(k_{\rm B}) v(c)v~{}(c)
BHBlp_M135135 BHBlp 1.35+1.35 0.16 20 0.18
BHBlp_M140140 BHBlp 1.40+1.40 0.14 17 0.20
LS220_M140140 LS220 1.40+1.40 0.15 17 0.17
LS220_M140120 LS220 1.40+1.20 0.16 13 0.20

2.2 Gamma-Ray Emission

The abundance of a nuclide can be defined as

Yi(t)=Ni(t)NB(t),Y_{i}(t)=\frac{N_{i}(t)}{N_{\rm B}(t)}, (1)

where Ni(t)N_{i}(t) and NB(t)N_{\rm B}(t) are the total numbers of the iith nuclide species and baryons, respectively. The total gamma-ray luminosity powered by the radioactive decay of heavy elements in the neutron star merger remnants can be obtained by

Ltot(t)=MejNAiλiYi(t)Eγ,L_{\rm tot}(t)=M_{\rm ej}N_{\rm A}\sum_{i}\lambda_{i}Y_{i}(t)E_{\gamma}, (2)

where NAN_{\rm A} is the Avogadro’s number, MejM_{\rm ej} is the mass value of ejected materials, λi\lambda_{i} is the decay rate of the iith nuclide, Yi(t)Y_{i}(t) is the corresponding abundance, and EγE_{\gamma} is the gamma-ray energy released by individual nuclear reaction.

To calculate the spectrum of gamma-ray emission, we divide the photon energy range of [103,101][10^{-3},10^{1}] MeV into 400400 energy bins in logarithmic space. The gamma-ray luminosity in an energy bin [E1,E2][E_{1},E_{2}] is given by

L(E,t)=MejNAiλiYi(t)E1E2Eγ.L(E,t)=M_{\rm ej}N_{\rm A}\sum_{i}\lambda_{i}Y_{i}(t)\sum_{E_{1}}^{E_{2}}E_{\gamma}. (3)

The corresponding photon flux can be written as

F(E,t)=L(E,t)4πD2,F(E,t)=\frac{L(E,t)}{4\pi D^{2}}, (4)

where DD is the distance to the source. Following Hotokezaka et al. (2016), we consider that each gamma-ray line is convolved with a Gaussian distribution with a central value EcE_{\rm c} and a width ΔF\Delta F, i.e.,

F(E)=F(E,t)G(EEc,ΔF2)δF,F(E)=\int F(E,t)G(E\mid E_{\rm c},\Delta F^{2})\delta F, (5)

where G(EEc,ΔF2)G(E\mid E_{\rm c},\Delta F^{2}) is the normalized Gaussian distribution. The width of the Gaussian profile is estimated by ΔF=2ln2vNSM/c\Delta F=2\sqrt{\ln 2}v_{\rm NSM}/c, where vNSMv_{\rm NSM} is the expansion velocity of neutron star merger remnants. For merger remnants aged 1010010-100 kyr, the expansion velocities are likely to lie between 100100 and 30003000 km s-1 (Korobkin et al., 2020).

3 Results

Refer to caption
Figure 1: The time evolution of the abundance of long-lived nucleus 50126{}^{126}_{50}Sn with a half-life of 230230 kyr. Astrophysical inputs for rr-process nucleosynthesis simulations are listed in Table 1.

Figure 1 shows the time evolution of the abundance of the long-lived nucleus 50126{}^{126}_{50}Sn. Due to its half-life of 230230 kyr, the abundance of 50126{}^{126}_{50}Sn remains at the level of 10410^{-4} for approximately 100100 kyr. After 100\sim 100 kyr, a significant amount of 50126{}^{126}_{50}Sn decays via the β\beta-decay chain 50126{}^{126}_{50}Sn (T1/2=230T_{1/2}=230 kyr) \to 51126{}^{126}_{51}Sb (T1/2=12.35T_{1/2}=12.35 days) \to 52126{}^{126}_{52}Te (stable) to form stable element, leading to a dramatic decrease in the elemental abundance. Our calculations show that the variations in the abundance of the heavy nucleus 50126{}^{126}_{50}Sn caused by different astrophysical inputs are within a factor of 2\sim 2. Note that the abundance of obtained through our detailed rr-process simulations is broadly consistent with the initial abundance of 50126{}^{126}_{50}Sn (Y0=1.7×104Y_{0}=1.7\times 10^{-4}) used by Wu et al. (2019).

Refer to caption
Figure 2: Radioactive gamma-ray lines from neutron star merger remnants with an age of 1010 kyr. The ejected material from neutron star merger is set to 0.01M0.01M_{\odot}. The distance to the source is 33 kpc. The line sensitivities with exposure times of 10610^{6} s (blue lines) and 10710^{7} s (red lines) for MASS taken from Zhu et al. (2024) are plotted for comparison. The bright gamma-ray lines generated by the radioactive decay of 51126{}^{126}_{51}Sb are shown.

In Figure 2, we show the gamma-ray spectra generated by the radioactive decay of heavy nuclei from binary neutron star merger remnants at a time of t=10t=10 kyr. The line sensitivities for MASS taken from Zhu et al. (2024) are also plotted for comparison. It is found that the energy of radioactive gamma-ray lines mainly ranges from 0.10.1 to 33 MeV, with specific energy fluxes between 10810^{-8} and 10510^{-5} MeV cm-2 s-1. The decay chain of 50126{}^{126}_{50}Sn (T1/2=230T_{1/2}=230 kyr) \to 51126{}^{126}_{51}Sb (T1/2=12.35T_{1/2}=12.35 days) \to 52126{}^{126}_{52}Te (stable) produces more than 30 discrete gamma-ray lines, with a total gamma-ray energy release of approximately 2.82.8 MeV. The bright gamma-ray lines with a high intensity (probability of emitting a gamma-ray per decay greater than 80%) are 415415 keV, 667667 keV, and 695695 keV. As seen in Figure 2, these bright radioactive gamma-ray lines can be detected by the MASS mission with an exposure time of 10710^{7} s.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 3: Radioactive gamma-ray spectra from neutron star merger remnants at times of 11 kyr (top panel), 1010 kyr (middle panel), and 100100 kyr (bottom panel). Here we take the astrophysical model BHBlp_M140140 as a representative case for our analysis. The gray solid lines represent Gaussian broadening for the merger remnant with an expansion velocity of vNSM=3000v_{\rm NSM}=3000 km s-1.
Refer to caption
Figure 4: The time evolution of photon fluxes of gamma-ray lines generated by the radioactive decay of heavy nucleus 51126{}^{126}_{51}Sb. The color shaded regions represent the possible range of photon flux caused by the astrophysical input models.

To further study the features of gamma-ray emission produced by long-lived nuclei, we use the astrophysical model BHBlp_M140140 as a representative case for our subsequent analysis. Figure 3 shows the radioactive gamma-ray spectra from neutron star merger remnants at times of 11 kyr, 1010 kyr, and 100100 kyr. As time goes on, the total gamma-ray flux produced by the merger remnants gradually decreases. The specific energy flux of several bright gamma-ray lines generated by the radioactive decay of 51126{}^{126}_{51}Sb decreases from 2×105\sim 2\times 10^{-5} to 5×106\sim 5\times 10^{-6} MeV cm-2 s-1 between 11 kyr and 100100 kyr, decreasing by a factor of 4\sim 4. We further investigate the time evolution of photon fluxes of each bright gamma-ray line produced by heavy nucleus 51126{}^{126}_{51}Sb, as shown in Figure 4. It is found that for neutron star merger remnants with ages less than 100100 kyr, the radioactive gamma-ray lines generated by heavy element 51126{}^{126}_{51}Sb can be detected by the MASS if the source is at a distance of 33 kpc. In other words, high energy resolution MeV gamma-ray detectors like MASS can identify young merger remnants (100\lesssim 100 kyr) within the Milky Way.

Refer to caption
Figure 5: Radioactive gamma-ray spectra from neutron star merger remnants calculated using nuclear physics input derived from the Weizsa¨\ddot{\rm a}cker-Skyrme model provided by Wang et al. (2014). The nucleosynthesis inputs are consistent with the astrophysical model BHBlp_M140140 provided by Radice et al. (2018). The kilonova remnant’s age is 11 kyr, and its distance is 1010 kpc, consistent with the possible kilonova remnant proposed by Liu et al. (2019). The gray solid lines indicate Doppler broadening caused by the expansion velocity of the merger remnant. The ejected material from the neutron star merger is set to 0.01M0.01M_{\odot}.

The nuclear physics inputs may affect the radioactive gamma-ray emission from neutron star merger remnants. To explore its sensitivity to the nuclear physics inputs, we estimate the radioactive gamma-ray spectrum using the Weizsa¨\ddot{\rm a}cker-Skyrme model provided by Wang et al. (2014), as shown in Figure 5. The merger remnant’s age is 11 kyr and its distance is 1010 kpc, consistent with the possible kilonova remnant associated with the guest star recorded in AD 1163 (Liu et al., 2019). One can observe that the radioactive gamma-ray spectrum calculated using the nuclear physics input derived from the Weizsa¨\ddot{\rm a}cker-Skyrme model has a similar total flux and global shape compared to that calculated using the Finite-Range Droplet model (Figure 2). Bright MeV gamma-ray lines generated by the radioactive decay of the heavy nucleus 51126{}^{126}_{51}Sb can be identified in the gamma-ray spectrum. Our analysis further indicates that it is promising to use high energy resolution MeV gamma-ray detectors to observe these gamma-ray lines from Galactic kilonova remnants.

4 Summary and Discussion

Detection of radioactive gamma-ray photons emitted from neutron star mergers can provide direct evidence for probing the nuclide composition and tracking its evolution. In this study, we used the rr-process nuclear reaction network and the astrophysical inputs derived from numerical relativity simulations to investigate the gamma-ray line features arising from the radioactive decay of long-lived nuclei in the merger remnants. Among these nuclei, 50126{}^{126}_{50}Sn, with a half-life of 230230 kyr, emerges as the most promising candidate. The abundance of heavy element 50126{}^{126}_{50}Sn typically reaches a high level of 104\sim 10^{-4} within 100\sim 100 kyr (Figure 1). Given such high yield, the decay chain of 50126{}^{126}_{50}Sn (T1/2=230T_{1/2}=230 kyr) \to 51126{}^{126}_{51}Sb (T1/2=12.35T_{1/2}=12.35 days) \to 52126{}^{126}_{52}Te (stable) produces several bright gamma-ray lines with energies of 415415, 667667, and 695695 keV (Figure 2 and Figure 3). The photon fluxes of these bright gamma-ray lines reach 105\sim 10^{-5} γ\gamma cm-2 s-1 for neutron star merger remnants with ages less than 100100 kyr, which can be detected if the source is at a distance of 33 kpc (Figure 4). This suggests that it is promising to use high energy resolution MeV gamma-ray detectors to observe gamma-ray lines generated by the radioactive decay of heavy rr-process elements and to identify young neutron star merger remnants (100\lesssim 100 kyr) within the Milky Way. Our results are consistent with the analysis given by Wu et al. (2019). They suggested that 50126{}^{126}_{50}Sn is the most promising nucleus for gamma-ray searches in neutron star merger remnants by investigating individual long-lived nuclei and assuming that each merger event contains a distribution of rr-process nuclei following the Solar rr-process abundances.

The event rate of binary neutron star merger inferred from the LIGO/Virgo gravitational wave detectors is 1000\sim 1000 Gpc-3 yr-1 (Abbott et al., 2017a). Assuming a local density of Milky Way-equivalent galaxies of 0.01\sim 0.01 Mpc-3, the occurrence rate within our Galaxy is then 100\sim 100 Myr-1. Thus, the age of the most recent Galactic merger remnant is estimated to be 10\sim 10 kyr. However, it’s worth noting that the youngest Galactic merger remnant could be substantially younger, with approximately a 10%10\% probability of having an age less than 11 kyr. Liu et al. (2019) proposed that G4.8+6.2 is a possible kilonova remnant associated with the Korean guest star of AD 1163 in the Milky Way, with an age of 1\sim 1 kyr. If G4.8+6.2 and AD 1163 are indeed associated, the radioactive gamma-ray emission lines produced by this kilonova remnant can be identified by MeV gamma-ray detectors (Figure 5).

The line sensitivity for the current gamma-ray mission INTEGRAL (Winkler et al., 2003) at 1 MeV is 3×1053\times 10^{-5} γ\gamma cm-2 s-1, which is not sufficient to detect radioactive gamma-ray lines from long-lived neutron star merger remnants. Recently, Zhu et al. (2024) proposed a new MeV gamma-ray mission, the MeV Astrophysical Spectroscopic Surveyor (MASS). The MASS mission is a large area Compton telescope using 3D position sensitive CdZnTe detectors optimized for MeV gamma-ray line detection. The line sensitivities for the MASS mission could achieve 1×1051\times 10^{-5} and 4×1064\times 10^{-6} γ\gamma cm-2 s-1 with exposure times of 10610^{6} and 10710^{7} seconds, respectively. With an energy resolution of 0.6%0.6\% in the MeV band, MASS is sufficient to detect gamma-ray lines produced by the decay chain of 50126{}^{126}_{50}Sn and to identify young Galactic kilonova remnants.

We thank Hua Feng and Jia-Huan Zhu for valuable discussions. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11973014, 12133003, and 12347172). MHC also acknowledges support from the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant Nos. GZB20230029 and 2024M750057). This work was also supported by the Guangxi Talent Program (Highland of Innovation Talents). ORCID iDs Meng-Hua Chen: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8406-8683 Li-Xin Li: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8466-321X En-Wei Liang: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7044-733X

References

  • Abbott et al. (2017a) Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., et al. 2017a, Phys. Rev. Lett., 119, 161101, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.161101
  • Abbott et al. (2017b) —. 2017b, ApJ, 848, L12, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa91c9
  • An et al. (2023) An, Y., Wu, M.-R., Guo, G., et al. 2023, Phys. Rev. D, 108, 123038, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.108.123038
  • Arcavi et al. (2017) Arcavi, I., Hosseinzadeh, G., Howell, D. A., et al. 2017, Nature, 551, 64, doi: 10.1038/nature24291
  • Arcones & Thielemann (2013) Arcones, A., & Thielemann, F. K. 2013, Journal of Physics G Nuclear Physics, 40, 013201, doi: 10.1088/0954-3899/40/1/013201
  • Barnes & Kasen (2013) Barnes, J., & Kasen, D. 2013, ApJ, 775, 18, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/775/1/18
  • Barnes et al. (2016) Barnes, J., Kasen, D., Wu, M.-R., & Martínez-Pinedo, G. 2016, ApJ, 829, 110, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/829/2/110
  • Brown et al. (2018) Brown, D. A., Chadwick, M. B., Capote, R., et al. 2018, Nuclear Data Sheets, 148, 1, doi: 10.1016/j.nds.2018.02.001
  • Burbidge et al. (1957) Burbidge, E. M., Burbidge, G. R., Fowler, W. A., & Hoyle, F. 1957, Reviews of Modern Physics, 29, 547, doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.29.547
  • Chen et al. (2022) Chen, M.-H., Hu, R.-C., & Liang, E.-W. 2022, ApJ, 932, L7, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac7470
  • Chen et al. (2023) —. 2023, MNRAS, 520, 2806, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad250
  • Chen et al. (2024) Chen, M.-H., Li, L.-X., Chen, Q.-H., Hu, R.-C., & Liang, E.-W. 2024, MNRAS, 529, 1154, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae475
  • Chen et al. (2021) Chen, M.-H., Li, L.-X., Lin, D.-B., & Liang, E.-W. 2021, ApJ, 919, 59, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1267
  • Chen & Liang (2024) Chen, M.-H., & Liang, E.-W. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 5540, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3523
  • Coulter et al. (2017) Coulter, D. A., Foley, R. J., Kilpatrick, C. D., et al. 2017, Science, 358, 1556, doi: 10.1126/science.aap9811
  • Cowan et al. (2021) Cowan, J. J., Sneden, C., Lawler, J. E., et al. 2021, Reviews of Modern Physics, 93, 015002, doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.93.015002
  • Cowperthwaite et al. (2017) Cowperthwaite, P. S., Berger, E., Villar, V. A., et al. 2017, ApJ, 848, L17, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa8fc7
  • Cyburt et al. (2010) Cyburt, R. H., Amthor, A. M., Ferguson, R., et al. 2010, ApJS, 189, 240, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/189/1/240
  • Drout et al. (2017) Drout, M. R., Piro, A. L., Shappee, B. J., et al. 2017, Science, 358, 1570, doi: 10.1126/science.aaq0049
  • Evans et al. (2017) Evans, P. A., Cenko, S. B., Kennea, J. A., et al. 2017, Science, 358, 1565, doi: 10.1126/science.aap9580
  • Goriely et al. (2008) Goriely, S., Hilaire, S., & Koning, A. J. 2008, A&A, 487, 767, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20078825
  • Hotokezaka et al. (2018) Hotokezaka, K., Beniamini, P., & Piran, T. 2018, International Journal of Modern Physics D, 27, 1842005, doi: 10.1142/S0218271818420051
  • Hotokezaka et al. (2016) Hotokezaka, K., Wanajo, S., Tanaka, M., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 459, 35, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw404
  • Kasen et al. (2013) Kasen, D., Badnell, N. R., & Barnes, J. 2013, ApJ, 774, 25, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/774/1/25
  • Kasen et al. (2017) Kasen, D., Metzger, B., Barnes, J., Quataert, E., & Ramirez-Ruiz, E. 2017, Nature, 551, 80, doi: 10.1038/nature24453
  • Kasliwal et al. (2017) Kasliwal, M. M., Nakar, E., Singer, L. P., et al. 2017, Science, 358, 1559, doi: 10.1126/science.aap9455
  • Kodama & Takahashi (1975) Kodama, T., & Takahashi, K. 1975, Nucl. Phys. A, 239, 489, doi: 10.1016/0375-9474(75)90381-4
  • Kondev et al. (2021) Kondev, F. G., Wang, M., Huang, W. J., Naimi, S., & Audi, G. 2021, Chinese Physics C, 45, 030001, doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/abddae
  • Korobkin et al. (2012) Korobkin, O., Rosswog, S., Arcones, A., & Winteler, C. 2012, MNRAS, 426, 1940, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21859.x
  • Korobkin et al. (2020) Korobkin, O., Hungerford, A. M., Fryer, C. L., et al. 2020, ApJ, 889, 168, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab64d8
  • Lattimer & Schramm (1974) Lattimer, J. M., & Schramm, D. N. 1974, ApJ, 192, L145, doi: 10.1086/181612
  • Levan et al. (2024) Levan, A. J., Gompertz, B. P., Salafia, O. S., et al. 2024, Nature, 626, 737, doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06759-1
  • Li (2019) Li, L.-X. 2019, ApJ, 872, 19, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf961
  • Li & Paczyński (1998) Li, L.-X., & Paczyński, B. 1998, ApJ, 507, L59, doi: 10.1086/311680
  • Lippuner & Roberts (2015) Lippuner, J., & Roberts, L. F. 2015, ApJ, 815, 82, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/815/2/82
  • Lippuner & Roberts (2017) —. 2017, ApJS, 233, 18, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aa94cb
  • Liu et al. (2019) Liu, Y., Zou, Y.-C., Jiang, B., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 490, L21, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slz141
  • Metzger (2019) Metzger, B. D. 2019, Living Reviews in Relativity, 23, 1, doi: 10.1007/s41114-019-0024-0
  • Metzger et al. (2010) Metzger, B. D., Martínez-Pinedo, G., Darbha, S., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 406, 2650, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16864.x
  • Möller et al. (2015) Möller, P., Sierk, A. J., Ichikawa, T., Iwamoto, A., & Mumpower, M. 2015, Phys. Rev. C, 91, 024310, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.91.024310
  • Möller et al. (2016) Möller, P., Sierk, A. J., Ichikawa, T., & Sagawa, H. 2016, Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables, 109, 1, doi: 10.1016/j.adt.2015.10.002
  • Pian et al. (2017) Pian, E., D’Avanzo, P., Benetti, S., et al. 2017, Nature, 551, 67, doi: 10.1038/nature24298
  • Qian et al. (1998) Qian, Y. Z., Vogel, P., & Wasserburg, G. J. 1998, ApJ, 506, 868, doi: 10.1086/306285
  • Radice et al. (2018) Radice, D., Perego, A., Hotokezaka, K., et al. 2018, ApJ, 869, 130, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf054
  • Shappee et al. (2017) Shappee, B. J., Simon, J. D., Drout, M. R., et al. 2017, Science, 358, 1574, doi: 10.1126/science.aaq0186
  • Smartt et al. (2017) Smartt, S. J., Chen, T. W., Jerkstrand, A., et al. 2017, Nature, 551, 75, doi: 10.1038/nature24303
  • Symbalisty & Schramm (1982) Symbalisty, E., & Schramm, D. N. 1982, Astrophys. Lett., 22, 143
  • Wanajo (2013) Wanajo, S. 2013, ApJ, 770, L22, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/770/2/L22
  • Wang et al. (2021) Wang, M., Huang, W. J., Kondev, F. G., Audi, G., & Naimi, S. 2021, Chinese Physics C, 45, 030003, doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/abddaf
  • Wang et al. (2014) Wang, N., Liu, M., Wu, X., & Meng, J. 2014, Physics Letters B, 734, 215, doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2014.05.049
  • Wang et al. (2020) Wang, X., N3AS Collaboration, Vassh, N., et al. 2020, ApJ, 903, L3, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/abbe18
  • Watson et al. (2019) Watson, D., Hansen, C. J., Selsing, J., et al. 2019, Nature, 574, 497, doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1676-3
  • Winkler et al. (2003) Winkler, C., Courvoisier, T. J. L., Di Cocco, G., et al. 2003, A&A, 411, L1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20031288
  • Wu et al. (2019) Wu, M.-R., Banerjee, P., Metzger, B. D., et al. 2019, ApJ, 880, 23, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2593
  • Zhu et al. (2024) Zhu, J., Zheng, X., Feng, H., et al. 2024, Experimental Astronomy, 57, 2, doi: 10.1007/s10686-024-09920-4