This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

institutetext: Department of Physics, Shinshu University,
3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto 390-8621, Japan

Quenched free energy in random matrix model

Abstract

We compute the quenched free energy in the Gaussian random matrix model by directly evaluating the matrix integral without using the replica trick. We find that the quenched free energy is a monotonic function of the temperature and the entropy approaches logN\log N at high temperature and vanishes at zero temperature.

1 Introduction

Recently, it is shown that the path integral of Jackiw-Teitelboim (JT) gravity Jackiw:1984je ; Teitelboim:1983ux is equivalent to a certain double-scaled matrix model Saad:2019lba . From the viewpoint of holography, this implies that the holographic dual of JT gravity is not a single quantum mechanical system but an ensemble of systems with random Hamiltonians. Moreover, it is realized in Saad:2018bqo that the Euclidean wormhole connecting different boundaries of spacetime plays an important role in explaining the so-called “ramp” of the spectral form factor Garcia-Garcia:2016mno ; Cotler:2016fpe in the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev (SYK) model Sachdev ; kitaev2015simple . The importance of the wormhole in quantum gravity is also emphasized in the recent computation of the Page cure using the replica method Penington:2019kki ; Almheiri:2019qdq , where the inclusion of the so-called replica wormhole is essential for the resolution of the apparent paradox in the original Hawking’s calculation.111However, the recovering of a unitary Page curve is far from sufficient to completely resolve the paradox. We still lack an understanding of by what mechanism information is able to exit an evaporating black hole.

In recent papers Engelhardt:2020qpv ; Johnson:2020mwi the replica method is applied to the computation of the free energy in JT gravity. As emphasized in Engelhardt:2020qpv , this problem is very interesting to reveal the role of replica wormholes and explore the possibility of replica symmetry breaking and the putative spin glass phase of quantum gravity.222The replica symmetry breaking in the SYK model is discussed in Gur-Ari:2018okm ; Arefeva:2018vfp . The idea of replica symmetry breaking is developed by Parisi parisi1979infinite ; parisi1980sequence to solve the sping glass model of Sherrington and Kirkpatrick sherrington1975solvable . See e.g. Denef:2011ee ; castellani2005spin ; sherrington for reviews of spin glasses. However, it is reported in Engelhardt:2020qpv that a naive application of the replica method leads to a pathological behavior of the free energy. In a recent paper Johnson:2020mwi it is emphasized that the non-perturbative effect is important to resolve this problem.

In this paper, we will consider a simple toy model for the computation of free energy in JT gravity. Instead of the matrix model of JT gravity in Saad:2019lba , we consider the free energy in the Gaussian matrix model where the Hamiltonian is regarded as a random hermitian matrix with Gaussian distribution.333This problem is suggested in the discussion section in Engelhardt:2020qpv . We are interested in the the so-called quenched free energy logZ(β)\langle\log Z(\beta)\rangle444 Strictly speaking the quenched free energy is defined by including the factor of temperature F=TlogZ(β)F=-T\langle\log Z(\beta)\rangle as in (6), but we will loosely use the name “quenched free energy” to indicate either logZ(β)\langle\log Z(\beta)\rangle or F=TlogZ(β)F=-T\langle\log Z(\beta)\rangle depending on the context. We believe that which one we are referring to is clear from the context and this will not cause a confusion to the readers. in the matrix model, where Z(β)=TreβHZ(\beta)=\operatorname{Tr}e^{-\beta H} is the partition function with the inverse temperature β=T1\beta=T^{-1} and the expectation value is defined by the integral over the N×NN\times N hermitian matrix HH

f(H)=𝑑HeN2TrH2f(H)𝑑HeN2TrH2.\displaystyle\langle f(H)\rangle=\frac{\int dHe^{-\frac{N}{2}\operatorname{Tr}H^{2}}f(H)}{\int dHe^{-\frac{N}{2}\operatorname{Tr}H^{2}}}. (1)

One can compute the quenched free energy by the replica method555 The correlators of the resolvent Tr(EH)1\operatorname{Tr}(E-H)^{-1} in the Gaussian matrix model are analyzed by the replica method in kamenev1999wigner . It is found that the replica symmetry breaking is important to reproduce the known results of the correlators of resolvents. In this paper we are dealing with the different quantity logZ(β)\langle\log Z(\beta)\rangle and the computation in kamenev1999wigner cannot simply be generalized to our case.

logZ(β)=limn0Z(β)n1n.\displaystyle\langle\log Z(\beta)\rangle=\lim_{n\to 0}\frac{\langle Z(\beta)^{n}\rangle-1}{n}. (2)

In the high temperature regime the nn-point correlator Z(β)n\langle Z(\beta)^{n}\rangle is approximated by the disconnected correlator

Z(β)nZ(β)n,\displaystyle\langle Z(\beta)^{n}\rangle\approx\langle Z(\beta)\rangle^{n}, (3)

and the n0n\to 0 limit in (2) gives rise to

logZ(β)limn0Z(β)n1n=logZ(β).\displaystyle\langle\log Z(\beta)\rangle\approx\lim_{n\to 0}\frac{\langle Z(\beta)\rangle^{n}-1}{n}=\log\langle Z(\beta)\rangle. (4)

The right hand side of this equation is known as the annealed free energy. On the other hand, in the low temperature regime it is not clear how to define the analytic continuation of Z(β)n\langle Z(\beta)^{n}\rangle to n<1n<1. This is the origin of the difficulty found in Engelhardt:2020qpv .

It turns out that we can avoid this difficulty of analytic continuation by directly evaluating the quenched free energy by the matrix integral

logZ(β)=𝑑HeN2TrH2logTreβH𝑑HeN2TrH2.\displaystyle\langle\log Z(\beta)\rangle=\frac{\int dHe^{-\frac{N}{2}\operatorname{Tr}H^{2}}\log\operatorname{Tr}e^{-\beta H}}{\int dHe^{-\frac{N}{2}\operatorname{Tr}H^{2}}}. (5)

We can rewrite this integral (5) as an integral over the NN eigenvalues of the matrix HH and study the physical quantities like the free energy FF and the entropy SS

F=TlogZ(β),S=FT.\displaystyle F=-T\langle\log Z(\beta)\rangle,\quad S=-\frac{\partial F}{\partial T}. (6)

In order for the entropy to be positive, the free energy FF should be a monotonically decreasing function of TT. In the replica computation of the quenched free energy of JT gravity Engelhardt:2020qpv , a pathological non-monotonic behavior of FF is found under a certain prescription of the analytic continuation in nn.666As emphasized in Engelhardt:2020qpv the analytic continuation of Z(β)n\langle Z(\beta)^{n}\rangle from positive integer nn to n<1n<1 is not unique. The non-monotonic behavior of the free energy is a consequence of the particular choice of the analytic continuation used in Engelhardt:2020qpv . However, as explained in Engelhardt:2020qpv their choice of analytic continuation is not meant to be the correct one but it is just an illustrative example to demonstrate the importance of the replica wormholes in the computation of free energy. We find that the direct computation of the quenched free energy in the Gaussian matrix model (5) gives rise to a well-defined monotonic behavior of the free energy FF.

This paper is organized as follows. In section 2, we find the explicit integral representation of the quenched free energy (5) and study its behavior in the high and low temperature regimes. In section 3, we study the exact free energy and entropy for N=2,3N=2,3 as examples. We find that the free energy exhibits a well-defined monotonic behavior as a function of TT. In section 4, we comment on the computation using the replica method. We propose a necessary condition for the analytic continuation of Z(β)n\langle Z(\beta)^{n}\rangle to satisfy. Finally, we conclude in section 5 with some discussions on the interesting future problems.

2 Quenched free energy in Gaussian matrix model

In this paper we will analyze the quenched free energy in Gaussian matrix model (5) directly without using the replica trick. From the standard argument, the matrix integral in (5) is written as an integral over the NN eigenvalues {E1,,EN}\{E_{1},\cdots,E_{N}\} of HH

logZ(β)=1𝒵1N!i=1NdEieN2Ei2i<j(EiEj)2log(ieβEi).\displaystyle\langle\log Z(\beta)\rangle=\frac{1}{\mathcal{Z}}\frac{1}{N!}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\prod_{i=1}^{N}dE_{i}e^{-\frac{N}{2}E_{i}^{2}}\prod_{i<j}(E_{i}-E_{j})^{2}\log\left(\sum_{i}e^{-\beta E_{i}}\right). (7)

Here the normalization factor 𝒵\mathcal{Z} is given by

𝒵=1N!i=1NdEieN2Ei2i<j(EiEj)2=NN22(2π)N2G2(N+1),\displaystyle\mathcal{Z}=\frac{1}{N!}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\prod_{i=1}^{N}dE_{i}e^{-\frac{N}{2}E_{i}^{2}}\prod_{i<j}(E_{i}-E_{j})^{2}=N^{-\frac{N^{2}}{2}}(2\pi)^{\frac{N}{2}}G_{2}(N+1), (8)

where G2(N+1)G_{2}(N+1) denotes the Barnes GG-function. Using this expression (7), in subsection 2.1 and 2.2 we will study the behavior of quenched free energy in the high temperature and the low temperature regimes, respectively.

2.1 High temperature regime

In the high temperature regime, the quenched free energy is approximated by the annealed free energy (4).

The one-point function Z(β)\langle Z(\beta)\rangle in the Gaussian matrix model happens to be the same as the computation of the 1/21/2 BPS Wilson loop in 𝒩=4\mathcal{N}=4 super Yang-Mills theory (SYM), and the exact result at finite NN is found in Drukker:2000rr in terms of the Laguerre polynomial

Z(β)=eβ22NLN11(β2N).\displaystyle\langle Z(\beta)\rangle=e^{\frac{\beta^{2}}{2N}}L^{1}_{N-1}\left(-\frac{\beta^{2}}{N}\right). (9)

The large NN behavior of the one-point function Z(β)\langle Z(\beta)\rangle can be computed from the genus-zero eigenvalue density

ρ0(E)=12π4E2,\displaystyle\rho_{0}(E)=\frac{1}{2\pi}\sqrt{4-E^{2}}, (10)

known as the Wigner semi-circle distribution. Then in the large NN limit the one-point function Z(β)\langle Z(\beta)\rangle becomes

Z(β)\displaystyle\langle Z(\beta)\rangle N22𝑑Eρ0(E)eβE=NI1(2β)β,\displaystyle\approx N\int_{-2}^{2}dE\rho_{0}(E)e^{-\beta E}=N\frac{I_{1}(2\beta)}{\beta}, (11)

where I1(2β)I_{1}(2\beta) is the modified Bessel function of the first kind. From this expression one can easily find the expansion of the free energy and the entropy in the high temperature regime (T1)(T\gg 1)

F\displaystyle F =TlogN12T1+𝒪(T3),\displaystyle=-T\log N-\frac{1}{2}T^{-1}+\mathcal{O}(T^{-3}), (12)
S\displaystyle S =logN12T2+𝒪(T4).\displaystyle=\log N-\frac{1}{2}T^{-2}+\mathcal{O}(T^{-4}).

In particular, the high temperature limit of entropy is logN\log N

limTS=logN.\displaystyle\lim_{T\to\infty}S=\log N. (13)

This is expected since NN is the dimension of the Hilbert space and logN\log N is the maximal entropy of the system.

2.2 Low temperature regime

Next let us consider the low temperature regime (T1)(T\ll 1). In the low temperature limit β\beta\to\infty, one can see that logTreβH\log\operatorname{Tr}e^{-\beta H} becomes

limβlog(i=1NeβEi)=βmin{Ei},\displaystyle\lim_{\beta\to\infty}\log\left(\sum_{i=1}^{N}e^{-\beta E_{i}}\right)=-\beta\text{min}\{E_{i}\}, (14)

where min{Ei}\text{min}\{E_{i}\} denotes the smallest eigenvalue in the set of NN eigenvalues {E1,,EN}\{E_{1},\cdots,E_{N}\}. Thus we find that the low temperature limit of the quenched free energy is determined by the expectation value E0=min{Ei}E_{0}=\langle\text{min}\{E_{i}\}\rangle of the smallest eigenvalue

limβlogZ(β)=βE0.\displaystyle\lim_{\beta\to\infty}\langle\log Z(\beta)\rangle=-\beta E_{0}. (15)

Note that E0E_{0} is explicitly written as the eigenvalue integral

E0=1𝒵1N!i=1NdEieN2Ei2i<j(EiEj)2min{Ei}.\displaystyle E_{0}=\frac{1}{\mathcal{Z}}\frac{1}{N!}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\prod_{i=1}^{N}dE_{i}e^{-\frac{N}{2}E_{i}^{2}}\prod_{i<j}(E_{i}-E_{j})^{2}\text{min}\{E_{i}\}. (16)

We do not know the closed form of this integral for general NN, but it is possible to evaluate this integral for small NN. For instance, for N=2,3N=2,3 we find

E0(N=2)\displaystyle E_{0}^{(N=2)} =2π0.79788,\displaystyle=-\sqrt{\frac{2}{\pi}}\approx-0.79788, (17)
E0(N=3)\displaystyle E_{0}^{(N=3)} =938π1.09936.\displaystyle=-\frac{9\sqrt{3}}{8\sqrt{\pi}}\approx-1.09936.

It is known bai1988necessary that in the large NN limit E0E_{0} converges to the edge of the Wigner semi-circle distribution (10)

E0(N=)=2.\displaystyle E_{0}^{(N=\infty)}=-2. (18)

It turns out that one can systematically compute the small TT corrections to the leading term in (15). In the eigenvalue integral (7), one can choose ENE_{N} as the smallest eigenvalue without loss of generality. Then the range of other eigenvalues Ei(i=1,,N1)E_{i}~{}(i=1,\cdots,N-1) is restricted to Ei>ENE_{i}>E_{N}. With this remark in mind, the quenched free energy is written as

logZ(β)\displaystyle\langle\log Z(\beta)\rangle =βE0+1𝒵NN!𝑑ENeN2EN2ENi=1N1dEieN2Ei2\displaystyle=-\beta E_{0}+\frac{1}{\mathcal{Z}}\frac{N}{N!}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dE_{N}e^{-\frac{N}{2}E_{N}^{2}}\int_{E_{N}}^{\infty}\prod_{i=1}^{N-1}dE_{i}e^{-\frac{N}{2}E_{i}^{2}} (19)
×i=1N1(EiEN)21i<jN1(EiEj)2log(1+i=1N1eβ(EiEN)).\displaystyle\times\prod_{i=1}^{N-1}(E_{i}-E_{N})^{2}\prod_{1\leq i<j\leq N-1}(E_{i}-E_{j})^{2}\log\left(1+\sum_{i=1}^{N-1}e^{-\beta(E_{i}-E_{N})}\right).

This is further simplified by shifting EiEi+EN(i=1,,N1)E_{i}\to E_{i}+E_{N}~{}(i=1,\cdots,N-1) and integrating out ENE_{N}

logZ(β)\displaystyle\langle\log Z(\beta)\rangle =βE0+1𝒵2πN!0i=1N1dEieN2iEi2+12(iEi)2\displaystyle=-\beta E_{0}+\frac{1}{\mathcal{Z}}\frac{\sqrt{2\pi}}{N!}\int_{0}^{\infty}\prod_{i=1}^{N-1}dE_{i}e^{-\frac{N}{2}\sum_{i}E_{i}^{2}+\frac{1}{2}(\sum_{i}E_{i})^{2}} (20)
×i=1N1Ei21i<jN1(EiEj)2log(1+i=1N1eβEi).\displaystyle\times\prod_{i=1}^{N-1}E_{i}^{2}\prod_{1\leq i<j\leq N-1}(E_{i}-E_{j})^{2}\log\left(1+\sum_{i=1}^{N-1}e^{-\beta E_{i}}\right).

This is our master formula.

The small TT behavior of (20) is found by rescaling one of the integration variables EiTEiE_{i}\to TE_{i}. In this way we find that the quenched free energy at low temperature (T1)(T\ll 1) behaves as

F=TlogZ(β)=E0σT4+𝒪(T5),\displaystyle F=-T\langle\log Z(\beta)\rangle=E_{0}-\sigma T^{4}+\mathcal{O}(T^{5}), (21)

where σ\sigma is an NN-dependent constant. From (21), it follows that the entropy in the low temperature regime behaves as

S=FT=4σT3+𝒪(T4).\displaystyle S=-\frac{\partial F}{\partial T}=4\sigma T^{3}+\mathcal{O}(T^{4}). (22)

This result implies that the entropy vanishes at zero temperature

limT0S=0.\displaystyle\lim_{T\to 0}S=0. (23)

Note that the vanishing of the entropy at zero temperature is also observed in the Parisi’s solution of Sherrington-Kirkpatrick model crisanti2002analysis ; sommers1984distribution .

3 Numerics for 𝑵=𝟐,𝟑N=2,3

In this section we study numerically the integral representation of the quenched free energy (20) for N=2,3N=2,3. For N=2N=2 the integral (20) becomes

logZ(β)=2πβ+2π0𝑑Ee12E2E2log(1+eβE),\displaystyle\langle\log Z(\beta)\rangle=\sqrt{\frac{2}{\pi}}\beta+\sqrt{\frac{2}{\pi}}\int_{0}^{\infty}dEe^{-\frac{1}{2}E^{2}}E^{2}\log(1+e^{-\beta E}), (24)

and for N=3N=3 we find

logZ(β)=938πβ\displaystyle\langle\log Z(\beta)\rangle=\frac{9\sqrt{3}}{8{\sqrt{\pi}}}\beta (25)
+\displaystyle+ 2738π0𝑑E10𝑑E2e32(E12+E22)+12(E1+E2)2E12E22(E1E2)2log(1+eβE1+eβE2).\displaystyle\frac{27\sqrt{3}}{8\pi}\int_{0}^{\infty}dE_{1}\int_{0}^{\infty}dE_{2}e^{-\frac{3}{2}(E_{1}^{2}+E_{2}^{2})+\frac{1}{2}(E_{1}+E_{2})^{2}}E_{1}^{2}E_{2}^{2}(E_{1}-E_{2})^{2}\log(1+e^{-\beta E_{1}}+e^{-\beta E_{2}}).

One can easily evaluate these integrals numerically. In Fig. 1 we show the plot of free energy as a function of temperature. At high temperature, the quenched free energy approaches the annealed free energy Fann=TlogZ(β)F_{\text{ann}}=-T\log\langle Z(\beta)\rangle (orange dashed curve) as expected. In Fig. 2 we show the plot of entropy SS. One can see that SS approaches logN\log N at high temperature and vanishes at zero temperature.

Refer to caption
(a) Free energy at N=2N=2
Refer to caption
(b) Free energy at N=3N=3
Figure 1: Plot of free energy for 1(a) N=2N=2 and 1(b) N=3N=3 as a function of temperature TT. The solid curves are the quenched free energy while the orange dashed curves represent the annealed free energy Fann=TlogZ(β)F_{\text{ann}}=-T\log\langle Z(\beta)\rangle with the exact one-point function in (9).
Refer to caption
(a) Entropy at N=2N=2
Refer to caption
(b) Entropy at N=3N=3
Figure 2: Plot of entropy for 2(a) N=2N=2 and 2(b) N=3N=3 as a function of temperature TT. The solid curves are the exact result while the horizontal gray lines represent the maximum value of entropy S=logNS=\log N.
Refer to caption
Figure 3: Plot of free energy for N=2N=2 at low temperature. The solid curve is the exact result while the orange dashed curve represents the small TT expansion (26).

Let us take a closer look at the low temperature regime for N=2N=2. The small TT expansion of the integral (24) is obtained by rescaling the integration variable ETEE\to TE and expanding the Gaussian factor in (24)

F\displaystyle F =2π[1+T40𝑑EE2n=01n!(T2E22)nlog(1+eE)]\displaystyle=-\sqrt{\frac{2}{\pi}}\Biggl{[}1+T^{4}\int_{0}^{\infty}dEE^{2}\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n!}\left(-\frac{T^{2}E^{2}}{2}\right)^{n}\log(1+e^{-E})\Biggr{]} (26)
=2π[1+7π4360T431π62520T6+𝒪(T8)].\displaystyle=-\sqrt{\frac{2}{\pi}}\Biggl{[}1+\frac{7\pi^{4}}{360}T^{4}-\frac{31\pi^{6}}{2520}T^{6}+\mathcal{O}(T^{8})\Biggr{]}.

Note that the first small TT correction is of order T4T^{4} which is consistent with the general result in (21). In Fig. 3 we show the plot of quenched free energy for N=2N=2 and its small TT expansion up to T6T^{6} in (26). One can see that the exact quenched free energy is a monotonic function of TT even in the low temperature regime and FF becomes E0E_{0} at zero temperature. A pathological non-monotonic behavior found in Engelhardt:2020qpv using the replica trick does not occur in the exact result of quenched free energy.

4 Comment on the replica method

Let us compare our direct calculation of quenched free energy with the replica method (2). As we mentioned in section 1, one can easily apply the replica method in the high temperature regime and obtain the result (4). In particular, in the high temperature limit β0\beta\to 0, the partition function Z(β)=TreβHZ(\beta)=\operatorname{Tr}e^{-\beta H} reduces to the dimension of the Hilbert space

limβ0Z(β)=Tr1=N.\displaystyle\lim_{\beta\to 0}Z(\beta)=\operatorname{Tr}1=N. (27)

Thus the quenched free energy approaches the maximal entropy of the system in the limit TT\to\infty

limβ0logZ(β)=limn0Nn1n=logN.\displaystyle\lim_{\beta\to 0}\langle\log Z(\beta)\rangle=\lim_{n\to 0}\frac{N^{n}-1}{n}=\log N. (28)

On the other hand, the application of the replica trick in the low temperature regime is rather subtle. Under a certain prescription of the analytic continuation in the number of replicas nn, it is found that the free energy exhibits a non-monotonic behavior as a function of temperature Engelhardt:2020qpv .

Our direct computation of the quenched free energy puts a certain constraint on the possible form of the analytic continuation in nn. At low temperature, the smallest eigenvalue E0E_{0} of HH becomes dominant and thus we expect

limβZ(β)n=enβE0.\displaystyle\lim_{\beta\to\infty}\langle Z(\beta)^{n}\rangle=e^{-n\beta E_{0}}. (29)

We can regard (29) as a condition for the possible analytic continuation of Z(β)n\langle Z(\beta)^{n}\rangle to satisfy. Then we can apply the replica method in the low temperature regime

limβlogZ(β)=limn0enβE01n=βE0,\displaystyle\lim_{\beta\to\infty}\langle\log Z(\beta)\rangle=\lim_{n\to 0}\frac{e^{-n\beta E_{0}}-1}{n}=-\beta E_{0}, (30)

which reproduces the correct behavior of the quenched free energy (15).

Note that there is no logN\log N entropy term in (30) since only a single eigenvalue (the lowest energy state) contributes to Z(β)n\langle Z(\beta)^{n}\rangle in the low temperature limit. This explains the vanishing of entropy at zero temperature (23).

We would like to understand the role of replica symmetry breaking in a possible large NN phase transition. When nn is a positive integer, the nn-replica correlator Z(β)n\langle Z(\beta)^{n}\rangle is expanded in terms of the connected correlators

Z(β)n=n!pνp=np=1n1νp!(p!)νp(Z(β)pconn)νp.\displaystyle\langle Z(\beta)^{n}\rangle=n!\sum_{\sum p\nu_{p}=n}\prod_{p=1}^{n}\frac{1}{\nu_{p}!(p!)^{\nu_{p}}}\Bigl{(}\langle Z(\beta)^{p}\rangle_{\text{conn}}\Bigr{)}^{\nu_{p}}. (31)

Here [pνp]=[1ν12ν2nνn][p^{\nu_{p}}]=[1^{\nu_{1}}2^{\nu_{2}}\cdots n^{\nu_{n}}] denotes a partition of nn. In the high temperature regime the disconnected part Z(β)n\langle Z(\beta)\rangle^{n} corresponding to the partition [1n][1^{n}] is dominant, while at low temperature the totally connected part Z(β)nconn\langle Z(\beta)^{n}\rangle_{\text{conn}} corresponding to the partition [n1][n^{1}] is dominant Okuyama:2019xvg . Then one might naively think that the quenched free energy in the low temperature regime is given by the totally connected correlator Z(β)nconn\langle Z(\beta)^{n}\rangle_{\text{conn}}

logZ(β)=limn0Z(β)nconn1n.\displaystyle\langle\log Z(\beta)\rangle=\lim_{n\to 0}\frac{\langle Z(\beta)^{n}\rangle_{\text{conn}}-1}{n}. (32)

One can try to compute Z(β)nconn\langle Z(\beta)^{n}\rangle_{\text{conn}} for integer nn and analytically continue it to n=0n=0. However, this analytic continuation is very subtle since Z(β)nconn\langle Z(\beta)^{n}\rangle_{\text{conn}} scales as N2nN^{2-n} in the large NN limit and the naive n0n\to 0 limit of Z(β)nconn\langle Z(\beta)^{n}\rangle_{\text{conn}} is not 11 and the limit (32) does not exist. It is not clear how to define the analytic continuation of Z(β)nconn\langle Z(\beta)^{n}\rangle_{\text{conn}} which satisfies the condition (29). We believe that (32) is not the correct way to compute the low temperature regime of quenched free energy. In other words, the two limits β\beta\to\infty and n0n\to 0 do not commute.

A similar problem has appeared in the so-called random energy model derrida1981random .777 The random energy model is defined as a model with NN randomly distributed energy eigenvalues with Gaussian distribution but the correlation among eigenvalues is ignored. It is known that the random energy model is equivalent to the pp\to\infty limit of a pp-spin generalization of the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick model derrida1980random ; derrida1981random . In derrida1981random this problem is circumvented by promoting (p,νp)(p,\nu_{p}) in (31) as a continuous variable and the correct low temperature behavior is obtained by plugging νp=np\nu_{p}=\frac{n}{p} and extremizing the term (Z(β)pconn)n/p(\langle Z(\beta)^{p}\rangle_{\text{conn}})^{n/p} in (31) with respect to pp. The nn-point function Z(β)n\langle Z(\beta)^{n}\rangle obtained with this prescription indeed satisfies the necessary condition (29) and we can safely take the n0n\to 0 limit derrida1981random . The resulting quenched free energy FF exhibits a phase transition in the large NN limit at a certain critical temperature TcT_{c}: for T>TcT>T_{c}, FF agrees with the annealed free energy which takes the form Fann=aT+bT1F_{\text{ann}}=aT+bT^{-1} with some coefficients a,ba,b, while for T<TcT<T_{c}, FF is constant derrida1981random . This FF is a monotonic function of TT as expected. It would be interesting to see if the same prescription works in the present case of random matrix model. We leave this as an interesting future problem.

5 Discussion

In this paper we have analyzed the quenched free energy in Gaussian matrix model directly without using the replica method. We find an integral representation of the exact quenched free energy (20). The exact quenched free energy is a monotonic function of temperature as expected, and the entropy computed from this free energy approaches logN\log N at high temperature and vanishes at zero temperature.

There are many interesting open questions. It is very interesting to see if there is a phase transition in the large NN limit. In the case of random energy model, it is known that there is a phase transition associated with the replica symmetry breaking and the low temperature phase corresponds to a spin glass gross1984simplest . Since the random matrix model considered in this paper can be thought of as a generalization of the random energy model, it is tempting to speculate that the quenched free energy of the random matrix model also exhibits a phase transition.888As discussed in Okuyama:2019xvg , all contributions in the decomposition (31) become comparable around TN2/3T\sim N^{-2/3} and the dominance of disconnected part Z(β)n\langle Z(\beta)\rangle^{n} is lost below this temperature. In the strict NN\to\infty limit this temperature TN2/3T\sim N^{-2/3} vanishes. To keep this scale finite, we can take a scaling limit N,T0N\to\infty,T\to 0 with TN2/3TN^{2/3} fixed. As discussed in Engelhardt:2020qpv , this amounts to focusing on the edge of the Wigner distribution (10) and this scaling limit corresponds to the so-called Airy limit. To settle this issue it is important to understand the analytic continuation of Z(β)n\langle Z(\beta)^{n}\rangle to n<1n<1. We proposed a simple condition (29) for the analytic continuation of Z(β)n\langle Z(\beta)^{n}\rangle to satisfy.

It would be very interesting to generalize our analysis to the JT gravity matrix model and see if the spin glass phase is realized at low temperature Engelhardt:2020qpv . In Engelhardt:2020qpv the quenched free energy is computed by a certain prescription of the analytic continuation of Z(β)n\langle Z(\beta)^{n}\rangle and it leads to a pathological behavior at low temperature. It is argued in Johnson:2020mwi that this problem is resolved by including the non-perturbative effect. It would be very interesting to complete the program of replica computation of the free energy in JT gravity.

Our analysis suggests that at low temperature the smallest eigenvalue (or the lowest energy state) gives a dominant contribution to the quenched free energy. This reminds us of the “eigenbrane” introduced in Blommaert:2019wfy . Perhaps the spacetime picture of the low temperature phase is described by an eigenbrane with one of the eigenvalues pinned to the edge of the spectral density. It would be interesting to investigate this picture further.

Acknowledgements.
This work was supported in part by JSPS KAKENHI Grant No. 19K03845.

References